- a Annual Repor Fiscal Year 2000 On ACtv ie W (1 Ocoe 199-3 etme*00 0 so-go. * 0 J Part 1 of 2 DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY OFFICE OF THE ASSISTANT SECRETARY CIVIL WORKS 108 ARMY PENTAGON WASHINGTON DC 20310-0108 26 JUL 2001 REPLY TO ATTENTION OF Honorable Richard B. Cheney President of the Senate Washington, D.C. 20510-0010 Dear Mr. President: I am submitting the Annual Report on Civil Works Activities for Fiscal Year 2000, in accordance with Section 8 of the Rivers and Harbors Act of 1888 and Section 925(b) of the Water Resources Development Act of 1986. This field report contains narrative summaries and statistics on water resources development projects of the Army Corps of Engineers where there has been activity between October 1, 1999, and September 30, 2000. Sincerely, Dominic Izzo Principa Assistant Secretary of the Army (Civil Works) TABLE OF CONTENTS Chapter North Atlantic Division New England, MA, District New York, NY, District Philadelphia, PA, District Baltimore, MD, District Norfolk, VA, District South Atlantic Division Wilmington, NC, District Charleston, SC, District Savannah, GA, District Jacksonville, FL, District Mobile, AL, District Mississippi Valley Division New Orleans, LA, District Vicksburg, MS, District Memphis, TN, District St. Louis, MO, District Rock Island, IL, District St. Paul, MN, District Mississippi River between Missouri River and Minneapolis, MN ............... Great Lakes and Ohio River Division Pittsburgh, PA, District ............. . Ohio River .............. Buffalo, NY, District . . . . . . . . . . Detroit, MI, District . . . . . . . . . . . . . Chicago, IL, District ............... Nashville, TN, District . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Louisville, KY, District . . . . . . . . ....... Huntington, WV, District .............. 1-1 2-1 3-1 4-1 5-1 6-1 7-1 8-1 9-1 10-1 11-1 12-1 13-1 14-1 15-1 16-1 17-1 18-1 19-1 20-1 21-1 22-1 23-1 24-1 25-1 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 0 0 0 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . 6 0 0 0 . 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 . NEW ENGLAND DISTRICT* NEW ENGLAND DISTRICT The New England District comprises all of New England except western Vermont and small portions of Massachusetts and Connecticut along their western boundaries, and includes small portions of southeastern New York. These areas are all embraced in the drainage basins tributary to Long Island Sound and the Atlantic Ocean east of the New York-Connecticut State line. The District also includes Fishers Island, NY. IMPROVEMENTS Navigation Page 1. Andrews River, MA............................... 1-3 2. Aunt Lydia's Cove, Chatham, MA.................1-3 3. Boston Harbor, MA ......................................... 1-3 4. Bridgeport Harbor, CT ..................... ............. 1-4 5. Cape Cod Canal, MA ....................................... 1-4 6. Chatham (Stage) Harbor, MA .......................... 1-5 7. Clinton Harbor, CT ................................... 1-5 8. Cocheco River, NH .......................................... 1-6 9. Cohassett Harbor, MA ..................................... 1-6 10. Cuttyhunk Harbor, MA .................................... 1-6 11. Fivemile River Harbor, CT................................. 1-7 12. Gloucester Harbor and Annisquam River, MA ........................ 1-7 13. Great Salt Pond, Block Island, RI .................... 1-7 14. Green Harbor, MA .................... ........... 1-8 15. Harbor of Refuge, Block Island, RI ................ 1-8 16. Hyannis Harbor, MA ....................................... 1-8 17. Kennebunk River, NH..................................... 1-9 18 Little Harbor, NH................................ .......... 1-9 19. Lynn Harbor, MA ............................................. 1-10 20. New Bedford and Fairhaven Harbor, MA .............................. 1-10 21. Plymouth Harbor, MA ....................................... 1-10 22. Portland Harbor, ME ........................................ 1-11 23. Portsmouth Harbor and Piscataqua River, NH & ME................................. 1-11 24. Providence River and Harbor, RI ...................... 1-12 25. Salem Harbor, MA...... .................... 1-12 26. Saugus River, MA .......................................... 1-13 27. Seekonk River, Providence, RI ...................... 1-13 28. Sesuit Harbor, MA ............................................ 1-13 29. Union River, ME................................. 1-14 30. Wells Harbor, ME............................................1-14 Beach Erosion Control 31. 32. 33. Point Beach, Milford, CT...................... .......1..-.1 5 Woodmont Beach, Milford, CT .................. 1-15 Inspection of Completed Beach Erosion Control Projects ................................. 1-15 Flood Control Page 34. Allendale Dam, North Providence, RI............. 1-15 35. Aroostook River, Fort Fairfield, ME ................ 1-16 36. Blackstone River Basin, MA and RI .............. 1-16 36A. West Hill Dam, MA ...................................... 1-16 37. Charles River (Natural Valley Storage Areas), MA ...................................... 1-16 38. Connecticut River Basin, VT, NH, MA and CT ..................................... 1-17 38A. Ball Mountain Lake, VT............................... 1-18 38B. Barre Falls Dam, MA .................................... 1-18 38C. Birch Hill Dam, MA ....................................... 1-18 38D. Colebrook River Lake, CT ............................ 1-18 38E. Conant Brook Dam, MA ............................... 1-19 38F. Knightville Dam, MA ....................................... 1-19 38G. Littleville Lake, MA ...................................... 1-19 38H. North Hartland Lake, VT.................................. 1-19 381. North Springfield Lake, VT........................... 1-19 38J. Otter Brook Lake, NH ................... .......... 1-20 38K. Surry Mountain Lake, NH ............................. 1-20 38L. Townshend Lake, VT .................................... 1-20 38M . Tully Lake, M A ............................................ . 1-20 38N. Union Village Dam, VT ................................ 1-20 39. Faulkner Island, CT ...................................... . 1-21 40. Galilee Salt Marsh, RI ................................... 1-21 41. Houtsatonic River Basin, CT and MA ............... 1-21 41A. Black Rock Lake, CT.................................... 1-21 41B. Hancock Brook Lake, CT ................................. 1-22 41C. Hop Brook Lake, CT ...................................... 1-22 41D. Naugatuck River, Torrington, CT..................... 1-22 41E. Northfield Brook Lake, CT ........................... 1-22 41F. Thomaston Dam, CT ..................................... 1-23 42. Merrimack River Basin, NH and MA.............. 1-23 42A. Blackwater Dam, NH .................................... 1-23 42B. Edward MacDowell Lake, NH ...................... 1-23 42C. Franklin Falls Dam, NH ................................... 1-24 42D. Hopkinton-Everett Lakes, NH................... 1-24 42E. North Nashua River, Lancaster, MA ................ 1-24 43. New Bedford, Fairhaven, and Acushnet, MA....................................... 1-24 1-1 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 2000 Page Tables 44. Quonset Point, Davisville, RI ........................ 1-25 45. Roughans Point, Revere, MA ........................... 1-25 46. Sagamore Marsh, Cape Cod Canal, MA ................................ 1-25 47. Saint John River Basin, ME........................ 1-26 48. Stamford, CT ........................................ 1-26 49. Thames River Basin, CT, RI, and MA............. 1-26 49A. Buffumville Lake, MA .................................. 1-26 49B. East Brimfield Lake, MA .............................. 1-27 49C. Hodges Village Dam, MA ....... ........ 1-27 49D. Mansfield Hollow Lake, CT ............................. 1-27 49E. West Thompson Lake, CT .......................... . 1-27 49F. Westville Lake, MA...................................... 1-27 50.. Town Brook, Quincy and Braintree, MA .................................... 1-28 51. Inspection of Completed Flood Control Projects ........................................... 1-28 52. Flood Control Reservoir Operations ................ 1-29 53. Hurricane Barrier Operations........................ 1-29 54. Flood Control Work Under Special Authorization ............................... 1-29 General Investigations Surveys ............................................................. 1-30 Collection and Study of Basic Data .................. 1-30 Planning, Engineering and Design .................... 1-30 Preconstruction Engineering and Design ....................................................... 1-30 Table 1-A Cost & Financial Statement ....................... 1-31 Table 1-B Authorizing Legislation ............................ 1-42 Table 1-C Other Authorized Navigation Projects.......................... 1-51 Table 1-D Other Authorized Beach Erosion Control Projects ........................ 1-55 Table 1-E Other Authorized Flood Control Projects ......................... 1-56 Table 1-F Other Authorized Multiple-Purpose Projects including Power ........................ 1-59 Table I-G Deauthorized Projects.............................1-60 Table 1-H Navigation Activities Pursuant to Sec. 107 ........... ....... 1-63 Table 1-I Beach Erosion Activities Pursuant to Sec. 103 ............................ 1-63 Table 1-J Flood Control Activities Pursuant to Sec. 205 ............................... 1-64 Table 1-K Emergency Bank Protection Activities Pursuant to Sec. 14 ................................. 1-64 Table 1-L Environmental Improvement Activities Pursuant to Sec. 1135...........................-64 Table 1-M Aquatic Ecosystem Restoration Activities Pursuant to Sec. 206...............1-65 Table 1-N Blackstone River Basin ........................... 1-66 Table 1-0 Connecticut River Basin ......................... 1-67 Table 1-P Housatonic River Basin ............................. 1-69 Table 1-Q Merrimack River Basin.............................1-70 Table 1-R Thames River Basin ................................. 1-71 Table 1-S Reconnaissance and Condition Surveys ................................. 1-72 1-2 Flood Control (Continued) Page 55. 56. 57. 58. NEW ENGLAND DISTRICT Navigation 1. ANDREWS RIVER, MA Location. The Andrews River is located on the western shore of Nantucket Sound in the Town of Harwich, Massachusetts, about 84 miles southeast of Boston, Massachusetts. Existing project. Provides for a channel 6 feet deep and 75 feet wide, extending about 2,900 feet from deep water in Nantucket Sound to a public marina, two jetties on the east and west sides of the harbor entrance, and a three-acre maneuvering and anchorage basin. The east jetty was completed in June 1967. Dredging was completed in April 1968. Construction of the west jetty was completed in May 1973. (See Table 1-B for Act authorizing the existing project.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with for completed work. Terminal facilities. None. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Maintenance dredging of the entrance channel was performed by the Government-owned dredge CURRITUCK from July 18 to July 21, 2000 at a plant rental cost of $40,000. A total of 9,775 cubic yards of sand were removed and placed in a nearshore disposal site southeast of the entrance channel in Nantucket Sound. Hired labor costs included $11,600 for performing and plotting pre- and afterdredge surveys, and $800 for project coordination and management. 2. AUNT LYDIA'S COVE, CHATHAM, MA Location. Aunt Lydia's Cove is located in Chatham Harbor, Chatham, Massachusetts. The cove is approximately 90 miles southeast of Boston, Massachusetts on the "elbow" of Cape Cod. Existing project. Provides for an entrance channel 8 feet deep and 100 feet wide for a length of 900 feet and a 9.5- acre anchorage also to a depth of 8 feet. Work was completed in June 1995. (See Table I-B for Act authorizing the existing project.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with for completed work. Terminal facilities. The Chatham Municipal Fish Pier is the only terminal facility in Aunt Lydia's Cove. Initially constructed in 1945, the pier is used to offload catch, access boats, load supplies and perform some repairs. Two independent fish companies lease space at the pier's main packing facility where fish are offloaded, packed in ice and shipped to various distributors. The pier provides diesel fuel, gasoline, parking and restroom facilities. Transient and recreational boaters use the pier for loading, offloading, and refueling. This facility is adequate for existing commerce. Operations during fiscal year. New work: Final project costs were apportioned between the Federal and non-Federal accounts. Maintenance: Maintenance dredging of the Federal channel was performed by the Government-owned dredge CURRITUCK from June 2 to June 4 and from June 19 to July 5, 2000 at a plant rental cost of $222,000. A total of 30,900 cubic yards of sand were removed and placed in a nearshore disposal area located southeast of the dredging area and outside the outer bar. Hired labor costs included $18,460 for plotting pre- and after-dredge surveys and $2,700 for project coordination and management. Costs of $50,000 were incurred by the Waterways Experiment Station (WES) to study the inlet evolutionary trends, regional sand management and navigation channel stability. 3. BOSTON HARBOR, MA Location. Boston Harbor includes all expanse of tidewater lying within a line from Point Allerton to Point Shirley and extending from that line westward to the mainland. This comprises an area of about 47 square miles, exclusive of the islands. (See National Ocean Service Coast Survey Charts 13270 and 13272.) Previous project. For details see the Annual Reports for 1915, 1917, and 1938. Existing project. Completed work at Boston Harbor, adopted in 1825 and supplemented by enactments through 1958, provides for the improvement of the harbor proper and its approaches - Fort Point Channel, Reserved Channel, Chelsea River and Weir River. For a more detailed description see page 3 of the Annual Report for 1974. These improvements were completed in May 1966 with the construction of the Chelsea River 35-foot channel and maneuvering basin. New work involves deepening the Mystic River and Reserved Channels from 35 to 40 feet and the Chelsea River Channel from 35 to 38 feet; widening and deepening to 40 feet the Inner Confluence Area which provides access to the Mystic and Chelsea River Channels; and widening at the entrance to the Reserved Channel. The proposed project would increase the navigational efficiency and safety of harbor operations and reduce tidal delays for larger vessels. (See Table I-B for Acts authorizing the existing project.) 1-3 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 2000 Local cooperation. Fully complied with for completed work. A Project Cooperation Agreement was signed on February 13, 1998 between the Corps and the Massachusetts Port Authority for the new work. Consistent with the cost sharing and financing concepts reflected in the Water Resources Development Act of 1986, the non-Federal sponsor must pay 25 percent of the costs allocated to deep draft navigation during construction; reimburse an additional ten percent of the costs allocated to deep draft navigation within a period of 30 years following completion of construction (partially offset by a credit allowed for the value of lands, easements, rights-of-way, relocations and dredged material disposal areas); relocate utilities necessary for construction of the project; and deepen berthing areas at the terminals of project beneficiaries. Terminal facilities. There are 156 wharves and piers in the harbor, not including Mystic, Weymouth-Fore, and Town Rivers, which are reported elsewhere. Of the terminals, 28 are publicly owned, 13 are open to public use, 73 have mechanical-handling facilities, and 70 have railroad connections. Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. For a full description of channel facilities in Chelsea River, refer to House Document 350, 87th Congress, 2nd session. (See Port Series No. 3, Part 2, Port of Boston, MA dated 1967.) Operations during fiscal year. New work: A contract for improvement dredging was awarded May 18, 1998. Work began in August 1998 and was completed in May 2000, except for rock removal in the upper Chelsea River Channel and deepening beneath the McArdle Street Bridge and over the Massachusetts Water Resources Administration's Section 8 waterline. Contractor earnings totaled $13,818,550 at FY end for improvement work. Maintenance: Maintenance dredging was performed in conjunction with improvement work. Contractor earnings for maintenance work totaled $18,302,143 at FY end. Work was completed in May 2000 except for dredging of silt material beneath the McArdle Street Bridge. 4. BRIDGEPORT HARBOR, CT Location. Bridgeport Harbor is located on the north shore of Long Island Sound, about 51 miles east of New York City. (See National Ocean Service Coast Survey Chart 12369.) Previous project. For details see page 1756 of the Annual Report for 1915 and page 133 of the Annual Report for 1938. Existing project. For a description of the completed improvements see the Annual Report for 1668. (See Table I-B for Acts authorizing the existing project.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with for completed work. There is no reasonable prospect that required cooperation will be forthcoming from local interests for the breakwaters at Black Rock Harbor and the Burr and Cedar Creek anchorages. For further details see the Annual Report for 1968. Terminal facilities. There are 35 waterfront facilities serving the port of Bridgeport. Three wharves are owned by the City of Bridgeport and three others may be used by the public upon agreement with the owners or operators. (See Port and Terminal Facilities of Southern New England No. 4, revised in 1952.) Facilities are adequate for existing commerce. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Hired labor costs of $6,000 were incurred for work on a Preliminary Environmental Assessment in association with evaluating maintenance dredging of the Federal project. 5. CAPE COD CANAL, MA Location. This waterway is a sea level canal; extending from the head of Buzzards Bay, Massachusetts, easterly to a point on Cape Cod Bay about 15 miles southeast of Plymouth Harbor, Massachusetts. (See National Ocean Service Coast Survey Chart 13246.) Existing project. For a description of existing project see the Annual Report for 1975. Navigational improvements were completed in April 1963, with completion of the East Boat Basin extension. Initial recreational development consists of public use facilities at various locations, which were completed in February 1965. Improvements to public use facilities at the East Boat Basin were completed in May 1974. Construction of public use facilities at Bourne Scenic Park were completed in May 1976. Cape Cod Canal is crossed by two high-level highway bridges and a vertical-lift railroad bridge. Major rehabilitation of Bourne Highway Bridge was completed in December 1965 and major rehabilitation of the Sagamore Highway Bridge was completed in 1982. Minor rehabilitation of the stone breakwater was completed in October 1963. (See Table I-B for Acts authorizing the existing project.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with for completed work. Local interests must also bear 50 percent of future recreational development in accordance with the 1965 Federal Water Project Recreation Act. Terminal facilities. There are seven terminals on the canal, of which three are privately owned. Four are used for receipt and freezing of fish and two are used for receipt and storage of oil. The seventh terminal is the State pier, which is owned by the Commonwealth of Massachusetts, and is 1-4 _ ____ I _ NEW ENGLAND DISTRICT located on the north bank of the canal at Bourne Neck. Terminals are adequate for existing commerce. Operations during fiscal year. Major rehabilitation: A contract for Phase I rehabilitation of the Buzzards Bay Railroad Bridge was awarded on 4 August 2000. Phase I work involves repairing or replacing steel member and painting the superstructure. Work had not begun by FY end. Maintenance: The cost of operation and maintenance work at the Cape Cod Canal totaled $11,552,227. Costs include $1,342,100 for vessel traffic control activities; $958,400 for maintenance of buildings, grounds and utilities; $725,300 for operation and maintenance of recreational facilities; $545,400 for operation and maintenance of the Buzzards Bay Railroad Bridge; $585,250 for project administration facilities; $82,000 for project utilities; $65,705 for general real estate activities; $210,633 for inspection of the Bourne and Sagamore Highway Bridges; $262,221 for dredging of the west approach channel; $21,274 for work on the master plan; $115,699 for work associated with the Tall Ships visit; $421,213 for engineering and design; and $316,786 for supervision and administration of contracts, including those described below. A contract to paint the Sagamore Bridge was awarded September 14, 1998. Work began in December 1998 and was completed in November 1999. The final contract amount was $2,466,068. A contract to repair docks and mooring dolphins was awarded on 8 September 2000. Work began in late September 2000 and was about 20 percent complete at FY end with contractor earnings of $99,545. A contract for concrete and pavement repairs on the Bourne and Sagamore Highway Bridges was awarded on 27 September 1999. Work began in October 1999 and was about 80 percent complete at FY end with contractor earnings of $2,127,712. A contract for repairs to the east entrance breakwater was awarded on 5 August 1999. Work began in September 1999 and was about 95 percent complete at FY end with contractor earnings of $948,500. A contract for deck repairs and paving of the Bourne and Sagamore Highway Bridges was awarded 31 March 2000. Work began in April 2000 and was about 95 percent complete at FY end with contractor earnings of $998,363. 6. CHATHAM (STAGE) HARBOR, MA Location. Chatham Harbor is located at the northeastern comrner of Nantucket Sound about 16 miles east of Hyannis Harbor, Massachusetts and 66 miles south of Providence Harbor, Rhode Island. The harbor lies at the southeastern extremity of Cape Cod. (See National Ocean Service Coast Survey Chart 13237.) Previous project. For details see the Annual Report for 1942. Existing project. Provides for an entrance channel 10 feet deep and 150 feet wide from Chatham Roads to the upper harbor. Construction of the existing project was completed in October 1957. By 1961, a break in the barrier beach connecting Morris and Monomoy Islands caused the Federal channel to fill in completely. Local interests dredged an emergency channel to obtain an 8-foot depth in June 1962 and performed additional dredging in 1963. Minimal maintenance dredging by the Federal Government in April and May 1964 provided access to the inner harbor for the 1964 boating season. A new 10-foot channel through Harding Beach to Morris Island was completed in July 1965. (See Table 1-B for Act authorizing the existing project.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with for completed work. Terminal facilities. The town operates a wharf on the north side of the inner harbor which is leased out to commercial users. Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Maintenance dredging of the entrance channel was performed by the Government owned dredge CURRITUCK from June 5 to June 7, and from July 6 to July 17, 2000 at a plant rental cost of $180,000. A total of 52,425 cubic yards of sand were removed and disposed of at a nearshore site off Harding Beach. Hired labor costs included $20,590 for performing and plotting pre- and after-dredge surveys, and $4,000 for project coordination and management. 7. CLINTON HARBOR, CT Location. Clinton Harbor is located along the north shore of Long Island Sound, about 10 miles west of the mouth of the Connecticut River and about 20 miles east of New Haven Harbor, Connecticut. (See National Ocean Service Coast Survey Charts 12374 and 12354.) Previous project. For details see page 640 of the Annual Report for 1894 and page 112 of the Annual Report for 1943. Existing project. Provides for a channel 8 feet deep at mean low water from Long Island Sound to the upper end of the wharves at Clinton Harbor, an anchorage area of the same depth opposite the above wharves, and for maintenance of a stone dike closing a breach in the sandy peninsula which separates the river from the outer harbor. Project was completed in 1950. (See Table 1-B for Acts authorizing the existing project.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with for completed work. 1-5 _ REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 2000 Terminal facilities. There are several small private wharves, some of which are open to the public. These facilities are adequate for existing commerce. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Maintenance dredging of the entrance channel was performed by the Government-owned dredge CURRITUCK from June 9 to June 17, 2000 at a plant rental cost of $118,000. A total of 20,000 cubic yards of sand were removed and disposed of at a nearshore site east of the entrance channel off Hammock Point. Hired labor costs included $40,100 for performing and plotting pre- and afterdredge surveys and $3,800 for project coordination and management. 8. COCHECO RIVER, NH Location. The Cocheco River is located about 9 miles northwest of Portsmouth, New Hampshire. Existing project. Provides for a 7-foot tidewater channel 60 to 75 feet wide (7.5 feet deep and 50 feet wide in rock), extending from the confluence of the Cocheco and Piscataqua Rivers to the head of navigation at the Upper Narrows in Dover, New Hampshire. Work was completed in 1906. (See Table 1-B for Acts authorizing the existing project.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with for completed work. Terminal facilities. The channel is used primarily by recreational craft based at a marina located near the head of the waterway. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Contract costs incurred in association with proposed maintenance dredging of the Federal channel were $21,500 for geotechnical investigations. Hired labor costs included $3,000 for continued work on an environmental assessment, $57,300 for preparation of plans and specifications, $5,300 for safety monitoring, $12,000 for project coordination, and $700 for contact processing. 9. COHASSET HARBOR, MA Location. Cohasset Harbor is located along the shore of Massachusetts Bay, about 16 miles southeast of Boston Harbor and 37 miles northwest of the eastern entrance to Cape Cod Canal. (See National Ocean Service Coast Survey Chart 3269.) Existing project. Provides for an entrance channel 8 feet deep and 90 feet wide, and an 18-acre anchorage area, 7 feet deep in the inner harbor. This work was completed in July 1960. Three additional anchorage areas; 6 feet deep with 3.9 acres in Cohasset Cove, 3.3 acres in the Government Island area and 5.4 acres in Bailey Creek; were constructed under Section 107 and completed in April 1968. Rock was encountered and a survey of the area was completed. Rock removal is still pending. The Commonwealth of Massachusetts has provided an 8-foot channel, 6-foot anchorage basin and 800-foot breakwater. (See Table I-B for Acts authorizing the existing project.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with for completed work. Terminal facilities. There are 10 wharves in the harbor, 2 are open to the public, and 5 are equipped with marine railways. Facilities are considered adequate for present harbor activities. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Dredging of the Federal channel and anchorage was completed in February 2000 under a continuing contract awarded on August 3, 1998. About 18,500 cubic yards of material were dredged this FY and placed in the Massachusetts Bay Disposal Site (MBDS) at a cost of $229,438, bringing the total Federal cost of maintenance dredging to $1,119,400. Hired labor costs associated with Federal dredging included $16,600 for supervision and inspection, $13,000 for performing and plotting after-dredge surveys, and $700 for contract processing. Work under this contract included maintenance and improvement dredging of town areas performed as work for others in association with the Federal work. Reimbursable costs for this effort this FY included $18,000 for contract dredging and $4,300 for surveys. 10. CUTTYHUNK HARBOR, MA Location. Cuttyhunk Harbor is located at the eastern end of Cuttyhunk Island, at the western entrance to Buzzards Bay, about 14 miles south of New Bedford Harbor, Massachusetts. (See National Ocean Service Coast Survey Chart 13229.) Existing project. Provides for a channel 10 feet deep and generally 75 feet wide from the outer harbor to the westerly terminal in Cuttyhunk Pond, about 3,500 feet long; an anchorage in the inner harbor 10 feet deep, 900 feet long and 800 feet wide; and maintenance of the existing jetties and stone dikes. The project was completed in 1939. (See Table 1-B for Act authorizing the existing project.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with for completed work. Disposal areas for maintenance will be furnished when required. 1-6 _ __ NEW ENGLAND DISTRICT Terminal facilities. Two town wharves of timber and pile construction, having total berthing space of 400 feet, are open to the public. Limited mechanical-handling facilities are available. Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Maintenance dredging of the entrance channel was performed by the Government-owned dredge CURRITUCK from April 23 to April 30, 2000 at a plant rental cost of $147,750. A total of 7,295 cubic yards of sand were removed and disposed of at a nearshore site off Church's Beach. Hired labor costs included $39,100 for performing and plotting pre- and after-dredge surveys, and $3,100 for project coordination and management. 11. FIVEMILE RIVER HARBOR, CT Location. Fivemile River Harbor is located on the north shore of Long Island Sound, about 41 miles east of New York City. (See National Ocean Service Coast Survey Chart 12364.) Existing project. Provides for an entrance channel 8 feet deep and 100 feet wide, from the mouth of Fivemile River extending upstream about 5,300 feet. This work was completed in 1910. The upper 700 feet of the original project, which was never constructed, was deauthorized in October 1978. Mean range of tide is 7.2 feet, and extreme range due to effects of wind and other causes is 12 feet. (See Table 1-B for Act authorizing the existing project.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with for completed work. Terminal facilities. There are several small wharves and piers, which are considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Hired labor costs of $1,000 were incurred for the final processing of the maintenance dredging contract completed last FY. 12. GLOUCESTER HARBOR AND ANNISQUAM RIVER, MA Location. Gloucester Harbor is located at the southern extremity of Cape Ann, about 23 miles northeast of Boston Harbor, Massachusetts. Annisquam River is a narrow tidal waterway extending across the base of Cape Ann from Gloucester Harbor to Ipswich Bay, a distance of approximately 4 miles. The last 1,800 feet of this waterway near Gloucester Harbor is known as Blyman Canal. (See National Ocean Service Coast Survey Chart 13279.) Previous project. For details see the Annual Reports for 1915 and 1937. Existing project. Provides for a breakwater at the Outer Harbor entrance; the removal of ledge from 8 areas in the northern half of the harbor; a 20-foot entrance channel into the Inner Harbor, separating into two 20-foot access channels along the side of the State Fish Pier; a 16-foot anchorage at the junction of the two access channels; an 18- foot entrance channel into Harbor Cove and a 10-foot access channel in Harbor Cove; a 16-foot entrance channel into Smith Cove; and removal of a rock shoal in the entrance channel to Harbor Cove to a depth of 24 feet. Annisquam River provides for a channel 8 feet deep from Gloucester Harbor to Ipswich Bay and an anchorage about 17 acres in extent and 8 feet deep at the entrance to Lobster Cove. For a more detailed description of the existing project see the Annual Report for 1973. The project was completed in 1965. (See Table 1-B for Acts authorizing the existing project.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with for completed work. Terminal facilities. There are 75 piers and wharves in Gloucester Harbor, two of which are owned by the city. The Fish Pier is owned by the State of Massachusetts and leased to the city. All of the other piers and wharves are privately owned and not available to the public. There are two commercial wharves on the east bank of the Annisquam River. There are no railroad sidings available. Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Costs of $9,380 were incurred on a contract for diving services in Gloucester Harbor to investigate an obstruction to navigation. Hired labor costs included $2,100 to review the dive plan, $2,300 for dive inspection, and $300 for contract administration. 13. GREAT SALT POND, BLOCK ISLAND, RI Location. Great Salt Pond is located on the west shore of Block Island, about 11 miles southwest from Point Judith Harbor, Rhode Island and 18 miles southeasterly from Stonington Harbor, Connecticut. (See National Ocean Service Coast Survey Chart 13217.) Existing project. Provides for an entrance channel 18 to 25 feet deep and 150 to 300 feet wide from the Atlantic Ocean to Block Island Pond; a riprap jetty extending 1,691 feet along the southerly side of the entrance channel; and a stone revetment and sand fences to protect the shoreline and 1-7 _ __ REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 2000 beaches. The south jetty was completed in 1905. (See Table beaches. The south jetty was completed in 1905. (See Table 1-B for Acts authorizing the existing project.) Local cooperation. None required for completed work. Terminal facilities. There is one wharf with about 600 feet available for public berthing and several privately owned and operated wharves and piers. Facilities are considered adequate for present harbor activities. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: A contract for maintenance dredging of a restrictive shoal in the entrance channel was awarded on August 3, 2000. Dredging was performed from August 16 to September 16, 2000 at a contract cost of $158,220. A total of 12,250 cubic yards of material were removed and disposed of at a nearshore site off Crescent Beach on the east side of the island. Hired labor costs included $14,100 for supervision and inspection, $12,000 for performing and plotting pre- and after-dredge surveys, $13,800 for project coordination and management, and $500 for contract administration. 14. GREEN HARBOR, MA Location. Green Harbor is located within the town of Marshfield on the west-side of Massachusetts Bay, about 30 miles southeast of Boston, Massachusetts, and 9 miles north of Plymouth Harbor, Massachusetts. (See National Ocean Service Coast Survey Chart 13253.) Existing project. For a description of the existing project see the Annual Report for 1995. Construction was completed in October 1969. A portion of project was deauthorized by the Water Resources Development Act of 1999. (See Table 1-B for Acts authorizing the existing project.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with for completed work. Terminal facilities. The major terminal facility is the Town Pier in the village of Brant Rock. The facility is a bulkheaded, earth-filled landing and parking area about 290 feet wide, extending 210 feet into harbor. A marina service is south of the Town Pier; and a facility for recreational craft has been developed on the south side of the harbor near the head of navigation. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Maintenance dredging of the entrance channel was performed by the Government-owned dredge CURRITUCK from May 1 to May 31, 2000 at a plant rental cost of $310,000. Dredging was restricted to November 1 through June 1 in order to protect juvenile lobsters at the disposal site. A total of 33,360 cubic yards of sand were removed and disposed of at a nearshore site off Green Harbor Beach. Hired labor costs included $19,500 for performing and plotting pre-and after-dredge surveys, and $2,700 for project coordination and management. 15. HARBOR OF REFUGE, BLOCK ISLAND, RI Location. The Block Island Harbor of Refuge is located on the east-side of Block Island, about 13 miles southwest from Point Judith Harbor, Rhode Island, and about 25 miles southeasterly from Stonington Harbor, Connecticut. (See National Ocean Survey Chart 13217.) Existing project. For a description of the existing project, see the Annual Report for 1967. The project was completed in 1916 except for dredging of two 15-foot anchorages in the outer harbor west of the entrance channel, which were deauthorized in November 1986. (See Table I-B for Acts authorizing the existing project.) Local cooperation. None required. Terminal facilities. There are two wharves in the harbor, both steel sheet pile bulkhead, which comprise the southern and eastern limits of the basin. Total docking space amounts to 500 feet. No mechanical-handling facilities are available. One wharf, owned by the town and open to the public, is considered inadequate for present general needs of boating in the harbor. There is limited room for expansion of terminal facilities. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: A contract for maintenance dredging of the 15-foot channel, boat basin and anchorage was awarded on March 13, 2000. Dredging was performed from May 3 to June 30, 2000. A total of 39,500 cubic yards of material were removed and disposed of in a nearshore site off Crescent Beach at a contract cost of $523,505. Hired labor costs included $8,000 for preparation of plans and specifications, $20,400 for supervision and inspection, $32,200 for performing and plotting pre- and after-dredge surveys, $12,100 for project coordination and management, and $2,600 for contract administration. 16. HYANNIS HARBOR, MA Location. Hyannis Harbor is located along the south shore of Cape Cod, about 16 miles west of Chatham, Massachusetts. (See National Ocean Service Coast Survey Chart 13237.) Existing project. For a description of the existing project see the Annual Report for 1992. New work involves deepening the Federal channel and basin to 13 feet; realigning the entrance channel through the outer Harbor to 1-8 NEW ENGLAND DISTRICT straighten the approach and eliminate two difficult turns; and widening the channel to 240 feet from the outer Harbor through most of Lewis Bay and to 220 feet from the upper reach of Lewis Bay to the entrance of the Inner Harbor. New work was completed in March 1999. (See Table 1-B for Acts authorizing the existing project.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with for completed work. Terminal facilities. There are two town wharves in the inner harbor. One has a bulkhead frontage of about 800 feet. Other private landings are available. Facilities are adequate for existing commerce. Operations during fiscal year. New work: Due to the limited environmental window for dredging work, construction was carried out in two phases. Phase I construction, consisting solely of improvement dredging of the realigned entrance channel, was completed in March 1998. A contract for Phase II construction was awarded August 19, 1998. Work began in September 1998 and was completed in March 1999. Phase II consisted of deepening the channel and basin to 13 feet and channel widening. Maintenance and municipal berth dredging was performed in conjunction with this work. Costs for improvement dredging under Phase II totaled $2,028,426 with final payment pending at FY end. The Woods Hole, Martha's Vineyard and Nantucket Steamship Authority provided the non-Federal share of improvement project costs including channel improvements and the improvement portion of disposal facilities. The Town of Barnstable and Massachusetts Department of Environmental Management provided the full cost of dredging and disposal for associated municipal berth dredging under the terms of a Memorandum of Agreement, which totaled $425,609. Maintenance: Maintenance costs for this FY under a continuing contract totaled $36,100. Final contract close-out is still pending. Hired labor costs associated with maintenance dredging this FY included $4,900 for supervision and inspection, $6,300 for performing and plotting after-dredge surveys, and $500 for contract administration. The Woods Hole, Martha's Vineyard and Nantucket Steamship Authority and the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Management provided the non-Federal share of the maintenance portion of disposal facility costs, which totaled $39,033. An obstruction was located in the Federal channel and removed at a contract cost of $2,000. A cost of $4,600 was incurred on a diving contract for locating the obstruction. Hired labor costs for the obstruction removal included $5,600 for review of the dive plan and supervision and inspection of the diving contract. 17. KENNEBUNK RIVER, ME Location. The Kennebunk River flows about 15 miles southeasterly along the border of Kennebunk and Kennebunkport, two popular summer resort communities on the coast of Maine. The river empties into the Atlantic Ocean about 30 miles southwest of Portland, Maine. (See National Ocean Service Coast Survey Chart 13286.) Existing project. For a description of the existing project see the Annual Report for 1977. The project was completed in December 1968, with completion of rock removal at the entrance to the west channel. Extension of the west jetty was completed in April 1965. Dredging and sand fences were completed in November 1965. (See Table I-B for Acts authorizing the existing project.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with for completed work. Terminal facilities.. There is one landing available to the public, the other 21 are private and include, 2 yacht clubs, a hotel and 2 boatyards. Marine railway facilities include two 15-ton and one 10-ton capacity lifts. There are 4 berths and 10 moorings. Open storage, boat building, repairs, and supplies are available for pleasure and commercial craft. Public landing of granite block construction has unloading facilities used by fishing craft to transfer catches for transportation. Facilities are adequate for existing commerce. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Hired labor costs of $4,600 were incurred for project coordination and management associated with the proposed maintenance dredging of the Federal channel. 18. LITTLE HARBOR, NH Location. Little Harbor is located on the west side of Portsmouth Harbor between New Castle Island and the New Hampshire mainland. Existing project. For a description of the existing project and authorizing legislation, see the Annual Report for 1976. Local cooperation. None required. Terminal facilities. One dock owned by Wentworth Hotel, but not available to public. Tentative State plans include a small boat landing and shore facilities. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Hired labor costs incurred in association with proposed maintenance dredging of the Federal channel were $4,800 for project coordination and management, $15,100 for the preparation 1-9 ... _ ,_ REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 2000 of plans and specifications, $24,800 for the preparation of an environmental assessment, $32,700 for planning and coordination, $26,800 for eelgrass mitigation surveys, $4,500 for supervision and inspection, and $400 for contract administration. Contract costs included $25,000 for identification and evaluation of alternative mitigation sites and $2,700 for grain size analysis of sediment at potential mitigation sites. 19. LYNN HARBOR, MA Location. Lynn Harbor is located about 8 miles northeast of Boston Harbor. It is a natural harbor at the head of Broad Sound and is about 3 miles long and 1.5 miles wide. (See National Ocean Service Coast Survey Chart 13275.) Previous project. For details see page 37 of the Annual Report for 1934 and page 52 of the Annual Report for 1994. Existing project. Provides for a channel 22 feet deep and 300 feet wide from deep water west of Bass Point, Nahant, to and including a turning basin 550 feet wide at the head of the harbor. The project also provides for a Western Channel leading to the Saugus River 8 feet deep and 150 feet wide. Construction of the project was completed in 1935. (See Table I-B for Acts authorizing the existing project.) Local cooperation. Conditions of local cooperation in connection with the existing project, which provide that local interests shall deepen to 25 feet the channel previously dredged by them to a depth of 22 feet; and contribute $8,000 towards the cost of deepening the widened turn into the Municipal Channel to that depth, have not yet been complied with. Terminal facilities. There are seven marinas in the harbor, one that is open to the public. There are also four public launching ramps and two town docks. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: A continuing contract for maintenance dredging of the Western Channel was awarded on August 1, 2000. Dredging commenced in September 2000 and was about 60 percent complete at FY end. About 10,000 cubic yards of fine sand were removed from the area seaward of General Edwards Bridge and disposed of at the Massachusetts Bay Disposal Site (MBDS) at a contract cost of $200,000. 20. NEW BEDFORD AND FAIRHAVEN HARBOR, MA Location. New Bedford Harbor is a tidal estuary located on the western side of Buzzards Bay, about 27 miles northwesterly from the harbor at Vineyard Haven, Massachusetts and about 37 miles east of Point Judith Harbor, Rhode Island. (See National Ocean Service Coast Survey Chart 252.) Previous projects. For details see the Annual Reports for 1915 and 1938. Existing project. Provides for a channel 30 feet deep and 350 feet wide from deep water in Buzzards Bay to just above the New Bedford-Fairhaven Bridge, nearly 5 miles, with increased widths for anchorage and maneuvering purposes in the area northwest of Palmer Island and above the bridge; a channel 25 feet deep and 200 to 250 feet wide along the New Bedford wharf front near the bridge, about 0.2 miles; a channel 15 feet deep and 150 to 400 feet wide from Pierce and Kilburn Wharf to the Old South Wharf, then 10 feet deep and 150 feet wide to a point 1,000 feet south of the old causeway pier, about 0.7 miles; and for the maintenance of the 25-foot anchorage area east of the channel north of Palmer Island. The project was completed in 1939. (See Table 1-B for Acts authorizing the existing project.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with for completed work Terminal facilities. There are 31 wharves in the harbor with a total berthing space of about 19,000 feet. Seven are publicly owned, five have railroad connections and seven have mechanical handling facilities. These facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Work on a Dredged Material Management Plan (DMMP) in conjunction with the Massachusetts Office of Coastal Zone Management was deferred this FY due to State funding constraints. Hired labor costs included $3,400 for project coordination and management. 21. PLYMOUTH HARBOR, MA Location. Plymouth Harbor is located about 45 miles south of Boston, Massachusetts. Its outer anchorage, the "Cow Yard" is common to Plymouth, Duxbury, and Kingston, Massachusetts. (See National Ocean Service Coast Survey Chart 13253.) Previous projects. For details see the Annual Reports for 1915 and 1938. Existing project. Provides for riprap along sections of Long Beach damaged by the storm of November 1898 and restoring the Eel River to its former course; a channel 18 feet deep and 200 feet wide, increased at the entrance and on curves, from the bay to the town wharves, a distance of about 2.5 miles, with a suitable turning basin at the inner end; a channel 15 feet deep and 150 feet wide extending 1-10 _ I __ NEW ENGLAND DISTRICT northwesterly about 0.3 miles from the State Pier with a 15- foot turning basin 300 feet square at its northwesterly end; maintenance of the area dredged by the Commonwealth of Massachusetts to 18 feet deep connecting the 15-foot and 18-foot channels in the vicinity of the State Pier; a rubble stone breakwater extending 1,400 feet easterly thence 2,100 feet southeasterly from the town wharf; an 8-foot anchorage, 60 acres in area, inside the breakwater; and recreational development to provide for sport fishing from the breakwater, consisting of a stone causeway about 360 feet long extending from the westerly end of the breakwater to land, a guardrail along the top of the breakwater, a footbridge spanning the navigation opening through the breakwater, parking and sanitary facilities. Construction of the 8-foot anchorage was completed in 1967. Construction of the breakwater along with rehabilitation of Long Beach Dike was completed in 1971. (See Table 1-B for Acts authorizing the existing project.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with for completed work Terminal facilities. There are 3 wharves of pile and timber construction; one is owned by the State, one by the town and one by the Plymouth Yacht Club. The State and town wharves are open to the public. In addition there are two boatyards with marine railway facilities along the waterfront, equipped for boat building and repairs. Local interests maintain the existing public landings open to all on equal terms and provide all necessary mooring facilities in the anchorage. Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Hired labor costs incurred in association with proposed repair to the Long Beach Dike were $20,900 for the preparation of plans and specifications and $4,700 for project coordination and management. A contract cost of $16,945 was incurred for repair of the guardrail and footbridge along the top of the breakwater. Hired labor costs in conjunction with the contract included $3,500 for supervision and inspection and $400 for contract administration. 22. PORTLAND HARBOR, ME Location. Portland Harbor is located on the southwestern coast of Maine, about 100 miles northeast of Boston, Massachusetts. (See National Ocean Service Coast Survey Chart 13292.) Previous projects. For details see the Annual Reports for 1915 and 1936. Existing project. For a description of the existing project and authorizing legislation, see the Annual Report for 1978. The project was completed in 1966, except for ledge removal that was completed in 1968. Local cooperation. Fully complied with for completed work. Terminal facilities. There are 37 waterfront facilities, seven of these facilities are publicly owned; the U.S. Government owns four, the State of Maine owns two, and the City of South Portland owns one. Mechanical-handling facilities are available at 24 wharves and railroad connections have been made to 27 wharves. The facilities are adequate for existing commerce. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Final contract closeout still pending at FY end on maintenance contract completed last FY. Hired labor costs included $3,200 for project coordination and management. A diving contract was awarded to investigate hard areas encountered during maintenance dredging. The cost of the diving contract was $12,347. Hired labor costs associated with the diving contract included $4,500 for inspection and $100 for contract administration. 23. PORTSMOUTH HARBOR AND PISCATAQUA RIVER, ME AND NH Location. The Piscataqua River forms a portion of the state boundary between Maine and New Hampshire. Portsmouth Harbor is located at the mouth of the Piscataqua River, about 45 miles northeast of Boston, Massachusetts and 37 miles southwest of Portland, Maine. (See National Ocean Service Coast Survey Chart 13278.) Previous projects. For details see the Annual Report for 1892. Existing project. For a description of the existing project and authorizing legislation, see the Annual Report for 1993. Widening of the 35-foot channel between the two vertical lift bridges and adjacent to Goat Island was completed in April 1992. Local cooperation. Fully complied with for completed work. Terminal facilities. Waterfront terminals are chiefly on the south bank of the Piscataqua River in Portsmouth and Newington, New Hampshire. The U.S. Navy Yard is on the opposite bank in Kittery, Maine. Eighteen piers, wharves and landings provide terminals for handling the port's waterborne commerce. The Navy Yard is not used for commercial activities. On the Maine side of the river there are two docks and a town landing. On the New Hampshire side there are 13 terminals, 6 of which include a public 1-11 --- .. - REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 2000 landing, 2 docks, 3 facilities used for vessel mooring and landings are at Portsmouth. In addition there are a number of private recreational boat docks. Terminal facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Hired labor costs incurred in association with proposed maintenance dredging of the Simplex Reach were $13,000 for the preparation of an environmental assessment, $15,300 for the preparation of plans and specifications, $11,000 for project coordination and management, and $2,200 for contract administration. 24. PROVIDENCE RIVER AND HARBOR, RI Location. The Providence River originates in Providence, Rhode Island at the junction of two small streams, the Woonasquatucket and Moshassuck Rivers. It then flows southerly about a mile to the head of Providence Harbor at Fox Point where it is joined by the Seekonk River and continues southerly another 8 miles to Narragansett Bay. (See National Ocean Service Coast Survey Charts 13224 and 13225.) Previous projects. For details see the Annual Reports for 1915, 1936, and 1938. Existing project. Provides for a channel 16.8 miles long and 40 feet deep, generally 600 feet wide from deep water in Narragansett Bay just south of Prudence Island Light to the turn below Field Point at Providence, thence up to 1,700 feet wide to Fox Point. The existing 40-foot channel was completed in January 1976. Dredging of a 30-foot channel, 150 feet wide from the upper end of the existing project to India Point at the mouth of the Seekonk River was deauthorized in November 1986. (See Table I-B for Acts authorizing the existing project.) Local cooperation. Local interests have yet to provide berthing areas commensurate to channel depths. Terminal facilities. There are 27 water terminal facilities serving the port of Providence, Rhode Island. Three-fourths of all facilities have railway connections. The City of Providence owns four of these facilities and the State of Rhode Island owns two others. Facilities are adequate for existing commerce. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Cost incurred for various contracts associated with the Final Environmental Impact Statement (FEIS) addressing proposed maintenance dredging of the 40-foot Federal channel were $173,265 for various environmental studies and report writing; $25,424 for subsurface explorations; $332,937 for sediment sampling and biological testing of proposed CAD sites; $306,393 for Phase I and II archaeology surveys; $85,000 for erosion modeling; $22,333 for remote underwater sediment profile photography of the disposal site; $87,000 for WES disposal site modeling; $5,000 for economic assessment of commercial/recreational fishing impacts; $56,587 for retest of mysid bioassay for inchannel CAD; and $31,000 for dredging windows document support. Hired labor costs included $421,300 for preparation of Final Environmental Impact Statement, $21,300 for the administration of contract sampling and testing, $64,000 for project coordination and management, $5,500 for coordination of public meetings, and $7,900 for contract administration. 25. SALEM HARBOR, MA Location. Salem Harbor is located on the north shore of Massachusetts Bay, about 12 miles north of the entrance to Boston Harbor, Massachusetts. (See National Ocean Service Coast Survey Charts 240 and 1207.) Previous projects. For details see the Annual Report of 1915. Existing project. Provides for a channel 32 feet deep and generally 300 feet wide, widened to 400 feet at bends and at the inner end, extending about 1.5 miles from deep water in the outer harbor to a point about 1,500 feet from Salem Terminal wharf, where it joins locally dredged approach channel of same depth leading to wharf. Project also provides for a channel 10 feet deep in South River, 300 feet wide and gradually narrowing to 50 feet wide at the upstream end of Pickering Wharf, and for a branch channel on the east side of Derby Wharf, 8 feet deep, 100 feet wide, and about 700 feet long, which widens into a basin of the same depth, 500 feet long and 200 feet wide. Existing project was completed in November 1967. (See Table 1-B for Acts authorizing the existing project.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with for completed work. Terminal facilities. The extensively developed waterfront of Salem Harbor and the South River is about 1 mile in extent and includes 9 wharves owned by private interests. The Salem Terminal is the largest of these and serves the New England Power Company's generating station. It is also the principal terminal for receipt and distribution of coal and petroleum products in Salem and tributary area. The Navy uses one of the two wharves owned by the National Park Service as a training center. Nine other wharves in the harbor are outside of the extensively developed area. 1-12 _ __ ___ __ NEW ENGLAND DISTRICT Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: A cost of $16,500 was incurred on a contract for sampling and testing of channel sediments is association with plans for maintenance dredging of the Federal channels. Hired labor costs included $5,000 for administration of sampling and testing, $800 for project coordination and management and $300 for contract administration. 26. SAUGUS RIVER, MA Location. The mouth of the Saugus River is located along the western shore of Lynn Harbor in Broad Sound, about 5 miles northeast of Boston Harbor, Massachusetts. The river forms the boundary between the communities of Saugus and Lynn, Massachusetts. Existing project. Provides for an entrance channel 80 to 150 feet wide and 18,400 feet long from deep water in Broad Sound, through the Western Channel of Lynn Harbor and upstream in the Saugus River to the harbor area and commercial facilities. The first 17,700 feet of the channel is 8 feet deep mean low water and extends to the uppermost commercial shore facilities. The final 700 feet of the channel is 6 feet deep and provides access to the uppermost anchorage. The project also provides for 2 anchorage areas, both 6 feet deep and totaling 4.3 acres, to accommodate the commercial fleet. (See Table 1-B for Act authorizing the project.) Local cooperation. A Project Cooperation Agreement was signed on May 22, 2000 between the Corps and the Commonwealth of Massachusetts Department of Environmental Management. The project sponsor must provide all lands, easements, rights-of-way, and perform all relocations determined by the Government to be necessary for project construction; provide 10 percent of total General Navigation Feature (GNF) costs during, construction; reimburse an additional 10 percent of total GNF costs within a period not to exceed 30 years following completion of construction (partially offset by a credit allowed for the value of lands, easements, rights-of-way, and relocations); and deepen and maintain all berthing areas and local access channel commensurate with project features. Terminal facilities. General Electric and a few marinas and yacht clubs line the eastern shore of the Saugus River. The western bank includes Refuse Energy Systems Company (RESCO), the Atlantic Lobstermen's Cooperative, a public landing and a few yacht clubs, marinas and boat yards. Most local fishermen moor their vessels opposite the town landing above the Fox Hill (Route 107) Bridge. Some fishermen, whose residences line the shore on both sides upstream of the town landing, berth their vessels at their own docks and floats during loading and off-loading operations conducted at higher tidal stages. There are about 20 such facilities along the river's edge. Facilities are considered adequate for present harbor activities. Operations during fiscal year. New Work: A continuing contract for improvement dredging of the Saugus River was awarded on August 1, 2000. The contractor mobilized in late August 2000 and was about 20 percent complete at FY end with contractor earnings of $492,500. 27. SEEKONK RIVER, PROVIDENCE, RI Location. The India Point Railroad Bridge is located at the mouth of the Seekonk River in Providence, Rhode Island. Existing project. Provides for the removal of the abandoned India Point Railroad Bridge at a currently estimated cost of $1,400,000. (See Table 1-B for Acts authorizing the project.) Local cooperation. Formal assurances have been requested. Local sponsors must transfer title of the bridge to the United States and provide 50 percent of construction costs. Revenue derived from the sale of scrap from the bridge shall be credited toward the non-Federal share of project costs. Operations during fiscal year. New work: Preparation of project plans and specifications continued along with coordination with the Rhode Island State Historic Preservation Office to identify measures to mitigate for the removal of this historic bridge. 28. SESUIT HARBOR, MA Location. Sesuit Harbor is located on the north shore of Dennis in Barnstable County, about 85 miles southeast of Boston, Massachusetts. The town of Dennis is bordered on the north by Cape Cod Bay, Brewster and Harwich on the east, Nantucket Sound on the south, and Yarmouth on the west. (See National Ocean Service Coast Survey Chart 13250.) Existing project. Provides for a channel 6 feet deep and 100 feet wide from deep water in Cape Cod Bay to a point opposite the Dennis Yacht Club, thence reducing in width to 80 feet at the entrance to the inner harbor basin, for a total channel length of 2,400 feet. Project was completed in August 1982. (See Table 1-B for Act authorizing the existing project.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with for completed work. 1-13 ._. . _ REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 2000 Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Maintenance dredging of the entrance channel was performed by the Government-owned dredge CURRITUCK from July 25 to July 28, 2000 at a plant rental cost of $40,000. A total of 7,090 cubic yards of sand were removed and placed east of the entrance channel in a nearshore area off Cold Storage Beach. Hired labor costs included $16,200 for performing and plotting pre- and after-dredge surveys, and $500 for project coordination and management. An environmental window of June I to January 30 was established to protect winter flounder. 29. UNION RIVER, ME Location. Union River connects a series of lakes and ponds in east central Maine, flows about 50 miles in a southerly direction, and discharges into Union River Bay just west of Mount Desert Island. (See National Ocean Service Coast Survey Chart 13312.) Existing project. Provides for a channel 6 feet deep and 100 to 125 feet wide, with widening of up to 150 feet along bends in the channel and at the mouth of Union River, extending 3.75 miles from deep water in Union River Bay to a 5.4 acre turning basin of the same depth at the wharves at Ellsworth, Maine. Project was completed in 1902. (See Table 1-B for Acts authorizing the existing project.) Local cooperation. None required. Terminal facilities. Facilities are adequate for existing commerce. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Hired labor costs incurred in association with proposed maintenance dredging of the Federal project to a reduced depth of 5 feet at mean low water were $11,900 for the preparation of plans and specifications, $46,000 for performing and plotting predredge surveys, $10,300 for project coordination and management, $3,200 for supervision and inspection, and $1,800 for contract administration. Bids for maintenance dredging were opened in September, but no contract had been awarded by FY end. State and Federal approvals for the project restrict work to the period between November 1I' and April 15th to protect Atlantic salmon and other anadromous fish. 30. WELLS HARBOR, ME Location. Wells Harbor is located in the town of Wells at the mouth of the Webhannet River, about 20 miles northeast of Portsmouth Harbor, New Hampshire and about 34 miles southwest of Portland Harbor, Maine. (See National Ocean Service Coast Survey Chart 13286.) Previous project. For a description the of previous project, see the Annual Report for 1991. This project was completed in April 1967. Existing project. The Water Resources Development Act (WRDA) of 1999 made substantial changes to project features. The modifications conformed to an agreement between the project's Sponsors (Towns of Wells and State of Maine) and the intervenors in the State review process on the proposed maintenance of the project (Maine Audubon society, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, State resource agencies, local businesses and shorefront property owners). The project's proximity to the Rachael Carson National Wildlife Refuge and 'Wells National Estuarine Research Reserve (WNERR) had generated opposition to continued project maintenance from State and Federal resource agencies and environmental interest. Local citizens and business groups had intervened in favor of the project. WRDA1999 modified the project as follows: shift the 6-foot inner harbor access channel, at 80 feet wide, to the west side of the harbor where the most important local landing is located; redesignate the existing east side channel and easterly portions of the settling basin as a 6-foot anchorage, 5.6 acres in size; deauthorize narrow areas along the east and west sides of the inner harbor project features to permit construction of a municipal marina; and relocate the settling basin to the outer harbor between the shore arms of the jetties. WRDA1999 also contains a provision authorizing the US Fish & Wildlife Service to accept enforcement rights over a conservation easement placed on a large intertidal sand bar occupying the central portion of the inner harbor. Under the terms of the easement, a 4.7-acre portion of the new 6-foot anchorage and the remaining areas of the original inner harbor settling basin could not be dredged. The purposed of this easement is to prevent the dredging of areas considered critical habitat by the Maine Audubon Society. (See Table I-B for Acts authorizing the existing project.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with for completed work. Terminal facilities. There is one wharf of pile and timber construction on the north side of the anchorage. The facility is owned and operated by the town of Wells and is considered adequate. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: A continuing contract for maintenance dredging of the modified Federal project was awarded on July 31, 2000. The contract also included work for the town of Wells to dredge municipal berthing areas. Dredging commenced in late September 2000 and continued in progress at the close of the FY. About 12,000 cubic yards of material were removed by hydraulic pipeline dredge and pumped about 1.5 1-14 _ I NEW ENGLAND DISTRICT miles south to the casino area of Wells Beach for use as nourishment. Of this amount, 8,000 cubic yards were from the Federal project and 4,000 cubic yards from the municipal project. Hired labor costs included $94,100 for the preparation of plans and specifications, $26,600 for supervision and inspection, $30,500 for performing and plotting pre-dredge surveys, $16,000 for project coordination and management, and $1,900 for contract administration. Beach Erosion Control 31. POINT BEACH, MILFORD, CT Location. The city of Milford is located in south-central Connecticut along the northern shore of Long Island Sound. Point Beach is a residential subdivision located in Milford about 75 miles northeast of New York City and 10 miles southwest of New Haven, Connecticut. Existing project. The proposed project involves raising the first floor of 58 shorefront and backshore residential structures above the estimated 100-year flood elevation. (See Table 1-B for Act authorizing the existing project.) Local cooperation. A Project Cooperation Agreement was signed on January 14, 1997 between the Corps and the Connecticut Department of Environmental Protection. This agreement was amended on September 18, 2000 to reflect the increased Federal cost limitation. The project sponsor must pay 35 percent of all costs allocated to storm damage reduction, assume all costs above the Federal cost limitation of $3,000,000 and assume all costs for the maintenance and repair of the project after completion. Operations during fiscal year. New work: Continued efforts to update project plans and specifications and amend Project Cooperation Agreement. 32. WOODMONT BEACH, MILFORD, CT Location. Woodmont Beach is located on the northern shore of Long Island Sound in the borough of Woodmont. The City of Milford is located about five miles southwest of New Haven, Connecticut and some 82 miles northeasterly of New York City. Existing Project. The original project provided for Federal participation in the amount of one-third of the first cost of protection and improvement of those portions of the shore which are publicly owned, by widening to a width of 100 feet by direct placement of sand, 500 feet of shore in the first pocket beach west of Mervin Point; widening to a width of 100 - 150 feet, 3,500 feet of shore from Chapel Street northerly to a point about 400 feet north of Anderson Avenue; and construction of five impermeable groins 300 to 400 feet long. This work was completed by the State of Connecticut in 1959. (For details see the Annual Report for 1961.) Work authorized in March 1992 provided for the direct placement of sandfill along approximately 1,500 feet of beach between Clinton and Bonsilene Streets to form a berm 50 feet wide, reconstruction of the Usher Road/Dunbar Street and Bonsilene Street groins, and mitigation to replace rocky habitat for blue mussels lost as a result of sand placement. This work was completed in 1994. New work involves periodic beach nourishment over the 50-year economic life of the project. The first periodic beach nourishment was completed in June 2000. (See Table I-B for Acts authorizing the project. Local cooperation. Fully complied with for completed work. In accordance with the Local Cooperation Agreement signed May 18, 1992 between the Corps and the City of Milford, the project sponsor must pay 35 percent of the total cost of periodic beach nourishment. Operations during fiscal year. New Work: A contract for re-nourishment of Woodmont Beach was awarded June 29, 1999. The contractor located a source of suitable beach re-nourishment material and began hauling in December 1999. Work was completed in June 2000 and involved placing 43,600 cubic yards of sand to protect shoreline properties between Clinton and Bonsilene Streets. 33. INSPECTION OF COMPLETED BEACH EROSION CONTROL PROJECTS No beach inspections were conducted in FY 2000. Flood Control 34. ALLENDALE DAM, NORTH PROVIDENCE, RI Location. Allendale Dam is located along the Woonasquatucket River, which forms the boundary line between the towns of North Providence and Johnston, Rhode Island. Existing project. Provides for the reconstruction of Allendale Dam. (See Table 1-B for Acts authorizing the project.) Local cooperation. Formal assurances have not been requested yet. The project sponsor must obtain title to the Allendale Dam; provide all lands, easements, rights-of-way, and relocations necessary for project construction; pay 25 1-15 rA / REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 2000 percent of project costs; and assume all costs for the operation and maintenance of the project after completion. Operations during fiscal year. New work: During FY 1998 we were alerted by EPA of possible contamination of sediments behind the dam. The RI Department of Environmental Management has requested we postpone further efforts until they conduct a risk assessment and make appropriate recommendations. 35. AROOSTOOK RIVER, FORT FAIRFIELD, ME Location. The Town of Fort Fairfield is located in northern Maine along the border with New Brunswick, Canada, about 140 miles northeast of Bangor, Maine. The central business district is located along the south side of the Aroostook River in downtown Fort Fairfield. Existing project. Provides for the construction of approximately 2,800 linear feet of earthen dike and concrete floodwall along the south side of the Aroostook River to protect the central business district of Fort Fairfield from future ice jam flooding. The project also includes construction of a pumping station to remove interior drainage, along with environmental and cultural resource mitigation measures involving planting shrubs over a 5,000 square foot area and relocation of an historic railroad station. (See Table 1-B for Act authorizing the existing project.) Local cooperation. A Project Cooperation Agreement was signed on May 25, 1999 between the Corps and the town of Fort Fairfield, Maine. The project sponsor shall provide all lands, easements, rights-of-way, and perform all relocations and alterations of buildings, utilities, highways, railroads, and bridges determined by the Government to be necessary for construction of the project; pay a cash contribution in the amount necessary to bring the non- Federal share of project costs to 35 percent (a minimum cash contribution of 5 percent is required); assume all costs in excess of the Federal statutory limitation of $5,000,000; and bear all operation, maintenance and repair costs of the project after completion. Operations during fiscal year. A contract to construct the project was awarded July 8, 1999. Work began in August 1999 and was about 80 percent complete at FY end with contractor earnings of$3,654,365. The historic railroad station was relocated on April 22, 2000 at a cost of $124,745. 36. BLACKSTONE RIVER BASIN, MA AND RI Works covered by this plan include a dam and reservoir on West River and local protection works at three cities on Blackstone River. Flood Control Act of 1944 authorized plan for a reservoir on West River and local protection works at Worcester, Massachusetts, and Woonsocket and Pawtucket, Rhode Island, substantially in accordance with House Document 624, 78th Congress, 2nd session. Flood Control Act of 1960 authorized a local flood protection project at lower Woonsocket, Rhode Island, substantially in accordance with Senate Document 87, 85th Congress, 2nd Session. Local protection nonstructural project authorized in 1982 for Belmont Park section of Warwick, Rhode Island, along the Pawtuxet River. Streambank protection projects on the Blackstone River in Millbury, Massachusetts, and on the Clear River in Burrillville, Rhode Island, were authorized in 1985. (See Table I-N for projects comprising the authorized plan.) 36A. WEST HILL DAM, MA Location. Dam is on West River, Massachusetts, three miles above its confluence with Blackstone River and 2.5 miles northeast of Uxbridge, MA. (See Geological Survey maps Blackstone, MA and RI, Milford, MA, and Grafton, MA.) Existing project. For a description of the completed improvements and authorizing legislation see the Annual Report for 1975. Construction of the dam and appurtenant structures was initiated in June 1959 and completed in June 1961. Construction of recreational facilities was completed in June 1967. Local cooperation. Section 3, Flood Control Act of 1944 applies. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Ordinary operation and maintenance activities were conducted. Plans and specifications for major rehabilitation of the dam were prepared at a cost of $431,424. 37. CHARLES RIVER (NATURAL VALLEY STORAGE AREAS), MA Location. The Charles River extends inland from Boston Harbor southwesterly toward the Massachusetts-Rhode Island border and is some 80 miles long with a watershed covering 307 square miles. Existing project. For a description of the existing project and authorizing legislation, see the Annual Report for 1995. Land acquisition was completed in 1990. 1-16 _ __ NEW ENGLAND DISTRICT Local cooperation. Local interests are required to prevent modifications or alteration of existing roadways, utilities, bridges, culverts, and any other improvements that might affect the drainage characteristics of the natural storage areas; adopt and enforce regulations to restrict development of flood plain lands; and operate and maintain the existing dams along the Charles River. Local assurances were provided by the Commonwealth of Massachusetts. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Hired labor costs for ordinary maintenance activities, project surveillance and inspection, and land use administration were $255,250. 38. CONNECTICUT RIVER BASIN, VT, NH, MA AND CT Location. Works covered by this project are a series of dams and reservoirs located on tributaries of the Connecticut River in Vermont, New Hampshire and Massachusetts, within a radius of 230 miles from Hartford, Connecticut, and local protection works at several cities in the basin. Existing project. Flood Control Act of 1936, as amended by Act of May 25, 1937, authorized construction of ten reservoirs on tributaries of Connecticut River in accordance with plans in House Document 412, 74th Congress, 2nd session, as the same may be revised upon further investigation of 1936 flood. Flood Control Act of 1938 approved a general comprehensive plan for control of floods and other purposes in Connecticut River Valley, as set forth in House Document 455, 75th Congress, 2nd session, and authorized $11,524,000 for construction of local flood protection projects in the plan. Act of October 15, 1940, modified Act of June 18, 1938, to provide additional protection at East Hartford, CT, as set forth in House Document 653, 76th Congress, 3rd session. Act of August 18, 1941, modified comprehensive plan approved in 1938 to include improvements recommended in House Document 653, 76th Congress, 3rd session, and House Document 724, 76th Congress, 3rd session, with such further modifications as may be found justifiable in discretion of Secretary of the Army and Chief of Engineers. Latter Act also authorized to be appropriated additional $6 million for local protection works and $10 million for reservoirs. Act of October 26, 1942, further modified plan by including construction of Gully Brook conduit at Hartford, CT. Flood Control Act of 1944 authorized expenditure of $30 million in addition to previous authorization for comprehensive plan approved in 1938 and modified plan by directing specific consideration of an alternative plan of Vermont State Water Conservation Board instead of Williamsville Reservoir in West River Basin, VT; directing consultation with affected States during course of investigations and transmission of proposal and plans to each affected State for written views and recommendations for reservoir projects heretofore authorized for construction at Cambridgeport, Ludlow, South Tunbridge, and Gaysville, and resubmission of projects or modifications for construction of Sugar Hill site. Flood Control Act of 1950 modified project for flood control at Hartford, CT, authorized by Flood Control Act of 1938, as amended to include Folly Brook dike and conduit. Flood Control Act of 1954 modified plan for flood control in Connecticut River Basin to provide for construction of a reservoir on Otter Brook at South Keene, NH, in lieu of any reservoir or reservoirs heretofore authorized. This Act further modified plan for West River Basin of Connecticut River in Vermont to consist of three reservoirs at Ball Mountain, The Island, and Townshend sites, in lieu of plan of eight reservoirs authorized in Flood Control Act of 1944. Flood Control Act of 1958 modified plan for flood control in Connecticut River Basin to include construction of Littleville Reservoir on Middle Branch of Westfield River, MA, and Mad River Reservoir on Mad River, above Winsted, CT. Flood Control Act of 1960 included authorization in Connecticut River Basin of plan for flood protection on Chicopee River, MA, substantially in accordance with House Document 434, 86th Congress; plan for flood protection on Westfield River, MA, substantially in accordance with Senate Document 109, 86th Congress; plan for flood control and related purposes on Farmington River, Connecticut, substantially in accordance with House Document 443, 86th Congress. Flood Control Act of 1968 included authorization in Connecticut River Basin of plan for construction of Beaver Brook Reservoir, on Beaver Brook in Keene, NH, substantially in accordance with Senate Document 60, 90th Congress; and plan for protection on Park River, Connecticut, substantially in accordance with Senate Document 43, 90th Congress. Flood Control Act of 1970 deauthorized the construction of a reservoir at Claremont, NH. The Water Resources Development Act of 1976 deauthorized the construction of Gaysville Lake, VT project. Flood control projects at Cambridgeport Lake, Brockway Lake, Victory Lake, South Tunbridge Lake, Ludlow Lake and The Island Lake, Vermont; Honey Hill Lake, West Canaan Lake, and the Alternative to Sugar Hill Reservoir, NH, were deauthorized in August 1977 in accordance with Section 12 of the Water Resources Development Act of 1974. The authorization for Beaver Brook Lake, NH project expired in April 1978 due to lack of local cooperation. Local protection projects at Gardner, MA, West Springfield, MA, Hartford, VT, Wethersfield, CT, and Keene, NH authorized and constructed in accordance with Section 205 of 1948 Flood Control Act. Emergency streambank erosion control projects at Brownsville, VT; Conway, MA; Huntington, MA; Charlestown, NH; North Stratford, NH; Colchester, CT; Middletown, CT; Milford, CT; Simsbury, CT; and two 1-17 .... _ _ REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 2000 projects in Leominster, MA authorized in accordance with Section 14 of the 1946 Flood Control Act were completed. (See Table 1-M at end of chapter for reservoirs and local protection works for Connecticut River Basin.) The Water Resources Development Act of 1986 modified the comprehensive plan for the control of flood-waters in the Connecticut River Basin, Vermont, New Hampshire, Massachusetts, and Connecticut, authorized by Section 5 of the Act of June 22, 1936 (49 Stat. 1572) by authorizing the design, construction, operation, and maintenance of facilities at Townshend Dam, West River, VT to enable upstream migrant adult Atlantic salmon to bypass that dam and Ball Mountain Dam, VT, and to provide at both Townshend and Ball Mountain Dams facilities as necessary for the downstream passage of juvenile Atlantic salmon. This work was completed in February 1993. 38A. BALL MOUNTAIN LAKE, VT Location. The Dam is on West River, 29 miles above its junction with Connecticut River at Brattleboro, Vermont. It is two miles north of Jamaica, VT. (See Geological Survey map for Londonderry, VT.) Existing project. For a description of the completed improvements and authorizing legislation see the Annual Report for 1994. Construction of the dam and appurtenant works was initiated in May 1957 and completed in November 1961. Cost of work was $10,448,000 for construction and $350,000 for lands and damages, a total of $10,798,000. Construction of recreation facilities was initiated in June 1975 and completed in June 1977. Fish passage facility work began in June 1992 and was completed in February 1993. The project is a unit of comprehensive plan for flood control and other purposes in Connecticut River Basin. Local cooperation. Section 2, Flood Control Act of 1938 applies. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Ordinary operation and maintenance activities were conducted. 38B. BARRE FALLS DAM, MA Location. The Dam is on Ware River in the Town of Barre, Massachusetts, 31.9 miles above confluence of Ware and Swift Rivers. It is 13 miles northwest of Worcester, MA. (See Geological Survey maps for Barre, MA and Wachusett Mountain, MA.) Existing project. For a description of the completed improvements and authorizing legislation see the Annual Report for 1975. Construction of the dam and appurtenant works was initiated in May 1956 and completed in May 1958. Local cooperation. Section 2, Flood Control Act of 1938 applies. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Ordinary operation and maintenance activities were conducted. 38C. BIRCH HILL DAM, MA Location. Dam is on Millers River, 27.3 miles above its junction with the Connecticut River. It is 1.3 miles east of South Royalston, Massachusetts and 7.5 miles northwest of Gardner, MA. (See Geological Survey maps for Royalston and Winchendon, MA-NH and Templeton, MA.) Existing project. For a description of the completed improvements and authorizing legislation see the Annual Report for 1975. Construction of the dam and appurtenant works was initiated in June 1940 and completed in February 1942. Local cooperation. Section 2, Flood Control Act of 1938 applies. Local interests have contributed $32,000 as their required 50 percent cost sharing of recreational development in accordance with 1965 Federal Water Project Recreation Act. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Ordinary operation and maintenance activities. A contract to replace gate operators and stems was awarded June 9, 1999. Work began in June 2000 and was completed in September 2000. Contractor earnings totaled $232,506 with final contract payment pending at FY end. 38D. COLEBROOK RIVER LAKE, CT Location. Damsite is in the Town of Colebrook, Litchfield County, Connecticut, on West Branch Farmington River about 3.9 miles upstream from its confluence with Still River at Riverton, CT, and about 1.5 miles upstream from Goodwin (Hogback) Dam. (See Geological Survey map for Winsted, CT.) Existing project. For a description of the completed improvements and authorizing legislation see the Annual Report for 1975. Construction of the dam and appurtenant works was initiated in May 1965 and completed in June 1969. Construction of recreation facilities was initiated in August 1969 and completed in June 1970. Local cooperation. A water supply contract was signed by the Hartford Connecticut Metropolitan Water District. 1-18 _ NEW ENGLAND DISTRICT Repayment is being made in accordance with provisions of the 1958 Water Supply Act. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Ordinary operation and maintenance activities were conducted. A contract to repair pavement, guardrails and drains was awarded September 21, 1998. Work began in April 1999 and was completed in August 1999. Final contract payment amount was $340,338. 38E. CONANT BROOK DAM, MA Location. Site is in south central part of Massachusetts in Town of Monson. Damsite, across Conant Brook, is about two miles southeast of the community of Monson, MA. (See Geological Survey map for Monson, MA.) Existing project. For a description of the completed improvements and authorizing legislation see the Annual Report for 1975. Construction of the dam, highway relocations, and appurtenant works was initiated in June 1964 and completed in December 1966. Local cooperation. Section 2, Flood Control Act of 1938 applies. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Ordinary operation and maintenance activities were conducted. 38F. KNIGHTVILLE DAM, MA Location. Dam is on Westfield River, 27.5 miles above its confluence with Connecticut River. It is four miles north of the Town of Huntington, Massachusetts, and about 12 miles west of the City of Northampton, MA. (See Geological Survey map for Westhampton, MA.) Existing project. For a description of the completed improvements and authorizing legislation see the Annual Report for 1975. Construction of the dam and appurtenant works was initiated in August 1939 and completed in December 1941. Local cooperation. Section 2, Flood Control Act of 1938 applies. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Ordinary operation and maintenance activities were conducted. A contract for masonry repairs to the gatehouse was awarded July 25, 2000. Work began in August 2000 and was about 5 percent complete at FY end with contractor earnings of $11,980. 38G. LITTLEVILLE LAKE, MA Location. Dam is on Middle Branch of Westfield River, one mile above its confluence with main stem of Westfield River and 25.2 miles above confluence of Westfield River with Connecticut River, in the Town of Chester, Massachusetts. (See Geological Survey map for Chester, MA.) Existing project. For a description of the completed improvements and authorizing legislation see the Annual Report for 1975. Construction of the dam and appurtenant works was initiated under a multicomponent contract in June 1962 and completed in September 1965. Local cooperation. Section 2, Flood Control Act of June 28, 1938, and Title III, Water Supply Act of 1958 apply and were fully complied with. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Ordinary operation and maintenance activities were conducted. 38H. NORTH HARTLAND LAKE, VT Location. Dam is on Ottauquechee River, 1.5 miles above its junction with Connecticut River, and one-mile northwest of North Hartland, Vermont. Reservoir extends upstream 5.5 miles. (See Geological Survey map for Hanover NH-VT.) Existing project. For a description of the completed improvements and authorizing legislation see the Annual Report for 1975. Construction of the dam was initiated in June 1958 and completed in June 1961. Local cooperation. Section 2, Flood Control Act of 1938 applies. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Ordinary operation and maintenance activities were conducted. 381. NORTH SPRINGFIELD LAKE, VT Location. Dam is in the Town of Springfield, Vermont, on Black River, 8.7 miles above its junction with Connecticut River, and three miles northwest of Springfield, VT. (See Geological Survey maps for Ludlow, VT, and Claremont, NH.) Existing project. For a description of the completed improvements and authorizing legislation see the Annual Report for 1975. Construction of the dam was initiated in May 1958 and completed in November 1960. Local cooperation. Section 2, Flood Control Act of 1938 applies. 1-19 __ REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 2000 Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Ordinary operation and maintenance activities were conducted. 38J. OTTER BROOK LAKE, NH Location. Dam is on Otter Brook, 2.4 miles-upstream from its junction with The Branch, which flows 2.5 miles to Ashuelot River at Keene, New Hampshire. (See National Ocean Survey maps for Keene, NH-VT, and Monadnock, NH.) Existing project. For a description of the completed improvements and authorizing legislation see the Annual Report for 1975. Construction of the dam and appurtenant works was initiated in September 1956 and completed in August 1958. Local cooperation. Section 2, Flood Control Act of 1938 applies. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Ordinary operation and maintenance activities were conducted. 38K. SURRY MOUNTAIN LAKE, NH Location. Dam is on Ashuelot River, 34.6 miles above its junction with Connecticut River and five miles north of Keene, New Hampshire. (See Geological Survey maps for Keene and Bellows Falls, NH-VT.) Existing project. For a description of the completed improvements and authorizing legislation see the Annual Report for 1975. Construction of the dam and appurtenant works was initiated in August 1939 and completed in June 1942. Additional recreational facilities were completed in September 1969 and 1980. Local cooperation. Section 2, Flood Control Act of 1938 applies. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Ordinary operation and maintenance activities were conducted. A contract to replace service gates was awarded November 11, 1999. The contractor received notice to proceed in January 2000 and work was completed in September 2000. Contractor earnings totaled $139,630 with final contract payment pending at FY end. 38L. TOWNSHEND LAKE, VT Location. Dam is on West River, 19.1 miles above its junction with Connecticut River at Brattleboro, Vermont, and about two miles west of Townshend, VT. The reservoir extends upstream about four miles. (See Geological Survey maps for Saxtons River, VT, and Londonderry, VT.) Existing project. For a description of the completed improvements and authorizing legislation see the Annual Report for 1994. Reservoir is operated as a unit of a coordinated system for flood control in Connecticut River Basin. Construction of the dam and appurtenant works was initiated in November 1958 and completed in June 1961. Additional recreational facilities were completed in October 1969 and September 1971. Fish passage facility work began in June 1992 and was completed in February 1993. Local cooperation. Section 2, Flood Control Act of 1938 applies. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Ordinary operation and maintenance activities were conducted. A contract to replace guardrails was awarded September 18, 2000. Work had not begun by FY end. A contract to furnish and install an electronic fish trap system was awarded June 10, 1999. The contractor had to fabricate concrete panels and purchase electronic equipment. Actual construction work did not begin until September 2000. Work was about 40 percent complete at the end of the FY with contractor earnings of $152,625. 38M. TULLY LAKE, MA Location. Dam is on East Branch of Tully River, 3.9 miles above its junction with Millers River. It is one mile north of Fryville, Massachusetts, and 3.5 miles north of Athol, MA. (See Geological Survey map for Royalston, MA-NH.) Existing project. For a description of the completed improvements and authorizing legislation see the Annual Report for 1975. Construction of the dam and appurtenant works was initiated in March 1947 and completed in September 1949. Local cooperation. Section 2, Flood Control Act of 1938 applies. Local interests must also bear 50 percent of future recreational development, in accordance with 1965 Federal Water Project Recreational Act. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Ordinary operation and maintenance activities were conducted. 38N. UNION VILLAGE DAM, VT Location. Dam is on Ompompanoosuc River, four miles above its junction with Connecticut River. It is one-fourth mile north of Union Village, Vermont, and 11 miles north of White River Junction, VT. (See Geological Survey maps for Strafford, VT and Mount Cube, NH-VT.) 1-20 _ __ NEW ENGLAND DISTRICT Existing project. For a description of the completed improvements and authorizing legislation see the Annual Report for 1975. Construction of the dam was initiated in March 1947 and completed in June 1950. Local Cooperation. Section 2, Flood Control Act of 1938 applies. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Ordinary operation and maintenance activities were conducted. 39. FAULKNER ISLAND, CT Location. Faulkner Island is located in Long Island Sound about 3 miles south of Guilford, Connecticut. Faulkner Lighthouse is located about 35 feet from the cliff edge along the eastern side of the island. Existing project. Provides for the construction of shoreline protection measures along the east side of the island adjacent to Faulkner Lighthouse. (See Table 1-B for Act authorizing the existing project.) Local cooperation. A Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) was signed September 14, 1998, between the Corps and the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. The island is owned and operated by the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service as a National Wildlife Refuge. In accordance with the MOU, the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service must agree to maintain the project after completion. Operations during fiscal year. New work: A contract to construct shoreline protection measures was awarded July 21, 2000. Work began in September 2000 and was about 15 percent complete at FY end with contract earnings of $300,000. 40. GALILEE SALT MARSH, RI Location. Galilee Salt Marsh is located in southern Rhode Island in the town of Narragansett about 30 miles south of Providence, between Point Judith Harbor of Refuge and Bluff Hill Cove. Existing project. Provides for installing two culverts beneath Escape Road and excavating channels to restore about 34 acres of former salt marsh. This area was degraded by the disposal of dredged material from the Federal navigation project at Point Judith Harbor of Refuge. Project was completed in August 1997. (See Table I-B for Act authorizing the existing project.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with for completed work. Operations during fiscal year. New work: Final project costs were apportioned between the Federal and non-Federal accounts. 41. HOUSATONIC RIVER BASIN, CT AND MA Seven flood control reservoirs on tributaries of the Naugatuck River, principal tributary of the Housatonic River, and three local protection projects have been specifically authorized as part of an overall plan for flood control in the Housatonic River Basin. The Naugatuck and Housatonic Rivers converge 12 miles above mouth of Housatonic River. A project for emergency snagging and clearing of the Blackberry River, a tributary of the Housatonic River, was authorized under authority contained in Section 208 of the 1954 Flood Control Act. Emergency streambank protection projects at: Alford, Green River, MA; Sheffield, MA; Salisbury, CT; and Squantz Pond, Fairfield, CT were authorized under authority provided by Section 14 of the 1946 Flood Control Act. Projects for local flood protection for: West Branch, Torrington, CT; East Branch, Torrington, CT; Mad River, Waterbury (Woodtick Area), CT; Pittsfield, MA; and Waterbury-Watertown, CT, were authorized under authority provided by Section 205 of the 1948 Flood Control Act. (See Table 1-P at end of chapter on dams, reservoirs, and local protection projects for Housatonic River Basin.) 41A. BLACK ROCK LAKE, CT Location. Damsite is on Branch Brook, about two miles upstream from its confluence with Naugatuck River, in the Towns of Thomaston and Watertown, Connecticut. (See Geological Survey map for Thomaston, CT.) Existing project. For a description of the completed improvements and authorizing legislation see the Annual Report for 1975. Road relocation was completed in November 1967. Construction of the dam and appurtenant works was initiated in July 1967 and completed in July 1971. Local cooperation. Section 2, Flood Control Act of 1938 applies. However, local interests must establish encroachment lines downstream of dam to permit efficient reservoir operation. State legislation requires establishment of such lines. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Ordinary operation and maintenance activities were conducted. A contract to repave roads at Black Rock and Northfield Brook Lakes was awarded August 25, 1998. Work began in April 1999 and was completed the following month. Final contract amount was $156,788, of which $104,526 was for 1-21 n r - - - r. r r REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 2000 work at Black Rock Lake. A contract for various dam and bridge repairs at Black Rock Lake and Thomaston Dam was awarded June 10, 1999. Work began is September 1999 and was completed in April 2000. Final contract amount was $428,303, of which $118,544 was for work at Black Rock Lake. 41B. HANCOCK BROOK LAKE, CT Location. Dam is on Hancock Brook, in the Town of Plymouth, Connecticut, about 3.4 miles above its confluence with Naugatuck River. (See Geological Survey map for Waterbury, CT.) Existing project. For a description of the completed improvements and authorizing legislation see the Annual Report for 1975. Construction of the dam and appurtenant structures was initiated in July 1963 and completed in August 1966. Local cooperation. Section 2, Flood Control Act of 1938 applies. However, local interests must establish encroachment lines downstream of dam to permit efficient reservoir operation. State legislation requires establishment of such lines. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Ordinary operation and maintenance activities were conducted. 41C. HOP BROOK LAKE, CT Location. Damsite is on Hop Brook, in city of Waterbury and towns of Middlebury and Naugatuck, Connecticut, about 1.4 miles upstream of confluence of Naugatuck River and Hop Brook. (See Geological Survey map for Waterbury, CT.) Existing project. For a description of the completed improvements and authorizing legislation see the Annual Report for 1975. Construction of the dam and appurtenant structures was initiated in December 1965 and completed in December 1968. Construction of a public use facility was completed in November 1973. Construction of an additional restroom was completed in 1980. Local cooperation. Section 2, Flood Control Act of 1938 applies. However, local interests must establish encroachment lines downstream of dam to permit efficient reservoir operation. State legislation requires establishment of such lines. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Ordinary operation and maintenance activities were conducted. 41D. NAUGATUCK RIVER, TORRINGTON, CT Location. The project is located at the confluence of the East and West Branches of the Naugatuck River in Torrington, Connecticut, and extends approximately 5,000 linear feet downstream along the main stem of the Naugatuck River. Existing project. Provides for placing approximately 300 boulders in the river channel along a 5,000 foot reach of the Naugatuck River to enhance in-stream cover and aquatic habitat diversity. The project was completed in September 2000. (See Table 1-B for Act authorizing the existing project.) Local cooperation. A Project Cooperation Agreement was signed on May 22, 2000 between the Corps and the City of Torrington, Connecticut. The project sponsor must provide all lands, easements, rights-of-way, including suitable borrow and dredged material disposal areas, and perform all relocations determined by the Government to be necessary for project construction. The project sponsor must also provide a cash contribution in the amount necessary to bring the total non-Federal share of study and project costs to 35 percent; and bear all operation, maintenance and repair costs of the project after completion. Operations during fiscal year. New work: A purchase order to place boulders in the river was awarded on July 13, 2000. Work was initiated in September 2000 and completed that same month at a total contract cost of $48,700. 41E. NORTHFIELD BROOK LAKE, CT Location. Dam is on Northfield Brook, about 1.3 miles upstream from its confluence with Naugatuck River, in town of Thomaston, Connecticut. (See Geological Survey map for Thomaston, CT.) Existing project. For a description of the completed improvements and authorizing legislation see the Annual Report for 1975. Construction of dam and appurtenances was initiated in May 1963 and completed in October 1965. Construction of recreation facilities was initiated in November 1966 and completed in August 1967. Local cooperation. Section 2, Flood Control Act of 1938 applies. However, local interests must establish encroachment lines downstream of dam to permit efficient reservoir operation. State legislation requires establishment of such lines. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Ordinary operation and maintenance activities were conducted. A 1-22 NEW ENGLAND DISTRICT contract to repave roads at Back Rock and Northfield Brook Lakes was awarded August 25, 1998. Work began in April 1999 and was completed the following month. Final contract amount was $156,788, of which $52,262 was for work at Northfield Brook Lake. 41F. THOMASTON DAM, CT Location. On Naugatuck River, about 30.4 miles above its junction with Housatonic River, and about 1.6 miles north of Thomaston, Connecticut. Reservoir extends upstream about 6.4 miles. (See Geological Survey map for Thomaston, CT.) Existing project. For a description of the completed improvements and authorizing legislation see the Annual Report for 1975. Construction of the dam and appurtenant works was initiated in May 1958 and completed in November 1960. Local cooperation. Section 3, Flood Control Act of 1944 applies. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Ordinary operation and maintenance activities were conducted. A contract for various dam and bridge repairs at Black Rock Lake and Thomaston Dam was awarded June 10, 1999. Work began in September 1999 and was completed in April 2000. Final contract amount was $428,303, of which $309,759 was for work at Thomaston Dam. A contract to construct an access road and maintain reservoir roads was awarded June 2, 2000. Work began in July 2000 and was about 55 percent complete at FY end with contractor earnings of $166,114. 42. MERRIMACK RIVER BASIN, NH AND MA Works covered by comprehensive plan are on Merrimack River and its tributaries in New Hampshire and Massachusetts. Flood Control Act of 1936 authorized construction of a system of flood control reservoirs in Merrimack River Basin for reduction of flood heights in Merrimack Valley. Flood Control Act of 1938 approved general comprehensive plan for flood control and other purposes as approved by Chief of Engineers pursuant to preliminary examinations and surveys authorized by Act of June 22, 1936, and modified project to provide in addition to construction of a system of flood control reservoirs, related flood control works which may be found justified by the Chief of'Engineers. All operations pertaining to flood control in Merrimack River Basin are now carried on under and reported under projects for individual units of comprehensive plan referred to above. No further expenditures are contemplated under general project for flood control in Merrimack River Basin. For final cost and financial summary, see The Annual Report for 1946. A comprehensive plan for development of water resources of the North Nashua River Basin, a principal tributary of the Merrimack River, was authorized by 1966 Flood Control Act substantially in accordance with Senate Document 113, 89th Congress. Plan provides for construction of coordinated system of four reservoirs and three local protection projects for flood protection, water supply, recreation and allied purposes. Water Resources Development Act of 1986 deauthorized two of the reservoirs and one of the local protection projects. The 1966 Flood Control Act also authorized construction of Saxonville local protection project substantially in accordance with Senate Document 61, 89th Congress. Emergency streambank protection projects at Amesbury, Massachusetts, two in Leominster, MA and two in Lancaster, MA were authorized under authority provided by Section 14 of the 1946 Flood Control Act. (See Table 1-Q at end of chapter for reservoirs and related flood control works for Merrimack River Basin.) 42A. BLACKWATER DAM, NH Location. Dam is on Blackwater River, 8.2 miles above confluence with Contoocook River, and 118.8 miles above mouth of Merrimack River. It is in the town of Webster, New Hampshire, just above village of Swetts Mills, NH, 18 miles by highway northwest of Concord, NH. (See Geological Survey maps for Penacook and Mount Kearsarge, NH.) Existing project. For a description of the completed improvements and authorizing legislation see the Annual Report for 1975. Project is complete except for construction of public facilities. Construction of the dam and appurtenant works was initiated in May 1940 and completed in November 1941. Local cooperation. Section 2, Flood Control Act of 1938 applies. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Ordinary operation and maintenance activities were conducted. A contract for concrete repairs was awarded April 25, 2000. Work began in May 2000, however, various types of patches failed to bond to the existing concrete and work was stopped in July 2000. Final contract amount was $210,416. 42B. EDWARD MACDOWELL LAKE, NH Location. Dam is on Nubanusit Brook, a tributary of Contoocook River, one-half mile upstream from village of West Peterborough, New Hampshire, and 14 miles east of 1-23 . _ - REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 2000 Keene, NH. (See Geological Survey map for Peterboro and Monadnock, NH.) Existing project. For a description of the completed improvements and authorizing legislation see the Annual Report for 1975. Construction of the dam and appurtenant works was initiated in March 1948 and completed in March 1950. Local cooperation. Section 2, Flood Control Act of 1938 applies. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Ordinary operation and maintenance activities were conducted. 42C. FRANKLIN FALLS DAM, NH Location. Dam is on Pemigewasset River, main tributary of Merrimack River, and about 2.5 miles upstream of Franklin, New Hampshire. (See Geological Survey maps for Penacook and Holderness, NH.) Existing project. For a description of the completed improvements and authorizing legislation see the Annual Report for 1975. Construction of the dam and appurtenant works was initiated in November 1939 and completed in October 1943. Local cooperation. Section 2, Flood Control Act of 1938 applies. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Ordinary operation and maintenance activities were conducted. A contract to replace Smith River Bridge was awarded August 15, 1998. Work began in November 1998 and was completed in July 1999. Final contract amount was $402,940. 42D. HOPKINTON-EVERETT LAKES, NH Location. Hopkinton Dam is on Contoocook River, 17.3 miles above its junction with Merrimack River and about one-half mile upstream from village of West Hopkinton, New Hampshire. Everett Dam is on Piscataquog River, 16 miles above its junction with Merrimack River, and about 1.3 miles southeast of village of East Weare, NH. Two interconnecting canals were provided to enable the two reservoir areas to function as one. (See Geological Survey map for Hillsboro, NH, and Concord, NH.) Existing project. For a description of the completed improvements and authorizing legislation see the Annual Report for 1975. Construction of two dams and appurtenant works was initiated in November 1959 and completed in December 1962. Construction of recreation facilities was initiated in November 1974 and completed in September 1975. Local cooperation. Section 2, Flood Control Act of 1938 applies. Local interests must also bear 50 percent of future recreational development in accordance with 1965 Federal Water Project Recreation Act. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Ordinary operation and maintenance activities were conducted. 42E. NORTH NASHUA RIVER, LANCASTER, MA Location. The Town of Lancaster is located in Worcester County in north central Massachusetts, approximately 40 miles west of Boston, Massachusetts and 18 miles north of Worcester, Massachusetts. The erosion site is located along the North Nashua River adjacent to State Highway Route 70. Existing project. Provides for the construction of approximately 500 linear feet of stone slope protection along the bank of the North Nashua River adjacent to State Highway Route 70. Project was completed in August 2000. (See Table 1-B for Act authorizing the existing project.) Local cooperation. A Project Cooperation Agreement was signed September 29, 1999 between the Corps and the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Management. The project sponsor must provide all lands, easements, rights-of-way, including suitable borrow and dredged material disposal areas, and perform all relocations determined by the Government to be necessary for project construction. The project sponsor must also pay a minimum cash contribution of 5 percent of total project costs during construction; pay an additional cash contribution during construction so that the total contribution including lands equals 35 percent of total project costs; assume all costs in excess of the Federal statutory cost limitation of $1,000,000; and bear all costs for maintenance and repair of the project after completion. Operations during fiscal year. New work: A contract for construction of emergency streambank protection measures was awarded on January 6, 2000. Work began in June 2000 and was completed in August 2000. Contractor earnings totaled $198,323 with final contract payment pending at FY end. 43. NEW BEDFORD, FAIRHAVEN AND ACUSHNET, MA Location. Main harbor barrier is across New Bedford and Fairhaven Harbor in vicinity of Palmer Island. Supplemental dikes and walls are provided in Clark Cove 1-24 _ NEW ENGLAND DISTRICT area of New Bedford and Fairhaven. (See Geological survey maps for New Bedford North, New Bedford South, Marion, and Sconticut Neck, MA and National Ocean Service Coast Survey Charts 13230, 13070 and 13218.) Existing project. For a description of the completed improvements and authorizing legislation see the Annual Report for 1975. Construction of the barrier and appurtenances was initiated in October 1962 and completed in January 1966. Construction of the pumping station was initiated in October 1962 and completed in June 1964. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Ordinary operations and maintenance activities were conducted. 44. QUONSET POINT, DAVISVILLE, RI Location. Quonset Point is located in east central Rhode Island along the west shore of Narragansett Bay in the village of Davisville and Town of North Kingstown, about 15 miles south of Providence, Rhode Island. Existing project. Provides for the construction of two elevated water, storage towers and relocation of 6,000 feet of sewer line. Construction of the water towers was completed in September 1998 and work on the sewer line was completed in July 1998. (See Table 1-B for Act authorizing the existing project.) Local cooperation. A Project Cooperation Agreement was signed January 29, 1997 between the Corps and the Rhode Island Economic Development Corporation.. The sponsor must provide all lands, easements, rights-of-way, and suitable borrow and dredged or excavated material disposal areas, and shall perform or ensure performance of all relocations necessary for the construction, operation, and maintenance of the project. The sponsor must also provide 25 percent of construction costs and assume all costs in excess of the Federal limitations of $1,350,000 for construction of the two elevated water storage towers and $1,050,000 for sewer line relocation. Operations during fiscal year. New work: A contract to construct two elevated water storage towers was awarded May 7, 1997. Work began in August 1997 and was completed in September 1998. Final contract amount was $1,932,182. 45. ROUGHIIANS POINT, REVERE, MA Location. The city of Revere is a coastal community located in Suffolk County about five miles northeast of Boston, Massachusetts. Roughans Point is a low-lying, ocean front neighborhood of Revere. The area has 55 acres and about 300 structures, mostly residential homes. Existing project. Project consists of 3,125 feet of stone revetment to dissipate incoming waves, prevent overtopping and stabilize existing facilities along the shoreline. The revetment extends from a point about 250 feet south of Eliot Circle southerly to a point 200 feet south of the intersection of Winthrop Parkway and Leverett Avenue. The project also provides for "backwater" protection by raising the ground elevation one-foot at the intersection of Bennington Street and State Road and installing a sluice gate on the 42-inch drain from the Roughans area to Sales Creek. Interior drainage improvements consist of a new intake structure at the existing pump station and a new gravity drain with a sluice gate. (See Table 1-B for Act authorizing the existing project.) Local cooperation. A Project Cooperation Agreement was signed April 25, 1997 between the Corps and the Commonwealth of Massachusetts Department of Environmental Management. The project sponsor must provide without cost to the United States all lands, easements, rights-of-way, and relocations necessary for construction of the structural elements of the project, including ponding areas, borrow areas, and disposal areas for excavated material; hold and save the United States free from damages due to construction, operation, and maintenance of the project, not including damages due to the fault or negligence of the United States or its contractors; bear all costs of operation, maintenance and replacements; pay an amount in cash to bring the total non-Federal share to 35 percent of project costs allocated to storm damage reduction. Operations during fiscal year. New work: A contract to construct the stone revetment project was awarded September 17, 1997. Work began in December 1997 and was substantially complete by FY end except for minor punch list items. Contractor earnings totaled $7,753,290 with final payment pending at FY end. A contract to upgrade the existing pump station was awarded June 15, 2000. Work began in July 2000 and was about 30 percent complete at FY end with contractor earnings of $147,273. 46. SAGAMORE MARSH, CAPE COD CANAL, MA Location. Sagamore Marsh is located in southeastern Massachusetts in the Towns of Bourne and Sandwich, approximately 50 miles southeast of Boston, Massachusetts. The marsh lies on the north side of the Cape Cod Canal, near the canal's east end. 1-25 _ ___ REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 2000 Existing project. Provides for enlarging culverts beneath Scussett Beach and Cape Cod Canal Service Roads, installing sluice gates and excavating channels to increase tidal flows and restore about 50 acres of salt marsh and estuarine habitat. Tidal flushing of Sagamore Marsh was restricted in the 1930s when the Cape Cod Canal was widened. (See Table 1-B for Act authorizing the existing project.) Local cooperation. A Project Cooperation Agreement was signed on September 22, 1999 between the Corps and the Commonwealth of Massachusetts Department of Environmental Management. The project sponsor must provide all lands, easements, rights-of-way, including suitable borrow and dredged material disposal areas, and perform all relocations determined by the Government to be necessary for project construction; pay a cash contribution in the amount necessary to bring the non-Federal share of study and project costs including lands to 25 percent; and bear all operation, maintenance and repair costs of the project after completion. Operations during fiscal year. New work: A contract for restoration of the salt marsh was awarded on January 10, 2000. Work began in May 2000 and was about 85 percent complete at FY end with contractor earnings of $1,193,831. 47. SAINT JOHN RIVER BASIN, ME Location. The project is located in Aroostook County in northern Maine, and lies within the Saint John River Basin. Existing project. The project involves a research and demonstration program of cropland irrigation and soil conservation techniques for increasing potato yield and quality. (See Table 1-B for Act authorizing the existing project.) Local cooperation. A Local Cooperation Agreement (LCA) for a two-year research and demonstration program was signed on April 22, 1991 between the Corps and the Maine Aroostook Water and Soil Management Board. The project sponsor must obtain all interests in real estate as determined by the Government and the project sponsor to be necessary for project implementation. The Government will reimburse the project sponsor 65 percent of project costs as work is accomplished, up to the Federal cost limit of $300,000. The LCA was amended on June 6, 1994 to include a third year of research and demonstration at an estimated Federal cost of $252,000. Operations during fiscal year. New work: Continued research at the University of Maine's farm in Presque Isle, Maine. 48. STAMFORD, CT Location. The Stamford Hurricane Barrier is located in Fairfield County on the north shore of Long Island Sound, about 30 miles east of New York City and 20 miles southwest of Bridgeport, Connecticut. (See Geological Survey map for Stamford, CT.) Existing project. For a description of the completed improvements and authorizing legislation, see the Annual Report for 1974. Project was completed in 1969. Local interests still owe a substantial amount based on claims settlements, including interest payment under the Contract Disputes Act. Local "cooperation. Fully complied with except for $662,000 ,outstanding which is local share of final claims settlement including interest payment. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Ordinary operation and maintenance activities. A contract to replace the navigation gate hoist system was awarded April 11, 1995. The gate hoist system was delivered to the site in June 1996 and installation was completed in August 1997. Final contract amount was $1,378,958. 49. THAMES RIVER BASIN, CT, RI, AND MA Works covered by this plan are a series of dams and reservoirs on tributaries of Thames River in Massachusetts and Connecticut, within a radius of 45 miles from Norwich, CT, and a channel enlargement on Shetucket River where it discharges into Thames River at Norwich. Flood Control Act of August 18, 1941, approved plan for a system of reservoirs and channel improvements in Thames River Basin in accordance with House Document 885, 76th Congress, 3rd session, and authorized $6 million for initiation and partial accomplishment of project. Flood Control Act of December 22, 1944, authorized completion of approved plan. Flood Control Act of July 14, 1960, authorized project for West Thompson Reservoir, substantially as recommended in Senate Document 41, 86th Congress, 2nd session. Local flood protection project for West River, New Haven, CT was authorized under authority provided by Section 205 of the 1948 Flood Control Act. (See Table 1-P on reservoirs and local protection projects, Thames River Basin, for projects comprising approved plan.) 49A. BUFFUMVILLE LAKE, MA Location. Dam is on Little River, 1.3 miles above its junction with French River, and eight miles northeast of Southbridge, MA. Reservoir extends upstream about 1.7 1-26 __ NEW ENGLAND DISTRICT miles northerly and 1.9 miles southerly. (See Geological Survey maps for Webster, MA and CT, and Leicester, MA.) Existing project. For a description of the completed improvements and authorizing legislation see the Annual Report for 1975. Construction of the dam and appurtenant works was initiated in September 1956 and completed in June 1958. Local cooperation. Section 2, Flood Control Act of 1938 applies. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Ordinary operation and maintenance activities were conducted. 49B. EAST BRIMFIELD LAKE, MA Location. Dam is on Quinebaug River, 64.5 miles above its confluence with Shetucket River, and one-mile southwest of the village of Fiskdale, Massachusetts. (See Geological Survey maps for Whales, MA and CT, Southbridge, MA and CT, East Brookfield, MA, and Warren, MA.) Existing project. For a description of the completed improvements and authorizing legislation see the Annual Report for 1975. Construction of the dam and appurtenant works was initiated in May 1958 and completed in June 1960. Local cooperation. Section 2, Flood Control Act of 1938 applies. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Ordinary operation and maintenance activities were conducted. 49C. HODGES VILLAGE DAM, MA Location. Dam is on French River, 15 miles above its confluence with Quinebaug River, at Hodges Village in the Town of Oxford, Massachusetts, about five miles north of Webster, MA. (See Geological Survey maps for Webster, MA, and CT, Leicester, MA, Worcester South, MA, and Oxford, MA.) Existing project. For a description of the completed improvements and authorizing legislation see the Annual Report for 1975. Construction of the dam and appurtenant works, initiated in March 1958, was completed in December 1959. Local cooperation. Section 2, Flood Control Act of 1938 applies. Operations during fiscal year. Major rehabilitation: A contract to rehabilitate Hodges Village Dam was awarded August 5, 1997. Work began in October 1997 and was completed in July 2000. Contractor earnings totaled $17,072,890 with final contract payment pending at FY end. Maintenance: Ordinary operation and maintenance activities were conducted. 49D. MANSFIELD HOLLOW LAKE, CT Location. Dam is at Mansfield Hollow, Connecticut, on Natchaug River, 5.3 miles above its confluence with Willimantic River. It is four miles northeast of the City of Willimantic, CT. (See Geological Survey maps for Spring Hill and Willimantic, CT.) Existing project. For a description of the completed improvements and authorizing legislation see the Annual Report for 1975. Construction of dam, initiated in 1949, was completed in May 1952. Local cooperation. Section 2, Flood Control Act of 1938 applies. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Ordinary operation and maintenance activities were conducted. 49E. WEST THOMPSON LAKE, CT Location. Dam is on Quinebaug River, in the Town of Thompson, Connecticut. Site is in the village of West Thompson, two miles upstream from the City of Putnam, CT. (See Geological Survey map, for Putnam, CT.) Existing project. For a description of the completed improvements and authorizing legislation see the Annual Report for 1975. Construction of dam, road relocation, and appurtenances was initiated in August 1963 and completed in October 1965. Initial phase of recreation facilities was completed in May 1976. Local cooperation. Section 2, Flood Control Act of 1938 applies. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Ordinary operation and maintenance activities were conducted. A contract to repair the spillway bridge was awarded June 24, 1999. Work began in August 1999 and was completed in November 1999. Final contract amount was $200,044. 49F. WESTVILLE LAKE, MA Location. Dam is on Quinebaug River, 56.7 miles above its confluence with Shetucket River, in the Towns of Sturbridge and Southbridge, Massachusetts, and 1.3 miles west of center of Southbridge. (See Geological Survey maps for Southbridge, MA and RI, and East Brookfield, MA.) 1-27 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 2000 Existing project. For a description of the completed improvements and authorizing legislation see the Annual Report for 1975. Construction of the dam and appurtenant works was initiated in April 1960 and completed in August 1962. Local cooperation. Section 2, Flood Control Act of 1938 applies. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Ordinary operation and maintenance activities were conducted. 50. TOWN BROOK, QUINCY AND BRAINTREE, MA Location. The project is located in the City of Quincy and the Town of Braintree on the south side of Massachusetts Bay, along the eastern shore of Massachusetts, seven miles south of Boston in Norfolk County. The watershed is approximately 4.5 square miles. Existing project. Project provides for the construction of a 12-foot diameter, 4,060-foot long, concrete lined tunnel in bedrock approximately 140 to 180 feet below ground, intake and outlet structures, and improvements to the Town River downstream of the outlet shaft. The tunnel and its appurtenances will be supplemented by reconstruction of the Old Quincy Reservoir Dam, located at the headwaters of Town Brook. Reconstruction work includes a new spillway and outlet structure. The project includes $6,100,000 in approved credit for compatible work that has .been accomplished by the project sponsor. Dam safety measures at Old Quincy Dam, which are estimated at $9,000,000, are a non-Federal responsibility. Construction of Town River improvements was completed in December 1994. Construction of the tunnel was completed in January 1997. (See Table 1-B for Act authorizing the existing project.) Local cooperation. A Local Cooperation Agreement (LCA) was signed on July 7, 1992 between the Corps and the Metropolitan District Commission (MDC). The MDC is required to provide all lands, easements, and rights-of-way; pay all cost for dam safety measures at Old Quincy Dam to insure its structural integrity; pay a cash contribution for the costs allocated to flood control so that the total contribution of local interests is equal to 25 percent of costs allocated to flood control; and bear all costs of operation, maintenance, and replacements. In addition, local interests must do the following: prescribe and enforce regulations to prevent encroachment on both the improvements and unimproved channels, and manage all project-related channels to preserve capacities for local drainage as well as for project functions. Operations during fiscal year. New work: A contract for construction of the tunnel was awarded September 15, .1993. Work on this contract began in January 1994 and was completed in January 1997. Contractor earnings totaled $23,503,070 with final payment pending at FY end. A contract for reconstruction of Old Quincy Dam was awarded September 25, 1998. Work began in February 1999 and was about 80 percent complete at FY end with contractor earnings of $7,821,690. 51. INSPECTION OF COMPLETED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS In accordance with provisions of the Flood Control Act of 1936, as amended, local flood protection works constructed with Federal funds are transferred to local interests to operate and maintain. To insure compliance with regulations prescribed for their operation and maintenance, regular inspections of the following projects were made during the FY: CONNECTICUT: October 99 - Pawcatuck; May 00 - Wethersfield; August 00 - Bridgeport, Danbury, Middletown, Milford, New Haven, North Caanan, North Fairfield, Salisbury, Simsbury, Waterbury, Winsted, Woodbury; September 00 - Ansonia, Derby, East Branch Dam, Hall Meadow Dam, Mad River Dam, Norwalk, Stamford, Sucker Brook Dam, Torrington, Waterbury/Winsted. MAINE: May 00 - Perry; June 00 - Ogunquit, Standish; July 00 - Whiting; August 00 - Machias, Machiasport, Millbridge; September 00 - Beals, Belfast, Blaine, Castine, Cherryfield, Fort Kent, Fort Kent (Perley Brook), Goldsboro, Harpswell, Hartland, Islesboro, Lubec, New Brunswick, Old Town. MASSACHUSETTS: October 99 - Chicopee, Conway, Fitchburg, Gardner, Huntington, Northampton, Springfield, West Springfield; November 99 - New Bedford; December 99 - Charles River; April 00 - Fitchburg, Gardner, West Springfield; May 00 - Blackstone, Charles River, Chicopee, Huntington, Millbury; June 00 - Holyoke, West Warren, Westfield; July 00 - Ware, Winthrop; August 00 - Alford, Lee, Sheffield (Covered Bridge), Sheffield (State Highway); September 00 - Braintree/Haywood Creek, Canton, Hayward Creek/Quincy, Island Avenue/Quincy, Pittsfield, Scituate, Three Rivers, Town River Bay/Quincy, Weymouth/Braintree, Worcester. NEW HAMPSHIRE: October 99 - Keene (Ashuelot River), Keene (Beaver Brook). RHIODE ISLAND: June 00- Providence, Woonsocket. VERMONT: December 99 - Weston. 1-28 __ ____ __ NEW ENGLAND DISTRICT 52. FLOOD CONTROL RESERVOIR OPERATIONS A coordinated system of flood control dams, all of which have flood control as primary storage available with recreation and/or water supply as secondary storage in most of the projects, has been established in five major flood producing basins in New England. During periods of flood flows, regulation of reservoirs is fully coordinated within each basin dependent upon its location in the watershed, its available storage capacity and origin of the flood. In addition to flood control releases, water supply, flow augmentation and hydropower releases were made from selected reservoirs. Winter pools are maintained at many projects to submerge the flood control gates and keep them from freezing. During FY 2000 there were only minor occasions requiring regulation activities. Although some reservoirs experienced flood storage impoundment, the downstream runoff was not significant enough to cause river levels to approach or exceed flood stage, therefore, no "damages prevented" attributable to our dams were computed. Although the summer months were 'wetter' than normal the timing of the rainstorms were such that the ground had the opportunity to 'dry up' between storms, thereby reducing the flood potential. CONNECTICUT RIVER BASIN Regulation for canoe and kayak activities occurred during FY 2000 at Otter Brook in March and April; Birch Hill, Tully, Littleville and Knightville in April; Ball Mountain and Townshend in April, September, October and November; and at Surry Mountain in May. Releases for hydropower from Colebrook Lake during non-flood periods of FY 2000 were controlled by the Hartford MDC. MERRIMACK RIVER BASIN Blackwater Dam was regulated for canoe races in April and May 2000. THAMES RIVER BASIN Regulation for canoe and kayak activities occurred during FY 2000 at East Brimfield in April and at Mansfield Hollow Lake in June. East Brimfield also supplied small releases for low flow augmentation to American Optical Co. during the summer months. 53. HURRICANE BARRIER OPERATIONS Five hurricane barriers are situated along the southern coast of New England, protecting coastal communities from tidal flooding associated with hurricanes and severe coastal storms. The Corps operates the navigational elements of the Stamford, CT and New Bedford-Fairhaven, MA barriers. The Fox Point, RI, the Pawcatuck and New London, CT barriers are operated by the local communities. A brief resume of operations for the FY follows: STAMFORD BARRIER. The barrier gates were operated on 10 occasions for coastal storms and hurricanes during FY 2000. Total benefits associated with gate operations during FY 2000 totaled $375,000. NEW BEDFORD BARRIER. During FY 2000, the New Bedford Barrier was operated on 9 different occasions resulting in a total of $305,000 in benefits. FOX POINT HURRICANE BARRIER. The Fox Point Hurricane Barrier was not operated during FY 2000, as tides did not reach damaging levels. PAWCATUCK HURRICANE BARRIER. No operations occurred at the Pawcatuck Hurricane Barrier during FY 2000, as tides did not reach damaging levels. NEW LONDON HURRICANE BARRIER. The New London Hurricane Barrier was not operated during FY 2000, as tides did not reach damaging levels 54. FLOOD CONTROL WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION Flood control activities pursuant to Section 205. Public Law 80-858, as amended (preauthorization). (See Table 1-J) Snagging and clearing activities pursuant to Section 208 of the 1954 Flood Control Act. (None) Emergency Bank Protection activities pursuant to Section 14 of the 1946 Flood Control Act (preauthorization). (See Table 1-K) Project modifications for the improvement of the environment pursuant to Section 1135, Public Law 99-662, as amended (preauthorization). (See Table l-L) Aquatic ecosystem restoration activities pursuant to Section 206, Public Law 99-662, as amended (preauthorization). (See Table 1 - M) 1-29 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 2000 Emergency flood control activities-repairf,l ood fighting, and rescue work (Public Law 99, 84th Cong., and antecedent legislation) Federal costs for FY were $82,955 for disaster preparedness and $264,485 for emergency operations. General Investigations 55. SURVEYS Costs for the FY for surveys from regular funds were $934,249 of which $40,064 was for one navigation study; $489,218 for five special studies; and $404,967 for coordination studies. 56. COLLECTION AND STUDY OF BASIC DATA The District Engineer is the U.S. member on the Saint Croix River Board of Control. Annual inspections are made of conditions on the Saint Croix River and basic hydrologic information is compiled. A report of operations and development in the basin was prepared in cooperation with Canadian counterparts. Total costs for the FY were $10,323. Total costs to September 30, 2000 are $387,613. The Gulf of Maine Council on the Marine Environment was established in 1989 under an agreement signed by the Governors of Maine, New Hampshire and Massachusetts, and the Premiers of Nova Scotia and New Brunswick. The Council was tasked under this agreement to develop consistent policies, initiatives and programs designed to protect and conserve the shared natural resources of the Gulf of Maine. In April 1993, the Council requested the New England District Engineer to participate in this international program as an "observer" to the Council. In this capacity, the District Engineer is expected to attend Council meetings and support their initiatives to the extent possible. In addition to the District Engineer's direct participation, a representative of the Corps is a member of the Working Group to the Council, which implements directives of the Council. The Corps representative on the Working Group is assisting the Habitat Sub-Group to establish policies, set priorities and identify lead agencies for implementing habitat restoration projects in the Gulf of Maine. This effort includes investigating potential habitat restoration sites eligible for Corps participation under Section 1135 and coordination of input from other Federal agencies. Total costs for the FY were $28,062. Total costs to September 30, 2000 are $129,476. Flood plain studies comprise compilation and dissemination, upon responsible local request, of information on floods and potential flood damages. Studies identify areas subject to inundation by floods of various magnitudes and frequencies, and provide general criteria for guidance in the conservation and limited use of flood plain areas, along with engineering advice in planning to ameliorate the flood hazard. Total costs for the FY were $375,083. Total costs to September 30, 2000 are $10,339,055. The April 1987 flood was one of the largest of recent times in New England, resulting in spillway discharge at six Corps flood control reservoirs. A comprehensive hydrologic analysis of this flood event is needed to develop a base of information for use in future planning and design studies, as well as reservoir operation. Fiscal year 1999 funds were used to conduct hydrologic analysis of the 1987 flood within the Merrimack River Basin. Total costs for the FY were $10,686. Total costs to September 30, 2000 are $119,981. 57. PLANNING, ENGINEERING AND DESIGN (None.) 58. PRECONSTRUCTION ENGINEERING AND DESIGN Pre-construction Engineering and Design costs were $5,897 for work on the Rochester, NH storm water management project. 1-30 NEW ENGLAND DISTRICT TABLE 1-A COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Total Cost Section to In Text Project Funding FY97 FY98 FY99 FY00 Sep. 30, 2000 1. Andrews River, MA (Contributed Funds) 2. Aunt Lydia's Cove Chatham, MA (Contributed Funds) (Contributed Funds - Other) Boston Harbor, MA (Contributed Funds) (Contributed Funds - Other) 4. Bridgeport Harbor, CT (Contributed Funds) 5. Cape Cod Canal, MA (Contributed Funds) New Work Approp. Cost Maint Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost Minor Rehab. Approp. Cost Major Rehab. Approp. Cost -1,000 85 1,377 7,951 58,500 58,297 9,000 43,800 43,000 59,800 59,722 65,000 74,295 9,000 8,066 - 12,804 65,000 74,295 293,000 293,183 -81,813 -2,607 -408 850 42 553,000 5,135,000 4,084,000 155,021 2,490,178 4,649,350 167,564 16,090,100 137,468 5,215,744 - 1,260,000 - 254,603 90,000 2,055,000 34,917 212,510 2,575,358 12,790,344 2,004,000 1,820,258 2,838,775 3,612,692 219,042 219,042 910,023 909,743 187,500 187,500 1,110,048 1,110,048 359,000 358,249 102,206 102,206 62,292 62,292 2,508,000 37,636,974 3 4,637,416 37,288,939 3 846,300 1,519,318 1,073,272 2,087,725 1,041,728 1,903,782 30,484,949 4 30,468,4344 4,337,272 4,162,586 6,025,503 5,763,900 - 4,491,119 - 4,491,119 25,473 25,473 1,700 1,700 84,700 2,271,327 84,660 2,271,287 S- - 147,887 - - - - 147,887 - - - - 21,798,322 1.2 S- - - 21,798,322 1,2 9,833,620 7,137,492 10,172,000 11,506,000 182,066,882 9,637,583 7,463,679 10,169,365 11,552,227 182,050,250 - - - - 115,432 - - - - 115,432 - - - - 390,677 - - - - 390,677 - - - 1,168,000 27,777,000 -- - 243,910 26,852,910 1-31 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 2000 TABLE 1-A (Continued) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Total Cost Section to In Text Project Funding FY97 FY98 FY99 FY00 Sep. 30, 2000 6. Chatham (Stage) Harbor, MA (Contributed Funds) 7. Clinton Harbor, CT 8. Cocheco River, NH 9. Cohasset Harbor, MA (Contributed Funds) (Contributed Funds-Other) 10. Cuttyhunk Harbor, MA (Contributed Funds) (Contributed Funds) 11. Fivemile River Harbor, CT 12. Gloucester Harbor and Annisquam River, MA New Work Aprop. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New York Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost Maint. Contrib. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost Maint. Contrib. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost 19,200 19,200 252,500 251,873 -299 206,500 4,552,160 207,079 4,552,065 - 43,500 - 43,500 - 104,957 - 104,957 25,074 25,074 601,920 74,215 5,400 5,400 16,300 490,115 4,474 630,000 4,474 616,778 - 142,587. -14,000 39,278 483,000 494,105 61,261 185,600 1,281,484 185,505 1,281,389 - 119,089 - 119,089 130,800 130,557 - 267,737 - 267,737 260,300 1,834,442 262,062 1,833,979 - 43,500 - 43,500 - 142,587 22,215 83,476 - 27,168 - 27,168 88,666 89,196 16,600 16,600 190,000 189,968 1,649,047 1,649,015 - 11,643 - 11,643 - 50,000 - 50,000 - 35,490 - 35,490 731 731 66,922 65,972 31,400 31,400 13,600 13,600 853,000 853,000 11,100 11,100 1,094 1,237,021 1,236,246 - 1,296,934 - 1,296,934 34,300 1,771,948 34,444 1,771,143 1-32 266,705 - 266,705 795,859 795,004 NEW ENGLAND DISTRICT TABLE 1-A (Continued) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Total Cost Section to In Text Project Funding FY97 FY98 FY99 FY00 Sep. 30, 2000 (Contributed Funds) 13. Great Salt Pond, Block Island, RI 14. Green Harbor, MA (Contributed Funds) 15. Harbor of Refuge, Block Island, RI 16. Hyannis Harbor, MA (Contributed Funds) (Contributed Funds-Other) 17. Kennebunk River, Nil (Contributed Funds) 18. Little Harbor, Nil New Work Contrib. Cost New Work Approp Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Minor Rehab. Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost Maint. Contrib. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost - 25,000 - 25,000 - 189,037 - 189,037 12,873 12,873 206,700 - 206,043 - 254,512 254,512 222,026 279,400 222,028 279,549 350,600 350,007 334,500 5,145,238 334,713 5,144,659 - 158,341 - 158,341 - 576,856 - 576,856 1,620 1,620 155,000 187,745 1,770,000 1,726,077 10,810 231,200 12,674 227,621 17,000 17,383 1,600,000 1,648,401 919,000 921,930 599,000 598,832 3,750 -440 64,900 2,217,763 64,962 2,217,040 - 129,757 - 129,757 732,500 161,218 127,500 330 367,900 3,025 137,157 137,657 12,963 13,302 87,300 241,128 -27,300 49,341 134,800 399,361 1,500 1,500 - 26,500 - 26,347 34,640 1,739 9,347 5,000 4,633 152,600 152,403 1-33 811,521 810,864 3,444,024 3,443,853 4,217,761 4,212,365 1,191,128 808,313 100,200 51,410 502,700 411,733 261,417 261,417 1,469,157 1,468,633 88,917 88,917 133,227 133,227 579,236 578,596 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 2000 TABLE 1-A (Continued) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Total Cost Section to In Text Project Funding FY97 FY98 FY99 FY00 Sep. 30, 2000 19. Lynn Harbor, MA 20. New Bedford and Fairhaven Harbors, MA (Contributed Funds) 21. Plymouth Harbor, MA (Contributed Funds) 22. Portland Harbor, ME (Contributed Funds) 23. Portsmouth Harbor and Piscataqua River, ME and NH (Contributed Funds) 24. Providence River and Harbor, RI 25. Salem Harbor, MA New Work. Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Major Rehab. Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost Maint. Contrib. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost 755,576 - 755,576 10,000 10,000 16,987 16,267 5,530 5,429 176,556 242,054 -30,000 51,395 18,720 18,7,20 28,500 27,911 72,000 65,189 2,751 1,709 1,709 16,500 16,500 2,376,500 2,381,751 204,100 204,099 477,234 477,233 - 1,857,618 - 1,857,618 5,300 792,915 5,743 792,399 65,300 65,688 20,385 20,385 2,127,218 2,127,218 1,594,139 1,593,527 894,475 894,475 541,611 541,611 400 400 9,588,710 9,588,710 51,800 11,000,039 52,879 10,999,505 -5,647 208 54,353 54,353 18,360,800 18,360,800 25,283 25,575 87,100 87,100 31,600 31,600 52,700 2,480,298 52,183 2,479,781 - 4,437,665 - 4,437,665 910,518 888,071 605,500 606,319 1,321,900 1,334,217 - 25,417,022 - 25,417,022 1,573,500 9,556,422 1,580,494 9,553,650 - 1,693,202 - 1,693,202 1-34 NEW ENGLAND DISTRICT TABLE 1-A (Continued) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Total Cost Section to In Text Project Funding FY97 FY98 FY99 FY00 Sep. 30, 2000 26. Saugus River, MA (Contributed Funds) 27. Seekonk River, Providence, RI* 28. Sesuit Harbor, MA (Contributed Funds) 29. Union River, ME 30. Wells Harbor, ME (Contributed Funds) (Contributed Funds-Other) 31. Point Beach, Milford, CT (Contributed Funds) 32. Woodmont Beach, Milford, CT (Contributed Funds) 34. Allendale Dam, North Providence, RI 35. Aroostook River, Fort Fairfield, ME Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New York Contrib. Cost New York Contrib. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost 20,980 19,795 103,000 15,801 650,000 45,161 - 62,745 62,741 135,255 135,255 - 73,974 73,707 25,000 31,038 50,000 9,420 87,800 83,067 82,736 99,700 105,038 80,000 79,875 9,901 144,800 143,950 - 1,300 1,300 3,600 4,069 20,000 23,148 20,000 47,716 195,000 36,784 - 300,084 - 186,569 98,300 98,900 700 700 79,500 79,179 2,000 - 123,000 100,162 406,000 -150,000 466,000 489,250 26,100 25,730 645,000 649,331 - 110,000 - 11,677 1 119,056 63,400 63,625 81,300 75,506 400,100 398,205 8,000 4,378 678,000 707,798 63,000 462,696 3,394,000 3,179,617 1-35 871,427 870,477 1,377,000 1,369,028 110,000 11,677 900,000 249,861 226,306 226,306 1,264,906 1,264,671 124,588 124,588 146,855 146,855 449,991 444,181 360,973 360,973 2,518,442 2,516,092 212,000 212,000 5,000 5,000 410,103 404,204 100,000 100,000 2,049,946 2,044,042 1,092,843 * 1,086,539 s 118,500 109,468 4,160,084 3,855,436 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 2000 TABLE 1-A (Continued) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Total Cost Section to In Text Project Funding FY97 FY98 FY99 FY00 Sep. 30, 2000 (Contributed Funds) 36A. West Hill Dam, MA 37. Charles River (Natural Valley Storage Areas), MA Ball Mountain Lake, VT Barre Falls Dam, MA Birch Hill Dam, MA (Contributed Funds) Colebrook River Lake, CT Conant Brook Dam, MA Knightville Dam, MA Littleville Lake, MA New Work Contrib. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost - 350,000 - 6,269 528,000 573,000 528,434 562,653 1,000,000 1,008,370 694,000 769,754 1,044,000 776,023 2,306,902 6 2,306,902 6 981,000 10,685,698 979,224 10,676,868 8,606,000 - 8,606,000 138,000 141,839 154,000 155,700 209,000 205,959 251,000 255,250 2,926,343 2,925,784 - 11,107,842 7 - 11,107,842 7 780,000 651,000 692,811 775,410 694,000 666,565 867,000 14,310,723 903,174 14,309,039 - 1,967,819 - 1,967,819 534,000 363,000 377,657 485,082 588,000 428,000 534,619 463,246 38A. 38B. 38C. 38D. 38E. 38F. 38G. 410,000 443,252 824,000 852,015 831,000 842,431 506,000 494,453 9,714,060 9,701,409 - 4,815,679 * - 4,815,679 s 674,000 10,917,050 659,078 10,892,943 - 32,000 9 - 32,000 9 14,263,971 - 14,263,971 420,000 413,939 7,299,527 7,292,227 2,950,530 - 2,950,530 138,000 191,461 134,000 136,565 371,000 509,000 374,009 498,589 137,000 133,134 515,000 533,998 192,000 194,023 2,856,697 2,855,344 - 3,415,640 10 - 3,415,640 o 718,000 11,612,446 537,847 11,430,532 - 7,013,412 - 7,013,412 1-36 381,000 393,000 380,737 387,628 NEW ENGLAND DISTRICT TABLE 1-A (Continued) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Total Cost Section to In Text Project Funding FY97 FY98 FY99 FY00 Sep. 30, 2000 3811. North Hartland Lake, VT 381. North Springfield Lake, VT 38J. Otter Brook Lake, NH 38K. Surry Mountain Lake, NH 38L. Townshend Lake, VT 38M. Tully Lake, MA (Contributed Funds) 38N. Union Village Dam, VT 39. Faulkner Island, CT 40. Galilee Salt Marsh, RI (Contributed Funds) 373,000 332,181 513,000 516,594 Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost 393,000 439,018 686,200 698,087 583,008 573,045 547,000 543,730 653,200 651,630 610,000 653,801 374,000 387,723 342,000 388,600 342,801 381,376 1,500,000 151,088 705,000 842,390 7,975 415,235 247,445 5,000 17,032 5,275 463,000 468,780 565,000 578,559 750,000 768,897 500,000 503,533 444,000 445,607 685,000 685,7181 400,000 407,233 576,000 583,342 18,000 105,050 10,029 3,000 398,000 395,871 8,213,427 8,209,302 7,312,225 " - 7,312,225 " 509,000 10,296,243 513,299 10,294,054 6,831,526 12 6,831,526 12 623,000 14,938,157 626,182 14,934,643 - 4,360,448 13 - 4,360,448 '3 478,000 10,149,297 480,159 10,147,922 - 2,833,610 ' - 2,833,610 14 500,000 10,894,691 505,234 10,894,034 - 8,540,545 '" - 8,540,545 "1 1,077,000 13,588,418 989,028 13,493,277 - 1,666,752 16 - 1,666,752 16 427,000 9,670,725 412,733 9,655,350 - 40,000 9 40,000 9 - 4,095,160 ' - 4,095,160 17 515,000 9,295,993 516,206 9,293,871 366,697 -4,021 -1,483 -5,007 1,483 1,518,000 870,280 1,274,979 1,274,979 424,993 424,993 1-37 733,000 743,363 - 449,000 449,211 - 562,000 558,441 624,000 899,401 - 413,000 409,903 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 2000 TABLE 1-A (Continued) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Total Cost Section to In Text Proiect Funding FY97 FY98 FY99 FY00 Sep. 30, 2000 41A. 41B. 41C. 41D. 41E. 41F. 42A. 42B. 42C. (Contributed Funds - Other) Black Rock Lake, CT Hancock Brook Lake, CT Hop Brook Lake, CT Naugatuck River, Torrington, CT (Contributed Funds) Northfield Brook Lake, CT Thomaston Dam, CT Blackwater Dam, NH Edward MacDowell Lake, NH Franklin Falls Dam, NH 19,499 716,122 29,540 16,854 -3,119 - 8,182,300 - 8,182,300 New Work Contrib. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost .568,000 580,463 201,000 224,825 867,000 885,810 23,000 52,511 446,000 6,530,581 453,619 6,529,295 - 4,178,911 - 4,178,911 232,000 3,162,934 234,876 3,162,447 - 6,151,562 ' - 6,151,562 'g 827,000 16,423,825 831,829 16,417,799 52,521 112,521 21,653 81,412 42,00 34,70 290,000 262,438 563,000 571,955 367,000 388,817 375,000 341,020 473,704 491,588 334,000 346,340 472,000 423,367 369,000 370,261 424,000 442,317 - 853,000 880,278 416,000 416,610 846,000 893,171 445,000 447,972 550,000 569,142 - 887,000 898,613 309,00 328,89 )0 42,000 )0 34,700 - 2,850,512 '9 - 2,850,512 19 )0 5,944,708 )8 5,943,932 - 14,282,112 - 14,282,112 1,028,000 12,270,342 1,030,589 12,269,320 - 1,319,746 20 - 1,319,746 20 532,000 532,762 518,000 518,869 579,000 13,704,086 581,465 13,704,024 1-38 836,381 836,381 383,000 316,000 385,956 299,410 170,000 205,000 173,965 179,395 796,000 884,000 817,097 864,285 - 37,000 - 7,248 7,522,094 7,522,049 2,014,253 21 2,014,253 21 8,637,569 8,637,538 7,950,487 22 7,950,487 22 NEW ENGLAND DISTRICT TABLE 1-A (Continued) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Total Cost Section to In Text Project Fundine FY97 FY98 FY99 FY00 Sep. 30, 2000 42D. 42E. Hopkinton-Everett Lakes, NH North Nashua River, Lancaster, MA (Contributed Funds) 43. New Bedford, Fairhaven, and Acushnet, MA (Contributed Funds) 44. Quonset Point, Davisville, RI (Contributed Funds) 45. Roughans Point, Revere, MA (Contributed Funds) 46. Sagamore Marsh, Cape Cod Canal, MA (Contributed Funds) 47. Saint John River Basin, ME 48. Stamford, CT (Contributed Funds) (Contributed Funds - Other) 49A. Buffumville Lake, MA New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost New Work Approp. Cost - 21,452,440 23 - 21,452,440 23 1,567,000 1,407,022 1,623,838 1,429,473 26,129 13,667 74,000 73,836 948,000 906,863 5,000 15,333 1,364,000 19,959,592 1,407,794 19,957,136 143,000 141,428 248,129 244,263 - 112,000 112,000 - 69,204 69,204 -- 11,510,088 -- 11,510,088 665,000 684,548 525,000 136,396 380,000 14,400 2,171,000 168,378 1,400,000 175,000 142,362 2,874 1,281,000 1,323,441 183,800 186,510 1,889,590 702,000 804,377 1,766,000 2,623,273 777,689 50,000 57,474 857 382,000 471,079 329,000 325,229 22,186 140,546 2,492,000 3,889,327 1,600,000 1,325,089 30,000 55,258 280,000 282,978 -111,071 -82,898 85,314 54,153 398,580 1,220,000 1,089,129 380,500 144,600 7,799,621 7,798,103 6,513,763 24 6,513,763 24 2,288,929 2,286,031 1,082,000 1,044,616 8,208,779 8,206,120 3,000,000 2,501,359 1,822,500 1,688,887 380,500 144,600 - 517,000 563 447,943 - 9,911,300 - 9,900,640 270,000 278,425 340,000 364,678 8,043,191 8,040,297 3,367,970 25 3,367,453 25 210,000 209,969 2,998,603 26 2,998,603 26 1-39 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 2000 TABLE 1-A (Continued) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Total Cost Section to In Text Proiect Funding FY97 FY98 FY99 FY00 Sep. 30, 2000 East Brimfield Lake, MA 49B. 49C. Hodges Village Dam, MA 49D. Mansfield Hollow Lake, CT 49E. West Thompson Lake, CT 49F. Westville Lake, MA 50. Town Brook, Quincy and Braintree, MA (Contributed Funds) (Contributed Funds - Other) Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Major Rehab. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost NewWork Contrib. Cost 358,000 408,000 366,233 410,116 - - 320,000 322,000 316,086 323,170 454,000 456,138 2,000,000 342,810 364,000 361,427 7,419,000 8,855,338 480,000 482,284 327,000 329,914 385,000 391,486 8,051,000 8,222,147 497,000 8,363,016 491,053 8,354,813 7,057,043 27 - 7,057,043 27 421,000 7,267,439 421,231 7,265,395 - 4,461,268 28 - 4,461,268 28 457,000 452,400 966,000 990,409 11,565,947 11,559,128 18,436,000 18,410,703 - 6,447,164 29 - 6,447,164 29 341,000 318,000 377,318 337,823 466,000 451,000 440,891 477,714 357,000 317,706 3,210,000 2,150,058 373,000 409,175 657,000 1,320,304 470,804 268,538 1,175,000 1,000,000 - 480 361,000 368,152 795,000 800,983 434,500 437,802 2,829,000 3,105,231 615,000 771,607 -615,000 3,173,111 521,000 8,662,599 520,460 8,660,539 - 7,001,220 30 - 7,001,220 30 518,000 10,087,997 521,555 10,087,816 - 5,684,683 3' - 5,684,683 31 432,000 432,485 1,286,000 1,368,752 8,338,059 8,335,752 32,851,740 32,745,643 670,000 4,020,000 426,902 3,624,623 3,674,889 8,969,889 2,485,128 6,619,267 Excludes $ 6,138,157 from Public Works Funds and $4,849,740 from Emergency Relief Funds. 2 Includes $389,929 Code 711 funds and $511,089 Code 713 funds. 3 Excludes $935,303 Emergency Relief Funds and $1,030,806 Public Works Funds. 4Excludes $17,767 Contributed Funds. s Excludes $118,215 expended for work beyond scope of project. 6 Includes $18,310 Code 711 funds. 1-40 - --- NEW ENGLAND DISTRICT TABLE 1-A (Continued) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Total Cost Section to In Text Project Funding FY97 FY98 FY99 FY00 Sep. 30, 2000 7 Includes $504,062 Code 711 funds and $67,066 for fish passage facility. S Includes $618,469 Code 711 funds and $32,000 Code 713 Funds. 9 Recreational cost sharing. "Ionc ludes $199,303 Code 711 funds. " Includes $229,436 Code 711 funds. 2 Includes $59,536 Code 711 funds. " Includes $364,688 Code 711 funds. " Includes $470,077 Code 711 funds. 15 Includes $245,168 Code 711 funds and $1,117,494 for fish passage facility. '6 Includes $3,695 Code 711 funds and $115,138 Code 713 funds. ' Includes $88,931 Code 711 funds. 18 Includes $143,538 Code 711 funds. 19 Includes $20,000 Code 711 funds. 20 Includes $2,881 Code 711 funds. 21 Includes $6,432 Code 711 funds. 22 Includes $4,671 Code 711 funds. 23 Includes $179,727 Code 711 funds. 2J Excludes $146,020 expended to date for land condemnation. 25 Excludes $199,410 expended to date for land condemnations. 26 Includes $71,943 Code 711 funds. 27 Includes $207,700 Code 711 funds. 28 Includes $6,255 Code 711 funds and $40,353 Code 713 funds. 29 Includes $68,717 Code 711 funds. 30 Includes $315,420 Code 711 funds. 1 Includes $67,667 Code 711 funds. 1-41 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 2000 TABLE 1-B AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Work Authorized Documents July 14, 1960 as amended July 14, 1960 as amended March 2, 1825 June 14, 1880 August 5, 1886 September 19,1890 July 25, 1892 July 13, 1892 June 3, 1896 March 3, 1899 June 13, 1902 July 25, 1912 August 8, 1917 August 30, 1935 Do. August 26, 1937 October 17, 1940 September 7, 1940 March 2, 1945 July 24, 1946 July 3, 1958 October 23, 1962 January 1, 1990 ANDREWS RIVER, MA (See Section 1 of Text.) Channel six feet deep, 75 feet wide from deep water in Nantucket Sound to the public marina; two jetties; and three-acre maneuvering and anchorage basin. AUNT LYDIA'S COVE, CHATHAM, MA (See Section 2 of Text.) Entrance channel 100 feet wide by 900 feet long and 9.5 acre anchorage area, both 8 feet deep. BOSTON HARBOR, MA (See Section 3 of Text.) Preservation of islands and seawalls. Weir River (Nantucket Beach Channel) 9.5 ft. deep. 100 ft, wide to Steamboat Wharf at Nantasket. Fort Point Channel.' Weir River (Nantucket Beach Channel) 9.5 ft. deep. 150 ft. wide to Steamboat Wharf at Nantasket. Weir River (Nantucket Beach Channel) from mouth of Weir River to Steamboat Wharf at Nantasket Beach 12 ft. deep, 150 ft. wide. Channel 15 feet deep from Long Island to Nixes Mate Shoal (Nixes Mate to Nubble Channel). Channel 27 feet from Nantasket Roads to President Roads. Dredge Chelsea River Channel to 18 feet. For 30-foot channel from sea to President Roads through Broad Sound by less direct route than 35 and 40-foot channels. For 35-foot channel from sea to Boston Naval Shipyard. Chelsea and Charles River Bridges. Elimination from project of removal of Finns Ledge at outer entrance. Dredge Chelsea River channel 25 ft. Depth of 40 feet (45 feet in rock) in Broad Sound Channel. Present project dimensions of channel from President Roads to Commonwealth pier No. 1, East Boston and anchorage area north side of President Roads. Present project dimensions of that part of approach channel to U.S. Navy dry-dock No.3 at South Boston between Main Ship Channel and U.S. harbor line. Chelsea River, channel 30 feet deep. Reserved channel 30 feet deep. Abandons seaplane channel authorized in 1940 River and Harbor Act (H.Doc.262,76th Cong., 1st sess.) Extension of 40-foot channel. Extension of President Roads anchorage. Reserved channel 35 feet deep, 430 feet wide, extending one Chelsea River Channel and Maneuvering Basin 35 feet deep. P.L. 86-645 Section 107. Authorized by the Chief of Engineers May 2, 1966. P.L. 86-645, Section 107. Authorized by the Chief of Engineers August 31, 1994. Annual Report, 1881, p. 518 H. Ex. Doc. 206 ,4 8th Cong., 2nd sess., Annual Report, 1885, p. 543. Annual Report, 1890, p. 503 Annual Report, 1893, p. 769 Annual Report, 1887, p.517 Annual Report, 1893, p. 766 H. Ex. Doc. No. 16 2,53 rd Cong., 3rd sess., Annual Report, 1895, p. 648 H. Doc. 133, 55 'h Cong., 2nd sess. Annual Report, 1898, p. 886. H. Doc. 119, 56 th Cong., 2" sess. Annual Report, 1901, p. 1096 Authorized by Chief of Engineers. March 11, 1913. H. Doc. 272, 62"d Cong., 2"dsess.2 H. Doc. 931, 63rd Cong., 2"d sess.2 H. Doc. 244, 72 nd Cong., I"t sess.2 Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 29, 74th Cong., 1st sess. 2 Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 24, 75 th Cong., 1st sess. 2 H. Doc. 225, 76th Cong., I"t sess. 2 Public Law 420,78 th Cong. H. Doc. 733, 79 th Cong., 2"d sess. H. Doc. 244, 80th Cong., 1" s sess. 2 iHD.o c. 349, 84 th Cong., 2"d sess.2 H. Doc. 350, 87 th Cong., 2"d sess. 2 Deauthorizes 1945 Act. Federal Register Volume 55, No. 194, October 5, 1990. 1-42 NEW ENGLAND DISTRICT TABLE 1-B (Continued) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Work Authorized Documents November 28, 1990 October 31, 1992 October 12, 1996 October 12, 1996 July 4, 1836 March 3, 1899 March 2, 1907 March 2, 1919 July 3, 1930 August 26, 1937 March 2, 1945 July 24, 1946 July 3, 1958 November 2, 1979 November 17, 1986 October 12, 1996 August 17, 1999 January 21, 1927 (Section 2) Deepen Mystic River and Reserved Channels to 40 feet; Chelsea River Channel to 38 feet; widen and deepen Inner Confluence Area to 40 feet. Deauthorizes portion of the 35-foot channel in Boston Inner Harbor lying easterly of the Charlestown waterfront authorized in 1902 River and Harbor Act. Deauthorizes portion of the 35-foot Chelsea River Channel authorized in the 1962 Act. Deauthorizes portion of the 40-foot Reserved Channel authorized in the 1990 Act. BRIDGEPORT HARBOR, CT (See Section 4 of Text.) Fayerweather Island seawall. Shore protection of Fayerweather Island. West breakwater and present project dimensions of east breakwater. Present project depths of 18-and 12-foot anchorage basins. 25-foot entrance channel, 25-foot anchorage and an 18-foot channel through Johnsons River, present project dimensions of channels through Poquonock River, Yellow Mill Pond, Black Rock Harbor and Cedar Creek. 25-foot channel through main harbor, and present Project location and extent of 18- and 12-foot anchorage basins. 30-foot channel; elimination of 12-foot anchorage. 30-foot turning basin and 15- and 9-foot channels in Johnsons River Present depth and extend of main channel, and turning Basin south and southeast of Cilco Terminal; Black Rock Harbor breakwater; Burr and Cedar Creek anchorage. Upper Johnsons River anchorage; lower Johnsons River anchorage. Deauthorizes the removal of rock in Yellow Mill Pond authorized in the 1930 Act. Deauthorizes construction of two rubble-mound breakwaters at the entrance to Black Rock Harbor and dredging a 28-acre anchorage 6 feet deep in Burr and Cedar Creeks at the head of Black Rock Harbor authorized In the 1958 Act. Deauthorizes two-acre anchorage area at the head of the Johnsons River authorized in the 1958 Act, and portion ' of the Johnsons River navigation channel authorized in the 1946 Act. Deauthorizes a 2.4-acre anchorage area, 9 feet deep, and an adjacent 0.6-acre anchorage area, 6 feet deep, located on the west side of the Johnsons River authorized in the 1958 Act. CAPE COD CANAL, MA (See Section 5 of Text.) Purchase canal from Boston, Cape Cod & New York Canal Co., in accordance with contract dated July 29, 1921, executed by that company. Section 101, Public Law 101-640. Section 116(2), P.L. 102-580 Section 364(12), P.L. 104-303 Section 364(16), P.L. 104-303 Annual Report, 1899, page 1173 H. Docs. 275 and 521, 59th Cong., 2nd sess. H. Doc. 898, 63 rd Cong., 2"d sess. H. Doc. 281,71st Cong., 2"d sess. H. Doc. 232, 75th Cong., 1St sess. H. Doc. 819, 76 th Cong., 3 rd sess. H. Doc. 680, 79 th Cong., 2" sess. ; H. Doc. 136, 85 th Cong. H. Doc. 157, 96 th Cong., l' sess. Sec, 1002, P. L. 99-662 Section 364 (2) (A) & (B), P.L. 104-303 Section 365 (a) (1), P.L. 106-53 H. Doc. 139, 67 th Cong., 2nd sess. 1-43 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 2000 TABLE 1-B (Continued) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Work Authorized Documents Included in Public Works Administration program, September 6, 1933 June 26, 1934 (Permanent Appropriations Repeal Act) Included in Public Works Administration program, April 29, 1935 Included in Emergency Relief Program, May 28, 1935. August 30, 1935 March 2, 1945 July 3, 1958 March 12, 1945 August 2, 1882 March 2, 1945 August 17, 1999 September 19, 1890 October 12, 1996 March 2, 1945 July 14, 1960 as amended October 12, 1996 August 26, 1937 Construct three bridges and widen canal to 250 feet. Operation and care of works of improvement provided for the funds from War Department appropriations for rivers and harbors. Construct a mooring basin. Dredging and bank protection. Existing project for main canal adopted. Channel and turning basin 15-feet deep in Onset Bay. Extend East Boat Basin for an area of about 4.3 acres to a depth of eight feet. CHATHAM (STAGE) HARBOR, MA (See Section 6 of Text.) Entrance Channel 10 feet deep, 150 feet wide from Chatham Roads into upper harbor. CLINTON HARBOR, CT (See Section 7 of Text.) Maintenance of a stone dike closing a breach of sandy peninsula which separates river from outer harbor. 8-foot channel and anchorage Deauthorizes the upstream portion of project authorized In the 1945 Act. COCHECO RIVER, NH (See Section 8 of Text.) Provides for a 3 mile long tidewater channel 7 feet deep and 60 to 70 feet wide. Deauthorizes portion of 1890 Act and directs maintenance dredging of the remaining project. COHASSET RIVER, MA (See Section 9 of Text.) Anchorage in inner harbor 7 feet deep, and channel 90 feet wide, 8 feet deep from anchorage to outer harbor. Construction of anchorage areas 6 feet deep. Deauthorizes portions of the 1945 Act and Section 107 project. CUTTYHUNK HARBOR, MA (See Section 10 of Text.) Channel 10 feet deep and 75 feet wide; anchorage 10 feet deep, 900 feet long, 800 feet wide; and maintenance of existing jetties and stone dikes. H. Doc. 795, 71". Cong., 3rd sess. Do. Do. Do. Rivers and Harbor Committee Doc. 15, 74th Cong., 1Sts ess. H. Doc. 431, 77th Cong., 1" sess. H. Doc. 168, 85'h Cong., 1si sess. H. Doc. 456, 77th Cong., 1" S sess. Annual Report 1942. S. Ex. Doc. 84, 47th Cong., 1'I sess. H. Doc. 240, 7 6 'h Cong., I" sess. Section 365 (a) (2), P.L. 106-53 H. Doc. 74, 51" Cong. 1" sess. Section 365(18), P.L. 104-303 H. Doc. 425, 76 th Cong. 1st sess. Annual Report 1904, p. 60. Section 107, P.L. 86-645 Authorized by Chief of Engineers, October 12, 1965. Section 364(13), P.L. 104-303 H. Doc. 81, 75th Cong., 1" S sess. 1-44 NEW ENGLAND DISTRICT TABLE 1-B (Continued) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Work Authorized Documents August 11, 1888 August I1, 1888 August 18, 1894 June 13, 1902 June 25, 1910 August 30,1935 March 2, 1945 October 23, 1962 June 3, 1896 June 13, 1902 March 2, 1945 November 17, 1986 July 14, 1960 as amended August 17, 1999 FIVEMILE RIVER HARBOR, CT (See Section 11 of Text.) Entrance channel 8 feet deep, 100 feet wide from the mouth of the Fivemile River extending 6,000 feet upstream. (Upper 700 feet of entrance channel, which was never constructed, was deauthorized in October 1978. GLOUCESTER HARBOR AND ANNISQUAM RIVER, MA (See Section 12 of Text.) Remove ledges and boulders, and dredge in Gloucester Harbor Construct breakwater at entrance to Gloucester Harbor from Eastern Point to Round Rock shoal. Termination of Cat Ledge of breakwater authorized by Act of August 18, 1894. Remove 8 ledges in Gloucester Harbor. Dredge in Annisquam River and removal of a ledge in Gloucester Harbor near entrance to Annisquam River. Dredge 8 foot anchorage area in Lobster Cove, Annisquam River. Entrance channel into Inner Harbor 20 feet deep, and turning basin. Access channel 20 feet deep along waterfront to northwest of Gloucester Fish pier. Access channel 20 feet deep along waterfront southeast of Gloucester Fish pier. Access channel 16 feet deep into Smith Cove. An access channel 18 feet deep along waterfront west of Harbor Cove and into Harbor Cove. A 5-acre anchorage 15 feet deep east of entrance to HIarbor Cove. A 10-acre anchorage 16 feet deep opposite entrance to Smith Cove. Remove isolated rock shoal adjacent to entrance channel south of Harbor Cove to a depth of 24 feet. GREAT SALT POND, BLOCK ISLAND, RI (See Section 13 of Text.) Channel and jetties. Extending south jetty and dredging. Channel and basin in inner harbor. Deauthorizes the 1,200-foot long north jetty at the entrance to Great Salt Pond, authorized in the 1896 Act, and the 12-foot Access channel and basin in the inner harbor authorized in the 1945 Act. GREEN HARBOR, MA (See Section 14 of Text.) Channel six feet deep, 100 feet wide from deep water to head of navigation; anchorage near town pier; sealing, rebuilding in part and extension of existing west jetty. Deauthorizes portion of the 6-foot channel and turning basin, and redesignates portion of 6-foot channel as an anchorage area. H. Doc. 1419, 63 rd Cong., 3rd sess. Annual Report 1902. p. 89 H. Ex. Doc. 56, 48 th Cong., 2 nd sess. And Annual Report 1885, p. 534. Annual Report 1902, p. 89 H. Doc. 1112, 60 th Cong., 2 nd sess. Rivers and Harbor Committee Doc. 39, 72" Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 329, 77th Cong., Ist sess. H. Doc. 431, 87th Cong., 2 nd sess. H. Doc. 57, 54 th Cong., Ist sess. Specified in Act. Annual Report for 1900, p. 1276. H. Doc. 330, 77 th Cong., Ist sess. Sec. 1002, P.L. 99-662. Section 107, P.L. 86-645 Authorized by the Chief of Engineers December 15, 1965. Section 365 (a)(11) & (d), P.L. 106-53. 1-45 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 2000 TABLE 1-B (Continued) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Work Authorized Documents July 11, 1870 August 2, 1882 August 5, 1886 June 3, 1896 July 25, 1912 November 17, 1986 March 2, 1827 July 11, 1871 August 5, 1886 March 2, 1945 July 14, 1960 as amended March 2, 1829 August 14, 1876 September 19, 1890 October 23, 1962 October 12, 1996 August 2, 1882 August 11, 1888 July 13, 1892 June 13, 1902 June 25, 1910 July 3, 1930 August 30, 1935 September 3, 1954 November 17, 1986 HARBOR OF REFUGE, BLOCK ISLAND, RI (See Section 15 of Text.) Main breakwater. Repairs to basin walls and cliff protection east of harbor. Breakwater enclosing inner harbor. Raising crest of main breakwater and making it sandtight. Rebuilding basin walls and present project dimensions of dredged area. Deauthorizes two 15-foot anchorages in the outer harbor authorized by the River and Harbor Act of 1912. HYANNIS HARBOR, MA (See Section 16 of Text.) Breakwater. Present dimensions of breakwater. Dredging behind breakwater. Channel, anchorage and jetty. Deepen channel and basin to 13 feet, realign the entrance channel through the outer harbor to straighten the approach, and widen the channel to 240 feet from the outer harbor through most of Lewis Bay and to 220 feet from there to the entrance of the Inner Harbor. KENNEBUNK RIVER, MAINE (See Section 17 of Text.) Repair of pier on east side of channel entrance Deepening at Wading Place and Mitchells Point. Jetty at Wading Place. 8-foot channel. 6-foot channel. 6-foot anchorage, west side of channel. 6-foot anchorage, east side of channel. Extension of west jetty, and construction of sand fence. Deauthorizes portion of the 6-foot channel authorized in the 1962 Act. LYNN HARBOR, MA (See Section 19 of Text.) Lynn Channel 200 feet wide and 10 feet deep. Extends the inner channel 400 feet and provides for an anchorage basin 500 feet by 300 feet, also to 10 feet deep. Western Channel leading to the Saugus River 8 feet deep and 150 feet wide. Deepen Lynn Channel and anchorage basin to 15 feet deep. Widen Lynn Channel to 300 feet, straighten the curve and enlarge the anchorage basin to 500 feet square. Deepen Lynn Channel to 22 feet and widen turning basin to 550 feet. Deepen Lynn Channel to 25 feet. Provides for the easterly 300 feet of the Municipal Channel. Deauthorizes the easterly 300 feet of the Municipal Channel and Deepening of the Lynn Channel from 22 to 25 feet. Annual report 1868, p. 785 and S. Misc. Doc. 81, 4 0th Cong., 2 nd sess. S. Ex. Doc.26, 47th Cong., Ist sess. S. Doc. 27, 48 th Cong., 2"d sess. and Annual Report 1885, p. 610 H. Doc. 83, 54th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 828, 60th Cong., 1"ss ess. Section 1002, P.L. 99-662. S. Doc. 32, 18 th Cong., 2"d sess. H. Doc. 63, 41st Cong., 2" sess. H. Ex. Doc. 96, 4 8th Cong., 2nd sess. H. Doc. 98, 77th Cong., 1" sess. P.L. 86-645, Section 107. Authorized by the Chief of Engineers August 19, 1997. Annual Report 1875, p. 115. H. Ex. Doc. 136, 51st Cong., 1"s sess., Annual Report 1890, p. 471. H. Doc. 459, 87th Cong., 2"d sess. Section 364 (10), P. L. 104 -303 H. Doc. 948, 60 'h Cong., 1" sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 7, 7 1 " Cong., 1" sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 7, 71" Cong., 1" sess. H. Doc. 568, 81st" Cong., 2"d sess. Section 1002, P. L. 99-662. 1-46 NEW ENGLAND DISTRICT TABLE 1-B (Continued) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Work Authorized Documents March 2, 1907 March 3, 1909 July 25, 1912 July 3, 1930 August 30, 1935 August 26, 1937 November 17, 1986 August 17, 1999 March 3, 1899 March 4, 1913 September 22, 1922 October 23, 1962 July 9, 1965 August 26, 1937 October 18, 1965 March 3, 1873 September 19, 1890 March 3, 1905 July 3, 1930 March 2, 1945 July 3, 1958 July 9, 1995 November 17, 1986 NEW BEDFORD AND FAIRHAVEN HARBOR, MA (See Section 20 of Text.) The 25-foot anchorage area north of Palmer Island Extension of the 25-foot channel along New Bedford wharf front. The 18-foot channel in Acushnet River to Belleville (project feature was abandoned by Congress in 1955). The 30-foot channel, anchorage, and maneuvering area (channel limited to width of 350 feet). Present project dimensions of the anchorage area north of Palmer Island and maintenance of the 25-foot anchorage. Elimination from the project of the prior authorization for enlarging and deepening the maneuvering area 30-feet deep east of the harbor channel. The 15-foot and 10-foot channels along Fairhaven wharf. Deauthorizes the 18-foot channel in Acushnet River to Bellville authorized in the 1912 Act. Deauthorizes portion of the 25-foot spur channel leading to the west of Fish Island authorized in the 1909 Act, and portion of the 30-foot maneuvering area authorized in the 1930 Act. PLYMOUTH HARBOR, MA (See Section 21 of Text.) Beach Protection. Dredging 18-foot channel. Dredging 15-foot extension, including turning basin. Rubblestone breakwater. Anchorages are eight feet deep inside breakwater. Elimination of authorized 18-foot anchorage from existing project. Recreational development. PROVIDENCE RIVER AND HARBOR, RI (See Section 24 of Text.) Channel 35 feet deep from deep water in Narragansett Bay to Fox Point. Deepen 35-foot channel to 40 feet, and provide a 30-foot channel from the upper end of the existing project to India Point at the mouth of the Seekonk River. (The India Point channel was deauthorized in November 1986.) SALEM HARBOR, MA (See Section 25 of Text.) Channel 8 feet deep and 300 feet wide at entrance to South River, and construction of a seawall and breakwater for the protection of Long Point. Extends channel 6 to 8 feet deep and 50 to 150 feet wide up South River. Channel 10 feet deep and 200 to 300 feet wide at entrance to South River. Main Ship Channel 25 feet deep and 300 feet wide, and removal of shoal near Abbot Rock Beacon. Main Ship Channel 30 feet deep. Main Ship Channel 32 feet deep and 300 to 400 feet wide. Deauthorizes uncompleted portions of the 1905 Act. Deauthorizes extending the 10-foot channel in the South River and a branch channel with an anchorage basin on the east side of Derby Warf as authorized in the 1945 Act. H. Doc. 271, 59 th Cong., 2 nd sess. Specified in act. H. Doc. 442, 62"d Cong., 2 nd sess. H. Doc. 348, 7 1S Cong., 2nd sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 16, 74 th Cong., I s' sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 25, 75th Cong., Is' sess. Section 1002, P. L. 99-662. Section 365 (a) (10), P. L. 99-662. Annual Report for 1899, p. 1089. H. Doc. 1194, 62"d Cong., 3rd sess H. Doc. 996, 66th Cong., 3 rd sess. H. Doc. 124, 87th Cong., 2 "d sess. H. Doc. 173, 75 th Cong., 1" sess. S. Doe. 93, 88th Cong., 2"nd sess. S. Ex. Doc. 25, 42 nd Cong., 3 rd sess. H. Ex. Doc. 28, 51St Cong., I t sess. H. Doc. 303, 58 th Cong., 2"d sess. H. Doe. 112, 70 th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doe. 701, 76 th Cong., 3 rd sess. H. Doc. 31, 85 th Cong., 1"Sse ss. Federal Register Vol. 61, No. 244 Section 1002, P. L. 99-662. 1-47 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 2000 TABLE 1-B (Continued) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Work Authorized Documents July 14, 1960 November 17, 1986 December 18, 1991 Intermodal Surface Transportation Infrastructure Act of 1991. October 12, 1996 July 14, 1960 as amended June 3, 1896 1835 June 10, 1872 July 14, 1960 July 14, 1960 July 14, 1960 August 17, 1999 October 23, 1962 SAUGUS RIVER, MA (See Section 26 of Text.) Entrance Channel 8 feet deep and 80 to 150 feet wide, and two anchorage areas 6 feet deep and totaling 4.3 acres SEEKONK RIVER, PROVIDENCE, RI (See Section 27 of Text.) Removal of abandoned India Point Railroad Bridge. Extends project authorization. Increases total project cost. SESUIT HARBOR, MA (See Section 28 of Text.) Channel 6 feet deep and 100 feet wide. UNION RIVER, ME (See Section 29 of Text.) Provides for the removal of ledge, boulders and mill waste to create a channel 3 to 4 feet deep from the mouth of the Union River to the wharves at Ellsworth; along with installing navigation beacons. Channel 6 feet deep, 100 to 1500 feet wide from the head of Union River Bay to the wharves at Ellsworth, and construction of a jetty and training wall at the mouth of Union River near Nortons Rocks. (Funds for construction of the jetty and the training wall were never appropriated and this work was subsequently omitted from the project.) WELLS HARBOR, ME (See Section 30 of Text.) Stone-filled timber crib pier (jetty) at the mouth of the Wells Inlet. Repairs to old government cribwork pier, about 750 feet long, at north side of harbor entrance. Construction of two stones jetties at inlet (south-940 feet long, north-640 feet long), 8-foot entrance channel, 6-foot inner channel, 6-foot by 7.4-acre anchorage. Extend north jetty 100 feet. Increase design elevations of both jetties. 680-foot long stone revetment for tip of Wells beach at municipal parking area. Add rough stone wave absorber to inner 100 feet of south jetty. Further extend north jetty by 1,225 feet. Extend south jetty by 1,300 feet. Dredge 10-foot by 3.1-acre inner harbor settling basin. Modified dredged features of existing project to deauthorize portions of the inner harbor channel, anchorage and settling basin, realign the inner access channel, redesignate portions of the inner channel and settling basin as part of the 6-foot anchorage, and relocated settling basin to outer harbor. POINT BEACH, MILFORD, CT (See Section 31 of Text.) Project involves raising the first floor of 58 shorefront and back shore residential structures above the estimated 100 year flood elevation. P. L. 86-645, Section 107. Authorized by the Chief of Engineers on May 22, 2000 Section 1166(c), P.L. 99-662. Section 1085, P.L. 102-240. Section 301 (a) (13), P.L. 104-303 Section 107, P.L. 86-645 Authorized by the Chief of Engineers February 6, 1980. Report of District Engineer dated June 30, 1867. H. Doc. 138, 51st Cong., 1st sess. River & Harbor Act of 1872 P.L. 86-645, Section 101. H. Doc. 202, 86th Cong., 2nd sess. Design Modification Authorized by the Chief of Engineers September 24, 1962. Design Modification Authorized by the Chief of Engineers September 20, 1965. P.L. 106-53, Section 365(a)(9) & (c). Section 103, P.L. 87-874. Authorized by the Chief of Engineers November 6, 1995. 1-48 NEW ENGLAND DISTRICT TABLE 1-B (Continued) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Work Authorized Documents September 3, 1954 October 23, 1962 October 31, 1992 October 12, 1996 June 30, 1948, as amended October 12, 1996 November 17, 1986 November 17, 1986 July 24, 1946, as amended October 31, 1992 November 17, 1986 November 17, 1986 WOODMONT BEACH, MILFORD, CT (See Section 32 of Text.) Widening to 100-foot width by direct placement of sand, 500 feet of shore west of Mervin Point; widening 3,500 feet of shore from Chapel Street; and construction of 5 impermeable groins. Placement of suitable sandfill along approximately 1,500 feet of beach and reconstruction of groins. Mitigation to replace rocky habitat for blue mussels. ALLENDALE DAM, NORTH PROVIDENCE, RI (See Section 34 of Text.) Reconstruct dam. Increases total project cost. AROOSTOOK RIVER, FORT FAIRFIELD, ME (See Section 35 of Text.) Construct 2,800 linear feet of earth dike and concrete floodwall along the side of the Aroostook River. FAULKNER ISLAND, CT (See Section 39 of Text.) Construct 2,000 linear feet of stone revetment running along the entire east side of the Island and wrapping around the north and south ends. GALILEE SALT MARSH, RI (See section 40 of Text.) Restoration of 34 acres of salt marsh by installing two culverts under Escape Road and excavating channels. NAUGATUCK RIVER, TORRINGTON, CT (See Section 41D of Text.) Place approximately 300 boulders in the Naugatuck River to provide enhanced in-stream cover and aquatic habitat diversity. NORTH NASHUA RIVER, LANCASTER, MA (See Section 42E of Text.) Construct 500 linear feet of stone slope protection along the streambank of the North Nashua River adjacent to Massachusetts Highway Route 70. QUONSET POINT, DAVISVILLE, RI (See Section 44 of Text.) Construction of two elevated water storage towers and extension, rehabilitation and relocation of 6,000 feet of sewer line. ROUGIIANS POINT, REVERE, MA (See Section 45 of Text.) Stabilize existing facilities along the shore with a 4,080-foot long armor stone revetment. Construct earth berm one-foot high and 200 feet long on existing median strip between Bennington Street and State Road. SAGAMORE MARSII, CAPE COD CANAL, MA (See Section 46 of Text.) Restoration of 50 acres of salt marsh by installing larger culverts beneath Scussett Beach and Cape Cod Canal Service Roads and excavating channels. H. Doc. 203, 83 rd Cong., I st sess. Section 103, P.L. 87-874. Authorized by the Chief of Engineers March 20, 1992. Section 358, P.L. 102-580. Section 347, P.L. 104-303. Section 205, P.L. 80-858. Authorized by the Chief of Engineers May 7, 1999. Section 527, P.L. 104-303 Section 1135, P.L. 99-662. Authorized by the Chief of Engineers January 13, 1995. Section 1135, P. L. 99-662, Authorized by the Chief of Engineers March 30, 2000. Section 14, P.L. 79-526. Authorized by the Chief of Engineers May 21, 1999 Section 362, P.L. 102-580. Section 401, P.L. 99-662. Section 1135, P.L. 99-662. Authorized by the Chief of Engineers September 5, 1996. 1-49 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 2000 TABLE 1-B (Continued) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Work Authorized Documents SAINT JOHN RIVER BASIN, ME (See Section 47 of Text.) November 17, 1986 Ten-year research and demonstration program of cropland Section 1108, P.L. 99-662. irrigation and soil conservation techniques for increasing potato yield and quality. TOWN BROOK, QUINCY AND BRAINTREE, MA (See Section 50 of Text.) November 17, 1986 Construct 12-foot diameter, 4,060-foot long, concrete lined H. Doc. 39, 99 h Cong., 1" sess. tunnel in bedrock approximately 140 to 180 feet below ground; channel improvements downstream of the tunnel outlet; and reconstruction of Old Quincy Reservoir Dam located at the headwaters of Town Brook. A portion has been abandoned pursuant to P.L. 624, December 31, 1970. 2 Contains latest published maps. See also Annual Report, 1911, p. 1178 (seawalls and Nixes Mate Channel) and Annual Report, 1903, p. 770 (Fort Point Channel.) 3Authorized in part by Public Works Administration, Sept. 6, 1933. Contains latest maps. 1-50 NEW ENGLAND DISTRICT TABLE 1-C OTHER AUTHORIZED NAVIGATION PROJECTS For Last Cost to September 30, 2000 Full Report Contributed See Annual Operation and Funds Expended Project Report for Construction Maintenance (Construction) Apponaug Cove, RI Bagaduce River, ME 13. Bar Harbor, ME Bass Harbor, ME 6 Bass Harbor Bar, ME Beals Harbor, ME Belfast Harbor, ME Bellamy River, NH 3.4 Beverly Harbor, MA Black Rock Harbor, CT Branford Harbor, CT Bristol Harbor, Bristol, RI 2 Bucks Harbor, Machiasport, ME 6 Bucksport Harbor, ME Bullocks Point Cover, RI Bunker Harbor, ME 6 Buttermilk Bay Channel, MA 6 Camden Harbor, ME Canapitsit Channel, MA { Cape Porpoise Harbor, ME Carvers Harbor, Vinalhaven, ME Cathance River, ME 3 Coasters Island Harbor, RI Cobscook Bay, ME 3.4 Connecticut River below Hartford, CT Corea Harbor, Gouldsboro, ME 6 Criehaven Harbor, ME Cross Rip Shoals Nantucket Sound, MA Damariscotta River, ME ; Deer Island Thoroughfare, ME 4 Dorchester Bay and Neponset River, MA Duck Island Harbor, CT Duxbury Harbor, MA Edgartown Harbor, MA Essex River, MA Exeter River, NH I Fall River Harbor, MA Falmouth Harbor, MA Frenchboro Harbor, ME Georges River, ME Greenwich Bay, RI Greenwich Harbor, CT Guilford Harbor, CT 1Hampton Harbor, NH Harraseeket River, ME 4 Hay (West Harbor), Fisher's Island, NY IHendrick's Harbor, ME Hingham Harbor, MA Hlousatonic River, CT Ipswich River, MA 1964 1912 1932 1965 1920 1959 1971 1897 1951 1988 1990 1987 1976 1907 1996 1969 1985 1960 1899 1977 1964 1884 1911 1866 1996 1984 1997 1954 1906 1916 1968 1953 1997 1978 1948 1913 1984 1978 1978 1978 1893 1969 1995 1996 1896 1931 1957 1954 1983 1969 156,874 28,000 406,591 188,859 4,076 184,880 61,561 34,643 246,048 9,537 316,288 277,420 18,421 170,902 95,372 163,855 102,400 9,113 175,037 190,438 21,000 5,500 4,173 1,550,185 24 797,954 40,776 24,200 5,000 40,000 94,584 482,166 421,297 65,614 21,759 62,454 6,164,757 9 123,763 657,345 25,788 2,000 198,758 137,222 200,000 30,963 8,401 28,204 28,316 859,691 5,618 57,469 39 2,187 38,172 20,382 143,077 304,657 28,427 1,672,093 1,925,607 32,092 22,133 410,630 32,906 235,138 196,489 12,279 361,364 39,327 13,161 17,844,952 100,469 517,617 54,328 905 5,792 407,424 412,764 2,430,540 27 62,980 151,781 8 3,032 2,180,867 338,049 24,616 312,414 3,719 225,972 1,935,267 2,280,607 30,069 38,462 23,025 176,720 2,609,428 68,534 104,583 7 100,000 123,757 69,323 20,000 130,410 35,000 26 10,000 35,000 100,000 25,500 193,761 222,010 1-51 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 2000 TABLE 1-C (Continued) OTHER AUTHORIZED NAVIGATION PROJECTS For Last Cost to September 30, 2000 Full Report Contributed See Annual Operation and Funds Expended Project Report for Construction Maintenance (Construction) Island End River, Chelsea, MA 6 1983 311,850 10,918 192,336 '~ Isle Au Haut Thoroughfare, ME 1980 137,653 195,886 Isle of Shoals Harbor, ME and NH 1977 80,691 651,644 Jonesport Harbor, ME 1992 7,489,073 47,328 832,119 Josias River, ME 5 1995 621,186 444,702 79,668 22 Kennebec River, ME 1998 1,599,940 4,524,043 Kingston Harbor (North Plymouth), MA 1895 8,940 Lagoon Pond, Martha's Vineyard, MA 6 1976 99,098 37,386 80,990 Lamprey River, NH 4 1913 19,980 67,123 Little Harbor, Woods Hole, MA 4 1906 18,000 19,673 Lubec Channel, ME 1956 380,322 33,289 Machias River, ME 1972 32,000 260,067 Malden River, MA 9 1922 104,853 45,097 62,000 Matinicus Harbor, ME 1962 14,000 " 8,989 Medomak River, ME 1953 17,000 92,359 Menemsha Creek, MA 1981 56,926 750,759 12,500 Merrimack River, MA 1940 369,891 739,100 Mianus River, CT 1985 132,435 726,012 46,500 Milford Harbor, CT 5 1989 90,506 1,412,502 11,380 12 Moosabec Bar, ME 1930 11,400 25,227 Mystic River, CT 1957 197,582 207,285 14,000 Mystic River, MA 1986 3,222,777 2,021,778 Nantucket (Harbor of Refuge), MA 1989 502,661 '" 759,000 Narragansett Town Beach, RI 21 - 27,398 Narraguagus River, ME 1969 821,144 176,279 New Harbor, ME s 1966 118,620 42,891 7,015 " New Haven Breakwater, CT 1950 1,242,246 40,273 New Haven Harbor, CT ' 1995 4,773,246 17,136,932 New London Harbor, CT 1986 638,774 1,995,100 Newburyport Harbor, MA 1999 565,224 30 6,873,160 80,357 Newport Harbor, RI 1953 733,524 172,378 Niantic Bay and Harbor, CT 6 1972 66,464 154,703 65,139 Northeast Harbor, ME 1954 138,942 57,247 Norwalk Harbor, CT 1983 531,129 3,949,627 34,500 Owl's Head Harbor, ME 3, 1968 124,158 34,124 4,383 Patchogue River, CT 1998 355,445 1,368,989 Pawcatuck River, Little Narragansett Bay and Watch Hill Cove, RI and CT 1997 318,787 1,512,960 20,000 Pawtuxet Cove, RI 1975 295,356 239,046 295,356 Penobscot River, ME 1985 501,020 1,085,175 Pepperell Cove, ME 1969 171,351 53,156 Pig Island Gut, ME 6 1966 191,753 94,656 Pleasant River, ME 1892 3,500 217 Point Judith Pond and Harbor of Refuge, RI 1996 2,714,510 25 8,107,334 17,587 Pollock Rip Shoals, Nantucket Sound, MA 1956 1,083,504 846,590 Potowomut River, RI 1882 5,000 50 Provincetown Harbor, MA ' 1997 3,889,577 1,053,966 797,847 Richmond Harbor, ME * 1883 20,000 . Richmond's Island Harbor, ME 1882 119,844 1,808 Rockland Harbor, ME 1976 1,948,462 537,778 1-52 NEW ENGLAND DISTRICT TABLE 1-C (Continued) OTHER AUTHORIZED NAVIGATION PROJECTS For Last Cost to September 30, 2000 Full Report Contributed See Annual Operation and Funds Expended Project Report for Construction Maintenance (Construction) Rockport Harbor, MA Rockport Harbor, ME Royal River, ME S Rye Harbor, Nil Saco River, ME s St. Croix River, ME Sakonnet Harbor, RI . Sakonnet River, RI Sandy Bay (Harbor of Refuge), Cape Ann, MA '7 Sasanoa River, ME 3.4 Scarboro River, ME Scituate Harbor, MA Searsport Harbor, ME Seekonk River, RI South Bristol Harbor, ME Southport Harbor, CT Southwest Harbor, ME Stamford Harbor, CT Stockton Harbor, ME 3.l Stonington Harbor, CT Stonington Harbor, ME 6 Stony Creek, Branford, CT 6 Sullivan Falls Harbor, ME Taunton River, MA Tenants Hlarbor, ME Thames River, CT Vineyard Haven, MA Wareham Harbor, MA Warren River, RI Warwick Cove, RI 6 Wellfleet Harbor, MA Westcott Cove, CT Westport Harbor and Saugatuck River, CT Westport River, MA Weymouth Back River, MA Weymouth-Fore & Town River, MA 5 Wickford Harbor, RI s Wilson Point Harbor, CT 4 Winnipesaukee Lake, NiH Winter Harbor, ME 6 Winthrop Harbor, MA Wood Island Harbor and the Pool at Biddeford, ME 5 Woods Hole Channel, MA York Harbor, ME 1996 1989 1997 1991 1995 1950 1995 1909 1922 1915 1997 1997 1966 1954 1971 1962 1962 1980 1915 1959 1985 1995 1914 1948 1920 1967 1943 1896 1890 1975 1995 1978 1972 1942 1944 1979 and 1983 1973 1895 1952 1976 1895 1995 1940 1997 1,808,745 32,000 336,704 130,342 1,064,983 179,550 764,651 38,427 1,925,553 35,000 392,635 379,851 572,568 '5 672,214 89,593 59,213 18 180,042 892,824 33,000 377,328 898,500 112,487 19,871 442,895 18,750 1,471,919 27,186 95,997 5,000 155,430 157,634 55,960 19,308 48,740 30,194,613 233,410 54,177 7,500 162,937 8,992 733,272 230,000 239,654 295,378 276,766 1,777,1555 28 719,718 2,926,255 64,685 392,280 13,578 16,060 124 2,802,888 1,143,987 83,170 902,873 43,923 434,335 90,085 1,832,247 34,376 157,273 33,258 813,197 32,917 20,854 1,709,440 26,806 42,891 120,849 1,858,413 347,248 205,744 27,353 1,725,721 162,650 29,870 37,038 39,315 624,595 55,614 1,116,848 51,430 49,562 29 61,338 16 74,996 19,892 21,928 10,000 69,976 67,792 2,567 18,285 7,501 169,636 85,176 133,985 20 32,000 21,000 20,000 630,133 49,094 23 43,660 32,161 1-53 - REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 2000 TABLE 1-C (Continued) OTHER AUTHORIZED NAVIGATION PROJECTS For Last Cost to September 30, 2000 Full Report Contributed See Annual Operation and Funds Expended Project Report for Construction Maintenance (Construction) Projects are complete unless otherwise noted. Complete except for inactive portion. 2 Inactive. 3Abandonment recommended in H. Doc. 467, 69th Congress, 1J session. 4No commerce reported. SPortion or project authorized by Chief of Engineers (Public Law 86-645, Sec. 107). 6 Authorized by the Chief of Engineers (Public Law 86-645, Sec. 107). 7 Construction of a public landing by local interests has not been completed. 8 Excludes $5,000 Contributed Funds. 9 Excludes $37,200 Contributed Funds, Other. 10 Excludes $582,188 Contributed Funds, Other. " Excludes $114,327 expended for rehabilitation; breakwater repaired in 1962. 12 Excludes $173,425 Contributed Funds, Other. '3 Excludes $211,649 expended for minor rehabilitation; jetty repaired in 1963. 1 Public landing at Black Cove has not been constructed. 1s Costs to local interests for berth improvements are estimated to be $60,000. 6 Excludes $81,548 Contributed Funds, Other. " Abandonment recommended in H. Doc. 411, 64 th Congress, ls 'ses sion, and in River and Harbor Committee Doc. 3,6 5' h Congress, 1s" session. 1s Excludes $37,714 Emergency Relief Funds. 9 Under State maintenance. 20E xcludes $10,000 Contributed Funds, Other. 21 Lack of local sponsor. (Project authorized by Section 361 of WRDA 1992.) 22 Excludes $17,495 non-project cost for removal of mooring chains, of which the project sponsor still owes $12,198. 23 Excludes $10,000 Contributed Funds. 2 Excludes $60,000 expended for major rehabilitation. 23 Excludes $1,926,000 expended for rehabilitation. 26 Excludes $65,000 consisting of $13,000 for public wharf and $52,000 for additional construction. " Excludes $571,401 Contributed Funds. 28 Excludes $20,000 Contributed Funds, Others. 29 Excludes $18,000 Contributed Funds, Others. 30Excludes $1,415,524 expended for major rehabilitation. 1-54 NEW ENGLAND DISTRICT TABLE 1-D OTHER AUTHORIZED BEACH EROSION CONTROL PROJECTS For Last Full Report Cost to Amount See Annual Sep. 30, 2000 Expended by Project Report For Construction Local Interest Burial Hill Beach, Westport, CT 1958 $ 5,810 $11,612 Calf Pasture Beach Park, Norwalk, CT 1964 56,386 120,179 Clark Point Beach, New Bedford, MA s 1982 228,081 228,080 Cliff Walk, Newport, RI i 1995 1,155,491 955,237 Compo Beach, Westport, CT 1962 84,544 169,089 Cove Island, Stamford, CT 1961 47,131 94,262 Cummings Park, Stamford, CT 1963 26,886 53,771 Guilford Point Beach (Jacobs Beach), Guilford, CT 1961 15,620 31,241 Gulf Beach, Milford, CT 1958 21,303 42,606 Hammonasset Beach, Madison, CT 1956 163,183 326,366 Hampton Beach, Hampton, NH 1966 260,868 385,641 Jennings Beach, Fairfield, CT 1956 14,401 28,802 Lighthouse Point Park (Area 9), CT 1961 3,930 7,859 Middle Beach, CT 1958 8,810 17,620 Misquamicut Beach, Westerly, RI 2 1963 14,512 29,024 North Scituate Beach, Scituate, MA 1969 106,552 106,552 Oak Bluffs Town Beach, Martha's Vineyard, MA s 1976 273,334 198,583 Oakland Beach, Warwick, RI 1982 559,200 181,175 Plum Island, MA S 1977 118,882 104,875 Prospect Beach, West Haven, CT 4 1995 1,870,407 1,089,351 Quincy Shore Beach, Quincy, MA 1962 621,464 1,242,880 Revere Beach, MA 1994 3,889,016 2,197,312 Roosevelt Campobello International Park, Lubec, ME 1993 233,260 Sand Hill Cove Beach, RI 1959 40,143 82,000 Sandy Point Outfall, West Haven, CT 5 1996 889,634 457,495 Sasco Hill Beach, Fairfield, CT 1961 23,759 47,518 Sea Bluff Beach, West Haven, CT s 1995 677,170 237,628 Seaside Park, CT 1958 150,000 329,921 Sherwood Island State Park, Westport, CT 4 1983 1,186,830 889,330 Short Beach, CT 3 1956 Silver Beach to Cedar Beach, CT 1964 62,560 270,695 Southeast Lighthouse, Block Island, RI 1995 1,648,249 970,000 Southport Beach, CT 1960 17,631 35,263 Town Beach, Plymouth, MA 1964 5,490 10,981 Wallis Sands State Beach, Rye, NIl 1966 65,131 435,942 Wessagusset Beach, Weymouth, MA 1971 180,944 200,208 Winthrop Beach, MA 1960 176,567 353,134 Projects are completed unless otherwise noted. Complete except inactive portion. 2 Additional Federal participation will be required based on Public Law 87-874, Sec. 103. SProject completed at no cost to Federal Government by using fill from Federal navigation improvement at HIousatonic River. (See page 88 of the 1956 Annual Report.) Portion authorized by Chief of Engineers (Public Law 87-874, Sec. 103.) 5Authorized by Chiefof Engineers (Public Law 87-874, Sec. 103.) 1-55 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 2000 TABLE 1-E OTHER AUTHORIZED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS Cost to September 30, 2000 For Last Full Report See Annual Contributed Project Report for Construction Funds Alford, Green River, MA * Alley Bay, Beals, ME 3 Amesbury, Powwow River, MA 3 Ansonia - Derby, CT Bagaduce River, ME 3 Beaver Brook, Keene, NH 2 Blackstone River, Millbury, MA 3 Bluffs Community Center, Swansea, MA 3 Bound Brook, Scituate, MA 2 Canton, MA 2 Charles River Dam, MA Charlestown, NH 3 Cherryfield, ME 2 Chicopee, MA Chicopee Falls, MA Clear River, Burrillville, RI 3 Cocheco River, Farmington, NH 2 Connecticut River, Middletown, CT 3 Connecticut River, North Stratford, NH Connecticut River, W. Stewartstown, NH Covered Bridge, Sheffield, MA 3 Danbury, CT Derby, CT East Branch Dam, CT East Hartford, CT Farmington River, Simsbury, CT 3 Fitchburg, MA (See No. Nashua River) Folly Brook, Wethersfield, CT 2 Fort Kent, ME 2 Fox Point Barrier, RI Gardner, MA 2 Gulf Street, Milford, CT 3 Hall Meadow Brook Dam, CT Hartford, CT Hartford, White River, VT 2 Haverhill, MA Hayward Creek, Braintree-Quincy, MA 2 Holmes Bay, Whiting, ME 3 Holyoke, MA Housatonic River, Pittsfield, MA 2 Housatonic River, Salisbury, CT Housatonic River, Sheffield, MA 3 Huntington, MA 3 Island Avenue, Quincy, MA 3 Islesboro (The Narrows), ME 3 Johnson Bay, Lubec, ME 3 Keene, NH * Lancaster, Israel River, NH 2 Lee, Housatonic River, MA 3 Little River, Belfast, ME 3 Lowell, MA Lower Woonsocket, RI 1977 1977 1979 1978 1977 1985 1989 1986 1995 1974 1964 1981 1976 1963 1954 1978 1987 1963 1996 1982 1976 1988 1978 1977 1973 1951 1996 1979 1979 1976 1970 1991 1970 1960 1973 1940 1979 1980 1953 1985 1982 1981 1960 1983 1985 1985 1955 1997 1976 1990 1945 41,419 190,500 132,113 18,266,040 129,500 2,591,000 249,999 189,131 47,300 156,568 41,170,921 113,330 191,095 1,433,600 2,183,912 168,000 183,100 262,046 180,000 54,703 250,000 13,143,000 7,582,642 1,959,836 2,135,447 500,000 220,284 1,997,820 11,112,801 495,691 365,000 2,572,357 6,929,100 332,236 1,743,485 2,325,470 207,390 3,418,000 739,003 102,800 202,608 3,900 172,000 165,500 163,082 44,100 595,878 37,852 166,682 1,284,974 6,600,681 1-56 - 3 4,576 54,447 92,981 5,554,088 9 385 411,292 '0 69,121 23 180,000 7,637 257,720 22 - 3,616,290 13 15,000 21,000 2,781,100 120,000 24,447 - - - 43,000 1,266,638 NEW ENGLAND DISTRICT TABLE 1-E (Continued) OTHER AUTHORIZED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS Cost to September 30, 2000 For Last Full Report See Annual Contributed Project Report for Construction Funds Machias River, Machias, ME 3 Machias Bay, Machiasport, ME Mad River Lake, CT Mad River, Waterbury (Woodtick Area), CT Marginal Way, Ogunquit, ME 3 Merriconeag Sound, HIarpswell, ME 3 Mill Brook, Brownsville, VT 3 Narraguagus River, Milbridge, ME a Nashua, NH New London Hurricane Barrier, CT Nonewaug River, Woodbury, CT 3 Northampton, MA North Canaan, Blackberry River, CT 4 North Nashua River, Fitchburg, MA North Nashua River, Lancaster, MA 3 North Nashua River, Leominster, MA North Nashua River, Leominster (Sewer Line), MA 3 Norwalk, CT 2 Norwich, CT Park River, Hartford, CT Pawcatuck, CT Pawtuxet River, Warwick, RI 2 Penobscot River, Old Town, ME 2 Perley Brook, Fort Kent, ME 3 Pleasant Point, Perry, ME 3 Point Shirley, Winthrop, MA 3 Port 5 Facility, Bridgeport, CT 3 Prestile Stream, Blaine, ME 3 Riverdale, West Springfield, MA * Salmon River, Colchester, CT 3 Sand Cove, Gouldsboro, ME 3 Saugus River & Tributaries, MA Saxonville, MA Sebago Lake, Standish, ME Sebasticook River, Hartland, ME 2 Shelburne, Androscoggin River, Nil Smelt Brook, Weymouth-Braintree, MA 2 South River, Conway, MA Springdale, MA Springfield, MA Squantz Pond, New Fairfield, CT 3 Stony Brook, Wilton, Nil Sucker Brook Dam, CT Three Rivers, MA Torrington, East Branch, CT 2 Torrington, West Branch, CT 2 Town River Bay, Quincy, MA 3 Village of Saxtons, VT 3 Ware, MA 2 Waterbury-Watertown, CT 2 Weston, VT 4 West Branch, Westfield River, Huntington, MA 1987 1995 1973 1998 1987 1980 1988 1995 1950 1992 1985 1950 1977 1981 1979 1997 1997 1952 1960 1986 1966 1986 1986 1994 1987 1995 1986 1980 1996 1983 1984 1997 1980 1998 1985 1977 1978 1987 1952 1950 1983 1973 1976 1970 1963 1963 1993 1985 1963 1963 1957 1983 152,000 133,473 4,773,020 1,177,905 243,000 107,682 110,000 132,967 270,000 6 8,504,919 222,500 960,000 73,865 4,605,000 81,671 152,756 221,455 52,150 1,209,000 60,176,919 644,311 3,174,260 178,045 70,990 189,000 500,000 227,500 73,674 1,905,261 247,100 127,500 5,525,000 4,218,700 500,000 1,857,475 37,657 1,803,738 133,500 700,000 932,000 116,296 19,500 2,227,792 1,577,189 389,237 228,237 55,228 140,500 400,000 265,300 13,000 119,433 32,733 '5 270,183 26 24,893 16 327 2,015,709 21 50,919 73,818 S17 214,106 20,554 ' 182,419 221,614 24 . 19 346,009 " 5,350 58,800 - 20 18,409 1-57 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 2000 TABLE 1-E (Continued) OTHER AUTHORIZED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS Cost to September 30, 2000 For Last Full Report See Annual Contributed Project Report for Construction Funds West.River, New Haven, CT 2 1996 3,883,293 748,840 25 West Springfield, MA s 1992 2,043,728 14,343 West Warren, MA 2 1964 389,200 41,000 Winsted, CT 1954 245,500 Woonsocket, RI 1962 4,033,100 224,476 Worcester Diversion, MA 1978 5,086,896 70,161 Projects are complete unless otherwise noted. ' Inactive. 2 Authorized by Chief of Engineers (Public Law 80-858, Sec. 205). 'Authorized by Chief of Engineers (Public Law 79-526, Sec. 14) ;Authorized by Chief of Engineers (Public Law 83-780, Sec. 208) 3Portion Authorized by Chief of Engineers (Public Law 80-858, Sec. 205). 6 Excludes $147,366 Flood Control and Coastal Emergency funds expended. ' Excludes $852,127 non-project cost per 1976 WRDA. s Excludes $727,460 Contributed Funds, Other. 9 Excludes $1,674,567 Contributed Funds, Other. 1o Excludes $12,000 expended for land condemnations and $25,184 Contributed Funds, Other for relocations. " Excludes $1,146,828 Contributed Funds, Other. 12 Excludes $406,653 Contributed Funds, Other. 3 Excludes $245,000 expended for land condemnations. " Excludes $488,920 Contributed Funds, Other. 'S Excludes $11,758 for lands. 16 Excludes $6,120 for lands. '7 Excludes $259,408 Contributed Funds, Other. 'I Excludes $3,109 for lands. 19 Excludes $8,503 Contributed Funds, Other. 20 Excludes $565,168 Contributed Funds, Other. 21E xcludes $1,629,256 for lands and $303,251 Contributed Funds, Other. 22 Excludes $10,195 lands. 23 Excludes $24,134 Contributed Funds, Other. 2; Excludes $109,140 for land and $46,929 Contributed Funds, Other. 23 Excludes $554,638 for lands and $71,650 Contributed Funds, Other. 26 Excludes $122,452 for lands. 1-58 NEW ENGLAND DISTRICT TABLE 1-F OTHER AUTHORIZED MULTI-PURPOSE PROJECTS INCLUDING POWER Cost to September 30, 2000 For Last Full Report See Annual Contributed Project Report for Construction Funds Passamaquoddy Tidal Power Project, ME ' 1935 $6,384,394 ' Work discontinued in 1937. Facilities transferred to War Assets Administration. 1-59 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 2000 TABLE 1-G DEAUTHORIZED PROJECTS Funds Expended For Last Full Report See Annual Date Contributed Project Report for Deauthorized Federal Funds Alternative for Sugar Hill Reservoir Andover Lake, CT Apponaug Cove, RI (portion of 1960 Act) Bagaduce River, ME (uncompleted portion) Baker Brook, MA Bar Harbor, ME (uncompleted portion of 1888 & 1890 Acts) Bass Harbor, ME (portions of Section 107 project) Beards Brook Reservoir, NH Beaver Brook Lake, NH Bennington Reservoir, NH Big River Reservoir, RI (portion of 1986 Act) Black Rock Harbor, CT (uncompleted portion of 1958 Act) Boothbay Harbor, ME (Portion of 1912 Act) Boothbay Harbor, ME Boston Harbor, MA (1945 Act) Boston Harbor, MA (portion of 1902 Act) Boston Harbor, MA (portion of Chelsea River 1962 Act) Boston Harbor, MA (portion of Reserved Channel 1990 Act) Brant Rock Beach, Marshfield, MA Branford Harbor, CT (portion of 1902 of Act) Bridgeport Harbor, CT (portions of 1958 Act) Bridgeport Harbor, CT (uncompleted portion of 1930 Act) Bridgeport Harbor, CT (portion of 1946 Act) Bridgeport Harbor, CT (portion of 1958 Act) Bridgeport Harbor, CT (portion of 1958 Act) Brockway Lake, VT . Bucksport Harbor, ME (portion of 1902 Act ) Cambridgeport Lake, VT Carvers Harbor, Vinalhaven, ME (portion of 1896 Act) Chicopee, MA (uncompleted portion) Claremont Lake, NH Clinton Harbor, CT (portion of 1945 Act) Clyde, RI Cocheco River, NH (portion of 1890 Act) Cohasset Harbor, MA (portion of 1945 Act) Cohasset Harbor, MA (portion of Section 107 project) Connecticut River (above Hartford), CT Connecticut River below Hartford, CT (uncompleted portion) Connecticut River below Hartford, CT (1950 Act) Cotuit Harbor, MA Dickey - Lincoln School Lakes, ME (portion of 1965 Act) Dorchester Bay and Neponset River, MA (uncompleted portion) East Boothbay Harbor, ME (portion of 1910 Act) East Boothbay Harbor, ME Eastport Harbor, ME Edgartown Harbor, MA (uncompleted portion of 1965 Act) Fall River Harbor, MA (uncompleted portion of 1930 Act) Falmouth Harbor, MA (portion of 1948 Act) Falmouth Harbor, MA (portion of 1948 Act) 1964 1972 1932 1965 1949 1973 1949 1987 1988 1953 1953 2000 2000 2000 2000 1961 1990 2000 2000 2000 2000 2000 1946 1907 1964 1954 1968 1985 1948 2000 2000 2000 1932 1996 1996 1962 1984 1968 1953 1953 1984 1978 1984 1978 1978 Aug 1977 Aug 1977 Aug 1999 Oct 1978 Nov 1979 Nov 1986 Aug 1999 Aug 1977 Apr 1978 Aug 1977 Nov 1990 Nov 1986 Oct 1992 Aug 1999 Jan 1990 Oct 1992 Oct 1996 Oct 1996 Nov 1979 Oct 1990 Nov 1986 Nov 1979 Oct 1996 Oct 1996 Aug 1999 Aug 1977 Aug 1999 Aug1977 Aug 1999 Aug 1977 Dec 1970 Aug 1999 Apr 1951 Oct 1996 Oct 1996 Oct 1996 Jan 1990 Oct 1978 Nov 1986 Oct 1978 Nov 1986 Jan 1990 Oct 1996 Aug 1999 Nov 1983 Nov 1986 Nov 1986 Oct 1996 Aug 1999 - - 94,000 78,000 378,300 205,000 - 18,000 - 242,700 8,800 132,146 8,541 26,285,298 6,500 638,675 . 141,530 1-60 NEW ENGLAND DISTRICT TABLE -G (Continued) DEAUTHORIZED PROJECTS Funds Expended For Last Full Report See Annual Date Contributed Project Report for Deauthorized Federal Funds Fivemile River Harbor, CT (uncompleted portion) 2000 Oct 1978 - Gaysville Lake, VT 1970 Oct 1976 206,600 Gorton's Pond, Warwick, RI Nov 1991 - Great Salt Pond, Block Island, RI (uncompleted portion of 1945 Act) 2000 Nov 1986 Greenwich Harbor, CT (portion of 1919 Act) - Nov 1990 Greenwich Point Beach, CT. 1969 Oct 1978 Green Harbor, MA (portion of Sec 107 project) 2000 Aug 1999 Guilford Harbor, CT (portion of 1945 Act) 1995 Oct 1996 Harbor of Refuge, Block Island, RI (uncompleted portion of 1912 Act) 2000 Nov 1986 Housatonic River, CT (uncompleted portion of 1888 Act) 1983 Nov 1979 Honey Hill Lake, NH 1949 Aug 1977 92,000 Ipswich River, MA (uncompleted portion of 1968 Act) 1969 Nov 1986 Kennebec River, ME (uncompleted portion of 1902 Act) 1998 Nov 1986 - Kennebunk River, ME (portion of 1962 Act) 2000 Oct 1996 - Ludlow Lake, VT Aug 1977 - Lynn Harbor, MA (uncompleted portions of 1954 & 1935 Acts) 2000 Nov 1986 - Lynn-Nahant Beach, MA 1986 Apr 1999 50,000 Manchester Harbor, MA 1949 Nov 1979 23,986 Marblehead Harbor, MA 1968 Oct 1978 43,711 Mattapoisett Harbor, MA 1950 Oct 1978 Merrimack River, MA - Nov 1991 Mianus River, CT (portion of 1945 Act) 1985 Nov 1986 Milford Harbor, CT (uncompleted portion of 1902 & 1937 Acts) 1989 Nov 1986 Monoosnoc Brook, MA 1967 Nov 1986 Monoosnoc Lake, MA 1967 Nov 1986 Mountain Brook Dam, NH 1949 Aug 1977 57,000 Mystic, CT 1968 Aug 1972 67,700 Mystic River, CT (uncompleted portion of 1913 Act) 1957 Nov 1986 - Mystic River, CT (portion of 1913 Act) 1957 Oct 1996 Mystic River, MA (portion of 1950 Act) 1986 Oct 1996 Nantasket Beach, MA 1971 Jan 1990 Nantucket Harbor of Refuge, MA (uncompleted portion of 1945 Act) 1989 Nov 1986 Nantucket Harbor of Refuge, MA (uncompleted portion of 1880 Act) 1989 Jan 1990 Napatree Beach, RI - Nov 1979 Narragansett Pier, RI 1966 Nov 1970 115,590 - Neponset River, Milton Town Landing to Port Norfolk, MA - Nov 1991 New Bedford and Fairhaven Harbors, MA (uncompleted portion of 1912 Act) 2000 Nov 1986 New Bedford and Fairhaven Harbors, MA (portion of 1909 & 1930 Acts) 2000 Aug 1999 - Newburyport Harbor, MA (uncompleted portion of 1945 Act) 1999 Nov 1986 - Newburyport Harbor, MA (portion of 1910 Act) 1999 Oct 1992 - - Newport Harbor, RI (portion of 1907 Act) 1953 Nov 1999 - New Haven Ilarbor, CT(uncompletedpodionof1946& 1910Acts) 1995 Nov 1986 Nookagee Lake, MA 1976 Nov 1986 563,677 North Andover and Lawrence, MA 1949 Aug 1977 20,000 North lampton Beach, North Hampton, NHi 1963 Nov 1981 - . 1-61 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 2000 TABLE 1-G (Continued) DEAUTHORIZED PROJECTS Funds Expended For Last Full Report See Annual Date Contributed Project Report for Deauthorized Federal Funds Norwalk Harbor, CT (portion of 1919 Act) 1983 Oct 1996 - - Norwalk-Wilton, CT 1973 Nov 1979 Patchoque River, Westbrook, CT (portion of 1954 Act) 1997 Oct 1996 - - Pawcatuck River, Little Narragansett Bay, RI and CT (uncompleted portions of 1896 Act) 1997 Nov 1986 - - Pawcatuck River, Little Narragansett Bay, RI and CT 1997 Nov 1979 - (1960 Act) Pawtucket, RI 1949 Nov 1977 - - Pepperell Cove, ME (uncompleted portion) 1969 'Nov 1981 Phillips Lake, MA 1982 May 1997 300,000 Pleasant Bay, MA 1971 Nov 1986 - Point Judith, RI 1968 Nov 1977 198,477 - Pontiac Diversion, RI 1948 Apr 1951 24,200 - Providence River and Harbor, RI (uncompleted portion) 2000 Nov 1986 - - Provincetown Beach (Herring Cove), MA 1961 Oct 1978 - Provincetown Harbor, MA (uncompleted portion) 1997 Oct 1978 - - Rockland Harbor, ME (uncompleted portion of 1956 Act) 1976 Nov 1986 - - Saco River, ME (uncompleted portion) 1995 Oct 1979 - Sakonnet Harbor, RI (uncompleted portion) 1995 Jun 1982 176,000 - Salem Harbor, MA (inactive portion of 1905 Act) 2000 Jul 1995 Salem Harbor, MA (uncompleted portion of 1945 Act) 2000 Nov 1986 - Sandy Bay, Cape Ann, MA (uncompleted portion) 1922 Oct 1978 - - Searsport Harbor, ME (portion of 1962 Act) 1966 Aug 1999 - Silver Beach to Cedar Beach, CT (uncompleted portion of 1954 Act) 1964 Nov 1986 - South Coventry Lake, CT 1951 Aug 1977 96,000 Southport Harbor, CT (portion of 1935 Act) 1962 Oct 1996 - South Tunbridge Lake, VT - Aug 1977 Stamford Harbor, CT (2 projects uncompleted portions) 1980 Oct 1978 - Stamford Harbor, CT (inactive portion) 1980 Jan 1990 - - Stonington Harbor, CT (uncompleted portion of 1 950 Act) 1959 Nov 1986 - Stonington Harbor, ME (1960 Act) 1985 Nov 1979 2,543 Stony Creek, CT (portion of 1960 Act) 1995 Oct 1996 - Stratford, CT 1973 Mar 1977 934,500 - Sugar Hill Reservoir, NH 1946 Dec 1944 - Taunton River, MA (inactive portion) 1948 Jan 1990 -- Thames River, CT (uncompleted portion of 1945 Act) 1967 Nov 1986 - - The Island Lake, VT - Aug 1977 - - Thumperton Beach, Eastham, MA 1961 Nov 1979 - Town Beach, Plymouth, MA (inactive portion) 1964 Jan 1990 - - Town Neck Beach, Sandwich, MA (portion of 1960 Act) 1961 Nov 1986 - - Trumbull Lake, CT 1983 May 1997 1,498,800 - Victory Lake, VT 1967 Aug 1977 168,400 - Wareham Harbor, MA (inactive portion) 1896 Jan 1990 - Wareham-Marion, MA 1965 Aug 1977 81,715 - Wells Harbor, ME (portion of 1960 Act) 2000 Aug 1999 - . West Brookfield Reservoir, MA 1965 Aug 1977 67,000 - West Canaan Lake, NH 1948 Aug 1977 92,000 Westerly, RI 1966 Nov 1986 - . Westfield, MA 1967 Sep 1969 507,200 - Westport, CT 1965 Feb 1970 29,634 - 1-62 NEW ENGLAND DISTRICT TABLE 1-G (Continued) DEAUTHORIZED PROJECTS Funds Expended For Last Full Report See Annual Date Contributed Project Report for Deauthorized Federal Funds Westport Harbor and Saugatuck River, CT (uncompleted portion of 1892 & 1954 Acts) 1972 Nov 1979 Westport River, MA (1938 Act) 1942 Jan 1990 Weymouth-Fore and Town Rivers, MA (portion of 1965 Act) 1979 & 1983 Oct 1996 Whitmanville Lake, MA 1979 Jul 1995 605,023 TABLE 1-H NAVIGATION ACTIVITIES PURSUANT TO SECTION 107, PUBLIC LAW 86-645 (PREAUTHORIZATION) Fiscal Year Contributed Funds Study Identification Costs Expended Blackwater River, NH $ 8,638 Coordination 15,878 Penobscot River, Bangor, ME 5,932 Thames Rivers, CT 5,709 Westport, MA 10,686 TABLE 1-I BEACH EROSION ACTIVITIES PURSUANT TO SECTION 103, PUBLIC LAW 87-874 (PREAUTHORIZATION) Fiscal Year Contributed Funds Study Identification Costs Expended Morris Cove, New Haven, CT $ 3,077 Nantasket Beach, Hull, MA North Nantasket Beach, Hull, MA 10 2,784 1-63 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 2000 TABLE 1-J FLOOD CONTROL ACTIVITIES PURSUANT TO SECTION 205 PUBLIC LAW 80-858 (PREAUTHORIZATION) Fiscal Year Contributed Funds Study Identification Costs Expend Black Rocks Creek, Salisbury, MA $19,216 $ 20,977 Coordination 14,335 Farm River, East Haven, CT 3,332 - Goodwin Brook, East Hartford, CT 5,000 Harbor Brook, Meriden, CT 22,792 Muddy River, Boston & Brookline, MA 196,218 96,789 Salem River, Haddam & East Haddam, CT 40,009 Waits River Basin, VT 72 - White River Basin, VT 807 TABLE 1-K EMERGENCY BANK PROTECTION ACTIVITIES PURSUANT TO SECTION 14, PUBLIC LAW 79-526 (PREAUTHORIZATION) Fiscal Year Contributed Funds Study Identification Costs Expended Allins Cove, Byway Road, Barrington, RI $ 745 Coordination 7,055 Hoosic River, Syndicate Road, Williamstown, MA 55,340 - Merrimack River, Riverside Road, Haverhill, MA 58,512 TABLE 1-L ENVIRONMENTAL IMPROVEMENT ACTIVITIES PURSUANT TO SECTION 1135, PUBLIC LAW 99-662 (PREAUTHORIZATION) Fiscal Year Contributed Funds Study Identification Costs Expended Allin's Cove, Barrington, RI $ 27,839 - Broad Meadows Marsh Restoration, MA 83,103 - Boyd's Marsh (Town Pond), RI 12,032 - Coordination Account 12,102 - Preliminary Restoration Plans 9,783 - 1-64 NEW ENGLAND DISTRICT TABLE 1-M AQUATIC ECOSYSTEM RESTORATION ACTIVITIES PURSUANT TO SECTION 206, PUBLIC LAW 99-662 (PREAUTHORIZATION) Study Identification Coordination $11,869 Copperas Brook, VT 6,708 Lonsdale Drive-in Restoration, RI 32,272 Manham Dam, Easthampton, MA 25,542 Neponset River, Boston, MA 24,019 Parker Pond, MA 105,673 Potter Pond, South Kingston, RI 3,579 Preliminary Restoration Plans 19,566 Presumpscot River Aquatic Ecosystem Restoration, ME 79,913 Run Pond Coastal Ecosystem Restoration, MA 42,803 1-65 Fiscal Year Contributed Funds Costs Expended ----- REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 2000 TABLE 1-N BLACKSTONE RIVER BASIN, MA AND RI (See Section 36 of Text) RESERVOIR Miles Estimated Federal Cost Above Mouth of Black- Reservoir Lands stone Height Capacity and Name Nearest City River (feet) Type (acre-feet) Construction Damages ' Total West Hill 2 Worcester,MA 25.8 51 Earthfill 12,400 $1,366,922 $940,000 $2,306,902 ' Includes highway, railroad, and utility relocations. 2 See individual report for details. LOCAL PROTECTION PROJECTS Miles Estimated Cost Above Mouth of Connec- Lands ticut and Location River Type of Structure Construction Damages' Total Worcester, MA 48 Diversion tunnel and channel $4,923,500 $1,179,000 2 $6,102,500 Woonsocket, RI 15 Channel improvement 3,733,100 1,069,0003 4,802,100 Lower Woonsocket, Flood wall, conduits and RI 13 channel improvement 8,356,239 435,000 8,791,239 Blackstone River, Millbury, MA 32 Slope protection 256,619 256,619 Clear River, Burrillville, RI 23 Retaining wall 168,000 168,000 Pawtuxet River, Warwick, RI - Land acquisition 4,125,000 4,125,000 Includes relocation. 2 $158,000 Federal; $1,021,000 non-Federal. 3$300,000 Federal; $769,000 non-Federal. 1$3 ,300,000 Federal; $825,000 non-Federal. $250,000 Federal; $6,619 non-Federal. 1-66 NEW ENGLAND DISTRICT TABLE 1-0 CONNECTICUT RIVER BASIN, VT, NH, MA AND CT (See Section 38 of Text) DAMS AND RESERVOIRS Estimated Federal Cost Miles Above Mouth of Connec- Reservoir Lands ticut Height Capacity and Name Nearest City River (feet) Type (acre-feet) Construction Damages' Total Vermont: Union Village 2 White River Jct. 228.4 170 Earthfill 38,000 $3,186,860 $ 908,300 $4,095,160 North Hartland 2 White River Jct. 211.7 185 Earthfill 71,400 6,349,225 963,000 7,312,225 North Springfield 2 Springfield 191.3 120 Earthfill 50,600 4,781,526 2,050,000 6,831,526 Ball Mountain 2 Brattleboro 178.2 265 Rockfill- 54,600 10,757,842 350,000 11,107,842 earth Townshend 2 Brattleboro 168.3 133 Earthfill 33,200 6,662,545 1,878,000 8,540,545 New Hampshire: Surry Mountain 2 Keene 174.4 86 Earthfill 32,500 2,448,610 385,000 2,833,610 Otter Brook 2 Keene 171.2 133 Earthfill 18,300 2,982,048 1,378,400 4,360,448 Massachusetts: Birch Hill 2 Gardner 153.3 56 Earthfill 49,900 1,740,679 3,075,000 4,815,679 Tully 2 Athol 148.7 62 Earthfill 22,000 1,298,752 368,000 1,666,752 Barre Falls 2 Worcester 130.2 62 Rockfill- 24,000 1,928,819 39,000 1,967,819 earth Knightville 2 Northampton 102.8 160 Earthfill 49,000 2,594,440 821,200 3,415,640 Littleville 2 Northampton 102.0 150 Earthfill 32,400 5,863,412 1,150,000 7,013,412 Conant Brook 2 Springfield 122.0 85 Rockfill- 3,740 1,935,530 1,015,000 2,950,530 earth Connecticut: Colebrook River 2 Winsted 116.0 223 Rockfill- 98,500 8,341,971 5,922,000 14,263,971 earth Mad River Winsted 120.0 178 Earthfill 9,700 4,773,020 2,210,000 ; 6,983,020 Sucker Brook Winsted 118.5 68 Earthfill 1,480 2,227,792 180,000 3 2,407,792 'Includes highway, railroad, and utility relocations. 3 Non-Federal cost. 2 For details, see individual report. 4 Non-Federal $670,000; Federal $1,540,000. LOCAL PROTECTION PROJECTS Miles Estimated Cost Above Mouth of Connec- Lands ticut and Location River Type of Structure Construction Damages' Total Beaver Brook, Keene, Nil Charlestown, NiH Chicopee, MA Chicopee Falls, MA 170.4 181 80 83 Channel improvement Riverbank protection Wall and levee Wall and levee $ 2,591,000 113,330 1,434,000 2,600,000 - $ 2,591,000 - 113,330 $ 250,000 1,684,000 70,000 2,670,000 1-67 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 2000 TABLE 1-0 CONNECTICUT RIVER BASIN, VT, NH, MA AND CT (Continued) (See Section 38 of Text) DAMS AND RESERVOIRS LOCAL PROTECTION PROJECTS Miles Estimated Cost Above Mouth of Connec- Lands ticut and Location River Type of Structure Construction Damages' Total Connecticut River, Middletown, CT 31 Streambank protection 331,167 6 - 331,167 East Hartford, CT 52 Wall and levee 2,143,084 271,000 2,414,084 Farmington River, Simsbury, CT 60 Streambank protection " 757,720 10,195 767,915 Folly Brook, Wethersfield, CT 50 Channel improvement 220,284 - 220,284 Gardner, MA 163 Dam and levee 510,691 35,000 545,691 Gulf Street, Milford, CT - Slope protection 386,000 - 386,000 Hartford, CT 52 Wall and levee 9,710,200; 1,150,000 10,860,200 Hartford, White River, VT 216 Channel improvement 332,236 - 332,236 Holyoke, MA 85 Wall and levee 3,442,447 150,000 3,592,447 Huntington, MA 100 Riverbank protection 3,900 - 3,900 Israel R., Lancaster, NH 314 Gabion overflow weir 551,606 - 551,606 Keene, NH 167 Channel improvement 44,146 - 44,146 Mill Brook, Brownsville, VT 200.3 Streambank stabilization 110,000 - 110,000 Northampton, MA 94 Wall and levee 960,000' 150,000 1,110,000 North Stratford, NH 345 Slope protection 180,000 - 180,000 Park River, CT 51 Conduit 58,876,919 1,300,000 60,176,919 Riverdale, MA 80 Wall and levee 2,126,875 7 109,140 2,236,015 Salmon R., Colchester, CT 38 Slope protection 247,100 - 247,100 South River, Conway, MA 107 Slope protection 133,500 - 133,500 Springdale, MA 84 Wall and levee 700,000 57,000 757,000 Springfield, MA 76 Wall and levee 937,350 2 272,000 1,209,350 Three Rivers, MA 98 Wall and levee 1,577,189 700,000 2,277,189 Ware, MA 110 Channel improvement 400,000 85,000 485,000 Weston, VT 195 Channel improvement 13,079 2,000 15,079 West Springfield, MA 76 Wall and levee 2,043,4523 30,000 2,073,452 West Warren, MA 111 Wall and levee 430,176 64,000 494,176 Winsted, CT 115 Channel improvement 245,500 30,000 275,500 STo be borne by local interests. Also includes local interests portion of relocation. 2 Includes $355,000 Public Works Administration funds. 3 Includes $245,000 Public Works Administration funds. 4 Includes $835,000 Public Works Administration funds. s Includes $280,000 Public Works Administration funds. 6 Excludes $24,134 Contributed Funds, Other. 7 Excludes $46,929 Contributed Funds, Other. 1-68 NEW ENGLAND DISTRICT TABLE 1-P HOUSATONIC RIVER BASIN, CT AND MA (See Section 41 of Text) DAMS AND RESERVOIRS ' Miles Estimated Federal Cost Above Mouth of Nauga- Reservoir Lands tuck Height Capacity and Name Nearest City River (feet) Type (acre-feet) Construction Damages 2 Total Hall Meadow Torrington, CT 41.0 73 Rock and 8,620 $2,572,357 $1,290,000 3 $3,862,357 earthfill East Branch Torrington, CT 43.7 92 Earthfill 4,350 1,959,836 1,290,000 3 3,249,836 Thomaston Torrington, CT 30.5 142 Rock and 42,000 6,382,112 7,900,000 14,282,112 earthfill Northfield Brook Torrington, CT 30.6 118 Earthfill 2,432 1,875,512 975,000 2,850,512 Black Rock Waterbury, CT 29.0 154 Earthfill 8,700 5,223,700 2,958,600 8,182,300 Hancock Brook Waterbury, CT 25.0 57 Earthfill 4,030 1,593,911 2,585,000 4,178,911 Hop Brook Waterbury, CT 15.9 97 Earthfill 6,970 2,701,562 3,450,000 6,151,562 'For details of projects, see individual reports. 2 Includes highway, railroad, and utility relocations. Includes cost of lands borne by local interests. LOCAL PROTECTION PROJECTS' Miles Estimated Cost Above Mouth of Housa- Lands Tonic and Location River Type of Structure Construction Damages 2 Total Alford, Green River, MA 111.0 Earth dike and stone slope $41,419 - $ 41,419 protection Ansonia-Derby, CT 13.0 Wall, levee, channel improve- 18,266,040 1,178,000 19,444,040 ment and pumping station Covered Bridge, Sheffield, MA 96.0 Stone slope protection 430,000 - 430,000 Danbury, CT 56.0 Walls, channel improvement 13,143,000 1,862,000 15,005,000 and bridge replacement Derby, CT 12.0 Walls, levees and pumping 7,582,642 647,000 8,229,642 station Mad River, Waterbury 35.0 Channel improvements 1,448,087 122,452 1,570,539 (Woodtick Area), CT North Canaan, 83.0 Snagging and clearing project 73,865 - 73,865 Blackberry River, CT Pittsfield, MA 133.0 Stone arch culvert 739,003 85,000 824,003 Salisbury, CT 76.0 Gabionade with slope 102,800 - 102,800 protection Sheffield, MA 96.0 Stone slope protection 202,608 - 202,608 Squantz Pond, New 43.0 Timber Bulkhead 116,296 - 116,296 Fairfield, CT Torrington, East Branch, CT 51.0 Dike and channel improvement 389,237 - 389,237 Torrington, West Branch, CT 52.0 Walls, dikes and channel 228,237 - 228,237 Waterbury- Watertown, CT 32.0 Wall, dike and channel 263,300 - 263,300 For details of projects, see individual reports. 2 To be borne by local interests. Includes relocations. 1-69 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 2000 TABLE 1-Q MERRIMACK RIVER BASIN, NH, AND MA (See Section 42 of Text) RESERVOIRS' Miles Estimated Federal Cost Above Mouth of Merri- Reservoir Lands mack Height Capacity and Name Nearest City River (feet) Type (acre-feet) Construction Damages 2 Total Hall Meadow Torrington, CT 41.0 73 Rock and 8,620 $2,572,357 $1,290,000 $3,862,357 Franklin Falls Franklin, NH 118.2 140 Earthfill 154,000 $ 6,190,487 $ 1,760,000 $ 7,950,487 Blackwater Concord, NH 118.8 75 Earthfill 46,000 766,746 553,000 1,319,746 Hopkinton- Everett Concord, NH 87.3 115 Earthfill 157,300 12,715,440 8,737,000 21,452,440 Edward MacDowell Keene, NH 161.3 67 Earthfill 12,800 1,708,253 306,000 2,014,253 Phillips Fitchburg, MA 105.4 48 Earthfill 1,600 13,450,000 7,350,000 20,800,000 SFor details, see individual report. 2 Includes highway, railroad, and utility relocations. LOCAL PROTECTION PROJECTS ' Miles Estimated Cost Above Mouth of Merri- Lands mack and Location River Type of Structure Construction Damages 2 Total Amesbury, Powwow and 3.0 Wall and revetment $ 132,113 $ - $ 132,113 Merrimack Rivers, MA Haverhill, MA 21.0 Floodwall, conduit and 1,863,485 - 1,863,485 pumping station Lowell, MA 39.0 Wall and levee 490,600 S 90,000 580,600 Nashua, NH 55.0 Wall and levee 270,000 3,000 273,000 * North Nashua River, 90.0 Stone slope protection 81,671 - 81,671 Lancaster, MA North Nashua River, 90.0 Stone slope protection 360,000 - 360,00 Lancaster, MA North Nashua River, 94.0 Stone slope protection 203,675 - 203,675 Leominster, MA North Nashua River, 94.0 Stone slope protection 295,273 - 295,273 Leominster (Sewer Line), MA North Nashua River, MA 100.5 Channel improvement 3,235,000 - 3,235,000 Saxonville, MA 69.0 Wall, levee, channel 4,218,700 530,000 4,748,700 SFor details, see individual report. 2 To be borne by local interests. Excludes $1,370,000 Public Works Administration Funds expended on Fitchburg, MA. SExcludes $15,000 expended from Contributed Funds. ' Excludes $794,374 Public Works Administration Funds. 1-70 NEW ENGLAND DISTRICT TABLE 1-R THAMES RIVER BASIN, CT, RI AND MA (See Section 49 of Text) RESERVOIRS' Miles Estimated Federal Cost Above Mouth of Reservoir Lands Thames Height Capacity and Name Nearest City River (feet) Type (acre-feet) Construction Damages 2 Total Hodges Village Webster, MA 74.5 55 Earthfill 13,000 $1,317,268 $3,144,000 $4,461,268 Buffumville Webster, MA 74.4 66 Earthfill 12,700 2,157,603 841,000 2,998,603 East Brimfield Southbridge, MA 82.8 55 Earthfill 30,000 1,337,043 5,720,000 7,057,043 Westville Southbridge, MA 75.2 80 Earthfill 11,000 2,284,683 3,400,000 5,684,683 West Thompson Putman, CT 59.3 70 Earthfill 25,600 5,036,220 1,965,000 7,001,220 Mansfield Hollow Willimantic, CT 40.0 70 Earthfill 52,000 4,107,164 2,340,000 6,447,164 ' For details, see individual report. 2 Includes highway, railroad, and utility relocations. LOCAL PROTECTION PROJECTS Miles Estimated Cost Above Mouth of Lands Thames and Location River Type of Structure Construction Damages ' Total Norwich, CT 15.0 Channel improvements $1,209,000 $72,000 $1,281,000 West River, New Haven, CT - Channel improvements 4,619,543 2 554,638 5,174,181 'Borne by local interests. 2 Excludes $12,590 for revisions to flood insurance rate map and $71,650 Contributed funds not required. 1-71 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 2000 TABLE 1-S RECONNAISSANCE AND CONDITION SURVEYS Date Survey Date Survey Project Conducted Project Conducted MASSACHUSETTS Andrews River Annisquam River Bass Harbor Boston Harbor Chatham (Stage) Harbor Cohasset Harbor Dorchester Harbor Duxbury Harbor Essex River Fall River Harbor Falmouth Harbor Gloucester Harbor Green Harbor Hyannis Harbor Ipswich River Lynn Harbor New Bedford Harbor Newburyport Harbor Plymouth Harbor Salem Harbor Scituate Harbor Sesuit Harbor Winthrop Harbor CONNECTICUT Bridgeport Harbor Clinton Harbor Connecticut River Below Hartford Guilford Harbor Housatonic River Milford Harbor New Haven Harbor Norwalk Harbor Thames River May/Jul/Aug 2000 Nov 99/Feb 2000 Jan/Mar 2000 Feb-Apr/Jul-Aug 2000 Nov-Dec 1999 Mar 2000 Oct 99/Feb 2000 Jun 2000 Mar-May/Aug-Sep 2000 Jan 2000 Jan-Mar 2000 Oct 99/Apr-Jun 2000 Oct 1999 Oct 99/Feb 2000 Mar 2000 Oct 99/Feb 2000 Nov 99/Mar 2000 Nov 99/Jan-Mar 2000 Jun-Jul 2000 Feb-Mar 2000 Dec 99/Mar/Jul/Aug 2000 Apr/Aug 2000 Feb 2000 Jan-Mar 2000 Jun-Aug 2000 Oct 99/Jan-Sep 2000 Aug 2000 Nov-Dec99/Jan/Jun/Jul 2000 Jun-Jul 2000 Feb-Jul 2000 Aug-Sep 2000 Apr-Jun 1999 MAINE Belfast Biddeford Pool Kennebec River Narraguagus River Portland Harbor Rockport Harbor Saco River Scuboro River Union River Wells Harbor Winter Harbor NEW HAMPSHIRE Cocheco River Little Harbor Portsmouth Harbor RHODE ISLAND Great Salt Pond, Block Islan Little Narragansett Bay and Watch Hill Cove Newport Harbor Providence River Seekonk River Warwick Cove Feb 2000 May-Jul 2000 Feb-Apr 2000 Mar/Apr/Jul 2000 Nov/Dec 99/May/Jun 2000 Mar/Jun 2000 Jan/Apr-Jun 2000 Oct-Dec 99/Jan-Feb/Jul-Sep 2000 Jan 2000 Oct/Dec 99/Jan/Feb/May 2000 Jan 2000 Aug-Sep 2000 Jan-Mar/Jun 2000 Nov-Dec 99/Jan-Feb 2000 Mar/Jul 2000 Jul-Aug 2000 Feb/Apr/May 2000 Oct-Dec 99/Feb/Jan/Jul 2000 Oct-Dec 1999 Jul-Aug 2000 Dredged Material Management Program Major activities for fiscal year 2000 were (1) monitoring surveys at the Portland, Central Long Island Sound, Massachusetts Bay, Rockland, New London, and Western Long Island Sound disposal sites (2) maintenance, replacement, and repositioning of disposal site buoys. Additionally, 2 monitoring study reports were completed and distributed to the public and regional resource agencies. Total cost of contracts was $650,000. Labor costs of $170,000 for program management, sampling and testing, and environmental analysis were incurred. Long Island Sound New England and New York Districts have an ongoing responsibility for maintenance of the 55 existing Federal Navigation Projects in Long Island Sound and adjacent waters. Work this FY consisted of continuing a Dredged Material Disposal Site Designation study in cooperation with EPA. A total of $1,389,060 was expended this FY on a continuing contract for the preparation of an Environmental Impact Statement, $32,000 for project coordination and management, and $6,800 for contract administration. A cost of $4,500 was incurred for conducting public meetings and conferences associated with the EIS process. 1-72 NEW YORK, NY DISTRICT* NEW YORK, NY DISTRICT This district comprises western Vermont, small portions of western Massachusetts and Connecticut, eastern New York including Long Island, and northeastern New Jersey, embraced in the drainage basins tributary to Lake Champlain and St. Lawrence River system east thereof and to the Atlantic Ocean from New York-Connecticut State Line to, but not including Manasquan Inlet, NJ. In addition it exercises jurisdiction over matters pertaining to improvement of Great Lakes to Hudson River waterway. Under the direction of the Secretary of the Army, the District Engineer, as Supervisor of New York Harbor, also exercises jurisdiction under the laws enacted for the preservation of the tidal waters of New York Harbor, its adjacent or tributary waters, and the waters of Long Island Sound. IMPROVEMENTS _ Navigation Page Beach Erosion Control (con't) 1. Aquatic Plant Control 2-3 29. Sandy Hook to Barnegat Inlet, NJ 2-18 2. Buttermilk Channel, NY 2-3 30. Other Authorized Beach Erosion 3. East Rockaway Inlet, NY 2-3 control projects 2-19 4. Fire Island to Jones Inlet, NY 2-4 31. Beach erosion control work under 5. Glen Cove, NY 2-5 special authorization 2-19 6. Hudson River, NY 2-5 Flood Control 7. Hudson River at Athens, NY 2-6 32. Hackensack Meadowlands, NJ 2-19 8. Jamaica Bay, NY 2-6 33. Joseph G. Minish Passaic River Waterfront 9. Kill Van Kull & Newark Bay, NJ & NY 2-7 and Historic Area, NJ 2-19 10. Lake Montauk Harbour, NY 2-8 34. New York City Watershed, NY 2 -20 11. Mamaroneck Harbor, NY 2-8 35. Passaic River Basin, NJ & NY 2 -20 12. Narrows and Lake Champlain, NY 2-9 36. Preservation of Natural Flood Storage, 13. New York Harbor and Adjacent Channels, Passaic River, NJ 2-21 (Port Jersey), NJ 2-9 37. Ramapo at Oakland, NJ 2-21 14. New York Harbor-Collection and Removal 38.Raritan River Basin, Greenbrook Sub-Basin, NJ 2-22 of Drift 2-10 39. Inspection of complete flood contro lprojects 2-23 15. New York Harbor-Entrance Channels 40. Other authorized flood control projects 2-23 and Anchorage Areas 2-10 41 .Flood control work under special authorization 2-23 16. New York and New Jersey Channels 2-11 General Investigations 17. Raritan River, NY 2-12 42. Surveys 2-24 18. Raritan River to Arthur Kill Cutoff 43. Collection and study of basic data 2-24 Channel, NJ 2-13 44. Deauthorized projects 2-24 19. Sag Harbor, NY 2-13 Tables 20. Supervisor of New York Harbor 2-13 Table 2-A Cost & Financial Statement 2-25 21. Reconnaissance and Condition Surveys 2-14 Table 2-B Authorizing legislation 2-28 22. Other Authorized Navigation Projects 2-14 Table 2-C Hudson River, NY, Features of Lock and Dam 23. Navigation work under special authorization 2-14 Included In Existing Project 2-35 Beach Erosion Control Table 2-E Supervisor of New York Harbor 24. Atlantic Coast of Long Island, Jones Inlet Statement of Activities 2-35 to East Rockaway Inlet; Table 2-F Reconnaissance and Condition Surveys 2-36 Long Beach Island, NY 2-14 Table 2-G Other Authorized Navigation Projects 2-37 25. East Rockaway Inlet to Rockaway Inlet Table 2-H Other Authorized Beach Erosion Control and Jamaica Bay, NY 2-14 Projects 2-39 26. Fire Island Inlet to Montauk Point, NY 2-15 Table 2-I Other Authorized Flood Control Projects 2-39 27. Raritan Bay and Sandy Hook, NJ 2-17 Table 2-J Surveys 2-40 2-1 -- 28. Rockaway Inlet - Norton Pt (Coney Island) 2-17 Table 2-K Preconstruction Engineering & Design 2-40 Table 2-L Cost for Flood Plain Management Services 2-40 Table 2-M Deauthorized Projects 2-41 Table 2-N Section 107 Study 2-42 Table 2-0 Section 103 Studies 2-42 Table 2-P Section 205 Studies 2-43 Table 2-Q Section 14 Studies 2-43 Table 2-R Section 206 Studies 2-43 Table 2-S Section 1135 Studies 2-43 2-2 NEW YORK, NY DISTRICT 1. AQUATIC PLANT CONTROL Location. Navigable waters, tributary streams, connecting channels, and other allied waters in New York District. Existing Project. Provides for control and progressive eradication of water chestnut. Eurasian water milfoil, and other obnoxious aquatic plant growths from the navigable waters, tributary streams, connecting channels, and other allied waters of the United States, in the combined interest of navigation, flood control, drainage, agriculture, fish and wildlife conservation, public health, and related purposes, including continued research for development of the most effective and economic control measures. (See Table 2-B for Authorizing Legislation.) Local cooperation. Local interests were required to provide 30 percent of the cost of the program except as modified by 1962 River and Harbor Act and agree to hold the United States free from damages. The Water Resources Development Act of 1986 changed the local responsibility from 30% to 50%. In FY 87 the States involved in the program were permitted to keep the cost sharing at 30% by order of the Secretary of the Army. Starting FY 88, However, local sponsors contributed 50% of the costs. The FY 2001 APC Project Cooperation Agreement is scheduled to be executed in May 2001. )perations and results during period. The purpose of the c'ontrol program, started in FY 1982, is for the removal of nuisance aquatic plants in the Lake Champlain Basin, Vermont. Recent work continued the removal of water chestnut and eurasian milfoil from portions of the basin. Condition as of September 30. Reconnaissance report covering the aquatic plant problems of the North Atlantic Division areas was complete in August 1967. The General Design Memorandum for this program was completed in March 1982 by the State of Vermont. The total Federal cost of this control program to date is $2,059,338 in FY 1998, the New York District did not cost-share a FY 1998 program with the State of Vermont, as Federal funds were not yet available. In October 1991, Waterways Experiment Station was directed to conduct a multi-year study which would identify and test potential biocontrol agents of water chestnuts. No successful biocontrol agents of water chestnut were identified. FY 2001 funds in the amount of $300,000.00 will be used to continue the Aquatic Plant Control Program with the state of Vermont. 2. BUTTERMILK CHANNEL, NY Location. Connects deep water in Upper Bay, New York Harbor, southwest of Governors Island, with deep-water in "t River northeast of Governors Island, and, with Bay Ridge 1 Red Hook Channels forms an easterly channel along Brooklyn waterfront from Narrows to East River. It lies between Governors Island and Borough of Brooklyn, New York City. (See Coastal and Geoditic Survey Charts 12334 and 12335). New York, New York District Previous Projects. For details see page 205, Annual Report for 1932 Existing Project. A channel 1,000 feet wide, 40 feet deep at mean low water for width of existing 500-foot width of existing channel. Suitable widening at junctions with East River and Anchorage Channel to 35 feet deep and with Red Hook Channel to 40 feet deep and for additional widening with Anchorage and Red Hook Channels to provide a minimum clear channel width of 2,100 feet to 35 feet deep. Section included in project is 2.25 miles long, mean tidal range 4.4 feet; mean range of spring tides, 5.3 feet, irregular fluctuations due to wind and atmospheric pressure vary from 3.8 feet mean low water up to 5.2 feet above mean high water, new work for completed projected cost $4,093,951, exclusive of amounts expended on previous projects. (See Table 2-b for Authorizing Legislation.) Local Cooperation. None Required. Terminal Facilities. See Port Series No. 5, revised 1978. Operations and results during period. A contract for dredging was awarded onn August 8, 2000 for removal of all material except ledge rock lying above the plane of 35 feet below MLW in Sections A and B with 2 feet allowable overdepth, and 40 feet below MLW in Section C with 2 feet allowable overdepth, from specified areas of Buttermilk Channel with placement of the dredged material at the Historic Area Remediation Site (HARS). Approximately 112,000 cubic yards of material was dredged from Buttermilk Channel. Operations and maintenance funds in the amount of $1,084,117.22 was expended on this project during FY 2000. Condition as of September 30. Work under existing project commenced October 1903 and was completed March 1965. Easterly 500-foot width of channel, from Anchorage Channel to East River, was completed to a 40-foot depth in May 1935. Westerly 500-foot channel, including widening the junction with East River was completed to a 35-foot depth in July 1961. Widening the junctions with Anchorage and Red Hook Channels was completed in March 1965.Total cost of existing project to September 30, 1982 was $8,971,475, $122,051 public works funds and $971,900 regular funds, a total of $4,093,051 for new work and $4,877,524 for maintenance. 3. EAST ROCKAWAY INLET, NY Location. On south shore of Long Island between main body of island and western end of Long Beach. It is 10 miles east of Rockaway Inlet and about 27 miles by water south and 2-3 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 2000 st from the Battery, New York City. (See National Ocean Survey Chart 12353.) Existing Project. A channel 12 feet deep at mean low water and 250 feet wide from 12 foot contour in Long Beach Channel protected by a jetty. Mean tidal range, 4.3 feet: mean range of spring tides. 5.2 feet above mean high water. New work for completed project cost $603,969, including $100.000 contributed funds. (See Table 2-B for Authorization Legislation.) Local Cooperation. Complied with Terminal Facilities. There are numerous terminals in Oceanside, Island Park, Long Beach, and East Rockaway, including oil terminals. Other terminals are repair and mooring docks with mechanical handling facilities. There are public wharves at East Rockaway and Woodmere. Waterfront on north side of Long Beach has bilkheaded. Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations and results during the period. A combined maintenance dredging and beach nourishment continuing contract for East Rockaway Inlet/Rockaway Beach was awarded September 27, 2000 to Weeks Marine Inc. The maintenance dging phase of the project involved the dredging of 241,470 cubic yards of material from East Rockaway Inlet federal navigation channel with placement at Rockaway Beach. Dredging is expected to be completed during the 1st quarter of FY 2001. Operations and Maintenance funds in the amount of $136,500 was expended on this project during FY 2000. Conditions as of September 30. Work under existing project began February 1933 and is 10 percent complete. East jetty, 4,250 feet long was completed in July 1934. Project channel was completed in May, 1935. 4. FIRE ISLAND TO JONES INLET, NY Location. On south shore of Long Island, about 50 miles by water south and east of Battery, New York City. Fire Island Inlet is the main entrance into Great South Bay from the Atlantic Ocean. (See National Ocean Survey Chart 12352.) Existing Project A jetty at Fire Island Inlet extending generally southwest and south for 5,000 feet from high ground on Democrat Point at the west end of Fire Island and a channel 14 t deep and 450 feet wide along the northern edge of the .et's shoaling area connecting the ocean to the deep water in the Inlet. Mean tidal ranges at the ocean and inlet ends of Democrat Point are 4.1 feet and 2.4 feet respectively. Irregular fluctuations due to wind and atmospheric pressure vary from 2.5 feet below mean low water up to 6.2 feet above mean high water on the ocean side. (See Table 2-B for Authorizing Legislation.) Local Cooperation. Requires cost sharing and lands, easements and rights-of-way Terminal Facilities. Great South Bay has extensive public and private facilities for mooring and servicing recreational boats. Much of this traffic uses the inlet during the boating season, and some traffic (Coast Guard craft and party head fishing boats) continues throughout the year. Condition as of September 30. The jetty, completed in 1941 surpassed its capacity as a sand entrapping agent in a little over a decade. Since the extensive sand bars and shoals cofltinued to form west of the jetty and in the inlet throat. Hydraulic dredging in the inlet was undertaken in 1959 and again in 1964 under a combined beach erosion control and navigation authorization (1958 Act). Since then 3 more hydraulic dredging operations were conducted starting 1973 and completed in 1977 under provision of the 1962 Act (See Table 2B). Maintenance dredging using a small hopper dredges has also been done from time to time. Due to local concerns about inlet dredging and consequent erosion at Oak Beach, maintenance had been deferred since 1979 which allowed the complete shoaling of the authorized project channel. To facilitate the navigation in this period the existing natural channel was dredged in FY 1985 and in FY 1987. In FY 1987 sand was deposited offshore of Gilgo Beach by hopperdredge using operations and maintenance funds. O&M funds were also used during FY 1987 and 1988 to make repairs to the inner portion of the jetty. In March 1988 the District recommended to plan to maintain a realigned channel in the vicinity of the natural channel to a depth of 14 feet (plus 2 feet of allowable overdepth) and a width of 450 feet. Th plan also recommended placement of the dredged material along Gilgo Beach for shore protection purposes. The recommended plan was approved by the Assistant Secretary of the Army for Civil Works on 2 August 1988. Since FY 1990, the realigned channel was dredged to project each year with placement of material along Gilgo Beach for shore protection purpose. Operations and results during period. The fifth scheduled nourishment cycle was awarded on 8 September 1999. A total of 1,107,718 cubic yards of material was dredged from Fire Island Channel and deposition basin with placement of 972,337 cubic yards of this material at Gilgo Beach and the remaining 135,381 cubic yards of material was placed at Robert Moses State Park Beach. Total direct contract cost was $9,851,971.82. Construction General funds expended in FY 2-4 NEW YORK, NY DISTRICT ,00 was $ 3,998,744.17; Operations and maintenance funds expended in FT 2000 was $2,331,837.87; and State funds expended in FY 2000 was $2,389,691.89 which includes 100% State funds for optional work performed at Robert Moses State Park Beach. 5. GLEN COVE, NY Location. A narrow tidal inlet extending eastwardly about 1 mile from east side of Hempstead Harbor on the north shore of Long Island, 26 miles northeast of the Battery, New York City. (See National Ocean Survey Chart 12366). Existing Project. Provides for a channel 100 feet wide and 8 feet deep at mean low from deep water in Hempstead Harbor about 1 mile to the head of navigation at city of Glen Cove. Mean tidal range, 7.5 feet; mean range of spring tides, 8.7 feet; irregular fluctuations due to wind and barometric pressure vary from 3.6 feet below mean low water up to 8.4 feet above mean high water. New work for completed project cost $29,760, exclusive of $29,774 expended from contributed funds. Widening to 100 feet the upper 1,630 feet of channel where it crosses to foregoing description and cost estimate. Existing project adopted by 1925 River and Harbor Act (H. Doc. 207, 68th Cong., Ist sess.). Latest published map is in project doc- 'ent. Local cooperation. River and Harbor Act of March 3, 1925 provides that local interests pay one-half of first cost of the work, provided rights-of-way, spoil disposal areas, and bulkheads, and give assurances that adequate terminals will be built. Complied with as to contribution of one-half of first cost of work done to date, ceding of rights-of-way, provision of disposal areas, and the construction of terminals. Pending construction of bulkheads by local interests along southerly section of channel in the upper 1,600 feet of the improvement, a channel of less than project width has been evacuated. In a letter dated February 4, 1948, the Commissioner, Department of Public Works, City of Glen Cove, was notified of the conditions affecting the remaining work. There is no indication as to when compliance with these conditions may be expected. Terminal Facilities. There are 1,875 feet of bulkheads along northerly side of waterway. Terminals are adequate for present needs and there is ample waterfront, both public and private, for additional terminals as'needs arise. Operations and results during the period. The basic portion of the contract wa awarded on 30 August 2000 for the removal and placement of approx. 30,000 c.y. of sediment '30,000) on the temporary dewatering site. The execution of Soptions (removal/placement of the remaining 15,000 c.y.) would depend on the remaining capacity of the dewatering site. Dewatering/temporary storage site preparation started in late September 2000 with dredging to take place in FY 2001 as a continuing contract. Conditions as of September 30. Entire existing project is about 55 percent complete. Work under the active portion of existing project was commenced on August 1933 and completed August 1934. The work done provided a channel 100 feet wide from deep water in Hempstead Harbor for 3,470 feet, thence gradually decreasing to 50 feet wide for 180 feet, and 50 feet wide for about 1,450 feet to the head of the improvement. Head of navigation is at City of Glen Cove, about I mile above the mouth. Work remaining to complete existing project consists of widening to 100 feet the upper 1,630 feet of channel and building a sand fence along the north side of channel where it crosses the beach. The Glen Cove Creek maintenance dredging project consists of the removal of total, 45,000 c.y. of sediment from the creek with the placement of the dredged material an an upland site for dewatering and temporary storage. The dredged material would be removed later by the City of GlenCove for beneficial use, if feasible, and/or final disposal at an approved upland site. 6. HUDSON RIVER, NY Location. Originates in Adirondack Mountains, about 250 miles in a direct line and 315 miles along its course from the Battery, New York City, and flows generally southerly into New York Bay- Section under improvement extends from New York City about 156 miles to Waterford. (See National Ocean Survey Charts 12335, 12341, 12343, 12347, 12348, and 14786.) Previous project. For details see Annual Reports for 1915 and 1938, pages 164 and 226, respectively. Existing projects. A channel 600 feet wide from New York City to Kingston, and thence 400 feet wide to Albany, with widening at bends, a turning basin 700 feet wide and 1,200 feet long at Albany, and 2 anchorages, 1 near Hudson and 1 near Stuyvesant, each 400 feet wide and an average length of 2,400 feet; all with depth of 32 feet in soft material and 34 feet in rock to 2,200 feet south of the Mall Bridge; thence 27 feet deep and 400 feet wide to 900 feet south of Mall Bridge, thence 14 feet deep at lower low water and generally 400 feet wide to Federal lock at Troy; and thence of same depth and 200 feet wide to southern limit of State barge canal at Waterford; and removal of State dam at Troy and construction of a lock and dam about 2.5 miles below Waterford. Channel is to be formed by dredging and rock excavation, and maintained by dredging and constructing new, and raising and repairing old, longitudinal dikes, built partly under previous projects and partly by the State of NY. In the tidal section below the Federal dam at Troy, the assumed lowest low water plane downstream to Albany is 3 feet below mean sea level. Mean tidal range is about 5 feet below the dam and about 4.9 feet at Albany. The normal pool 2-5 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 2000 /el above the dam from Troy to Waterford is 14.3 feet above mean sea level, with the mean range of pool level in seasons of moderate rains being 2.2 feet. (See Table 2-C for features of lock and dam included in existing project.) New work for completed project cost $39,050,019 exclusive of amounts of expended on previous projects. Widening to form harbors at Albany and Troy, NY, to 12 feet deep at a cost of $522,000 (1954) and completion of 27-foot channel at Albany at a cost of $642,000 (1957) was placed in deferred for restudy category, and has since been deauthorized. All three features of work are excluded from foregoing description of existing project and cost estimate. Construction of mooring facilities has been authorized. (See Table 2-B for Authorizing Legislation.) Local cooperation. Complied with except that local interests must furnish suitable soil disposal areas for future maintenance as required. Terminal facilities. See Port Series No. 6 Operations and results during period. Operations and maintenance funds in the amount of $1,032,362 were expended on engineering design, and supervision and administration for the next dredging cycle. iovernment plant and hired labor were employed through mie fiscal year performing project condition surveys at a total cost including supervision and administration of $259,292 for maintenance during FY 2000. Government plant and hired labor were employed through the fiscal year in the removal of snags and other obstructions which constituted a potential hazard to navigation at a total cost including supervision and administration of $320,847 Government plant and hired labor were employed through the fiscal year performing operation and maintenance of the Troy Lock and Dam and associated building and grounds. Total funds in the amount $1,038,327 were expended during FY 2000 for operation and maintenance of the Troy Lock and Dam and associated buildings and grounds including performing instrumentation monitoring, periodic inspection of the Troy Dam gallery, supervision and administration. Condition as of September 30. Work under existing project began in July 1910 and was substantially completed in November 1965. New lock and dam at Troy, removal of dam at Troy and construction of 15,545 linear feet of dikes also are complete. In reconstruction of old dikes 39,676 linear feet -e raised to adopted crest height. Channel from New York .y to Albany is complete to a depth of 32 feet except for the 1,500 linear foot section at the northern end of the 32-foot project which has never been dredged to project depth. Channel from Albany to Waterford is complete to a depth of 14 feet. 7. HUDSON RIVER AT ATHENS, NY Location. Athens, New York is along the west bank of the Hudson River approximately 116 miles above the Battery, New York City and approximately 29 miles downstream of Albany, New York. (See Geological Survey, Hudson North, NY quadrangle). Existing project. No constructed project has ever been done in Athens. The main Hudson River navigation channel runs along the east bank of the Hudson River, Hudson New York opposite Middle Ground Flats. The proposed project for Athens consists of the design and construction of a 300-foot wide channel to a depth of 24 feet (mean low water) extending from the existing Federal in the vicinity of the Hudson City Light to the north dock at Union Street in Athens. The project was authorized in Section 110 of the September 1996 Energy and Water Appropriations Act. Preliminary surveys, geologic, and sediment chemical tests have been carried out. A preliminary channel alignment has been prepared with accompanying dredge quantities. The preliminary cost is $20,400,000 with additional cost needed for improvements at the existing terminal docks. The Design Agreement and Project Management Plan have been completed and were approved to by the non- Federal sponsor, Green County Industrial Development Agency. Local cooperation. The non-Federal sponsor has signed the Design Agreement and provided the 25% cost share of the design, studies can be initiated. If the project is found to be viable, then another non-Federal sponsor would cost share in the construction. Operation and results during period, and condition as of Sept. 30. Preliminary studies have been completed and the engineering design and environmental assessment activities have been initiated. 8. JAMAICA BAY, NY Location. Inside south shore of Long Island, the entrance being about 17 miles by water south and east of the Battery, New York City. (See National Ocean Survey Chart No. 12350). Previous projects. For details see page 1770 of Annual Report for 1915, and page 185 of Annual Report for 1938. Existing Project. Provides for an interior channel extending from vicinity of Marine Parkway Bridge along west and north shores of the bay, 18 feet deep at mean low water and 300 feet wide to Mill Basin, with a swinging basin, 1,000 feet wide and 1,000 feet long at the point - thence 12 feet deep and 200 feet wide to Fresh Creek Basin; and interior channel extending from the same locality along south shore to Head of Bay, 15 feet deep and 200 feet wide, a channel in Mott Basin, 15 feet deep and 200 feet wide extending from the channel along the south shore, 3,000 feet to junction of the two branches, thence 2-6 NEW YORK, NY DISTRICT 200 feet in north branch (Inwood Creek) and 3,200 feet in south branch; and an entrance channel connecting the two interior channels with deep water in Atlantic Ocean, of suitable hydraulic dimensions to maintain present tidal prism in the bay, but not less than 18 feet deep and 500 feet wide from opposite Barren Island to Rockaway Point, thence enlarging to not less than 20 feet deep and 1,000 feet wide to the sea, protected by one riprap jetty. Length of section included in project is 19.7 miles. Mean tidal range, 4.9 feet at Barren Island, and 5.1 feet at Head of Bay; mean range of spring tides, 5.9 and 6.1 feet, respectively: irregular fluctuations due to wind and atmospheric pressure vary from 4 feet below mean low water to 4.9 feet above mean high water. Cost for new work for completed project is $4,466,421 (July 1961), excluding amounts expended on previous projects. Legal cooperation. River and Harbor Act of 1945 provides that in lieu of conditions heretofore prescribed local interest furnish suitable areas for disposal of dredge materials for new work and subsequent maintenance, and hold the United States free from damages. City of New York was notified of conditions of local cooperation in letter dated January 25, 1946. In letter dated February 7, 1946, the Mayor of New York advised 't disposal areas are available and necessary document Alding the United States free from claim for damages" would be executed. River and Harbor Act of 1950 provides local interests furnish lands, easements, rights-of-way, and suitable areas for disposal of dredged material during construction and subsequent maintenance, hold the United States free from damages and perform all necessary alterations to existing terminals and bulkheads, and dredge adequate approaches thereto. These conditions have been fulfilled. Terminal facilities. See Port Series No. 5. Operations and results during the period. A continuing contract was awarded to B&B Dredging Company on 20 September 2000 for maintenance dredging of the Outer Entrance Channel of Jamaica Bay for removal of all material except ledge rock lying above the plane of 20 feet below mean low water with placement of the dredged material on the nearby bay beaches at Breezy Point, New York. Approximately 249,210 cubic yards of material is expected to be removed. The scheduled date for completion is 24 November 2000. Operation and maintenance funds in the amount of $470,500.00 was expended on this project during FY 2000. Conditions as of September 30. Work under existing project was commenced in August 1912 and completed in June 1961. Westerly interior channel from Barren Island to Fresh Creek Basin and swinging basin at Mill Basin were completed in April 1929. Southerly interior channel and channel in Mott Basin, including its two branches were completed in June 1961. No new work dredging of entrance channel, was done, since depths provided under previous project were greater than those required under existing project. East jetty was restored to project dimensions in August 1963. 9. KILL VAN KULL-NEWARK BAY CHANNEL, NJ & NY Location. The project includes Kill Van Kull connecting upper New York Bay with Newark Bay, and channels in lower Newark Bay serving Port Newark and Elizabeth Marine Terminal. These terminals are located on the west shore of Newark Bay. (See National Ocean Survey Chart 12333.) Existing project. Deepening the existing Kill Van Kull channel and channels in lower Newark Bay, including turning and maneuvering areas, as well as deepening the Elizabeth and Port Newark channels. The deepening to be done from the existing 35 foot depth incrementally to 40 feet and then 45 feet. The Federal cost of construction is estimated at $582,500,000 with an additional $436,600,000 to be contributed by local interests. Local cooperation. The Port Authority of New York and New Jersey, the local cooperating agency, has entered into a local cooperation agreement with the Government which was executed on 30 May 1986. A supplemental agreement was executed on 21 May 1987, for Phase I. A new project cooperating agreement will be entered into on 30 January 1999 for Phase II (40 feet to 45 feet). Terminal facilities. See Port Series No. 5, Vol. 2. Operations and results during period, and condition as of Sept. 30. Stage 1, channel deepening to 40 feet in seven contracts was substantially completed. Contract No. 1, awarded in June 1987, is completed. Contract No. 2 was awarded in July 1988 and is completed. Contract No. 3 was awarded in Sept. 1988 and is completed. Removal of rock and hard material in the Kill Van Kull and Newark Bay was divided in three contracts, 4A, 4B, and 4C. Contract 4A was awarded in April 1991 and was completed in Sept. 1995. Contract No. 5 was awarded in May 1988 and is complete. Contract 4C was awarded in Sept. 1994 and was completed in July 1995. Stage 2, channel deepening to 45 feet has commenced with start of work on a Limited Re-evaluation Report, which was approved Oct., 1997. First construction contract for Area 2 was awarded 16 March 1999, and was completed September 2000 The second constriction control for Area 1 was awarded 4 Aug. 1999. The third construction control for Area 4A was awarded 28 Feb. 2000. 2-7 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 2000 10. LAKE MAMARONECK HARBOR, NY Location. On the east side of Long Island, about 3 miles by land west of Montauk Point and 125 miles by water east of New York City. It is land-locked on the east, south and west sides and is connected to the north with Block Island Sound by an artificial inlet. (See National Ocean Survey Chart 13209). Existing Project. A channel 12 feet deep and 150 feet wide extending from 12-foot contour in Block Island Sound to same depth in existing yacht basin east of Star Island; a boat basin 10 feet deep, 400 feet wide, and 900 feet long, northwest of Star Island; repair and extension shoreward of the east and west jetties; and addition of sport fishing facilities on top of both jetties. Section included in the project is 0.7 miles long and. Mean tidal range, 1.9 feet; mean range of spring tides, 2.2 feet. Irregular fluctuations due to wind and atmospheric pressure vary from 2 feet below mean low water up to 7 feet above mean high water. For latest published map see project document. (See Table 2-B for Authorizing Legislation). Leghal Cooperation. Fully complied with Terminal Facilities. There are numerous marinas and mooring facilities for recreational boats. In addition, two terminals used for commercial fishing vessels. None of the terminals ie rail connections or are equipped with freight handling uevices. Treminals are considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations and results during period. A contract for rehabilitation of eastern jetty at Lake Montauk Harbor, New York was awarded on 6 September 1995. Rehabilitation work was completed June 11, 1996. This work was restructuring station 6+25 to station 10+25 for 400 feet and constructing a 50 feet Tie-in station 13+00, under contract No. DACW51-95-C- 0073. The total cost of contract was $960,31. The contractor was Ribar Contracting Inc., Westbury, New York. Conditions as of September 30. Work under existing project was commenced August 1942 and was completed November 1968. Dredging entrance channel and shoreward extension of west jetty were performed from August 1942 to January 1943, at the request of the Navy Department with Navy funds. Extension of east jetty and repair of both jetties and dredging the boat basin was completed'November 1968. Operations and results during the period. A dredging and beach placement contract was awarded to Gibson and Cushman Company on 27 January 2000. The degree of shoal- : in the navigation channel had determined a need to per- Im maintenance dredging of the inlet with placement of 28,000 cubic yards of material as beach placement along the beach of west jetty. As work for others under this contract, the U.S. Coast Guard Station Montauk mooring area was accomplished in conjunction with this maintenance dredging as Option 1. Operations and maintenance funds in the amount of $590,571.28 was expended on this project during FY 2000. 11. MAMARONECK HARBOR, NY Location. On north shore of Long Island South, 5 miles west of Connecticut state line, and 27 miles by water east of the Battery, New York City. (See National Ocean Survey Chart 12367). Previous projects. For detail see Annual Reports for 1915, 1924, and 1938, pages 1759, 141, and 160, respectively. Existing Project. A channel 10 feet deep at mean low water and 100 feet wide from deep water in Long Island Sound to Orient Point, and thence 80 feet wide to a point about 150 feet below the Boston Post Road, including an extension to northeast 300 feet long and 80 feet wide, all the widening at bends; for 2 anchorages, 1 of 10-foot depth about 4 1/2 acres in extent and the second about 14 acres in area to a depth of 6 feet; and an anchorage in the West Basin 6 feet deep at mean low water with a channel of like depth and 80 feet wide connecting this anchorage with the main channel. Section. included in project, 1 3/4 miles. Mean tidal range, 6.9 feet; mean range of spring tides, 8.3 feet; irregular fluctuations due to wind and atmospheric pressure vary from 3.9 feet below mean low water up to 8.5 feet above mean high water. New work for completion cost $258,996 exclusive of $151,044 and $43,023 expended from contributed funds, required and contributed funds, other, respectively, and amounts expended in previous projects. Local cooperation. Provisions under River and Harbor Acts of 1922 and 1935 compiled with except local interests must provide adequate and suitable spoil-disposal areas suitably diked or bulk-headed as needed. River and Harbor Act of 1960 provides that local interests contribute in cash 50 percent of first cost of construction, to be paid in lump sum prior to construction final allocation of cost to be made after actual costs are determined; provide lands, rights-of-way, and suitable disposal areas for construction and future maintenance of anchorage; hold the United States free from damages; provide at all times adequate public landing facilities, open to all on equal terms, for access to the shore by users of the anchorage; and allocate and adequate portion of the anchorage to accommodate a minimum of 15 boats and provide mooring facilities therein, specifically designated for use by local craft. Assurance of compliance were furnished by the village of Mamaroneck and accepted by the District Engineer on April 3, 1962. Terminal facilities. See Port Series No. 5, Revised 1978, Vol 2. 2-8 NEW YORK, NY DISTRICT Operations and results during the period. A maintenance and advance maintenance dredging contract was awarded to Jay Cashman, Inc. on 17 February 1999 for removal of all material from Mamaroneck Harbor with disposal of the material at the Central Lond Island Sound Disposal Area. Approximately 166,820 cubic yards of material was removed from Mamaroneck Harbor between February and May of 1999 at a project cost of $5,712,654.52. During FY 2000 the contract was modified to reflect actual yardage dredged (161,935 cy's ) resulting in a 117,240.00 decrease in the total contract cost. Condition as of September 30. Work under existing project began in October 1924 and was completed in May 1966. Work completed consisted of providing a 10 foot main channel, branch channel and anchorage area in East Basin completed in April 1933. A 6 foot connecting channel and anchorage area in West Basin completed in July 1939. An enlargement of anchorage area in East Basin to a depth of 6 feet completed in May 1966. In June 1963 and May 1966 controlling mean low water depth was 10 feet for a width varying from 100 to 80 feet in main channel from Long Island South to East Basin anchorage and thence 9 feet to upper limit including branch channel; in East Basin anchorage areas, 10 feet in 10 foot anchorage sa and 6 feet in 6 foot anchorage area; in West Basin, 6 feet 6 foot anchorage area and 6 feet in connecting channel cnereto. 12. NARROWS OF LAKE CHAMPLAIN, NY & VT Location. This waterway, 37 miles long, comprises southern end of Lake Champlain and extends from Whitehall to Crown Point, NY at southern extremity of lake, northerly to Benson Landing, VT. (See N.O.S. Chart 14784). Previous projects. For details, see Annual Reports for 1931, and 1963, pages 256 and 177 respectively. Existing project. A channel extending from Whitehall, NY at head of Lake Champlain to Benson Landing, 12 feet deep at low lake level and generally 150 feet wide, and installation of fender booms at Putts Rock, Putts Leap, Narrows near Dresden, Pulpit Point and, Cedar Mountain. Reference plane of low take level is 93 feet above mean sea level. Section included in project is about 13.5 miles. Usual annual variation of lake level is 5.8 feet and extreme variation varies from 0.6 foot below up to 8.8 feet above low lake level. Widening channel throughout its entire length to project width of 200 feet is inactive and excluded from foregoing 1cription of existing project and cost estimate. (See Table 2- for Authorizing Legislation. Local cooperation. None required. Operations and results during period. Government plant and hired labor were employed intermittently during fiscal year 1999 in the removal of snag and obstructions that constituted a potential hazard to navigation at a cost of $29,311. Government plant and hired labor were employed in the repair and replacement of deteriorated fender booms at a cost of $13,058 during the fiscal year. Operations and Maintenance funds in the amount of $6,775 were expended during FY 1999 on project condition surveys and funds in the amount of $159,477 were expended on engineering and design work associated with proposed maintenance dredging of the project channel. Condition as of September 30. Work under the existing project was commenced June 1919 and is about 77 percent complete. A channel 12 feet deep at low lake level and least width of 150 feet has been excavated throughout the length of the improvement, except at the Elbow, where the width is 110 feet. Fender booms have been placed at the elbow. (Putts Leap and Putts Rock.) 13. NEW YORK HARBOR AND ADJACENT CHANNELS, (PORT JERSEY CHANNEL), NJ Location. The Port Jersey Channel is the navigation channel from its confluence with Anchorage Channel to its head of navigation in Bayonne, where Global Terminal provides berthing facilities for container commerce, located within the Port of New York and New Jersey. Existing Project. Deepening the existing (non-Federal) Port Jersey Channel and a turning basin at the head of navigation. The authorized project provides for deepening the existing 38- foot deep channel to a depth of 41-feet deep below mean low and generally 450 feet wide with suitable bends and turning areas to extend from deep water in the Anchorage Channel, New York Harbor, westward approximately 12,000 feet along the southern boundary of the Port Jersey peninsula, to the head of navigation in Jersey City/Bayonne, New Jersey. The Federal cost of construction is estimated at $84,300 with and additional $28,895 to be contributed by the Federal sponsor.. Local cooperation. The State of New Jersey, the primary local cooperating agency and the Port Authority of N.Y. and N.J. will enter into a Project Cooperating Agreement (PCA) with the Government. Operations and results during period, and conditions as of September 30. On Feb 2000 the Limited Reevaluation Report (LRR), which recommended the deepening of the channel to 41 feet, was submitted by Corps of Engineering Headquarters to Assistant Secretary of the Army for Civil Works for submission to Congress. The dredged material disposal site environmental assessment was completed in June 2000. The final PCA negotiation is underway with the project sponsors. 2-9 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 2000 14. NEW YORK HARBOR-COLLECTION AND REMOVAL OF DRIFT Location. Applies to Lower and Upper Bays, New York Harbor; East River, Harlem River, Hudson River Channel, New York, NY and New Jersey Channels, Newark Bay, NJ and their tributaries. Existing project. Provides for collection, removal and disposal of drift, derelict vessels, deteriorated shore structures and debris along shores of New York Harbor and tributary waters, and for the repair of certain other piers, wharves and shore structures. Work authorized before Act of 1974 was restricted solely to removal of drift from waterway and was funded as maintenance activity. The current estimate of first cost is $292,000,000 (October 1997 P.L.) including $68,000,000 cash contribution from local interests plus $89,000,000 to be contributed for repair and disposal of deteriorated shore structures in use. (See Table 2-B for Authorizing Legislation.) Local cooperation. Local cooperation conditions of the plans currently under review by the Chief of Engineers provide that local interests must furnish all lands, easements and rightsof- way required for the improvement; hold the United States 'e from damages; enact and enforce local legislation to pre- It creation of sources of drift, contribute in cash one third of me first cost of the Federal work, and make necessary repairs to deteriorated structures in use so as to eliminate them as a source of drift. These conditions are subject to approval by the Secretary of the Army and the President, as stipulated in Section 113 of the authorizing law, Public Law 91-611. Operations and results (New work-cumulative to date). A total of five Liberty State Park contracts have been completed at a cost of $10,321,112. East River-Manhattan Waterfront contract was completed at a cost of $1,477,806. A contract for the removal of pier 17 and 18 on the East River was completed at a cost of $219,604. The City of Elizabeth contract was completed at a cost of $791,656. The Stapleton, Staten Island contract was completed at a cost of $2,910,400. A contract for the city of Hoboken was completed at a cost of $2,123,404. Work along the Jersey City South waterfront was completed at the cost of $979,580. Contract Number One at Weehawken to Edgewater was completed at a cost of $1,697,487. The Brooklyn Reach One contract was completed at a cost of $5,057,920. Work was completed on the Weehawken to Edgewater Contract No. 2 at a cost of $8,490,000, and Jersey City North Contract No. 2 at a cost of $1,800,000. The Bayonne One contract has been completed at a- cost of 35,800. Hoboken Pier B was completed at a cost of ,73,590, and Jersey City North 1 was completed at a cost of $2,358,000. Weehawken-Edgewater Contract 2A was completed at a cost of $4,550,000. Engineering and design is in progress for the Shooters Island Reach, the Arthur Kill, NY & NJ Reaches, the Bayonne 2 Reach, and the Kill Van Kull Reach. The Brooklyn 2A Reach removal contract was completed in October 1999 at a cost of $4,878,022. The Passaic River, Newark, Kearny and Passaic, NJ Reach was completed in May 1999 at a cost of $109,907. Maintenance. U.S. Debris Boats Driftmaster, Gelberman and Hayward and auxiliary plant were assigned the task of removing and disposing of floating debris that is a hazard to navigation. Removal and disposal of 560,500 cubic feet (4,379 cords) of floating debris consisting mainly of driftwood, ranging in size from small blocks to large timbers, including pilings, pieces of wreckage, derelict vessels and sections of deteriorated pier structure was accomplished at a cost of $4,888,200. Conditions as of September 30. For work authorized by Water Resources Development Act, removal of drift sources has been completed in New Jersey at Liberty State Park, the City of Elizabeth, Hoboken, and parts of Jersey City, Bayonne, Weehawken to Edgewater and Passaic River in Newark, Kearney and Passaic. The New York City work has been completed along the Manhattan side of the East River, along part of the Brooklyn waterfront, and at Stapleton, Staten Island. 15. NEW YORK HARBOR-ENTRANCE CHANNELS AND ANCHORAGE AREAS Location. In Upper and Lower Bays, New York Harbor is 330 miles southwest by water of Boston Harbor. Mass., and 165 miles northeast of entrance to Delaware Bay, NJ. The Upper Bay extends about 5.5 miles southerly from junction of Hudson and East Rivers opposite the Battery, New York City to the Narrows. Lower Bay extends about 9 miles from the Narrows to the sea. (See National Ocean Survey charts 12334, 12335, and 12349.) Existing project. Ambrose Channel 45 feet deep and 2,000 feet wide, extending about 10.2 miles from sea to deep water in the Lower bay; Anchorage Channel, and extension of Ambrose Channel, with same depth and width, in the Upper bay opposite anchorage grounds, about 5.7 miles long; and southerly entrance channel. Sandy Hook Channel (East Section) 35 feet deep and generally 800 feet wide extending 3.4 miles from 35-foot ocean contour to Bayside Channel along an alignment generally west of the South Channel; and elimination from authorized project of that portion of Bayside- Gedney Channel east of junction with new southerly entrance channel; for Bayside Channel 35 deep and 800 feet wide, extending about 5.3 miles from Bayside Channel to deep water in Lower bay; a channel along New Jersey pierhead line connecting Kill Van Kull with deep water in anchorage Channel, south of Liberty Island anchorage. 20 feet deep for 500 feet wide with sidening at bends to 800 feet and about 3 miles long; 2-10 NEW YORK, NY DISTRICT anchorage in vicinity of Liberty (Bedloes) Island (about 160 acres in extent) 20 feet deep; and for removal of Craven Shoal to 30 feet deep; for a channel 16 feet deep, 200 feet wide, and about 2.3 miles long, extending from bell buoy 23 to Hoffman and Seinburne Island; for an anchorage area in Red Hooks Flats to depths of 45, 40 and 35 feet and an anchorage area in Gravesand Bay to 47 feet deep. Project depths refer to mean low water. Mean tidal range is 4.7 at Fort Hamilton; mean range of spring tides, 5.7 feet; irregular fluctuations due to wind and atmospheric pressure vary from 3.9 feet below mean low water up to 6.2 feet above mean high water. Location cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. See Port Series No. 5,,Vol.2. Operations and results during period. Implementation of management and monitoring plans for closure of the existing ocean disposal site (the Mud Dump) and operation of the recently designated Historic Area Remediation Site (HARS) with particular emphasis on capping projects; prepared supplemental NEPA documentation and design for the selected options of the Dredged Material Management Plan (DMMP) for The Port of New York/New Jersey. These options include 'ected options of the island CDF's, new CAD pits, upland posal, innovative technologies (decontamination technologies), etc. for the medium and long term management of dredged material from the region; and continued contaminant reduction efforts recently identified under the New York/New Jersey Harbor Estuary Program and the DMMP. Operations and maintenance funds in the amount of $3,832,541.21 was expended on New York Harbor in FY '00. Condition as of September 30. Work under existing projects began in 1885 and is 100 percent complete. Main Ship and Bayside-Gedney Channels were completed to 30 feet deep in February 1891. Deepening of Bayside-Gedney Channel to 35 feet for a width of 800 feet was completed in June 1939. Ambrose Channel was completed to 40 feet deep for a width of 2,000 feet in April 1914 and substantially completed to 45 feet for a width of 2,000 feet in 1951. Relocation of Anchorage Channel was completed to 40 feet deep in October 1932. Center 800 feet was dredged to 45 feet in June 1947 and westerly 6 00-foot strip in April 1948. Easterly 600-foot strip was substantially completed in June 1953. Channel between Staten Island and Hoffman and Swinburne Islands was completed in December 1920 up to within 300 feet of southerly limits of the project. Dredged channel meets all needs of navigation and no further work of improvement is contemplated for the present. annel along New Jersey peirhead line from Kill Van Kull to achorage Channel was completed in March 1939. Widening at bends nearly southerly and northerly ends authorized in 1948 was completed to depths of 45, and 35 feet in October 1976. Anchorage Channel was relocated to the westward in 1982. Red Hook Flats Anchorage was accordingly increased in area. No dredging was required. Liberty (Bedloes) Island anchorage was completed to 20 feet in October 1944, Sandy Hook Channel (east section was completed to a depth of 35 feet in June 1963. Gravesend Bay was completed to a 47-foot depth in November 1977. 16. NEW YORK AND NEW JERSEY CHANNELS Location. Extends from deep water northwest of Sandy Hook, through Lower New York Bay and Raritan Bay, to Perth Amboy, and thence through Arthur Kill, Lower Newark Bay, and Kill Van Kull to deep water in Upper New York Bay. This route is approximately along boundary line between States of New York and New Jersey. (See National Ocean Survey Charts 12333, 12331, and 12327. Previous projects. For details, see 1963 Annual Report, pages 184 and 185. Existing project. A channel through Lower New York Bay, Raritan Bay, Arthur Kill, Lower Newark Bay, and Kill Van Kull to Upper New York Bay and Raritan Bay and in Arthur Kill to a point 1,000 feet north of Smith Creek, widened to 800 feet in vicinity of Seguine Point and Wards Point, respectively, thence 500 wide to a point 1,000 feet south of Piles Creek; thence 500 to 600 feet wide and passing, north of Shooters Island and protected by a dike o nits northern side to junction of channel into Newark Bay; thence 800 feet wide through Kill Van Kull to Constable Hook; thence 1,000 feet wide for a point near the intersection with the channel along New Jersey pierhead line: and thence 1,400 feet wide through Kill Van Kull to Upper New York Bay; with an anchorage 38 feet deep to accommodate five vessels south of Perth Amboy, all with suitable easing at bends and junctions. Section included in project is 30.8 miles long. In addition, construction of a dike north of Shooters Island and two secondary channels 30 feet deep and 400 feet wide, one south of Shooters Island and the other in Raritan Bay connecting with Raritan River, were completed under previous projects and maintained under existing project. A triangular area at the eastern end of the 30 foot channel south of Shooters Island was deepened to 35 feet in order to provide additional widening in the vicinity of Bergen Point and is included in the Newark Bay project. All depths refer to plane of mean low water. Mean range of tides varies between 4.7 and 5.1 feet; mean range of spring tides 5.7 to 6.3 feet; irregular fluctuations due to wind and atmospheric pressure vary from 3.9 feet below mean low water up to 6.9 feet above mean high water. Anchorage as Sandy Hook and cutoff at junction of Main Ship Channel are deferred for restudy and excluded from foregoing description and cost estimate. (See Table 2-B for Authorizing Legislation). 2-11 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 2000 Local cooperation. Fully complied with except for the middle section of Arthur Kill where local interest must furnish spoil disposal areas for maintenance. Terminal facilities. See Port Series No. 5, revised 1988, Vol.2. Operations and results during the period. Operation and maintenance funds in te amount of $668,152.61 was expended on this project in FY '00, for engineering and design for dredging of Perth Amboy Anchorage and Wards Point Bend. Condition as of September 30. Work under active portion of existing project began in October 1933. Work completed consists of providing authorized project depth and widths throughout entire channel from Lower New York Bay to Upper New York Bay and providing Depths of 37 and 25 feet in Perth Amboy Anchorage. In addition to above mentioned work, construction of dike north of Shooters Island, two secondary channels 30 feet deep and 400 feet wide, one south of Shooters Island, the other in Raritan Bay connecting with Raritan River were completed under previous projects. Work remaining under existing project consists of dredging cutoff junction of Main Ship Channel to dimensions authorized by 'ver and Harbor Acts of August 30, 1935, and May 17, 30, dredging anchorage in vicinity of Sandy Hook. 17. RARITAN RIVER, N.J. Location. Rises in northern-central part of New Jersey and flows generally southeasterly into Raritan Basin, between Perth Amboy and South Amboy, about 24 miles by water south of the Battery, New York City. (See National Ocean Survey Chart 12332.) Previous Projects. For Details see Annual Reports for 1915, 1918, and 1938 pages 1777, 359, and 259 respectively. Existing Projects. A channel 25 feet deep and 300 feet wide extending 5.8 miles from turn in New York and New Jersey Channels near Great Beds Light to Govrnment wharf on Main Channel, widened to 600 feet for 1,000 feet of long opposite wharf to form a turning basin of same depth; thence a channell5 feet deep and 200 feet wide 3 miles to Washington Canal, thence 10 feet deep in soft material, 11 feet deep in rock, and generally 100 feet wide with widening at bends 5 miles to site of former D & R Canal entrance at New Brunswick, and a South Channel 25 feet deep and 300 feet wide 0.8 mile from junction with Main Channel at Keasby to upper limit of Titanium Pigment Co. property; thence 15 feet ep and 150 feet wide 0/4 mile to dock of Middlesex County ,werage Authority; thence 10 feet deep and 150 feet feet wide 2 miles to a point 1,300 feet below upper juncion with Main Channel at Crab Island. Plane of reference is mean low water. Mean range of tides is 5.1 feet at mouth of river and 5.6 feet at New Brunswick; mean range of spring tides, 6.1 and 6.6 feet respectively. Irregular fluctuations due to winds and atmospheric pressure vary from 3.6 feet below mean low water up to 6.9 feet above mean high water. New work for completed portion of project, consisting of channels described above cost $1,237,000, exclusive of amounts expended on previous projects, including $66,000 contributed by local interests . Dredging South Channel to 10 feet deep and 150 feet wide for 1,300 feet to upper junction with Main Channel at Crab Island is inactive and excluded from foregoing description and cost estimate. (See Table 2-B for Authorizing Legislation. Local cooperation. Complied with except local interests must furnish spoil-disposal areas for maintenance to 25-foot channel from New York & Long Branch Railroad bridge to junction of Main and South Channels, and in South Channel to Titanium Pigment Co. Property. River and Harbor Act of 1962, provides local interests furnish spoil-disposal areas and necessary retaining dikes, bulkheads and embankments therefore, required for maintenance of improvement, and hold the United States free from damages. Terminal Facilities. See Port Series No., 5, revised 1988, Vol.2. Operations and results during the period. A continuing contract for maintenance and dredging was awarded on 4 August 2000 to Great Lakes Dredge and Dock Company to remove 420,000 cubic yards of material. Dredging commenced on 21 August 2000 and is expected to be completed in November 2000. Operations and maintenance funds in the amount of $2,418,270.89 was expended on this project during FY 2000. Condition as of September 30. Entire existing project is about 96 percent complete. Work unde active portion existing project was commenced on September 1919 and completed July 1941. A shoal along northerly channel line in vicinity of Victory Bridge was eliminated by relocation of channel in February 1959. Main Channel dredged 25 feet deep and 300 feet wide from junction with New York and New Jersey Channels toand including a turning basdin of same depth opposite Government Wharf, thence 15 feet deep and 200 feet wide to mouthof Washington Canal, thence 10 and 11 feet deep and 100 feet wideto Delawareamd Raritan Canal outlet locks at New Brunswick. South Channel Dredged 25 feet deep and 300 feet wide for 3,200 feet, thence 10 feet deep andl50 feet wide for 12,400 feet to withinl,300 feet of junction with Main Channel to Crab Island. Model study of Raritan River was completed in March 1952. Work remaining under existing project is dredging South Channel to 10 feet deep and 150 feet wide for 1,300 feet to upper junction with Main Channel at Crab Island. 2-12 NEW YORK, NY DISTRICT 18. RARITAN RIVER TO ARTHUR KILL CUTOFF CHANNEL, N.J. Location. Channel is in western portion of Raritan Bay, off Perth Amboy, and about 23 miles by water southwest of the Battery, New York City. (Chart No. 12331) Existing project. Channel 1 mile long, 20 feet deep at mean low water, and 800 feet wide, connecting Raritan River channel with southern end of Arthur Kill Channel, New York and New Jersey Channels Project. Mean tidal range, 5.1 feet; mean range of spring tides, 6.1 feet; irregular fluctuations due to wind and barometric pressure vary from 3.6 feet below mean low water up to 6.9 feet above mean high water. New work for completed project cost $810,500. (See Table 2-B Authorizing Legislation.) Local cooperation. None Required Terminal Facilities. See Port Series No. 5, revised 1981 Vol. 2. Operations and results during the period. Approximately 72,000 c.y. of material was removed by Corps' Hopper Dredge cFarland" during FY91, to restore project dimensions itan River to Arthur Kill Cut-Off Channel, at a project cost f $699,173. Conditions as of Sept. 30. Existing project was completed in 1935. Operations and results during the period. A continuing contract for maintenance and dredging was awarded on 4 August 2000 to Great Lakes Dredge and Dock Company on 30 June 2000. Dredging commenced on 9 August 2000 to remove approximately 175,070 cubic yards of material. Operations and maintenance funds in the amount of $972,778.10 was expended on this project during FY 2000. 19. SAG HARBOR, N.Y. Location. On northern shore of south fork of Long Island, about 24 miles west of Montauk Point. (See U.S. Coast and Geodedit Survey Chart No. 298.) Existing Project. Provides for a breakwater 3,180 feet long extending notherly from Conklin Point; and for an entrance channel 3,200 feet long, 100 feet wide, and 10 feet deep at mean low water from Shelter Island Sound by way of village wharf to mooring dolphins of Standard Oil Co.; for a turning 'in of same depth; for and anchorage area 8 feet deep at a .all anchorage area 6 feet deep at mean low water between the village wharf and Sag Harbor Yacht Club pier. Length of section included in project is about five eighths mile. Mean tidal range, 2.5 feet; mean range of spring tides, 3 feet; irregiular fluctuations due to wind and barometric pressure vary from 2 feet below mean low water up to 4.9 feet above mean high water. Cost for new work for completed project was $121,805. The entrance channel anchorages and turning basin were deauthorized in 1992. Local Cooperation. Fully Complied with. Terminal Facilities. There are 7 terminals with a total available berthage of 4,250 feet located in harbor. Three of these terminals with berthage of 2,700 feet, and in addition two small basins, with suitable landing facilities, are open to the public. Mooring dolphins serve to tie up oil barges. One boatyard with storage space for 50 boats and equipped with twomarine railways is available for pleasure craft. Facilities are considered adequate fior existing commerence. Operations and results during fiscal year. Work under existing project was commenced December 1902 and completed on 1938. Breakwater was completed in 1908. When examined in March 1963 controlling mean low water depth and entrance channel and turning basin was 10 feet for a width varying from 40 to 100 feet; in southerly anchorage area, 6 feet; and in main anchorage, 8 feet. Operations and results during the period. A continuing contract (FY 00/01/02) was awarded to Newborn Construction, Inc. on 30 September 2000 for rehabilitation of the breakwater. The rehabilitaed structure will have a small dimension (length, crest width and elevation) as the authorized structure, however, the bayward facing slope will be flattened from 1 on 1 on 1.5 to correspond with Corps of Engineers breakwater design. Operations and maintenance funds in the amount of $366,263.30 was expended on this project during FY 2000. 20. SUPERVISOR OF NEW YORK HARBOR (PREVENTION OF OBSTRUCTION AND INJURIOUS DEPOSITS) The District Engineer, New York District, was designated Supervisor of New York Harbor under the provisions of the River and Harbor Act of June 29, 1888 (33 U.S.C. 441-451), as amended July 12, 1952. Under this Act, the Supervisor of New York Harbor is charged with the mission of preventing the deposit of obstructive and injurious materials in New York Harbor and its adjacent and tributary waters, including Long Island Sound. The River and Harbor Act of August 18, 1894 (33 U.S.C. 452) makes it unlawful for any person or persons to engage in fishing or dredging for shellfish in any of the channels leading to and from New York Harbor, or to interfere in any way with the safe navigation of deep draft traffic; the River and Harbor Act of March 3, 1899 (33 U.S.C. 403, 407, 409) prohibits obstructions to navigable waters such as unauthorized structures, unauthorized fill, deposit of refuse, and 2-13 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 2000 .Ilful or negligent abandonment of vessels. Other laws relating to the supervision of New York Harbor and its tributary waters are the Clean Water Act, the Marine Protection, Research and Sanctuaries Act of 1972, the Coastal Zone Management Act of 1969, the Fish and Wildlife Act of 1956, the Federal Power Act of 1920, the National Historic Preservation Act of 1966, the Endangered Species Act of 1973, the Deepwater Port Act of 1972, the Wild and Scenic Rivers Act, and the Land and Water Conservation Fund Act. Direct supervision of the waters under the jurisdiction of the New York District is accomplished by means of a patrol vessel whose scope of duty includes surveillance of the water front for unauthorized construction or fill, surveillance of tows enroute to dumping grounds in the Atlantic Ocean to ensure that material is not illegally deposited in the waters of New York Harbor, and investigation of wrecks and abandoned vessels. In addition to the patrol vessels, whose range of patrol is limited to New York Harbor, inspectors utilizing government vehicles equipped with two-way radios patrol shorefront facilities and property. The inspectors operate out of the New York District Office. Their duties include inspection of authorized construction, fill or excavation in waterways, including wetland areas, to ensure that work is performed in accordance with Corps permit, as well as investigation unauthorized con- Action activities. The inspectors also patrol all waterways in uleir respective areas and inform the public of the Corps' role and jurisdiction as well as provide assistance in the preparation of permit application. (See Table 2-E at end of chapter). 21. RECONNAISSANCE AND CONDITION SURVEYS (See Table 2-F at end of chapter.) 22. OTHER AUTHORIZED NAVIGATION PROJECTS (See Table 2-G at end of chapter.) 23. NAVIGATION WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION Navigation Activities pursuant to Section 107, Public Law 645, 86th Congress as amended (Pre-Authorization). (See Table 2-N at end of chapter.) 24. ATLANTIC COAST OF LONG ISLAND JONES INLET TO EAST ROCKAWAY INLET LONG BEACH ISLAND, NY Location. Atlantic Coast of Long Island, in Nassau County, New York, between Jones Inlet and East Rockaway Inlet. Existing project. The project feasibility study was conductpursuant to a resolution by the Committee on Public Works d Transportation of the U.S. House of Representatives that was adopted October 1, 1986. Project construction was authorized by the Water Resources Development Act of 1996. The total Federal cost of the project is .$284,150. and total non- Federal cost is $153,000. The authorized plan provides for storm damage protection for 7 miles of public shoreline against a 100-year storm event. Protection is provided by constructing a 110-foot wide protective beach berm at an elevation of 10 feet above sea level backed by a 25-foot wide dune system at an elevation 15 feet above sea level. The project also includes the rehabilitation of 16 existing groins and the construction of four new groins at the eastern end of the island. In addition, the project includes periodic nourishment of the restored beaches on a 5-year cycle for a period of 50 years following initial construction. Local cooperation. The local sponsor is the New York State Department of Environmental Conservation, who funded 50 percent of the cost of the feasibility study. The Project Cooperation Agreement has not yet been negotiated, but the customary provisions are that local interests will provide, without cost to the United States, all lands, easements, and rights-of-way, including borrow areas, necessary for construction of the project, fund 35% of the total project cost, assure continued conditions of public ownership and use of the shore, maintain public use facilities open and available to all on equal terms, and maintain all improvements after completion of construction in accordance with Federal regulations for the economic life of the project. Operations and results during the period and condition as of September 30. The Feasibility Report with Draft Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) was completed in February 1995. The Pre-construction, Engineering and Design (PED) phase was completed in September 1997. The final EIS was released for public comment in May 1998 and the record of decision was signed in December 1998. Since current administration policy does not support continued funding for shore protection projects such as Long Beach, construction funds were not budgeted in FY 1998 or FY 1999. Congress added $2 million in FY 1998 and $7.5 million in FY 1999 to continue the design of the project and initiate construction. The local sponsors requested that the Corps of Engineers reanalyze the area between the proposed new groins and existing groin field in the City of Long Beach before starting construction. The study was conducted which utilized new modeling techniques that were unavailable during the feasibility study to finalize the groin field design. The final report summarizing the findings of the study was completed in March 2000. A supplement to the feasibility report will be prepared to report the modified plan and will be used as a basis for the PCA. The non-Federal sponsor is coordinating with local interests in resolving public access issues before signing the PCA. BEACH EROSION CONTROL 25. EAST ROCKAWAY INLET TO ROCKAWAY INLET & JAMAICA BAY, NY Location. Atlantic Coast of New York City, between East 2-14 NEW YORK, NY DISTRICT ickaway and Rockaway Inlets, and the lands within and surrounding Jamaica Bay. The coastal area (about 10 miles long) is a peninsula in Queens County separating the ocean and the bay. (See National Ocean Survey Charts 12327, 12350, and 12326). Existing project. The projects consists of nourishing 100 foot wide beach at an elevation of 10 feet above mean low water from Beach 149th Street to 19th Street. Initial beach replenishment was completed in FY 1997. Periodic nourishment (5 contracts) previously took place between 1979 and 1988. Construction of a stone groin at Beach 149th St. was completed in September 1982. A Section 934 Report approved in February 1994, recommended continued nourishment over a nine year period. Federal participation includes first cost and periodic beach nourishment, the total estimated at $64,000,000 (Oct. 1996 P.L.) The Section 934 Report also recommended a reformulation study to evaluate alternative methods of providing drainage protection to the Rockaway area. Local cooperation. Local interests have agreed to provide lands and rights-of-way, including borrow areas: bear a portion of the total cost as a cash contribution; hold the United States free from damages; maintain, during economic life of a prot, continued public ownership and use of non-Federal pub- .y-owned shores upon which Federal participation in beach protection is based; maintain and operate all works after completion, control water pollution to the extent necessary to safeguard the health of bathers. The project cooperation agreement for additional renourishment over the nine year period was executed on 25 May 1995. Operations and results during period and condition as of September 30. A final Environmental Impact Statement was filed with the Council of Environmental Quality on April 16 1971. Initial beach restoration was completed in FY 1977. Contract for first increment of periodic nourishment was completed in August, 1982. Contract for construction of a stone groin at Beach 149th street was completed in September, 1982. Periodic nourishment contracts Nos. 3, 4, and 5 were completed between 1978 and 1988. Contract No. 6 was completed in 1997. The contract included beachfill placement of approximately 3 million cubic yards of sand from Beach 19th to Beach 149th Street. Contract No 7 was completed by Weeks Marine Inc. in February 2001. The contract included beachfill placement of approximately 1.01 million cubic yards of sand from beach 119 to beach 66th street and beach 25th streets. 26. FIRE ISLAND INLET TO MONTAUK POINT, NY socation. That portion of Atlantic Coast of Long Island in affolk County extending from Fire Island Inlet easterly to Montauk Point, NY about 83 miles long. This frontage comprises about 70 percent of total ocean frontage of Long Island. Fire Island Inlet is about 50 miles by water east of the Battery, New York. (See Coast and Geodetic Charts 13209, 12354 and 12353.) Existing project. Provides for Federal participation in improvement to prevent beach erosion and hurricane damages by: widening beaches along developed areas between Kismet and Mecox Bay, to a minimum width 100 feet at elevation 14 feet above mean sea level; raising dunes to an elevation of 20 feet above mean sea level from Fire Island Inlet to Hither Hills State Park, at Montauk and opposite Lake Montauk Harbor; planting grass on dunes; constructing gated interior drainage structures at Mecox Bay, Sagaponack Lake, and Georgica Pond; constructing up to 50 groins, if needed; and Federal participation in cost of beach nourishment. Local cooperation. The New York State Department of Environmental Conservation is the local cooperating agency. The State agreed to provide necessary lands, rights-of-way and borrow areas, and furnish 30 percent of the project costs for the Interim Project along the Moriches Inlet to Shinnecock Inlet reach of the authorized project. The State has also agreed to be the local sponsor for interim projects immediately west of Shinnecock Inlet and along Fire Island. Project history. On July 30, 1963, the State reflecting the desires of Suffolk County, requested the inclusion of a minimum of 13 groins in initial construction of Moriches- Shinnecock reach. Chief of Engineers concurred in inclusion of up to 13 groins. Assurances were executed by Superintendent of Public Works, State of New York, on August 14, and accepted by the District Engineer August 20, 1963. On February 5, 1964, the State requested consideration of a plan, as proposed by Suffolk County, for initial construction of 13 groins of which 11 would be in the Moriches-Shinnecock reach, and 2 in the Southampton-Beach Hampton reach vicinity of Georgica Pond, and that sandfill and dune construction be withheld for the present except for 1 mile on each side of Shinnecock Inlet. On February 27, 1964, the Chief of Engineers accepted the proposals, in part, and supplemental assurances were executed by State of New York on April 20, 1964, and accepted by District Engineer April 27, 1964, as follows: the State of New York now elects to proceed with authorized combined beach erosion control and hurricane protection project for South Shore of Long Island; that Superintendent of Public Works hereby reaffirms his assurance of August 14, 1963, relative to complete project; that State of New York, as cooperating agency, will now agree that artificial fills will be added when and to extent found necessary by the Chief of Engineers, but not earlier than 3 years after completion of groins unless both the State of New York and the Chief of Engineers mutually agree to an earlier placement; that the superintendent agrees for State of New York to contribute the full amount of any increase in Federal costs resulting from the 2-15 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 2000 parate construction of the groins and subsequent fill; and that the State agree that construction of the two groins in the Georgica Pond area will depend on a favorable finding, following a study by the Chief of Engineers. Study was completed July 31, 1964, recommending construction, and approved by the Chief of Engineers on September 22, 1964. By letter dated November 5, 1964, the New York State Department of Public Works confirmed that title to all properties and interests in properties necessary for constructing the 11 groins was fully vested in Suffolk County. By letter dated December 7, 1964, the Department stated that the county had obtained easements or fee title for the parcels necessary for constructing the two groins. New York State Department of Public Works Furnished $884,600 and $830,330 required contributed funds October 30, 1964, and September 7, 1965, respectively, for construction of 11 groins in Moriches-Shinnecock reach and $439,900 on January 22, 1965, for construction of 2 groins in Georgica Pond area of the Southampton-Beach Hampton reach. The completed 2 groins and 11 groins were accepted by the New York State Department of Public Works for maintenance on May 11, 1966 and April 10, 1967 respectively. On March 22, 1965, the State Recommended that planning priority be in the order: Southampton-Beach Hampton DTrainage structures first): Shinnecock Inlet-Southampton; ich Hampton-Montauk Point; and fire Island-Moriches a.det. Planning on the drainage structures was initiated but was suspended, based on: meeting of October 28, 1965 with Georgica Pond Association and the Preservation Society of East End wherein concern was indicated regarding the effects of the proposed drainage structure on ecology, salinity, pond level and aesthetic values; meeting with the Congressional representatives, State legislators, Federal agencies and local officials held on May 26, 1966: and resolution of the Suffolk County Board of Supervisors adopted June 13, 1966 requesting advancement of the planning of the Fire Island-Moriches Inlet reach (Fire Island National Seashore). On June 16, 1967, the New York State Department of Public Works requested the following works undertaken as immediate priority items: in Moriches-Shinnecock reach, beach and dine fill at 11 groins, beach and dune fill east of the 11 groins; in Southampton- Beach Hampton reach (at East Hampton), construction of two additional groins, and the outlet structure at Georgica Pond. On March 18, 1968 the Suffolk County Board of Supervisors adopted a resolution supporting construction of 4 groin in Reach 2 (Moriches-Shinnecock) and 2 groins in Reach 4 (Southampton-Beach Hampton). On April 22, 1968 the Board adopted a more inclusive resolution authorizing participation in beach erosion and hurricane protection for the Morichesinnecock reach and in the Georgica Pond area of the athampton-Beach Hampton reach. On December 24, 1968, the Commissioner of the New York State Conservation Department executed the second supplement to the assurances of local cooperation, which was accepted by the District Engineer on January 24, 1969. The reaffirmed previous assurances contained provisions for constructing four additional groins in an area extending 6,000 feet west from the most westerly groin in the existing leveen-groin field in the Moriches Inlet to Shinnecock Inlet Reach, and for placing beach and dune fill in this area to the full design cross section as defined in the authorized project report. A General Design Memo completed in 1980 recommended placement of sand fill in the existing 11 groin field and along 9,500 feet of shore to the west. Condition as of September 30. Engineering and design began November 1962 and the project construction commenced in January 1965. Two groins in Reach 4: Southampton Beach Hampton, Section 3, were initiated in March, and completed in September 1964, at a total cost of $720,950 of which $382,109 were incurred against required contributed funds. Eleven groins in Reach 2: Moriches-Shinnecock, Section 2, were initiated in January 1965, and completed in October 1966 at a total cost of $2,845,565 of which $1,370,191 were incurred against required contributed funds. Initial beach fill placement for 750,000 cubic yards in Reach 2. Section IA was completed on May 23, 1969. On August 4, 1969 work started on 4 groins and sandfill in Reach 2, Section 1A and was completed November 14, 1970. 3,083 tons of stone and 1,111,000 cubic yards of sand was placed. Total cost for all Section 1A was $3,663,455 including $1,791,428 in required contributed funds. Funds in the amount of $70,000 were allotted on April 14, 1977 for initiation of the Phase 1 study in Reach 1, Fire Island Inlet to Moriches Inlet. The Final Environmental Impact Statement was filed with Environmental Protection Agency on January 28, 1978. On March 7, 1978, the Department of the Interior, supported by the other environmental resource agencies referred the Environmental Impact Statement to Council on Environmental Quality as unacceptable. On June 6, 1978 the Council agreed and recommended project reformulation. Public meetings were held in October 1979 to delineate the scope and level of effort needed to reformulate the project. A final scoping session was held January 17, 1980 and agreement was reached between the Federal agencies although New York State had strong objections. A plan of study was completed in July 1980. However, because of New York State's inability to financially participate in construction at Westhampton Beach, reformulation was postponed. Two breaches (new inlets) occurred in the vulnerable Westhampton area during periods of storm tides, one in Jan. 1980, just east of the Moriches inlet, and the most recent in Dec. 1992, at the eastern end of Moriches Bay. Both breaches were filled in by contract, the last one completed in Sept. 1993, at a cost of 7 million. In April 1993, the State provided a letter of intent to participate in an interim project for the Moriches Inlet to Shinnecock Inlet Reach. Based on this agreement in 1993 on a conceptual plan for the most critically eroded reach of the authorized pro- 2-16 NEW YORK, NY DISTRICT st, the Westhampton Interim Project, the Reformulation Study was reinitiated. A construction contract for the Westhampton Interim Project was awarded in May 1996 to Great Lakes Dredge & Dock Company in the amount of 16 million. The contract was substantially completed in December 1997 and included beach placement of 4 million cubic yards of sand, dune creation, fencing and grass planting, groin modifications and construction of public done walkovers. The first renourishment was completed in February 2001 at a cost of $5 million. Renourishment is scheduled to continue at 3 year intervals until 2027. In January 1996, a Breach Contingency Plan was approved, which provides a mechanism for rapid response to breaches along the barrier island, within the authorized project. The Reformulation Study, which has been consistently funded since 1993, is currently underway. Data has been collected including beach profile surveys and aerial topography maps of the entire 83 mile long shoreline. Initial scoping for the preparation of an Environmental Impact Statement has been conducted. The study is scheduled to be completed in June 2002. Based on requests from local, state and congressional interests, evaluations are underway for separable interim measures along Fire Island and immediately west of Shinnecock Inlet. 27. RARITAN BAY AND SANDY HOOK BAY, NJ Location. Situated at the southern end of Lower New York Bay between the Raritan River and Sandy Hook, in Middlesex and Monmouth Counties, New Jersey. Shoreline area is typified by small developing communities built upon and near salt and freshwater marshes. The study area is largely located in low elevation regions with numerous small creeks providing drainage. Low-lying residential and commercial structures in the area are experiencing flooding caused by coastal storm inundation. Problem has progressively worsened due to loss of protective beaches and increased urbanization in the area with structures susceptible to flooding from rainfall and coastal storm surges, erosion and wave attack, combined with restrictions to channel flow in the tidal creeks. Existing project. Existing Federal project was authorized by the Flood Control Act of 12 October 1962 as a dual purpose Beach Erosion Control and Hurricane Protection Project in accordance with House Document No. 464, 86th Congress, Second session. This project provided for beach fill, groins, and levees for various sections of the study area. The constructed project consists of segmented sections of beach fill and levees surrounding the communities at Old Bridge Township and Keansburg and East Keansburg. A study was authorized by a resolution of the Committee on Public Works 1 Transportation, U.S. House of Representatives, adopted -. gust 1, 1990. The study seeks to determine the advisability to the recommendations in the authorizing report for Raritan Bay and Sandy Hook Bay. Section 506 of WRDA 1996 authorized perodic nourishnment, if determined necessary, for a period of 50 years from initiation of construction of the project, in accordance with section 156 of WRDA 1976 and Section 934 of WRDA 1986. Local cooperation. The non-Federal sponsor, NJDEP, is currently cost sharing a number of Raritan Bay and Sandy Hook Bay, NJ feasibility studies with USACE: Port Monmouth, Union Beach, and Cliffwood Beach. The non- Federal sponsor would also be required to cost share in feasibility studies for the communities of Leonardo, Highlands and Keyport in order for them to proceed. (The non-Federal sponsor also operates and maintains the existing, constructed project). Operation and results during period, and condition as of Sept. 30. Construction of the authorized project for Old Bridge Township was initiated in 1965 and completed in 1966. Construction of the shoreline portion of the authorized project for Keansburg and East Keansburg was initiated in 1968 and completed in 1969. Construction of the closure portion (levees, closure gate and pumping station) of the authorized project for Keansburg and East Keansburg was initiated in 1970 and completed in 1973. Cliffwood Beach and Union Beach were the only portions of the authorized project that were not constructed. After construction of the closure work all of the completed works were formally.turned over to the State of New Jersey in 1974. A reconnaissance study was completed in March 1993. Subsequently, a feasibility study for Port Monmouth was initiated in February 1994, and for Union Beach and Cliffwood Beach in April 1997. In FY 2000, the final feasibility report and EIS for Port Monmouth were issued. Feasibility study activities for Union Beach and Leonardo continued. The feasibility study for Cliffwood Beach was completed by the project was not recommended for continued Federal involvemnet. The pre-feasibility activities for highlands were finalized in preparation for a scheduled FY 2001 FCSA execution. Pre-feasibility activities continued for Keyport. A design agreement was executed with the NJDEP for the Raritan 934 (Keansberg, East Keansberg, Old Bridge) reevaluation study in November 1999. The study was initiated in January 2000. 28. ROCKAWAY INLET TO NORTON POINT (CONEY ISLAND AREA), NY Location. Atlantic Coast of New York City, in Brooklyn (Kings County), approximately nine miles south of the Battery, New York City. Authorized project. Authorized by the Water Resources Development Act of 1986. The authorized plan provides for beach erosion control by restoring the Coney Island public beach up to 250 feet beyond its historic shoreline; the extension of the westerly terminal groin; construction of a terminal groin at the easterly end of the restored beach, and a fillet of 2-17 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 2000 achfill from the terminal groin at W. 37th Street extending approximately 2300 feet into the community of Sea Gate. The authorized plan also provides for restoration of the beach by periodic beach nourishment. The project was modified by the Intermodel Surface Transportation and Efficiency Act (ISTEA) of 1991 to include the relocation of existing comfort and lifeguard stations at full Federal expense. The total Federal cost of the project is $99,100, and non-Federal cost is $49,900,000 Local cooperation. The local sponsor is the NY State Department of Environmental Conservation. In accordance with the provisions of the Project Cooperation Agreement, the sponsor will; provide without cost to the United States all lands, easements, and rights-of-way including borrow areas necessary for construction of the project, hold and save the United States free from claims for damages which may result from the construction works and subsequent maintenance of the project; provide a cash contribution toward the total first cost; assure that water pollution that would affect the health of bathers will not be permitted; assure continued conditions of public ownership and use of the shore upon which the amount of Federal participation is based, during the economic life of the project; maintain public use facilities open and available to on equal terms and maintain all improvements after com- .ion in accordance with regulations prescribed by the .ecretary of the Army, including periodic nourishment during the economic life of the project as may be required to serve the intended purpose, subject to Federal participation in the cost of periodic nourishment for the economic project life. Operations and results during period, and condition as of September 30. Initial construction of the beach and 37th Street jetty was completed in January, 1995. The design of the comfort and lifeguard stations was completed in 1996. Adequate funding is not available to proceed with construction. Post-construction monitoring continued in FY '00. A study that evaluated the causes of the accelerated beach erosion downdrift of the W. 37th Street groin and identified alternatives for a long-term solution. The report was completed in March 1998. The report recommends three alternative solutions. A re-evaluation report that includes an environment assessment of the alternatives is underway is scheduled to be completed in plans and specifications were prepared for an interim sand nourishment contract to provide protection to this area while a long-term solution is being developed. A contract was awarded in August 2000 and construction started in September 2000. Post-construction started in September 2000. Post-construction monitoring is continuing. 29. SANDY HOOK TO BARNEGAT INLET, NJ Location. The northern portion of the Atlantic coast of New Jersey extending from Sandy Hook southerly to Barnegat Inlet-length about 48 miles. Erosion has seriously reduced the width of most beaches in the study area with consequent exposure of the shore to storm damage. Because of this erosion of the shore the area does not provide sufficient recreational beaches for the proper accommodation of the present and prospective tributary population. SECTION I - SEA BRIGHT TO OCEAN TOWNSHIP, NJ Location. That portion of the Atlantic coast of New Jersey in Monmouth County extending from Sea bright southerly to Ocean Township - length about 12 miles. Sea Bright is about 30 miles by water south of the Battery, New York City. Authorized project. The Water Resources Development Act of 1988 (PL 100-670) authorized a plan substantially in accordance with the plan recommended in the General Design Momorandum for the project dated May, 1988. In general the plan provides for beach erosion control along approximately 12 miles of coastline, extending from Sea Bright southward to Ocean Township, New Jersey, by artificial placement of sand to widen the beach berm to 100 feet at an elevation of 10 feet above mean low water with an additional 2 foot high berm cap to provide an extra increment of protection from overtopping. The project also provides for the notching of 15 groins, and periodic nourishment throughout the 50 year economic life of the project. Total estimated Federal cost for Section 1 is $681,200,000. Total estimated non-Federal cost for all requirements of local cooperation is $366,800,000. Local cooperation. Includes reconstruction of sea wall at Sea Bright and all lands easements, rights-or-way and drainage outfall extensions. Operations and results during period and condition as of September 30. The Local Cooperation Agreement for Section I was executed with the State of New Jersey on July 30, 1992. Work under Contract IA was completed in November 1995. Approximately 4.4 million cubic yards of sand was placed under Contract 1A at an estimated cost of $21 million. Work under Contract IB was completed in October 1996. Approximately 3.8 million cubic yards of sand was placed under Contract 1B at an estimated cost of $15.8 million. Construction on Contract 2 (Long Branch) began in May 1997 and was completed in September 1999. Plans and specifications for Contract 3 (Deal) near completion but contract award is delayed indefinitely due to local real estate issues. SECTION II--ASBURY PARK TO MANASQUAN, NJ Location. That portion of the Atlantic coast of New Jersey in Monmouth County extending from Asbury Park southerly to Manasquan--length about 9 miles. Authorized project. Provides for Federal participation in 2-18 NEW YORK, NY DISTRICT restoration and protection of the shore from Asbury Park to Manasquan by artificial placement of sand to widen the beach to a minimum width of 100 feet at an elevation of 10 feet above mean low water. The project provides for Federal participation in periodic nourishment costs for a period of 50 years from the year that the total quantity to fill placed has equalled that required to restore the beach to project dimensions. Total estimated Federal cost is $442,200,000. Total estimated non-Federal costs for all requirements of local cooperation is $238,100,000. Operations and results during period and condition as of September 30. The local cooperation agreement for Section II was executed with the State of New Jersey on August 20, 1006. The contract for the Southern Reach (Belmar to Manasquan) was awarded in March 1997. Construction began in June 1997 and was completed in August 1999. The award of the Northern Reach (Asbury Park to Avon-by-the-Sea) contract was in June, 1999. Beachfill placement commenced in July 2000 was completed in December 1999. Work on the groin notching and outfall extrusions is scheduled for completion in January 2001. 30. OTHER AUTHORIZED BEACH EROSION CONTROL PROJECTS (See Table 2-H at end of chapter). 31. BEACH EROSION CONTROL WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION Beach Erosion Control activities pursuant to Section 103 Publ. Law 826, 84th Congress as amended (See Table 2-0 at end of chapter). FLOOD CONTROL 32. THE HACKENSACK MEADOWLANDS AREA, NJ Location. The project location is the Hackensack Meadowlands River Basin in Bergen and Hudson Counties, New Jersey. Existing project. The program was authorized by Section 324 of the Water Resources Development Act of 1992 and amended by Section 550 of the Water Resources Development Act of 1996. The program was authorized for $5,000,000. The objective of the program is to provide design and construction assistance for the development of the Environmental Improvement Program within the Hackensack Meadowlands District of New Jersey. The intent of the program is to assist the Hackensack Meadowlands Development Commission in: tide gate improvements to control flooding in the Berry's lek drainage basin, the mitigation, enhancement and acqui- ,on of wetlands, the development and implementation of a system to provide for water quality monitoring and wetland control in the Hackensack Meadowlands River Basin. A hydraulic modeling study of the Hackensack River will be performed and it will also examine a proposed tide gate on Berry's Creek. The Corps of Engineers Waterways Experiment Station will be performing the modeling study. Local cooperation. The non-Federal sponsor is the Hackensack Meadowlands Development Commission (HMDC). Operations and results during the period and condition as of September 30. The General Management Plan, which outlines the management process for implementing the program, was completed in October 1998. A total of $2.5 million was appropriated for the program in FY 1996. The design agreement was to be executed between the Corps of Engineers and the HMDC in March 2000. The modeling study is expected to take two years to complete. 33. JOSEPH G. MINISH PASSAIC RIVER WATERFRONT AND HISTORIC AREA, NJ Location. The project area is located along the west bank of the Passaic River between Bridge and Brill Streets in the City of Newark, New Jersey. This reach of the Passaic River is eroded, deteriorated and environmentally degraded due to past heavy commercial and industrial use and flooding. The most recent flooding occurred in December 1992. In light of the renewal of the commercial downtown area of Newark near the Passaic River, the project area is viewed as an environmental resource to be restored. Authorized project. The project was authorized in the Water Resources Development Act (WRDA) of 1990 (Public Law 101-640) as an element of the Passaic River Flood Damage Reduction Project on November 28, 1999, modified in the Water Resources Development Act of 1992 (Public Law 102-580) by extending the project area, and further modified in the Water Resources Development Act of 1996 (Public Law 104-303). The project has three phases. The first phase will provide 6,000 feet of new bulkhead, 3,200 feet of restored riverbank and wetlands. The second phase adds a 9,200-foot waterfront walkway and the third phase adds park facilities, plazas and landscaping. Links to the Arts Center, Riverbank Park, and other sites will also be provided. The project will reduce the flooding and erosion and provide environmental restoration, recreation and economic development benefits. The cost of the first phase is $37,300,000, adding the second phase increases the cost to $60,000,000 and the third phase brings the total project cost to $78,800,000. The sponsor of the first phase is the New Jersey Department of Environmental Protection and cost sharing is set a 75% Federal and 25% non-Federal. The State may reduce its share through credit provisions in WRDA 1992. The credit consists of the value of lands in the basin that the State puts into wetlands bank. 2-19 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 2000 Local cooperation. Project will be operated and maintained by sponsor as each portion is completed. Operations and results during period and condition as of September 30. Construction on the first phase started in September 1999. A formal ground breaking was held in November 1999. Additional appropriations will be required to complete the first phase. Interest is also being expressed by the city of Newark by its letter of March 7, 2000 will sponsor the second and third phases. Design efforts and a project cooperation agreement will be prepared. 34. NEW YORK CITY WATERSHED ENVIRONMENTAL ASSISTANCE PROGRAM, NY Location. The project location is the New York City Watershed, which is located within the following counties in New York State: Delaware, Greene, Schoharie, Ulster, Sullivan, Westchester, Putnam and Dutchess. Existing project. The program was authorized by Section 552 of the Water Resources Development Act (WRDA) of 1996 and amended in WRDA 1999. The program was authorized for $42,500,000 in Federal funds. The objective of the program is to provide design and construction assistance for " ,ater-related environmental infrastructure and resource proion and development projects in the New York City .atershed, including projects for water supply, storage, treatment and distribution facilities and surface water resource protection and development. Twenty-six projects have been certified by the New York State Department of Environmental Conservation (NYSDEC) and recommended for implementation. The types of projects include stream restoration, installation of sanitary sewer lines, stromwater studies, pathogen monitoring, planning and implementation of agricultural non-point source pollution reduction and watershed protection training. Local cooperation. The non-Federal sponsor is the NYDEC. The projects will be accomplished by the local sponsors, the New York City Department of Environmental Protection, municipalities and counties. Operations and results during the period and condition as of September 30. The General Management Plan, which outlines the management process for implementing the program, was completed in September 1998. A total of $10 million has been appropriated for the program in FY 1997 through 2001. The request for proposals, under which the proposed projects were submitted, evaluated and certified for implementation, was completed in February 1999. A total of 'roject Cooperation Agreements have executed for 9 pro- ,ts. Discussions with the local sponsors and negotiations of the PCA's for the other certified projects is underway. 35. PASSAIC RIVER BASIN, NJ & NY Location. The Passaic Basin, comprising 787 square miles in northeastern New Jersey and 148 square miles in southern New York State, is located in the greater New York City Metropolitan area. The Passaic River Basin is roughly elliptical in shape 26 miles long and 56 miles wide-and contains portions of Bergen, Essex, Morris, Passaic, Hudson, Somerset, Sussex and Union Counties in New Jersey. The Basin also includes parts of Orange and Rockland Counties in New York. Previous projects. Three Federal flood control projects have been completed by the Corps of Engineers in the Passaic River Basin. A $67,400 de-snagging, debris removal, and channel restoration project was completed in 1951 along Beaver Brook and the Pequannock Township Ditch, tributaries of the Pompton River in Pequannock Township, NJ. Along the Pompton River, a channel clearing project including shoal removal and channel restoration was implemented in the two-mile reach from the Delaware, Lackawanna and Western Railroad Bridge to the Erie Railroad (Greenwood Lake Branch) Bridge. This work, in Pequannock Township, Wayne Township and Lincoln Park Borough, NJ, was completed in 1954 at a cost of $50,000. A $1.5 million basin-wide project to improve the Flood Warning and Preparedness System was completed in 1988. The project was implemented by the Corps of Engineers in conjunction with the National Weather Service and U.S. geological Survey, The State of New Jersey is the non-Federal sponsor of the project. Project history. U.S. Army Corps of Engineers involvement in Passaic River planning was first authorized in the Flood Control Acts of 1936. Since then, reports recommending plans of action were issued in 1939, 1948, 1962, 1972, and 1973. None of these plans were implemented because they did not receive widespread public support. In 1976, Congress authorized a Phase I Advanced Engineering and Design Study in Section 101(a) of the Water Resources Development Act of 1976. Congressional Guidance on the conduct of the study was provided in House Report 94-1702. Local protection plans were completed for tributary flood damage areas along the Ramapo and Mahwah Rivers at Mahwah, NJ, and Suffern, NY, Molly Ann's Brook at Haledon, Prospect Park and Paterson, NJ, the Ramapo River at Oakland, NJ, and the Lower Saddle River in Bergen County, NJ. These projects were authorized in the Water Resources Development Act of 1986. Construction began on the Molly Ann's Brook project in 1995. The Ramapo River at Oakland project received construction funds in Fiscal year 1995 and was reauthorized in WRDA 1996. In April 1984, the Passaic Basin experienced flooding estimated to be the worst in 40 years. In June 1984, the State of New Jersey selected a dual inlet diversion tunnel plan as the preferred Basin-wide alternative for detailed plan formulation. 2-20 NEW YORK, NY DISTRICT ie Phase I General Design Memorandum and draft Environmental Impact Statement, (EIS), recommending the Pompton River/Passaic Dual Inlet Tunnel Diversion Plan, were completed during FY 1988. The final EIS was Filed with EPA in December 1988. Section 101(a) 18 of the Water Resources Development Act (WRDA) 1990 (PL 101-640), as modified by section 102(p) of WRDA '92 (PL 102-580) authorizes construction of the Passaic River Flood Protection Project for the Passaic River Basin which will address both environmental and engineering objectives of the Act. The Passaic River Flood Protection Project combines diversion tunnels, levees, flood walls channel modification, and natural flood storage to provide flood protection to about 35 towns in the Passaic River Basin. Preconstruction Engineering and Design for the Passaic River Flood Protection Project was initiated in FY 1989 and is continuing with preparation of a General Design Memorandum and Supplemental Environmental Impact Statement with accompanying project cost estimate, and update of buy-out plans. A draft report was completed in Sept. 1995. The final report was completed in July 1996 with the State's ision to implement the natural flood storage areas at this Lime. Engineering and design for the Joseph G. Minish Passaic River Waterfront Part and Historic Area project element, consisting of environmental and streambank restoration measures in the city of Newark was completed in May 1996. Condition as of September 30. Construction is continuing on Molly Ann's Brook, the Ramapo River at Oakland, Joseph G. Minish Passaic River and Waterfront Park. The purchases of the national flood storage areas is underway. The Saddle River, Harrison Leave Project, and Mahwah River projects are in the design phase. 36. PRESERVATION OF NATURAL FLOOD STORAGE - PASSAIC RIVER FLOOD DAMAGE REDUCTION REPORT, NJ Location. Flooding has long been a problem in the Passaic River Basin. Since colonial times, floods have claimed lives and damaged property. The most severe flood, the "flood of record", occurred in 1903, and more recent floods in 1968, 1971, 1972, 1973, two in 1975, 1984 and 1992 were sufficiently devastating to warrant Federal Disaster declarations. The flood of 1984 resulted in the loss of three lives and caused .493 million in damages (October 1994 dollars). Authorized project. The U.S. Army Corps of Engineers has been working on plans to reduce flooding in the basin since 1936, but no plan has yet been implemented. Congress authorized a new study of the Passaic River Basin for the State of New Jersey in the Water Resources Department Act (WRDA) of 1976 (Public Law 94-587) which led to a plan authorized in WRDA 1990 and modified in WRDA 1992. The project includes several elements (see separate fact sheet on Passaic River). The element described herein is the Preservation of Natural Flood Storage Areas which the State has asked to Corps to implement. The Preservation element includes the acquisition of 5,350 acres of natural storage areas. 5,200 acres of which are wetlands and could conceivably be developed, worsening existing flood problems. The State of New Jersey has an agreement with the Corps to continue to protect 6,300 floodway acred, thus avoiding any secondary development. About 9,500 acres of the Central Basin are already protected as designated parkland, bringing the total of natural storage areas that would be permanently protected with the project to 21,000 acres. The Preservation element will prevent flood damages from becoming worse. It will not reduce flooding in the Passaic River Basin. The cost sharing is set a 75% Federal and 25% State. The State may reduce its share by applying credits included in the authorization. Local cooperation. Project lands will be operated and maintained by non-Federal sponsors as each parcel is acquired. Operations and results during period and condition as of September 30. The General Design Memorandum for the element was completed in July 1996 and the State has requested that the Corps proceed with its implementation at a cost of $19.8 million dollars. Currently, the Corps has completed a Real Estate Design Memorandum for purchasing the preservation lands and is negotiating a Project Cooperation Agreement with the State as a non-Federal sponsor. Funds are available to begin purchases once the Agreement is signed. Purchases started in spring 2000 and continue. Total estimated Federal cost is $19,300,000. Total non-Federal costs for all requirements of local cooperation is $1,700,000. 37. RAMAPO RIVER AT OAKLAND, NJ Location. The project involves the construction of features for flood protection along the Ramapo River from Pompton Lake in Wayne Township and the Borough of Pompton Lakes, upstream through the Borough of Oakland to West Oakland Avenue, a distance of 3.3 miles. The principal problem along the Ramapo River is flooding caused by backwater effect produced by the Pompton Lake Dam, the hydraulic construction produced by bridges crossing the river, and insufficient channel capacity. Flooding has occurred frequently, with the most recent events in 1968, 1970, 1971, 1973, 1977, 1978, 1979, 1980, 1983, 1984, 1987, 1993, and as recently as January of last year. Authorized project. The Ramapo River was studied as part of the Passaic River Basin Phase I Advanced Engineering and Design Study which was authorized by the Water Resources 2-21 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 2000 >velopment Act of 1976 (Public Law 94-587, October 22, 1976). Congressional guidance for the conduct of the study is included in House of Representatives Report 94-1702. The study was authorized for construction under the Water Resources Development;ent Act (WRDA) of 1986 (Public Law 99-662) and reauthorized in WRDA 1996 (PL 104-303). The sponsor is the New Jersey Department of Environmental Protection. The authorized plan for flood damage reduction along the study area includes channel modification of 5,800 feet of the Ramapo River. The authorized plan also calls for the installation of flood control gates at the existing Pompton Lake Dam. Mitigation for the environmental impacts of the plan include the creation of a five-acre wetland in Potash Lake. The recommended plan would provide a consistent 40-year level of protection to the project area. The plan has an estimated cost of $13,100,000. The cost is shared by the Federal Government (75%) and the State (25%). The State share includes the cost for all lands, easements, and rights-of-way as well as a cash contribution. The State share may be reduced through the use of credits available for Passaic River Basin projects. Local cooperation. Non-Federal sponsor will operate and maintain project once construction is complete and project is turned-over to sponsor. erations and results during period and condition as of aeptember 30. Engineering and design commenced in October 1987. The final General Design Memorandum was completed in May 1994 and approved in July 1994. Permits were issued in January 1999. The Project Cooperation Agreement was executed in April 1999. Construction on the channel modification started in spring 2001. Total estimated Federal cost is $11,700,000. Total estimated non-Federal costs for all requirements of local cooperation is $1,400,000 38. RARITAN RIVER BASIN GREEN BROOK SUB-BASIN, NJ Location. The Green Brook Basin lies in central New Jersey within the counties of Somerset, Middlesex and Union and is one of the major tributaries in the Raritan River Basin. The Green Brook, which originates in the Watchung Mountains, has a 65-square mile watershed. The bell shaped basin widens markedly as Green Brook flows southwesterly to its mouth at the Raritan River. Project History. The Green Brook Flood Control Project is the result of efforts over the past three decades by the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, other Federal agencies, state and local agencies, civic organizations and the general public. In S8, a reconnaissance investigation was conducted, under the ,rps of Engineers Continuing Authority Program for small projects, for Ambrose, Bound and Bonygutt Brooks. The resulting report recommended further study at all three locations. Detailed project reports concluded that individual flood protection projects were not economically feasible at any of the locations. Subsequently, record floods occurred in 1971 and again in 1973, causing catastrophic damage throughout the basin. As a result of the devastating events, the need for basinwide studies of the entire Green Brook Basin was apparent. The Corps of Engineers, North Atlantic Division (NAD) issued the Feasibility Report for Flood Control, Green Brook Sub-Basin, dated August 1980. The plan recommended in this report consisted of a system of levees and floodwalls to provide protection against a 150-year flood in the lower portion of the Green Brook Basin only. A more comprehensive, basinwide solution would have also extended 150-year protection to the upper and Stony Brook portions of the basin. The Board of Engineers for Rivers and Harbors (BERH) reviewed the NAD report and issued its report on 16 March 1981, in which they endorsed all plan formulation decisions in the 1980 Feasibility Report. However, the BERH also stated the "the recommended 150-year level of protection is inadequate for this highly urbanized floodplain". Th avoid catastrophic consequences of levee overtopping, the BERH recommended protection to 500- year level. The Chief of Engineers Report dated 4 September 1981. In February 1984, the Secretary of the Army expressed the administration's views in his letter transmitting the report to Congress in which he recommended that the August 1980 report should be authorized. The Water Resources Act of 1986 authorized construction of a project, providing protection in all three portions of the Green Brook Basin. Section 401a of the Water Resources Development Act (WRDA) 1986 authorizes construction of the Green Brook Flood Control Project for the Green Brook Sub-basin, which will address both environmental and engineering objectives of the Act. The Green Brook Flood Control Project combines levees, floodwalls, channel modification, flood proofing, and natural flood storage to provide flood protection to about 13 municipalities in the Green Brook Subbasin. On the basis of this authorization, funds were budgeted and appropriated for preconstruction engineering and design. Surveying, mapping and other studies necessary to provide the basis for actual construction commenced toward the end of 1986. However, delays were incurred due to conflict between the needs and desires of the non-Federal sponsor and national economic development which affected the quest for a comprehensible implementable plan. In January 1994, a general reevaluation study was initiated. Unfortunately, the area was hit with another record storm in September 1996. causing more damages, the draft General Reevaluation Report was issued in December 1996 and opened for public comment for the period between January 7 - March 7, 1997. As a result comments expressed with significant concerns over the flood protection plan proposed for the upper portion of the basin, the Corps and the NJDEP agreed to defer action on the flood protection plan 2-22 NEW YORK, NY DISTRICT � the upper portion of the basin. The Final General Reevaluation Report and Supplemental Environmental Impact Statement was approved in May 1997 with the support of the New Jersey Department of Environmental Protection (NJDEP) who is the non-Federal sponsor for the project. In FY 1998, an Upper Basin Task Force (UBTF) was formulated to develop potential plan alternatives to the upper basin. The UBTF released their final report on November 12, 1998. In September 1999, again the area saw another record storm which not only caused catastrophic damage but resulted in 3 deaths. The Corps of Engineers, New York District released a Project Study Plan (PSP) to determine the feasibility of the alternatives discussed in the UBTF report in June 2000. Preconstruction Engineering and Design for the Green Brook Flood Control Project was initiated in FY 1997 and the Project Cooperation Agreement (PCA) between the NJDEP and the Federal Government was executed on June 24, 1999. Condition as of September 30. The first construction contract was awarded on September 29, 2000 to begin work in the lower portion of the basin which includes a temporary bridge demolition and replacement of a bridge and demolition of 3 houses on East Street of Bound Brook. As a result of the 1999 storm event, the construction of the levee system has been re- 1lyzed. Construction is scheduled to begin 3rd quarter 2001. ernatives to the proposed flood proofing measures in Mivddlesex Borough along Prospect Place is currently being review as a result of a resolution submitted by the Borough in October 1999 requesting buyouts. 39. INSPECTION OF COMPLETED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS Inspections of the following completed flood control works and beach erosion and hurricane protection projects were performed to determine the extent of compliance by local interests with operation and maintenance requirements. New England Adams, MA - Hoosic River Bennington, VT - Roaring Branch, Walloomsac River East Barre Dam, VT - Jail Branch Winooski River Montpelier Dam, VT - Winooski River North Adams, MA - Hoosic River Richford, VT - Missiquoi River 'terbury Dam, VT - Little River rightsville Dam, VT - North Branch, Winooski River Inspection Date Sept. 00 Oct. 99 Sept. 00 Sept. 00 Sept. 00 Sept. 00 Sept. 00 Sept. 00 NY - NJ Areas * E. Rockaway Inlet to Rockaway Inlet Oct. 99 Elizabeth, NJ - Elizabeth River NI * Fire Is. Inlet to Montauk Pt., NY Oct. 99 Herkimer, NY - Bellinger Brook & Mohawk River Oct. 99 Holland Patent, NY - Thompson Creek Oct. 99 Hoosic Falls, NY - Hoosic River Oct. 99 Kingston, NY - Esopus Creek Sept. 00 North Ellenville, NY - Beer & Fantine Kills & Snadburg Creek Sept. 00 Rahway, NJ - Rahway River, S. Branch Rahway River NI * Raritan Bay & sandy Hook Bay, NJ Old Bridge, Keansburg & Middletown, NJ NI Rosendale, NY - Roundout Creek Sept. 00 So. Amsterdam, NY - So. Chuctanunda Creek & Mohawk River Oct. 99 So. Orange NJ - E. Branch, Rahway River NI Yonkers, NY - Saw Mill River Oct. 98 Chappaqua, NY - Saw Mill River Oct. 99 Ardsley, NY - Saw Mill River Oct. 99 Sandy Hook to Barnagat Inlet, NJ NI * Beach Erosion & Hurricane Protection Projects NI - Not Inspected FY 1997 40. OTHER AUTHORIZED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS (See Table 2-1 at end of chapter.) 41. FLOOD CONTROL WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION Flood Control activities pursuant to Section 205, Public Law 858, 80th Cong. as amended (Pre-authorization) See Table 2-P at end of chapter). Natural Disaster and Emergency Flood Control Activities. Pursuant to Public Law 84-99 and antecedent legislation provides for disaster preparedness, emergency operation, rehabilitation, advance measures, emergency water, and drought assistance. Under disaster preparedness, the New York District initiated revisions to emergency response plans to include lessons learned from previous disasters, attended meetings and seminars dealing with emergency response planning and purchased supplies and equipment to maintain its' flood fight and response capability. Under emergency operations, the New York DIstrict conducted field investigations, provided technical assistance and 2-23 NEW YORK, NY DISTRICT adbags to local and county government in response to flooding events. In response to Presidential disaster declarations under P.L. 93-288 the New York District received mission assignments from the Federal Emergency management Agency (FEMA) for generator repair and servicing during the Jan. 1998 NY ice storm and environmental technical assistance during the June 1998 flash flooding in NY. GENERAL INVESTIGATIONS 42. SURVEYS (See Table 2-J at end of chapter.) 43. COLLECTION AND STUDY OF BASIC DATA Costs for the period of $338,163 for flood plain management services are set forth in Table 2-L at the end of chapter. 44. DEAUTHORIZED PROJECTS Projects having all, or inactive or uncompleted portions deauthorized by Congressional Action pursuant to Water Resources Development Acts (See Table 2-M at end of chapter.) 2-24 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 2000 COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT FY 97 FY 98 Total Cost to FY 99 FY 00 September 30, 2000 1. Aquatic Plant Control 2. Buttermilk Channel, NY 3. East Rockaway Inlet, NY 4. Fire Island to Jones Inlet, NY 5. Glen Cove Creek, NY New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost 86,771 145,377 463,000 479,000 5,304,194 5,270,950 2,142,000 2,130,088 2,734,000 2,733,537 268,000 158,315 335,000 -180,355 - 311,000 2,641,1831 31,890 311,000 2,640,5212 - - 7,250,210 -- - 7,250,326 - 1,084,000 18,679,560 - 1,084,117 18,692,113 2,052,000 2,067,751 3,605,000 710,388 706,000 695,277 136,000 136,502 4,239,734 6,381,366 706,000 695,277 -- 694,599 -- 694,598 83,969 533,334 18,815,560 18,828,615 31,012,8623 30,984,783 24,364,050 23,888,941 165,882 165,882 937,358 937,357 6. Hudson River, NY New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost 7. Hudson River, NY New Work (New York City to Approp. Waterford: Athens Channel) Cost 8. Jamaica Bay, NY New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost 9. Kill Van Kull-Newark New Work Approp. Cost 10. Lake Mont Harbor, NY New Work Approp. Cost Maint Approp. Cost 11. Mamaroneck New Work Harbor, NY Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost 12. Narrows of Lake New Work Champlain, NY Approp. Cost Maint Approp. Cost 3,486,000 3,501,224, 300,000 990,000 989,192 1,412,959 2,030,721 1,895,000 1,713,221 8,700,000 30,914 395,000 356,205 1,299,000 1,094,175 --- 114,900 -- 114,900 3,689,000 3,776,614 290,000 192,216 1,455.000 1,494,628 29,096,000 10,398,616 - 44,249,800'. 5 -- 44,249,865 2,655,000 63,604,4506 ' 3,776,614 63,439,698 9,299,000 32,264 268,131 -- 4,545,750 - 4,454,750 1,455,000 13,794,750 1,494,628 13,771,686 20,951,000 326,417,959 35,858,098 313,739,023 590,570 590,571 - 5,714,000 5,714,000 -- 5,712,297 5,712,297 46,000 96,275 28,837 93,266 93,000 207,000 93,784 208,949 791,680 791,680 1,993,633 1,993,632 513,764 513,764 7,093,087 7,091,258 681,811 681,811 1,956,365 1,878,775 2-25 TABLE 2-A Projects Funding NEW YORK, NY DISTRICT TABLE 2-A COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT ... .. .,..mma. Projects FY97 FY 98 13. New York Harbor and Adjacent Channels, 14. New York Harbor- Collection and Removal of Drift 15. New York Harbor- Entrance Channels & Anchorage Areas 16. New York and New Jersey Channels 17. Raritan River, NJ 18. Raritan River To Arthur Kill Cutoff Channel, NJ 19. Sag Harbor. NY 20. Supervisor of New York Harbor 24. Long Beach Island NY 25. East Rockaway Inlet to Rockaway Inlet and Jamaica Bay, NY 26. Fire Island Inlet to Montauk Point, NY 27. Raritan Bay and Sandy Hook Bay, NJ 28. Rockaway Inlet to Norton Point (Coney Island), NY 29. Sandy Hook to Bamegat Inlet, NJ FY 99 563,000 649,000 463,110 631,652 -- 200,000 456,393 3,277,738 4,623,000 4,810,000 4,570,944 4,859,837 Funding New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost 3,453,000 44,394,000 3,353,643 44,469,574 322,000 252,578 -105,000 741,285 4,978,000 4,986,697 9,545,000 9,515,720 Total Cost to FY 00 September 30, 2000 715,000 538,514 358,000 228,592 4,855,000 4,855,000 3,825,000 3,852,541 656,000 668,153 - 2,418,000 -- 2,418,271 -- 972,000 -- 972,778 -- 366,264 - 366,264 730,000 726,567 381,000 337,517 1,228,000 2,396,586 15,193,000 13,765,050 130 300,000 607,193 35,929,573 27,166,129 747,000 729,765 859,040 466,632 563,000 234,115 4,510,000 7,607,472 188,000 25,932 1,639,000 715,734 22,696,000 28,394,251 2-26 740,000 763,192 884,000 651,110 569,000 884,663 3,591,000 3,697,967 139,000 17,884 1,644000 703,188 21,007,000 23,399,243 867,000 868,908 0 194,807 1,147,000 1,421,411 5,065,000 3,906,736 368,000 178,880 957,000 733,296 17,287,648 18,007,299 8,544,000 8,442,420 - -- 3,260,000 3,437,544 - 985,000 999,636 2,736,000 2,371,230 46,099,000 45,914,267 118,496,250 10 113,762,933 45,009,710 45,009,710 110,968,170 110,963,077 73,052,435 73,052,435 47,549,090 47,591,312 1,551,470 1,551,470 18,428,269 18,419,757 810,510 810,510 4,892,581 4,890,107 121,805 121,805 377,973 377,973 38,126,960 38,126,946 2,782.040 2,270,021 53,913,000 51,288,711 63,544,439 61,370,978 113,970 143,753 1,461,000 984,099 22,241,765 19,433,092 " 157,296,221 152,819,332 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 2000 TABLE 2-A COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT wwfftww .. .. Projects FY 97 FY 98 32. Hackensack Meadowlands, NJ 33. Joseph G. Minish Waterfront Park, NJ 34. New York City Watershed, NY 35. Passaic Mainstem NJ 36. Preservation of Natural Storage Areas, NJ 37. Ramapo at Oakland NJ 38. Raritan River Basin Green Brook Sub-basin Funding New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost FY 99 187,737 900,000 331,157 1,000,000 51,656 -1,400,000 , 611,699 500,000 104,747 237,000 113,710 2,780,000 3,090,080 IUl0 LUL LU FY 00 September 30, 2000 21,252 3,000,000 594,915 96,000 57,765 ~ 6,975 50,000 136,616 467,000 288,073 2,911,000 2,157,946 47,875 3,800,000 289,160 930,000 109,242 71,817 930,000 71,798 2,290,000 216,021 2,706,000 2,244,279 1. Of which $12,500 is for North Atlantic Division Accounts. 2. Of which $12,127 is for North Atlantic Division Accounts 3. Excludes $90,190 for new work expended from contributed funds. Additional NY State Funds were $200,000 in 1990, $581,000 in 1991, $611,574 in 1996, $2,093,194 in 1997, $1,280,000 in 1999 and $1,468,734 in 2000. 4. Includes $5,112,694 for new work for previous project. 5. Includes $238,350 for new work expended from public works funds and $311,461 emergency relief funds. Excludes $81,373 expended from contributed funds. 6. Excludes $454,273 expended between August 18, 1915 and June 30, 1935, for operation and care of lock and dam at Troy, NY, under permanent indefinite appropriation. Excludes $23,735 reimbursement for repairs to Troy Lock. 7. Includes $346,797 for maintenance for previous project. 8. Includes $84,191,000 from contributed funds. 9. Includes $115,000 for new work for previous projects. 10. Includes $2,491,206 expended to date for construction of a land-based overfire air pit incinerator ($1,493,393 in maintenance funds and $997,813 in O & M funds.) 11. Includes $116,530 applied to removing wrecks authorized by acts prior to adoption of existing projects. 12. Includes $22,777,035 from contributed funds. 13. Includes $9,700,000 contributed funds. 14. Includes $6,900,000 from contributed funds. 15. Includes $39,785,000 from contributed funds. 16. Includes $487,500 from contributed funds. 17. Includes $4,072,420 from contributed funds. 2-27 T- 'nLn + +Ce --~- -- 487,500 300,013 5,887,000 2,518,295 762,265 1,510,000 507,541 409,000 342,987 4,930,420 2,227,640 2,987,500 578,841 12,787,000 3,733,527 2,026,00 980,928 63,459,669 63,095,489 2,490,000 820,699 4,574,000 2,291,343 34,547,420 30,631,349 NEW YORK, NY DISTRICT AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Work Authorized River and Harbor Act of 1959 AQUATIC PLANT CONTROL (See Section 1 of Text) Control and progressive eradication of obnoxious Aquatic Plant growths H. Doc. 37, 85th Cong., Ist sess. Section 104 and Harbor Provided that all research and planning cost to be borne fully by Act of 1958 the United States Section 302 River and Harbor Act of 1965 Modified project to include control of waterchestnut June 13, 1902 July 3, 1930 August 26, 1937 May 17, 1950 S1958 River & Harbor Act 1962 River & Harbor Act March 1988 March 3, 1925 June 25, 1910 March 3, 1925 July 3, 1930 July 1, 1935 August 30, 1935 June 20, 1938 September 3, 1954 P.L. 89-72 BUTTERMILK CHANNEL, NY (See Section 2 of Text) Channel 1,200 feet wide was not less than 30 fet deep. East Rockaway Inlet, NY (See Section 5 of Text) Channel 12 feet deep and 250 feet wide, and ajetty FIRE ISLAND TO JONES INLET, NY (See Section 4 of Text) construction of jetty. H. Doc. 122, 56th Cong., 2nd sess. Annual Report 1901, p. 1299 H. Doc. 19, 71st Cong., 1st sess. Rivers & Harbors Committee Doc. 33, 75th Cong., 1st sess. Channel 10 feet deep H. Doc 762, 80th Cong., 2nd sess. Three dredging operations with sand serving as nourishment to the beaches westerly of the inlet Extension of existing jetty, a littoral reservoir, a navigation channel and dikes, sand deposit on westerly beaches 14 foot channel with sand placed along Gilgo Beach GLEN COVE CREEK (See Section 5 of Text) Channel 8 feet deep and 100 feet wide HUDSON RIVER, NY (See Section 6 of Text) Channel 12 feet deep from Hudson to Waterford, remove State Lock and dam at Troy and construct a new lock and dam Channel 27 feet deep from Hudson to Albany, NY Channel 27 feet below Hudson Operation and care of lock and dam at Troy were included in project Relocation of 12 foot channel between Troy and Waterford Deepen channel between Albany and Waterford to 14 feet with no change in depths for harbors in front of Albany & Troy. Deepen channel between New York City and Albany to 32 feet and construct a turning basin and 2 anchorages. Mooring facilities Note: The 12 and 27 foot classification have been deauthorized. 2-28 H. Doc. 411, 84th Cong., 2nd sess. H. Doc. 115, 89th Cong., Ist sess. H. Doc. 207, 68th Cong, 1st sess. H. Doc. 719, 61st Cong., 2nd sess. H. Doc. 350, 68th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 210, 70th Cong., 1st sess. S. Doc. 155, 72nd Cong., 2nd sess. H. Doc. 572, 75th Cong., 3rd sess. H. Doc. 228, 83rd Cong., 1st sess. TABLE 2-B Act Document __ __ REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 2000 AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Wonrk A1thnri7mad Document September, 1996 Rivers and WRDA, 1997 June 25, 1910 March 2, 1945 May 17, 1950 HUDSON RIVER AT ATHENS, NY (See Section 7 of Text) The District will coordinate the assessment report to address the Rivers & Harbors Act of 1910 need for additional formulation and economic analysis to modified by Section 110 of the determine economic viability. Energy and Water Development Appropriations Act, 1997 JAMAICA BAY, NY (See Section 8 of Text) Construction of 1 jetty. Interior channel along west shore of bay, 18 and 12 feet deep; interior channel along south shore, 15 feet deep; entrance channel 20 and 18 feet deep; and I riprap jetty all in lieu of work heretofore authorized. Modified conditions of local cooperation. Channel 15 feet deep in Mott Basin including its 2 branches H. Doc 1488, 72nd Cong., 2nd sess. H. Doc. 700, 76th Cong., 3rd sess. H. Doc. 665, 80th Cong. Fy 1985 Supplemental Appropriations Act. March 2, 1945 September 22, 1922 August 20, 1935 July 14, 1960 August 8, 1917 WRDA 1986 KILL VAN KULL-NEWARK BAY, NJ & NY (See Section 9 of Text) Deepening existing 35 foot channels in increments to 40 feet and then 45 feet. PL 99-662 PL 91-611 LAKE MONTAUK HARBOR, NY (See Section 10 of Text) Channel 12 feet deep and 150 feet wide, 70 feet boat basin; repair. H. Doc. 369, 76th Cong., and extension of two jetties; and addition of sport fishing facilities 1st sess. on top of jetties. MAMARONECK HARBOR, NY (See Section 11 of Text) Dredging 10-foot channel and anchorage H. Doc. 651, 66th Cong., 2nd sess. Dredging 6-foot anchorage in West Basin and its approach Rivers and Harbors Committee channel. Doc. 4, 74th Cong., 1st sess.' Dredging 6-foot anchorage in East Basin H. Doc. 209, 86th Cong., 2nd sess.' 'Contains latest published maps NARROWS OF LAKE CHAMPLAIN, NY, AND VERMONT (See Section 12 of Text) Channel 12 feet deep and 150 feet wide Rivers & Harbor Committee NEW YORK HARBOR AND ADJACENT CHANNELS (PORT JERSEY), NJ (See Section 13 of Text) Deepening existing 35 foot channel and turning basin 2-29 PL 99-662 TABLE 2-B Act __ yyyln TULLI11G\+ NEW YORK, NY DISTRICT TABLE 2-B AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Act Work Authorized Document March 14, 1915 July 3, 1930 December 31, 1970 March 7, 1974 July 5, 1884 March 3, 1899 NEW YORK HARBOR COLLECTION AND REMOVAL OF DRIFT (See Section 14 of Text) Allotment from appropriations made for New York Harbor and its immediate tributaries may be used for collection and removal of drift in these waterways. Carrying on this work as a separate and distinct project. Increase scope of project to include removal and disposal of derelict vessels, some deteriorated shore structures and debris along shores; and the repair of other shore structures; all subject to approval by Secretary of the Army and the President. Removal and disposal of derelict vessels, some deteriorated shore Structures and debris along shores and the repair of other shore Structures. NEW YORK HARBOR, ENTRANCE CHANNELS AND ANCHORAGE AREAS (See Section 15 of Text) Main-Ship-Bayside-Gedney to 30 feet deep for width of 1,000 feet (Dimensions fixed by Secretary of War, December 27, 1886 by authority of Act of August 5, 1886). Ambrose Channel (East Channel). P.L. 91-611, 91st Cong., H.R. 1987 P.L. 93-251, 93rd Cong. Annual Reports 1887, p. 62 and 1888, p. 63 H. Doc-159, 55th Cong., 2nd sess. June 25, 1910 Maintenance of entrance channel under I head. August 8, 1917 August 8, 1917 August 8, 1917 August 30, 1935 August 30, 1935 August 26, 1937 July 3, 1958 October 27, 1965 March 31, 1982 Anchorage Channel, extension of Ambrose Channel into Upper Bay Removal of Craven Shoal Channel between Staten Island and Hoffman and Swinburne Islands Dredging south end of Red Hook Flats, Liberty Island Anchorage, and channel along New Jersey pierhead line. Deepen Bayside-Gedney Channel to 35 feet for a width of 800 feet Deepen Ambrose and Anchorage Channels to 45 feet for a width of 2,000 feet Dredging South Channel, elimination of portion of Bayside-Gedney Channel Deepen and expand Red Hook Flats Anchorage, Deepen Gravesend Bay Anchorage Further expansion of Red Hook Flats Anchorage and the relocation of Anchorage channel. 2-30 H. Doc- 518, 63rd Cong., 2nd sess. H. Doc 557, 64th Cong., Ist sess. H. Doc. 625, 64th Cong., Ist sess. H. Doc. 183, 73rd Cong., 2nd sess. H. Doc. 133, 74th Cong., 1st sess. Senate Commerce Doc. 75th Cong., I sess. S. Doc. 45, 84th Cong., 1st sess. S. Doc. 17, 89th Cong., 1st sess. OCE Letter 31 Mar. 1982 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 2000 TABLE 2-B AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Act Work Authorized Document September 6, 1933 August 30, 1965 May 28, 1935 May 17, 1950 October 27, 1965 March 2, 1919 July 3, 1930 July 3, 1930 July 3, 1930 NEW YORK AND JERSEY CHANNELS (See Section 16 of Text) Anchorage off Perth Amboy to 35 feet H. Doc. 1387, 62nd Cong., Doc. 17, 71st. Cong., 2nd sess. Channels 35 feet deep from lower bay to upper bay, except H. Doc. 133, 74th Cong., between vicinity of Smith Creek and vicinity of Piles Creek 1st sess. to 30 feet with anchorage 38 feet deep at Sandy Hook and Perth Amboy Channel 35 feet deep from vicinity of Smith Creek to vicinity of H. Doc. 233, 81st Cong., Piles Creek 1st sess. Widen entrance'to Kill Van Kull to 1,400 feet narrowing to a H. Doc. 108, 98th Cong., Minimum width of 1,000 feet 1st sess.. RARITAN RIVER, N.J. (See Section 17 of Text) Channel 15 feet deep and 20 feet wide to Washington Canal H. Doc. 1341, 62nd Cong., 10 feet deep and 150 feet wide to canal locks and 10 feet deep 3rd sess. thru South Channel Channel 25 feet deep and 300 feet wide up to New York and Long H. Doc. 454, 70th Cong., Branch Railroad bridge. 2st sess. Channel 10 feet deep in earth and 11 feet in rock to New Brunswick. H. Doc. 127, 70th Cong., Width reduced to 100 feet. 1st sess. Relocation of lower reach to South Channel. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 31, 71st Cong., 2nd sess. August 26, 1937 October 17, 1940 October 23, 1962 September 6, 1933 August 30, 1935 June 13, 1902 Channel 25 feet deep and 300 feet wide to junction of Rivers and Harbors Committee main and south channels, thence of same depth on South Channel to Doc. 74, 74th Cong. Titanium Pigment Co. 2nd sess. Channel 25 feet deep and 300 feet wide from junction of main south channels to government wharf, including a turning basin 2nd sess. In South Channel, maintenance of 15-foot channel to dockof Middlesex County Sewerage Authority. RARITAN RIVER TO ARTHUR KILL CUT-OFF CHANNEL, N.Y. (See Section 18 of Text) Channel 1 mile long, 20 feet deep, 800 feet wide, connecting Raritan River and Arthur Kill channels. SAG HARBOR, N.Y. (See Section 19 of Text) Breakwwater Report on file in the Office, Chief of Engineers (report not printed) H. Doc. 455, 86th Cong., 2nd sess. H. Doc. 50, 73rd Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 77, 56nd Cong., 1st sess. (Annual Report 1900, p. 1451) 2-31 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 2000 AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Act August 30, 1935 October 31, 1992 October 1, 1986 1974 & 1986 Water Resources Development Acts 1960 River & Harbor Act 1974 Water Resources Development Act Work Authorized Entrance channel, anchorages and turning basin Entrance channel, anchorages and turning basin deauthorized ATLANTIC COAST OF LONG ISLAND, JONES INLET TO EAST ROCKAWAY INLET, LONG BEACH ISLAND, NY (See Section 24 of Text) Storm damage protection, rehabilitation of existing groins and construction of new groins EAST ROCKAWAY INLET TO ROCKAWAY INLET AND JAMAICA BAY, NY (See Section 25 of Text) Beach nourishment of 100 to 200 foot wide beach at elevation 10 feet MSL FIRE ISLAND INLET TO MONTAUK POINT, NY (See Section 26 of Text) Raising dunes, widening beaches, interior drainage structures, groins beach replenishment, annual nourishment. Project modified to provide that non-Federal interest shall contribute 30 percent of first costs Document Rivers and Harbor Committee Doc. 32 , 74th Cong., 1st sess. (contains latest published map) H.R. 6167 Section 101(a) 21 of WRDA 1996 H. Doc. 425 86th Cong., 2nd sess. P.L. 93-251, 93rd Cong., H.R. 10203 1986 and 1992 Water Resources Development Acts October 12, 1962 RARITAN BAY AND SANDY HOOK, NJ (See Section 27 of Text) This project provides for beach fill, groins, and levees for various Flood Control Act of 1962 sections of the study area. H. Doc. 464, 86th Cong., 2nd sess. The study seeks to determine the advisability of changes to the recommendation Section 506 of WRDA 1996 2-32 TABLE 2-B Actmm __ _ _ m TABLE 2-A COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT FY 96 FY 97 FY 98 Total Cost to FY 99 September 30, 2000 1. Aquatic Plant Control 2. East Rockaway Inlet, NY 3. Fire Islant to Jones Inlet, NY New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost 4. Hudson River, NY New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost 5. Hudson River, NY New Work (New York City to Approp. Waterford: Athens Channel) Cost 6. Jamaica Bay, NY New Work 7. Kill Van Kull-Newark 8. Mamaroneck Harbor, NY 9. Moriches Inlet, NY 10. Narrows of Lake Champlain, NY Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint Approp. Cost 131,523 86,771 145,377 3,189 2,330,183 ' 2,324,573 2 83,969 533,334 2,360,000 463,000 2,734,000 2,052,000 2,377 479,000 2,733,537 2,067,751 -290,000 5,304,194 -291,724 5,270,950 254,000 2,142,000 250,173 2,130,088 3,486,000 3,501,224, 1,895,000 1,713,221 268,000 3,605,000 158,315 1,710,338 335,000 706,000 -180,355 695,277 3,689,000 2,655,000 3,776,614 3,776,614 300,000 8,700,000 30,914 192,216 - ,, - - -- 290,000 12,737 18,679,560 18,692,113 26,773,128 3 24,743,599 42,364,050 23,888,941 44,249,800 5 44,249,865 63,604,4506.7 63,439,698 9,299,000 235,867 4,545,750 4,454,750 635,000 990,000 637,471 989,192 2,000,000 1,412,959 2,664,007 2,030,721 395,000 1,455,000 356,205 1,494,628 1,299,000 29,096,000 1,094,175 10,399,616 - 5,714,000 - 5,712,297 1,490,000 -46,000 1,536,336 383,395 30,483 5,120 - 1,115,000 -50,000 - 960,654 103,084 45,000 46,000 46,334 28,837 96,275 93,000 93,226 93,784 13,794,750 13,771,686 294,093,886 274,136,853 29,014,500 29,014,500 7,093,087 7,091,258 9,801,000 9,773,444 1,074,422 1,073,460 681,811 -681,8119 1,749,365 1,669,796 2-33 Projects Funding FINANCIAL, STATEMENT TABLE 2-A NEW YORK, NY DISTRICT AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Act Work Authorized Document 1986 Water Resources Development Act Section 501 July 3, 1958 1988 Water Resources Development Act February, 1996 November 28, 1990 ROCKAWAY INLET TO NORTON POINT (CONEY ISLAND) NY (See Section 28 of Text) Provide beach fill to public beach to furnish storm damage protection to the area. Extension of terminal groins a W. 37 St. and Brighton Beach Fillet of beach fill at Sea Gate. SANDY HOOK TO BARNEGAT INLET, NJ (See Section 29 of Text) Restoration of beach to minimum width of 100 feet at height of H. Doc. 332, 85th Cong., 10 feet above mlw, and construction of 23 new groins and 2nd sess., modified by Appr. Act extension of 14 existing groins for Energy & Water Dev. for FY "85 HACKENSACK MEADOWLANDS, NJ (See Section 32 of Text) Tide gate improvements to control flooding in the Berry's WRDA of 1992, sect. 324 Creed damage basin, the mitigation enhancement and Amended by WRDA of 1996 acquisition of wetlands, the development and implementation of sect. 550 a system to provide for water quality monitoring and wetland monitoring, storm water management and watershed clean-up. JOSEPH G. MINISH PASSAIC RIVER WATERFRONT PARK AND HISTORIC AREAS, NJ (See Section 33 of Text) The first phase restores riverbanks and wetlands. The second phase WRDA 1990; PL 101-640 adds 9,200 foot waterfront walkway and third phase adds park WRDA 1992: PL 101-580 facilities, plazas and landscaping WRDA 1996; PL 104-303 April, 1997 1976, 1990 & 1992 Water Resource Dev. Acts October 22, 1976 October 22, 1976 NEW YORK CITY WATERSHED, NY (See Section 34 of Text) Provide design and construction assistance for water-related environmental infrastructure and resource protection PASSAIC RIVER BASIN, NJ (See Section 35 of Text) Advanced engineering and design study; involving reformulation of plans for flood control and water resource management PRESERVATION OF NATURAL FLOOD STORAGE PASSAIC RIVER, NJ (See Section 36 of Text) The preservation element includes acquisitions 5,350 acres of natural storage area, 5,200 acres of which are wetlands and could conceivably be developed RAMAPO AT OAKLAND, NJ (See Section 37 of Text) Phase I Advanced Engineering and Design Study was authorized. Congressional guidance for the conduct of the study. The study was authorized for construction. WRDA 1996, sect. 552 CR52, HR. 36 H. Rpt. 94-1702 WRDA of 1976; PL 94-587 WRDA of 1990 WRDA of 1996 WRDA of 1976: PL 94-587 WRDA of 1986: PL 99-662 WRDA of 1996: PL 104-303 March 16, 1981 February, 1984 RARITAN RIVER BASIN, GREENBROOK SUB-BASIN, NJ (See Section 38 of Text) Recommended 150 year flood protection in lower portion. Recommended protection to 500 year level. Authorizes construction WRDA 1986, sect. 401(a) of Greenbrook Flood Control. Flood control combines levees, flood walls, channel modification, flood proofing, and natural flood storage to provide protection. 2-34 TABLE 2-B REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 2000 HUDSON RIVER, NY FEATURES OF LOCK AND DAM INCLUDED IN EXISTING PROJECT (Section 6 of Text) Location: Below Waterford Above Battery, New York City Locks: Clear Width Greatest length available for full width Lift at lowest stages Depth on miter sills: Upper (at normal pool level) Lower (at lowest low water) Character of foundation: Rock King of dam: Fixed Crest Type of construction: Concrete Complete: 1917 Cost $1,463,014 SUPERVISOR OF NEW YORK HARBOR STATEMENT OF ACTIVITIES - FY 2000 1. Number of Patrols: a. Shore b. Vessel c. Air (helicopter) 2. Number of Inspections: a. Shore Facilities b. Vessels 3. Disposition of Cases: a. Voluntary Restoration b. After-the-Fact Permit Applications Accepted c. Permit Not Required or Already Under Permit d. Submitted for Litigation to OCE or U.S. Attorney e. Other Misc. f. Cases Pending as of 10/1/98 2-35 TABLE 2-C 2.2 miles 152.6 miles 44.4 feet 492.5 feet 17.3 feet 16.3 feet 13.0 feet TABLE 2-E 82 176 0 Total 258 130 114 Total 244 42 12 59 1 51 178 Total 343 -- -- NEW YORK, NY DISTRICT TABLE 2-F RECONNAISSANCE AND CONDITION SURVEYS FY 00 NAME OF PROJECT DATE SURVEY CONDUCTED NEW JERSEY Cheesequake Creek..........................................................................Nov 99 Keyport Harbor ............................................................................. Apr/May 00 M atawan Creek .................................. ...................................... Apr/M ay 00 Newark Bay-Main Channel, NJ ........................... ............... .............. Oct 99/May 00 Newark Bay Hackensack & Passaic River .................................................... Oct/Nov 00 Raritan River ... ..................... .............................. ........... Apr/May 00 Sandy Hook Bay at Leonard .......................................... Mar/Apr 00 Shark River ............................... ....................................... May/Jun 00 Shoal Harobr & Compton Creek ........................ ........................ Jan/May 00 Shrewsbury River ............................................................. ..... Mar/Apr 00 NEW YORK Ambrose Channel ............. ................................ ...................... Dec 99 Arthur Kill ....................... ............................................. Dec 99 Bayridge & Red Hook Channel, NY.................................................... Mar 00 Bronx River ................................................................................ Feb 00 Browns Creek ......................................... ..................................... Dec 99 Buttermilk Channel ........... .... ......... ..................................... ... Dec 99 Chapel Hill Channel ............................. .......................................... Nov 99 Coney Island Channel ........................................................................ Feb 00 Coney Island Creek ................................................................................ Nov 99 Eastchester Creek ........................................................................... Dec 99 East River............... ........................ ......................................... Feb 00 East Rockaway Inlet ........... ........................................................... Apr 00 Edgewater-Weehawken Channel ............... ...... ........................................... Jun 00 Fire Island Jetty ................................................................... 20 Feb - 18 Mar 00 Flushing Bay and Creek ...................................................................... Nov 99 Gravesend Bay........ ...... .................................................. ............. May00 Glen Cove Creek...................................... .................................... Apr 00 Great Kill Harbor ............................ ..... ................................ Mar 00 Great South Bay..........................................................................Jun/Jul 00 Green Port Harbor .... .................................................................... May 00 Hudson River........................................................................... Mar 00 Huntington Harbor.......................................................................... M ar 00 Jamaica Bay .......................................................................... Jul/Aug 00 Jones Inlet.............................................................................. Apr/Jun 00 Lake Montauk Harbor........................................................................ Mar 00 Long Island Intercoastal W/W.. ........................ ............................ ........... Mar 00 Main Channel ................................. ................................................... Mar00 Mamaroneck Harbor ............................... .................. ........................ Jun 00 Mattituck Harbor.. ...................................... ...... ................... Apr 99 Milton Harbor ................................... . ........................... Apr 00 M orichesInlet ........... .................................................................. Aug 00 New York Harbor .......................................................................... Jul00 New York & New Jersey Channel ................. .............................. Dec 99/May 00 Newton Creek........................................................................... Nov 00 Pierhead/Bulkhead GIS Database ..... ............................................... Jan 00 PortChesterCreek Harbor ........... . ....... DDe..c. ..9..9.............. Raritan BayReaches................................... ......... .......................... Dec 99 Red Hook FlatsAnchorage................... .............................. Oct 99/Dec 99/Jan 00 Sanday Hook Channel................................... .............................. Oct 99/Dec 99 Sheepshead Bay . ..... ..... .. .................... ............. Nov/Dec 99 Shinnecock Inlet................. . .............................................. Aug 00 Tarrytown Harbor............................ ....................... ......... Dec 99 Ward Point Bend ......................... ............................... ............... May00 Westchester Creek .......... ........ ....................................................... May 00 Total cost of Reconnaissance and Condition Surveys in Fiscal Year 2000 was $1,458,409.00 2-36 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 2000 TABLE 2-G OTHER AUTHORIZED NAVIGATION PROJECTS Cost to Sept 30, 2000 For Last Full Report See Annual Operation & Projects Report for Construction Maintenance Bay Ridge-Red Hook Channels, NY Bronx River, NY Browns Creek, NY Burlington Harbor, VT Channel between North & South Hero Islands, VT Cheesequake Creek, NJ Coney Island Channel, NY Coney Island Creek, NY East River, NY East Rockaway Inlet, NY Echo Bay Harbor, NY Fire Island Inlet, NY Flushing Bay & Creek, NY Gordon's Landing, VT Gowanus Creek Channel, NY Great Chazy River, NY Great Kills Harbor, NY Great Lakes to Hudson River W/W, NY Greenport Harbor, NY Harlem River, NY Hempstead Harbor, NY Hudson River Channel, NY Huntington Harbor, NY Keyport Harbor, NJ Lake Montauk, NY Larchmont Harbor, NY Little Neck Bay, NY Mamaroreck Harbor, NY Matawan Creek, NJ Mattituck Harbor, NY Milton Harbor, NY Newton Creek, NY New Rochelle Harbor, NY New York State Barge Canal, NY Northport Harbor, NY Peconic River, NY Peekskill Harbor, NY Plattsburgh Harbor, NY Port Chester Harbor, NY Port Henry Harbor, NY Port Jefferson Harbor, NY Raritan River, NJ Raritan River to Arthur Kill Cut-Off Channel, NJ Roundout Harbor, NY Rouses Point, Lake Champlain, NY Sag Harbor, NY 1992 1991 1995 1966 1909 1953 1973 1952 1997 1997 1953 1973 1997 1982 1972 1980 1962 1976 1953 1969 1993 1997 1953 1990 1991 1970 1969 1990 1984 1990 1984 1986 1971 1988 1956 1953 1951 1986 1990 1931 1977 1991 1991 1989 1895 1964 $5,523,297 1,149,946 3 33,976 12 706,414 9 31,000 40,000 111,371 69,489 32,723,662 13 83,969 64,584 594,355 2,102,905 34,750 346,831 18,000 137,301 i 33,562,640 20 74,681 3,616,119 3,687,949 6,771,870 91,081 17 40,475 791,680 76,065 1,741,210 19 513,764 21,000 177,925 151,373 1,168,354 73,214 8 78,644 25,000 19,400 198,415 433,470 6 69,406 23 221,12831 1,551,470 810,500 142,437 98,468 212,805 26 41,200,035 3,802,517 1,072,040 303,555 1,288 210,675 423,148 6,203 8,225,184 16,624,362 21,571 2,908,786 8,878,900 115 394,004 292,919 88,029 457 21,720 493,491 76,497 37,136,037 57,527 1,417,437 1,288,163 267,768 537 1,351,086 315,613 1,417,832 1,057,26 1,760,745 212,411 61,487 116,500 66,037 256,415 1,742,097 1,299 359,294 16,114,463 3,965,631 3,185,437 249 11,710 2-37 NEW YORK, NY DISTRICT TABLE 2-G OTHER AUTHORIZED NAVIGATION PROJECTS Cost to Sept 30, 2000 For Last Full Report See Annual Operation & Projects Report for Construction Maintenance Sandy Hook Bay, NJ Sandy Hook Bay @ Leonardo, NJ St. Albans Harbor, Lake Champlain, VT Saugerties Harbor, NY Shark River, NJ Sheepshead Bay, NY Shoal Harbor & Compton Creek, NJ Staten Island Rapid Transit Railway Bridge, Arthur Kill, NY Sumpawanus (Babylon Creek) Inlet, NY Wallabout Channel, NY Wappinger Creek, NY Washington Canal and South River, NJ Woodbridge Creek, NJ 1. Excludes $104,800 for new work expended from contributed funds. 2.' Includes $1,836,400 for new work for previous projects. Excludes $285,600 expended from contributed funds. 3. Includes $496,250 for new work for previous projects and $122,051 from public works funds. 4. Excludes $1,822,530 for new work expended from contributed funds. 6. Includes $16,369 for maintenance for previous projects. 7. Includes $17,000 for new work for previous projects. 8. Includes $43,175 for new work for previous projects. 9. Includes cost of maintenance prior to July 1, 1886. Excludes $1,415,133 for rehabilitation. 10. Includes $169,700 for maintenance for previous projects. 12. Includes $69,036 for new work and $26,921 for maintenance for previous projects. Excludes $10,000 for new work expended from contributed funds. 13. Includes $6,187,690 for new work and $37,664 for maintenance for previous projects. 14. Excludes $104,805 for new work expended from contributed funds. 1985 1991 1917 1988 1987 1948 1990 1973 1895 1953 1950 1953 1953 508,936 56,479 3,125 81,905 18 150,000 33,828 124,572 7 7,730,476 7,000 18,174 13,000 206,116 30 48,823 4,002,330 679,916 385 429,180 1,254,813 64,078 1,822,938 'o 36,312 44,691 212,827 178,398 15. Includes $111,419 for maintenance for previous projects and $64,560 expended from public works funds. 16. Includes $1,490,713 for maintenance for previous projects. 17. Excludes $19,546 for new work expended from contributed funds and $31,454 to be contributed. 19. Excludes $1,741,210 for new work expended from contributed funds. 20. Included $4,456,400 for new work expended from emergency relief funds. 23. Excludes $15,000 for new work expended from contributed funds. 25. Excludes $1,000 for new work expended from contributed funds. 26. Excludes $66,758 for rehabilitation. 28. Includes $15,000 for maintenance for previous projects. 30. Includes $84,934 for maintenance for previous projects. 31. Includes costs for new work $171,427 and maintenance $20,646 for previous projects. 2-38 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 2000 TABLE 2-H Cost to Sept 30, 2000 For Last Full Report See Annual Operation & Projects Report for Construction Maintenance Atlantic Coast of NJ, Sandy Hook to Barnegat Inlet' 1959 Raritan Bay and Sandy Hook Bay, NJ 1981 $11,061,256 262 Fire Island Inlet to Jones Inlet, NY2 1981 18,044,667 217,900 1. Reactivated as a modified project in 1985 (Sec. 21) 2. Listed since 1982 as a navigation and beach nourishment project (Sec. 4) TABLE 2-I OTHER AUTHORIZED BEACH EROSION CONTROL PROJECTS Cost to Sept 30, 2000 For Last Full Report See Annual Report for Report for Construction Maintenance Projects Operation & Maintenance Adams, Hossic River Basin, Mass.' Ardsley, NY Byram River at Pemberwick, Conn. 1,3 East Barre Dam, Winooski River, Vt.' Elizabeth, NJ Herkimer, NY Hoosic Falls, Hoosic River Basin, NY ' Lamoille River, Vt: Hardwich Dams.6 Liberty State Park Levee and Seawall, NJ Missisquoi River at Richford, Vt 13 North Adams, Hoosic River Basin, Mass. Rahway, NJ Rahway, South Branch, NJ Rosendale, NY Sandburg Creek, Spring Glen, NY Sawmill R. Elmsford & Greenburgh, NY South Amsterdam, Mohawk River, NY South Ellenville, NY South Orange, NJ Staten Island, NY Wappinger Creek at Pleasant Valley, NY '3 Waterbury Reservoir Winooski River Basin, Vt. Winooski River, Vt. Wrightsville Dam, Winooski River Basin, Vt. Yonkers, NY 1. Completed. 2. Excludes costs of $913,360 under other contributed funds. 3. Authorized by Chief of Engineers pursuant to Sec. 205, Public Law 858, 80th Cong., as amended. 4. Inactive. 1964 1990 1959 1963 1985 1973 1956 1939 1990 1965 1968 1971 1979 1975 1976 1987 1967 1984 1981 1983 1959 1976 1940 1970 1984 6,282,307 2 5,477,281 363,515 2,898,334 54,374,070 1,249,530 9 1,064,626 17,888,670 238,169 15,572,988 973,142 8 15,863,723 3,684,966 109,702 62,917 1,564,976 289,702 6,857,484 664,998 142,075 1,438,845 5,897,427 1,549,929 113,754,475 to 8,200 5. Includes $213,507 emergency relief funds. 7. Excludes cost of $21,000 under other contributed funds. 8. Excludes cost of $51,500 under other contributed funds. 9. Uncompleted portion has been deauthorized. 10. Includes $622,8176 contributed funds. 2-39 OTHER AUTHORIZED BEACH EROSION CONTROL PROJECTS Projects3 Construction NEW YORK, NY DISTRICT TABLE 2-J SURVEYS Study Class FY 00 Cost Navigation Studies $1,447,459 Flood Control Studies 1,303,594 Beach Erosion Studies 1,508,757 Special Studies' 928,149 TOTAL 5,187,959 1. Includes watershed/ecosystems, special investigations, FERC licensing activities, Intra Army water resources, Nat'l Estuary studies, Marine Fisheries Service, Planning Ass't to States, Coord. studies of other agencies. TABLE 2-K PRECONSTRUCTION ENGINEERING AND DESIGN Authorized Projects FY 00 Cost Navigation Arthur Kill Channel - Howland Hook Terminal, NY & NJ $476,842 Hudson River Habitat Restoration, NY $11,799 TOTAL $488,141 Flood Control Green Brook Sub-Basin, NJ $-11,634 Lower Saddle River, NJ 25,326 Passaic River Mainstem, NJ 71,817 Passaic River Mainstem 175,727 Preservation of Natural Flood Storage Areas, NJ Ramapo Mahwah, NY & NJ 5,640 TOTAL 266,876 TABLE 2-L COSTS FOR FLOOD PLAIN MANAGEMENT SERVICES Study Class FY 00 Cost Flood Plain Technical Services $44,208 Flood Plain Management Unit 28,150 Camp Robinson, NY 2,420 Detention/Retention Study, VT 18,576 Kaaterskill Creek, NY 959 Quick Response 7,078 Bryant Park, VT 521 Searcy Park, NY 460 Taylor Loop Creeks, NY 1,920 Diamond Mills, NY 1,099 Pine Grove Lake, NY 142 Chazy Lake, NY 29,498 Haysville, NY 349 TOTAL 135,380 2-40 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 2000 TABLE 2-M DEAUTHORIZED PROJECTS For Last Full Report Date Federal Operation See Annual And Funds And Projects Report for Authority Expended Construction Maintenance Bennington, VT (1936 & 41 Acts) 1974 670,000 Bronx River, NY 1981 Aug. 1982 1,149,946 1,159,946 12 1,947,853 Brown's Creek, NY 1980 Aug. 1977 33,976 33,976 8 505,369 Cheesequake Creek, NJ 4 1953 Aug. 1982 40,000 40,000 30,675 Coney Island Creek, NY 4.6 1952 Aug. 1982 69,489 69,489 1,622 East Chester Creek, NY (1950 Act) 1992 July 1992 - - East Rockaway (Devs) Inlet, NY * 1963 Aug. 1977 3,503,969 13 100,000 East Rockaway Inlet to Rockaway Inlet 1976 1988 - 1,185,365 -- and Jamaica Bay, NY (Part 11) Elizabeth, NJ 1948 Aug. 1977 60,481 60,481 59,391 Glen Cove Harbor, NY 1966 Aug. 1977 165,882 165,8824-" 2,455 Hempstead Harbor, NY (68 Act) 14 1989 Jan. 1990 - 39,468 76,497 Hudson River, NYC to Albany (12 ft, 27 ft) 18 1982 Aug. 1987 - Huntington Harbor, NY 1953 Aug. 1977 49,035 68,581 4. 51,566 Irvington Harbor, NY 1947 Aug. 1977 --- Lamoille River, VT 1939 Aug. 1977 49,837 49,837 - Lemon Creek, NY 1937 1988 - 6,621 1,621 Manhasset Bay, NY 1948 1988 - - 4,636 Matawan Creek, NJ (1881 Act) 1984 1988 21,000 257,237 N. Shore of Long Island, Suffolk County, NY 1979 Jan. 1990 - Newark Bay, Hackensack and Passaic 1982 Aug. 1982 - - River, NJ 16 NY & NJ Channels 418 1982 Aug. 1982 - - Orowoc Creek, NY 1949 1988 - - 4,951 Otter Creek, VT 1937 Jan. 1990 - - Perth Amboy, NJ 1966 Jan. 1990 - - Port Chester Harbor, NY 23 1967 Aug. 1977 433,470 433,470 ' 441,656 Port Jefferson Hbr. NY (1890, 1930 & 68 Acts) 1977 Jan. 1990 - - Rahway River, NJ6.7 1948 Aug. 1982 - 37,000 * 307 Raritan River, NJ 4.6 1981 Aug. 1982 1,551,470 1,617,470 's 10,113,903 Rome Mohawk River, NY 6'7 1959 Aug. 1982 7,000 7,000 - Rutland, Otter Creed, VT 1963 1988 -- 211,015 - Sag Harbor, NY (Channel) ' 1964 Oct. 1992 - - - Shooters Island, NJ & NY 9 - July 1992 - - Shrewsbury River, NJ (1950 & 1965 Act) 1992 Jan. 1990 - - - Swanton Harbor, VT6 1888 Aug. 1977 - 70,500 4 235 Ticonderoga River, NY' 4 1895 Nov. 1983 167,760 16,500 1,260 Waterbury, VT (1941 Act) 7. 1951 Nov. 1981 9,253 9,253 - Waterford, NY 6.7 1939 Aug. 1982 - - - Waycake Creek, NJ 1949 1988 - 2,781 - Westchester Creek, NY' 1981 Aug. 1982 175,933 175,933 2,921,311 2-41 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8., 9. TABLE 2-N SECTION 107 Project FY 00 Cost CONTINUE COORDINATING FEASIBILITY STUDY Coordination Account $9,234 TABLE 2-0 SECTION 103 Project FY 00 Cost CONSTRUCTION FUNDING Oakwood Beach, Staten Island, NY Shelter Island, NY Rikes Island, East River, NY $539,797 23,212 1,304 2-42 NEW YORK, NY DISTRICT No Commerce reported. 10. Deepening 8 foot project to 10 feet. Completed. 11. Includes $93,882 for Rehabilitation. A portion of this project is classified "inactive." 12. Includes $10,000 expended from contributed funds. Uncomplete portion deauthorized. 13. Includes $100,000 expended from contributed funds. Excludes $19,546 for new work expended contributed 14. Deepening project to 13 feet. funds. 15. Includes $66,000 expended from contributed funds. Inactive. 16. 1912 authorization. Entire project deauthorized. 17. 1935 authorization. Excludes $71,423 for rehabilitation. 18. 1910 construction dikes. Removal for navigation. REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 2000 TABLE 2-P SECTION 205 Project FY 00 Cost FEASIBILITY STUDY Poplar Brook, Monmouth City NJ 17,904 Fulmer Creek, Village of Mohawk, Herkimer City, NY 25,502 Moyer Creek, Village of Frankfort, Herkimer City, NY 25,513 Steele Creek, Village of Ilion, Herkimer City, NY 26,294 Mad River Basin, VT 20,963 New Haven River Basin,VT 20,046 Otter Creek Basin, VT 20,006 McKeel Brook MorrisCounty, NJ 46,465 Trout River, VT 187 PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS Sauquoit Creek, Whitesboro, NY 96,980 Elizabeth River, Hillside, NJ 976,199 Mill Brook, Highland Park, NJ 226,042 Coordination Account 24,741 TABLE 2-Q SECTION 14 Project FY 00 Cost PLANNING AND DESIGN ANALYSIS Wallkill River, Rosendale, NY $136,071 Elizabeth River, Valley View Rosendale, NJ 20,049 Coordination Account 24,138 Hudson River Poughkeepsie, NY 31,784 Richford Water Supply, VT 16,181 TABLE 2-R SECTION 206 Project FY 00 Cost COORDINATION ACCOUNT $19,634 PRELIMINARY RESTORATION PLANS $40,976 2S SECTION 1135 Project FY 00 Cost COORDINATION ACCOUNT $12,890 INITIAL APPRAISALS, GENERAL $28,420 Lincoln Park, West Jersey, NJ $25,296 Town of Brookhaven Hand Camp Restoration, NY 67,041 2-43 PHILADELPHIA, PA DISTRICT* This district comprises a portion of southeastern New York, eastern Pennsylvania, western and southern New Jersey, northern and southern Delaware, and a small Part of northeaster Maryland embraced in the drainage basins tributary to the Atlantic Ocean from Manasquan River, NJ inclusive, to south boundary of Delaware. It also includes Chesapeake and Delaware Canal and approach channel thereto in Chesapeake Bay and Elk River, MD. IMPROVEMENTS Navigation Page 1. Barnegat Inlet, NJ............ ........................ .. 3-2 2. Chesapeake and Delaware Canal St. Georges Bridge Replacement, DE...................3-2 3. Cold Spring Inlet, NJ..................................3-3 4. Delaware River between Philadelphia, PA and Trenton, NJ.......................3-3 5. Delaware River Mainstem Channel & Deepening............................. ....... 3-4 6. Delaware River, PA, NJ, and DE Philadelphia to the Sea...................................3-4 7. Indian River Inlet and Bay, DE.................... 3-5 8. Inland Waterway from Delaware River to Chesapeake Bay DE & MD.................3-6 9. Inland Waterway Rehoboth to Delaware Bay, DE...........................................3-7 10. Murderkill River, DE..... .............................. 3-7 11. New Jersey Intracoastal Waterway....................3-8 12. Salem River, NJ.........................................3-9 13. Schuylkill River, PA.................................. 3-9 14. Wilmington Harbor, DE....................................3-10 Shore Protection Page 15. Brigantine Inlet to Great Egg Harbor Inlet, NJ (Absecon Island, NJ)...........................3-11 16. Cape May Inlet to Lower Twp., NJ....................................... ..... 3-11 17. Delaware Coast Cape Henlopen to Fenwick Island, DE (Dewey/Rehoboth, DE)....................3-12 18. Delaware Coast Protection, DE................................3-12 19. Great Egg Harbor Inlet and Peck Beach, NJ................................. .. 3-13 lood Control Local Protection Page 20. Beltzville Lake, PA.................................. ... 3-13 21. Blue Marsh Lake, PA......................................... ....3-13 22. Emergency Bank Protection.......................... 3-14 23. Francis E. Walter Dam, PA...........................3-14 24. General Edgar Jadwin Dam and Reservoir, PA .................. ......................... 3-14 25. Inspection of Completed Flood Control Projects ...................................... ......3-15 26. Inspection of Non-Federal Levees...........................3-15 27. Molly Ann's Brook, NJ...................... ..... ........... 3-15 28. National Emergency Preparedness............ 3-16 29. Prompton Lake, PA................................... .. 3-16 30. Reconnaissance and Conditions Surveys.................3-16 31. Schuylkill River Park, Philadelphia, PA .............. 3-16 32. South Central, Pennsylvania Environmental Improvement, PA ..................... 3-17 33. Southeastern Pennsylvania, PA......................3-17 Miscellaneous 34. Aquatic Ecosystem Restoration Work ........... 3-18 Under Special Authorization 35. Environmental Improvemerit Work Under...........3-18 Special Authorization 36. Flood Control Work Under Special............... .3-19 Authorization 37. Navigation Work Under Special...................3-19 Authorization 38. Wetland/Other Aquatic Habitat Work ...............3-19 Under Special Authorization General Investigations Page 39. Collection and Study of Basic Data........................3-19 40. Preconstruction, Engineering and Design................3-19 41. Surveys..........................................3-19 Tables Page TABLE 3-A Cost and Financial Statement...................3-20 TABLE 3-B Authorizing Legislation ......................3-25 TABLE 3-C Other Authorized Navigation Projects...................................3-33 TABLE 3-D Other Authorized Beach Erosion Control Projects............................3-35 TABLE 3-E Other Authorized Flood Control Projects...................3-35 TABLE 3-F Deauthorized Projects. ....................... 3-36 3-1 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 2000 1. BARNEGAT INLET, NJ Location: On the east coast of New Jersey about 50 miles south of Sandy Hook, between Island Beach on the north and Long Beach on the south (See U.S. Coast and Geodetic Chart Nos. 825 and 1216). This inlet is the main entrance to Barnegat Bay, largest of the bays on New Jersey coast, which are separated from the ocean by narrow barrier beaches. Previous Project: None Existing project: The existing project, adopted as HD 73-19 in 1935 and modified as HD 74-85 in 1937 and HD 79-358 in 1946, provides for a channel eight feet deep through the inlet and ten feet deep through the outer bar, protected by two converging stone jetties and a channel of suitable hydraulic characteristics extending in a northwesterly direction from the gorge in the inlet to Oyster Creek channel and through the latter channel to deep water in the bay. The project was modified in 1946 to provide for the maintenance of a channel eight feet deep and 200 feet wide to connect Barnegat Light Harbor with the main inlet channel. The project length is about 4.5 miles. (For details see page 203, Annual Report 1964.) The Supplemental Appropriation Act of 1985 contained language stating that the existing project has. not worked as projected and, in fact has created a hazard to navigation. As a result, the following administratively approved modifications were constructed as design deficiency correction measures: a new south jetty 4,270 feet in length along an alignment generally parallel to the existing north jetty, extending from the old groin located near the Barnegat Lighthouse to the tip of the existing south jetty; a navigation channel 300 feet wide to a depth of 10 feet below mean low water from the outer bar in the Atlantic Ocean to the north end of the existing sand dike in Barnegat Bay; remove the shoal located between the north jetty and the proposed navigation channel; jetty sport fishing facilities on the new jetty. All dredged material from initial construction was placed on the shores of Barnegat Light between the existing and new south jetties, and is being stabilized by vegetation and sand fence. Dredged material from maintenance operations are placed on the down draft beaches, the area between the existing and new south jetties, or in other locations as determined by a shoreline monitoring program. Estimated cost for new work (October 1990) Federal share is $31,200,000 and non-Federal is $14,230,000. (See Table 3-B at end of chapter for Acts authorizing existing project. See Table 3-A at end of chapter for total cost for existing project to Sept. 30, 2000.) Local cooperation: Fully complied with. A local cooperation agreement for the approved modification was executed on 19 May 1986 and a modification to the local cooperation agreement was executed on 20 March 1987. Terminal facilities: There are four docks or terminals in inner harbor at Barnegat Light that furnish adequate facilities for present commerce of locality. Operation during fiscal year: Maintenance: Condition surveys were accomplished. Dredging by the U.S. Government Dredge Currituck removed a total of 135,000 cubic yards of material at a total of $435,750. 2. CHESAPEAKE AND DELAWARE CANAL, ST. GEORGES BRIDGE REPLACEMENT, DE Location: The new St. Georges Bridge carries the new Delaware State Route 1 over the Chesapeake and Delaware Canal in New Castle County, Delaware and is located approximately 2,200 feet west of the existing St. Georges Bridge. Previous project: None. Existing project: This project was authorized by the Water Resources Development Act of 1990. It states that the project for navigation, Inland Waterway from the Delaware River to the Chesapeake Bay, Delaware and Maryland, authorized by the first section of the Act of August 30, 1935 (45 Stat. (030) and modified by the Act entailed an Act authorizing construction of a highway bridge across the Chesapeake and Delaware Canal at Saint Georges, Delaware, approved August 7, 1939 (53 Stat. 1240-1241) is modified to direct the Secretary to replace the highway bridge on United States Route 13 in the vicinity of St. Georges, Delaware, to meet current and projected traffic needs, at a Federal cost of$115,000,000. The bridge was officially opened to traffic in December 1995. (See Table 3-B at end of chapter for Acts authorizing existing project. See Table 3-A at end of chapter for total cost for existing project to Sept. 30, 2000.) Local cooperation: The state will carry out the bridge replacement and the Secretary will reimburse the State for cost incurred. 3-2 PHILADELPHIA, PA DISTRICT Terminal facilities: None. Operations during fiscal year: Maintenance: Work included supervision and administration and reimbursement to the State of Delaware for construction costs of St. Georges Bridge Replacement and work on draft EIS for closure/removal of the St. Georges bridge. 3. COLD SPRING INLET, NJ Location: In Cape May County, southern New Jersey, about 3 miles east of Cape May City and about 16 miles northeast of Delaware breakwater. Inlet connects Cape May Harbor and New Jersey Intracoastal Waterway with the Atlantic Ocean and is about I mile long. (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Charts 234, 827 and 1219). Existing project: An entrance channel 25 feet deep and 400 feet wide, protected by two parallel jetties, and extending from the 25-foot depth curve in the Atlantic Ocean to a line 500 feet harborward of a line joining the inner ends of the jetties, thence 20 feet deep and 300 feet wide to deep water in Cape May Harbor. The total length of the section included in the project is about 2.25 miles. Extreme tidal range, due to ocean storms, is about 11 feet. Project was completed in 1942. (For details see page 238, Annual Report for 1962. See Table 3-B at end of chapter for Acts authorizing existing project. See Table 3-A at end of chapter for total cost for existing project to Sept. 30, 2000.) Local cooperation: Complied with Act of 1907, except work of deepening and enlarging inner harbor that is 80 percent complete. Terminal facilities: See page 238 Annual Report for 1962. Operations during fiscal year: Maintenance: Dredging by the U.S. Government Side Casting Dredge Fry removed a total of 157,000 cubic yards of material from the inlet at a total cost of $311,550. Dredging in Cape May Harbor removed 94,000 cubic yards of material at a cost of $170,000. 4. DELAWARE RIVER BETWEEN PHILADELPHIA, PA AND TRENTON, NJ Location: Rises in southeastern New York, flows generally southerly 367 miles, forming boundary line between New York and New Jersey on the east and Pennsylvania and Delaware on the west, and empties into Delaware Bay. (See U.S. COAST and Geodetic Survey Charts 1218, 280, 294, 295, and 296.) Previous project: For details see page 1778 of annual report for 1915, page 311 of Annual Report for 1924, page 220 of Annual Report for 1934, and page 296, Annual Report for 1938. Existing project: A channel from Allegheny Avenue, Philadelphia, 23.5 miles to upstream end of Newbold Island 40 feet deep and 400 feet wide, with suitable widening of bends, including relocation of channel at Delair Railroad bridge, and reconstruction of bridge, thence 5.5 miles to upper end of Trenton Marine Terminal, 35 feet deep and 300 feet wide, with a turning basin 800 feet wide and 1,700 feet long at the terminal; and maintenance of a channel 12 feet deep and 300 feet wide from upper end of 34-foot channel to Penn Central railroad Bridge at Trenton, dredged under a previous project. Project also provides for an auxiliary channel 20 feet deep and 200 feet wide east of Burlington Island, extending easterly from main channel to upper end of U.S. Pipe and Foundry Co.'s property at East Burlington, with a turning basin 450 feet wide at upper end; for initial excavation, only, of a cross channel 8 feet deep and 200 feet wide through artificial island opposite Delanco, NJ, and for construction of such bank protection works as may be necessary. Section included in project is about 30.5 miles long, excluding auxiliary channel east of Burlington Island, which is 1.4 miles long, and cross channel opposite Delanco. Lower end is about 55 miles above river mouth at Liston Point and about 105 miles above Harbor of Refuge at mouth of Delaware Bay. Freshets, which occur usually during February and March, attain a height of 9 to 20 feet above mean low water in the vicinity of Trenton. Navigation is occasionally suspended during a portion of winter months due to ice. Existing project is 90 percent complete. A 40-foot channel under the 1954 modification from Allegheny Avenue to upper end of Newbold Island was completed April 1964. Work remaining is dredging from upper end of Newbold Island to Trenton Marine Terminal and widening turning basin at terminal that is in deferred category. (See Table 3-B at end of chapter for Acts authorizing existing project. See Table 3-A at end of chapter for total cost for existing project to Sept. 30, 2000.) Local cooperation: Modification authorized by 1954 River and Harbor Act provides local interests must provide suitable terminal facilities, furnish lands and rights-of-way for construction and future maintenance, and hold the United States free from damages. Local 3-3 - Y " - I Y I + REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 2000 interest complied with requirements, except city of Trenton has not provided suitable terminal facilities. Terminal facilities: There are 21 piers, wharves, and docks from Allegheny Avenue, Philadelphia, PA to Trenton, NJ facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. (For details see Port Series No. 8 (revised 1966-Corps of Engineers.) Operations during fiscal year: Maintenance: Work included channel examination surveys. 5. DELAWARE RIVER MAINSTEM CHANNEL & DEEPENING, NJ, PA, & DE Location: The project area is located within the Delaware Estuary and borders Pennsylvania, New Jersey and Delaware. It extends over 100 miles of the Delaware River from Philadelphia Harbor, Pa. and Beckett Street Terminal in Camden, NJ to the mouth of the Delaware Bay. Existing project: Delaware River Federal Navigation Channel (Philadelphia to the Sea Project) completed in 1942. The project calls for modifying the existing Delaware River Federal Navigation (Philadelphia to the Sea Project) channel from 40 to 45 feet below Mean Low Water (MLW) with an allowable dredging over depth following the existing channel alignment from Delaware Bay to Philadelphia Harbor and the Beckett Street Terminal, Camden New Jersey, a distance of about 102.5 miles. The channel width (same as the existing 40-foot project) would range from 400 feet in Philadelphia Harbor to 800 feet from Philadelphia Naval Business Center to Bombay Hook and then 1,000 feet in Delaware Bay. The plan includes appropriate bend widening as well as provision of a two-space anchorage for safety purposes to a depth of 45 feet at Marcus Hook. The estimated project construction cost is $311,000,000. Dredged material would be placed in confined upland disposal areas and for beneficial uses in Delaware Bay. The improved channel will have a significant impact in allowing more efficient vessel loading, reducing the lightering requirements of crude oil tankers in the lower Delaware Bay, and attracting larger, more efficient container and dry bulk vessels. It is estimated that the proposed deepening will result in annual transportation savings of $40.1 million. Project estimate cost (October 1999) is Federal, $224,000,000, which includes $1,150,000 of Coast Guard contributions. Non-Federal costs are $123,850,000. (See Table 3-B at end of chapter for Acts authorizing existing project. See Table 3-A at end of chapter for total cost for existing project to Sept. 30, 2000.) Local Cooperation: Project Cooperation Agreement (PCA) is being negotiated and coordinated with the Delaware River Port Authority and USACE. Operations During Fiscal Year: New Work: Executed PCA and engineering and design. 6. DELAWARE RIVER, PA, NJ, AND DE, PHILADELPHIA TO THE SEA Location: See U.S. COAST and Geodetic Survey Charts 1218, 394, 295, and 280. Previous project: For details see page 1779 of Annual Report for 1915, and page 299, Annual Report for 1938. Existing project: Provides for a channel from deep water in Delaware Bay to a point in the bay, near Ship John Light, 40 feet deep and 1,000 feet wide; thence to Philadelphia Naval Base, 40 feet deep and,800 feet wide, with 1,200-foot width at Bulkhead Bar and 1,000-foot width at- other bends; thence to Allegheny Avenue, Philadelphia, PA, 40 feet deep and 500 feet wide through Horseshoe Bend and 40 feet deep and 400 feet wide through Philadelphia Harbor, along west side of channel; and for anchorages at Reedy Point, Deepwater Point, Marcus Hook, and Mantua Creek, each 40 feet deep and 2,300 feet wide with respective length of 8,000, 5,200, 12,650, and 11,500 feet; anchorage at Gloucester 30 feet deep and about 3,500 feet long. Project also provides for construction of dikes and training works for regulation and control of tidal flow; for maintenance of an area on north side of channel opposite Philadelphia Naval Base between Shipway 3 and Schuylkill River to 40 feet deep and width of 150 feet on Mifflin Range and 200 feet on West Horseshoe Range; and for maintenance of any areas dredged by local interests to 35 feet deep between channel and a line 100 feet channelward of pierhead line between Point House wharf and Philadelphia Naval Base, when in opinion of Chief of Engineers such areas are so located as to be of benefit to generate navigation. Section included in project is about 96.5 miles long. All depths refer to plane of mean lower low water. Under influence of heavy and long-continued winds extreme tidal range is about 14 feet. Normal maximum velocity of tidal currents in the dredged channel varies between 2 and 3.5 miles per hour. Storm tides may increase 3-4 ip rl rYrY1 ! rim PHILADELPHIA, PA DISTRICT maximum to as much as 4.5 miles per hour. Estimated cost for new work is $71,630,000 (July 1972) exclusive of amounts expended on previous projects. Channel to 37 deep and 500 feet wide through Horseshoe Bend and 37 feet deep and 60 feet wide through Philadelphia Harbor along east side of channel and Port Richmond anchorage to 37 feet deep, except for that portion of channel which forms a part of 40 feet deep and 400 feet wide channel portion is to be restudied and excluded from foregoing cost estimate. Estimated cost (July 1960) of this portion of project is $2,951,000. Existing project, excluding work deferred for restudy, is about 66 percent complete. The 40-foot channel from Naval Base to the sea was completed in 1942. Dredging Naval Base to Allegheny Avenue to 40 feet deep was completed in 1962. Enlarging anchorage at Marcus Hook was completed in 1967. Work remaining is to construct new anchorages at Reedy Point and Deepwater Point, and enlarge Mantua Creek anchorage, channel dredging from 35 to 37 feet deep over a width of 500 feet through Horseshoe Bend and about 600 feet through Philadelphia Harbor, and deepening Port Richmond Anchorage to 37 feet, all of which have been deferred for restudy. (See Table 3-B at end of chapter for Acts authorizing existing project. See Table 3-A at end of chapter for total costs for existing project to Sept. 30, 2000.) Local cooperation: Requirements under 1938 River and Harbor Act for maintaining channel and anchorage in Philadelphia Harbor annually by cities of Philadelphia and Camden were removed (see 1962 Annual Report for details.) Terminal facilities: There are 217 piers, wharves, and docks between Allegheny Avenue, Philadelphia and the sea, 135 on the waterfront of Philadelphia, Camden, and Gloucester, and 82 below Philadelphia. Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. (For further details see Port Series Nos. 7, revised 1967, and 8, revised 1966-Corps of Engineers.) Operations during fiscal year: Maintenance: Routine maintenance of Government owned disposal areas and channel examination surveys. Work included dredging by the U.S. Government Dredge McFarland removing 1,300,000 cubic yards of material at a cost of $4,900,000. Maintenance dredging also was accomplished by Norfolk Dredging Company removing 2,444,000 cubic yards of material at a cost of $2,983,690. 7. INDIAN RIVER INLET AND BAY, DE Location: Indian River rises in Sussex County, DE, and flows easterly 13 miles into Indian River Bay which is a shallow lagoon 6 miles long and 2 miles wide on the Delaware Coast about midway between Cape Henlopen and the Maryland State line. The inlet is an opening through the barrier beach separating Indian River Bay and the Atlantic Ocean (See U.S. COAST and Geodetic Survey Chart No. 1219.) Previous project: Adopted by River and Harbor Act of August 2, 1882. For further details see page 744, Annual Report for 1888. Existing project: This provides for the fixation of the inlet by the construction of two parallel jetties of steel-sheet pile and stone design extending to approximately the 14-foot depth curve in the ocean, and for dredging an entrance channel 15 feet deep and 200 feet wide, for a distance of 7,000 feet inshore from the jetties; thence a channel 9 feet deep, 100 feet wide in the bay, and 80 feet wide in the river, to and including a turning basin 9 feet deep, 175 feet wide, and 300 feet long at Old Landing; thence a channel 4 feet deep and 60 feet wide to the highway bridge at Millsboro. The project also provides that the interior channel dimensions may, at the discretion of the Chief of Engineers, be modified as found desirable to increase: the hydraulic efficiency of the channel, without increasing the cost. The total length of the section included in the project is about 13.75 miles. All depths refer to the plane of mean low water. The extreme tidal range at the highway bridge is about 6 feet. Existing project was completed in 1951. For details see Annual Report for 1963. (See Table 3-B at end of chapter for Acts authorizing existing project. See Table 3-A at end of chapter for total costs for existing project to Sept. 30, 2000.) Local cooperation: Fully complied with except that local interest are required to furnish suitable areas for disposal of dredged material during maintenance as and when needed, and provide terminal facilities. Terminal facilities: There is a privately owned basin with berthing facilities for small boats located .75 miles west of the highway bridge near the inlet and .25 miles north of the inlet channel, connected therewith by a channel 6 feet deep and 40 feet wide; a U.S. Coast Guard wharf on the north side of the inlet channel in the same locality; and two wharves at Oak Orchard in Indian River Bay. The facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations during fiscal year: Maintenance: Work included project condition surveys. 3-5 j REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 2000 8. INLAND WATERWAY FROM DELAWARE RIVER TO CHESAPEAKE BAY, DE & MD Location: The Waterway begins at Reedy Point on Delaware River, about 41 miles below Philadelphia, PA, and passes through the sea level Chesapeake and Delaware Canal, a distance of 14 miles, to Back Creek, at Chesapeake City, MD. It then passes for 5 miles down Back Creek, thence 9 miles down Elk River to Chesapeake Bay and thence 18 miles down Chesapeake Bay to a point near Pooles Island. A branch channel connects Delaware River at Delaware City, DE, with main channel at a point about 1.5 miles west of Reedy Point. (See U.S. COAST and Geodetic Survey Charts 294, 1226, 570, and 572.) Previous project: For details see Annual Report for 1934, page 242, and Annual Report for 1938, page 312. Existing project: A channel 35 feet deep and 450 feet wide from Delaware River through Elk River and Chesapeake Bay to water of natural 35-foot depth in Chesapeake Bay including a cutoff at Penn Central Railroad crossing, and having a maximum radius of curvature of 7,000 feet at bends; a high-level, fixed railroad bridge with vertical clearance of 135 feet and horizontal clearance of 600 feet at the railroad crossing over the cutoff (economic study of railroad crossing requested by Office of Management and Budget resulted in construction of a single track vertical lift bridge in lieu of a high-level fixed railroad bridge); high-level fixed highway bridges over canal at Reedy Point, St. Georges, Summit, and Chesapeake City; a bascule drawbridge across Delaware City Branch Channel; extension of entrance jetties at Reedy Point; and anchorage in Elk River, 35 feet deep and 1,200 feet wide, with an average length of 3,700 feet; enlargement of anchorage and mooring basin in Back Creek to afford an area about 400 feet wide, 1000 feet long, and 12 feet deep; dredging Delaware City Branch Channel to 8 feet deep and 50 feet wide, and deepening existing basin to same depth; revetment of banks of canal as required between Delaware and Elk Rivers, and on banks of Delaware City Branch Channel east of Fifth Street Bridge; and construction of bulkheads. Total of section included in project, excluding Delaware City Branch Channel, which is about 2 miles long, is about 46 miles. All depths refer to plane of low water in Delaware River. Extreme tidal range is from 6.3 feet above mean high water to 3 feet below mean low water. High-level fixed highway bridges were completed at St. Georges (4-lane) in 1942; at Chesapeake City (2-lane) in 1949; at Summit (4-lane) in 1960; and at Reedy Point (2-lane) in 1969. Relocation of Penn Central Railroad bridge was completed December 21, 1965. Enlargement to 35 feet deep and 450 feet wide was completed in the third quarter of FY 1975 with the exception of the anchorage at Elk River. Removing the old Penn Central railroad bridge was completed on January 21, 1972. Deepening of the Delaware City Branch Channel from 6 to 8 feet from a point 400 feet east of Fifth Street Bridge to its junction with the canal has been deferred for study. Original cost of canal including purchase was $10,709,755; estimated cost of new work for modifications of 1935 and 1954 are federal cost $166,000,000 (October 1992). This portion is deauthorized. Major Rehabilitation of St. Georges and Summit Bridges was completed in fiscal year 1991 at an approximate federal cost of $20,868,000 (90 price level). Portion of project comprising completion of Delaware City Branch Channel from a point 400 feet east of Fifth Street Bridge to its junction with canal is to be restudied and excluded from foregoing estimate. (See Table 3-B at end of chapter for Acts authorizing existing project. See Table 3-A at end of chapter for total costs for existing project to Sept. 30, 2000.) Local cooperation: River and Harbor Act of 1954 provided that local interests furnish lands and rights-of-way required for bridges. Assurances accepted and approved February 16, 1955. Requirements for Summit and Reedy Point Bridges have been met. Terminal facilities: Ample mooring facilities at eastern and western ends of canal and bulkheads at Delaware City and St. Georges were constructed by the United States. A small-boat harbor was provided and a wharf constructed at Chesapeake City. Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations during fiscal year: Maintenance: Work included general maintenance of traffic control television, dispatch service, operation of traffic, administration building, bridges, roadways, grounds, museum, auxiliary works, and periodic bridge inspection. Also included in work was maintenance night lighting, lease of equipment, surveys, environmental monitoring, electrical maintenance, property management, plans and specifications, engineering and design, and supervision and administration. There was also work on the Disposal Material Management Plan, Geographical Information System, Environmental Review Guide for Operations 3-6 PHILADELPHIA, PA DISTRICT assessment, mosquito control, monitoring data, monitoring stabilization banks, and miscellaneous repairs. There was also maintenance dredging by Great Lakes Dredge and Dock Company from February 13, 2000 to March 31, 2000 removing a total of 336,620 cubic yards of material at a total cost of $1,955,763. 9. INLAND WATERWAY, REHOBOTH BAY TO DELAWARE BAY, DE Location: A tidal canal in southeasterly part of Sussex County, DE It extends 12 miles northward from Rehoboth Bay through high land west of town of Rehoboth to Gordon Lake; thence down Lewes River to its junction with Broadkill River near its mouth. An entrance to the waterway from Delaware Bay is about 4 miles above Cape Henlopen. (See U.S. Coast and Geodetic Survey Charts 379, 1218, and 1219.) Previous project: A canal along a slightly different route formed a part of projected waterway from Chincoteague Bay, Va. to Delaware Bay, begun in 1886 and abandoned in 1905. Existing project: This provides for an entrance channel near Lewes 10 feet deep and 200 feet wide protected by two parallel jetties 500 feet apart; thence a channel 10 feet deep and 100 feet wide to South Street Bridge at Lewes, and a basin of the same depth 1,200 feet long and up to 375 feet in width at the latter point; thence a channel 6 feet deep and 100 feet wide (40 feet wide through Deep Cut near Rehoboth Bay) to Rehoboth Bay; a channel 6 feet deep and 100 feet wide from the entrance to Broadkill River; two parallel rubble jetties 725 feet long at the Rehoboth Bay entrance; and the construction of the one highway bridge and one railroad Bridge to Rehoboth. The total length of the section included in the project is about 12 miles. The extension of the jetties at the Delaware Bay entrance is considered to be inactive and is excluded from the foregoing cost. The cost of the portion was last revised in 1960 and was estimated to be $816,000. Existing project is about 70 percent complete. For details on completed work see page 241 of Annual Report for 1963. Work remaining, extension of existing jetties at Delaware Bay entrance, is considered inactive. The Sheet Pile Jetty at the Delaware Bay entrance was removed during FY 1987. (See Table 3-B at end of chapter for Acts authorizing existing project. See Table 3-A at end of chapter for total costs for existing project to Sept. 30, 2000.) Local cooperation: Complied with except local interest must furnish suitable terminal facilities and necessary spoil-disposal areas. Terminal facilities: See page 228, Annual Report 1962. Operations during fiscal year: Maintenance: Work included a boundary monumentation survey from Roosevelt Inlet to the Savannah Ave. Bridge for the purpose of identifying all land the government holds an interest in, be it by fee or easement right. Also, a continuing contract to remove shoals from within the projects entrance channel (Roosevelt Inlet) was awarded to Cottrell Construction Corporation on 16 September 1998. Actual dredging operations commenced on 27 October 1998 and was completed on 9 November 1998. A total of 29,577 cubic yards of material were removed at a cost of $172,000. 10. MURDERKILL RIVER, DE Location: Rises in Kent County, DE, flows northeasterly 19 miles through county, and empties into Delaware Bay about 25 miles above Cape Henlopen. (See U.S. Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart no. 1218.) Existing project: Provides for a channel 7 feet deep at mean low water, 150 feet wide in Delaware Bay to mouth, and thence 80 feet wide to Frederica, 7.5 miles above mouth. Total length of section included in project is about 8.5 miles. Extreme tidal range is from about 1 foot below mean low water to about 2 feet above mean high water. Estimated cost for new work revised in 1954 is $38,000. Portion comprising widening channel to project width throughout its length is to be restudied and excluded from foregoing cost estimate. Estimated cost of this portion last revised in 1954 was $86,000. Project was authorized by River and Harbor Act of July 13, 1892 (H. Ex. Doc. 21, 52d Cong., 1st Sess. See page 981 Annual Report for 1892). Latest published map is in House Document 1058, 62d Congress 3rd Session. Existing project about 30 percent complete, including revision to be restudied. Channel 7 feet deep and 60 feet wide was completed in 1911. Work remaining is widening the channel to project width. (See Table 3-B at end of chapter for Acts authorizing existing project. See Table 3-A at end of chapter for total costs for existing project to Sept. 30, 2000.) 3-7 _ ___ ~~_~ __ REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 2000 Local cooperation: None required. Terminal facilities: There are a number of light timber wharves on both sides of river near mouth and two wharves at Frederica, all privately owned. Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations during fiscal year: Maintenance: A continuing contract to remove selected shoals within the Murderkill River Entrance channel was awarded to Cottrell Construction Corporation on 16 September 1998. Actual dredging operations commenced on 7 December 1998 and was completed on 16 December 1998. A total of 30,233 cubic yards of material were removed at a cost of $198,000. 11. NEW JERSEY INTRACOASTAL WATERWAY Location: A sea level inland water route approximately parallel with New Jersey coast, extends from Atlantic Ocean at Manasquan Inlet, about 26 miles south of Sandy Hook, NJ to Delaware Bay about 3 miles above Cape May Point. Waterway extends through inlet and up Manasquan River about 2 miles; thence by Point Pleasant Canal through high ground for 2 miles to head of Barnegat Bay. It then passes through a series of bays, lagoons, and thoroughfares along New Jersey coast to Cape May Harbor; thence across Cape May County to Delaware Bay through a land cut by way of New England Creek basin. (See U.S. COAST and Geodetic Survey Charts, 234, 795, 825, 826, 827, 1216, 1217, 1218, and 1219.) Existing project: This provides for a channel 12 feet deep at mean low water and generally 100 feet wide, extending from the Atlantic Ocean at Manasquan Inlet, NJ to Delaware Bay above Cape May, NJ, by the further improvement of Manasquan River and Inlet, NJ, and the present New Jersey Intracoastal Waterway, and by the construction of a canal of similar dimensions from Cape May Harbor to Delaware Bay via the New England Creek basin, with adequate jetties at the Delaware Bay entrance. The total length of the project is about 117 miles. The unconstructed portion of the project, deepening the channel from 6 feet to 12 feet from the Atlantic Ocean at Manasquan Inlet to Cape May Harbor, was deauthorized on 1 January 1990, by PL 99-662. Normal tide range in sections of the waterway remote from inlets is 0.5 foot. Estimated cost for new work is $71,549 (July 1969), exclusive of $1,824,940 Navy Department funds and $99,000 contributed by local interests. Portion of project extending from Manasquan River to Cape May Harbor is to be restudied and excluded from new work costs estimate. Estimated cost of this portion is $6,470,000 (July 1954). Existing project was adopted by 1945 River and Harbor Act (H. Doc 133, 76th Cong., 1st Sess.) Latest published map is in project document. River and Harbor Act of 1946 (Public Law 525, 79th Cong., 2nd Sess., as extended by Public Law 240, 82d Cong.), authorized use for a period not to exceed 6 years, of funds from appropriations heretofore or hereafter made fdr maintenance and improvement of rivers and harbors, for maintenance of canal from Cape May Harbor to Delaware Bay constructed as an emergency wartime project with Navy Department funds, including cost of maintaining temporary railroad and seashore highway bridges over canal. A canal 12 feet deep and 100 feet wide from Cape May Harbor to Delaware Bay was completed in 1942 as well as two parallel stone jetties at Delaware Bay entrances and a temporary highway and a railroad bridge in 1944, all with Navy Department funds. The project between Ottens Harbor and Richardson Channel and from that point to Cape May are being maintained to 10 feet and 12 feet, respectively, since they were originally dredged to these depths by the State. Section 860 of the Water Resources Development Act of 1986 authorized, 'for preconstruction engineering and design, a 15 foot depth in the Vicinity of Cape May Harbor, titled as Cold Spring Inlet. (See Table 3-B at end of chapter for Acts authorizing existing project. See Table 3-A at end of chapter for total costs for existing project to Sept. 30, 2000.) Local cooperation: The project is subject to the conditions that the State of New Jersey cede to the United States all right, title, and interest that it has acquired to lands, easements, rights-of-way, and structures other than bridges for the Bayhead-Manasquan Canal; that the State of New Jersey furnish, free of cost to the United States, all lands, easements, rights-of-way, and disposal areas required for construction of the Cape May Canal and for improvement of the proposed waterway and for their subsequent maintenance; that local interests provide, maintain, and operate suitable bridges over the waterway; that the State of New Jersey donate to the United States the navigation aids in use on the present New Jersey Intracoastal Waterway; and that the State of New Jersey hold and save the United States and its agents free from any claims for damages resulting from the work of improvement. Compliance with these conditions was completed January 15, 1954, except that local interests 3-8 _ ____ PHILADELPHIA, PA DISTRICT are required to furnish disposal areas for the construction and the subsequent maintenance of the proposed improvements. Terminal facilities: See Annual Report for 1962. Operations during fiscal year: Maintenance: Work included general maintenance, surveys, and inspection of Point Pleasant Canal bulkhead. Maintenance dredging by Barnegat Bay Dredging Company removed 335,000 cubic yards of material at a total cost of $1,331,000. Real Estate inspections were also conducted. 12. SALEM RIVER, NJ Location: This river rises in Salem County, NJ, flows through the county westerly 13 miles, thence southerly 7 miles to the City of Salem, and thence westerly 3 miles, emptying into Delaware River about 45 miles below Philadelphia, PA. It is joined at Salem by Little Salem River, or Fenwick Creek, from the east. (See U.S. Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart No. 294.) Previous project: The River and Harbor Act of July 11, 1870, provided for a survey and the original project was adopted by River and Harbor Act of March 3, 1871, and modified in 1878, and a subsequent project adopted by River and Harbor Act of March 2, 1907. This project was further modified as HD 68-110 in 1925, providing an entrance channel from the Delaware River to the fixed highway bridge in Salem with dimensions and limits as shown, including a cut-off and by the WRDA of 1986. The letter provided for channel widening and deepening; a turning basin; and wetland restoration. For further details see the Report of the Secretary of the Army dated 20 October 1994. Existing project: Provides a channel depth to 16 feet below mean low water between the Route 49 highway bridge and the Delaware River, a distance of about 5 miles. The channel is 150-250 feet wide and a trapezoidal shaped turning basin has a width of 495 feet and average length of 1000 feet. The project also contains 15.6 acres of wetland restoration to replace the loss of wetlands and shallow water habitat. The portion of the project comprising the deepening of Little Salem River to 12 feet is to be restudied and is excluded from the foregoing estimate. The estimated cost of this portion revised in 1953 is $28,000 excluding an equal amount to be contributed by local interests. The dredging for the existing project is completed. The dredging of the channel from Penns Neck Bridge to project dimensions, including the cutoff, was completed in 1928. The channel from Penns Neck Bridge to the fixed highway bridge in Little Salem River was dredged to a depth of 9 feet under a previous project. The work remaining to be done is the deepening of the channel in Little Salem River from 9 feet to 12 feet. (See Table 3-B at end of chapter for Acts authorizing existing project. See Table 3-A at end of chapter for total costs for existing project to Sept. 30, 2000.) The controlling depths at mean low water were as follows: In March 1996, Delaware River to Penns Neck Highway Bridge 16 feet; and thence in December 1956 to the fixed highway bridge at Salem, 9 feet. The existing project was adopted by the River and Harbor Act of March 3, 1925 (H. DOC. 110, 68th Cong. 1st Sess.) The latest published map is in this document. Section 859 of the Water Resources Development Act of 1986 authorized a project depth of 20 feet. Local cooperation: The local cooperation agreement was executed on March 31, 1995 and requires that the Non-Federal sponsor provides cash in the amount of $779,000 and "other" (disposal area and associated costs) costs of $1,556,000, provide real estate and perform associated dredging. These requirements have been satisfied. Terminal facilities: There are 9 wharves on the river all at Salem, NJ. Eight wharves are privately owned and one is owned by the City. The facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations during fiscal year: Maintenance: Starting of plans and specifications and chemical testing of the soil for maintenance dredging. Maintenance dredging by B&B Dredging from August 3, 2000 to September 22, 2000 removing 80,989 cubic yards of material at a cost of $851, 945. 13. SCHUYLKILL RIVER, PA Location: Rises in Schuylkill County, PA, flows generally southeasterly 150 miles, and empties into Delaware River at Philadelphia, PA (See U.S. Coast and Geodetic Survey Charts 295 and 280.) Previous project: For details see page 325, Annual Report for 1932. Existing project: This provides for a channel 33 feet 3-9 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 2000 deep and 400 feet wide in Delaware River the mouth and within the river to 29th Street, .75 mile above the mouth; thence the same depth and 300 feet wide to Passyunk Avenue Bridge, 3.5 miles above the mouth; thence 26 feet deep and 300 feet wide to Gibson Point, 4.5 miles above the mouth; and thence 22 feet deep and 200 feet wide to University Avenue Bridge, 6 miles above the mouth, including widening at bends. The total length of the section included in the project is about 6.5 miles. All depths refer to the plane of mean low water. The extreme tidal range, due to freshets and prolonged heavy winds, is about 14 feet. The cost for new work for the completed existing project was $7,440,000. Existing project was completed in September 1962. For details see Annual Report for 1962. (See Table 3-B at end of chapter for acts authorizing existing project. See Table 3-A at end of chapter for total costs for existing project to Sept. 30, 2000.) Local cooperation: The River and Harbor Act of July 24, 1946, imposed the condition that the City of Philadelphia agree to remove 60,000 cubic yards, place measurement, of material annually from that portion of those portions of the project which the District Engineer may designate until such time as adequate municipal sewage-treatment works are constructed and placed in effective operation. Compliance with this condition has been met through the completion of sewage-treatment works by the City of Philadelphia. All other requirements have been fully complied with. Terminal facilities: There are 38 wharves, piers, and docks within limits of improvement. Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. (For further details see Port Series No. 7, Revised 1967, Corps of Engineers.) Operations during fiscal year: Maintenance: Work included channel examination surveys. 14. WILMINGTON HARBOR, DE Location: Formed by Christina River, which rises in New Castle County, DE, flows northeasterly 16 miles, passing through the City of Wilmington, DE, and empties into Delaware River about 29 miles below Philadelphia, PA (See U.S. Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart 294.) Previous project: For details see page 1785 of Annual Report for 1915 and page 308 of Annual Report for 1938. Existing project: This provides for a channel 38 feet deep and 400 feet wide from west edge of Delaware River ship channel to Lobdell Canal, a distance of about 1.2 miles; thence 21 feet deep and 250 feet wide for the distance of .8 mile to the mouth of Brandywine River; thence the same depth and 200 feet wide for a distance of about 2.2 miles to a point approximately 4.2 miles from the Delaware River ship channel; thence decreasing to a depth of 10 feet in a distance of 750 feet to Penn Central Railroad bridge No. 4; and thence 7 feet deep and 100 feet wide for a distance of about 5.6 miles to Newport, DE, approximately 9.9 miles above Delaware River ship channel, including a turning basin 38 feet deep opposite the Wilmington Marine terminal and extending upstream from the mouth to Lobdell Canal, 320 feet wide, 2,900 feet long on the north side of the channel and decreasing to a length of 2,000 feet on the north side of the basin. It also provides for the removal of about 1,200 feet of the outer end of a stone-filled, pile-and-timber crib jetty constructed 2,150 feet long on the north side of the entrance; for a steel sheet-pile jetty 2,300 feet long, with 120-foot inshore wing, on the south side of the entrance, and for a V-shaped stone-filled pile-and-timber jetty at the mouth of Brandywine River 430 feet along the north side of Brandywine and 260 feet long on the Christina. Depths refer to the plane of mean low water. The extreme tidal range, due to prolonged heavy winds, is about 13 feet. Existing project was completed in 1962. (For details see page 222, Annual Report 1962). Authority from Section 107 of the River and Harbor Act of July 1960 provide for channel and turning basin deepening from 35 to 38 feet and the turning basin widened from 200 to 320 feet. (See Table 3-B at end of Chapter for Acts authorizing existing project. See Table 3-A at end of chapter for total costs for existing project to Sept. 30, 2000.) Local cooperation: Fully complied with. Terminal facilities: There are 18 piers, wharves, and docks within limits of the improvement. Facilities considered adequate for existing commerce. (For further details see Port Series No.8, revised 1966-Corps of Engineers.) Operations during fiscal year: Maintenance: Routine maintenance of disposal areas, channel examination surveys, project shoaling study, and contract administration. Also, a contract for maintenance dredging of both the 35-foot and 38-foot project channels was completed by Weeks Marine Dredging Company on 10 June 1999. As a result of this work, 581,292 cubic yards of material were removed at a cost of $743,526. 3-10 PHILADELPHIA, PA DISTRICT Shore Protection: 15. BRIGANTINE INLET TO GREAT EGG HARBOR INLET (ABSECON ISLAND, NJ) Location: This project is located along the Atlantic Coast of New Jersey in Atlantic County, approximately 50 miles east of Philadelphia, Pennsylvania. It is 8.1 miles in length, extending from Absecon Inlet to Great Egg Harbor Inlet. Existing project: The project consists of providing 6.2 million cubic yards of initial beachfill, with subsequent periodic nourishment of 1.6 million cubic yards every three years, for a 200-foot-wide berm at elevation 8.5 feet above mean low water and a dune to elevation 16 feet above mean low water for Atlantic City, and a 100-foot-wide berm at elevation 8.5 feet above mean low water and a dune to 14 feet above mean low water for Ventnor, Margate and Longport along 8.1 miles of shoreline. The plan also includes 0.3 miles of bulkhead construction along the Absecon Inlet frontage of Atlantic City. Estimated project cost (October 1999) Federal share is $436,000,000 and non-Federal is $234,000,000. (See Table 3-B at end of Chapter for Acts authorizing existing project. See Table 3-A at end of chapter for total cost for existing project to Sept. 30, 2000.) Local Cooperation: The existing authority for this project is Section 101 (b) (13) of WRDA 1996. Federal participation in the proposed project is recommended and contingent on the local sponsor signing the Project Cooperation Agreement that identifies the required items of cooperation. Operations during fiscal year: New work: Work included real estate studies, engineering and design and negotiation of the Project Cooperation Agreeement with the local sponsor. 16. CAPE MAY INLET TO LOWER TWP., NJ Location: The project is located in Cape May County and extends along the beach front from the western side of Cape May Inlet to the boundary of Lower Township, and Cape May City. Existing project: The plan, as presented in IHD 94-641, was authorized for the Phase I Design Memorandum Stage of Advance Engineering and Design by Section 101a of the Water Resources Development Act of 1976, proposes the following features: breakwater on the updrift side of Cape May Inlet; beachfill from Cape May Inlet to Cape May Point; provision of a dune with sand fence and grass from Cape May Inlet to Wilmington Avenue; construction of two groins in Cape May City and seven groins in Lower Township; inclusion of all groins comprising the existing project; and periodic nourishment of the beaches and maintenance of the dune and dikes. The Phase I GDM, completed in August 1980 and approved by the Chief of Engineers in December 1981, determined that only beach erosion control measures in Cape May City are warranted. The plan proposed in that document consists of modifying the existing navigation project for Cape May Inlet to provide; a weir-breakwater at Cape May Inlet with construction being deferred pending demonstration of need; two new groins at Trenton and Baltimore Avenues in Cape May City; placement of beachfill between Cape May Inlet and the terminal groin at Third Avenue in Cape May City; maintenance of two new groins and existing groins in Cape May; periodic beach maintenance with material obtained from deposition basin on the northeast side of Cape May Inlet; and institution of a beach monitoring program in Lower Township area. Work for the initial beachfill was accomplished as follows; USGS feeder beach fiscal year 1989, Cape May City groin fiscal year 1990, and Beachfill Cape May City fiscal year 1991. Project estimate cost (October 1999) is Federal, $144,500,000, which includes $51,800,000 of Coast Guard contributions. Non-Federal costs are $10,300,000. The existing authority is for Phase I studies as provided by Section 101(a) of the Water Resources Development Act of 1976 in accordance with the provision of House Document 94-641. Continuation of planning and engineering for this proposed project was initiated in October 1977. The Phase I GDM was completed in August 1980 and approved by the Chief of Engineers in December 1981. Phase II AE&D studies were completed in July 1983. The project was authorized for separable elements under Section 501(a) of the Water Resources Development Act of 1986, PL 99-662. (See Table 3-B at end of Chapter for Acts authorizing existing project. See Table 3-A at end of chapter for total cost for existing project to Sept. 30, 2000.) 3-11 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 2000 Local cooperation: The State of New Jersey furnished a letter of intent on 6 May 1981 regarding their willingness to comply with the above items of local cooperation. In addition, a draft Section 221 local cooperation agreement has been coordinated with letter of intent on May 31, 1983 regarding compliance with the items of local cooperation. Operations during fiscal year: New Work: Work included plans and specifications for beachfill, supervision and administration, hydraulic studies, engineering and design, surveys of the beach, aerial photography, monitoring, sediment sampling, and periodic nourishment. 17. DELAWARE COAST FROM CAPE HENLOPEN TO FENWICK ISLAND, DE (DEWEY/REHOBOTH, DE) Location: The Rehoboth Beach to Dewey Beach project area stretches for approximately 2 miles along the northern part of the Atlantic Ocean coast of Delaware in Sussex County, Delaware. From north to south the project area includes the Town of Rehoboth Beach, the unincorporated region in front of Silver Lake (under Sussex County jurisdiction), and the Town of Dewey Beach. (See NOAA Nautical Chart Number 12214). Existing project: The project consists of providing initial beachfill with subsequent periodic nourishment. The proposed plan consists of one continuous project, from the northern end of Rehoboth Beach to the southern border of Dewey Beach, a distance of 13,500 linear feet. Along Rehoboth Beach, the plan provides for a 125-foot wide beach berm at elevation +8.0 feet National Geodetic Vertical Datum (NGVD) and a dune at elevation +14.0 feet NGVD. At Dewey Beach, the project would transition to a 150-foot wide beach berm at elevation +8.0 feet NGVD and a dune at elevation +14.0 feet NGVD. The plan requires the initial placement of 1,354,000 cubic yards of material and subsequent periodic nourishment of approximately 277,000 cubic yards of material every 3 years throughout the 50-year project life to ensure the integrity of the design. The material for the initial construction and subsequent periodic nourishment will be taken from an offshore borrow area. The plan also includes the extension of stormwater outfalls at Rehoboth Beach. Appurtenant project features such as dune grass planting, sand dune fencing, vehicle access ramps, and dune walkovers are included with the plan as well. (See Table 3-B at end of Chapter for Acts authorizing existing project. See Table 3-A at end of chapter for total cost for existing project to September 30, 2000.) Local Cooperation: Federal participation in the proposed project is recommended and contingent on the local sponsor signing the Project Cooperation Agreement (PCA) that identifies the required items of local cooperation. Operations during fiscal year: New Work: PCA coordination with non-Federal sponsor. Engineering and design. 18. DELAWARE COAST PROTECTION, DE Location: The project is located in Sussex County, Delaware, on the Atlantic Ocean and starts immediately south of Delaware Bay extending in a southerly direction a distance of 24.5 miles to Fenwick Island on the Delaware-Maryland border. Previous Project: The previous project, adopted as HD 85-216 in 1958 and modified by P.L. 87-874 in 1962, provided for Federal participation in the cost of restoration and subsequent periodic nourishment, and the initial periodic nourishment was completed in 1957 by local interests. The second increment of beach replenishment by local interest was completed in 1963. Existing project: Provides a sand bypass system and periodic nourishment until 2021. (For details, see S. Doc. 90, 90th Cong. 2nd Sess.) Estimated cost of project (October 1999) is $28,200,000 of which $13,000,000 are federal costs and $15,200,000 are required non-Federal costs. The construction of the feeder beach north of Indian River Inlet was completed in 1973 and nourished in 1978, and 1984. Section 869 of the Water Resources Development Act of 1986 deauthorized the unscheduled portion of the project. (See Table 3-B at end of Chapter for Acts authorizing existing project. See Table 3-A at end of chapter for total costs for existing project to Sept. 30, 2000.) Local cooperation: Assurances of local cooperation were provided by the State of Delaware, January 13, 1981. Operations during fiscal year: New work: Work included supervision and administration, engineering and design, monitoring, and sand bypassing. 3-12 ~ PHILADELPHIA, PA DISTRICT 19. GREAT EGG HARBOR INLET & PECK BEACH, NJ Location: The project is located in Cape May and Atlantic Counties, New Jersey. Great Egg Harbor Inlet, an unimproved inlet, is about 1.1 miles wide at its narrowest point and provides a tidal connection between the Atlantic Ocean, Great Egg Harbor Bay, the New Jersey Intercoastal Waterway, and Great Egg Harbor River. Peck Beach is occupied in its entirety by the City of Ocean City and extends from Great Egg Harbor Inlet southward to Corson Inlet. The ocean frontage is about eight miles in length. Existing project: The project consists of providing initial beachfill, with subsequent periodic nourishment, with a minimum berm width of 100 feet at an elevation of 8 feet above mean low water. The beachfill extends from Surf Road southwest to 34th Street with a 1000 foot taper south of 34th Street. This plan required the initial placement of 6,200,000 cubic yards of material and subsequent periodic nourishment of approximately 1,100,000 cubic yards every three years. The material for the initial construction, and periodic nourishment is being taken from the ebb shoal area located approximately 5,000 feet offshore of the Great Egg Harbor" Inlet. Additionally, the construction of the project required the extension of 38 storm drainpipes. All work is programmed. Estimated cost for new work (October 1999) Federal share is $393,000,000 and non-Federal is $211,000,000. (See Table 3-B at end of Chapter for Acts authorizing existing project. See Table 3-A at end of chapter for total cost for existing project to Sept. 30, 2000.) Local Cooperation: The Local Cooperation Agreement was executed in September 1991 with the State of New Jersey Department of Environmental Protection Agency. Operations during fiscal year: New work: Work included plans and specifications for beachfill, hydraulic studies, engineering and design, supervision and administration, surveys of the beach, aerial photography, monitoring, sediment sampling, and periodic nourishment. Flood Control: 20. BELTZVILLE LAKE, PA Location: Damsite is on Pohopoco Creek about 4.5 miles upstream from its confluence with Lehigh River and 4 miles east of Lehighton, PA (See Geological Survey Quadrangle Map for Lehighton, PA-1960.) Existing project: This is a multiple-purpose development project providing water supply, flood control, and recreation. Plan of improvement provides for an earth and rock fill dam 4,200 feet long rising 170 feet above creekbed; a spillway around the north end of dam; and gate control outlet works discharging through a conduit on rock along right abutment. The lake, a unit of comprehensive plan for flood control and other purposes of Delaware River Basin, has a reservoir capacity of 68,250 acre-feet at spillway crest level with 1,390 acre-feet of inactive storage, 39,830 acre-feet for water supply and recreation, and 27,030 acre-feet for flood control. The cost of project was $22,931,400 including $6,100,000 required non-Federal reimbursement for costs allocated to water supply storage during life of project. The construction of the dam and appurtenances was completed in 1971. (See Table 3-B at end of Chapter for Acts authorizing existing project. See Table 3-A at end of chapter for total costs for existing project to Sept. 30, 2000.) Local cooperation: Project was approved subject to certain requirements of cooperation by local interests as defined in approved House Document. Resolution of Delaware River Basin Commission providing assurances of repayment of water supply and pollution control costs was accepted June 7, 1965. A contract for repayment of water supply costs was signed October 16,1966. Operations during fiscal year: Maintenance: Normal operation and maintenance of the project continued. 21. BLUE MARSH LAKE, PA Location: Dam site is on Tulpehocken Creek about 1.5 miles upstream from its confluence with Plum Creek and about 6 miles northwest of Reading, PA (See Geological Survey Quadrangle Sheet, Bernville, PA) Existing project: This is a multiple-purpose development project providing water supply, flood control, and recreation. Construction started in 1974 and was completed in 1980. The dam is 1,775 feet long and rises 98 feet above creekbed, with spillway about 1,500 feet south of dam, and gate-controlled outlet works discharging through a conduit on rock along right abutment. The lake, a unit of comprehensive plan for flood control and other purposes of Delaware River 3-13 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 2000 Basin, has a capacity of 50,010 acre-feet at spillway crest level, with 3,000 acre-feet of inactive storage, 14,620 acre-feet for water supply and recreation, and 32,390 acre-feet for flood control. (For details see H.Doc 533 87th Cong., 2nd Sess.) Costs of project $63,163,791. Existing project was authorized by 1962 Flood Control Act. (See Table 3-B at end of Chapter for Acts authorizing existing project. See Table 3-A at end of chapter for total costs for existing project to Sept. 30, 2000.) (H. Doc. 533, 87th Cong., 2d Sess., contains latest published maps.) Local cooperation: Project was approved subject to certain requirements by local interests, as prescribed in House Document cited above. Delaware River Basin Commission on December 29, 1964, adopted a preliminary resolution providing for repayment of water supply costs. Operations during fiscal year: Maintenance: Normal operation and maintenance of the project continued. 22. EMERGENCY BANK PROTECTION Emergency Bank Protection Section 14, Public Law "79-526. Name of Project Cost to 30 Sept. 2000 Plans and Specifications Delaware Canal, Paunnacussing $ 4,913 Creek, Bucks County Fort Mifflin, Phila., PA $ 3,520 Manasquan River, Howell Twp, NJ $ 3,654 Ocean Gate, Ocean County, NJ $54,911 Section 14 Coordination $14,244 Stoney Creek East Norriton, PA $ 325 23. FRANCIS E. WALTER DAM, PA Location: Reservoir is in northeastern Pennsylvania on Lehigh River between White Haven and Stoddartsville. Dam is about 0.4 mile below mouth of Bear Creek, about 60 miles above confluence of Lehigh River and Delaware River at Easton, PA (See Geological Survey Quadrangle Sheet, Stoddartsville, PA). Existing project: Plan of improvement authorized by 1946 Flood Control Act (H. Doc. 587, 79th Cong., 2d Sess.) provided for a single-purpose flood control reservoir. Modification of project, authorized by 1962 Flood Control Act (H. Doc.522, 87th Cong., 2d Sess.), provides for a multiple-purpose development for water supply and recreation in addition to present single-purpose flood control project. Plan of improvement requires altering spillway, increasing height of dam, constructing a new intake tower, extending outlet tunnel by addition of a concrete conduit, and constructing new dikes and raising existing dikes. Modified dam will rise 264 feet above riverbed and be 3,500 feet long. Reservoir modification, a unit of comprehensive plan for flood control and other purposes of Delaware River Basin, will have a reservoir capacity of 181,000 acre-feet spillway crest level with 3,000 acre-feet of inactive storage, 70,000 acre-feet for water supply and recreation and 108,000 acre-feet for flood control. Total cost is $186,000,000, estimated Federal cost of new work (October 1993) is $30,000,000 including $156,000,000 required non-Federal reimbursement for costs allocated to water supply storage during life of project after use of this storage is initiated. Project as authorized under the 1946 Flood Control Act was completed June 1961. Settlement for lands was completed October 1962. The advance engineering and design for the modified project is completed. (See Table 3-B at end of Chapter for Acts authorizing existing project. See Table 3-A at end of chapter for total costs for existing project to Sept. 30, 2000.) Local cooperation: None required under 1946 Flood Control Act. Under 1962 Flood Control Act, project was approved subject to certain requirements by local interests, as defined in House Document 522 cited above. The Delaware River Basin Commission expressed its support by a resolution dated 23 April 1980 and reiterated its sponsorship for the modified project in August 1985, October 1985, and July 1988. Operations during fiscal year: Maintenance: Normal operation and maintenance of the project. 24. GENERAL EDGAR JADWIN DAM AND RESERVOIR, PA Location: In Dyberry Creek valley in central part of Wayne County, PA, between borough of Honesdale and village of Tanners Falls. Dam is about 3 miles above confluence of Dyberry Creek and Lackawaxen River in Honesdale and 29 miles above confluence of Lackawaxen and Delaware Rivers. (See Geological Survey Quadrangle Sheet, Honesdale, PA.) 3-14 _ __ PHILADELPHIA, PA DISTRICT Existing project: A single-purpose flood control reservoir with a capacity of 24,500 acre-feet formed by an earth embankment, about 1,225 feet long at crest and rising 109 feet above creek bed. It also has a tunnel with intake structure and a chute-type spillway with a stilling basin in left abutment. Reservoir controls runoff from a drainage area of 65 square miles which is 91 percent of watershed of Dyberry Creek and 39 percent of Lackawaxen River watershed above Honesdale, PA. Construction of project was authorized by 1948 Flood Control Act (H.Doc. 113, 80th Cong., 1st Sess.). Project, completed in June 1960. (See Table 3-B at end of Chapter for Acts authorizing existing project. See Table 3-A at end of chapter for total costs for existing project to Sept. 30, 2000.) Local cooperation: Assurances of Compliance with requirements of local cooperation were accepted July 30, 1956. For details see page 251, Annual Report for 1962. Operations during fiscal year: Maintenance: Normal operation and maintenance of the project . 25. INSPECTION OF COMPLETED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS To ascertain whether local interests were maintaining and operating completed projects as required, inspections were made as follows: PROJECT INSPECTION Chester River, Chester, PA Darby Creek, Lansdowne, PA Fort Mifflin Delaware River, PA Lehigh River, Bethlehem, PA Pennypack Creek, Hatboro, PA Perkiomen Creek, Poquessing Creek, Lower Southampton, PA Port Jervis, NY, Delaware River Ice Division Rancocas Creek, Mt. Holly, NJ Schuylkill River (Culm Removal Proj) DATES November 1999 November 1999 A 2000 O Nov Nov Nov Local interests are satisfactorily main operating projects in accordance with regul during the period were $20,071. 26. INSPECTION OF NON-FEDERAL LEVEES Inspection of non-federal levees were conducted at the following sites: PROJECT INSPECTION Allentown, PA - Jordon Creek Bristol, PA - Adams Hollow Run Cheltenham, PA - Tookany Creek East Stroudsburg, PA - Broadheads Creek Hawley, PA - Middle Creek & & Lackawaxen River Morrisville, PA - Delaware River New Castle, DE - Broad Dyke Stroudsburg, PA - McMichael's Creek & Broad Heads Creek Upland, PA - Crozers Creek & Maris Run Weissport, PA - Lehigh River White Mills, PA DATES August 2000 August 2000 August 2000 May 2000 September 2000 August 2000 August 2000 May 2000 August 2000 August 2000 September 2000 27. MOLLY ANN'S BROOK, NJ Location: Approximately 12 miles northwest of New York City, located in Haledon, Prospect Park and Paterson, New Jersey along Molly Ann's Brook from the mouth below Totowa Avenue in Paterson upstream to Church Street in Haledon. Previous project: None. fiil uVV Existing project: The recommended plan modified ctober 1999 the channel a total length of 2.5 miles. The channel ember 1999 includes both trapezoidal channel sections and walled ctober 1999 sections. Five bridges were replaced and one building ember 1999 was removed. Estimated cost of project (October 1997) is $ 38,800,000 of which $20,600,000 are Federal costs May 2000 and $18,200,000 are required non-Federal costs. Costs are in accordance with Section 401(a) of the Water April 2000 Resources Development Act (Public Law 99-662), dated April 2000 November 17, 1986. (See Table 3-B at end of chapter for Acts authorizing existing project. See Table 3-A at end of chapter for total costs for existing Project to Sept. taining and 30, 2000.) ation. Costs Local cooperation: Fully complied with. A Project Cooperation Agreement was executed on December 16, 1993. The State of New Jersey Department of Environmental Protection and Energy, the non-federal sponsor, provided a portion of their support through the 3-15 --- ._ _ REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 2000 Intermodal Surface Transportation Efficiency Act of 1991. Terminal facilities: None. Operations during fiscal year: New work: Work included engineering and design and supervision and administration. 28. NATIONAL EMERGENCY PREPAREDNESS The total fiscal year cost for this category amounted to $85,991. 29. PROMPTON LAKE, PA Location: In Lackawaxen River Valley in central part of Wayne County, PA, between borough of Prompton and village of Aldenville. Dam is within corporate limits of Prompton, 4 miles upstream from Honesdale, PA, and approximately 30 miles above confluence of Lackawaxen and Delaware River. (See Geological Survey Quadrangle Sheet, Honesdale, PA) Existing project: Plan of improvement authorized by 1948 Flood Control Act (H. Doc. 113, 80th Cong., 1st Sess.) provides for a single-purpose flood control reservoir. Modification of project authorized by 1962 Flood Control Act (H. DOC 522, 87th Cong., 2nd Sess.) provides for a multiple-purpose development for water supply and recreation in addition to present single-purpose flood control project. Plan of improvement requires construction of control tower with gates and service bridge, placing an impervious blanket on valley walls and floor upstream from dam, widening spillway, and clearing land and relocating roads in reservoir. Dam, completed under 1948 Flood Control Act which will not be modified, is 1,230 feet long and rises 140 feet above riverbed. Existing spillway, cut into rock of right abutment, will be modified and present uncontrolled outlet works discharging into a concrete conduit along right bank, and will be provided with gates and a control tower. Reservoir modification, a unit of comprehensive plan for flood control and other purposes of Delaware River basin has a capacity of 52,000 acre-feet: 3,500 acre-feet for inactive storage, 28,200 acre-feet for water supply and recreation, and 20,300 acre-feet for flood control. Estimated Federal cost of new work (October 1994) is $3,510,000 including $54,990,000 required non-Federal reimbursement for costs allocated to water supply storage during life of project after use of this storage is initiated. Project as authorized under the 1948 Flood Control Act was completed in November 1960. (For details, see page 358, Annual Report for 1963.) Work accomplished under the 1962 Flood Control Act was preconstruction engineering and design. (See Table 3-B at end of Chapter for Acts authorizing existing project. See table 3-A at end of chapter for total cost for existing project to Sept. 30, 2000.) Local cooperation: Project modification was approved subject to certain requirements by local interests, as defined in House Document 522 cited above. Assurances of compliance under Flood Control Act of 1948 have been iiet. Delaware River Basin Commission on March 18, 1966, gave their view that the need for water supply was not urgent at that time. However recent studies conducted by DRBC have determined that there is now a need for water supply. In August 1983, DRBC expressed their strong support for the project modification. Preconstruction engineering and design was initiated in 1966, suspended in 1968 and again suspended in and resumed in 1986. Operations during fiscal year: Maintenance: Normal. operation and maintenance at the project continued. Continued design memo on spillway efficiency. 30. RECONNAISSANCE AND CONDITION SURVEYS No Reconnaissance Surveys were conducted. Condition Surveys Cedar Creek, DE Lewis & Rehoboth Canal, DE Lewis & Rehoboth Canal, DE Mispillion River, DE Mispillion River, DE Murderkill River, DE Salem River, NJ Survey Conducted May 2000 May 2000 June 2000 May 2000 June 2000 March 2000 December 2000 31. SCHIIUYLKILL RIVER PARK, PHILADELPHIA, PA Location: The Schuylkill River Park is located about six nautical miles from the confluence of the Delaware and Schuylkill River in Center City Philadelphia. Philadelphia represents the urban gateway of 1,900 square mile Schuylkill Watershed. 3-16 _ __ __ PHILADELPHIA, PA DISTRICT Existing Project: This proposed project is the final phase of a three-phase master plan, which the City of Philadelphia and other local interest have implemented. This phase focuses on the restoration of a greenway to include a 3,800-foot long promenade and amenities enabling and experience with values of the river corridor and provide opportunities for active and passive recreation. The greenway will eliminate urban blight and increase the viability of the surrounding residential, institutional and commercial communities. Corps of Engineers assistance on the project is authorized by Section 564 (c) of the Water Resources Development Act of 1996 (PL 104-303) and Section 348 of the Water Resources Development Act of 1999, which amended the authorization amount to $4,000,000. The total cost of the entire project is estimated at $6,400,000 of which $4,000,000 is a Federal cost pursuant to the Section 348 of the Water Resources Development Act of 1999 (Public Law 106-53) authorization. (See Table 3-B at end of chapter for acts authorizing existing project. See Table 3-A at end of chapter for total costs for existing project to Sept. 30, 2000.) Local Cooperation: Under cost-share provisions for environmental restoration, non-Federal sponsors are required to provide 25% of project costs to include lands, easements and rights of way and bear all costs of operation and maintenance of the project after construction. Operations during fiscal year: New Work: Hired labor. 32. SOUTH CENTRAL PENNSYLVANIA ENVIRONMENTAL IMPROVEMENT, PA Location: The south central Pennsylvania area includes twenty-one counties defined by the authorizing legislation. The program area within the Philadelphia District consists of Pike, Monroe, and Lackawanna Counties. Existing project: Section 313 of the Water Resources Development Act of 1992, as amended, established a pilot program for providing environmental assistance to non-Federal interests in south central Pennsylvania. Such assistance may be in the form of design and construction assistance for water-related environmental infrastructure and resource protection and development projects, including projects for wastewater treatment and related facilities, water supply, storage treatment, distribution facilities, and surface water resource protection and development. The Federal share may be provided in the form of grants or reimbursements to the sponsor. FY 98 was the first year of funding for three project names in the Energy and Water Appropriations documents. Total project funds earmarked were $7,650,000 for work within Philadelphia District. The House Report (105-190) provides $10,000,000 in design and construction assistance under the Section 313 Program for projects in Lackawanna, Lycoming, Susquehanna, Wyoming, Pike and Monroe Counties in Pennsylvania. The Conference Report (105- 271) specifies the funds among eight specific projects. Appropriations for those projects in the Philadelphia District are: Westfall Municipal Sewage Authority, Pike County; Jefferson Township, Lackawanna County; Township of Tobyhanna Sewer Authority, Monroe County. (See Table 3-B at end of chapter for acts authorizing existing project. See Table 3-A at end of chapter for total costs for existing project to Sept. 30, 2000.) Local cooperation: The non-Federal sponsors are required to provide 25% of project costs including lands, easements, rights-of-way, and relocations and bear all costs of operation, maintenance, replacement, repair and rehabilitation of the project after construction. Operations during fiscal year: New work: Continued design on Municipal Authority of the Westfall Township, PA and Jefferson Township, Lackawanna County, PA. Completed construction on Tobyhanna Township, Monroe County, PA. Design was initiated on Municipal Authority of the Borough of Milford, PA. 33. SOUTHEASTERN PENNSYLVANIA, PA Location: Section 566 of the Water Resources Development Act (WRDA) of 1996 authorized a pilot program to provide for environmental assistance (design and construction) to non-Federal interests for publicly owned facilities in the five (5) county area surrounding the city of Philadelphia. Previous project: None. Existing project: Pilot program established for providing environmental assistance to non-Federal interests in southeastern Pennsylvania. Assistance under this section may be in the form of design and construction assistance for water-related environmental 3-17 rnr r w r + r REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 2000 infrastructure and resource protection and development projects in southeastern Pennsylvania, including projects for waste water treatment and elated facilities, water supply and related facilities, and surface water resource protection and development. The four pilot programs are the East Central Incinerator, Wissinoming, Logan (Feltonville), and Delaware Canal. (See Table 3-B at end of chapter for acts authorizing existing project. See Table 3-A at end of chapter for total costs for existing project to Sept. 30, 2000.) The East Central Incinerator property is located on Municipal North Piers 31 through 35 at 601 North Columbus Boulevard (at the intersection of North Columbus Boulevard and Spring Garden Street), in Philadelphia, Philadelphia County, Pennsylvania. The Delaware River bounds the property on the north and east. The property is bounded to the south by the Delaware River and a parking lot. North Columbus Boulevard bounds the property on the west. The East Central Incinerator property consists of approximately seven (7) acres of land which currently accommodates the Incinerator Building, a Service Building (built on piles in 1968 at the north side of the former Municipal pier 34), an electric switch building, a scale house, two (2) small parking attendant buildings and a parking lot. Wissinoming and Logan (Feltonville) sections of Philadelphia are located in north/northeast Philadelphia. These areas are experiencing severe subsidence of residential properties that were built many years ago on fill material placed over old watercourses. Breaks in the pipes provide an avenue for the fill material to be transported by ground water away from building foundations. In an effort to determine the cause and extent of the subsidence, a topographic map will be prepared and compared to historic maps to show how much fill was placed in the old watercourses. Borings will be taken in the fill to confirm topographic data and to determine the engineering characteristics of the fill material. Water and sewer lines will also be mapped to determine if such lines are present in areas where subsidence has occurred and to predict where subsidence may occur due to leaking water lines and deteriorating sewer lines. Local cooperation: 1. East Central Incinerator: The non-Federal sponsors are required to provide 25% of the project costs to include lands, easements and rights of way and bear all costs of operation and maintenance of the project after construction. The non-Federal sponsors receive credit for any design work completed prior to the federal involvement. 2. Wissinoming, Logan (Feltonville), and Delaware Canal studies are 100% Federal expense. Design and construction cost sharing will be in accordance with policy guidance. Terminal facilities: None. Operations during fiscal year: New Work: East Central Incinerator - Execution of design agreement, completed plans and specifications and prepared construction PCA. Delaware Canal - Surveys and initiated plans and specifications. Wissinoming and Logan (Feltonville) sinking home studies were completed and released. Miscellaneous: 34. AQUATIC ECOSYSTEM RESTORATION WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION Activities pursuant to Section 206, Public Law 104-303. ' Name of Project Cost to 30 Sept. 2000 Feasibility Lake Wallenpaupack, PA Coordination Section 206 Coordination Account Funds Preliminary Restoration Funds $ 2,096 $14,546 $42,853 Construction Cooper River Fishway $63,451 35. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPROVEMENT WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION Activities pursuant to Section 1135, Public Law 99-662. Name of Project Cost to 30 Sept. 2000 Coordination Coordination Account Funds Initial Appraisals $10,538 $15,627 3-18 _ I PHILADELPHIA, PA DISTRICT Name of Project Cost to 30 Sept. 2000 Restoration of Grass Dale, DE Planning & Design Analysis Ft. Mifflin Cooper River Fishway $40,258 $33,105 $15,386 36. FLOOD CONTROL WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION Flood control activities pursuant to Section 205, Public Law 838, 80th Congress, as amended (Preauthorization). Name of Project Cost to 30 Sept. 2000 Wills Hole Thoro, Pt. Pleasant, NJ Feasibility Section 107 Coordination Account Wilmington Harbor, DE Plans and Specifications Little Mill Creek, New Castle City, DE Feasibility Bock & Brock Creeks, Yardley, PA Mill Creek, Bristol Township, PA Mill Creek, St. Clair, Schuylkill County, PA Mill Creek, Upper Moreland, PA Port Indian, W. Norriton Township Repaupo Creek, NJ Section 205 Coordination Southampton Creek, Upper Southampton, PA Upper Mill Creek, Middletown, PA Name of Project Cost to 30 Sept. 2000 Construction $ 52,730 Sedge Islands Protection, NJ $ 5,498 $ 12,370 $ 12,911 $ 13,907 $ 2,035 $ 14,601 $ 19,785 $ 6,789 $ 3,817 Construction Palmerton, PA $163,081 Emergency flood control activities-repair, flood fighting, and rescue .work (Public Law 99, 84th Congress, and antecedent legislation). Fiscal year costs were $264,997 for disaster preparedness. 37. NAVIGATION WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION Navigation activities pursuant to Section 107, Public Law 86-645. $519,400 General Investigations: 39. COLLECTION AND STUDY OF BASIC DATA Cost and expenditures during the period for flood plain information studies were $202,974. 40. PRECONSTRUCTION ENGINEERING AND DESIGN Cost and expenditures during the period totaled $2,725,150. 41. SURVEYS Cost for the period were $128 for navigation studies, $670,368 for shoreline protection studies, $1,228,519 for special studies: a total of $1,899,015. 3-19 Feasibility Plans and Specifications $ 8,824 $14,873 $96,524 38. WETLAND/OTHER AQUATIC HABITAT WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION Activities pursuant to Section 204, Public Law 102-560. _ I REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 2000 TABLE 3-A COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Section in Text Projects Funding FY97 FY98 FY99 FY00 SEPT. 30, 2000 Barnegat Inlet, NJ (Regular Funds) (Contributed Funds) 2. Chesapeake & Delaware Canal, St. George's Bridge Replacement 3. Cold Spring Inlet, NJ (Regular Funds) (Contributed Funds) 4. Delaware River between Philadelphia, PA and Trenton, NJ (Regular Funds) (Contributed Funds) 5. Delaware River Mainstem Channel & Deepening 6. Delaware River, PA, NJ, and DE Philadelphia to the Sea (Regular Funds) New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint Approp. Cost Rehab. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Rehab. Approp. Cost 2,100 1,341,000 1,288,725 -3,575 14,000,000 13,998,657 - - - 31,083,849 S- - 30,994,363 1,228,500 1,129,000 2,020,567 24,078,000 1,275,068 1,110,503 2,044,553 24,063,577 -- - 13,917,000 - - 13,793,140 15,500,000 12,500,000 3,299,789 122,299,789 15,498,402 12,504,761 3,299,788 122,299,786 879,275 879,275 359,000 351,394 368,000 373,298 156,305 482,569 7,780,525 158,750 482,569 7,777,623 1,134,346 1,134,346 150,00010 150,00010 S- - - 72,147,8003 - - - - 72,147,8003 1,059,000 3,834,000 388,000 2,622,824 56,290,8614 1,071,328 3,794,627 423,647 2,635,021 56,287,8734 565,000 550,000 565,000 - 1,500,000 1,176,000 2,676,000 - 302,405 2,254,649 2,557,054 57,879,8725 57,879,872 s 13,734,500 12,856,000 17,092,302 13,772,311 12,778,810 17,221,925 16,847,568 527,787,17819 16,889,458 527,424,89419 508,324 508,324 3-20 550,000 PHILADELPHIA, PA DISTRICT TABLE 3-A COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT Section in Text Projects Funding FY97 FY98 FY99 FY00 SEPT. 30, 2000 Indian River Inlet and Bay, DE (Regular Funds) (Contributed Funds) Inland Waterway from Delaware River to Chesapeake Bay, DE and MD (Regular Funds) Inland Waterway, Rehoboth Bay to Delaware Bay, DE (Regular Funds) (Contributed Funds) Murderkill River, DE (Regular Funds) New Jersey Intracoastal Waterway (Regular Funds) New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Rehab. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Rehab. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Rehab. Approp. Cost 17,965 18,887 50,000 37,048 219,000 6,972 218,861 4,549 511,21018 511,21018 5,016,967 5,015,395 1,323,775 1,323,775 210,000 210,000 132,535,5918 132,532,5988 13,123,260 14,768,000 11,748,000 14,270,832 13,006,114 14,641,638 12,043,064 14,348,534 -2,739 - - - 600 -- - - 333,053,0579 332,905,7609 17,356,292 17,356,290 561,514 561,514 42,000 197,000 170,873 35,273 191,575 183,428 58,000 5,272,131 58,396 5,272,125 60,000 60,000 37,630 37,630 219,918 217,359 25,000 134,026 26,102 136,354 358,564 3,092,570 356,488 3,090,525 - - - - 71,549" S - - - 71,549" 2,634,851 2,415,000 1,523,000 2,292,165 54,359,33212 2,655,033 2,369,179 1,581,219 2,293,803 54,341,65312 - - - - 1,196,581 - - - - 1,196,581 3-21 8. 9. 10. 11. 6 __ ,,o REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 2000 TABLE 3-A COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Section in Text Projects Funding FY97 FY98 FY99 FY00 SEPT. 30, 2000 (Contributed Funds) 12. Salem River, NJ (Regular Funds) (Contributed Funds) 13. Schuylkill River, PA (RegularFunds) 14. Wilmington Harbor, DE (Regular Funds) (Contributed Funds) 15. Brigantine Inlet to Great Egg Harbor Inlet, NJ (Abecon Island, NJ) (Regular Funds) 16. Cape May Inlet to Lower Twp., NJ (Regular Funds) (Contributed Funds) 17. Delaware Coast Cape Henlopen to Fenwick Island, DE (Dewey/Rehoboth, DE) (Regular Funds) New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost NewWork Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost 99,000 99,000 594,000 650,586 -2,487 -1,399 76,145 1,735 6,732,8642 3,338 6,701,7642 - 50,000 1,060,683 3,981,3696 , 46,532 1,064,151 3,981,3696 1,450,825 36,787 802,038 - - - 3,334,00713 - - - 3,334,00713 258,744 1,470,000 582,000 1,514,421 37,468,714 263,578 1,457,158 566,780 1,544,325 37,458,250 1,954,72514,7 - - 1,954,725'14,7 4,370,000 3,728,000 3,257,000 7,107,246 101,133,971 4,378,512 3,654,402 3,347,868 7,106,138 101,106,418 -100,000 100,000 371,000 201,603 160,000" 160,000"7 371,000 201,603 1,765,000 263,000 930,000 1,458,000 18,700,176 2,027,041 146,607 1,047,917 1,458,028 18,298,666 162,000 20,693 -- 225,000 3,249,558 16,918 166,102 3,139,031 273,000 -- 76,910 273,000 76,910 3-22 PHILADELPHIA, PA DISTRICT TABLE 3-A See Sect in Ti COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT 18. Delaware Coast Protection (Regular Funds) (Contributed Funds) 19. Great Egg Harbor Inlet & Peck Beach, NJ (Regular Funds) (Contributed Funds) Beltzville Lake, PA (Regular Funds) Blue Marsh Lake, PA (Regular Funds) Francis E. Walter Dam, PA (Regular Funds) General Edgar Jadwin Dam and Reservoir, PA (Regular Funds) Molly Ann's Brook, NJ (Regular Funds) New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. 214,000 210,000 217,000 235,073 248,133 222,314 222,000 5,528,95322 222,041 5,107,95422 215,350 215,350 1,268,67120 1,259,00220 2,380,000 1,658,000 139,000 359,000 31,530,000 2,591,461 1,672,833 139,146 356,563 31,517,547 904,000 525,000 86,110 1,752,978 - - 18,704,053 37,020 78,791 18,696,026 22,931,831 22,931,831 1,120,000 747,000 866,000 937,320 15,602,909 1,092,620 725,359 921,574 948,030 15,567,842 63,180,300 63,180,299 Approp. 2,349,000 1,986,000 2,172,509 2,224,752 32,690,555 Cost 2,246,589 2,028,329 2,273,844 2,260,124 32,650,109 New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost 12,449,682's 45,698 12,437,32315 1,248,000 663,000 564,000 865,773 15,877,722 1,237,457 613,735 650,390 875,544 15,873,571 205,000 211,000 170,000 189,697 204,667 193,290 4,580,000 7,090,000 4,765,000 8,110,218 8,177,256 4,788,378 208,679 208,608 4,073,105 4,073,105 4,404,043 4,371,348 300,000 21,513,000 411,959 21,487,811 3-23 ion ext Projects Funding FY97 FY98 FY99 FY00 SEPT. 30, 2000 20. 21. 23. 24. 27. REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 2000 TABLE 3-A See Section in Text Projects (Contributed Funds) 29. Prompton Lake (Regular Funds) 31. Schuylkill River Park, Phila., PA (Regular Funds) 32. South Central, PA Environmental Restoration (Regular Funds) 33. Southeastern Pennsylvania (Regular Funds) Funding New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost * Total adjusted to correct discrepancies in prior years. 1. Includes $1,950,906 for 30 and 37 foot projects. 2. Includes $55,809 for new work funds expended on previous project. 3. Includes $2,489,173 for new work for previous projects, $105,000 for preauthorization studies and minus $142,015 adjustment new work toDelaware River, Philadelphia to Sea project from this project under 1954 modification. 4. Includes $552,720 for maintenance for previous projects, and $685,000 Jobs Bill Funds. 5. Excludes $12,976,054 for new work for previous projects and $142,015 adjustment from Delaware River, Philadelphia to Trenton, NJ under 1954 modification. 6. Includes $1,285 for reconnaissance and condition surveys in FY 1957, $1,792 Operations and Maintenance cost incurred for preperation of environmental impact statement, and $48,000 expended for maintenance on previous projects. 7. Excludes $412,400 spent for Continuing Authority project. 8. Includes $10,709,755 for new work for previous projects. 9. Includes $6,903,748 for maintenance for previous projects, and $9,500 Job Bill Funds. FY97 FY98 FY99 4,164,795 1,700,000 1,800,000 60 1,980,000 1,192,715 1,710,058 1,27 588,000 573,281 FY00 SEPT. 30, 2000 )0,000 6,300,00021 75,000 5,783,57421 4,609,48316 4,609,48316 541,000 691,000 948,608 11,295,249 509,760 745,515 952,782 11,290,766 75,000 54,694 4,650,000 3,200,000 132,107 1,162,292 19,246 75,000 73,940 - 7,850,000 1,068,472 2,362,871 939,000 102,000 2,516,000 3,557,000 36,373 13,271 386,215 435,859 10. Includes $50,000 Navy Department Funds & $100,00 Contributed Funds. 11. Excludes $1,824,940 Navy Department Funds. 12. Excludes $286,953 Navy Department Funds expended maintenance. for 13. Includes $525,000 for previous projects. 14. Includes $402,121 for new work for previous project, and $206,177 emergency relief funds. 15. Includes $40,000 appropriated and $61,551 expended under Code 710 Recreation Facilities. 16. Includes $63,000 appropriated and $61,551 expended under Code 710 Recreation Facilities, excluded $23,600 preauthorization studies under 1948 modification. 17. Excludes $213,336 spent on Continuing Authority project. 18. Excluded $10,000 for previous projects. 19. Includes $1,025,409 for maintenance of previous projects, and $8,000 Jobs Bill funds. 20. Excludes $85,000 cash and $130,000 services furnished during preconstruction planning. 21. Includes $112,000 for work done for the State of New Jersey. 22. Includes $704,000 AE&D. 3-24 COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT FY99 PHILADELPHIA, PA DISTRICT TABLE 3-B Acts Aug. 30, 1935 Aug. 26, 1937 Jul. 24, 1946 Jul. 2, 1985 Oct. 27, 1990 Mar. 2, 1907 Mar. 2, 1945 Jul. 3, 1930 Aug. 30, 1935 Aug. 30, 19352 AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Work Authorized BARNEGAT INLET, NJ (See Section 1 of Text) An 8-foot depth through inlet to Oyster Creek Channel across inner bar, 10-foot depth through outer bar and for jetties. A channel of suitable hydraulic characteristics from gorge to Oyster Creek Channel, and thence to deep water in bay. Maintenance dredging of channel to connect main inlet channel with Barnegat City Harbor. Construction of a parallel, 4270 foot rubble mound south jetty and dredging a channel 10 feet deep, 300 feet wide, and 11,300 feet long. CHESAPEAKE AND DELAWARE CANAL ST. GEORGES BRIDGE REPLACEMENT, DE (See Section 2 of Text) The replacement of the U.S. Route 13 bridge near St. Georges, DE, and the state may be reimbursed if it carries out the work COLD SPRING INLET, NJ (See Section 3 of Text) An inlet channel 25 feet deep and jetties. A 20-foot channel to deep water in harbor DELAWARE RIVER BETWEEN PHILADELPHIA, PA AND TRENTON, NJ (See Section 4 of Text) A channel 28 feet deep, 300 feet wide between Allegheny Ave., Philadelphia, PA and Delair Bridge Channel 25 feet deep from Delair Bridge to Trenton, NJ, and maintenance of 12-foot channel from upper end of 25-foot project to Penn Central R.R. Bridge at Ferry St., Trenton. Auxiliary channel, 20 feet deep east of Burlington Island. Documents Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 19, 73rd Cong., 2nd sess.' Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc.85, 74th Cong., 2nd sess.' H. Doc. 358, 79th Cong., 2nd sess. H. Doc. 236, 99th Cong., 2nd sess. WRDA 1990 H. Doc. 388, 59th Cong., 2nd sess. H. Doc. 262, 77th Cong., Ist sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 3, 71st Cong., Ist sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 11, 73rd Cong., 1st sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 66, 74th Cong., 1st sess' 3-25 - ----- -- REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACITIVITIES FOR FY 2000 TABLE 3-B Acts AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Work Authorized Aug. 26, 1937 Jul. 24, 1946 Sept. 3, 1954 October 1992 Jun. 25, 1910 Jul. 3, 1930 A cross channel 8 feet deep, opposite Delanco, NJ Anchorage at mouth of Biles Creek A channel 40 feet deep and 400 feet wide between Allegheny Ave., Philadelphia, PA, and upstream end,, of Newbold Island, thence 35 feet deep to Trenton Marine Terminal and turning basin to 800 feet wide. Relocate channel at railroad bridge at Delair and suitably reconstruct bridge. Construct necessary bank protection works; and eliminate authorized anchorage near mouth of Biles Creek, PA DELAWARE RIVER MAINSTEM CHANNEL & DEEPENING (See Section 5 of Text) The 45-foot deep project was authorized for construction. DELAWARE RIVER, PA, NJ, AND DE, PHILADELPHIA TO THE SEA (See Section 6 of Text) Channel 35 feet deep from Allegheny Ave., Philadelphia, PA to Delaware Bay. Anchorages 35 feet deep at Port Richmond and Mantua Creek, a 30 foot anchorage at Gloucester, NJ and extend 1,000 foot channel in Philadelphia Harbor to Horseshoe Bend. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 90, 74th Cong., 2nd sess. H. Doc. 679, 79th Cong., 2nd sess. H. Doc. 358, 83d Cong., 2nd sess.' WRDA 1992 P.L. 902-580 Section 101 (6) Doc. 733, 61st Cong., 2nd sess. H. Doc. 304, 71st Cong., 2nd sess.' Aug. 30, 19352 Jun. 20, 19383 Mar. 2, 19454 Mar. 2, 19454 An anchorage 35 feet deep at Marcus Hook, PA Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 5, 73rd Cong., 1" sess. A channel 37 feet deep from Philadelphia - Camden Bridge to Navy Yard, thence 40 feet deep to deep water in Delaware Bay. A 37-foot depth channel from Allegheny Ave., Philadelphia, PA to Philadelphia-Camden Bridge A 37-foot depth in an enlargement of anchorage near Mantua Creek and Marcus Hook. S. Doc. 159, 75th Cong. 3rd sess.' H. Doc. 580, 76th Cong. Ist sess.' H. Doc. 340, 77th Cong. 1st sess.' 3-26 Dlocuments - _ PHILADELPHIA, PA DISTRICT TABLE 3-B Acts AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Work Authorized Maintain enlarged channel opposite Philadelphia Navy Yard. A channel from Allegheny Ave., to Naval Base 40 feet deep, 400 feet wide along west side of channel through Philadelphia Harbor and 500 feet wide through Horseshoe Bend. Anchorages at Reedy Point, Deepwater Point, Marcus I-ook, and Mantua Creek 40 feet deep and 2,300 feet wide with mean lengths of 8,000, 5,200,13,650 and 11,500 feet respectively. Specified in Act. H. Doc. 358, 83rd Cong. 2nd sess.' H. Doc. 185, 85th Cong., 1st sess. 74th Cong., 1st sess.' INDIAN RIVER INLET AND BAY, DE (See Section 7 of Text) A 15-foot inlet channel, steel and stone jetties, 6 foot channel from end of inlet channel to deep water in the bay and authority to modify interior inlet channel. A 9-foot channel from inlet to Old Landing, including basin, and 4-foot channel to highway bridge at Millsboro. INLAND WATERWAY FROM DELAWARE RIVER TO CHESAPEAKE BAY, DE & MD (See Section 8 of Text) A sea level channel 27 feet deep, 250 feet wide from Delaware River to Elk River and 400 feet wide down Elk River and Chesapeake Bay to deep water at or near Pooles Island; alter existing bridges over canal; enlarge Delaware City Branch Channel to 8 feet deep and 50 feet wide, with a basin same depth and revetment of both banks east of Fifth Street; enlarge anchorage and mooring basin in Back Creek to 400 feet wide, 1,000 feet long and 12 feet deep; extend jetties at Reedy Point; and construct bulkheads. Construct a 4-lane high-level fixed highway bridge at or near St. Georges. A channel 35 feet deep and 450 feet wide from Delaware River through Elk River and Chesapeake Bay. For an 8-foot depth and width increased to 150 feet in Delaware Bay. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 41, 75th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 330, '76th Cong., 1st sess.' H. Doc. 201, 72nd Cong., Ist sess. and Rivers and Harbors Committee Does. 18 and 24, 736 Cong., 2nd sess.' Public Law 310, 76th Cong., 1st sess. S. Doc. 123, 83rd Cong., 2nd sess.' H. Doc. 275, 73rd Cong., 2nd sess.'. 3-27 Mar. 2, 19454 Sept. 3, 1954 Jul. 3, 1958 Documents Aug. 26, 1937 Mar. 2, 1945 Aug. 30, 1935 Aug. 7, 1939 Sept. 3, 1954 Aug. 30, 1935 - -~- -- ----- REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACITIVITIES FOR FY 2000 TABLE 3-B Acts Jul. 25, 1912 Aug. 30, 1935 Mar. 2, 1945 Jul. 13, 1982 Jul. 1, 1945 Nov. 17, 1986 Jul. 3, 1930 Aug. 30, 1935 AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Work Authorized INLAND WATERWAY, REHOBOTH BAY TO DELAWARE BAY, DE (See Section 9 of text) For a 6-foot depth canal to connect Rehoboth Bay and Delaware Bay. For a 6-foot depth entrance near Lewes, for jetties, for widening the canal from Broadkill River to Lewes and basin. For a 10-foot depth from Delaware Bay to Lewes and in basin, and for extending jetties. S MURDERKILL RIVER, DE (See Section 10 of Text) A channel 7 feet deep at low water from Frederica to the 7 foot curve in Delaware Bay, 80 feet wide down to the mouth, and 150 feet wide at bottom and 250 feet wide at top from the mouth to the 7 foot curve in the bay. Embankment of dredged material on each side to a height of at least 2 feet above high spring tides. NEW JERSEY INTRACOASTAL WATERWAY (See Section 11 of Text) A channel 12 feet deep at mean low water and generally 100 feet wide, extending from the Atlantic Ocean at Manasquan Inlet, NJ to Delaware Bay above Cape May, NJ. Construction of a canal of similar dimensions from Cape May Harbor to Delaware Bay via the New England Creek basin, with adequate jetties at the Delaware Bay entrance. To increase the depth of the 2,000, foot reach of the Waterway in Cape May County to 15 feet. SALEM RIVER, NJ (See Section 12 of Text) A channel of 10-foot depth from Delaware River Masters Sand Plant Documents H. Doc. 823, 60th Cong., 1st sess. and Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 51, 61st Cong., 3rd sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 56, 75th Cong., 2nd sess.' H. Doc. 344, 77th Cong., Ist sess.' H. Ex. Doc. 21, 52nd Cong., 1st Sess. (See page 981 in Annual Report of 1892.) H. Doc. 133, 76th Cong., 1st Sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 525 79th Cong., 2nd sess. WRDA of 1986 H. Doc. 217, 70th Cong., Ist Sess.' Extention of project to Clements Bridge. Rivers and Harbors Comm. Doc. 15, 73rd Cong., 1st sess.' 3-28 - I -- PHILADELPHIA, PA DISTRICT TABLE 3-B Acts AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Work Authorized Nov. 17, 1986 Aug. 8, 1917 Jul. 3, 1930 Jul. 24, 1946 Jun. 3,1896 Jul. 25,1912 Sept. 22, 1922 Jul. 3, 1930 Aug. 30, 19357 A channel of 20-foot depth SCHUYLKILL RIVER, PA (See Section 13 of Text) Depths of 35 feet from mouth to Girard Point thence 30 feet, 26, and 22 feet to University Avenue Bridge, Philadelphia. A depth of 30 feet instead of 35 feet between the mouth and the conditional restoration and maintenance of the channel belowPassyunk Ave., channel dimensions between Passyunk Ave., and' by the United States. A depth of 33 feet from the channel in Delaware River to Passyunk Ave., restoration of the project channel dimensions between Passyunk Ave., and University Ave., and full maintenance of the entire project. WILMINGTON HARBOR, DE (See Section 14 of Text) Depths of 21, 10 and 7 feet and jetties. Purchase or construct a dredge and auxiliaries including a wharf and depot, and maintenance of project. Entrance channel and basin with 25-foot depth and construction by local interests of new south jetty. A 30-foot depth between Delaware River and Lobdell Canal and modification or removal of a portion of north jetty. Completion of new south jetty by the United States subject to provision that city of Wilmington reimburse the United States for cost, without interest, of any part of structure that may subsequently be occupied and utilized for city activities. WRDA of 1986' H. Doc. 1270, 64th Cong., 1st sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 40, 71st Cong., 2nd sess' H. Doc. 699, 79th Cong., 2nd sess' H. Doc. 66, 54" Cong., 1" sess. Annual Report, 1897 p. 12501 H. Doc. 359, 62nd Cong., 2nd sess. H. Doc. 114, 67th Cong., 1st sess. and S. Committee Print, 68th Cong., 1st sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 20, 71st Cong., 2nd sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 32, 73rd Cong., 2nd sess. 3-29 ---- -- -- Documents REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACITIVITIES FOR FY 2000 TABLE 3-B Acts AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Work Authorized Permit temporary occupancy by city of Wilmington of any part of south jetty for city activities under revocable license, provided occupied portion of jetty is properly maintained without expense to the United States. H. Doc. 658, 76th Cong., 3rd sess. Jul. 14, 1960 Oct. 12, 1996 H. Doc. 88, 86th Cong., 2nd sess. Section 101 (b) (13) of WRDA 1996 A 35-foot depth between Delaware River ship channel and Lobdell Canal including turning basin of same depth, opposite Wilmington Marine Terminal, 200 feet wide, 2,900 feet long on north side of channel, and 2,000 feet long on north side of basin. BRIGANTINE INLET TO GREAT EGG IIARBOR INLET, NJ (ABSECON ISLAND, NJ) (See Section 15 of Text) Consists of providing 6.2 million cubic yards of initial beachfill, with subsequent periodic nourishment of 1.6 million cubic yards every three years, for a 200-foot-wide berm at elevation 8.5 feet above mean low water and a dune to elevation 16 feet above mean low water for Atlantic City, and a 100-foot-wide berm at elevation 8.5 feet above mean low water and a dune to 14 feet above mean low water for Ventnor, Margate and Longport along 8.1 miles of shoreline. The plan also includes 0.3 miles of bulkhead construction along the Absecon Inlet frontage of Atlantic City. CAPE MAY INLET TO LOWER TOWNSHIP, NJ (See Section 16 of Text) Consists of beach fill; dune fill; new groins; main tenance of existing groins; rehabilitation of an existing seawall; and a breakwater with weir and deposition basin at Cape May Inlet. Project may be constructed separately or in combination with any other feature of the project. DELAWARE COAST CAPE HENLOPEN TO FENWICK ISLAND, DE (DEWEY/REHOBOTH, DE) (See Section 17 of Text) Provides for beachfill with subsequent periodic nourishment. The plan consists of one continuous project, from the northern end of Rehoboth beach to the southern border of Dewey Beach, a distance of 13,500 linear feet. Along Rehoboth Beach, the plan provides for a 125-foot wide beach berm at elevation +8.0 feet NGVD and a dune at elevation +14.0 feet NGVD. At Dewey Beach, the project would transition to a 150-foot wide beach berm at elevation +8.0 feet NGVD and a dune at elevation +14.0 feet NGVD. WRDA of 1986 Section 101 (b) (6) of WRDA 1996 3-30 Oct. 17, 1940 Documents Rivers & Harbors Act of 1968 Nov. 17, 1986 Oct. 12, 1996 PHILADELPHIA, PA DISTRICT TABLE 3-B AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Work Authorized Documents Section 307 of WRDA 2000 Project is modified to authorize increased project costs. DELAWARE COAST PROTECTION (See Section 18 of Text) Provides for Federal participation in the cost of restoration and subsequent periodic nourishment, not to exceed 10 years, of the shore from Rehoboth Beach to Indian River Inlet. H. Doc. 90, 90th Cong., 2nd sess. Project is modified to authorized the construction of sand bypass facilities and stone revetment erosion control measures at Indian River Inlet, DE.8 GREAT EGG HARBOR INLET & PECK BEACH, NJ (See Section 19 of Text) Project may be constructed separately or in combination with any other feature of the project. Consists of providing initial beachfill, with subsequent periodic nourishment, with a minimum berm width of 100 feet at an elevation of 8 feet above mean low water. BELTZVILLE LAKE, PA (See Section 20 of Text) Provides for multiple-purpose development for water supply flood control and recreation BLUE MARSH LAKE, PA (See Section 21 of Text) Provides for multiple purpose development for water supply, flood, control, and recreation. Site is located on Tulpehocken Creek about 1 1/2 miles upstream from its confluence with Plum Creek and about six miles northwest of Reading, PA. FRANCIS E. WALTER DAM, PA (See Section 23 of Text) Provided for a single-purpose flood control reservoir Provides for a multiple-purpose development for water supply and recreation. GENERAL EDGAR JADWIN DAM AND RESERVOIR, PA (See Section 24 of Text) A single-purpose flood control reservoir with a capacity of 24,500 acre-feet formed by an earth embankment. WRDA of 1986 Sec. 869 River and Harbor Act of 1965. WRDA of 1986. H. Doc. 522, 87th Cong., 2nd sess. H. Doc. 522, 87th Cong., 2nd sess. H. Doc. 587, 79th Cong., 2nd sess. H. Doc 522, 87th Cong., 2nd sess. H. Doc 113, 80th Cong., 1st sess. 3-31 Dec. 11, 2000 Nov. 17, 1986 Nov. 17, 1986 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACITIVITIES FOR FY 2000 TABLE 3-B AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Work Authorized Documents Nov. 17, 1986 WRDA of 1986 MOLLY ANN'S BROOK, NJ (See Section 27 of Text) Modify Channel with a total length of 2.5 miles miles. Channel will include both trapezoidal channel sections and walled sections. Five bridges will be replaced and one building will removed. PROMPTON LAKE, PA (See Section 29 of Text) Provides for a single-purpose flood control reservoir. ,, Provides for multiple-purpose development for water supply and recreation in addition to present singlepurpose flood control project. SCHUYLKILL RIVER PARK, PHILADELPHIA, PA (See Section 31 of Text) Authorized appropriated amount is increased. Authorized $4 million to provide technical, planning, design, and construction assistance. SOUTH CENTRAL PENNSYLVANIA ENVIRONMENTAL IMPROVEMENT, PA (See Section 32 of Text) Pilot program providing environmental assistance to non-Federal Interests in South Central Pennsylvania. Provides $10 million in design and construction assistance under the Section 313 progam. Specifies the funds among eight specific projects. SOUTHEASTERN PENNSYLVANIA, PA (See Section 33 of Text) Pilot program providing for environmental assistance (design and construction) to non-Federal interests for publicly owned facilities in the five (5) county area surrounding the City of Philadelphia. "Brownfields" initiative to investigate to spur the revitalization of these properties and return them to productive use. Section 566, WRDA of 1996 Section 104 (d)(l) of the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability Act of 1980 1. Contains latest published maps. 2. Also Public Works Administration September 6, 1933, and Emergency Relief Administration, May 28, 1935. 3. Channel 37 feet deep and 600 feet wide from Naval Base to Philadelphia-Camden Bridge, deferred for restudy. 4. Channel 37 feet deep and 600 feet wide from Philadelphia-Camden Bridge to Allegheny Ave. deferred for restudy. 5. Extension of jetties considered to be active. 6. The 10 and 12 foot anchorages are considered inactive. 7. Also May 28, 1935, under Emergency Relief Administration. 8. Deauthorized the remaining portion of the project. 3-32 H. Doc. 113, 80th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 522, 87th Cong., 2nd sess. WRDA 1996 Section 564 (c) Section 313, WRDA of 1992 H. Report 105-190 Conference Report 105-271 PHILADELPHIA, PA DISTRICT TABLE 3-C OTHER AUTHORIZED NAVIGATION PROJECTS For Last Cost to Full Report Sept. 30, 2000 See Annual Operation and Active Projects Status Report For Construction Maintenance Absecon Creek, NJ COMPLETED Absecon Inlet, NJ COMPLETED Alloway Creek, NJ' COMPLETED Aquatic Plant Control INACTIVE Big Timber Creek, NJ COMPLETED Broadkill River, DE COMPLETED Cedar Creek, NJ ACTIVE Cohansey River, NJ COMPLETED Cooper River, NJ' COMPLETED Delaware Bay to Millville COMPLETED Millville fixed bridge to upper end of project SEE TABLE 3-F Delaware River, Pennsville, NJ COMPLETED Delaware River Vicinity of Camden, NJ ACTIVE Dennis Creek, NJ' INACTIVE Double Creek, NJ' COMPLETED Harbor of Refuge COMPLETED Goshen Creek, NJ' INACTIVE Ice Harbor at Marcus Hook, PA S5 INACTIVE Ice Harbor at New Castle, DE 5 INACTIVE Inland Waterway from Chincoteague Bay to Delaware Bay COMPLETED Leipsic River, DE' INACTIVE Little Egg Harbor, NJ '3 INACTIVE Little River, DE COMPLETED Manasquan River, NJ ACTIVE Mantua Creek, NJ COMPLETED Maurice River, NJ ACTIVE Mispillion River, DE ACTIVE Neshaminy State Park** Harbor, PA COMPLETED Oldmans Creek, NJ COMPLETED. Pepper Creek, DE** COMPLETED Raccoon Creek, NJ COMPLETED Schuylkill River above Fairmount Dam, PA' COMPLETED 1989 1990 1989 1975 1989 1976 1999 1995 1989 1997 1897 1912 1964 1905 1928 1898 1981 1931 6 1980 1998 1966 1997 1999 1968 1941 1989 1994 1955 11,935 534,20916 21,398 87,594 58,6652 68,228 256,100 146,75620 33,102 143,98421 256,624 5,045,17322 4,701 7,800 5,162,23018 15,359 208,964 224,704 168,412" 36,956 15,048 12,016 8,008,27823,24 169,6877 110,000 738,83926 128,203'14 31,188 138,09415 83,66513 4,291,810 84,186' 5,98517317 55,117 71,925* 243,641 560,813 3,749,983 396,528* 161,913 3,261,386 4 1,169,01419 870 14,336 98,36012 32,345 288,310 5,315,59925 339,340' 1,577,194 4,482,88427 54,601 32,125 38,988' 368,001 4 3-33 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR 2000 TABLE 3-C OTHER AUTHORIZED NAVIGATION PROJECTS For Last Cost to Full Report Sept. 30, 2000 See Annual Operation and Active Projects Status Report For Construction Maintenance Smyrna River, DE 1949 Delaware River to Wharf at Smyrna Landing9 COMPLETED 198,844 197,327 Wharf at Smyrna Landing to fixed bridge. SEE TABLE 3-F - Toms River, NJ ACTIVE 1996 10,050 262,485 Tuckerton Creek, NJ ACTIVE 1999 60,242 1,307,669 Waterway from Indian River ACTIVE 1997 - 340,104 Inlet to Rehoboth Bay, DE Woodbury Creek, NJ' COMPLETED 1940 27,09310 56,474 For Last Cost to Full Report Sept. 30, 2000 See Annual Operation and Deferred Projects Status Report For Construction Maintenance St. Jones River, DE 1961 - Delaware Bay to Lebanon '8 Jetties and new entrance at mouth DEFERRED 1. Completed. 2. Excludes $50,000 contributed funds expended for new work. 3. Abandonment recommended in House Doc. 467, 69th Congress,lst Sess. 4. Maintenance assumed by local interests. 5. Harbor not now required by commerce. 6. Last appropriation for project was in 1852. No information is at hand relative to work done. 7. Includes $3,000 for new work for previous projects. 8. Includes $54,590 new work and $28,935 maintenance funds expended on previous projects. 9. Includes $55,085 new work and $22,723 maintenance funds expended on previous projects. 10. Includes $2,950 new work funds expended on previous projects. 11. Entire amount expended on previous projects repealed in 1905. 12. Excludes $2,000 contributed funds and includes $25,330 for maintenance for previous project. 13. Encludes $757 new work funds expended on previous projects. 14. Excludes $327,957 contributed funds allotted expended for new work. 15. Excludes $38,988 non-Federal funds. 16. Includes $116,497 for new work on previous projects. 17. Includes $2,489,173 for maintenance for previous projects. 18. Includes $2,749,452 for new work for previous projects. 19. Excludes $1,089 for reconnaissance and condition surveys fiscal year 1963. 20. Includes $36,000 for new work for previous projects. 21. Includes $43,000 new work funds expended on previous projects. 22. Includes $1,950,906 for 30 and 37 foot projects. 23. Includes $39,000 for new work for previous projects. 24. Includes $555,809 for previous projects. 25. Inlcudes $2,054 for maintenance for previous projects. 26. Includes $148, 798 for new work on previous projects. 27. Includes $61,172 for maintenance on previous projects. * Operation and maintenance figure includes cost incurred for preparation of environmental impact statements. ** Projects authorized by the Chief of Engineers. 3-34 207,102 66,093 - PHILADELPHIA, PA DISTRICT OTHER AUTHORIZED TABLE 3-D SHORE PROTECTION PROJECTS For Last Cost to Full Report Sept. 30, 2000 See Annual Operation and Project Status Report For Construction Maintenance Brigantine Island INACTIVE* - Townsends Inlet and Seven Mile Beach, NJ INACTIVE* - - - * NO CURRENT YEAR FUNDS. OTHER AUTHORIZED TABLE 3-E FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS For Last Cost to Full Report Sept. 30, 2000 See Annual Operation and Project Status Report For Construction Maintenance Allentown, Lehigh River, PA COMPLETED 1961 1,615,581 - Bethlehem, Lehigh River, PA COMPLETED 1966 4,520,995 - Glen Foerd, PA COMPLETED 1999 998,860 - Hay Creek, Birdsboro, PA INACTIVE 1984 335,299 - Mt. Holly, NJ COMPLETED 1946 283,655 a Pottstown, PA ACTIVE 1984 487,366 - Tamaqua, PA ACTIVE 1990 628,4672 1. Maintenance assumed by local interest as required by authorizing project. 2. Transferred from Baltimore District in FY 1989. 3-35 REPORT OF THE SECRECTARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR 2000 TABLE 3-F DEAUTHORIZED PROJECTS Navigation Projects Appoquinimink River, DE' Delaware County, PA Maurice River, NJ Millville fixed bridge to upper end of project2 Oldmans Creek, NJ3 Rancocas River, NJ4 Smyrna River, DEs Wharf at Smyrna Landing to fixed bridge. For Last Full Report See Annual Report For 1934 1931 1948 1941 1942 1949 Date And Authority 3 Oct 78 HD 95-351 PL 99-662 52 Stat. 323 Section 12 PL 93-251 2 Nov 79 Section 12 PL 93-251 2 Nov 79 Section 12 PL 93-251 2 Nov 79 HD 95-157 Federal Contributed Funds Funds Expended Expended $78,243 $ 7,139 $63,313 $57,590 $396,169 Shore Protection Projects For Last Full Report See Annual Report For Date And Authority Federal Contributed Funds Funds Expended Expended Atlantic City, NJ Barnegat Light, NJ Cape May City, NJ Corson Inlet and Ludlam Beach, NJ Hereford Inlet Long Beach Island, NJ Ocean City, NJ 1972 1964 1961 HD 538 918 HD 208 918 3 Sep 54 HD 206 918 $2,083,289 $ 70,908 $ 22,957' 1978 $ 314,400 1964 1969 14 Jul 60 HD 208 918 HD 184 918 $ 40,665 $ 395,8319 3-36 - -- PHILADELPHIA, PA DISTRICT TABLE 3-F DEAUTHORIZED PROJECTS For Last Full Date Federal Contributed Report See Annual And Funds Funds Shore Protection Projects Report For Authority Expended Expended Rehoboth Beach to Indian River 1965 HD 216 $326,116 - Inlet, DE 918 For Last Full Date Federal Contributed Report See Annual And Funds Funds Flood Control Projects Report For Authority Expended Expended Aquashicola Reservoir, PA Chester River, Delaware County, PA Delaware River, Mouth of Neversink Lehigh River at Bethlehem, PA6 Maiden Creek Reservoir, PA Tocks Island, PA, NJ, and NY 8 Tocks Island (Relocation of U.S. Route 209 only) PA8 Trexler Lake, PA 1963 1931 1917 1966 1963 1979 1979 1981 17 Nov 86 PL 99-662 46 Stat., 918 17 Nov 86 PL 99-662 52 Stat., 323 5 Aug 77 HD 94-192 2 Nov 79 Section 12 PL 93-251 17 Nov 86 PL 99-662 46 Stat., 918 23 Oct 62 PL 87-87 23 Oct 62 PL 87-874 $ 4,520,995 $65,106,260!0 $ 195,223 17 Nov 86 PL 99-662 76 Stat., 1180 1. Includes $36,973 new work, and $41,270 for maintenance. 2. There is no need now for this portion of the project. 3. Includes $31,188 new work, and $32,125 for maintenance. 4. Includes $44,500 new work, and $13,090 for maintenance. 5. Includes $143,759 new work, $55,085 previous project, $174,602 for maintenance, and $22,723 maintenance, previous project. 6. Maintenance assumed by local interest. 7. Excludes $58,585 Accelerated Public Works funds expended for extention to two groins. 8. National Parks and Recreation Act of 1978 terminated Corps authority to proceed with the project. Legislation would be required to proceed with the project. 9. Excludes cost of $1,146,325 to local interests and $272,766 Federal participation expended under Public Works Acceleration Program for extention of five existing groins completed 11 May 1964. 10. Includes $3,489,088 for AE&D. 3-37 - --------- -- BALTIMORE, MD DISTRICT* This district comprises the watershed of Susquehanna River and its tributaries from headwaters in south central New York State through central Pennsylvania to its mouth in Chesapeake Bay; watershed of the Potomac River and its tributaries from headwaters in Maryland, eastern West Virginia, and Northern Virginia to its mouth in Chesapeake Bay; District of Columbia; and southwestern portion of Delaware. It includes that portion of Chesapeake Bay and its tributaries north of Smith Point, MD, on western shore of the bay, and includes that portion of Maryland between Chesapeake Bay and Atlantic Ocean. IMPROVEMENTS Navigation Page 1. Baltimore Harbor and Channels, M D and VA ................................................ 4-3 2. Baltimore Harbor, MD, Collection and Removal of Drift .................. 4-4 3. Honga River and Tar Bay, MD ................... 4-4 4. Knapps Narrows, MD .................................. 4-4 5. Little Wicomico River, VA ............................ 4-5 6. Nanticoke River, DE & MD ............................ 4-5 7. Neale Sound, M D ............................................ 4-5 8. Northeast River, M D ....................................... 4-6 9. Ocean City Harbor and Inlet and Sinepuxent Bay, M D ..................................... 4-6 10. Potomac and Anacostia Rivers, DC, Collection and Removal of Drift .................. 4-7 11. Potomac River at Alexandria, VA ................... 4-7 12. Potomac River at Mt. Vernon, VA ............... 4-7 13. Potomac River Below Washington, DC.........4-7 14. Prevention of Obstructions and Injurous Deposits, MD ................................. 4-7 15. Shallow Creek, Baltimore, MD ........................ 4-8 16. Tolchester Channel, S-Turn, MD ............ 4-8 17. Twitch Cove and Big Thorofare, MD............4-8 18. Washington Harbor, DC ............................... 4-9 19. Wicomico River, MD ..................................... 4-9 20. Reconnaissance and Condition Surveys ....... 4-9 21. Navigation Work under Special Authorization ..................................... 4-9 Shore Protection 22. Shore Protection Work under Special Authorization ....................... 4-10 23. Assateague Island ...................................... 4-10 24. Atlantic Coast of Maryland ......................... 4-10 Flood Control 25. Broad Top Region, PA ............................... 4-10 Flood Control (cont'd) Page 26. Cumberland MD, and Ridgeley, WV ............ 4-11 27. Jennings Randolph Lake, MD and WV ....... 4-11 28.- Lackawanna River Basin, PA ..................... 4-12 28A. Aylesworth Creek Lake, PA ....................... 4-12 29. Lock Haven, PA ......................................... 4-12 30. Moorefield, WV .......................................... 4-12 31. Neabsco Creek, VA .................................... 4-13 32. Lackawanna River, Olyphant, PA .............. 4-13 33. Dickson City, (Olyphant), PA .................... 4-13 34. Petersburg, W V .......................... .............. 4-13 35. Raystown Lake, Raystown Branch, Juniata River, PA .................................... 4-14 36. Lackawanna River, Scranton, PA ................ 4-14 37. Williamsport Hagerman's Flume ................... 4-14 38. WV and PA Flood Control ........................... 4-15 39. Southern New York Flood Control Projects ...... ...................... ....... .... 4-15 39A. Addison, NY ........................................ 4-15 39B. Almond Lake, NY ....................................... 4-15 39C. Arkport Dam, NY .......................................... 4-15 39D. Avoca, NY ....................................... 4-16 39E. Binghamton, NY ....................................... 4-16 39F. Canisteo, NY ............................................... 4-16 39G Corning, NY ................................................ 4-17 39H. East Sidney, NY .................................. 4-17 391. Elm ira, N Y .................................................... 4-17 39J. lHornell, NY ..................................... 4-18 39K . Lisle, N Y ....................................................... 4-18 39L. Oxford, NY ........................ ........................ 4-18 39M. Whitney Point Lake, NY ............................ 4-19 39N. Whitney Point Village, NY ......................... 4-19 40. Stillwater Lake, Lackawanna River, PA ........ 4-19 41. Susquehanna River Flood Control Projects, NY and PA ................................. 4-19 41A. Cowanesque Lake, PA .................................. 4-19 41B. Tioga-Hammond Lakes, PA ........................... 4-20 4-1 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 2000 Flood Control (cont'd) Page 42. West Branch of Susquehanna River, PA ..... 4-20 42A. Alvin R. Bush Dam, PA ...................... 4-20 42B. Curwensville Lake, PA ............................... 4-21 42C. Foster Joseph Sayers Dam, PA ................. 4-21 43. Wyoming Valley, PA (Levee Raising)........... 4-21 44. York, Indian Rock Dam, PA .......................... 4-22 45. Inspection of Completed Flood Control Projects .......................................... 4-22 46. Scheduling Flood Control Reservoir Operations ................................... 4-22 47. Flood Control Work under Special Authorization .............................................. 4-22 Environmental Restoration 48. Anacostia River & Tributaries, MD & DC.. 4-22 49. Chesapeake Bay Oyster Recovery, MD....... 4-23 50. Chesapeake Bay Environmental Prog, MD .. 4-23 51. Little Falls Dam Fish Passage #2, MD ........ 4-23 52. Poplar Island, M D .................................... .. 4-24 53. South Central PA Environmental Improvement Program .............................. 4-24 Regulatory Program 54. Regulatory Program ....................................... 4-25 Water Supply Page 55. Washington Aqueduct ............................... 4-25 56. 57. 58. 59. General Investigations Surveys .......................... ......................... . 4-25 Aquatic Ecosystem Restoration ................... 4-25 Collection and Study of Basic Data ............ 4-26 Pre-construction Engineering and Design ...4-26 FUSRAP 60. W.R. Grace, Curtis Bay, MD ...................... 4-26 Tables Table 4-A Cost and Financial Statement .............. 4-27 Table 4-B Authorizing Legislation ..................... 4-34 Table 4-C Other Authorized Navigation Projects ......................... 4-42 Table 4-D Other Authorized Beach Erosion Control Projects ............... 4-4..4................ Table 4-E Other Authorized Flood Control Projects ................................. 4-45 Table 4-F Not Applicable Table 4-G Deauthorized Projects ............ 44.-.4.7........... Table 4-H Reconnaissance and Condition Surveys ............................. 4-49 Table 4-I Inspection of Completed Projects ............................ 4-50 4-2 BALTIMORE, MD DISTRICT NAVIGATION 1. BALTIMORE HARBOR AND CHANNELS, MD AND VA Location. Baltimore Harbor is at the head of the navigable portion of Patapsco River about 12 miles from Chesapeake Bay. The Patapsco River rises near the town of Westminster in Carroll County, MD, and flows generally southeast for about 65 miles to enter Chesapeake Bay. (See National Ocean Survey Chart 12278.) Existing project. a. A uniform main channel depth of 50 feet between Cape Charles, VA, and Fort McHenry at Baltimore, MD, with dimensions as follows: (1) Cape Henry Channel: 50 feet deep and 1,000 feet wide from the 50-foot depth curve in the Atlantic Ocean to that depth in Chesapeake Bay, a distance of 3.0 miles; (2) York Spit Channel: 50 feet deep and 1,000 feet wide connecting the 50-foot depth curves in Chesapeake Bay near York Spit, a distance of 18.4 miles; (3) Rappahannock Shoal Channel: 50 feet deep and 1,000 feet wide connecting the 50-foot depth curves in the Chesapeake Bay opposite the Rappahannock River, a distance of 10.3 miles; and (4) Baltimore Harbor Approach Channels: 50 feet deep and generally 800 feet wide, widened at the approach and bends, from the 50-foot depth curve in Chesapeake Bay opposite the mouth of the Magothy River to Fort McHenry on the Patapsco River, a distance of 20.2 miles. b. Branch channels with dimensions as follows: (1) Connecting Channel to Chesapeake and Delaware Canal Approach Channel: 35 feet deep, 600 feet wide, and 15.6 miles long from the Cutoff Angle in the main channel to the 35-foot depth curves in the natural channel on the east side of Chesapeake Bay which is part of the inland waterway from Delaware River to Chesapeake Bay. The channel includes the Brewerton Extension and Swan Point and Tolchester Channels; (2) Curtis Bay: 50 feet deep, 600 feet wide, and 2.3 miles long from the main channel to and including a turning basin at the head of Curtis Bay; (3) Curtis Creek: (a) a channel, 35 feet deep and generally 200 feet wide, from the 50-foot channel in Curtis Bay to 750 feet downstream of the Pennington Avenue Bridge; (b) a channel, 22 feet deep and generally 200 feet wide, from the 35-foot channel to and along the marginal wharf of the Curtis Bay Ordnance Depot; (c) an irregular shaped 3-acre basin, with a depth of 18 feet, adjacent to the head of the 22-foot channel; (d) a basin, 15 feet deep and 450 feet wide, from the end of the 22- foot channel to the end of the marginal wharf; and (e) a channel, 22 feet deep and 200 feet wide, from the 22- foot channel south of the Baltimore and Ohio Railroad Bridge to the vicinity ofArundel Cove, a distance of2,800 feet, thence 100 feet wide in Arundel Cove for a distance of 2,100 feet, with an anchorage basin, 700 feet square, adjacent to the channel and southwest of the wharf of the Coast Guard Depot at Curtis Bay; (4) Middle Branch; Ferry Bar East Section: a channel, 42 feet deep and 600 feet wide, from the main channel at Fort McHenry to Ferry Bar, a distance of 1.5 miles; and (5) Northwest Branch: Federal maintenance of 39-foot or 35-foot deep channels after either depth has been provided by local interests: (a) East Channel: a channel, 49 feet deep, 600 feet wide, and 1.0 mile long with a turning basin at the head of the channel from that depth existing at the time of construction; and (b) West Channel: a channel, 40 feet deep, 600 feet wide, and 1.3 miles long with a turning basin at the head of the channel from that depth existing at the time of construction. c. The following anchorages: (1) Riverview Anchorage No. 2: 30 feet deep, 2400 feet long, and 1,200 feet wide; (2) Riverview Anchorage No. 1: 35 feet deep, 4,500 feet long, and 1,500 feet wide; and (3) Fort McHenry Anchorage: 35 feet deep, 3,500 feet long, and 400 feet wide. The mean range of tide is 2.8 feet at the Cape Henry Channel, 2.3 feet at the York Spit Channel, 1.4 feet at the Rappahannock Shoal Channel, 0.8 foot at the Craighill Entrance, 0.9 foot in the Cutoff Section, 1.1 feet at Fort McHenry, and 1.2 feet at Pooles Island in the upper Chesapeake Bay. Depths refer to mean low water. Estimated cost for new work is $361,581,000 which includes: $8,330,000 for completed work through the River and HarborAct of 1945; $38,411,000 for work completed under the River and Harbor Act of 1958 of which $33,991,000 is Corps of Engineers, $60,000 is U.S. Coast Guard and $4,360,000 is non-Federal; and $314,840,000 (October 1989 prices) for work authorized by the River and Harbor Act of 1970, of which $460,000 is U.S. Coast Guard and $314,380,000 is Corps of Engineers and non-Federal. Local cooperation. Requirements are described in full on page 4-3 of Fiscal Year 1982 Annual Report. Terminal facilities. The Port of Baltimore has 45 miles of waterfront of which 25 miles are industrially developed. There are 94 covered and open overseas piers for the loading and discharging of 173 ships, providing 84 general cargo, 65 specialized cargo, and 24 public bulk cargo berths. The existing ground storage is equivalent to 53,700 railroad cars of cargo. There are 31 public general merchandise warehouses, with 4.9 million square feet of storage space and 4.7 million cubic feet of cold storage space. Eight ship-building, ship-repair, and ship-dismantling yards are available for handling up to 90 vessels. The two grain elevators in the port have a capacity of about 8 million bushels. Latest description of terminal facilities is in "Port Series No. 10 (revised 1991)" on Port of Baltimore, MD, (issued by Board of Engineers for Rivers and Harbors). Operations and results during fiscal year. New Work, Baltimore District: A Project Cooperation Agreement for widening the Brewerton Channel Eastern Extension from 450 to 600 feet was executed on June 26, 2000 and plans and specifications for dredging were completed in June 2000. A contract in the amount of $18,438,770 to 4-3 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 2000 dredge an estimated 400,000 cubic yards of maintenance material and 2.1 million cubic yards of new work material to widen the Brewerton Channel Eastern Extension to 600 feet and place the material in the Poplar Island Environmental Restoration Project was awarded to Great Lakes Dredge & Dock Company on August 24, 2000. Dredging is scheduled to start in March 2001 and be completed in June 2001. New Work, Norfolk District: None. Maintenance, Baltimore District. Condition surveys of the project channels were made. Dredged material testing of the channels and ongoing studies continued for preparation of an Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) to determine the feasibility of using the proposed Site 104 open water placement area in the Cheasapeake Bay. Work on the EIS was terminated after the Governor of Maryland announced on June 30, 2000 that he was withdrawing Site 104 from consideration. Preparation of a draft decision document and Environmental Assessment to determine the feasibility of cost-sharing the renovation of the CSX/Cox Creek dredged material containment facility was completed in June 2000. Maintenance dredging, by contract, of the Craighill Entrance, Craighill Angle, Ft. McHenry Channel, Curtis Bay Channel, Curtis Creek Channel, and Tolchester Channel commenced on January 6, 2000 and was completed on June 1, 2000. A total of 3,035,444 cubic yards of material were dredged and deposited in the approved Hart-Miller Island containment facility in the Chesapeake Bay at a cost of $15,566,282. An additional maintenance dredging contract in the amount of $2,598,330 (base amount) was awarded on September 8, 2000 and optional bid items in the amount of $5,893,570 were awarded on November 1, 2000, for a total contract of $8,491,900 to dredge an estimated 1.5 million cubic yards from the Craighill Upper Range, Cutoff Angle, Curtis Creek Channel, and Swan Point Channel and to deposit the material in the approved Hart-Miller Island containment facility in the Chesapeake Bay. Dredging commenced on November 13, 2000 and is scheduled to be completed in February 2001. Maintenance, Norfolk District: Condition surveys were made of the Rappahannock Shoal and Atlantic Ocean Channels. Channel surveys and plans and specifications for dredging the Cape Henry Channel were completed. Maintenance dredging, by contract, of the Cape Henry Channel commenced on April 8, 2000 and was completed on June 2, 2000. A total of 470,792 cubic yards of material were dredged and deposited in the approved Dam Neck Ocean Placement Area in the Atlantic Ocean at a cost of $954,505. 2. BALTIMORE HARBOR, MD, COLLECTION AND REMOVAL OF DRIFT Location. Project applies to Baltimore Harbor, MD, and its tributaries. Existing project. Provides for collection and removal of drift from Baltimore Harbor and its tributary waters, and authorizes the Secretary of the Army to allot such amounts as may be necessary for work from appropriations for maintenance and improvement of exisiting river and harbor works or other available appropriations, and that this work shall be carried as a separate and distinct project. It is wholly a work of maintenance. Purpose of work is to afford relief from variable conditions of obstruction. Local cooperation. None required. ' Terminal facilities. See Section 1 of this text. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Operations, by hired labor, consisted of collection and disposal of 7,560 cubic feet of driftwood, ranging from small blocks up to timbers of large dimensions. 3. HONGA RIVER AND TAR BAY, MD Location. Honga River is a tidal estuary of Chesapeake Bay and penetrates Dorchester County on Eastern Shore of Maryland between Hooper Island and the mainland; Tar Bay lies between Barren Island and the mainland and Hooper Island. Fishing Creek connects Tar Bay and Honga River. Back Creek is a branch of Honga River extending into Hooper Island; the mouth is about 2 miles south of Fishing Creek. (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart 1224.) Existing project. Provides for a channel 60 feet wide and 7 feet deep at mean low water from the 7-foot contour in Chesapeake Bay, through Tar Bay and Fishing Creek to the 7-foot contour in Honga River, 25,300 feet long, and a channel in Back Creek 7 feet deep and 60 feet wide from the 7-foot depth curve in Honga River to a point near the head of Back Creek with a turning basin of the same depth 150 feet long and 200 feet wide at the head of channel, about 5,500 feet long. Mean range of tide is about 1.4 feet. Federal cost of new work for the completed project was $66,119. Local cooperation. Local interests furnished placement areas for future maintenance dredging. Terminal facilities. Numerous small private wharves are scattered along Fishing Creek and Back Creek. A public wharf is on Fishing Creek. A public wharf, four oyster houses, and a marine railway are on Back Creek. Facilities are adequate for existing and reasonable prospective commerce. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Dredging contract was completed to remove 111,000 cubic yards of material from the channel at a cost of$1,299,796. 4. KNAPPS NARROWS, MD Location. A small channel separating Tilghman Island from mainland of eastern shore of Chesapeake Bay about 4-4 BALTIMORE, MD DISTRICT 40 miles south of Baltimore, MD. (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart 1225.) Existing project. A channel 9 feet deep at mean low water, 75 feet wide, widened at the bends from deep water in Chesapeake Bay to deep water in Harris Creek, MD. Mean range of tide is 1.4 feet. Cost of new work for completed project was $46,121. Existing project channel was authorized by the Public Works Administration, September 16, 1933, and later adopted by 1935 River and Harbor Act. Local cooperation. Complied with except local interests must furnish disposal areas as needed for future maintenance. Terminal facilities. A bulkhead wharf exists on each side of the southerly abutment of the bridge across the Narrows. There are several small-boat landings within the Narrows and several marine railways for repairing boats of a few feet in draft. A bulkhead landing is available for public use at the turning basin. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Dredging contract was completed to remove 40,000 cubic yards of material from the channel at a cost of $565,177. 5. LITTLE WICOMICO RIVER, VA Location. A tidal estuary 6 miles long in Northumberland County, VA, flowing southeasterly to Potomac River, which it enters on the right bank one-half mile upstream of its mouth and about 108 miles downstream from Washington, DC. (See U.S. Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart 12233.) Existing project. A channel 8 feet deep, 150 feet wide, and 4,800 feet long, extending from deep water in the Potomac River to deep water in the Little Wicomico River; two stone jetties, extending to the 8-foot contour in Potomac River; and bulkhead walls from the inner ends thereof extending sufficiently into Little Wicomico River to stabilize the dredged inner channel. Plane of reference is mean low water. Tidal ranges in Potomac River at the entrance are: Mean 1.2 feet; irregular, 2.5 feet; and extreme, about 7 feet. Mean tidal range within the river is about 1 foot. Federal cost of new work for the completed project was $81,885, exclusive of $5,000 contributed by local interests. Local cooperation. Fully met except local interests are to furnish disposal areas for future maintenance dredging. Terminal facilities. Two wharves open to the public and numerous small wharves and stagings for private use, an oyster shucking, and packing plant, and a marine railway and boat-building yard. Facilities are considered adequate for present commerce. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Engineering and design work continued in connection with the proposed maintenance dredging and breach repair. 6. NANTICOKE RIVER, DE AND MD Location. Headwaters of Nanticoke River consist of numerous branches rising mainly in the northern portion of Sussex County, DE. The river is about 50 miles long and flows southwesterly from its source to Tangier Sound. Northwest Fork is a branch of Nanticoke River which rises in Kent County, DE, and flows past Federalsburg, MD, generally southerly through Dorchester County, MD, to its junction with the main river opposite Riverton, MD. It is about 30 miles long. (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart 77.) Existing project. Nanticoke River: Channel 12 feet deep and 100 feet wide from the 12-foot depth curve in Tangier Sound to the highway bridge at Seaford, DE, with a turning basin at the upper end. Disjointed sections included in the project is about 4 miles long, extending over 32 miles of river; lower end of the first section of the project is about 8 miles above the mouth of the river. Mean range of tide is 3.4 feet, and the extreme tidal range is 4.3 feet. Northwest Fork: Dredging a channel 6 feet deep and 60 feet wide at mean low water from upper Browns wharf to within one-half mile of the southern boundary of town of Federalsburg, with a turning basin at the upper end. Section included in the project is about 4 miles long, and its lower end is 11.75 miles above the mouth of the river. Mean range of tide is 2.6 feet. Local cooperation. Local interests must furnish disposal areas for future maintenance dredging. Terminal facilities. Waterfront at Seaford consists largely of unconnected pile-and-timber bulkhead wharves with earthfills. One public wharf is used as a launching ramp. Remaining wharves are privately owned. A rail siding extends along a considerable portion of waterfront and offers facilities for interchange of rail and water traffic. Existing terminals are reasonably adequate for present and prospective commerce. Terminal facilities on Northwest Fork are all privately owned and open to general public use. They consist of one solid bulkhead wharf of 80-foot frontage and three landings each with 60-foot frontages. Depths of water are from 2 to 8 feet. Landings are log revetments backed by earthfill and are in poor condition. Operations and results during fiscal year. Local sponsor was unable to identify a suitable placement site for dredge material therefore all engineering and design work was suspended pending identification of a site and future funding. 7. NEALE SOUND, MD Location. Along the Potomac River between Cobb Island and the mainland of Charles County, Maryland, near the confluence with Wicomico River, 70 miles down- 4-5 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 2000 stream of Washington, D.C. (See U.S. Coast Guard and Geodetic Survey Chart. (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart 12286.) Existing Project. A channel 7 feet deep and 100 feet wide at the lower entrance to Neale Sound, from deep water within the Sound to deep water in the Wicomico River; a channel 6 feet deep and 80 feet wide in the Potomac River to deep water within the sound at the upper entrance. Plane of reference is mean low water. Total project length is 5,000 feet. Tidal range is 1.9 feet. The project was adopted by the River and Harbor Act of August 26, 1937, and constructed in 1939. The upper channel has been maintained five times, the lower channel has not required maintenance. In July 1999, the project was modified by Section 107 of the River and Harbor Act of 1960 to provide for a 1,650 foot stone jetty to protect the upper channel from shoaling. Local Cooperation. Charles County has completed their cost-sharing requirements, pending project financial closeout, which is anticipated in spring 2001. Charles County has provided 50 percent of the cost of the feasibility study, including in-kind services, that was completed in February 1997, and sufficient cash and credits to satisfy the requirements of Section 107 for plans and specifications and construction. Operations During Fiscal Year. Construction ofa 1,650- foot stone jetty to protect the upper channel to the Sound was physically completed in October 2000. Final closeout, and acceptance of the project by the sponsor will be completed in FY 2001. 8. NORTHEAST RIVER, MD Location. A tidal waterway extending southwestward 5.5 miles from the junction of its branches in the town of North East to the head of Chesapeake Bay, 6 miles north of entrance to the Chesapeake and Delaware Canal. (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart 1226.) Existing project. Provides for a channel 60 feet wide and 7 feet deep at mean low water from that depth in river to foot of Church Street in the town of North East, enlarged at its upper end to form a basin 120 feet wide and 300 feet long. Mean range of tide is 2.25 feet. Local cooperation. Fully met except that local interests are to furnish disposal areas for future maintenance as required. Terminal facilities. There are a few lightly constructed landings for small boats scattered along the waterfront in the town of North East. There are two fish-packing plants, two marine railways, several bulkhead wharves, 11 marinas, and a number of small boathouses along the length of the waterway. Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Dredging contract was completed to remove 36,779 cubic yards if material from the channel at a cost of$322,232. 9. OCEAN CITY HARBOR AND INLET AND SINEPUXENT BAY, MD Location. Ocean City is on a barrier island between Sinepuxent Bay and Atlantic Ocean about 35 miles south of entrance to Delaware Bay. (See U.S. Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart 12211.) Existing project. This provides for an inlet channel 200 feet wide and 10 feet deep through the inlet to the channel in the Isle of Wight Bay, protected on the south side by a stone jetty with a top elevation of 8.8 feet above mean low water and a top width of 18 feet, and on the north side by a stone jetty with a top elevation of 9 feet above mean low water and a top width of generally 20 feet, thence generally 100 feet wide and 6 feet deep to the project harbor; a channel 6 feet deep and 150 feet wide in Sinepuxent Bay from the inlet to Green Point, and thence 100 feet wide in Chincoteague Bay; and for a channel 6 feet deep and 125 feet wide from the inlet channel to a point opposite North Eighth Street in Ocean City, thence 75 feet wide into the Isle of Wight Bay. The modification authorized by the 1954 River and Harbor Act was deauthorized in December 1989. This work included 16- and 14-foot depth channels with widths from 300 to 100 feet from the Atlantic Ocean to the head of the harbor. Depths in the inlet channel and harbor refer to project datum. Depths in the bay channels refer to mean low water. The elevation of mean low water in the bays above mean low water in the ocean at Ocean City varies from about 0.8 foot in the vicinity of the inlet to 1.7 feet at their heads. The mean range of ocean tide is 3.4 feet. The extreme range is from 3 feet below mean low water to about 3.5 feet above mean high water, a total of 9.9 feet. In the bays the mean range of tide varies from approximately 2.5 feet at the inlet to 0.3 foot at their heads. Greater fluctuations are caused by prolonged high winds. Federal cost of new work for the completed project was $1,190,530, exclusive of $500,000 contributed by local interests and exclusive of $3,700,000 for rehabilitating the south jetty. Local cooperation. Fully met except local interests must furnish disposal areas for future maintenance as needed. Terminal facilities. On bay side of Ocean City: two storage basins, for pleasure and small commercial craft, and numerous privately owned pile-and timber piers and bulkhead wharves. At project harbor: a public landing about 1,000 feet long, several privately constructed bulkhead wharves open to the public for transaction of business with the owners, and a boat repair yard with a marine railway capable of handling boats up to about 150 tons. All piers and wharves are accessible by highway. Port facilities have been expanded to include all available space in the Fish Harbor. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Engineering and design work was started for the repairs of the South Jetty. 4-6 BALTIMORE, MD DISTRICT 10. POTOMAC AND ANACOSTIA RIVERS, DC, COLLECTION AND REMOVAL OF DRIFT Location. Project applies to the Potomac and Anacostia Rivers, Washington, DC, and their tributaries. Existing project. Collection and removal of drift from the waters of the Potomac and Anacostia Rivers and their tributaries in the Washington area from the head of tidewater to Mount Vernon, VA. Total length of project, considering both sides of the waterway, is about 50 miles. Local cooperation. None required. Terminal facilities. See Section 22 of this text. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Operations by hired labor consisted of collection and disposal of 47,547 cubic feet of driftwood, ranging from small blocks up to timbers of large dimensions. 11. POTOMAC RIVER AT ALEXANDRIA, VA Location. Alexandria is 3 miles below Washington, DC, on right bank of Potomac River, which flows southeasterly into Chesapeake Bay 105 miles downstream. (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart 12289.) Existing project. Provides for depth of 24 feet in front of Alexandria between the through channel and a line drawn 20 feet outside of established pierhead line. Project area is about 6,700 feet long and averages 300 feet wide. Plane of reference is mean low water. Tidal ranges are: mean, 2.8 feet; irregular, 4.5 feet; and extreme, 10.6 feet. Cost of new work for completed project was $95,215. Existing project was adopted by 1910 River and Harbor Act (H. Doc. 1253, 60th Cong., 2d sess.). Map is the project documents. Local cooperation. None required. Terminal facilities. Alexandria has 3 regular shipping wharves or landings. Terminal and transfer facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Dredging contract was completed to remove 103,637 cubic yards of material from the channel at a cost of $508,8 5 7. 12. POTOMAC RIVER AT MOUNT VERNON, VA Location. Mount Vernon lies in Fairfax County, VA, about 14 1/2 miles below Washington, DC on the right bank of the Potomac River, which flows in a southeasterly direction into the Chesapeake Bay, 93 1/2 miles downstream from Mount Vernon. (See U.S. Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart No. 560.) Existing project. This provides for dredging a channel 200 feet wide and 9 to 10 feet deep, at mean low water, between the main channel of the Potomac River and the Mount Vernon wharf, a distance of about 2,200 feet, with a turning basin of the same depth and a radius of 200 feet at the wharf. Tidal ranges are: mean, 2.2 feet; irregular, 3 feet; and extreme, 9.7 feet. The cost estimate of the project to the Federal Government made in 1888 was $26,000. There is no approved estimate for annual cost of maintenance. Local cooperation. None required. Terminal facilities. There is one privately owned and operated wharf on the Mount Vernon estate at the head of the channel. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Engineering and design was continued in connection with the proposed maintenance dredging. The location of environmentally acceptable placement site is ongoing. 13. POTOMAC RIVER BELOW WASHINGTON, DC Location. Potomac River is formed 21 miles below Cumberland, MD, and flows southeasterly about 285 miles and enters Chesapeake Bay, about 80 miles from Atlantic Ocean. Washington, DC is 108 miles upstream of mouth, and head of tidewater is at mile 117. (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Charts No., 12233, 12286, 12287, 12288, and 12289.) Existing project. Provides for a channel 24 feet deep and 200 feet wide between the mouth of the river and Giesboro Point at Washington, DC--a distance of 108 miles. Plane of reference is mean low water. Tidal ranges are: mean, 1.3 feet at mouth, 2.9 feet at Washington; irregular, 2 feet at mouth, 4.5 feet at Washington; extreme, about 6 feet at mouth, 10.7 feet at Washington. Federal cost of new work for the completed project was $153,836. Local cooperation. None required. Terminal facilities. In general, the improvement is a main river channel, and terminal facilities are only served where the channel runs close to either bank of river. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Dredging contract was completed to remove 200,131 cubic yards of material from the Hunting Creek Channel and Mattawoman Channel at a cost of$1,358,111. 14. PREVENTION OF OBSTRUCTIONS AND INJURIOUS DEPOSITS, MD Location. Project applies to tidal waters of the harbor of Baltimore and its adjacent and tributary waters and to all tidal waters of Chesapeake Bay and in Maryland. Existing project. Patrol and inspection throughout the project location to detect violations of sections 13 and 15 of the River and Harbor Act of March 3, 1899 and to investigate obstructions to navigation pursuant to Federal regulations (33 CFR 209.109). Local cooperation. None required. 4-7 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 2000 Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Operations, by Supervisor of Harbor of Baltimore included inspections of approximately 81 Federal navigation channels within the project location to insure channels are not obstructed to general navigation by debris, sunken vessels/wrecks, and fishing appurtenances. There were 11 investigations of obstructions or sunken vessels/ wrecks. 15. SHALLOW CREEK, BALTIMORE, MD Location. Shallow Creek is a tidal water tributary of the Chesapeake Bay and is located directly adjacent to Fort Howard Veteran's Hospital in southeast Baltimore County, approximately 10 miles southeast of Baltimore, Maryland. (see NOAA Chart No. 12278). Existing Project. Provides for a channel 5 feet deep and 50 feet wide from that depth in the Patapsco River through the mouth of Shallow Creek and with a turning basis 100 feet long, 100 feet wide, and 5 feet deep in Shallow Creek. It includes a spur channel, with the width varying between 40 feet and 30 feet, and a depth of 4 feet from the existing Federal channel into the northern reach of the creek. Total project length is approximately 5,940 feet. Local cooperation. Fully complied with except local interests are required to provide or pay to the Government the full cost of providing dredged material disposal areas for future maintenance as needed. For the new spur channel the local sponsor is responsible for sharing the cost of the placement site with the Government. Terminal facilities. There are a number of small wharves and landings within the creek, all privately owned. The facilities are considered adequate for present commerce. Operation and results during fiscal year. New Work: Construction of the new spur channel and maintenance dredging of the existing Federal project were completed in March 2000. The total project was $346,000. A total of 20,700 cubic yards of material was removed. In June 2000, 4000 submerged aquatic vegetation plants were placed in the creek as part of the project mitigation plan. The cost for mitigation planting was $6,400. 16. TOLCHESTER CHANNEL S-TURN, MD Location. The Tolchester Channel is located along the eastern side of the upper Chesapeake Bay, near Tolchester Beach, Kent County, Maryland (see National Ocean Survey Chart 12278). Existing Project. The Tolchester Channel is a uniform channel 35 feet deep, 600 feet wide with widening at the bends, and 7 miles long that follows the naturally deeper water along the eastern side of the upper Chesapeake Bay. The mean range of tide is 1.2 feet. Depths refer to mean lower low water. The project provides for constructing a new straight channel 35 feet deep, 600 feet wide, and 2 miles long to replace the existing the Tolchester Channel S-Turn, which has several turns within a 3-mile long reach of channel. Estimated cost of new work is $13,919,300. Local cooperation. Section 101 of the River and Harbor Act of 1958, PL 85-500, 3 July 1958 requires locals interests to: (1) furnish without costs to the United States all lands, easements, rights-of-way, and dredged material ,placement areas necessary for construction and subsequent maintenance, when and as required; (2) hold and save the United States free from damages due to construction and maintenance of the project; and (3) provide and maintain all necessary alterations in sewer, water supply, drainage, and other utilities. Terminal faciliites. Terminal facilities are described under the Baltimore Harbor & Channels, MD and VA, Federal navigation project. Operations and results during fiscal year. New Work: Engineering and design activities and preparation of the Environmental Assessment continued for straightening the Tolchester Channel S-Turn. 17. . TWITCH COVE AND BIG THOROFARE, MD Location. A tidal waterway about 4 miles long traversing Smith Island, MD, southeasterly from Chesapeake Bay on the west to Tangier Sound on the east. (See U.S. Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart 1224.) Existing project. A channel 7 feet deep at mean low water and 60-feet wide from Twitch Cove on Tangier Sound through Big Thorofare, thence through canal at Ewell, MD, thence through Levering Creek and Big Thorofare to vicinity of Swan Point, thence of same depth and 100 feet wide through offshore bar to deep water in Chesapeake Bay, with twin stone jetties at entrance, north jetty is about 2,080 feet long, and south jetty about 1,800 feet long; and anchorage basin 7 feet deep, 100 feet wide, and 700 feet long connecting with west side of existing project channel at Ewell; extension of existing project channel in Levering Creek, 6 feet deep, 60 feet wide, and 1,000 feet long; and a channel 4 feet deep and 25 feet around point between Big Thorofare and Tylers River. Mean range of tide is 1.7 feet, and extreme tidal range is 3 feet. Federal cost of new work for completed project was $193,175. Local cooperation. Fully complied with, except that local interests are to furnish placement sites for future maintenance as needed. Terminal facilities. Numerous privately owned pileand- timber wharves and bulkheads at Ewell are open to the public for business transactions with the owners. A county wharf is also at west end of town. Five crab houses are on Levering Creek, and one oyster house on project waterway west of Town of Ewell. 4-8 BALTIMORE, MD DISTRICT Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Repairs to the twin jetties was completed at the cost of$1,113,547. 18. WASHINGTON HARBOR, DC Location. Within the District of Columbia at junction of the Anacostia River with the Potomac River which flows southeasterly 108 miles to the Chesapeake Bay. It is southerly 202 miles by water from Baltimore, MD, and northerly 195 miles from Norfolk, VA. (See U.S. Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart 12289.) Existing projects. The Washington Harbor project provides for a channel in the Potomac River from Giesboro Point to Key Bridge, a second channel from Giesboro Point to the end of Washington Channel, and a third channel from the mouth of the Anacostia River to the foot of 15th Street, SE, with turning basins opposite the Naval Weapons Plant (800 feet wide 2,400 feet long) and at the head of the Anacostia Channel (400 feet square). Channel dimensions are 24 feet deep and 400 feet wide except upstream from Anacostia Channel Bridge where the width is reduced to 200 feet and from Giesboro Point to a point 3,000 feet downstream of Arlington Memorial Bridge and above Easby Point where channel dimensions are 20 feet deep and 200 feet wide. Channel lengths including turning basins are: Virginia Channel, 5,000 feet; Washington Channel, 10,000 feet; and Anacostia River, 15,000 feet; and operations and maintenance of the inlet gates and lock and the outlet gates of the Tidal Basin constructed under a previous project to flush Washington Channel. Plane of reference is low-water datum which is .35 foot below mean low tide as observed from 1932 to 1942. Tidal ranges are: mean, 2.9 feet; irregular, 4.5 feet; and extreme, 10.7 feet. Federal cost of new work for the completed project was $162,006. Local cooperation. None required. Terminal facilities. There are four wharves generally of bulkhead type on Virginia Channel that are privately owned and not open to the public except by special arrangement. On Washington Channel there are four piers under jurisdiction of District of Columbia, two of which are open to the public and one open to the public by special arrangement. In Anacostia River there are four privately owned piers and eight government piers and slips. None of the piers is open to the public except by special arrangement. Terminal facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: The tidal basin gates were inspected and maintained by hired labor. 19. WICOMICO RIVER, MD Location. Wicomico River has its source in northern part ofWicomico County, MD, and flows generally southwardly emptying into Monie Bay, a tributary of Tangier Sound on the east side of Chesapeake Bay about 85 miles southeast of Baltimore. Webster Cove is the site of an improved small-boat harbor on southeast bank of Wicomico River about 3 miles above the mouth. (See U.S. Coast and Geodetic Survey Charts 567 and 1224.) Existing project. Channel 14 feet deep and 150 feet wide from Chesapeake Bay to Salisbury, about 37 miles long, including about 12 miles from the mouth of river to Chesapeake Bay; 14 feet deep in channels and turning basins in north and south prongs with channel widths of 100 feet, and a channel 6 feet deep and 60 feet wide extending from 6-foot contour in Wicomico River to and including a basin in Webster Cove of the same depth, 100 feet wide and 400 feet long; and extension of basin 200 feet long and 100 feet wide on each side. Plane of reference is mean low water. Mean range of tide is about 3 feet, and extreme tidal range is 4.4 feet . Cost of new work for the completed project was $421,609, exclusive of amounts expended on the previous project. Local cooperation. Fully met, except that local interests are to furnish disposal areas for future maintenance as needed and hold the United States free from such damages as may occur to public or leased oyster beds. Terminal facilities. Present waterfront at Salisbury consists of pile-and-timber bulkheads with earthfills. Some wharves have warehouses and factories with mechanical freight-handling facilities and rail sidings. All terminals are privately owned. A shipyard, with two marine railways with capacities of 1,200 and 500 tons, respectively, is on right bank of river below prongs. Areas for development of new terminals on north prong are limited. Areas for considerable expansion of terminal facilities are available on main river. There is a pile-and -timber wharf about 4 miles above the mouth of river at Mount Vernon. A wharf of similar construction is at White Haven. There is a county wharf at head of basin in Webster Cove, a pile-and-timber pier at oyster house on southwest side of basin, a T-shaped pile-and-timber pier at cafe on southwest side of basin and several small timber piers on walkways that local interests constructed around the basin. Fueling facilities are available for construction of additional facilities when required. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Dredging contract was started to remove 76,200 cubic yards at the cost of $944,194. Completion of the project is anticipated in FY 2001. 20. RECONNAISSANCE AND CONDITION SURVEYS (See Table 4-H at end of chapter.) 21. NAVIGATION WORK UNDER SPECIALAUTHIORIZATION Fiscal year cost were $30,940 for Coan River, VA; $22,179 for Rockhold Creek, MD; $9,985 for Section 107 4-9 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 2000 Coordination; $7,431 for Tedious Creek, and $24,759 for Webster's Cove, Somerset County, MD. Non-Federal contributed costs for the fiscal year were $17,349 for Rockhold Creek. SHORE PROTECTION 22. SHORE PROTECTION WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION Shore Protection pursuant to Sec. 103 of Public Law 727, as amended (preauthorization). None. 23. ASSATEAGUE ISLAND, MD Location. The Town of Ocean City and adjacent areas of Worcester County comprise an area of 625 square miles including Assateague Island, Ocean City Inlet, and Chincoteague, Sinepuxent, Assawoman, and Isle of Wight Bays on the Eastern Shore of Maryland. Adjacent to Ocean City is the Assateague Island National Seashore and State Park. Existing project. The project involves the short-term and long-term restoration of Assateague Island. The short-term restoration plan includes dredging of approximately 1.4 million cubic yards from Great Gull Bank and placing it on Assateague Island in the area between 1.6 miles and 7.2 miles south of the south jetty. The beach will be widened varying distances and a low storm berm will be constructed to elevation 3.3 meters. The longterm portion of the project consists of the mobile bypassing of 190,000 cubic yards of sand around the inlet. Both the short-term and long-term projects include monitoring components. The project area is composed of 4.7 miles of National Park Service and 0.9 miles of State of Maryland land. Local cooperation. The sponsor for the project is the National Park Service who administers the Assateague Island National Seashore. The National Park Service will provide lands, easements and rights-of-way for the initial construction work. Operations and results during fiscal year. Negotiations continued between the Corps and the National Park Service on how the long-term restoration costs will be shared. 24. ATLANTIC COAST OF MARYLAND Location. The project is located on Fenwick Island at Ocean City, MD, which is about 35 milessouth of the entrance to Delaware Bay. (See U.S. Coast and Geodetic Survey Charts 1220.) Existing project. The authorized project provides for a steel sheetpile bulkhead along the oceanward edge of the boardwalk from about 4th Street to 27th Street and a sand dune from 27th Street to about 0.3 mile across the Delaware line. The bulkhead is fronted by a 165-foot wide beach, and the dune is fronted by a 100-foot wide beach. The project also provides for periodic nourishment over the 50-year project life. The current estimated total project cost is $500,000,000 (including a future inflation allowance through the project completion) which includes $44,881,000 for initial construction and $455,119,000 for periodic nourishment. Local cooperation. The State of Maryland is the project sponsor and the Local Cooperation Agreement was executed March 30, 1990. The sponsor is required to: provide lands, easements, and rights-of-way; modify or relocate buildings, utilities, roads, bridges and other facilities; pay 35% of the first costs and 47% of periodic nourishment costs; and bear all costs of operation maintenance, replacement and major rehabilitation of storm damage reduction facilities. To date the sponsor has fully met these requirements. Operations and results during fiscal year. New Work: Beach monitoring continued throughout the fiscal year. FLOOD CONTROL 25. BROAD TOP REGION, PA Location. The project is located in South Central Pennsylvania, and includes portions of Bedford, Fulton, and Huntingdon Counties. (See Geological Survey Quadrangle sheets Saltillo, PA, and Saxton, PA.) Existing project. Section 304 of the water resources development Act of 1992, as amended provides for a pilot project to develop and carry out a watershed reclamation and protection, and wetlands creation and restoration project using innovative reclamation technologies for the purposes of restoring, maintenance and protecting surface and ground water, including municipal water supplies, from adverse impacts related to acid mine draining and other runoff. A Master Plan, prepared at a cost of $400,000 identified many potential projects in the Broad Top Region. The Wood-Broad Top-Wells Water Supply and Environmental Restoration project was developed as the initial pilot project. The project consists of two components-- replacement and upgrade of the Water Supply System for the villages of Wood and Robertsdale and the restoration of abandoned mine sites at Rocky Ridge South and Defiance North. The current estimated total project cost is $6,975,000, which includes a future inflation allowance through project completion. Federal funds allocated for the project are $5,000,000. Local cooperation. The Wood-Broad Top-Wells Joint Municipal Authority is the non-Federal sponsor for the project. The local sponsor is required to provide 25% of the cost of the project, including lands, easements, rights-of-way, and relocations, and bear all costs of 4-10 BALTIMORE, MD DISTRICT operation, maintenance, replacement, repair and rehabilitation of the project after construction. Operations and results during fiscal year. New Work: Sponsor completed construction of water distribution system main lines with installation of meters and hookups completed in April 2000. Bureau of Abandoned Mine Reclamation construction for Defiance North continues. Potential for additional projects continued to be investigated. 26. CUMBERLAND, MD, AND RIDGELEY, WV Location. On the North Branch of the Potomac River, 21 miles upstream from its junctoin with the South Branch of the Potomac River and 197 miles upstream from Washington, DC. The Chesapeake and Ohio (C&O) Canal stretches 184.5 miles along the Potomac River from the District of Columbia to its terminus in Cumberland, MD, Allegany County. (See Geological Survey Quadrangles, Frostburg and Flintstone, MD, WV, and PA.) Existing project. Channel improvements on the North Branch of Potomac River from the Western Maryland Railway bridge in South Cumberland upstream to the mouth of Wills Creek, with levees and fill along the left bank and levees along the right bank from downstream corporate limits of Ridgeley, WV, to a point about 150 feet above Johnson Street Bridge; channel improvements along Wills Creek from its mouth upstream to a point in the Narrows about 500 feet upstream from the highway bridge on U.S. Highway 40; levee and flood wall in West Cumberland, MD, on the left bank of the North Branch of the Potomac River from the mouth of Wills Creek upstream to Kelly Boulevard; levee and flood wall in Ridgeley, WV, on the right bank of the North Branch of the Potomac River from Carpenter Avenue upstream to Patapsco Street near the upstream corporate limits of Ridgeley, WV; interior drainage facilities in Cumberland and West Cumberland, MD, and Ridgeley, WV; removal of the Chesapeake and Ohio Canal dam and construction of a new industrial dam on the North Branch of the Potomac River immediately above mouth of Wills Creek; and alteration and reconstruction of highway and railroad bridges. Federal cost of new work for the completed project is $15,633,970, which includes $49,998 emergency relief funds and is exclusive of $197,513 public works acceleration ftmds. Estimated cost to local interests is $2,900,000 of which $1,402,001 is contributed funds and $1,497,999 is for lands and damages. Section 580 of WRDA 99 authorizes the Secretary of the Army to undertake "restoration of the historic Chesapeake and Ohio Canal substantially in accordance with the Chesapeake and Ohio Canal National Historic Park".... The plan envisioned is to re-build and rewater 1.1 miles of the historic C&O Canal terminus at Cumberland. The turning basin was filled in by the Corps in the 1950's as part of the Cumberland, MD-Ridgeley, WV Flood Protection Project. The current estimated total project cost is $15,000,000. Local cooperation. Fully met for the completed project. The City of Cumberland is the non-Federal sponsor for the new work. The local sponsor is required to provide 35% of the cost of the project, including lands, easements, rights-of-way, and relocations. In-kind services are permitted to count towards the sponsors's share to include those incurred prior to a signed project cooperation agreement. The National Park Service (NPS) is responsible for operation and maintenance. Operations and results during fiscal year. New Work: Rewatering design is 50 percent complete and a value engineering study was completed. Maintenance: Normal operation and maintenance of the project continued. 27. JENNINGS RANDOLPH LAKE, MD AND WV Location. Project is located on the North Branch Potomac River on the state line between Garrett County, MD, and Mineral County, WV. The damsite is located approximately 7.9 miles upstream from the confluence with Savage River at Bloomington, MD. It is also about 5 air miles southwest of the tritowns of Luke and Westernport, MD and Piedmont, WV. (See Geologial Survey quadrangle sheets, Kitzmiller and Westernport, MD.) Existing project. The improvement consists of a rolled earth and rock fill dam with an impervious core and an 800-foot long dike on the left bank. Top of dam is 296 feet above streamed with a total length of 2,130 feet. When filled to spillway crest, the reservoir will extend about 6.6 miles upstream and inundate 965 acres. Flood control storage of 36,200 acre-feet is provided. Storage available for low flow augmentation for water supply and water quality improvement is 92,000 acre-feet. The reservoir controls a drainage area of 263 square miles. Recreation facilities are provided for picnicking, camping and boating. Final project cost is $176,325,300. Local cooperation. See page 4-15 of the 1977 Annual Report for requirements. A water supply contract between the Federal Government and the Washington Suburban Sanitary Commission in concert with the Fairfax County Water Authority, VA and the District of Columbia was executed for repayment of all water supply costs. The first of 50 annual payments began in July 1981. Federally approved water quality standards put into effect by Maryland, Virginia, West Virginia, and the District of Columbia are considered satisfactory assurances of intent to control pollution. Satisfactory assurances have been received from Maryland, West Virginia, and Virginia that they will protect downstream channels from encroachment that would adversely affect operation of the project. Local interests operate a white water access area below the dam. 4-11 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 2000 The State of Maryland has constructed a recreation area on the Maryland side of the lake. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Normal operation and maintenance of the project continued. 28. LACKAWANNA RIVER BASIN, PA Flood Control Act of 1962 authorized construction of Aylesworth Creek Lake, Fall Brook Lake, and local protection works on Lackawanna River at Scranton, PA, substantially as recommended by the Chief of Engineers (S. Doc. 141, 87th Cong., 2d Sess.). The Basin includes an area of 346 square miles in northeastern Pennsylvania. 28A. AYLESWORTH CREEK LAKE, PA Location. Project is located in Lackawanna County on Aylesworth Creek about one mile above its confluence with the Lackawanna River, near the community of East Jermyn, PA. Existing project. Provides for an earthfill dam with a maximum height of 90 feet above streambed and a top length of 1,200 feet. The spillway located adjacent to the left abutment is an open cut channel 80 feet wide with a concrete sill. The outlet works consist of a 3-foot diameter uncontrolled conduit. Project controls a drainage area of 6.2 square miles and provides flood control storage of 1,700 acre-feet equivalent to 5.1 inches of runoff from the drainage areas. The lake will extend about 4,600 feet and inundate 87acres when filled to spillway crest. Recreation facilities constructed by local interests include a bathing beach, bathhouse, and picnic area. Federal cost of new work was $2,268,200 of which $2,153,559 was for construction and $114,641 for lands and damages. In addition $52,200 Federal and $52,200 non-Federal funds were expended for construction of bathhouse facilities under the recreation facilities for completed projects program. Local cooperation. None required. The Aylesworth Creek Reservoir ParkAuthority, representing the Boroughs ofArchbald and Jermyn, operate and maintain limited day use facilities including a small beach. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Normal operation and maintenance of the project continued. 29. LOCK HAVEN, PA Location. On the West Branch Susquehanna River in the City of Lock Haven, PA, about 194 miles above the mouth of the Susquehanna River in Clinton County, PA. (See Geological Survey Quadrangle sheets, Lock Haven and Mile Hall, PA.) Existing project. Provides for 36,600 feet of levee and 1,000 feet of concrete floodwall along the West Branch and Bald Eagle Creek, five closure structures, five ponding areas, a sanitary pumping station, 35 gravity type drainage structures, necessary road and utility relocations, nonstructural measures for Woodward and Allison Townships, and minor recreation facilities. Total project cost was $62,166,936. Local cooperation. The Lock Haven Area Flood Protection Authority, a municipal authority created by the City of Lock Haven and Woodward Township, is the sponsor for the project. The Local Cooperation Agreement was signed March 14, 1991. The local sponsor is required to: provide lands, easements, rights-of-way; modify or relocated buildings, utilities, roads, bridges, and other facilities, pay 5% of structural flood control costs during construction; pay 50% of separable recreation costs; and bear all operation maintenance and replacement costs for the project after construction. To date the sponsor has fully met these requirements. Operations and results during fiscal year. Project was fiscally closed out. 30. MOOREFIELD, WV Location. Moorefield, WV, is located at the junction of the South Fork (Moorefield River) of the South Branch of the Potomac River, 57 miles upstream from the mouth of the South Branch of the Potomac River, and 233 miles upstream from Washington, DC. (See Geological Survey Quadrangle sheets, Moorefield, WV). Existing project. Provides for a flood warning system, 21,600 feet of earth levee, 1,360 linear feet of floodwall, highway bridge replacement of one span of a railroad bridge, environmental mitigation, and appurtenant project features such as ramps, closures, riprap, relocations, and ponding areas for local drainage. The current estimated total project cost is $26,925,000 which includes a future inflation allowance through project completion. Project cooperation. The Town of Moorefield is the sponsor for the project. The Project Cooperation Agreement was signed May 12, 1994. The local sponsor is required to: provide lands, easements, rights-of-way; modify or relocate buildings, utilities, roads, bridges, and other facilities; pay 5% of the cost allocated to flood control; and bear all costs of operations, maintenance and replacement of flood control; and bear all costs of operation, maintenance and replacement of flood control facilities after construction. (The cash contribution is deemed satisfied in consideration of the transfer of Grandview State Park to the Federal Government.) The Water Resources Development Act of 1999 waived the non-Federal requirement to pay its unpaid balance on the project. Operations and results during fiscal year. New Work: Project close-out activities continued during the fiscal year. 4-12 BALTIMORE, MD DISTRICT 31. NEABSCO CREEK, VA Location. Neabsco Creek is located in Woodbridge, Prince William County, Virginia. A tidal estuary approximately three miles long, enters the west side of the Potomac River about 83 miles above its mouth and about 27 miles south of Washington, D.C. (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart 560.) Existing project. Silt and debris build-up has dammed the lower reach of Neabsco Creek between US Route 1 and its confluence with the Potomac River. The new hydraulic flow regime is inefficient and leads to frequent flooding of US Route I and local businesses. Any project constructed in the area would have the intent of reopening an efficient stream channel to reduce flood frequency upstream. This area was studied in 1995 under Section 208 of the Flood Control Act of 1954 and was found to lack ecomonic justification. Section 576 of the Water Resources Development Act of 1996 directed the Secretary of the Army to carry out a project for flood control in the Neabsco Creek Watershed, Prince William County, Virginia, at an estimated cost of $1,500,000. Local cooperation. The sponsor for the project is the Board of County Supervisors of Prince William County which will be required to provide all lands, easements, rights-of-way and relocations and contribute a total of 25 percent of project costs. Operations and results during fiscal year. Engineering and design continued including award of a contract for environmental and technical work. 32. LACKAWANNA RIVER, OLYPIIANT, PA Location. The project is located along the Lackawanna River in the northeastern portion of the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania in Lackawanna County. (See Geological Survey Quandrangle sheets, Olyphant, PA.) Existing project. Provides for 3,800 feet of earth levee, 1,100 feet of concrete floodwall, a closure structure, interior drainage facilities, 1,500 feet of gabion slope protection and associated cultural mitigation and environmental restoration. The current estimated total project cost is $15,400,000 which includes a future inflation allowance through project completion. Local cooperation. The Borough of Olyphant is the sponsor for the project. The local sponsor is required to: provide lands, easements, and rights-of-way; modify or relocated buildings, utilities, roads, bridges, and other facilities; pay 5% of the costs allocated to flood control; and bear all costs of operation, maintenance, and replacement of flood control facilities after construction. Operations and results during fiscal year. New Work: The Borough of Olyphant continued real estate acquisitions. Engineering and design continued. The overall project is scheduled for completion in November 2002. 33. DICKSON CITY, (OLYPHANT), PA Location. Dickson City is located on the Lackawanna River across from the Borough of Olyphant. (See Geological Survey Quadrangle sheets, Olyphant, PA.) Existing project. The Energy and Water Development Appropriations Act of 1998 provided I million for the Corps to undertake activities leading to construction of flood control measures at Dickson City with the same levels of protection (100-year) as provided to Olyphant, PA. Local cooperation. Dickson City is the sponsor for the project. The sponsor is required to: provide lands, easements and rights-of-way; modify or relocate buildings, utilities, roads, bridges and other facilities; pay a minimum of 5% of the cost allocated to flood control; and bear all costs of operation, maintenance, and replacement of flood control facilities after construction. Operations and results during fiscal year. New Work: Engineering and design work continued to determine if there is federal interest in a flood control project at Dickson City. 34. PETERSBURG, WV Location. On the South Branch of the Potomac River in eastern Grant County, WV. (See Geological Survey Quandrangle sheets, Petersburg, East, WV; Petersburg, West, WV; Maysville, WV; and Rig. WV.). Existing project. Provides for 18,460 feet of levee and 900 feet of concrete floodwall along the South Branch, raising of U.S. Route 220 highway bridge, 61,000 cubic yards of channel excavation, ramps, closures, slope protection, relocations, ponding areas for interior drainage, and flood warning system improvements. The current estimated total project cost is $25,251,000 which includes a future inflation allowance through project completion. Local cooperation. Grant County is the sponsor for the project. The Project Cooperation Agreement was signed July 13, 1993. The local sponsor is required to: provide lands, easements, rights-of-way, modify or relocate buildings, utilities, roads, bridges, and other facilities; pay 5% of the cost allocated to flood control; and bear all costs of operation, maintenance and replacement of flood control facilities after construction. (The cash contribution is deemed satisfied in consideration of the transfer of Grandview State Park to the Federal Government.) Operations and results during fiscal year. New Work: Project close-out activities were completed. 35. RAYSTOWN LAKE, RAYSTOWN BRANCH, JUNIATA RIVER, PA Location. Dam site is on Raystown Branch, about 5.5 miles upstream from its confluence with Juniata River. 4-13 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 2000 Project is about 10 miles south of Huntingdon, PA. (See Geological Survey Quadrangle sheets, Huntingdon, Mt. Union, Broad Top and Everett, PA.) Existing project. The rock and earthfill dam rises 225 feet above streambed with a gated concrete spillway and auxiliary spillway in the right abutment. The reservoir has a storage capacity of 762,000 acre-feet, of which 248,000 acre-feet are for flood control, 476,000 acre-feet for recreation and water quality control, and the balance for sediment reserve. At full flood control pool elevation, the reservoir would inundate 10,800 acres and extend 34 miles upstream. Recreation facilities are provided for boating, fishing, camping, swimming, hunting, hiking, and picnicking. Federal cost for new work was $77,408,700 of which $46,120,931 was for construction and $31,287,769 was for lands and damages including relocations. Construction of a private hydroelectric plant at Raystown Lake was completed May 1988. Local cooperation. None required. Operations and results duriing fiscal year. Maintenance: Normal operation and maintenance of the project continued. Senoia (Marker 8) campground was completed in April 2000. Contract was awarded to design and construct a floating breakwater at the entrance to Seven Points Harbor. 36. LACKAWANNA RIVER, SCRANTON, PA Location. The project is located along the Lackawanna River in the northeastern portion of the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania in Lackawanna County. (See Geological Survey Quadrangle sheets, Scranton, PA.) Existing project. The Albright Ave. portion of the project provides for 6,800 feet of earth levee, 700 feet of concrete floodwall, 3 closure structures, interior drainage facilities, 2,700 feet ofgabion slope protection, an improved flood warning system, removal of a railroad bridge, access ramps, and associated cultural mitigation. The Energy and Water Development Appropriations Act of 1999 provided funding to construct 100-year level flood protection for two additional communities: the Green Ridge Section and the Plot neighborhood. The current estimated total project cost is $55,459,000 which includes $20,934,000 for the Albright Ave. portion, $14,672,000 for the Plot portion and $19,853,000 for the Green Ridge portion of the project. Local cooperation. The City of Scranton is the sponsor for the project. The local sponsor is required to: provide lands, easements and rights-of-way; modify or relocate buildings, utilities, roads, bridges, and other facilities; pay a minimum of 5% of the cost allocated to flood control; and bear all costs of operation, maintenance, and replacement of flood control facilities after construction. Operations and results during fiscal year. New Work: Engineering and design by the Corps and real estate acquisition by the local sponsor continued on the Albright Ave. portion of the project. A decision document was approved on the Plot and Green Ridge portions of the project. The Albright Ave. portion of the project is scheduled for completion in November 2002. The overall project is scheduled to be completed in September 2006. 37. WILLIAMSPORT, PAHAGERMAN'S FLUME Location. Williamsport, the county seat of Lycoming County, PA, is located on the left bank of the West Branch of the Susquehanna River, 40 miles above its mouth. (See U.S. Geological Survey Quadrangle sheets, "Trout Run and Williamsport, PA.") Existing project. The plan of improvement provides for the construction of a system of levees and concrete floodwalls and appurtenant structures, consisting of the following features: about 26,200 feet of earth levee and 3,060 feet of concrete floodwall along the left bank of the West Branch of the Susquehanna River, extending from high ground near Sheridan Street, generally parallel to and on the right bank of Millers Run to the Susquehanna thence River, extending upstream along the left bank of the river and Lycoming Creek; about 29,900 feet of earth levee and 860 feet of concrete floodwall along the left bank of the West Branch of the Susquehanna River, extending from high ground and Bottle Run generally parallel to and on the right bank of Lycoming Creek to the Susquehanna River, thence extending upstream along the left bank of the river to Carothers Lane, thence to high ground along the Pennsylvania Railroad; about 11,400 feet of earth levee and 880 feet of concrete floodwall along the right bank of the West Branch of the Susquehanna River in South Williamsport, extending from high ground at Central Avenue and Charles Street, along Charles Street to the river, thence upstream along the river to high ground at Maynard Street; a reinforced concrete pressure culvert about 1,390 feet along and a flume 470 feet along to provide for control of Hagerman's Run; 10 pumping stations for the disposal of interior drainage; and appurtenant closure and drainage structures. The improvement provides protection for the City of Williamsport and the Borough of South Williamsport and part of Old Lycoming Township against a flood discharge equal to the maximum flood of record, which occurred in March 1936. The Federal costs of new work for the completed project are $12,964,893, which includes $1,887 emergency relief funds. The estimated local cost of lands and damages and utility relocations, revised in 1955, is $2,158,500. The Energy and Water Deveolopment Appropriations Act of 1998 directed the Corps to use $225,000 to construct necessary repairs to the flume and conduit for flood control 4-14 BALTIMORE, MD DISTRICT at the Hagerman's Run, Williamsport, Pennsylvania flood control project. Local cooperation. Fully complied with on the completed work. Operations and results during fiscal year. Engineering and design and local coordination continued on the repairs necessary to the flume and conduit for flood control at Hagerman's Run. 38. WEST VIRGINIA AND PENNSYLVANIA FLOOD CONTROL Location. The eight projects within the Baltimore District are located in the City of Altoona, Logan Township and Allegheny Township; Carbon Township; Coalmont Borough; Rock Hill Furnace Borough; the Borough of Everett; Bedford County; Newton Hamilton Borough; and Huntingdon Borough in Pennsylvania. Existing project. Section 581 of the Water Resources Development Act of 1996, as amended, provides for design and construction of structural and non-structual flood control, streambank protection, stormwater management and channel clearing and modificaton measures in the Lower Allegheny and Lower Monongahela (Pittsburgh District) and West Branch Susquehanna River and Juniata River basins, Pennsylvania at a level of production that is sufficient to prevent any future losses to communities in the basins from flooding such as occurred in January 1996, but no less than a 100-year level of flood protection with respect to measures that incorporate levees or floodwalls. The current estimated total project cost is $16,532,000 which includes a future inflation allowance through project completion. Local cooperation. Local sponsors identified to date include Everett and Logan Township/Altoona. The sponsors are required to: provide lands, easement, and rights-of-way; modify or relocate buildings, utilities, roads, bridges, and other facilities; provide cash contributions such that their total share including lands and relocations is a minimum of 25 percent; and bear all costs of operation and maintenance. Operations and results during fiscal year. New Work: Negotiations were continued for the design phase study for Logan Township/Altoona (Mill Run) project, and sponsor coordination was conducted for the Everett project. Coordination continued to identify sponsors for six other projects. 39. SOUTHIERN NEW YORK FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS Authorized plan provides for construction of reservoirs and related flood control works for protections are located in the upper watershed of the Susquehanna River to and including the Chemung River. 39A. ADDISON, NY Location. At confluence of Tuscarora Creek and Canisteo River in the City ofAddison, NY. (See Geological Survey map for Addison, NY.) Existing project. Provides for construction of about 3,100 feet of earth levee and 700 feet of concrete flood wall on the right bank of the Canisteo River, extending from high ground on Steuben Street near the Baltimore & Ohio Railroad to the mouth of Tuscarora Creek; removal of existing dam, mill, and raceway from the channel; construction of about 2,200 feet of earth levee on the left bank of Tuscarora Creek, extending from Tuscarora Street to Canisteo River; construction of 4,600 feet of earth levee on the right bank of Tuscarora Creek, extending from high ground at the southwest edge of the village to high ground at the southeast edge of the village; and appurtenant drainage structures. Local cooperation. Fully met. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Normal operation and maintenance of the project continued. 39B. ALMOND LAKE, NY Location. Dam is located two miles upstream from Hornell, NY, on Canacadea Creek, a tributary of the Canisteo River. (See Geological Survey map for Hornell, NY) Existing project. The dam is an earthfill structure, 1,260 feet long rising 90 feet above the streambed, with a concrete spillway and a gated outlet conduit in the left abutment. The outlet works consist of three 5-foot by 10-foot service gates and three emergency gates of the same size. The reservoir has a storage capacity of 14,640 acre-feet at spillway crest. The project controls a drainage area of 56 square miles, 36 percent of the watershed of the Canisteo River upstream from Hornell, NY. Recreation facilities include a boat-launching ramp and dock, bathing beach, picnic area, and tent and trailer camping area. Local cooperation. None required. Local interests have developed recreational facilities at the lake in conjunction with the Federal Government. These facilities are operated and maintained by the Steuben County Board of Supervisors. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Normal operation and maintenance of the project continued. 39C. ARKPORT DAM, NY Location. Dam is located five miles upstream from Hornell, NY, on the Canisteo River, a tributary of the Chemung River which flows into the Susquehanna River. (See Geological Survey map for Arkport, NY.) Existing project. The dam is an earthfill structure, 1,200 feet long, exclusive of spillway, rises 113 feet above the 4-15 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 2000 streambed, with a concrete spillway and an ungated outlet in the right abutment. The outlet structure consists of an 8-foot diameter reinforced concrete lined conduit, 660 feet long. A cast iron nozzle placed in the lower end of the conduit, reducing the outlet size to 4 feet 4 inches. The reservoir has a storage capacity of 7,950 acre-feet at spillway crest. The project controls a drainage area of 31 square miles, 20 percent of the watershed of the Canisteo River upstream from Hornell. Local cooperation. None required. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Normal operation and maintenance of the project continued. 39D. AVOCA, NY Location. On the Cohocton River at the Village of Avoca, NY, about 30 miles Upstream from the confluence of the Cohocton and Chemung Rivers. (See Geological Survey map for Avoca, NY.) Existing project. Provides for improvement and realignment of about 8,300 feet of Cohocton River channel, extending from above the Erie Railroad to below the junction of Main Street and U.S. Highway 15; construction of about 8,500 feet of earth levee on left bank of the Cohocton River, extending from high ground above Alexander Avenue to about 1,300 feet below the junction of Main Street and U.S. Highway 15; and 4,500 feet of earth levee on the right bank of Salmon Creek, extending from high ground above Alexander Avenue to the Erie Railroad; a new highway bridge for U.S. Highway 15 over Cohocton River, raising of the Erie Railroad bridge 4 feet; and appurtenant drainage structures. Local cooperation. Fully met. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Normal operation and maintenance of the project continued. 39E. BINGHAMTON, NY Location. At the confluence of the Chenango and Susquehanna Rivers in the City of Binghamton, NY. (See Geological Survey map for Binghamton, NY.) Existing project. Provides for construction of earth levees, concrete flood walls, and appurtenant drainage structures, consisting of about 850 feet of channel excavation and about 1,375 feet of earth levee along Phelps Creek, Town of Port Dickinson; new concrete wall on the right bank of the Chenango River, extending downstream from high ground near the city limits to an existing flood wall below DeForest Street, a distance of about 520 feet; about 150 feet of concrete wall just below Cutler Dam; about 180 feet of concrete wall at the pumphouse near McDonald Avenue; raising existing earth levees on the right bank of Chenango River, extending from Cutler Dam downstream for about 1,220 feet; about 2,915 feet of earth levee on the left bank of Chenango River north of the city limits in the Village of Port Dickinson, extending from Church Street to high ground just north of the city line; about 3,900 feet of earth levee on the left bank of Chenango River, extending from DeForest Street to Cutler Dam; new concrete flood walls and riverbank revetment for about 5,570 feet extending on the left bank of Chenango River from Cutler Dam to the junction with the Susquehanna River; about 540 feet of new concrete flood wall and raising about 1,085 feet of concrete flood wall on'the right bank of the Susquehanna River, extending from the Delaware, Lackawanna & Western Railroad downstream to Tompkins Street Bridge; about 1,940 feet of earth levee; about 1,940 feet of concrete flood wall and capping about 125 feet of concrete flood wall, on the right bank of the Susquehanna River from Stuyvesent Street to mouth of Chenango River; about 8,380 feet of earth levee, about 2,180 feet of new concrete flood wall on the left bank of the Susquehanna River extending from Pierce Creek to high ground at State Highway 17, a debris dam and flume between Corbett and Hotchkiss Streets and a concrete pressure conduit, 1,060 feet long to carry flow of Park Creek from Vestal Avenue to the Susquehanna River; about 665 feet of levee extending from the Erie Railroad to high ground along the right bank of Chamberlain Creek near the mouth; closure structures at Erie Railroad and at Court Street; a weir, a drop structure, and about 1,800 feet of earth levee, about 2,235 feet of channel excavation, about 645 feet of channel paving and raising, about 470 feet of existing concrete flood wall, and about 200 feet of new concrete flood wall for improvement of Pierce Creek from its mouth to about 1,000 feet about Conklin Avenue; and appurtenant drainage structures. Improvement, supplemented by authorized flood control dams above the area, will provide protection for the City of Binghamton against a flood discharge about 20 percent greater than the maximum flood of record, which occurred in July 1935 on the Chenango River and in March 1936 on the Susquehanna River. Local cooperation. Fully met. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Normal operation and maintenance of the project continued. 39F. CANISTEO, NY Location. On Purdy and Bonnets Creeks in the Town of Canisteo, NY, situated along the south side of the Canisteo River, at the confluence of Bonnets Creek and in the Canisteo River. (See Geological Survey map for Canisteo, NY.) Existing project. Provides for construction of about 8,000 feet of earth levees on the right bank of the Canisteo River, extending from high ground 1,570 feet west of State Highway Route 21 above the Town to a point at the intersection of Ordway Lane and East Main Street; about 4-16 BALTIMORE, MD DISTRICT 7,400 feet of earth levee on the left bank of Purdy and Bennetts Creeks, extending from the Main Street Bridge to high ground above Greenwood Street 1,000 feet of earth levee on the right bank of Bennetts Creek extending upstream from the Main Street Bridge; a concrete check dam with wing levees from Greenwood Street; a new highway bridge at Greenwood Street; channel excavation in Bennetts and Purdy Creeks; and appurtenant drainage structures. Local cooperation. Fully met. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Normal operation and maintenance of the project continued. 39G. CORNING, NY Location. On the Chemung River in the City of Corning, NY, about 44 miles upstream from the confluence of Chemung River and North Branch of Susquehanna River. (See Geological Survey map for Corning, NY.) Existing project. Plan of improvement provides for construction of a pumping station, earth levees, and concrete flood walls, consisting of about 4,300 feet of earth levee, enlargement of about 8,610 feet of existing earth levee and about 3,100 feet of concrete flood wall on the right bank of the Chemung River, extending from the Erie Railroad Bridge to high ground at Park Avenue below the City; about 200 feet of concrete flood walls, about 2,500 feet of earth levees and enlargement of about 11,500 feet of existing earth levee on the left bank of the Chemung and Cohocton Rivers, extending from the Erie Railroad Bridge over Cohocton River to the mouth of Post Creek; about 2,500 feet of earth levee and enlargement of about 4,700 feet of existing earth levee on the right bank of Post Creek; about 2,500 feet of earth levee and enlargement of about 4,700 feet of existing earth levee on the right bank of Post Creek from its mouth to Watkins Street; realignment of about 3,000 feet of channel, about 8,800 feet of earth levee, about 3,000 feet of channel excavation, a pressure conduit about 400 feet long, a drop structure and a weir for improvement of Cutler Creek, extending from its mouth to high ground at Deckertown Road and Hornby Road; and appurtenant drainage structures. Flood protection on Monkey Run was authorized by the Flood Control Act of 1950. Plan of improvement provides for construction of2,0 10 feet of open flume, 2320 feet of pressure conduit storm sewers, and appurtenant facilities between the existing improved channel above Sixth Street and the Chemung River at a point immediately east of Pine Street East. Modified improvement will provide protection for the City of Corning against a flood discharge in Chemung River approximately equal to the maximum flood of record, which occurred in May 1945, and on tributary streams against floods of greater magnitude than known to date. Local cooperation. Fully met. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Normal operation and maintenance of the project continued. 3911. EAST SIDNEY LAKE, NY Location. Dam is located near East Sidney, NY, on the Ouleout Creek, about five miles above the confluence of the creek with the Susquehanna River. (See Geological Survey map for Franklin, NY.) Existing project. The dam is an earthfill and concrete structure, 2,010 feet long, including spillway, rises 130 feet above the streambed and consists of a concrete gravitytype section with a compacted earth-dike section at the right abutment. The outlet works consist of five rectangular conduits each 3.5 feet b 5.85 feet and 105 feet long. The reservoir has a storage capacity of 33,500 acre-feet at spillway crest. The project controls a drainage area of 102 square miles which is 93 percent of the Ouleout Creek drainage area, and 5 percent of the watershed of the Susquehanna River upstream from Binghamton, NY, exclusive of the separately controlled Chenango River. Recreation facilities include a bathing beach, picnic and camping areas, and boat-launching and docking facilities. Local cooperation. None required. The Town of Sidney, NY, cooperated in the development of recreation facilities and operations and maintains all the facilities with the exception of the recreational pool, which is the responsibility of the Federal Government. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Normal operation and maintenance of the project continued. 391. ELMIRA, NY Location. On the Chemung River in the City ofElimira, NY, about 27 miles stream from the confluence of the Chemung River and North Branch of Susquehanna River (See Geological Survey map for Elmira, NY.) Existing project. Provides for about 17,700 feet of earth levees, and about 4,100 feet of concrete flood wall on the right bank of the Chemung River, extending from South Hoffman Street to a point below the city near the upper end of Big Island; about 12,100 feet of earth levee and about 6,300 feet of concrete wall on the left bank of the Chemung River extending from Durland Avenue to the Delaware, Lackawanna & Western Railroad at the mouth of Newton Creek; about 10,000 feet of earth levee on right bank of Newton Creek, extending from about the intersection of Delaware, Lackawanna & Western Railroad and East Church Street to high ground near intersection of Sullivan and Warren Streets; about 4,300 feet of earth levee on the right bank of Divan Creek; about 2,000 feet 4-17 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 2000 of concrete conduit enclosing Hoffman Brook from West Second Street to the Chemung River; clearing islands and riverbanks of trees and brush for about 3.5 miles in the Chemung River; about 14,300 feet of earth levee on the left bank of Seely Creek, extending from the Erie Railroad to high ground approximately 1,000 feet northwest of the intersection of South Broadway and Pennsylvania Avenue; a pumping plant for disposal of interior drainage; an interceptor sewer about 6,000 feet long varying in size from 48 to 96 inches in diameter; and appurtenant structures. Local cooperation. Fully met. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Normal operation and maintenance of the project continued. 39J. HORNELL, NY Location. On the Canisteo River in the City of Hornell, NY, about 42 miles upstream from the confluence of the Canisteo and Tioga Rivers. (See Geological Survey map for Canisteo, NY.) Existing project. Provides for channel realignment and earth levees, concrete flood walls, and check dams consisting of: realignment of about 4,600 feet of the Canisteo River channel, and about 5,800 feet of earth levee on its right bank, extending from Seneca Street upstream to the junction of the Pittsburgh, Shawmut & Northern Railroad and the Erie Railroad; about 4,500 feet of earth levee, extending on both sides of Seneca Street from the Canisteo River to Wrightman Avenue and the junction of Cleveland Avenue and Bethesda Drive; about 7,200 feet of earth levee, about 2,500 feet of concrete flood wall, and raising about 1,500 feet of existing concrete flood wall, on the right bank of the Canisteo River, and about 12,000 feet of channel improvement, extending from Seneca Street to the Erie Railroad; about 2,500 feet of earth levee, about 2,100 feet of concrete flood wall on the left bank of the Canisteo River extending from Seneca Street to the Erie Railroad; about 2,500 feet of earth levee, about 2,100 feet of concrete flood wall on the left bank of the Canisteo River extending from a point opposite Walnut Street to the Erie Railroad; a ring-earth levee about 2,800 feet long around the sewage-disposal plant on the left bank of the Canisteo River; about 4,500 feet of realignment and improvement of the Canisteo River Channel with about 4,500 feet of earth levee on its right bank extending from Cedar Street downstream to about 1,400 feet about East Avenue; about 2,400 feet of channel paving, 1,400 feet of earth levee, raising about 1,900 feet of concrete flood wall, and construction of one check dam on Canacadea Creek; about 1,600 feet of channel paving and construction of three check dams on Chauncey Run with about 300 feet of new wall and about 300 feet ofcapping; a weir, a check dam, 3,030 feet of channel paving, 4,800 feet of flood walls and levees, and related work on existing walls, on Crosby Creek; removal of 6 bridges, erection of 4 bridges, miscellaneous bridge structures, and 3 drop structures; and appurtenant drainage structures and small stream control works. Improvement, supplemented by Arkport and Almond Reservoirs above the area, provides protection for the City of Homell against a flood discharge approximately double the maximum flood of record, which occurred in July 1935. Local cooperation. Fully met. 'Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Normal operation and maintenance of the project continued. 39K. LISLE, NY Location. On the Tioughnioga River in the Village of Lisle, NY, about 12 miles upstream from the confluence of the Tioughnioga and Chenango Rivers. (See Geological Survey map for Lisle, NY.) Existing project. Provides for channel realignment and construction of earth levees and concrete flood walls, consisting of: relocation of about 3,000 feet of Dudley Creek Channel, extending from 1,200 feet west of the intersection of Cortland and Main Streets to the confluence with Tioughnioga River; realignment of some 5,700 feet of Tioughnioga River Channel east of the Village; about 4,150 feet of earth levee and 970 feet of concrete wall on the right bank of Dudley Creek and Tioughnioga River; realignment of some 5,700 feet of Tioughnioga Street to the railroad crossing on River Street; raising about 1,860 feet of the Delaware, Lackawanna & Western single track railroad over the levee; relocation of about 1,600 feet of Cortland Street; a new bridge over relocated Dudley Creek; and appurtenant drainage structures. Local cooperation. Fully met. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Normal operation and maintenance of the project continued. 39L. OXFORD, NY Location. On the Chenango River in the Village of Oxford, NY, about 40 miles upstream from the confluence of the Chenango and Susquehanna Rivers. (See Geological Survey map for Oxford, NY.) Existing project. Provides for earth levees and clearing of Chenango River Channel, consisting of about 2,100 feet of earth levees on the left bank of the Chenango River, extending from high ground near Cemetery Drive and running mostly along the railroad to high ground near Main Street; removal of dam and island below Main Street; raising the Delaware, Lackawanna & Western Railroad over the levee; and appurtenant closure and drainage 4-18 BALTIMORE, MI DISTRICT structures. Improvement provides protection for the Village of Oxford on the left bank against a flood discharge substantially larger than the maximum flood of record, which occurred in July 1935. Local cooperation. Fully met. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Normal operation and maintenance of the project continued. 39M. WHITNEY POINT LAKE, NY Location. Dam is located near Whitney Point, NY, on the Otselic River about 0.7 mile upstream from its confluence with Tioughnioga River. (See Geological Survey map for Whitney Point and Willet, NY.) Existing project. The dam is an earthfill structure, 4,900 feet long, exclusive of a spillway, rises 95 feet above the streambed, with a concrete spillway and gated outlet in the left abutment. The outlet works consist of three 5- foot by 10-foot gates and one emergency gate of the same size. The reservoir has a storage capacity of 86,440 acrefeet at spillway crest. The project controls a drainage area of 255 square miles, the entire watershed of Otselic River, or 16 percent of the Chenango River watershed upstream from Binghamton, NY. Recreation facilities, constructed in cooperation with local interests, provide for swimming, picnicking, camping, boating, fishing, and hunting. Local cooperation. None required. Local interests operate and maintain all of the recreation facilities. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Normal operation and maintenance of the project continued. A contract was awarded for repairs to the flood control gates. 39N. WHITNEY POINT VILLAGE, NY Location. On the Tioughnioga River at the confluence of the Tioughnioga and Otselic Rivers, tributaries of the Susquehanna River. (See Geological Survey map for Whitney Point, NY.) Existing project. Provides for channel realignment and earth levees, consisting of realignment of about 1,800 feet ofTioughnioga River Channel, above the confluence with Otselic River; about 7,100 feet of earth levee along the right bank of the Tioughnioga River, extending from high ground on Main Street above the Village to Collins Street just below the Village; and appurtenant drainage structures. Local cooperation. Fully met. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Normal operation and maintenance of the project continued. A contract was awarded for repairs to the flood control gates. 40. STILLWATER LAKE, LACKAWANNA RIVER, PA Location. Dam is on the Lackawanna River, 39 miles from the mouth of the stream and about 4 miles upstream from Forest City, Susquehanna County, PA (See Geological Survey Quadrangle sheet, Honesdale, PA.) Existing project. Dam is earthfill type, rising 77 feet above the streambed, with a controlled outlet conduit and side channel spillway in the left abutment. Reservoir capacity is 12,000 acre-feet, of which 11,600 acre-feet is flood control storage and the remainder is used to maintain the existing water supply reservoir for Forest City, PA, at this site. Reservoir area is 422 acres, and the pool extends about 2.1 miles upstream. Reservoir controls 52 percent of the watershed above Carbondale, 26 percent above Olyphant, and 17 percent above Scranton. Federal cost of new work, completed in 1965, was $5,725,700 of which $4,500,500 was for construction and $1,225,200 was for lands and damages. Local cooperation. None required. Section 2, Flood Control Act of June 28,' 1938, applies. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Normal operation and maintenance of the project continued. A boat ramp for fishing access was constructed by the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania. 41. SUSQUEHANNA RIVER FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS, NY AND PA Plan of improvement authorized by the 1958 Flood Control Act provides for construction of Cowanesque Lake, PA, Tioga-Hammond Lakes, PA, local protection works at Elkland, PA, and Nichols, NY, and channel improvements at Cortland, NY. This project plan supplemented the comprehensive flood control program for Southern New York and Northern Pennsylvania which included the Southern New York flood control project and Stillwater, Genegantslet, and South Plymouth Reservoirs. 41A. COWANESQUE LAKE, PA Location. Dam is on the Cowanesque River about 2.2 miles above its confluence with Tioga River at Lawrenceville, PA. (See Geological Survey map for Tioga, PA.) Existing project. The project provides for an earthfill dam 3,100 feet long and rising 151 feet above the streambed, an uncontrolled spillway in the right abutment, a gated conduit in the Valley floor, and flood control storage is 82,000 acre-feet. Relocation of the Town of Nelson to a new townsite was authorized by Section 121 of the Water Resources Development Act of 1976. The Federal cost of this new work was $106,030,700 of which $61,743,600 was for construction and $44,287,100 was for lands and damages and relocations (which includes $5,755,000 for relocation of the Town ofNelson). Within 4-19 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 2000 the discretionary authority of the Chief of Engineers the project was modified in March 1983 in accordance with the Water Supply Act of 1958, as amended, and the Flood Control Act of 1944, as amended. The modification provides for reallocating 25,600 acre-feet of present flood control storage for water supply storage by raising the permanent pool from elevation 1,045 to 1,080 mean sea level. Other features include modifying the existing intake tower and two access ramps, stabilizing the reservoir slope near the relocated Town of Nelson, replacing existing dayuse recreation facilities, and expanding both day-and overnight-use recreation facilities to accommodate an expected increase in annual visitation due to the larger pool. Estimated cost (October 1991) of the modification is $55,198,00 of which $1,257,00 is Federal (for expanded recreation facilities) and $53,941,000 is non-Federal (which includes $39,414,000 for reimbursement of the cost of existing flood control storage reallocation to water supply storage, $13,270,000 cash contribution for the water supply modification, and $1,257,000 cash contribution for expanded recreation facilities.) Local cooperation. The Water Resources Development Act of 1976, which authorized relocation of the Town of Nelson, provides that before the Secretary of the Army acquires any real estate property for the new townsite, appropriate non-Federal interests shall furnish binding contractual commitments that all lots in the new townsite will be either occupied when available, replacements for open space and vacant lots in the existing town, or will be purchased by non-Federal interests at the fair market value. The required contractural agreement for local cooperation was executed with Nelson Township on August 25, 1977. The March 1983 project modification (discussed above) requires non-Federal interests repay 100 percent of the investment cost of project modifications allocated to water supply, to terrestrial wildlife habitat mitigation, and to in-kind replacement recreation, plus the allocated share of the project's original cost (escalated to current price levels). Additionally, they are required to pay annual costs of operation, maintenance, and major replacements allocated to water supply and to provide 50 percent of the cost of expanded recreation facilities, as well as, all operation, maintenance, and replacement costs for the expanded facilities. Water supply and recreation contracts were executed by the Assistant Secretary of the Army (Civil Works) and the Susquehanna River Basin Commission on June 30, 1986. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Normal operation and maintenance of the project continued. Repairs of the quality control gates was completed and are now fully operational. 41B. TIOGA-HAMMOND LAKES, PA Location. The dams are located in Tioga County, PA, upstream from the confluence of the Tioga River and Crooked Creek. Tioga Dam is located on the Tioga River and Hammond Dam on Crooked Creek, approximately opposite the Tioga damsite, about 3.3 miles above its mouth and less than one mile from the Village of Brooklyn. (See Geological Survey map for Tioga, PA.) Existing project. Tioga Dam is 2,600 feet long, rising 140 feet above the streambed, with a controlled outlet conduit. Hammond Dam is 5,900 feet long, and has a maximum height of 121.5 feet above the streambed, with a concrete spillway. Both dams are of earth and rockfill construction. The Tioga-Hammond Lakes project controls a total drainage area of 402 square miles, with Tioga Dam controlling 280 square miles of the Tioga River Basin and Hammond Dam controlling 122 square miles of the Crooked Creek Basin. Recreation facilities are provided for swimming, camping, picnicking, boating, and fishing. Federal cost of completed work was $185,620,000 of which $125,029,000 is for completed construction and $60,591,000 is for lands and damages and relocations. Estimated Federal cost (October 1988) of Mill Creek recreation facilities (inactive) is $7,500,000. Local cooperation. None required. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Normal operation and maintenance of the project continued. 42. WEST BRANCH OF SUSQUEHANNA RIVER, PA A system of three flood control reservoirs, in the headwaters of the West Branch Susquehanna River, PA, are known as Curwensville, Alvin R. Bush (formerly known as Kettle Creek), and Foster Joseph Sayers (formerly known as Blanchard). In accordance with the terms of local cooperation, the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania furnished assurances that it will coordinate operation of George B. Stevenson Reservoir (formerly known as First Fork Reservoir) with operation of Curwensville, Alvin R. Bush, and Foster Joseph Sayers Reservoirs to secure optimum flood control benefits from system operation. George B. Stevenson Reservoir on the First Fork Sinnemahoning Creek in Cameron and Potter Counties, PA, was constructed by the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania at a first cost of $12,240,000 and an estimated $30,000 annually for operation and maintenance. 42A. ALVIN R. BUSH DAM, PA Location. Alvin R. Bush (formerly Kettle Creek Dam) is located on Kettle Creek about 8.4 miles above the mouth and 15 miles upstream from Renovo, PA. (See Geological Survey map for Keating, PA.) Existing project. Dam is an earthfill structure, about 1,350 feet long, rises 165 feet above the streambed, with 4-20 BALTIMORE, MD DISTRICT an uncontrolled spillway located in rock adjacent to the right abutment, and has a horseshoe-shaped outlet tunnel with 3 service gates. The reservoir has a storage capacity of 75,000 acre-feet at spillway crest. The project controls a drainage area of 226 square miles or about 92 percent of the Kettle Creek watershed. Recreation facilities are provided for camping, fishing, boating, picnicking, hiking, winter sports, hunting, and swimming by the State of Pennsylvania at Kettle Creek State Park. Local cooperation. None required. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Normal operation and maintenance of the project continued. 42B. CURWENSVILLE LAKE, PA Location. Dam is on the West Branch of Susquehanna River approximately 2.5 miles upstream from Curwensville, Clearfield County, PA. (See Geological Survey map for Curwensville, PA.) Existing project. Within the discretionary authority of the Chief of Engineers, the project was modified in September 1992, in accordance with the Water Supply Act of 1958, as amended. The modification provides for reallocating an estimated 5,360 acre-feet of storage from conservation to water supply. The reallocation project includes a year-round normal pool and modifications to the existing recreation area. Estimated cost of the modification is $1.7 million which is being funded entirely by the local sponsor, the Susquehanna River Basin Commission. In addition, the sponsor will reimburse the Federal Government about 4.5 million for part of the original project cost. Local cooperation. The 1992 project modification requires non-Federal interests to pay 100 percent of costs allocated to water supply plus the allocated share of the original project cost (escalated to current price levels). Additionally, they must pay annual costs of operation, maintenance, and major replacement allocated to water supply. A water supply contract was executed on September 30, 1994. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Normal operation and maintenance of the project continued. Improvements to the recreation facilities were cOmpleted in September 2000, per authorization included in the Water Resources Development Act of 1999. 42C. FOSTER JOSEPH SAYERS DAM, PA Location. Dam is located on Bald Eagle Creek in Centre County, PA, about one mile upstream from Blanchard and about 14 miles above the confluence of Bald Eagle Creek with the West Branch Susquehanna River at Lock Haven, PA. (See Geological Survey map for Howard, PA.) Existing project. Dam is an earthfill structure, about 6,835 feet long, rises 100 feet above the streambed, and has an open-cut concrete chute and uncontrolled concrete weir 600 feet wide located in rock in a saddle adjacent to the left abutment. The outlet works, located in the left abutment, consist of a 15-foot diameter circular outlet conduit with two hydraulically-operated wheel gates 7 feet wide and 15 feet high. The reservoir has a storage capacity of 99,000 acre-feet at spillway crest. The project controls a drainage area of 339 square miles or 88 percent of the drainage area above Beech Creek and 43 percent of the Bald Eagle Creek drainage area. Recreation facilities are provided for boating, camping, fishing, picnicking, hunting, swimming, hiking, and winter sports by the State of Pennsylvania at Bald Eagle State Park. Local cooperation. None required. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Normal operation and maintenance of the project continued. Modification to gate repair contract made to fix bent stem brackets was completed in March 2000. 43. WYOMING VALLEY, PA (LEVEE RAISING) Location. The Wyoming Valley flood control projects are located in Northeastern Pennsylvania on the Susquehanna River in Luzerne County and are the four contiguous existing Federal flood control projects at Plymouth, Kingston-Edwardsville, Swoyersville-Forty Fort, and Wilkes-Barre/Hanover Township, which together function as a flood control system within the Wyoming Valley. Existing project. The proposed modification provides for raising existing levees and floodwalls between 3 and 5 feet, structural, mechanical and electrical modifications to pump stations, modifying closure structures, relocating utilities and providing some new floodwalls and levees to maintain the integrity of the existing flood control system. The proposed project also includes a plan to reduce project-related adverse impacts. The current estimated total project is $175,000,000 which includes a future inflation allowance through project completion. Local cooperation. The Luzerne County Flood Protection Authority is the sponsor for the project. The local sponsor is required to: provide lands, easements and rights-of-way; modify or relocate buildings, utilities, roads, bridges, and other facilities; pay a minimum of 5% of costs allocated to flood control and pay 50% of costs allocated to recreation; and bear all costs of operations, maintenance and replacement of flood control and recreation facilities after construction. Operations and results during fiscal year. Work was completed on the Swoyersville-Forty Fort levee raising and the sanitary pump stations contracts continued on 4-21 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 2000 the Kingston-Edwardsville and Wilkes-Barre/Hanover Township I levee raising contracts. The Mechanical and Electrical upgrades for the Stormwater Pump Stations was awarded August 25, 2000 in the amount of $31,008,875. Engineering and design also continued. 44. YORK, INDIAN ROCK DAM, PA Location. On Codorus Creek 10 miles above its confluence with the Susquehanna River. Codorus Creek has tributary branches in York County in the south and central parts of Pennsylvania. (See Geological Survey Quadrangle sheets for York and Hanover, PA.) Existing project. Indian Rock Dam is an earth and rockfill dam about 1,000 feet long at the top, rising 83 feet above the streambed, with a reservoir providing for control storage of28,000 acre-feet. The dam is on the main branch of Codorus Creek about 3 miles above York. Outlet works are in the right abutment, and the uncontrolled spillway is on the right bank. The reservoir will control the entire drainage area of the main branch of Codorus Creek and 41 percent of the drainage area above York. Improvements in Codorus Creek in the vicinity of and through the City of York provide for 22,969 feet of channel extending from 300 feet above Richland Avenue to a point downstream from the Pennsylvania Railroad crossing known as Black Bridge. Improvements, which will increase channel capacity to 24,000 cubic feet per second, include widening and deepening the channel, bank protection, removal of York Roller Mill Dam, and a low water channel about 3,900 feet long in the vicinity of York Roller Mill Dam. Cost of new work for the completed project was $5,061,167, of which $4,566,446 (regular funds) and $11,588 (emergency relief funds) were for construction and $483,133 (regular funds) was for lands and damages. Local cooperation. Section 2, Flood Control Act of June 28,1938, applies. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Normal operation and maintenance of the project continued. 45. INSPECTION OF COMPLETED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS Projects in New York, Pennsylvania, Maryland, District of Columbia, and Virginia were inspected during the period by hired labor. See table 4-I. 46. SCHEDULING FLOOD CONTROL RESERVOIR OPERATIONS Operations and results during fiscal year. The operation of George B. Stevenson Dam, PA, was coordinated with the operation of Alvin R. Bush, Curwensville, and Foster Joseph Sayers Dams in the West Branch Susquehanna River Basin in order to secure optimum flood control benefits from the system operation. Costs during the period were $2,144,137. Supplemental instructions for the operation of Savage River Dam, MD, were provided, during periods of high water, to insure maximum protection for downstream localities. Costs during the period were $130,056. 47. FLOOD CONTROL WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION Cost for the period was $377,805 for the Disaster Preparedness Program; $81,769 for Mobilization, Continuity of Government and Emergency Water Preparedness Programs; $15,125 for Emergency Operations; $83,375 for Rehabilitation; $63,043 for the Nationwide Civil Works Activities; and cost for the period for Advance Measures was $2,774 for Assateague Island Breach Contingency. Federal year costs were $6,124 for Section 205 Coordination; $15,136 for Anacostia Flood Warning System; $135,037 for Elkton, MD; $19,126 for Gwynns Falls, Baltimore, MD; $53,332 for Lycoming County Flood Warning System, PA; $14,925 for Paxton Creek Harrisburg, PA; $7,704 for Juniata River, Borough of Alexandria, PA; $13,136 for McClure Run (POCO Farm Area), PA; $41,987 for South River, City of Waynesboro, VA; $12,050 for Tannery Spring Run Watsontown Borough, PA; $26,329 for Montoursville Lycoming County, PA; $9,143 for Loyalsock Creek Lycoming Airport Lycoming; and $18,734 for Soloman Creek Wilkes-Barre, PA. Non-Federal contributed costs were: $693 for Paxton Creek Harrisburg, PA and $138,276 for Elkton 205 Feasibility. Flood control activities pursuant to Section 14, Public Law 526, 79th Congress, as amended (pre-authorization). Fiscal year costs were $6,385 for Section 14 Coordination; $865 for Chesapeake Bay State Route 261, MD; $47,124 for Deep Run, Race Road, MD; $2,204.68 for Hooper Island Causeway, MD; $69,902 for Hudson Branch, Colored Schoolhouse, Ellicott, MD; $47,744 for Loyalsock Creek, Warrensville Road, PA; $46,536 for Susquehanna River, Hepburn Street, PA; $83,554 for Toms Creek Water Supply Dide, Carrol, VA; ($138,480) for Isle of Wight Bay Ocean City, MD; and $32,184 for Satterlee Creek Athens Township Bradford. Non-Federal contributed costs were: $2,254.43 for Hooper Island Causeway, MD and $138,480 for Isle of Wight Bay Ocean City, MD. ENVIRONMENTAL RESTORATION 48. ANACOSTIA RIVER AND TRIBUTARIES, MD AND DC Location. The project area is the 170-square mile watershed of the Anacostia River. This watershed en- 4-22 BALTIMORE, MD DISTRICT compasses approximately 145 square miles in Montgomery and Prince George's Counties, Maryland, and 25 square miles in the District of Columbia. The entire area is within the Washington, D.C. metropolitan area. Existing project. The authorized plan provides for the construction of 80 acres of tidal and non-tidal freshwater wetlands, the restoration of 5 miles of piedmont streams, and the planting of 33 acres of bottomland hardwood forest within the highly urbanized Anacostia River watershed. The construction is located at 13 sites within the project area. The 13 actions include 2 wetland restorations, development of 5 stormwater management wetlands areas, and restoration of 6 stream reaches. The current estimated total cost for the Anacostia environmental restoration project is $16 million. Local cooperation. The non-Federal sponsors for the project are Montgomery County, Prince George's County, the District of Columbia, the Maryland-National Capital Park and Planning Commission, and the National Park Service. The last two sponsors are the currrent landowners of the project sites. The non-Federal sponsors are required to pay 25 percent of the cost allocated to fish and wildlife restoration and to bear all costs of operation, maintenance, repair, rehabilitation and replacement of the facilities after construction. Operations and results during fiscal year. Project construction continued for work in Montgomery County. Construction is scheduled to continue through 2002, with project monitoring planned through September 2005. 49. CHESAPEAKE BAY OYSTER RECOVERY, MD Location. The project is located in the Maryland portion of the Chesapeake Bay. Existing project. The authorized project contributes to multi-agency and private efforts to restore oyster populations in the Maryland portion of the Chesapeake Bay. Project elements include: construction and rehabilitation of oyster habitat; construction of seed bar facilities for production of oyster seed or "spat"; purchase of disease-free spat from the state-owned hatcheries, planting of disease-free spat in locations which best foster oyster production and health; and monitoring of project performance to increase oyster populations. Phase I of the project has an estimated total cost of $3,334,000. Phase II of the project, which will extend into the waters of Virginia, has an estimated project cost of$23,333,000. Local cooperation. The State of Maryland is the sponsor for the Maryland action of the project. The local sponsor is required to pay 25% of the cost allocated to fish and wildlife restoration and to bear all costs of operation, maintenance, repair, rehabilitation and replacement of fish and wildlife facilities after construction. Operations and results during fiscal year. New Work: In 2000, new oyster bars were created in the Choptank River. Project monitoring activities continued. The Phase I project construction was completed in September 2000, with monitoring planned through September 2004. Planning for the Phase II project will be initiated in October 2000. 50. CHESAPEAKE BAY ENVIRONMENTAL RESTORATION/PROTECTION PROGRAM, MD Location. The project is located in the Chesapeake Bay area within portions of the states of Maryland, Virginia and Pennsylvania. Existing Project. Section 510 of WRDA 1996 authorizes the Corps of Engineers to provide design and construction assistance to non-Federal interests for publicly owned water-related environmental infrastructure and resource protection and development of projects affecting the Chesapeake Bay estuary. These projects include sediment and erosion control, protection of eroding shorelines, protection of essential public works, wastewater treatment and related facilities, water supply and related facilities, and beneficial uses of dredged material, and other related projects that may enhance the living resources of the estuary. At least one project shall be established in each of the states of Maryland, Virginia and Pennsylvania. The Maryland projects include Tylerton Shoreline Protection Project and upgrade of Smith Island Wastewater Treatment Plants, the Virginia project is an oyster restoration project being handled by Norfolk District and the Pennsylvania project will be upgrade of the Scranton Wastewater Treatment Plant to include nitrogen removal. Local cooperation. The sponsors for the project include the Maryland Department of Natural Resources, Maryland Department of the Environment, Somerset County, Maryland, and the Virginia Marine Resources Commission. Operations and results during fiscal year. Design work continued on the Tylerton project, the Smith Island Wastewater Treatment Plants and Lower Rappahannock Oyster Restoration Project. 51. LITTLE FALLS DAM FISH PASSAGE, MD Location. Little Falls is located in Montgomery County just upriver from the District of Columbia. Existing project. Little Falls Dam was built in 1959 as a water supply facility for the Washington D.C. metropolitan area. A fishway was recently constructed within the dam and is centered 75 feet from the Virginia side of 4-23 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 2000 the river. This is where migratory fish typically congregate below the dam. The innovative design uses three "W" -shaped labyrinth weirs within and below a 36-foot wide, 4-foot deep notch in the dam. The weirs reduce water velocity to levels that allow fish to move upstream over the passage despite a wide range of river flow. The main target species of the fishway is American shad (Alosa sapidissima). The goal of the project was to reestablish migrating fish access to 10 miles of historic spawning habitat upstream of the dam. Construction was completed in February 2000. The total project cost was $2 million. Additional information about this project can be found at http://www.chesapeakebay.net/fishpass.htm. Local cooperation. The State of Maryland Department of Natural Resources (DNR), is the project sponsor under this Section 1135 project. As required under the Section 1135 program, the State contributed 25 percent of the total project cost of $2 million. The Washington Aqueduct has assumed these responsibilities because the dam serves as a water supply conduit. Operations and results during fiscal year. As part of the post construction activities for this project, a fiveyear monitoring program was established to verify the effectiveness of the modification. This is a continuation of stocking and monitoring efforts begun in 1995, by the Interstate Commission for the Potomac River Basin (ICPRB), DC Fisheries, Maryland DNR, and citizen volunteers. The monitoring will determine how many of the original hatchery fish return to the area as adults to spawn. Three American shad were collected during the spring 2000 monitoring efforts in the Mater Gorge area and no other migratory fishes were captured. 52. POPLAR ISLAND, MD Location. The group of islands known as Poplar Island is located in the upper middle Chesapeake Bay approximately 34 nautical miles southeast of the Port of Baltimore and I mile northwest of Tilghman Island, Talbot County, MD. Existing project. The authorized project provides for the use of approximately 38 million cubic yards of dredged material from the southern approach channels of the Baltimore Harbor and Channels navigation project to restore 1,140 acres of remote habitat. The restoration project will employ dikes to contain the dredged materials necessary for the wetlands vegetation and to protect the facility from the severe wave activity common in this region of the Chesapeake Bay. The placement site will restore Poplar Island to its approximate 1847 configuration and will consist of 570 acres of upland habitat at an elevation up to +20 feet MLLW and 570 acres of wetland habitat that would be further divided into approximately 444 acres of low marsh and 111 acres of high marsh. The current estimated total project cost is $427 million (including a future inflation allowance through the project completion). Local cooperation. The State of Maryland is the project sponsor and the Local Cooperation Agreement was executed April 4, 1997. The sponsor is required to provide lands, easements, and rights-of-way; pay 25% of the cost of the project; and bear all costs of operation, maintenance, replacement and major rehabilitation of the ecosystem restoration project. Operations and results during fiscal year. New Work: Phase I construction was completed in March 2000. Phase II construction was initiated in April 2000 with completion expected in November 2001. 53. SOUTH CENTRAL PENNSYLVANIA ENVIRONMENTAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM Location. The south central Pennsylvania area includes fifteen counties defined by the authorizing legislation. Funds for an additional six counties were provided in the FY 1998 and FY 1999 Energy and Water Appropriation Act. The program area within the Baltimore District consists of the Chesapeake Bay watershed portion of the program area including Bedford, Blair, Clearfield, Franklin, Fulton, Huntingdon, Juniata, Mifflin, Snyder, and a portion of Cambria Counties. Existing project. Section 313 of the Water Resources Development Act of 1992, as amended, established a pilot program for providing environmental assistance to non- Federal interests in south central Pennsylvania. Such assistance may be in the form of design and construction assistance for water-related environmental infrastructure and resource protection and development projects, including projects for waste water treatment and related facilities, water supply, storage treatment, distribution facilities, and surface water resource protection and development. The Federal share may be provided in the form of grants or reimbursements to the sponsor. Section 313 as amended authorizes Federal appropriations of $180 million to carry out the program, including $90 million within the Chesapeake Bay watershed area. From FY 94 through FY99, Congress has added $56,667,000 to the Corps budget for 45 projects in the Baltimore District. This includes two Master Plans; 15 Projects for water supply and distribution; 20 for wastewater collection and treatment; 6 combined improvements for water, wastewater and stormwater; and two for stormwater and flood control. Local cooperation. The non-Federal sponsors are required to provide 25% of project costs including lands, easements, rights-of-way, and relocations and bear all costs of operation, maintenance, replacement, repair and rehabilitation of the project after construction. 4-24 BALTIMORE, MD DISTRICT Operations and results during fiscal year. Of the 43 projects in the Baltimore District, 3 construction projects and 2 studies were completed prior to FY 00, and 7 design agreements and 3 construction agreements were completed prior to FY 00. With carryover funds for 38 active projects, we completed construction of 2 projects, continued or initiated sponsor construction of 6 projects, continued Corps design of Hollidaysburg, continued sponsor design of 24 projects, initiated a Corps water supply study for McConnellsburg and continued sponsor negotiations for 4 projects. In support of these actions, 19 design and 16 construction agreements were executed in FY 00. REGULATORY PROGRAM 54. REGULATORY PROGRAM During fiscal year 2000, there were 777 pending applications and 4,103 new applications received for permits to perform work in waters of the United States including jurisdictional wetlands within Maryland, Washington DC, the Susquehanna River Basin in Pennsylvania, and military bases in Northern Virginia. Of the 3,864 final actions; 16 were withdrawn and 3 were denied. The enforcement program began the year with 269 active cases; 153 new violation cases were initiated, and 134 cases were resolved. In addition, 510 jurisdictional verifications were requested and performed and 20 public hearings were held. Total costs during the fiscal year were $4,678,204. WATER SUPPLY 55. WASHINGTON AQUEDUCT Location. The diversion dam and raw water supply intakes at Great Falls, the two collecting conduits, part of Dalecarlia receiving reservoir, the booster pumping of Dalecarlia receiving reservoir, the booster pumping station and the Little Falls raw water pumping station are located in Maryland. All other structures of the water SUpply system including parts of the raw water collecting system, two purification plants, pumping stations, Storage reservoirs, and transmission mains are in the District of Columbia. Federally owned water mains are maintained in Virginia and Maryland. Existing project. Control of the water supply system is vested in the Chief of Engineers (see Acts of March 3, 1859, and March 2, 1867, November 22, 1973 and Sec. 1800 of Revised Statutes). The project includes: administration; operation and maintenance of the collection, purification, pumping, and transmission facilities; protection of the water supply system; engineering; and construction of major water system additions and improvements. Authority to supply water to Arlington County, the City of Falls Church, and other jurisdictions in Virginia is contained in Public Law 119, 69th Congress, approved April 14, 1926; and Public Law 118, 80th Congress, June 26, 1947. Local cooperation. Requirements are described in full on page 4-19 of the Fiscal Year 1981 Annual Report. Operations and results during fiscal year. Purified water was furnished to the District of Columbia; Arlington County, and Falls Church, VA; and to the Federal establishments in the District of Columbia, Arlington County, VA, and Montgomery County, MD. Total consumption for Fiscal Year 2000 was 63.5 billion gallons. The average amount furnished Arlington County and Falls Church, VA was 40.9 million gallons per day. The Corps of Engineers was reimbursed $32,033,332 of which $7,845,436 was from VA. GENERAL INVESTIGATIONS 56. SURVEYS Federal costs for the fiscal year were $2,535,017 including $919,729 for flood damage prevention studies, $1,070,238 for special studies, $84 for review of completed projects, $379,953 for special investigations, $23,548 for interagency water resource development, and $141,465 for coordination with other agencies and non-Federal interests. Non-Federal contributed costs for the fiscal year were $2,519,053 of which $33,418 was for navigation studies, $1,737,160 for flood damage prevention studies, and $748,475 for coordination with other agencies and non- Federal interest. 57. AQUATIC ECOSYSTEM RESTORATION Fiscal year costs were $30,410 for Section 206 Coordination; $59,558 for Preliminary Plans; $301,185 for Chesapeake Bay Environmental Restoration; $38,435 for Deep Run/Tiber Hudson, MD; $379,252 for Dents Run, MD; $65,199 for Isle of Wight Bay, MD; $145,217 for Lackawanna, PA; $65,790 for Ocean Pines, Worcester County, MD; $98,846 for Seele Creek, MD; $65,462 for Nanticoke Creek Luzerne County, PA; and $378,389 for Upper Susquehanna-Lackawanna Watershed, PA. Fiscal year costs were $32,054 for Section 1135 Hart-Miller Island, MD. Fiscal year costs were $119,211 for Aquatic Plant Control. Fiscal year miscellaneous costs were $4858 for Coordination Account Funds and $2618 for Initial Appraisals. 4-25 REPORT OF TIlE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 2000 58. COLLECTION AND STUDY OF BASIC DATA Costs for flood plain management activities and general planning guidance during the period was $184,875. Providing assistance and guidance to local interests on methods and procedures for preventing and reducing flood damages was in progress at end of fiscal year.. 59. PRECONSTRUCTION ENGINEERING AND DESIGN Washington, DC & Vicinity--The authorized project would provide for raising the grade of a portion of P Street, filling an area near the Lincoln Memorial (along 23rd Street), regrading the area adjacent to 17th Street and constructing a removable closure structure across 17th Street. These measures were authorized to restore the design level of protection of the existing project and to reduce the need for emergency closure in the event of a flood. Total costs during the fiscal year were $26,000. Estimated preconstruction planning cost is $2,992,000. Baltimore Harbor & Anchorages, MD -- The proposed project would: widen and deepen Federal anchorages, widen branch channels, dredge a new branch channel, dredge a turning basin and deauthorize an existing anchorage. Total costs during the fiscal year were $97,826. Estimated preconstruction planning cost is $900,000, of which $675,000 is Federal and $225,000 is non-Federal. FORMERLY UTILIZED SITES REMEDIAL ACTION PROGRAM (FUSRAP) 60. W.R. GRACE, CURTIS BAY FACILITY, MD Location. The W.R. Grace Curtis Bay Facility is located at 5500 Chemical Road in Baltimore, Maryland on an industrialized peninsula in south Baltimore, and consists of 260 acres owned by Grace. The property is bordered on the north by Curtis Bay, on the west by Curtis Creek, on the east by the Patapsco River, and on the south by the Baltimore City Municipal Landfill. The facility currently consists of a manufacturing plant (Building 23) and a waste disposal area. Exisiting project. Currently, W.R. Grace manufactures and produces speciality chemicals at its Curtis Bay facility. Contamination at the site consists of radioactivelycontaminated slabs and other surfaces impacted by the thorium extraction process in Building 23 and the Radioactive Waste Disposal Area to the east of the plant property. The W.R. Grace Site has been separated into 3 distinct work components: Containerized Waste Rubble, Building 23, and the Radioactive Waste Disposal Area. The overall project cost is estimated at $50 million. Local Cooperation. Not applicable. Operation and results during fiscal year. The Interim Removal Action was completed in November 1999. A contract for the Removal Site Inspection was awarded in the amount of $1,266,833 and field work was completed on September 22, 2000. Total cost for the fiscal year was $3,053,100. 4-26 BALTIMORE, MD DISTRICT TABLE 4-A See Section in Text Project 1. Baltimore Harbor and Channels, MD and VA 2. Baltimore Harbor, MD, Collection & Removal of Drift 3. Hlonga River & Tar Bay, MD 4. Knapps Narrows, MD 5. Little Wicomico River, MD 6. Nanticoke River, Northwest Fork, MD &DE 7. Neale Sound, MD 8. Northeast River, MD 9. Ocean City Htarbor and Inlet and Sinepuxent Bay, MD COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT Funding New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Contributed Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint Approp. New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost FY97 0 110,505 10,888,000 11,268,468 108,000 124,837 320,000 319,082 66,000 141,289 FY98 (80,000) (192,418) 16,288,000 15,267,157 527,674 497,983 FY99 (110,000) 3,810 17,155,000 17,162,474 47,500 18,496 Total to FY00 Sep. 30, 2000 1,714,000 146,576,712' 432,753 145,248,140' 6,768,417 214,637,0862 22,016,323 229,034,4092 0 67,717,114 0 66,820,847 348,000 373,000 419,100 344,122 373,555 423,940 -- -- 0 -- -- 0 354,000 790,933 850,497 352,828 789,570 853,101 " -- -- 0 -- -- -- 0 84,000 53,000 676,900 -- 83,759 52,764 677,058 -- 39,999 -- 39,211 -- 47,000 -- 46,961 00 50,000 36,438 00 14,003 14,042 0 1,087,009 0 1,046,825 - 212,941 .50,000 57,977 634,100 634,012 -- -- 0 -- -- 0 25,000 502,000 173,800 23,645 506,749 174,079 -- -- 0 "-- -- 0 49,000 338,000 267,000 46,713 339,515 248,170 8,061,799 8,071,688 66,1193 66,119 7,753,565 7,787,007 23,836 23,836 1,207,910 1,207,831 81,885 4 81,8864 2,419,976 2,402,923 73,243 5 73,243 5 1,177,844 1,196,689 1,087,00913 1,046,825 903,45014 28,4896 28,4896 1,826,144 1,796,059 362,193 7 362,193 7 12,521,800 12,501,943 4-27 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 2000 TABLE 4-A (Continued) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Section in Text Project Funding FY97 F9 FY. Total to FY00 Sept. 30, 2000 10. Potomac and Anacostia Rivers, DC Collection & Removal of Drift 11. Potomac River at Alexandria, VA 12. Potomac River at Mt. Vernon, MD 13. Potomac River Below Washington, DC 14. Prevention of Obstructions & Injurious Deposits, Baltimore Harbor, MD 15. Shallow Creek, MD 16. Tolchester Channel, MD 17. Twitch Cove & Big Thorofare, MD 18. Washington Harbor, DC 19. Wicomico River, MD Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Maint. Approp Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost 759,000 766,753 41,000 41,798 831,000 764,000 709,700 15,757,075 828,458 762,184 715,626 15,755,827 -- .. 0 -- .. 0 174,100 160,000 863,530 141,704 215,295 864,125 -- 17,452 -- 9,842 62,000 59,450 577,000 578,054 00 47,900 55,508 -- .. 0 176,000 193,000 1,918,417 145,553 233,584 1,919,978 95,214 95,214 1,956,788 1,957,668 17,000 8 17,000 8 408,817 405,961 254,036 244,858 4,630,711 5,139,859 551,000 559,000 605,600 10,884,645 544,192 562,412 609,935 10,884,736 31,000 140,000 24,845 60,838 1,242,000 1,261,707 24,800 22,616 2,015,410 2,023,344 0 85,290 -- 100,000 120,300 -- 67,869 152,383 -- .. 0 "" -- 0 844,100 671 000 549,296 849,728 670,772 553,039 .. .- 0 w -- 0 21,000 13,000 29,900 19,518 16,557 29,806 -- -- 0 w- -- 0 78,000 272,000 220,228 76,464 272,802 219,794 1,968,433 1,967,324 220,300 220,252 424,800 424,800 6,899,407 6,859,488 3,191,077 9 3,191,077 9 5,235,58310' 5,235,280 ' 471,609 471,609 12,337,743 12,338,111 4-28 FY98 FY99 BALTIMORE, MD DISTRICT TABLE 4-A (Continued) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT Funding FY97 FY98 FY99 Total to FY00 Sept. 30, 2000 23. Assateague Island 24. Atlantic Coast of Maryland 25. Broad Top Region, PA 26. Cumberland, MD and Ridgeley, WV 27. Jennings Randolph Lake, MD and WV 28A. Aylesworth Creek Lake, PA 29. Lock Hlaven, PA 30. Moorefield, WV 31. Neabsco Creek, VA 32. Olyphant, Lackawanna River, PA New Work Approp. Cost Contributed Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Contributed Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Contributed Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Contributed Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Contributed Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost -- 200,000 -- 77,561 -- 0 -- 0 0 136,115 68,910 58,752 0 514,718 97,000 92,776 2,122,650 2,165,781 6,350 6,350 -- 201,000 204,245 0 42,117 100,000 0 8,633,000 6,953,624 '13,256 212,189 4,701,000 3,760,164 5,018,670 4,234,108 393,000 891,050 393,000 891,050 0' 0 2,747,659 1,107,840 -- 0 -- 94,963 352,000 87,000 57,148 92,950 150,000 11,648 2,301,000 2,286,156 146,100 187,512 1,574,000 1,572,976 172,000 143,953 237,249 169,279 0 78,098 0 181,884 112,200 112,594 23,035 119,471 1,549,150 1,574,734 00 -- -- 0 -- -- 0 199,000 226,000 234,100 199,220 225,578 231,582 80,000 301,301 124,196 121,453 1,580,000 2,245,941, 473 14,013 0 34,349 0 84,755 (800,000) 483,826 0 5,855 0 35,093 1,971 21,698 86,000 391,998 00 -- 0 207,271 577,000 637,460 400,000 6,800,000 0 403,825 369,335 125,487 4-29 See Section in Text Project 200,000 77,561 00 32,176,000 32,076,300 22,321,301 21,850,261 100,000 4,518,279 15,634,070 15,910,917 2,017,713 1,724,981 176,644,435 176,652,364 27,078,722 27,077,181 6,350 6,350 2,320,410 2,320,410 3,256,623 3,253,617 55,235,000 55,323,950 18,248,035 6,878,038 19,074,100 18,960,170 1,205,602 1,199,461 0 207,27112 9,047,000 2,371,861 _ v v- -ft REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 2000 TABLE 4-A (Continued) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Section in Text Project Funding FY97 FY98 Total to FY99 FY00 Sept. 30, 2000 33. Dickson City, (Olyphant), PA 34. Petersburg, WV 35. Raystown Lake, Raystown Branch, Juniata River, PA 36. Scranton, Lackawanna River, PA 37. Williamsport Hagerman Flume 38. WV and PA Flooding Program 39A. Addison, NY 39B. Almond Lake, NY 39C. Arkport Dam, NY 39D. Avoca, NY New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Contributed Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Contributed Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Contributed Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Contributed Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost 0 1,000,000 0 0 0 45,377 309,152 371,455 7,077,000 5,983,414 80,000 80,000 5,556,000 4,807,190 7,500 0 339,000 217,032 28,800 0 1,531,000 (800,000) '1,719,435 276,448 .. 0 .. 0 4,750,800 5,674,106 3,050 650 5,425,000 1,131,921 12,200 10 4,563,000 4,653,854 5,000 10,629 38,651,000 704,343 (86,000) 29,058 0 0 00 3,844,000 3,948,300 4,264 2,025 0 1,263,132 00 0 - - 20,028 S"- 21,000 "" -- 6,242 -- 250,000 727,000 -- 25,942 47,648 13,000 12,345 493,000 505,537 227,100 261,158 20,000 15,819 5,010 11,500 5,740 7,998 00 21,200 24,014 .. -- 0 "" -- 0 427,000 422,000 432,620 425,001 424,163 427,918 -- -- 0 "- -- 0 213,000 199,000 232,900 214,078 198,655 228,366 6,100 10,491 9,500 9,132 1,000,000 725,984 18,554,000 18,554,009 80,000 80,000 77,418,770 77,418,770 66,530,415 66,522,602 19,814 13,304 45,792,000 4,674,849 41,000 0 0 20,028 21,000 6,242 977,000 73,590 827,050 827,050 351,765 351,078 5,760,211 5,760,211 8,291,301 8,258,449 1,910,00015 1,910,000'5 4,109,712 4,104,788 0 436,37416 0 016 16,800 591,561 17,187 591,432 4-30 BALTIMORE, MD DISTRICT TABLE 4-A (Continued) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT Funding FY97 FY98 FY99 Total to FY00 Sept. 30, 2000 39E. Binghamton, NY 39F. Canisteo, NY 39G Corning, NY 3911. East Sidney Lake, NY 391. Elmira, NY 39J. Hlornell, NY 39K. Lisle, NY 39L. Oxford, NY 39M. Whitney Point Lake, NY New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost 41,000 41,491 50,000 42,756 51,600 48,065 460,000 467,499 18,500 12,810 -- 160,000 162,189 37,300 31,500 27,500 '18,740 587,900 603,349 101,600 41,000 97,670 45,089 10,200 40,000 18,142 39,079 47,280 41,000 52,762 40,218 00 54,500 54,913 3,460,000" 3,460,0007 1,001,481 1,001,443 0 1,183,11118 0 1,183,111 46,900 1,171,135 47,790 1,171,047 00 31,500 32,319 -- -- 0 -- -- 0 479,000 436,000 580,700 464,032 452,920 580,171 1,760 18,000 7,446 18,004 00 20,400 20,343 -- -- 0 -- -- 0 147,030 167,100 194,400 148,312 157,880 203,720 22,550 28,000 28,115 27,389 (2,230) 19,000 6,592 19,027 00 37,100 38,007 3,322,00019 3,322,00019 1,294,778 1,295,759 6,049,504 6,049,504 10,384,471 10,453,771 6,883,305 6,883,305 463,209 463,152 4,558,69820 4,558,69820 10,161,106 10,161,054 661,19921 661,199 1,078,172 1,078,028 -- 131,00022 -- 131,00022 15,000 393,102 14,985 393,089 -- -- 0 -- -- 0 596,800 515,000 703,800 547,990 566,990 693,742 5,421,540 5,421,540 15,101,796 15,254,625 4-31 See Section in Text Project ._ - ... REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 2000 TABLE 4-A(Continued) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT Funding FY97 FY98 FY99 Total to FY00 Sept. 30, 2000 39N. Whitney Point Village, NY 40. Stillwater Lake, Lackawanna River, PA 41A. Cowanesque Lake, PA 41B. Tioga-Hammond Lakes, PA 42A. Alvin R. Bush Dam, PA 42B. Curwensville Lake, PA 42C. Foster Joseph Sayers, Dam, PA 43. Wyoming Valley, PA (Levee Raising) New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost. New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Contributed Approp. Cost. New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Contributed Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Contributed Approp. Cost 36,000 26,448 336,900 336,812 1,615,800 685,483 2,280,000 2,419,061 579,000 598,440 669,000 685,483 990,410 1,169,309 1,152,200 1,150,160 10,307,000 4,790,496 500,000 182,435 14,700 24,040 4,900 5,226 00 35,800 35,914 r" -- 0 .. .. 0 328,000 343,000 408,300 334,136 343,025 407,946 1,459,000 2,317,000 1,416,058 2,359,014 -- 124,068 -- 124,067 00 1,701,600 1,698,550 141,591 126,366 2,615,200 2,089,000 2,007,703 2,355,484 2,356,276 2,029,549 493,000 492,083 636,000 625,265 35,000 53,285 -- 0 -- 0 639,000 707,000 640,001 703,924 624,000 629,459 21,143 13,474 00 752,600 754,830 37,500 20,518 0 -"" -- 0 701,000 771,000 685,000 721,185 776,771 685,383 8,596,000 11,543,597 1,000,000 852,321 10,919,000 9,641,663 5,950,000 2,845,621 8,875,000 10,503,210 0 1,623,010 4-32 See Section in Text Project 424,196 424,196 608,881 609,007 5,725,700 5,725,700 6,390,290 6,388,940 107,470,700 107,470,751 25,564,781 24,564,929 13,760,935 13,767,708 186,244,800 186,244,800 35,309,846 35,317,792 7,103,001 7,103,001 12,833,076 12,838,861 20,406,060 20,406,060 15,289,776 15,284,549 1,333,653 1,391,986 30,887,06323 30,887,06323 15,853,308 5,412,467 40,052,048 40,402,921 7,450,000 5,503,387 BALTIMORE, MD DISTRICT TABLE 4-A (Continued) See Section in Text Project COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT Funding FY97 FY98 FY99 Total to FY00 Sept. 30, 2000 44. York, Indian Rock Dam, PA 48. Anacostia River & Tributaries, MD & DC 49. Chesapeake Bay Oyster Recovery, MD 50. Chesapeake Bay Environmental Program, MD 51. Little Falls Fish Passage #2, MD 52. Poplar Island, MD 53. South Central Environmental Restoration Infrastructure and Resource Protection Development Pilot, PA 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. 11. 12. New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Contributed Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Contributed Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Contributed Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Contribution Approp. Cost 2,129,000 2,151,907 505,410 446,000 504,286 429,924 0 0 552,000 569,543 -- 2,401,000 (868,000) 3,757,000 -- 750,516 445,639 4,112,045 495,000 500,809 130,000 124,646 757,000 743,614 50,000 0 1,850,000 3,357,800 4,291,000 4,172,647 Includes $8,467,003 for previous projects. Includes $399,802 for previous projects. Excludes $2,200 contributed funds and includes $27,668 emergency relief funds. Excludes $5,000 contributed funds. Includes $5,000 for previous project. Includes $20,641 for previous projects. Includes $283,008 public works funds adn $67,185 emergency relief funds; excludes $500,000 contributed funds. Unconstructed portion of the project was deauthorized November 2, 1979. Includes $3,029,001 for previous project. Excludes $1,831,609 for previous project. Excludes $4,000 for emergency dredging under provisions of Section 3, 1945 River and Harbor Act. Includes $114,712 for previous project. 509,000 705,000 365,000 450,813 811,901 317,947 -- -- 114,000 -- -- 301,186 -- -- 400,000 -- -- 11,461 44,000 512,700 56,371 415,081 -- 215,000 -- 56,337 13,542,000 8,512,844 2,975,000 1,386,474 15,350,000 1,550,027 (240,825) (29,884) 20,518,000 25,017,546 9,300,000 10,471,436 23,566,775 8,639,568 (15,552) (8,076) 500,503 611,757 274,641 348,418 14,606,000 14,824,205 6,175,000 5,518,176 0 9,555,699 00 13. Includes $12,000 for previous project and excludes $1000 contributed funds. 14. Excludes $903,450 contributed funds. 15. Includes $62,577 emergency relief funds. 16. Includes $109,944 emergency relief funds. 17. Excludes $163,096 contributed funds. 18. Includes $207,520 rehabilitation funds. 19. Excludes $34,729 contributed funds. 20. Includes $250,899 emergency relief funds and excludes $15,000 contributed funds. 21. Includes $71,557 emergency relief funds. 22. Includes $73,465 emergency relief funds. 23. Excludes $263,900 contributed funds in accordance with the Tri-party Agreement for construction of a sanitary system for public use. 24. Includes $11,588 emergency relief funds. 25. Includes $15,000 for deferred maintenance. 4-33 5,601,16724 5,601,16724 17,363,79025 17,367,29625 5,290,000 5,308,200 2,506,000 2,442,078 114,000 301,186 400,000 11,461 1,409,703 1,407,918 489,641 404,755 49,423,000 49,098,209 18,500,000 17,376,086 51,016,775 25,551,719 5,672,923 5,772,925 -- REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 2000 TABLE 4-B AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION See Date Section Authorizing in Text Act Project and Work Authorized Documents BALTIMORE HARBORAND CHANNELS, MD and VA Aug 8, Branch channel 35 feet deep to head to Curtis Bay, and one 35 feet deep and 1917 400 feet wide Fort McHenry to Port Covington entrance channel, thence 150 feet wide to Ferry Bar, and thence 27 feet deep and 150 feet wide to Hanover Street Bridge, widen approaches and bends, and enlarge anchorage basin near entrance. Inclusion of Patapsco River and tributaries into one project for Baltimore Harbor. Jan 21, 1927 Jul 3, 1930 Jul. 3, 1930 Change in location of anchorage near upper end of Fort McHenry Channel. Increased anchorage facilities Rivers and Harbors. For 37-foot depth in that portion of channel to Baltimore lying between 37-foot depth curve near Baltimore Light to Sparrows Point entrance channel; widen angle between Fort McHenry and Ferry Bar section; and for width of 400 feet in Curtis Bay section. Oct. 17, For 22-, 18-, and 15-foot channels in Curtis Creek from 22-foot depth below 1940 Pennington Avenue Bridge to upper end of marginal wharf of U.S. Ordinance Depot Mar 2, Uniform main channel 309 feet deep from the ocean through York Spit section 1945 and Craighill entrance to Fort McHenry, additional anchorage area, 2,400 feet long, 1,200 feet wide, and 30 feet deep; a connecting channel 400 feet wide and 27 feet deep from Cutoff Brewerton Angle in main channel to Inland Waterway from Delaware River to Chesapeake Bay; a channel in Curtis Creek 200 feet wide and 35 feet deep from head of existing 35-foot project channel in Curtis Bay to a point in the creek about 750 feet below Pennington Avenue Bridge. Mar. 2, A channel 22 feet deep and 200 feet wide from 22-foot depth curve south of 1945 Baltimore & Ohio R.R. bridge about 2,800 feet to vicinity ofArundel Cove, thence 100 feet wide in Arundel Cove for about 2,100 feet; with an anchorage basin about 700 feet square adjacent to channel southwesterly of Coast Guard wharf. Jul 3, Main channel 42 feet deep and 1,000 feet wide in Cape Henry section at 1958 entrance to Chesapeake Bay and in York Spit section; 42 feet deep and 800 feet wide in Rappahannock Spit section and in approach channel to Baltimore Harbor from Craighill entrance to Fort McHenry, with widening at entrance and bends; channels 42 feet deep and 600 feet wide in Curtis Bay and Ferry Bar sections of harbor; a connecting channel 35 feet deep and 600 feet wide from main channel to approach channel to Chesapeake and Delaware Canal; and for three disjointed sections of channels of same depth and width in Chesapeake Bay leading to Chesapeake and Delaware Canal; and to provide Federal maintenance of 39-foot depth in Northwest Branch, in areas dredged to that depth by local interests. Dec, 31, Deepening of the Cape Henry Channel to 50 feet at the existing width of 1,000 1970 feet, with widening at bends; deepening of the Spit Channel to 50 feet at the existing width of 1,000 feet, with widening at bends; enlargement of the Rappahannock Shoal Channel to a depth of 50 feet and a width of 1,000 feet; deepening of the main ship channel from Chesapeake Bay to Fort McHenry to a depth of 50 feet at the existing width of 800 feet, with widening at bends and at the Craighill Entrance; deepening of the Curtis Bay Channel to a depth of 50 feet at the existing width of 600 feet, and deepening of the 950-foot wide and 980-foot long turning basin at the head of channel to the same depth; deepening of the Northwest Branch--East Channel to a depth of 49 feet from the depth existing at the time of construction at a width of 600 feet, and deepening of the 950-foot wide and 950-foot long turning basin at the head of the channel to the same depth; and deepening and extension of the Northwest Branch--West Channel to a depth of 40 feet from the depth existing at the H. Doc. 799, 64th Cong., 1st Sess. Committee Doc. 11, 70th Cong., Ist Sess. H. Doc. 86, 85th Cong., Ist Sess. Adopted as a national defense project. (No printed report.) H. Doc. 741, 79th Cong., 2nd Sess. In accordance with plans on file in the Office, Chief of Engineers H. Doc. 86, 85th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 181, 94th Cong., 1st Sess. 4-34 1. BALTIMORE, MD DISTRICT TABLE 4-B (Continued) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Date Authorizing Act Project and Work Authorized 2. Jun. 30, 1948 time of construction, at a width of 600 feet, and with an irregularly shaped turning basin at the head of the channel 40 feet deep and about 2,000 feet long with a maximum width of 1,150 feet. BALTIMORE IIARBOR, MD, COLLECTION AND REMOVAL OF DRIFT Collection and removal of drift from Baltimore Harbor and its tributary waters. IIONGA RIVERAND TAR BAY, MD Aug. 30, Channel 60 feet wide and 7 feet deep from the 7-foot contour in Chesapeake Bay 1935 through Tar Bay and Fishing Creek to the 7-foot contour in Honga River. Jun. 30, Modification providing for a channel in Back Creek 7 feet deep and 60 feet wide 1948 from the 7-foot depth curve in Honga River to a point near the head of Back Creek, with a turning basin of the same depth, 150 feet long and 200 feet wide. KNAPPS NARROWS, MD Aug. 30, A channel 9 feet deep at mean low water, 75 feet wide, widened at the bends 1935 from deep water in Chesapeake Bay in deep water in Harris Creek, MD with a turning basin west of the drawbridge, 7 feet deep at mean low water, about 320 feet long and 120 feet wide. Project channel was authorized by the Public Works Administration September 16, 1933 and later adopted by 1935 River and Harbor Act. 4. River and Harbor Act of 1948 Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 35, 74th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 580, 80th Cong., 2nd Sess. H. Doc. 308, 72nd Cong., 1st Sess. LITTLE WICOMICO RIVER, VA Aug. 30, A channel 8 feet deep and 150 feet wide from Potomac River to deep water in 1935 Little Wicomico River; two stone jetties 1,000 feet and 1,300 feet long at the entrance; and 1,004 linear feet of timber bulkhead to stabilize the dredged inner channel. NANTICOKE RIVER, DE AND MD A 9-foot channel, 100 feet wide up to Seaford, DE, with a turning basin. Slight widening between bridges in harbor at Seaford, DE. A channel 6 feet deep, 60 feet wide in Northwest Fork, together with turning basin. A channel 12 feet deep, 100 feet wide from 12-foot contour in Tangier Sound to highway bridge at Seaford, DE. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 24, 72nd Cong., Ist. Sess. H. Doc. 333, 53rd Cong..,3rd Sess., and Annual Report, 1985, p. 1165. H1. Doc. 674, 61st Cong., 2nd Sess. H. Doc. 869, 60th Cong., 1st Sess.2 S. Doc. 69, 77th Cong., 1st Sess. NEALE SOUND, MD Aug. 26, Channel 7 feet deep and 100 feet wide through lower entrance into Wicomico 1937 River and a second channel 6 feet deep at upper entrance entending from deep water within the sound through a marshy barrier at head of Cobb Island to deep water in the Potomac with widths of 60 feet within the sound and 80 feet elsewhere. Jul. 13, 1999 Sec. 107 A channel 7 feet deep and 100 feet wide at the lower entrance to Neale Sound, from deep water within the Sound to deep water in the Wicomico River; a channel 6 feet deep and 80 foot wide in the Potomac River to deep water within the sound at the upper entrance. This project provides for a 1,650 foot stone jetty to protect the upper channel from shoaling. -I. Doc. 159, 75th Cong., 1st Sess. Detailed Project Report, Feb. 28, 1997 4-35 See Section in Text Documents Jun. 3, 1896 Jun. 25, 1910 Jun. 25, 1910 Mar. 2, 1945 i r - REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 2000 TABLE 4-B (Continued) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION See Date Section Authorizing in Text Act Project and Work Authorized Documents 8. NORTHEAST RIVER, MD Aug. 26, Channel 60 feet wide and 7 feet deep from that depth in the river to the foot of 1937 Church Street in the town of North East, enlarged at its upper end to form a basin 120 feet wide and 300 feet long. OCEAN CITY HARBORAND INLET AND SINEPUXENT BAY, MD Aug. 30, Construction of an inlet between the Atlantic Ocean and Sinepuxent Bay, 10 feet 19353 deep and 200 feet wide, protected by jetties; a channel 8 feet deep and 100 feet wide from the inlet to Ocean City, 6 feet deep and 150 feet wide to Green Point, and 100 feet wide into Chincoteague Bay. Aug. 39, Modification providing a 10-foot by 100-foot channel from the inlet to the west 1935 side of the bay with two turning basins; a channel 6 feet deep and 125 feet wide from the inlet to Ocean City, 6 feet deep and 150 feet wide to Green Point feet wide into Isle of Wight Bay. Sep. 3 Modification providing for raising the north jetty to an elevation 9 feet above 19453 mean low water, and a channel 300 feet wide and 16 feet deep from the ocean through the inlet to the Isle of Wight Bay Channel, thence 200 feet to the project harbor, and a depth of 14 feet in the project harbor. Channel depths refer to project datum. POTOMAC & ANACOSTIA RIVERS, DC, COLLECTION & REMOVAL OF DRIFT Oct. 27, Collection and removal of drift from waters of the Potomac and Anacostia 1985 Rivers and their tributaries in the Washington, DC area from the head of the tidewater to Mount Vernon. VA POTOMAC RIVER AT ALEXANDRIA, VA Jun. 25, A channel 6,700 feet long and averages 300 feet wide for depth of 24 feet in 1910 front of Alexandria between the through channel and a line drawn 20 feet outside of established pierhead line. POTOMAC RIVER AT MT. VERNON, MD Mar. 3, Channel 6 to 7 feet deep, 150 feet wide, from Potomac River channel to Mount 1879 Vernon wharf, with turning basin at wharf. Channel increased to 9- to 10-feet depth, 200-foot width, turning basin to have 200-foot radius. POTOMAC RIVER BELOW WASHINGTON, DC Mar. 3, A channel 24 feet deep and 200 feet wide between mouth at Chesapeake Bay 1899 and Giesboro Point at Washington, DC, a distance of 108 miles. PREVENTION OF OBSTRUCTIONS AND INJURIOUS DEPOSITS, BALTIMORE HARBOR, MD Aug. 30, Continuous patrol and inspection of Baltimore Harbor, Chesapeake Bay, and its 1935 tributaries to prevent and detect violations, and issue permits as required for transporting and despositing waste materials in navigable waters. (The project is limited to the tidal waters of Chesapeake Bay and its tributaries that lie within the State of Maryland.) SHALLOW CREEK May 22, 1987 Sec. 107 Jul. 13, 1999 Sec. 107 Dredging a navigation channel, 5 feet deep at mean low water, 50 feet wide, and 2,700 feet long from the Patapsco River to a turning basin, 100 feet wide by 100 feet long at the head of creek. Dredging a navigation spur channel, 4 feet deep at mean low water, 30-40 feet wide and 1,940 feet long from the existing Federal channel into the northern reach of the creek. H. Doc. 248 75th Cong., 1st Sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 38, 72nd Cong., Ist Sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 60, 74th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 444, 82nd Cong., 2nd Sess. H. Doc. 286, 89th Cong., 1st Sess. IH. Doc. 1253, 60th Cong., 2nd Sess. Annual Report, 1879, vol. 1, p. 83. Annual Report, 1888, vol. 1, p. 814. H. Doc. 33, 52nd Cong., 1 st Sess. River and HarborAct, June 28, 1888 as amended by Public Law 85-802, dated August 29, 1959 Detailed Project Report Jan. 1986 Detailed Project Report, May 21, 1996 4-36 9. 10. 11. 12. 13. 14. 15. BALTIMORE, MD DISTRICT TABLE 4-B (Continued) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION See Date Section Authorizing in Text Act 16. Project and Work Authorized Documents TOLCHESTER CHANNEL S-TURN, MD Aug. 5, Dredge a new straight channel 35 feet deep, 600 feet wide, and 2 miles long 1999 to replace the existing Tolchester Channel S-Turn off Tolchester Beach. Water Resources Dev. Act of 1999 TWITCH COVE AND BIG THOROFARE, MD A channel 4 feet deep and 25 feet wide from Tangier Sound into Big Thorofare River, and one of same dimensions around point between said river and Tyler River. WASHINGTON HARBOR, DC Aug. 30, Provides for: (a) Virginia Channel, from Giesboro Point to area for 25,000 1935 square feet; (b) Washington Channel, from Haines Point to head of Washington Channel, 24 feet deep and 400 feet wide; (c) Anacostia River from Giesboro Point to Anacostia Bridge, 24 feet deep and 400 feet wide, with turning basin 800 feet wide and about 2,400 feet long of same depth opposite Naval Weapons Plant, (d) Anacostia River from Anacostia Bridge 24 feet deep and 200 feet wide to turning basin 400 feet square of same depth at foot of 15th Street SE Channel lengths including turning basins are: Virginia Channel, 25,000 feet; Washington Channel, 10,000 feet; and Anacostia River, 15,000 feet; and (e) operation and maintenance of inlet gates and lock and outlet gates of Tidal Basin constructed under a previous project to flush Washington Channel. H. Doc. 285, 62nd Cong., 2nd Sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 22, 74th Cong., Ist Sess. 19. Sep. 19, 1890 WICOMICO RIVER, MD Channel 9 feet deep from Main Street Bridge to about 2 miles below. Jun. 25, Extend 9-foot depth into north prong from Main Street Bridge to the Salisbury 1910 Dam and turning basin. Mar. 2, 1919 Jul. 3, 1930 Extend 9-foot depth into south prong to head of navigation at Cathell Street, including a turning basin, and extend project down to mouth of river in Monie Bay. A 12-foot channel below the Main Street Bridge. Aug. 26, A 14-foot channel, 150 feet wide; depths of 14 feet in the north and south 1937 prongs and a basin 6 feet deep at Webster Cove and approach channel thereto of the same depth. Sep. 3, Enlarge existing basin at Webster Cove, by dredging an extension 6 feet deep, 1954 100 feet wide, and 200 feet long on each side of existing basin to form a Tshaped harbor. ASSATEAGUE ISLAND, MD Oct. 12, Provides for expediting the Assateague Island restoration feature of the Ocean 1996 City, Maryland and vicinity study with a Federal appropriation limit of $35 million. ATLANTIC COAST OF MARYLAND Nov. 17, Consists of a dune beginning at 27th Street extending north to the Delaware line; 1986 a steel sheetpile bulkhead from 27th Street south to Fourth Street; and widened and raised beach from Third Street to just beyond the Delaware line. H. Doc. 20, 51st Cong., Ist Sess., and Annual Report 1890, p. 947 H. Doc. 569, 61st Cong., 2nd Sess. H. Doc. 1509, 63rd Cong., 3rd Sess. Senate Committee Print, 75th Cong., 3rd Sess. 2 H. Doc. 619, 81st Cong., 2nd Sess.2 P.L. 104-303 Report of the Chief of Engineers dated Sept. 29, 1981 4-37 17. 18. 23. 24. REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 2000 TABLE 4-B (Continued) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION See Date Section Authorizing in Text Act Project and Work Authorized Documents BROAD TOP REGION, PA Oct. 31, Pilot program to develop and carry out a watershed reclamation and protection, 1992 and wetlands creation and restoration project using innovative reclamation technologies for the purposes of restoring, maintaining and protecting surface and ground water, including municipal water supplies, from adverse impacts related to acid mine drainage and other runoff. Oct. 12, Provided for non-Federal sponsor credit for design and construction prior to 1996 PCA execution; allowed for Federal share of project costs to be provided in the form of grant or reimbursement of project costs. CUMBERLAND, MD, AND RIDGELEY, WV Jun. 22, Levees, retaining walls, movable dam, and channel clearing for Cumberland, 1936 West Cumberland and South Cumberland, MD and Ridgeley, WV. Jul. 24, Levees, wall, channel improvement, remove Chesapeake and Ohio Canal Dam 1946 and construct new industrial dam. 27. Oct. 23, 1962 JENNINGS RANDOLPH LAKE, MD AND WV Construction of Bloomington Lake project. LACKAWANNA RIVER BASIN, PA Oct. 23, Construction of Aylesworth Creek Lake, Fall Brook Lake, and local protection 1962 works on Lackawanna River at Scranton, Pennsylvania LOCK HAVEN, PA Nov. 17, Consists of 36,600 feet of levee and 1,000 feet concrete floodwall along the 1986 West Branch and Bald Eagle Creek, five closure structures, seven ponding areas, a sanitary pumping station, 35 gravity type drainage structures, necessary road and utility relocations, non-structural measures for Woodward and Allison Townships, and minor recreation facilities. MOOREFIELD, WV Nov. 28, Levee, floodwall, closures, relocations, and improvements to the flood warning 1990 system. NEABSCO CREEK, VA Oct. 12, Provides for a flood control project in the Neabsco Creek Watershed in 1996 Prince William County. OLYPHANT, LACKAWANNA RIVER, PA Oct. 31, Provides for 3,800 feet of earth levee, 1,400 feet of concrete floodwall, a closure 1992 structure, interior drainage facilities, 1,500 feet of gabion slope protection and asscociated cultural mitigation and environmental restoration. DICKSON CITY, PA Oct. 13, Provides for Corps to undertake activities leading to construction of flood 1997 control measures at Dickson City, with the same level of protection as Olyphant, PA. P.L. 102-580 P.L. 104-303 H. Doc. 101, 73rd Cong., 1st Sess. Report on file in Office, Chief of Engineers H. Doc. 469, 87th Cong., 2nd Sess. S. Doc. 141, 87th Cong., 2nd Sess. H. Doc. 187, 98th Cong. Report of the Chief of Engineers dated July 23, 199 P.L. 104-303 Report of the Chief of Engineers dated June 29, 1992 P.L. 105-62 4-38 25. 26. 28. 29. 30. 31. 32. 33. BALTIMORE, MD DISTRICT TABLE 4-B (Continued) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION See Date Section Authorizing in Text Act Project and Work Authorized PETERSBURG, WV Nov. 28, Channel improvements, levee and floodwall, closures, relocations, and improve- 1990 ments to the flood warning system. RAYSTOWN LAKE, RAYSTOWN BRANCH, JUNIATA RIVER, PA Oct. 23, 1962 Construction of dam and appurtenant facilities. SCRANTON, LACKAWANNA RIVER, PA Oct. 31, Provides for 5,800 feet of earth levee, 1,700 feet of concrete floodwall, 3 closure 1992 structures, interior drainage facilities, 2,700 feet of gabion slope protection, an improved flood warning system, removal of a railroad bridge, access ramp, and associated cultural mitigation. Modified by Act of Oct. 12, 1996 Directs Secretary to carry out the project for Plot and Green Ridge sections and allows non-Federal interest to participate in the financing of the project in accordance with Section 903(c) of WRDA 86. WILLIAMSPORT, PA- HAGERMAN'S RUN Oct. 13 Directs the Secretary of the Army to use $225,000 to construct necessary repairs 1997 to the flume and conduit for flood control at the Hagerman's Run project. PA & WV FLOODING PROGRAM Oct. 12, Provides for design and construction of structural and non-structural flood 1996 control, streambank protection, stormwater management and channel clearing and modification measures in the West Branch Susquehanna River and Juniata River Basins in Pennsylvania. Aug. 17 Requires flood protection not less than 100-year level for measures that 1999 incorporate levees or floodwalls. SOUTHERN NEW YORK FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS Jun. 22, 1936 modified by Acts of Jun. 28, 1938 Aug. 18, 1941; Dec. 22, 1944; May 17, 1950; and Jul. 3, 1958 Aug. 18, 1941 Construction of detention reservoirs and related flood control works for protection of Binghamton, Hornell, Corning and other towns in New York and Pennsylvania. STILLWATER LAKE, LACKAWANNA RIVER, PA Construction of a flood control reservoir. Report of the Chief of Engineers dated June 29, 1990 H. Doc. 565, 87th Cong., 2nd Sess. Report of the Chief of Engineers dated June 29, 1992 P.L. 104-303 P.L. 105-62 P.L. 104-303 P.L. 106-53 H. Doc. 702, 77th Cong., 2nd Sess. 11DHoc.. 702, 77th Cong., 2nd Sess. 4-39 34. 35. Documents 36. 37. 38. 39. 40. ______ __ __ REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 2000 TABLE 4-B (Continued) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION See Date Section Authorizing in Text Act Project and Work Authorized Documents SUSQUEHANNA RIVER FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS, NY AND PA Jul. 3, Construction of Cowanesque and Tioga-Hannond reservoirs, local flood pro- 1958 tection works at Elkland, PA, and Nichols, NY and channel improvement at Cortland, NY. Sess. Oct. 22, Modification in connection with the construction of Cowanesque Lake to relo- 1976 cate the Town of Nelson, PA, to a new townsite. Mar. I, Modification of Cowanesque Lake to include water supply as provided by Sec. 1983 tion 4 of the Flood Control Act of 1944 (PL 78-534) and Section 301 of Water Supply Act of 1958 (PL 85-500). WEST BRANCH OF SUSQUEHANNA RIVER, PA Sep. 3, 1954 Construction of three flood control reservoirs. WYOMING VALLEY, PA (LEVEE RAISING) Nov. 17, Modification provides for raising existing levees and floodwalls between 3 and 5 1986 feet, modifying closure structures, relocating utilities and providing some new floodwalls and levees to maintain the integrity of the existing flood control system. YORK, INDIAN ROCK DAM, PA Jun. 22, 1936 Construction of Indian Rock Dam and channel improvements on Codorus Creek. ANACOSTIA RIVER AND TRIBUTARIES, MD AND DC Oct. 12, The project consists of two wetland restoration sites in the District of Columbia, 1996 one stream restoration site and one stormwater wetland site in Prince George's County, and nine stream restoration and stormwater wetland sites in Montgomery County. The project will restore a total of 80 acres of tidal and non-tidal freshwater wetlands, 5 miles of piedmont streams, and 33 acres of bottomland hardwood forest within the highly urbanized Anacostia River watershed. CHESAPEAKE BAY OYSTER RECOVERY, MD Nov. 17, Contributes to multi-agency and private efforts to restore oyster populations in 1986 the Maryland portion of the Chesapeake Bay. CHESAPEAKE BAY ENVIRONMENTAL RESTORATION Oct. 12, Establishes a pilot program to provide environmental design and construction 1996 assistance to new Federal interests in the Chesapeake Bay watershed. LITTLE FALLS PASSAGE #2, MD Apr. 12, Modification to improve the environment includes a 24-foot notched fishway 1996 to re-establish migratory fish access to 10 miles of historic habitat upstream of the dam. POPLAR ISLAND, MARYLAND Oct. 12, The project consists of reconstructing Poplar Island to its approximate size in 1996 1847 (1,110 acres), using an estimated 38 million cubic yards of uncontaminated dredged material from maintenance dredging of the southern approach channels of the Baltimore harbor and Channels navigation project. H. Doc. 702, 77th Cong., 2nd H. Doc. 394, 84th Cong., 2nd Sess. H. Doc. 29, 84th Cong., 1st Sess. Report of the Chief of Engineers dated October 19, 1983 H. Doc. 702, 77th Cong., 2nd Sess. Report of the Chief of Engineers, dated November 15, 1994 P.L. 99 - 662 P.L. 104-303 Ecosystem Restoration Report Report of the Secretary of the Army, dated September 3, 1996 4-40 41. 42. 43. 44. 48. 49. 50. 51. 52. BALTIMORE, MD DISTRICT TABLE 4-B (Continued) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Project and Work Authorized SOUTH CENTRAL PA ENVIRONMENTAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM Oct. 31, Pilot program for providing environmental assistance to non-Federal interests in 1992 South Central Pennsylvania. Expanded scope to include 15 counties; increased program authorization limits to $50 million; provided for non-Federal sponsor credit for design and construction prior to PCA execution; allowed for Federal share of project costs to be provided in the form of grants or reimbursement of project costs; and provided the non-Federal sponsors to receive credit for reasonable interest to provide non-Federal share of project's cost. Modified by Acts of Nov. 13, 1995 Oct. 13, Increased program authorization to $80 million and allowed for more non- 1997 Federal credits. Added six counties to the program area. Documents P.L. 102-580 P.L. 104-46 P.L. 104-303 P.L. 105-62 1. Exclusive of portion considered inactive. Inactive portion is widening 35-foot depth channel from 150 to 400 feet from Port Covington to Ferry Bar, widening 27-foot depth channel from 150 to 250 feet to Hanover Street Bridge, and providing a channel 127 feet deep by 250 feet wide to Western Maryland Railway Bridge with an anchorage and turning basin at the upper end. 2. Contains latest published maps. 3. Included in Public Works Administration program September 16, 1993. The site chosen for the inlet under this authorization was opened just south of Ocean City by natural forces during a severe storm in August 1933. This eliminated the necessity for an 8-foot channel from the inlet to Ocean City. 4. Included in Emergency Relief Program 1935. 5. Raising of the north jetty to an elevation of 9 feet above mean low water was accomplished with maintenance funds in 1956. 4-41 See Section in Text 53. Date Authorizing Act REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 2000 TABLE 4-C OTHER AUTHORIZED NAVIGATION PROJECTS Project Status Accotink Creek, VA ' Anacostia River and Flats 2 Annapolis Harbor, MD Aquia Creek, VA Back Creek, MD Black Walnut Harbor, MD Bonum Creek, VA Branson Cove, Lower Machodoc River, VA Breton Bay, MD6 Broad Creek River, DE Cambridge Harbor, MD Chester River, MD Chester River, Bodkin Island, MD Choptank River, MD Claiborne Harbor, MD' Corsica River, MD Crisfield Harbor, MD Cypress Creek, MD Duck Point Cove, MD Elk and Little Elk rivers, MD' 3 Fishing Bay, MD Goose Creek, MD' 7 Herring Bay & Rockhold Creek, MD Herring Creek, MD Herring Creek, Tall Timbers, MD LaTrappe, MD Little Creek, Kent Island, MD Lowes Wharf, MD Lower Machodoc Creek, VA Lower Thorofare, Deal Island, MD Madison Bay, MD17 Manokin River, MD20 Middle River and Dark Head Creek, MD Monroe Bay and Creek, VA Muddy Hook Tyler Coves, MD Nan Cove, MD 4 Nanticoke River, MD Nanticoke River at Bivalve, MD Neabsco Creek, VA Neale Sound, MD Neavitt Harbor, MD '7 Nomini Bay and Creek, VA25 Occoquan Creek, VA'3 Parish Creek, MD Patuxent River, MD' 3 Pocomoke River, MD Potomac River -Aquatic Plant Control, MD, VA, and DC Potomac River and Tributaries at and below Washington, DC, Elimination of Waterchestnut Potomac River at Lower Cedar Point, MD Potomac River North Side of Washington Channel, DC' Queenstown Harbor, MD Rhodes Point to Tylerton, MD Rock Hall Harbor, MD Shad Landing State Park, MD Slaughter Creek, MD St. Catherine's Sound, MD St. George's Creek, MD St. Jerome's Creek, MD St. Michael's Harbor, MD 7 St. Patrick's Creek, MD Completed Deferred Completed Inactive Completed , Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Deferred Completed Deferred Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed For Last Full Report See Annual Report 1878 1953 1993 1928 1946 1982 1993 1950 1950 1964 1993 1998 2000 1979 1987 1948 1998 1947 1982 1932 1998 1973 1998 1989 1998 1980 1958 1986 1904 2000 1977 1919 1947 1994 1996 1965 1995 1983 1998 1991 1968 1946 1971 1988 1905 1995 1998 1977 1920 1956 1985 1995 1998 1966 1994 1989 1985 1991 1964 1987 Construct $ 5,000 3,910,582 34,250 52,465 23,061 32,631 202,200 15,755 47,924E 64,510E 195,974' 70,495 67,000 96,796 42,974 39,071' 416,736' 3,057 25,289. 90,121 34,074' 75,900 133,337 1,506,259 1,504,297 8,064' 23,000' 2,100 9,916 1,832,411 125,550 34,7882 38,7152 22,434 64,001 34,8612 73,242 240,817 57,841 12,6002 36,500 78,446 66,2532 19,1702 14,0002 191,7262 2,363,589 10,234 1,744,6923 72,8583 304,000 1,072,5003 33,531 4,140 29,9473 147,650 44,3573 16,7233 15,752 - --- 4-42 -- Cost to September 30, 2000 Operation and tion Maintenance $ ... 3 51,366 11,770 41,378 431,478 468,464 35,684 6 47,593 167,952 946,934 598,8039 0 104,230 1I 709,047 134 770 2 1,895,645 14,729 14 353,188 16 53,808's '6 2,161,260 22,013 1,105,148 1,124,317 216,265 9 40,475 7,327 327,530 30,432 1,264,372 42,643 I 43,534 2 96,785 483,685 687,568 33,138 604,441 142,131 1,947,744 4 945,585 45,019 42,063 6 203,198 '7 533,808 29 3,454,849 292,116 184,394 6,216 0 27,4613' 2 321,803 2,368,946 457,157 19,198 682,983 659,369 6 756,360 35,666 151,849 BALTIMORE, MD DISTRICT TABLE 4-C (Continued) OTHER AUTHORIZED NAVIGATION PROJECTS Cost to September 30, 2000 For Last Full Report See Annual Operation and Project Status Report Construction Maintenance St. Peter's Creek, MD'7 Smith Creek, MD Susquehanna River above and below Havre De Grace, MD Susquehanna River at Williamsport, PA'7 Tilghman Island Harbor, MD Tedious Creek, MD Town Creek, MD Tred Avon River, MD Tuckahoe River, MD Tyaskin Creek, MD Upper Machodoc Creek, VA Upper Thorofare, Deal Island, MD Warwick River, MD I. Unconstructed portion of the project was deauthorized August 5, 1977. 2. Project deferred for restudy. 3. Includes $8,476 for previous projects. 4. Includes $31,065 for previous projecst. 5. Excludes $3,998 contributed funds. 6. Includes $37,500 for previous projects. 7. Includes $50,000 for previous projects. 8. Excludes $3,998 contributed funds and includes $61,321 for previous projects. 9. Includes $40,041 for previous projects. 10. Authorization for the unconstructed portion of the project was withdrawn by the Chief of Engineers January 22, 1979. 11. Includes $30,000 for previous projects. 12. Includes $87,741 for previous projects. 13. Unconstructed portion of the project was deauthorized November 2, 1979. 14. Includes $79,626 for previous project and excludes $8,414 contributed funds. 15. Includes $24,321 for previous projects. 16. Includes $2,840 for previous projects. 17. Authorized by Chief of Engineers. 18. Excludes $10,306 contributed funds. 19. Excludes $1,100 contributed funds. 20. Abandonment recommended in 1926 (H. doc. 467, 69th Cong., 1st Sess.) 21. Includes $2,000 expended outside project limits. 22. Excludes $111,581 expended by Navy Department and $52,000 from contributed funds. 23. Excludes $565 contributed funds. 24. Excludes $1,000 contributed funds. 25. Unconstructed portion of the project was deauthorized November 6, 1977. 26. Includes $25,000 for previous projects. 27. Includes $19,170 Works Progress Administration funds. 28. Includes $10,617 for previous projects. 29. Unconstructed portion of the project is inactive. Includes $20,500 for previous projects. 30. Excludes $389,000 contributed funds. 31. Excludes $101,162 Public Health Service funds expended for waterchestnut removal. 32. Includes $19,000 for previous projects. 33. Excludes $672,880 contributed funds. 34. Excludes $24,125 contributed funds. 35. Excludes $600 contributed funds. 36. Includes $26,500 for previous projects. 37. Excludes $6,984 contributed funds. 38. Unconstructed portion of the project was deauthorized November 6, 1977. Includes $22,905 Works Progress funds and $97,390 for previous projects. 39. Excludes $40,000 contributed funds. 40. Excludes $10,158 contributed funds. 41. Includes $6,000 for previous projects. 42. Includes $49,548 for previous project. 43. Excludes $344,952 contributed funds. 4-43 Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed 1963 1936 1985 1974 1996 1998 1950 1994 1980 1923 1971 2000 1984 46,74037 5,252 293,57038 57,03139 424,800 2,330,01340 43,220 523,310 9,727 19,29741 20,281 62,446 22,04143 41,223 16,448 859,051 41,437 464,788 0 62,386 927,949 23,489 54,302 34,777 864,205 148,728 __~ _ REPORT OF THE, SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 2000 TABLE 4-D OTHER AUTHORIZED BEACH EROSION CONTROL PROJECTS Cost to September 30, 2000 For Last Full Report See Annual Operation and Project Status Report Construction Maintenance Colonial Beach, MD Complete 1995 $ 649,957' .-- Oxford, MD2 Complete 1978 97,7503 ... Punch Island Road, MD Complete 1996 199,105 -..- Town of North Beach, MD Complete 1995 450,6104 --- 1. Excludes $414,977 contributed funds. 2. Authorized by Chief of Engineers. 3. Excludes $80,648 contributed funds. 4. Excludes $245,262 contributed funds. 4-44 BALTIMORE, MD DISTRICT TABLE 4-E OTHER AUTHORIZED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS Cost to September 30, 2000 For Last Full Report See Annual Operation and Project Status Report Construction Maintenance Anacostia River and Tributaries Flood Protection and Navigation Improvements, DC and MD Anacostia River and Tributaries, Prince Georges Co., MD2 Bainbridge, NY 3,4 Bath, NY 5 Bayard, WV 4 Black Walnut Point, MD Bridgewater, VA4 Bull Run, PA Chesapeake Bay at Hoopersville Road, MD Conklin-Kirkwood, NY4 Cortland, NY 8 Elkland, PA Endicott Johnson City and Vestal, NY Forest Heights, MD Fourmile Run, VA Hills Point Road, Dorchester Co., MD3 Greene, NY 4 Kingston-Edwardsville, PA Kitzmiller, MD4 Isle of Wight Bay, Ocean City, MD4 Latta Brook Rd., NY McCready's Point Road, MD Middle Hooper Island, MD Nichols, NY Norwich, NY 4 Painted Post, NY 5 Paxton Creek, Harrisburg, PA Plymouth, PA Rooster Island, Dorchester County, MD Savage River Dam, MD Scranton, PA' 9 Spring Brook Creek, Pittston Township, PA Solomon Creek, Ashley Borough, Luzerne County, PA Solomons Island, Calvert County, MD Sunbury, PA Swoyersville-Forty Fort, PA Tunkhannock Creek, Tunkhannock, PA Tyrone, PA25 Unadilla, NY Upper Marlboro MD 4 Verona Lake, VA* Washington, DC and Vicinity Wilkes-Barre, Hanover Township, PA Williamsport, PA Wyoming Valley, PA Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Deferred Completed Completed Deferred Completed Completed Completed Completed 1995 1977 1959 1970 1965 1985 1953 1984 1993 1955 1970 1971 1979 1964 1987 1989 1951 1979 1965 1992 1984 1993 1993 1974 1950 1970 1998 1958 1998 1954 1971 1993 1993 1993 1953 1968 1991 1980 1970 1965 1978 1953 1958 1979 1987 $ 6,042,325 1,000,0003 382,000 638,332 55,2186 200,500 136,500 2,742,000 156,4917 71,000 324,486 1,297,850 7,034,5349 430,0000 52,480,000 186,077 37,000 4,731,3941" 501,50012 972,988 115,500 74,01913 327,16514 1,487,800 94,500 414,181 48,509's 1,911,68916 753,791' 7 2,271,93918 2,006,800 425,96020 70,44121 126,04922 6,06300023 2,728,113 174,49124 6,401,016 1,000,00026 590,013 992,000 331,92728 3,853,45729 12,964,89330 25,549,098 I. Includes $49,998 emergency relief funds. 2. Local interests will not accept opeartion and maintenance responsibility of the project until the severe erosion and sedimentation of the project caused by tropical storm Eloise is corrected and the project is restored to design condition. 3. Excludes $357,022 contributed funds. 4. Authorized by Chief of Engineers. 5. Unit of Southern New York Flood Control Projects. 6. Excludes $182,672 Public Works Acceleration funds and $4,290 contributed funds. 7. Excludes $67,954 Contributed funds. 8. Unit of Susquehanna River Flood Control Projects. 9. 10. 11. 12. 13. 14. 15. 16. 17. 18. Excludes $154,694 contributed funds. Excludes $87,720 contributed funds. Includes $1,162,548 emergency relief funds and excludes $225,877 emergency relief funds expended prior to adoption of project. Excludes $6,616 contributed funds. Excludes $42,081 contributed funds. Excludes $137,900 contributed funds. Excludes $14,917 contributed funds. Includes $4,357 emergency relief funds. Excludes $278,801 contributed funds. Includes $200,000 expended from contributed funds. 4-45 $3,735,979' --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- 33,999 --- .. ,, -- ----- ---- --- REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 2000 Unit of Lackawanna River Basin Projects. Excludes $126,255 contributed funds. Excludes $25,014 contributed funds. Excludes $51,666 contributed funds. Excludes $140,504 contributed funds. Excludes $53,383 contributed funds. The unconstructed portion of the project was reclassified to the deferred category January 8, 1981. Excludes $132,578 contributed funds. 27. Authorized for the design memorandum state of advanced engineering and design. 28. Cost of previous project. Includes $106,500 emergency relief funds. 29. Includes $872,715 emergency relief funds. Excludes $36,375 emergency relief funds expended for new work before adoption of project. 30. Includes $1,887 emergency relief funds and excludes $110,835 contributed funds. 4-46 19. 20. 21. 22. 23. 24. 25. 26. BALTIMORE, MD DISTRICT TABLE 4-G DEAUTI Project Almond Village, NY 1,2 Baltimore Harbor & Channels, MD (Ferry Bar & Spring Garden Channel) Betterton Harbor, MD Breton Bay, MD (1902 River & Harbor Act) Broadwater Creek, MD Cadle Creek, MD 2 Cambridge Harbor, MD (1948 River & Harbor Act) Channel Connecting Plain Dealing Creek and Oak Chester River, MD (1873 River & Harbor Act) Coan River, VA Copes Corner Lakes, NY 2 Cuckold Creek, MD4 Cunninghill Cove, MD4 Curwensville Lake (WaterLine), PA Davenport Center Lake, NY2 Endicott, Johnson City, and Vestal (Remedial), NY5 Fall Brook Lake, PA6 Genegantslet Lake, NY Governors Run, MD HIarpers Ferry, WV flellens Creek, MD JORIZED PROJECTS For Last Full Report Date See Annual and Report For Authority 1970 May 26, 1953 1941 Flood Control Act 1920 Nov. 17, 1986 1966 Water Res. Dev. Act 1960 Dec. 31, 1989 1986 Water Res. Dev. Act 1950 Dec. 31, 1989 1986 Water Res. Dev. Act 1949 Nov. 6, 1977 1974 Water Res. Dev. Act 1949 Nov. 6, 1977 1974 Water Res. Dev. Act 1989 Dec 31, 1989 1986 Water Res. Dev. Act 1940 Aug. 5, 1977 1974 Water Res. Dev. Act. 1988 Dec. 31, 1989 1986 Water Res. Dev. Act 1937 Aug. 5, 1977 1974 Water Res. Dev. Act 1970 May 6, 1981 1974 Water Res. Dev. Act 1978 Jan 22, 1979 1960 River and Harbor Act 1977 Jan. 22, 1979 1960 River and Harbor Act Nov. 18, 1991 1986 Water Res. Dev. Act 1970 May 6, 1981 1974 Water Res. Dev. Act Nov. 18, 1991 1986 Water Res. Dev. Act 1970 May 6, 1981 1974 Water Res. Dev. Act , 1954 May 6, 1981 1974 Water Res. Dev. Act 1950 Aug. 5, 1977 1974 Water Res. Dev. Act 1937 Aug. 5, 1977 1974 Water Res. Dev. Act 1950 Nov. 6, 1977 1974 Water Res. Dev. Act 4-47 Contributed Funds Expended Federal Funds Expended $ 24,6223 787,710 3,482 10,424 212 112 25,419 106,7003 5,720 11,200 286,4003 46,100 214,5783 _____ REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 2000 TABLE 4-G (Continued) DEAUTHORIZED PROJECTS For Last Full Report Date See Annual Federal C and Funds Project Report For Authority Expended 1 Lake Ogleton, MD 1950 Nov. 6, 1977 1974 Water Res. Dev. Act Marsh Creek Bridge, Foster Joseph Sayers Dam, PA5 Mill Creek, MD Moorefield, WV Neabsco Creek, VA (1881 River & Harbor Act) Ocean City Harbor and Inlet and Sinepuxent Bay, MD (1954 River & Harbor Act) Pocomoke River, MD (1945 River & Harbor Act) Pocomoke River, MD & VA (1954 River & Harbor Act) Saint Georges Creek, MD Sixes Bridge Lake, MD & PA South Plymouth Lake, NY Susquehanna River, Sunbury Closure Structure, PA7 Tyrone, PA Waterway from Little Choptank River to Choptank River, MD West Oneonta Lake, NY2 Nov. 18, 1991 1986 Water Res. Dev. Act 1949 Nov. 6, 1977 1974 Water Res. Dev. Act 1941 Oct. 3, 1978 1974 Water Res. Dev. Act 1978 Dec. 31, 1989 1986 Water Res. Dev. Act 1989 Dec. 31, 1989 1986 Water Res. Dev. Act 1989 Dec. 31, 1989 1986 Water Res. Dev. Act 1989 Dec. 31, 1989 1986 Water Res. Dev. Act 1971 Sep. 23, 1986 1974 Water Res. Dev. Act 1974 Dec. 29, 1981 1974 Water Res. Dev. Act 1953 May 6, 1981 1974 Water Res. Dev. Act Nov. 18, 1991 1986 Water Res. Dev. Act 1980 Nov. 1, 1997 1992 Water Res. Dev. Act 1939 Aug. 5, 1977 1974 Water Res. Dev. Act 1970 May 6, 1981 1974 Water Res. Dev. Act 5. 6. 7. I. Local cooperation withdrawn, project authorization expired May 26, 1958. 2. Unit of Southern New York Flood Control Projects. 3. Cost for preliminary work only. 4. Project authorization was withdrawn by the Chief of Engineers. Project deauthorized by Section 100(A) of Public Law 99-662. Unit of Lackawanna River Basin Projects. .Authorized for the design memorandum stage of advanced engineering and design. 4-48 ontributed Funds Expended 7,9283 14,600 100,0363 6,401,016 305 189,1003 -- BALTIMORE, MD DISTRICT TABLE 4-H RECONNAISSANCE AND CONDITION SURVEYS Date Survey Project Completed MARYLAND Black Walnut Creek May 2000 Chester River Mar 2000 Fishing Bay Sep 2000 Herring Bay & Rockhold Creek Apr 2000 Lower Thorofare Jul 2000 Nanticoke at Nanticoke May 2000 Pocomoke River Jun 2000 Smith Creek Jul 2000 Tilghman Island Harbor May 2000 Upper Thorofare Jul 2000 VIRGINIA Occoquan River Jun 2000 4-49 C REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 2000 TABLE 4-I INSPECTION OF COMPLETED PROJECTS Date Inspected MARYLAND Anacostia River Basin Cumberland Forest Heights Kitzmiller Upper Marlboro NEW YORK Addison Avoca Bainbridge--Newton Creek Bath--Cohocton River Binghamton Canisteo Cincinnatus Conklin-Kirkwood Corning-Monkey Run Cortland Elmira Endicott-Johnson City & Vestal Greene Hornell Latta Brook Lisle Nichols Norwich Owego Oxford Painted Post Port Dickinson Sherburne Unadilla Whitney Point PENNSYLVANIA Ashley Elkland Hanover Kingston-Edwardsville Lock Haven Loyalsock Milton Pittston Plymouth Scranton Solomon Creek South Williamsport Sunbury Swoyersville--Forty Fort Tunkhannock Tyrone Wilkes-Barre-Hanover Twp. Williamsport VIRGINIA Bridgewater Fourmile Run District of Columbia & MD Projects Anacostia River Washington, DC & Vicinity September 2000 November 2000 September 2000 November 2000 September 2000 October 2000 October 2000 October 2000 October 2000 October 2000 October 2000 October 2000 October 2000 October 2000 October 2000 October 2000 October 2000 October 2000 October 2000 October 2000 October 2000 October 2000 October 2000 October 2000 October 2000 October 2000 October 2000 October 2000 October 2000 October 2000 October 2000 October 2000 October 2000 October 2000 October 2000 October 2000 October 2000 October 2000 October 2000 October 2000 October 2000 November 2000 October 2000 October 2000 October 2000 October 2000 October 2000 October 2000 May 2000 October 2000 October 2000 October 2000 October 2000 4-50 Project BALTIMORE, MD DISTRICT TABLE 4-I (Continued) INSPECTION OF COMPLETED PROJECTS Project Date Inspected WEST VIRGINIA Bayard November 2000 Moorefield October 2000 Petersburg October 2000 Ridgeley November 2000 4-51 NORFOLK, VA DISTRICT* The district comprises the State of Virginia, except the Potomac, Roanoke, and Ohio River Basins; the entire area on the eastern shore of Virginia except for the project for Pocomoke River, Maryland and Virginia. On the west shore of Chesapeake Bay, all waterways south of Smith Point, VA, at the mouth of the Potomac River except the project for Little Wicomico River, VA. North Carolina, only the Chowan River Basin downstream to and including the mouth of the Meherin River, and the Dismal Swamp Canal Route of the Atlantic Intracoastal Waterway to the Albemarle Sound. West Virginia, only the James River Basin. IMPROVEMENTS NAVIGATION 1. Appomattox River, VA 2. Atlantic Intracoastal Waterway Between Norfolk, VA, and St. Johns River, FL 3. Atlantic Intracoastal Waterway at Deep Creek, VA 4. Atlantic Intracoastal Waterway Bridge at Great Bridge, VA 5. Back River, Poquoson, VA 6. Bennett's Creek, VA 7. Channel to Newport News, VA 8. Chesapeake Bay Shoreline, Hampton, VA 9. Chicoteague Inlet, VA 10. Guilford Creek, VA 11. Hampton Roads, VA, Collection & Removal of Drift 12. James River, VA 13. Jones Creek, VA 14. Lynnhaven Inlet, VA 15. Nadua Creek, VA 16. Newport News Creek, VA 17. Norfolk Harbor & Channels, VA 18. Oyster Channel, VA 19. Parker Creek, VA 20. Rudee Inlet, VA 21. Supervisor of Norfolk Harbor (Prevention of Obstructive & Injurious Deposits) Page NAVIGATION (Cont) 5-2 5-2 5-3 5-4 5-4 5-4 5-5 5-5 5-6 5-6 5-6 5-7 5-7 5-8 5-8 5-8 5-8 5-10 5-10 5-11 Page 22. Tangier Island, VA 5-11 23. Thimble Shoal Channel, VA 5-12 24. Waterway on the Coast of VA 5-12 25. York River, VA 5-13 26. Work Under Continuing Authority Program 5-13 BEACH EROSION CONTROL Page 27. Virginia Beach, VA (Hurricane Protection) 5-14 28. Virginia Beach, VA (Reimbursement) 5-14 FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS Page 29. Gathright Dam & Lake Moomaw, VA 5-15 30. Emergency Flood Control Activities 5-15 GENERAL INVESTIGATION Page 31. General Investigation Surveys 5-15 32. Collection and Study of Basic Data 5-15 33. Winter Harbor, VA 5-15 34. Hoskins Creek, VA 5-15 5-11 5-1 Report of the Secretary of the Army on Civil Works Activities for FY 2000 1. APPOMATTOX RIVER, VA Location. This river rises in Appomattox County, VA, flows northeasterly 137 miles, and empties into the James River at Hopewell, VA. The portion under improvement extends from its mouth to Petersburg, VA, a distance of 11 miles, which is the length of the tidal and navigable reach. (See National Ocean Service Chart No. 12251.) Previous projects. For details see page 469 of Annual Report for 1938. Existing project. This project provides for a channel 60 to 80 feet wide and 10 feet deep from the mouth of the river to a point 400 feet above Lieutenant Run; thence 80 feet wide and of such depth, not exceeding 10 feet, as can be obtained without rock excavation to the head of navigation at Petersburg; including a turning basin at the mouth of Lieutenant Run 410 feet long, 80 to 140 feet wide, and 10 feet deep. All depths are referred to mean low water. The project also provides for a dam at Petersburg and the excavation for a width of from 200 to 300 feet of a diversion channel connecting the river above the dam with the river at a point 2.5 miles below; for about 1.7 miles of levees on the low grounds between the navigable and the diversion channels; for a highway bridge and a railway bridge across the diversion channel; and for other work incidental to the diversion channel. Under ordinary conditions the mean tidal range is 2.9 feet and the extremes 3.4 and 2.3 feet. There are no records available of the heights of stage due to ordinary floods. These are estimated at 6 to 8 feet above mean low water at Petersburg, where the extremes are from 15.6 feet to 17.1 feet. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. City of Petersburg, VA is the local sponsor. For details see page 212 of Annual Report for 1969. Terminal facilities. There are about 2,500 feet of wooden bulkhead and a shore landing in Petersburg Harbor. These facilities are in an abandoned, dilapidated condition and have not been used by commercial traffic on the river since 1950. There are two large recreational facilities now in operation on the Appomattox River. One is located about 2 miles downstream from Petersburg, VA, and the other is at Hopewell, VA, near the confluence of the Appomattox and the James. There is also a sand and gravel loading facility at Puddledock, located about 3 miles downstream from Petersburg, VA. Operations during fiscal year. Work consisted of coordination with the city of Petersburg and environmental agencies, performing testing and preliminary engineering on the realignment of the navigation channel away from the contaminated sediments, and for placing contaminated dredged material into an old borrow pit. 2. ATLANTIC INTRACOASTAL WATERWAY BETWEEN NORFOLK, VA, AND ST. JOHNS RIVER, FL (NORFOLK DISTRICT) Location. Two inland water routes approximately paralleling Atlantic coast south of Norfolk, VA ,between a point in Southern Branch of Elizabeth River, VA, 2,500 feet upstream of Norfolk & Western Railway bridge and Virginia-North Carolina state line in North Landing River, a distance of 27.2 miles; and 64.6 miles between mouth of Deep Creek, VA, and mouth of Pasquotank River, NC. These routes are shown on National Ocean Service Chart 12206. Existing project. A channel 12 feet deep at mean low water and 90 to 250 feet wide following southern Branch of Elizabeth River, 5.2 miles, Virginia Land Cut, 8.3 miles, and North Landing River, 13.7 miles; and construction of tidal guard lock at Great Bridge, VA. It also provides channels 10 feet deep at mean low water and 90 to 100 feet wide in Deep Creek, 3.1 miles, Turners Cut, 4.3 miles and Pasquotank River, 35.1 miles; maintaining Dismal Swamp Canal, 22.1 miles, to about 9 feet deep mean canal level over a width of 50 feet; protection of banks in Turners Cut with sheet piling, and cutting curtain sharp points in Pasquotank River to shorten its course. (See Table 5-C at end of chapter on Data Relative to Completed Locks included in Project.) Project includes operating and care of completed locks, dams and bridges. Southern Branch of Elizabeth River and Deep Creek sections of the two routes are tidal, mean range being about 3 feet with extremes of minus 3.5 and plus 9.6 feet. Remaining sections are non-tidal with fluctuations of I 5-2 Report of the Secretary of the Army on Civil Works Activities for FY 2000 to 2 feet in level due to winds. Local cooperation. None required. Terminal facilities. Existing facilities are considered adequate. See Annual Report for FY 1970. Operations during fiscal" year. Maintenance: Work consisted of operation and ordinary maintenance of the project consisting of real estate management services, condition and operation studies. Operation and care of locks, bridges, spillways, wharves, canal equipment, grounds, roads, buildings, etc. performed by contract. Contracts were awarded to dredge the Dismal Swamp Canal at the Feeder Ditch, install gauges along the Dismal Swamp Canal, repair the roadway to Lake Drummond and install erosion control at the feeder ditch junction with Route 17. 3. ATLANTIC INTRACOASTAL WATERWAY (AIW) BRIDGE REPLACEMENT, DEEP CREEK, CHESAPEAKE, VA Location. Deep Creek, located in southeastern Virginia within the City of Chesapeake, is the northern terminus of the Dismal Swamp Canal (DSC). The DSC is a portion of the Atlantic Intracoastal Waterway (AIW) that connects the Southern Branch of the Elizabeth River at Deep Creek to the Pasquotank River at South Mills, North Carolina, via Turner's Cut, covering a distance of 64.6 miles. The route of the AIW, extending from New Jersey to Florida, passes through the harbor of Baltimore, Maryland; Norfolk Harbor, Virginia; and down the Southern Branch of the Elizabeth River, to the tidal river Deep Creek, a tributary to the Southern Branch, down to the Deep Creek Locks where the DSC begins. The canal is generally oriented north-south. Existing projects. Atlantic Intracoastal Waterway Bridges on the DSC - The Norfolk District operates two bridges crossing the waterway along the DSC: at Deep Creek, Virginia and South Mills, North Carolina. both are operated for the Norfolk Districtby a contractor. The Deep Creek Bridge, spanning the DSC, is a two-lane, single-leafbascule bridge that was constructed in June 1934 at a cost of $64,000. When the bridge is open, there is a 60-foot horizontal channel clearance. The bridge underwent major repair in Fiscal Year 1996 to upgrade its capacity from 13 tons to 20 tons at a cost of about $271,000. This bridge is the subject of analysis for the ongoing Section 216 study. The bridge at South Mills also spans the DSC and is almost identical to the bridge at Deep Creek. Opened for traffic on 23 June 1934, it was built at the approximate cost of $67,500. As with the Deep Creek bridge, the South Mills bridge underwent major repair in Fiscal Year 1996 to upgrade its capacity from 13 tons to 20 tons at a cost of about $286,000. The State of North Carolina constructed two parallel, high level, fixed span bridges (one for northbound traffic and one for southbound traffic) about 1.5 miles north of the existing bridge. They were constructed from 1980 to 1982 at a cost of approximately $4,000,000 each. They both are about 2,100 feet long and have a roadway width of 38 feet. At the AIW itself, there is a vertical clearance of 65 feet with no horizontal restriction for vessels. Local cooperation. Complied with except that the entire project through construction will be fully Federally funded. Upon completion of the plan formulation process, the district will determine the National Economic Development (NED) plan and the Locally Preferred Plan, if any. Operations during fiscal year. The district received FY00 feasibility funds to continue the detailed investigations on the engineering, economic, environmental, cultural and real estate aspects of the project to determine if replacing the bridge is in the Federal interest. Activities this past year include: the plan formulation process of building plans that meet the project's planning objectives, define the combination of management measures that make up the plan for replacing the obsolete bridge, conducting formulation analysis sufficiently to allow the District's evaluation and screening of alternatives, in order to narrow down the plans to those which best meet the study objectives, developing a Formulation Analysis Notebook that provides a description of the formulation process and methodology, and a summary of the evaluation of alternatives that were considered and screened to determine the appropriateness of moving 5-3 Report of the Secretary of the Army on Civil Works Activities for FY 2000 ahead with the plan selected for detailed formulation. Additionally, conducting on-going technical review to ensure the project status and compliance with the District Quality Control Plan, coordinating with the non-Federal sponsor, and working toward closure of any unresolved District-Sponsor issues or major technical or policy issues previously identified. Lastly, preparing the draft feasibility report. 4. ATLANTIC INTRACOASTAL WATERWAY BRIDGE AT GREAT BRIDGE, VA Location. The project is located in the city of Chesapeake, in the southeastern portion of VA. The city is bordered by the city of Suffolk on the west, the cities of Norfolk and Portsmouth on the North, the city of Virginia Beach on the east, and North Carolina on the south. The federally owned Atlantic Intracoastal Waterway highway bridge crosses the Albermarle and Chesapeake Canal in the community of Great Bridge. Existing project. The plan of improvement includes replacement of the existing 55-year old, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, 2-lane swing bridge with a 5-lane, double-leaf, rolling-lift bascule bridge, 2000 LF of approach roadway, utility relocations, and removal of the existing bridge. The feasibility report was approved in Jul 94. Pre-construction engineering and design was initiated during FY 95 and completed in FY 97. Local cooperation. The local sponsor (city of Chesapeake) is required to assume OMRR&R responsibility on project completion in accordance with the provisions described in Section 339 of the National Highway System Designation Act of 1995. (P.L. 104- 59) Operations during fiscal year. Project Cooperation Agreement was executed on 22 November 1999. Federal acquisition of real estate and rights-ofway are in progress. Contract award scheduled for 3rd quarter FY 2001. 5. BACK RIVER, POQUOSON, VA Location. Back River is a tidal estuary located within the cities of Poquoson and Hampton, VA. The proposed project channel joins Front Cove with Back River at Messick Point, near the river's juncture with the Chesapeake Bay. The proposed channel is about 3,000 feet long, flows in a southern direction, and terminates in deep water within Back River. (See National Ocean Service Chart No. 12222) Existing study. Provides for a channel 6 feet deep and 60 feet wide from deep water in Back River to the city boat ramp and public landing at Messick Point, a distance of approximately 3,000 feet; also provides a turning basin at the boat ramp 100 feet square. Mean tidal range is 2.3 feet. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. City of Poquoson, VA is the local sponsor. Terminal facilities. Privately owned commercial docking and berthing facilities on the southern end of Messick Point at the terminal end of Messick Road, and a public boat ramp, wharf and parking area, are adequate for present commerce. Operations during fiscal year. Coordination with the local sponsor was continued, and the preparation of plans and specifications in anticipation of construction was commenced. 6. BENNETT'S CREEK, VA Location. Bennetts Creek is a tidal estuary of the Nansemond River wholly within the city of Suffolk, VA. It is about 3 miles in length, flows in a northern direction, and empties into the Nansemond River at its juncture with the James River. (See National Ocean Service Chart No. 12248) Existing project. Provides for a channel 6 feet deep and 60 feet wide from the 6 foot contour in the Nansemond River to the 6 foot contour within the mouth of Bennetts Creek, and extending upstream to the city boat ramp at Bennetts Creek Park, a distance of approximately 2.4 miles. Mean tidal range is 2.8 feet. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. City of Suffolk, VA is the local sponsor. 5-4 Report of the Secretary of the Army on Civil Works Activities for FY 2000 Terminal facilities. A privately owned commercial dock and berthing facility on the east side of the creek at the U.S. Route 17 bridge, and a public boat ramp and parking area at the city park, are adequate for present commerce. Operations during fiscal year. None. 7. CHANNEL TO NEWPORT NEWS, VA Location. West of north entrance to Norfolk Harbor Channel, connects deep water in James River with Hampton Roads. (See National Ocean Service Chart No. 12245.) Existing project. A channel 55 feet deep at mean low water and 800 feet wide from Norfolk Harbor Channel in Hampton Roads to Newport News, a distance of about 4.5 miles, and two deep-draft anchorage berths opposite Newport News 45 feet deep over a 1,200-foot swinging radius. Under ordinary conditions mean tidal range is 2.7 feet and extremes 2.1 and 3 feet. Extremes of irregular fluctuations due to combined wind and tides, referred to mean low water, are minus 2 feet and plus 9.5 feet. Local cooperation. Fully complied with for dredging the channel to an intermediate depth of 50 feet, which was completed December 2, 1988. The local sponsor (Virginia Port Authority) is required to furnish cost sharing in accordance with the provisions described in the Water Resources Development Act of 1986, as amended, for additional deepening. Terminal facilities. See Port Series No. 11, (Revised 1993) on Ports of Hampton Roads, prepared by the Water Resources Support Center. Operations during fiscal year. Work on the project consisted of condition surveys of the channel Performed during FY 2000. 8. CHESAPEAKE BAY SHORELINE, HAMPTON, VA Location. The city of Hampton is located approximately 135 miles southeast of Washington, D.C. at the junction of Hampton Roads and the Chesapeake Bay. The city is bordered by the Chesapeake Bay on the east; the Chesapeake Bay and Hampton Roads harbor on the south; the city of Newport News on the west; and York County, the city of Poquoson, and the Chesapeake Bay on the north. The city has approximately 6 miles of shoreline which fronts on the Chesapeake Bay and includes the areas of Buckroe Beach, Salt Ponds, White Marsh, Grandview, and Grandview Nature Preserve. The location and orientation of this shoreline on the western side of the southern Chesapeake Bay and immediately within the mouth of the bay have made this area susceptible to damages associated with coastal storms such as hurricanes and northeasters. (See National Ocean Service Chart No. 12222.) Existing Projects. There are a variety of existing coastal protection structures located along the beach within the study area including groins, bulkheads, riprap, and jetties. The condition of these structures ranges from good to completely deteriorated, with ages varying from relatively new to 35 years old. In addition, the city of Hampton has conducted several beach nourishment activities in the study area to provide storm protection and to alleviate the erosion problem, primarily along the public section of Buckroe Beach. However, these projects have been small in scope, given the limited resources of the city. A reconnaissance study was initiated in 1994 under the authority of Section 114 of WRDA 92. The subsequent reconnaissance report, completed and approved in 1995, concluded that several beach nourishment plans of various heights, widths, and renourishment intervals along the public portion of Buckroe Beach are feasible. However, the study process was terminated shortly thereafter, because the plans contained long-term beach renourishment, which was against (then) new Administration policy. Consequently, no funds were budgeted for the study in subsequent fiscal years. In Fiscal Year 1999, funds were added to the budget by Congress, thus allowing continuation of the study process into the feasibility phase. Congress again added funds in Fiscal Years 2000 and 2001. The estimated cost of this phase is $1.308 million, which is being cost shared 50-50. The study was initiated in April 1999 and is scheduled for completion 36 months later in April 2002. 5-5 Report of the Secretary of the Army on Civil Works Activities for FY 2000 Local cooperation. The local sponsor, the city of Hampton, signed the FCSA on 29 March 1999. Operations during fiscal year. The feasibility study will evaluate a variety of non-structural and structural plans of improvement for hurricane and storm damage protection for the shoreline. FY 99 funds were used to initiate the feasibility study with activities such as starting in-depth coordination with the local sponsor, gathering existing data, awarding the first of several contracts, and beginning the field work. FY 00 funds were used to continue coordination with the local sponsor, to complete the gathering of existing data, to conduct several public meetings with property owners in the study area, to award several more contracts, to complete the field work, to conduct detailed analyses based on existing data and data acquired during the field work, to begin formulating and evaluating plans, and to begin report preparation. 9. CHINCOTEAGUE INLET, VA Location. Chincoteague Inlet at the southern end of Assateague Island provides access to the Atlantic Ocean from the inland waterway near the town of Chincoteague, VA. (See National Ocean Service Chart 12211.) Existing project. Provides for a channel 12 feet deep and 150 feet wide across the ocean bar in the Atlantic Ocean and to the mouth of the inlet, a channel 9 feet deep and 100 feet wide from the inlet through the canal, and then along Chincoteague Channel to a point approximately 2,000 feet north of the state highway bridge to Chincoteague, a distance of about 6.6 miles. Mean range of tide is about 3 feet. All depths are referred to mean low water. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. For details see Annual Report for 1974. Terminal facilities. Existing facilities at Chincoteague are considered adequate for current and prospective traffic. Operations during fiscal year. Work on the project consisted of condition surveys of the channel. Location. Guilford Creek is located in Accomack County, VA, near the communities of Guilford and Parksley, VA, and is a tributary to the Chesapeake Bay. (See National Ocean Service Chart No. 12225) Existing project. Provides for a channel 6 feet deep and 60 feet wide over a length of about 1.0 mile, from Beasley Bay into Guilford Creek, and "including a turning basin 6 feet deep and 100 feet square. The project also includes construction of a rock groin approximately 140 feet long at the dredged material placement site. Mean range of tide is 2.3 feet. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. County of Accomack, VA, is the local sponsor. Terminal facilities. Existing terminal facilities are adequate for present commerce. Operations during fiscal year. None. 11. HAMPTON ROADS, VA COLLECTION AND REMOVAL OF DRIFT Location. Hampton Roads is a natural harbor 300 miles south of New York and 180 miles south of Washington, DC. Its principal tributaries are the James River, affording a natural deep harbor at Newport News, VA; Elizabeth River, with its Southern, Eastern, and Western Branches providing harbors for Norfolk and Portsmouth, VA; and Hampton Creek, serving the harbor at Hampton, VA. (See National Ocean Service Chart Nos. 12248,12245 and 12253.) Existing project. Collection and removal of drift in Hampton Roads and its tributary waters authorizes the Secretary of the Army to allot necessary amounts of work from appropriations for main-other available appropriations and that this work shall be carded on as a separate and distinct project. It is wholly a work of maintenance. The purpose of work is to afford relief from variable conditions of obstruction. No advance estimate of the amount of work is required. Local cooperation. None required. 10. GUILFORD CREEK, VA 5-6 Report of the Secretary of the Army on Civil Works Activities for FY 2000 Terminal facilities. See Norfolk Harbor, VA, and Channel to Newport News, VA. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Operation of the project resulted in collection and disposal of a variety of floating refuse. Operations were performed using government plant and hired labor. 12. JAMES RIVER, VA Location. The river is formed by the junction of the Cowpasture and Jackson Rivers in Botetourt County, VA, flows east 340 miles and empties into Hampton Roads at Newport News, VA. (See National Ocean Service Chart Nos. 12248 and 12251.) Existing project. A channel 25 feet deep and 300 feet wide from the mouth to Hopewell, 25 feet deep and 200 feet from Hopewell to the Richmond Deepwater Terminal, and a channel 18 feet deep and 200 feet wide from the Deepwater terminal to Richmond Lock, a mooring basin 25 feet deep, 180 to 220 feet wide and 2,100 feet long alongside the channel opposite waterfront at Hopewell; a turning basin at Richmond Deepwater Terminal to 500 feet wide, 2,770 feet long and 25 feet deep; a turning basin in Richmond Harbor 200 feet wide, 600 feet long and 18 feet deep; and construction of spur and training dikes. Depth of channels is referred to main low water. Total length of channel included in the project is 91 miles, which is the navigable section. Mean tidal ranges under ordinary conditions for different parts of the river are: mouth, 2.6 feet; Jamestown, 2 feet; City Point, 2.6 feet; and Richmond, 3.2 feet. Spring tide ranges under ordinary conditions at the same localities are mouth, 3.1 feet; Jamestown, 2.4 feet; City Point, 3 feet; Richmond, 3.2 feet. Ordinary fluctuations of stage at Richmond, d[ab to floods are 6 to 12 feet above mean low water. Extreme fluctuations are 16 to 32 feet. Flood heights below Richmond diminish rapidly. The extreme according to available information is about 11 feet lower at Dutch gap, 14 miles below and 17 to 18 feet lower, 20 miles below. For previous projects, see Annual Report for 1938. Local cooperation. Fully complied with for conditions imposed by River and Harbor Act of 1962. However, the local sponsor (Richmond Port Authority) is required to furnish cost sharing in accordance with the provisions described in the Water Resources Development Act of 1986, as amended. Deepening the project from 25 feet to 35 feet, and the widening, authorized by the River and Harbor Act of 1962 has not been started. Terminal facilities. There are city-owned wharves at Richmond Harbor and at Richmond Deepwater Terminal, and numerous private facilities elsewhere on the James River. The Deepwater Terminal is at the head of the 25-foot deep improved channel, and it serves oceangoing vessels and larger ships engaged in coast-wide trading. For detailed information on the terminal facilities on the James River, see Port Series No. 11, (Revised 1993) on Ports of Hampton Roads, prepared by the Water Resources Support Center. Existing terminal facilities are adequate for present commerce. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance dredging was performed under an Indefinite Quantities Contract to remove shoals on several areas of the James River; at Dancing Point - Swann Point Shoal Channel, at Goose Hill Channel, between Richmond Deepwater Terminal and Hopewell, at Richmond Deepwater Terminal, and at Richmond Harbor. Related work performed during the year included condition surveys, environmental and archeological studies, and engineering investigations related to shoaling, river currents and realignments at Turkey Island Cutoff, Goose Hill Channel and Tribell Shoal Channel. 13. JONES CREEK, VA Location. Jones Creek is a tributary to the Pagan River, in Isle of Wight County on the southwest shore of the James River. (See National Ocean Service Chart No. 12248.) Existing project. Provides for a channel 6 feet deep and 60 feet wide over a length of about 5,000 feet, from the Pagan River into Jones Creek and as far upstream as the State Highway Route 704 Bridge at Rescue, VA. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. County of Isle of Wight, VA is the local sponsor. 5-7 Report of the Secretary of the Army on Civil Works Activities for FY 2000 Terminal facilities. Existing terminal facilities at Rescue, VA are adequate for present commerce. Operations during fiscal year. None. 14. LYNNHAVEN INLET, VA Location. On the south shore of the Chesapeake Bay, 5 miles west of Cape Henry, and 10 miles east of Norfolk, VA, the inlet connects Lynnhaven Roads, a part of the Chesapeake Bay, with a network of inland waters in the northern half of the city of VA Beach. (See National Ocean Survey Chart 12254.) Existing project. An entrance channel from Chesapeake Bay through Lynnhaven Inlet, 10 feet deep and 150 feet wide; a mooring and turning basin inside of Lynnhaven Inlet, 10 feet deep, 1,100 feet long, and 750 feet wide; a channel 9 feet deep and 90 feet wide to extend from the mooring and turning basin into Broad Bay via Long Creek-Broad Bay Canal, a side channel from the basin into Long Creek at a depth of 8 feet and width of 100 feet, and a channel through the Narrows connecting Broad and Linkhorn Bays, 6 feet deep and 90 feet wide. Mean range of tide in Lynnhaven Inlet is about 2 feet with extreme fluctuations of 1.5 feet below and 9.5 feet above mean low water. Range in Lynnhaven Bay is a little more than 2 feet, in Broad and Linkhorn Bays, fluctuations in water level are caused by local winds. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. The city of Virginia Beach is the local project sponsor. For details see page 308 of Annual Report for 1965. Terminal facilities. Existing facilities are considered adequate. For details see page 308 of Annual Report for 1970. Operations during fiscal year. Work on the project consisted of a condition survey of the channel performed during Fiscal Year 2000. 15. NANDUA CREEK, VA Location. Nandua Creek is located within the county of Accomack, VA, about ten miles south of Watts Island light, and is a tributary to the Chesapeake Bay. (See National Ocean Service Chart No. 12226.) Existing project. Provides for a channel 9 feet deep at mean low water and 100 feet wide across the bar at the mouth of the creek. Mean tide range is about 1.60 feet. Local cooperation. None required. Terminal facilities. Terminal facilities are adequate for existing commerce. Operations during fiscal year. None. 16. NEWPORT NEWS CREEK, VA Location. On the southern end of the peninsula between the James and York Rivers and within the corporate limits of the city of Newport News. (See National Ocean Survey Chart 12245.) Existing project. A channel 12 feet deep and with width varying from 150 to 90 feet, from deep water in Hampton Roads to the municipal boat harbor, and including a turning and anchorage basin at the upper end of the same depth, width varying from 188 to 214 feet, and 500 feet in length. Under a Section 107 modification, a portion of the entrance channel 125 feet wide is being deepened to 18 feet, to connect with the adjacent harbor protected with an L-shaped wave screen. Portions of this harbor are also being deepened to 18 feet under Section 107 authority. Mean range of tide is 2.6 feet. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. The city of Newport News is the local project sponsor. Terminal facilities. Existing facilities are considered adequate, and the local sponsor is constructing a new pier to service commercial vessels. Operations during fiscal year. None. 17. NORFOLK HARBOR AND CHANNELS, VA. 5-8 Report of the Secretary of the Army on Civil Works Activities for FY 2000 Location. Norfolk, VA, is 187 miles south of Baltimore, MD, and 30 miles from entrance to Chesapeake Bay at Cape Charles and Cape Henry. Harbor extends 18.3 miles from 40-foot contour in Hampton Roads to a point 2,500 feet above Norfolk and Western Railway bridge over a Southern Branch of Elizabeth River. (See National Ocean Service Chart Nos. 12245 and 12253.) Previous projects. For details see Annual Report for 1938. Existing project. For details see Annual Report for 1993. HAMPTON ROADS AND ELIZABETH RIVER: A channel 55 feet deep and 1,500 feet wide from that depth in Hampton Roads to a point approximately 6.3 miles upstream from the Hampton Roads Bridge-Tunnel; thence 55 feet deep and 800 feet Wide to Lamberts Point; thence 45 feet deep and 750 feet wide to the junction of Southern Branch and Eastern Branch. EASTERN BRANCH: A channel 25 feet deep and 500 feet wide from the junction of the branches to Norfolk and Western Railway Bridge, from the Norfolk and Western Railway Bridge a channel 25 feet deep and 200 feet wide to the Campostella Bridge, channel 25 feet deep and 200 feet wide to the Norfolk and Western Railway Bridge (formerly Virginian), including a turning basin 25 feet deep and approximately 5.5 acres in size located at the upstream end of the project. WESTERN BRANCH: A channel 24 feet deep and 300 feet wide to a point 0.78 mile from the 4 0 -foot channel, thence 24 feet deep and 200 feet wide for a distance of 0.38 mile; thence 18 feet deep and 150 feet wide for 0.57 mile to a point 0.34 mile above the West Norfolk Bridge. SCOTTS CREEK: A channel 12 feet deep at mean low water and 100 feet wide from the 40-foot channel for a distance of 0.73 mile. ANCHORAGE, SEWELLS POINT: Three fixed mooring anchorage facilities with a depth of 55 feet, each capable of accommodating two large vessels simultaneously; two anchorages opposite Sewells Point, 45 feet deep over a swing radius of 2,300 feet; anchorage area on the west side of the 55-foot channel opposite Lamberts Point aggregating 173 acres consisting of open space 1,500 feet square and 38 feet deep, one space 1,500 feet square and 35 feet deep, and one space 3,000 feet long, 1,000 feet wide and 20 feet deep; and 45-acre anchorage, 12 feet deep, near Pinners Point. SOUTHERN BRANCH: The southern branch of the Elizabeth River generally oriented and flows south to north, and in the vicinity of this project is bordered on the east bank by the city of Chesapeake. The Southern Branch 40 Foot Deepening element will deepen a 2.5 mile section of the Elizabeth River from its current depth of 35 feet to 40 feet between the Norfolk and Western Railroad Bridge at mile 15, upstream to the U.S. Routes 460 and 13 highway bridge (also known as Gilmerton Bridge) at mile 17.5. This reach of the channel ranges in width between 250 and 500 feet, with an average width of 300 feet. The channel will be widened at selected points to permit vessels to safely negotiate bends. At mile 17.5, in the vicinity of the Gilmerton Bridge, an 800 foot turning basin with a depth of 40 feet will be constructed. In addition, the possible need for modifying the Gilmerton Bridge will be explored as part of this project. Operations during fiscal year. Planning, engineering and design were temporarily postponed due to questions of local sponsorship. Coordination continued with the local sponsor and other agencies regarding scheduling of additional deepening. Anchorages: Three fixed mooring anchorage facilities with a depth of 55 feet, each capable of accommodating two large vessels simultaneously; two anchorages opposite Sewells Point, 45 feet deep over a swing radius of 2,300 feet; anchorage area on the west side of the 55-foot channel opposite Lamberts Point aggregating 173 acres consisting of open space 1,500 feet square and 38 feet deep, one space 1,500 feet square and 35 feet deep, and one space 3,000 feet long, 1,000 feet wide and 20 feet deep; and a 45-acre anchorage, 12 feet deep, near Pinners Point. Operations during fiscal year. The District developed and negotiated the Project Cooperation 5-9 Report of the Secretary of the Army on Civil Works Activities for FY 2000 Agreement on the proposed 50-foot anchorage improvement with the non-federal sponsor, the Virginia Port Authority. Construction of the 50-foot anchorages was initiated in May 1999 and completed in October 1999. CRANEY ISLAND DREDGED MATERIAL AREA: A dredge material placement area of about 2,500 acres adjacent to and north of Portsmouth, Virginia, enclosed by stone-faced levee of sand; rehandling basin, approach and exit channels connecting re-handling basin and Norfolk Harbor 55-foot channel and hopper dredge unloading facility. Operations during fiscal year. Craney Island received 4,008,000 cubic yards of dredged material in FY 2000. A foundation stabilization and levee construction contract for the north side of Craney Island was awarded and completed in FY 2000. Local cooperation. Fully complied with for dredging the channel to an intermediate depth of 50 feet, which was completed December 15, 1988. The local sponsor (Virginia Port Authority) is required to furnish cost sharing in accordance with the provisions described in the Water Resources Development Act of 1986, as amended for additional deepening. Terminal facilities. See Port Series No. 11 (revised 1993) on Ports of Hampton Roads, prepared by the Water Resources Support Center. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: A contract to dredge the 45-Ft. and 50- Ft. Channels was awarded in September 1998, with work completed in March 1999; a total of 713,047 cubic yards was removed. A contract to dredge the Norfolk Harbor 45-Ft. and 50-Ft. Channels was awarded in March 2000, and completed in August 2000; a total of 494,196 cubic yards was removed. In addition to maintenance dredging, work on the project included condition surveys and environmental studies. 18. OYSTER CHANNEL, VA Location. Oyster Channel is located in Northampton County, Virginia, at the town of Oyster, VA, and is a tributary of Liscombes Channel and Ramshorn Channel on the Virginia Eastern Shore. (See National Ocean Service Chart No. 12224) Existing project. Provides for a channel 6 feet deep and 80 feet wide from deep water in Liscombes Channel to and including a turning basin 6 feet deep and 1,100 feet long at Oyster, VA. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. , The county of Northampton, VA, is the local sponsor. Terminal facilities. Existing terminal facilities are adequate for the present commerce. Operations during fiscal year. None. 19. PARKER CREEK, VA Location. Parker Creek empties into the western side of Metompkin Bay in Accomack County, Virginia. It is on the ocean side of Virginia's Eastern Shore, about 20 miles south of the Maryland-Virginia state line. (See National Ocean Service Chart No. 12210.) Existing project. Provides for a channel 5 feet deep and 40 feet wide, from the junction with the Waterway on the Coast of Virginia in Metompkin Bay, extending into Parker Creek as far upstream as the 5-ft. contour. Mean range of tide is approximately 3.5 feet. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. The county of Accomack is the local sponsor of the project. Terminal facilities. Existing terminal facilities, including a public dock located on the creek, are considered adequate for present commerce. Operations during fiscal year. A maintenance dredging contract was awarded in September 1997, as a combined contract with the dredging of the Ramshorn Channel on the Waterway on the Coast of Virginia. Work on this contract continued into FY 1998, and was completed in February 1998, with a total of 21,649 cubic yards removed from Parker Creek. 5-10 Report of the Secretary of the Army on Civil Works Activities for FY 2000 20. RUDEE INLET, VA Location. On the Atlantic Coast of VA, within the city of Virginia Beach approximately 5 miles south of Cape Henry. (See National Ocean Service Chart No. 12205) Existing project. An entrance channel 10-ft deep, 100 to 72-ft wide and 1605-ft long; an inner channel 7-ft deep, 72 to 53-ft wide and 2,495-ft long including a safety area 7-ft deep, and approximately 1.9 acres in size and a turning basin 7-ft deep, 175-ft wide and 1,570-ft long; a sand trap 18-ft deep and approximately 3.3 acres in size; and a weir and jetty system at the mouth of the inlet. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. The city of Virginia Beach as local sponsor is required to financially participate in continued annual maintenance as described in the Local Cooperation Agreement, and has fully participated through the current fiscal year. Terminal facilities. Existing terminal facilities are considered adequate for present commerce. Operations during fiscal year. A contract to dredge the entrance channel and sand trap was advertised for bids in February 2000, and bids opened during March 2000. The contract was completed in May 2000; a total of 27,219 cubic yards was removed. In addition, the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Special Purpose Dredge CURRITUCK was utilized to dredge the entrance channel during January, August and September 2000. 21. SUPERVISOR OF NORFOLK HARBOR (PREVENTION OF OBSTRUCTIVE AND INJURIOUS DEPOSITS) The District Engineer, Norfolk District, was designated Supervisor of the harbor of Hampton Roads under the provisions of the River and Harbor Act of June 29, 1888 (33 U.S.C. 441-451), as amended July 12,1952. Under this Act, the Supervisor of the harbor of Hampton Roads is charged with the mission of preventing the deposit of obstructive and injurious materials in the tidal waters of the harbors of Norfolk, Portsmouth, Newport News, Hampton Roads, and their adjacent and tributary waters, so much of the Chesapeake Bay and its tributaries as lies within the state of Virginia, and so much of the Atlantic Ocean and its tributaries as lies within the jurisdiction of the United States within or to the east of the State of Virginia. The River and Harbor Act of March 3, 1899 (33 U.S.C. 403,407,409), as amended, prohibits obstructions to navigable waters such as unauthorized structures, unauthorized fill, deposit of refuse, and sinking of vessels. Other laws relating to the supervision of Norfolk Harbor and its tributary waters are the Clean Water Act, The Marine Protection, Research and Sanctuaries Act of 1972, the Coastal Zone Management Act of 1969, the Fish and Wildlife Act of 1956, the Federal Power Act of 1920, the National Historic Prevention Act of 1966, the Endangered Species Act of 1973, the Deepwater Port Act of 1972, the Wild and Scenic Rivers Act, and the Land and Water Conservation Fund Act. Direct supervision of the waters under the jurisdiction of the Norfolk District was accomplished by means of two patrol vessels performing inspections, removing debris and investigating navigational hazards and sunken abandoned vessels. A derrick boat and crane barge performed removal of sunken vessels and navigational hazards and supported federal dredging projects. In addition, surveillance of the harbor was performed regarding the Corps' regulatory program, using also two small outboard craft, motor vehicles from land and occasional chartered aerial reconnaissance. This regulatory surveillance involved compliance surveys of permitted activities and evaluation of navigational impacts of proposed piers and other structures. 22. TANGIER ISLAND, VA Location. Tangier Island is located in the Chesapeake Bay approximately 95 miles Southeast of Washington, DC, and is enti4rely within the political boundaries of Accomack County on Virginia's Eastern Shore. The island is about 5 miles long and 1-1/2 miles wide, and, with the exception of three sand ridges, it composed of low marshland and tidal flats. Over 50 percent of the submerged aquatic vegetation (SAV) in the waters adjacent to the idland have been lost during the 1990s. SAV is prime habitat for young blue crabs. 5-11 Report of the Secretary of the Army on Civil Works Activities for FY 2000 Since these waters are a significant crab nursery for the Chesapeake Bay, the economic impact could be severe. (See National Ocean Service Chart No. 12228.) Existing Projects. Three Corps of Engineers projects are located in the vicinity of the island. The Tangier Channel to the Chesapeake Bay (or North Channel) provides a channel 7 feet deep and 60 feet wide from the anchorage basin at the town of Tangier, northwesterly through Tangier Creek to the Chesapeake Bay, a distance of 0.7 mile. The anchorage basin is 7 feet deep and 400 feet square. The Tangier Channel to Tangier Sound provides a channel which approaches the island from the east and is 8 feet deep and 100 feet wide and 0.2 mile long in Tangier Sound; thence 8 feet deep and 60 feet wide and 0.9 mile long to the anchorage basin. The Tangier Seawall project provides over one mile of shore protection to the island's west coast, south of the North Channel. Local cooperation. The local sponsors for the study are 6the Town of Tangier and Accomack County, both of whom strongly support these studies. Terminal facilities. The existing facilities at Tangier are considered adequate fo4r current and prospective traffic. Operations during fiscal year. Funds were received in FY 2001 to prepare a Preliminary Restoration Plan under Section 206 of the Continuing Authorities Program. 23. THIMBLE SHOAL CHANNEL, VA Location. In lower portion of Chesapeake Bay between Hampton Roads and the ocean, 20 miles northeast of center of Norfolk Harbor, extending southeasterly 12 miles from a point 1.25 miles east of Thimble Shoal lighthouse toward entrance to Chesapeake Bay. (See National Ocean Service Chart No. 12222) Existing project. Provides for dredging a channel 12 miles long, 1,000 feet wide, and 55 feet deep at mean low water. To date the 650-ft. wide outbound lane has been deepened and maintained to a depth of 50 feet, and the remaining 350-ft. width is maintained at a 45-ft. depth under the previous project. Under ordinary conditions mean tidal range is 2.5 feet and extreme 3 feet. Extremes of irregular fluctuation, due to combined wind and tides referred to mean low water, and minus 3 feet and plus 7 feet. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. For the most recent improvements to the channel (50-ft. depth over 650-ft. wide outbound lane), the Virginia Port Authority was project sponsor and shared in the , cost of the improvement. Terminal facilities. Project serves as an entrance channel to Hampton Roads. See Port Series No. 11 (revised 1993) on Ports of Hampton Roads, prepared by the Water Resources Support Center. Operations during fiscal year. During the period between December 1999 and September 2000, a contract hopper dredge removed a total of 1,895,205 cubic yards of maintenance dredged material from the navigation channel. Additionally, work consisted of condition surveys of the channel and monitoring of the Dam Neck Ocean Dredged Material Management Site as required by the EPA. 24. WATERWAY ON THE COAST OF VA Location. The Waterway on the Coast of Virginia is on Virginia's Eastern Shore. The waterway extends for approximately 90 miles on the Atlantic Coast side of Northampton and Accomack Counties. Existing projects. The project provides a channel 60 feet wide and 6 feet deep. All depths are referred to mean low water. The channel provides north to south navigation for vessels between Chincoteague and the Chesapeake Bay. Its primary usage is to connect various fishing harbors on the Eastern Shore. There is usage of the waterway to connect fishing harbors to ocean inlets. There are approximately 20 shoaling areas along the 90-mile route. 3-4 of the shoaling areas are dredged each year. Local cooperation. Accomack and Northampton Counties are the local sponsors for the project. All items of local cooperation have been provided. 5-12 Report of the Secretary of the Army on Civil Works Activities for FY 2000 Facilities. No facilities exist on the WCV for launching or docking vessels. All facilities are in the local fishing harbors adjacent to the WCV. Other Federal channels that connect the harbors to the WCV serve these harbors. Operations during fiscal year. Work consisted of local sponsor coordination, preliminary engineering and design, and environmental permitting activities to support an upcoming maintenance dredging event scheduled for FY 2001, contingent upon receipt of funds. 25. YORK RIVER, VA Location. This river is formed at West Point, VA, by the confluence of the Mattaponi and Pamnukey Rivers, and flows southeasterly about 41 miles into the Chesapeake Bay, which it enters about 20 miles in a northerly direction from Norfolk, VA, and 20 miles in a northwesterly direction from the Atlantic Ocean at Cape Henry. (See National Ocean Service Chart Nos. 12238 and 12243.) Existing project. This provides for dredging a channel 22 feet deep at mean low water and 400 feet wide through the bars, and a basin of the same depth at the wharves at West Point, and the construction of a dike on the right bank at West Point to assist in maintaining the channel. Also provides for dredging a channel 37 feet deep at mean lower low water and 750 feet wide from the 38 foot contour in the Chesapeake Bay to a point adjacent to the piers at the Yorktown Naval Weapons Station, approximately 8 miles above the mouth of the river. Mean range of tide is 2.2 feet at the mouth and 2.9 feet at West Point. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Virginia Port Authority was project sponsor and shared in the cost of the improvement to the Entrance Channel. Terminal facilities. The facilities are considered adequate for the existing commerce. Operations during fiscal year. None. 26. WORK UNDER CONTINUING AUTHORITY PROGRAM The district continues work on six Section 107 (navigation) studies: York River Entrance Channel, VA, has completed construction and project close-out activities have been initiated; Newport News Creek, VA, has completed construction and project close-out activities have been initiated; Guilford Creek, VA, has completed construction and project close-out activities have been initiated; Messick Point, Back River, VA, continuing the Plans & Spec (P&S) phase, Starlings Creek, VA continuing the feasibility phase; Nassawaddox Creek, VA, initiating the feasibility phase. In addition, the district continues work on one Section 205 (Small Flood Control) study, Jamestown Island, VA, initiating the feasibility phase. BEACH EROSION CONTROL 27. VIRGINIA BEACH, (HURRICANE PROTECTION) VA Location. The city of Virginia Beach is located on the southeastern coast of Virginia bordered by the Atlantic Ocean on the east, Chesapeake Bay on the north, the cities of Norfolk and Chesapeake on the west, and North Carolina on the south (See National Ocean Service Chart 12207.) Existing project. The plan of improvement includes construction of a vertical steel sheet-pile wall with concrete cap extending from Rudee Inlet to 58th Street (about 4 miles), enhancement of the existing dune system between 58th Street and 89th Street (about 2 miles), construction and periodic re-nourishment of a widened and raised beach berm between Rudee Inlet and 89th Street (about 6.2 miles), a new boardwalk integrated with the vertical wall which will be placed seaward of the existing boardwalk extending from Rudee Inlet to approximately 40th Street (about 3 miles), a storm water runoff system consisting of the offshore discharge by pumped flow through submarine pipelines, appropriate beach access structures consisting of ramps and stairs and dune crossover facilities. Periodic beach nourishment will maintain the beach and dune system over the 50 year project life. The Project Cooperation Agreement was executed in June 1996 and the first construction contract was 5-13 Report of the Secretary of the Army on Civil Works Activities for FY 2000 underway in October, 1996. Initial construction of the project is scheduled for completion in September 2002. Local cooperation. The local sponsor (city of Virginia Beach) is required to furnish cost sharing in accordance with the provisions described in The Water Resources Development Act of 1986. Operations during fiscal year. The project was in continuing construction: A 7,300 LF segment of seawall and interior drainage improvements between 8 h and 271 Streets was turned over to the local sponsor in April, 2000. This was the first segment of seawall and boardwalk improvements to be completed under the project. Construction of the 16th Street and 42nd street pump stations and ocean outfall systems was completed in May 200 and turned over to the City of Virginia Beach. Work on the 42"d Street Pump Station and ocean outfalls is continuing. Cracking of the concrete outfall pipes was discovered and investigations are proceeding to determine the cause of the cracks and what remediation measures are acceptable for repairing or replacing the cracked sections. Plans and specifications were also being prepared for the remaining beach berm and dune improvements. 28. VIRGINIA BEACH, VA, (REIMBURSEMENT) Location. The city of Virginia Beach is located on the southeastern coast of Virginia bordered by the Atlantic Ocean on the east, Chesapeake Bay on the north, the cities of Norfolk and Chesapeake on the west, and North Carolina on the south. (See National Ocean Service Chart 12207.) Existing project. The periodic nourishment program is a modification of the original project adopted by the 1954 River and Harbor Act, which provided for beach restoration and the deferred construction of a system of groins. Comparative cost studies of groin construction versus periodic nourishment indicate that the later is the more suitable and economical method for maintaining share stability, protecting property, and insuring maximum recreation benefits from use of the publicly-owned shores. The current project includes periodic nourishment of approximately 3.3 miles of beach between Rudee Inlet and 49th Street with maintenance of the berm to a minimum width of approximately 100 feet of elevation 7 feet above mean low water. Federal participation began in 1962. In accordance with Sec 355 of the Water Resources Development Act of 1996, federal participation shall extend until the earlier of: (1) the year 2012; or (2) Completion of the project for beach erosion control and hurricane projection, Virginia Beach, VA. Local cooperation. The city of Virginia Beach provides annual engineering and contracting services for the truck haul and placement of 150,000 cubic yards of beach fill. The city directs sand placement in the most eroded areas of the beach with oversight and verification by the Norfolk District. Upon conclusion of each year of nourishment, a government audit is performed and the city is reimbursed for the federal share of eligible contract hauling and engineering costs. Operations during fiscal year. The federal share (65%) of the 2000 re-nourishment cost was reimbursed to the city of Virginia Beach. The federal share totaled $778,270. FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS 29. GATHRIGHT DAM AND LAKE MOOMAW, VA Location. Gathright Dam is on the Jackson River, a tributary of James River at mile 43.4 in Allegheny County. Gathright Dam site is in the reach of the Jackson River known as the Gorge, about 19 miles upstream from Covington, VA. At the elevation of the top of the conservation pool, the lake extends upstream about 9 miles. (See Falling Spring and Mountain Grove, Virginia-West Virginia quadrangles of geological survey.) Existing project. Gathright Dam consists of a 1,172-foot long, rolled-rock-fill dam with an impervious core, with the top at elevation 1,684.5; outlet works consisting of a concrete intake structure located in the right bank 500 feet upstream from the axis of the dam: a 1,075-foot long outlet tunnel through the right abutment and a stilling basin; and a 2,450-foot 5-14 Report of the Secretary of the Army on Civil Works Activities for FY 2000 long fixed-crest emergency spillway excavated in a low saddle in the divide at Fortney Branch about 2.5 miles south of the dam. Discharges through the maximum conservation poot elevation 1,582 will be provided for water quality control. The reservoir area at elevation 1,582 will be 2,530 acres. A total of 302,000 acre-feet of storage between elevation 1,582 and the spillway crest (elevation 1,663.5) will be reserved for flood control. At the spillway crest the reservoir will have an area of 4,540 acres. Local cooperation. None required. Operations during fiscal year. Care of service and recreational facilities, water control management, testing and monitoring, supervision and administration and engineering and design. 30. EMERGENCY FLOOD CONTROL ACTIVITIES During FY 99, a total of $77,879 was spent on Catastrophic Disaster Preparedness Program (Approp. 96X3123), and $354,879 on Flood Control and Coastal Emergencies including Emergency Operations (Approp. 96X3125). GENERAL INVESTIGATION 31. GENERAL INVESTIGATION SURVEYS Total cost of surveys during the fiscal year amounted to $1,998,944. The work consisted of a shoreline protection study of Hampton $121,012; Special studies $1,486,082; Interagency Water Resources Development $30,610; National Marine Fisheries Service $2,666; coordination with other agencies and cooperation with states $45,312; and review of the AIWW Bridge Replacement at Deep Creek, VA $13,267. 32. COLLECTION AND STUDY OF BASIC DATA During the fiscal year 99, cost of collection and study of basic data was $192,000 consisting of flood plain management studies including Quick Responses, Management Service Unit, Technical Services and Environmental Data Studies and special studies. 33. WINTER HARBOR, VA Location. Winter Harbor is a tidal estuary located in Mathews County, VA entering Chesapeake Bay on its western shore 4.9 miles north of New Point Comfort. (See National Ocean Service Chart No. 12238) Existing project. Provides for a channel 12 feet deep and 100 feet wide from the 12-foot contour in Chesapeake Bay to the vicinity of the public landing, a distance of approximately 7,600 feet. Also provides a mooring and turning basin of the same depth 400 feet square, with flared approach, at the inner end of the channel. Mean tidal range is 2.0 feet. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. County of Mathews, VA is the local sponsor. Terminal facilities. Privately owned commercial docking and berthing facilities adjacent to the mooring basin, and a public wharf and parking area, are adequate for present commerce. Operations during fiscal year. Coordination with the local sponsor and environmental agencies was continued. Additionally, a condition survey was performed, and the preparation of plans and specifications in anticipation of dredging was commenced. 34. HOSKINS CREEK, VA Location. Hoskins Creek is a tidal estuary 2.5 miles long flowing easterly and entering the right bank of the Rappahannock River in Essex County, VA, 42 miles upstream from its mouth in the Chesapeake Bay. It is located at the southern limits of the Town of Tappahannock, VA. (See National Ocean Service Chart No. 12237) Existing project. Provides for a channel 10 feet deep from the 10-foot contour in the Rappahannock to the US Route-17 Highway Bridge, a distance of approximately one mile. The channel width 5-15 Report of the Secretary of the Army on Civil Works Activities for FY 2000 is 100 feet through the bar in the Rappahannock River and 80 feet within the creek. Also provides a turning basin of the same depth 250 feet by 200 feet, with flared approach, at the public landing. Mean tidal range is 1.6 feet. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. County of Essex, VA is the local sponsor. Terminal facilities. Two bulkheaded landings and two wharves, with a public boat ramp. The facilities are considered adequate for present commerce. Operations during fiscal year. A condition survey was performed. Additionally, coordination with the local sponsor and environmental agencies was continued, as well as coordination with the Virginia Department of Transportation. 5-16 WILMINGTON, N.C., DISTRICT* This district comprises central and eastern North Carolina and a portion of south-central Virginia, embraced in drainage basins tributary to the Atlantic Ocean from the southern boundary of Virginia to the Shallotte River, inclusive, with exception of the Meherrin River Basin above Murfreesboro, N. C., the Chowan River Basin above the confluence of the Nottaway and Blackwater Rivers, and the Pasquotank River and its tributaries for navigation only. Also included are those portions of the Yadkin-Pee-Dee and Catawba River basins within the state of N. C. as well as a portion of the Atlantic Intracoastal Waterway from the northern boundary of North Carolina to Little River, S. C., and a portion of the waterway from Norfolk, Va., to the Sounds of North Carolina, south of the north shore of Albemarle Sound. IMPROVEMENTS Page Navigation 1. Aquatic Plant Control .................. 6-2 (R & H Act of 1965) 2. Atlantic Intracoastal Waterway Between Norfolk, Va. and St. Johns River, Fla, (Wilmington District) ...................... 6-2 3. Cape Fear River, N.C. Above Wilmington .............6-4 4. Lockwoods Folly River, N.C .............................. 6-4 5. Manteo (Shallowbag) Bay, N.C ......................... 6-5 6. Morehead City Harbor, N.C ........................... 6-6 7. Rollinson Channel, N.C ...................................... 6- 8. Silver Lake Harbor, N.C .................................... 6-7 9. Waterway Connecting Pamlico Sound and Beaufort Harbor, N.C ................................... 6-7 10. Wilmington Harbor, N.C ................................ 6-7 Flood Control 11. Adkin Branch, Kinston, N.C ........................... 6-9 12. Cape Fear River Basin, N.C. ............................ 6-9 12-A. B. Everett Jordan Dam and Lake, N.C ............. 6-10 13. Brunswick County Beaches, N.C. (Cape Fear to North Carolina - South Carolina State Line)......6-10 14. Carolina Beach and Vicinity, N.C .................. 6-11 15. Clinton Wastewater Treatment Plant, Clinton, N .C ................................................... 6-12 16. Moravian Creek, Wilkesboro, N.C .............. 6-12 17. Neuse River Basin, N.C ................................... 6-13 17-A. Falls Lake, N.C ........................................ 6-13 18. Roanoke River Upper Basin, Va. - Headwaters Area ............................... 6-14 19. Wrightsville Beach, N.C ........................ ,.6-14 20. Yadkin River Basin, N.C. and S.C .................. 6-14 2 0-A. W. Kerr Scott Dam and Reservoir, N.C ....................................... 6-15 21. Inspection of Completed Flood Control Projects ...................................... 6-15 22. Flood Control Work Under Special Authorization ................. 6-15 Multiple-Purpose Projects, Including Power 23. Roanoke River Basin, Va. and N.C ................. 6-15 23-A. John H. Keff Dam and Reservoir, Va. and N.C ......................... ........6-16 23-B. Philpott Lake, Va . ...................................... 6-16 24. Scheduling Flood Control Reservoir Operations .................. 6-16 Miscellaneous 25. Cape Fear River L & D No. 1 Fish Ladder, N.C. (CAP Section 1135) ................................... 6-18 26. Little Sugar Creek Habitat Restoration, N.C. (CAP Section 1135) .................................... 6-18 27. Sea Turtle Habitat Restoration, Oak Island, N.C (CAP Section 1135) ........... 6-19 28. Little Sugar Creek Aquatic Ecosystem Restoration, N.C. (CAP Section 206) ..............6-19 29. Battery Island Bird Habitat Preservation NC (CAP Section 204) .................................. 6-20 General Investigations 30. Surveys .................... .............. ....... 6-20 31. Collection and Study of Basic Data .................- 20 32. Preconstruction Engineering and Design ................................. ...... 6-20 Tables Table 6-A Cost and Financial Statement ................6-21 Table 6-B Authorizing Legislation ......................... 6-27 Table 6-C Other Authorized Navigation Projects ............... .............. 6-30 Table 6-D Other Authorized Beach Erosion Control Projects ................... ................ 6-31 Table 6-E Other Authorized Flood Control Projects ...................... 6-32 Table 6-F Not Applicable Table 6-G Deauthorized Projects ........................... 6-33 Table 6-H Reconnaissance and Condition Surveys ............................... 6-34 Table 6-I Navigation Work Under Special Authorization .......................... 6-34 Table 6-J Dams and Reservoirs ........................... 6-35 Table 6-K Flood Control Work Under Special Authorization ..........................6-36 6-1 Page REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 2000 Navigation 1. AQUATIC PLANT CONTROL (RIVER AND HARBOR ACT OF 1965) Location. Navigable waters, tributary streams, connecting channels, and other allied waters in Wilmington District. Existing project. The existing project provides for control and progressive eradication of water-hyacinth, alligatorweed, Eurasian watermilfoil, and other obnoxious aquatic plant growths from navigable waters, tributary streams, connecting channels, and other allied waters of the United States, in the combined interest of navigation, flood control, drainage, agriculture, fish and wildlife conservation, public health, and related purposes, including continued research for development of the most effective and economic control measures in cooperation with other Federal and State agencies in accordance with the report of the Chief of Engineers, House Document 251,89th Congress, 1st session. The project was authorized by Section 302, 1965 River and Harbor Act (H.D. 25, 89th Congr., Ist sess.). The Act provides that research and planning costs shall be borne fully by the United States. Local cooperation. Local interests must agree to hold the United States free from damages that may occur from operations performed in connection with this project, and participate to the extent of 50 percent of the cost of the program. Recon studies are 100 percent Federal. Requirements are being met. Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: No operations in FY 00 and no new areas were added to the program in FY 00. $482 cost for Aquatic Plant Control Program Management activities. Condition at end of fiscal year. The State has kept alligatorweed treatment sites under maintenance control in FY 00. Monitoring of hydrilla control sites previously stocked with triploid grass carp indicates that overall our biological control efforts have been effective. 2. ATLANTIC INTRACOASTAL WATERWAY BETWEEN NORFOLK, VA.,AND ST. JOHNS RIVER, FL. (WILMINGTON DISTRICT) Location. The project is located on the east coast of the United States, between Norfolk, Va., and St. Johns River, Florida. The section within Wilmington District begins at the Virginia-North Carolina State line and extends generally southerly and southwestwardly to Little River, S. C., a total of 308 statute miles. (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Charts 830 to 842, inclusive.) Previous projects. For details see Annual Reports for 1915, 1926, 1932, and 1938. Existing project. The authorized project provides for a waterway, 12 feet deep, with widths varying from 90 feet in land cuts to 300 feet in open waters; the construction, operation and maintenance of suitable bridges; saltwater intrusion preventive measures in the vicinity of Fairfield, N. C.; a channel in Peltier Creek, 6 feet deep and 50 feet wide from the Intracoastal Waterway in Bogue Sound to and including a basin in Peltier Creek, 6 feet deep, 200 feet wide, and 600 feet long; a channel, 6 feet deep and 90 feet wide between the Intracoastal Waterway and the gorge in Bogue Inlet, then 8 feet deep and 150 feet wide across the ocean bar; a channel, 12 feet deep and 90 feet wide to a turning basin, 200 feet wide and 350 feet long, at Swansboro; a channel, 6 feet deep and 90 feet wide in New River Inlet, and a connecting channel of the same dimensions to the Intracoastal Waterway near the mouth of New River; a channel, 10 feet deep, and 90 feet wide in New River, between the Intracoastal Waterway and the Seaboard Coastline Railroad bridge at Jacksonville, N. C.; a channel through New Topsail Inlet, 8 feet deep and 150 feet wide and a channel from New Topsail Inlet to the Intracoastal Waterway by way of Old Topsail Creek, 7 feet deep and 80 feet wide; a channel, 7 feet deep and 80 feet wide, in Banks Channel, from New Topsail Inlet, paralleling the barrier beach, to the Atlantic Intracoastal Waterway; a channel, 14 feet deep and 400 feet wide, across the ocean bar at Masonboro Inlet, with suitable jetties at the entrance, thence 12 feet deep and 90 feet wide to the channel of the Intracoastal Waterway at Wrightsville Beach by way of Banks and Motte Channels; a turning basin, 15 feet deep, 300 feet wide, and 700 feet long, on the east side of Banks Channel near Masonboro Inlet, with three 15-pile dolphins therein; a channel, 8 feet deep and 150 feet wide across the ocean bar at Carolina Beach Inlet to the Atlantic Intracoastal Waterway; a channel, 6 feet deep, 80 feet wide, and 8,000 feet long, to and including a turning basin of the same depth, 130 feet wide and 180 feet long, at Carolina Beach; a yacht basin, 230 feet wide, 450 feet long, and 12 feet deep, at the town of Southport, connected to the waterway by a suitable channel of the same depth; and maintenance of the general navigation features of the North Carolina State Ports Authority SmallBoat Harbor at Southport, consisting of an entrance channel, 150 feet wide and 400 feet long, an eastern harbor access channel, 70 feet wide and 430 feet long, a western harbor-access channel, 60 feet wide and 185 feet long, to a turning basin, 180 feet wide and 550 feet long, all to a depth of 6 feet. A modification providing for the replacement of five Federally owned and operated highway bridges was authorized in December 1970. A modification providing for 100 percent Federal funding for Walter B. Jones (formerly Wilkerson Creek) and Joseph P. Knapp (formerly Coinjock) bridges was authorized in October 1976. A modification providing for 100 percent Federal funding at Core Creek, Gene A. Potter (formerly Hobucken), and Fairfield Bridges was authorized in November 1986. Estimated Federal cost is $70,200,000 (2000). The tidal lock at Snow's Cut was deauthorized 6-2 WILMINGTON, N.C., DISTRICT September 23, 1986, under authority of Sec. 12, PL 93-251. The 12-foot-deep channel in Peltier Creek was deauthorized by the Water Resources Development Act of 1986. The 12-foot deep channel modification to New River was deauthorized January 1, 1990, under Sec. 1002, PL 99-662. The jetties at Masonboro Inlet are complete except for the training wall, which was deauthorized April 5, 1999. A Section 111 project to mitigate damages caused by the north jetty was authorized in October 1980 and was completed in April 1981. Length of channels and basins total 347.7 miles. Plane of reference is mean low water. In the waterway north of Neuse River, variations in water surface due to winds seldom exceed 2 feet above or below mean stage. Between Beaufort and the Cape Fear River, normal tidal range varies from 3.5 feet at the inlets to 1 foot at points between. Average range of tide is 4 feet on the ocean side of Bogue Inlet and 2.5 feet just inside the inlet. At New River, tidal range varies from 3.5 feet at the inlet to 1 foot at the head of the marshes and zero at Tar Landing, 31 miles above. From Cape Fear River, N. C., to Little River, S. C., mean tidal range varies between 4.7 feet in Cape Fear River and 4 feet at the intermediate inlets, and 2 feet at points midway between the inlets. On October 15, 1954 (Hurricane Hazel), the tide at Holden Beach reached an elevation of 17.6 feet. (See Table 6-B for Authorizing Legislation.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with to date except for the uncompleted modifications. The State of North Carolina has agreed to keep the bridges toll free and upon completion of each bridge, accept maintenance, replacement, and ownership responsibilities thereof. They have withdrawn their offer to contribute 25 percent of the first cost. The Water Resources Acts of 1976 and 1986 modified the terms of local cooperation to delete the non- Federal cost-sharing requirement for all five bridges. Operations and results during fiscal year. New Work: Construction of Fairfield Bridge continued at a cost of $5,827,127. Costs in connection with close-out of the completed Gene A. Potter Bridge (Hobucken), including Wetlands mitigation and real estate activities were $35,576. Maintenance: Through Channel - During intermittent periods the U.S. debris boat Snell conducted clearing and snagging operations and maintained dredging ranges and mooring facilities at a cost of $250,250. Between March 12 and August 22, 2000, the contract btredges Marion and Blue Ridge dredged 315,339 cubic yards from shoals at the inlet crossings at a cost of $2,880,743. Between February 1 and February 24, 2000, the U.S. hopper dredge Currituck removed 17,160 cubic yards from shoals in Bogue Sound at a cost of $235,000. Cost adjustment for prior year dredging at inlet crossings resulted in a negative cost of $3,000. Engineering and design for future years dredging for the through channel cost $164,080 and for the inlet crossings cost $45,478. Mosquito control in disposal areas cost $103,525. Real estate support for easements and audit cost $41,236. Long-term environmental dredging and monitoring study cost $35,301. Periodic inspections of Fairfield Bridge cost $795. One highway bridge was operated and maintained at a cost of $214,970. Snows Cut erosion control maintenance cost $41,821. Encroachment and boundary surveys at Snows Cut cost $1,637. Chain link fencing at Snows Cut cost $10,000. Planning for the AIWW SAD Regional Dredging Contract cost $15,536. GIS development for the AIWW cost $140,897. An Initial Appraisal for review of the completed project at Snows Cut cost $4,992. Encroachment and boundary surveys for the Core Creek Land Cut cost $84,137. Sediment sampling and analysis in New Hanover and Pender counties cost $23,750. Dredged material management plan cost $478,452. Dredged material facility surveys and maintenance cost $1,110,328. Condition and operations studies cost $502,055. Bogue Inlet - Between January 27 and February 9, 2000, the U.S. sidecasting dredge Fry removed 54,360 cubic yards from shoals in Bogue Inlet at a cost of $86,361. During intermittent periods, the U.S. sidecasting dredge Merritt removed 587,559 cubic yards from shoals in Bogue Inlet at a cost of $1,368,000. Between March 12 and March 18, 2000, the contract dredge Richmond removed 14,000 cubic yards from shoals in the Channel to Bogue Inlet at a cost of $86,000. Condition and operation studies cost $40,694. Carolina Beach Inlet -Between October 1 and October 20, 1999, the U.S. hopper dredge Currituck removed 10,075 cubic yards from shoals in Carolina Beach Inlet at a cost of $53,200. During intermittent periods the U.S. sidecasting dredge Fry removed 228,140 cubic yards from shoals in Carolina Beach Inlet at a cost of $372,000. During intermittent periods the U.S. sidecasting dredge Merritt removed 165,493 cubic yards from shoals in Carolina Beach Inlet at a cost of $495,261. During intermittent periods the U.S. debris boat Snell repaired mooring facilities at a cost of $12,000. Construction of a mooring facility for government plant cost $118,388. Project operations and management cost $5,233. Condition and operation studies cost $20,449. Masonboro Inlet - Environmental studies and monitoring activities cost $5,846. Cost adjustment in connection with the FY 1998 sand bypassing to Masonboro Island and Wrightsville Beach resulted in a cost of $47,619. New River Inlet - Between March 27 and April 22, 2000 the contract dredge Richmond removed 15,833 cubic yards from the Channel To New River Inlet at a cost of $87,165. During intermittent periods, the U.S. sidecasting dredge Fry removed 267,160 cubic yards from shoals in New River Inlet at a cost of $402,000. Between March 1 and March 23, 2000, the U.S. sidecasting dredge Merritt removed 94,640 cubic yards from shoals in New River Inlet at a cost of $207,000. Condition and operation studies cost $35,062. New Topsail Inlet - Between April 23 and May 16, 2000 the contract dredge Richmond removed 39,978 cubic yards from Topsail Creek at a cost of $207,890. During intermittent periods, the U.S. sidecasting dredge Fry removed 91,140 cubic yards from shoals in 6-3 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 2000 New Topsail Inlet at a cost of $138,000. During intermittent periods the U.S. sidecasting dredge Merritt removed 42,260 cubic yards from shoals in New Topsail Inlet at a cost of $108,000. During intermittent times the U.S. debris boat Snell repaired mooring facilities at a cost of $18,500. Between February 25 and March 22, 2000, the U.S. hopper dredge Currituck removed 49,510 cubic yards from shoals in New Topsail Inlet at a cost of $167,200. Condition and operation studies and project operation management plan cost $31,778. Condition at end of fiscal year. The project was completed in September 1997 except for three tie-up dolphins at Masonboro Inlet and the replacement of Fairfield Bridge. The construction contract for Fairfield Bridge was awarded December 22, 1997 with completion scheduled for April 2001. Total cost of existing project to September 30, 2000, was $283,237,937, of which $86,453,557 was for new work including $86,851 in contributed funds and $196,784,380 was for maintenance, including $667,300 in contributed funds. 3. CAPE FEAR RIVER, N. C. ABOVE WILMINGTON Location. The river is formed by confluence of the Deep and Haw Rivers at Moncure, Chatham County, N.C., and empties into the Atlantic Ocean at Cape Fear, near the southern extremity of the State. (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart 426.) Previous project. For details see Annual Reports for 1915 and 1938. Existing project. The authorized project provides for a channel 25 feet deep and 200 feet wide from Wilmington to a turning basin 400 feet wide and 550 feet long at Navassa (2.9 miles); a channel 12 feet deep and 140 feet wide from Navassa to mileboard 30 at Acme, with five channel cutoffs, 12 feet deep and 150 feet wide to eliminate sharp bends; a channel 8 feet deep from mileboard 30 to Fayetteville by constructing three locks and dams and by dredging river shoals; and recreational facilities at the locks and dams. Total length of the project channels is 113.9 miles. The project was authorized by River and Harbor Acts of June 25, 1910; June 26, 1934; August 30, 1935; August 26, 1937; October 27, 1965; and Section 4, Flood Control Act of 1944. For further details see Annual Reports for 1962 and 1970. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. There are twelve waterfront facilities on the river, with a total frontage of 1,190 feet. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: During intermittent periods, the U.S. debris boat Snell conducted clearing and snagging operations at a cost of $93,500 and replaced a foot bridge at Lock and Dam No.2 at a cost of $51,000. E&D for removal of a house at Lock and Dam No.2 cost $3,280. Replacement of flush toilet facilities at lock and Dam No.2 cost $12,256. Periodic inspections cost $41,509. Operation and maintenance of three locks and dams cost $534,745. Condition at end of fiscal year. The project was completed in June 1970. Total cost of existing project to September 30, 2000, was $27,345,153 of which $3,610,454 (including $1,226,385 public works) was for new work and $23,734,699 for maintenance. 4. LOCKWOODS FOLLY RIVER, N. C. Location. The project is located on the south coast of North Carolina about 12 miles west of Cape Fear River. (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart 1236 and Geological Survey Map of North Carolina.) Existing project. The authorized project provides for a channel 100 feet wide and 6 feet deep at low water from the ocean to the bridge at Supply 12.5 miles above, to be obtained by dredging through oyster rocks and mudflats. The completed river portion of the project above the waterway was reclassified to the active category in 1971. Lunar tidal ranges in Lockwoods Folly River are 4.5 feet at the inlet and 2 feet at the head of navigation at Supply. The existing project was authorized by the 1890 River and Harbor Act. (See Annual Report for 1887, page 1099.) A modification to enlarge the channel from 6 to 12 feet deep and from 100 to 150 feet wide across the ocean bar for a distance of 4,700 feet was approved by the Chief of Engineers on June 3, 1980, under Section 107 of the 1960 River and Harbor Act. During dredging operations it became apparent that establishment of the 12-foot project would not be possible with currently available equipment. Therefore, the Chief of Engineers, on December 20, 1983, approved the District's recommendation that further construction activity for the Lockwoods Folly Inlet project be suspended until suitable equipment becomes available and that the project be maintained at an 8-foot project depth in the interim. Local cooperation. For the new modification local interests must: (a) pay, contribute in kind, or repay with interest, one-half of the first costs of construction allocated to recreational boating; (b) hold and save the United States free from damages resulting from changes in ground water levels, saltwater intrusion, or wave action due to the construction works, except damages due to the fault or negligence of the United States or its contractor; (c) provide without cost to the United States all lands, easements, and rights-of-way necessary for the construction and subsequent maintenance of the project and for aids to navigation upon the request of the Chief of Engineers, and (d) provide depths in berthing areas commensurate with the project depths, and provide service facilities. 6-4 WILMINGTON, N.C., DISTRICT Terminal facilities. Thirty-one piers and wharves on the Atlantic Intracoastal Waterway at Holden Beach, about 1.25 miles west of Lockwoods Folly Inlet, with a total frontage of about 1,980 feet available. At Dixons Landing, about 2 miles upstream of the inlet, there are five wharves with a total frontage of 240 feet. Numerous natural landings are used for loading and unloading small boats. Berthing space in the vicinity of Lockwoods Folly Inlet totals about 2,220 feet. Facilities are considered adequate for present commerce. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: During intermittent periods, the U.S. hopper dredge Currituck removed 45,535 cubic yards from shoals In Lockwoods Folly Inlet at a cost of $144,400. During intermittent periods the U.S. sidecasting dredge Fry removed 73,530 cubic yards from shoals in Lockwoods Folly Inlet at a cost of $106,500. Condition and operation Studies cost $29,858. Condition at end of fiscal year. The active portion of the project was completed in June 1965 except for the latest modification. Work was initiated on the latest modification on September 23, 1982, with a depth of 8 feet being reached in October 1982. The project will be maintained at the 8-foot depth until suitable equipment for deepening to 12 feet becomes available. 5. MANTEO (SIHALLOWBAG) BAY, N. C. Location. The project is located on the northeastern side of Roanoke Island, North Carolina. (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart 1229.) Existing project. The authorized project provides for a channel 14 feet deep and 400 feet wide from the Atlantic Ocean through Oregon Inlet with connecting 12-foot channels, 100 feet wide, to Pamlico Sound, Manteo, and Wanchese; and a channel 6 feet deep and 100 feet wide connecting the Manteo-Oregon Inlet Channel with Albemarle Sound. Length of channels is 25.4 miles. A newly authorized modification provides for stabilization of Oregon Inlet with a dual rubble-mound jetty system, including means for sand transfer to the downdrift beach; a channel, 20 feet deep and 400 feet wide, through the Ocean bar at Oregon Inlet; a channel, 14 feet deep and 120 feet wide, from the gorge in Oregon Inlet to and through Roanoke Sound to and including a 15-acre basin of the same depth at Wanchese; and a channel 10 feet deep and 100 feet wide from the 12-foot-deep channel in Manteo (Shallowbag) Bay through Roanoke and Albemarle Sounds to deep water near the northern end of Croatan Sound. The 12-foot Croatan Sound channel has been deferred due to lack of economic justification. The estimated Federal cost for the modification is $100,000,000 (2000 inflated). The project was authorized by River and ltarbor Acts of June 25,1910; October 17, 1940; May 17, 1950; and December 31, 1970; and under Section 107 of the 1960 River and Harbor Act. Local cooperation. For the new modification, local interests must: (a) provide all lands, easements, and rightsof- way for construction and subsequent maintenance of the project, including suitable areas required for initial and subsequent disposal of spoil; (b) hold and save the United States free from damages due to the construction works and subsequent maintenance; (c) continue to provide and maintain adequate terminal and transfer facilities, open to all on equal terms, in accordance with plans approved by the Chief of Engineers; (d) provide and maintain necessary mooring and berthing facilities in any enlarged basin, open to all on equal terms, in accordance with plans approved by the Chief of Engineers; (e) provide and maintain depths in berthing areas and local access channels serving the terminals commensurate with depths provided in the related project areas; (f) accomplish such alterations as required in sewer, water supply, drainage, electrical powerlines, telephone lines, or other utility facilities as well as their maintenance; (g) establish a competent and properly constituted public body empowered to regulate the use, growth, and free development of the harbor facilities, with the understanding that said facilities will be open to all on equal terms; (h) establish regulations prohibiting the discharge of untreated sewage, garbage, and other pollutants in the water of the harbor by the users thereof, which regulations shall be in accordance with applicable laws or regulations of Federal, State, and local authorities responsible for pollution prevention and control; (i) perform, or, cause to be performed, any investigation for hazardous substances as are determined necessary to identify the existence and extent of any hazardous substances regulated under CERCLA and assume complete financial responsibility, as between the Federal government and the non-Federal sponsor, for all necessary clean up and response costs; j) pay 10 percent of the costs allocated to navigation during construction presently estimated at $10,933,000; (k) pay an additional 10 percent of the costs allocated to navigation within a period of 30 years following completion of construction offset by a credit allowed for the value of lands, easements, rights-of-way and relocations (except utility relocations), presently estimated at $11,019,000. Reasonable assurances have been received. The State of N.C. has constructed the Wanchese Harbor portion and was reimbursed under Sec. 215, PL 90-483. Terminal facilities. The project is served by 33 waterfront facilities with a total frontage of 3,320 feet. Additional wharves and facilities will be provided with the enlarged basin at Wanchese. Operations and results during fiscal year. New Work: Work continued on the economic update, GDM supplement, and EIS supplement at a cost of $36,942. Maintenance: Between January 18 and April 2, 2000, the contract dredge Richmond dredged 230,000 cubic yards from shoals in Old House Channel and Channel to Wanchese at a cost of $1,254,338. Between October 14 and December 15, 1999, the contract dredge M.V Atchafalaya dredged 173,731 cubic yards from shoals in 6-5 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 2000 the ocean bar and vicinity of the bridge at a cost of $658,857. Between July 21 and September 30, 2000, the contract dredge Northerly Island dredged 113,285 cubic yards from shoals in the ocean bar and vicinity of the bridge at a cost of $975,615. The U.S. sidecasting dredge Fry removed from Oregon Inlet 69,870 cubic yards between October 1 and October 13, 1999 and 50,340 cubic yards between March 23 and April 5, 2000 at a cost of $171,900. Between November 20, 1999 and January 4, 2000, the U.S. sidecasting dredge Merritt removed 108,360 cubic yards from shoals in Oregon Inlet at a cost of $387,000. Engineering and design and surveys in connection with future years dredging of Old House Channel and Channel to Wanchese cost $21,362. Project monitoring and environmental dredging cost $2,466. Monitoring environmental impact of placing dredge material near shore in the Pea Island Refuge cost $78,314. Cost adjustment in connection with construction of oyster reefs for mitigation resulted in a negative cost of $1,000. Condition and operation studies and project operations management cost $145,022. E&D for Island H disposal area repairs cost $4,991. Dredged material management plan cost $3,500. Island H disposal area was repaired at a contributed funds cost of $21,696. Shoreline monitoring at Oregon Inlet was accomplished at a contributed funds cost of $28,981. Surveys of the channel from Wanchese to Albemarle Sound resulted in a contributed funds cost of $7,725. Condition at end of fiscal year. The project is complete except for the latest modification. (For further detail, see Annual Report of 1962.) 6. MOREHEAD CITY HARBOR, N. C. Location. The project is located on the northern shore of Bogue Sound, adjacent to Beaufort Inlet. (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart 420.) Previous project. For details see page 470 of Annual Report for 1935. Existing project. A channel 47 feet deep and 450 feet wide from deep water in the Atlantic Ocean through the ocean bar at Beaufort Inlet with three wideners; a cutoff channel 400 feet wide; and a depth of 45 feet in the east leg of the basin, including a 1,350 foot diameter turning area; a channel 12 feet deep, 100 feet wide from the turning basin to Sixth Street, Morehead City, then 12 feet deep, 200 to 400 feet wide to Tenth Street; then 6 feet deep, 75 feet wide, to Bogue Sound. Project also includes assumption of maintenance in the northwest leg and the east leg extension. Jetties at Beaufort Inlet were reclassified to the "active" category on March 8, 1972. The jetties were deauthorized by the Water Resources Development Act of 1986. The project was authorized by the 1958 River and Harbor Act (S.D. 54, 84th Cong., 1st Sess.), the River and Harbor Act of December 31, 1970 and the Water Resources Development Act of 1992. (For further details see Annual Report for 1962.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with to date. Terminal facilities. Twenty-six waterfront facilities serve the port, with a total frontage of 1,250 feet. Marine terminals provide 5,300 feet of berthing space, with a depth alongside of 35 feet, and facilities for transfer of cargoes between rail and water carriers. Improvements to facilities were completed in 1969. (For further details see Port Series No. 12, revised 1987, Corps of Engineers.) Operations and results during fiscal year. , Maintenance: Between January 1 and March 11, 2000, the contract dredges Sugar Island Northerly Island, and Dodge Island dredged 1,701,659 cubic yards from shoals in the ocean bar at a cost of $5,025,084. Between October 9 and October 25, 1999, the U.S. hopper dredge McFarland dredged 110,000 cubic yards from shoals in the ocean bar at a cost of $426,314. Cost in connection with prior year dredging of the ocean bar was $579. Engineering and Design in connection with future dredging of the inner harbor cost $2,249. Engineering and design in connection with future dredging of the ocean bar cost $30,562. Ocean dumping monitoring cost $722. Project monitoring of impacts on Bogue Banks and Shackleford Banks cost $11,512. Condition and operation studies and project operation management cost $82,133. Condition at end of fiscal year. The project is complete with the latest modification being physically complete in April 1994. (For further details, see Annual Report of 1962.) Total cost of the existing project to September 30, 2000, was $99,362,874 of which $15,892,219 was for new work, including $2,731,996 contributed funds (including $553,477 public works funds) and $83,470,655 for maintenance, including $1,827,294 contributed funds. 7. ROLLINSON CHANNEL, N. C. Location. The project is located about 3.5 miles northeast of Hatteras Inlet. (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart 1232.) Existing project. The authorized project provides for a channel 12 feet deep, 100 feet wide, and about 5.1 miles long from deep water in Pamlico Sound to and including a basin of the same depth, 80 to 150 feet wide, and 1,450 feet long at Hatteras; a rubble-mound breakwater on each side of the channel at the entrance to the basin; and a channel 10 feet deep and 100 feet wide from that depth in Hatteras Inlet gorge to Rollinson Channel, in the vicinity of the basin at Hatteras. The project was authorized by the River and Harbor Acts of August 30, 1935; March 2, 1945; September 3, 1954; and October 23, 1962. (For further details see Annual Report for 1961.) Local cooperation. Complied with to date. Terminal facilities. Six waterfront facilities serve the channel, with a total frontage of 926 feet. Existing facilities are adequate for present commerce. 6-6 WILMINGTON, N.C., DISTRICT Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Between April 6 and April 28, 2000 the U.S. sidecasting dredge Fry removed 108,680 cubic yards from shoals in Rollinson Channel at a cost of $153,300. Between December 9 and December 11, 1999, the U.S. snagboat Snell repaired the Rollinson Channel breakwaters at a cost of $18,000. Engineering and design in connection with future dredging of the channel cost $37,659. Project condition surveys cost $16,948. Condition at end of fiscal year. The project was completed August 22, 1966. (For further details see Annual Report for 1961.) 8. SILVER LAKE HARBOR, N. C. Location. The project is located at the southwest end of Ocracoke Island, a portion of the Outer Banks on the southeast coast of North Carolina, separating Pamlico Sound from the Atlantic Ocean. (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart No. 1232.) Existing project. The authorized project provides for basin depths of 12 feet in Silver Lake Harbor; an entrance channel 12 feet deep and 60 feet wide, from the basin to Teaches Hole Channel; a channel, 12 feet deep and 150 feet wide, from the entrance channel through Big Foot Slough Bar to the 12-foot contour in Pamlico Sound; a channel, 12 feet deep and 150 feet wide, from the entrance channel through Teaches Hole Channel to the gorge in Ocracoke Inlet, a channel, 12 feet deep and 150 feet wide, across Bluff Shoal; and for rubble-mound training walls on the north and south sides of the entrance channel, 300 feet and 400 feet long, respectively. Mean tidal ranges are 1.9 feet in the throat of Ocracoke Inlet and 1 foot at Ocracoke. Variations in the Water surface of Pamlico Sound are generally due to Winds and seldom exceed 1 or 2 feet above or below mean stage. Severe storms have raised the water surface as much as 7 feet above normal water level at Ocracoke. (See Table 6-B for Authorizing Legislation.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. Twelve waterfront facilities serve the harbor. These facilities are adequate for existing commerce. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Between January 15 and March 10, 2000 the contract dredge Hampton Roads dredged 197,000 cubic yards from shoals in the channel at a cost of $1,175,615. During intermittent periods, the U.S. sidecasting dredge Merritt removed 32,920 cubic yards.from shoals in the channel at a cost of $126,000. Engineering and design in connection with future dredging of the channel cost $60,008. Environmental monitoring cost $1,020. Project condition surveys cost $7,536. Condition at end of fiscal year. The project was completed July 28, 1970. (For further details see Annual Report for 1961.) 9. WATERWAY CONNECTING PAMLICO SOUND AND BEAUFORT HARBOR, N. C. Location. The project is located in Core Sound, west of the outer banks of eastern North Carolina. (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Charts Nos. 420 and 1233.) Existing project. The authorized project provides for a through channel to Core Sound 7 feet deep and 75 feet wide from Pamlico Sound to Beaufort Harbor; an alternative route of the same dimensions through Back Sound by way of channels at the east and west ends of Harkers Island; a channel 7 feet deep and 70 feet wide from the through channel to the local harbor at Cedar Island, including the authorized passage and future maintenance of a channel through the existing private basin, and an access channel 6 feet deep, 50 feet wide and about 400 feet long to a basin the same depth, 60 feet by 100 feet; a channel 7 feet deep and 75 feet wide from the through channel to Atlantic; a channel 7 feet deep and 75 feet wide, with a basin 200 feet by 500 feet, the same depth, at Sealevel; a channel 5 feet deep and 75 feet wide, with basin 150 feet by 130 feet, the same depth, at Davis; a channel 6 feet deep and 60 feet wide with a basin 100 feet by 600 feet, the same depth, at Marshallberg; an entrance channel 6 feet deep and 60 feet wide, from Back Sound to harbor of refuge 120 feet by 250 feet, the same depth in Brooks Creek at the west end of Harkers Island; and a channel 7 feet deep and 70 feet wide, from the existing side channel at Atlantic, N.C., to the mouth of Little Port Brook; thence 7 feet deep and 50 feet wide, along the Brook to a basin 600 feet long, 180 feet wide, and 7 feet deep, with a breakwater, beginning at a point between the mouth of Little Port Brook and White Point, running along the channel approximately 2,000 feet. Plane of reference is mean low water. The length of the authorized channels is about 50.6 miles. (See Table 6-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Fully compiled with to date for completed portion. Terminal facilities. Sixteen small wharves serve the waterway. Additional facilities are needed along Core Sound. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Between October 8, 1999 and March 31, 2000 the contract dredge Miss Margaret removed 6,278 cubic yards from shoals in the Atlantic Harbor of Refuge at a cost of $9,281. Condition at end of fiscal year. The project was completed in September 1972. (For further details, see Annual Report for 1961.) 10. WILMINGTON HARBOR, N. C. Location. The project is located on the Cape Fear River, on southeast coast of North Carolina, between the Atlantic Ocean and Wilmington, North Carolina. (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart No. 426.) Previous projects. For details, see page 1804 of Annual Report for 1915 and page 533 of Annual Report for 1938. 6-7 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 2000 Existing project. The authorized and constructed project provides for a channel 40 feet deep and 500 feet wide from the Atlantic Ocean through the ocean bar and entrance channels to Southport, thence 38 feet deep and 400 feet wide to the upper end of the anchorage basin (foot of Castle Street) at Wilmington, thence 32 feet deep and 400 feet wide, to Hilton Bridge over Northeast Cape Fear River; a 38-foot deep anchorage basin at Wilmington; a 32-foot-deep turning basin opposite the principal terminals; a channel 12 feet deep and 100 feet wide, about 3 miles long, in Cape Fear River; and a channel 25 feet deep and 200 feet wide from Hilton Bridge over Northeast Cape Fear River to a point 1.66 miles above, including a turning basin of the same depth, 700 feet wide and 500 feet long, at a point 1.25 miles above the bridge. The project was authorized by River and Harbor Acts of July 3, 1930; March 2, 1945; May 17, 1950; October 23, 1962; and March 10, 1964; and under the continuing authority of Section 107 of the 1960 River and Harbor Act. Three modifications to the project were authorized by the Water Resources Development Acts of November 17, 1986 (PL 99-662) and October 12, 1996 (PL104-303). These three modifications were subsequently combined into one project modification by the Energy and Water Development Appropriations Act for FY 98. The project consists of two separable elements, the portion for deepening of the existing project and the portion for raising the dikes on Eagle Island dredged material disposal facility (DMDF) for maintenance of the existing project until the deepening is completed. The plan of improvement consists of deepening the ocean bar and entrance channels from the authorized depth of 40 feet to 44 feet; deepening the authorized 38-foot project to 42 feet up to and including the anchorage basin immediately upriver from the State Ports Authority dock, and extending the anchorage basin northward by 300 feet; widening the existing 400-foot wide channel to 600 feet over a total length of 6.2 miles including Lower and Upper Midnight and Lower Lilliput reaches; widen five turns and bends by 100 to 200 feet providing a total average channel width of 500 to 675 feet; widening the Fourth East Jetty Channel to 500 feet over a total length of 1.5 miles; deepening the 32-foot channel between Castle Street and the Hilton Railroad Bridge, the 32-foot turning basin just above the mouth of the Northeast Cape Fear river on the west side, and the 25-foot channel from the Hilton Railroad Bridge to 750 feet upstream all to a depth of 38 feet; deepening the 25-foot channel from 750 feet upstream of the Hilton Railroad Bridge to the turning basin near the upstream limits of the project to 34 feet, along with widening of the channel from 200 to 250 feet; and widening the turning basin from 700 to 800 feet; mitigation to include acquiring, by fee title, 30 acres of upland and construction of an embayment and acquisition of about 500 acres of existing marsh and upland areas for preservation of habitat to offset losses of wetlands and primary nursery areas. The plan of improvement for the dredged material disposal facility consists of incrementally raising the dikes of three cells on Eagle Island confined disposal facility from their current elevations to an ultimate elevation of 40 feet. The environmental enhancement portion of the project is unprogrammed. The estimated Federal cost is $215,678,000 (2000) for the deepening project separable element and $34,100,000 (2000) for the dredged material disposal facility separable element. (For further details of authorization, see 1962 Annual Report.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with to date except for latest modification. Cost-sharing and financing are in ,accordance with concepts reflected in the Water Resources Development Act of 1986. For the deepening project separable element the non-Federal sponsor must (1) provide all lands, easements, rights-of-way, and dredged material disposal area lands presently estimated at $1,915,000, and bear all operation and maintenance costs presently estimated at $6,000 annually; (2) modify or relocate buildings, utilities, roads, bridges (except railroad bridges), and other facilities, where necessary in the construction of the project, presently estimated at $19,595,000; (3) pay 25 percent of the costs allocated to deep draft navigation during construction presently estimated at $71,600,000 and reimburse an additional 10 percent of the costs allocated to deep draft navigation within a period of 30 years following completion of construction which is partially offset by a credit allowed for the value of lands, easements, rightsof- way, relocations (except utility relocations), and dredged material disposal areas, presently estimated at $27,000,000: and (4) provide and maintain, at its own expense, the local service facilities necessary to realize the benefits of the general navigation features, presently estimated at $23,212,000. For the dredged material disposal facility separable element the non-Federal sponsor must (1) pay 25 percent of the costs allocated to deep draft navigation during construction, presently estimated at $11,300,000; and (2) reimburse an additional 10 percent of the costs allocated to deep draft navigation within a period of 30 years following completion of construction, presently estimated at $4,540,000. Terminal facilities. Forty-three principal wharves, piers, and docks at port of Wilmington, with a berthing space of about 20,000 linear feet serve the harbor. These facilities handle general cargo and petroleum products. (For further details, see Port Series No. 12, revised 1987, Corps of Engineers.) Operations and results during fiscal year. New Work: Engineering and design and construction management in connection with the harbor deepening project cost $4,943,585. Contract costs for the FY 2001 Ocean Bar Contract 1 (Outer Bar-New Channel) were $23,000. Between September 25 and September 30, 2000, the contract dredge Illinois dredged 15,367 cubic yards for the Big Island contract at a Federal cost of $1,406,000. Construction of mitigation on Island 13 resulted in a contributed funds cost of $3,109,000. Disposal area con- 6-8 WILMINGTON, N.C., DISTRICT struction in connection with the harbor deepening project resulted in a Federal cost of $1,000,000 and a contributed funds cost of $2,079,296. The south cell dike raise on Eagle Island in connection with the 38 foot project resulted in a contributed funds cost of $7,856. These funds were accepted under an advanced funds agreement with the State. Maintenance: Between February 4 and March 10, 2000, the contract dredge Dodge Island dredged 719,817 cubic yards from shoals in the ocean bar at a cost of $2,267,238. Between October 1, 1999 and March 27, 2000, the contract dredge Arlington dredged 1,367,132 cubic yards from shoals in the anchorage basin and river channel at a Federal cost of $2,932,214 and 66,755 cubic yards from shoals at the State Port at a contributed funds cost of $287,337. Between August 28 and September 30, 2000 the contract dredge Cherokee dredged 449,465 cubic yards from shoals in the anchorage basin and river channel at a cost of $391,639 and 19,913 cubic yards from shoals at the State Port at a contributed funds cost of $140,151. Between April 3 and April 5, 2000, the contract dredge Dodge Island dredged 21,961 cubic yards from shoals in the channel at a cost of $121,974. Disposal Island 10 was repaired at a contributed funds cost of $403,874. During intermittent periods the U.S. debris boat Snell conducted clearing and snagging operations and maintained dredging ranges and mooring facilities at a cost of $186,500. Prior year dredging by the U.S. hopper dredge McFarland from shoals in the river channel resulted in a cost of $16,800. Engineering and design for future Years dredging of the ocean bar \'ost $3,047. OMDS/ocean dumping monitoring cost $7214 Mosquito control in disposal areas cost $154,689. Dredged material management plan cost $3,638. Condition and operation studies and project operation management cost $240,402. Condition at end of fiscal year. The active portion of the project was completed August 1997 except for latest modification. (For further details, see Annual Report for 1962.) Total cost of existing project to September 30, 2000, Was $205,042,992 of which $67,519,936 was for new Work, including contributed funds and $137,523,056 was for maintenance, including $11,152,275 contributed funds. The remaining uncompleted portion of the work authorized Under the River and Harbor Act of March 2, 1945, was deauthorized in accordance with Section 1001(b) (1), PL 99-662. A new construction start for the latest modification Was received in FY98, with the first disposal area construction contract awarded May 1999 and completed October 1999 and the mitigation contract awarded August 1999 and completed November 2000 and the first deepening contract awarded August 2000 . The total project is Scheduled for completion in March 2005. Flood Control 11. ADKIN BRANCH, KINSTON, N.C. Location. The project area is along about 2650 meters (8700 feet) of Adkin Branch from Lincoln Street upstream to NC Highway 11, in the City of Kinston, Lenoir County, in eastern North Carolina. (See USGS quadrangle sheet, Kinston, N.C.) Existing project. Provides for channel improvement along approximately 2650 meters (8700 feet) of Adkin Branch, between Lincoln Street and Greenville Highway, to include deepening and widening to a bottom width of 8 meters (26 feet). The project also includes grading and grassing of exposed slopes to reduce siltation, use of stone bank protection in selected areas, and planting of native trees and shrubs where practicable. Approved estimated Federal implementation cost for construction is $2,057,000 (1999). The project was approved by the Division Commander on July 14, 1999, under the continuing authority of Section 205 of the Flood Control Act of 1948, as amended. Local Cooperation. Local interests must provide all lands, easements, and rights-of-way, including suitable borrow and disposal areas for construction and subsequent maintenance and inspection of the project; accomplish without cost to the United States all relocations and alterations of buildings, transportation facilities, storm drains, utilities and other structures and improvements made necessary by the construction; provide, during the period of construction, an amount equal to not less than 25, but no greater than 50 percent, of total project implementation costs, estimated at $1,543,000, at least 5 percent of which will be cash; hold and save the United States free from damages due to the construction and subsequent maintenance, except damages due to the fault or negligence of the United States or its contractors; maintain and operate. Operations and results during fiscal year. New Work: Coordination with the Sponsor on the project cooperation agreement and on real estate acquisition cost $2,201. Condition at end of fiscal year. The PCA is with the sponsor for signature. This project does not include Federal funds of $219,477 and Federal costs of $219,477 for an earlier project that was deauthorized September 8, 1981. 12. CAPE FEAR RIVER BASIN, N. C. Location. Work covered by this project consists of a series of dams and reservoirs on tributaries of the Cape Fear River in North Carolina within a radius of 100 miles from Raleigh, North Carolina. (See Geological Survey Map of North Carolina.) Existing project. Public Law 88-253, approved December 30, 1963, authorized three principal dams and reservoirs and a series of smaller reservoirs on tributaries of the Cape Fear River in accordance with the comprehensive plans in House Document 508, 87th Congress, 2d session. The act also provides that the appropriate agen- 6-9 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 2000 cies of the Departments of the Army and Agriculture shall conduct joint investigations and surveys and prepare a report on the upper tributaries of the Cape Fear River in the interest of watershed protection and flood prevention, and the conservation, development, utilization, and disposal of water. The report was prepared in compliance with provisions of Public Law 87-639. The study was unfavorable and has been submitted to Congress. No further action will be taken. A list of the dams and reservoirs included in the comprehensive plan follows. (See Table 6-J on Dams and Reservoirs.) Estimates of cost as given are based on 1960 price levels, except the ones for B. Everett Jordan Dam and Lake and Randleman Lake, which were revised in 1990, and Howards Mill Lake in 1980. These three projects have been authorized for construction in accordance with the above authorization. Howards Mill Lake was deauthorized in July 1995 due to the current lack of economic justification. Randleman Lake was reclassified to the "deferred" category in April 1992 due to the current lack of economic justification. Local cooperation. Requirements are given in the individual project reports. 12A. B. EVEREITT JORDAN DAM AND LAKE, N. C. Location. The project is located on the Haw River, N.C., 4.3 miles above its mouth, and 2.5 miles north of Moncure, N. C. Existing project. The project provides for an earth dam 1,330 feet long with a maximum height of 112 feet above the streambed, an uncontrolled, unpaved chute spillway, and a controlled 19-foot diameter outlet structure. Some saddle dikes are required beyond the spillway. The reservoir has a gross storage capacity of 753,500 acre-feet, of which 538,400 acre-feet is for flood control and a conservation pool of 215,100 acre-feet for water-quality control, water supply, and sedimentation. The reservoir will be operated as a unit of a coordinated system for control of floods in the Cape Fear River Basin and for water supply, water-quality control, and other purposes. Estimated Federal cost for new work is $147,600,000 (1996), consisting of $89,186,000 for construction, and $58,414,000 for lands and damages, including highway, railroad, and utility relocations. The existing project was authorized by Public Law 88-253 approved December 30,1963 (H.D. 508, 87th Cong., 2d sess.). Local cooperation. Local interests must protect downstream channels from encroachments and obstructions which would adversely affect operation of the project; reimburse the Federal Government for all costs allocated to municipal and industrial water supply, presently estimated at $3,700,000 and bear all annual costs for operation, maintenance, and major replacements allocated to municipal and industrial water supply, an amount presently estimated at $46,000 annually; and contribute toward the cost of the ranger security buildings, an amount presently estimated at $44,000. A contract between the State of N. C. and the United States for water supply storage space was executed by ASA (CW) on April 10, 1988. In addition, the State of N. C. has leased the project for public park, recreational, fish, wildlife, and other natural resource management purposes and the estimated cost to the State for O&M under this lease is $806,000 annually. Operations and results during fiscal year. New Work: A cost adjustment for construction of the Crosswinds Marina resulted in a cost decrease of $6,631. Work continued on the boater recreation study at a cost of $47,480, real estate activities at a cost of $121,982, and the master plan update at a cost of $15,987. Total Federal expenditures were $194,376, including the above items. Maintenance: Periodic inspections cost $14,525. Engineering and Design for the management center addition cost $14,423. The inventory of rare, threatened, and endangered species cost $8,420. Installation of a handicap comfort station cost $13,765. Repairs to service gate 8 cost $111,253. Repair of concrete ditches and piezometers cost $30,524. Picnic shelters at Poe's Ridge cost $18,783. The warehouse facility cost $15,394. A seismic reevaluation cost $5,916. GIS development cost $45,061. Normal operation and maintenance cost $1,058,696. Condition at end of fiscal year. All facilities are complete. Impoundment was completed in February with 1982, dedication on May 1,1982. The project was completed in June 1999. The real estate audit is scheduled to be completed March 2001. The master plan update and boater use study are scheduled to be completed September 2001. 13. BRUNSWICK COUNTY BEACHES, N.C. (CAPE FEAR TO NORTH CAROLINA-SOUTH CAROLINA STATE LINE) Location. The project is in Brunswick County, on the south Atlantic coast of North Carolina, between the mouth of the Cape Fear River and the North Carolina-South Carolina State Line. (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Charts 1236 and 1237.) Existing Project The project was authorized by the 1966 Flood Control Act (H.D. 511, 89th Congress, 2d session) The project was rejected by a public referendum in 1974 and was reclassified inactive in February 1976. The project was reclassified to active in 1985 due to renewed local interest caused by continuing erosion and repeated storm damage, with the exception of Sunset Beach, which remains inactive. The General Reevaluation Report for Ocean Isle Beach was approved May 15, 1998. The authorized project for the Ocean Isle Beach portion provides a continuous vegetated dune and berm stabilized by periodic re-nourishment. The dune crown width is 25 feet at elevation 9.5 feet NGVD fronted by a berm 50 feet 6-10 WILMINGTON, N.C., DISTRICT Wide at 7 feet NGVD for a distance of 5,150 feet, then a berm with crown width of 50 feet at 7 feet NGVD for a distance of 2,600 feet, then a berm with crown width of 25 feet at 7 feet NGVD for a distance of 2,400 feet. Transitions will be 4,200 feet on the eastern end and 2,800 feet on the western end. Total length of beach segment including transitions is 17,150 feet. A General Reevaluation is underway for the Oak Island (formerly Long Beach and Yaupon Beach), Caswell Beach, and Holden Beach portion. Sunset Beach remains inactive. The estimated Federal cost is $93,376,000 (2000) for the Ocean Isle beach portion and $3,224,000 (2000) for the Oak Island, Caswell Beach, and Holden Beach portion. Local Cooperation The PCA executed January 9, 2001, for the Ocean Isle Beach portion provides that the non-Federal sponsor shall: (a)provide all lands, easements, rights-of-way, and suitable borrow and dredged or excavated material disposal areas; (b)perform required relocations; (c)during initial construction, contribute 35 percent of construction costs assigned to hurricane and storm damage reduction, with credit allowed for (a) and (b), currently estimated at $3,339,000; (d)during periodic re-nourishment, contribute 35 percent of construction costs assigned to hurricane and storm damage reduction, with credit allowed for (a) and (b), currently estimated at $46,970,000; (e) participate in and comply with applicable Federal floodplain management and flood insurance programs; (f)not less than once a year inform affected interests of the extent of protection afforded by the project; (g)enforce floodplain regulations; (h)provide and maintain public ownership, during the economic life of the project, of an adequate width of beach for public use, with acceptable beach access, parking areas, and other facilities necessary for realization of the benefits upon which Government participation is based; (i)adopt and enforce ordinances to provide for preservation of the project and its protective vegetation; (j)control water pollution to the extent necessary to safeguard the health of bathers; and (k)operate, maintain, repair, and rehabilitate the project. Operations and results during fiscal year. New Work: The General Reevaluation for the Oak Island, Caswell Beach, and Holden Beach portion continued at a cost of $810,975. Engineering and design and real estate activities in preparation for the FY 2001 construction of the Ocean Isle portion cost $140,071. Condition at end of fiscal year. A new construction start was approved in FY 2000 for the Ocean Isle Beach Portion, with execution of the PCA and construction contract award scheduled for FY 2001. The General Reevaluation is continuing for the Oak Island, Caswell Beach, and Holden Beach portion. Sunset Beach remains inactive. 14. CAROLINA BEACH AND VICINITY, N.C. Location. The project is in New Hanover County, about 15 miles southeast of Wilmington, N. C., on the peninsula which separates lower Cape Fear River from the Atlantic Ocean. (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Map 834.) Existing project The authorized project consists of two separable elements, the Carolina Beach Portion and the Area South of Carolina Beach and extends about 32,000 feet from the northern limits of Carolina Beach to the southern limits of Kure Beach. Federal participation in the cost of periodic beach nourishment will be for a period not to exceed 50 years from the year of initial placement. The project provides for construction of a dune with a crown width of 25 feet at elevation 13.5 feet National geodetic vertical datum (NGVD), a berm with a crown width of 50 feet at elevation 10.5 feet NGVD for Carolina Beach and 9 feet NGVD for the Area South, and for Carolina Beach a rock revetment at elevation 10.5 feet NGVD along the northern 2,050 feet fronted by a 130- foot wide berm at elevation 6.5 feet NGVD. The Area South of Carolina Beach was reclassified to the active category, June 1985. Approved estimated Federal cost for Area South new work is $157,300,000 (2000). The project was authorized by the 1962 Flood Control Act (H.D. 418, 87th Cong. 2d sess.). The Water Resources Development Act of 1986 authorized Federal participation in future nourishment for 50 years. Local cooperation. For the Carolina Beach portion, local interests must: (a) Provide lands, easements, and rights-ofway for construction; (b) make required relocations and alterations of streets, utilities, or structures; (c) contribute 37.9 percent of the total first cost, with credit allowed for (a) and (b); (d) hold the United States free from damages; (e) maintain all works after completion; (f) maintain continued public ownership of the shore; (g) adopt and enforce appropriate ordinances to provide for preservation of improvement and its protective vegetation; (h) control water pollution to extent necessary to safeguard health of bathers; and (i) at least annually inform interests affected that project will not provide any substantial protection from ocean surges higher in elevation than that of Hurricane Hazel, October 15, 1954. Requirements have been fulfilled to date for the town of Carolina Beach portion of the project. For the Area South portion, local interests must: (a) provide lands, easements, rights-of-way, including borrow areas; (b) pay 35 percent of the first costs of operation, maintenance and replacement of hurricane and storm damage reduction facilities; (c) contribute, in cash, 35 percent of the total project cost; (d) inform affected interests of the limitation of the protection afforded by the project no less than once each year; (e) assure that water pollution which would endanger the health of bathers will not be permitted to the extent of its power; (f) assure the continued public ownership of the above shore and its administration for public use during the 50 year economic life of the project; (g) to the extent of its powers, prescribe and enforce regulations to prevent obstruction of or encroachment on the project that would reduce the level of protection it affords or that would hinder operation or maintenance; and (h) provide and maintain 6-11 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 2000 necessary access roads, parking areas and other public use facilities open and available to all on equal terms. Operations and results during fiscal year. New Work: Engineering and design for future year re-nourishment of the Carolina Beach portion cost $73,005. Cost adjustments for prior year construction of the Area South portion resulted in a Federal cost decrease of $14,535 and a contributed funds cost of $35,787. Future borrow sources investigations cost $1,720. Condition at end of fiscal year. Initial project construction for the Carolina Beach portion was completed August 12, 1982, except for grassing which was completed in September 1983. The latest increment of periodic nourishment for the Carolina Beach portion was completed in April 1998 with the next increment scheduled for FY 2001. The contract for the initial construction of the Area South portion was awarded August 1996 with dredging completed in January 1998, and final contract completion December 1999. The first increment of periodic nourishment for Area South is scheduled for FY 2001, with contract award scheduled for January 2001 and completion scheduled for May 2001. 15. CLINTON WASTEWATER TREATMENT PLANT, CLINTON, N.C. Location. The project is located at the confluence of Dollar Branch and Williams Old Mill Branch near the City of Clinton, about 60 miles south of Raleigh, North Carolina. Existing Project. The project consists of construction of a dike approximately 2,200 feet long around the Clinton Wastewater Treatment Plant, with sumps and pumps to provide interior drainage. Loss of 1.8 acres of wetlands due to construction will be mitigated by purchase of a 4 acre mitigation site and by the Sponsor placing a restrictive covenant to preserve 6 acres of land already owned. The project provides protection from a 100 year flood event. Approved estimated Federal cost for construction implementation is $591,000 (1998). The project was approved by the Division Commander on April 7, 1998, under Section 205 of the Flood Control Act of 1948, as amended. Local cooperation. Local interests must provide all lands, easements and rights-of-way, including suitable borrow and disposal areas necessary for construction and subsequent maintenance and inspection of the project; accomplish without cost to the United States all relocation and alterations of buildings, transportation facilities, storm drains, utilities and other structures and improvements made necessary by the construction; provide, during the period of construction, an amount equal to not less than 25 percent, but no greater than 50 percent, of total project costs, estimated at $197,000, at least 5 percent of which will be cash; hold and save the United States free from damages due to the construction and subsequent maintenance, except damages due to the fault or negligence of the United States or its contractors; maintain and operate the project after completion without cost to the United States; assume full responsibility for all project costs in excess of the Federal cost limitation of $5,000,000 and assume financial responsibility for cleanup of hazardous and toxic waste, as defined in the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act, which is necessitated by the project. Such costs will not be considered part of the total project costs, nor will the sponsor receive credit for such costs it incurs. Operations and results during fiscal year. New Work: Construction was substantially completed June 30, 2000 at a Federal cost of $245,785 and a contributed funds cost of $96,123. Condition at end of fiscal year. Real estate acquisition by the Sponsor is complete. The construction contract was awarded July 13, 1999 and was substantially complete in June 2000. The project is scheduled to be turned over to the Sponsor in October 2000. Coordination continues with the Sponsor on mitigation lands and the flood plain management plan. 16. MORAVIAN CREEK, WILKESBORO, N.C. Location. The project is located along 440 meters of Moravian Creek in the Town of Wilkesboro, Wilkes County, in western North Carolina. Existing Project The project consists of a concrete flood barrier approximately 200 meters long and up to 6 feet high, bank protection, clearing and snagging of the stream, grading and grassing of banks, and planting of native trees and shrubs. The project provides protection from a 15-year flood event of commercial structures. During design a second concrete barrier approximately 95 meters long and 6 to 18 inches high was determined necessary to provide the 15-year protection. Approved estimated Federal cost for construction implementation is $696,000 (2000). The project was approved by the Division Commander on September 30, 1998, under Section 205 of the Flood Control Act of 1948, as amended. Local cooperation. Local interest must provide all lands, easements and rights-of-way, including suitable borrow and disposal areas necessary for construction and subsequent maintenance and inspection of the project; accomplish without cost to the United States all relocation and alterations of buildings, transportation facilities, storm drains, utilities and other structures and improvements made necessary by the construction; provide, during the period of construction, and amount equal to not less than 25 percent, but not greater than 50 percent, of total project 6-12 WILMINGTON, N.C., DISTRICT costs, estimated at $232,000, at least 5 percent of which will be cash; hold and save the United States free from damages due to the construction and subsequent maintenance, except damages due to the fault or negligence of the United States or its contractors; maintain and operate. Operations and results during fiscal year. New Work: Coordination with the Sponsor on real estate acquisition cost $23,501. Condition at end of fiscal year. The PCA was executed December 1998 and acquisition of real estate by the Sponsor is underway. Construction contract award is scheduled for FY 2001. 17. NEUSE RIVER BASIN, N. C. Location. Works covered by this project consist of a series of dams and reservoirs in the Neuse River Basin in North Carolina within a radius of 50 miles from Raleigh, North Carolina. (See Geological Survey Map of North Carolina.) Existing project. The Flood Control Act of 1965 authorized construction of the Falls project as the key project in the recommended general plan of development of the Neuse River Basin. The plan will serve as a guide for immediate and future development of the basin's water resources as set forth in House Document 175, 89th Congress, Ist Session. A list of projects included in the general plan of development follows. (See Table 6-J on Dams and Reservoirs.) Estimated costs as given are based on 1963 price levels, except for Falls Lake which was revised in 1989. 17A. FALLS LAKE, N. C. Location. The project is on the Neuse River about 10 miles north of the city of Raleigh, North Carolina. Existing project. The authorized project provides for an earth dam 1,915 feet long with a maximum height of 95 feet above streambed. The dam has a 30-foot top width. An uncontrolled chute spillway, 100 feet wide, is located in the east abutment. The reservoir has a gross storage capacity of 374,450 acre-feet, of which 243,050 acre-feet is for flood control, 45,000 acre-feet for water supply for the city of Raleigh, 61,330 acre-feet for water quality control, and 25,070 acre-feet for sediment storage. The reser- Voir will be operated as the initial unit of a coordinated System for control of floods in the Neuse River Basin for Water supply, water quality control, recreation, and other purposes. Estimated cost of new work is $183,000,000 (1996) consisting of $91,334,000 for construction and $91,666,000 for lands and damages, including highway, railroad, and utility relocations. The project was authorzed by the 1965 Flood Control Act (H.D. 175, 89th ong., Ist sess.) Local cooperation. Local interests must prevent encroachment on downstream channels that would interfere with the operation of the reservoir; pay the United States in accordance with the Water Supply Act of 1958, as amended, the entire amount of construction cost allocated to water supply, presently estimated at $13,637,000 and entire amount of operation, maintenance, and replacement costs allocated to water supply, presently estimated at $116,000 annually, the final amounts to be determined after actual costs are known; administer project land and water areas for recreation and fish and wildlife enhancement; pay, contribute in kind, or repay (which may be through user fees), with interest, one-half of the separable cost of the project allocated to recreation and one-fourth of the separable cost allocated to fish and wildlife enhancement, the amount involved currently being estimated at $21,595,000, and bear all costs of operation, maintenance, and replacement of recreation and fish and wildlife lands and facilities, the amount involved currently being estimated at $1,544,000 on an average annual basis. Formal assurances have been received. The N.C. Department of Natural and Economic Resources has been authorized by an act of legislation to assure payment of all non-Federal costs allocable to water supply in all Federal projects as required by law. The State will require repayment of water supply costs, by the users. A contract between the city of Raleigh and the United States for water-supply storage space was approved by the Secretary of the Army on September 11, 1972. A contract agreement for cost sharing of recreational lands and facilities in accordance with PL 89-72 was approved by the Secretary of the Army on September 11, 1972. A contract agreement in accordance with Section 221 of PL 91-611 was executed on October 10, 1972. Operations and results during fiscal year. New Work: Warranty design and contract payments for work on the wildlife sub-impoundments that were completed in FY 98 cost $5,464. Work continued on Holly Point Recreation Area improvements at a cost of $58,445 and on real estate activities at a cost of $263,752. The boaters recreation study cost $32,667. Total Federal expenditures were $426,215, including the above items. Maintenance: Periodic inspections cost $21,363. Replacement of the Indication and Control System cost $23,750. The warehouse facility cost $3,581. A seismic reevaluation cost $1,965. The water control plan update cost $52,574. GIS development cost $50,719. Normal operation and maintenance cost $960,730. Condition at end of fiscal year. Reservoir filling was completed on December 7, 1983. Dedication ceremonies were held on April 30, 1983. Minor modifications for recreational areas were completed in March 2000. Project was completed March 2000. The real estate audit is scheduled for completion March 2001. The master plan update and boater use study are scheduled for completion in December 2001. 6-13 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 2000 18. ROANOKE RIVER UPPER BASIN, VIRGINIA, HEADWATERS AREA Location. The project is located on the Roanoke River in the City of Roanoke, Va. (See USGS quadrangle sheet, Roanoke, Va.) Existing project. The authorized plan includes about 6.2 miles of channel widening along the 10-mile project reach through the City of Roanoke, Va. Channel widening will be accomplished with the construction of a benched channel above the elevation of the average steamflow. Other flood damage reduction features include floodproofing at two locations, training walls to prevent floodwater intrusion into low areas along the river (total length 6,120 feet), replacement of two lowlevel bridges which constrict streamflows and a flood warning system. Recreation facilities consist of a 2.9- mile recreation trail along the project reach and access and parking areas. Approved estimated Federal cost for new work is $31,000,000 (2000). The project was authorized by the Water Resources Development Act of 1986 (H.R. 6, PL 99-662). Local cooperation. Local interests must provide all lands, easements, and rights-of-way including spoil disposal areas presently estimated at $9,391,703; modify or relocate buildings, utilities, roads and other facilities except railroad bridges, where necessary for construction of the project presently estimated at $3,244,991; pay 25 percent of the cost of flood warning system (partially offset by a credit for lands, easements, rights-of-way, and relocations) presently estimated at $10,000; pay 5 percent of the total cost allocated to flood control in cash in addition to all lands, easements, rights-of-way and relocations presently estimated at $2,128,680, and bear all costs of operation, maintenance, and replacement of flood control facilities presently estimated at $101,000, annually; pay one-half of the separable cost allocated to recreation presently estimated at $1,157,626, (partially offset by a credit for land, easements, rights-of-way and relocations) and bear all costs of operation, maintenance and replacement of recreation facilities presently estimated at $9,000, annually; and pay 25 percent of the cost of non-structural floodproofing (partially offset by a credit for lands, easements, rights-of-way and relocations) presently estimated at $367,000. Fully complied with to date. Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: Engineering and design continued at a cost of $711,636. Condition at end of fiscal year. The contract for the flood warning system was completed in January 1991. The contract for the sewage treatment plant floodproofing was awarded in August 1991 and completed in February 1993. Two hazardous material sites have been cleared by the owners. Sponsor initiated land acquisition for channel improvement in FY98. Low water bridges will be constructed at owners expense as part of the channel/floodwall construction contract from the sewage treatment plant to Wasena Park scheduled for award FY2002 Project completion is scheduled for September 2008. 19. WRIGHTSVILLE BEACH, N. C. Location. A small island 10 miles east of Wilmington, N. C. (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Map p.834) Existing project. Construct a dune with a base bordering at or near the building line, with a crown width of 25 feet at elevation 15 feet above mean low water, together with integral construction of a beach berm with a crown width of 50 feet at elevation 12, extending about 14,000 feet from Moores Inlet on the north to Masonboro Inlet on the south. Existing project was authorized by 1962 Flood Control Act (H.D. 511, 87th Cong., 2d sess.). The Water Resources Development Act of 1986 authorized Federal participation in future nourishment for the life of the project. Local cooperation. Fully complied with to date. Operations and results during fiscal year. New Work: Cost adjustment for final accounting in connection with the FY 98 re-nourishment cycle resulted in a decreased Federal cost of $65,421 and a contributed funds cost of $50,363. Condition at end of fiscal year. All work under the initial authorization has been completed. Under WRDA 86 the third renourishment was completed in May 1998. The next renourishment is scheduled for 2002. 20. YADKIN RIVER BASIN, N. C. AND S.C. Location. The river rises on the eastern slope of the Blue Ridge Mountains in western North Carolina, flows generally easterly about 100 miles to the vicinity of Donnaha, North Carolina, thence southeasterly 104 miles to its confluence with Uwharrie River near Badin, North Carolina, where its name changes to Great Pee Dee River. (See U.S. Geological Survey map of North Carolina.) Existing project. The Flood Control Act of July 24,1946, authorized construction of four flood control dams in the Upper Yadkin River Basin, two on the Yadkin River above Wilkesboro, North Carolina, and two on Reddies River, a tributary stream. Studies made subsequent to authorization established the economic advantage of providing needed flood-control storage in only two reservoirs, one on the Reddies and one on the Yadkin. Present planning considers only the two-reservoir plan, W. Kerr Scott Dam and Reservoir constructed 1962 and Reddies River Lake. W. Kerr Scott was transferred to the Wilmington District from Charleston in fiscal year 1980. Any future work on Reddies River will also be done by the Wilmington District. (See Table 6-J on Dams and Reservoirs.) 6-14 WILMINGTON, N.C., DISTRICT 20A. W. KERR SCOTT DAM AND RESERVOIR, N. C. Location. W. Kerr Scott Dam and Reservoir is on Yadkin River, North Carolina, about 6 miles upstream from Wilkesboro. At full flood-control pool elevation (1,075 feet mean sea level), the reservoir extends 15.7 miles upstream to the Wilkes-Caldwell County line. Existing project. The project consists of a rolled earthfill dam 1,740 feet long, with top of dam at elevation 1,107.5 feet mean sea level or about 148 feet above streambed elevation; a spillway near the north abutment of the dam in a rock cut with crest elevation 1,075; and outlet works consisting of an intake structure, control tower, and a circular concrete conduit 12.25 feet in diameter through the base of the dam near the south abutment. The reservoir has a gross capacity of 153,000 acre-feet of Which 112,000 acre-feet are reserved for flood control, 33,000 acre-feet will be used as required for water supply, and 8,000 acre-feet being contained in the minimum pool. Estimated cost is $9,110,000 (1983) for new work. The existing project was authorized by the 1946 Flood Control Act. Local cooperation. Requirements fully satisfied. For details, see page 413 of Annual Report for 1963. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Management center exhibits cost $252,814. Replacement of the Indication and Control System cost $23,750. Periodic inspections cost $19,974. The warehouse facility cost $19,844. Normal operation and maintenance cost $1,956,419. Condition at end of fiscal year. The project was commenced in August 1960 and placed in operation for flood control and water storage purposes in August 1962. 21. INSPECTION OF COMPLETED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS To determine the extent of compliance with approved regulations for maintenance and operation, review and inspections were made for the following projects during fiscal year 2000: Ararat River, Surry County, N.C.; Carolina Beach and Vicinity, N.C.; Carolina Beach and Vicinity, N.C. (Area South); Core Creek, Craven County, N.C.; Dan River, Madison Wastewater Treatment Plant, N.C.; Danville (Southside Wastewater Treatment Plant), Va.; Ellis Swamp, Gates County, N.C.; Filberts Creek, N.C.; Gapway Swamp, N.C. & S.C.; Genoa Sewer Facility, Wayne County, N.C. (Sec 14); Joyce Creek, Camden County, N.C.; King (Water Plant), NC (Sec 14); Leith's Creek, Scotland County, N.C.; Lick Run, Roanoke, Va.; Little Rockfish Creek, Hope Mills, N.C.; N.C. Aquarium, Dare County, N.C. (Sec 14); Neuse River, Oriental, N.C. (Hodges Street Bulkhead) (Sec 14); Old Field Swamp, Robeson County, N.C.; Pungo Creek, Edgecombe County, N.C.; Pungo River, Edgecombe County, N.C.; Roanoke River Upper Basin, Va.- Headwaters Area (Floodproofing Of Roanoke Sewage Treatment Plant); Simmons Bay Creek, Columbus County, N.C.; South Creek, Beaufort, N.C.; South Mayo River, Patrick County, Va.; Swift Creek, Pitt and Craven Counties, N.C.; Tar River, Princeville, N.C. and Wrightsville Beach, N.C. Responsible local officials were advised of inadequacies in maintenance and operation on local flood protection works where appropriate. Cost for the period was $7,225. Total cost to September 30, 2000, was $555,493, charged to operations. 22. FLOOD CONTROL WORKS UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION Flood control activities pursuant to Section 205, Public Law 858, 80th Congress, as amended (preauthorization). (See Table 6-K.) Emergency flood control activities and hurricane flood and shore-protection activities at Federally authorized projects (Public Law 99, 84th Congress, and antecedent legislation). The Catastrophic Disaster Preparedness Program cost $39,627. The Disaster Preparedness Program cost $262,986. Non-reimbursable emergency operations costs in connection with Hurricane Dennis were $98; Hurricane Floyd $124,307; Hurricane Irene $4,329; Hurricane Jose $1,594; Hurricane Lenny $6,562; and Hurricane Debby $2,522. Cost in connection with the Advance Contracting Initiative was $6,004. Non-reimbursable costs for the Rehabilitation and Inspection Program in connection with Deep Creek Dike at Speed, N.C. were $25,669; Pasquotank River, N.C. $16,199; and Tar River, Princeville, N.C. $745,900. Field inspections and preparation of project information reports for flood control works cost $116,241. Multiple-Purpose Projects, Including Power 23. ROANOKE RIVER BASIN, VA. AND N.C. Location. The project is on the Roanoke River and its tributaries in Virginia and North Carolina within a radius of 100 miles from Danville, Virginia. Existing project. The Flood Control Act of 1944 approved a general plan for the comprehensive development of the Roanoke River Basin for flood control and other purposes, and authorized construction of John H. Kerr and Philpott Reservoirs. (See Table 6-J for a list of dams and reservoirs included in the comprehensive plan.) 6-15 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 2000 Local cooperation. None required. John H. Kerr and Philpott Reservoirs are the only projects in the comprehensive plan that have been authorized for construction. (See Table 6-J on Dams and Reservoirs.) 23A. JOHN H. KERR DAM AND RESERVOIR, VA. AND N. C. Location. The project is on Roanoke River, about 178.7 river miles above its mouth, in Mecklenburg County, Virginia, and 20.3 miles downstream from Clarksville, Virginia. The reservoir extends upstream on Roanoke River 56 miles and on Dan River 34 miles. Existing project. The authorized project provides for a concrete gravity dam with wing and saddle dikes on the right and left banks, with a total length of about 22,285 feet. The reservoir is operated as a unit of a coordinated system of reservoirs in the Roanoke River Basin for control of floods, generation of hydroelectric power, regulation of low-water flow, and for other purposes. The power installation is 204,000 kilowatts. (For further details see Annual Report for 1962.) The existing project was authorized by the 1944 Flood Control Act. Local cooperation. None required. Operations and results during fiscal year. New Work: Major rehabilitation of power facilities cost $1,095,603, including engineering and design and construction management costs of $735,603 and contract earnings of $360,000 for the Circuit Breaker Supply Contract. Maintenance: Cost adjustment for upgrading the SCADA system at the powerhouse resulted in a cost decrease of $112. Hurricane Fran repairs cost $240. Cemetery relocations cost $316,809. Engineering and design for the powerhouse bridge crane rehabilitation cost $7,000. Cost adjustment for replacing the washhouse at North Bend Park resulted in a cost decrease of $880. The Resource Management Office addition cost $282. The Island Creek pumping plant rehabilitation and replacement cost $1,843,380. Preliminary assessment and delineation of DDT and Dioxin sites cost $6,883. Cost adjustment for prior year earth dike modifications resulted in a cost decrease of $1,074. Rehabilitation study of 7 main units in the powerhouse cost $18,242 Highway 58 recreation mitigation cost $920 in Federal funds and $5,249 in contributed funds. The turbine venting hydraulic study cost $9,571. Mitigation of flood damages at Buggs Island and Cedar Grove archaeological activities cost $162,156. For the Occoneechee State Park boat ramp archaeology cost $22,121 and preparation of the environmental assessment cost $6,359. Engineering and design for the pre-engineered storage building at the powerhouse cost $14,263. The warehouse facility cost $64,049. The archaeological survey of the Greenwood Wildlife Management Area cost $4,865. Periodic inspections cost $1,161. Normal operation and maintenance cost $7,403,544. Maintenance and operation of dams cost $472,993. Condition at end of fiscal year. Project is complete except for additional recreational facilities. Production of power and protection from floods are provided by project. 23B. PHILPOTT LAKE, VA. Location. The project is located on Smith River, Virginia, 44.3 miles above its junction with Dan River, and 35 miles upstream from Virginia-North Carolina State line in Franklin and Henry Counties. Existing project The authorized project provides for a concrete gravity dam 892 feet long and with a maximum height of 220 feet. Reservoir is operated as a unit of a coordinated reservoir system for flood control in the Roanoke River Basin, generation of hydroelectric power, regulation of low-water flow, and for other purposes. The powerhouse has a total installation of 14,000 kilowatts. (For further details see Annual Report for 1962.). Existing project was authorized by 1944 Flood Control Act. Local cooperation. None required. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Mercury contamination cleanup in the transformer yard cost $62,432. The warehouse facility cost $25,165. Recreation modernization at the Goose Point Recreation Site cost $59,678. The marina feasibility study cost $15,284. Periodic inspections cost $17,285. Normal operation and maintenance cost $2,194,222. Condition at end of fiscal year. The project is complete except for additional recreational facilities, and is providing power and flood protection. 24. SCHEDULING FLOOD CONTROL RESERVOIR OPERATIONS B. Everett Jordan Dam and Lake, located in the Cape Fear River Basin, North Carolina, began Fiscal Year 2000 at elevation 223.32 feet, m.s.l. or 7.32 feet above guide curve and continued to rise to the maximum elevation for the fiscal year at 224.34 feet, m.s.l. on 2 October as a result of a fall rain event. The lake level had returned to near normal by mid-October and continued to fluctuate between elevations 216 and 218 feet, m.s.l. for the remainder of the calendar year. From mid-January through April several rainfall events caused the lake to rise above guide curve to elevation 222.41 feet, m.s.l. on 19 February. The lake level had returned to near guide curve by the first week of May. From May through the end of the fiscal year the lake remained near guide curve with the exception of rising to near elevation 219 feet, m.s.l. during minor rain events. The minimum elevation at Jordan Lake for the fiscal year was 215.77 feet, m.s.l. on 22 August and was the only time the lake fell below guide curve for the fiscal year. Maximum flood pool storage utilized during the fiscal year was 74 percent and conservation pool storage remaining at the minimum elevation was near 100 percent. 6-16 WILMINGTON, N.C., DISTRICT Flood damages prevented during Fiscal Year 2000 were $527,060 making the cumulative total $205,436,460 since inception of the project in 1981. Total cost of functional operation for the period was $67,325. Falls Lake, located in the Neuse River Basin, North Carolina, began Fiscal Year 2000 at elevation 264.25 feet, m.s.l. or 13.25 feet above guide curve of 251.0 feet, m.s.l. as a result of the heavy rains associated with Hurricanes Dennis and Floyd in August and September 1999. Falls Lake level continued to rise, peaking at elevation 264.34 feet, m.s.l. or 13.34 feet above guide curve on 1 October. This level represents a new all time record maximum elevation for Falls Lake since first filling of the project back in 1983. Monthly rainfall averaged below normal each month through March while monthly inflows to Falls Dam fluctuated both above and below normal during the same period. Both the annual rainfall and inflow to Falls Dam Were less than the long term average yet within 93 and 99 percent of normal, respectively. After returning to near guide curve in late November, Falls Lake fluctuated between elevations 251.0 and 255.0 feet, m.s.l. during the remainder of the fiscal year. A temporary diversion to the approved 'Plan of Operation' was granted by the South Atlantic Division office beginning 1 June 2000 which permitted the water control management group in the Wilmington District to maintain the normal guide curve level of Falls Lake at elevation 251.5 feet, m.s.l. on a continuous year round basis. Currently a one-year study is underway to review the 'Plan of Operation' at Falls Lake for possible enhancements due to increased operational experience gained during the floods which occurred during the late 1990's and the need to implement the revised Operational level of 251.5 feet, m.s.l., following physical modifications to the dam and spillway. The elevation of Falls Lake reached 251.08 feet, m.s.l. or 0.42 feet below guide curve, on 27 August 2000 which was the minimum elevation for the fiscal year. Falls Lake ended the fiscal Year at elevation 251.52 feet, m.s.l. or 0.52 feet above the temporary guide curve of 251.5 feet, m.s.l. The maximum flood pool storage utilized during the year was 95.9 percent, and the minimum conservation pool storage remaining was 95 percent. Flood damages prevented during Fiscal Year 2000 were $29,400 making the cumulative total $539,199,000 since inception of the project in 1983. Total cost of functional operation for the period was $62,352. John II. Kerr Dam and Reservoir, located in the Roanoke River Basin, Virginia and North Carolina, began Fiscal Year 2000 at elevation 302.60 feet, mean sea level (m.s.l.) or 3.10 feet above guide curve. This high starting elevation was a continuation of the high inflow received during the previous fiscal year. On 15 September 1999 HIurricane Floyd made land fall in southeast North Carolina, followed a path towards the Piedmont area then bowed out towards the southeast Virginia coast. In late September, inflows into John H. Kerr were again increased by two separate weather fronts (Canada and Gulf of Mexico) converging and releasing heavy rainfall over the Carolinas. This combination of events caused the reservoir level of John H. Kerr to peak at elevation 304.20 feet, m.s.l. or 4.90 feet above guide curve on 3 October. Flood discharges from John H. Kerr through the month of October and briefly into November brought the reservoir level to its lowest point during the fiscal year at elevation 297.20 feet, m.s.l. or 0.98 feet above guide curve on 19 November. Sporadic rainfall from December through February kept John H. Kerr's reservoir level above guide curve and conversely below the flood control pool level. Heavy rainfall events occurred in mid-March and mid- April causing a quick rise in the reservoir level to elevations 303.27 and 305.53 feet, m.s.l, on 31 March and 23 April, respectively. The reservoir level was below guide curve most of May due to a combination of fish augmentation flows and below average inflow and rainfall. Minor rainfall events in late May, mid-June, early August and September helped maintain the reservoir level above guide curve for the remainder of the year. Maximum flood pool storage utilized during the fiscal year was 23 percent. The contractual power pool storage remaining at the lowest elevation during the year was 58 percent. Gross generation for the fiscal year amounted to 349,278,000 kilowatt-hours or 18 percent below normal. Annual flood damages prevented during Fiscal Year 2000 were $10,000 making a cumulative total of $390,261,200 since 1952. Total cost of functional operation for the period was $284,689. Philpott Lake, located on the Smith River in the Dan River Basin, Virginia, began Fiscal Year 2000 at elevation 957.41 feet, m.s.l. or 14.09 feet below guide curve. The level of Philpott Lake continued to drop into December due to well below average inflows. This resulted in the minimum elevation for the fiscal year on 10 December at 956.36 feet, m.s.l, or 15.14 feet below guide curve. Slightly over one-half of the normal average rainfall in December and January pushed the lake level to near elevation 958 feet, m.s.l. where it remained until the third week of March. Rainfall events occurred during each month through the remainder of the fiscal year with monthly totals near normal in June and September. This activity pushed the lake elevation above 966 feet, m.s.l. in late April. The lake fluctuated between elevations 966 and 968 feet, m.s.l, for the remainder of the year. The maximum lake elevation for the fiscal year occurred on 27 September at 968.20 feet, m.s.l. Philpott Lake ended the fiscal year at elevation 968.16 feet, m.s.l, or 3.34 feet below guide curve. Discharges were minimal and energy commitments were transferred to John H. Kerr project throughout the fiscal year to conserve water. Both the observed monthly rainfall and inflow remained below the period of record average for each month of the fiscal year. The Hurricane season had no effects on Philpott Lake. No flood pool storage was utilized during the fiscal year. The contractual power pool storage remaining at the lowest elevation during the year was 21 percent. Gross genera- 6-17 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 2000 tion for the fiscal year amounted to 9,034,087 kilowatt hours or 35 percent of normal. There were no flood damages prevented during Fiscal Year 2000 making the cumulative total $346,205,000. Total cost of functional operation for the period was $89,757. W. Kerr Scott Dam and Reservoir, located in the Yadkin-Pee Dee River Basin, North Carolina, began Fiscal Year 2000 at elevation 1028.78 feet, m.s.l., or 1.22 feet below the guide curve elevation of 1030.00 feet, m.s.l. Dry conditions that began in August 1999 continued through late November until a rain event brought the lake back to guide curve on 26 November. During the period of December through May several storm events caused minor rises in the reservoir level with the annual maximum elevation of 1031.36 feet, m.s.l. or 1.36 feet above guide curve, occurring on 11 January. Drought conditions returned in late June and continued for the remainder of the fiscal year drawing the lake down to the annual minimum elevation of 1026.72 feet, m.s.l. or 3.28 feet below guide curve, on 31 August. Minor rainfall brought the level back to 1027.62 feet, m.s.l. by the end of September. Maximum flood pool storage utilized during the fiscal year was 2.3 percent, and the conservation pool storage remaining was 87.8 percent at the minimum elevation. There were no flood damages prevented during Fiscal Year 2000 leaving the cumulative total since inception of the project in 1963 at $164,009,800. Total cost of functional operation for the period was $60,046. Miscellaneous 25. CAPE FEAR LOCK AND DAM NO. 1 FISH LADDER, N.C. (CAP Section 1135) Location. The project is located at Lock and Dam No. 1 on the Cape Fear River in Bladen County, North Carolina, 39 miles upstream (northwest) of Wilmington, N.C. (See USGS quadrangle sheet, Kelly, N.C.) Existing project. This project modification for improvements to the environment modifies the Cape Fear River Above Wilmington, N.C. project. The project modification at Lock and Dam No. I includes the installation of a prefabricated fish ladder that would provide for passage of anadromous shad and river herring. The project will restore access by these species to 33 miles of high quality spawning habitat in the Cape Fear River above Lock and Dam No. 1. It is anticipated that this project will have a life of 10 to 15 years. This ladder is not expected to pass sturgeon or striped bass; therefore, future studies and projects are needed to provide a comprehensive fish passage solution that addresses all affected species. The fish ladder was attached to the existing lock and dam structure. Approved estimated Federal cost for construction implementation is $92,000 (2000). The project was approved by the Division Commander on April 24, 1996, under continuing authority of Section 1135, Water Resources Development Act of 1986, as amended. Local Cooperation. The sponsor shall contribute 25 percent of total project modification costs which includes implementation of the authorized improvements as well as planning, engineering, design, supervision and administration, monitoring, and other activities associated with implementation, but does not include the implementation of betterments. The non-federal contribution will be credit for in-kind work, consisting of monitoring the operation and effectiveness of the fish ladder over two spawning seasons. Operations and results during fiscal year. New Work: Continuing installation of fish ladder and monitoring at a cost of $740. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction was initiated in May 1996 and substantially completed April 1997. Monitoring is continuing. 26. LITTLE SUGAR CREEK HABITAT RESTORATION, N.C. (CAP Section 1135) Location. This project is located on Little Sugar Creek between Archdale Drive and Brandywine Road in Charlotte, North Carolina. (See USGS quadrangle sheets, Charlotte East and Weddington, N.C.) Existing project. This project modification for improvement of the environment modifies the Little Sugar Creek CAP Section 205 flood control project and includes: placement of fishery enhancement structures in the area of the flood control project, to include rock vanes that project into the stream and boulder clusters; stream bank stabilization on Little Sugar Creek upstream to Brandywine Road to reduce sedimentation that would cover the fish structures; and tree plantings in riparian areas to provide stream shading and aesthetic enhancement. The approved estimated cost for construction implementation is $4,000,000 (2000), consisting of $3,000,000 Federal and $1,000,000 non- Federal. The project was approved by the Division Commander on April 21, 2000 under the continuing authority of Section 1135, Water Resources Development Act of 1986, as amended. Local Cooperation. The sponsor shall contribute 25 percent of project costs which include implementation of the authorized improvements as well as planning, engineering, design, supervision and administration, monitoring, and other activities associated with implementation, but does not include betterments. The sponsor shall also contribute sufficient additional funds to keep the Federal cost from exceeding the per project limit of $5,000,000. The non-Federal contribution will consist of credit for required lands, easements, relocations, and rights-of way; 6-18 WILMINGTON, N.C., DISTRICT Work-in-kind credit for public involvement and 3 years of monitoring of fish and benthic organism populations, to be Provided by the sponsor; credit for participation on the Project Coordination Team; and cash. Operations and results during fiscal year. New Work: The feasibility study phase was completed at a cost of $14,448. Design was initiated at a cost of $38,176. Condition at end of fiscal year. The report and project Were approved by the Division Commander on April 21, 2000. Design is underway. The draft PCA is with the sponsor for review. 27. SEA TURTLE HABITAT RESTORATION, OAK ISLAND, N.C. (CAP Section 1135) Location. This project is located on the oceanfront of the Town of Oak Island (formerly Long Beach), south of the Atlantic Intracoastal Waterway in Brunswick County, North Carolina. (See USGS quadrangle sheet, Southport, N.C.) Existing project. This project modification for improvement of the environment modifies the Atlantic Intracoastal Waterway Between Norfolk, Virginia and the St. Johns River, Florida. The project modification restores sea turtle nesting habitat on Oak Island by placing beach compatible sand from the Yellow Banks Confined Disposal Facility between East 26th Place and East 58th Street to construct a 8,900 foot long main fill and a small dune to discourage turtles from crawling beyond the project. Implementation of a lighting ordinance will provide a more attractive nesting beach and improve survival of hatchlings. The approved estimated cost for construction implementation is $11,284,000 (2000), consisting of $5,000,000 Federal and $6,284,000 non-Federal. The project was approved by the Division Commander on September 17, 1999 under the continuing authority of Section 1135, Water Resources Development Act of 1986, as amended. Local Cooperation. The sponsor shall contribute 25 percent of total project modification costs which include implementation of the authorized improvements as well as planning, engineering, design, supervision and administration, monitoring, and other activities associated with implementation, but does not include betterments. The Sponsor shall also contribute sufficient additional funds to keep the Federal cost from exceeding the per project limit of $5,000,000. The non-Federal contribution will consist of credit for required lands, easements, relocations, and rightsof way; work-in-kind credit for dune walkover Structures and dune stabilization provided by the sponsor; credit for participation on the Project Coordination Team; and cash. Operations and results during fiscal year. New Work: The feasibility study phase was closed out at a cost of $4,074. Design and real estate certification were completed and the PCA was executed at a cost of $179,408. Condition at end of fiscal year. Design and certification of real estate have been completed. The PCA was executed September 22, 2000. The construction contract was advertised September 27, 2000 and is scheduled to be awarded December 2000 and substantially complete April 2001. 28. LITTLE SUGAR CREEK AQUATIC ECOSYSTEM RESTORATION, N.C. (CAP Section 206) Location. This project is located on Little Sugar Creek between Brandywine Avenue and East Boulevard in Charlotte, North Carolina. (See USGS quadrangle sheet, Charlotte East, N.C.) Existing project. This aquatic ecosystem restoration project includes: placement of fishery enhancement structures to include rock vanes that project into the stream, boulder clusters, and lunker boxes; removal of an inoperable dam and concrete apron in the upstream area; stream bank stabilization on Little Sugar Creek upstream to East Boulevard to reduce sedimentation that would cover the fish structures; and planting of trees and vegetation in riparian areas to provide stream shading and aesthetic enhancement. The approved estimated cost for construction implementation is $2,680,000 (2000), consisting of $1,742,000 Federal and $938,000 non-Federal. The project was approved by the Division Commander on July 27, 2000 under the continuing authority of Section 206, Water Resources Development Act of 1996, as amended. Local Cooperation. The sponsor shall contribute 35 percent of project costs which include implementation of the authorized improvements as well as planning, engineering, design, supervision and administration, monitoring, and other activities associated with implementation, but does not include betterments. The sponsor shall also contribute sufficient additional funds to keep the Federal cost from exceeding the per project limit of $5,000,000. The non-Federal contribution will consist of credit for required lands, easements, relocations, and rights-of way; work-in-kind credit for public involvement and 3 years of monitoring of fish and benthic organism populations, to be provided by the sponsor; credit for participation on the Project Coordination Team; and cash. Operations and results during fiscal year. New Work: The feasibility study phase was completed at a cost of $112,681. Design was initiated at a cost of $39,968. Condition at end of fiscal year. The report and project were approved by the Division Commander on July 27, 2000. Design is underway. 6-19 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 2000 29. BATTERY ISLAND BIRD HABITAT PRESERVATION, N.C. (CAP Section 204) Location. Battery Island is located in the Cape Fear River approximately '/2 mile east of Southport and 24 miles south of Wilmington, North Carolina. (See USGS quadrangle sheet, Southport, N.C.) Existing project. This project for ecosystem restoration in connection with dredging will protect 10 acres of upland nesting habitat for colonial water birds from further erosion by placing approximately 5400 linear feet of geotubes along the southern and western shorelines of Battery Island and restore 5.5 acres of valuable colonial water bird nesting habitat by placement behind the filled geotubes of material from periodic maintenance dredging of the Wilmington Harbor , N.C. navigation project. The approved estimated cost for construction implementation is $1,272,000 (2000) consisting of $954,000 Federal and $318,000 non-Federal. The project was approved by the Division Commander on January 13, 1999 under the continuing authority of Section 204, Water Resources Development Act of 1992, as amended. Local Cooperation. The sponsor shall contribute 25 percent of project costs which include implementation of the authorized improvements as well as planning, engineering, design, supervision and administration, monitoring, and other activities associated with implementation, but does not include betterments. The non-Federal contribution will consist of credit for required lands, easements, relocations, and rights-of way; credit for participation on the Project Coordination Team; and cash. Operations and results during fiscal year. New Work: Construction was substantially completed February 29, 2000 at a Federal cost of $728,329 and a contributed funds cost of $244,528. Condition at end of fiscal year. The construction contract was awarded August 10, 1999. The project was substantially complete in February 2000. The project was turned over to the sponsor in August 2000. Work is underway on preparation of an O&M Manual, the final accounting, and project close-out. General Investigations 30. SURVEYS Cost for the period was $567,849 of which $50,352 was for flood damage prevention studies, $280,684 for shoreline protection studies, $19,732 for watershed/ecosystem studies, $65,346 for Special Investigations, $989 for FERC Licensing Review, $16,494 for Interagency Water Resources Development, $3,630 for National Estuary Studies, $2,729 for North American Waterfowl Management, $3,198 for Cooperation With Other Water Resource Agencies, and $124,695 for Planning Assistance To States. Contributed funds in the amount of $236,964 were expended for shoreline protection studies and $69,793 for Planning Assistance To States. 31. COLLECTION AND STUDY OF BASIC DATA Flood plain information studies, as authorized by Section 206, 1960 Flood Control Act, as amended, comprise compilation and dissemination, upon the request of a State or a political subdivision thereof, of information on floods and flood damages, including identification of areas subject to inundation by floods of various magnitudes and frequencies, and general criteria for guidance of Federal and non-Federal interests and agencies in the use of flood plain areas; and provide advice to other Federal agencies and local interests for their use in planning to ameliorate the flood hazard. Total costs for the period were $301,300. Total costs to September 30, 2000 were $8,106,462. Contributed funds in the amount of $129 were expended for the Burgaw Flood study, the cost of which is fully paid for by the Cape Fear Resource Conservation and Development, Inc. 32. PRECONSTRUCTION ENGINEERING AND DESIGN Preconstruction engineering and design (PED) was continued on Brunswick County Beaches, N. C., at a cost of $825,888 (this cost is included in the Brunswick County Beaches, N.C. narrative and cost and financial data). 6-20 WILMINGTON, N.C., DISTRICT Project 1. Aquatic Plant Control (R&H Act of 1965) (Regular Funds) (Contributed Funds) 2. Atlantic Intracoastal Waterway between Norfolk, Va. & St. John River, Fla. (Regular Funds) (Contributed Funds) 3. Cape Fear River, N.C. above Wilmington 4. Lockwoods Folly River, N.C. (Regular Funds) (Contributed Funds) S. Manteo (Shallowbag) Bay, N.C. (Regular Funds) (Contributed Funds) 6 Morehead City Harbor, N.C. (Regular Funds) (Contributed Funds) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT Fundin New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Contrib. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost New Work: Contrib. Cost Maint: Contrib. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost New Work: Contrib. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost Maint: Contrib. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost New Work: Contrib. Cost Maint: Contrib. Cost FY97 10,288 FY98 -1,0081 Total cost to FY99 FY00 Sept. 30, 2000 2,991 482 960,400 958,727 -S - - - 31,809 - - - - 31,809 ' 3,101,000 4,337,000 5,455,800 5,484,000 86,706,273 2 3,494,326 4,244,622 5,150,682 5,862,703 86,565,4132 11,279,997 12,509,024 8,266,957 10,466,301 196,264,9723 12,751,096 12,579,027 8,247,475 10,495,630 196,224,7143 S- - 86,851 - - - - 86,8514 - - - - 667,300 - - - - 667,300 - - - - 3,759,573 S S- - - 3,759,5735 598,000 441,793 580,495 711,764 23,750,702 6 720,785 448,671 556,760 736,290 23,742,877 6 - - - - 241,272' - - - - 241,272 8 432,631 235,007 443,143 280,145 11,598,744 433,480 235,057 441,783 280,758 11,597,997 - - - - 92,650 - - - - 92,650 ' -200,000 330,000 330,201 397,219 90,000 87,852 100,000 9,847,51510 36,942 9,758,33910 3,392,000 3,120,646 3,234,718 3,611,526 97,215,982 3,382,956 2,813,750 3,576,334 3,702,365 97,210,764 79,000 75,000 -4,000 115,625 110,000 2,794,993 - 56,570 58,402 2,679,717 - - - - 13,204,707" - - - - 13,204,707" 6,769,505 2,535,716 4,823,440 5,571,450 81,927,92012 3,918,162 5,396,328 4,856,221 5,579,155 81,927,91812 - - - - 2,731,996 S- - 2,731,996 5,900 2,519 52,100 47,998 28,966 28,965 1,836,778 1,827,294 6-21 TABLE 6-A See Section in Text __ ---- =:.= -- 4 V L . J ., ... . .... b - .,._ REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 2000 TABLE 6-A (Continued) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Section Total cost to in Text Prqject Funding FY97 FY98 FY99 FY00 Sept. 30, 2000 7. Rollinson Channel, N.C. (Regular Funds) (Contributed Funds) 8. Silver Lake Harbor, N.C. (Regular Funds) (Contributed Funds) 9. Waterway connecting Pamlico Sound and Beaufort Harbor, N.C. (Regular Funds) (Contributed Funds) 10. Wilmington Harbor, N.C. (Regular Funds) (Contributed Funds) 11. Adkin Branch, Kinston, N.C. (Regular Funds) 12A. B. Everett Jordon Dam and Lake, N.C. (Regular Funds) (Contributed Funds) New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost Maint: Contrib. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost Maint: Contrib. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost Maint: Contrib. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint Approp. Cost New Work: Contrib. Cost Maint: Contrib. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost. New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost New Work: Contrib. Cost S. 589,105 - - - 589,105 416,821 -60,036 343,090 225,907 2,876,900 352,676 4,109 343,090 225,907 2,876,900 S- - 41,142 41,142 184,284 S- - 184,284 716,708 173,864 701,705 188,867 565,257 566,257 17,000 14,800 9,005 10,005 -2,200 32,681 1,369,945 10,185,760 31,689 1,370,179 10,185,002 75,000 - 75,000 502,567 502,567 82,502 35,181 -38,040 4,132,498 9,281 4,132,498 - 17,252 17,252 5,400,000 4,465,000 7,561,200 8,364,000 56,864,426" 5,896,574 3,908,876 7,783,606 7,372,585 55,399,786"3 8,225,500 6,008,493 3,890,410 5,794,161 126,817,347 ' 8,197,479 5,648,322 3,930,773 6,318,863 126,794,344" 2,400,000 3,160,000 1,369,253 9,239,100 21,568,353 2,557,591 3,589,853 1,110,622 5,196,152 16,745,764 1,238,885 1,123,224 478,645 681,000 11,570,964" 1,261,682 583,347 895,278 831,362 11,331,326"3 109,000 82,889 -24,000 37,471 11,000 22,029 4,000 2,201 247,0006 242,798 7 1,251,300 615,000 110,000 205,000 149,612,287 1,282,395 995,559 227,109 194,376 149,470,849 1,318,000 1,569,000 1,193,000 1,312,590 19,923,2338 1,249,813 1,634,012 1,199,057 1,336,760 19,917,283g - 1,764,735 -- 1,764,735 6-22 WILMINGTON, N.C., DISTRICT TABLE 6-A (Continued) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Section Total cost to in Text Project Funding FY97 FY98 FY99 FY00 Sept. 30, 2000 13. Brunswick County Beaches N.C. (Cape Fear to N.C. - S.C. Line) (Regular Funds) (Contributed Funds) 14. Carolina Beach and Vicinity, N.C. (Regular Funds) (Contributed Funds) 15. Clinton Wastewater Treatment Plant, Clinton, N.C. (Regular Funds) (Contributed Funds) 16. Moravian Creek, Wilkesboro, N.C. 17A. Falls Lake, N.C. (Regular Funds) (Contributed Funds) 18. Roanoke River Upper 19. 20A. New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Contrib. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Contrib. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Contrib. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost New Work: Contrib. Cost New Work: Basin Va. - Headwaters Area Approp. (Regular Funds) Cost (Contributed Funds) New Work: Contrib. Cost Wrightsville Beach, New Work: N.C. (Regular Funds) (Contributed Funds) W. Kerr Scott Dam and Reservoir, N.C. Approp. Cost New Work: Contrib. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost 407,000 1,000,000 553,000 1,126,000 5,287,314 314,987 785,332 696,526 951,046 4,926,019 - - - - 270,000 S- - 270,000" 2,497,000 6,197,000 2,671,349 6,200,059 3,917,000 1,437,000 1,801,647 4,113,983 10,000 41,023 55,000 26,257 14,000 21,990 15,000 45,357 55,000 288,232 -310,723 46,181 180,000 24,165,533 60,190 23,947,814 - 15,176,34721 35,787 15,162,66821 64,000 294,000 76,768 245,785 144,000 41,527 10,000 15,425 96,123 32,000 23,500 1,014,000" 964,912 3 144,000 137,650 260,00024 249,399" 973,000 850,000 625,000 150,000 184,247,996 386,428 1,287,256 883,872 426,215 183,980,147 1,132,000 983,000 948,000 1,078,205 18,968,466 '8 1,221,861 923,866 985,088 1,114,682 18,962,03519 - 8,456 -1,081 259,724 192,216 258,000 591,000 358,000 827,000 4,324,000 176,148 459,852 539,504 711,636 4,133,263 - - - - 446,00026 S- - 416,06426 75,000 1,005,000 70,572 944,802 50,332 - 630,204 - 549,457 - 4,609,100 -65,421 4,486,362 - 3,250,93327 50,363 3,220,54927 S- - 8,841,326 - - - - 8,841,326 2,481,000 1,581,000 1,487,000 2,238,420 39,171,324" 2,673,202 1,656,217 1,512,678 2,272,801 39,158,025 6-23 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 2000 TABLE 6-A (Continued) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Section Total cost to in Text Project 23A. John H. Kerr Dam and Reservoir, Va. & N.C. (Regular Funds) (Contributed Funds) 23B. Philpott Lake, Va. 25. Cape Fear Lock Dam No. 1 Fish Ladder, N.C. 26. Little Sugar Creek Habitat Restoration, N.C. (Regular Funds) 27. Sea Turtle Habitat, Oak Island, N.C. (CAP Section 1135) 28. Little Sugar Creek Aquatice Ecosystem, Restoration, N.C. (Regular Funds) 29. Battery Island Bird Habitat Preservation, N.C. (CAP Section 204) (Contributed Funds) Funding New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost Maint: Contrib. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Contrib. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Contrib. Cost FY97 11,397,500 10,863,691 FY98 FY99 FY00 Sept. 30, 2000 1,201,000 95,603,927 1,095,603 95,498,530 7,056,000 7,256,000 7,802,850 7,549,030 383,657 57,847 2,855,000 2,089,000 2,147,000 2,934,811 2,071,419 2,209,109 7,000 32,557 150,000 4,792 10,247 40,000 16,807 30,000 163,663 127,000 115,339 -12,000 2,994 110,000 128,745 10,436,000 10,352,772 5,249 2,378,002 2,374,066 6,000 740 75,000 52,624 41,000 184,000 43,471 183,482 120,000 59,000 151,000 44,071 152,649 55,000 730,000 61,661 728,329 311,000 60,000 244,528 161,318,188" 161,023,3753' 390,657 70,096 14,796,384 14,796,384 47,619,59832 47,582,147" 64,000' 57,839's 225,000 198,176" 405,000" 399,408"9 120,000 0 210,000 196,72041 912,0002 905,329"3 311,000 304,528 6-24 v y - --- WILMINGTON, N.C., DISTRICT 1. Includes $2,369 refund to local interests in FY 82. 2. Includes $198,707 for previous projects. 3. Includes $107,634 for previous projects. 4. Includes $13,934 refund to local interests. 5. Includes $149,119 for previous projects. 6. Includes $8,178 for previous projects. 7. Includes preauthorization study funds: FY 64, $3,000; FY 65, -$2,755; FY 71, $8,000; FY 72, $2,000; FY 74, $9,000; FY 75, $25,000; FY 76 & 76T, $20,000; FY 77, $2,500; FY 78, $8,800; FY 79, $3,000; FY 81, $1,680; and preconstruction planning funds: FY 80, $15,000 and FY 81, $19,320. 8. Includes preauthorization study costs: FY 64, $219; FY 65, $26; FY 71, $8,000; FY 72, $1,448; FY 73, $552; FY 74, $9,000; FY 75, $11,925; FY 76 & 76T, $27,977; FY 77, $7,598; FY 78, $7,449; FY 79, $4,351; FY 81, $1,680; and preconstruction planning costs: FY 80, $5,686 and FY 81, $1,471. 9. Includes $69,145 refund to local interests. 10. Adjusted by $6,361 to reflect actual costs. 11. Includes $44,484 for previous projects. 12. Includes $284,557 for previous projects. 13. Includes $4,625,614 for new work on previous projects. 14. Includes $602,614 for previous projects. 15. Includes refunds to local interests: FY 78, $92,374; FY 79, $8,000; FY 80, $14,007; FY 81, $1,847; FY 82, $2,823; FY 85, $60,000. 16. Includes preauthorization study funds: FY 92, $40,000 and preconstruction planning funds: FY 95, $5,000; FY 96, $102,000; FY 97, $109,000; FY 98, $24,000; FY 99, $11,000; FY 00, $4,000. Does not include $219,477 of FY 67-FY81 funds for an earlier study and design that was deauthorized 18 September 1981. 17. Includes preauthorization study costs: FY 92, $39,626, FY 93, $563; FY 94 $414; FY 95 $523 and preconstruction planning costs: FY 95, $682; FY 96, $57,527; FY 97, $82,889; FY 98 $37,471; FY 99 $22,029; and FY 00, $2,201. Does not include $219,477 of FY 67-FY 82 costs for an earlier study and design that was deauthorized 18 September 1981. 18. Includes maintenance and operation of Dams funds: FY 87, $66,678; FY 88, $75,000; FY 89, $73,000; FY 90, $54,000; FY 91, $97,200; FY 92, $79,000; FY 93, $80,300; FY 94, $67,800; FY 95, $153,900. 19. Includes maintenance and operation of Dams costs: FY 87, $66,678; FY 88, $75,000; FY 89, $73,000; FY 90, $54,000; FY 91, $97,200; FY 92, $79,000; FY 93, $80,300; FY 94, $67,800; FY 95, $153,900. 20. Includes $116,508 refund to local interests and prior to FY 77 costs of $31,161 for Ocean Isle, $49,731 for Long Beach, $41,443 for Yaupon Beach and $31,157 for Sunset Beach. 21. Includes refunds to local interests: FY 83, $400,000; FY 84, $128,345; FY 85, $82,600. 22. Includes preauthorization study funds: FY 82, $10,000; FY 83, $85,000; FY 84, $70,000; FY 85, $35,000; FY 86, $45,000; FY 87, $30,000; FY 88, $1,000; FY 89, $55,000; FY 90, $85,000; FY 92, $39,484 and preconstruction planning funds: FY92, $516; FY 94, $40,000; FY 95, $75,000; FY 96, $61,000; FY 97, $10,000; FY 98, $14,000 and FY 99,$11,910. 23. Includes preauthorzation study costs: FY 82, $4,828; FY 83, $76,218; FY 84, $61,709; FY 85, $41,994; FY 86, $36,550; FY 87, $49,888; FY 88, $3,562; FY 89, $30,816; FY 90, $32,657; FY91, $63,108; FY 92, $50,468; FY 93, $3,024; FY 94, $662 and preconstruction planning costs: FY 94, $25,758; FY 95 $70,987; FY 96, $27,117; FY 97, $41,023; FY 98, $21,990; and FY 99 $25,551. 24. Includes preauthorization study funds: FY 91, $70,000; FY 92, $15,000; FY 93, $3,000; FY 94, $35,000; FY 95, $4,543 and preconstruction planning funds: FY 95, $457; FY 96, $20,000; FY 97, $55,000; FY 98, $15,000; FY 99, $10,000 and FY 00, $32,000. 25. Includes preauthorization study costs: FY 91, $12,573; FY 92, $69,544; FY 93, $57; FY 94, $32,103; FY 95, $13,311; FY 96, -$45 and preconstruction planning costs: FY 96, $11,317; FY 97, $26,257; FY 98, $45,357; FY 99, $15,425; and FY 00, $23,500. 6-25 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 2000 26. Adjusted in FY2000 report to remove funds and costs for reimbursable, support for others work on the low water bridges; should not have been included in the FY 90 - FY 99 report. 27. Includes $61,585 refund to local interests. 28. Includes Special Recreation Use Fees funds: FY 74, $4,000; FY 75, $5,500; FY 76 & 76 T, $3,600; FY 77, $5,800; FY 78,$7,200; FY 79,$8,000; FY 80, $10,000; FY 81, $10,000; FY 82, $11,040; FY 83, $7,000; FY 84, $9,000; and maintenance and operation of Dams funds: FY 87, $66,678; FY 88, $75,000; FY 89, $73,000; FY 90, $54,000; FY 91, $97,200; FY 92, $79,200; FY 93, $80,300; FY 94, $67,800; FY 95, $153,900. 29. Includes Special Recreation Use Fees costs: FY 74, $4,000; FY 75, $4,400; FY 76 & 76T, $4,666; FY 77, $5,193; FY 78, $6,824; FY 79, $7,506; FY 80, $11,312; FY 81, $9,688; FY 82, $9,727; FY 83, $7,000; FY 84, $8,444; FY 85, $2,379; and maintenance and operation of Dams costs: FY 87, $66,678; FY 88, $75,000; FY 89, $73,000; FY 90, $54,000; FY 91, $97,200; FY 92, $79,200; FY 93, $80,300; FY 94, $67,800; FY 95, $153,900. 30. Includes Special Recreation Use Fees funds: FY 74, $35,000; FY 76 & 76T, $48,000; FY 77, $51,400; FY 78, $115,100; FY 79,$63,000; FY 80, $60,000; FY 81, $80,000; FY 82,$67,160; FY 83, $77,759; FY 84, $73,000; and maintenance and operation of Dams funds: FY 79, $167,646; FY 87, $66,678; FY 88, $75,000; FY 89, $73,000; FY 90, $54,000; FY 91, $97,200; FY 92, $79,000; FY 93, $80,300; FY 94, $67,800; FY 95, $153,90; FY 00, $475,769. 31. Includes Special Recreation Use Fees costs: FY 75, $35,000; FY 76 & 76T, $13,606; FY 77, $85,692; FY 78, $114,604; FY 79, $1,120; FY 80, $118,718; FY 81, $83,760; FY 82, $67,160; FY 83, $77,759; FY 84, $67,850; FY 85, $5,149; and maintenance and operation of Dams costs: FY 79, $167,350; FY 80, $296; FY 87, $66,678; FY 88, $75,000; FY 89, $73,000; FY 90, $54,000; FY 91, $97,200; FY 92, $79,000; FY 93, $80,300; FY 94, $67,800; FY 95, $153,900; FY 00, $472,993. 32. Includes Special Recreation Use Fees funds: FY 75, $47,000; FY 78, $40,400; FY 79, $22,000; FY 80, $25,000; FY 81, $20,000; FY 82, $20,240; FY 83, $21,000; FY 84, $19,000; and maintenance and operation of Dams funds: FY 87, $66,678; FY 88, $75,000; FY 89, $73,000; FY 90, $54,000; FY 91, $97,200; FY 92, $79,000; FY 93, $80,300; FY 94, $67,800; FY 95, $153,900; FY 00, $18,748. 33. Includes Special Recreation Use Fees costs: FY 75, $13,741; FY 76 & 76T, $31,666; FY 77, $1,593; FY 78, $39,771; FY 79, $22,629; FY 80, $24,619; FY 81, $20,381; FY82,$20,240; FY83,$21,000; FY84,$19,000; and maintenance and operation of Dams costs: FY 87, $66,678; FY 88, $75,000; FY 89, $73,000; FY 90, $54,000; FY 91, $97,200; FY , 92, $79,000; FY 93, $80,300; FY 94, $67,800; FY 95, $153,900. 34. Includes planning and design analysis funds: FY 96, $9,296; and construction implementation funds: FY 96, $53,704. 35. Includes planning and design analysis cost: FY 96, $9,296; and construction implementation cost: FY 96, $2,005. 36. Includes preauthorization study funds; FY 98, $40,000; FY 99, $110,000; FY 00, $10,000 and preconstruction planning funds; FY 00, $65,000. 37. Includes preauthorization study costs; FY 98, $16,807; FY 99, $128,745; FY 00, $14,448 and preconstruction planning costs; FY 00, $38,176. 38. Includes preauthorization study funds: FY 97, $150,000; FY 98, $30,000, FY 99, $40,000 and preconstruction planning funds: FY 99, $ 1,000; FY 00, $184,000. 39. Includes preauthorization study costs: FY 97, $4,792; FY98, $167,663; FY 99, $43,471; FY 00, $4,074 and preconstruction planning costs: FY 00 $179,408. 40. Includes preauthorization study funds: FY 99, $59,000; FY 00, $111,000 and preconstruction planning funds: FY 00, $40,000. 41. Includes preauthorization study costs: FY 99, $44,071; FY 00, $112,681 and preconstruction planning costss: FY 00, $39,968 42. Includes preauthorization study funds: FY 98, $127,000; FY 99, $3,000 and preconstruction planning funds: FY 99, $36,000. 43. Includes preauthorization study costs: FY 98, $115,339; FY 99, $14,661 and preconstruction planning costs: FY 99, $36,000. 6-26 WILMINGTON, N.C., DISTRICT TABLE 6-B Acts July 25, 1912 July 25, 1912 August 8, 1917 July 18, 1918 January 21, 1927 July 3, 1930 March 4,19332 June 26, 19343 August 26, 1937 August 26, 1937 June 20, 1938 June 20, 1938 March 2, 1945 June 30, 1948 May 17, 1950 May 17, 1950 September 3, 1954 November 29, 1963, Sec. 107 July 14, 1960 April 7,1966, Sec. 107 July 14, 1960 Documents AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Project and Work Authorized ATLANTIC INTRACOASTAL WATERWAY BETWEEN NORFOLK, VA., and ST. JOHNS RIVER, FLA. (See Section 3 of text) Original route of the Norfolk-Beaufort Inlet section. Purchase of canal. Change in route; following changes approved by Secretary of War, April 14, 1919: Albemarle Sound-Pamlico Sound section: Changed from "Alligator River- Rose Bay route" to "Alligator River- Pungo River route." Pamlico Sound- Neuse River section: Changed from "Pamlico Sound-Brant Shoal Neuse River route" to "Goose Creek-Bay River route." Alligator River-Pungo route (proposed land cut connecting the rivers): Changed from a straight line to a bent line approaching nearer town of Fairfield, N. C. A 12-foot channel 90 feet wide from Beaufort to Cape Fear River, N. C., including highway bridge and tidal lock.4 An 8-foot channel 75 feet wide from Cape Fear River to Winyah Bay, S.C. Construct a suitable bridge near Fairfield, N. C. Operating and care of works of improvements provided for with funds from War Department appropriations for rivers and harbors. Increasing dimensions of waterway to 12 feet deep and 90 feet wide. A 12-foot side channel 90 feet wide to Swansboro. A yacht basin near Southport, 12 feet deep, 230 feet wide, and 450 feet long, with connecting channel. A 6-foot channel 90 feet wide from New River Inlet to Inland Waterway. Six mooring basins.. A 12-foot channel in New River. " Vicinity of Fairfield - drainage. Masonboro Inlet and connecting channels, including jetties at the inlet .7'12 A 12-foot channel and basin in Peltier Creek.' A 6-foot channel 90 feet wide from Intracoastal Waterway to Bogue Inlet gorge. An 8-foot channel 150 feet wide through New Topsail Inlet, thence a 7- foot channel 80 feet wide to Intracoastal Waterway by way of Old Topsail Creek; and a 7-foot channel 80 feet wide in Banks Channel from New Topsail Inlet, paralleling barrier beach, to Intracoastal Waterway. 6-27 H.D. 391, 62d Cong., 2d sess. H.D.589, 62d Cong., 2d sess. H.D. 1478,63d Cong., 3d sess. and H. D. 1136, 64th Cong., 1st sess.' Approved by Secretary of War, May 15, 1919. H.D. 450,69th Cong., 1st sess. H.D. 41, 71st Cong., 1st sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 5, 72d Cong., 1st sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee, Doc. 6, 75th Cong., 1st sess.' Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 16, 75th Cong., Ist sess.' H.D. 549, 75th Cong., 3d sess.' H.D. 691, 75th Cong., 3d sess.' H.D. 660, 76th Cong., 3d sess.' H.D. 421, 80th Cong., 1st sess.' H.D. 723, 80th Cong., 2d sess.' H.D. 341, 81st Cong., 1st sess.' H.D. 379, 81 st Cong., 1st sess.' Detailed Project Report April 1963. Detailed Project Report July 1965 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 2000 TABLE 6-B (Continued) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Project and Work Authorized Documents November 7, 1966 November 7, 1966 December 31, 1970 October 22, 1976 August 13, 1968 February 18, 1982, Sec. 107 July 14, 1960 September 7, 1983, Sec. 107 July 14, 1960 November 17, 1986 Maintenance of a channel 6 feet deep, 80 feet wide, and 8,000 feet long, from the through channel of the waterway to and including a basin of the same depth, 130 feet wide and 180 feet long at Carolina Beach. Maintenance of general navigation features of N.C. State Ports Authority Small Boat Harbor at Southport. Replacement of Federally-owned and operated highway bridges at Coinjock, Fairfield, Wilkerson Creek, Hobucken and Core Creek. Modification of terms of local cooperation to allow for full Federal funding of Wilkerson Creek and Coinjock Bridges. Mitigation of damages caused by north jetty at Masonboro Inlet. H.D. 515, 89th Cong., 2d sess.' H.D. 514, 89th Cong., 2d sess. H.D. 142, 92nd Cong., 1st sess. H.D. 597, 94th Cong., 2d sess. Approved by OCE Oct. 2,1980 An 8-foot channel 150 feet wide through Carolina Beach Inlet to the Detailed Project Report June Intracoastal Waterway. 1980 An 8-foot channel 150 feet wide from the gorge in Bogue Inlet through Detailed Project Report May the ocean bar. 1983 Modification of terms of local cooperation to allow for full Federal funding of Core Creek, Hobucken and Fairfield Bridges. BEAUFORT HARBOR, N.C. (See Section 5 of text) March 3, 1881 March 2, 1907 March 3, 1925 July 3, 1930 March 2, 1945 May 17,1950 May 21, 1965, Sec. 107 July 14, 1960 August 12, 1983 Sec. 107 July 14, 1960 A 9-foot channel 200 feet wide through Bulkhead Channel to Beaufort; a 6-foot channel 100 feet wide to North River and Core Sound; and construct jetties on Shackleford Point. Repairs to Fort Macon jetties and additional jetties and shore protection. Annual Report, 1881, p. 1013 Specified in act. Bulkhead across Bird Shoal. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 8, 68th Cong., 2d sess.' Increase in depth to 12 feet in Bulkhead Channel, Gallants Channel, and in front of Beaufort. Increase in width and length of basin in front of Beaufort, all to 12 feet deep. Increase in depth to 12 feet and in width to 100 feet in Taylors Creek; transfer to Beaufort Harbor project. Channels 15 feet deep, 100 feet wide in Bulkhead, Gallants and Taylors Creek channels, and through turning basin in front of Beaufort; and harbor of refuge in Town Creek, 12 feet deep, 400 feet wide and 900 feet long connected to Gallants Channel by channel 12 feet deep, 150 feet wide and 1,400 feet long. A channel 14 feet deep, 70 feet wide, and 1,900 feet long, from Bulkhead Channel to a turning basin 14 feet deep, 150 feet wide, and 300 feet long near the upper end of Morgan Creek. H.D. 776, 69th Cong., 2nd sess.' H.D. 334, 76th Cong., 2nd sess.' H.D. 111, 81st Cong., 2nd sess.' Detailed Project Report April 1965 Detailed Project Report June 1983 6-28 WILMINGTON, N.C., DISTRICT TABLE 6-B (Continued) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Project and Work Authorized Documents SILVER LAKE HARBOR, N. C. (See Section 20 of text) Entrance channel, 5 feet deep and 50 feet wide, from Pamlico Sound Rivers and Harbors Committee to the 3-foot contour in the lake, and training wall at entrance. Doc. 3, 70th Cong., 1st sess. October 17, 1940 February 7, 1967, Sec. 107 July 14, 1960 August 30, 19359 August 26, 1937 March 2, 1945 March 2, 1945 May 17,1950 July 11, 1963, Sec. 107 July 14, 1960 September 22, 1967, Sec. 107 July 14, 1960 February 17, 1969, Sec. 107 July 14, 1960 April 3, 1975, Sec. 107 July 14, 196010 Channel, 10 feet deep, and anchorage basin of same depth, 100 feet wide across Big Foot Slough and 60 feet wide in entrance. Basin depth of 12 feet in Silver Lake harbor; channels 12 feet deep, 150 feet wide, in Teaches Hole and Big Foot Slough Channels and across Bluff Shoal; entrance channel, same depth, 60 feet wide; and training wall on south side of entrance channel. WATERWAY CONNECTING PAMLICO SOUND AND BEAUFORT HARBOR, N. C. (See Section 21 of text) A 7-foot channel 75 feet wide from Pamlico Sound to Beaufort Harbor via Wainright Channel. A 7-foot channel 75 feet wide to Atlantic. Channels, 7 feet deep, 75 feet wide, at east and west ends of Harkers Island and side channel 5 feet deep, 75 feet wide, with basin 150 by 130 feet, same depth, at Davis. A 7-foot side channel 75 feet wide, with basin 200 feet by 500 feet, same depth, at Sealevel. A 6-foot side channel 60 feet wide, with basin 100 feet by about 600 feet, same depth, at Marshallberg. A side channel 7 feet deep, 70 feet wide to local harbor at Cedar Island and an access channel 6 feet deep, 60 feet wide and about 400 feet long to a basin same depth, 60 by 100 feet. An entrance channel 6 feet deep, 60 feet wide, from Back Sound to harbor of refuge 120 by 250 feet, same depth, at west end of Harkers Island in Brook Creek. A channel 7 feet deep, 70 feet wide, from existing side channel at Atlantic to a basin 600 by 180 feet, same depth, with a breakwater, between mouth of Little Port Brook and White Point. Deepening the existing 5-foot channel and basin at Davis to 7 feet. H.D. 325, 76th Cong., 1st sess.' Detailed Project Report July 9, 1965 H.D. 485, 72d Cong., 2d sess.' Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 92, 74th Cong., 2d sess.' H.D. 99, 77th Cong., 1st sess.' S.D. 247, 77th Cong., 2d sess.' H.D. 68, 81st Cong., 1st sess.' Detailed Project Report Dec. 12, 1962 Detailed Project Report March 13, 1967 Detailed Project Report Dec.21,1967 Detailed Project Report Feb. 8, 1974 1. Contains latest published maps. 2. Public Law No. 443, 72d Cong. 3. Permanent Appropriations Repeal Act. 4. Tidal lock in land cut between Myrtle Sound and Cape Fear River, deauthorized September 23, 1986, under authority of Sec. 12, PL 93-251. 5. Deauthorized August 5, 1977, under authority of Sec. 12, PL 93-251. 6. A 12-foot by 90-foot channel in New River from Intracoastal Waterway to and including a basin at Jacksonville, N. C. 7. Jetties on each side of Masonboro Inlet. 8. A 6-foot by 50-foot channel provided under Section 3, River and Harbor Act of March 2, 1945; 12-foot by 90-foot project deauthorized November 17, 1986, under authority of 1002, PL 99-662. 9. Included in the Public Works Administration Program, Jan. 3, 1934. 10. Deauthorized by the Chief of Engineers March 31, 1982. 11. Deauthorized January 1, 1990, under authority of Sec. 1001(b)(1), PL 99-662. 12. Training wall at Masonboro Inlet deauthorized April 5, 1999 under authority of Sec. 1001 (b)(1), PL99-662. 6-29 Acts July 3, 1930 -- ----~ REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 2000 TABLE 6-C OTHER AUTHORIZED NAVIGATION PROJECTS For Last Cost to September 30. 2000 Full Report See Annual Operation and Project Reportfor Construction Maintenance Aquatic Plant Control' (R & H Act of 1958 and 1962) 1969 70,664 Atlantic Beach Channels, N.C.' 1998 18,501 443,889 Avon Harbor, N.C.' 1999 ' 74,096 1,819,729 Bay River, N. C.' 1950 44,382 49,627 Beaufort Harbor, N.C.' 1999 852,040 4,713,949 Belhaven Harbor, N.C.' 1998 126,687 773,175 Black River, N. C.' 1969 12,358 124,846 Cashie River, N. C.' 1950 40,403 15,905 Channel Connecting Thoroughfare Bay with Cedar Bay, N. C.' 1975 69,610 25,615 Channel from Back Sound to Lookout Bight, N.C.' 1997 88,328 3,280,694 Channel from Pamlico Sound to Rodanthe, N.C.' 1998 42,029 851,125 Chowan River, N. C. 1950 .. 8 Contentnea Creek, N. C.' 1941 64,395 32,247 Drum Inlet, N.C.' 1999 166,119 3,724,511 Edenton Harbor, N. C.' 1960 73,750 47,642 Far Creek, N.C.' 1999 164,642 2,311,371 Fishing Creek, N. C.' 1922 22,715 8,633 Knobb's Creek, N. C.'2 19613 80,500 48,969 Mackay Creek, N. C.' 19383 13,375 6,273 Neuse River, N.C.' 1999 477,223 336,747 Newbegun Creek, N. C.' 19283 4,802 247 Northeast Cape Fear River, N. C.' 1950 10,688 61,139 Ocracoke Inlet, N.C.' 1998 346,240 948,786 Pamlico and Tar Rivers, N.C.' 1999 674,651 1,220,413 Pembroke Creek, N. C.' 1976 60,000 Perquimans River, N. C.' 1910, 13,750 414 Roanoke River, N.C.' 1999 404,584 708,419 Scuppernong River, N. C.' 1950 81,164 92,825 Shallotte River, N.C.' 1998 18,181 568,203 Smith's Creek (Pamlico County), N. C.' 1989 113,273 52,945 Smiths Creek (Wilmington), N. C.' 1950 8,507 18 South River, N. C.' 1936 12,452 23,686 Stumpy Point Bay, N.C.' 1999 268,381 1,453,941 Swift Creek, N. C.' 1940 1,600 5,422 Trent River, N. C.'" 1968 115,199 143,579 Wallace Channel, Pamlico Sound, N. C.' 1965 132,834 85,299 Waterway connecting Swanquarter Bay with Deep Bay, N.C.' 1997 751,099 193,880 Waterway - Norfolk, Va. to Sounds of N. C. 1976 751,196 2,893,812 Wrights Creek, N. C.' 1984 68,325 166,602 1. Completed. 3. Report of Norfolk District. 2. Transferred from Norfolk District (FY 1970 Meherrin 4. 8-foot modification deauthorized August 5, 1977, River, N. C., transferred to Norfolk District, under authority of Sec. 12, PL 93-251. 6-30 WILMINGTON, N.C., DISTRICT TABLE 6-D OTHER AUTHORIZED BEACH EROSION CONTROL PROJECTS For Last Full Report See Annual Proect Report for Cost to September 30, 2000 Construction Operation and Maintenance Fort Fisher and Vicinity, N.C. Fort Macon Park, N.C.' 1997 1973 1. Uncompleted portion of project was deauthorized November 17 1986, under authority of Sec. 1002, PL 99-662. 6-31 5,966,730 620,000 --^ ___ REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 2000 TABLE 6-E OTHER AUTHORIZED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS For Last Full Report See Annual Project Report for Cost to September 30, 2000 Constructi Operation and ion Maintenance Ararat River, Mount Airy, N. C.' 1987 Black River, Harnett County, N. C.' 1984 Blackberry Creek, Henry Country, Va.' 1994 Broad Creek, Beaufort County, N. C.' 1972 Conetoe Creek, N. C.' 1960 , Contentnea Creek, N. C.' 1939-1943 & 1958 Core Creek, N. C.' 1965 Dan River, Madison Wastewater Treatment Plant, N. C.' 1989 Danville (Southside Wastewater Treatment Plant) Va.' 1999 Deep Creek, Edgecombe County, N. C.' 1984 Ellerbe Creek, Durham County, N. C.' 1963 Ellis Swamp, Gates County, N. C.' 1971 Filberts Creek, N. C.' 1970 Gapway Swamp, N. C. & S. C.'8 1969 Gardners Creek, N. C.' 1972 Genoa Sewer Facility, Wayne County, N. C.' 1985 Goldsboro, Neuse River, N. C. 1984 Hamlet City Lake, N.C.' 1999 Joyce Creek, Camden County, N. C.' 1984 King (Water Plant), N.C.' 1998 Leesville, Va.' 1989 Leith's Creek, Scotland County, N. C.' 'o 1982 Lick Run, Roanoke, Va.' 1974 Little Rockfish Creek, Hope Mills, N. C.' 1978 Little Sugar Creek, Charlotte, N. C.' '8 1979 Lower Creek, Lenoir, N.C.' 1997 Neuse River, Oriental, N. C.' 1992 New River, N.C.' 1950 & 1956 New River, Onslow County, N. C.' 1972 N.C. Aquarium, Dare County, N.C.' 1998 Northeast Cape Fear River, N. C.' 1961 Old Field Swamp, N. C.'- 1.969 Oriental, South Avenue, N.C.' 1997 Pantego Creek and Cucklers Creek, N. C. 1963 Pasquotank River, N. C. 1960 Perquimans River, N. C.' 1961 Pungo Creek, N. C.' 1972 Pungo River, N. C.' 1971 Randleman Lake, N.C. 1994 Reddies River Lake, N. C.O 1980 Roaring River Lake, N. C.O 1978 Simmons Bay, N. C.8 1963 South Creek, N. C.' 1971 Stuart, Va. ' 1989 Swift Creek, Pitt and Craven Counties, N. C.' 1966 Tar River, N. C. 1964 Tar River, N. C.' 1947 Tar River and Tributaries, N. C.' 1943 Tar River, Princeville, N. C.' 1967 Thomasville (Walnut Street), N.C.' 1996 Trent River, N. C.' 1953 Waccamaw River & Seven Creeks, N. C. & S. C.1"' 1961 White Oak Dike, Bladen and Pender Counties, N.C.' 1963 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. Project authorized by Chief of Engineers under continuin g authority. Includes $17,356 refund to local interests. Adjusted to reflect actual cost. Includes $1,519 refund to local interests. Includes $387 refund to local interests. Includes $338 refund to local interests. 7. Adjusted $3,000 to include 4,901,854 475,574 22,870 283,846 29,867 50,889 236,2237 175,315 279,562 394,055 223,413 138,117' 37,7773 374,005 54,5976 167,800 50,430 3,019,776 606,18912 270,227 367,755 430,951 1,280,317 113,657 763,022 638,500 370,446 51,896 580,977 708,000 95,873 86,600 542,800 517,948 80,931 6,366 582,270 296,602" 4,786,088 985,800 370,000 186,435 194,367 2,220,440 611,096 81,266 18,624 22,660 390,249 59,919 64,769 67,821 214,286 11 IU1JV. 8. Transferred from Charleston District, FY 1980 9. Reclassified to inactive category February 3, 1976. 10. Transferred from Charleston District, FY1984. 11. Includes $1,057 refund to local interests. 6-32 --- ~--~- 623,687 --- 61,473 preauthorization cost prior to WILMINGTON, N.C., DISTRICT TABLE 6-G DEAUTHORIZED PROJECTS For Last Full Report See Annual report Project For Date Deauthorized Adkin Branch, N. C. AIWW Masonboro Inlet - Training Wall AIWW Mooring Basins AIWW - New River Onslow County, N. C. AIWW - Peltier Creek, N. C. 12-foot project AIWW - Tidal Lock in Snows Cut Bodie Island, N. C. Cape Lookout, N. C. Conoho Creek, N. C. Contentnea Creek, N. C. Davis, N. C. Fort Macon State Park, N. C., Remaining Work Harbor of Refuge, Cape Lookout, N. C. Hominy Swamp, N. C. Howards Mill Lake, N.C. Hyde County Dike, N. C. MacKay Creek, N.C. Mann's Harbor, N. C. Mill Creek, N. C. Mocassin Swamp, N. C. Morehead City Harbor, N. C. Jetties at Beaufort Inlet Moyock Creek, N. C. Nahunta Swamp, N. C. Neuse River, N. C. Neuse River Barrier, N. C. Neuse River, 300 ft.-wide channel in front of New Bern, N. C. North River Dike, N. C. Ocracoke Inlet Jetty, N. C. Ocracoke Island, N. C. Roanoke River, 50 mile long Channel from Palmyra Landing to Weldon, N. C. Rockfish Creek, N. C. Scuppernong River, Six N. C. Runs Creek, N. C. Sweetwater Creek, N. C. Thoroughfare Swamp, N. C. Topsail Beach and Surf City, N. C. Tranters Creek, N. C. Trent River, Basins and Access Channels at New Bern, N. C. Wilmington Harbor Widening and Deepening, N. C. 1. Deauthorized under authority of Sec. 12, PL 93-251. 2. Deauthorized pursuant to the continuing authority provided the Chief of Engineers under Sec. 205 of the 1948 FC Act, as amended. 3. Deauthorized pursuant to the continuing authority provided the Chief of Engineers under Sec. 208 of the 1954 Flood Control Act. * Deauthorized pursuant to the continuing authority provided the Chief of Engineers under Sec. 107 of the R&H 5. 6. 7. 8. Act of 1960, as amended. Deauthorized under authority of Sec. 1002, PL 99-662. Deauthorized under authority of Sec. 1001 (b)(1), PL 99-662. Cost-to-date included in remaining authorized portion of project (Engineering and Design only). Deauthorized under authority of Sec. 1001(b)(2), PL 99-662. 6-33 Federal Funds Expended Contributed Funds Expended 1982 1998 None 1990 None None None None 1974 1972 1982 1973 1934 1973 1980 None 1976 1973 1973 1973 1986 1973 1973 None None None None 1986 1975 1983 1976 1987 1971 1973 1976 None 1974 None 1990 8 Sept. 812 5 April 998 5 Aug. 77' 1 Jan. 906 17 Nov. 86S 23 Sept. 86' 5 Aug. 77' 5 Aug. 77' 31 Mar. 78' 31 Mar. 783 31 Mar. 824 17 Nov. 86' 1 Nov. 81' 31 Mar. 782 9 Jul. 958 5 Aug. 77' 31 Mar. 782 31 Mar. 784 31 Mar. 782 31 Mar. 782 17 Nov. 865 31 Mar. 782 31 Mar. 782 31 Mar. 784 5 Aug. 77' 5 Aug. 77' 5 Aug. 77' 17 Nov. 861 17 Nov. 86' 17 Nov. 86' 31 Mar. 78' 20 Apr. 882 31 Mar. 78 31 Mar. 78" 31 Mar. 782 5 Aug. 77' 11 Jan. 852 5 Aug. 77' 1 Jan. 906 219,477 79,782 4,250 25,419 1,396,653 .107,472 698,400 130,900 7,265 116,395 36,680 64,416 65,673 30,911 129,592 157,721 234,032 64,977 64,584 132,767 139,339 -,.. -- - I - r _ ___ __ -----~--- REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 2000 TABLE 6-H RECONNAISSANCE AND CONDITION SURVEYS Project Date Survey Conducted Avon Harbor, N.C. Channel from Pamlico Sound to Rodanthe, N.C. Far Creek, N.C. Rollinson Channel, N.C. Scuppernong River, N.C. Silver Lake Harbor, N.C. June 2000 June 2000 January 2000 December 1999 - August 2000 June 2000 December 1999 - June 2000 NAVIGATION WORK UNDER SPECIALAUTHORIZATION Navigation Activities Pursuant to Section 107, Public law 86-645 (preauthorization) TABLE 6-I Study Identification Fiscal Period Cost Durant Channel, Dare County, N.C. 1,034 Morehead City Harbor, Pine Knoll Shores, N.C.' 146,3792 Newport River, Carteret County, N.C. 52,6823 Walter Slough, Dare County, N.C. 47,9994 1. Sec. 111 Project. 2. Includes $70,954 contributed funds. 3. Includes $25,663 contributed funds. 4. Includes $17,578 contributed funds. 6-34 TABLE 6-J DAMS AND RESERVOIRS See Miles Height Reservoir Power Estimated Section Project Name Nearest City River Above of Type capacity Development Construction Cost Lands Total in Text Mouth Dam (Ft) (acre-feet) (kilowatts) and Damages' 23. Cape Fear B. Everett Jordan' Moncure, N.C. Haw River Basin, Howards Mill'" Carthage, N.C. Deep N.C. Randleman- Randleman, N.C. Deep Small reservoirs - Various 31. Neuse River Falls' Falls, N.C. Neuse Basin, N.C. Wilson Mills Wilson Mills, N.C. Neuse Beulahtown Kenly, N.C. Little Bakers Mills Princeton, N.C. Little Little Buffalo Kenly, N.C. Little Buf Buckhorn Wilson, N.C. Contentne Wiggins Mill Wilson, N.C. Contentn Stantonsburg Stantonsburg, N.C Tisnot Sw Great Swamp Fremont, N.C. Great Sw; Black Creek Wilson, N.C. Black Cre Aycock Swamp Fremont, N.C. Aycock S Hillsboro Durham, N.C. Eno Orange Durham, N.C. Little 34. Yadkin River W. Kerr Scott, N.C. Wilkesboro, N.C. Yadkin-Pc Basin, N.C.& S.C. 37. Roanoke River John H. Kerr, Va., and Boydton, Va. Roanoke Basin, Va. and N.C. 2 N.C. Philpott, Va. Bassett, Va. Roanoke Gaston, Va. and N.C.' Roanoke Rapids, N.C. Roanoke Roanoke Rapids, N.C.7 Roanoke Rapids, N.C. Roanoke Smith Mountain, Va.' Altavista, Va. Roanoke Leesville, Va.' Altavista, Va. Roanoke Taber, Va. Altavista, Va. Roanoke Melrose, Va. Bookneal, Va. Roanoke Randolph, Va. Chase City, Va. Roanoke Stuart, Va. and N.C. Spray, N.C. Roanoke Schoolfield, Va. and N.C. Danville, Va. Roanoke C' W~ 4.3 55.0 85.0 - ffalo Creek - ea Creek - ea Creek - vamp - amp - ek - wamp - ee Dee 404.0 112 E 106 E 110 E 20 to70+ E 92 E 81 CG,E 50 E 53 E 51 E 63 E 42 E 36 E 39 E 33 E 37 E 136 E 107 E 148 E 753,500 233,000 108,000 923,000 335,620 201,000 81,000 36,000 13,000 119,000 35,000 48,000 18,000 17,000 7,000 123,000 57,000 153,000 178.7 144 CG,E 2,808,000 336.2 144.9 137.0 314.2 293.7 275.0 262.9 227.8 297.2 265.9 220 CG" 249,800 108 CG,E 432,000 75 CG 59,300 244 CG 825,000 95 CG,E 76,900 54 CG 34,000 110 CG,E 120,000 147 CG,E 350,000 138 E 163,000 126 CG,E 248,000 89,186,000 18,874,000 62,300,000 91,334,000. 5,749,343 58,414,000 14,726,000 61,700,000 91,666,000 3,360,657 147,600,000' 33,600,000 124,000,000'3 38,454,000 183,000,000' 13,000,000 9,300,000 6,600,000 1,100,000 17,300,000 6,700,000 5,100,000 1,800,000 1,500,000 550,000 8,100,000 3,500,000 9,110,000 204,000 67,529,000 24,521,000 92,050,000' 14,000 54,000 83,000 41,000 20,000 12,000 43,000 48,000 15,000 80,000 13,933,000 27,000,000 31,300,000 28,000,000 9,100,000 8,000,000 17,700,000 22,100,000 9,000,000 27,800,000 1,157,000 3,500,000 800,000 3,800,000 1,000,000 1,700,000 6,000,000 4,700,000 1,100,000 6,400,000 15,090,000 30,500,000 32,100,000 31,800,000 10,100,000 9,700,000 23,700,000 '0 26,800,000 10,100,000 36,000,000 1. Includes highway, railroad, and utility relocations. 9. Construction completed in June 1963 by Appalachian Power Co. 2. For details, see individual report. 10. Includes cost of earth dam on Whipping Creek. 3. Includes $3,700,000 presently allocated to water supply to be reimbursed in the future by local 11. Authorizing legislation provided for earth dam; concrete gravity dam constructed. interests and $44,000 cash contribution for construction of ranger security buildings. 12. Includes $1,600,000 presently allocated to recreation and fish and wildlife. 4. Includes $13,637,000 presently allocated to water supply and $21,595,000 recreation and fish 13. Includes $74,058,000 presently allocated to water supply, $8,646,000 allocated to recreation and wildlife to be reimbursed in the future by local interests. and $8,296,000 to flood control to be paid by local interests during construction. 5. Exclusive of transmission lines. 14. Deauthorized July 1995. 6. Construction completed in 1963 by Virginia Electric and Power Co. 7. Based on modified plan developed in fiscal year 1949. Construction completed June 1955 by Key Virginia Electric and Power Co. E ......................... .......... Earth 8. Construction completed in February 1966 by Appalachian Power Co. CG .................. Concrete-Gravity REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 2000 FLOOD CONTROL WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION Flood Control Activities Pursuant to Section 205, Public Law 858, 80th Congress, as amended (Preauthorization) TABLE 6-K Study Identification Fiscal Period Cost Big Foot Creek, Clarkton, N.C. 10,041 Burgaw Creek, Pender County, N.C. 18,057 Dan River, Halifax County, N.C. 16,458 Irwin Creek, Mecklenburg County, N.C. 55,279 Tar River, Princeville, N.C. 25,407 White Marsh, Whiteville, N.C. 4,427 Tar River, River Road, Greenville, N.C.' 1,377 John H. Kerr, Wolftrap Waterfowl Impoundment, Va.2 5,153 Wilson Bay Restoration, Jacksonville, N.C.' 24,347 Wanchese Marsh Creation and Protection, Dare County, N.C.4 15,236 Section 205 Coordination Account 8,918 Section 14 Coordination Account 1,799 Section 1135 Coordination Account 9,402 Section 1135 Preliminary Restoration Plans 24,087 Section 206 Coordination Account 5,040 Section 206 Preliminary Restoration Plans 16,369 Section 204 Coordination Account 2,786 1. Sec. 14 Project. 2. Sec. 1135 Project. 3. Sec. 206 Project. 4. Sec. 204 Project. 6-36 CHARLESTON, S.C., DISTRICT* This district comprises all of South Carolina (except local watersheds draining into the Savannah River). It embraces the drainage basins tributary to the Atlantic Ocean between Little River and Port Royal Sound, except watersheds of Mackey and Skull Creeks, and excluding Hilton Head Island. IMPROVEMENTS Navigation 1. Aquatic Plant Control, SC ................................... 7-1 2. Atlantic Intracoastal Waterway Between Norfolk, VA and St. Johns River, FL .................... 7-2 3. Charleston Harbor, SC .......................................... 7-2 4. Charleston Harbor Rediversion (Fish Lift), SC................................ 7-3 5. Cooper River, Charleston Harbor, SC ................... 7-3 6. Folly River, SC ..................................... 7-4 7. Georgetown Harbor, SC ........................................ 7-4 8. Little River Inlet, NC and SC................................. 7-5 9. Murrells Inlet, SC ........................................ 7-5 10. Port Royal Ilarbor, SC.................................. 7-5 11. Shipyard River, SC ..................................... 7-6 12. Town Creek, SC .................................... 7-6 13. Reconnaissance and Condition Surveys.................... 7-6 14. Other Authorized Navigation Projects.................. 7-6 15. Navigation Work Under Special Authorization ..................................... 7-6 16. Calabash Creek, Brunswick County, SC.................. 7-7 Shore Protection 17. Myrtle Beach, SC .................................... 7-7 18. Other Authorized Shore Protection Projects ............. 7-7 19. Shore Protection Work Under Special Authorization7-7 Flood Control 20. Inspection of Completed Works ............................... 7-7 21. Other Authorized Flood Control Projects ........... 7-8 22. Flood Control Work Under Special Authorization... 7-8 23. Turkey Creek, Sumter County, SC ........................ 7-8 Enfergency Bank Protection 24. Streambank Erosion Under Special Authorization... 7-8 25. ,Shore Drive, Singleton Swash, Myrtle Beach, SC... 7-8 26. Castle Pinckney, Charleston, SC ........................... 7-8 27. Hunting Island State Park Waste Treatment Plant , SC ............................................................................. 7-9 Multiple Purpose Projects Including Power 28. Multiple Purpose Projects Including Power ............. 7-9 Miscellaneous 29. Ecosystem Restoration and Protection.................... 7-9 30. Cape Marsh Management Area, Santee Coastal Reserve, Charleston, SC ........................................... 7-9 31. Miller Corner Phragmites Control, SC....................7-10 32. Emergency Response Activities................. .... 7-10 33. General Regulatory Activities.................................7-10 General Investigations 34. Active Investigations..............................7-10 Tables Table 7-A Cost and Financial Statement.......................7-11 Table 7-B Authorizing Legislation......................... 7-15 Table 7-C Other Authorized Navigation Projects.........7-21 Table 7-D Other Authorized Shore Protection Projects..7-21 Table 7-E Other Authorized Flood Control Projects ...... 7-22 Table 7-F Multiple Purpose Projects Including Power ..................................... ...... 7-22 Table 7-G Deauthorized Projects .................................. 7-23 Table 7-H Other Authorized Streambank Erosion Control Projects........ ............................... 7-24 Table 7-I Active General Investigations ........................ 7-25 Table 7-J Flood Control Work Under Special Authorization .............................................. 7-26 Table 7-K Inspection of Completed Works............. 7-27 Table 7-L Other Authorized Environmental Projects ..... 7-27 *All costs and financial statements for projects are listed at the end of this chapter. All other tables are referenced in text and also appear at the end of this chapter. 7-1 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 2000 Navigation 1. AQUATIC PLANT CONTROL, SC Location. The project includes all public waters in the State of South Carolina. Existing Project. The project provides for the control of noxious aquatic plant growths from public waters in the combined interest of navigation, flood control, drainage, agriculture, fish and wildlife conservation, and public health. Local Cooperation. Local interests must agree to hold the United States free from damages that may occur from operations performed in connection with this project and contribute 50 percent of the total cost. The South Carolina Department of Natural Resources, Water Resources Division, is designated as the State's lead agency for aquatic plant management and meets local interest requirements. Operations and results during fiscal year. Aquatic plants now infest approximately 7,400 acres, with the worst infestations occurring in the Cooper River, Lake Marion, Lake Murray and Lake Greenwood. During FY 00, 3,502 acres of aquatic plants in 21 water bodies were treated with herbicides. The total cost of control operations (non-Federal and Federal) in FY 00 was $483,236. The total Federal share of work performed in FY 00 was $77,339. 2. ATLANTIC INTRACOASTAL WATERWAY BETWEEN NORFOLK, VA AND ST. JOHNS RIVER, FL (CHARLESTON DISTRICT) Location. The project starts near Little River at the North Carolina-South Carolina state line and extends generally south along the coast of South Carolina 62 miles to Winyah Bay; thence 63.5 miles to Charleston; thence 84.5 miles to and including Port Royal Sound; a total of 210 miles. (See National Ocean Survey Charts Nos. 11513, 11521, 11531, 11534, and 11535.) Previous projects. For further details see page 613 of Annual Report for 1932. Existing project. The project provides for a waterway twelve feet deep and not less than 90 feet wide with a branch channel of the same dimensions to McClellanville and construction of three bridges crossing the waterway in Horry County, South Carolina. Existing project was completed in 1940; three bridges were completed in 1936. (See Table 7-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. None required. Terminal facilities. There are rail-water terminals at Georgetown, Charleston and Port Royal and numerous open-pile wharves mostly for shipping agricultural products, fish, oysters, pulpwood, wood products, and petroleum products. Marinas are located at convenient intervals along the waterway where limited supplies and repair facilities are available for both commercial vessels and pleasure craft. Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce and recreation requirements. Operations and results during fiscal year. New Work: None. Maintenance: Maintenance dredging was performed by Eastern Dredging using a pipeline dredge in the AIWW from Winyah Bay to Charleston during October 1999 - March 2000, removing 581,465 cubic yards of material, at a cost of $1,129,404. Costs of $17,000 were incurred for contract dike maintenance. Costs of $110,000 were incurred for mosquito abatement and trenching. Condition and operation studies, natural resource management, project operations management, lands and damages, water control management, planning, engineering and design and supervision and administration costs were $1,047,001. Federal costs for the project were $2,303,405. 3. CHARLESTON HARBOR, SC Location. The harbor is located on the coast of South Carolina about 15 miles south of the midpoint of the coastline, 50 miles southwest of Winyah Bay, SC, and 80 miles northeast of the mouth of Savannah River. (See National Ocean Survey Charts Nos. 11521 and 11524.) Previous projects. For further details see page 1808 of the Annual Report for 1915; page 579 of the Annual Report for 1926; page 562 of the Annual Report for 1938; page 425 ofthe Annual Report for 1962; and page 7-2 of the Report for 1997. Existing project. The project as authorized by the 1996 Water Resources Development Act provides for deepening of the entrance channel from 42 ft deep to 47 ft deep and the inner channels from 40 ft deep to 45 ft deep. Other improvements include realignment/widening of various channels/reaches, construction of a new turning basin opposite the future Daniel Island terminal, construction of a new contraction dike, reconstruction of two existing dikes and removal of a third existing dike. Removal of the east contraction dike on Daniel Island was completed in June 1999. Dredging of the Daniel Island Reach was completed in July 2000. The Entrance Channel dredging contract started in December 1999 with completion scheduled for January 2002. Dredging in the Lower Hlarbor began July 1999 with completion scheduled for August 2001. Design work continues for diking of the Clouter Creek disposal area and dredging of the Upper Harbor. The Upper Harbor dredging is scheduled to start February 2002 and be completed in March 2004. The entire project is scheduled for completion in March 2004. Ultimate project cost after 10% reimbursement will be $85,433,000 (Federal) and $53,267,000 (non-Federal) for a 7-2 CHARLESTON, SOUTH CAROLINA DISTRICT total project cost of$ 138,700,000 (fully funded). (See Table 7-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Requirements are described in full on pg 7-2 of the FY 99 Annual Report. The non-Federal partner is the South Carolina State Ports Authority. The Project Cooperation Agreement was executed on June 5, 1998. Terminal facilities. The SC State Ports Authority owns and operates four public terminals and a grain elevator in Charleston Harbor. These terminals offer more than two miles of berthing Space, room enough for seventeen vessels at one time. The Ports Authority operates fifteen custom-built container cranes and a variety of gantry and mobile cranes for breakbulk applications. On the land side, Charleston has extensive interstate and rail connections and is served by over 100 motor carriers. Modern facilities are also at wharves of seven major petroleum companies including storage tank farms. Modem facilities for marine repairs and servicing are available at Detyens Shipyard, located approximately ten miles northeast of Charleston on the Wando River. The Charleston Naval Complex Redevelopment Authority is currently marketing the former naval facilities to private industry and businesses. For further details see Port Series No. 13, 1987, Corps of Engineers. Operations and results during fiscal year. New Work: Dredging was performed (a) by Great Lakes using hopper and hydraulic dredges in the Entrance Channel during October 1999 - September 2000, removing 4,821,143 cubic yards of material, at a cost of $22,197,644, and (b) by Norfolk Dredging using a clam/bucket dredge in the Lower Harbor during October 1999 - September 2000, removing 4,051,691 cubic yards of material, at a cost of$ 12,579,112, and ( c) by Great Lakes using a bucket dredge in the Daniel Island Widening reach during October 1999 - July 2000, removing 2,194,379 cubic yards of material, at a cost of $9,927,692. Adjustments of -$8,194 were made for work performed in FY 99 for the demolition of the east contraction dike on Daniel Island. Costs of(a) $3,929,645 were incurred for rehabilitation/construction of three contraction dikes, and (b) $2,238,831 for diking and trenching efforts at the Clouter Creek Disposal Area. Real estate costs, engineering and design and supervision and administration costs were $2,183,584. The South Carolina State Ports Authority paid costs of $8,037,581 to carry dredged material to their proposed future terminal site on Daniel Island instead of being taken to the ocean disposal site. Federal costs were $39,839,960. Maintenance: Adjustments of - $72,355 were made for work performed in FY 98 for dredging of the Wando River. Dredging was performed (a) by Great Lakes using hopper and hydraulic dredges with scows in the Entrance Channel during October 1999 - September 2000, removing 806,243 cubic yards of material, at a cost of $1,518,980, and (b) by Norfolk Dredging using a clam/bucket dredge in the Lower hlarbor during October 1999 - September 2000, removing 594,087 cubic yards of material, at a cost of $1,333,218, and (c) by Southern Dredging in Ordnance Reach using a pipeline dredge during October - November 1999, removing 459,753 cubic yards of material, at a cost of $536,169. Costs of $70,000 were incurred for trenching the North cell of the Clouter Creek Disposal Area. Condition and operation studies, water control management, natural resource management, lands and damages, planning, engineering and design, and supervision and administration costs were $472,824. Federal costs for maintenance were $3,858,836. 4. CHARLESTON IHARBOR REDIVERSION (FISH LIFT), SC Location. Cooper River is located in Charleston and Berkeley Counties, SC, and empties into the Atlantic Ocean at Charleston, SC. (See National Ocean Survey Charts Nos. 11521 and 11524.) All works of improvement are in Berkeley County about 45 miles from Charleston, SC. Existing Project. The completed Cooper River, Charleston Harbor project (See Section 5) resulted in significant reduction in the transfer of blueback herring into the Santee Cooper Lakes. The landlocked striped bass fishery, a major tourist attraction, is dependent on these fish for forage. A model study, completed in March 1992 at CEWES, determined how the turbine discharge could be prevented from overwhelming the attractant flow through the fish lift and how best to improve fish passage. Phase I construction consisted of installation of new wing walls to keep turbulence from the turbines from interfering with the attractant flow to the fish lift entrance. Construction of Phase I was completed in FY 95. Phase IIA work consisted of installing adjustable weirs and control equipment on the newly installed concrete wingwalls. Construction was completed in January 1998. Phase IIB work consisted of installation of three 42 inch siphon pipes, intake structure and outfall structure to increase flow to attract fish. Phase lIB was completed in March 2000. Monitoring of the fish lift operation for two years after construction will be required to gather and analyze data to be used to refine the operation of the fish lift and to ensure its effectiveness. Total estimated cost of the project is $6,705,000, all Federal. (See Table 7-B for authorizing legislation.) Local Cooperation. None required. Operations and results during fiscal year. Construction payments in FY 00 for Phase IIB were $1,288,184. Costs for engineering and design, and supervision and administration were $115,856. Federal costs for the project were $1,404,040. 5. COOPER RIVER, CHIARLESTON HARBOR, SC Location. Cooper River is located in Charleston and Berkeley Counties, SC, and empties into the Atlantic Ocean at Charleston (See National Ocean Survey Charts Nos. 11521 and 11524.) 7-3 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 2000 Existing project. The major cause of the shoaling problem in Charleston Harbor was the diversion of fresh water from the Santee River through Pinopolis Dam into the salt water of Charleston Harbor, which caused density currents that trapped sediments resulting in a phenomenal rate of deposition. The most practical solution of the shoaling problem was to redivert most of the Santee River waters above Pinopolis Dam back into the lower Santee River through a canal beginning at Lake Moultrie and extending to the Santee River in the vicinity of St. Stephen, South Carolina. The project for Cooper River, as authorized by the 1968 River and Harbor Act, provided that the discharge through the existing Pinopolis Hydroplant be reduced to a flow which would not establish a density current in the harbor. This flow was estimated at 3,000 cubic feet per second (cfs) during the design phase of the project, but after operational tests, this flow is estimated at 4,500 cfs. The excess water impounded in Lake Moultrie is being directed through a new canal above St. Stephen, South Carolina, to enter the Santee River at a point well below the Lake Marion Spillway (Wilson Dam). A new hydroelectric facility was constructed on the new canal at the edge of the swamp adjacent to the Santee River. This plant replaces those features made less effective at Pinopolis through curtailment of flows. The average flow of 11,000 cfs at the new powerplant, plus the 4,500 cfs average release planned for Pinopolis, approximates the historical average flow at Pinopolis. The three generators at the new plant are rated at 28,000 kilowatts each, for a total of 84,000 kilowatts. In the interest of fish and wildlife resources of the area, the project includes a herring lift at the new powerhouse site and a fish hatchery. Construction as initiated March 1977. The power-on-line date was March 1985. The power plant, channels and canals, and attendant work were completed in FY 85. (See Table 7-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. None required. Operations and results during fiscal year. New Work: None. The cooling towers were not able to deliver the required cooling capacity after the project came on-line in March 1985. The Corps bears all lost capacity costs until such time as the facility or its operation can be modified at our expense to eliminate such losses. Adjustments to the capacity loss payment were $-92,200. Engineering and design and supervision and administration costs were $1,975. Federal costs for the project were $-90,225. Maintenance: Funds of $3,345,327 were spent for maintenance of completed work. 6. FOLLY RIVER, SC Location. The project begins in Folly River and Folly Creek north of the Town of Folly Beach and follows a southwesterly course into the Atlantic Ocean. (See National Ocean Survey Chart No. 1 1521.) Existing project. The project provides for an entrance channel, eleven feet deep by 100 feet wide extending from the Stono River three miles through the ocean bar; a channel within Folly River nine feet deep and 80 feet wide, extending three miles downstream from U. S. Highway 171 to the confluence of Folly and Stono Rivers; and a channel within Folly Creek nine feet deep by 80 feet wide extending three miles downstream from Highway 171 to the confluence with the Folly River. The existing project was completed in FY 79. (See Table 7-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. None required. Operations and results during fiscal year. New Work: None. Maintenance: Maintenance dredging was performed (a) by the government-owned sidecaster dredge Fry in the entrance channel during June 2000 at a cost of $121,950, and (b) by Marinex in the inside shoals by pipeline dredge during March - May 2000, removing 101,513 cubic yards of material, at a cost of $307,610. This material was placed on the southwest end of the Folly Beach County Park for nourishment efforts and on Skimmer Flats to build a pelican nesting area. Condition and operations studies, planning, engineering and design and supervision and administrative costs were $56,344. Federal costs for the project were $485,904. 7. GEORGETOWN HARBOR, SC Location. The harbor is located on the coast of South Carolina 50 miles northeast of Charleston Harbor and 90 miles southwest of the entrance to Cape Fear River, North Carolina. (See National Ocean Survey Chart No. 11532) Previous projects. For further details see page 1806 of Annual Report for 1915; page 549 of Annual Report for 1938; and page 442 of Annual Report for 1944. Existing project. The authorizations provide for a channel 27 feet deep with varying widths of 600 feet to 400 feet from the Atlantic Ocean to and including a turning basin at the U. S. Highway 17 bridge over Sampit River, with a side channel 2,400 feet long and not less than 200 feet wide leading to a turning basin at the upper end of the built-up portion of the city waterfront, a total of 17.9 miles. The project also provides for the continued maintenance to a depth of 18 feet and a width of 400 feet for the bypassed portion of Sampit River opposite the City of Georgetown. The existing project was completed in 1951. Thejetties were completed in 1903 - 1904. (Seel Table 7-13 for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. None required. Terminal facilities. Terminal facilities at the Port of Georgetown, suitable for oceangoing vessels, consist of one 500- foot concrete pier with creosote-timber fenders and one 700-foot concrete and steel bulkhead, both of which are backed up by 25 acres of paved area. Since 1984 approximately $8.5 million has been spent on structures and improvements by the SC State Ports 7-4 CHARLESTON, SOUTH CAROLINA DISTRICT Authority and private interests. Other than the 700-foot bulkhead, recent improvements include a 43,000-foot warehouse, salt dome, cement dome, three lumber sheds, plus acquisition of ten additional acres of land. For further details, see Port Series No. 13, 1987, Corps of Engineers. Operations and results during fiscal year. New Work: None. Maintenance: Adjustments of -$202,284 were made for work performed in FY 98 for dredging of the Sampit River and Upper Winyah Bay. Maintenance dredging was performed (a) by NATCO Limited Partnership in Winyah Bay by hopper dredge during October - December 1999, removing 266,896 cubic yards of material, at a cost of $1,575,953, and (b) by Southern Dredging in the Sampit River and By-Pass area by Pipeline dredge during October 1999 - May 2000, removing 825,287 cubic yards of material, at a cost of $1,360,759, and (c) by NATCO Limited Partnership in the Entrance channel by hopper dredging during December 1999 - January 2000, removing 528,190 cubic yards of material, at a cost of $1,385,879. Costs of $572,430 were incurred for dike maintenance. Water control management, natural resource management, condition and operation studies, easement acquisition, planning, engineering and design and supervision and administration costs were $586,366. Federal costs for the project Were $5,279,103. 8. LITTLE RIVER INLET, NC AND SC Location. The project is located near the North Carolina-South Carolina state line. Little River enters the Atlantic Ocean at Little River Inlet at the state line and affords the only connection between the Atlantic Intracoastal Waterway and the ocean along 68 miles of coastline from Shallotte, N. C. to Georgetown, S. C. (See National Ocean Survey Chart No. 11535.) Existing project. The project provides for an entrance channel twelve feet by 300 feet across the ocean bar; thence a ten by 9 0-foot inner channel to the Atlantic Intracoastal Waterway. The entrance channel is stabilized by jetties extending seaward 3,284 feet and 3,830 feet long on the east and west sides of the inlet, respectively. The project was completed in FY 84. (See Table 7-1 for authlorizilng legislation.) Local cooperation. Fully in compliance. Terminal facilities. There are eight marinas, numerous Private docks, and several public boat ramps located in or near Little River. Operations and results during fiscal year. New Work: None. Maintenance: Condition and operation studies, Water control management, and supervision and administration costs were $5,077. 9. MURRELLS INLET, SC Location. The project is located on the coast of South Carolina, in Georgetown County, about 13 miles southwest of the City of Myrtle Beach. The inlet is the ocean entrance through a barrier beach to several tidal streams in the Murrells Inlet-Garden City estuarine area. (See National Ocean Survey Chart No. 11535.) Existing project. The project provides for an entrance channel twelve feet by 300 feet across the seaward bar; thence a ten by 90-foot inner channel to a turning basin at the old Army crashboat dock. The entrance channel is stabilized by ocean jetties extending seaward 3,445 feet and 3,319 feet on the north and south sides of the inlet, respectively. The recreational project includes a walkway on the south jetty with access road and parking area. The existing project was completed in 1981. (Sec Table 7-B for autlloizing legislaionl.) Local cooperation. Fully in compliance. Terminal facilities. There are five marinas and numerous private docks located about the Murrells Inlet Harbor. There are several public boat ramps in the area. Operations and results during fiscal year. New Work: None. Maintenance: Condition and operations studies, water control management costs, mapping, and supervision and administration costs were $5,857. 10. PORT ROYAL HARBOR, SC Location. The harbor is located on the coast of South Carolina 57 miles southwest of Charleston Harbor and 23 miles northeast of the mouth of the Savannah River. (See National Ocean Survey Chart No. 11516.) Existing project. The authorized project provides for a channel from the ocean through Port Royal Sound to Port Royal, South Carolina, 27 feet deep and 500 feet wide across the ocean bar and in Port Royal Sound for approximately 12.8 miles, thence 24 feet deep and 300 feet wide in Beaufort River and Battery Creek for approximately 8.8 miles to and including a turning basin 27 feet deep and 600 feet wide opposite the wharf of the South Carolina State Ports Authority. The existing project was completed in 1959. (See Table 7-B for authorizinlg legislatioi.) Local cooperation. None required. Terminal facilities. Facilities include one 565-foot concrete wharf and one 50-ton gantry crane. Since the late 1980's improvements to the port facilities consist of two large cargo tanks for storage of clay, a freezer for exports, additional warehouse space and the dock has been reinforced. 7-5 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 2000 Operations and results during fiscal year. New Work: None. Maintenance: Maintenance dredging was performed by NATCO Limited Partnership in the Entrance Channel by hopper dredge during January - February 2000, removing 756,429 cubic yards of material, at a cost of $1,619,151. Condition and operation studies, water control management, natural resource management, planning, engineering and design, and supervision and administration costs were $157,181. Federal costs for the project were $1,776,332. 11. SHIPYARD RIVER, SC Location. This waterway is a tidal tributary of Charleston Harbor, South Carolina. It has its source about one-half mile below the U. S. Naval Base, whence it flows southerly about one and one-half miles and empties into the Cooper River, about three-fourths miles above Drum Island. (See National Ocean Survey Chart No. 11524.) Previous projects. For details, see page 610 of Annual Report for 1932, page 463 of Annual Report for 1944, and page 534 of the Annual Report for 1952. Existing project. The 1986 Water Resources Development Act authorized deepening to 38 feet and enlarging the lower turning basin to 1000 ft. as part of the Charleston Harbor, SC improvement. New work dredging was accomplished in 1989 and 1996 under the Charleston Harbor, SC improvement. The entrance channel and the lower turning basin have been deepened to 38 feet. Cost for that work is reflected in the cost for the Charleston Harbor improvement. (See Table 7-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. None required. Terminal facilities. Located in the lower three-quarters of a mile of the channel are wharves operated by the Chevron USA Products Company and the Shipyard River Coal Terminal Company. These wharves accommodate deep-draft, oceangoing vessels for handling petroleum products, coal and miscellaneous dry bulk materials. Located mid-channel are Salmons Dredging Corporation, Detyens Shipyard, and Pre-Stress Concrete Company. For further details see Port Series No. 13, 1987, Corps of Engineers. Operations and results during fiscal year. New Work: None. Maintenance: Adjustments of-$63,236 were made for work performed in FY 98 for dredging of the inside shoals. Maintenance dredging was performed by Southern Dredging using a pipeline dredge during February - March 2000, removing 380,974 cubic yards of material, at a cost of $476,892. Water control management, planning, engineering and design and supervision and administration costs were $11,328. Federal costs for the project were $424,984. 12. TOWN CREEK, SC Location. Town Creek Channel begins at the AIWW directly' south of the Town of McClellanville in Charleston County, SC. The channel follows Five Fathom Creek in a southerly direction to the Atlantic Ocean. (See National Ocean Survey Chart No. 11531.) Existing project. The project provides a channel ten feet deep by~ 80 feet wide from the AIWW to the mouth of Five Fathom Creek, a distance of 6.2 miles. The project includes an entrance channel twelve feet deep by 100 feet wide across the ocean bar, a distance of 4.0 miles. The existing project was completed in 1975. In 1989, Hurricane Hugo breached Sandy Point and created a new inlet to the ocean. This inlet continued to increase in size and was being used by local traffic to get to the Atlantic Ocean. In 1997, the district requested authority to maintain this new inlet in lieu of the existing authorized channel. Our request to abandon the existing Town Creek channel alignment and establish the Clark's Creek channel alignment was approved by headquarters. The proposed channel relocation, due to natural occurrences, is within the scope of the project authorization. The authorized project dimensions of 12 feet deep by 100 feet wide shall be maintained as appropriate. (See Table 7-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Requirements fully satisfied. Operations and results during fiscal year. New Work: None. Maintenance: Maintenance dredging was performed by the government-owned sidecaster dredge Fry during May - June 2000, at a cost of $187,350. Condition and operations studies, water control management, natural resource management, planning, engineering and design and supervision and administration costs were $3,698. Federal costs for the project were $191,048. 13. RECONNAISSANCE AND CONDITION SURVEYS Costs of $85,597 were incurred. 14. OTHER AUTHORIZED NAVIGATION PROJECTS (See Table 7-C.) 15. NAVIGATION WORK SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION UNDER Navigation Activities Pursuant to Section 107, Public Law 86-645, as amended (Preauthorization). Fiscal year costs were Murrells Inlet, $45,507. 7-6 CHARLESTON, SOUTH CAROLINA DISTRICT Snagging and Clearing for Navigation (Section 3, Public Law 79-14.) No costs incurred. 16. CALABASH CREEK, BRUNSWICK COUNTY, SC Location. Calabash Creek originates in the southeastern part of Brunswick County, NC, and flows generally southwestward, parallel to the ocean coastline, until it enters the Little River in Ilorry County, SC. The creek is flanked by the Town of Calabash, NC on the north at the upper limit of the project area. The SC and NC state line crosses Calabash Creek approximately mid-way up the navigation channel. The confluence of Calabash Creek and the Little River is approximately 0.5 miles from the AIWW and about 3.0 miles from the Atlantic Ocean at Little River Inlet. Existing project. The existing navigation channel does not provide adequate depth for full tidal use by commercial vessels. The project will consist of construction of approximately 2,585 linear feet of low-level dikes at the Goat Island Disposal Site using material at the site. An adjustable water control structure will be constructed on the AIWW side of disposal site. A 60' Wide navigation channel will be dredged in Calabash Creek from the AIWW upstream for a distance of approximately 1.5 miles. Approximately 1.0 miles of the channel will be dredged to a depth of 7 ft deep with the reminder dredged to a depth of 8 ft deep. Dredged material is to be placed in the Goat Island Disposal Site. (See Table 7-B for authorizing legislation). Local cooperation. The Project Cooperation Agreement Was executed on December 8, 1999 with the Town of Calabash, NC. Operations and results during fiscal year. The construction contract was awarded April 19, 2000 to Cottrell Contracting. Dredging work began in September 2000 and is Scheduled for completion in October 2000. Contract costs incurred were $467,269. Federal contract costs incurred were $388,870. Engineering and de.,ign and supervision and administration costs were $89,069. Federal costs for the project Were $477,939. Shore Protection 17. MYRTLE BEACH, SC Location. Myrtle Beach is located along the northern coast of SC. The area is commonly referred to as the Grand Strand. The Grand Strand extends from Little River Inlet at the NC border, in a southerly direction, to Murrells Inlet, SC for a total distance of approximately 37 miles. This project includes the developed area along the coast of Horry County, SC and a portion of the coastal area of Georgetown County, SC. Major municipalities in the project area include the cities of Myrtle Beach and North Myrtle Beach, Garden City, and the Town of Surfside Beach. Existing project. The plan of improvement would place about 5.1 million cubic yards of sand over a total project reach of 25.4 miles of beach encompassing three separable reaches. This material will come from offshore borrow sites. Periodic nourishment will be required once every 8 to 10 years throughout the project life of 50 years. All work is programmed. Estimated cost (October 1995 price levels) of initial construction is $35,188,000 Federal and $18,947,000 non-Federal for a total of $54,135,000. Estimated cost of periodic nourishment is $105,347,000 Federal and $56,725,000 non-Federal for a total project cost of $216,207,000. Sand placement on the North Myrtle Beach reach was completed in May 1997 placing 2.5 million cubic yards of sand. Sand placement on the Myrtle Beach reach was completed in January 1998 placing 2.3 million cubic yards of sand. Sand placement on the Garden City/Surfside reach was completed in November 1998 placing 1.5 million cubic yards of sand. (See Table 7-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Requirements are described in full on page 7-8 of the FY 1995 Annual Report. Operations and results during fiscal year. Monitoring and supervision and administration costs were $207,158. Federal costs for the project were $207,158. 18. OTHER AUTHORIZED SHORE PROTECTION PROJECTS (See Table 7-D.) 19. SHORE PROTECTION WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION Shore Protection Activities Pursuant to Section 103, Public Law 87-874 (Preauthorization). No cost incurred in FY 00. Flood Control 20. INSPECTION OF COMPLETED WORKS Flood Control Act of June 22, 1936, and subsequent acts require local interests to maintain and operate local protection projects after completion in accordance with regulations prescribed by Secretary of the Army. Inspections were made to determine extent of compliance and responsible local officials were advised of inadequacies in maintenance and operation on local flood protection works when appropriate. Cost for the period was $33,488. For project inspection data see Table 7-K. 7-7 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 2000 21. OTHER AUTHORIZED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS (See Table 7-E.) 22. FLOOD CONTROL WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION Flood Control Activities Pursuant to Section 205, Public Law 80-858, as amended (Preauthorization). (See Table 7-J.) 23. TURKEY CREEK, SUMTER COUNTY, SC Location. City of Sumter, SC. Existing project. Flooding was occurring within the City of Sumter along Turkey Creek. Homes, businesses, industries, and public properties were inundated and received damages during flood events. The project consisted of 3,200 feet of channel modification, requiring 4,500 cubic yards of excavation and slope protection, and enlargement of an existing 66-inch railroad culvert to 102 inches. Construction was completed in March 1999. A contract modification is scheduled for construction in Spring 2001. (See Table 7-B for authorizing legislation). Local cooperation. The Project Cooperation Agreement was executed on December 19, 1997 with the City of Sumter. Operations and results during fiscal year. Engineering and design and supervision and administration costs were $14,202. Federal costs for the project were $14,202. Emergency Bank Protection 24.STREAMBANK EROSION UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION Emergency Streambank and Shoreline Protection Activities Pursuant to Section 14, Public Law 79-526 as amended (Preauthorization). Fiscal year costs were Morris Island Lighthouse, SC, $17,057 and Coordination Account, $17,598. (See Table 7-H for Other Authorized Streambank Erosion Control Projects.) Snagging and Clearing of Navigable Streams and Tributaries in Interest of Flood Control, Section 208, Public Law 83-780. No costs were incurred in FY 00. 25. SHORE DRIVE, SINGLETON SWASH, MYRTLE BEACH, SC Location. Singleton Swash is located adjacent to Shore Drive. Shore Drive is an area of Horry County just north of Myrtle Beach, SC. Existing project. Approximately 634 feet of Shore Drive located parallel to Singleton Swash was being threatened by shoreline erosion caused by tidal action of the Atlantic Ocean. The water had eroded the embankment to within approximately 1- foot of the pavement at several locations along the roadway. Shore Drive is a two-lane asphalt surface road that provides the only means of ingress and egress for several large beachfront hotels and condominiums, and numerous homes and businesses. Horry County had attempted to slow the erosion by placing various types of rubble along the embankment without success. The project consisted of placement of approximately 438 cubic yards of 12-inch riprap with approximately 160 cubic yards of 6- inch bedding along a distance of 634 feet. Underlying the bedding was approximately 1,878 square yards of geotextile fabric to aid in stability. Approximately twelve drainage outlets were built into the project to aid water runoff from Shore Drive thereby preventing blowout of the armored bank. A curb, gutter, and sidewalk betterment was included in the project at the sponsor's request and cost. Construction was completed in December 1998. Preparation of the O&M manual is underway. (See Table 7-B for authorizing legislation). Local cooperation. Horry County signed the initial Project Cooperation Agreement on 11 May 1995 and an amendment on 17 June 1998. Operations and results during fiscal year. Engineering and design costs were $4,079. Federal costs for the project were $4,079. 26. CASTLE PINCKNEY, CHARLESTON, SC Location. Castle Pinckney is located on the southern tip of Shutes Folly Island in Charleston Harbor, Charleston, SC. Castle Pinckney is accessible only by boat. It is one of a series of forts that made up the defenses of Charleston during the Civil War. Existing project. Throughout its long history, the south end of Shutes Folly Island has experienced accelerated erosion. Estimates have shown that the island has eroded from 224 acres in 1711 to less than 64 acres in 1998. The erosion had advanced to such a degree that the main brick fortification was in danger of falling into the water. Efforts to halt erosion had been unsaccessful. The project consisted of construction of a breakwater composed of 1,667 tons ofarmor stone and a 12-inch thick layer of 582 tons of bedding stone over geotextile fabric along a distance of 294 feet. Armor stone sizes range from 1200 7-8 CHARLESTON, SOUTH CAROLINA DISTRICT lbs to 2000 lbs. The work also included leveling the existing ground surface and placement of a layer of 308 tons of coarse aggregate. (See Table 7-B for authorizing legislation). Local cooperation. The Project Cooperation Agreement was executed on May 14, 1999 with the South Carolina State Ports Authority. Operations and results during fiscal year. The construction contract was awarded to Ashridge, Inc on July 27, 1999. Construction began on September 23, 1999 and was completed on October 25, 1999. Contract costs incurred were $123,085. Federal share of contract payments was $19,747. Engineering and design and supervision and administration costs Were $7,167. Federal costs for the project were $26,914. 27. HUNTING ISLAND STATE PARK WASTE TREATMENT PLANT, SC Location The waste treatment plant is located on the northern section of Hunting Island State Park in Beaufort County, SC. Existing project. Hunting Island was initially nourished by the Corps in 1968 and received an 840-foot terminal groin on the north end. Three subsequent renourishments were completed in 1971, 1975, and 1980. Emergency repair was required to build a dike to stabilize and protect the freshwater Wetland that receives treated effluent from the waste treatment plant. Construction began in April 1999 and was completed in May 1999. (See Table 7-B for authorizing legislation). Local cooperation. The Project Cooperation Agreement was executed on April 27, 1999 with the South Carolina Department Of Parks, Recreation and Tourism. Operations and results during fiscal year. An adjustment to the Federal cost was made as a result of a cost transfer from the non-Federal sponsor to balance the project costsharing requirements. Federal costs for the project were $1,263. 28. MULTIPLE PURPOSE PROJECTS INCLUDING POWER (See Table 7-F.) Miscellaneous 29. ECOSYSTEM RESTOlRATION AND PROTECTION Project modifications accomplished under the authority of Section 206, Aquatic Ecosystem Restoration. Water Resources Development Act of 1996. Fiscal year costs were Cousar Branch, SC, $10,202; Folly Beach Ecosystem, SC, $51,231; Pocotaligo River and Swamp, $104,062; Coordination Account, $26,052; and Preliminary Restoration Plans, $66,015. Project modifications accomplished under the authority of Section 204, Beneficial Use of Dredged Material, Water Resources Development Act of 1986, as amended. Fiscal year costs were Sand Island, SC $73,694 and Coordination Account, $4,660. Project modifications accomplished under the authority of Section 1135, Project Modifications For Improvement of the Environment, Water Resources Development Act of 1986, as amended. Fiscal year costs were Coordination Account, $8,210 and Initial Appraisals, $5,367. See Table 7-L for Other Authorized Environmental Projects. 30. CAPE MARSH MANAGEMENT AREA, SANTEE COASTAL RESERVE, CHARLESTON COUNTY Location. Cape Marsh Management Area is located at the junction of the Atlantic Intracoastal Waterway (AIWW) and South Santee River, Charleston County, 35 miles north of Charleston, SC. Existing project. The existing 12x90 navigation channel of the AIWW was completed in 1940. Construction of the AIWW through the Santee Coastal Reserve converted a shallow 30-foot wide tidal creek into a 14-foot deep (project depth plus maintenance overdepth) navigation channel with a top width of 226 feet. Since construction, an additional 100 feet of tidal saltmarsh has disappeared for a total loss of 131 acres. Loss of this saltmarsh has allowed spring high tides, storm surge and boat wakes to attack and erode the wildlife impoundment dikes at the Cape Marsh Management Area. The project consisted of raising 35,000 linear feet of existing dike to elevation 8 feet NGVD to prevent overtopping by spring high tides and installation of three water control structures to enhance water level management within the wildlife impoundments. (See Table 7-B for authorizing legislation). Local cooperation. The Project Cooperation Agreement was executed August 6, 1999 with the SC Department of Natural Resources. Operations and results during fiscal year. The construction contract was awarded to Wilco Marsh Buggies on September 29, 1999. Construction began on February 15, 2000 7-9 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 2000 and was completed on July 5, 2000. The sponsor completed the work-in-kind installation of the water control structures in July 2000 at a cost of $43,000. Contract costs incurred for the diking were $171,610. Federal contract costs incurred were $131,503. Engineering and design and supervision and administration costs were $33,586. Federal costs for the project were $165,089. 31. MILLER CORNER PHRAGMITES CONTROL, SC Location. The Miller Corner Disposal Area is located along the northwest corner of the Tom Yawkey Wildlife Center near the intersection of Winyah Bay and the Atlantic Intracoastal Waterway, near the City of Georgetown, in Georgetown County SC. Existing project. In the past two years, phragmites had taken root in the disposal area. This nuisance plant, which has virtually no beneficial value to wildlife, had the potential of spreading to the adjacent wetlands at the Tom Yawkey Wildlife Center. Unchecked, this nuisance plant will rapidly spread, causing loss of prime wildlife habitat. The thickness of this plant also greatly restricts flow of dredge disposal material. This attribute reduces the useful life of disposal areas. The recommended project consisted of both structural and non-structural measures to significantly reduce the size of existing stands of phragmites and to control its re-emergence and spread. Structural measures included raising approximately 10,600 linear feet of existing interior dike within and approximately 1,500 linear feet of causeway adjoining the Goose Pasture at the Wildlife Center. The dike modifications were enhanced by the construction and installation of five water intake structures in the dikes to support phragmites control through manipulation of water levels and continuous circulation of water between cells. Finally, a trailermounted, high-volume discharge pump was provided to support flooding of the individual cells created by the dike modifications to water levels higher than those currently supported by tidal influx. Non-structural measures included chemical treatment by aerial spraying of the existing stands ofphragmites located within the disposal area and the Wildlife Center. The interior sections of the phragmites stands were also chemically treated by localized, direct application of the chemical spray. (See Table 7-B for authorizing legislation). Local cooperation. The Project Cooperation Agreement was executed May 12, 1999 with the SC Department of Natural Resources. Operations and results during fiscal year. The sponsor completed the work-in-kind structural modifications in April 2000 at a cost of $47,600. Contract costs incurred were $50,980. Federal contract costs incurred for aerial spraying and the pump were $42,380. Engineering and design and supervision and administration costs were $3.955. Federal costs for the project were $46,335. 32. EMERGENCY RESPONSE ACTIVITIES - FLOOD CONTROL AND COASTAL EMERGENCIES Disasters. The Emergency Operations Center was activated four times in FY 00 for Hurricane Irene, Jose, Lenny and Debby. Operational Program Areas. Federal costs $490,755 for the Disaster Preparedness Program and $896,267 for Emergency Operations. Emergency Work in Support of Other Federal Agencies. Costs of $2,260,537 were incurred to support various debris removal and ice missions for FEMA. Total Federal costs incurred under the Flood Control and Coastal Emergencies Program were $1,387,022. Costs of $55,279 were incurred for the Catastrophic Disaster Preparedness Program. 33. GENERAL REGULATORY ACTIVITIES During FY 00, $2,345,114 was expended on Permit Evaluation, $676,892 on Enforcement, and $7,828 on Daniel Island Terminal EIS. Total costs were $3,029,834. General Investigations 34. ACTIVE INVESTIGATIONS See Table 7-1 which covers: Surveys, Collections, and Study of Basic Data, and Research and Development Activities. 7-10 CHARLESTON, SOUTH CAROLINA DISTRICT TABLE 7-A COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Sect. in Text Proiect Fundin FY 97 FY 98 FY 99 Total Cost to FY 00 Sept. 30, 2000 1 Aquatic Plant Control, SC (Contributed Funds) 2 Atlantic Intracoastal Waterway Between Norfolk, Va. and the St. Johns River, FL 3 Charleston Harbor, SC (Contributed Funds) 4 Charleston Harbor Rediversion (Fish Lift), SC 5 Cooper River, Charleston IHarbor, SC 6 Folly River, SC New Work: Approp. Cost Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost 0 6,666 0 0 167,000 11,887 0 0 0 79,459 0 0 0 0 0 77,339 0 0 0 0 0 0 2,517,000 2,457,000 3,040,040 2,186,288 2,448,351 2,530,265 3,010,964 2,303,405 -56,321 2,000,000 11,957,000 38,117,0003 -48,635 869,684 11,230,545 9,839,960 3,804,820 4,784,000 4,450,000 6,800,520 3,858,836 4,953,257 4,367,712 6,911,371 -15,152 300,000 4,000,000 43,624 300,000 3,480,881 12,700,000 13,208,413 160,000 380,000 2,260,000 1,365,000 614,574 403,650 2,295,761 1,404,040 10,848,605 10,844,710 52,028 52,028 7,455,378 I 7,455,378 1 79,832,996 2 79,826,004 2 99,787,107 3 99,653,297 3 145,795,458 4 145,792,357 4 29,588,848 5 29,578,142 5 6,690,000 6,682,772 356,321 455,000 280,000 -143,000 204,214,512 1,432,918 530,275 263,522 -90,225 204,210,255 4,202,000 3,433,000 2,896,015 3,390,689 56,239,217 6 4,044,274 3,625,660 3,046,845 3,345,327 56,182,922 6 798,000 210,000 176,035 487,541 793,844 190,761 204,430 485,904 337,736 337,736 5,829,575 5,827,312 7-11 .. .. C -ftft REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 2000 TABLE 7-A COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Sect. in Total Cost to Text Project Funding FY 97 FY 98 FY 99 FY 00 Sept. 30, 2000 7 Georgetown Harbor, SC 8 Little River Inlet, NC and SC (Contributed Funds), 9 Murrells Inlet, SC (Contributed Funds) 10 Port Royal Harbor, SC 11 Shipyard River, SC New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost 0 0 0 ** 0 7,061,755 7 7,061,755 7 2,690,000 4,068,000 2,455,920 5,215,583 84,325,141 8 2,822,460 3,884,977 2,626,655 5,279,103 84,324,604 8 0 0 34,000 37,110 0 8,353 12,280 12,570 0 0 5,110 5,077 0 0 0 0 84,000 87,942 0 0 0 15,020 14,135 17,553 14,500 5,857 0 0 0 0 17,037,428 17,037,428 3,010,030 3,009,995 1,521,920 1,521,920 15,502,240 15,502,240 4,143,689 4,134,828 1,536,893 9 1,536,893 9 1,786,100 1,786,100 133,000 809,000 130,440 1,757,168 16,111,251 119,173 820,070 114,664 1,776,332 16,110,645 0 0 5,000 736,000 8,586 755,158 20,630 32,727 491,974 491,974 10 10 424,256 12,399,440 424,984 12,399,440 7-12 TABLE 7-A See Sect. in Text Project 12 Town Creek, SC (Contributed Funds) CHARLESTON, SOUTH CAROLINA DISTRICT COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT Funding New Work: Approp. Cost Maint. Appro. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost FY 97 FY 98 FY 99 0 0 570,000 567,404 0 0 312,000 303,135 0 0 153,985 173,031 0 0 191,045 191,048 0 0 219,521 219,521 8,158,316 8,158,316 8,600 8,600 16 Calabash New work: Creek, NC Approp. Cost New Work: (Contributed Approp. Funds) Cost 17 Myrtle New Work: Beach, SC Approp. Cost New Work: (Contributed Approp. Funds) Cost 23 Turkey New Work: Creek, SC Approp. Cost New Work: (Contributed Approp. Funds) Cost 25 Shore Drive, Singleton Swash, SC (Contributed Funds) 46,000 27,931 0 6,703 10,000 13,747 0 0 15,676,000 10,070,000 2,975,000 14,794,419 7,600,006 6,230,104 7,805,000 4,500,000 2,550,000 6,687,598 4,620,290 3,480,169 65,000 35,143 0 0 New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost 1,000 29,699 150,000 962 30,000 23,021 74,700 0 398,000 233,371 0 98,183 88,000 82,787 0 74,653 473,503 477,939 78,400 78,399 529,503 526,320 78,400 78,399 0 33,285,000 11 207,158 33,124,742 i1 15,960,000 12 15,881,056 12 -151,357 14,202 -5,000 4,079 312,643 312,415 150,000 99,147 139,776 136,663 74,700 74,653 7-13 Total Cost to FY 00 Sept. 30, 2000 _ ___ a -- -- ----- REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 2000 TABLE 7-A COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Sect. in Text Total Cost to Project Funding FY 97 FY 98 FY 99 FY 00 Sept. 30, 2000 Castle New Work: 26 Pinckney, SC Approp. 15,000 65,000 178,500 3,593 262,093 Cost 4,625 39,995 190,559 26,914 262,093 New Work: (Contributed Approp. 0 0 117,700 1,888 119,588 Funds) Cost 0 0 16,175 103,414 119,588 27 Huntington New Work: Island State Approp. 0 0 60,000 -6,923 53,077 Park, SC Cost 0 0 51,814 1,263 53,077 New Work: (Contributed Approp. 0 0 16,625 -542 16,083 Funds) Cost 0 0 16,625 -542 16,083 30 Cape Marsh New Work: Management Approp. 0 59,277 32,000 169,000 260,277 Area, SC Cost 0 33,155 51,075 165,090 249,320 New work: Aprop. 0 0 0 57,500 57,500 Cost 0 0 0 40,107 40,107 31 Miller Corner New Work: Phragmites Approp. 0 86,000 54,500 38,000 178,500 Control, SC Cost 0 38,626 90,633 46,335 175,594 (Contributed New Work: Funds) Approp. 0 0 11,900 0 11,900 Cost 0 0 377 11,419 11,797 I 1 Includes $109,490 for new work for previous projects. 2 Includes $69,422 for maintenance of previous projects. 3 Includes $47,395,108 for previous projects and $318,000 for Preconstruction, Engineering and Design on the current project. 4 Includes $401,989 for maintenance of previous projects and $600 for maintenance expended from contributed funds for the existing project. 5 Includes $12,409,848 for the 40 ft project, excludes $2,996,994 credit for LERRD's and $1,966,945 final project reimbursement for the 40 ft project. Includes $179,000 for Preconstructon, Engineering and Design on the current project. 6 Includes $765,000 appropriated and expended'in FY 96 under appropriation 96X5125 Maintenanceand Operation of Dams and Other Improvements of Navigable Waters. 7 Includes $2,445,852 for new work for previous projects. 8 Includes $1 14,556 for maintenance of previous projects. .9 Includes $67,000 accomplished under authority of Section 3, P.L. 79-11 incurred through FY 73. 10 Includes $4,150 for new work on previous projects. 11 Includes $2,666,000 for Preconstruction, Engineering and Design. 12 Excludes $1,629,993 credit for LERRD's. 7-14 CHARLESTON, SOUTH CAROLINA DISTRICT TABLE 7-B See Sect. in Text Date of Authorizing Act Project and Work Authorized AQUATIC PLANT CONTROL, SC Oct. 27, 1965 Sep. 19, 1890 Jun. 13, 1902 Mar. 2, 1907 Mar. 2, 1907 Mar. 3, 1925 Mar. 3, 1925 Jul. 3, 1930 Aug. 30, 1935 Aug. 30, 1935 2 Aug. 30, 1935 2 Aug. 26, 1937 Mar. 2, 1945 Provides for control and progressive eradication of water hyacinth, alligatorweed, Eurasian water-milfoil and other obnoxious aquatic plant growths from navigable waters, tributary streams, connecting channels, and other allied waters of the U.S., in combined interest of navigation, flood control, drainage, agriculture, fish and wildlife conservation, public health and related purposes, including continued research for development of most effective and economic control measures in cooperation with other Federal and state agencies. ATLANTIC INTRACOASTAL WATERWAY BETWEEN NORFOLK, VA, AND ST. JOHNS RIVER, FL Channel from Minim Creek to Winyah Bay. Channel from Charleston to a point opposite McClellanville. Branch channel to McClellanville. Extending the channel to Minim Creek, thence through the Esterville-Minim Canal to Winyah Bay. Cut across the Santee Delta at Four Mile Creek. Widening and deepening the waterway from Charleston to Beaufort. A waterway eight feet deep and 75 feet wide from Cape Fear River to Winyah Bay. Construction of bridges across the waterway in Horry County, SC. Cutoff between Ashepoo and Coosaw Rivers. Enlarging the channel from Winyah Bay to Charleston including the branch channel to McClellanville, to depth of ten feet and bottom width of 90 feet. Increasing dimensions of waterway to twelve feet deep and 90 feet wide. Anchorage Basin 125 feet wide, 335 feet long, twelve feet deep, near Myrtle Beach, SC. (Deauthorized by 1986 WRDA) 4 H.D. 251, 89th Cong., Ist Sess. P.L. 89-298 Annual Report, 1889, p. 1184. H.D. 84, 56th Cong., 1st sess. and Annual Report 1900, p. 1908 Annual Report 1903, p. 1133 H.D. 178, 63rd Cong., Ist. sess. H.D. 237, 68th Cong., 1st sess. S.D. 178, 68th Cong., 2nd sess. H.D. 41, 71st Cong., Ist sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 14, 72nd Cong., 1st sess. H.D. 129, 72nd Cong., Ist sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 11, 72nd Cong., 1st sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee, Doc 6, 75th Cong., 1st sess.3 H.D. 327, 76th Cong., 1st sess. 7-15 AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Documents 2. [ ! V r . + v . -- REPORT ON THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 2000 TABLE 7-B AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION See Sect. in " Date of Project and Work Text Authorizing Act Authorized Documents CHARLESTON HARBOR, SC Jun. 18, 1878 Aug. 8, 1917 Jul. 18, 1918 Jan. 21, 1927 Oct. 17, 1940 Mar. 2, 1945 Sep. 3, 1954 Jul. 14, 1960 as amended Oct. 22, 1976 Nov. 17, 1986 2 jetties. s Increase in depth to 30 feet with width of 500 feet between the jetties and 1,000 feet seaward thereof. The 40-foot channel to the Naval Base. Act provided that the 40-foot channel should not be undertaken "until the proposed new drydocks at this navy yard, carrying a depth of 40 feet of water over the blocks, has been authorized." This dock was authorized in the Naval Appropriations Act approved July 1, 1918 (40 Stat. L. 725). A 30-foot channel from the sea to Goose Creek via Cooper River, together with a 30-foot channel through Town Creek for commercial purposes. The act also provided that the 40-foot channel be prosecuted only as found necessary for national defense. The 35-foot channel depth from the sea to the head of the project via Cooper River and Town Creek, also a channel in Shem Creek to Mount Pleasant, 110 feet wide and ten feet deep, including a turning basin at the upper end. An anchorage area 30 feet deep in the water area between Castle Pinckney and Fort Moultrie. 6 (Deauthorized by 1986 WRDA) Deepen the 30-foot channel north and east of Drum Island to 35 feet. Shem Creek Channel modified by extending 1,150 feet upstream and downstream from mouth to Atlantic Intracoastal Waterway. Project authorized for the Phase I design memorandum stage of Advanced Engineering and Design. Deepening 35 foot channel to 40 feet (42 feet in the ocean bar and entrance channel) from the 42 foot ocean contour to Goose Creek, a distance of 27.1 miles, construction of one turning basin, modification of existing turning basins, deepening and modification of the anchorage basin, deepening Shipyard River to 38 feet, maintain the Wando River Channel to 35 feet at Federal expense and the deepening of this channel to 40 feet if economically justified. Annual Report 1878, pp. 553-572. H.D. 288, 62nd Cong., 2nd sess. H.D. 1946, 64th Cong., 2nd sess, pt.1, pp. 21-29, 57, 58, and 64-68. H.D. 249, 69th Cong. 1st sess. H.D. 259, 76th Cong., Ist sess. H.D. 156, 77th Cong., 1st sess. S.D. 136, 83rd Cong., 2nd sess.3 H.D. 35, 86th Cong., Ist sess. H.D. 94-436, 94th Cong., 2nd sess. 99th Cong. 2nd sess., P.L. 96-662 7-16 CHARLESTON, SOUTH CAROLINA DISTRICT TABLE 7-B AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION See Sect. in Date of Project and Work Text Authorizing Act Authorized Documents Oct 12, 1996 Aug. 13, 1968 Aug. 17, 1991 Aug. 13, 1968 Jul. 14, 1960 as amended Aug. 5, 1886 Jun. 25, 1910 Mar. 2, 1945 Jun. 30, 1948 Deepening of the entrance channel from 42 ft. deep to 47 ft. deep and the inner channels from 40 ft. deep to 45 ft. deep. Other improvements include realignment/widening of various channels/reaches, construction of a new turning basin opposite the future Daniel Island terminal, construction of a new contraction dike, reconstruction of two existing dikes and removal of a third existing dike. CHARLESTON HARBOR REDIVERSION (FISH LIFT), SC See Cooper River, Charleston Harbor. Modify the fish lift at the Cooper River, Charleston Harbor, SC (Rediversion Project) and monitor operation of the fish lift for two years following such modifications. COOPER RIVER, CHARLESTON HARBOR, SC (ST. STEPHEN PROJECT) Redivert most of the Santee River waters Pinopolis Dam into the lower Santee River through a canal beginning at Lake Moultrie and extending to the Santee River in the vicinity of St. Stephen, South Carolina FOLLY RIVER, SC Consists of stable all-tide channel nine feet deep and 80 feet wide in Folly River and Folly Creek and an entrance channel at Stono Inlet 100 feet wide and eleven feet deep. GEORGETOWN HARBOR, SC Jetties and earthen dike to protect south jetty. Previous project channel dimensions and training wall. 27-foot channel from ocean, including a turning basin in Sampit River. Cutoff and side channel in Sampit River. 104 th Cong. P.L. 104-303 S.D. 88, 90th Cong.,P.L. 90-483 P.L. 102-104 S.D. 88, 90th Cong.,P.L. 90-483 Sec. 107, P.L. 86-645. Authorized by Chief of Engineers, Dec. 23, 1977. Hi. Ex. Doc. 258 48th Cong., 2nd sess., and Annual Report 1885, pp. 1154-1170, and H. Ex. Doc. 117, 50th Cong., 2nd sess., and Annual Report 1889, pp. 1110-1111. H.D. 398, 58th Cong., 2nd sess. and Annual Report 1904, pp. 1591-1605. H.D. 211, 76th Cong., 1st sess. H.D. 21, 81st Cong., Ist sess. 7-17 4. 5. 6. 7. REPORT ON THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 2000 TABLE 7-B AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION See Sect. in � Date of Project and Work Text Authorizing Act Authorized Documents LITTLE RIVER INLET, NC AND SC Mar 2. 1945 Auth. by Senate Public Works Comm. and the House Public Works Comm. on Oct. 12, 1972, under auth. of Sec. 201, P.L. 89-298, 1965 FC Act. Mar. 7, 1974 Provides for an entrance channel twelve feet by 300 feet across the ocean bar; thence ten feet by 90-foot inner channel to the Atlantic Intracoastal Waterway. Authorized emergency dredging operations as the Chief of Engineers determines necessary to maintain channel depths sufficient to permit free and safe movement of vessels until such time as the authorized project is constructed. Sec. 3, P.L. 79-14 H.D. 362, 92nd Cong. H.D. 10203, 93rd Cong., 2nd sess., P.L. 93-251 MURRELLS INLET, SC Mar. 2, 1945 Auth. by the House Comm. on Public Works on Nov. 10, 1971, and the Senate Comm. on Public Works on Nov 18, 1971, under auth. of Sec. 201, P.L. 89-298, 1965 FC Act. Mar. 7, 1974 Provides for an entrance channel twelve feet by 300 feet across the seaward bar, thence ten by 90-foot inner channel to a turning basin at the old Army crash boat dock. Authorized emergency dredging operations as the Chief of Engineers determines necessary to maintain channel depths sufficient to permit free and safe movement of vessels until such time as the authorized project is constructed. Sec. 3, P.L. 79-14 H1.D. 137, 92nd Cong. H.D. 10203, 93rd Cong., 2nd sess., P.L. 93-251 7-18 8. 9. CHARLESTON, SOUTH CAROLINA DISTRICT TABLE 7-B See Sect. in I Text Date of Authorizini Act Project and Work Authorized 10. Sep. 3, 1954 Jul. 25, 1912 Mar. 3, 1925 Jul. 3, 1930 Aug. 30, 1935 Aug. 26, 1937 2 Mar. 2, 1945 Nov. 17, 1986 PORT ROYAL HARBOR, SC A channel from the ocean through Port Royal Sound to Port Royal, SC.; 27 feet deep and 500 feet wide across the ocean bar and in Port Royal Sound for approximately 12.8 miles thence 24 feet deep and 300 feet wide in Beaufort River and Battery Creek for approximately 8.8 miles to and including a turning basin 27 feet deep and 600 feet wide opposite wharf of the SC State Ports Authority. SHIPYARD RIVER, SC Channel depth of 15 feet and width of 100 feet. Deepening of channel to 18 feet from deep water in Cooper River upstream 1-1/16 miles. Channel depths of twelve to twenty feet. 28-feet from Cooper River to Gulf Oil Corp's terminal, and the deepening of the channel above that point to twenty feet from the depth of twelve feet previously authorized without local cooperation. Enlargement of the channel to a depth of 30 feet and a width of 200 feet up to the Gulf Oil Corp's terminal, with a turning basin 30 feet deep at the latter point. Extension of the existing 30-foot channel to vicinity of the Pittsburgh Metallurgical Co. Plant, with a turning basin at the upper end. Deepening to 38 feet under the Charleston Harbor, SC authorization. TOWN CREEK, SC 12. Jul 14, 1960 as amended 16. Jul. 14, 1960 as amended An entrance channel twelve feet deep by 100 feet wide across the ocean bar a distance of 4.0 miles and a channel ten feet deep by 80 feet wide from the mouth of Five Fathom Creek to the Atlantic Intracoastal Waterway, a distance of 6.2 miles. CALABASH CREEK, BRUNSWICK CTY, NC Deepen navigation channel. Sec. 107, P.L. 86-645. Authorized by Chief of Engineers, Feb. 12, 1974. Sec. 107, P.L. 86-645 Authorized by Chief of Engineers. 7-19 AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION H.D. 469, 81st Cong., 2nd sess. S.D. 350, 62nd Cong., 2nd sess. H.D. 288, 68th Cong., 1st sess. Rivers & Harbors Committee Doc. 13, 71st Cong., 2nd sess. Rivers & Harbors Committee Doc. 43, 73th Cong., 2nd sess. Rivers & Harbors Committee Doc. 38, 75th Cong., 1st sess. H.D. 93, 79th Cong., 1st sess. 99th Cong. 2nd sess., P.L. 96-662 Documents 11. Ax wswxa- -N .. tz --- w-- REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 2000 TABLE 7-B AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION See Sect. in '" Date of Project and Work Text Authorizing Act Authorized Documents Nov. 28, 1990 Jun. 30, 1948 Jul. 24, 1946 Jul. 24, 1946 Jul. 24, 1946 Nov. 17, 1986 Nov. 17, 1986 17. P.L. 101-640 Sec. 205, P.L. 80-858. MYRTLE BEACH, SC Storm damage reduction for periodic nourishment over the 50-year life of the project. TURKEY CREEK, SUMTER COUNTY, SC Reduce flooding by construction of 3,200 feet of channel modification; improvement of a crossing by excavating 170 cubic yards of material from between the creek and a tributary; and enlargement of a railroad culvert. SHORE DRIVE, SINGLETON SWASH, MYRTLE BEACH, SC Abate erosion and protect Shore Drive. CASTLE PINCKNEY, CHARLESTON, SC Abate erosion and protect Castle Pinckney. HUNTINGTON ISLAND STATE PARK WASTE TREATMENT PLANT, SC Abate erosion and construct a dike to protect a waste treatment facility. CAPE MARSH MANAGEMENT AREA, SANTEE COASTAL RESERVE, CHARLESTON CTY, SC Raise 35,000 linear feet of existing dike to prevent overtopping by spring high tides and installation of three water control structures to enhance water level management within the wildlife impoundments. MILLER CORNER PHRAGMITES CONTROL, SC Reduce the size of existing stands of phragmites and control its reemergence and spread. 1/ Included in Public Works Administration Program September 6, 1933. 2/ Included in Emergency Relief Administration Program May 28, 1935. 3/ Contains latest published maps. 4/ Inactive. 5/ Completed under previous projects. 6/ For national defense. 7-20 Sec. 14, P.L.79-526. Authorized by Chief of Engineers, Apr. 24, 1998. Sec. 14, P.L. 79-526. Authorized by Chief of Engineers, Mar. 23, 1999. Sec. 14, P.L.79-526. Authorized by Chief of Engineers, Apr. 21, 1999. Sec. 1135(b), P.L. 96-662 Sec. 1135(b), P.L. 96-662 23. 25. 26. 27. 30. 31. CHARLESTON, SOUTH CAROLINA DISTRICT TABLE 7-C OTHER AUTHORIZED NAVIGATION PROJECTS (See Section 14 of Text) For Last Full Report See Annual Report For Construction Cost to Sep. 30, 2000 Operation & Maintenance Adams Creek, SC Aquatic Plant Control, NC and SC 1/ Archers Creek, SC Ashley River, SC Brookgreen Gardens, SC Edisto River, SC Great Pee Dee River, SC Jeremy Creek, SC Lynches River and Clark Creek, SC Mingo Creek, SC Salkahatchie River, SC Santee River, NC & SC Village Creek, SC Waccamaw River, NC and SC Wateree River, SC I Pilot Program S2 Excludes $7,800 contributed funds OTHER AUTHORIZED SHORE TABLE 7-D PROTECTION PROJECTS (See Section 18 of the Text) For Last Full Report See Annual Report For Construction Cost to Sep. 30, 2000 Operation & Maintenance Battery Pringle, SC Folly Beach, SC Hunting Island Beach, SC Completed Completed Completed 1996 1996 1984 $99,200 1 $10,652,458 2 $2,872,717 3 1 Excludes $53,379 contributed funds 2 Excludes $1,059,742 contributed funds and $819,693 credit for LERRD's 3 Excludes $1,249,336 contributed funds 7-21 Project Status Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed 2/ 1978 1968 1914 1955 1992 1938 1950 1996 1982 1950 1896 1950 1985 1978 1940 $125,697 379.680 20,646 260,996 94,700 33,103 183,712 49,987 9,500 29,050 15,841 99,750 26,500 262,814 60,000 $29,143 589,436 4,011 2,887 271,098 116,175 85,595 8,575 1,936 182,469 111,314 284,347 154,559 jo ect Status ----- -- ---- ~ _ REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 2000 TABLE 7-E OTHER AUTHORIZED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS (See Section 21 of Text) For Last Full Report Cost to Sep. 30, 2000 See Annual Operation & Project Status Report for Construction Maintenance Buck Creek, NC & SC 1 Cow Castle Creek, SC l Cowpen Swamp, SC 1 Crabtree Swamp, SC 1 Eagle Creek, SC 1 Edisto River, SC 1 Edisto River, North Fork, SC I Edisto River, Vicinity Canadays Landing, SC 1 Gapway Swamp, SC I Kingstree Branch, Williamsburg County, SC 1 Leith Creek, NC 13 Little Sugar Creek, NC 1 2 Old Field Swamp, NC 1 2 Reddies River Lake, NC 3 Reedy River, SC 1 Roaring River, Wilkes County, NC 1 3 Saluda River, SC 1 Sawmill Branch, SC 1 Scotts Creek, SC 1 Shot Pouch Creek, Sumter Co., SC I Simmons Bay Creek, NC 2 Simpson Creek, SC 1 Socastee Creek, SC 1 . Todd Swamp, SC 1 Turkey Creek, Sumter County, SC 1 Waccamaw R. & Seven Creeks, NC & SC 1 2 Wilson Branch, Chesterfield County, SC 1 I Authorized by Chief of Engineers 2 Transferred to Wilmington District in 1980 3 Transferred to Wilmington District in 1984 Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Discontinued Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Discontinued Phase I Only Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed ' 1970 1985 1960 1969 1986 1947 1969 1958 1969 1978 1982 1969 1979 1980 19.74 1978 1963 1971 1988 1971 1963 1957 1996 1964 1974 1961 1985 $298,167 250,000 18,679 97,000 1,245,063 6,379 127,660 3,160 339,197 247,242 430,951 86,600 763,022 985,800 4,500 370,000 99,000 248,605 545,000 77,400 186,435 81,000 1,110,156 29,000 319,669 67,821 277.111 MULTIPLE PURPOSE PROJECTS TABLE 7-F INCLUDING POWER (See Section 28 of the Text) For Last Full Report Cost to Sep. 30, 2000 See Annual Operation & Project Status Report for Construction Maintenance Cooper River Seismic Modification, SC Completed 1992 $29,400,000 1 I Excludes S770,000 for credits to Santee Cooper 7-22 - - ", .. r r .r r+ r r . " w" r r + i .r " + .r .r " wr TABLE 7-G CHARLESTON, SOUTH CAROLINA DISTRICT DEAUTHORIZED PROJECTS For Last Full Report See Date Federal Contribute Annual Report and Funds d Funds Project for Authority Expended Expended Abbapoola Creek, SC Beresford Creek, SC Charleston Hbr (Anchorage Basin), SC 1954 Congaree River, SC Little Pee Dee River, SC Lumber River, SC & NC Myrtle Beach (Anchorage Basin), SC 1954 Reedy River, Greenville, SC 1971 Russell Creek, SC 5 Aug 77 Section 12, P.L. 93-251 5 Aug 77 Section 12, P.L. 93-251 17 Nov 86 Section 1002, P.L. 99-662 5 Aug 77 Section 12, P.L. 93-251 5 Aug 77 Section 12, P.L. 93-251 5 Aug 77 Section 12, P.L. 93-251 17 Nov 86 Section 1002, P.L. 99-662 17 Nov 86 Section 1002, P.L. 99-662 5 Aug 77 Section 12, P.L. 93-251 7-23 $1,330,000 $ 4,500 I REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 2000 OTHER AUTHORIZED TABLE 7-H STREAMBANK EROSION CONTROL PROJECTS (See Section 24 of the Text) For Last Full Report Cost to Sep. 30, 2000 See Annual Operation & Project Status Report for Construction Maintenance Cooper River, Pompion Hill Chapel, SC Indian Bluff, SC Drayton Hall, SC Pinopolis Dam, SC Santee Dam, SC SC DOT Bridges, SC Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed 1 100% Federal cost 2 Excludes $41,032 contributed funds 3 Excludes $62,574 contributed funds 4 Excludes $143,747 contributed funds 5 Excludes $139,880 contributed funds 6 Excludes $54,467 contributed funds 7-24 1987 1998 1994 1996 1996 1998 $185,000 1/ $123,124 2/ $187,800 3/ $431,040 4/ $418,237 5/ $163,423 61 CHARLESTON, SOUTH CAROLINA DISTRICT TABLE 7-I ACTIVE GENERAL INVESTIGATIONS (See Section 34 of Text) ITEM FISCAL YEAR COSTS SHORELINE PROTECTION (CATEGORY 130) Pawleys Island $ 59,598 SPECIAL STUDIES (CATEGORY 140) Charleston Estuary $ 36,980 Yadkin-Pee Dee Rivers Watershed, SC 22,967 COMPREHENSIVE STUDIES (CATEGORY 150) Santee, Cooper, & Congaree Rivers $ 5,695 REVIEW OF AUTHORIZED PROJECT (CATEGORY 160) AIWW, SC $ 388,651 MISCELLANEOUS ACTIVITIES (CATEGORY 170) Special Investigations $ 27,971 FERC Licensing Activities 95 Interagency Water Resources Development 13,910 COORDINATION STUDIES WITH OTHER AGENCIES (CATEGORY 180) Cooperation With Other Water Resource Agencies $ 929 Planning Assistance to States (Coordination) 19,615 Planning Assistance to States (Cost-shared Studies) 130,194 TOTAL (CATEGORY 100) $ 705,676 FLOOD PLAIN MGMT SERVICES (CATEGORY 250) Flood Plain Management Services 45,180 Technical Services 74,449 Quick Responses 5,126 SC TIES Restudy 49,260 SS-Richland County, SC 30,818 SS-Riverine Model 162 SS-Coastal Flood Analysis, SC 74,999 liYDROLOGIC STUDIES (CATEGORY 260) 1Hydrologic Studies 3,525 TOTAL (CATEGORY 200) $ 283,519 TOTAL GENERAL INVESTIGATIONS $ 989,195 7-25 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 2000 TABLE 7-J FLOOD CONTROL WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION Preauthorization Studies (See Section 22 of Text) Study Identification Section Fiscal Year Costs Bolton Branch, Camden, SC ,, 205 $ 3,400 Brushy Creek, Greenville, SC 205 44,808 Camp Branch, Lake City, SC 205 4,949 Coordination Account 205 15,991 Cow Castle, SC 205 2,471 Crooked Creek, Bennettsville, SC 205 18,961 Gilder Creek, Greenville County, SC 205 2,600 Goose Creek, SC 205 6 Johnson's Branch, Willamsburg County, SC 205 19,047 Pleasant Meadow Swamp, Loris, SC 205 24,235 Rocky Branch, Greenville County, SC 205 33,748 Shadowmoss Creek, Charleston, SC 205 974 St. Andrews Canal, Charleston County, SC 205 49,821 Turkey Creek, Berkeley County, SC 205 24,347 Waccamaw River, SC 205 12,949 7-26 TABLE 7-K CHARLESTON, SOUTH CAROLINA DISTRICT INSPECTION OF COMPLETED WORKS (See Section 20 of Text) Project Date of Inspection Battery Pringle, SC Cow Castle Creek, SC Drayton Hall, SC Eagle Creek, SC Folly Beach, SC Garden City/Surfside Reach, SC Indian Bluff, SC Kingstree Branch, SC Murphy Island, SC Myrtle Beach, SC North Myrtle Beach, SC Pinopolis Dam, SC Pompion Hill, SC Santee Dam, SC Sawmill Branch, SC Shore Drive, Singleton Swash, SC Scotts Creek, SC SC DOT Bridges, SC Socastee Creek, SC Turkey Creek, SC Wilson Branch, SC March 2000 March 2000 February 2000 March 2000 April 2000 March 2000 March 2000 March 2000 March 2000 March 2000 March 2000 March 2000 February 2000 March 2000 March 2000 March 2000 April 2000 August 2000 March 2000 March 2000 March 2000 TABLE 7-L OTHER AUTHORIZED ENVIRONMENTAL PROJECTS (See Section 29 of the Text) Project Status Murphy Island, SC (Section 1135) 1 Excludes $33,631 Contributed Funds and $100,277 for Work-in-kind credit Completed For Last Full Report See Annual Report for 1998 Construction Cost to Sep. 30, 2000 Operation & Maintenance $241,723 1/ 7-27 _ .~--- ---~~~I-----~--~ -- ",- ---- ------- -= .. -- ".... SAVANNAH, GA, DISTRICT* The District comprises drainage basins that flow into the Atlantic Ocean between Port Royal Sound, SC, and Cumberland Sound, GA and FL, and includes the Atlantic Intracoastal Waterway between these points. This area covers the headwaters of the Savannah River in southwestern North Carolina, eastern Georgia, and a small portion of northeastern Florida. IMPROVEMENTS Navigation 1. Atlantic Intracoastal Waterway between Norfolk, VA and St. Johns River, FL ....... 8-2 2. Brunswick Harbor, GA. .................. 8-2 3. Lower Savannah River Basin, GA & SC.......8-3 4. Savannah Harbor, GA.............. . .... 8-3 5. Savannah River Below Augusta, GA........ 8-5 6. Reconnaissance and Condition Surveys...... 8-5 7. Other Authorized Navigation Projects....... 8-5 8. Navigation Work Under Special Authorization ......................... 8-5 Beach Erosion Control 9. Tybee Island, GA................ ... .8.-5 Flood Control 10. Inspection of Completed Flood Control Projects ............................ 8-7 11. Other Authorized Flood Control Projects.... 8-7 12. Flood Control Work Under Special Authorization ................. ...... .8-7 13. Emergency Streambank and Shoreline Protection Under Special Authorization.... 8-7 Environmental Restoration 14. Project Modification to Improve Environment Under Special Authorization... 8-7 15. Aquatic Ecosystem Restoration Under Special Authorization .................. 8-7 Multiple-Purpose Projects Including Power 16. J. Storm Thurmond Dam and Lake, GA & SC (Formerly Clarks Hill Lake).................8-7 17. Hartwell Dam and Lake, GA & SC......... 8-8 18. Richard B. Russell Dam and Lake, GA & SC (Formerly Trotters Shoals Lake, GA & SC)... 8-8 General Investigations 19. Surveys ................... ............ 8-9 20. Coordination With Other Agencies........ 8-9 21. Collection and Study of Basic Data........ 8-9 22. Pre-Construction Engineering and Design (PED) ................... ... 8-9 Miscellaneous 23. Catastrophic Disaster Preparedness Program...................... ........... 8-10 24. Other Programs and Activities............ 8-10 25. Flood Control and Coastal Emergency .... 8-10 26. General Regulatory Functions...... ..... 8-10 27. Rivers and Harbors Contributed Funds..... 8-10 Tables Table 8-A Cost and Financial Statement.........8-11 Table 8-B Authorizing Legislation...... ... 8-14 Table 8-C Other Authorized Navigation Projects........................8-20 Table 8-D Other Authorized Flood Control Projects ......................... 8-21 Table 8-E Savannah River Basin, GA & SC Dams and Lakes ................... 8-22 8-1 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 2000 Navigation 1. ATLANTIC INTRACOASTAL WATERWAY BETWEEN NORFOLK, VA, AND ST. JOHNS RIVER, FL (SAVANNAH DISTRICT) Location. This 161-mile section of waterway connects Port Royal Sound, SC, with Cumberland Sound, GA and FL. (See NOAA charts 11489-11507, formerly Coast and Geodetic Survey Charts 838-841, inclusive.) Previous Projects. (Between Savannah, GA, and Fernandina, FL) For details see pages 1814, 1821-1823 of Annual Report for 1915 and page 585 of Annual Report for 1938. Existing Project. The project provides for a waterway 12 feet deep at mean low water and not less than 90 feet wide between Port Royal Sound, SC, and Savannah, GA; 12 feet deep at mean low water, with widths of 90 feet in land cuts and narrow streams and 150 feet in open waters between Savannah, GA, and Cumberland Sound, GA and FL; and a suitable anchorage basin at Isle of Hope, GA. Mean tidal range between Port Royal, SC, and Cumberland Sound, GA and FL is from 6 to 8 feet with fluctuations from 1.5 to 2.5 feet due to winds and lunar phases. (See Table 8-B for Authorizing Legislation.) Local Cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal Facilities. Exclusive or adequate terminal facilities at port of entry. This improvement serves numerous wharves, some of which are open to the public on equal terms. Facilities are considered ample for existing commerce. Operations and Results During Fiscal Year. Maintenance: The District used Cottrell Engineering Corporation dredges "Richmond" and "Marion" to dredge the waterway during the first two quarters of FY 00. The dredges removed 1,003,568 cubic yards of material at a cost of $1,284,257. Condition at End of Fiscal Year. The main channel of the existing project, completed in 1941, is maintained at 12 feet. The former main channel, now an alternate route through the westerly end of the south channel and northerly end of Wilmington River, will be maintained to a depth of 7 feet mean low water for traffic points north and south of Savannah Harbor. Relocation of the main channel from the Frederica to Mackay Rivers near St. Simons Island, GA, was accomplished under Section 107 of the Continuing Authorities Program after construction of a new bridge for the Torras Causeway. The notice on the final Environmental Impact Statement appeared in the Federal Register October 29, 1976. Total expenditures for the FY amounted to $1,641,128, which included such items as water quality monitoring, project condition surveying, and real estate monitoring. (See Table 8-A for Cost and Financial Statement.) ,'2. BRUNSWICK HARBOR, GA Location. The harbor entrance is 70 statute miles south of the entrance to Savannah Harbor, GA, and 25 statute miles north of the entrance to Femandina Harbor, FL. (See NOAA Chart 11215, formerly Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart 447.) Previous Project. For details see page 1818 of Annual Report for 1915 and page 591 of Annual Report for 1938. Existing Project. The project provides for a stone jetty 4,350 feet long at the entrance to East River and the following channels: 32 feet deep and 500 feet wide across the bar; 30 feet deep and 400 feet wide through St.' Simons Sound, Brunswick River, and East River to the foot of Second Avenue; 30 feet deep and 300 feet wide in Turtle River to the Allied Chemical Company wharf, formerly the Atlantic Refining Company; 30 feet deep and 400 feet in South Brunswick River; 30 feet deep and 400 feet wide in East River from Second Avenue to its confluence with Academy Creek; 24 feet deep and 150 feet wide from St. Simons Sound to the mouth of Mill Creek; and a channel in Terry Creek 20 feet deep and 150 feet wide from St. Simons Sound to the mouth of Mill Creek; and a channel in Terry Creek 10 feet deep and 80 feet wide from its mouth to a point immediately above the wharf of the former Glynn Canning Company. All depths refer to mean low water. Mean tidal range on the bar is 6.5 feet, at the City of Brunswick 7.3, and 7.6 feet at the upper end of the harbor. For further details see Annual Report for 1962. Local Cooperation. Complied with to date. Terminal Facilities. Twenty-six wharves and piers, almost all privately or state (Georgia Ports Authority) owned, have a berthing space of 7,530 linear feet. The Port of Brunswick and the State of Georgia have a transit shed and modem docks with 1,640 feet of berthing space (three general cargo berths) on East River. For further details see Port Series No. 14, Corps of Engineers (revised 2000). Operations and Results During Fiscal Year. Maintenance: The District used Wright Dredging Company, Inc. dredge "Enterprise to dredge the East 8-2 SAVANNAH, GA, DISTRICT River during the first quarter of FY 00. The dredge removed 394,086 cubic yards of material at a cost of $598,978. The District used Manson Construction & Engineering Company during the second quarter in FY 00 to dredge the Bar Channel using the dredge "Newport". The dredge removed 1,227,827 cubic yards of material at a cost of $2,457,977. The District prepared plans and specifications for the FY 00 Brunswick and Savannah Entrance Channel and East River contracts. Operation and Maintenance costs for the FY amounted to $7,032,468, which included such items as water quality monitoring, project condition surveying, and cultural resources monitoring. (See Table 8-A for Cost and Financial Statement.) Condition at End of Fiscal Year. The existing project Was completed in December 1960. General condition of the harbor works is satisfactory, providing maintenance dredging continues. The notice on the Final Environmental Impact Statement appeared in the Federal Register October 3, 1975. Authorized depths were maintained throughout the FY. Total cost for existing completed project to September 30, 2000, is $113,038,077. New Work costs for the FY amounted to $446,633. (See Table 8-A for Cost and Financial Statement.) 3. LOWER SAVANNAH RIVER BASIN, GA & SC Location. The project is located on the Savnnah River between river mile 40.9 and river mile 42.0, approximately 20 river miles above the city of Savannah, GA. The project area itself is located within Effingham County, GA and Jasper County, SC. A portion of the project is within the Federal Savannah National Wildlife Refuge. Existing Project. This environmental restoration project was authorized by a resolution passed on August 1, 1990, by the U.S. House of Representatives Committee on Public Works and Transportation. The total Project cost approved is $4,222,000. The recommended Plan includes a large partial diversion structure at cut #3, a plug in bend #3 below the mouth of Bear Creek, a ealignment and restoration of the mouths of Bear and Mill Creeks, which provides improved flows into both creeks The Project Cooperation Agreement (PCA) was executed and the construction phase officially began in FY 00. Local Cooperation. The cost share is 75% Federal and 25% non-Federal. New Work costs for the FY amounted to $61,085. (See Table 8-A for Cost and Financial Statement.) 4. SAVANNAH HARBOR, GA Location. Harbor entrance is 75 statute miles south of Charleston, SC, and 70 miles north of Brunswick Harbor, GA. (See NOAA Chart 11512, formerly Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart 440.) Previous Project. For details see page 1810 of Annual Report for 1915 and page 578 of Annual Report for 1938. Existing Project. The project provides for a channel 44 feet deep and 600 feet wide across the ocean bar about 7.0 miles long; 42 feet deep and 500 feet wide to the vicinity of Garden City (Georgia Ports Authority terminal) and 36 feet deep and 400 feet wide to the vicinity of the Savannah Foods and Industries, Inc., about 22.6 miles; and 30 feet deep and 200 feet wide to a point 1,500 feet below the Houlihan Highway Bridge, about 1.5 miles, for a total length of 31.1 miles; Fig Island and Marsh Island Turning Basins 34 feet deep by 900 feet wide by 1,000 feet long in the vicinity of the Georgia Kaolin Terminal and East Coast Terminal, respectively; Kings Island Turning Basin 42 feet deep by 1,500 feet wide by 1,600 feet long in the vicinity of the Garden City Terminal of the Georgia Ports Authority; Argyle Island and Port Wentworth Turning Basins 30 feet deep by 600 feet long near Savannah Foods and Industries, Inc. terminal and at the extreme upper limit of the project near the Stone-Smurfit Pulp and Paper Company, respectively; and a 1,200 foot long by 1,050 foot wide by 40 foot deep Oyster Bed Island Turning Basin in the vicinity of Georgia Ports Authority Lash Facility. The project also provides for sediment control works consisting of a tide gate structure across Back River; a sediment basin 40 feet deep, 600 feet wide; about 2 miles long, with an entrance channel 38 to 40 feet deep and 300 feet wide; a drainage canal across Argyle Island 15 feet deep and 300 feet wide; control works and canals for supplying fresh water to the Savannah National Wildlife Refuge; and facilities to mitigate damages to presently improved areas other than refuge lands. Mean range of tide is 7.9 feet at the upper end of the harbor and 6.9 feet at the lower end. Extreme ranges are about 11.1 and 10.7 feet, respectively. The tide gate structure across Back River was taken out of operation as of March 1991 to decrease salinity levels in the wildlife refuge. The drainage canal across Argyle Island, which was part of the original tide gate project, was closed as of April 1992 by the New Cut closure contract done by a Section 1135 program. The cost of 8-3 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 2000 this contract was $1,531,847. Local Cooperation. Local interests must provide suitable disposal areas and retaining dikes for construction and future maintenance of the project. The Chatham County Board of Commissioners, as local assurers, have met all requirements to date. Terminal Facilities. Sixty-one piers and wharves adequately serve existing waterborne commerce of the port. These facilities, with use of dolphins, have a combined berthing space of 46,930 linear feet at mean low water. Included in the berthing space are six container berths with 271 acres of handling area. All have railway and highway connections. Lash Facilities are located at the entrance to the harbor and have depth ranging up to 38 feet mean low water. The berthing space of Lash facilities is included in the above combined berthing space. For further details, see Port Series No. 14, Corps of Engineers (revised 1982) and Annual Report for 1990. Savannah Harbor Deepening. The Savannah Harbor Deepening project was authorized by WRDA 92 on October 31, 1992. The LCA was signed with the local sponsor, the Georgia Ports Authority, on March 2, 1993. Because Federal appropriations would be no earlier than FY 95, the LCA was written and negotiated to allow the local sponsor to up-front the construction funds upon project authorization and the signing of the LCA. The first phase contracts for the Savannah Harbor Deepening project was awarded in March 1993 for the outer bar channel from Station 0+000 to -60+000 and the lower inner harbor channel from Station 0+000 to 70+000 for $7,298,876 and $8,748,883, respectively. The second phase, that requiring significant real estate acquisition, was awarded in July 1993 from Station 70+000 to 103+000, for $4,675,376. The total project scope entails the deepening of the harbor by 4 feet, from -38 ft mlw to -42 ft mlw in the inner harbor and from -40 ft mlw to -44 ft mlw in the bar channel, for a total of 31 miles of harbor improvement. Construction was initiated with the Inner Harbor contract (0+000 to 70+000) on May 1, 1993, and was completed on April 21, 1994. The authorized cost for the Savannah Harbor Deepening project is $50,050,000. The current estimated cost for the project is $28,107,635. New Work costs for the FY amounted to $6,246. (See Table 8-A for Cost and Financial Statement.) In the FY 95 appropriations bill, Congress provided $11,585,000 as reimbursement to the local sponsor for the Federal share of the NED plan. The appropriations bill also provided the $2,083,000 of those funds be provided for the cost shared Savannah Riverwalk Extension. The PCA for the Savannah Riverwalk Extension Project was executed on July 21, 1995. The final cost estimate for the Savannah Riverwal project is $3,532,499, of which the Federal share was fixed at. $2,083,000 and the City of Savannah's share was $1,449,499. Work was completed as scheduled on May S24,1996 and a dedication ceremony took place on June 10, 1996. In November 1996, the Georgia Ports Authority received $7,500,000 towards their reimbursement of the Federal share of the project and the balance of the Federal share of $1,500,000 has been forwarded now that all the contracts have been closed out and the final audits completed. Savannah Harbor Expansion. The Georgia Ports Authority completed the Feasibility Study and Tier I Environment Impact Statement (EIS) for the Savannah Harbor Expansion project in August 1998. Based on this study, WRDA 1999, gave a conditional authorization for construction. The conditions are, the completion of a Chiefs Report and the completion of a Tier II EIS and General Reevaluation Report (GRR). In addition, this Tier II EIS and GRR must obtain the approvals from the Secretary of the Army, the Director of the Environmental Protection Agency, and the Secretary of Commerce and Interior. The Georgia Ports Authority is currently underway with the additional Environmental Studies as required by the authorization. These studies are scheduled for completion in FY 2003. The authorization calls for the Savannah Harbor to be deepened as much as 6 feet, from the present -42 feet mlw to as deep as -48 feet at a first cost (October 1997 price levels) of $229,527,000. Operations and Results During Fiscal Year. Maintenance: The District dredged from Station 50+000 to 112+500 using the Norfolk Dredging Company dredge "Pullen" to remove 3,585,318 cubic yards of material at a cost of $6,090,646. In the first quarter of the FY, the District dredged the Sediment Basin and Station 0+000 to 50+000 using the Wright Dredging Company dredges "Enterprise" and "Stuart" to remove 1,019,651 cubic yards of material at a cost of $1,726,425. The District used Manson Construction & Engineering Company during the second quarter of FY 00 to dredge the Bar Channel using the dredges "Newport" and "Bayport". The dredges removed 1,217,331 cubic yards of material at a cost of $2,759,772. The District prepared Plans and Specifications for the FY 00 Brunswick and Savannah Entrance Channel, Station 50+000 to 112+500, and the Sediment Basin and Station 0+000 to 50+000 contracts. 8-4 SAVANNAH, GA, DISTRICT Operation and Maintenance costs for the FY amounted to $13,571,188 which included such items as water quality monitoring, project condition surveying, and cultural resources monitoring. (See Table 8-A for Cost and Financial Statement.) Condition at End of Fiscal Year. Training walls, jetties, and other structures are in fair condition. Authorized channels are maintained by a planned dredging program with work at critical areas when necessary. The notice on the Final Environmental Impact Statement appeared in the Federal Register June 25, 1976. Notices of availability on two Final Supplements to the Environmental Impact Statement appeared in the Federal Register September 25, 1978, and January 8, 1980. 5. SAVANNAH RIVER BELOW AUGUSTA, GA Location. Savannah River is formed by the confluence of the Tugaloo and Seneca Rivers on the boundary line between South Carolina and Georgia. It flows southeast 314 miles, forming the boundary line between two states, and empties into the Atlantic Ocean 16.6 miles below Savannah, GA. (See NOAA Charts 11514 and 11515, formerly Geological Survey maps of South Carolina and Georgia.) Previous Projects. For details see page 1813 of Annual Report for 1915 and page 581 of Annual Report for 1938. Existing Project. The authorized project provides for a channel 9 feet deep and 90 feet wide (at ordinary summer flow of 5,800 second-feet at Augusta, GA) from the upper end of the Savannah Harbor to the head of navigation at Augusta, above the 13th Street Bridge (R.M. 202.6), a total distance of about 181 miles. A lock and dam is located approximately 15 miles below the upper limit of the project at New Savannah Bluff. Improvement is to be obtained by construction of contraction works, closure of cutoffs, bank protection, dredging, removal of snags, over hanging trees and Wrecks, and open-river regulation. Mean tidal variation at the mouth of the river is 7 feet. Freshet variation above the normal pool level (elevation 114.5 mean sea level) of New Savannah Bluff Lock and Dam at mile 187 is ordinarily about 13 feet with an extreme of 34 feet. Due to lack of commercial use, the river has not been dredged since FY 79. Local Cooperation. Complied with to date. Terminal Facilities. The only water terminals served by this improvement are at Augusta, Sylvania, and at or near Savannah. Augusta provided a municipal dock valued at $50,000 and Georgia Ports Authority constructed a state port at Augusta, GA, costing about $418,000. These facilities were expanded in 1965 at an additional cost of about $250,000. These are supplemented by natural landings along the river and extensive facilities at Savannah. Operations and Results During Fiscal Year. In general, open-channel works are in good condition. The notice on the Final Environmental Impact Statement appeared in the Federal Register February 18, 1977. There were no dredging projects during this fiscal year. Operation and Maintenance costs for the FY amounted to $183,806. (See Table 8-A for Cost and Financial Statement.) 6. RECONNAISSANCE AND CONDITION SURVEYS Reconnaissance and Condition Surveys were conducted in FY 00 on the following projects: AIWW Brunswick Harbor Savannah Harbor 7. OTHER AUTHORIZED NAVIGATION PROJECTS (See Table 8-C.) 8. NAVIGATION WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION Navigation activities pursuant to Section 107, Public Law 86-645 (preauthorization). Expenditures in FY 00 totaled $64,226. Coordination account: $7,400; Port Wentworth, GA: $56,826. Mitigation of shore damages activities pursuant to Section 111, Public Law 90-483 (preauthorization). Tybee Island, GA incurred costs in FY 00 of $33,273. Beach Erosion Control 9. TYBEE ISLAND, GA Location. Tybee Island is located directly south of the Savannah River entrance, about 17 miles east of the City of Savannah, GA. (See NOAA 11512, 11513, and 11509, formerly U. S. Coast and Geodetic Survey Charts Numbers 440, 1240, and 1241, and on maps included in HD 92-105, 92nd Cong.) The only portion of the island that has developed is bounded on the north by the south channel of the Savannah River, on the east 8-5 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 2000 by the Atlantic Ocean, and on the south and west by Tybee Creek and other small tidal streams. This area, hereinafter referred to as "Tybee Island," is occupied by the city of Tybee Island, GA. The ocean face of this area has a wide sandy beach. Tybee Island is about 3.5 miles long from its northerly tip to the mouth of Tybee Creek with an average width of about 0.5 miles. Behind the beach lies a line of sand dunes, a number of which have been removed during the years to make room for improvements and for various other reasons. Those that remain are from 10 to 20 feet high. The ground elevation west of the dunes is from 10 to 18 feet and slopes westward to the salt marsh. Existing Project. The Water Resources Development Act of 1976 authorized a Project Plan of Improvement for an 800-foot rock groin at the north end of the island, with a 225-foot tie-in to high ground. An additional 1,200-foot extension of this groin is deferred, as are two additional intermediate groins (480 feet long); these would be added at a later date, if needed. The plan also provided for the initial restoration of approximately 13,300 feet of beach, from the vicinity of 18th Street to the terminal groin located at the northern end of the island. Periodic nourishment is authorized to maintain suitable beach dimensions. In 1981, the plan was modified to add a groin at the south end and modification and rehabilitation of the north rock groin. Local Cooperation. Local interests must: (a) contribute in cash the required percentage of the first cost (including costs for construction, engineering and design, and administration; and excluding the cost of lands, easements, rights-of-way and relocation) of all items of work to be provided by the Corps of Engineers. The local contribution is presently estimated at 39.9 percent to be paid in a lump sum prior to start of construction or in installments prior to the start of pertinent work items in accordance with construction schedules as required by the Chief of Engineers, the final apportionment of cost to be made after the actual costs have been determined; (b) provide maintenance and repair of the groins, and provide (after the first 10 years of project life) periodic nourishment of the restored beach as may be required to serve the intended purpose during the life of the project; (c) provide without cost to the United States all lands, easements, rights-of-way, and relocations required for construction and subsequent nourishment of the project; (e) control water pollution to the extent necessary to safeguard the health of bathers; and (f) provide, without cost to the United States, access and facilities necessary for realization of the public benefits upon which Federal participation is based, and maintain continued public use of the beach and administer it for public use during the life of the project, and provide further the construction on the project shall not be started until local interests furnish lands for beach access and parking, satisfactory to the Chief of Engineers, for the entire project limits. Condition at End of Fiscal Year. In January 1987, the South Groin contract was completed at a cost of $607,392. In February 1987, the first periodic renourishment contract was awarded, calling for the placement of approximately 1 million cubic yards of ,.sand on two reaches of the island; the south end from the mouth of Tybee Creek to 14th Street, and the north end from the North terminal groin to about 6th Street. The contract was completed in May 1987, at a contract cost of $1,988,843. A Beach Monitoring Program was performed for three years to monitor the performance of the design. The Local Sponsor has invested over $200,000 in additional funds for the implementation of a dune building program for the North and South ends of the island. New Work costs for the FY amounted to $3,992,265. (See Table 8-A for Cost and Financial Statement.) A reevaluation study under Section 934 WRDA 86 was initiated in 1990 for the Tybee Island Beach Erosion Control Project. The purpose of the study was to determine if the authorized Tybee Island Beach Erosion Control Project should be extended to a project life of 50 years, and determine if the Federal Government should continue to participate in the project. The study used current Federal policy and economic guidelines to evaluate the economic and environmental feasibility of additional periodic beach nourishment. The study was completed in October 1994. Approval of the report authorized continued Federal participation in the project for the remainder of the project's 50-year life and was approved in June 1995. The District received a total of $5.7 million Federal funds in FY 97, 98 and 99 for construction of the recommended project. The city ofTybee Island, GA the local sponsor, obtained $3.8 million for project construction. The total project cost estimate is $9.6 million. A study to determine if the South Tip of the island and the Back River area up to Horse Pen Creek should be added to the authorized project was completed in November 1997, approved by HQUSACE in August 1998 and authorized in the Water Resources Development Act of 1996. The project, now constructed, included: * Renourishing 13,200 feet of oceanfront beach between north and south Federal terminal groins to provide minimum 124-foot wide beach at high tide. * Constructing rock groin field along 1,800 feet of Back River Beach. * Restoring the beach along Back River Beach. In September 1999, construction of the Back River Beach groins began and the associated beach renourishment was completed in July 2000. 8-6 SAVANNAH, GA, DISTRICT Flood Control 10. INSPECTION OF COMPLETED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS Expenditures for the FY amounted to $66,503. (See Table 8-A&D.) 11. OTHER AUTHORIZED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS (See Table 8-D) 12. FLOOD CONTROL WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION These Flood Damage Reduction activities are accomplished under the authority of Section 205, Flood Control Act of 1948 (Public Law 858, 80th Congress) as amended. During FY 00 a total of $170,278 was spent on preauthorization flood damage reduction studies. Study efforts during FY 00 were as follows: Harmon Canal: $159,635. 13. EMERGENCY STREAMBANK AND SHORELINE PROTECTION UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION In FY 00, costs were incurred for Section 14, Coordination Account: $10,397. Environmental Restoration 14* PROJECT MODIFICATION TO IMPROVE ENVIRONMENT UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION These projects are accomplished under the authority of Section 1135, Water Resources Development Act of 1986 (Public Law 99-662) as amended. During FY 00 COsts were incurred as follows: Coordination Account: $3,733 and Initial Appraisals: $4,246. Environmental Study efforts were as follows: Latham River/Jekyll Island, GA: $120,276; Ebenezer Creek Swamp, GA: $6,528; and Back River Restoration, GA: $13,284. Preparation of an Environmental Restoration Report on IEbenezer Creek was initiated. Project Modification eport was completed for Latham River/Jekyll Creek to determine environmental benefits. 15. AQUATIC ECOSYSTEM RESTORATION UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION These projects are accomplished under the authority of Section 206, Aquatic Ecosystem Restoration, Water Resources Development Act of 1996. During FY 00 costs were incurred as follows: Coordination Account: $5,746 and Preliminary Restoration Plans: $14,559. Multiple-Purpose Projects Including Power 16. J. STROM THURMOND DAM AND LAKE, GA AND SC (Formerly Clarks Hill Lake) Location. J. Strom Thurmond Dam and Lake is located at mile 237.7 on the Savannah River about 22 miles upstream from Augusta, GA. (See Geological Survey maps of GA and SC.) Existing Project. The authorized project provides for construction of J. Strom Thurmond Dam and Reservoir, the final cost of which was $79,156,300. The dam has a concrete section 2,282 feet long with a maximum height of 200 feet and a controlled spillway 1,096 feet long. The concrete section is flanked on the west side by a rolled-earth embankment of 2,069 feet and on the east side by a similar embankment of 1,329 feet. The total length of the dam is 5,680 feet. The lake covers 71,100 acres at maximum power pool elevation 330 msl. It provides a total storage capacity of 2,900,000 acre-feet allocated as follows: flood control 390,000 acre-feet; hydropower 1,045,000 acre-feet; dead storage 1,465,000 acre-feet. Seven 40,000- kilowatt generators have a combined generating capacity of 282,000 kilowatts with an average annual output of 700 million kilowatt-hours of electrical energy. Local Cooperation. None required. Operations and Results During Fiscal Year. Net generations of electric energy for the period was 470,506 megawatt-hours, most of which was delivered to the Southeastern Power Administration. Cumulative flood damage prevented through FY 00 was $29,372,744. Maintenance: Operation and Maintenance costs for the FY amounted to $10,116,982. (See Table 8-A for Cost and Financial Statement.) The notice of availability on the Final Environmental Impact Statement on J. Strom Thurmond Dam and Reservoir 8-7 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 2000 Operation and Maintenance appeared in the December 18, 1981 Federal Register. In FY 00, 6,859,800 persons visited the facility. Condition at End of Fiscal Year. Construction is complete except for providing additional recreational development. Major Rehabilitation. The J. Strom Thurmond Powerplant was included as a project in the Major Rehabilitation Program in 1996. An Evaluation Report was approved in July 1994. Appropriations were provided in the FY 96 Energy and Water Bill in November 1996. Current estimate is $69,700,000. All eight contracts have been awarded. Current project cost estimate remains at $69,700,000. Project completion date is September 2004. Currently six of the eight contracts have been completed in FY 00 with two more scheduled for completion in FY 2003 and 2004. Major Rehabilitation costs for the FY amounted to $9,187,982. (See Table 8-A for Cost and Financial Statement.) 17. HARTWELL DAM AND LAKE, GA AND SC Location. Hartwell Dam and Lake is on the Savannah River 305 miles above its mouth and 89 miles upstream from Augusta, GA (See Geological Survey maps of GA and SC.) Existing Project. The dam is a concrete gravity-type structure 1,900 feet long with a maximum height of 204 feet and a controlled spillway 480 feet in length. The concrete section is flanked on the east and west abutments by earth embankments totaling 13,362 feet in length and by a saddle dike 2,590 feet long also on the west side. Total length of the dam is 17,852 feet. At maximum conservation pool elevation of 660 feet the lake covers 55,950 acres. Total capacity of the lake is 2,843,000 acre-feet of storage allocated as follows: flood control - 293,000 acre-feet; hydropower - 1,416,000 acre-feet; dead storage - 1,134,000 acre-feet. Four 66,000 kilowatt generators having a generating capacity of 264,000 kilowatts were installed initially with provisions for a future unit. Following rehabilitation, the capacity will be 342,000 kilowatts. A fifth 80,000 kilowatt generating unit has been installed which increased the rated capacity to 422,000 kilowatts. Local Cooperation. None required. Operations and Results During Fiscal Year. Net generation of electrical energy for the period amounted to 278,957,500 kilowatt-hours, all of which was marketed by the Southeastern Power Administration. Cumulative flood damage prevented through FY 00 is $13,729,334. Maintenance: Operation and Maintenance costs for the FY amounted to $10,079,228. (See Table 8-A for Cost and Financial Statement.) The notice on the Final Environmental Impact Statement on the operation and maintenance of Hartwell Dam and Lake appeared in the Federal Register on August 21, 1978. Approximately 9,598,800 persons visited the lake in FY 00. , Major Rehabilitation. The Hartwell Powerplant Major Rehabilitation project was approved by HQUSACE, and was included in the FY 96 budget. The project scope includes the rewinding of the first four generators, the replacement of the transformers, the refurbishment of the turbine water passageways, and the replacement of key electrical/mechanical peripheral equipment and the replacement/refurbishment of the four older headgates. The fully funded cost for the recommended plan is $26,000,000. All five contracts have been awarded and the first two completed in FY 00. It is currently scheduled for completion in September 2000. Major Rehabilitation costs for the FY amounted to $5,909,315. 18. RICHARD B. RUSSELL DAM AND LAKE, GA AND SC (Formerly Trotters Shoals Lake, GA and SC) Location. Richard B. Russell Dam is located on the Savannah River 275.1 miles above its mouth, 29.9 miles below Hartwell Dam, and about 37.4 miles above J. Strom Thurmond Dam (formerly Clarks Hill Darn). (See NOAA Survey maps of GA and SC.) Existing Project. The authorized project provides for construction of Richard B. Russell Dam and Lake substantially in accordance with the recommendations. The latest approved (FY 99) cost estimate for the project is $620,000,000 of which $466,969,000 is for construction; $28,857,000 for lands and damages; $4,880,000 for cultural resources; and $124,174,000 for engineering/design, supervision/administration, and all project studies, including environmental. Approval was received in January 1977 to include minimum provisions for pumped storage. A Feasibility Report and Final Environmental Impact Statement to address the installation and operation of four 75 MW reversible pump-turbines were prepared in 1979 with the Record of Decision signed in August 1980. The Richard B. Russell Fish and Wildlife Mitigation Plan was completed in 1981, approved by the Assistant Secretary of the Army (Civil Works) in September 1982, and the provisions are being implemented. Since 1986, the District has conducted comprehensive Fishery studies in the Russell tailrace and J. Stron Thurmond Lake (formerly Clarks lill Lake) 8-8 SAVANNAH, GA, DISTRICT downstream. In addition, the District conducted water quality studies, hydraulic modeling, and an evaluation of various fish protection measures associated with hydro- electric projects. The results of these study efforts have been used to evaluate the need to develop fish protection at the Richard B. Russell Project associated with pumped storage operations. This evaluation is presented in a supplement to the final Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) on pumped storage. The Record-of-Decision (ROD) was signed September 1991. Installation of pumped storage is complete; final Phase III environmental testing was completed in October 1996. The Phase III Environmental Report and its Interagency Review was completed in August 1997. The District has completed the NEPA Documentation Phase and has also completed discussions with the resource agencies in attempting to resolve issues. SAS has reached an agreement with SCDNR on operational measures and general mitigation package. The Federal Court injunction is still in place prohibiting commercial operation of pumped storage. The remaining issue was that SC insisted on a consent order for commercial operations. COE could not accept this condition and attempted to resolve this with a Memorandum of Agreement (MOA) in addition to the NEPA Documentation. SCDNR did not accept the MOA. DOJ/USACE request for summary judgement and oral arguments were presented in the Charleston, SC U.S. District Court on October 17, 2000, requesting release from the injunction to commercially operate this 320 mw addition. The case is on the court's 6-month calendar and we expect a decision in the Apr/May 2001 time frame. All cost shared recreation is complete except for work planned in the McCalla Peninsula with SC in FY 2002 and FY 2003. Local Cooperation. Federal Water Project Recreation Act. Public Law 89-72; 79 stat. 213C (for Legislative listory of Act see page 1864). Operations and Results During Fiscal Year. Net generations of electric energy for the period was 319,814 megawatt-hours. Maintenance: Operation and Maintenance costs for the FY amounted to $8,073,013. (See Table 8-A for Cost and Financial Statement.) These funds were for management of lake and power activities. (See Table 8-A for Cost and Financial Statement.) Ap- Proximately 1,093,356 persons visited the lake in FY Condition at End of Fiscal Year. The project is 97 Percent complete. Total cost of project to September 30, 2000, is $706,198,681. New Work costs for the FY amounted to $2,517,471. (See Table 8-A for Cost and Financial Statement.) General Investigations 19. SURVEYS During FY 00, costs of $517,580 were incurred as follows: Navigation Studies: $810; Flood Damage Prevention Studies: $151,546; Special Studies: $276,149; and Miscellaneous Activities: $89,075. 20. COORDINATION WITH OTHER AGENCIES Planning Assistance to States activities are accomplished under the authority of Section 22, Water Resources Development Act of 1974, as amended. During FY 00, a total of $151,050 was expended. 21. COLLECTION AND STUDY OF BASIC DATA During FY 00, under the Flood Plain Management Services Program, flood hazard related information and assistance were provided to state and local governments on a nonreimbursable basis and to other Federal agencies and private persons on a cost recovery basis. Expenditures were as follows: Flood Plain Management Services: $63,015; Technical Services: $103,719; Quick Responses: $8,008; for two Special Studies: $179; Georgia HES Restudy: $71; and Hydrologic Studies: $1,227. 22. PRE-CONSTRUCTION ENGINEERING AND DESIGN (PED) Total PED expenditures in FY 00 were $679,397. Brunswick Harbor, GA: $446,633. Congress added additional funds in FY 00 to continue with the preparation of Plans and Specifications to deepen the harbor from -30 feet mlw to -36 feet mlw (inner harbor) and from -32 feet mlw to -38 feet mlw (bar channel). In addition, a new turning basin will be added in Upper East River. The first set of draft Plans and Specifications were approved on May 26, 2000. Lower Savannah River Basin, GA & SC: $14,836. We completed the PED funded phase. We initiated the construction phase. Savannah Harbor Expansion, GA & SC: $217,928. Congress added funds to initiate Federal Oversight of the project that was formulated by a non-Federal interest 8-9 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 2000 (The Georgia Ports Authority) (GPA) under Section 203 of WRDA 86. The project was conditionally authorized for construction by Congress in the Water Resources Development Act of 1999. The GPA has initiated numerous studies and data gathering under Federal oversight for the required Tier II Environmental Impact Statement. Miscellaneous 23. CATASTROPHIC DISASTER PREPAREDNESS PROGRGAM Catastrophic Disaster Preparedness 1st Army Launch Relief Exercise TOTAL: $ 52,912 9,726 $ 62,638 24. OTHER PROGRAMS AND ACTIVITIES Natural Resources Technical Support Ranger Uniforms TOTAL: $ 6,418 691,960 $ 698,378 25. FLOOD CONTROL AND COASTAL EMERGENCY Disaster Preparedness Program (Code 100) Emergency Operations (Code 200) ACI Purchase/Haul & Install Manufactured Mobile Homes Advance Temp Housing Planning Hurricane Debby Hurricane Floyd Hurricane Irene Hurricane Joyce Rehabilitation (Code 300) Emergency Work for Others: ACI Emergency Power Emergency Power PRT Training EPIS Train-the-Trainer FEMA Generator Maintenance Hurricane Debby Hurricane Floyd Hurricane Floyd Evacuation Study Hurricane Irene Hurricane Jose Hurricane Lenny $409,170 59,283 14,779 29,296 3,566 40,733 3,005 749 22,194 9,736 14,777 1,842 464,629 7,638 104,101 218,429 1,408 5,582 27,378 Logistics PRT Training Temporary Housing Exercise Develop Temporary Housing PRT Training TOTAL: 1,487 5,155 8,658 $1,453,595 26. GENERAL REGULATORY FUNCTIONS Permit Evaluation Enforcement TOTAL: $2,238,886 426,599 $2,665,485 27. RIVERS AND HARBORS CONTRIBUTED FUNDS Contributed funds expended in FY 00 for authorized Federal studies included: Brunswick Harbor, GA $ 191,440 Harmon Canal, GA 59,740 Flood Plain Management Services 1,215 Flood Reduction Study Augusta- Richmond, GA 4,206 Planning Assistance to States (Section 22) 106,522 Savannah Harbor, GA 2,183,377 Savannah Harbor Ecosystem Restoration 90,126 Savannah River Below Augusta, GA 82 Tybee Island, GA 3,617,006 TOTAL: $6,253,714 8-10 SAVANNAH, GA, DISTRICT COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT Funding FY-97 FY-98 FY-99 Atlantic Intracoastal Waterway between Norfolk, VA, and the St. Johns River, FL 2. Brunswick Harbor, GA (Contributed Funds) 3. Lower Savannah River Basin, GA & SC 4. Savannah Harbor, GA (Contributed Funds) 5. Savannah River below Augusta, GA Tybee Island, GA (Contributed Funds) New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost 958,096(1) 958,096(1) 942,000 1,631,000 1,641,000 1,567,808 1,041,826 1,629,109 1,574,274 1,641,128 302,000 106,000 600,000 243,993 134,144 1,185,267 3,384,000 .3,975,000 6,193,000 3,458,485 2,814,984 6,302,619 302,000 88,000 355,081 154,586 2,876 503,000 446,633 7,030,500 7,032,468 35,879,315(2) 35,878,628(2) 6,531,608(3) 7,316,852(3) 106,914,428(4) 105,721,225(4) -2,876 -- 168,000 - 61,085 273,000 14,000 100,000 160,068 156,232 103,276 163,000 217,928 11,478,000 14,458,000 13,047,000 13,581,368 11,580,374 14,448,990 13,091,633 13,571,188 -65,951 5,988 -- 2,984,915 30,540,032 -- 42,375 2,183,377 2,392,000 2,574,000 553,000 1,677,663 2,599,254 1,125,318 966,000 2,000,000 353,876 513,911 2,734,000 407,159 194,000 286,419 3,992,265 -- 3,100,000 700,000 -- 77,015 3,617,006 168,000 61.085 67,627,721(5) 66,949,438(5) 265,726,061(6) 265,853,878(6) 58,206,979 25,655,271 -- 6,790,031(7) - 6,790,031(7) 24,874,771 24,818,591 10,385,249(8) 9,952,013(8) 3,820,430 3,714,451 8-11 TABLE 8-A See Section In Text Project FY-00 Total to Sep 30, 2000 - ~---- - - _ __ -ow-mu 9, REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 2000 COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT Project Funding FY-97 FY-98 FY-99 FY-00 Total to Sep 30, 2000 10. Inspection of Completed Flood Control Projects 16. J. Strom Thurmond Dam and Lake, GA and SC (Formerly Clarks Hill Lake) 17. Hartwell Dam and Lake, GA and SC 18. Richard B. Russell Dam and Lake, GA and SC (Formerly Trotters Shoals) Maint: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost Major Rehab: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost Major Rehab: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost 119,000 139,00 70,000 83,590 118,068 122,012 62,853 66,503 860,917 859,555 -- -- -- - 84,880,940(9) -- - - -- 84,876,004(9) 9,073,100 9,199,000 9,610,000 8,449,500 186,239,845(10) 9,087,385 8,692,823 8,817,216 10,116,982 186,194,893(10) 4,155,000 6,330,000 6,100,000 8,500,000 3,241,306 2,511,084 8,553,066 9,187,982 25,775,000 24,129,285 - 115,874,985(11,12) -- 115,876,925(11,12) 10,004,000 9,874,000 9,957,000 9,597,029 9,891,592 10,079,228 5,425,000 7,067,000 6,786,000 4,528,120 4,541,634 8,626,374 9,702,500 181,259,127(13) 10,300,248 181,933,957(13) 5,086,000 5,909,315 5,395,000 3,757,000 1,667,000 2,882,000 5,425,293 3,622,062 2,063,168 2,517,471 6,448,000 6,304,000 6,050,000 7,149,000 6,763,933 5,823,005 5,833,984 8,073,013 31,938,950 31,028,663 625,590,000 623,814,275 73,273,991 82,384,406 1. Includes $194,497 for previous projects. 2. Includes $134,789 for previous projects. Does not include $35,000 appropriated but unexpended of contributed funds in FY's 86 and 87. 3. Includes $643,456 for previous projects and $97,521 expended from Public Works Funds for existing project. Does not include $10,000 contributed funds. 4. Includes $54,414 for previous projects, $4,995 expended from Public Works Funds for existing project, and $2,150,000 under 1983 Job Bill Act. Does not include contributed funds by Brunswick and Georgia Port Authority. 5. Includes $7,260,384 for previous projects. Does not include $46,847 for removal of sunken vessels or contributed funds. 6. Includes $298,894 for previous projects and $62,727 contributed funds. 7. Includes $93,480 for previous projects and $1,634,562 from Public Works Fund. 8. Does not include $61,856.45 contributed funds. 9. Does not include $395,634 accelerated Public Works Funds. Includes $4,558,613 appropriated under 8-12 TABLE 8-A See Section In Text _ SAVANNAH, GA, DISTRICT TABLE 8-A COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Total Section to In Text Project Funding FY-97 FY-98 FY-99 FY-00 Sep 30, 2000 Code 710. Also includes $1,000,000 expended under the 1983 Job Bill Act. 10. Includes $576,665 under special recreation use fees and $736,000 under the 1983 Job Bill Act. 11. Includes $17,515,000 appropriated for construction of 5th Unit of which $17,469,002 has been expended. 12. Does not include $276,200 accelerated Public Works Funds. Includes $ 4,861,000 appropriated under Code 710 of which $4,8- 51,306 has been expended and $54- 5,000 expended under the 1983 Job Bill Act. 13. Includes $797,558 expended special recreation use fees. 8-13 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 2000 TABLE 8-B AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION See Date of Section Authorized In Text Act Project and Work Authorized Documents 1. Jun 3, 1896 Mar 3, 1899 Jul 13, 1892 Mar 3, 1905 Jul 25, 1912 Aug 8, 1917 Mar 2, 1919 Mar 2, 1919 Mar 3, 1925 Jul 3, 1930 Aug 26, 1937 Aug 26, 1937 Jun 20, 1938 Mar 2, 1945 Oct 15, 1981 ATLANTIC INTRACOASTAL WATERWAY BETWEEN NORFOLK, VA, AND ST. JOHNS RIVER, FL (SAVANNAH DISTRICT) Section from Beaufort, SC, to Savannah, GA Route No. 2 adopted. Route No. 1 adopted. Section from Savannah, GA, to Fernandina, FL. Original 7-foot channel. Provided for Skidaway Narrows. Incorporated alternative routes previously improved as separate projects and the auxiliary channels. Section from Cumberland Sound, GA and FL to St. Johns River, FL. Consolidation of the 3 sections shown above, into "Waterway between Beaufort SC, and St. Johns River, FL." Section from Beaufort, SC to Cumberland Sound GA and FL. Removing logs and snags from Generals Cut. Improving Back River to provide a channel 7 feet deep and 150 wide. Channel 75 feet wide between Beaufort, SC, and Savannah, GA. Channel from Baileys Cut to Dover Creek. A 7-foot protected channel around St. Andrews Sound. A 12-foot channel between Beaufort, SC, and Savannah, GA, via Beaufort River and Port Royal Sound. A 12-foot channel between Savannah, GA, and Fernandina, FL, various cutoffs; and anchorage basin at Thunderbolt, GA. An alternate route 9 feet deep and 150 feet wide in that part of Frederica River, GA, not now traversed by the main route, at no additional cost to the United States. Main channel relocated from Frederica River to Mackay River in the vicinity of Torras Causeway. Navigation Project. HD295, 53d Cong., 3d sess. HD295, 53d, Cong., 3d sess. HD41, 52d Cong., 1st sess. HD450, 58th Cong., 2d sess. HD1236, 60th Cong., 2d sess. 11D581, 63d Cong., 2d sess. 11D1391, 62d Cong., 3d sess. SD178, 68th Cong., 2d sess. SD43, 71st Cong., 2d sess. Senate Committee Print, 74th Cong., 1st sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee, Doc 6, 75th Cong., 3d sess. HD618, 75th Cong., 3d sess. HD114, 77th Cong., 1st sess. Project authorized by Chief of Engineers under the Small Navigation Project Authority, Sec. 107, PL 86-645, as amelnded. 8-14 SAVANNAH, GA, DISTRICT AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Project and Work Authorized A u Rpr,10. 5 Mar 3, 1879 Mar 2, 1907 Mar 2, 1919 Jul 3, 1930 Jul 3, 1930 Jun 20, 1938 May 17, 1950 Oct 22, 1976 Jul 14, 1981 Jul 13, 1983 Oct 17, 1986 BRUNSWICK HARBOR, GA Construction of East River jetty. Channels in the inner and outer harbors of 30-foot depth at mean high water, with widths varying from 150 feet in Academy Creek to 400 feet across the outer bar, extension of training wall in East River and construction of two spur dikes. Channels 27 feet deep at mean low water over the bar and at Brunswick point; and 24 feet deep at mean low water in the inner harbor and provides for a cut from Academy Creek to Turtle River, if deemed advisable. A channel in Back River 230 feet deep and 150 feet wide. Increased Channel dimensions of the bar, Brunswick Point, East River, and Turtle River, as given in the then existing project. A 10-foot channel in Terry Creek. Increased channel dimensions of the bar, St. Simons Sound, Brunswick River, East River, and Turtle River, as given in the existing project. Provides for Phase I AE&D studies for deepening portions of existing harbor (East River and Entrance Channel) and for provision of a navigation channel to Colonels Island. Enlargement of the maneuvering area of the entrance to East River and dredging Brunswick and Turtle Rivers to obtain depths authorized by the Rivers and Harbors Act of May 17, 1950. Enlargement of the East River Turning Basin to a length of 1,000 feet and a width of 750 feet. Incorporated Georgia Port Authority's 30 foot deep by 300 foot wide by 8000 foot channel in South Brunswick River serving Colonel's Island into Brunswick Harbor Navigation Project. Annual Report, 1980, p.959. HD407, 59th Cong., 1st sess. HD393, 64th Cong., 1st sess. SD57, 71st Cong., 2d sess. SD132, 71st Cong., 2d sess. HD690, 75th Cong., 3d sess. HD110, 81st Cong., 1st sess. Report of Chief of Engineers dated Aug. 18, 1976. HD177, 97th Cong., 1st sess. PL 98-360 HR6, 99th Cong., 2d sess., Section 846 8-15 TABLE 8-BI3 saf See Section In Text Date of Authorized Act 2. Documents nar If REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 2000 -TABLE 8-B AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION See Date of Section Authorized in Text Act Project and Work Authorized Documents PL-104-303 Water Resources Development Act of 1996, Oct 12, 1996 4. Mar 2, 1907 Jun 25, 1910 Jul 25, 1912 Aug 8, 1917 Jan 21, 1927 Jan 21, 1927 Jul 3, 1930 Aug 30, 1935 Mar 2, 1945 Nov 7, 1945 LOWER SAVANNAH RIVER BASIN, GA & SC Project for the environmental restoration of the Lower Savannah River Basin; modification to cut off Bend No. 3 and improve the mouths of Bear Creek and Mill Creek. SAVANNAH HARBOR, GA Tentative provisions for a 26-foot channel from the Quarantine Station to the Seaboard Air Line Railway Bridge. Definite provision for the 26-foot channel. A 21-foot channel from the Seaboard Air Line Railway Bridge to the foot of Kings Island. A 30-foot depth from the sea to the Quarantine Station. A 21-foot channel above Kings Island. Channel 30 feet deep, with general width 50 feet, from the ocean to the Quarantine Station, thence 26 feet deep, general width 400 feet, to the Seaboard Air Line Rho. Bridge, thence 21 feet deep and 300 feet wide to Kings Island. Widening at West Broad and Barnard Streets; anchorage basin; mooring dolphins; regulating dam across South Channel; relocation of the Inland Waterway; dredging Drakes Cut to 13 feet; widening to 525 ft. at Kings Island; extension of training walls, revetments, and jetties. Consolidation of projects relating to Savannah Harbor. Channel 26 feet deep and 300 feet wide from the Seaboard Air Line Rho. Bridge to the foot of Kings Island. Authorized the 30-foot project and eliminated from the project (a) the relating dam across South Channel; (b) the relocation of the Inland waterway; and (c) the further extension of training walls, revetments, and jetties. Deepening the channel and turning basin above the Seaboard Air Line Rho. Bridge from 26 to 30 feet and widening the channel opposite the Atlantic Coast Line Terminals to a maximum of 550 feet for a length of 5,000 feet. Deepening the channels to 36 feet deep and 500 feet wide across the ocean bar; 34 feet deep and generally 400 feet wide increased to 550 feet opposite the Atlantic Coast Line Terminals, with a turning basin 34 feet deep at the Mexican Petroleum Corp. Refinery; and with such modifications thereof HD105-173, 105th Congress, 2nd Session, Jan 27, 1998 HD181, 59th Cong., 1st sess. HD563, 62d, Cong., 2d sess. HD1471, 64th Cong., 2d sess. H1D261,69th Cong., 1st sess. HD262,69th Cong., 1st sess. SD39, 71st Cong., 1st sess. 1HD276, 73d Cong., 2d sess. HD283, 76th Cong., 1st sess. IID227, 79th Cong., 1st sess. 8-16 SAVANNAH, GA, DISTRICT A TTTlTT7INfl I 1.C(T'I .ATINT - -- i 0 1) A I jIj IJALL.,IJA VJ ZjJ JLLJrr. L See Date of Section Authorized in Text Act Project and Work Authorized Documents as the Secretary of War and the Chief of Engineers Jul 24, 1946 Sep 3, 1954 Oct 23, 1962 Oct 27, 1965 Oct 27, 1965 SPWC Resolution Jun 15, 1976 and IHPWC, Jun 9, 1976 under authority of Sec. may consider desirable. Extending channel 30 feet deep, 200 feet wide upstream from Atlantic Creosoting Terminal to a point 1,500 feet below the Atlantic Coastal Highway Bridge, with turning basin 30 feet deep at upper end. Deepening the channel to 34 feet and widening to 400 feet from the upper end of the presently authorized 34-foot channel in the vicinity of the American Oil Company Refinery wharf, to the Savannah Sugar Refinery Corp. with a turning basin at the upper end of the proposed improvement made by widening the channel to 600 feet for a length of 700 feet and providing approaches. Enlargement of turning basin near Kings Island to a width of 900 feet and a length of 1,000 feet, with suitable approaches, at a depth of 34 feet. Deepening the bar channel from 36 feet to 40 feet, the channel between the bar channel and Garden City Terminal from 34 feet to 38 feet, and the channel from the Garden City Terminal to the vicinity of the Savannah Sugar Refining Corp., from 30 feet to 36 feet; widening the bar channel from 500 feet to 600 feet, the channel between Fort Pulaski and the Atlantic Coast Line Terminal from 400 feet to 500 feet, and the channel between Garden City Terminal and the Savannah Sugar Refinery Corp., from 200 feet to 400 feet; providing necessary wideners of the bends; constructing a new turning basin 900 feet wide by 1,000 feet long by 34 feet deep opposite the Atlantic Coast Line Terminals; and enlargement of existing turning basin at the American Oil Company Terminal from 600 feet wide by 600 feet long to 900 feet wide by 1,000 feet long. Providing sediment control works consisting of tide gate structure across Back River; sediment basin 40 feet deep, 600 feet wide about 2 miles long, with entrance channel 38 to 40 feet deep and 300 feet wide; control works and canals for supplying fresh water to Savannah National Wildlife Refuge; and facilities to mitigate damages to presently improved areas other than refuge lands. Provided for modification of the existing project to include (1) incorporation of the LASH Turning Basin as an element of the existing Federal navigation project for maintenance purposes, (2) enlargement of Kings Island Turning Basin to 1,500 HD678, 79th Cong., 2d sess. HD110, 83d Cong., 1st sess. SD115, 87th Cong., 1st sess. HD226, 89th Cong., 1st sess. HD223, 89th Cong., 1st sess. HD94-520, 94th Cong. dated June 8, 1976. 8-17 TART . 8 i REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 2000 TABLE 8-B AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION See Date of Section Authorized in Text Act Project and Work Authorized Documents 201, Flood Con feet by 38 feet. trol Act of 1965 Jul 16,1984 Oct 17, 1986 Oct 31, 1992 Sep 13, 1891 Jun 25, 1910 Jul 3, 1930 Aug 30, 1935 Aug 26, 1937 May 17, 1950 SPWC Resolution Jun 22, 1971 and HPWC, Jun 23, 1972 under authority of Sec. 201, Flood Control Act of 1965 Oct 17, 1986 PL-104-303 Water Resources Development Act Construction of three new work curve wideners in the inner harbor channel. Curve Widener #1 is between mile 11.1 and 11.9. Curve widener #2 is between mile 13.2 and 13.8 and curve widener #3 is between mile 14.0 and 14.8. The Wideners are located on the north side of the channel. Savannah Harbor Widening as described in Report of Chief of Engineers date Dec. 19, 1978. Widen channel from 400 feet to 500 feet between Kings Island turning Basin and Fig Island Turning Basin. Allows planning, engineering and design to remove drift and debris as part of operations and maintenance. Savannah Harbor Deepening deepened harbor from -38 feet to -42 feet mlw in Inner Harbor and from - 40 feet to -44 feet mlw in the Bar Channel for a total of 31 miles of harbor improvements. SAVANNAH RIVER BELOW AUGUSTA, GA For a 5-foot channel Special improvement by bank protection work of 20 to 25 miles of the river immediately below Augusta. The present 6-foot channel project and Lock and Dam, GA. Provision made for locating the lock and dam at New Savannah Bluff. Conditions of local cooperation modified. Provides for a 9-foot channel. TYBEE ISLAND, GA Project will provide for beach erosion control, consisting of beach restoration, groin nourishment. Extends authority for renourishment with Federal participation from 15 to 50 years. Sect 301(b)(4) provided for inclusion of that portion of Tybee Island located south of the existing terminal groin, including the East Bank of Tybee PL 98-360 HD6, 99th Cong., 2d sess. Dated Oct. 17, 1986, Section 201 Section 867 WRDA 1992 HD255, 51st Cong., 2d sess. I1D962, 60th Cong., 1st sess. HD101, 70th Cong., 1st sess. Senate Committee Print, 73d Cong., 2d sess. Rivers and Harbors Com., Doc. 39, 75th Cong., 1st sess. SD6, 81st Cong., 1st sess. HD105, 92d Cong. 11R6, 99th Cong., 2d sess. Dated Oct. 17, 1986, Section 867 WRDA 1996 8-18 5. 9. SAVANNAH, GA, DISTRICT AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Project and Work Authorized of 1996, Oct 12, Creek up to Horse Pen Creek. 1996 Flood Control Act of Dec 22, 1944 Oct 17, 1986 Jan 1988 Flood Control Act of May 17, 1950 Flood Control Act of Jul 3, 1958 Water Resources Development Act of 1976 Flood Control Act of Nov 7, 1966 Water Resources Development Act of 1986 Sect 506(a)(4) extended periodic nourishment for a period of 50 years beginning on the date of initiation of construction. J. STROM THURMOND DAM AND LAKE, GA&SC Approved the general plan for the comprehensive development of the Savannah River Basin and pro vided for construction of the Project. Recreation and fish and wildlife added as name changed. (Formerly Clarks Hill Lake.) IIARTWELL LAKE, GA AND SC Provided for construction of Hartwell Project. Provided for the completion of the Hartwell Project. Provides for installation of 5th unit. RICHARD B. RUSSELL DAM AND LAKE, GA & SC Provided for construction of the Trotters Shoals Project. Authorized mitigation plan. WRDA 1996 HD657, 78th Cong., 2d sess. HR6, 99th Cong., 2d sess. Section 864, HJR 376 HD657, 78th Cong., 2d sess. PL516, 82st Cong., 2d sess. PL85-500, 87th Cong., 2d sess. PL94-587, Sec. 182b., 85th Cong. SD52, 89th Cong., 1st sess. 11R6, 99th Cong., 2d sess. dated Oct. 17, 1986, Section 601 8-19 TABLE 8-B See Section in Text Date of Authorized Act 19. Documents 20. 21. loo t -- REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 2000 TABLE 8-C OTHER AUTHORIZED NAVIGATION PROJECTS (See Section 7 in text) Cost to September 30, 2000 For Last Full Report See Annual Operation and Project Status Report for Construction Maintenance I~~ I IllI I Bellville Point, GA Cedar Point, GA Darien Harbor, GA Fancy Bluff Creek, GA 1 St. Mary's River, GA and FL, and North River, GA Sapelo Harbor, GA 2, 3 Satilla River, GA 1, 5, 6 Savannah River above Augusta, GA 2, 3, 4 Savannah River at Augusta, GA 2, 3, 5 Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed See Notes See Notes 1986 1982 1975 1935 1951 1929 1951 1929 1929 599,379 656,233 199,723 8,000 15,688 17,906 9,452 69,600 200,556 185,433 7,200 69,936 19,594 57,172 85,944 17,444 1.Channel adequate for commerce. 2. Project recommended for abandonment in HD 467, 69th Cong., 1st session. 3.No commerce reported. 4.About 84 percent completed. Owing to construction of two power dams which submerged much of the work under the present and former projects, this improvement cannot be completed as originally planned. 5.Excludes $185,000 contributed funds ($172,151 for construction and $12,849 for operation and maintenance). 6.Water Resources Development Act of 1986 authorized demonstration project on the Umbrella Creek - Dover Creek for the purpose of reducing shoaling. Monitor for 10 years, develop a hydrodynamic model. 8-20 SAVANNAH, GA, DISTRICT TABLE 8-D OTHER AUTHORIZED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS (See Section 13 in text) Cost to September 30, 2000 For Last Full Report See Annual Operation and Project Status Report for Construction Maintenance Augusta, Savannah River, GA Curry Creek Dam and Lake, GA (1) Dunn Branch, Woodbine, Camden County, GA Macon, GA Oates Creek, GA (2) Peacock Creek, Liberty County, GA Completed See Note Completed Completed Completed Completed 1941 $ 643,016 1974 1977 1955 1993 1976 $38,242 132,640 380,043 5,219 38,243 5,219 12,565,000 582,163 1.Feasibility report completed. Project not authorized for construction. 2 .Authorized by HR 6, Water Resource Development Act of 1986 dated October 17, 1986. First Federal cost of $9,600,000 and non-federal cost of $4,100,000. 8-21 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 2000 SAVANNAH RIVER BASIN, GA AND SC DAMS AND LAKES (See Section 19, 20, & 21 in text) Estimated Cost Name River Federal Non-Federal Total III~~~ ~~ JlII I II J. Strom Thurmond Dam & Lake, GA and SC Hartwell Dam & Lake, GA and SC Richard B. Russell Dam & Lake, GA and SC(4)(5) Savannah Savannah Savannah $79,156,000(3) $79,156,000(1,3) 89,240,000 89,240,000(2) 618,100,000 618,100,000 1.Final Cost. (Excludes $127,000 for preauthorization study.) 2.Approved August 1963. (Excludes $73,000 for preauthorization study.) 3.Approved July 1954. 4.Excludes Code 710 funds. 5.Richard B. Russell Dam and Lake (formerly Trotters Shoals Lake) replaced Goat Island, GA and SC and Middleton Shoals, GA and SC. 8-22 TABLE 8-E JACKSONVILLE, FL DISTRICT* With the exception of a small area in the north-eastern section of Florida, this district comprises a portion of south-central Georgia and all of peninsular Florida, embracing the watersheds tributary to the IMPROVEMENTS Navigation 1. Aquatic Plant Control (R&H Act of 1965) ............3 2. Arecibo Harbor, PR ................................... .3 3. Atlantic Intracoastal Waterway between Norfolk, VA and St. Johns River, FL ..................... 3 4. Bakers Haulover Inlet, FL ..................................... 4 5. Canaveral Harbor, FL ............................................. 4 6 . Channel from Naples to Big Marco Pass ............... 5 7. Charlotte Harbor, FL ........................................... 5 8. Cross Florida Barge Canal .................................... 5 9. Eau Gallie Harbor, FL .............. ... .......... 6 10. Fernandina Harbor, FL .......................................... 6 11. Fort Myers Beach, FL ............................................ 7 12. Fort Pierce Harbor, FL ................................... 7 13. Intracoastal Waterway, Caloosahatchee River to Anclote River, FL ................................. 8 14. Intracoastal Waterway, Jacksonville to Miami, FL .................................... 8 15. Jacksonville Harbor, FL .................................... 9 16. Jacksonville Harbor (Mill Cove), FL .............. 10 17. John's Pass, FL ................................... ... 11 18. Longboat Pass, FL ................................... 11 19. Manatee Harbor, FL .................................. .. 11 20. Mayaguez Harbor, PR ................................... 12 21. Melbourne Harbor, FL .................................... 12 22. Miami Harbor.......... .............. 12 23. New Pass, Sarasota, FL .................................... 13 24. Okeechobee Waterway, FL .............................. 13 25. Oklawaha River, FL........ .................. 14 26. Palm Beach Harbor, FL .................................. 15 27. Palm Valley Bridge, FL ................................... 15 28. Ponce de Leon Inlet, FL ....................................... 16 29. Ponce Harbor, PR ................... ..................... 16 30. Port Everglades Harbor, FL ................................. 17 31. Removal of Aquatic Growth from Navigable Waters in the State of Florida ........................ 17 32. St. Augustine Harbor, FL ..................................... 18 33. St. Johns River, Jacksonville to Lake Hamrney, FL .................................................. 18 34. St. Lucie Inlet, FL ................................................ 19 35. San Juan Harbor, PR ............................................ 19 36. Tampa Harbor, FL .............................. ............20 Atlantic Ocean and the Gulf of Mexico from, and including the harbor at Femandina, Florida, to and including the Aucilla River. It also includes Puerto Rico and the U.S. Virgin Islands. Navigation (cont) 37. Navigation Projects on which Reconnaissance and Condition Surveys only were Conducted during Period .................................... ... 22 38. Other Authorized Navigation Projects ................ 22 39. Navigation Work under Special Authorization .................................... 22 Beach Erosion Control 40. Brevard County, FL .......................................... 22 41. Broward County, FL Beach Erosion Control and Hillsboro Inlet, FL Navigation Project .......... 22 42. Duval County, FL ............................................. 23 43. Ft. Pierce Beach, FL .......................................... 24 44. Indian River County, FL .................................. 24 45. Lee County, FL................................ .............. 25 46. Manatee County, FL........................................ 25 47. Martin County, FL................................................ 26 48. Nassau County, FL ............................................... 26 49. Palm Beach County, FL ...................................... 27 50. Palm Beach Island, FL ......................................... 28 51. Pinellas County, FL ............................................. 28 52. St. Johns County, FL ......................................... 29 53. Sarasota County, FL ............................................ 29 54. Other Authorized Beach Erosion Control Projects .................................................................. 30 55. Beach Erosion Control Activities under Special Authorization ........................................ 30 Flood Control 56. Central and Southern Florida ........................... 30 57. Dade County, FL .............................................. 32 58. Dade County, N. of Haulover Beach, FL ........... 33 59. Four River Basins, FL ...................................... 33 60. Portugues and Bucana Rivers, PR .................... 34 61. Rio De La Plata, PR ............................. ......... 34 62. Rio Grande De Arecibo, PR.............................. 35 63. Rio Puerto Nuevo, PR .......................................... 35 64. Inspection of Completed Flood Control Projects ................................................................. 36 65. Other Authorized Flood Control Projects ........... 36 66. Flood Control Work under Special Authorization ....................................................... 36 9-1 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 2000 General Investigations 67. Surveys ............................................................. 36 68. Collection and Study of Basic Data ................. 36 69. Continuation of Planning and Engineering .......... 36 70. Advance Engineering and Design ........................ 36 General Regulatory 71. Permit Evaluation.................................................. 37 72. Enforcement.......... ....... ........ 37 73. Studies ............................................. ............... 37 Project Modifications 74. Kissimmee River Restoration ........................... 37 75. Everglades South Florida Ecosystem Restoration ............ ........................... .........38 76. Restoration Work under Special Authorization..................... ... .... .39 77. Wetland and Other Aquatic Habitat Creation under Special Authorization ................ 39 *All cost and financial statements for projects are listed at the end of this chapter. All other tables are referenced in text and also appear at the end of the chapter. 9-2 JACKSONVILLE, FL DISTRICT Navigation 1. AQUATIC PLANT CONTROL (R&H ACT OF 1965) Location. Navigable waters, tributary streams, connecting channels, and other allied waters in Florida. Existing project. The authorized project provides for control and progressive eradication of water hyacinth, alligatorweed, Eurasian water-milfoil, and other noxious aquatic plant growths from navigable waters, tributary streams, connecting channels, and other allied waters of the United States, in combined interest of navigation, flood control, drainage, agriculture, fish and wildlife conservation, public health, and related Purposes, including continued research for development of most effective and economical control measures in cooperation with other Federal and State agencies in accordance with report of Chief of Engineers, H 251/89/1. The Water Resource Development Act of 1986 amended the River and Harbor Act of 1965 requiring the local sponsor to share 50 percent of planning costs and 50 percent of research costs that are local in nature. The cost of research that is regional or national in scope shall be borne fully by the United States. Local cooperation. Florida Department of Natural Resources holds the United States free from damages that may occur from operations performed in connection with this project and contributes 50 percent of cost of operations. Compliance with requirements of local cooperation is on schedule. Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: Costs incurred was $-13,744. Condition at end of fiscal year. Operations by the Corps and the State of Florida are in progress; water hyacinths within Florida are under maintenance control. Hydrilla is continuing to spread throughout the state and is causing major problems in some areas. 2. ARECIBO HARBOR, PR Location. The harbor is located on the north shore of Puerto Rico about 40 miles west of San Juan Harbor. (See NOAA Nautical Chart No. 25668.) Previous project. For details see page 504 of 1956 Annual Report. Existing project. The project provides for a channel 25 feet deep by 400 feet wide, with flare at entrance and widening at inner end to form a maneuvering area and a stone breakwater 1,200 feet long. Plane of reference is mean low water. Mean tidal range is 1.1 feet. (See Table 9-B for Authorizing Legislation.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with to date. Terminal facilities. A bulkhead wharf 688 by 220 feet providing deep water berthing space of approximately 500 feet and a 300 by 100-foot transit shed. Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Locks and dams cost was $4,700. Operation of service utilities cost was $3,200. Real estate management cost was $2,009,500. Bank stabilization cost was $3,700. Credits totaled $1,200. Condition at end of fiscal year. Project was completed in 1944. Breakwater was repaired in 1952. Wave action has since caused damage. 3. ATLANTIC INTRACOASTAL WATERWAY BETWEEN NORFOLK, VA AND ST. JOHNS RIVER, FL (JACKSONVILLE DISTRICT) Location. That part of Intracoastal Waterway between southerly limit of Fernandina Harbor, FL, at junction of Lanceford Creek and Amelia River, and St. Johns River, FL. (See NOAA Nautical Chart No. 11489.) Previous project. For details see page 605 of 1938 Annual Report. Existing project. Channel 12, 90 to 150 feet wide from Fernandina Harbor to St. Johns River, about 22 miles long. Plane of reference is mean low water. Mean tidal range is 6 feet at Fernandina and 3.8 feet at St. Johns River. (See Table 9-B for Authorizing Legislation.) Existing project was authorized by River and Harbor Acts of 1913 (H 898/62/2) and 1938 (H 618/75/3). Local cooperation. Fully complied with to date. Terminal facilities. There is a commercial marina located at Sisters Creek. No other facilities exist along this section of the waterway and none are currently required. 9-3 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 2000 Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Real estate management cost was $110,500. Bank stabilization cost was $3,000. Condition at end offiscal year. Project was completed in 1941. 4. BAKERS HAULOVER INLET, FL Location. The inlet connects the Intracoastal Waterway and the Atlantic Ocean and is located 2 miles north of Miami Beach in Dade County, Florida. Existing project. The authorized project provides for an entrance channel 11 by 200 feet, thence 8 by 100 feet to the Intracoastal Waterway and a marina basin 8 by 200 feet. The length of the project is 1.02 miles. Plane of reference is mean low water. Operations and results during fiscal year. None. Condition at end of fiscal year. The project was completed in December 1964. 5. CANAVERAL HARBOR, FL Location. The harbor is located on the east coast of Florida in Canaveral Bight, about 146 miles south of the entrance to Jacksonville Harbor and 69 miles north of the entrance to Fort Pierce Harbor. (See NOAA Nautical Chart Nos. 11478 and 11484.) Existing project. The authorized project provides for a 37 foot deep entrance channel and maintenance of the 44 foot deep Navy channel in the 37 foot channel reach; and 35 foot depth turning basin; construction and operation of a sand transfer plant; relocation of the perimeter dike about 4,000 feet westward and extension of the harbor westward; south entrance jetty 1,100 feet long and the entrance jetty 1,150 feet long; a lock; a channel and turning basin 31 feet deep near the relocated dike; and a barge canal 12 by 125 feet from the turning basin to the Atlantic Intracoastal Waterway. Plane of reference is mean low water (Banana River) for barge canal. The project is about 11.5 miles long. Mean tidal range is 3.5 feet at the entrance and practically non-tidal in Banana and Indian Rivers. (See Table 9-I for Data Relative to Lock.) Estimated project cost for Canaveral Harbor Sand Transfer System is $133,740,000 Federal and $4,960,000 non-Federal. (See Table 9-B for Authorizing Legislation.) Local cooperation. Local interests must; provide all lands, rights-of-way, spoil-disposal areas, retaining dikes, and embankments; hold United States free from damages; provide and maintain four-lane bridge and roadway subject to Federal contribution of 65.3 percent of cost of constructing bridge and 51.2 percent of constructing roadway; provide public terminal and transfer facilities; and make alterations as required in , berthing facilities. For further details see Senate Document 140, 87th Congress, 2nd session. Non- Federal contribution for new work is $2,558,133. Terminal facilities. Canaveral Harbor has 27 commercial waterfront facilities. The General Cargo Facilities consist of 1,900 feet of usable berthing space capacity of 168,000 square feet. The Oil Handling Facilities operate with 3,760 feet of usable berthing space and 1,413,000 barrels of tank storage. Available warehouse storage includes 28,000 square feet of dry storage and 2,500,000 cubic feet of cold storage. Open storage is 189 acres. Three-cruise ship berths totaling 1,400 feet long by 34-foot depth and three 8,800 square foot cruise terminals are also located on the south side. The western cruise ship berth is equipped with a roll on/off ramp and is adjacent to 20 acres of trailer storage area. Hoisting facilities consist of one 45-ton floating crane and crawler and mobile cranes, with capacities from 70 to 200 tons, available from local crane rental services. There are 2 waterfront marine repair facilities with the nearest dry-dock facilities located at Port Everglades and Jacksonville. Two tugs with ratings of 1,600 and 2,250 horsepower are also available. There is no rail service available at the port. The nearest rail service is the Florida East Coast Railway located 9 miles away. Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. (See Port Series No. 16, Rev. 1982.) Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: Canaveral Harbor: Engineering and design and construction management costs were $161,692 and $85,098 respectively. Canaveral Harbor Deepening: Navigation port and harbor cost was $590,473. Engineering and design cost was $38,087. Maintenance: Maintenance and operation of locks and dams amounted to $554,000 for the fiscal year. Operation of service utilities costs $-400. Operation of flood control structure cost was $100. Real estate management was $5,538,400. National emergency preparedness cost was $144,700. Prevention of 9-4 JACKSONVILLE, FL DISTRICT obstructive and injurious deposits cost was $700. General regulatory function cost was $100. Bank stabilization cost was $19,400. Engineering and design cost $-1,100. Credits amounted to $41,600. Condition at end of fiscal year. Sand bypass and north jetty temporary sand tightening were completed in FY 98. South jetty repair is scheduled for award in November 2000 and completion in April 2001. Widening and deepening completed in FY 1995. Entrance channel widener to be constructed. Severe erosion of the northbank has resulted from harbor improvements. A new study to investigate a permanent sand tightening of the north jetty is scheduled for completion in February 2001. 6. CHANNEL FROM NAPLES TO BIG MARCO PASS, FL Location. Naples Bay is on the southwestern side of the Florida peninsula about 35 miles south of the mouth of the Caloosahatchee River and approximately l-mile inland and parallel to the Gulf of Mexico coastline. (See NOAA Nautical Chart No. 11430.) Existing project. The authorized project provides for an interior channel 6 by 70 feet from Naples to Big Marco Pass; a channel 12 by 150 feet from the Gulf of Mexico to Gordon Pass, thence 10 by 100-70 feet to a 10 foot depth turning basin in the upper Naples Bay; and an 8 foot depth turning basin at the municipal Yacht basin. Plane of reference is mean low water. Mean tidal range is 2.1 feet. (See Table 9-B for Authorizing Legislation.) For further details see Annual Report of 1962. Local cooperation. Fully complied with to date. Contributed funds for new work were $159,975. Terminal facilities. Four seafood-packing houses; 4 marine repair yards; a municipal pier and basin for use by recreational boats; and numerous private piers and slips for both commercial and recreational craft are available. Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations and results duringfiscal year. None. Condition at end of fiscal year. The project is Complete. 7. CIIARLOTTE HARBOR, FL Location. The Harbor is located on the west coast of Florida about 68 miles south of the entrance to Tampa Bay and 150 miles north of Key West. (See NOAA Nautical Chart No. 11429.) Previous projects. For details, see page 457 of 1959 Annual Report. Existing project. The authorized project provides for a channel 32 by 300 feet, increased to 700 feet at the bend, from the Gulf of Mexico to Port Boca Grande to and including a turning basin at 200 feet square at the municipal terminal at Punta Gorda. Plane of reference is mean low water. The project is about 29.5 miles long. Mean tidal range is one foot at Port Boca Grande and 1.4 feet at Punta Gorda. Extreme range is about 3 feet at Port Boca Grande and 3.8 feet at Punta Gorda. Strong southwesterly winds raise water levels about 1.5 feet; strong northerly and easterly winds lower water levels about one foot. (See Table 9-B for Authorizing Legislation.) Local cooperation. Local cooperation is fully complied with to date. Terminal facilities. Existing facilities consist of a phosphate wharf at Port Boca Grande and a municipal earthfill pier about 850 feet long at Punta Gorda, both open to the public. Railway connections are available at Port Boca Grande, and highway and railway connections are available at Punta Gorda. There is a tank farm at Port Boca Grande for storage and rehandling of bunker fuel oil and numerous facilities are available in the area for docking and servicing small craft. Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations and results Maintenance: Real estate $3,500. Credits totaled $800. during fiscal year. management cost was Condition at end of fiscal year. The project was completed in 1959. (See Table 9-A for total project costs.) In addition, $15,563 was expended from contributed funds for new work in Boca Grande entrance channel. 8. CROSS FLORIDA BARGE CANAL Location. The proposed canal extends up the St. Johns River, past Palatka, thence up the valley of the 9-5 REPORT OF TlE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 2000 Oklawaha River across the divide south of Ocala, and down the valley of the Withlacoochee River to the Gulf of Mexico, about 95 miles north of Tampa, Florida. Existing project. The authorized project provides for a lock canal with project depth of 12 feet and a minimum bottom width of 150 feet, with five locks and two earth dams. Project including the section in the St. Johns River is 184 miles long. (See Table 9-J for Locks and Dams.) WRDA 92 authorizes and directs ASA (CW) to offer to enter into a contract to operate and maintain the project at a level necessary to ensure safe operating conditions and to prevent deterioration of the structures. (See Table 9-B for Authorizing Legislation.) Local cooperation. Local interests must furnish lands and rights-of-way for construction of canal; hold the United States free from damages; and operate and maintain all highway bridges and roadways built in connection with project. Terminal facilities. None. Regulation. a. Lake Ocklawaha. During the period, the lake continued to be regulated at 18.0 feet, NGVD by discharging through the Rodman spillway. b. Lake Rousseau. During the period, the lake continued to be regulated at 27.5 feet, NGVD by discharging through the Inglis Main and Bypass Spillways. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Operation of locks and dams cost was $6,200. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction of project commenced February 25, 1964, and is 36 percent completed. Inglis Lock, Dam, and Spillway; Rodman Dam and Spillway; Eureka Lock, Dam, and Spillway; Henry H. Buckman Lock; and canal from Palatka to Lake Ocklawaha and from Withlacoochee River to Gulf of Mexico, including Inglis Bypass Channel, are completed. Construction work on the project was terminated in FY 1971 by order of the President. A restudy report and environmental impact statement were completed in February 1977. Project was deauthorized in Water Resources Development Act of 1990 (P.L. 101-640) and $5,000,000 of prior appropriations was withdrawn. 9. EAU GALLIE HARBOR, FL Location. The Harbor is located on Indian River about midway of the State of Florida, 176 miles south of Jacksonville Harbor and 174 miles north of Miami Harbor. Existing project. The authorized project provides for a channel 8 by 100 feet from Indian River to and including a 300 by 600-foot turning basin in Eau Gallie. The project is about 2,700 feet long. Plane of reference is mean low water. The harbor is almost nontidal. Local cooperation. Fully complied with to date. Terminal facilities. A privately owned boatyard in Eau Gallie Harbor provides more than 600 feet of docking space used chiefly by pleasure boats. There are also 2 marine railways and repair and storage facilities available. The facilities are considered adequate for the present needs of navigation. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: None. Condition at end of fiscal year. The project was completed in 1939. In December 1982, the controlling depth of the channel was 5 feet. 10. FERNANDINA HARBOR, FL Location. Entrance to the harbor is located on the northeast coast of Florida about 95 miles south of the entrance to Savannah Harbor, Georgia, and 22 miles north of the entrance to Jacksonville Harbor, Florida. (See NOAA Nautical Chart No. 11503.) Existing project. The authorized project provides for a 32 foot depth channel (maximum channel in active status: 28 feet) generally 300-400 feet wide from deep water in the ocean to the junction of Lanceford Creek with Amelia River; an 800 foot wide turning basin at the first bend below Lanceford Creek; and 2 jetties, 19,150 and 11,200 feet long. The project is 7 miles long. Plane of reference is mean low water. Mean tidal range is 5.8 feet on the bar and 6 feet in the inner harbor. (See Table 9-B for Authorizing Legislation.) 9-6 JACKSONVILLE, FL DISTRICT Local cooperation. Fully complied with to date. Non- Federal contribution for new work was $935,000. Terminal facilities. There are 2 large wharves operated by industrial plants; 12 wharves serving fishing boats, recreational craft, and other vessels; 3 oil handling wharves with pipelines; and a Municipal Marina and Sportsman's Wharf with public facilities for small craft. Total berthing space is approximately 4,065 feet. Most terminals are served by rail, and all have highway access. Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. (See Port Series No. 16 (Part 2), 1964.) Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Operation of locks, dams, and reservoirs cost was $25,200. Operation of service facilities $1,300. Real estate management cost was $1,621,100. National emergency preparedness cost was $3,900. Bank stabilization cost was $68,600. Credits totaled $16,300. Condition at end of fiscal year. The active portion of the existing project is complete. Jetties are in poor condition and are badly in need of repair. Remaining Work is to deepen the inner harbor channel and turning basin to 32 feet when and if the presently inactive 1950 authorization is reactivated. The entrance channel has been deepened to 46 feet for the Kings Bay project. Authorized depths were restored as of March 1991. 11. FORT MYERS BEACH, FL Location. Fort Myers Beach is on Estero Island near the mouth of the Caloosahatchee River, about 20 miles below Fort Myers and 110 miles south of Tampa, Florida. (See NOAA Nautical Chart No. 11427.) Existing project. The authorized project provides for a channel 12 by 150 feet from that depth in San Carlos Bay into Matanzas Pass, thence 11 by 125 feet in Matanzas Pass to and including a turning basin 2,000 feet upstream from the upper shrimp terminals. Plane of reference is mean low water. Project is 2.5 miles long. Mean tidal range is 1.7 feet. Spring range is about 2.3 feet. Strong northerly winds lower the water surface 1 to 2 feet; strong southerly winds have an opposite effect. (See Table 9-B for Authorizing Legislation.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with to date. Terminal facilities. There are 3 shrimp-packing houses and several fish-packing houses, 2 marine railways, a fuel terminal and an ice manufacturing plant in the area. There are several commercial facilities for servicing shrimp boats. Recreational craft facilities include 9 marinas, a boat motor testing laboratory which is closed, and numerous privately owned piers and wharves. All terminals have highway access. Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Operation of locks and dams cost was $3,800. Real estate management cost was $150,900. Prevention of obstructive and injurious deposits cost was $100. Condition at end of fiscal year. The project is complete. 12. FORT PIERCE HARBOR, FL Location. On east coast of Florida, about 218 miles south of entrance to St. Johns River and about 124 miles north of entrance to Miami Harbor. (See NOAA Nautical Chart No. 11475.) Existing project. A channel 350 feet wide at the 27 foot contour in the ocean, tapering to a width of 200 feet at Station 100+00, thence 200 feet wide to Sta. 30+00, and thence flaring to a turning basin 900 feet wide. Entrance channel is 27 feet deep to Sta. 130+00 and thence 25 feet deep to and including the turning basin. Project includes the maintenance of two jetties and shore revetments at the inlet. Length of project is about 3.5 miles. Plan of improvement consists of enlarging the existing entrance channel to 400 feet wide and 30 feet deep, the interior channel to 250 feet wide and 28 feet deep, the existing turning basin to 1,100 feet square and 28 feet deep, and providing an access channel 1,250 feet long, 250 feet wide and 28 feet deep north of the main turning basin. Mean tidal range is 2.6 feet at the entrance and 0.7 feet at terminals. (See Table 9-B for Authorizing Legislation.) For further details see 1961 Annual Report. Local cooperation. Fully complied with to date. Non- Federal contribution for new work was $2,503,387. A 25% contribution and an additional 10% reimbursement over 30 years from locals are required. 9-7 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 2000 Terminal facilities. Two earth-filled piers forming a slip 200 by 300 feet, with bulkhead wharf at inner end, affording berthing space of about 1,653 feet. The south pier and bulkhead wharf are municipally owned. Facilities also include a cooling plant, a warehouse and a fruit-packing house. Railway and both piers serve the north pier by highway connections. North of the turning basin local interests have provided deep-draft berthing and pier facilities. Also available is a bulkhead wharf with a depth of 25 feet with ample room for open storage and with tank storage for petroleum in the rear. Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Operation of locks, dams and reservoirs cost was $82,000. Real estate management cost was $1,527,300. General regulatory functions cost was $10,000. Condition at end of fiscal year. Mitigation contract completed in May 1996. No further work is scheduled. 13. INTRACOASTAL WATERWAY, CALOOSAHATCHEE RIVER TO ANCLOTE RIVER, FL Location. The Waterway extends from the mouth of the Caloosahatchee River at Punta Rassa, Florida, to the mouth of Anclote River, Florida, following in general an almost continuous series of protected inside waterways along the gulf coast of Florida. (See NOAA Nautical Chart Nos. 11411, 11425 and 11427.) Previous projects. For details see page 767 of 1945 Annual Report. Existing project. The authorized project provides for a channel 9 by 100 feet from Caloosahatchee River to Anclote River; deepening the existing channel at Casey's Pass to 9 feet; a channel 6 by 80 feet (Cats Point Channel) along the southeastern side of Boca Ciega Bay past Frenchman Creek and Gulfport; maintenance of bulkheads, revetments, and two jetties built at Casey's Pass under previous project; and improvement and maintenance of Sunshine Skyway Channel. Plane of reference is mean low water. The project includes about 160 miles of channels. Mean ranges of tide are 1.7 feet at Punta Rassa, I foot at Port Boca Grande, 1.4 feet in Tampa Bay at Anna Maria, and 2 feet at entrance to Anclote River. Extreme ranges are about 4.5 feet at Punta Rassa, about 3 to 4 feet between Port Boca Grande and Corey Causeway over Boca Ciega Bay, and about 5.5 feet at entrance to Anclote River. Southerly winds over the area generally raise water levels by 1 to 1.5 feet; northerly winds lower water levels by 1 to 2 feet. (See Table 9-B for Authorizing Legislation.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with to date. Terminal facilities. Existing facilities include one municipal concrete pier, one railway pier, one freight wharf, one marginal wharf 500 feet long on terminal island, and 11 privately owned landings, all at Sarasota. Municipal pier and freight wharf are open to the public. All piers have highway connections. There are 6 wharves along Boca Ciega Bay and a number of small privately owned piers and wharves at various points along waterway for use by commercial fishing boats and recreational craft. Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations and results during fiscal year Maintenance: Operation of locks and dams cost was $39,100. Real estate management costs was $147,900. National emergency preparedness cost was $100. Condition at end of fiscal year. Existing project is complete. 14. INTRACOASTAL WATERWAY, JACKSONVILLE TO MIAMI, FL Location. The Waterway extends from Jacksonville to Miami, Florida, following the St. Johns River to the mouth of Pablo Creek and thence following in general an almost continuous series of protected inside waterways along the Atlantic coast of Florida to Miami. (See NOAA Nautical Chart Nos. 11489, 11485, 11472 and 11467.) Previous projects. For details, see pages 618-619 of 1938 Annual Report. Existing project. The authorized project provides for a channel 12 by 125 feet from Jacksonville to Miami, modified by Chief of Engineer's report of July 22, 1960; side channels at Sebastian and Daytona Beach and turning basins at Sebastian and Vero Beach, all to an 8 foot depth, and operation and maintenance of Palm Valley highway bridge. Project is 370 miles long, including 21 miles in Jacksonville Harbor. Mean range 9-8 JACKSONVILLE, FL DISTRICT of tide is 3.8 feet at St. Johns River, 0.7 foot in Indian River at Fort Pierce, 1.8 feet in Lake Worth at Port of Palm Beach terminals, 2.3 feet at the Port Everglades terminals, and 2 feet in Biscayne Bay. The extreme range is about 7 feet at St. Johns River, 1.5 feet at Fort Pierce, and 3 feet in Biscayne Bay. Plane of reference is mean low water. Tidal effect is imperceptible at points along waterway distant from inlets. (See Table 9-B for Authorizing Legislation.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with to date. Terminal facilities. There are a number of privately Owned piers, wharves, and landings at various points along waterway. Terminals with railway connections are available at Jacksonville, Fort Pierce, West Palm Beach, Port Everglades, and Miami. Municipal piers or Wharves have been constructed at Titusville, Cocoa, Melbourne, and Vero Beach for handling general freight and at St. Augustine, Daytona Beach, New Smyrna Beach, Eau Gallie, West Palm Beach, Delray Beach, Fort Lauderdale, and Miami for use of recreational craft. Yacht basins, open to the public, have been provided at Jacksonville Beach, Daytona Beach, Titusville, Eau Gallie, Vero Beach, Fort Pierce, West Palm Beach, Fort Lauderdale, Hollywood, and Miami. Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. (For further details on facilities at Jacksonville, see Port Series No. 15, 1969, and at Palm Beach, Port Everglades, and Miami, see Port Series No. 16, Revised 1972.) Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Operation of locks and dams cost was $361,200. Operation of service facilities was $-3,200. Natural resource management cost was $300. Water quality control cost was $100. Real estate management Cost $2,711,200. National emergency preparedness Cost was $1,500. Prevention of obstructive and injurious deposits cost was $39,600. Bank Stabilization cost was $39,800. Construction management cost $500. Credits were $5,000. Condition at end offiscal year. The existing project as modified by the Chief of Engineers is complete. (Construction of the channel and turning basin at Sebastian, Florida, was deauthorized by WRDA of 1988, P.L. 100-676.) (See Table 9-A for total project costs.) In addition, $2,199,842 has been expended from public works funds for new work. 15. JACKSONVILLE HARBOR, FL Location. The authorized project comprises the lower 24.9 miles of St. Johns River, which empties into the Atlantic Ocean near the northeasterly corner of the Florida peninsula. (See NOAA Nautical Chart No. 11491.) Previous projects. For details, see page 607 of Annual Report, 1938. Existing project. The authorized project provides for a channel 38 feet deep by 400-1,200 feet wide from ocean to mile 20 via Dame Point-Fulton Cutoff, thence 34 feet to Commodore Point, and thence 30 feet deep to the FEC railway bridge at Jacksonville, including a 30 foot channel in Arlington cut in the old Dames Point-Fulton channel; maintenance of the existing 42 and 40 foot depth entrance channel; widening of channel by 100 feet near mile 5 and by 200 feet near mile 7; maintenance of jetties at channel entrance; construction of training walls and revetments; a navigation and floodway channel 26 by 200 feet along south side of Commodore Point; on approach and mooring basin 20 feet deep, 1,300 feet long at 20 foot depth contour and 600 feet long at pierhead line near Naval Reserve Armory in south Jacksonville; a depth of 24 feet between that depth contour and the pierhead line from Hogan Creek to the foot of Laura Street; and a depth of 28 feet to within 60 feet of pierhead line between foot of Laura Street and St. Elmo W. Acosta (formerly Upper State) bridge. Length of project is about 26.8 miles. In addition the Navy has provided funds for a deeper Jacksonville Harbor entrance channel 42 feet deep and 800 feet long, intersecting with the Navy's Mayport entrance channel to the Mayport turning basin; also an extension of the existing project to provide 38 foot depth for the Navy fuel depot, at Drummond Creek. Mean tidal range is 5.3 feet on the bar, 4.9 feet at Mayport, 2.6 feet at Dame Point, and 1.1 feet at Jacksonville. The extreme range varies from about 9 feet on the bar to about 1.5 feet at Jacksonville. Strong northeasterly winds raise the water level about 2 feet at Mayport and Jacksonville. Strong southwesterly winds lower the water about 1.5 feet at Mayport and one foot at Jacksonville. (See Table 9-B for Authorizing Legislation.) Estimated cost of new work $11,000,000 Federal and $20,592,000 non-Federal. Local cooperation. Local interests have fully complied with requirements of local cooperation for 9-9 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF TIlE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 2000 work performed to date. For work authorized by the 1965 River and Harbor Act, local interests were required to contribute 2.6 percent of the contract price plus supervision and administration for work provided by the Corps; provide all lands and rights-of-way; save the United States free from damages; and provide and maintain public terminal and transfer facilities. Assurances of local cooperation for this work were accepted February 11, 1966. Non-Federal contribution for new work was $1,135,669. Terminal facilities. Jacksonville Harbor has 84 waterfront facilities. Available at the General Cargo Facilities are 11,140 feet of usable berthing space and 12 transit sheds with a total storage space of 1,009,800 square feet. The Oil Handling Facilities consist of 7,843 feet of usable berthing space and 179 storage tanks providing a total of 8,478,900 barrels of tank storage. Warehouse storage at the port includes 3,266,900 square feet of dry storage and 4,071,100 cubic feet of cold storage. Available open storage is 233 acres. Four fixed cranes with capacities from 40 to 100 tons are located at the port. Available locally are crawler and truck cranes with capacities up to 100 tons. Various phases of marine repair work are accomplished by 7 waterfront repair facilities and numerous other companies located offwater. Dry-dock facilities consist of 6 floating dry-docks with capacities from 800 to 33,000 tons. Floating equipment includes 25 tugs with up to 3,300 horsepower and 16 tank barges with capacities up to 20,700 barrels. Three major railroads furnish rail service from port docks to all points outside of Jacksonville. Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce (See Port Series No. 15, Rev. 1978.) Operations and results during fiscal year. New Work: Engineering and design cost was $524,542. Maintenance: Operation of locks and dams cost was $579,000. Operation of flood control structures cost was $15,100. Natural resource management cost was $2,900. Condition and operation study cost was $300. Real estate management cost $2,732,400. Bank stabilization cost was $3,100. Credits totaled $400. Condition at end offiscal year. DE's notice executed September 1998. Chiefs report approved March 1999. PED is scheduled for completion in December 2000. (See Table 9-A for total project costs.) In addition, $290,013 has been expended from public works funds for new work. 16. JACKSONVILLE HARBOR (MILL COVE), FL Location. The authorized Mill Cove project comprises a 6 square mile body of shallow water on the St. Johns River approximately 10 miles from the Atlantic Ocean near the northeasterly corner of the Florida peninsula. (See NOAA Nautical Chart No. 11491.) Previous project. None. Existing project. The authorized project provides improved flow and circulation through Mill Cove to eliminate further shoaling. This large shallow area averages about 2 to 4 feet deep, is about 5.5 miles long, and varies from 0.5 to 2.0 miles wide. It is situated along the St. Johns River near the Dame Point- Fulton Cutoff portion of the Jacksonville Harbor navigation project. The Mill Cove project includes dredging a 650 foot by 3,600 foot flow channel at the west end to -12 feet MSL; enlarging the weir opening at the eastern end to 1,300 feet wide and -12 feet MSL; and installing flow diversion features at the west and east ends of the cove. Mean tidal range is 4.9 feet at entrance, 4.5 feet at Mayport, 3.0 feet at Dame Point, and 1.2 feet at Jacksonville. Strong northeasterly winds raise the water level about 2 feet at Mayport and Jacksonville. Strong southwesterly winds lower the water about 1.5 feet at Mayport and 1 foot at Jacksonville (See Table 9-B for Authorizing Legislation.) Local cooperation. In conformance with Section 221, Public Law 91-611, and prior to commencement of construction, the Jacksonville Port Authority, as local sponsor, must provide written agreement to the following local cooperation requirements: provide without cost to the United States all lands, easements, and rights-of-way required for construction and subsequent maintenance of the project; hold and save the United States free from damages that result due to construction and maintenance other than damages due to the fault or negligence of the United States or its contractors; accomplish without cost to the United States such utility and other relocations or alterations as necessary for construction. Non-Federal contributions for new work was $250,000. Terminal facilities. None. Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: Engineering and design cost was $174,782. 9-10 JACKSONVILLE, FL DISTRICT Condition at end of fiscal year. Plans and specifications were completed September 2000. 17. JOHNS PASS, FL Location. A natural inlet on the west coast of Florida Connecting Boca Ciega Bay with Gulf of Mexico. The Pass is located about 8 miles northwest of lower Tampa Bay directly across Boca Ciega Bay from St. Petersburg, Florida. (See NOAA Nautical Chart No. 11411.) Existing project. Channel 10 by 150 feet in the Gulf, thence 8 by 100 feet inside pass, and 6 by 100 feet to the Intracoastal Waterway, and suitable protective measures over a frontage of approximately 1,000 linear feet of shore along the north end of Treasure Island. Plane of reference is mean low water. Mean range of tide is 1.5 feet. Project is about 2.6 miles long. Project was authorized December 2, 1964 by the Chief of Engineers under Section 107 of the 1960 River and Harbor Act and by Section 110 of the 1966 River and Harbor Act. Local cooperation. Fully complied with to date. Terminal facilities. Only small marinas and repair Yards for recreational craft are in the general vicinity. Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Operation of locks and dams cost was 19,900. Real estate management cost was $511,200. Condition at end offiscal year. Project was completed in 1968. Authorized project depths were restored as of June 1991. 18. LONGBOAT PASS, FL Location. Longboat Pass is located on the west coast of Florida about 11 miles northwest of Sarasota and 23 miles south of St. Petersburg. Located in Manatee County, it is one of several natural inlets connecting Sarasota Bay, a tidal estuary, with the Gulf of Mexico. (See NOAA Nautical Chart No. 11425.) Existing project. The authorized project provides for an entrance channel 12 by 150 feet from the Gulf to LOngb oat Pass Bridge, thence a channel 10 by 100 feet from Longboat Pass Bridge along a north to northeasterly alignment to the Intracoastal Waterway to Cortez Bridge. The mean tidal range is 2.2 feet and the maximum tidal range is about 5 feet. Currents are predominantly tidal. (See Table 9-B for Authorizing Legislation.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with to date. See 1978 Annual Report for detailed local cooperation requirements. Contributed funds for new work were $172,324. Terminal facilities. From Sarasota north to Tampa Bay there are about 28 small craft facilities including marinas, boat repair yards, and boat basins along the Intracoastal Waterway. Nine of them are located within 2 miles of Longboat Pass. Numerous private mooring piers and wharves also exist in the area. The marina and repair facilities appear adequate for the general boating needs of the area. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Operation of locks and dams $2,000. Real estate management cost was $58,200. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction of the project is complete. Authorized project depths were restored as of June 1991. 19. MANATEE HARBOR, FL Location. The project is located in Manatee County on the east side of Tampa Bay 10 miles from the Gulf of Mexico. (See NOAA Nautical Chart No. 11414.) Existing project. The authorized project provides for maintenance of the existing 40-foot deep draft navigation channel and turning basin, which extends from Tampa Bay Channel to berthing facilities at Port Manatee. Also provide initial construction for a widener at the northwest end of the Manatee Harbor Channel and initial construction to deepen approximately 6.6 acres adjacent to the southern berthing area to provide a larger turning basin. All material from the project will be placed on upland sites west and northeast of the port slip. Estimated cost of new work $26,485,000 Federal and $12,900,000 non-Federal. Local cooperation. Fully complied with to date. A 25 percent contribution and an additional 10 percent reimbursement over 30 years from locals are required. 9-11 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 2000 Non-Federal contribution for new work was $2,586,943. Terminal facilities. Existing facilities at Port Manatee consist of 675 acres of port operational lands, a ship basin 1,500 feet long by 788 feet wide; and an approximately 3 mile access channel, with a design width of 400 feet, which connects with the Federally authorized Tampa Bay Channel. The Manatee project was constructed between August 1968 and February 1970. The required design depth was 40 feet, and the dredging contractor was allowed a pay overdepth of 2 feet. Port Manatee also operates its own terminal railroad, which is licensed under the Interstate Commerce Commission, and publishes a switching tariff as a Class III railroad. It also maintains and operates 2 switch engines and about 30,000 feet of track, which connects with the CSX Railroad. Operations and results during fiscal year. New Work: Engineering and design cost was $745,126. Maintenance: Real estate management cost $9,913. Condition at end of fiscal year. Project has been delayed due to environmental. impacts, which necessitate difficult mitigation requirements regarding seagrasses. Award of Phase II (wideners, turning basin, and mitigation) are scheduled for December 2001 and completion in December 2002. The GRR to reconfigure the turning basin is scheduled for completion in June 2001. 20. MAYAGUEZ HARBOR, PR Location. The Project is on the west coast of Puerto Rico, about 110 miles by water from San Juan Harbor. (See NOAA Nautical Chart No. 25673.) Existing project. The authorized project provides for a 30 by 1,000-foot approach channel to the deep-water terminal, decreasing to a 500-foot width opposite the westerly end of terminal, thence the same width to the easterly end of terminal. (See Table 9-B for Authorizing Legislation.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with to date. Terminal facilities. A modern deep water terminal is located in the northeast section of the harbor consisting of a bulkhead wharf about 1,270 feet long with a storage transit shed 800 by 60 feet immediately shoreward. The Puerto Rico Industrial Development Company, an agency of the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico, owns a bulkhead wharf of about 200 feet in line with the existing deep water terminal plant located within the industrial harbor area. In addition, Bumble Bee Packing Company, Inc., owns and operates a dock of about 200 feet for docking tuna fish boats. Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations and results duringfiscal year. None. Condition at end offiscal year. Project was completed in 1934. 21. MELBOURNE HARBOR, FL Location. The project is on Indian River about midway of the State of Florida, 179 miles south of Jacksonville Harbor and 171 miles north of Miami Harbor. Existing project. The authorized project provides for a channel 8 by 100 feet from Indian River to a 400 by 800 foot turning basin in Crane Creek. Project is about 3,150 feet long. Plane of reference is mean low water. The harbor is almost non-tidal. Terminal facilities. The Municipal Marina on the north end of the turning basin has a 350 foot steel bulkhead with 11 finger piers, each about 40 feet long. There are also 2 privately owned storage and repair facilities and several privately owned boathouses and docks. The facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations and results during fiscal year. None. Condition at end of fiscal year. The project was completed in 1938. As of September 1984 channel depths as authorized were available throughout the project. 22. MIAMI HARBOR, FL Location. Miami is near the northern end of Biscayne Bay, about 71 miles south of the entrance to Palm Beach Harbor. Miami River has its source in the Everglades and flows southeasterly to enter Biscayne Bay at Miami. (See NOAA Nautical Chart No. 11468.) Existing project. The authorized project provides for a 38 by 500 foot channel from the ocean to the outer end of the north jetty, thence 36 by 400 feet through the entrance and across Biscayne Bay to and including a turning basin at the municipal terminals; a 36 foot 9-12 JACKSONVILLE, FL DISTRICT depth turning basin at Fisher Island; 2 rubblestone jetties at the entrance; and a channel 15 feet deep in Miami River varying in width from 250 feet at mouth to 90 feet 5.5 miles inland. Plane of reference is mean low water, except for 15-foot channel in Miami River Where depths are based on flood conditions. Total length of the project is about 13 miles. Mean tidal variation is 2.5 feet at entrance and 2 feet in the bay. Extreme variation is about 4.5 feet at entrance and 3 feet in Biscayne Bay. Strong easterly Winds raise the water level about 1.5 feet at entrance and 1 foot in the bay. Strong westerly winds lower Water level about 1 foot at entrance and about 0.5 foot in the bay. Estimated cost for Miami Harbor Channel is $50,255,000 Federal cost and $38,400,000 non- Federal. (See Table 9-B for Authorizing Legislation.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with to date. See 1978 Annual Report for detailed local cooperation requirements. Non-Federal contribution for new work Was $2,300,710. Assurances of local cooperation for the 1968 modification to the project were accepted December 18, 1968. Terminal facilities. There are 91 commercial Waterfront facilities serving the port. The General Cargo Facilities include 21,373 feet of usable berthing Space, 13 transit sheds with a total capacity of 474,300 Square feet, and 9 freight stations with a total storage capacity of 270,400 square feet. Oil Handling Facilities consist of 2,714 feet of usable berthing space and 36 Storage tanks with a total storage capacity of 744,475 barrels. Available sharehouse storage includes dry Storage of 1,450,500 square feet and cold storage of 11,204,000 cubic feet. There are 117.1 acres of open Storage at the port. Hoisting Facilities located at the port include two 40 ton cranes and cranes with capacities up to 200 tons available through local rental. Twelve waterfront repair Yards and 2 offwater yards serve the port. Dry-dock facilities available include 7 marine railways and 4 boat lifts with haulout capacities ranging from 40 to 1,000 tons and lifting capacities ranging from 79 to 500 tons. Nine tugs, with ratings up to 3,000 horsepower, and 13 tank barges, with capacities up to 35,000 barrels, are also available. Rail Facilities at the Port are served by the CSX and the Florida East Coast Railway. Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. (See Port Series No. 16, Rev. 1982.) Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: Engineering and design cost $367,776. Construction management cost was $60,711. Maintenance: Operations of locks and dams cost was $107,800. Natural resource management cost $100. Real estate management cost was $529,300. Engineering and design cost $10,800. Credits totaled $14,900. Condition at end of fiscal year. Contract I has been completed. Contract II is underway but project depth has not been achieved to date due to hard rock. Port submitted letter requesting Corps take over project September 2000. GRR to investigate additional deepening is underway. 23. NEW PASS, SARASOTA, FL Location. Sarasota Bay is a tidal lagoon along the west coast of Florida immediately south of Tampa Bay. New Pass is a gulf inlet across the bay from Sarasota, Florida. (See NOAA Nautical Chart No. 11425.) Existing project. The authorized project provides for an entrance channel 10 feet deep and 150 feet wide in the Gulf of Mexico diminishing to 8 by 100 feet through New Pass and extending across Sarasota Bay to the Intracoastal Waterway with side channels to, and turning basins at, Payne Terminal and city pier. Plane of reference is mean low water. Mean range of tide is 1.3 feet in Sarasota Bay; mean spring range is 1.7 feet. Project is about 4 miles long. (See Table 9-B for Authorizing Legislation.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with to date. Terminal facilities. Consist of Payne Terminal, a slip 200 by 650 feet, and city pier, 400 feet long with 2 finger piers equipped with adequate facilities at each location. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Operation of locks and dams cost was $2,000. Real estate management cost was $49,500. Condition at end offiscal year. Project was completed in 1964. Authorized project depths were restored as of April 1991. 24. OKEECHOBEE WATERWAY, FL Location. The waterway traverses the southern part of the Florida peninsula via the Caloosahatchee River, 9-13 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 2000 Lake Okeechobee, and St. Lucie Canal, connecting coastal waterways along the Gulf and Atlantic Shores. (See NOAA Nautical Chart No. 11428.) Previous project. For details, see page 785 of 1949 Annual Report. Existing project. The authorized project provides for replacing the old locks on the St. Lucie Canal by a single new lock; a channel 10 by 100 feet from Ft. Myers for about 5 miles upstream, thence 8 by 80-100 feet to the Intracoastal Waterway, Jacksonville to Miami, near Stuart; a side channel at Ft. Myers; operation and care of St. Lucie Lock; and maintenance of features completed under previous projects as follows: a 12 by 200 foot channel from the Gulf of Mexico to Punta Rassa, thence 10 by 100 feet to Ft. Myers with a 10 foot depth basin at Fort Myers; a 6 by 80 foot channel along the south shore of Lake Okeechobee from Clewiston to St. Lucie Canal; a 6 by 60 foot channel in Taylor Creek from the town of Okeechobee to the Lake; and operation and care of Moore Haven and Ortona Locks. (See Table 9-B for Authorizing Legislation.) For further details see 1962 Annual Report. Local cooperation. Fully complied with for completed portion of project. Non-Federal contribution amounted to $503,700. Terminal facilities. There are 3 freight piers, one municipal recreation pier, 4 privately owned piers, and a municipal yacht basin on the Caloosahatchee River near Fort Myers. The Corps has provided a boat basin, launching ramp, and a 120-foot wharf on the Caloosahatchee River about one-quarter mile below Ortona Lock. There are tie-up dolphins above and below all 5 locks. Commercial yacht basins are provided on the south side of the Caloosahatchee River about halfway between Ortona and Moore Haven Locks and about 3 miles east of LaBelle. A commercial/municipal yacht basin is provided on the north side of the St. Lucie Canal at Indiantown. There are numerous small wooden-pile landings along the Caloosahatchee River, St. Lucie Canal, and on the St. Lucie River, including one railroad terminal pier, municipal pier, and a pier for handling petroleum products at Stuart. Also, 550 feet of wharves have been provided on the west side of Taylor Creek immediately landward of Hurricane Gate No. 6 and 150 feet on the east side of the creek. A yacht basin has been provided on the west side of the creek immediately landward of the hurricane gate. The installations on Taylor Creek are privately owned, but are open to the public. A breakwater protected harbor is available at Pahokee. There is a 440 foot marginal wharf on the Industrial Canal at Clewiston; a 125 foot wharf at LaBelle; a 150 foot wharf at Belle Glade; a 125 foot wharf at Moore Haven; a 50 foot wharf at Alva; and a 30 foot wharf on Taylor Creek at the town of Okeechobee. A docking facility for loading raw sugar was constructed in 1967 on Herbert Hoover Dike near Belle Glade. All have *, highway and/or railway connections. Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations and results during fiscal year. (See Table 9-L for work accomplished.) Condition at end of fiscal year. The project is complete. (The 8 foot depth basin at Stuart was deauthorized by WRDA of 1988, P.L. 100-676.) 25. OKLAWAHA RIVER, FL Location. The river has its source in a system of large lakes in the central part of the Florida peninsula and flows generally northerly, then easterly, emptying into St. Johns River 22 miles upstream from Palatka. The extreme head of the system is considered to be Lake Apopka, 120 miles above the river's mouth. Previous projects. For details, see page 613 of 1938 Annual Report. Existing project. The authorized project provides for clearing a channel to Lake Griffin; maintaining dikes to obtain a navigable depth of about 4 feet to Leesburg and construction of a lock and dam at Moss Bluff. The project length is about 85.7 miles. (See Table 9-B for Authorizing Legislation.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with to date. Terminal facilities. Several private and public landings and boat-launching ramps are located along the river. Public recreation craft basins and boat launching ramps are near Silver Springs and State Roads 40 and 316 bridges. There is a municipal wharf on Lake Griffin at Leesburg. A dam has created Lake Ocklawaha (13,000 acres) with egress to the St. Johns River through Buckman Lock. Along the lake are 4 launching ramps; Payne's Landing, Orange Springs, Kenwood Landing, and Rodman Recreation Area. Access below the darn is at the Ocklawaha Boat launch ramp and at State Road 19. Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. 9-14 JACKSONVILLE, FL DISTRICT Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Operation of locks and dams cost was $700. Real estate management cost $37,200. Condition at end of fiscal year. The project is complete. (A 6-foot depth channel from the mouth of the river to the head of Silver Springs Run was deauthorized.) The Moss Bluff lock and dam structure Was replaced under the Four River Basins, Florida flood control project. 26. PALM BEACH HARBOR, FL Location. The authorized project is located on the east coast of Florida about 71 miles north of the entrance to Miami Harbor and about 264 miles southeasterly from the entrance to Jacksonville Harbor. (See NOAA Nautical Chart No. 11472.) Existing project. The authorized project provides for an entrance channel 35 by 400 feet merging with an inner channel 33 by 300 feet to and including a turning basin; tank revetment; and restoring jetties. Plane of reference is mean low water. The project is about 1.6 miles long. Mean range of tide in the ocean at the entrance is 2.8 feet and at the turning basin, 2.2 feet. Extreme range of tide is about 4.5 feet at the inlet and 3 feet at the terminals. Seven-foot tidal ranges have occurred during storms. For details, see 1962 Annual Report. (See Table 9-B for Authorizing Legislation.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with to date. For requirements, see 1961 Annual Report. Terminal facilities. The port has 13 commercial Waterfront facilities. The General Cargo Facilities include 5,156 feet of usable berthing space and 6 transit sheds with a total of 118,030 square feet of Storage capacity. The Oil Handling Facilities consist of 10 storage tanks with a total capacity of 2,029,600 barrels. Usable berthing space is not available at the Oil Handling Facilities. Dry storage is available at 150,500 square feet, cold storage at 19,200 cubic feet and open storage at 27.1 acres. Seven cranes with capacities from 15 to 230 tons are located at the port. There are no floating cranes, repair facilities or drydock facilities located at the port. A 100-ton vertical boatlift is located on the Intracoastal Waterway south of the port for heavy lifts. Two tugs with ratings of 900 and 1,000 horsepower are available. The Palm Beach Belt Line which connects with the Florida East Coast Railway serves the port. Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. (See Port Series No.16, Rev. 1982.) Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Operation for locks and dams cost was $24,100. Operation of service utilities cost $2,000. Real estate management cost was $1,373,800. National emergency management cost $43,100. Prevention of obstructive and injurious deposit cost was $797,800. Engineering and design cost $5,400. Credits totaled $22,500. Condition at end of fiscal year. The project was completed in 1967. Jetties and revetment are in need of repair. The south jetty was completed in FY 1986. Maintenance dredging was completed May 1996. Future maintenance dredging will occur yearly as necessary depending on shoaling conditions. 27. PALM VALLEY BRIDGE, FL Location. Palm Valley Bridge is located over the Intracoastal Waterway on State Road 210 in St. John's County, Florida. Existing project. The project provides for the replacement of the existing Palm Valley Bridge with a new high level bridge that is fixed for navigation. Additional roadway construction will be required because of the new bridge alignment. The old bridge will be removed and the Intracoastal Waterway in the vicinity of the old bridge will be dredged to its authorized dimensions. (See Table 9-B for Authorizing Legislation). Estimated cost is $19,000,000 Federal and $7,000,000 non-Federal. Local cooperation. Operations and maintenance at an estimated $75,000 per year. Terminalfacilities. None in the immediate area. Operations and results during the fiscal year. New Work: Real estate cost was $2,827,946. Engineering and design cost was $715,159. Construction management cost was $14,364. Condition at end of fiscal year. Local sponsor is funding expansion from 2 to 4 lanes. PCA executed in 9-15 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF TIlE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 2000 December 1999. Construction contract awarded September 2000. The County Commissioners have approved a betterment to a 4-lane bridge. 28. PONCE DE LEON INLET, FL Location. Ponce de Leon Inlet is on the Atlantic coast of Florida about 65 miles south of St. Augustine Harbor and 57 miles north of Canaveral Harbor. (See NOAA Nautical Chart No. 11485.) Existing project. The authorized project provides for an entrance channel 15 by 200 feet across the ocean bar, thence 12 by 200 feet and 12 by 100 feet through the inlet; thence southward in Indian River North, 12 by 100 feet, and northward in Halifax River, 7 by 100 feet, each leg continuing to the Intracoastal Waterway; ocean jetties on the north and south of the inlet 4,200 and 2,700 feet long respectively, and weir in the north jetty with an impoundment basin inside the jetty. Plane of reference is mean low water. Mean range of tide is 4.1 feet in the ocean and 2.3 feet inside the inlet. the project is about 5 miles long. Estimated cost for new work is $3,284,000 Federal and $2,800,000 non-Federal. Local cooperation. Fully complied with to date. Non- Federal contribution for new work was $2,452,600. Terminal facilities. None in the immediate area. Operations and results during fiscal year. New Work: Engineering and design cost was $59,858. Maintenance: Operation of locks and dams cost was $20,900. Operation of power plants cost $800. Real estate management cost was $5,794,500. Bank stabilization cost $53,200. Credits totaled $1,200. Condition at end of fiscal year. Maintenance is required on the North Jetty. PED is scheduled for completion September 2001. 29. PONCE HARBOR, PR Location. Ponce Harbor is an open bay about midway on the south coast of Puerto Rico. From the center of the city of Ponce, the harbor is about 3 miles south. (See NOAA Nautical Chart No. 25677.) Previous project. For details, see page 12 of Annual Report for 1975. Existing project. The authorized project provides for a seawall 362 feet long extending northwesterly across the rock reef from near the landward end of the municipal pier, 30 feet deep and containing about 18 acres; a breakwater 2,400 feet long extending southwesterly from Punta Carenero; a channel 36 feet deep by 600 feet wide extending from the Caribbean Sea approximately 2.8 miles up to the port, thence a channel 400 feet wide by 36 feet deep into the harbor, and a 36 foot deep, irregularly shaped turning basin with a diameter of 959 feet. Plane of reference is mean low water. Mean tidal range is 0.6 foot, extreme varies between about I foot below and 2 feet above mean low water. (See Table 9-B for Authorizing Legislation.) Local cooperation. Should provide all lands, easements and rights-of-way; provide and maintain at local expense depths in berthing areas and local access channels; hold United States free from any damages resulting from construction and maintenance of the project; relocate without cost to the United States all cables, sewer mains, water supply, drainage and other utility installations as required; provide adequate public terminal and transfer facilities open to all on equal terms. A letter has been received from mayor of Ponce, assuring compliance with local requirements and to cost share the project. Non-Federal contribution for new work was $717,304. A 25 percent contribution is required and an additional 10 percent reimbursement over 30 years from locals. Terminal facilities. The municipality of Ponce owns and operates the only deep-draft terminal facilities in Ponce Harbor, which consist of a municipal pier 515 feet long and 108 feet wide, and a bulkhead wharf 3,811 feet long. Both are equipped for transfer and storage of freight. A 40-ton container lift shore crane is available for the handling of loaded containers. The municipal pier has a steel transit shed 386 by 85 feet. The bulkhead wharf has 4 steel transit sheds totaling over 103,000 square feet. Three concrete and steel warehouses are available providing 800,000 square feet for general storage. Open storage areas for structural steel, lumber, and other bulk and package commodities are also provided. Bulk cement is handled and loaded into cement cargo ships by the use of a private pipeline loading facility. A tuna fish processing and canning factory is located on the premises, with direct access to the bulkhead wharf. Existing facilities are open to the public. Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations and results during fiscal year Maintenance: None. 9-16 JACKSONVILLE, FL DISTRICT Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction of the project is complete. South and north jetties are in fair condition. 30. PORT EVERGLADES HARBOR, FL Location. The harbor is on the east coast of Florida about 23 miles north of Miami and about 48 miles south of Palm Beach Harbor, Florida. (See NOAA Nautical Chart No. 11470.) Existing project. The authorized project provides for an ocean entrance channel 45 by 500 feet through an Ocean bar tapering to 42 by 450 feet between rubblestone entrance jetties, and continuing at that depth to an irregularly flared entrance and turning basin of same depth; enlarging Pier 7 channel to 36 by 400 feet for distance of about 1,600 feet; maintenance of the locally dredged channel opposite Berth 18 to 36 feet deep over a length of 700 feet with varying widths of 200 to 150 feet; construction of a south jetty fishing Walkway; and, maintenance of the jetties. Plane of reference is mean low water. The project is about 1.9 miles long. Mean range of tide is 2.5 feet at the entrance and 2.3 feet at the terminals; extreme range is about 4.5 feet with storm tides of about 6.5 feet. Local cooperation. Fully complied with for work completed to date. For work under H 144/93/1, local interests must: provide all lands, easements and rights- Of-way; save United States free from damages; accomplish utility and other relocations or alterations; provide depths in berthing areas and local access channels serving the terminals commensurate with depths provided in the related project areas; establish regulations prohibiting discharge of pollutants into Waters of the channel by users thereof; prohibit erection of any structure within 100 feet of project channel as authorized at time of construction; provide and maintain public terminal and transfer facilities; contribute 50 percent of total first costs of recreational Jetty fishing facility; and operate and maintain jetty fishing facility. Assurances of local cooperation for the 1974 authorization have been furnished by the local Sponsor. Terminal facilities. There are 22 commercial Waterfront facilities serving the port. The General Cargo Facilities include 13,807 feet of usable berthing Space, 7 transit sheds with a total capacity of 393,870 Square feet, and 6 container yards with space for 3,965 containers. Oil Handling Facilities consist of 232 storage tanks with a total storage capacity of 9,564,800 barrels. There is no usable berthing space located at the Oil Handling Facilities. Dry storage is available at 225,000 cubic feet and open storage at 100.3 acres. Hoisting facilities available from a local firm include 5 cranes with capacities from 20 to 155 tons. No floating cranes or derricks for heavy lifts are available at the port. There are 2 marine repair yards. Dry-dock facilities include 2 dry-docks with capacities of 2,200 and 3,200 tons and a 4,270 ton vertical boatlift. Three tugs with ratings up to 4,290 horsepower serve the port. The Port Everglades Belt Line connects with the CSX railroad to serve the port. Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. (See Port Series No. 16, Rev. 1982.) Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Condition survey cost was $9,300. Real estate management cost $47,800. National emergency preparedness cost was $1,700. Condition at end of fiscal year. Work required to complete the project is construction authorized in H 144/93/1. Amended FCSA was executed April 2000. Project re-scoped to meet expansion requests from the Port. 31.REMOVAL OF AQUATIC GROWTH FROM NAVIGABLE WATERS IN TIHE STATE OF FLORIDA. Location. Water hyacinth, hydrilla and water lettuce are found in freshwater streams and lakes in various parts of the district. Existing project. The authorized project provides for destruction or removal of aquatic growth in navigable waters of the State so far as they constitute an obstruction to navigation and commerce, using any mechanical, chemical or other means not injurious to cattle, and use of log booms to close sloughs and backwaters as an auxiliary means. No estimate of the final cost of work has been made. (See Table 9-B for Authorizing Legislation.) For further details, see 1962 Annual Report. Local cooperation. None required. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Operations continued during the year. 9-17 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 2000 (See Table 9-B for Authorizing Legislation and Table 9-M for spraying operations.) Condition at end of fiscal year. The project is for maintenance of navigable waterways. During the year 24,556 acres of floating vegetation (water hyacinth and/or water lettuce) and 2,136 acres of hydrilla were controlled in approximately 2,200 miles of waterways. Hyacinth in Lake Okeechobee and in St. Johns River Watershed is under maintenance control. 32. ST. AUGUSTINE HARBOR, FL Location. The harbor is on the east coast of Florida, about 35 miles south of the entrance to St. Johns River and about 180 miles north of Fort Pierce Harbor. (See NOAA Nautical Chart No. 11485.) Previous project. For details see page 412 of Annual Report for 1958. Existing project. The authorized project provides for a channel 16 by 200 feet along the best natural new inlet bar, thence 12 feet deep to the Intracoastal Waterway; a sandtrap groin on the north side of the inlet extending seaward from the shore of Vilano Beach, and a sandtight jetty on the south side of the channel extending seaward from the shore of Conch Island parallel to and coextensive with the groin; future landward extension of the groin and jetty; and a channel 10 by 100 feet in San Sebastian River from the Intracoastal Waterway to King Street Bridge, with a turning basin near the upper end. Length of the inlet channel is about 1.5 miles and length of the San Sebastian River channel is about 2.6 miles. Plane of reference is mean low water. The mean tidal range is 4.5 feet in the ocean at St. Augustine Inlet and 4.2 feet at the city waterfront. Strong northerly winds, mostly in the winter, lower the water surface about 1 foot. (See Table 9-B for Authorizing Legislation.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with to date. Terminal facilities. There are several timber docks on the Matanzas waterfront of St. Augustine. In this area of the harbor is a concrete dock, which serves as a municipal yacht pier. It has fuel facilities, 19 slips and accommodates boats up to 60 feet in length. A large public boat ramp is also available. The principal terminals are the numerous shrimp docks in the San Sebastian River, which flows southward through the city into the Matanzas River south of the bridge. These consist of timber wharves, with frame and corrugated iron warehouses thereon, and 9 marine railways for small boats. There is also a marine supply facility and several boat yards. The present terminals have highway connections and several of the shrimp docks have rail connections. They are considered adequate for existing commerce and recreational craft. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Real estate management cost was $375,100. Condition at end of fiscal year. Project is complete except for the North Jetty, which is in a deferred status. The groin is in good condition except for the 300 feet, which has subsided to about elevation 3.0 feet, mean low water. The jetty is in good condition, but is submerged at high tide. Maintenance dredging at the entrance channel was completed June 1996. 33. ST. JOHNS RIVER, FL, JACKSONVILLE TO LAKE HARNEY Location. Rises in marshes of Brevard County, Florida, near east coast, and flows northwesterly to Jacksonville, thence easterly into the Atlantic Ocean, 122 miles south of Savannah River. River is about 285 miles long, of which 161.5 miles are included in project. (See NOAA Nautical Chart No. 11492.) Previous projects. Adopted by River and Harbor Acts of June 14, 1880 and July 5, 1884. For further details see Annual Reports for 1915 and 1938. Existing project. Channel is 13 by 200 feet from Florida East Coast Railway bridge at Jacksonville to Palatka, thence 12 by 100 feet to Sanford, and thence 5 by 100 feet to Lake Harney, with side channel to Enterprise and maintenance of two jetties. Existing project was authorized by River and Harbor Acts of March 2, 1945 (H 445/78/2) and July 24, 1946 (SD 208/79/2). For further details see Annual Report for 1962. Terminal facilities. There are 36 piers and wharves along project, including municipal piers and wharves at Green Cove Springs and Palatka, 12 Navy piers at Green Cove Springs, a municipal recreational pier at Sanford, and 19 privately owned piers, 5 of which have nearby tank storage facilities for petroleum projects. Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations and results duringfiscal year. None. 9-18 ,JACKSONVILLE, FL DISTRICT Condition at end of fiscal year. Active portion is complete. Condition of project, as a whole is adequate for present needs of navigation. (For more detailed information refer to 1963 Annual Report.) 34. ST. LUCIE INLET, FL Location. The inlet is on the east coast of Florida about 19 miles south of the entrance to Fort 'Pierce Harbor, Florida, and 100 miles north of the entrance to Miami Harbor, Florida. (See NOAA Nautical Chart No. 11472.) Previous project. For details see page 764 of Annual Report for 1949. Existing project. The authorized project provides for extending the north jetty about 500 feet and modifying existing jetty to provide a sand bypass weir section about 500 feet long; excavation of a sand impoundment basin adjacent to the bypass weir in the north jetty; construction of a south jetty consisting of a rubblemound structure about 2,400 feet long with a Walkway for recreational fishing; channel between existing bar cut and the Intracoastal Waterway 10 by 500 feet through the bar cut, tapering to 150 feet through the inlet, and 7 by 100 feet to the Intracoastal Waterway; and transfer of 380,000 cubic yards of material to the south beach during each two year maintenance period. Total project length is about 1.9 miles. Plane of reference is mean low water. Mean tidal range is 2.6 feet on the ocean side and about one foot on the landside of the inlet. (See Table 9-B for Authorizing Legislation.) Estimated cost of new work $21,100,000 Federal and $5,200,000 non-Federal. Local cooperation. Local interests must: contribute 19.9 percent of construction cost allocated to navigation in the combined project, 23.1 percent allocated to beach erosion, and 50 percent of COnstruction cost of jetty fishing walkway; provide 39.8 percent of the annual maintenance cost allocated to navigation and 23.2 percent of the annual costs for maintenance dredging allocated to beach erosion control for periodic beach nourishment and 100 Percent of the annual jetty maintenance costs allocated to beach erosion control; maintain jetty fishing Walkway; agree that each 5 years the amount of local Cost sharing for maintenance is to be adjusted; provide all lands, easements, and rights-of-way; hold United States free from damages; provide marina with mooring facilities and utilities; provide and maintain depths in berthing area and local access and feeder channels commensurate with the depths provided in the project; accomplish such alterations as required to sewer, water supply, drainage, and other utility facilities, and take action to place in effect statutes and/or regulations which will protect water quality for the authorized uses of the project. Assurances of local cooperation for the 1974 modification were signed by the local sponsor on August 24, 1978. Terminal facilities. A municipal pier provides facilities for docking and servicing charter fishing and small recreational craft. At Stuart there is a dock for handling bulk petroleum products and several marinas, which provide facilities for mooring, servicing and minor repair of small craft. Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations and results during fiscal year. New Work: Engineering and design cost was $171,379. Maintenance: Natural resource management cost was $1,700. Real estate management cost $2,488,200. Credits totaled $14,400. Condition at end of fiscal year. Work required to complete the project is construction authorized in HD 294/93/1. Authorized project depths were restored as of July 1991. Maintenance dredging was completed June 1996. Improvements to the inlet were authorized in 1974. Due to limited funding during construction, the south jetty was completed 1,000 feet short of the authorized length; the impoundment basin was not constructed to design capacity as a shallow subsurface rock was encountered. Sufficient commercial benefits were identified in the economic update study to reclassify the inlet from a predominately recreational usage inlet to a commercial usage inlet. Preconstruction, engineering, and design is scheduled for completion in February 2001. A section 221 agreement was signed for the initial construction and the locals will use this as authority to initiate land acquisition. A supplemental agreement may be required. Contract award is scheduled for April 2001 and completion October 2001. 35. SAN JUAN HARBOR, PR Location. San Juan Harbor is on the north coast of Puerto Rico and about 35 miles from the east end of the island and 1,100 miles southeast of Miami, Florida. (See NOAA Nautical Chart No. 25670.) 9-19 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 2000 Previous projects. For details see Annual Reports for 1915, 1916, and 1938. Existing project. Modification of the authorized project to provide the deepening of the Bar Channel to 48 feet and shifting its alignment 350 feet west; deepening Anegado and Army Terminal to 40 feet; deepening Graving Dock Channel, the Cruise Ship Basin, Puerto Nuevo Channel, and San Antonio Channel to 36 feet; and deepening Anchorage Area E to 38 feet while reducing its size and constructing 6 mooring dolphins within its limits. A 1,500-foot long extension to San Antonio Channel would be added to the Federal project and Sabana approach deepened to 32 feet. Estimated cost of new work $38,325,000 Federal and $13,475,000 non-Federal. Local cooperation. Should provide all lands, easements and rights-of-way; hold the United States free from any damages; provide and maintain depths in berthing areas and local access and feeder channels; provide alterations as required to sewer, water supply, and other utility facilities. It is further recommended that local interests be reimbursed for work performed by them on the project subsequent to project authorization. A 25 percent contribution and an additional 10 percent reimbursement over 30 years from locals are required. Non-Federal contribution for new work was $8,100,000. Terminal facilities. There are 28 piers and bulkhead wharves in the harbor capable of docking deep-draft vessels, which have an aggregate berthing length of about 23,700 feet. Eleven piers and bulkhead wharves are on the north shore, 2 piers and a three-level ramp facility for roll-on/roll-off operations at Front Graving Dock turning basin and channel, 9 at the eastern side and 3 at the western side of the Army Terminal basin and channel, and 3 on the south shore of San Antonio Channel. One pier and bulkhead wharf are privately owned, 7 are U.S. Government property, and 24 are owned by the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico. Twenty piers and wharves are equipped with mechanical crane transfer facilities. Five wharves are equipped with a special crane for handling loaded containers. Twentyfour are open to the general public. Pier No. 6 was repaired and improved in 1985. There is an aggregate length of about 1,339 feet of berthing space at Catano Point used principally by small vessels within the 18-foot draft range. This space is also open to the public. In addition, there are 10 piers and bulkhead wharves with approximately 6,910 feet of berthing space owned and operated by different agencies of the Federal Government. This space is not open to the public. Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations and results during fiscal year. New Work: Channels and canal cost was $17,889,795. Navigation ports and harbors cost was $1,155,529. Reconnaissance cost was $5,417. Engineering and design cost was $314,764. Construction management cost was $1,293,911. Maintenance: Operation of locks and dams cost was $2,200. Real estate management cost $1,433,700. Bank stabilization cost was $2,500. Credits totaled $15,000. Condition at end of fiscal year. The PED phase was completed in September 1995. Revisions to the plans and specifications were accomplished in FY 97. Execution of PCA was completed June 1998. Authorized in WRDA 1996. Contract I scheduled for completion December 2000. Contract II awarded September 1999 and scheduled for completion September 2001. Existing project includes the entrance channel and turning basin to Army Terminal, which cost $1,543,712 (this expenditure was made from military appropriations and is not included in Table 9-A costs). 36. TAMPA HARBOR, FL Location. Tampa Harbor is in a large natural indentation of the Gulf of Mexico about midway of the west coast of Florida. The entrance is about 220 miles north of Key West and about 330 miles southeast of Pensacola. (See NOAA Nautical Chart Nos. 11413 and 11414.) Previous projects. For details see page 665 of 1938 Annual Report. Existing project. The authorized project provides for a channel from the Gulf of Mexico to Port Sutton and Tampa; 46 by700 feet from the Gulf of Mexico to Mullet Key; 44 by 600 feet in Mullet Key Cut Channel; 44 by 500 feet in Tampa Bay from Mullet Key Cut to Hillsborough Bay and Port Tampa Channels; 44 by 500 feet in Hillsborough Bay from junction with Tampa Bay and Port Tampa Channels to the junction with Port Sutton entrance channel, thence 42 by 400 feet to the junction with Seddon and Garrison Channels; 44 by 400 feet in Port Sutton 9-20 JACKSONVILLE, FL DISTRICT entrance channel; 42 by 400 feet in Sparkman Channel; 40 by 300 feet in Ybor Channel; 42 by 400 feet in Port Tampa Channel; 44 by 400-500 feet in East Bay entrance channel; 44 by 300 feet in East Bay approach channel; 30 by 300 feet in Seddon and Garrison Channels; 30 by 200 feet in Alafia River; 9 by 100 feet in Hillsborough River to a point 2,000 feet above Columbus River bridge; a breakwater; a 43 by 200 foot Port Sutton Terminal Channel 3,700 feet long; turning basins at Ybor Channel, Port Tampa, East Bay, mouth of Hillsborough River, and in Alafia River; and maintenance of a channel 12 by 200 feet in Hillsborough River, a 43 by 200 feet by 3,700 feet long in Port Sutton Terminal Channel, and 34 by 300 feet in East Bay Channel. (The 46-foot and 44 foot depth portions of the project include a 5-foot underkeel clearance. Special studies on the project concluded that 4 feet underkeel is sufficient. Therefore, a one-foot Overdepth has been placed in an inactive status, resulting in active project depths of 45 and 43 feet respectively.) Plane of reference is mean low water. The project is about 67 miles long, including 10 miles in Hillsborough River and 3.6 miles in Alafia River. Mean range of tide is 1.3 feet at the lower end of the bay, 1.6 feet at Port Tampa, and 1.8 feet at Tampa. Extreme range is about 3.8 feet at the lower end of the bay and 4.8 feet at Tampa. Strong southwesterly winds raise the water level about 1.5 feet. Strong northerly Winds, which usually occur in the winter, lower the Water level about 2 feet. (See Table 9-B for Authorizing Legislation.) Estimated cost for Big Bend Channel $7,874,000 Federal and $6,000,000 non-Federal. Estimated cost for Ybor Channel $46,700,000 Federal and $24,800,000 non-Federal. For further details, see 1962 Annual Report. Local cooperation. Local cooperation has been fully complied with for work completed to date. See 1978 Annual Report for requirements for work authorized by the River and Harbor Act of 1970, H 401/91/2 and l 150/91/1. Assurances of local cooperation for the 1970 authorization were approved by the Secretary of the Army on January 10, 1973. The LCA for branch channels was signed June 20, 1986. An amendment to the LCA reflecting cost sharing requirements of WRDA of 1986 for section 6 was signed August 31, 1987. Non-Federal contribution for new work was $4,971,144. A 25 percent contribution and an additional 10 percent reimbursement over 30 years is required from locals. Terminal facilities. There are 102 commercial waterfront facilities serving Tampa Harbor. The General Cargo Facilities consist of 7,226 feet of usable berthing space and 15 transit sheds with a total of 585,200 square feet of storage space. The Oil Handling Facilities include 16,440 feet of usable berthing space and 316 storage tanks for a total capacity of 11,610,350 barrels. Dry storage is available at 1,904,750 square feet, cold storage at 14,309,000 cubic feet, and open storage at 59.4 acres. There are 2 wharves available for coal storage at 750,000 tons total storage and grain elevators with a 3,400,000-bushel total capacity. One elevator on Ybor Channel has a 1,000,000-bushel capacity. Hoisting Facilities include 13 cranes, fixed and mobile, with capacities from 45 to 150 tons and other crawler and mobile cranes available locally. Marine repair yards include 9 waterfront repair facilities and numerous other offwater companies engaged in various phases of marine repair. There are 4 floating and 4 graving docks available at the port with capacities ranging from 548 to 5,400 long tons. Floating equipment includes 24 tugs with up to 3,350 horsepower and 4 companies with tank barges of capacities up to 14,000 barrels. The CSX Railroad serves the port. Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. (See Port Series No. 17, Rev. 1979.) Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: Port Sutton: Engineering and design cost was $156,729. East Bay Channel: Engineering and design cost was $224,391. Supervision and administration cost was $25,071. Big Bend: Engineering and design cost was $23,105. Maintenance: Operations of locks and dams cost was $342,100. Real estate management cost was $3,612,500. National emergency operations cost was $61,200. Prevention of obstructive and injurious deposit cost was $900. Bank stabilization cost was $300. Engineering and design cost $100. Credits totaled $38,000. Condition at end of fiscal year. Big Bend Channel Chiefs report signed in October 1998. Plans and specifications were completed in September 2000. Feasibility report for Alafia River is scheduled for completion October 2000. Ybor Channel NTP was issued August 2000 and is scheduled for completion June 2001. 9-21 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 2000 37. NAVIGATION PROJECTS ON WHICH RECONNAISSANCE AND CONDITION SURVEYS ONLY WERE CONDUCTED DURING PERIOD. Total cost was $1,052,638. 38. OTHER AUTHORIZED NAVIGATION PROJECTS (See Table 9-C.) 39. NAVIGATION WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION Navigation Activities Pursuant to Section 107, Public Law 86-645 (Preauthorization) Fiscal year costs for Section 107 Coordination Account, $5,553; Island of Vieques, PR $240; Aguadilla Harbor, PR $270; Fernandina Harbor, FL $178; Port Everglades, FL $20; Salt Run, St. Augustine, FL, $255; Hernando Beach Channel, FL $194,471; Limetree Port, VI $7,831; Key West Harbor, FL $8,067. Snagging and clearing for navigation (Section 3 of 1945 River and Harbor Act, Public Law 14, 79th Congress.) No costs incurred. Mitigation of shore damages attributed to navigation projects (Sec II ). Stohl Road, Aguadilla Harbor, PR $181,770. Beach Erosion Control 40. BREVARD COUNTY, FL Location. The project is on the east coast of Florida at approximately the midpoint of the peninsula. (See NOAA Nautical Chart Nos. 11484 and 11476.) Existing project. The authorization provides for a protective and recreational beach with a berm 50 feet wide at elevation 10 feet above mean low water and a natural seaward slope as would be shaped by wave action, along 14,600 feet of beach at the city of Cape Canaveral and 10,600 feet of beach at Indiatlantic and Melbourne beach, and for periodic nourishment of the restored beach at Indiatlantic and Melbourne beach limited initially to a period of 10 years. Nourishment of the restored beach at the city of Cape Canaveral would be provided by the authorized sand-transfer plant for construction at Canaveral Harbor. The project also provides for improvement of the Federally owned shores for beach erosion control or hurricane " protection to be accomplished by the Federal agencies involved, subject to their own determination of economic justification. The areas involved include 4.9 miles of shore at Kennedy Space Center, 4.0 miles at Cape Kennedy Air Force Station, and 2.3 miles at Patrick Air Force Base. Mean tidal range in the area is 3.5 feet. (See Table 9-1 for Authorizing Legislation.) Estimated cost for new work $136,600,000 Federal and $94,400,000 non-Federal. Local cooperation. Local interests must contribute 50 percent of all first costs of the work and 50 percent of the nourishment cost at Indiatlantic and Melbourne beach for the first 10 years of the project life; provide lands and rights-of-way; provide, after the first 10 years of project life, periodic nourishment of the restored beach at Indiatlantic and Melbourne beach during project life; maintain continued public ownership of the shore upon which the amount of Federal participation is based; control water pollution; and hold the United States free from damages. Assurances of local cooperation were approved by the Secretary of the Army on July 9, 1973. Non-Federal contribution for new work was $2,462,000. Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: Lands and damages cost was $9,022. Feasibility cost was $5,165. Engineering and design cost was $405,064. Construction management cost was $35,732. Condition at end of fiscal year. Feasibility report was completed in September 1996, approved in December 1996, and authorized by Section 101(b) of WRDA 1996. PED completed in September 1999. PCA was signed April 2000 and North Reach contract was awarded September 2000. 41. BROWARD COUNTY, FL BEACI EROSION CONTROL AND HILLSBORO INLET, FL NAVIGATION PROJECT 9-22 JACKSONVILLE, FL DISTRICT Location. Broward County is on the lower east coast of Florida, 300 miles south of Jacksonville and about 30 miles north of Miami. Hillsboro Inlet is in the northern part of Broward County. (See NOAA Nautical Chart No. 11466.) Existing project. The authorization provides for Federal participation toward cost of a shore restoration and protection project and a project to maintain a channel adequate for small craft navigation. Plan provides for restoration of a shoreline protection and recreational beach at 4 locations generally 100 feet Wide with berm elevation of 10 feet above mean low Water; a navigation channel 8 by 100 feet from the Intracoastal Waterway to a point 1,500 feet oceanward in Hillsboro Inlet, thence 10 by 150 feet in the ocean; jetties on north and south sides of ocean entrance; a permanently based floating dredge; and on a deferred basis, a trestle-mounted sand-transfer plant, if needed. Navigation portion of the project is in an inactive status. Mean range of tide in areas is 2.5 feet. Plane of reference is mean low water. Cost estimate for new Work is $90,200,000 Federal and $78,800,000 non- Federal contribution. (See Table 9-B for Authorizing Legislation.) Local cooperation. Local interests must contribute 90.5 percent of the first cost beach restoration in the reach between north county line and Hillsboro Inlet, 90 Percent of first cost allocated to beach restoration, and 50 percent of first cost allocated to navigation for reach between Hillsboro Inlet and Port Everglades and 72.4 Percent of beach restoration in reach between Port Everglades and south county line; provide all lands and rights-of-way; obtain approval of Chief of Engineers of plans and specifications if local interests construct beach erosion features; and furnish assurances that they will hold the United States free from damages; provide and maintain adequate public landing or wharf at Hillsboro Inlet; establish a public body to cooperate financially and to provide and operate local facilities for navigation, control water pollution, maintain ownership of publicly owned shores, and maintain all Project works except the jetties (maintenance of the channel to revert to the United States if sand-transfer Plant is constructed). Assurances of local cooperation Were accepted November 22, 1968. Non-Federal contribution for new work was $3,460,990. Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: Engineering and design cost $257,528. Condition at end of fiscal year. The sponsor conducted engineering and design for preparation of a GRR for renourishment of Segments II and III. The sponsor submitted GRR for review and is under revision by sponsor. Initiate LRR for Segment I scheduled in 2001. 42. DUVAL COUNTY, FL Location. On upper east coast of Florida, within 20 miles of Florida-Georgia line. Ocean shoreline is about 16 miles long. (See NOAA Nautical Chart No. 11488.) Existing project. Provides for Federal participation toward cost of construction with artificial fill, a beach 60 feet wide at elevation 11 feet above mean low water with a natural slope seaward, and for periodic nourishment for 10 years. Federal participation to be 100 percent of the first cost of construction applicable to the Federal shore and 50 percent applicable to the other publicly owned shore and 55.5 percent of periodic nourishment cost for first 10 years of project life. Mean tidal range at south jetty in St. Johns River is 4.9 feet. Estimated cost of new work $111,700,000 Federal and $73,200,000 non-Federal. Project was authorized by River and Harbor Act of 1965 (H 273/89/1). Local cooperation. Local interests must contribute 50 percent of first cost of constructing non-Federal publicly owned shores; contribute 44.5 percent of periodic nourishment costs for first 10 years of project life; provide all lands, rights-of-way, and relocations; hold the United states free from damages; control water pollution; and furnish assurances that they will maintain continued public ownership of the shore upon which the amount of federal participation is based during economic life of project. Assurances of local cooperation were accepted on November 29, 1973. Non-Federal contribution for new work was $16,895,567. Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: Lands and damages cost was $6,850. Engineering and design cost was $450,275. Condition at end of fiscal year. Engineering and design is underway for next renourishment contract, which is scheduled for award in March 2001. 9-23 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 2000 43. FORT PIERCE BEACH, FL Location. Fort Pierce Beach Erosion Control Project extends 1.3 miles south of Fort Pierce Inlet, on the east coast of Florida about 120 miles north of Miami. Existing project. The project fill was initially completed by local interests in 1971, using offshore borrow material. Prior to the nourishment, severe shorefront recession had destroyed a private residence and threatened other residences and a state road. Local interests were reimbursed the federal share of the initial project construction cost. Federal participation in renourishment was authorized for an initial 10-year period and subsequently extended five years under the discretionary authority of the Chief of Engineers until 1985. The project is also periodically nourished with suitable material obtained from operational maintenance of the nearby Fort Pierce Harbor federal navigation project. The project was renourished in the summer of 1980. A Section 111 project authorized in 1982 provides that 60 percent of the cost of material required to nourish 1.2 miles south of Fort Pierce Inlet should be reallocated to the navigation project. A reevaluation report is being conducted to determine whether extension of federal participation in cost sharing to 50 years is warranted. Estimated cost is $37,300,000 Federal and $15,200,000 non-Federal. Local cooperation. Non-Federal contribution for new work was $5,054,180. Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: Lands and damages cost was $9,020. Fish and wildlife cost was $433,999. Navigation port and harbor cost was $9,945. Renourishment cost was $136,186. Engineering and design and construction management cost was $394,378 and $40,141 respectively. Condition at end offiscal year. The Section 934 report recommending extension of Federal participation was approved in June 1995 by ASA (CW). GRR for the additional mile undergoing higher authority review and approval. 44. INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FL Location. Indian River County is on the east coast of Florida, midway between Jacksonville and Miami. The authorized project comprises 2.65 miles of beach along the ocean shore of Vero Beach and 1.7 miles along the Sebastian Inlet State Park. (See NOAA Nautical Chart Nos. 11474 and 11476.) Existing project. The authorized project provides nourishment for 8,870 feet (1.68) miles) of the State Park, south of Sebastian inlet. The initial beach fill would consist of 202,000 cubic yards of nourishment material. An estimated 202,000 cubic yards of periodic nourishment at 5-year intervals would be required. The Federal share of the first cost was estimated to be 65 percent of this segment. The plan also provided for nourishment of 9,180 feet (1.74 miles) of Vero Beach. The initial beach fill consisted of 572,000 cubic yards of material, including advance nourishment. The restored beach would have a 20-foot wide level berm at an elevation of 15 feet above mean low water. The beach fill as designed would provide protection against a 10-year return interval storm. An estimated 120,000 cubic yards of periodic nourishment would be required at 5-year intervals. In addition to the beach fill a "Sabecon" reef breakwater was recommended. The structure would be placed 500 feet offshore of the new beach and would be 400 feet in length, with a zero mean low water crest elevation. The Federal share of the first cost was estimated to be 43.7 percent for this segment. The project was authorized on November 17, 1986 (Public Law 99-662) by the 1986 Water Resource Development Act. Local cooperation. The authorization of a beach erosion control project for Indian River County, Florida was made with the provision that the State and local interests will, in addition to the general requirements, agree to comply with the following requirements: provide all necessary lands, easements and rights-of way; including borrow areas and disposal areas for excavated material, and relocations; hold and save the United States free from claims for damages; assure continued conditions of public ownership and public use of the shore; assure maintenance and repair during the economic life of the project; provide and maintain as necessary access roads, parking areas and other public use facilities; provide a cash contribution for periodic nourishment's for the life of the project; provide an additional cash contribution for the Sebastian Inlet State Park Beach. The project, as authorized, provides that the work may be accomplished in separate units or features and that the written agreement with non-Federal interests be obtained. The Indian River County Board of 9-24 JACKSONVILLE, FL DISTRICT Commissioners, by letters dated December 21, 1984 and January 15, 1987, affirmed their support for the project and their willingness and ability to share in project costs. Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: Lands and damages cost was $2,704. Renourishment cost was $1,994. Engineering and design cost was $58,039. Condition at end of fiscal year. No work is currently scheduled. 45. LEE COUNTY, FL Location. Lee County is on the lower Gulf coast of Florida, about 90 miles south of the entrance to Tampa Bay and 130 miles north of Key West. Existing project. The project provides for the Federal Participation in restoration and protection of Lee County, Florida, as follows: On Gasparilla Island, restore beach along 2.7 miles of shore and provide revetment along 2,400 feet of shore and a 500-foot terminal groin; on Captiva Island, restore beach along 4.7 miles of shore; and on Estero Island, restore beach along 4.6 and provide a 5-year advance supply of beach nourishment material and periodic nourishment of the restored beaches, as needed, with Federal aid for nourishment limited to the first 10 years of project life after completion of the initial fill placement on each island. Estimated cost is $181,200,000 Federal cost and $134,300,000 non-Federal cost. (See Table 9-B for Authorizing Legislation.) Local Cooperation. Local interest must: contribute in cash) including contract price, engineering and design, and supervision and administration) 65.8 percent of first cost at Gasparilla Island, 91.3 percent of first cost at Captiva Island, and 87.5 percent of first coast at Estero Island; contribute toward beach nourishment for the first 10 years of project life, 95.5 percent for Gasparilla Island; 91.3 percent for Captiva Island, and 96.9 percent for Estero Island; and contribute 50.9 Percent of the annual maintenance costs of the terminal groin on Estero Island; provide after 10 years of Project life periodic nourishment of the restored beaches; provide lands, easements, rights-of-way, and relocations; assure continued public ownership for Public use of the shore upon which the amount of Federal participation is based; control water pollution; Save the United States free from damages; and provide an adequate width of beach with acceptable access and other facilities necessary for public use. Operations during the year. New work: Renourishment cost was $3,748. Engineering and design cost was $91,257. Condition at end of fiscal year. Revised GRR for Estero and Gasparilla Islands is scheduled for submittal for approval January 2001. 46. MANATEE COUNTY, FL Location. Manatee County is on the west coast of Florida, just south of the entrance to Tampa Bay. The county's 14 mile gulf shoreline consists of 2 barrier islands, Anna Maria Key and the northern half of ,Longboat Key, separated from the mainland by Tampa and Sarasota Bays and from each other by Longboat Pass. Project consists of about 7.5 miles of gulf shoreline. Existing project. Provides for Federal participation in the shore protection project for Manatee County, which includes the entire 7.5-mile, gulf shoreline of Anna Maria Key. The project consists of restoration of 3.2 miles of gulf shore beach to an elevation 6 feet above mean low water with a level berm 50 feet wide and a natural slope seaward as would be shaped by wave action. The project also provides for periodic nourishment of the restored beach and such adjacent shoreline as may be and justified for the project life. Mean tidal range is 2.3 feet. Estimated cost is $45,400,000 Federal and $38,000,000 non-Federal. (See Table 9-B for Authorizing Legislation.) Local cooperation. The authorization of a shore protection project for Manatee County, Florida was made with the provision that Federal cost sharing would be in accordance with policy established by existing law, and the percentages based on conditions of shore ownership and use existing at the time of construction: Provided that, prior to construction, local interests furnish assurances satisfactory to the Secretary of the Army that they will: (a) Provide without cost to the United States all lands, easements, and rights-of-way, including borrow areas, and relocations necessary for construction of the improvements; (b) Provide a cash contribution equal to 47 percent of the first cost of construction, subject to any credit for eligible construction costs incurred by local interests, and exclusive of costs for lands, 9-25 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 2000 easements, rights-of-way, relocations, and alterations, and exclusive of the cost of fill placed behind the Corps construction line, the final percentage to be based on shore ownership and use existing at the time of construction; (c) Provide all costs of construction for nourishment landward of the Corps construction line; (d) Provide a cash contribution for periodic nourishment equal to 41 percent of the cost of each nourishment, such contribution to be made prior to each nourishment operation, and the final percentage to be based on shore ownership and use existing at the time of construction; (e) Hold and save the United States free from damage due to the construction works, except for damages due to the fault or negligence of the United States or its contractors; (f) Assure continued public ownership and administration of the shore upon which the amount of Federal participation is based; (g) Provide without cost to the United States appropriate access and facilities, including parking and sanitation, necessary for realization of the public benefits upon which Federal participation is based; (h) Adopt appropriate ordinances, or provide other means, to insure the intended use of the beach fill areas; (i) Control water pollution to the extent necessary to safeguard the health of bathers; and (j) Agree to pay 100 percent of the operation, maintenance, and replacement and rehabilitation's costs of the project, or functional element thereof. Non-Federal contribution for new work is $3,337,348. Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: Engineering and design cost was $95,482. Condition at end of fiscal year. The local sponsor is preparing P&S for the next renourishment and has received approval to use Section 206 (WRDA 92) authority for reimbursement. Renourishment contract is scheduled for award in July 2001 by Manatee County. 47. MARTIN COUNTY, FL Location. Martin County is located on the east coast of Florida about 300 miles south of Jacksonville and 70 miles north of Miami. (See Table 9-B for Authorizing Legislation.) Existing project. The recommended plan of improvement for Martin County provides for restoration of a protective beach along 3.75 miles of shoreline. The plan includes restoration of the primary dune as needed and a 35-foot wide protective berm. The recommended plan was designed to reduce environmental impacts. Of primary importance is the impact of project construction on sea turtle nesting. In order to avoid these impacts, project construction has to occur between November 1st and April 15th. Only one island segment is authorized for this project which is located on Hutchinson Island in Martin County. The project begins at the St. Lucie/Martin County line and proceeds south 4 miles. The actual project to be constructed is 3.75 miles. The project was shortened 0.25 miles to avoid impacting sensitive hardgrounds. The borrow area is approximately 3,000 feet offshore of the southern end of the project area. Estimated cost of new work is $35,000,000 Federal and $40,100,000 non-Federal. Local cooperation. Martin County Board of Commissioners is the local sponsor. Non-Federal funds will be requested from the sponsor following execution of the PCA. Non-Federal contributions for new work is $5,030,000. Operations and results during fiscal year. New Work: Engineering and design cost was $202,898. Condition at end of fiscal year. Initial nourishment was completed April 1996. Contract is scheduled for award January 2001. 48. NASSAU COUNTY, FL Location. Nassau County is on the east coast of Florida, north of Jacksonville and adjoins the state of Georgia. The authorized project comprises 4.3 miles of beach along the ocean shore of northern Amelia Island, and tightening 1,500 feet of the shoreward end of the existing south jetty at the entrance to Fernandina Harbor. Existing project. The authorized project would provide initial restoration of 3.6 miles of eroded beach, starting at a point about .7 mile south of the Fernandina Harbor south jetty and extending south to Sadler Road; sand tightening about 1,500 feet of the shoreward end of the south jetty; and periodic nourishment of 4.3 miles of shore between the south jetty and Sadler Road. The restored beach would have a 20-foot wide level bera' at an elevation of 13 feet above mean low water. The initial beach fill would consist of an estimated 1,100,000 cubic yards of nourishment material. An estimated 240,000 cubic yards of nourishment at 2� year intervals would be required. Sand tightening would require about 16,700 tons of stone. The Federal share of the first cost was estimated to be 77%. (Sand 9-26 JACKSONVILLE, FL DISTRICT tightening, accomplished as part of the Navy's effort to deepen and widen the navigation channel was deleted from the plan.) Estimated cost of new work $13,000,000 Federal and $3,500,000 non-Federal contributed funds. Local cooperation. The authorization of a shore protection project for Nassau County, Florida was made with the provision that the State and local interests will, in addition to the general requirements, agree to comply with the following requirements: provide without cost to the United States all necessary lands, easements, and rights-of-way, including borrow areas and disposal areas for excavated material and relocations required for construction of the project, including that required for periodic nourishment; hold and save the United States free from claims for damages which may result from construction and Subsequent maintenance, operation and public use of the project, except damages due to the fault or negligence of the United States or its contractors; assure continued conditions of public ownership and Public use of the shore upon which the amount of Federal participation is based during the useful life of the project; assure maintenance and repair during the useful life of the project as required to serve the project's intended purpose; provide and maintain clearly marked beach access, nearby parking areas, and other public use facilities, open to all on equal terms, and as required to realize the benefits upon which Federal participation is based; provide a cash contribution for beach erosion control equal to the appropriate percentage of the final construction cost allocated to this function, exclusive of lands, easements, rights-of-way, alterations, and relocations, the percentage to be in accordance with existing law and based on shore ownership at the time of implementation; provide a cash contribution for Periodic nourishment during the useful life of the project, such contribution to be made prior to each nourishment, with the actual amount to be based on existing law and conditions of ownership at the time of each nourishment; and at least annually inform affected interests of the limitations of the protection afforded by the project. Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: Engineering and design cost $43,543. Condition at end of fiscal year. Revision of GRR is Scheduled for completion January 2001. 49. PALM BEACH COUNTY, FL Location. Palm Beach County is on the east coast of Florida about 300 miles south of Jacksonville and 70 miles north of Miami. (See NOAA Nautical Chart No. 11466.) Existing project. Project authorization, the River and Harbor Act of 1962, provides for Federal participation toward the cost of local shore project for restoration of beaches to a general width of 100 feet with a berm elevation of 10 feet above mean low water, and periodic nourishment for 10 years from the year of initial nourishment, as follows: 62.1 percent of the cost for Martin County line-Jupiter Inlet segment; 55.8 percent of cost for Jupiter Inlet-Lake Worth Inlet segment; and 50 percent for south Lake Worth Inlet- Delray Beach; and 53 percent of cost for Delray Beach-Boca Raton inlet segment. Mean range of tide is 2.8 feet in the Atlantic Ocean at Palm Beach and 2.3 feet at Boca Raton Inlet, Estimated cost for Palm Beach County is $85,000,000 Federal and $181,600,000 non-Federal cash contributions. (See Table 9-B for Authorizing Legislation.) Local cooperation. Federal participation is subject to the conditions that responsible local authorities will: (a) obtain approval by the Chief of Engineers, prior to commencement of work on the project, of detailed plans and specifications and arrangements for prosecution of the work on the project; (b) provide at their own expense all necessary lands, easements, and rights-of-way; (c) furnish assurances satisfactory to the Secretary of the Army that they will: (1) assure maintenance of the protective measures during their economic life as may be required to serve their intended purpose, and periodic nourishment of the protective beach at suitable intervals; (2) control water pollution to the extent necessary to safeguard the health of bathers; and (3) maintain continued public ownership of the publicly owned shores upon which a part of the recommended Federal participation is based and their administration for public use during the economic life of the project. Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: Lands and damages cost was $1,548. Renourishment contract cost was $-1,589,890. Engineering and design cost was $1,606,695. Lake Worth Inlet STP: Engineering and design cost was $175,032. 9-27 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF TIlE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 2000 Condition at end of fiscal year. Partial reimbursement for Ocean Ridge to the local sponsor was completed September 2000. Completion of reimbursement is scheduled for January 2001. 50. PALM BEACH ISLAND, FL Location. Palm Beach Island is on the east coast of Florida about 300 miles south of Jacksonville and 70 miles north of Miami. (See NOAA Nautical Chart No. 11466). Existing project. The River and Harbor Act of 1958 authorization provides for Federal participation in the costs of a plan for protection of the shore of the Palm Beach Island, comprising restoration of a protective beach with berm elevation of 10 feet above mean high water from Lake Worth Inlet to a point about 1,000 feet south of Southern Boulevard extended, thence with a general width of 100 feet to South Lake Worth Inlet, construction and operation of a sand-transfer plant at Lake Worth Inlet, and additional periodic nourishment from Lake Worth or other suitable source, substantially in accordance with the plan developed by the district engineer, with such modifications thereof as may be considered advisable by the Chief of Engineers. Federal assistance would entail contribution of funds in the amount of 4.7 percent of the initial construction cost of the beach restoration and appurtenant drainage work, and of the expenditures for periodic nourishment from Lake Worth for a period of 10 years from the year of the initial placement, plus 19.3 percent of the expenditures for construction, and for operation, maintenance, and current replacements of parts of the sand-transfer plant for the same period. Mean tidal range is 2.8 feet in the Atlantic Ocean at Palm Beach and 2.3 feet at Boca Raton Inlet. Estimated cost for Palm Beach Island is $13,400,000 Federal and $154,100,000 non-Federal cash contribution. (See Table 9-B for Authorizing Legislation.) Local cooperation. Federal participation is subject to the conditions that responsible local authorities will: (a) obtain approval of the Chief of Engineers, prior to commencement of work on the project (except the sand-transfer plant already under contract), of detailed plans and specifications and arrangements for prosecution of the work on the project; (b) make appropriate modification of the location of the end of the discharge line of the sand-transfer plant to accomplish satisfactory dispersion of bypassed material; (c) provide at their own expense all necessary lands, easements, and rights-of-way; (d) furnish assurances satisfactory to the Secretary of the Army that they will: (1) assure maintenance of the protective measures during their economic as may be required to serve their intended purpose, and periodic nourishment of the protective beach at suitable intervals, including operation of the sand-transfer plant; (2) control water pollution to the extent necessary to safeguard the health of bathers; and (3) maintain continued public ownership of the publicly owned shores upon which a part of the recommended Federal participation is based and their administration for public use during the economic life of the project. Operations and results during fiscal year. New Work: None. Condition at end offiscal year. No work scheduled. 51. PINELLAS COUNTY, FL Location. Pinellas County is on the Gulf coast of Florida, about midway of the peninsula. It extends northerly about 39 miles from the main entrance to Tampa Bay to the vicinity of the mouth of Anclote River. (See NOAA Nautical Chart No. 11411.) Previous project. For details see page 429 of Annual Report for 1965. Existing project. The authorized project provides for Federal participation in preserving and protecting the shores of Pinellas County, Florida, by: restoration of 5,000 feet of beach at Clearwater Beach Island; restoration of 49,000 feet of beach at Sand Key; restoration of 9,200 feet of beach at Treasure Island; construction of 600 feet of revetment at Long Key; and advance nourishment of Long Key and periodic nourishment of each island. Estimated cost is $171,200,000 Federal and $114,200,000 non-Federal. (See Table 9-B for Authorizing Legislation.) Local cooperation. Local interests must (a) contribute in cash the required percentages of the first costs of work provided by the Corps of Engineers, the percentages varying with the type of beach ownership; 94.1 to 50 percent of the beach restoration at Clearwater Beach; 98.1 to 50 percent of the improvement at Sand Key; 94.3 to 50 percent of the improvement at Treasure Island; and 50 percent of the first cost of the revetment at Long Key; (b) contribute in cash an amount computed in accordance with the 9-28 JACKSONVILLE, FL DISTRICT cost sharing provision contained in P.L. 826, 84th Congress as amended by P.L. 87-874, for beach nourishment cost for the first 10 years of the project life; (c) provide lands, easements, and rights-of-way; (d) assure maintenance and repair of the stone revetment of Long Key; (e) assure periodic nourishment of the restored beaches; (f) assure public Ownership of beaches; (g) assure against water pollution; (h) hold the United States free from damages; and (i) provide beach for public use. Assurances of local cooperation were accepted March 22, 1967. Non-Federal contribution for new work is $31,444,173. Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: Real estate cost was $72,398. Navigation port and harbor cost was $654,041. Beach renourishment cost Was $5,781,077. Reconnaissance cost was $114,392. Feasibility cost was $203,532. Engineering and design and construction management cost $1,236,103 and $239,155 respectively. Condition at end of fiscal year. DM for north terminal structure on Treasure Island is scheduled for approval November 2000. 4 th renourishment of Long Key underway; completion scheduled for June 2001. Preparation of a DM for the construction of the authorized breakwaters along Sand Key has been initiated. 52. ST. JOHNS COUNTY, FL Location. St. John's County is located about 100 miles south of the Florida/Georgia border. Existing project. The project consists of restoration of 2.5 miles of shoreline, beginning approximately 2.7 miles south of St. Augustine Inlet, and including the City of St. Augustine Beach. The authorized project provides for initial restoration of the beach to a width of 80 feet +12 feet elevation relative to mean low Water. The initial fill would consist of placement of 3,580,000 cubic yards of beach quality sand, includes six Years of advanced nourishment. The project would replace sand lost due to frequent northeasters and provide storm protection to upland development. The borrow area is located at the ebb tidal shoal south of St. Augustine. The project was authorized with a 50-year Project life from the start of construction. (See Table 9- 18 for Authorizing Legislation.) Estimated cost is $179,700,000 Federal and $43,500,000 Non-Federal. Local cooperation. The sponsor of this project is the St. John's County Board of Commissioners. Cost sharing for this project is 76.4 percent Federal and 23.6 percent Non-Federal. The cost sharing reflects the higher Federal percentage required to mitigate for erosion caused by the Federal navigation project at St. Augustine Harbor. PCA will be executed following completion and approval of the General Reevaluation Report. Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: Engineering and design cost was $219,696. Condition at end of fiscal year. GRR approved by ASA (CW) December 1998. Preparation of plans and specifications are scheduled for completion January 2001. Contract award scheduled for April 2001. 53. SARASOTA COUNTY, FL Location. Sarasota County is on the Gulf coast of Florida about 30 miles south of Tampa Bay. The northern most portion of the project adjoins the Manatee County Beach Erosion Control Project on Longboat Key. The total project consists of about 5.7 miles of gulf shoreline on Longboat Key and Venice Beach. Existing project. The authorized project provides for Federal participation in the construction of a protective beach 12,600 feet long at Longboat Key and a protective beach 29,400 feet long at Manasota Key at the City of Venice, Florida. Two borrow areas will be required. The first is located within 2 shoal areas located between 1 to 2 miles offshore of Manasota Key south of the project area. This borrow area will be supplemented by material located within the ebb tidal shoal of Big Sarasota Pass which is about 13 nautical miles north of the project beach at Venice. The project also provides periodic nourishment of the restored beach and such adjacent shoreline as may be needed and justified for life of the project. The mean tidal range is 2.1 feet. Estimated cost is $54,900,000 Federal and $28,000,000 non-Federal. The Federal share of each periodic nourishment is 72.55 percent for Venice, and 15.4 percent for Longboat, of applicable nourishment costs. Local cooperation. Federal participation is subject to the conditions that responsible local authorities will: 9-29 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 2000 (a) provide without cost to the United States all lands, easements, and rights-of-way, including borrow areas, and relocations necessary for construction of the improvements; (b) provide a cash contribution equal to 29.3 percent of the first cost of construction, subject to any credit for eligible construction costs incurred by local interests, and exclusive of costs for lands, easements, and rights-of-way, relocations, and alterations, and exclusive of the cost of fill placed behind the Erosion Control Line (ECL), the final percentage to be based on shore ownership and use existing at the time of construction; (c) provide all costs of construction for nourishment of private lands and share in the costs of construction for public lands landward of the Erosion Control Line (ECL); (d) provide a cash contribution for periodic nourishment equal to 29.3 percent of the cost of each nourishment, such contribution to be made prior to each nourishment operation, and the final percentage to be based on shore ownership and use existing at the time of construction; (e) hold and save the United States free from damage due to the construction works, except for damages due to the fault or negligence of the United States or its contractors;(f) assure continued public ownership and administration of the shore upon which the amount of Federal participation is based; (g) provide without cost to the United States appropriate access and facilities, including parking and sanitation, necessary for realization of the public benefits upon which Federal participation is based; (h) adopt appropriate ordinances, or provide other means, to insure the intended use of the beach fill areas; (i) control water pollution to the extent necessary to safeguard the health of bathers; and (j) agrees to pay 100 percent of the operation, maintenance, and replacement and rehabilitation costs of the project, or functional element thereof. Non-Federal contribution for new work is $5,020,605. Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: Real estate cost was $907. Reconnaissance cost was $18,560. Engineering and design and supervision and administration cost was $23,192 and $32,737 respectively. Condition at end offiscal year. Initial construction of 3.2 miles of beach fill was broken into two contracts. The first contract was completed in January 1995. The second contract was completed in June 1996. Construction of an artificial reef was completed by the local sponsor in the winter of 1997 as mitigation. PCA to be amended to reimburse locals for Federal share of reef. 54. OTHER AUTHORIZED BEACH EROSION CONTROL PROJECTS Key West, FL; Lido Key, FL; Mullet Key, FL; Virginia Key and Key Biscayne, FL were deauthorized January 1, 1990 by the WRDA of 1988, P.L. 100-676. (See Table 9-D.) 55. BEACH EROSION CONTROL ACTIVITIES UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION Beach erosion control activities pursuant to section 103, Public Law 87-874 (Preauthorization) Reports incurring costs during the fiscal year were Little Talbot Island, FL $1,637; Hwy 187, Pinones, PR $398,077; Former USCG Seaplane Base, Miami, FL $1,921; Puerto Nuevo Beach, PR $9,652; Christiansted, VI $6,614; Red Point Airport, VI $24,109. Beach erosion control activities pursuant to section III, Public Law 90-433, Mitigation of Shore Damages Attributable to Navigation Projects. No costs were incurred under the above authorization. Beach erosion control activities pursuant to Shoreline Erosion Control Act of 1074, Public Law 93-251. No costs were incurred under the above authorization. Flood Control 56. CENTRAL AND SOUTHERN FLORIDA Location. The project is generally located within the southeastern 18 counties of Florida covering an area of about 15,200 square miles. It is comprised of the Upper St. Johns River basin in the northeastern section of project, Kissimmee River basin in central section north of the Lake Okeechobee-Everglades area in the central and southwestern section, and the east coast Everglades area in southeastern section. Previous projects. Completed works for control of Lake Okeechobee were included in and constructed under the navigation project for Okeechobee Waterway, FL (formerly Caloosahatchee River and Lake Okeechobee drainage area, FL) and under provisions of River and Harbor Acts of July 3, 1930 9-30 JACKSONVILLE, FL DISTRICT and August 30, 1935. For further information, see Annual Reports for 1948 and 1949. Existing project. The authorized project is for flood relief and water conservation and provides principally for: an east coast protective levee extending from the Homestead area north to the eastern shore of Lake Okeechobee near the St. Lucie Canal; three conservation areas for water impoundment in the Everglades area west of the east coast protective levee With control structures to effect transfer of water as necessary; local protective works along the lower east coast; encirclement of the Lake Okeechobee agricultural area by levees and canals; enlargement of Portions of Miami, North New River, Hillsboro, and West Palm Beach Canals; enlargement of the existing Lake Okeechobee levees and construction of new levees on the northeast and northwest shores of the lake; increased outlet capacity for improved control of Lake Okeechobee; floodway channels in the Kissimmee River basin, with suitable control structures to prevent over-drainage; an interrelated system of canals, levees, pumping stations, and structures in Southwest Dade County to control water levels; and facilities for regulating floods in Upper St. Johns River basin; a system of canals and control structures for gravity drainage of Martin County and distribution of available water supplies to portions of Martin and St. Lucie Counties; and works to improve the supply, distribution, and conservation of water resources in central and southern Florida, including the Lake Okeechobee agricultural area, Everglades National Park, and other related areas. The project will provide Water control and protection from recurrence of the devastating floodwaters from the Everglades and local Sources, for the highly developed urban area along the lower east coast of Florida and for the productive agricultural areas around Lake Okeechobee (including towns around the lake), in the Upper St. Johns and Kissimmee River basins, and in South Dade County. The project includes a total of 990 miles of levees, 978 miles of canals, 30 pumping plants, 212 floodway control and diversion structures, 56 railroad bridge relocations, and 2 highway bridge relocations. The Project also provides that upon completion, local interests assume operation and maintenance of all Completed works except levees, channels, locks, and control works for regulation of Lake Okeechobee and the main control structures of conservation areas, Which will be operated and maintained by the United States. The principal features of the hurricane gates, Constructed under previous projects for Okeechobee Waterway and maintained under existing project since July 1, 1950, are set forth in Table 9-Q. Also, see Table 9-N for principal features of locks and dams. Estimated cost for new work is $2,218,300,000 Federal and $1,568,200,000 Non-Federal, exclusive of river and harbor funds expended on previous projects. (See Table 9-B for Authorizing Legislation.) Local cooperation. (See Table 9-R for local cash contribution.) Local interests must also: provide lands, rights-of-way, and spoil disposal areas; hold the United States free from damages; bear the cost of maintenance and operation of all works except those having to do with regulation of Lake Okeechobee and the main control structures of conservation areas; construct and maintain lateral drainage facilities; prohibit encroachment on flood-carrying capacity of the improved channels; and assume cost of all new highway bridges, relocations of existing bridges and alterations to utilities incident to construction of the project. In addition, for small boat navigation channels, local interests must provide, maintain, and operate adequate public landings, sanitary and access facilities, and establish regulations prohibiting discharge of pollutants into the waters of the locks and channels by users thereof. Assurances of local cooperation have been accepted by the District Engineer for all items of work authorized to date. Non-Federal contributions for new work is $72,295,268. Operations and results during fiscal year. (See Table 9-S for work accomplished.) Operations and care. a. Features completed under previous navigation project for Okeechobee Waterway and being maintained under this project are: a levee about 70 miles long following in general the south shore of Lake Okeechobee and a north shore levee 15.8 miles long; spillways at Ortona and St. Lucie Locks; 5 hurricane gates; and 16 spillways along St. Lucie Canal. b. Features completed under existing project that are to be maintained with operation and maintenance funds are: (1) Levees 47, 48, 49 and 50 -- total length 63 miles and enlargement of existing levees L-DI, LD2, L-D3, L-D4, and L-D9, (2) spillway structures S- 10, S-1l,1 S-12, S-18C, S-77, and S-78 (3) C-43, Section 4 (Caloosahatchee River), and (4) W.P. Franklin Lock and Dam. In addition to the actual facilities listed above it is necessary under operation and maintenance to continue meteorological studies, water level records, stream 9-31 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF TIlE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 2000 gauging stations, etc., for proper regulation of the level of Lake Okeechobee and storage of water in Conservation Areas 1, 2 and 3. Corps of Engineers - The Corps of Engineers operates and maintains the major outlets to Lake Okeechobee and Water Conservation Area Nos. 1, 2A and 3A in central and southern Florida. South Florida Water Management District - SFWMD is responsible for operation and maintenance of the project facilities, including major pumping stations, spillways, locks (except on Okeechobee Waterway), levees and culverts. Condition at end of fiscal year. Preparation of the Water Preserve Areas, Indian River Lagoon, and Southwest Florida feasibility studies are underway. Engineering and design is underway for Upper St. Johns, South Dade, C-51, C-7, 8, 9 GRR and Manatee Pass. Construction of the Upper St. Johns, C-51 and C- 111 projects is underway. The Comprehensive Review Study was completed and submitted to Congress 1 July 1999. (For status of work under construction at the end of the fiscal year see Table 9-P.) 57. DADE COUNTY, FL Location. Dade County is on the southeast coast of Florida. Project area consists of that part of the Atlantic shoreline of the county from Government Cut north to Bakers Haulover Inlet and at Haulover Beach Park. (See NOAA Nautical Chart No. 11466.) Existing project. Project provides for a protective and recreational beach having a dune at elevation 11.5 feet and a level berm 50 feet wide at elevation 9 feet, mean low water, for beach erosion control and hurricane protection between Government Cut and Bakers Haulover Inlet; a protective and recreational beach with a berm elevation of 9 feet for beach erosion control at Haulover Beach Park; and Federal participation in the initial construction and in periodic nourishment of both the above reaches for the first 10 years of project life. Plane of reference is mean low water. Mean range of tide in the area is 2.5 feet. Estimated cost of the project is $182,400,000 Federal cost and $165,500,000 non-Federal cost. Project was authorized by Flood Control Act of 1968 (H 335/90/2). Local cooperation. Local interests must (a) contribute for the first cost of the work: between Government Cut and Bakers Haulover Inlet amounts ranging from 60.2 percent of the cost of the fill within the project limit with existing shorefront ownership, and 100 percent of the cost of fill required landward of the project limit; and for the work at Haulover Beach Park, contribute 21.3 percent of the entire first cost excluding costs for lands, easements, rights-of-way, relocations, and preproject work, but including credit for preproject work; (b) contribute in cash for the first 10 years of project life, amounts ranging from 88.9 percent of the nourishment cost for the beach, with existing ownership, to 60.7 percent with public ownership, and the entire maintenance cost for dune, all between Government Cut and Bakers Haulover Inlet; (c) provide all lands and rights-of-way; (d) hold United States free from damages; (e) assure continued public ownership and use of the shore upon which the amount of Federal participation is based; (f) assure maintenance of the groin, and after 10 years of project life, periodic nourishment of the protective beach and maintenance of the dune during the economic life of the project; (g) assure that water pollution will not be permitted; (h) prevent removal or relocation by man of fill from the beach berm and dune; (i) prevent the erection of barriers to the littoral movement of material that would interfere with the nourishment of the beach; (j) maintain at the parks qualifying for 70 percent Federal participation a zone that excludes permanent human habitation; (k) at least annually inform interests affected that the project will not provide complete protection from a hurricane tide level equal to or higher in elevation than that of the hurricane of September 1926; and (1) establish in public ownership for public use the beaches within project limits as a requirement for Federal participation in the allocated beach erosion control costs of improvement of shores presently in private ownership. Assurances of local cooperation were accepted January 16, 1973. A supplemental agreement for Bal Harbour portion was approved June 30, 1976. Non-Federal contribution for new work was $47,733,876. Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: Renourishment cost was $-78,975. Engineering and design and construction management cost $962,828 and $113,568 respectively. Condition at end of fiscal year. Renourishment for Surfside and South Miami Beach was completed in July 1999. The contract for sand tightening the north jetty at Government Cut was completed in June 1999. Engineering and design is continuing for several 9-32 JACKSONVILLE, FL DISTRICT Upcoming renourishments. The modified contract for Sunny Isles (base only) was awarded in September 2000. Contract for renourishment of Haulover Beach is scheduled to be awarded in March 2002. 58. DADE COUNTY, NORTH OF HAULOVER BEACH, FL Location. On the southeast coast of Florida. Project area consists of that part of the Atlantic shoreline extending 2.5 miles north of Haulover Beach Park. (See NOAA Nautical chart No. 11466.) Existing project. The existing shore protection project for Dade County provides for Federal participation in the cost of construction of a beach fill for the purpose of erosion control and hurricane protection along 9.3 miles of shore between Government Cut and Bakers Haulover Inlet and for the construction of a beach fill for the purpose of erosion control along the 1.2 miles of shore fronting Haulover Beach Park and provides for protection and nourishment of 2.5 miles of beach shore north of Haulover Beach Park and for extension of the period of Federal participation from 10 years to the life of the project. (See Table 9-B for Authorizing Legislation.) Local cooperation. Consistent with the cost-sharing and financing concepts agreed to by the administration and Senate Majority Leadership, local interests will be required to: provide lands, easements, and rights-of- Way and relocations; pay 50 percent of the separable and joint costs allocated to recreation; pay 35 percent of the cost allocated to storm damage prevention; hold the United States free from damages; control water Pollution; and furnish assurances that they will mraintain continued public ownership of the shore upon Which the amount of Federal participation is based during economic life of project. Assurances of local Cooperation have been requested from local sponsors. Non-federal contribution for new work was $8,082,927. Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: None. Condition at end of fiscal year. No new work Scheduled 59. FOUR RIVER BASINS, FL Location. The Four River Basins area covers about 6,000 square miles within 14 counties in central and southwest peninsular Florida. Project includes all or part of the four main stream basins -- the Hillsborough, Oklawaha, Withlacoochee, and Peace Rivers -- and all of three smaller coastal basins north of Tampa, Florida, drained by the Pithlachascotee and Anclote Rivers and Lake Tarpon. Existing project. The authorized project provided for improvements for control of floods and drainage, and for conservation through construction of necessary canals, levees, reservoirs, and control structures. More specifically, the project provided for: Green Swamp Area -- a conservation area and 3 storage reservoirs with necessary canals and control structures; Hillsborough River -- 4 flood-storage reservoirs, with necessary channels, control structures and levees; Oklawaha River --a levee on the north shore of Lake Apopka, improvement of parts of the river channel and a west bank levee below Moss Bluff lock and dam, and replacement of the lock and dam; Withlacoochee River -- one flood-storage reservoir with outlet canals and control structures; Peace River -- Peace Creek canal and control structures and improvements to the existing water control and drainage features; Gulf Coastal Areas-Lake Tarpon; outlet canal and control structure; Pithlachascotee River: reservoir with outlet canals and control structures. (See Table 9-T on Moss Bluff Lock.) Estimated cost for new work is $179,000,000 Federal and $157,000,000 non-Federal. (See Table 9-B for Authorizing Legislation.) Local cooperation. Local interests must furnish all lands, and rights-of-way; provide all alterations or replacements of public and private utilities, roads, bridges (except railroad bridges), etc.; hold the United States free from damages; operate and maintain all project works after completion; construct and maintain such associated works as are necessary to realize benefits made available by the project works; and contribute in cash 17 percent of the first cost of construction and 50 percent of recreation costs. Non- Federal contribution for new work is $14,095,058. Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: Engineering and design cost was $10,857. Condition at end offiscal year. Construction of the project commenced April 18, 1966 and the scheduled work is 98 percent complete. Flatwoods Phase II has been rescheduled for FY 01 at the sponsors request. 9-33 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 2000 60. PORTUGUES AND BUCANA RIVERS, PR (This project authorized as Lago de Cerrillos, Lago de Portugues, and Channel Improvement at Ponce.) Location. Portugues and Bucana Rivers originate on the southern slopes of Cordillera Central divide of Puerto Rico and flow from this central ridge of the island to the Caribbean Sea. Their drainage areas are 22.6 and 31.4 square miles, respectively. Ponce, the second largest city in Puerto Rico, is located in the lower coastal area along Portugues River and is the only urban community in the two basins. Existing project. The authorized project provides for 2 multiple-purpose reservoirs for flood control, water supply, general recreation, and fish and wildlife enhancement -- one on Portugues River and the other on Cerrillos River, a tributary to the Bucana River; enlargement of about 5.7 miles of the Bucana River, with an additional 0.2 mile long tieback levee at the upstream terminus of the improvement; enlargement of 2.1 miles of the Portugues River, with an additional 0.5 mile of tieback levee at the upstream terminus of the improvement; and a 1.3 mile diversion channel connecting Portugues River to lower Bucana River. Estimated cost of the project is $430,300,000 Federal and $146,200,000 non-Federal. (See Table 9-B for Authorizing Legislation.) Local cooperation. Local interests must provide all lands, easements, and rights-of-way; hold the United States free from damages; operate and maintain all project works after completion; repay construction cost allocated to water supply in accordance with Water Supply Act of 1958; pay one-half of the separable cost allocated to recreation and fish and wildlife enhancement; prohibit discharge of inadequately treated sewage and other pollutants into the reservoir; and prevent encroachment on downstream channels. Assurances of local cooperation have not been completed, except for Cerrillos Reservoir, which was signed March 15, 1982. Non-Federal contribution for new work was $10,148,201. Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: Real estate cost was $148,772. Construction contract for dams' cost was $1,152,784. Building, grounds, and utilities cost were $116,766. Engineering and design and construction management cost $4,749,801 and $761,741 respectively. HTRW cost was $31,478. Construction facilities cost was $29,992. O&M during construction was $86,930. Condition at end of fiscal year. Final grouting was completed in 1999. Cerrillos Dam Lake Recreation was awarded in September 2000. Portugues Darn contract is scheduled for award in February 2001. 61. RIO DE LA PLATA, PR Location. The Rio de La Plata basin is located about 11 miles west of the San Juan metropolitan area along the north coast of Puerto Rico. The Rio de la Plata basin drains an area of 240 square miles through several towns and villages into the Atlantic Ocean. Existing project. The project was authorized by the Water Resources Development Act of 1990. It would provide 100-year protection upstream of PR Highway 2 and SPF protection down stream and calls for construction of 7.6 miles of levees. The plan includes the replacement of 3 bridges, recreation facilities, and mitigation for the loss of environmental habitats. The benefit-cost ratio is 1.6. Estimated cost is $66,700,000 Federal and $32,300,000 Non-Federal. Local cooperation. The project cooperation agreement was executed on 7 June 1995. The Commonwealth of Puerto Rico, Department of Natural and Environmental Resources, is the body authorized to represent the local interest and is responsible for complying with the following requirements: (1) provide a cash contribution equal to five percent of total project costs; (2) provide all lands, easements, rights-of-way, relocations, and dredged material disposal areas; (3) provide an additional cash payment when the sum of both items (1) and (2) are less than 25 percent of total project costs; (4) operate and maintain the project after completion, including accomplishment of any needed repairs or rehabilitation's of any of its components; (5) hold and save the United States free from damages due to the construction or subsequent maintenance of the project, expect due to damages due to the fault or negligence of the United States or its contractors; (6) prevent future encroachments which might interfere with proper functioning of the project; (7) participate in and comply with applicable Federal flood plain management and flood insurance programs; and (8) (a) provide guidance and leadership to prevent unwise future development in the flood plain; and (b) recreation local cooperation requirements: (1) provide one-half of the separable first cost of post authorization planning and 9-34 JACKSONVILLE, FL DISTRICT construction of recreation facilities and provide all land required for recreation; and (2) all costs and full responsibility for the operation, maintenance, replacement, and management of recreation lands and facilities. Non-Federal contribution for new work was $681,088. Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: Real estate cost was $69,462. Engineering and design Cost was $570,228. Condition at end offiscal year. Sponsor is proceeding With land acquisition for first contract. Award Contract #1 (lower channel) in April 2001. Contract #1 extends from Atlantic Ocean to Station 163+95 (about 3 miles). 62. RIO GRANDE DE ARECIBO, PR Location. The city of Arecibo is located on the northern coast of Puerto Rico, approximately 40 miles West of San Juan. The Rio Arecibo Basin covers a 272 square mile area and includes towns of Utuado, Jayuya, and Adjuntas. Existing Project. The authorized project for flood Control includes channel improvements, a flood wall, and a levee along the Arecibo River; a levee along the Tanama River; and a plug, channel improvements, and a diversion channel along the Santiago River. Estimated cost of the project is $14,400,000 Federal and $11,600,000 non-Federal. (See Table 9-B for Authorizing Legislation.) Local cooperation. Local interests must provide lands, easements, rights of way, and dredged material disposal areas; modify or relocate buildings, utilities, roads, bridges (except railroad bridges), and other facilities, where necessary in the construction of the project; pay one-half of the separable costs allocated to recreation and bear all costs of operation and maintenance, and replacement of recreation facilities; Pay 8.52 percent of the first costs allocated to flood Control, and bear all cost of operation, maintenance, and replacement of flood control structures; and has also agreed to make all required payments COncurrently with project construction. Non-Federal Contribution for new work is $0. Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: Engineering and design cost was $501,387. Condition at end offiscal year. VE proposal at Lower Reach is being evaluated. Awaiting sponsor financial plan required for PCA package submittal. PCA execution is scheduled for December 2000. 63. RIO PUERTO NUEVO, PR Location. The Rio Puerto Nuevo drainage basin is located within the San Juan Metropolitan Area along the northern coast of Puerto Rico. The basin joins the southeast side of San Juan Harbor and extends south and up into the foothills of the central mountains of Puerto Rico. The basin is traversed by the Rio Piedras, Rio Puerto Nuevo, Quebrada Margarita, Quebrada Josefina, Quebrada Dona Ana, Quebrada Vista, and Quebrada Guaracanal. Existing project. The authorized project for flood control includes improvements to 11.2 miles of the existing channel of Rio Puerto Nuevo and Rio Piedras and five tributaries of the Rio Puerto Nuevo drainage basin. The 25 square mile drainage basin drains into San Juan Harbor. Estimated cost of the project is $331,000,000 Federal and $111,000,000 non-Federal. (See Table 9-B for Authorizing Legislation.) Local cooperation. Local interests must provide cash contribution equal to five percent of the total project costs; provide LERRD (except railroad bridge alterations); provide an additional cash payment when the sum of cash and LERRD are less than 25 percent of the total project costs; operate and maintain project works after completion; hold and save the United States free from damages; prevent future encroachments; participate and comply with Federal flood plain management and flood insurance programs; provide guidance and leadership to prevent unwise future development in the flood plain; provide one-half of the separable first cost of post authorization planning and construction of recreation facilities; and all costs and full responsibility for operations, maintenance, replacement, and management of the recreation lands and facilities. Non-Federal contribution for new work was $17,670,000. Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: Real estate cost was $36,465. Roads and railroads cost was $1,199,000. Channels and canals cost was $12,602,988. Engineering and design cost was $2,724,682. Construction management cost was $1,187,720. 9-35 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 2000 Condition at end of fiscal year. Contract No.1 (first 1.7 miles of channel) is scheduled for completion September 2001. Contract #2A (Margarita Earthen Channel, next 1.3 miles of channel) is scheduled for completion by May 2002. Plans and specifications for Contract 2AA (Margarita Levee and Bechara Drainage Works) are underway with advertisement scheduled January 2001. Plans and specifications for Contract 2B, Roosevelt Avenue Bridge Replacement and Associated Channel Work are complete and will advertise once sponsor has completed land acquisition. Detailed Design Report for Contract 2C, the Margarita Concrete Channel, were initiated November 1999 and contract award is scheduled for September 2001. 64. INSPECTION OF COMPLETED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS Features transferred to the Central and Southern Florida Flood Control District and Southwest Florida Water Management District were inspected quarterly during the fiscal year at a total cost of $99,912. 65. OTHER AUTHORIZED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS (See Table 9-E.) 66. FLOOD CONTROL WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION Flood control activities pursuant to section 205, Public Law 685, 84th Congress, as amended (Preauthorization). (See Table 9-V.) Emergency flood control activities -- repair, flood fighting, and rescue work (Public Law 99, 84th Congress, and antecedent legislation). Federal costs for the fiscal year were $555,394 for the Disaster Preparedness Program. Emergency Operations cost was $401,130. Rehabilitation cost was $3,538,409. Catastrophic Disaster Preparedness Program cost was $133,987. Emergency streambank and shoreline protection activities pursuant to Section 14, Public Law 526, 79th Congress as amended (Preauthorization). Federal cost for the fiscal year was Coordination Account $12,963; Los Carolinas Bridge, Caguas, PR $41,317; and Police Station and Sewerline, Trujillo Alto, PR $32,978. General Investigations 67. SURVEYS Costs during the fiscal year were: navigation studies $785,616; flood damage prevention studies $602,718; shoreline protection studies $79,838; special studies $207,298; review of authorized projects $54,577; miscellaneous activities $49,883; and coordination with other agencies and non-Federal interests $362,810; for a total cost of $2,142,740. 68. COLLECTION AND STUDY OF BASIC DATA The requirement for preparation of regular flood plain information studies has been rescinded. FPI studies that deal with land use changes will continue to be prepared. Flood Plain Management Services $40,871; Project Impact $309; Technical Services $134,483; Quick Responses $2,406; SE Florida Evacuation Study $3,999; Florida Statewide Evacuation $31,078; Hurricane Evacuation Study Northern Puerto Rico $2,505; Hurricane Evacuation Study Western Puerto Rico $6,648; Seminole Floodway $20,167; Puerto Rico Hurricane Evacuation Study Wrapup $-10,838; for a total cost of $229,984. 69. CONTINUATION OF PLANNING AND ENGINEERING Navigation cost was Jacksonville Harbor $524,542; Hillsboro Inlet $84,977; Lake Worth Inlet $63,011; Ponce De Leon Inlet $59,858 and St. Lucie Inlet $171,379. Beach erosion cost was Brevard County $42,102 and Monroe County, FL $5,122. Local protection cost was Rio Grande de Loiza, PR $4,927 and Rio Nigua de Salinas, PR $144,321. Total cost for Continuation of Planning and Engineering was $1,100,239. 70. ADVANCE ENGINEERING AND DESIGN Navigation cost was Miami River Sediments, FL $3,505 and Tampa Harbor Big Bend, FL $28,499 Beach erosion control cost was Nassau County, Fe 9-36 JACKSONVILLE, FL DISTRICT $43,543 and St. Johns County, FL $363. Flood control cost was Guanajibo River, PR $707,690; Arecibo River, PR $79,431; Rio Nigua at Salinas, PR $377,428 and Cedar Hammock (Wares Creek), Fl $91,829. Total cost for Advance Engineering and Design was $1,326,894. General Regulatory 71. PERMIT EVALUATION (R&iH ACT of 1899; CWA of 1977; MIPRSA of 1972) Location. Navigable waters of the United States, including tributary systems, headwaters and isolated Waters, and ocean waters to the limits of the territorial Seas. Existing Program. The program evaluates permit applications for work in navigable waters (dredging, filling, and other structures) of the United States, and the transportation of dredged material to the oceans for Ocean disposal. Geographic coverage includes Florida, Puerto Rico, and the U.S. Virgin Islands. Decision making criteria consist of the public interest review, Section 404(b)(1) Guidelines, and ocean dumping criteria. Local Cooperation. Joint application agreement with the Florida Department of Environmental Protection (FDEP) and the regional Water Management Districts (WMD) have been signed. Have developed a Programmatic General Permit with the FDEP and are in the process of expanding it. We are working closely With the FDEP on watershed/ecosystem management areas for the state. Joint application booklet with the Virgin Island Department of Planning and Natural Resources (DPNR) is finished. We are developing a Joint federal/state process for mitigation banks in Florida. All involved agencies (FWS, EPA, NMFS, FDEp, and the WMDs) have embraced the Mitigation Bank Review Team (MBRT) approach to permitting as laid out in the Federal guidelines. The Federal agencies are in agreement on the credit/debit method. Operations and results during fiscal year. Permit evaluation cost was $6,828,554. 72. ENFORCEMENT (R&II ACT of 1899; CWA of 1977; MPRSA of 1972) Existing program. The program takes appropriate enforcement action against both unauthorized work requiring a permit and noncompliance findings on issued permits. Operation of the program is continuing to make increased use of alternative dispute resolution processes to remediate violations. Close coordination with and cooperation of Department of Justice continues, with development of consent orders and fines as appropriate. Local cooperation: Developed MOA agreement on enforcement with EPA Region II to cover Puerto Rico and the Virgin Islands. The local operating agreement with FDEP and WMD contains provisions for cooperative enforcement, within the limits of state and federal law. Operations and results during fiscal year. Cost incurred this fiscal year for enforcement was $792,703. 73. STUDIES (R&H Act of 1899) Location. Navigable waters of the United States in Florida, Puerto Rico, and the U.S. Virgin Islands. Existing program. This program conducts studies to determine geographic extent of navigable waters of the United States, and establishment of danger or restricted zones in these waters. Local cooperation. This program is carried out with informal cooperation with the State of Florida and cooperation of other Department of Defense agencies needing restricted zones in which to conduct their defense related missions. In addition we are cooperating with the Florida Inland Navigation District (FIND), the local sponsor of the AIWW and the IWW, to update our criteria's for setback requirements for structures in the IWW and the AIWW to ensure the safety of navigation. Operations and results during fiscal year. Studies cost was $38,622. Environmental inspection statement cost was $151,600. Project Modifications for Improvement of Environment 74. KISSIMMEE RIVER, FLORIDA 9-37 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 2000 Location. The Kissimmee River Basin comprises 3,013 square miles, and extends from Orlando southward to Lake Okeechobee, the second largest freshwater lake in the United States. The area is bounded on the north by the lakes of the Orlando area, on the west by the Peace River Basin, on the south by Lake Okeechobee, and in the east by the Upper St. John's and the Taylor Creek-Nuddin Slough Basins. The watershed is about 105 miles long and has a maximum width of 35 miles. Existing Project. The purpose of this study is to determine the extent of Federal participation in the Level II Backfilling Plan, as developed by the South Florida Water Management District, for restoration of the Kissimmee River and flood plain ecosystem. It is expected that restoration will restore the ecological integrity of the river system. Environmental improvements through modification of operations for Lake Kissimmee, Cypress, and Hatchineha. The project will include canal and/or structure improvements and real estate acquisition. The recommended plan consists of backfilling approximately 29 miles of C-38. This will result in the restoration of almost 29,000 acres in the floodplain. Three structures will be removed and two bridges and associated utilities will be relocated. Real estate interests will be acquired for effected portions of the floodplain. Estimated cost of the project for Kissimmee River (Upper and Lower Basins) $240,000,000 Federal and $311,000,000 non-Federal. Local Cooperation. The South Florida , Water Management District, an agency of the State of Florida, is the feasibility study cost-sharing partner, and has expressed its intent to be the project sponsor. Local cost for the Headwater Revitalization is to be credited towards the total project cost. The authorization calls for the restoration to be cost-shared 50%-50% and that the lands be credited toward the total cost of the Kissimmee River Restoration. A draft Local Cooperation Agreement (LCA) has been reviewed by the sponsor and a letter of intent has been provided for the Headwaters Revitalization. LCA for the River Restoration project is scheduled for execution in May 1994. Non-Federal contribution amounted to $2,087,000. Operations and results duringfiscal year. New work: Lands and damages cost was $702,265. Reservoir cost was $-66,241. Locks cost was $36,116. Channels and canal cost was $17,034,719. Levees and floodwall cost was $2,306,576. Floodway control structure cost was $238,270. Reconnaissance cost was $12,340. Feasibility cost was $23,178. Engineering and Design cost was $3,761,694. Construction management cost was $1,106,042. Condition at the end of the fiscal year. Construction is near completion for modification of structure S-65. Pool C local levees have been completed. The following contracts are under construction: widening of canal C-36 and maintaining canal S-35, backfilling ' 7 miles of Reach 1, modifying tie-back levees at S- 65A, and adding culverts in spoil bank in Pool A. Engineering and design continues for mitigation measures in the Istokpoga Basin. 75. EVERGLADES SOUTH FLORIDA ECOSYSTEM RESTORATION, FL Location. The area consisting of the lands and waters within the boundary of the South Florida Water Management District, including the Everglades, the Florida Keys, and the contiguous near-shore coastal waters of South Florida. Existing Project. The authorized project shall develop a comprehensive plan for the purpose of restoring, preserving, and protecting the South Florida Ecosystem. The comprehensive plan shall provide for the protection of water quality in, and the reduction of the loss of fresh water from, the Everglades. The comprehensive plan shall include such features as are necessary to provide for the water-related needs of the region, including flood control, the enhancement of water supplies, and other objectives served by the Central and Southern Florida Project. The comprehensive plan shall be developed in cooperation with the non-Federal sponsor and in consultation with the Task Force. Projects identified for design and construction of any Central and Southern Florida Project that are authorized, may use funds that are available provided that they will accelerate the restoration, preservation, and protection of the South Florida ecosystem; will be generally consistent with the conceptual framework specified in the report entitled "Conceptual Plan for the Central and Southern Florida Project Restudy"; and be compatible with the overall authorized purposes of the Central and Southern Florida Project. If it is determined, in cooperation with the non-Federal sponsor and the Task Force, that a restoration project for the South Florida ecosystem will produce independent, immediate, and substantial restoration, preservation, and protection benefits, and will be 9-38 JACKSONVILLE, FL DISTRICT generally consistent with the conceptual framework, the project may proceed expeditiously with the implementation of the restoration. Estimated cost of the project $75,000,000 Federal and $73,968,000 non-Federal. Local Cooperation. The comprehensive plan shall be developed in cooperation with the non-Federal sponsor and in consultation with the Task Force. The non- Federal cost share is 50 percent, except for water quality, which is 100 percent with the exclusion of Everglade's restoration, which is 50 percent. The value of lands or interests in land acquired by non- Federal interests will be included in the total cost of the activity and credited against the non-Federal share of the cost of the activity. The operation and maintenance of projects will be a non-Federal responsibility. Non-Federal contributions amount to $3,172,000. Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: Real estate cost was $46,286. Feasibility cost was $633,845. Engineering and design cost was $3,602,850. Construction management cost was $123,666. Condition at the end of the fiscal year. Plans and Specifications are nearing completion on East Coast Canal Structures and Western C- 11 Water Quality Treatment Projects. PCA's were executed on eight projects 7 January 2000. The eight projects are: East Coast Canal Structures, Tamiami Trail Culverts, Western C-11 Water Quality Treatment, Seminole Big Cypress Preservation Water Conservation, Southern Crew, Lake Okeechobee Water Retention/Phosphorus Removal, Ten Mile Creek Water Preserve Area, and Lake Trafford. The PCA for Keys Carrying Capacity Was executed in 1998. 76. RESTORATION WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION Restoration Activities Pursuant to Section 1135, Public Law 99-662. Fiscal year costs were Coordination Account Funds $14,632; Initial Appraisals $46,673; Wetland Restoration Oklawaha River, FL $251,102; Munyon Island Wetland Palm Beach, FL $17,113; La Esperanza Peninsula, PR $17,583; Peanut Island Restoration, FL $29,376; Manatee Protection, Canaveral Lock, FL $242,987; Sarasota Bay Restoration, Sarasota, FL $265,633; Palm River Restoration, Hillsborough Co., FL $74,453; Chicopit Bay Wetland, FL $55,474; Johns Island Habitat Preservation $57,056 and Ocklawaha Prairie Restoration $15,142.. Restoration Activities Pursuant to Sec 206, Public Law 104-303. Coordination Account Funds $22,021; Preliminary Restoration Plans $13,375; Aquatic Ecosystem $269,339; C-1 Rediversion/Lagoon Restoration $26,735; Dinner Key $63,120 and Sawgrass Lake/Hell'n Blazes $786. 77. WETLAND AND OTHER AQUATIC HABITAT CREATION UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION Wetland Activities Pursuant to Sec 204 Public Law 102-560. Fiscal year costs was Cockroach Bay Habitat $134,857 and Coordination Accounts $17,457. 9-39 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 2000 TABLE 9-A COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Total Cost To Sect. PROJECT FUNDING FY 97 FY 98 FY 99 FY 00 Sep. 30, 2000 1.Aquatic Plant Control (R&H Act of 1965) 2.Arecibo Harbor, PR (Federal Funds) 3.Atlantic Intracoastal Waterway between Norfolk, VA and St. Johns River, FL 4.Bakers Haulover Inlet, FL (Federal Funds) 5.Canaveral Harbor, FL (Federal Funds) (Contrib. Funds) New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost - 82,000 (55,622) 144,434 - - 39,412,500 9,919 (13,744) 39,395,349 1,128,075' - - - 1,128,075' 190,000 2,033,000 6,524,431 179,472 2,022,434 6,503,337 S- - - 361,2252 - - - - 361,2252 3,048,000 10,000 51,000 118,000 10,896,042 3,023,822 17,764 45,111 113,428 10,884,309 - - - - 243,2353 - - - - 243,2353 - - - 185,688 - - - - 185,688 1,365,000 6,866,000 962,000 1,354,000 1,593,412 6,309,299 1,478,243 673,809 5,649,560 3,991,000 4,397,000 6,182,000 5,643,304 4,027,017 4,297,912 6,300,263 - 375,348 -375,348 (9,308) - 145,046 201,540 40,800,3104 40,058,200 89,321,366 89,311,525 2,558,133 2,536,719 9-40 JACKSONVILLE, FL DISTRICT TABLE 9-A (Cont.) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Sect. PROJECT FUNDING FY 97 Total Cost To FY 98 FY 99 FY 00 Sep. 30, 2000 6 .Channel from Naples to Big Marco Pass, FL (Federal Funds) (Contrib. Funds) 7 .Charlotte Harbor, FL (Federal Funds) 8 .Cross-Florida Barge Canal (Federal Funds) 9 .Eau Gallie Harbor, FL (Federal Funds) 10.Fernandina Harbor, FL (Federal Funds) (Contrib. Funds) New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost - 305,290 - 305,290 - 2,243,372 - 2,243,372 - 159,975 - 159,975 533,1695 533,1695 2,499,000 1,944,000 2,690,000 2,456,676 1,978,085 2,699,790 20,000 45,488 3,386 6,579 - 22,835,644 4,246 22,835,530 - 63,567,473 63,567,473 6,169 2,529,6806 2,529,655 9,627 9,627 2,137 2,137 4,639,040' 4,639,040' 798,000 3,830,000 1,765,000 1,692,700 41,547,710 769,210 3,828,284 1,744,989 1,736,138 41,539,076 -- - - 935,000 -- - - 935,000 9-41 _ ___ _____ t REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 2000 TABLE 9-A (Cont.) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Total Cost To Sect. PROJECT FUNDING FY 97 FY 98 FY 99 FY 00 Sep. 30, 2000 11 .Fort Myers Beach Channel, FL (Federal Funds) 12.Fort Pierce Harbor, FL (Federal Funds) (Contrib. Funds) 13.Gulf Intracoastal Waterway Caloosahatchee River to Anclote River, FL (Federal Funds) 14.Intracoastal Waterway Jacksonville to Miami, FL (Federal Funds) (Contrib. Funds) 15.Jacksonville Harbor, FL (Federal Funds) New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost Rehab: Approp. Cost 158,1408 158,1408 40,000 490,000 110,000 146,500 0 505,491 121,005 154,686 (150,000) (50,461) 510,000 780,000 71,000 1,623,900 455,008 811,417 96,214 1,619,208 28,813 104,297 1,792,631 1,787,314 5,424,500 -5,417,853 9,893,138 9,882,161 - 2,503,387 10,272 - 2,498,659 137,000 172,000 373,000 151,600 162,166 167,882 334,502 187,078 8,112,557 9 8,112,557 9 7,767,859 '0 7,760,391 '0 -- - - 19,251,598 " 19,251,598 " 1,496,000 2,936,000 5,209,000 3,025,000 59,733,382 2 1,513,913 2,900,112 5,138,066 3,155,634 59,681,15912 -- - - 61,000 61,000 63,688 2,334,605 50,000 50,044,571 '3 - - 1,786,233 357,931 49,740,442 " 5,583,000 4,692,000 3,405,000 3,275,800 5,614,015 4,636,411 3,418,078 3,333,365 103,578,79814 103,569,688 '4 102,813 102,813 9-42 JACKSONVILLE, FL DISTRICT TABLE 9-A (Cont.) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Sect. PROJECT FUNDING FY 97 Total Cost To FY 98 FY 99 FY 00 Sep. 30, 2000 (Contrib. Funds) 16 .Jacksonville Hbr. (Mill Cove), FL (Federal Funds) (Contrib. Funds) 17 .Johns Pass, FL (Federal Funds) 18 .Long Boat Pass, FL (Federal Funds) (Contrib. Funds) 19 .Manatee Harbor, FL (Federal Funds) (Contrib. Funds) New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost 208,015 4,090 188,264 250,000 174,782 35,000 35,685 1,145,000 1,143,281 25,000 521,200 22,156 521,177 2,040 - 90,000 - 60,222 4,104,000 4,094,741 250,000 174,782 2,466,912 2,463,656 1,020,233 1,020,233 3,843,186 3,813,385 172,324 172,324 603,100 376,000 (30,000) 755,000 1,348,294 76,252 105,255 745,126 100,000 1,055,000 4,166,000 10,000 78,469 1,062,354 4,178,355 9,913 148,790 - - - 278,285 - - - 6,837,100 6,647,317 5,331,000 5,329,089 2,586,943 2,586,943 9-43 1,135,6695 1,120,008 s 25,000 25,000 82,098 16 82,098 16 __ REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 2000 TABLE 9-A (Cont.) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Total Cost To Sect. PROJECT FUNDING FY 97 FY 98 FY 99 FY 00 Sep. 30, 2000 20.Mayaguez Harbor, PR (Federal Funds) 21.Melbourne Harbor, FL (Federal Funds) 22.Miami Harbor, FL (Federal Funds) (Contrib. Funds) 23.New Pass Sarasota, FL (Federal Funds) 24.Okeechobee Waterway, FL (Federal Funds) 25.Oklawaha River, FL (Federal Funds) New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp Cost Maint: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost 168,187 168,187 1,061,561 1,061,561 17,696 17,696 634,864 634,864 3,440,000 248,000 3,458,812 59,840 320,000 280,000 313,577 283,694 1,790,000 50,000 1,760,491 14,738 1,126,000 874,000 1,266,962 428,487 135,000 673,500 123,551 663,022 - 65,000 730 51,365 51,495,625 '7 50,994,425 ' 7,045,317 6,994,515 2,300,710 18 2,300,710 ' 45,81119 45,811 19 6,810,926 6,796,063 - - - 21,756,418 20 - . - 21,756,418 20 3,425,000 7,025,000 3,289,000 6,188,500 83,582,921 21 3,454,609 7,003,440 3,260,515 6,222,474 83,574,644 21 80,500 46,000 83,449 42,965 10,000 38,900 15,512 37,926 315,264 22 315,264 22 2,897,976 2,896,230 23 9-44 JACKSONVILLE, FL DISTRICT TABLE 9-A (Cont.) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Sect. PROJECT FUNDING FY 97 Total Cost To FY 98 FY 99 FY 00 Sep. 30, 2000 2 6 .Palm Beach Harbor, FL (Federal Funds) 27. Palm Valley Bridge, FL (Federal Funds) 2 8.Ponce de Leon Inlet, FL (Federal Funds) (Contrib. Funds) 2 9.Ponce Harbor, PR (Federal Funds) (Contrib. Funds) 30.Port Everglades HIarbor, Fl (Federal Funds) New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost 2,215,000 2,268,681 2,127,000 1,985,109 1,657,400 2,173,000 1,727,178 2,270,202 25,000 451,000 700,000 3,334,000 23,382 193,768 265,012 3,557,469 - 378 146,000 25,000 - - 94,187 57,854 245,000 1,405,000 1,270,000 5,825,400 230,286 1,391,092 1,220,805 5,870,546 - - - 37,000 - - - 2,004 6,924,021 24 6,924,021 24 29,516,346 25 29,502,772 25 5,401,100 4,930,568 2,124,654 2,105,317 28,440,820 28,392,718 2,452,600 2,417,604 - 1,379,000 1,112,663 2,227,260 26 2,227,260 26 1,779,270 1,779,270 -717,304 - 717,304 54,426,666 27 54,426,666 27 95,000 278,000 50,000 50,000 136,651 247,493 65,421. 58,858 2,412,878 2,405,879 9-45 I __ _ __ ______ REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 2000 TABLE 9-A (Cont.) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Total Cost To Sect. PROJECT FUNDING FY 97 FY 98 FY 99 FY 00 Sep. 30, 2000 31.Removal of Aquatic Growth (Federal Funds) 32. St. Augustine Harbor, FL (Federal Funds) 33. St. Johns River, FL Jacksonville to Lake Harney (Federal Funds) 34. St. Lucie Inlet, FL (Federal Funds) (Contrib. Funds) 35.San Juan Harbor, PR (Federal Funds) (Contrib. Funds) Maint: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost 5,965,000 3,088,000 5,467,000 3,658,856 5,958,507 3,139,877 5,259,768 3,792,390 172,000 100,000 273,090 94,813 60,000 376,000 56,066 375,028 76,597,993 76,472,406 1,476,434 28 1,476,434 28 9,717,107 9,708,760 1,171,243 29 1,171,243 29 - 1,300,299 30 - 1,300,299 30 268,000 162,100 242,000 162,000 268,190 189,865 182,859 171,379 (25,000) 83,092 - (15,000) 2,496,500 8,290 (10,337) 2,504,209 (108,184) 99,217 800,000 5,036,000 1,519,000 14,215,146 481,609 1,168,347 5,096,761 14,615,441 57 - 970,000 1,416,100 - 916,800 1,453,384 -300,000 1,800,000 6,000,000 107,250 1,675,741 6,043,974 8,930,869 '3 8,861,701 12,658,456 12,656,402 3,851,383 3,851,383 35,315,114 32 35,107,126 23,921,929 33 23,905,956 33 8,100,000 7,826,965 9-46 JACKSONVILLE, FL DISTRICT TABLE 9-A (Cont.) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Sect. PROJECT FUNDING FY 97 Total Cost To FY 98 FY 99 FY 00 Sep. 30, 2000 36.Tampa Harbor, FL (Main Channel) (Federal Funds) (Contrib. Funds) 36.Tampa Harbor, FL (East Bay - Branch Channels) (Federal Funds) (Contrib. Funds) 36. Tampa Harbor, FL (Port Sutton) (Federal Funds) 36. Tampa Harbor, FL (Big Bend) (Federal Funds) (Contrib. Funds) (Alafia River) (Federal Funds) 40. Brevard County, FL (Federal Funds) (Contrib. Funds) New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost 173,767,440 34 173,767,440 34 4,472,440 5,910,000 3,224,500 3,997,000 4,509,614 5,818,645 3,232,324 4,055,048 61,269,232 35 61,218,906 35 1,038,711 1,038,711 25,000 300,000 - 90,286 - 234,000 174,643 249,462 - 500,000 9,249 190,415 145,000 40,000 118,686 40,968 - 75,000 62,566 156,729 25,000 15,063 48,333 23,105 5,394 - 125,000 446,000 154,000 36,851 396,110 2,248,813 2,204,204 3,759,100 2,901,443 630,000 623,541 210,000 197,823 48,333 5,394 125,000 - 1,868,000 4,804,873 124,785 439,949 3,334,568 29,001 29,001 148,670 51,330 - 150,511 30,717 15,034 30,717 15,034 2,462,000 2,453,343 9-47 _ _ __ _ ___~__ ___ ~s REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 2000 TABLE 9-A (Cont.) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Total Cost To Sect. PROJECT FUNDING FY 97 FY 98 FY 99 FY 00 Sep. 30, 2000 41. Broward County, FL Beach Erosion Control & Hillsboro Inlet, FL Navigation Proj. (Federal Funds) (Contrib. Funds) 42. Duval County, FL (Federal Funds) (Contrib. Funds) 43. Ft. Pierce Beach, FL (Federal Funds) (Contrib. Funds) 44.Indian River County, FL (Federal Funds) 45.Lee County, FL (Federal Funds) 46.Manatee County, FL (Federal Funds) (Contrib. Funds) New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost - 94,000 40,000 290,349 19,817,449 7,785 7,950 99,517 257,528 19,731,847 S- - - 26,884 S- - - 26,884 3,460,990 36 3,460,990 36 - 261,000 152,000 370,000 20,543,900 71,332 98,886 212,656 457,125 20,488,763 - 16,895,567 - 16,895,567 302,982 1,839,396 302,982 1,839,396 595,000 2,123,000 1,410,000 1,139,000 468,591 383,661 3,062,753 1,023,668 - 3,715,000 431,180 - 3,623,800 - - - 113,000 38,000 74,580 62,737 1,111,000 337,000 279,000 40,000 1,206,851 382,220 355,174 95,005 339,000 193,000 (152,000) 150,000 313,043 48,522 6,482 95,482 7,366,403 7,038,076 5,054,180 4,528,211 536,681 522,998 3,520,000 3,501,595 6,265,600 6,198,923 3,337,348 3,337,320 9-48 JACKSONVILLE, FL DISTRICT TABLE 9-A (Cont.) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Total Cost To Sect. PROJECT FUNDING FY 97 FY 98 FY 99 FY 00 Sep. 30, 2000 4 7 .Martin County, FL (Federal Funds) (Contrib. Funds) 4 8 .Nassau County, FL (Federal Funds) 4 9 .Palm Beach County, FL (Federal Funds) Lake Worth Transfer Plant, FL (Federal Funds) 50 .Palm Beach Island, FL (Federal Funds) 51.Pinellas County, FL (Federal Funds) (Contrib. Funds) 52. St. Johns County, FL (Federal Funds) (Contrib. Funds) New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost 138,900 245,164 393,000 210,000 216,000 398,447 198,261 202,898 216,258 206,899 216,258 206,899 357,000 290,732 240,430 314,900 127,000 240,489 198,044 200,000 5,312,000 171,287 5,335,393 43,543 5,871,600 5,840,380 5,030,000 5,016,752 1,875,553 1,849,462 (195,000) 132,113 14,489,547 (203,450) 18,353 14,333,443 13,621 13,621 - 32,500 249,000 824,289 22,855 179,410 175,032 60 1,560,000 11,670,000 1,646,353 8,841,616 4,991,000 4,765,000 7,345,421 5,225,357 1,105,789 377,297 1,793,000 1,793,000 47,169,693 47,003,688 - - - - 5,625 S- - 5,625 - 5,000,000 5,253,828 1,030,000 31,444,173 - 4,463,467 3,641,392 3,075,340 31,326,900 334,000 455,000 109,000 202,000 359,162 197,764 328,435 219,696 - - 28,986 - 2,001,286 1,964,650 28,986 9-49 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 2000 TABLE 9-A (Cont.) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Total Cost To Sect. PROJECT FUNDING FY 97 FY 98 FY 99 FY 00 Sep. 30, 2000 53.Sarasota County, FL (Federal Funds) (Contrib. Funds) 56.Central and Southern Florida (Federal Funds) (Contrib. Funds) 57. Dade County, FL (Federal Funds) 57. Dade County, FL (Contrib. Funds) 58.Dade County, N. of Haulover Beach, FL (Federal Funds) (Contrib. Funds) 59.Four River Basins, FL (Federal Funds) (Contrib. Funds) New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost 377,000 470,000 50,000 (94,462) 14,219,337 1,020,099 572,262 20,164 (94,762) 14,173,891 26,605 62,896 - 10,541 170,158 16,813,000 20,209,000 14,327,000 34,586,854 17,837,677 16,552,693 17,514,478 31,870,918 10,245,000 8,724,000 10,132,600 18,789,900 10,563,383 8,840,884 10,073,397 18,757,847 5,020,605 4,995,501 505,365,167 37 500,705,423 37 171,397,440 171,269,230 1,917,000 2,896,395 2,678,707 6,440,167 72,295,268 1,682,687 1,834,724 2,570,763 6,081,434 70,424,925 4,606,000 3,607,000 . 5,300,000 1,511,000 57,600,552 38 4,593,948 2,045,748 6,185,514 1,136,923 56,394,419 38 2,500,000 4,000,000 1,558,942 7,817,599 47,733,876 39 4,131,499 - 5,353,213 (139,502) 39,570,869 39 6,801,611 6,801,611 8,082,927 8,082,927 69,000 151,000 153,901 38,092 - (100,000) 76,155,095 40 20,050 (183,910) 75,974,912 40 - 185,857 14,095,058 - 194,767 14,095,058 9-50 JACKSONVILLE, FL DISTRICT TABLE 9-A (Cont.) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Sect. PROJECT 60. Portugues and Bucana Rivers, PR (Federal Funds) (Contrib. Funds) 6 1.Rio De La Plata, PR (Federal Funds) (Contrib. Funds) 62. Rio Grande De Arecibo, PR (Federal Funds) 6 3.Rio Puerto Nuevo, PR (Federal Funds) (Contrib. Funds) 71.General Regulatory (Federal Funds) 74.Kissimmee River, FL (Federal Funds) (Contrib. Funds) FUNDING FY 97 New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Total Cost To FY 98 FY 99 FY 00 Sep. 30, 2000 8,232,000 11,939,000 8,094,000 10,839,511 10,108,478 9,544,272 5,460,000 5,715,802 2,335,000 1,713,000 587,302 2,435,000 10,148,201 1,535,598 939,591 1,072,506 1,341,221 7,455,789 418,000 479,000 340,000 658,000 462,859 385,371 429,367 599,517 - 681,088 40,173 25,000 793,000 30,000 444,000 33,897 557,487 205,264 501,387 11,173,000 14,146,000 11,464,449 13,126,044 11,157,000 10,524,000 9,734,511 11,932,705 2,100,000 3,500,000 3,750,000 5,250,000 1,997,157 3,335,479 1,418,592 5,818,149 7,231,000 7,295,000 7,390,000 8,283,000 7,061,780 7,240,244 7,673,829 7,811,478 - 2,817,000 6,339,000 25,244,000 5,130,869 7,898,500 9,269,223 24,065,361 - 1,100,000 493,000 494,000 - 380,850 1,089,598 9-51 384,899,968 384,526,201 6,544,998 6,446,461 681,088 40,173 2,302,215 2,280,170 65,699,096 64,357,736 17,670,000 14,422,702 78,059,2004' 77,039,469 41 66,479,000 64,382,760 2,087,000 1,470,448 _ ___ ___ __ ___ REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 2000 TABLE 9-A (Cont.) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Total Cost To Sect. PROJECT FUNDING FY 97 FY 98 FY 99 FY 00 Sep. 30, 2000 75. Everglades South New Work: Florida Ecosystem Approp. - 4,009,000 1,809,000 5,435,700 11,253,700 Restoration, FL Cost - 1,199,364 3,152,382 4,368,378 8,720,125 (Federal Funds) (Contrib. Funds) New Work: Approp. - - 500,000 2,672,000 3,172,000 Cost - - 38,269 38,269 I Excludes $288,000 for contributed funds for new work. 2 Includes $97,566 for previous project. 3 Excludes $243,235 contributed funds for new work. 4 Excludes $700,000 contributed by NASA In connection with construction of lock. 5 Includes $113,0100 for new work on previous project; excludes $15,563 expended for new work on existing project in Boca Grande entrance channel from contributed funds. 6 Excludes $113,744 for maintenance and operations of dams. 7 Includes $905,221 expended for recreation facilities. 8 Includes $10,128 cost for reconnaissance and detailed project report prepared under Section 107 modification to the project Excludes $1,095 contributed funds for new work. 9 Includes $515,479 for new work for previous projects: $8,472 for new work on Sunshine Skyway Channel; and $9,707 for new work for Cats Point Channel. Excludes $14,473 contributed funds for new work for Sunshine Skyway and Boca Ciega Bay channels. 10 Includes $450,749 for maintenance for previous project. 11t Includes $94,776 for work for previous projects. Excludes $2,199,842 expended from public works funds for new work. 12 Includes $213,222 for maintenance on previous projects and $3,179 operating and care under provisions of permanent indefinite appropriation. 13 Includes $3,520,137 new work on previous project and 5290,013 for new work expended from public works funds. 14 Includes $543,399 maintenance on previous projects. 15 Includes unused contributed funds of $64,136 returned to local Interests. 16 Project authorized December 2, 1964, by Chief of Engineers under Section 107 of 1960 R&H Act and by Section 110 of the 1966 R&H Act. Cost of new work excludes $53,732 contributed funds. 17 Includes $5,502,126 expended from public work funds for new work. Includes costs of $6,777.906 for recreation facilities. 18 Includes $381,479 work-in-kind and $172,314 in costs for north Jetty recreation facility. 19 Excludes $45,811 contributed funds for new work. 20 Includes $21,101,919 for new work under previous project, $626,925 for recreational facilities (Code 710), and $27,574 for reconnaissance and detailed project report prepared under Section 107 modification to the project. 21 Includes $7,581,150 for maintenance for previous projects. Excludes $1,1000 for maintenance from 9-52 JACKSONVILLE, FL DISTRICT TABLE 9-B AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Work Authorized Oct. 27, 1965 WRDA Aug. 17, 1999 WRDA Oct. 12, 1996 WRDA Oct. 12, 1996 NAVIGATION PROJECTS Aug. 26, 1937 WRDA Oct. 12, 1996 Mar. 4, 1913 Jun. 20, 1939 AQUATIC PLANT CONTROL (See Section 1 of Text) Control and progressive eradication of obnoxious aquatic plants, and continued research to develop best method of control. LOWER ST. JOHNS RIVER BASIN, FL May apply the computer model developed under the feasibility study to assist non-Federal interests in developing strategies for improving water quality at 50 percent cost share. TAMPA, FL May enter into a cooperative agreement under section 229 with the Museum of Science and Industry, Tampa, Fl to provide technical, planning, and design assistance to demonstrate the water quality functions found in wetlands, at an estimated total Federal cost of $500,000. WEST DADE, FL Conduct a reconnaissance study to determine the Federal interest in using the West Dade, FL, reuse facility to improve water quality in, and increase the supply of surface water to, the Everglades in order to enhance fish and wildlife habitat. ARECIBO HARBOR, PR (See Section 2 of Text) Construction of breakwater 1,200 feet long and dredging channel 25 feet deep and 400 feet wide with flare at entrance and widening at inner end to form a maneuvering area. ATLANTIC INTRACOASTAL WATERWAY, ST. JOHNS COUNTY, FL Project for navigation. Operation, maintenance, repair, replacement and rehabilitation shall be a non-Federal responsibility, and the non-Federal interest shall assume ownership for the bridge. ATLANTIC INTRACOASTAL WATERWAY BETWEEN NORFOLK, VA AND THE ST. JOHNS RIVER, FL (See Section 3 of Text) Channel 7 x 100 feet. Channel 12 feet deep and 90-150 feet wide with cutoffs. H.Doc. 251, 89th Cong., 1st sess. P.L. 106-53, Aug. 17, 1999 106' Cong., 1St sess. P.L. 104-303, Oct. 12, 1996 104th Cong. P.L. 104-303, Oct. 12,1996 104th Cong. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 43, Cong.,75th 1st sess. P.L. 104-303, Oct. 12, 1996 104th Cong. H.Doc. 898, 62nd Cong.,2d sess. II.Doc. 618, 75th Cong.,3d sess. 9-53 Documents REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 2000 TABLE 9-B (Continued) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Work Authorized Documents Jul. 14, 1960 Mar. 2, 1945 Oct. 23, 1962 BAKERS HAULOVER, FL (See Section 4 of Text) Channel 11 x 200 feet in ocean entrance, thence 8 x 100 feet to Intracoastal Waterway; Marina basin 8 x 200 feet; reconstruction of jetties and protection of inlet shores. CANAVERAL HARBOR, FL (See Section 5 of Text) Entrance channel jetties, a turning basin enclosed by a dike, and a barge canal with a lock. Maintain improved channel, turning basin, enlarge barge channel and lock, relocate dike, provide channel and turning basin west of 35-foot turning basin, construct and operate sand-transfer plant. Report of the Mitigation of fish and wildlife losses at Port Canaveral West Chief of Engineers Turning Basin Project. Oct. 1985 Report of the Project for navigation, Canaveral Harbor, FL, Chief of Engineers as modified by the letter of the Secretary Jul. 24, 1991 dated Oct. 10, 1991 WRDA Modification of navigation project to reclassify the removal Oct. 12, 1996 and replacement of stone protection on both sides of the channel as general navigation features. CHANNEL FROM NAPLES TO BIG MARCO PASS, FL (See Section 6 of Text) Jun. 20, 1938 Interior channel 6 x 70 feet. Jul. 14, 1960 Channel 12 x 150 feet from the Gulf to Gordon Pass, thence 10 x 100 feet to a point 400 feet south of U.S. Highway 41 Bridge, thence 10 x 70 feet to bridge and two turning basins. CHARLOTTE HARBOR, FL (See Section 7 of Text) Jul. 25, 1912 Channel 24 x 300 feet through Gulf through Boca Grande entrance. Mar. 3, 1925 Depth of 27 feet at entrance and width of 500 feet at bend. H.Doc. 189, 86th Cong., Ist sess. H.Doc. 367, 77th Cong., Ist sess. S.Doc. 140, 87th Cong.,2d sess. P.L. 99-662, Nov. 17, 1986 99th Cong., 2d sess P.L. 102-580, Oct. 13, 1992 102nd Cong., 2d sess. P.L. 104-303, Oct. 12, 1996 104 th Cong. H.Doc. 596, 75th Cong.,3d sess. H.Doc. 183, 86th Cong.,lst sess. H.Doc. 699, 62nd Cong.,2d sess. H.Doc. 113, 66th Cong., Ist sess. 9-54 JACKSONVILLE, FL DISTRICT TABLE 9-B (Continued) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION =.__. Work Authorized Jul. 3, 1930 Aug. 26, 1937 May 17, 1950 P.O. 675/77 Jul. 23, 1942 WRDA Nov. 17, 1986 WRDA Nov. 28, 1990 WRDA Oct. 31, 1992 Jun. 20, 1938 Channel 10 x 100 feet to Punta Gorda and a turning basin. Depth of 30 feet at entrance and width of 700 feet at bend. Depth of 32 feet in entrance channel. CROSS-FLORIDA BARGE CANAL, FL (See Section 8 of Text) Barge Canal 12 x 150 feet. Establishment of the Cross Florida National Conservation Area. Deauthorized project purposes in the Act of July 23, 1942, transferred lands and completed facilities to the state, and required state payments to Citrus, Clay, Duval, Levy, Marion. and Putnam counties During the period November 28, 1992 and September 30, 1993, authorized and directed to enter into a contract with the St. Johns River Water Management District and the Southwest Florida Water Management District of the State of Florida for the continued operation and maintenance of the project. The maintenance shall be performed at a level of service that is necessary to ensure safe operating conditions and to prevent deterioration of the structures. No major rehabilitations or renovations shall be performed in such portions of the project during such period. Funding for the continued operation and maintenance of the barge canal project, shall not exceed $300,000 federal and the State of Florida shall pay a nonfederal share of $600,000 to fund the continued maintenance. EAU GALLIE HARBOR, FL (See Section 9 of Text) Channel 8 x 100 feet and a turning basin. Rivers and Harbors Committee, Doc. 1, 70th Cong., 1st sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc.95, 74thCong.,2dsess. H.Doc. 186, 81st Cong., lst sess. H.Doc. 109, 79th Cong., Ist sess. P.L. 99-662, Nov. 17, 1986, 99th Cong., 2d sess. P.L. 101-640, Nov. 28, 1990, 101st Cong., 2d sess P.L. 102-580, Oct. 31, 1992, 102nd Cong., 2d sess. H.Doc. 497, 75th Cong., 3 sess. 9-55 Acts Documents ___ -- REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 2000 TABLE 9-B (Continued) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Work Authorized Documents FERNANDINA HARBOR, FL (See Section 10 of Text) Entrance jetties. Raising and extending jetties to provide a 19-foot depth. Improvement of inner harbor to obtain 20 to 24-foot depth and 400 to 600-foot channel width. Combining improvement of Fernandina Harbor and Cumberland Sound under the general heading of Fernandina Harbor. Annual Report 1879 Annual Report 1891 & 1896 H.Doc. 388, 59th Cong., Ist sess. Mar. 3, 1925 Jun. 20, 1938 Mar. 2, 1945 May 17, 1950 WRDA Nov. 28, 1990 Jul. 14, 1960 Provided for a 26-foot channel. Provided for the 28-foot channel and turning basin. Provided for reducing the maximum width of turning basin from 1,000 to 800 feet, for shifting channel line in this vicinity vicinity 50 feet northwesterly and for including in authorized project small area dredged by Rayonier, Inc. Provided for 32-foot channel and turning basin. Redesignated location of turning basin until Section 107 (R&H Act of 1960) study is completed and the resulting. project constructed FORT MYERS BEACH, FL (See Section 11 of Text) 12 x 150 foot channel in San Carlos Bay, thence 11 x 125 feet in Matanzas Pass to upper shrimp terminals. H.Doc. 227, 68th Cong., Ist sess. H.Doc. 548, 75th Cong.,3d sess. H.Doc. 284, 87th Cong.,lst sess. H.Doc. 662, 80th Cong.,2d sess. P.L. 101-640, Nov. 28, 1990 101st Cong., ?? sess. H.Doc. 183, 86th Cong.,1 st sess. Auth. by Chief of Engineers Dec. 6, 1968 under Sec. 107 of 1960 R&H Act Extension of 11 x 125 foot channel easterly about 2,000 feet to and including a turning basin adjacent to natural deep water in Matanzas Pass. 9-56 Jun. 14, 1880 Jul. 13, 1892 Mar. 2, 1907 Jun. 25, 1910 JACKSONVILLE, FL DISTRICT TABLE 9-B (Continued) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Work Authorized Def. Act of Mar. 4, 1931 War Dept. Approp. Act, Mar. 4, 1933 Aug. 30, 1935 Report of the Chief of Engineers Dec. 14, 1987 Mar. 2, 1945 Jun. 30, 1948 May 17, 1950 Sep. 3, 1954 May 10-16, 1957 Auth. Mar. 1, 1962 by Senate and House Public. Works Comm Auth. by Chief of Engineers, Mar.1, 1963,. under Sec 107 of 1960 R&H Act FORT PIERCE HARBOR, FL (See Section 12 of Text) Expenditure of $20,000 for dredging channel, maintenance by local interests. Expenditure of up to $30,000 for dredging channel. Maintaining channels, jetties, and revetments, and enlarging channels and turning basin to existing project dimensions. Deepening and enlarging channels and turning basin. Total cost of $6,742,000. INTRACOASTAL WATERWAY, CALOOSAHATCHEE RIVER TO ANCLOTE RIVER, FL (See Section 13 of Text) 9 x 100 foot channel; deepening channel at Casey's Pass to 9 feet and construction of highway bridge at Venice. Original route may be modified at no excess cost to U.S. Any route in Venice-Lemon Bay area may be used. Use of alternate Route C-1 in Venice-Lemon Bay area. Local interests to bear costs of Venice Avenue highway bridge and any other necessary crossing over Route C-1. Sunshine Skyway Channel to be improved and maintained to. 9 x 100 feet 6 x 80 foot channel in Boca Ciega Bay. Specified in Act Specified in Act H.Doc. 252, 72nd Cong., 1st sess. and Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 21, 74th Cong., 1st sess. P.L. 100-676, Nov. 17, 1988 100th Cong., 2d sess H.Doc. 371, 76th Cong., Ist sess. Specified in Act Specified in Act Specified in Act H.Doc. 109, 85th Cong.,lst sess. 9-57 Acts Documents __ __ ___ _ ___ REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 2000 TABLE 9-B (Continued) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Work Authorized Documents INTRACOASTAL WATERWAY, JACKSONVILLE TO MIAMI, FL (See Section 14 of Text) Jan. 21, 1927 Channel 8 x 75 feet from Jacksonville to Miami. H.Doc. 586, 69th Cong.,2d sess. Jul. 3, 1930 Channel width of 100 feet. " S.Doc. 71, 71st Cong., 2d sess. PARA Jun. 26, Operation and care of Palm Valley Bridge. Specified in Act 1934 Aug. 26, 1937 Turning basin at Jacksonville Beach. H.Doc. 180, 75th Cong., 1st sess. Mar. 2. 1945 Channel 12 x 125 feet. H.Doc. 740_ 79th Cong., Side channel and turning basin at Sebastian (deauthorized). Turning basin at Vero Beach. Maintenance of side channel at Daytona Beach. 2d sess. H.Doc. 336, 76th Cong., Ist sess. H.Doc. 261, 76th Cong., Ist sess. H.Doc. 222, 85th Cong., 1st sess. Chief of Engineers Channel 10 x 125 feet from Ft. Pierce to Miami. Report of Jul. 22, 1960,Mod. 12-foot Channel Mar. 2, 1907 Nov. 17, 1986 WRDA Aug. 17, 1999 JACKSONVILLE HARBOR, FL (See Section 15 of Text) ST. JOHNS RIVER, FL OPPOSITE THE CITY OF JACKSONVILLE The 24-foot area from Hogan Creek to Florida East Coast Railroad Bridge. Deauthorized the 24-foot area from Hogan Creek to Florida East Coast Railroad bridge. Project for navigation. H.Doc 663, 59th Cong., 1st sess. P.L. 99-662, Nov. 28, 1986 99th Cong., 2d sess. P.L. 106-53, Aug. 17, 1999 106 Cong., 1" sess. 9-58 Mar. 2, 1945 Mar.2, 1945 Jul. 3, 1958 JACKSONVILLE, FL DISTRICT TABLE 9-B (Continued) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Work Authorized Report of the Chief of Engineers Feb. 12, 1982 WRDA Oct. 12, 1996 Auth. by Chief of Engineers Dec. 2, 1964 under Sec. 107 of 1960 R&H Act and Sec. 110 of 1966 R&H Act WRDA Oct. 12, 1996 Auth,. by Chief of Engineers, Apr. 20, 1976 under Sec. 107 of 1960 JACKSONVILLE HARBOR (MILL COVE), FL (See Section 16 of Text) Enlarge weir structure and west opening controlling flow into Mill Cove, to reduce shoaling and improve navigation as well as circulation. Modification to carry out a project for mitigation consisting of measures for flow and circulation improvement within. Mill Cove. JOHN'S PASS, FL (See Section 17 of Text) Channel 10 x 100 feet in gulf, 8 x 100 feet inside pass, 6 x 100 feet to IWW, 2.6 miles long. LAKE WORTH INLET, FL Project for navigation and shoreline protection subject to final report to be completed not later than December 31, 1996. LONGBOAT PASS, FL (See Section 18 of Text) 12 x 150 foot entrance channel from Gulf of Mexico to Longboat Bridge; 10 x 100 foot channel from Longboat Bridge northeasterly to IWW; channel from north channel to Cortez Bridge. P.L. 99-662, Nov. 17, 1986 99th Cong., 2d sess P.L. 104-303, Oct. 12, 1996 104th Cong. P.L. 104-303, Oct. 12, 1996 104th Cong. R&IH Act, as amended MANATEE HARBOR, FL (See Section 19 of Text) Report of the Provide for maintenance of the existing 40-foot deep draft Chief of Engineers navigation channel and turning basin from Tampa Bay May 12, 1980 to Port Manatee. Initial construction of a widener at Manatee Harbor and deepen area adjacent to berthing area. WRDA Nov. 28, 1990 Modified the project for navigation authorized by the WRDA of 1986 to construct substantially in accordance with the post authorization change report dated April 1990. P.L. 99-662, Nov. 17, 1986 99th Cong., 2d sess. P.L.101-640, Nov. 28, 1990, 101st Cong., ?? sess. 9-59 Acts Documents - --- -- REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 2000 TABLE 9-B (Continued) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Work Authorized Documents Aug. 30, 1935 Aug. 26, 1937 Jul. 3, 1930 PWA Program Sep. 6, 1933 Jun. 13, 1902 Mar. 2, 1907 Mar. 4, 1913 Mar. 3, 1925 Jul. 3, 1930 Aug. 30, 1935 MAYAGUEZ HARBOR, PR (See Section 20 of Text) Approach channels 30 feet deep to and along deep-water terminal. MELBOURNE HARBOR, FL (See Section 21 of Text) Channel 8 x 100 feet and a turning basin. MIAMI HARBOR, FL (See Section 22 of Text) MIAMI RIVER The 15-foot channel in Miami River, 150 feet wide at the mouth. The channel at Dinner Key Airport. An 18-foot channel in a land cut across the peninsula and construction of the north jetty. Construction of the south jetty and increase of channel width to 100 feet. Modification of local cooperation requirements imposed by the Act of July 25, 1912. A channel 25 feet deep with present widths from the ocean to Biscayne Bay, thence 200 feet wide across the bay to but not including the municipal turning basin, and extension of both jetties. A channel width of 300 feet across the bay and enlarging the municipal turning basin, with expenditures thereon limited. to $200,000 A depth of 30 feet from the ocean to and in the turning basin, with the existing authorized project widths, including the 300-foot width in the channel across the bay. H.Doc. 215, 72nd Cong., 1st sess. & River and Harbor Committee Doc. 1,73rd Cong., 1st sess. H.Doc. 390, 74th Cong., 2d sess. Specified in Act S.Doc. 95, 72nd Cong., 1st sess. and Specified in Act H.Doc. 622, 56th Cong., 1st sess. (Annual Report 1900, p. 1987) Specified in Act Specified in Act H.Doc. 516, 67th Cong., 4th sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 15, 71st Cong., 2d sess. Sen. Comm. Print. 73rd Cong., 2d sess. 9-60 JACKSONVILLE, FL DISTRICT TABLE 9-B (Continued) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Work Authorized Documents Aug. 26, 1937 Mar. 2, 1945 Mar. 2, 1945 Jul. 14, 1960 Aug. 13, 1968 WRDA Nov. 17, 1986 Report of the Chief of Engineers Sep. 25, 1989 WRDA Oct. 12, 1996 WRDA Aug. 17, 1999 Extending the turning basin 200 feet to the southward. The Virginia Key improvement. For incorporation of the project for Miami River in that for Miami Harbor, the widening at the mouth of Miami River to existing project widths; the channels from the mouth of Miami River to the turning basin and to Government Cut; and the channel from Miami River to the harbor of refuge, provided that local interests contribute one-third of the cost. Deletion of Virginia Key development and the Dinner Key, approach channel widening the existing ship channel by easing the ocean bend and increasing the width of the 300-foot wide section to 500 feet, enlarging the existing turning basin 300 feet along both the south and northeasterly sides, and dredging a turning basin along the north side of Fisher Island about 39 acres in extent and 30 feet in depth. Enlarging existing entrance channel to 38 x 500 feet, deepening existing 400-foot wide channel across Biscayne Bay to 36 feet; deepening existing turning basins at Biscayne Boulevard terminal and Fisher Island to 36 feet. Deauthorized the widening at the mouth of Miami River to existing project widths; and the channels from the mouth of Miami River to the turning basin, to Government Cut, and to a harbor of refuge in Palmer Lake. The project for navigation, Miami Harbor Channel. The project for navigation, Miami Harbor Channel subject to a final report to be completed no later than 31 December 1996. Miami Harbor Channel project modified to include construction of artificial reefs and related environmental mitigation. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 86, 74th Cong., 2d sess. S.Doc. 251, 79th Cong., 2d sess. H.Doc. 91, 79th Cong., 1st sess. S.Doc. 71, 85th Cong., 2d sess. S.Doc. 93, 90th Cong., 2d sess. P.L. 99-662, Nov. 17, 1986, 99th Cong., 2d sess P.L. 101-640, Nov. 28, 1990, 101st Cong, ?? sess. P.L. 104-303, Oct. 12, 1996 104th, Cong P.L. 106-53, Aug. 17, 1999, 10 6 Cong., 1St sess. 9-61 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 2000 TABLE 9-B (Continued) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Work Authorized Documents Auth. by Chief of Engineers Apr. 20, 1964 under Sec. 107 of 1960 R&H Act PARA Jun. 26, 1934 Aug. 26, 1937 Mar. 2, 1945 Mar. 2, 1945 WRDA Nov. 17, 1986 Auth. by Chief of Engineers Nov. 5, 1968, under Sec. 107 of 1960 R&H Act NEW PASS, SARASOTA, FL (See Section 23 of Text) 10 x 150 foot entrance channel; 8 x 100 foot inner channels; and 8-foot deep turning basins at Payne Terminal and City Pier. OKEECHOBEE WATERWAY, FL (See Section 24 of Text) Operation and care of locks and dams provided for with funds from R&H appropriations. New lock and weir structure in St. Lucie Canal. Deepening to 8 feet from Ft. Myers to Jacksonville-Miami waterway near Stuart via channel across lake from Clewiston. Channel to yacht basin at Ft. Myers and a basin at Stuart. Deauthorized basin at Stuart. Specified in Act Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 28, 75th Cong., 1st sess. H.Doc. 696, 76th Cong., 3d sess. H.Doc. 736, 79th Cong., 2d sess. PL 99-662, Nov. 17, 1986 99th Cong., 2d sess. Enlarge existing 8 x 90 foot section of Okeechobee Waterway for about 5 miles upstream from Ft. Myers to 10 x 100 feet. Sep. 19, 1890 Mar. 2, 1907 Jun. 25, 1910 Jul. 25, 1912 Jul. 27, 1916 OKLAWAHA RIVER, FL (See Section 25 of Text) Clearing obstructions for channel 4 feet deep from mouth to Leesburg. Channel 6 feet deep from mouth to head of Silver Springs Run. Maintenance of levels in the lakes at head of river. Acceptance of certain artificial waterways in lieu of portions of natural river bed. Annual Report 1889, p.1360 H.Doc. 782, 59th Cong., 1st sess. Specified in Acts Specified in Act 9-62 JACKSONVILLE, FL DISTRICT TABLE 9-B (Continued) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Work Authorized PARA Jun. 26, 1934 WRDA Nov. 17, 1986 Mar. 13, 1934 Dec. 10, 1934 Aug. 30, 1935 Mar. 2, 1945 May 17, 1950 Jul. 14, 1960 Operation and care of lock and dam provided for with funds from appropriations for rivers and harbors. Deauthorized channel 6 feet deep from mouth to head of Silver Springs Run PALM BEACH HARBOR, FL (See Section 26 of Text) Maintenance of improvement previously constructed by local interests. Deepening the channels and turning basin, as constructed by local of interests, to 20 feet. Authorized the work previously approved by Public Works Administration, and widening the channels to existing project dimensions, enlarging the 700-foot square turning basin eastward removing the obstructive point on south side of the and inlet, revetting the banks of the inlet restoring existing jetties. Deepening the channels and turning basin to 25 feet. Extending the turning basin 550 feet southward over a 900-foot width, with a flare to the east; provided that local interests may be reimbursed not to exceed $305,000 for work done by them on this modification subsequent to July 1, 1949. An entrance channel 35 feet deep, 400 feet wide, and 0.8 mile long merging with an inner channel 33 feet deep, 300 feet wide and 0.3 mile long, thence flaring into a turning basin, 1,400 feet north-south by a minimum of 1,200 feet east-west. Report of the Assume maintenance of locally expanded turning basin to Chief of Engineers a depth of 25 feet on north side of existing basin. Dec. 10, 1985 Specified in Act P.L. 99-662, Nov. 17, 1986 99th Cong., 2d sess. H.Doc. 185, 73rd Cong., 2d sess. Recommended by Chief Engineers to Public Works Administration Oct. 17, 1934 H.Doc. 185, 73rd Cong., 2d sess. and Rivers and Harbors Comm. H. Doc. 42, 74th Cong., 1st sess. H.Doc. 530, 78th Cong., Cong., 2d sess. H.Doc. 704, 80th Cong., 2d sess. H.Doc. 283, 86th Cong., 1st sess. (contains latest published map) P.L. 99-662, Nov.17, 1986, 99th Cong., 2d sess. WRDA Oct. 12, 1996 PALM VALLEY BRIDGE, FL (See Section 27 of Text) Replacement of a two lane bridge. P.L. 104-303 Oct. 12, 1996 10 4th Cong. 9-63 Acts Documents _ __ __ _ ~_I___~ __ _ REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 2000 TABLE 9-B (Continued) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Work Authorized Documents Oct. 27, 1965 WRDA Aug. 17, 1999 Mar. 3, 1925 Aug. 30, 1935 Mar. 2, 1945 H.R. Sep. 23, 1976, S.R. Oct. 1, 1976 Jul. 3, 1930 Aug. 30, 1935 Jun. 20, 1938 Jul. 24, 1946 Jul. 3, 1958 PONCE DE LEON INLET, FL (See Section 28 of Text) Widening and deepening channels; jetties on north and south sides of inlet; a weir in the north jetty and an impoundment. basin inside the weir Project for navigation and related purposes. PONCE HARBOR, PR (See Section 29 of Text) Dredging 3 continuous areas, aggregating 153 acres, to depths of 30, 18, and 9 feet, and construction of a seawall, costs to be shared by U.S. and local interests. Modified conditions of local cooperation to provide that U.S. undertake all dredging at Federal expense and return local funds previously contributed for dredging, all other portions of the improvement hereafter to be at the expense of local interests. Eliminate previously authorized 9-foot dredging area, and provided for dredging 30-foot depth area and 18 acres off the municipal pier and for construction of the breakwater off Punta Carenero. Eliminate previously authorized 18-foot and a portion of the 30-foot project outside the proposed 36-foot and a portion adjacent to the municipal bulkhead. Channel 36 x 600 feet from Caribbean Sea to harbor; channel 36 x 400 feet into harbor; and a 36-foot turning basin. PORT EVERGLADES HARBOR, FL (See Section 30 of Text) Maintenance of harbor constructed by local interests. Enlarge entrance channel and complete turning basin to 1,200 feet square. Widen turning basin 350 feet on north side. Widen turning basin 200 feet on north side, 500 feet on south side and enlarge flare at entrance channel. H.Doc. 74, 89th Cong., 1st sess. P.L. 106-53, Aug. 17, 1999, 106 h Cong., 1st sess. H.Doc. 532, 67th Cong., 4th sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 18, 72nd Cong., 1st sess. H.Doc. 745, 79th Cong., 2d sess. H.Doc. 532, 94th Cong., Cong., 2d sess. Cong., 2d sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 25, 74th Cong., 1st sess. H.Doc. 545, 75th Cong., 3d sess. H.Doc. 768, 78th Cong., 2d sess. Deepen and widen entrance channel on a new alignment and increase H.Doc. 346, 85th turning basin in size and depth. Cong., 2d sess. 9-64 JACKSONVILLE, FL DISTRICT TABLE 9-B (Continued) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Work Authorized H.R. May 9, 1974; S.R. May 31, 1974 Report of the Chief of Engineers Sep. 23, 1991 Mar. 3, 1899 Jun. 13, 1902 Mar. 3, 1905 Jun. 20, 1938 May 17, 1950 Mar. 3, 1899 Deepen and widen entrance channel, enlarge turning basin, widen Pier 7 channel, maintenance of Berth 18 channel, and planning for a south jetty fishing walkway with construction contingent upon need as developed by detailed post authorization studies. Project for navigation. REMOVAL OF AQUATIC GROWTH FROM NAVIGABLE WATERS IN THE STATE OF FLORIDA (See Section 31 of Text) Construction and operation of a suitable vessel and use of log booms for removal of water hyacinths in the navigable waters of the State. Extermination and removal of water hyacinths by any mechanical, chemical or other means. Prohibits use of any chemical process injurious to cattle. ST. AUGUSTINE HARBOR, FL (See Section 32 of Text) Channel 27 x 200 feet protected by a groin. Channel 16 x 200 feet across bar, and thence 12 feet deep to Intracoastal Waterway; jetty on south side of inlet; future landward extension of groin and jetty; and channel 10 x 100 feet in San Sebastian River. ST. JOHNS RIVER, FL, JACKSONVILLE TO LAKE HARNEY (See Section 33 of Text) A channel 13 feet deep and 200 feet wide from Jacksonville to Palatka. H.Doc. 144, 93rd Cong., 1st sess. The improvement of Deep Creek. H.Doc. 699, 63rd Cong., 2d sess. Two jetties at Volusia Bar (Maintenance only; new work completed under previous project). Annual Report for 1879, pp. 795-798 9-65 Acts Documents Mar. 2, 1919 Jun. 14, 1880 r . .. t r .r i r r r r . r r r r -. P.L. 102-580, Oct.,31 1992 102nd Cong., 2d sess. Annual Report 1899 Specified in Act Specified in Act H.Doc. 555, 75th Cong., 3d sess. H.Doc. 133, 81st Cong., 1st sess. H.Doc. 523, 55th Cong., 2d sess. and Annual Report 1899 p. 1343 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 2000 TABLE 9-B (Continued) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Work Authorized Documents Jun. 25, 1910 Jul. 3, 1930 Mar. 2, 1945 Mar. 2, 1945 Jul. 24, 1946 Mar. 2, 1945 Nov. 7, 1966 H.R. May 9, 1974 S.R. May 31, 1974 Aug. 8, 1917 Sep. 22, 1922 A channel 100 feet wide, 8 feet deep from Palatka to Sanford with a side channel to Enterprise, and thence 5 feet deep to Lake Harney. Cutoffs at Butcher Bend, Shake Creek, and Starks Landing, and easing bends at other points. A channel 10 feet deep and 100 feet wide from Palatka to Sanford, with a side channel to Enterprise and with cutoffs and easing of bends. (Cutoffs deauthorized) Combining the two projects above into a single project for St. Johns River, FL, Jacksonville to Lake Harney, and for a cutoff 5 feet deep and 75 feet wide between Lake Monroe and the vicinity of Osteen Bridge (Woodruff Creek Cutoff). A channel 12 feet deep and 100 feet wide from Palatka to Sanford, and in the branch to Enterprise. ST. LUCIE INLET, FL (See Section 34 of Text) Channel 10 x 200 feet. Modification to maintain existing channel 6 x 100 feet. Extending north jetty and modifying existing jetty to provide a sand bypass weir section; excavation of sand impoundment basin; construction of south jetty with a walkway for recreational fishing; channel 10 x 500 feet through bar cut, tapering to 150 feet through the inlet, and 100 feet and 7 feet deep to the Intracoastal Waterway; and transfer of 380,000 cubic yards of material to the south beach during each two-year maintenance period. SAN JUAN HARBOR, PR (See Section 35 of Text) Anchorage (inner harbor) area of 206 acres and San Antonio Channel to 30-foot depth. Substitution of a 68-acre area 30 feet deep along southeasterly side of anchorage area, for one 25 acres in extent and of same depth extending easterly from eastern end of the San Antonio project channel. H.Doc. 1111, 60th Cong., 2d sess. H.Doc. 691, 69th Cong., 2d sess. H.Doc. 603, 76th Cong., 3d sess. H.Doc. 445, 78th Cong., 2d sess. S.Doc. 208, 79th Cong., 2d sess. H.Doc. 391, 77th Cong., 1st sess. H.Doc. 508, 89th Cong., 2d sess. H.Doc. 294, 93rd Cong., 1st sess. H.Doc. 865, 63rd Cong., 2d sess. Specified in Act 9-66 JACKSONVILLE, FL DISTRICT TABLE 9-B (Continued) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Work Authorized Modified condition of local cooperation. H.Doc. 45, 71st Cong., 2d sess. Aug. 30, 1935 Aug. 26, 1937 Oct. 17, 1940 Mar. 2, 1945 Jul. 3, 1958 Aug. 4, 1976 Report of the Chief of Engineers Dec. 23, 1982 Entrance channel across outer bar 38 feet deep and 800 feet wide, and thence across bay to anchorage area (Anegado Reach Channel) 30 feet deep and 700 feet wide and increasing anchorage area to 239 acres to 30-foot depth. Widening Anegado Reach Channel and increasing anchorage. area to 329 acres Removal to 8-foot depth of Anegado, Largo, and Capitanejo Shoals, and dredging to 30-foot depth the entrance channel and turning basin to the Graving Dock. Maintenance of the 30-foot depth entrance channel and turning basin to the Army Terminal. Deepening portions of entrance and approach channels and basins to Army Terminal and San Antonio Pier areas to 35-45 feet; new 32- foot depth Puerto Nuevo Channel; new 36-foot depth anchorage. A bar channel 48 x 800 feet, shifting the centerline 350 feet west; deepening Anegado Channel in steps from 46 to 40 feet while reducing width to 800 feet; deepening Army Terminal Channel and turning basin to 40 feet while widening the channel to 450 feet; deepening Puerto Nuevo Channel to 40 feet and widening it to 400 feet; deepening Graving Dock Channel to 40 feet at existing 400-foot width; deepening San Antonio Channel to 38 feet at varying widths, minimum of 500 feet; deepening cruise ship basin at 30 x 250 feet; provide a 38-foot depth in Anchorage Area "E" with irregular width; six mooring dolphins for vessels using the area. Modification of the authorized project to provide the deepening of the Bar Channel to 48 feet and shifting its alignment 350 feet to the west; deepening Anegado, and Army Terminal to 40 feet; deepening Graving Dock Channel, and Cruise Ship Basin, Puerto Nuevo Channel, and San Antonio Channel to 36 feet; and deepening Anchorage Area "E" to 38 feet while reducing its size and constructing six mooring dolphins within its limits. A 1,500-foot long extension to San Antonio Channel would be added to the Federal project and Sabana approach deepened to 32 feet. R&H Comm. Doc. 38, 74th Cong., 1st sess. R&H Comm. Doc. 42, 75th Cong., 1st sess. H.Doc. 364, 76th Cong., 1st sess. Specified in Act H.Doc. 38, 85th Cong., 1st sess. H.Doc. 574, 94th Cong., 2d sess. P.L. 99-662 -Nov. 17, 1986 99th Cong., 2d sess 9-67 Acts Jul. 3, 1930 Documents _ _ REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 2000 TABLE 9-B (Continued) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION WRDA Oct. 12, 1996 Mar. 3, 1899 Mar. 3, 1905 Jun. 25, 1910 Aug. 8, 1917 Mar. 3, 1899 Sep. 22, 1922 Jul. 3, 1930 Acts Work Authorized Documents Modification of the project to deepen the bar channel to depths varying from 49 feet to 56 feet below mean low water with other modifications to authorized interior channels as described in the General Reevaluation Report and Environmental Assessment dated March 1994. TAMPA HARBOR, FL (See Section 36 of Text) TAMPA BAY For a channel 27 feet deep from the Gulf of Mexico to Port Tampa, 500 feet wide across the bar and 300 feet wide in the bay. For a channel depth of 26 feet with sufficient width from the Gulf of Mexico to Port Tampa. TAMPA AND HILLSBOROUGH BAYS For a depth of 24 feet in Hillsborough Bay. For a 27-foot depth from Gulf of Mexico up to and in the several channels of Hillsborough Bay, the widths to be 500 feet on the bar, 300 feet in Tampa Bay, Ybor, and Garrison Channels, and 200 feet in Hillsborough Bay, Sparkman, and Seddon Channels, with turning basins at the mouth of Hillsborough and at Ybor Estuary. HILLSBOROUGH RIVER For a 12 x 200 foot channel to within 100 feet of the Lafayette St. highway bridge (maintenance only; new work completed under a previous project under title Improving Hillsborough Bay, FL). TAMPA HARBOR, FL Consolidation of the above projects to form a single project for Tampa Harbor. Increasing the depth of Egmont Channel to 29 feet and the width of Sparkman Channel to 300 feet. P.L. 104-303, Oct.12, 1996 104th Cong. H.Doc. 52, 55th Cong., 3d sess. (Also printed in Annual Report 1899, p. 1640) Channel dimensions specified in Act Specified in Act H.Doc. 634, 61st Cong., 2d sess. H.Doc. 634, 61st Cong., 1st sess. H.Doc. 545, 55th Cong., 2d sess. and Annual Report 1998, pp 1357- 1360 Specified in Act H.Doc. 100, 70th Cong., Ist sess. 9-68 JACKSONVILLE, FL DISTRICT TABLE 9-B (Continued) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Work Authorized Aug. 30, 1935 Jun. 20, 1938 Jun. 20, 1938 Mar. 2, 1945 S.Doc. 22, 72nd Cong., 1st sess. S.Doc. 164, 75th Cong., 3d sess. Sen. Comm. Print. 76th Cong., 1st sess. S.Doc. 183, 78th Cong., 2d sess. For a depth of 32 feet and a width of 600 feet on Egmont Bar, a depth of 30 feet and a width of 400 feet in Mullet Key Cut, and a depth of 30 feet and a width of 300 feet in all other project channels in Tampa Harbor (except in Hillsborough River and in the channel leading to Alafia River); and for a turning basin 2,000 feet long and 500 feet in maximum width at the entrance to the Port Tampa terminals. For widening the bend between Sparkman Channel and Cut D of Hillsborough Bay Channel by 250 feet; widening Ybor Channel to 400 feet and extending the turning basin at the west end of Garrison Channel (mouth of Hillsborough River) easterly for 300 feet. For construction of a breakwater at Peter O. Knight Field, Davis Islands, its maintenance to be assumed by local interest. For widening Sparkman Channel to 400 feet and Ybor Channel to 500 feet; widening the bend between Sparkman and Garrison Channels an additional 250 feet to extend the turning basin westerly and widening the bend between Seddon and Garrison Channels by 150 feet (in lieu of 300 feet previously authorized) to extend the turning basin easterly. For a channel 9 feet deep and 100 feet wide in the Hillsborough River for about 2.4 miles above the upper end of the existing 12-foot channel, and for the removal of obstructions thence to the Florida Avenue Bridge. For a channel 25 feet deep and 150 feet wide from the Hillsborough Bay channel to and including a turning basin in the Alafia River. (Revoked by Act of May 17, 1950). For deepening Egmont Channel to 36 feet; enlarging Mullet Key Cut, Tampa Bay Channel, Hillsborough Bay Channel, Port Tampa Channel and Port Tampa turning basin to present project dimensions; deepening Sparkman Channel and Ybor turning basin to 34 feet; a channel 30 feet deep and 200 feet wide from Hillsborough Bay Channel to and including a turning basin in Alafia River, 700 feet wide and 1,200 feet long (in lieu of the improvement previously authorized); and substantial widening at entrance, bends, and turns. 9-69 Acts Documents H.Doc. 119, 77th Cong., 1st sess. S.Doc. 16, 77th , Cong., 1st sess. H.Doc. 258, 81st Cong., 1st sess. Mar. 2, 1945 Mar. 2, 1945 May 17, 1950 I A - w \ REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 2000 TABLE 9-B (Continued) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Work Authorized Documents Sep. 3, 1954 Oct. 23, 1962 Dec. 31, 1970 Do. Do. Do. Do. Do. Do. Do. Do. Do. Do. Extended removal of obstructions in Hillsborough River to City Water Works Dam. Maintenance of cleared channel to be assumed by local interests. Channel and turning basin at Port Sutton 30 feet deep, Ybor Channel 34 x 400 feet. For federal maintenance of Port Sutton Channel, 280 feet wide and an irregularly shaped turning basin both to a depth of 34 feet. H.Doc. 567, 81st Cong., 2d sess. H.Doc. 529, 87th Cong., 2d sess. H.Doc. 150, 91st Cong., 1st sess. Enlarge entrance channel across Egmont Bar to 46 x 700 feet from the H.Doc. 401, 91st Gulf to Mullet Key. Cong.,2d sess. Enlarge Mullet Key Cut Channel to 44 x 600 feet. Do. Enlarge Tampa Bay Channel to 44 x 500 feet from Mullet Key Cut Do. through Tampa Bay to the junction of Hillsborough Bay and Port Tampa Channels. Enlarge Hillsborough Bay Channel to 44 x 500 feet from the junction Do. with Tampa Bay and Port Tampa Channels to the junction with Port Sutton entrance channel, and thence deepening to a depth of 42 feet at the existing width of 400 feet to the junction with Seddon and Sparkman Channels. Enlarge Port Sutton entrance channel to 44 x 400 feet. Do. Enlarge Port Sutton turning basin to a depth of 44 feet and a Do. turning diameter of 1,200 feet. Deepening Sparkman Channel to 42 x 400 feet. Do. Deepening Ybor Channel to 40 x 300 feet. Do. Enlarge turning basin at the entrance to Ybor Channel to a depth of 42 Do. feet and an additional width of 200 feet on the southwest edge of the present basin. Deepening Port Tampa Channel to 42 feet at its existing width from the Do. junction with Hillsborough and Tampa Bay Channels to the turning basin. 9-70 JACKSONVILLE, FL DISTRICT TABLE 9-B (Continued) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Work Authorized Do. Do. Do. Do. Do. Aug. 15, 1985 Deepening the Port Tampa turning basin to 42 feet over its existing length of 2,000 feet and width of 900 feet. An entrance channel in East Bay 44 x 400 feet and 500 feet north from the Port Sutton turning basin for a distance of about 2,000 feet. A turning basin in East Bay at a depth of 44 feet and with a turning diameter of 1,200 feet. An approach channel in East Bay 44 x 300 feet north from the East Bay turning basin for a distance of about 2,500 feet. Maintenance of Port Sutton Terminal channel to 44 x 200 feet for a distance of 4,000 feet. Maintenance of East Bay channel to 34 x 300 feet for a distance of 5,500 feet. Report of the Port Sutton Channel deepening to 43 feet for a distance of 3,700 Chief of Engineers feet and a width of 200 feet. Mar. 28, 1988 Do. Do. Do. Do. Do. H.Doc. 236, 99th Cong., 1st sess. P.L. 100-676, Nov. 17,1988, 100th Cong., 2d sess. WRDA Nov. 28, 1990 WRDA Aug. 17, 1999 WRDA Aug. 17, 1999 Maintenance of Alafia Channel to a depth of 34 feet, if a Non-Federal Sponsor agrees to reimburse the Secretary Project for navigation, Tampa Harbor-Big Bend Channel Expedite completion of report for Alafia Channel and proceed to project preconstruction, engineering, and design if justified. TAMPA HARBOR BRANCH CHANNELS, FL Report of the Enlarging Hillsborough Bay Cut D, Sparkman Channel, Port Chief of Engineers Tampa Channel and existing turning basins at the entrance to Jan. 25, 1979 Ybor Channel and at Port Tampa, all to a depth of 41 feet with varying lengths and widths and deepening Ybor Channel to a depth of 39 feet. This work will be associated with the Main Channel deepening. P.L. 106-53, Aug. 17, 1999 106 'h Cong., 1st sess. P.L. 106-53 Aug. 17, 1999 106 th Cong., 1st sess. P.L. 99-662, Nov. 17, 1986, 99th Cong., 2d sess 9-71 Acts Documents REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 2000 TABLE 9-B (Continued) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Work Authorized Documents TAMPA HARBOR EAST BAY CHANNEL, FL WRDA Maintenance dredging at an average annual cost of $471,000. Nov.17, 1986 BEACH EROSION CONTROL PROJECTS BREVARD COUNTY, FL (See Section 40 of Text) Aug. 13, 1968 Federal participation in cost of shore protection project. WRDA Shoreline protection project for periodic nourishment over Oct. 12, 1996 the 50-year life of the project subject to completion of report no later than Dec. 13, 1996. WRDA Use services of independent coastal expert, who shall consider Aug. 17, 1999 all reverent studies and shall mitigate any damage to the shore protection project that is a result of Federal navigation project. Costs of the mitigation shall be allocated to the Federal navigation project as operation and maintenance costs. BROWARD COUNTY, FL BEACH EROSION CONTROL AND HILLSBORO INLET, FL, NAVIGATION PROJECT (See Section 41 of Text) Oct. 27, 1965 Improvement for beach erosion control in Broward County, FL and a combined beach erosion and navigation improvement to Hillsboro Inlet and the shore south thereof to Port Everglades. WRDA Deauthorized navigation improvement to Hillsboro Inlet. Nov. 17, 1986 WRDA Continued authorization for Hillsboro Inlet dredging for 5 years. Nov. 28, 1990 WRDA Periodic beach nourishment for a period of 50 years beginning Oct. 12, 1996 on the date of initiation of construction of segments II and III. WRDA Project for shore protection is modified to authorize the Secretary, Aug. 17, 1999 on execution of a contract to construct the project, to reimburse the non-Federal interest for the Federal share of the cost of preconstruction planning and design for the project, if work is compatible with and integral to the project. P.L. 99-662, Nov.17, 1986 99th Cong., 2d sess. H.Doc. 352, 90th Cong.,2d sess. P.L.104-303, Oct. 12, 1996 104th Cong. P.L. 106-53, Aug. 17, 1999 106" Cong., 1" sess. H.Doc. 91, 89th Cong., 1st sess. P.L. 99-662, Nov. 17, 1986, 99th Cong., 2d sess. P.L. 101-640, Nov. 28, 1990 101st Cong., 2d sess P.L. 104-303, Oct. 12, 1996 P.L. 106-53, Aug. 17, 1999, 106" Cong., 1st sess. 9-72 JACKSONVILLE, FL DISTRICT TABLE 9-B (Continued) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Work Authorized CIARLOTTE COUNTY, FL Report of the Shoreline protection. Chief of Engineers 2 Apr. 1982 Aug. 13, 1968 Aug. 15, 1985 DADE COUNTY, FL (See Section 57 of Text) Federal participation in cost of shore protection and hurricaneflood control project. DADE COUNTY-NORTH OF HAULOVER BEACH, FL (See Section 58 of Text) Federal participation in cost of shore protection and hurricaneflood control project. Report of the Extending of existing shore protection project for Dade County to Chief of Engineers provide for protective beach fill and subsequent nourishment Dec. 17, 1983 along 2.5 miles of shore north of Haulover Beach Park. Oct. 27, 1965 River and Harbor Act of 1965 WRDA Oct. 12, 1996 WRDA Aug. 17, 1999 WRDA Nov. 17, 1986 WRDA Aug. 17, 1999 DUVAL COUNTY, FL (See Section 42 of Text) Federal participation in cost of local shore protection project. FORT PIERCE BEACH, FL (See Section 43 of Text) Project for beach erosion control. Periodic beach nourishment for a period of 50 years beginning on the date of initiation of construction. Modified to incorporate 1 additional mile into the project in accordance with a final approved general reevaluation report. INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FL (See Section 44 of Text) The plans provide for a 2.65 mile beach fill along the ocean shore of Vero Beach, a 1.7 mile beach fill along the ocean shore of Sebastian Inlet State Park and for periodic nourishment of the new beaches. Reauthorized if determined project is technically sound, environmentally acceptable, and economically justified. P.L. 99-662, Nov. 12, 1986 99th Cong., 2d sess. H.Doc. 335, 90th Cong., Cong., 2d sess. H.Doc. 236, 99th Cong., 1st sess. P.L. 99-662 Nov. 17, 1986, 99th Cong., 2d sess H.Doc. 273, 89th Cong., 1st sess. P.L. 104-303, Oct.12, 1996 104th Cong. P.L. 106-53, Aug. 17, 1999 106 hC ong., 'sts ess. P.L. 99-662, Nov.17, 1986. 99th Cong., 2d sess P.L. 106-53, Aug. 17, 199, 106 ' Cong., Ist sess. 9-73 Acts Documents _ ~__ REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 2000 TABLE 9-B (Continued) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Work Authorized Documents Dec. 31, 1970 WRDA Oct. 12, 1996 WRDA Oct. 12, 1996 WRDA Aug. 17, 1999 LEE COUNTY, FL (See Section 45 of Text) Federal participation in cost of shore protection project. Modification of the project for shoreline protection, Captiva Island, to reimburse the non-Federal interest for beach nourishment work carried out by such interest as if such work occurred after execution. of the agreement. Complete a review not later than 6 months after enactment of this Act to determine if periodic beach nourishment is necessary for Captiva Island for a period of 50 years beginning on the date of initiation of construction. Project for shore protection, Captiva Island, is modified to direct the Secretary to enter into an agreement with the Non-Federal interest to carry out the project in accordance with section 206 of WRDA 1992. The design memorandum approved in 1996 shall be the decision document supporting continued Federal participation in cost sharing of the project. H.Doc. 395, 91st Cong., 2nd sess. P.L. 104-303, Oct. 12, 1996 104th Cong. P.L. 104-303, Oct. 12, 1996 104th Cong. P.L. 106-53, Aug. 17, 1999, 106' Cong., 1"' sess. R&H Act of 1970 Sec. 101 WRDA Nov. 17, 1986 WRDA Aug. 17, 1999 WRDA Aug. 17, 1999 S.R. May 31, 1974 and H.R. Nov. 20, 1975 LIDO KEY, SARASOTA COUNTY, FL Project for shore protection Deauthorized. Reauthorized project for shore protection for a 50-year period. LITTLE TALBOT ISLAND, DUVAL COUNTY, FL Project for hurricane and storm damage prevention and shore protection. MANATEE COUNTY, FL (See Section 46 of Text) The plan provides for a level berm 50 feet wide at an elevation 6 feet (MLW) along 3.2 miles of shore on Anna Maria Island and nourishment of entire Gulf shore of that island as needed throughout project life. P.L. 99-662, Nov. 17, 1986 9 9t Cong., 2d sess. P.L. 106-53, Aug. 17, 1999, 106" Cong., 1' sess. P.L. 106-53, Aug. 17, 1999 106" Cong., 1" sess. S.Doc. 37, 93rd Cong., Ist sess. 9-74 JACKSONVILLE, FL DISTRICT TABLE 9-B (Continued) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Work Authorized Documents MARTIN COUNTY, FL (See Section 47 of Text) Periodic nourishment over the 50 year life of the project MONROE COUNTY, FL Report of the Modification of existing project from 6,200-foot long to 8,770-foot Chief of Engineers long beach fill stabilized with 2 groins and periodic nourishment. Apr. 22, 1984 NASSAU COUNTY, FL (See Section 48 of Text) Report of the Improvement for beach erosion control on Amelia Island Chief of Engineers May 19, 1986 WRDA Modified to construct the project for periodic nourishment over Aug. 17, 1999 the 50-year life of the project PALM BEACH COUNTY, FL, FROM MARTIN COUNTY LINE TO LAKE WORTH INLET AND FROM SOUTH LAKE WORTH INLET TO BROWARD COUNTY LINE (See Section 49 of Text) Oct. 23, 1962 Federal participation in cost of local shore protection project and sand-transfer plant WRDA Complete a review not later than 6 months after enactment of this Act Oct. 12, 1996 to determine if periodic beach nourishment is necessary for a period of 50 years beginning on the date of initiation of construction for Jupiter/Carlin, Ocean Ridge, and Boca Raton North Beach segments. PALM BEACH COUNTY, FL, FROM LAKE WORTH INLET TO SOUTH LAKE WORTH INLET, FL (See Section 50 of Text) May 17, 1950 Federal participation in cost of local shore protection project on Palm Beach Island. Jul. 3, 1958 Federal participation in cost of local sand-transfer plant at Lake Worth Inlet and shore protection project. WRDA Nov. 28, 1990 9-75 P.L.101-640, Nov.28,1990 101st Cong., 2d sess. P.L. 99-662, Nov.17, 1986 99th Cong., 2d sess P.L. 100-676, Nov.17, 1988, 99th Cong., 2d sess P.L. 106-53, Aug. 17, 1999, 106 Cong., 1s' sess. H.Doc. 164, 87th Cong., 1st sess. P.L. 104-303, Oct. 12,1996 104th Cong H.Doc. 772, 80th Cong., 2d sess. H.Doc. 342, 85th Cong., 2d sess. REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 2000 TABLE 9-B (Continued) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Work Authorized Documents PINELLAS COUNTY, FL (See Section 51 of Text) Nov. 7, 1966 Federal participation in cost of shore protection project. Report of the Restoration of 5,000 feet of beach at Clearwater Beach Island, Board of Engineers 49,000 feet of beach at Sand Key, 92,000 feet of beach at for Rivers and Treasure Island, and construction of 600 feet of revetment at Harbors Apr. 23, Long Key. Also, renourishment of each island 1985 SARASOTA COUNTY, FL (See Section 53 of Text) Report of the Shoreline protection along 12,600 feet of shoreline on central Chief of Engineers Longboat and 21,100 feet on Manasota Key in the vicinity of Feb.28, 1986 Venice, Florida and periodic nourishment of these areas ST. JOHNS COUNTY, FL (See Section 52 of Text) Report of the Shoreline protection along 2.5 miles of problem area in the Chief of Engineers St. Augustine Beach and Coquina Gables area and periodic Feb. 26, 1980 nourishment. WRDA M Aug. 17, 1999 FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS Cl WRDA Pr Oct. 12, 1996 codified to include navigation mitigation. EDAR HAMMOCK (WARES CREEK), FL roject for flood control. H.Doc. 519, 89th Cong., 2d sess. P.L. 99-662, Nov.17, 1986. 99th Cong., 2d sess P.L. 99-662 Nov.17, 1986, 99th Cong., 2d sess. P.L. 99-662 Nov.17, 1986, 99th Cong., 2d sess P.L. 106-53, Aug. 17, 1999 106' Cong., 1"' sess. P.L. 104-303, Oct.12, 1996 104th Cong CENTRAL AND SOUTHERN FLORIDA, FL (See Section 56 of Text) First phase of comprehensive plan for flood control and other H.Doc. 643, 80th Cong., purposes. 2d sess. (Contains latest published map) Modification and expansion of authorization to include entire comprehensive plan of improvement. Canals, levees, and water-control and drainage structures in the Nicodemus Slough area, Glades County. Flood protection on Boggy Creek, near Orlando. Flood protection in the Cutler Drain area, near Miami. H.Doc. 643, 80th Cong., 2d sess. S.Doc. 53, 86th Cong., 1st sess. S.Doc.125, 87th Cong., 2d sess. S.Doc. 123, 87th Cong., 2d sess. 9-76 Jun. 30, 1948 Sep. 3, 1954 Jul. 14, 1960 Oct. 23, 1962 Do. JACKSONVILLE, FL DISTRICT TABLE 9-B (Continued) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Work Authorized Do. Do. Do. Oct. 27, 1965 Flood control and drainage works for South Dade County. Project Shingle Creek between Clear Lake and Lake Tohopekaliga for flood control and major drainage, including development of. Reedy Creek Swamp Improvement of easterly section of West Palm Beach Canal for flood control and major drainage. Primary works for flood control and major drainage in southwest Dade County. Do. Primary works for flood control and major drainage in Hendry County. Aug. 13, 1968 Gravity drainage in Martin County and distribution of available water supplies to portions of Martin and St. Lucie Counties. Do. Improvement of supply, distribution and conservation of water resources in Central and Southern Florida, including Lake Okeechobee agricultural area, Everglades National Park and other related areas. Approved Navigation improvements suitable for recreational craft. Dec. 17, 1970 under the provisions of Section 201 of the Flood Control Act of 1965 WRDA Deauthorized flood protection on Boggy Creek, near Orlando; Nov. 17, 1986 primary works for flood control and major drainage in southwest Dade County; and navigation improvements suitable for recreational craft. WRDA Extended modified water delivery schedules to Everglades National Nov. 17, 1988 Park. Everglades National Construct modifications to the Central and Southern Park Protection and Florida Project to improve water deliveries into the park and Expansion Act shall, to the extent practicable take steps to restore the natural of 1989 hydrological conditions within the park. S.Doc 138, 87th Cong., 2d sess. S.Doc. 139, 87th Cong., 2d sess. S.Doc. 146, 87th Cong., 2d sess. S.Doc. 20, 89th Cong., 1st sess. H.Doc. 102, 88th Cong., 1st sess. S.Doc. 101, 90th Cong., 2d sess. H.Doc. 369, 90th Cong., 2d sess. H.Doc. 394, 91st Cong., 2d sess. P.L. 99-662, Nov.17, 1986, 99th Cong., 2d sess P.L. 100-676, Nov. 17,1988, P.L. 101-229, Dec.13, 1989 101st Cong., 2d sess 9-77 Acts Documents - -- REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 2000 TABLE 9-B (Continued) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Work Authorized Documents WRDA Oct. 12, 1996 WRDA Oct.12, 1996 Oct. 23, 1962 WRDA Nov. 17, 1986 WRDA Aug. 17,1999 Dec. 31, 1970 Modification of project for flood protection of West Palm Beach (C-51) to provide for the construction of an enlarged stormwater detention area, Storm Water Treatment Area 1 East. Modification of the project to implement the recommended plan of improvement for South Dade County (C-111), including acquisition by non-Federal interests of such portions of the Frog Pond and Rocky Glades areas as are needed for the project. FOUR RIVER BASINS, FL (See Section 59 of Text) Control of floods and improvement of drainage, and for water conservation through construction of necessary canals, levees, reservoirs and control structures. Deauthorized Anclote River control structure and channel improvement. GUANAJIBO RIVER, PR Project for flood control. PORTUGUES AND BUCANA RIVERS, PR (See Section 60 of Text) LAGO de CERRILLOS, PR Multiple purpose dam and lake for flood control, water supply and recreation. LAGO de PORTUGUES, PR Multiple purpose dam and lake for flood control, water supply and recreation. PONCE, PR Diversion and enlargement of existing channels through Ponce for flood control. P.L. 104-303, Oct.12, 1996 104th Cong. P.L. 104-303, Oct. 12,1996 104th Cong. H.Doc. 585, 87th Cong., 2d sess. P.L. 99-662, Nov. 17, 1986 99th Cong., 2d sess. P.L. 106-53 Aug. 17, 1999 106" Cong., 1"t sess. H.Doc. 422, 91st Cong., 2d sess. RIO GRANDE DE ARECIBO, PR (See Section 62 of Text) WRDA Project for flood control. Oct. 12, 1996 RIO GRANDE DE LOIZA, PR Report of the Project for flood control. Chief of Engineers Mar. 5, 1992 P.L. 104-303, Oct. 12, 1996 104th Cong. P.L. 102-580, Oct. 31, 1992 102nd Cong., 2d sess. 9-78 JACKSONVILLE, FL DISTRICT TABLE 9-B (Continued) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Work Authorized Documents WRDA Aug. 17, 1999 WRDA Aug. 17, 1999 Report of the Chief of Engineers 25 Apr. 1986 Report of the Chief Engineers Jan. 1989 Sec. 205 of the Flood Control Act of 1948 WRDA Nov. 28, 1990 WRDA Oct. 31, 1992 RESTORATION PROJECTS WRDA Nov. 28, 1990 RIO GRANDE DE MANATI, BARCELONETA, PR Project for flood control. RIO NIGUA, SALINAS, PR Project for flood control. RIO PUERTO NUEVO, PR (See Section 63 of Text) Project for flood control. RIO DE LA PLATA, PR (See Section 61 of Text) Project for flood control. SAVAN GUT, ST. THOMAS, VI Project for flood control. Increased maximum allotment to $100,000. Set maximum amount allotted under Section 205 of the Flood Control Act of 1948 at $10,000,000. TURPENTINE RUN, ST. THOMAS, VI Project for flood control. KISSIMMEE RIVER RESTORATION, FL (See Section 74 of Text) Conduct a feasibility study for the purpose of determining modifications of the flood control project for central and southern Florida, authorized by section 203 of Flood Control Act of 1948 (62 Stat. 1176), which are necessary to provide a comprehensive plan for the environmental restoration. P.L. 106-53, Aug. 17, 1999 10 6th Cong., 1St sess. P.L. 106-53, Aug. 17, 1999 10 6 Cong., 1st sess. P.L. 99-662, Nov. 17, 1986 99th Cong., 2d sess. P.L. 858, Jun. 30, 1948, 80th Cong, 2d sess. P.L. 101-640, Nov. 28, 1990, 101st Cong., 2d sess. P.L. 102-580, Oct. 31, 1992 102nd Cong., 2d sess. P.L. 101-640, Nov.28,1990 101st Cong., 2d sess 9-79 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 2000 TABLE 9-B (Continued) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Work Authorized Documents Report of the Project for the ecosystem restoration, to construct the headwaters Chief of Engineers revitalization project, and any modifications for the environmental Mar. 17, 1992 restoration of the Kissimmee River Basin, ensuring that implementation of the project to restore the Kissimmee River will maintain the same level of flood protection as is provided by the current flood control project. EVERGLADES AND SOUTH FLORIDA ECOSYSTEM RESTORATION (See Section 75 of Text) WRDA Project consists of a comprehensive plan for the purpose of Oct. 12, 1996 restoring, preserving, and protecting the South Florida ecosystem. The comprehensive plan shall provide for the protection of water quality in, and the reduction of the loss of fresh water from, the Everglades. The comprehensive plan shall include such features as are necessary to provide for the water-related needs of the region, including flood control, the enhancement of water supplies, and other objectives served by the Central and Southern Florida project. WRDA Extension of program from 1999 until 2003 and amendment to Aug. 17, 1999 credit and reimbursement of past and future activities to non- Federal sponsor. HILLSBORO AND OKEECHOBEE AQUIFER, FLORIDA WRDA The project for aquifer storage and recovery described in the Central Aug. 17, 1999 and Southern Florida Water Supply Study and House Document 369 P.L. 102-580,, Oct.31, 1992 102nd Cong., 2d sess. P.L. 104-303, Oct. 12, 1996 10 4th Cong., P.L. 106-53 Aug. 17, 1999 106" Cong. 1"tsess. P.L. 106-53 Aug. 17, 1999 106" Cong., 1S" sess. 9-80 JACKSONVILLE, FL DISTRICT TABLE 9-C OTHER AUTHORIZED NAVIGATION PROJECTS (See Section 38 of Text) Full Report Project For Last See Annual Report For Cost to Sep. 30, 2000 Construction Operation and Maintenance Anclote River, FL Aguadilla Harbor, PR Aquatic Plant Control, FL (R&H Acts of 1958 & 1962) Atlantic Gulf Ship Canal, FL Bayport, FL3 Cedar Island, Keaton Beach, FL Cedar Keys Harbor, FL Christiansted Harbor, St. Croix, V16 Clearwater Pass, FL2 1 Courtnay Channel, FL' Crystal River, FL' Everglades Harbor, FL' Fajardo Harbor, PR3 Guayanes Harbor, PR3 Gulf Intracoastal Waterway St. Marks to Tampa Bay, FL3 Hillsboro Inlet, FL24 Homosassa River, FL' Horseshoe Cove, FL Hudson River, FL3 Intracoastal Waterway, Miami to Key West, FL3 Key West Harbor, FL' Kissimmee River, FL' Lake Crescent and Dunns Creek, FL" Largo Sound Channel, FL' 1' 2 Little Manatee River, FL3' " Manatee River, FL'5 New River, FL' Orange River, FL' Ozona, FL, channel and turning basin' Palm Beach, FL, side channel and basin3 Pass-A-Grille Pass, FL ' '6 Pithlachascotee River, FL Rice Creek, FL' St. Petersburg Harbor, FL St. Thomas Harbor, VI3 Steinhatchee River, FL' Suwannee River, FL'5 Withlacoochee River, FL'5 1974 - 1968 1939 1972 1977 1964 1980 1940 1941 1964 1945 1945 1974 1965 1937 1977 1974 1963 1972 1931 1931 1966 1949 1970 1956 1962 1963 1946 1966 1973 1957 1983 1949 1940 1977 1969 $ 267,427 1,640,997 2 5,099,153 58,524 168,569 s 303,317 46,349 7 22,846 25,000 221,509 8 38,850 - 3,999 9 347,521 9,889 243,079 1,548,89210 23,479 10,276 117,44313 11,90314 123,350 36,518 2,000 105,527 41,297"7 400,00018 85,20819 255,60820 1,989 135,053 76,41822 614,91223 9-81 - .. $ 3,127,691 688,263 54,969 76,023 61,559 1,724,484 26,779 152,208 51,034 26,454 698,557 28,046 534,623 112,954 9,035 51,149 194,516 31,296 24,918 15,089 60,686 261,401 18,814 2,456,99721 63,343 317,813 658,963 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 2000 'Complete. 2 Excludes $1,640,997 contributed funds. 3 Inactive. 4 Includes $41,222 for reconnaissance and detailed project reports under Section 107 of the R&H Act of 1960. Includes $82,500 expended under previous project. Excludes $1,473 contributed funds. 6 Project as modified by Chief of Engineers in report of June 30, 1961, is complete. Previously authorized depth of 25 feet in inactive status. 7 Excludes $42,783 contributed funds. * Excludes $36,000 contributed funds. 9 In addition, $1,000 expended from contributed funds. "~ Includes $27,500 for new work under previous project. Excludes $35,371 contributed funds. " Deauthorized by Public Law 93-251, Section 12. '2Authorized April 20, 1964 by Chief of Engineers under Section 107 of 1960 R&H Act. 13 Includes $25,008 for detailed project report but excludes $86,716 expended from contributed funds. 14 Expended on restudy. is Inactive portion of project deauthorized by Public Law 93- 251,Section 12. 16Au thorized November 19, 1964 by Chief of Engineers under Section 107 of R&H Act of 1960. " Excludes $41,297 contributed funds. * Excludes $215,728 contributed funds. 19 Excludes $93,000 contributed funds. 20 Includes $32,689 under previous project. 21 Includes $20,532 under previous project. * Includes $10,154 expended under previous project. 2 Includes $30,000 expended under previous project. 24 Authorized by Section 301, R&H Act of 1965 and Section 107 of P.L. 101-640. 9-82 JACKSONVILLE, FL DISTRICT TABLE 9-D OTHER AUTHORIZED BEACH EROSION PROJECTS (See Section 55 of Text) For Last Cost to Sep 30, 2000 Full Report See Annual Operation and Project Report For Construction Maintenance Cape Florida State Park, FL 1969 $34,862 $ - El Tuque Beach, Ponce, PR 1985 1,396,730 Lee County, FL 1971 - Punta Salinas, PR 1984 855,511 Palm Beach County, FL, from Lake Worth Inlet to South Lake Worth Inlet 1970 195,140 6,257 San Juan, PR 1965 TABLE 9-E OTHER AUTHORIZED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS (See Section 66 of Text) For Last Cost to Sep 30, 2000 Full Report See Annual Operation and Project Report For Construction Maintenance Arch Creek, Dade County, FL 1960 $66,485 ' Biscayne Bay, FL, Hurricane Protection 2 1966 - Hillsborough Bay, FL 2 1969 Phillippi Creek Basin, FL 2 1966 Excludes $11,734 cost of preauthorization studies. Project was authorized February 20, 1959, by Chief of Engineers under Section 205 of the 1948 Flood Control Act as modified by P.L. 685, 84th Congress. 2 Deauthorized by Public Law 93-251, Section 12. 9-83 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 2000 TABLE 9-G DEAUTHORIZED PROJECTS For Last Full Report Date Federal Contributed Project See Annual Report and Funds Funds For: Authority Expended Expended Central and Southern Florida - 1 Jan 90 (S.W. Dade Co. Area) WRDA 86 Central and Southern Florida - do - (Boggy Creek Basin) Central and Southern Florida 9 Jul 95 (Cutler Drainage Area) PL 99-662 Central and Southern Florida (Hendry County) do Central and Southern Florida (Martin County Recreation) do - Central and Southern Florida (Nicodemus Slough) do Central and Southern Florida (Reedy Creek Swamp) do - Central and Southern Florida - 1 Jan 90 (Small Boat Harbor) WRDA 86 Charlotte County, FL - 18 Nov 91 - PL 99-662 Four River Basin (Anclote - 1 Jan 90 River C-532, S-552), FL WRDA 86 - GIWW St. Marks to Tampa - do 38,850 Bay, FL Hillsboro Inlet (Broward - do - County), FL Key West, FL do 104,140 9-84 JACKSONVILLE, FL DISTRICT DEAUTHORIZED PROJECTS For Last Full Report Date Federal Contributed Project See Annual Report and Funds Funds For: Authority Expended Expended Mullet Key, FL Palm Beach to Lake Worth Inlet (1950 Act) San Juan and Vicinity, PR do 19 Jul 92 PL 99-662 1 Jan 90 WRDA 86 Virginia Key and Key Biscayne, FL do 436,201 195,140 187,133 781,188 13,774,968 100,000 1,667,220 714,522 9-85 TABLE 9-G REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 2000 TABLE 9-H NAVIGATION PROJECTS ON WHICH RECONNAISSANCE ANDCONDITION SURVEYS ONLY WERE CONDUCTED DURING FISCAL YEAR (See Section 37 of Text) Cost Incurred Project During Period IWW - Miami to Key West, FL 23,000 Charlotte Harbor, FL 25,100 Clearwater Pass, FL 17,500 Fort Myers Beach, FL 14,000 Horseshoe Cove, FL 14,000 Johns Pass, FL 14,000 Longboat Pass, FL 17,500 Mayaguez Harbor, PR 3,400 Naples to Gordon Pass, FL 32,800 New Pass, Sarasota, FL 14,000 Pass-a-Grille, FL 145,900 Ponce Harbor, PR 4,800 St. Johns River, FL 600 St. Petersburg Harbor, FL 24,400 Vessel Snell 497,600 WCC 160,600 Withlacoochee River, FL 43,600 Total $ 1,052,800 9-86 JACKSONVILLE, FL DISTRICT Distance to nearest town 9.9 miles via 12-foot barge canal and Intracoastal Waterway Name of nearest town Cocoa, FL Distance from Intracoastal Waterway 6.5 miles Lock dimensions 909 wide; 6009 long' Lift Varies with tide Depth of Sills (mlw, ocean) 14 feet Character of foundation Piles in sand Year completed and opened to navigation 1965 Contract cost $2,979,670 S56x400 feet authorized. At request of NASA lock was constructed 90 feet wide with NASA bearing additional cost ($700,000). Length increased to 600 feet to be compatible TABLE 9-J with increased width. Operation and maintenance of lock is a Federal responsibility. Henry H-. Buckman Lock and Dam Eureka Lock R.N. Bert Dosh Dunellon Lock Lock Nearest town (miles) Miles from Atlantic Intracoastal Waterway Lock dimensions (ft.)' Normal lift (ft.) Depth over sills at normal pool levels: Upper (ft.) Character of foundation Kind of dam Type construction Percent complete Estimated contract cost Palatka, 11.2 90.4 84 x 600 20 14 Piles in sand Movable Earth3 100 Sparr, 15.8 111.4 84 x 600 20 17 Piles in sand Movable Earth3 100 Ocala, 8.9 127.7 84 x 600 0-152 16-312 Piles in sand None 0 Dunnellon, Inglis, 2.5 3.2 156.5 84 x 600 12-272 16-312 Rock None 0 $6,094,000 $7,975,000 $7,430,000 $9,500,000 $7,800,000 SClear width and greatest available length. 2 Pool level varies with natural ground water profile from minimum elevation of 40 feet to maximum elevation of 55 feet. 3 With concrete spillway and movable gates. 9-87 TABLE 9-I CANAVERAL HARBOR, FL PROJECT DATA RELATIVE TO LOCK (See Section 5 of Text) CROSS-FLORIDA BARGE CANAL PROJECT LOCKS AND DAMS (See Section 8 of Text) Inglis Lock and Dam 168.6 84 x 600 28 18 Rock Movable Earth3 100 t- ____ REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 2000 TABLE 9-L OKEECHOBEE WATERWAY OPERATIONS AND RESULTS DURING FISCAL YEAR (See Section 24 of Text) Work Performed Cost Operations and Maintenance: Operations: Operations of locks, dams, and reservoirs $ 1,507,500 Operation of service utilities -4,100 Operation of flood control structures 0 Operation of power plants 267,600 Natural resource management 475,000 Recreation management 0 Water Control Management 0 Condition and operation studies and activities 0 Real estate management 3,646,000 National emergency peparedness program 7,800 Prevention of obstructive and injurious deposits 1,000 General regulatory functions 303,400 Construction Management 0 Sub-Total 6,204,200 Maintenance: Lands and damages 0 Maintenance of locks -10,300 Maintenance of non-recreational buildings and grounds 0 Maintenance of recreational facilities 0 Maintenance of permanent operating equipment non-recreational -200 Bank stabilization, maintenance of revetments and dikes 800 Channel and canal maintenance 0 Engineering and Design 0 Construction Management 0 Clearing accounts 0 Income Credits 6,800 Sub-Total -2,900 Total $ 6,201,300 9-88 JACKSONVILLE, FL DISTRICT TABLE 9-M REMOVAL OF AQUATIC GROWTH FROM NAVIGABLE WATERS IN THE STATE OF FLORIDA CONTROL OPERATIONS (See Section 31 of Text) Locality Cost Channel and canal maintenance Operation of locks, dams, and reservoirs Operation of power plants Operation of service facilities Natural resource management Recreation management Water control management Condition and operation study Real estate management Project operations management Maintenance of recreational facilities Maintenance of non-recreational permanent operating equipment Maintenance of non-recreational buildings and grounds Engineering and Design Construction Management Credit $ -2,100 34,800 300 13,700 0 0 1,800 0 3,553,000 0 0 0 0 0 800 -600 Total $ 3,602,300 9-89 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 2000 TABLE 9-0 CENTRAL AND SOUTHERN FLORIDA PROJECT CONSTRUCTION COMPLETED DURING FISCAL YEAR 2000 (See Section 57 of Text) Date transferred to Flood Control District Construction for Operation and Feature Period Maintenance Levees: SJWMA Improvements July 1997 - June 1999 November 1999 Channels: Upper St. Johns S-252 Flowway; S-252D April 1997 - June 1998 November 1999 Recreation: Hwy 512 and Fellsmere Access March 1997 - June 1998 November 1999 TABLE 9-P CENTRAL AND SOUTHERN FLORIDA PROJECT STATUS OF WORK UNDER CONTRACT AT END OF FISCAL YEAR 2000 (See Section 57 of Text) Construction Feature Started Approx. % Complete Recreation: Blue Cypress Lake Park September 2000 9-90 10 _ __ _ __ __ JACKSONVILLE, FL DISTRICT TABLE 9-Q CENTRAL AND SOUTHERN FLORIDA PROJECT PRINCIPAL FEATURES OF HURRICANE GATES (See Section 58 of Text) Gate' Nearest Town No. Name 2. Clewiston, FL 3. Lake Harbor, FL 4. Belle Glade, FL 5. Canal Point, FL 6. Okeechobee, FL Distance (miles) 0.5 0.5 4.0 0.0 0.5 Depth Over Sills (feet) 10 10 10 10 7 Character of Foundation Pile Rock Rock Rock Pile Year Completed w~f 149 35 1935 1935 1935 1935 1936 Actual Cost $309,748 316,938 350,025 262,465 373,273 'All are 50 feet wide with available length unlimited. They are constructed of concrete with steel sector Gate gates and have no lift. No. 6 has an auxiliary culvert spillway with automatic control. Moore Haven Lock serves as Hurricane Gate Structure 1. TABLE 9-R CENTRAL AND SOUTHERN FLORIDA PROJECT LOCAL COOPERATION (See Section 58 of Text) Flood Control Act Work Authorized Cash Contribution' Jun. 30, 1948 Sep. 3, 1954 Jul. 14, 1960 Oct. 23, 1962 Oct. 27, 1965 Aug. 13, 1968 P.L. 89-72 Approved Dec. 17, 1970 under provisions of Section 201 of 1965 Flood Control Act (Deauthorized Jan. 1, 1990 by P.L. 99-662) P.L. 99-662 First phase of comprehensive plan Second phase of comprehensive plan Nicodemus Slough area West Palm Beach Canal Boggy Creek Basin Shingle Creek Basin South Dade County area Reedy Creek Swamp Southwest Dade County Hendry County area Martin County Flood Control Features Irrigation Features Backflow Features Recreation Features Water Resources - St. Lucie Recreation Features Navigation improvements suitable for recreational craft Upper St. Johns River Basin - non-structural flood protection 9-91 15.0 20.0 31.5 66.3 29.7 25.9 19.2 50.0 46.0 19.5 34.0 49.0 20.0 50.0 20.0 50.0 50.0 25.0 s -- ~~ - -- --- --- - ~--------- -- I--- --- REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 2000 Computed on total contract cost and supervision and Features which are computed on all costs, including engineering administration except for Reedy Creek Swamp and Recreation and design and land. 9-92 JACKSONVILLE, FL DISTRICT TABLE 9-S CENTRAL AND SOUTHERN FLORIDA PROJECT OPERATIONS AND RESULTS DURING FISCAL YEAR (See Section 58 of Text) Work Performed New Work: Lands and damage Channels and canals Levees Pumping plants Recreation Feasibility Engineering and Design Construction Management Total cost Operations: Operation of locks, dams, reservoirs and performance system Operation of service facilities Operation of flood control structures Operation of power plants Natural resource management Recreational management Operation and maintenance of recreation facilities, service and maintenance of traffic counters, master planning Condition and operation studies, periodic inspections, dam safety studies Roads, railroads, and bridges Water control management National preparedness program Prevention of obstructive and injurious deposits General regulatory Real estate management Project operations management Sub-Total 779,500 2,836,200 7,200 414,600 392,200 -200 0 0 0 0 11,966,300 106,600 124,500 2,096,600 0 $ 18,723,400 Maintenance: Lands and damages Maintenance of dams Maintenance of locks Pumping plant maintenance Maintenance of levees and floodwalls 0 0 -17,500 0 -10,000 9-93 Cost 3,311,000 2,483,000 822,000 13,848,000 240 1,422,000 8,710,000 1,035,000 $ 31,871,000 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 2000 TABLE 9-S CENTRAL AND SOUTHERN FLORIDA PROJECT OPERATIONS AND RESULTS DURING FISCAL YEAR (See Section 58 of Text) Work Performed Cost Maintenance of recreational facilities 0 Maintenance and purchase of non-recreational permanent operating equipment -2,800 Bank stabilization 1,600 Utilities, supplies, and maintenance of non-recreational buildings and grounds -100 Channel and canal maintenance 0 Engineering and Design 0 Construction Management -1,700 Clearing accounts 12,100 Sub-Total $ -18,400 Total $18,705,000 9-94 JACKSONVILLE, FL DISTRICT FOUR RIVER BASINS, FLORIDA PROJECT CONDITION AT END OF FISCAL YEAR 2000 (See Section 61 of Text) Date transferred to Southwest Florida For Operation and Maintenance Bridges: B-194 Alteration of Facilities B-195 B-594 Alteration of Facilities B-196 SCL RR Bridge, B-196 Channels and Canals: C-135 C-135, Sec. IA C-135, Sec. IB C-135, Sec. IC & 2 C-135, Sec. 3A C-135, Sec. 3B C-135, Sec. 4A C-136 C-231, Phase I C-231, Phase II C-331 C-531 C-534 C-135 Structures: S-160 S-161 S-162 S-353 Moss Bluff Lock and Spillway S-551 Levees: L-212, Sec. 1 L-212, Sec. 2 L-112 L-112 & Floodway S-155 S-163 S-159 Middle & Lower S-159 Upper Recreation: Jul 1968 - Mar 1970 May 1971 - Jan 1973 Jan 1973 - Jan 1974 Oct 1972 - Jan 1975 Dec 1972 - Jul 1975 May 1967 - Dec 1968 Jul 1966 - Aug 1967 May 1968 - Sep 1972 Jan 1971 - Dec 1973 Dec 1972 - Apr 1975 Feb 1975 - Aug 1977 Apr 1976 - Jan 1979 Aug 1975 - May 1977 Jul 1973 - Apr 1975 Jul 1973 - Jan 1974 Jul 1967 - Sep 1968 Apr 1966 - Jan 1969 Jun 1979 - Jul 1971 Mar 1977 - Oct 1980 May 1967 - Dec 1968 Aug 1975 - May 1977 Apr 1975 - Jun 1977 Jul 1967 - Sep 1968 Apr 1967 - Mar 1969 Jul 1970 - Feb 1972 Jun 1968 - Jul 1970 Jul 1970 - Sep 1971 Mar 1977 - Oct 1980 May 1978 - Jul 1981 May 1978 - Jul 1981 May 1978 - Jul 1981 Apr 1979 - Aug 1981 Jun 1979 - Sep 1981 Not transferred Do. Do. Do. Jul 1975 Dec 1968 Oct 1967 Not transferred Not transferred Oct 1977 Not transferred Not transferred Nov 1977 Dec 1975 Dec 1975 Sep 1968 Apr 1969 Nov 1971 Dec 1968 Nov 1977 Apr 1977 Nov 1968 Dec 1975 Not transferred Dec 1975 Dec 1975 Oct 1980 Jan 1983 Jan 1983 Jan 1983 Oct 1981 9-95 TABLE 9-T Construction Feature Period __ __ r r w r rm n -- REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 2000 TABLE 9-T FOUR RIVER BASINS, FLORIDA PROJECT CONDITION AT END OF FISCAL YEAR 2000 (See Section 61 of Text) Date transferred to Construction Southwest Florida Feature Period For Operation and Maintenance Morris Bridge & Flint Creek Sites Dec 1982 - Aug 1984 Jan 1985 Dead River Sites Mar 1985 - Jul 1986 Dec 1986 TABLE 9-U FOUR RIVER BASINS, FLORIDA PROJECT MOSS BLUFF LOCK (See Section 61 of Text) Nearest town 20 miles Name of nearest town Ocala, FL Distance above mouth of river 65.5 miles Lock dimensions 30 x 125 feet Normal lift 18.0 feet Elevation of normal pool surface 58 feet Depth of sills 12 feet Character of foundation Piles in sand Kind of dam None Type of construction Reinforced concrete Percent complete 100 Estimated cost (including dam and spillway) $1,990,138 9-96 JACKSONVILLE, FL DISTRICT TABLE 9-V FLOOD CONTROL WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 205, PUBLIC LAW 685, (PREAUTHORIZATION) (See Section 67 of Text) Study Identification Detailed Project Report: Black Creek, FL Cedar Creek, Jax, FL Cedar Hammock, Bradenton, FL Christopher Creek, FL Cyril E. King Road, St. Thomas, VI Estate Mon Bijou, St. Croix, VI Goodbys Creek, Jax, FL Government Center - N. Miami Bch, FL Hwy 187, El Terraplen Inabon River, PR Itchapackasassa Creek, Polk Co., FL LaGrange Gut, Frederiksted, St. Croix, VI Ortega River, FL Ponce Regional, PR Pottsburg Creek, Jax, FL Quebrada Blasinia, PR Rio Anton Ruiz-Runta, Santiago, PR Rio Cibuco, Vega Baja, PR Rio Coamo, Parcelas Valezquez, PR Rio Cidra, La Playita, PR Rio Culebrinas, Aguada, PR Rio Culebras, Aguada, PR Rio Descalabrada, Santa Isabel, PR Rio El Ojo De Agua, PR Rio Fajardo, PR Rio Guamani, Guayama, PR Rio Jacaguas at Juana Dizz, PR Rio Loco, Guanica, PR Rio Manati, Barceloneta, PR Rio Nigua, Arroyo, PR Rio Orocovis, PR Rio Patillas, PR Rio Yauco, Yauco, PR Sabana Grande, PR Savan Gut, St. Thomas, VI Soto Town, St. Thomas, VI Spanish Pond, FL Period Costs $ 26,116 927,202 161 0 0 995 0 0 0 14,858 60 0 0 0 0 0 3,955,279 0 0 0 47,698 0 66,731 147,806 106,156 81,543 0 87,011 145,540 0 13,915 1,609 0 0 56,599 0 0 9-97 -- -- REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 2000 TABLE 9-V FLOOD CONTROL WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 205, PUBLIC LAW 685, (PREAUTHORIZATION) (See Section 67 of Text) Study Identification Period Costs Streams in Jacksonville, FL 397 Turpentine Run, St. Thomas, VI , 3,452 W. Maule Lake - N. Miami Bch, FL 0 Wahneta Canal, Polk Co., FL 0 West Palm Beach, M-Canal, FL 0 Whitaker Bayou, FL 60,457 Sec 205 Coordination Account 9,270 9-98 MOBILE, AL., DISTRICT* This district comprises a small portion of southeastern Tennessee, western Georgia, western Florida, all of Alabama south of Tennessee River Basin, eastern Mississippi, and a small portion of southeastern Louisiana embraced in drainage basins tributary to the Gulf of Mexico, west of Aucilla River Basin, to and including the Pascagoula River Basin. The Pearl River Basin, Mississippi was included as part of the Mobile District until October 1, 1981, when responsibilities were transferred to Vicksburg District. Lower Mississippi Valley Division. A section of the GulflIntracoastal Water from St. Marks, Florida, to Lake Borgne Light No. 29, Louisiana is also within Mobile District. IMPROVEMENTS Page 1. Alabama-Coosa Rivers, AL & GA ............... 10-3 IA. Claiborne Lock and Dam, AL .................... 0-3 1B. Coosa River, Montgomery to Gadsden, AL ............................................. 10-4 2. Apalachicola Bay, FL.............................. 10-4 3. Apalachicola, Chattahoochee, and Flint Rivers, AL, FL & GA ., ............ 10-4 3A. George W. Andrews Lock and Dam, AL & GA ..................................... 110..- 5 4. Aquatic Plant Control (R & H Act of 1965) ........................... 10-6 5. Bayou Coden, AL ........................ 10-6 6. Bayou La Batre, AL .................................. 10-7 7. Biloxi Harbor, MS ................................. 10-7 8. Black Warrior and Tombigbee Rivers, AL .................................... 10-8 8A. Jackson Port, Vicinity of Jackson, AL .......... 10-9 8B. Oliver Lock and Dam (Replacement), AL ..................................... 10-9 9. Bon Secour River, AL .............................. 10-10 10. Carrabelle Harbor, FL .............................. 0-10 11. Dauphin Island, AL ..................................... 0-10 12. Dog and Fowl Rivers, AL ............................. 10-11 13. East Pass Channel From Gulf of Mexico into Choctawhatchee Bay, FL .................. 10-11 14. Fly Creek, Fairhope, AL ...................... 10-11 15. Gulf Intracoastal Waterway between Apalachee Bay, FL and Mexican Border .... 10-12 16. Gulfport Harbor, MS .................................. 10-12 17. M obile Harbor, AL ..................................... 10-13 18. Panama City Harbor, FL ............................. 10-13 19. Pascagoula Harbor, MS .............................. 10-14 20. Pensacola Harbor, FL ................................. 0-15 21. Perdido Pass Channel, AL ...................... 10-15 22. Tennessee-Tombigbee Waterway, AL & MS ................................ 10-15 22A. Tennessee-Tombigbee Wildlife Mitigation, AL & MS ................... 10-16 23. Other Authorized Navigation Projects ..................................... 0-17 24. Other Authorized Beach Erosion Control Project ............................................ 10-17 25. Other Authorized Flood Control Project ................................. 10-17 26. Deauthorized Projects.......................... 10-17 27. Navigation Work Under Special Authorization ................................. 0-17 28. Navigation Work Under Special Authorization ............................. 10-17 29. Flood Control Work Under Special Authorization ............................... 10-17 30. Reconnaissance and Condition Surveys.....10-17 Flood Control 31. Black Warrior River Northport Levee, AL ................................... 0-17 32. Cedar Point Seawall Bay St. Louis, MS .................................... 10-17 33. Choctawhatchee and Pea Rivers, A L and FL ................................................ 10-18 33A. Choctawhatchee and Pea Rivers, Elba and Geneva Levees, AL ............... 110..-.1..8 34. Gulf of Mexico, Highway 193 Mobile County, AL ............................... 10-18 35. Gulfside Seawall, Waveland, MS ............. 10-18 36. Texas Flat Road Kiln, M S ..................................... 10-19 37. Okatibbee Lake, MS ............................... 10-19 10-1 Navigation Page REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 2000 Flood Control Page 38. Threemile Creek, M obile, AL .................................. 10-19 36. Tombigbee River (East Fork), MS & AL ............................. 10-19 40. Tombigbee River and Tributaries, MS & AL ............................. 10-20 41. Upper Gordon Creek, Hattiesburg, MS .......................................... 0-20 42. Village Creek, Birmingham, AL .................................. 10-20 43. Flood Control Work Under Special Authorization ...................... 10-21 44. Inspection of Completed Flood Control Projects ..... ......... 10-21 45. Other Authorized Flood Control Projects ............................. 10-21 Multiple Purpose Power Projects 46. Allatoona Dam Coosa River Basin, GA .............................. 0-21 47. Buford Dam, Lake Sidney Lanier, GA ........................... 110. -22 48. Carters Dam and Reservoir, GA ................. 10-22 49. Jim Woodruff Lock and Dam, FL & GA ........................................... 0-23 50. Millers Ferry Lock and Dam, AL ............... 10-23 51. Robert F. Henry Lock and Dam, AL ........... 10-23 52. Walter F. George Lock and Dam, AL & GA ......................................... 10-24 53. West Point Lake, Chattahoochee River Basin, AL & GA.......10-24 Miscellaneous 54. Scheduling Flood Control Reservoir Operations ................................. 10-25 55. Flood Control and Coastal Emergencies (FC&CE) ............................ 10-25 56. National Emergency Preparedness Program (NEPP) ......................... ................ 10-25 57. Regulatory Functions Program ................ 10-25 58. Project Modification to Improve Environment ...................... 110..-.2..5.... 59. Aquatic Ecosystem Restoration (Sec. 206) .................................................. 10-25 60. Other Aquatic Habitat (Sec. 204) ... .......................................... 10-25 General Investigations Page 61. Surveys 10-26 62. Collection and Study of Basic Data............10-26 63. Preconstruction Engineering and Design.... 10-26 64. Rivers and Harbors Contributed Funds ...................... 10-26 Tables Table 10-A Table 10-B Table 10-C Table 10-D Table 10-E Table 10-G Table 10-H Table 10-J Table 10-K Table 10-L Table 10-M Table 10-N Table 10-0 Table 10-P Cost & Financial Statement ............ 10-27 Authorizing Legislation .................. 10-33 Other Authorized Navigation Projects ...................... 10-43 Other Authorized Beach Control Erosion Control Project ................. 10-43 Other Authorized Flood Control Projects ..................... 10-44 Deauthorized Projects ..................... 0-45 Navigation Work Under Special Authorization ..................... 10-45 Flood Control Work Under Special Authorization ..................... 0-46 Reconnaisssance and Condition Surveys ................................. 10-47 Alabama-Coosa Rivers, AL & GA Development Proposed Under Existing Project .............................. 10-47 Apalachicola, Chattahoochee, and Flint Rivers, AL, GA, & FL, Locks and Dams and Multiple-Purpose Development Included in Existing Projects..........10-48 Black Warrior and Tombigbee Rivers, AL ....................................... 10-49 Tennessee-Tombigbee Waterway, AL & M S ........................................ 10-50 Completed Flood Insurance Studies And Flood Hazard Information Reports For FY 1988 Thru FY 1998 ............ 10-51 10-2 MOBILE, ALABAMA, DISTRICT Navigation 1. ALABAMA-COOSA RIVERS, AL AND GA Location. Alabama River is formed 18 miles above Montgomery, Alabama, by the junctions of the Coosa and Tallapoosa Rivers. It then flows southwesterly through Alabama 318 miles and unites with the Tombigbee River about 45 miles north of Mobile, in southwestern Alabama, to form the Mobile River. (See Geological Survey maps for central and southwest Alabama.) The Coosa River is formed at Rome, Georgia, in northwest Georgia, by the junction of the Oostanaula and Etowah Rivers, which have their sources in southeastern Tennessee and northern Georgia. From Rome the Coosa River flows southwesterly through Georgia and Alabama 286 miles and unites with the Tallapoosa River near Montgomery, Alabama, at about the center of the State, to form the Alabama River. (See Geological Survey maps for northeast Alabama, southeast Tennessee, and northwest Georgia.) Previous project. Projects for Alabama River: for details see page 1837, Annual Report for 1915; page 725, Annual Report for 1938; and page 592, Annual Report for 1944. Projects for Coosa River: for details see page 1837, Annual Report for 1915; page 728, Annual Report for 1938; and page 594, Annual Report for 1944. Existing project. The authorized project provides for full development of the Alabama-Coosa Rivers and tributaries for navigation, flood control, power, recreation, and other purposes, in accordance with plans under preparation by Chief of Engineers, subject to modifications thereof which may be advisable for increasing development of hydroelectric power. (See Table 10-B for authorizing legislation.) Public Law 436, 83rd Congress, suspended authorization of the comprehensive plan, insofar as it provides for development of hydroelectric power for Coosa River, to permit non-Federal interests to develop the Coosa River by construction of a series of dams in accordance with conditions of a license issued pursuant to Federal Power Act and in accordance with certain other provisions and requirements of the aforementioned public law. The plan was further modified by the WRDA of 1986 to authorize planning, engineering and design for the project generally in accordance with the plans contained in Design Memorandum No. 1, General Design, dated May 1982. The present phase of improvement includes the construction of Robert F. Henry and Millers Ferry multiple-purpose improvements, Claiborne Lock and Dam, and supplemental channel work providing for a nine-foot deep navigation channel from the mouth of the Alabama River to Montgomery, Alabama, and construction of Carters Dam, a multiplepurpose improvement on Coosawattee River, Georgia. Local cooperation. Requirements of local cooperation will be determined as formulation of plans for development of projects progress. No action in the matter of local cooperation has been initiated. Terminal facilities. On the east bank of the river a natural landing connects with city streets at Montgomery. There are also various natural landings along the river. Facilities and natural landings on Alabama River are considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Contract maintenance dredging of the river system at a cost of $239,300. General charges for water control management, condition surveys, engineering and design, supervision and administration amounted to $2,095,782. Claiborne Lock and Dam charges were $215,600. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction was initiated on Carters Dam in April 1962, on Millers Ferry Lock and Dam in April 1963, Claiborne Lock and Dam in May 1965, and Robert F. Henry Lock and Dam in June 1966. Carters Dam was completed in FY 1980. The authorized nine-foot navigation channel to Montgomery, Alabama was opened to traffic in January 1972. Overall construction is complete in Millers Ferry Lock and Dam. Construction of Robert F. Henry Lock and Dam is complete. Total Federal cost of the existing project as of September 30, 2000 is $119,973,990, including $3,245,400 for new work and $116,728,590 for maintenance. (See Table 10-L.) IA. CLAIBORNE LOCK AND DAM, AL Location. The site is in Monroe County at mile 72.5 on the Alabama River, 15 miles northwest of Monroeville and 5.7 miles upstream from the U.S. Highway 84 bridge. Existing project. The existing project consists of a short earth dike on the right bank, a combination of a fixed-crest and gated spillway extending across the river channel and into the left bank, a navigation lock and mound on the left bank, and an earth dike extending across the left overbank to high ground. Normal upper pool is elevation 35 and the minimum pool will be elevation 32 to provide storage for reregulation of Millers Ferry powerplant releases. The 60- mile long reservoir has an area of 5,850 acres and a volume of 96,360 acre-feet. For other information see description of Alabama-Coosa projects. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Operation and maintenance of the lock and dam totaled $215,600. 10-3 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 2000 Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction began in May 1965 and was completed in FY 1976 at a total cost of $27,997,450. Recreation attendance during FY 2000 totaled 222,062 visits. lB. COOSA RIVER, MONTGOMERY TO GADSDEN, AL Location. The Coosa River is one of the two major tributaries forming the Alabama River approximately 18 miles northeast of Montgomery, Alabama. From its source at the, juncture of the Etowah and Ooostanaula Rivers in northwest Georgia, it flows southwesterly about 286 miles to join with the Tallapoosa River in forming the Alabama River. Existing project. The improvement of the Alabama-Coosa River for navigation to Rome, Georgia was authorized by Congress in the River and Harbor Act of 1945. A report in House Document 320, transmitted to Congress on January 27, 1960, recommended that the navigation project for the Coosa River from Montgomery to Gadsden be accomplished after the waterway to Montgomery was assured. The plan of improvement identified in House Document 320 provided for a waterway 9 feet deep with widths of 200 feet to Montgomery, Alabama, and 150 feet to Rome, Georgia. The waterway to Montgomery has essentially been completed. The plan for the Coosa River segment of the waterway between Montgomery and Gadsden was further modified by the WRDA of 1986 to authorize planning, engineering and design for the project generally in accordance with the plans contained in Design Memorandum No. 1, General Design, dated May 1982. Total Federal cost of the existing project as of September 30, 2000 is $14,986,400 for new work. 2. APALACHICOLA BAY, FL Location. The project is on the coast of northwest Florida 160 miles east of Pensacola Harbor. (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart1 1401.) Previous project. For details, see page 1833, Annual Report for 1915, and page 689, Annual Report for 1938. Existing project. The existing project provides for: (a) A channel 10 feet deep and 100 feet wide from the 10-foot depth in Apalachicola Bay, across St. George Island, to within 300 feet of the gulf shore, thence increasing uniformly in width to 200 feet at the shore and continuing with that width to the 10-foot depth in the Gulf of Mexico, with twin jetties extending from the dune line to the outer end of the channel; (b) an inner bar channel, 10 feet deep and 100 feet wide, in Apalachicola Bay; (c) a boat basin 200 feet by 880 feet and 9 feet deep at Apalachicola, Florida, with a connecting channel 9 feet deep and 80 feet wide through Scipio Creek to Apalachicola River; (d) a channel known as Link Channel, 10 feet deep and 150 feet wide, in Apalachicola Bay; (e) a channel generally parallel to the shore at Eastpoint, Florida, 6 feet deep, 100 feet wide, and about 6,000 feet long, and a connecting channel 6 feet deep and 100 feet wide to water at the same depth in St. George Sound, with twin breakwaters on either side parallel to the shore and having a total length of 5,300 feet; (f) a channel 10 feet deep and 100 feet wide through Bulkhead Shoals, connecting Apalachicola Bay with St. George Sound; and (g) a 6-foot by 100-foot channel about one mile long, generally parallel to the shore at Two Mile, Florida, with a 6-foot by 100-foot connecting channel to water of the same depth in Apalachicola Bay. Mean range of tide throughout this harbor is 1.6 feet. Extreme range, except during storms, is about three feet. Plane of reference is mean low water. (See Table 10-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Requirements have been fully complied with. Terminal facilities. Facilities consist of pile-and-timber wharves which are considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Condition surveys, contract dredging, supervision and administration and other miscellaneous costs amounted to $2,254,668. Condition at end of fiscal year. The existing project, authorized by the 1954 River and Harbor Act, was completed in 1959, including reimbursement to local interests for approved work, as authorized by the 1958 River and Harbor Act. Improvements at Two Mile except for modifications authorized in 1975 were completed in September 1964. Construction of the breakwater and channel improvements authorized in 1975 at Two Mile was completed in September 1977. Construction of breakwaters at Eastpoint authorized in 1983 was completed in March 1984. Total Federal cost under existing project as of September 30, 2000 is $2,033,461 for new work and $8,571,801 for maintenance, a total of $10,605,262. APALACHICOLA, CHATTAHOOCHEE, AND FLINT RIVERS, AL, GA, AND FL Location. The Apalachicola River is formed at the southwest corner of the State of Georgia by the junction of the Chattahoochee and Flint Rivers and flows south 108 miles emptying into Apalachicola Bay. The Florida River enters the Apalachicola from the east at mile 45.4 and the River 10-4 3. MOBILE, ALABAMA, DISTRICT Styx also enters from the east at mile 36.7 and Chipola River enters from the west at mile 28.2. (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart 11401.) The Chattahoochee River, 418 miles long, rises in northeast Georgia and flows southwesterly to West Point, and thence southerly to join the Flint River at the southwest corner of Georgia, forming the Apalachicola River. (See Geological Survey maps for northwest Georgia.) The Flint River, 330 miles long, rises in west central Georgia, flows generally southeasterly to Albany, and thence southwest to the southwest corner of the State, where it joins the Chattahoochee River to form the Apalachicola River. (See Geological Survey maps for southwest Georgia. Previous project. For details see page 484 of Annual Report for 1963. Existing project. The authorized project provides for development of the Apalachicola, Chattahoochee, and Flint Rivers for navigation, flood control, hydropower, and recreation. Navigation features of the existing project consist of a continuous 9-foot by 100-foot channel in the Apalachicola River from the intersection of the Gulf Intracoastal Waterway to the confluence of the Chattahoochee and Flint Rivers, 104 miles, thence to Columbus, Georgia, on the Chattahoochee River, 164 miles, and to Bainbridge, Georgia, on the Flint River, 29 miles, and a 3-foot by 100-foot channel on the Flint River from Bainbridge to Albany, Georgia, 74 miles, thence a channel suitable for light draft vessels at moderate stage to Montezuma, Georgia, 79 miles to be accomplished by dredging, contract works, and construction of three locks and dams (Jim Woodruff, George W. Andrews, and Walter F. George) along the 9-foot depth channel, two multipurpose dams (West Point and Buford) on the Chattahoochee River. Three multipurpose dams (Lower Auchumpkee Creek, Lazer Creek, and Spewrell Bluff) on the Flint River were deauthorized in the Water Resources Development Act of 1986. The project also provides for minor improvements of certain streams tributary to the Apalachicola River, including a 9-foot by 100-foot side channel, approximately 2,000 feet long, from Apalachicola River to Apalachicola River Industrial Park at Blountstown, Fla. Plane side of reference is mean low water. Hydropower and flood control storage are provided at Sidney Lanier, Walter F. George, and West Point, and hydropower is provided at Jim Woodruff. For further details see Annual Report for 1962. The project was originally authorized in section 2 of the River and Harbor Act of 1945, was further modified by the WRDA of 1986 (P.L. 99-662). (See Table 10-B for authorizing legislation.) Mean range of tide at the mouth of Apalachicola River is 1.6 feet. At the point where the river is formed the variation between low and high water is about 37 feet. On the Chattahoochee River, variation between average low and high water is about 20 feet, and extreme fluctuation is 65.3 feet at Eufaula. On the Flint River the extreme fluctuation of stage due to flood is 40 feet, while average variation between low and high water is about 21.5 feet. A Comprehensive Basin Study is currently being conducted on the Apalachicola, Chattahoochee, Flint (ACF), and Alabama-Coosa-Tallapoosa (ACT) River Systems. Local cooperation. The six Florida Counties that originally served as local sponsors for the Florida portion of the waterway have all informed the District in writing that they no longer wish to serve as local sponsors. The State of Florida has also declined assumption of responsibilities of local sponsorship. At this time no items of local cooperation are being complied with. No local sponsors are required for the Alabama and Georgia portions of the waterway. Terminal facilities. About 200 feet of public docks, in addition to private wharves, are available at Apalachicola, Florida. There are numerous constructed and natural landings along the entire system for launching small craft. For details of other terminal facilities, which are considered adequate for existing commerce, see individual project descriptions. See also Table I 0-M on locks and dams and multiple-purpose development included in existing project. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Operation and maintenance of George W. Andrew Lock and Dam cost $872,700. All other cost for project amounted to $2,100,504, Condition at end of fiscal year. Improvement of Apalachicola River channel by dredging to provide project dimensions throughout is complete. All major construction on Lake Sidney Lanier Dam, George W. Andrews Lock and Dam, Jim Woodruff Lock and Dam, Walter F. George Lock and Dam and West Point are complete. Channel rectification in Apalachicola River was completed December 1970. More detailed information concerning condition at the end of fiscal year for individual locks and dams and multiple-purpose developments comprising the system is presented under their respective project titles elsewhere in this report. Total Federal cost under existing project as of September 30, 2000 is $4,452,162 for new work and $133,174,274 for maintenance, a total of$ 137,626,436. (See Tables 10-Aand 10-M for fiscal year costs and summaries of overall project.) 3A. GEORGE W. ANDREWS LOCK AND DAM, AL AND GA Location. The project is on the Chattahoochee River about 46.5 miles above its mouth and about one mile below the town of Columbia, Alabama, near the head of Jim Woodruff 10-5 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 2000 Reservoir. (See Geological Survey maps for southeast Alabama). The pool extends up the navigation channel about 28 miles upstream to Walter F. George Lock and Dam. Existing project. This single-purpose project provides for a concrete fixed-crest spillway 340 feet long extending into the right bank with a crest at elevation 102 feet national geodetic datum, a concrete gate spillway adjacent to the lock 280 feet long with crest at elevation 82 feet national geodetic datum, a single-lift lock with usable chamber dimensions of 82 feet by 450 feet, and a maximum lift of 25 feet. Depths are 13 feet over the lower sill and 19 over the upper sill at normal pool elevation. The underlying foundation is limestone. The project provides for maintenance and care. The House Committee on Public Works, by resolution adopted May 19, 1953, approved the plan as proposed by the Chief of Engineers for a high dam at Walter F. George site and a low dam at the Fort Benning site and a high dam at the upper Columbia site, construction of which was authorized by the 1946 River and Harbor Act as the initiation and partial accomplishment of the plan for full development of the Apalachicola, Chattahoochee, and Flint River system. (See Table 10-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Local interests must operate all movable span bridges, provide suitable public terminals, and hold the United States free from damages. These conditions are being complied with. Terminal facilities. At Columbia, Alabama, there is a public wharf with concrete deck for handling general cargo and a bulk petroleum terminal with an unloading dock. Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Maintenance cost included under overall Apalachicola, Chattahoochee and Flint project. Recreation attendance for FY 2000 totaled 412,076. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction of the lock and dam began in March 1959 and was completed in November 1963 at a total cost of $13,038,427. (See also Table 10-M). 4. AQUATIC PLANT CONTROL (RIVER AND HARBOR ACT OF 1965) Location. Navigable water, tributary streams, connecting channels and other allied waters in Mobile District. Existing project. The existing project provides for management and control of water hyacinth, alligatorweed, Eurasian watermilfoil, hydrilla, and other obnoxious aquatic plant growths from navigable water, tributary streams, connecting channels, and other allied waters of the United States, in the combined interest of navigation, flood control, drainage, agriculture, fish and wildlife conservation, public health, and related purposes, including continued research for development of the most effective and economical control measures to be administered by the Chief of Engineers, under the direction of the Secretary of the Army, in cooperation with other Federal and State agencies. Research and planning cost prior to construction shall be borne fully by the United States. (See Table 10-B for authorizing legislation). Local cooperation. Local interests shall agree to hold and save the United States free from claims that may occur from control operations and to participate to the extent of 50 percent of such operations. Requirements are being met in the state of Alabama by the Department of Conservation and Natural Resources. Operations and results during fiscal year. Environmental studies amounted to $-2,680. Condition at end of fiscal year. Total Federal cost under the exiting project as of September 30, 2000 is $934,760. Contributed funds for maintenance amount to $21,225. 5. BAYOU CODEN, AL Location. The project is located in a small tidal stream on the southern coast of Mobile County, Alabama, emptying into Mississippi Sound about 7.6 miles northwest of Cedar Point, the southern tip of western mainland shore of Mobile Bay. (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart 11376.) Previous project. For details see Annual Report for 1945, page 843. Existing project. The existing project provides for a channel 8 feet deep by 60 feet wide extending from La Belle Avenue bridge south for about 3,000 feet through the bayou to Portersville Bay, thence 8 feet deep by 100 feet wide extending about 2.3 miles westward across Portersville Bay to connect with the Bayou La Batre channel, and a turning basin 8 feet deep by 60 feet wide by 100 feet long on the west side of the bayou channel about 500 feet south of the La Belle Avenue bridge. Mean tidal range is 1.75 feet, and extreme, except during storms, is 3.5 feet. Plane of reference is mean low water. (See Table 10-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. Small privately-owned timber dock piles used in connection with fishing industry in this locality are adequate for existing commerce. A small ship building facility is located near the upper limits of the channel. The marina which will accommodate about 12 small recreational craft, and a slip with facilities for loading oyster shells are located near the mouth of the bayou, and are maintained by the Alabama Department of Conservation. 10-6 MOBILE, ALABAMA, DISTRICT' Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Miscellaneous cost amounted to $7,753. Condition at end of fiscal year. That portion of the project authorized prior to the 1969 modification was completed in 1956. Construction authorized in 1969 was initiated March 31, 1975 and completed March 26, 1976. Total Federal cost under existing project as of September 30, 2000 is $330,701 for new work and $1,912,599 for maintenance, a total of $2,243,300. Contributed funds expended for new work amount to $100,000 and $131,912 for maintenance. 6. BAYOU LA BATRE, AL Location. Bayou La Batre is a tidal stream about 10 miles long, emptying into Mississippi Sound on the southern coast of Mobile County, AL., about 10 miles northwest of Cedar Point, the southern tip of the western mainland shore of Mobile Bay. (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart 11373.) Previous project. For details see Annual Report for 1945, page 844. Existing project. The existing project provides for a 18- foot by 120-foot channel from Pascagoula Ship channel, connecting with the GIWW, along the GIWW alignment, Connecting with an extension of the previous 12-foot channel alignment, through Mississippi Sound to the mouth of the bayou, a total distance of approximately 20 miles; then provides for a 12-foot by 100-foot channel to a point about 2,800 feet south of the highway bridge, thence a channel 12 feet deep by 75 feet wide to the bridge, with the channel widened at a point 0.6 mile below the bridge to provide a turning basin 12 feet deep and about 2.6 acres in area. Authorized by the Water Resources Development Act of 1990, the plan of improvement is to deepen channel to 18-foot by 100-foot from the mouth through the turning basin, a distance of about 1.8 miles; deepen channel from turning basin to 0.29 miles above highway 188 bridge to 14-feet by 75-feet, a distance of about 0.89 miles; extend a 14-foot by 50-foot channel from turning basin into Snake Bayou for about 730 feet and a 12-foot by 50-foot channel within Snake Bayou about 790 feet. Mean tidal range is 1.75 feet, and extreme, except during storms, is 3.75 feet. Plane of reference is mean low water. (See Table 10-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. Wooden wharves have been provided. at seafood processing plants and public launching ramps are available. Several boatways for construction of small seagoing vessels are also available. Facilities are adequate for existing commerce. Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: Engineering and design cost $2,895. Maintenance: None. Condition at end of fiscal year. The existing project was modified December 30, 1966 under the discretionary authority of the Chief of Engineers to include a turning basin. The project was completed in March 1967. The contract for deepening the Sound Channel was completed in May 1994. The construction of the Bayou Channel was completed in September 1997. Total Federal cost under existing project as of September 30, 2000 is $5,791,249 for new work and $10,806,509 for maintenance, a total of $16,597,758. Contributed funds from local interests for new work amount to $641,880. 7. BILOXI HARBOR, MS Location. The project is located on Mississippi Sound in southeastern Mississippi, 32 miles by water west of Pascagoula Harbor, Mississippi, and 14 miles east of Gulfport Harbor, Mississippi (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart 11373.) Previous project. For details see page 584, Annual Report for 1962. Existing project. The existing project provides for a continuous channel 12 feet deep, 150 feet wide and 23 miles long from the Gulf Intracoastal Waterway through Mississippi Sound east of Deer Island, Biloxi Bay, Back Bay, Cranes Neck, and a land cut to Gulfport lake, including a 500-foot by 2,600-foot basin in the lake, thence a 12-foot deep by 100- foot wide channel for about two miles westward from the west end of the lake, terminating in a 300-foot by 500-foot basin; a 12-foot by 100-foot channel from the main channel in Big Lake to and up Bayou Bernard to the Air Force oil terminal at about mile 2.6; a 12-foot by 150-foot spur channel from the main channel in Biloxi Bay for about one mile, terminating in a 400-foot by 600-foot turning basin opposite Ott Bayou; continuation of maintenance of the 12-by 150- foot lateral channel westward about 2.2 miles to Biloxi's south waterfront; a 10-foot by 150-foot channel from Mississippi Sound, passing west of Deer Island to a point where it connects to the 12-foot by 150-foot lateral channel at Biloxi's south waterfront. Construction for the modifications lateral channel authorized by River and Harbor Act of November 7, 1966 was commenced in FY 1974 and completed in February 1975. Further modifications to the project were authorized by the Chief of Engineers on March 28, 1979, which provided for a channel 10 feet deep, 100 feet wide and 300 feet long extending northward from the Biloxi Lateral Channel, and 10-7 REPORT OFTHE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 2000 into a rectangular basin, approximately 300 by 370 feet, for use by commercial small craft, and an East Harrison County Canal project which provides for a 12-foot project depth, 130- feet wide and about 2,100 feet long, and a 300 by 300 foot turning basin also to a 12-foot project depth. This work was completed in April 1980. Cost of modification as authorized by the 1966 River and Harbor Act was $664,390. That portion of the project providing for an entrance channel 6 feet deep, 50 feet wide, and about 1,800 feet long into Old Fort Bayou, as authorized by the 1945 River and Harbor Act, is inactive. Estimated cost (1954) of this portion was $6,000. (See Table 10-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. A number of wooden piling-and-timber piers for small craft and fishing boats, a bulk gasoline terminal, several boat ways, and concrete products plant are available. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Miscellaneous costs totaled $12,077. Condition at end of fiscal year. The existing project, prior to the modification authorized in 1966, was commenced in 1931 and completed in 1962. The 1966 modification was completed in FY 1975. The 1979 modification was completed in 1980. Total Federal cost under existing project as of September 30, 2000 is $1,431,919 for new work and $15,410,338 for maintenance, a total of $16,842,257. Contributed funds for new work amount to $102,600. Contributed funds for maintenance amount to $238,640. 8. BLACK WARRIOR AND TOMBIGBEE RIVERS, AL Location. Black Warrior River rises in northern Alabama above Birmingham and flows generally southwesterly to unite with the Tombigbee River at Demopolis, Alabama. Thence the Tombigbee flows south, uniting with the Alabama River to form the Mobile River 45 miles above the head of Mobile Bay. Distance by water from Mobile to vicinity of Birmingham is about 430 miles. Previous project. For details see page 732, Annual Report for 1938. Existing project. The existing project provides for a channel 9 feet deep and 200 feet wide from the mouth of the Tombigbee River, 45 miles above Mobile, to the vicinity of Birmingham, via the Tombigbee and Black Warrior Rivers, to mile 430.4 on Sipsey Fork, mile 429.6 on Mulberry Fork and mile 407.8 on Locust Fork, and for maintenance by snagging of Mobile River above the mouth of Chickasaw Creek, a total waterway distance of about 408 miles. The total lift of 255 feet is accomplished by six locks and dams. The original construction program, consisting of 17 dams and 18 lifts, was completed in 1915. Replacement of the original structures with new I10-by 600-foot locks and dams, under the modernization program is as follows: William Bacon Oliver replaced locks 10, 11, and 12; Armistead I. Selden replaced locks 8 and 9; Demopolis replaced locks 4, 5, 6, and 7; Coffeeville (Jackson) replaced locks I, 2, and 3; and Holt replaced locks 13, 14, 15, and 16. Thus, 16 of the original locks have been replaced by five new locks. Bankhead Lock and Dam (Lock 17) rehabilitation to replace the original double lift lock with a single lift lock was completed in 1980. The Coffeeville Lock and Dam wildlife refuge, authorized in 1960, includes 4,250 acres within the reservoir area and along its boundaries. A replacement lock for the old Oliver Lock located 2,300 feet downstream has been completed. The replacement lock has dimensions of 110 feet by 600 feet. A fixed crest spillway extends 800 feet across the river. Minimum provision was provided to allow construction of a hydropower plant. (See Table 10-B for authorizing legislation.) Tidal influence extends upstream from Mobile 101.6 miles to Coffeeville Lock and Dam, where tidal effect is apparent only at low stages of the river. At Mobile the mean and extreme tidal ranges are 1.5 and 3.6 feet, respectively. These are at times slightly increased by the effect of winds. The greatest fluctuation of river stages is at Demopolis, Ala., the maximum being 59.7 feet. Maximum fluctuations at other points are 40 feet at old lock 1, which is 100.6 miles from Mobile; 57.8 feet at Tuscaloosa, 346.1 miles from Mobile; 13 feet at Birmingport, 404.9 miles from Mobile; and 27 feet at Cordova, 424.3 miles from Mobile. Ordinary fluctuations at these points are at old lock 1, 20 feet; at Demopolis, 35 feet; at Tuscaloosa, 40 feet; at Birmingport, four feet; and at Cordova, seven feet. Works of improvement reduced the amount of fluctuations at different points by three to 10 feet. Local cooperation. Requirements of local cooperation have been fully complied with to date. Terminal facilities. Docks, storage facilities, and handling equipment have been provided as required at most loading and unloading points along the waterway. These include facilities for handling petroleum and petroleum products, coal, ores, sand and gravel, pulpwood, manufacturers, and various other commodities. While most terminal facilities are privately owned, many are available for use by the general public. Facilities are considered adequate for existing 10-8 MOBILE, ALABAMA, DISTRICT commerce. (See Table I 0-N for existing locks and dams.) Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Contract dredging of the river system cost $3,581,800. Condition surveys, engineering and design cost Supervision, administration and other general charges for the overall river project totaled $15,312,397. Recreation attendance FY 2000 totaled 4,959,716 visits. Condition at end of fiscal year. Work on the project, commenced in 1887, was essentially completed in 1915. Since then three of the original locks and dams (10, 11 and 12) were replaced by William Bacon Oliver (Tuscaloosa) Lock and Dam which was opened to navigation in August 1939; four original lock and dams (4, 5, 6 and 7) were replaced by Demopolis Lock and Dam which was opened to navigation In August 1954; two original locks and dams (8 and 9) were replaced by Warrior Lock and Dam which was opened to navigation in October 1957; three original locks and dams (1,2 and 3) were replaced by Coffeeville Lock and Dam which was opened to navigation in August 1960; and four original locks and dams (13, 14, 15 and 16) were replaced by Holt Lock and Dam which was opened to navigation in June 1966. Rehabilitation of the spillway at John Hollis Bankhead Lock and Dam commenced in 1966, and physically completed February 6, 1970. Replacement of the double lift lock with a single lift lock at John Hollis Bankhead Lock and Dam commenced in April 1970 and was completed in 1980. The power plant at John Hollis Bankhead Lock and Dam and Holt Lock and Dam, was built and is operated by the Alabama Power Co. Construction of the new Oliver Lock and Dam is completed with the new lock open to traffic as of July 1991. Project construction began in November 1986 and is Scheduled for completion in January 1996. Total Federal cost Under existing project as of September 30, 2000 is $88,461,935 for new work and $415,714,496 for maintenance, and $52,292,880 and major rehabilitation, a total of $556,469,311. 8A. JACKSON PORT, JACKSON, AL Location. The project is located on the Tombigbee River in Clarke County in southwest Alabama in the city of Jackson, Alabama, approximately 90 miles north of Mobile, Alabama. Existing project. None. The authorized Port would be located on the Black Warrior-Tombigbee River System, which is a federally authorized 9 by 300 feet navigation project connecting Birmingham, Alabama with the Port of Mobile. In conjunction with the realignment project on the existing navigation project, the district has been directed to construct a spur canal to serve as a port at Jackson. Local cooperation. Local Cooperation Agreement requirements have not been determined. Operation and results during fiscal year. New work: Engineering and design $293,461. Condition at end of fiscal year. The Final Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) is scheduled for completion in January 2000 and the project is scheduled for contract award in March 2000. Total Federal cost under existing project to September 30, 2000 is $2,794,008. 8B. OLIVER LOCK AND DAM (REPLACEMENT), AL Location. The project is located at mile 337.7 on the Black Warrior-Tombigbee River System at Tuscaloosa, Alabama. Existing project. The existing navigation facilities on the Black Warrior and Tombigbee include six (6) locks having a total lift of 255 feet. Each of the locks have chamber dimensions of 11 0 by 600 feet. Original work on the waterway was authorized by the River and Harbor Act of 1884. The 17 original locks have been replaced by the existing six (6) locks. Previously, Oliver Lock was the only lock in the system with chamber dimensions of 95 by 460 feet. Authorized by the Water Resources Development Act of 1986, the plan of improvement was to replace Oliver Lock and Dam at a new location 2,300 feet downstream. The replacement lock with chamber dimensions by 110 by 600 feet was opened to traffic in July 1991. The fixed crest spillway, extends 800 feet across the river. Minimum provisions are being provided to allow construction of a hydropower plant. Land Acquisition is complete. Construction was initiated in November 1986 with the award of the Alabama Power Company relocation contract. The first stage cofferdam and river diversion contract was awarded in February 1987 and the lock and dam construction contract was awarded in March 1988. For other information see description of Black Warrior and Tombigbee Rivers project. Local cooperation. A local cooperation agreement is not required. One-half of the total cost of construction of the navigation lock and dam will be paid by amounts appropriated from the Inland Waterways Trust Fund. Operation and results during fiscal year. New work: None. Condition at end of fiscal year. The project is complete. Total Federal (Corps of Engineers) cost under existing project to September 30, 2000 is $61,373,113 for new work. Contributed funds (Inland Waterways Trust) expended total $63,128,156. 10-9 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 2000 9. BON SECOUR RIVER, AL Location. Rises 2 miles south of Foley, Ala., and flows southerly about 8 miles, emptying into Bon Secour Bay, an arm of Mobile Bay in southwest Alabama. Existing project. A 10- by 80-foot channel from Gulf Intracoastal Waterway through Bon Secour Bay to mouth of Bon Secour River and extending up river to vicinity of Swifts Landing, thence 6 by 80 feet up river to a point about 600 feet above Oak Landing with two turning and maneuvering areas 150 feet wide and 1,100 to 1,200 feet long opposite' Swifts Landing and ice loading dock. Also a 10 by 80 foot South Fork channel from the intersection with the Bon Secour channel, 1.14 miles to a 150 x 150 foot turning basin. Plane of reference is mean low water. Overall length of improvement is about 4.7 miles. Mean tidal range is about 1.5 feet and extreme, except during storms, is 3.5 feet. Existing project was authorized by Chief of Engineers, May 16, 1963, under authority in Section 107, River and Harbor Act of 1960. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. A number of pile-and-timber marginal wharves used by the seafood industry and a marine ways are located along the existing project. These, together with numerous privately owned piers, are considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Miscellaneous cost $25,876. Condition at end of fiscal year. Project was commenced in July and completed in October 1964. Total Federal cost under existing project as of September 30, 2000 is $150,615 for new work and $1,519,583 for maintenance, a total of $1,670,198. Contributed funds for new work amounted to $9,700. 10. CARRABELLE HARBOR, FLORIDA Location. Carrabelle Bar and Harbor is located 50 miles south, southeast of Tallahassee, Florida, on St. George Sound and the Gulf of Mexico. Existing Project. The existing project provides for a 27- by 200-foot channel from the Gulf of Mexico for 3 miles to a point west of Dog Island, thence a 25- by 150-foot channel for 5 miles through St. George Sound and Carrabelle River to a turning basin 500 feet square and 25 feet deep at the town of Carrabelle, a 10- by 100-foot channel from turning basin for 0.6 mile to U.S. 98 bridge, thence a 10- by 80-foot channel for 3 miles to the confluence of New and Crooked Rivers. Plane of reference is mean low water. Channels above the turning basin were authorized May 17, 1965 by Chief of Engineers under authority in Section 107 of the River and Harbor Act of July 14, 1960. Other features of existing project were authorized by River and Harbor Act of September 3, 1954. The mean tidal range is 2.2 feet, and extreme is 3.0 feet, exclusive of storms. Local Cooperation. Items of local cooperation have been furnished by the Board of County Commissioners, Franklin County, Florida. Terminal Facilities. Existing terminal facilities are adequate for the current needs of the project. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: None. Condition at end of fiscal year. All new work for this project was completed in 1965. Total Federal cost of the existing project to September 30, 2000 is $481,627 for new work and $1,033,205 for maintenance, a total of $1,514,83 2 . 11. DAUPHIN ISLAND BAY, AL Location. The project is located between Dauphin and Little Dauphin Island on the west side of the entrance to Mobile Bay, about 30 miles south of Mobile, Alabama and 55 miles west of Pensacola, Florida. (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart 11376.) Existing project. The existing project provides for: (a) A channel 7 feet deep and 150 feet wide from Mobile Bay to an anchorage basin of the same depth, and about 7 acres in area, in the marsh just north of Fort Gaines on Dauphin Island; a channel 6 feet deep and 40 feet wide from the anchorage basin to Dauphin Island Bay; and a jetty and revetment to protect the entrance channel; and (b) an anchorage basin 7 feet deep and 500 feet square at Dauphin Island Village, with an entrance channel of like depth, 100 feet wide and about 8,300 feet long, extending to the 7-foot hydrographic contour in Mississippi Sound. Mean tidal range is 1.1 feet, and extreme, except during storms is about 4 feet. Plane of reference is mean low water. (See Table 10-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Requirements of local cooperation have been fully complied with to date. Terminal facilities. Several privately-owned wharves for handling seafood, a public dock and mooring slip, and a pier for recreational craft are located on the village basin. A marina, public launching ramp, and a number of private piers are located on the bay. Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations and results during fiscal year. 10-10 MOBILE, ALABAMA, DISTRICT Maintenance: Contract dredging cost $1,195,400. Condition surveys and miscellaneous cost $65,126. Condition at end of fiscal year. The project was completed in July 1959. Total Federal cost under existing project as of September 30, 2000 is $292,864 for new work and $4,047,887 for maintenance, a total of $4,340,75 I. 12. DOG AND FOWL RIVERS, AL Location. Dog and Fowl Rivers are primarily tidal streams emptying into the west side of Mobile Bay, 8.5 and 17 miles, respectively, south of central Mobile (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart 11376.) Existing project. The Dog River project provides for a 7 by 100-foot channel with a total length of4.5 miles to provide access to the Mobile ship channel. The Fowl River project provides for a channel 8 feet deep and 100 feet wide from Mobile Bay into and up Fowl River to deep water about 6,700 feet above its mouth. Total length of the channel is about 2.6 miles. Plane of reference is mean low water. Mean range of tide is about 1.5 feet in Dog River. Extreme range during storms is about 3.6 feet. This segment of the project was completed in November 1973. (See Table 10-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. Existing facilities consist of a boatyard for fabricating steel vessel hulls, nine marinas, four marine ways, a yacht basin on Dog River; two marinas on Fowl River, and numerous timber piers and docks on both rivers. Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Miscellaneous cost $12,377. Condition at end of fiscal year. The existing Fowl River Portion of the project was commenced in August 1973 and completed in November 1973. Work on the Dog River channel realignment was initiated and completed during FY 1986. Total Federal cost on the existing project as of September 30, 2000 is $4,393,715; $391,354 for new work and $4,002,361 for maintenance. Contributed funds for new work amounted to $195,626. 13. EAST PASS CHANNEL FROM GULF OF MEXICO INTO CHOCTAWHATCHEE BAY, FL Location. East Pass Channel is located in the entrance from the Gulf into Choctawhatchee Bay at eastern end of Santa Rosa Island, 48 miles east of the entrance into Pensacola Bay and 49 miles west of the new entrance to St. Andrews Bay. (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart I 1388.) Previous project. For details see page 672 of Annual Report for 1937. Existing project. The existing project provides for a 12- foot by 180-foot channel from the Gulf of Mexico into Choctawhatchee Bay, and a 6-foot by 10-foot channel from East Pass Channel into Old Pass Lagoon. The project consists also of two converging jetties spaced 1,000 feet apart at the seaward end. Mean range of tide is 1.3 feet; extreme range, except during storms, is 2.5 feet. Plane of reference is mean low water. (See Table 10-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Responsibilities of local cooperation have been complied with to date. Terminal facilities. Small privately-owned pile-and-timber piers used in connection with the fishing industry in this locality are considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: None. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction of the 1965 modification was commenced October 1967 and completed January 1969. Total Federal cost under existing project as of September 30, 2000 is $916,715 for new work and $13,803,377 for maintenance, a total of $14,720,092. Contributed funds for new work from local interests amount to $398,000. 14. FLY CREEK, AL Location. Fly Creek (Volanta Bayou) is a small stream about 4.5 miles long rising in Baldwin County, Alabama, 3 miles east of town of Fairhope, from whence it flows northerly, thence westerly and southerly, to form an estuary on eastern shore of Mobile Bay just north of Fairhope and about 13 miles southeast of Mobile, Alabama. (See U.S. Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart No. 11376.) Existing project. Provides for a channel 6 feet deep, 80 feet wide, and about 1,650 feet long from 6-foot depth in Mobile Bay to a turning basin of same depth, 100 feet wide and 350 feet long, in Fly Creek. Mean tidal range in vicinity of project is about 1.3 feet, and extreme, except during storms, is 3.5 feet. Existing project was authorized by the River and Harbor Act of May 17, 1950, (H. Doc. 194, 81st Cong., Ist Sess.). The project document contains the latest published map. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. Fairhope Yacht Club has facilities for small recreational craft on the south bank near mouth of creek, consisting of a pile-and-timber service wharves, several sheet metal boat sheds, boat slips, and other mooring facilities. There is also a commercial marina on north bank of creek. 10-11 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 2000 Operation and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: None. Condition at end of fiscal year. Project was commenced in August and completed in October, 1957. Total project costs as of September 30. 2000 amounted to $983,020 of which $29,000 was for new work and $954,020 for maintenance. 15. GULF INTRACOASTAL WATERWAY BETWEEN APALACHEE BAY, FL AND MEXICAN BORDER (MOBILE DISTRICT) Location. The project extends westward from Apalachee Bay, Florida, along the Gulf coast to the Rigolets, Louisiana, via a series of coastal lakes, bays, sounds, and land custs. (For further details see Annual Report for 1962.) Previous project. For details see page 906, Annual Report for 1930. Existing project. The existing project provides for a waterway 12 feet deep and 125 feet wide at mean low water from Apalachee Bay, Florida, to Mobile Bay, Alabama, and 12 feet deep and 150 feet wide from Mobile Bay, Alabama to Rigolets, Louisiana (Lake Borgne Light No. 29), and for a tributary channel (Gulf County Canal), 12 feet deep, 125 feet wide and about six miles long connecting Intracoastal Waterway at White City, Florida, with St. Joseph Bay. The waterway between the 12-foot depth contours in Apalachee Bay and Lake Borgne Light No. 29 at the Rigolets is 379 miles long. (See Table 10-B for authorizing legislation. Local cooperation. None. Terminal facilities. Facilities are available for public use at Carrabelle, Apalachicola, Panama City, and Pensacola, Florida; Mobile and Bayou La Batre, Alabama; and Pascagoula, Biloxi, Gulfport, Pass Christian, and Bay St. Louis, Mississippi. Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Dredging navigation channel maintenance cost $3,447,300. Condition surveys, water quality studies, supervision and administration totaled $2,631,989. Condition at end of fiscal year. The existing project is completed except for the portion between Apalachicola Bay and St. Marks, Florida, which has been deauthorized. Modification of the Gulf County Canal to provide a 12-foot by 125-foot channel was commenced July 1968 and completed June 1969. Total cost of the existing project to September 30, 2000 is $106,649,985, of which $6,480,299 was for new work and $100,169,686 for maintenance. 16. GULFPORT HARBOR, MS Location. The project is located on Mississippi Sound in southeastern Mississippi, about 35 miles west of Pascagoula, Mississippi, and 60 miles east of New Orleans. (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart 11373.) Previous project. For details see page 747. Annual Report for 1938, and page 995, Annual Report for 1948. Existing project. The existing project provides for: (a) A channel 32 feet deep, 300 feet wide, and about eight miles long across Ship Island Bar, a channel 30 feet deep, 220 feet wide, and about 11 miles long through Mississippi Sound, and an anchorage basin at Gulfport 30 feet deep, 1,320 feet wide, and 2,640 feet long; and (b) maintenance of the existing commercial smallboat harbor about 26 acres in area, and a straight-approach channel, 100 feet wide and about 4,300 feet long, from deep water in Mississippi Sound to a smallboat basin, all at a depth of 8 feet. Under ordinary conditions mean tidal range is about 1.75 feet, and extreme range, except during storms, is about 3.5 feet. Plane of reference is mean low water. The project is authorized in the Water Resources Development Act (WRDA) 1986, and further amended by WRDA 1988 to modify the existing ship channel to 36 by 300 feet in Mississippi Sound, and 38 by 400 feet across the bar, with changes in the channel alignment and the turning basin for safe and unrestricted navigation. The FY 91 construction appropriation provided for constructing an increment of the authorized project and provide a 36 by 220 feet channel in Mississippi Sound and 38 by 300 feet across the bar. (See Table 10-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Conditions of local cooperation have been fully complied with to date. Terminal facilities. Existing modern rail-connected terminal facilities at this port are considered adequate for existing commerce. (See Port Series 19, revised in 1979.) Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: Contract dredging cost $348,513. Maintenance: Contract dredging at a cost of $2,696,500. Supervision and administration and miscellaneous costs amounted to $131,312. Condition at end of fiscal year. The main harbor was commenced 1932 and completed April 1950. Maintenance for small boat harbor and approach channel, constructed by local interests in 1950, was authorized by 1958 River and Harbor Act. Awarded thin-layer monitoring contract in June 1991 under the authority of WRDA 1986 and 1988. The channel contract was awarded in April 1992, thin-layer monitoring program is continuing. Total Federal cost under existing project as of September 30, 2000 is $24,524,519 for new work and $58,472,948 for maintenance, a total of 10-12 MOBILE, ALABAMA, DISTRICT $82,997,467. Contributed funds for new work amounted to $8,637,401. 17. MOBILE HARBOR, AL Location. The project is located along the lower 5 miles of Mobile River, and channel extends thru Mobile Bay and into Gulf of Mexico, in southwestern Alabama, 91 miles by water west of Pensacola Harbor, Florida, 90 miles east of Gulfport Harbor, Mississippi, and 144 miles by water northeast of mouth of Mississippi River. (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart 11376.) Previous project. For details see page 503, Annual Report for 1963. Existing project. The existing project provides for: (a) A 4 7-foot by 600-foot channel about 1.5 miles long across Mobile Bar; (b) a 45-foot by 400-foot channel in Mobile Bay to mouth of Mobile River; (c) a 40-foot channel in Mobile River to highway bridge, varying from 500 to 775 feet wide; (d) a 25-foot channel from highway bridge to and up Chickasaw Creek to a point 400 feet south of mouth of Shell Bayou, widths being 500 feet in Mobile River and 250 feet In Chickasaw Creek; (e) a turning basin 40 feet deep, 2,500 feet long, and 800 to 1,000 feet wide, opposite Alabama State Docks; (f) a turning basin 40 feet deep, 1,000 feet wide, and 1,600 feet long opposite Magazine Point; (g) a 27-foot by 150-foot channel from Mobile Bay Channel along Arlington pier to a turning basin 800 feet long and 600 feet wide opposite Brookley Complex ocean terminal, and continuing thence a turning basin 250 feet wide and 800 feet long in Garrows Bend, thence a 22-foot by 150-foot channel to the causeway linking McDuffie Island to the mainland; (h) a channel serving the Theodore Industrial Park 40 feet deep and 400 feet wide from the main ship channel in Mobile Bay and extending northwesterly for about 5.3 miles to the shore of Mobile Bay, including an anchorage basin near the shoreline, thence a land cut 40 feet deep, 300 feet wide and 1.9 miles long to and including a 42 acre trapezoid turning basin 40 feet deep, and a barge channel 12-by 100-feet, extending 6,500 feet and terminating in a 300- by 300-foot turning basin; and (i) maintenance of Three Mile Creek by snagging, from its intersection with Industrial Canal to Mobile River. The project provides also for an anchorage area 32 feet deep, 100 feet wide, and 200 feet long opposite site formerly occupied by the U.S. Quarantine Station at McDuffie (Sand) Island. Prior to widening the Mobile Bay Channel as authorized in 1954, the Quarantine Station anchorage area was maintained to a project width of 200 feet. Construction by local interests of a solid-fill causeway across Garrows Bend Channel between McDuffie Island and the mainland is also provided for under existing project. Total length of the bay and river channel is about 41.7 miles. Plane of reference is mean low water. Under ordinary conditions mean tidal range at the lower end of the improvement is 1.2 feet and at the upper end 1.5 feet. Extreme tidal range is 3.4 feet at the lower end and 3.6 feet at the upper end. Further authorization provides for future development to deepen and widen entrance channel over the bar to 57 feet by 700 feet about 7.4 miles long, deepen and widen bay channel to 55 feet by 550 feet about 27.0 miles long, deepen and widen an additional 3.6 miles of bay channel to 55 feet by 650 feet and provide 55 foot deep anchorage area and turning basin in vicinity of Little Sand Island. All dredged material will be placed in an approved disposal area in the Gulf of Mexico. (See Table 10-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. A local cooperation agreement was signed by the local sponsor to construct the project for the first increment of work. Terminal facilities. Modern rail-connected terminal facilities at this port are considered adequate for existing commerce. (See Port Series No. 18, revised in 1979.) Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: Engineering and Design $644,229. Maintenance: Contract dredging at a cost of $11,628,800. Water quality studies, engineering and design and supervision and administration cost $4,396,182. Condition at end of fiscal year. Phase I of the project modification was completed in June 1990. Current estimated Federal cost is $218,548,000, and non-Federal cost is $178,452,000. Total Federal cost under existing project as of September 30, 2000 is $97,195,466 for new work and $305,594,342 for maintenance, a total of $402,789,808. Contributed funds expended amounted to $19,074,226 for maintenance. New work contributed funds amounts to $202,040. 18. PANAMA CITY HARBOR, FL Location. The project is located on the northwest coast of Florida, 102 miles east of entrance to Pensacola Harbor. (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart 11389.) Previous project. For details see page 710, Annual Report for 1938. Existing project. The existing project provides for a channel about 3.5 miles long, extending from deep water in St. Andrew bay through barrier peninsula, known as Lands End, to the Gulf of Mexico, 300 feet wide and 32 feet deep in the bay through Lands End; and 450 feet wide and 34 feet deep in the gulf, protected by east, west jetties, extending 2,075 feet and 2,896 feet respectively; a channel 100 feet 10-13 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 2000 wide and 8 feet deep in Grand Lagoon to a point about 2,400 feet east of State Highway 392 Bridge, with branches to serve terminal facilities; and the maintenance of a channel in Watson Bayou, an arm of St. Andrew Bay, 100 feet wide and 10 feet deep from that depth in bay to highway bridge. Authorized modifications includes branch channels 38 feet deep and 300 feet wide, leading from the inner end of the main entrance channel westward to the Port Authority terminal at Dyers Point and eastward to the Bay Harbor terminal, about 3.4 and 3.6 miles in length, respectively; turning and, maneuvering areas comprising about 55 acres opposite Dyers Point, and 42 acres opposite Bay Harbor, both at a depth of 38 feet; and an anchoring and loading basin for LASH type intermodal carriers, 40 feet deep and containing about 177 acres in St. Andrew Bay near the inner end of the main entrance channel. Mean tidal range is about normally 1.3 feet and 3.0 feet extreme. (See Table 10-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. Available terminal facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. (See Port Series No. 19.) Operations and results during fiscal year. New Work: Engineering and Design cost $175,494. Maintenance: Miscellaneous costs totaled $8,519. Condition at end of fiscal year. The existing project (prior to modifications) was completed in November 1949. Repairs to jetties were commenced in June 1961 and completed October 1968. Modifications to the project at Grand Lagoon were completed in January 1972. Total Federal cost under existing project as of September 30, 2000 is $1,813,539 for new work and $13,511,013 for maintenance, a total of $15,324,552. Contributed funds expended for new work amount to $80,000. 19. PASCAGOULA HARBOR, MS Location. The project is located along lower 6.8 miles of Pascagoula River, the lower six miles of Dog River, and in Bayou Casotte (about four miles east of the mouth of Pascagoula River), and through Mississippi Sound into the Gulf of Mexico, in southeastern Mississippi, about 38 miles west of Mobile, Alabama, and about 100 miles east of New Orleans, Louisiana. (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart 11373.) Previous project. For details see page 741, Annual Report for 1938. Existing project. The existing project provides for (a) An entrance channel 40 feet deep and 350 feet wide from the Gulf of Mexico through Horn Island Pass, including an impounding area for littoral diift, 40 feet deep, 200 feet wide, and about 1,500 feet long adjacent to the channel at the west end of Petit Bois Island; (b) a channel 38 feet deep and 350 feet wide in Mississippi Sound and Pascagoula River to the railroad bridge at Pascagoula, including a turning basin 2,000 feet long and 950 feet wide (including channel area) on the west side of the river below the railroad bridge; (c) a channel 38 feet deep and 225 feet wide from the ship channel in Mississippi Sound to the mouth of Bayou Casotte, thence 38 feet deep and 300 feet wide for about one mile to a turning basin 38 feet deep, 1,000 feet wide, and 1,750 feet long; (d) a 22-foot deep by 150-foot wide channel up Pascagoula River from the railroad bridge to the mouth of Escatawpa (or Dog) River, then up Escatawpa River to Highway 613 (formerly 63) bridge; (e) a 12-foot by 125-foot channel from the highway bridge; via Robertson and Bounds Lakes, to mile 6 on Escatawpa River; and (f) a 12-foot by 80-foot channel extending from deep water in the Pascagoula River (about one-half mile north of the railroad bridge) to a turning basin in Krebs Lake a distance of about 1,500 feet, then along the south bank of the lake a channel 10-foot by 60-foot and terminating at a second turning basin, a distance of 2,700 feet from the first. Under ordinary conditions mean tidal range is 1.75 feet, and extreme range is 3.75 feet. Plane of reference is mean low water. Further authorization provides for deepening and widening gulf entrance channel to 44 by 550 feet; widen Horn Island channel to 600 feet, relocating that channel about 500 feet westwardly; deepen Mississippi Sound portion to 42 feet; widen and deepen Bayou Casotte to 42 by 350 feet and construct turning basin. Disposal of all new work material in Gulf of Mexico. (See Table 10-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. Modern rail-connected terminal facilities at this port are considered adequate for existing commerce. (See Port Series No. 19.) Operations and results during fiscal year. New Work: Contract dredging cost $13,800,000 and other miscellaneous cost $271,126. Maintenance: Contract dredging at a cost of $1,632,441. Condition surveys cost $125,274. Water quality studies, supervision and administration, and miscellaneous costs totaled $269,605. Condition at end of fiscal year. The existing project was completed in August 1965 and the Krebs Lake project was completed in November 1983. The General Design Memorandum (GDM) was approved in June 1992 for deepening and widening channels. Preconstruction 10-14 MOBILE, ALABAMA, DISTRICT Engineering and Design is complete. The channel dredging contract was awarded in September 1994. Total Federal cost of existing project to September 30, 2000 is $29,017,208 for new work and $77,787,011 for maintenance, a total of $106,804,219. Contributed funds expended for maintenance amounted to $7,231,778. 20. PENSACOLA HARBOR, FL Location. The project is located in a landlocked bay on the coast of northwest Florida about 50 miles east of the entrance to Mobile Bay. (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Charts 490 and 11382.) Previous project. For details see Annual Report for 1938. Existing project. The existing project provides for: (a) A 35-foot by 500-foot entrance channel about five miles long, from the Gulf of Mexico to lower Pensacola Bay; (b) a 33- foot by 300-foot bay channel; (c) two 33-foot by 300-foot parallel approach channels to opposite ends of the inner harbor channel; (d) an inner harbor channel 500 feet wide, 33 feet deep, and 3,950 feet long; (e) a 30-foot by 250-foot approach channel to the pierhead line south of Muscogee wharf; and (f) a 15-foot by 100-foot entrance channel into Bayou Chico, thence a channel 14 feet deep, 75 feet wide, and about 4,400 feet long to a turning basin 14 feet deep and 500 feet square. Mean range of tide throughout the harbor is about 1.1 feet near the entrance and about 1.6 feet at the head of bay. Extreme tidal range, except during storms, is about three feet. Plane of reference is mean low water. Modification of the Bayou Chico project to provide for enlarging the entrance channel to 21 by 100 feet, the bayou channel to 20 feet by 100 feet, and deepening the turning basin to 20 feet has been deferred for restudy. (See Table 10-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. Modern rail-connected terminal facilities at this port are considered adequate for existing commerce. (See Port Series No. 19, revised in 1979.) Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Miscellaneous costs totaled $134,421. Condition at end of fiscal year. New work is completed except for features which are deferred for restudy. The modification authorized in 1962 was commenced in March and completed in May 1965. Total Federal cost of the existing project to September 30, 2000 is $1,469,693 for new work and $8,603,818 for maintenance, a total of $10,073,511. Contributed funds for maintenance amount to $312,350. 21. PERDIDO PASS CHANNEL, AL Location. The project is located about midway between Pensacola, Florida, and Mobile, Alabama. (See Coast and Geodetic Chart 11378.) Existing project. The existing project provides for a channel 12 feet deep and 150 feet wide for about 1,300 feet from the Gulf of Mexico into the inlet, thence 9 feet deep and 100 feet wide for about 2,200 feet to the highway bridge, where the channel branches into two arms, each having dimensions of 9 by 100 feet, one of which extends about 3,400 feet into Terry Cove and the other about 3,200 feet into the southern arm of Perdido Bay. The project also provides for two jetties spaced 600 feet apart at the seaward end. The east jetty has a low weir section, 1000 feet long to permit passage of littoral drift into a dredged deposition basin 800 feet by 1,200 feet located between the east jetty and the navigation channel. Mean tidal range is 1.1 feet and extreme is 2.8 feet. (See Table 10-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Requirements of local cooperation have been fully complied with to date. Terminal facilities. Six marinas, numerous timber piers, docks, and several launching ramps are available. These facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Miscellaneous costs totaled $39,399. Condition at end of fiscal year. The existing project was commenced in May 1968 and completed in May 1969. Total Federal cost of the existing project to September 30, 2000 is $629,860 for new work and $11,118,444 for maintenance, a total of $11,748,304. Contributions from local interest amount to $510,000 for new work and $10,325 for maintenance. 22. TENNESSEE-TOMBIGBEE WATERWAY, AL AND MS Location. The waterway extends from mile 215 in Pickwick pool on the Tennessee River, southerly through northeastern Mississippi and western Alabama, a total of 234 miles, to the confluence of the Black Warrior and Tombigbee Rivers at Demopolis, Alabama. Previous project. For details see Annual Report for 1953. Existing project. The existing project provides for a waterway 234 miles long, connecting the Tennessee and Tombigbee Rivers via the East Fork of Tombigbee River and Mackeys and Yellow Creeks and consists of three sections as follows: (1) the river section, a 9-foot by 300-foot channel for 149 miles between Demopolis and Amory, Mississippi; (2) the canal section, 12 feet by 300 feet for 46 miles from Amory to Bay Springs; and (3) the divide section, a 12-foot by 300-foot channel (except in the 27 mile long divide cut in which the bottom width is 280 feet) for 39 miles from Bay Springs through the dividing ridge to the Tennessee River. 10-15 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF T-HE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES- --FOR FY 2000 1 1 The total lift of 341 feet is accomplished by 10 locks (See Table 10-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Local interests have made and are maintaining alterations in highways and highway bridges and in sewer, water-supply, and drainage facilities and provide and maintain suitable and adequate river and canal terminals. Officials of the State of Mississippi were notified of these requirements on December 13, 1949, and officials of the State of Alabama were notified on December 20, 1949. Legislation enabling boards of supervisors of the various counties, concerned to enter into agreements with theUnited States relative to navigation projects was adopted by the State of Mississippi in 1950. A compact between the States of Alabama, Mississippi, Tennessee, Kentucky and Florida has been formed for the purpose of promoting the project. The name of this organization is the Tennessee-Tombigbee Waterway Development Authority. During its 1962 session the Mississippi Legislature authorized the formation of the Tombigbee River Valley Water Management District. The District was organized in accordance with the enabling legislation and is empowered to fulfill the requirements of local cooperation for the portion of the project in Mississippi. A satisfactory resolution has been furnished. During its 1967 session the Alabama Legislature authorized the formation of a public corporation to be named the Tombigbee Valley Development Authority for the purpose of further development of the Tombigbee River and tributary streams. The organization was formed in accordance with the enabling legislation and in a referendum held December 5, 1967 the voters of Alabama authorized a bond issue not to exceed $10,000,000 of finance participation in this project and the Tombigbee River and Tributaries project. A satisfactory resolution has been furnished. Terminal facilities. Docks, storage facilities and handling equipment are still being developed along this new waterway. As of September 30,1998, twelve such facilities were operational, while five were under construction, and five more are planned. The operational facilities are handling grain, wood chips, and logs. When all facilities are complete, about half will be publicly owned and operated. Additional ports and terminals must be completed before the waterway can achieve its full potential. (See Table 10-N for existing locks and dams.) Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: Engineering and design cost $2,100. Maintenance: Contract dredging on the river system cost $2311,100. Lock operations and maintenance cost $10,147,800. Recreation cost totaled $1,962,200. Total cost for operation and maintenance of the project for FY 2000 amounted to $21,313,425, which included general charges of $6,892,325. Recreation attendance for FY 2000 totaled 3,065,951 visits. Condition at end of fiscal year. Total Federal cost under the existing project as of September 30, 2000 is $1,053,071,181 for new work, and $325,843,133 for maintenance for a total of $1,378,914,314. Construction formally began December 12, 1972 and overall project is essentially complete. The waterway was opened for navigation in January 1985. 22A. TENNESSEE-TOMBIGBEE WATERWAY WILDLIFE MITIGATION PROJECT, AL AND MS Location. This project is in Alabama and Mississippi at the following locations: (1) Existing Project Lands - Approximately 72,500 acres ofTennessee-Tombigbee Project Lands have been designated for mitigation purposes. An additional 20,100 acres have also been designated at Coffeeville Lake, Demopolis Lake, Claiborne Lake and Dannelly Lakes in Alabama and at Okatibbee Lake in Mississippi. (2) Separable Lands - Acquisition and management of 88,000 separable lands in the Mobile-Tensaw Delta, Alabama (not less than 20,000 acres); the Pascagoula, Pearl, and Mississippi Delta Basins in Mississippi (not less than 25,000 acres); and the balance at any location in the two states. Previous project. None. This project was a new construction start in Fiscal year 1990. It was authorized by Section 601 of the Water Resources Development Act of 1986. Existing project. The authorized project calls for the acquisition of separable lands at the above named locations. The Alabama Department of Conservation and Natural Resources, Mississippi Department of Wildlife Fisheries and Parks, and the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (FWS) assisted in the selection of separable lands. The selected lands are being purchased from willing sellers at fair market value. Emphasis is placed on forested wetlands, with a minimum of 34,000 acres of bottomland hardwoods being purchased. Management of Lands, the separable lands and the existing project lands designated for mitigation purposes will be managed for wildlife. The States will be primarily responsible for managing these lands in accordance with management plans jointly developed by the States, Corps and the FWS. However, due to operational constraints it will be necessary for the Corps to retain management responsibility for some of the existing project lands included in the mitigation program. 10-16 _mum MOBILE, ALABAMA, DISTRICT Local cooperation. A local cooperation agreement is not required since the cost of this project is a 100% Federal responsibility. Operation and results during fiscal year. Land acquisition cost $788,744. Condition at end of fiscal year. Initial funding for the project was received in January 1990. At the end of September 1998, 21,182 acres had been acquired in the Mobile-Tensaw Delta; 13,433 acres in the Pascagoula Basin; 18,542 acres in the Mississippi Delta; 7,655 acres in the Pearl Basin; 14,378 acres in northeast Mississippi; and 12,292 acres in other areas of Alabama. A variety of activities also continued to intensively manage the 92,600 acres of existing project lands included in the Mitigation Program. The total project cost is estimated to be $94,042,000. Total Federal cost of the project as of September 30, 2000 is $91,690,129. 23. OTHER AUTHORIZED NAVIGATION PROJECTS (See Table 10-C.) 24. OTHER AUTHORIZED BEACH EROSION CONTROL PROJECT (See Table 10-D.) 25. OTHER AUTHORIZED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS (See Table 10-E.) 26. DEAUTHORIZED PROJECTS (See Table 10-G.) 27. NAVIGATION WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION (See Table 10-H.) 28. NAVIGATION WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION Navigation activities pursuant to Section 107, Public Law 86-645, as amended (Preauthorization). Studies conducted under this authority amounted to $32,190 in FY 1998. (See Table 10-H.) 29. FLOOD CONTROL WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION (See Table 10-J.) 30. RECONNAISSANCE AND CONDITION SURVEYS (See Table 10-K.) FLOOD CONTROL 31. BLACK WARRIOR RIVER NORTHPORT LEVEE PROJECT, NORTHPORT, ALABAMA Location. The city of Northport is located along the Black Warrior River north and across the river from the city of Tuscaloosa, Alabama. The damage center ofNorthport is also about 60 miles west of the city of Birmingham, Alabama. Existing project. The project consists of a 3.2 mile levee construction to provide flood protection for the city of Northport, Alabama from over bank flows from the Black Warrior River. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Operation and results during fiscal year. New Work: Engineering and Design cost $263,578. Conditions at end of fiscal year. The project is scheduled for completion in March 2000. The total project construction costs is $5,979,000. Of this amount, the Federal share is $4,480,500 and the non-Federal share is $1,498,500. Total Federal cost under existing project to September 30, 2000 is $4,807,566 for new work. Contributed funds for new work amounted to $322,260. 32. CEDAR POINT SEAWALL BAY ST. LOUIS, MS Location. The project is located in the city of Bay St. Louis, Mississippi. It is on St. Louis Bay about 95 miles from Mobile, Alabama, on the east and about 50 miles from New Orleans, Louisiana, on the west. Existing project. The shoreline erosion project provides for construction of a 1,500 linear-foot concrete/sheetpile wall constructed in front of an existing concrete seawall. Concrete will be placed between the new sheetpile walls and the bottom step of the existing concrete seawall. Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: Reconnasissance and feasbility studies $240. Conditions at end of fiscal year. Construction was authorized on September 9,1998, with contract awarded in November 1999. Total Federal cost to date is $394,301 for new work. Contributed funds expended amounted to $192,000 for new work. 10-17 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 2000 33. CHOCTAWHATCHEE/PEA RIVERS, ALABAMA AND FLORIDA Location. The Choctawhatchee and Pea River Basins are located in southeast, Alabama. The damage center of Elba is located approximately 68 miles southwest from the head water of the Pea River. The damage center of Geneva is located approximately 48 miles south from the head water of the Choctawhatchee River. Existing project. The project consists of the installation' of 12 combination rain and stream gages and two raw gages within the Choctawhatchee and Pea River Basins. The base stations are located at Elba and Geneva, Alabama. The project is being upgraded to add one additional base station at New Brockton, Alabama. The flood warning system provides early warning time ranging between 18 to 36 hours. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: Engineering and design cost $39,156. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction was initiated in September 1995. Total Federal cost to date is $390,393 for new work. Contributed funds expended for new work amounted to $141,558. 33A. CHOCTAWHATCHEE AND PEA RIVERS MINOR REHABILITATION PROJECTS ELBA AND GENEVA LEVEES, ALABAMA Location. The minor levee rehabilitation projects are located in the cities of Elba and Geneva, Alabama. The damage center of Elba is located approximately 68 miles southwest from the head waters along the Pea River. The damage center of Geneva is located at the confluence of the Pea River and the Choctawhatchee River, which is about 48 miles south from the headwaters of the Choctawhatchee River. Existing project. The Elba and Geneva projects consists of a 3.2 mile and a 2.7 mile long earthen levee system respectively, which were constructed by the Works Project Administration (WPA) in 1938. Project rehabilitation work consists ofreplacing or repairing culverts flap gates, installing sluice gates on the inside of the levee and clearing the underbrush along the levee side slopes. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Operation and results during fiscal year. New Work: None. Conditions at end of fiscal year. The project is scheduled for completion in January 2000. The total project construction cost for the two projects is $1,195,800. Of this amount, the Federal share is $822,800 and the non-Federal share is $443,000. Total Federal cost under existing project to September 30, 2000 is $659,060 for new work. Contributed funds for new work amounted to $309,079. 34. GULF OF MEXICO, HIGHWAY 193 MOBILE COUNTY, AL Location. The project area ia located along Highway 193 near the town of Dauphin Island, in Mobile County, Alabama. It is about 85 miles from Pensacola, Florida, on the east and about 125 miles from New Orleans, Louisiana on the west. Existing project. The project consists of a 5,875 vinyl sheetpile/riprap seawall constructed along Highway 193 to prevent erosion and destruction of the highway due to wave action from the Gulf of Mexico. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Operation and results during fiscal year. New work: Construction cost $856,971 and Project Design Analysis studies cost $17,338. Conditions at end of fiscal year. Construction was authorized on and the contract awarded in September 1999. Total Federal costs were $1,000,000 and non-Federal costs were $578,670. 35. GULFSIDE SEAWALL WAVELAND, MS Location. The project is located in Hancock County, in the city ofWaveland, Mississippi. It is on Mississippi Sound about 95 miles from Mobile, Alabama, on the east and about 50 miles from New Orleans, Louisiana on the west. Existing project. The project consists of construction of a 3,000-foot long sheetsteel concrete bulkhead to protect South Beach Boulevard from erosion due to wind driven wave action from Mississippi Sound. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Operation and results during fiscal year. New work: Project Design Analysis studies cost $178,584. Conditions at end of fiscal year. Construction was authorized on 9 May 2000, and the contract awarded on 13 10-18 MOBILE, ALABAMA, DISTRICT June 2000. Total Federal costs were $758,800, and non- Federal costs were $374,665. 36. TEXAS FLAT ROAD KILN, MS Location. The project area is located in northwestern Hancock County, in the city of Kiln, Mississippi. It is about 90 miles from Mobile, Alabama, on the east and about 55 miles from New Orleans, Louisiana on the west. Existing project. The shoreline protection project protects a roadway and atrium through construction of a 150-foot revetment consisting of vinyl sheetpile and riprap placed along the southeastern slope of the Jourdan River. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Operation and results during fiscal year. New work: Project Design Analysis studies cost $106,842. Non-Federal cost $87,300. Conditions at end of fiscal year. Construction was authorized on 30 June 1999, and the contract awarded on 24 September 1999. Total Federal costs were $195,100 and non- Federal costs were $87,300. 37. OKATIBBEE LAKE, MS Location. The project is located on Okatibbee Creek 37.7 miles above its mouth, in Lauderdale County, Mississippi, seven miles northwest of Meridian. Existing project. The project provides for a dam and reservoir for flood control, water supply, water quality control, fish and wildlife, and recreation. The dam consists of a compacted earth fill 6,540 feet long with the top elevation 369.8 feet above national geodetic datum, with top width of 18 feet. The spillway, which is located 1,500 feet east of the east end of the dam, is an unpaved free overflow type, 1,500 feet long with a fixed crest at elevation 359. A sluice intake structure near the center of the dam serves a 9.0-foot diameter concrete conduit. Storage allocated for water supply and water quality control varies seasonally from 21,400 acre-feet to 34,300 acre-feet between a minimum elevation of 328 and top-of-conservation-pool elevation varying from 339 to 343. Storage varying from 46,500 to 59,500 acre-feet between the top of the conservation pool and elevation 352 has been reserved exclusively for storage of flood waters. (See Table 10-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Complied with to date. Operations and results during fiscal year. : Maintenance: Costs for the year for ordinary maintenance and recreational management amount to $1,617,975. Recreation attendance at the reservoir during FY 2000 totaled 997,117 visits. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction began in June 1965, and was completed in November 1968. Total Federal cost of the existing project as of September 30, 2000 is $9,739,528 for new work and $28,059,284 for maintenance, a total of $37,798,812. 38. THREEMILE CREEK, MOBILE, AL Location. The project is located near the Gulf of Mexico in the southwest corner of the state of Alabama and in the city of Mobile, approximately 180 miles southwest of Montgomery, Alabama. Threemile Creek originates in the western part of Mobile and flows easterly about 14 miles to enter Mobile River near the Alabama State Docks. The drainage area of the basin consists of 39 square miles of urbanized area. Existing project. None. The authorized flood control project will consist of channel widening and deepening from about 2,000 feet downstream of Stone Street to a point about 6,300 feet upstream of Interstate 65 or a total distance of 5.6 miles. The plan also includes development of certain recreational facilities of the type associated with urban parks. (See Table 10-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. The Local Cooperation Agreement with the city of Mobile, Alabama was completed on September 30, 1987. The local sponsor has agreed to make all payments concurrently with project construction. Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: Reimbursable funding $43,484. Engineering and design cost $3,430. Condition at end of fiscal year. The project is complete and has been turned over to the local sponsor. Total Federal cost under existing project to September 30, 2000 is $17,384,782 for new work. Contributed funds expended $1,172,516. 39. TOMBIGBEE RIVER (EAST FORK), MS AND AL Location. The project is located on the Tombigbee River and its tributaries between the junction of the Browns and Mackeys Creek in Itawamba County, Mississippi, for a distance of 53 miles along the East Fork of the Tombigbee River, from Walkers Bridge at the junction of Browns and Mackeys Creeks to the Monroe County line. Existing project. Provides for alleviation of floods from the Tombigbee River by clearing and snagging and excavation of 13 cut-off channels, and other related channel improvements. (See Table 10-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with on work done under the 1963 Flood Control Act. Work to be done under 10-19 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 2000 authority of the 1941 Flood Control Act requires local interest to provide all lands, easements, and rights-of-way for project construction; hold and save the United States free from damages due to construction of the project; and maintain and operate all the works after completion in accordance with regulations prescribed by the Secretary of the Army. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Routine maintenance of channels cost $139,923. Condition at end of fiscal year. The project for Itawamba County, as authorized in the 1936 Flood Control Act, was completed during fiscal year 1940. No work has been done on the extension of the project authorized in the 1941 Flood Control Act. Total Federal cost of the existing project as of September 30, 2000 is $134,801 for new work and $4, 114,582 for maintenance, a total of $4,249,383. 40. TOMBIGBEE RIVER TRIBUTARIES, MS AND AL Location. The Tombigbee River rises in extreme northeast Mississippi and flows southerly through eastern Mississippi and western Alabama, emptying into the Mobile River about 45 miles above its mouth at Mobile, Alabama. Tributaries to be improved for flood control are all in northeast Mississippi and northwest Alabama. Luxapalila Creek project consists of 2.1 miles of completed channel modifications. The remaining effort consists of approximately 26 miles of various channel work. Approved estimate of cost for new work is $42,108,000; consisting of $37,743,000 Federal funds, and $4,365,000 non-Federal funds. (See Table 10-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Local interests must furnish lands and rights-of-way for construction; make all roads, highway bridge, and utility changes, alterations, additions, and relocations necessary for the project; hold the United States free from damages; prevent future encroachments along the improved channels; maintain all works after completion, with the exception of Twenty Mile Creek from mile 11.7 to mile 22.0. Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: Engineering and design cost $589,434. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction commenced in July 1965, and is proceeding stream by stream as fundsare made available. Total project is 98% complete. Luxapalila Creek is the only remaining work scheduled to be accomplished. The main construction contract was awarded in June 1994, and was completed in December 1997. The only remaining work involves a "clean-up" contract of the lower 2.1 mile segment that was completed in 1973 before litigation delayed the remaining work. Total Federal cost of existing project as of September 30, 2000 is $39,829,222 for new work. Contributed funds for new work amounted to $557,724. 41. UPPER GORDON CREEK, HATTIESBURG, MS Location. The proposed project on Gordons Creek is located in Hattiesburg, MS. Existing project. A Federal project on the lower 2.5 miles was constructed in 1979 under the Section 205 of the Flood Control Act of 1948. The project consisted of clearing and snagging from the creek's confluence with the Leaf River upstream to Bay Street and channel widening to a 40-foot bottom width between Bay and Broad Streets. The work will consist of real estate acquisition of eight (8) residences and removal from floodplain; habitat mitigation and channel enlargement for 1.1 miles between Broad and Hardy Streets; and flood damages mitigation downstream of Broad Street. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Operations and results during fiscal year. New Work: Engineering and design cost $47,654. Condition at end of fiscal year. The construction contract was awarded in April 1994, and construction was completed in April 1995. Necessary right-of-ways for channel improvement are available and necessary relocations performed by non-federal sponsors. Also, acquisition of twenty-one (21) residences for mitigation is underway. Total Federal cost to date is $3,894,607 for new work. Contributed funds expended $130,689. 42. VILLAGE CREEK, BIRMINGHAM, AL Location. The project is located in central Alabama, Jefferson County, in the city of Birmingham, Alabama. Existing project. None. The project is basically nonstructural and includes evacuating 642 structures, in six (6) separate neighborhoods, from the floodplain; enlarging 2 miles of the stream channel in the vicinity of the Municipal Airport which also involves modification of three (3) bridges, demolishing two (2) unused bridges, and relocating two (2) waterlines and other utilities, installing three (3) emergency floodwarning devices; and creating an area of 210 acres which can be utilized for future recreation development. Channel enlargements (2 miles) will reduce annual damages near Municipal Airport by 82 percent and evacuation of 642 structures will reduce annual damages in residential areas by 61 percent. The channel segment is not being constructed at the request of the sponsor. 10-20 MOBILE, ALABAMA, DISTRICT Local cooperation. The Local Cooperation Agreement with the city of Birmingham, Alabama was executed on December 14, 1988. The local sponsor has also agreed to make all required payments concurrently with the project construction. Operation and results during fiscal year. New work: None. Condition at end of fiscal year. Real Estate design memorandum completed February 1988. Real Estate acquisition started January 1989. The project is complete with acquisition of 634 tracts. Current estimated Federal cost is $26,912,000; and the non-Federal portion is $10,388,000. Total Federal cost under existing project to September 30, 2000 is $22,864,904 for new work. Contributed funds for new work amounted to $7,203,102. 43. FLOOD CONTROL WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION -Flood Control activities pursuant to Section 205, Public Law 858, 80th Congress, as amended (Preauthorization). Snagging and Clearing for flood control pursuant to Section 208 of Flood Control Act of 1954, as amended. Emergency streambank and shoreline protection pursuant to Section 14 of the Flood Control Act of 1946, as amended. (See Table 10-J) Emergency flood control activities - repair, flood fighting; and rescue work under Public Law 99, 84th Congress, and antecedent legislation, and disaster relief and assistance under Public law 288, 93d Congress. (See Table 10-J) 44. INSPECTION OF COMPLETED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS Local flood protection works for which inspection is performed under this heading consist of levee projects at West Point, Georgia, on the Chattahoochee River; Beaver Creek at Montezuma, Georgia, in the Flint River Basin; Elba and Geneva, Alabama in the Choctawhatchee River Basin; Rome, Georgia, and Little Wills Creek at Collinsville, Alabama, in the Alabama-Coosa River Basin. Channel rectification projects include Little Cove Creek, Glencoe, Alabama and Black Creek, Gadsden, Alabama in the Alabama-Coosa River Basin; Big Brown Creek, Donivan Creek, Twenty Mile Creek and Mantachie Creek, near Fulton, Mississippi, Burketts Creek and Stanifer Creek near Amory, Mississippi, Houlka Creek and Sakatonchee Creek in Chickasaw and Clay Counties, Mississippi, James Creek in Monroe County, Mississippi, and Luxapalila Creek, Lowndes County, Mississippi, all in the Tombigbee River Basin; Sowashee Creek, Meridian, Mississippi in the Pascagoula River Basin; Burnt Corn and Murder Creeks, Brewton, Alabama in the Conecuh River Basin; Autauga Creek, Prattville, Alabama; Poley Bridge, Goose Pond and Walnut Creeks, Clanton, Alabama; Pinchgut Creek, and Cahaba River, Trussville, Alabama; Town Creek, Americus, Georgia; and Lake Douglas in Bainbridge, Georgia. Shore protection and erosion control projects include Harrison County, Mississippi; Chattahoochee River at La Grange, Troup County, Georgia; Pumpkinvine Creek, Emerson, Georgia; and Chickasawbogue Creek, US Highway 43 Bridge, Linden, Alabama. The project at Rome and Montezuma, Georgia and Collinsville, Alabama include pumping stations. Inspections were made during FY 91 to determine the extent of compliance with approved regulations for maintenance and operation of the project. Responsible local officials were advised of inadequacies in the maintenance and operation of the local flood protection works under their jurisdiction where appropriate. Followup for compliance of the deficient projects continued during the year. Fiscal year costs were $20,701. Total cost to September 30, 2000 is $828,568 charged to maintenance. OTHER AUTHORIZED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS (See Table 10-E.) Multiple-Purpose Projects Including Power Multiple Purpose Power Projects 46. ALLATOONA DAM, COOSA RIVER BASIN, GA Location. The project is on Etowah River in Bartow County, Georgia, about 48 miles upstream from Rome, Georgia, about five miles due east of Cartersville, Georgia, and about 2,000 feet downstream from mouth of Allatoona Creek. The reservoir extends about 28 miles up the Etowah River at maximum power-pool elevation of 840 feet above mean sea level. Existing project. The authorized project provides for a dam and reservoir for flood control, regulation ofstreamflow for navigation, and development of hydroelectric power. Height above the river bottom of the concrete, gravity-type dam is about 190 feet, from elevation 690 feet to 880 feet national geodetic datum. The spillway, with crest at elevation 835, is controlled by nine tainter gates, 40 feet wide by twentysix feet high, and two tainter gates, 20 feet wide by twentysix feet high; having a combined discharge capacity of 321,000 cubic feet per second with the water surface at elevation 870.3. One 48-inch diameter sluicing conduit with 10-21 45. REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 2000 a free discharge valve and four sluices, 5 feet-8 inches wide by 10 feet high, are included in dam. Installed generating capacity consists of two 36,000 kilowatt units and one 2,000 kilowatt unit, or a total of 74,000 kilowatts. The reservoir, covering 19,200 acres at elevation 860, has a storage capacity of 670,000 acre-feet. The initial construction cost was $31,424,738, excluding the addition of recreation facilities at the completed project. (See Table 10-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. None required. (Sec. 2, Flood Control Act of June 28, 1938, applies). Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Operation and maintenance of the dam, reservoir, powerhouse, service and recreational activities, and administration totaled $6,452,321. Gross power generation amounted to 79,178,100 kilowatt hours during FY 2000 ,of which 77,747,000 kilowatt hours were delivered to Southeastern Power Administration. Recreation attendance at Allatoona Lake during FY 2000 totaled 5,615,525 visits. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction of the existing project began in March 1944 and was completed in October 1955. Total Federal cost under existing project as of September 30, 2000 is $35,709,085 for new work and $136,279,722 for maintenance, a total of $171,988,807. 47. BUFORD DAM, LAKE SIDNEY LANIER, GA Location. Buford Dam is on the Chattahoochee River about 348.9 miles above its mouth, 50 miles above Atlanta and five miles northwest of Buford, Georgia. The reservoir, Lake Sidney Lanier, extends about 47 miles upstream along the Chattahoochee River, and about 21 miles up the Chestatee River, which enters the Chattahoochee River 14.5 miles above the dam. Existing project. The authorized project provides for a rolled-earth dam 1,630 feet long with crest elevation 1,106 feet national geodetic datum, or about 192 feet above streambed elevation; three earth saddle dikes with a total length of 5,406 feet; a chute spillway with crest at elevation 1,085; a powerhouse in a deep cut with steel penstocks in tunnels, and concrete intake structure at the upstream end of the tunnels; and a flood control sluice tunnel paralleling the power tunnels. The Lake Sidney Lanier reservoir has a gross capacity of 2,554,000 acre-feet of which 637,000 acre-feet of storage is reserved for flood control storage. The power installations consist of one generating unit of 6,000 kilowatts and two units of40,000 kilowatts each, or a total of 86,000 kilowatts. (See Table 10-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. None required. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Operation and maintenance cost $7,480,371. Gross power generation amounted to 101,516,900 kilowatt hours during FY 2000, of which 99,203,000 kilowatt hours were delivered to Southeastern Power Administration. Recreational attendance at Lake Sidney Lanier during FY 2000 totaled 7,899,657 visits. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction commenced in March 1950 and was completed in June 1960. The reservoir was in useful operation for flood control in February 1956. The first power generating unit was placed on the line June 19, 1957; the second on July 26, 1957; and the third on October 10, 1957. Total Federal cost under existing project as of September 30, 2000 is $53,030,038 for new work, major rehabilitation cost $2,564,455 and $168,678,450 for maintenance, a total of $224,272,943. (See also Table 10- M.) 48. CARTERS DAM AND RESERVOIR, GA Location. The damsite is in Murray County, Georgia, on the Coosawattee River 26.8 miles above its junction with Conasauga River, one of the headwater tributaries of the Alabama-Coosa system. It is 60 miles north of Atlanta near the town of Oakman, Georgia. The reservoir is in both Murray and Gilmer Counties. Existing project. The existing project consists of a 1,950- foot long rockfill dam across the river, three saddle dikes on the left bank, a 258-foot long high-level, gated spillway on the left bank, a powerhouse on the right bank having two conventional units with a generating capacity of 125,000 kilowatts each and two pump-generating units of the same size, and a regulating dam 2,855 feet long with a gated spillway 208 feet long 1.5 miles downstream from the main dam. The lake has an area of 3,220 acres, at maximum pool power elevation 1,072, total capacity of 472,800 acre-feet, of which 134,900 acre-feet is usable for power and 95,700 acre-feet reserved for flood control and 242,200 acre-feet dead storage. For other information see description of Alabama- Coosa project. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Operation and maintenance of the dam, reservoir, powerhouse, service and recreational activities and administration totaled $7,229,225. Gross power generation amounted to 414,167,300 kilowatt hours during FY 2000, of which 43,452,000 were delivered to Southeastern Power Administration. Recreation attendance during FY 2000 totaled 579,501 visits. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction which commenced in April 1962 and completed in September 1980. 10-22 MOBILE, ALABAMA, DISTRICT Total Federal cost of the existing project as of September 30, 2000 is $202,434,551, including $111,140,340 for new work and $91,294,211 for maintenance. 49. JIM WOODRUFF LOCK AND DAM, GA AND FL Location. The project is located on the Apalachicola River 107.6 miles above its mouth, about 1,000 feet below confluence of the Chattahoochee and Flint Rivers, and 1.5 miles northwest of Chattahoochee, Florida. Reservoir extends about 46.5 miles upstream along the Chattahoochee River to the vicinity of Columbia, Alabama, and about 47 miles upstream along Flint River, or 17 miles above Bainbridge, Georgia. (See Geological Survey maps for southwest Georgia.) Existing project. The existing project provides for a concrete open-crest spillway 1,634 feet long on the right bank, with a crest at elevation 79 feet national geodetic datum; a single-lift lock with usable chamber dimensions of 82 by 450 constituting a portion of the dam; an earth section 506 feet feet, a maximum lift of 33 feet, and depth over the sills of 14 feet; a gated spillway 766 feet long with the bridge at elevation 107 feet national geodetic datum, or about 67 feet above the streambed elevation; a powerhouse with an intake section constituting a portion of the dam; an earth section 506 feet long to accommodate the switchyard and substation; and an overflow dike section 2,130 feet long on the left bank, with a crest at elevation 85. The underlying foundation is limestone. At the normal pool elevation of 77, the reservoir has a total capacity of 406,160 acre-feet. The power installation consists of three units of 10,000 kilowatts each, or a total of 30,000 kilowatts. (See Table 10-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Required cooperation is being fulfilled. Easements for rights-of-way and spoil-disposal areas were provided as required along the Apalachicola River. Adequate Public terminals were constructed by local interests at Bainbridge, Georgia, on the Flint River, and at Columbia, Alabama, on the Chattahoochee River. Facilities are being planned for other localities on the project. Terminal facilities. A public wharf with concrete deck for handling general cargo, a bulk storage terminal for petroleum, a grain elevator, and private riverside facilities at Bainbridge, Georgia, on the Flint River, are considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Operation and maintenance cost $5,641,600. Gross power generation, amounted to 68,961,000 kilowatt hours during FY 2000, of which 67,915,000 kilowatt hourswere delivered to Southeastern Power Administration. Recreational attendance at Lake Seminole during FY 2000 totaled 1,031,532 visits. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction of the lock was commenced in 1947, and completed in 1957. The pool was opened to navigation in May 1954, and the pool was raised to project level in January 1957. The first powergenerating unit was placed on-the-line on February 1, the second on March I, and the third April 26, 1957. Total Federal cost under existing project as of September 30, 2000 is $47,978,858 for new work, major rehabilitation cost $16,763,147 and $124,473,644 for maintenance, a total of $189,215,649. (See also Table 10-M.) 50. MILLERS FERRY LOCK AND DAM, AL Location. The site is in Wilcox County at mile 142.2 on the Alabama River, 10 miles northwest of Camden, Alabama, and 30 miles southwest of Selma. Existing project. The existing project consists of an earth dike on the right bank, a concrete, gravity-gated spillway in the river channel, a lock and mound on the left bank, an earth dike extending downstream paralleling the lock, to the powerhouse intake structure; a powerhouse, and an earth dike extending to high ground on the left bank. Normal upper pool is at elevation 80. The powerplant contains two 25,000 kilowatt units and one 30,000 kilowatt unit. The 103-mile long reservoir has an area of 17,200 acres at normal pool level and a total capacity of 331,800 acre-feet. The lock chamber is 84 by 600 feet with a 13-foot depth over the miter sills. For other information see description ofAlabama-Coosa project. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Operation and maintenance of lock, dam, powerhouse, reservoir, and administration cost $5,170,723. Gross power generation amounted to 258,153,000 kilowatt hours during FY 2000, of which 255,301,000 kilowatt hours were delivered to Southeastern Power Administration. Recreation attendance at William "Bill" Dannelly Reservoir during FY 2000 totaled 1,617,457 visits. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction began in April 1963. The lock was placed in temporary operations in June 1968 and opened to full use in November 1969. The powerhouse units were placed on line during April and May 1970. The project was completed in 1980. Total Federal cost of the project as of September 30, 2000 is $63,125,300 for new work and $90,216,348 for maintenance, a total of $153,341,648. 51. ROBERT F. HENRY LOCK AND DAM, AL Location. The site is in Lowndes and Autauga Counties at mile 281.2 on the Alabama River, 26 miles west of Montgomery. 10-23 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 2000 Existing project. The existing project provides for a navigation lock, a gated spillway, and a power plant located at mile 281.2. The normal upper pool is at elevation 125.0 and the minimum lower pool due to the Millers Ferry Lock and Dam is at elevation 80.0. The structures consist of earth dikes and a power plant on the right bank, a gated spillway in the river channel, a lock and mound on the left bank, and an earth dike extending upstream parallel to the Western Railway ofAlabama. The total length of the structures is about 14,962 feet with maximum height above the foundation at the power plant intake about 101 feet. The power plant contains four" 20,500-kw. units. The 88-mile long reservoir has an area of 12,300 acres at normal pool level and a total capacity of 234,200 acre-feet. The lock has a chamber 84 feet wide and 600 feet long and provides a 12-foot depth over the lower miter sill. For other information see description of Alabama- Coosa project. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Operation and maintenance costs amounted to $5,515,036. Gross power generation amounted to 204,196,000 kilowatt hours during FY 2000, of which 201,545,000 kilowatt hours were delivered to Southeastern Power Administration. Recreation attendance during FY 2000 totaled 1,489,625 visits. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction began in March 1966 and is complete. The first powerhouse unit was placed in operation in June 1975, with the last unit on line in November 1975. Total Federal cost of the project as of September 30, 2000 is $230,296,900, including $83,360,800 for new work and $69,090,336 for maintenance. 52. WALTER F. GEORGE LOCK AND DAM, AL AND GA Location. The project is on the Chattahoochee River about 75.2 miles above its mouth and about 1.5 miles above Fort Gaines, Georgia. (See Geological Survey maps for southwest Georgia.) Existing project. The existing project provides for a concrete dam, gated spillway, and single-lift lock, with earth embankments at either side. The non-overflow section of the dam includes a powerhouse and an intake structure. The gated spillway is 708 feet long with a fixed crest at elevation 163 feet national geodetic datum. The two earth embankments, of almost equal lengths, have a total length of 12,128 feet, with a crest elevation at 215, and a maximum height of about 68 feet. The nonoverflow section of the concrete dam is 200 feet long, with the deck of the powerhouse section at elevation 208. The lock, with usable chamber dimensions of 82 feet by 450 feet, has a lift of 88 feet with the normal upper pool elevation at 190. Depths are 13 feet over the lower sill and I 8 feet over the upper sill at normal pool elevation. The underlying foundation is limestone. Total reservoir capacity is 934,400 acre-feet, with 244,000 acre-feet reserved for power. The power installation consists of four units of 32,500 kilowatts each, or a total of 130,000 kilowatts. The project provides for maintenance, including operation and care. (See Table 10-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Local interests must maintain and operate all utility and highway facilities which may be relocated or otherwise altered as part of the improvement, provide suitable public terminal facilities, and hold the United States free from damages. Local agencies and other organizations have indicated their willingness and ability to comply. Terminal facilities. Public wharves at Eufaula and Phenix City, Alabama, and Columbus, Georgia, are considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Operation and maintenance cost for FY 2000 was $7,520,468. Gross power generation amounted to 213,856,000 kilowatt hours, of which 208,062,000 kilowatt hours were delivered to Southeastern Power Administration. Recreational attendance during FY 2000 totaled 6,339,735 visits. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction was completed in 1963. The lock was opened to navigation in June 1963. The first power generating unit was placed onthe- line in March, the second in May, the third in September, and the fourth in November 1963. Total Federal cost under existing project as of September 30, 2000 is $88,330,669 for new work, major rehabilitation cost $14,667,914 and $158,774,990 for maintenance, a total cost of $261,773,573. (See also Table 10-M.) 53. WEST POINT LAKE, CHATTAHOOCHEE RIVER BASIN, GA AND AL Location. The damsite is on the Chattahoochee River 2.8 miles upstream from West Point, Georgia, 201.4 miles above the mouth of the Chattahoochee River, and 309.2 miles above the mouth of the Apalachicola River. At the full power pool elevation of 635 feet above national geodetic datum, the reservoir would lie in Troup and Heard Counties, Georgia, and in Chambers and Randolph Counties, Alabama (See Geological Survey maps of Georgia and Alabama.) Existing project. The existing project provides for flood control, power, recreation, fish and wildlife development, and streamflow regulation for downstream navigation. The project provides for a gravity-type concrete dam 896 feet long with earth embankments at either end 1, 11 feet long on the east 10-24 MOBILE, ALABAMAt DISTRICT end and 5,243 feet long on the west end. The total length of the dam and spillway is 7,250 feet. The main dam consists of a concrete non-overflow section, 185 feet long on the west side and an earth embankment retaining wall on the east side; a gravity concrete spillway 390 feet long, including piers and abutments, with six tainter gates, each 50 feet by 41 feet. A monolith intake-powerhouse section and erection bay 321 feet long is constructed directly west and adjacent to the spillway. At the full power-pool elevation of 635 the reservoir provides a total storage of 605,000 acre-feet of which 307,000 acre-feet is usable. During the critical flood season the reservoir is operated with maximum power pool elevation at 625 feet to provide flood storage between elevations 625 and 635. The initial power installation of 73,375 kilowatts consisting of units 1, 2 and 3 were placed in operation in March and April, 1975. (See Table 10-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. None required. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Operation and maintenance of the project totaled $6,753,889. Gross power generation amounted to 100,272,000 kilowatt hours during FY 2000, of which 95,291,000 kilowatt hours were delivered to Southeastern Power Administration. Recreational attendance during FY 2000 totaled 2,343,054 visits. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction of the project, which was initiated in June 1966, and completed at the end of FY 1984. Total Federal cost under existing project as of September 30, 2000 is $131,565,760 for new work and $106,218,324 for maintenance, a total of $237,784,084 (See also Table 10-M.) 54. SCHEDULING FLOOD CONTROL RESERVOIR OPERATIONS Mobile District monitors flood control operations of Alabama Power Company's Weiss, H. Neely Henry, and Logan Martin Dams on Coosa River, Alabama, and their Lewis Smith Dam on Sipsey Fork (headwaters of Black Warrior River, Alabama), for compliance with regulation plans prepared in accordance with Public Law 436, 83rd Congress, and Federal Power Commission licenses. Fiscal Year cost for these activities on the Weiss, H. Neely Henry, and Logan Martin Dams are included under operation and maintenance costs for the Alabama-Coosa Rivers. Fiscal year cost for the Lewis Smith Dam is included under the overall operation and maintenance costs for the Black Warrior- Tombigbee Rivers System. 55. FLOOD CONTROL AND COASTAL EMERGENCIES (FC & CE) Disaster Preparedness Program ............................ $682,993 Emergency Operations .............................................. 57,707 Rehabilitation .............................................. -0- Miscellaneous Reimbursable ............................ 3,562,984 Total FC & CE $4,303,684 56. NATIONAL EMERGENCY PREPAREDNESS PROGRAM (NEPP) National Preparedness ............................................ $60,934 Local Preparedness .......................................... ....... 18,101 Emergency Facilities ..................................... 5,090 Total NEPP $84,125 57. REGULATORY FUNCTIONS PROGRAM Permit Evaluation ................................. $1,980,588 Enforcement ........................................ 498,407 Studies ..................................... 2,130 Other Navigational Regulations ....................... -0- Coastal Mississippi EIS .................................. 175,023 Total Regulatory $2,656,148 58. PROJECT MODIFICATION TO IMPROVE ENVIRONMENT (Sec. 1135) Mayo's Bar, Floyd Co., GA .................................... $17,918 Coordination Account Funds ............................ 14,316 Initial Appraisals ......... ....................... .. 23,154 Lake Seminole Habitat, FL ................................. 1,829 Twentymile Creek Habitat, MS ........................... 4,585 Coosa River Levees, GA ................................. 7,337 Paddlefish Spawning, MS......................................... 26,496 Moores Creek Channel, MS ............................... 5,844 Total Improvement (Sec. 1135, P.L. 99-662) $101,479 59. AQUATIC ECOSYSTEM RESTORATION (SEC. 206) Big Escambia Creek ................................. $73,723 Coordination Account Funds .................................. 5,172 Gulf Breeze Wetlands .................................... 2,610 M arvel Slab Removal, AL ............................................. 927 Preliminary Restoration Plans ............................ 20,889 Total Restoration (Sec. 206, P.L. 104-303) $103,321 60. OTHER AQUATIC HABITAT (SEC. 204) Bayou Casotte ................................. ..... $2,133 Total Other Aquatic (Sec. 204, P.L. 102-560) $2,133 10.25 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 2000 General Investigations 61. SURVEYS During FY 2000, costs of $2,380,318 were incurred as shown below: Flood Damage Preventive Studies ..................... $178,316 Navigation Studies .................................... 944,340 Special Studies .................................... 1,046,668 Shoreline Protection Studies ................................ $17,355 Coordination with Other Agencies, and non-Federal Interests .......................................... 60,299 Miscellaneous Activities ....................................... 133,340 Total Surveys $2,380,318 62. COLLECTION AND STUDY OF BASIC DATA Collection and study of basic data continued during the fiscal year with the initiation of Flood Insurance studies, the cost of which was reimbursable by FEMA. In addition, Flood Plain Management Services were performed at a cost of $295,347 and $17,743 expended for Hydrologic Studies. (See Table 10-P for listings of studies completed during FY 2000.) 63. PRECONSTRUCTION ENGINEERING AND DESIGN Wolf and Jordan Rivers, MS. The authorized plan provides for deepening the existing industrial channel from 7 by 100 feet to 8 by 100 feet for about 4 1/2 miles from the end of the 200 by 800 foot turning basin to the 8-foot depth contour in St. Louis Bay. Plans and specifications were initiated in January 1997 and were completed in November 1999. Estimate Preconstruction, Engineering and Design cost is $500,000. Fiscal year 2000 expenditures were $4,701. Total FY 2000 expenditures for Preconstruction, Engineering and Design (PED) were $4,701. 64. RIVERS AND HARBORS CONTRIBUTED FUNDS (GENERAL INVESTION) Contributed funds expended for authorized Federal studies included: Atlanta Sewer, GA .................................................... $3,185 Birmingham Watershed, AL ...................................... 85,825 Dog River Watershed, AL ..................................... 146,000 Metro Atlanta Watershed, GA ................................ 165,819 Pascagoula Harbor, MS .............................................. 4,726 Planning Assistance to States ................................... 38,712 Total Contributed Funds $444,267 10-26 MOBILE, ALABAMA, DISTRICT TABLE 10-A COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT Se Section Total Cost to In Text Project Funding FY97 FY98 FY99 FY00 Sept. 30, 2000 Navigatio, 1. n Alabama-Coosa Rivers, AL and GA IA. Claibome Lock and Dam, AL 1B. Coosa River, Montgomery to Gadsden, AL 2. Apalachicola Bay, FL 3. Apalachicola, Chattahoochee and Flint Rivers, AL and GA 3A. George W. Andrews Lock and Dam, AL and GA 4. Aquatic Plant Control (Contributed Funds) 5. Bayou Coden, AL (Contributed Funds) (Contributed Funds) 6. Bayou La Batre, AL (Contributed Funds) 7. Biloxi Harbor, MS (Contributed Funds) New Work: Approp. Cost Maint.: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint.: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint.: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint.: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint.: Contrib. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint.: Approp. Cost New Work: Contrib. Cost Maint.: Contrib. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint.: Approp. Cost New Work: Contrib. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint.: Approp. Cost New Work: Contrib. Cost 5,514,980 5,519,831 228,000 185,911 4,311,283 4,298,317 30 w 38,891 511,100 444,755 80,340 1,763,000 1,612,688 1,805,000 1,723,601 74,235 1,109,000 1,074,719 4,661,000 4.604,697 -8,000 37.483 6.059,500 6,050,362 x, 30 8,796 -68,000 4,805 25,000 54,123 317,500 371,420 100,000 162,034 537,000 563,709 4,331,000 4,451.309 963,410 965,050 5,092.390 5,165,761 30 30 15,829 221,300 217,077 4,000 10,663 4,563,100 4,595,177 526,600 544,631 2,532,000 2,550,682 2,255,050 2,254,668 2,986,050 2,973,204 -2,680 4,000 7,753 -2,428 2,895 -2,800 -55,619 12,000 12,077 3,245,400 3,245,400 116,738,16824 116,728,590 27,997,450 27,997,450 14,986,40023 14,986,40023 2,033,461' 2,033,461' 8,574,5182 8,571,8012 4,452,16226 4,452,16226 133,217,48727 133,174,27427 13,038,42729 13,038,42729 30 30 969,187 934,760 21,225 21,225 330,701' 330,701' 1,913,158 1,912,599 100,000 100,000 134,357 131,912 5,971,095 5,791,249 10,806,546 10,806,509 697,5004 641,880' 1,431,919' 1,431,919' 15,410,3956 15,410,3386 102,600 102,600 10-27 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 2000 TABLE 10-A (Continued) See Section in Text Project (Contributed Funds) 8. Black Warrior & Tombigbee Rivers. AL 8A. Jackson Port Jackson, AL 8B. Oliver Lock & Dam (Replacement). AL (Contributed Funds) 9. Bon Secour River, AL (Contributed Funds) 10. Carrabelle Bar and Harbor, FL 11. Dauphin Island, Bay, AL (Contributed Funds) 12. Dog and Fowl Rivers, AL (Contributed Funds) 12A. Dog River Pilot, AL 13. East Pass Channel From Gulf of Mexico into Choctwhatchee Bay, FL (Contributed Funds) 14. Fly Creek, AL Funding Maint.: Contrib. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint.: Approp. Cost Major Rehab. Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Contrib. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint.: Approp. Cost New Work: Contrib. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint.: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint.: Approp. Cost New Work: Contrib. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint.: Approp. Cost Maint.: Contrib. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint.: Approp. Cost New Work: Contrib. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT FY97 FY98 FY99 Total Cost to FY00 SeCt 30 2000 -- ~ 18,916,779 19,583,480 318,000 233,483 58,395 74,658 70,000 80,168 47,000 9,670 75,000 64,398 66,000 76,070 974,850 1,037.542 20,379,990 20,603.059 563,000 514,582 1.206 14,000 13,614 533,000 570,695 -11,000 4,335 48,000 48,086 -9,000 9,703 19,514,000 119,702,560 715,000 591,457 -12,938 664,125 677,143 -1,500 18,853,000 18,894,197 -7,000 293,461 31,000 25,876 -300 1,160 1,800 2,429 230,000 230,735 376 1,287,000 1,260,526 14,800 12,377 350,000 185,178 735,500 736,479 238,640 238,640 88,461,935' 88,461,935' 415,811,863' 415,714,496' 52,292,880 52,292,880 2,824,000 2,794,008 61,409,000 61,373,113 63,164,125 63,128,156 150,615 150,615 1,524,758 1,519,583 9,700 9,700 481,627 481,627 1,034,085 1,033,205 292,864 292,864 4,074,426 4,047,887 41,422 41,422 391,354 391,354 4,004,786 4,002,361 197,450 195,626 350,000 185,178 916,715 916,715 13,803,461 13,803,377 398,000 398,000 29.000 29,000 10-28 MOBILE, ALABAMA, DISTRICT TABLE 10-A (Continued) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Section Total Cost to in Text Project Funding FY97 FY98 FY99 FY00 Sept. 30, 2000 IS. Gulf Intracoastal Waterway between Apalachee Ba%. FL and Mexican Border 16. Gulfport Harbor, MS (Contributed Funds) 17. Mobile Harbor. AL (Contributed Funds) 18. Panama City' Harbor, FL (Contributed Funds) 19. Pascagoula Harbor, MS (Contributed Funds) (Contributed Funds) 19A. Bayou Casotte, MS (Contributed Funds) Pensacola Harbor, FL (Contributed Funds) 21. Perdido Pass Channel, AL Maint.: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint.: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint.: Approp. Cost New Work: Contrib. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint.: Approp. Cost Maint.: Contrib. Cost New Work: Contrib. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint.: Approp. Cost New Work: Contrib. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint.: Approp. Cost New Work: Contrib. Cost Maint.: Contrib. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Contrib. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint.: Approp. Cost Maint.: Contrib. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost 75,000 55,456 4,680,090 4,644,492 100,000 27.005 1,995.000 1,678,098 131,977 100,000 104,360 20,554,000 20,520,942 43,650 2,729,000 2,727,876 550,000 574,454 3,035,900 2,799,202 -412,717 375,000 386,293 60,000 41,273 8,500 31,598 5.810,000 5,810,074 30,034 443,000 744,059 300,000 46,118 20,199,000 20,077,190 150,000 157,492 -27,000 .11,439 751,000 136,363 3,097,000 3,294,586 400,000 317,086 3,000 21,948 112.900 113,019 7,063,540 7.113,864 3,632 2,148,800 2,194,584 11,949 544,000 187,937 32,166,700 32,281,406 475,000 410,584 488,500 490,655 12,000,000 223,855 1,989,200 2,027,320 .15,896 -98,429 1,150,000 795,285 46,000 43,136 28,400 31,114 14,763 -12,000 -12,041 6,086,500 6,079,289 350,000 348,513 2,836,501 2,827,812 -350,575 365,000 644,229 15,890,000 16,024,982 209,000 175,494 202,040 202,040 209,000 175,494 8,550 8,519 1,835,000 14,071,126 9,409,000 9,341,198 4,200,000 4,705,000 500,000 928,022 2,133 683,000 683.000 135.150 134,421 14,763 954,121 954,020 6,480,299' 6,480,299" 100,192,376 ' ' 100,169,686 " 24,529,000" 24,524,519" 58,483,50312 58,472,94812 9,495,000 8,637,401 97,540,935" 97,195,466" 305,707,040" 305,594,342" 19,142,500 19,074,226 202,040 202,040 1,847,045" 1,813,539" 13,511,06316 13,511,013 ' 6 80,000 80,000 29,220,985" 29,017,208" 77,858,69218 77,787,011'" 8,077,102 8,077,102 7,246,884 7,231,778 46,000 45,268 683,000 683,000 1,469,69319 1,469,693'9 8,604,90820 8,603,81820 312,350 312,350 629,860 629,860 10-29 20. REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 2000 TABLE IO-A (Continued) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Section in Text Project (Contributed Funds) (Contributed Funds) 22. Tennessee- Tombigbee Waterway, AL and MS 22A. Tenn-Tom Wildlife Mitigation 22B. Tenn-Tom Wildlife Environmental Flood Control 31. Black Warrior River Northport Levee, AL (Contributed Funds) 32. Cedar Point Seawall Bay St. Louis, MS (Contributed Funds) 33. Choctawhatchee and Pea Rivers, AL and FL (Contributed Funds) 33A. Choctawhatchee and Pea Rivers, Elba and Geneva Levees, AL (Contributed Funds) 34. Gulf of Mexico, Highway 193 Mobile County, AL (Contributed Funds) 35. Gulfside Seawall Waveland, MS (Contributed Funds) 36. Texas Flat Road Hancock County, MS (Contributed Funds) Funding Maint.: Approp. Cost New Work: Contrib. Cost Maint.: Contrib. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint.: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Contrib. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Contrib. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Contrib. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Contrib. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Contrib. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Contrib. Cost FY97 FY98 FY99 FY00 -45.000 5.083 1,231,000 1,110,701 925,000 1,028,697 21,849,010 21,965,942 3,351,000 5,822,930 3,198,000 129,018 299,000 4,711 - - 7,500 36,560 2,487 46,723 S110,000 89,659 1,092,50 1,167,11 28,14 20,248,00 20,477,44 300,00 1,541,50 1,000,00 1,392,61 139,19 316,20 335,28 192,00 192,00 60,00 85,68 42,50 8 376,40 190,00 208,92 50,00 66,18 499,96 100,00 40,06 50,00 52,65 87,3( 10 * 39,499 39,399 127.582 19,338,290 19,367.403 4,040.000 2,721.172 2,583.075 115,958 80,000 58,773 112.500 34.610 15.000 7,566 423.000 76.882 1,039 100,000 57,242 -. 80,000 24,753 * - -224,500 s0 2,100 10 21,302,000 11 21,313,425 )0 300,000 )8 788,744 * 2,030,000 * 1,516,048 )0 90,000 8 263,578 - 30,000 )5 62,663 )0 37 240 )0 )0 10 -28,000 18 39,156 )0 10 42,663 - -68,000 )2 -21,683 10 -5,697 1 99,119 A0 850,000 17 874,309 53 138,321 - 578,670 )0 658,800 55 178,584 * 374,665 . 374,665 )0 65,100 58 106,842 )O . 87,300 10-30 Total Cost to Sept. 30. 2000 11,118.616 11,118,444 5 10.000 510,000 10,325 10,325 1,053,127,70021 1,053,071,18121 325,965,485 325,843,133 92,400,000 91,690,129 2,030,000 1,516,048 4,819,264 4,807,566 329,000 322,260 396,200 394,301 192,000 192,000 391,800 390,393 157,287 141,558 665,000 659,060 332,303 309,079 1,000,000 997,739 638,284 578,670 758,800 218,649 374,665 374,665 195,100 10,847 87,300 87,300 MOBILE, ALABAMA, DISTRICT TABLE 10-A (Continued) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Section Total Cost to in Text Project Funding FY97 FY98 FY99 FY00 Sept. 30. 2000 37. Okatibhhbee Damrn. New Work: MS 38. Three Mile Creek, Mobile, AL. (Contributed Funds) (Contributed Funds) 39. Tombigbee River (East Fork) MS and AL 40. Tombigbee River Tributaries, MS and AL Approp. Cost Maint.: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Contrib. Cost New Work: Contrib. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint.: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost (Contributed Funds) New Work: Contrib. Cost 41. Upper Gordon Creek New Work: Hattiesburg, MS Approp. Cost (Contributed Funds) New Work: Contrib. Cost 42. Village Creek, New Work: Birmingham, AL Approp. Cost (Contributed Funds) New Work: Contrib. Cost Multiple Purpose Power Projects 46. Allatoona Dam, New Work: Coosa River Basin, Approp. GA Cost Maint.: Approp. Cost 47. Buford Dam, New Work: Lake Sidney Approp. Lanier, GA Cost Maint.: Approp. Cost Major Rehab. Approp. Cost 48. Carters Dam and New Work: Reservoir, GA Approp. Cost Maint.: Approp. Cost 49. Jim Woodruff Lock New Work: and Dam, GA and Approp. FL Cost 1,736,875 1,794,079 6,039 18,000 18,000 200,000 66,500 2,215,00.0 1,982,458 183,000 96,756 50,00 14,166 50 372,000 140,690, 5,996 5,458,465 5,312,654 6,942,415 6,687,110 4,451,100 4,446,504 1,518,000 1,517,668 340,000 392,126 43,484 43,484 118,000 226,477 1,860,000 804,567 82,765 -50,000 10,348 20,000 45,863 6,864 5,357,500 5,549,977 6,297,000 6,506,257 980,000 711,615 4,532,790 4,544,616 1,504,000 1,507,897 3,430 -43,484 -43,484 -43,484 -43,484 116,000 139,923 250,000 1,107,718 6,423 -15,000 17,806 1,599,000 1,617,976 146,000 133,774 589,434 3,333 50,000 47,654 4,665 5,396,000 5,514,680 6,744,000 6,881,663 819,000 747,790 5,006,000 5,064,240 6,428,000 6,452,321 7,488,004 7,480,371 1,397,000 1,105,050 7,563,000 7,228,225 9,739,528 9,739,528 28,067,710 28,059,284 17,385,000 17,384,782 1,172,516 1,172,516 1,172,516 1,172,516 134,801 134,801 4,132,201 4,114,582 39,976,825 39,829,222 872,700 557,724 3,900,000 3,894,607 130,720 130,689 22,894,000 22,864,904 7,206,574 7,203,102 35,709,08525 35,709,0852" 136,328,346 136,279,722 53,030,03821 53,030,03828 168,795,299 168,678,450 3,196,000 2,564,455 111,140,340 111,140,340 91,693,731 91,294,211 47,978,8583" 47,978,858" 10.31 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 2000 TARI . lilA t nntinuned) COST AND FINANCIA. STATMENT See Section Total Cost to in Text Project Funding FY97 FY98 FY99 FY00 Sept. 30, 200 Maint.: Approp. 6,570.414 7,075,000 7,322,000 5.559,535 124.637,246 Cost 6,661.034 6,614,769 7,794,899 5.641,637 124.473,644 Major Rehab. Approp. 1,925,000 2,896,000 4,399,000 7.346,000 17,466,000 Cost 1,633,345 1,004,297 5,638.983 7.639,724 16,763,147 50. Millers Ferry Lock New Work: and Dam, AL Approp. " ,, - 63.125,300 Cost 63,125,300 Maint.: Approp. 7,901,440 6,184,350 6,720,000 5,532,000 90,633,858 Cost 7,958.569 6,182,153 6,089,150 5.170,723 90,216,348 51. Robert F. Henry New Work: Lock and Dam, AL Approp. - 83,360,800 Cost.. 83,360,800 Maint.: Approp. 4,333,445 4,288,950 5,290,000 5.997,000 69,623,113 Cost 4,404.812 4,270,283 5,351,539 5,515,036 69,090,336 52. Walter F. George New Work: Lock and Dam, Approp. - 88,330,669 u AL and GA Cost 88,330,6691 Maint.: Approp. 6,069.744 6,754,290 5,941,000 7,486,658 158,834,946 Cost 6,411,825 6,643,568 6,089,150 7,520,468 158,774,990 Major Rehab.: Approp. 473,000 1,880,000 1.219,000 1.756,000 15,946,000 Cost 314,884 904,004 2,106,592 724,438 14,667,914 52A. Walter F. George Major Rehab.: Secant Wall, Approp. 743,000 743,000 AL and GA Cost - - - 661,563 661,563 53. West Point Lake, New Work: Chattahoochee River Approp. 131,565,760" Basin, GA and AL Cost .. . . 131,565,760" Maint.: Approp. 5,847,857 5,190,000 5,649,000 6,774,292 106,255,167 Cost 6,067,778 4,792,049 6,051,989 6.753,889 106,218,324 1. Includes $134,613 for previous projects and $28,500 for DPR on Two-Mile. 2. Includes $168,766 for previous projects. 3. Includes $5,650 for.previous projects. 4. Cost for providing spoil dikes for work authorized by 1965 River and Harbor Act. 5. Includes $44,382 for previous projects of which $5,000 was contributed funds. 6. Includes $96,509 for previous projects of which $10,200 was contributed funds. 7. Includes $606,931 for previous projects and $1,243,661 for recreational facilities on completed projects. 8. Includes $50,000 for previous projects. 9. Includes $45,605 for previous projects. 10. Includes $65,137 for previous projects. 11. Includes $269,017 for previous projects. 12. Includes $2,312,297 for previous projects and $442,836 Special O and M Funds. 13. Includes $6,683,104 for previous projects, $14,000 Public Work Funds, and $41,242 Emergency Relief funds. 14. Includes $4,096,681 for previous projects and $494,136 Special O and M funds. 15. Includes $203,560 for previous projects, $581,959 Public Works Funds, $457,467 rehabilitation of jetties under existing project and $48,001 for Grand Lagoon modification. 16. Includes $513,604 for previous projects. 17. Includes $904,442 for previous projects. 18. Includes $412,624 for previous projects, $124,565 Special 0 and M funds, and $829,472 Emergency Work Funds. 19. Includes $594,688 for previous projects. 20. Includes $126,649 for previous projects. 21. Includes $1,993,000 transferred to National Park Service; $210,249 GI funds expended during FY 1957 thru FY 1961. Previous project cost amounted to $197,651. 22. Includes $234,331 for previous projects. 23. Includes $3,692,483 for previous projects. 24. Includes $2,978,050 for previous projects. 25. Includes $3.347,489 for recreational facilities. 26. Includes $1,883,193 Federal funds, $1,924 contributed funds for previous projects; and $809,553 for Lazer Creek design and $301,310 for Rysco Channel. 27. Includes $2,246,233 for previous projects. 28. Includes $8,233,325 for recreational facilities. 29. Includes $84,014 for recreational facilities. 30. Included under maintenance for overall Apalachicola, Chattahoochee and Flint Rivers projects. 31. Includes $1,515,822 for recreational facilities. 32. Includes $2,441,029 for recreational facilities. 33. Includes $35,045 for previous project costs. 10-32 MOBILE, ALABAMA, DISTRICT AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Work Authorized Documents Mar. 2, 1907 Jan. 21, 1927 Sep. 3, 1954 Sep. 3, 1954 Jul. 3, 1958 Nov. 21, 1963' Feb. 5, 1975' Aug. 11, 1983' Jul. 3, 1958 Oct. 23, 1962 Oct. 27, 1965 Nov. 17, 1986 Mar. 2, 1945 Jun. 2, 1969' Oct. 27, 1965 Nov. 28, 1990 Jul. 3, 1930 10-33 TABLE 10-B APALACHICOLA BAY, FL (See Section 2 of Text) Channel 18 feet deep through West Pass and Link Channels. Ten feet H. Doc. 422, 59th Cong.. deep across the inner bar, and 9 feet deep through Bulkhead Shoals. Ist Sess. Modify project to provide for channel 10 feet deep from mouth of inner H. Doc. 106, 69th Cong., bar channel to Gulf via Link and West Pass Channels, and 10-foot Ist Sess. depth in Bulkhead Shoals Channel. At Eastpoint, FI., a channel 6 feet deep, 100 feet wide, and about 6,000 feet H. Doc. 156, 82d Cong., long, parallel to shore, with connecting channel 6 feet deep, and 100 feet Ist Sess. wide to St. George Sound, and at Apalachicola, Fl.. a small-boat basin 200 feet and 9 feet deep, with a connecting channel 9 feet deep and 80 feet wide through Scipio Creek to the Apalachicola River. Modify project to provide for a channel 10 feet deep and 100 feet wide from H. Doc. 557, 82d Cong., the I 0-foot depth in Apalachicola Bay across St. George Island to within 2d Sess. 300 feet of the Gulf shore, thence increasing uniformly in width to 200 feet at shore and continuing at this width to the 10-foot depth in the Gulf, with two jetties extending from the dune line on St. George Island to the outer end of channel, and for abandonment of West Pass Channel upon completion of of channel through St. George Island. Modify improvement ofApalachicola Bay, Fl., authorized by River and Harbor Act of Sept. 3, 1954 to provide that the Secretary of the Army shall reimburse local interests for such approved work as they may have done based upon the reduction in the amount of material which will have to be removed to provide project dimensions at such time as Federal dredging of the channel is undertaken. A channel 6 feet deep, 100 feet wide, and about I mile long, parallel to DPR (Sec. 107) shore at Two Mile, Fl., with a 6-by 100-foot connecting channel to water of the same depth inAr palachicola Bay. A channel 6 feet deep and 100 feet wide extending from the eastern DPR (Sec. 107) end of the existing Two Mile channel and generally paralleling the shoreline for a distance of about 9,000 feet to intersect with the Gulf Intracoastal Waterway about 1,650 feet south of Gorrie Bridge at Apalachicola, and a breakwater built to elevation 4.0 feet above mean low water along the seaward side of the existing channel parallel to the shore at Two Mile. The total length of the breakwater of about 6,150 feet, includes two 860-foot legs paralleling the existing entrance channel. Modify Eastpoint project to include breakwaters with a DPR (Sec. 107) total length of 5,300 feet. AQUATIC PLANT CONTROL (See Section 4 of Text) Aquatic plant control for N.C., S.C., Ga., Fl., Al., Ms., H. Doc. 37, 85th Cong., and La. ist Sess. Research and planning costs to be borne by U.S. Public law 87-874 87th Cong. Provided for continued research. H. Doc. 251, 89th Cong., 1st Sess. Increased non-federal cost-sharing from 30% to 50%. Water Resources Development Act of 1986 (P.L. 99-662) BAYOU CODEN, AL (See Section 5 of Text) Channel 4 by 40 feet. H. Doc. 824, 77th Cong., Channel 8 by 60 feet to connect with Bayou La Batre 2d Sess. channel. DPR (Sec. 107) BAYOU LA BATRE, AL (See Section 6 of Text) A 12- by 100-foot channel from that depth in Mississippi Sound to a H. Doc. 327, 88th Cong., point about 2,800 feet south of the highway bridge, thence a channel 2d Sess. 12 by 75 feet to the bridge, an overall distance of about 33,500 feet. Deepen existing channel to 18 feet to the bridge; to 14 feet Water Resources above bridge, and into Snake Bayou at a depth of 12 feet. Development Act of 1990 (P.L. 101-640) BILOXI HARBOR, MS (See Section 7 of Text) Channel 10 feet deep and 150 feet wide from Mississippi Sound H. Doc. 754, 69th Cong., west and north of Deer Island to deep water in Back Bay of Biloxi. 2d Sess. REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITES FOR FY 2000 TABLE 10-B (Continued) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Work Authorized Documents Jun. 20. 1938 Relocation of channel. H. Doc. 639. 75th ConQ.. Mar. 2, 1945 Mar. 2. 1945 May 17, 1950 Jul. 14, 1960 Nov. 7, 1966 Mar. 28, 1979' Aug. 15, 1985 Jul. 5, 1884 Mar. 3, 1899 Sep. 19, 1890 Sep. 19, 1890 Mar. 2, 1907 Mar. 3, 1909 Aug. 22, 1911 Mar. 2, 1919 Aug. 30, 1935 3d Sess. H. Doc. 258, 76th Cong.. 1st Sess. H. Doc. 326, 76th Cong.. Ist Sess. H. Doc. 256, 81st Cong., Ist Sess. H. Doc. 271, 86th Cong., 2d Sess. H. Doc. 513, 89th Cong., 2d Sess. Entrance channel 6 feet deep and 50 feet wide into Old Fort Bayou. Entrance channel 8 feet deep and 100 feet wide through Cranes Neck into Bayou Bernard. Maintain channel 6 feet deep and 40 feet wide from Biloxi Harbor to Ott Bayou. Continuous channel 12 feet deep from Mississippi Sound the Air Force terminal on Bayou Bernard via Back Bay and Cranes Neck. A 23-mile-long through channel 12 feet deep and 150 feet wide from the Gulf Intracoastal Waterway through: Mississippi Sound, Biloxi Bay (east of Deer Island). Back Bay, Big Lake, and via land cut to Gulfport Lake, including a 500 by 2.600-foot turning basin in the lake, thence. a channel 12 by 100 feet from the western end of Gulfport lake for about 2 miles to a 300- by 500- foot turning basin; adoption for maintenance of a 12- by 150-foot spur channel from the main channel in Biloxi Bay, westward about I mile to a 400- by 600-foot turning basin opposite Ott Bayou, and abandonment of the existing 6- by 40-foot channel into Ott Bayou; continuation of maintenance of the 12- by 150-foot lateral channel westward about 2.2 miles from the main channel in Biloxi Bay to a point opposite Oak Street; continuation of maintenance of the channel west of Deer Island. A channel 10 feet deep; 100 feet wide and 300 feet long extending northward from the Biloxi Lateral Channel and, into a rectangular basin approximately 300 feet by 370 feet. A channel 12-feet deep; 130-feet wide and 2,100-feet long, and a 300 by 300 foot turning basin also to a 12-foot depth. BLACK WARRIOR AND TOMBIGBEE RIVERS, AL (See Section 8 of Text) Original appropriation for improving Black Warrior River. Original project for slack-water improvement authorized by Secretary of War, Apr. 19, 1887 Construction of the first locks between Tuscaloosa and Demopolis. (Maintenance of the section of Tombigbee River below lock I to its mouth (66 miles) included in the existing project.) Construction of locks and dams, 1, 2, and 3. Merging of the individual project for the Black Warrior and Warrior Rivers and the Tombigbee River below Demopolis Construction of locks and dams 14, 15, 16, and 17. Provides for reconstruction of obsolete structures, modified in plan and location, to provide efficient and economical maintenance and operation. Lift of lock 17 changed to 63 feet, and construction of locks and dams 18 and 19 eliminated from the project. Extension of slack-water improvement on Sanders Ferry on Mulberry Fork and Nichols Shoal on Locust Fork. Raising of various dams 2 feet and raising the lock walls 2 feet at lock I to provide a minimum depth of 8 feet at low water, widening the channel to 150 feet where practicable. For snagging Mobile River from the mouth of Chickasaw Creek to the junction of the Alabama and Tombigbee Rivers. 10-34 DPR (Sec. 107) DPR (Sec. 107) Annual Report, 1887, pt. 2, p. 1302. H. Doc. 178, 56th Cong., 2d Sess., and Annual Report, 1901, pt. 3, p. 1858 H. Doc. 165, 57th Cong., 1st Sess., and Annual Report, 1902, p. 1293 Public Law 317 H. Doc. 72, 62d Cong., 1st Sess. Annual Report, 1918. P. 876 H. Doc. 728, 71st Cong., 3d Sess. MOBILE, ALABAMA, DISTRICT TABLE 10-B (Continued) Acts AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Work Authorized Aug. 30, 1935 Aug. 30, 1935 Jun. 26, 1934 Dec. 22, 1944 Mar. 2, 1945 Mar. 2, 1945 Jul. 14, 1960 Dec. 21, 1982 Jul. 30, 1983 Nov. 17, 1986 Oct. 18, 1986 Aug. 15, 1985 Nov. 17, 1986 May 16, 1963' Sep. 3, 1954 Mar. 2, 1945 Sep. 3, 1954 Aug. 16, 1991 Increase channel dimensions to 9 by 200 feet; construct crest gates at lock and dam 17; add flashboards at all dams; Sunflower Bend Cutoff. Construction of a lock and dam below Tuscaloosa to replace original locks and dams 10, I11a, nd 12. Operation and care of locks and dams provided for with funds from War Department appropriations for rivers harbors. Recreation facilities. Construction of a lock and dam near Demopolis to replace existing dams 4, 5, 6, and 7. Provide increased spillway capacity at dam 1. Coffeeville Lock and Dam Wildlife Refuge. Provides for a wider navigation opening at the Franklin Ferry Bridge, Jeffeison County, Al. Authorized to widen, as necessary for safe passage, the navigation opening of Franklin Ferry Bridge, Jefferson County, Al. Conduct a feasibility study of protection from erosion problems on the southern bank from river mile 253 to river mile 255: JACKSON PORT, AL (See Section 8A of Text) Construct a spur canal 9 feet deep, 300 feet wide, and 1000 feet long in conjunction with the realignment project on the existing navigation proejct. (Jackson Port) OLIVER LOCK AND DAM (REPLACEMENT), AL (See Section 8B of Text) Construction and land acquisition for Oliver Lock Replacement Construction of a lock and dam to replace the William Bacon Oliver Lock and Dam. BON SECOUR RIVER, AL (See Section 9 of Text) A 10. by 100-foot channel from Gulf Intracoastal Waterway through Bon Secour Bay to mouth of Bon Secour River and extending up river to vicinity of Swift's Landing, thence 6 by 80 feet up river to a point 600 feet above Oak Landing, with two turning and maneuvering areas 150 feet wide and 1,100 and 1,200 feet long opposite Swift's Landing and ice loading dock. Overall length of improvement is about 4.7 miles. CARRABELLE HARBOR, FL (See Section 10 of Text) Entrance channel 27- by 200-foot, harbor channel 25- by 150-foot, turning basin 25- by 100-foot. DAUPHIN ISLAND BAY, AL (See Section II of Text) A channel 7 feet deep and 150 feet wide from Mobile Bay to an anchorage basin of same depth, about 7 acres in area, in marsh just north of Fort Gaines on Dauphin Island; a channel 4 feet deep and 40 feet wide from anchorage basin to Dauphin Island Bay; and a jetty and revetment to protect entrance channel; and (b) an anchorage basin 7 feet deep and 500 feet square at Dauphin Island Village, with an entrance channel of like depth, 100 feet wide and about 8,300 feet long, extending to 7.foot hydrographic contour in Mississippi Sound. Deepen existing 4-foot channel to 7-feet and 40-feet wide from anchorage basin to Dauphin Island Bay. 10-35 Documents H. Doc. 56. 73d Cong., 1stSe ss., and Rivers and Harbors and Committee Doc. 45 73d Cong. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 26. 74th Cong., Ist Sess. H. Doc. 276, 76th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 382, 76th Cong., Ist Sess. S. Doc. 50, 86th Cong., Ist Sess. Public Law 97, 377 Public Law 98-63 Water Resource Development Act of 1986 (P.L. 99-662) Energy and Water Development Appropriation Act of 1987 (P.L. 99-591) The Supplemental Appropriations Act, 1985 (P.L. 99-88) Water Resources Development Act of 1986 (P.L. 99-662) DPR (Sec. 107) H. Doc. 451, 83d Cong., 2d Sess. H. Doc. 333, 76th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 394, 82d Cong., 2d Sess. DPR (Sec. 107) t REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 2000 TABLE 10-B (Continued) Acts AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Work Authorized Jun. 23. 1993 May 19. 1969' Jul. 3. 1930 Oct. 24, 1951 Oct. 27, 1965 Oct. 1. 1980 May 17, 1950 Jun. 25, 1910 Aug. 30, 1935 Jun. 25, 1910 Aug. 30, 1935 Jul. 3, 1930 Jul. 3, 1930 Jul. 3, 1930 Jul. 23, 1942 Jun. 17, 1943 Provides 400 feet of stone protection along the shoreline near the pier and erosion protection for shoreline in the immediate vicinity of Fort Gaines. DOG AND FOWL RIVERS, AL (See Section 12 of Text) To provide small craft navigation on west side of Mobile Bay. EAST PASS CHANNEL FROM GULF OF MEXICO INTO CHOCTAWHATCHEE BAY, FL (See Section 13 of Text) Maintenance of 6-foot channel by 100-foot channel from Choctawhatchee Bay into Gulf. Maintenance of 12-foot channel from Chbctawhatchee Bay into Gulf, and maintenance of 6-foot channel into Old Pass Lagoon. Construction of twin jetties. (Present project dimensions.) Modifications to provide a channel length of approximately 3,800 feet in lieu of 2,000 feet from the East Pass Channel into Old Pass Lagoon, with no changes in width and depth. FLY CREEK, FAIRHOPE, AL (See Section 14 of Text) A channel 6 feet deep, 80 feet wide, and about 1,650 feet long from 6-foot depth in Mobile Bay to a turning basin of same depth, 100 feet wide and 350 feet long, in Fly Creek. GULF INTRACOASTAL WATERWAY BETWEEN APALACHEE BAY, FL, AND MEXICAN BORDER (Mobile District) (See Section 15 of Text) APALACHICOLA RIVER TO ST. ANDREW BAY, FL A channel 5 feet deep at mean low water and 65 feet wide at the bottom. A channel 9 feet deep at mean low water and 100 feet wide at the bottom. CHOCTAWHATCHEE BAY TO WEST BAY, FL A channel 9 feet deep at mean low water and 100 feet wide at the bottom. A channel 6 feet deep at mean low water, with no reference to width. CHOCTAWHATCHEE BAY TO PENSACOLA BAY, FL A channel 9 feet deep at mean low water and 100 feet wide at the bottom. PENSACOLA BAY, FL, TO MOBILE BAY, AL A channel 9 feet deep at mean low water and 100 feet wide at the bottom. MOBILE BAY, AL, TO NEW ORLEANS, LA A channel 300 feet wide and 10 feet from the 10 foot contour in Mobile Bay to the 10-foot contour in Mississippi Sound. A channel 100 feet wide and 9 feet deep from Lake Pontchartrain to Mississippi Sound. APALACHEE BAY, FL, TO NEW ORLEANS, LA A channel 12 feet deep and 125 feet wide at mean low water, except in the section between Mobile, Al., and New Orleans, La., where the width is to be 150 feet. Conditional acquisition of Gulf County Canal, Fl. and enlargement of the canal to 9 feet deep and 100 feet wide. 10-36 Documents DPR (Sec. 14) DPR (Sec. 107) H. Doc. 209, 70th Congress ist Sess. H. Doc. 470, 81st Cong., 2d Sess. H. Doc. 194, 88th Cong., 2d Sess. Energy and Water Development Appropriation H. Doc. 194, 81st Cong., Ist Sess. H. Doc. 670, 61st Cong., 2d Sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 52. 72d Cong., 2d Sess. H. Doc. 259, 72d Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 565, 61st Cong., 2d Sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 42, 73d Cong., 2d Sess. H. Doc. 42, 71st Cong., 1st Sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 4, 71st Cong., Ist Sess. H. Doc. 341, 71st Cong., 2d Sess. Public Law 675, 77th Cong., 2d Sess., and H. Doc. 96, 79th Cong., Ist Sess. H. Doc. 257, 76th Cong., Ist Sess., and Public Law 75, 78th Cong., Ist Sess. "WO TABLE 10-B (Continued) MOBILE, ALABAMA, DISTRICT AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Work Authorized Documents Mar. 2. 1945 May 17. 1950 Nov. 7. 1966 Mar. 3. 1899 Mar. 2, 1907 Feb. 27, 1911 Jan. 21, 1927 Jul. 23, 1930 Jun. 30, 1948 Jul. 3. 1958 Aug. 15, 1985 Nov. 17, 1986 Nov. 17, 1988 Aug. 26, 1937 Mar. 2, 1945 Sep. 3, 1954 Construction of a movable span in the Georgia. Florida & Alabama R.R. bridge crossing the Ochlockonee River. Abandonment and closure of original channel between Big Lagoon and Pensacola Bay and construction of a new channel to enter the bay north of original entrance. Authorized enlargement of Gulf County Canal to 12 by 125 feet. GULFPORT HARBOR, MS (See Section 16 of Text) A channel 19 feet deep and 300 feet wide from the anchorage basin at Ship Island to Gulfport, Ms., and an anchorage basin next to the shore end 19 feet deep and not less than 2.640 feet by 1,320 feet in area. Combined Ship Island Pass with Gulfport Harbor project. Increased depth to 26 feet and width to 300 feet across Ship Island Bar and depth to 19 feet in channel from anchorage basin at Ship Island to anchorage basin at Gulfport. Authorized relocation of channel across Ship Island Bar. Increased depth to 27 feet and width to 300 feet across Ship Island Bar, 26 feet deep and 220 feet wide through Ms. Sound and depth of 26 feet in the anchorage basin at Gulfport. Increased depth of 32 feet and width to 30 feet across Ship Island Bar, 30 feet deep and 220 feet wide through Ms. Sound and a depth of 30 feet in the anchorage basin at Gulfport. Maintenance of the existing commercial small-boat harbor and an approach channel 100 feet wide and 4,300 feet long, from deep water in Ms. Sound to the small-boat basin, all at a depth of 8 feet. Modify the existing Ship Channel to 36 x 300 feet in Mississippi Sound, and 38 x 400 feet across the bar, with changes in the channel alignment and the entrance to the anchorage basin for safe and unrestricted navigation. Modification of FY 1985 Supplemental Appropriations Act. Dredged material from project shall be disposed of in open water in the Gulf of Mexico in accordance with all provisions of Federal law. Modify of WRDA of 1986 and authorize disposal of dredged material in open waters of the Gulf of Mexico; and by Thin-layer disposal in Mississippi Sound under a demonstration program. MOBILE HARBOR, AL (See Section 17 of Text) For improvement of Threemile Creek by snagging from Mobile River to the Industrial Canal. Adoption of existing channel through Garrows Bend from Choctaw Point in Arlington pier, 27 feet deep and 150 feet wide, with 2 turning basins. Adoption of the existing channel alongside Arlington pier from the of Garrows Bend Channel. 27 feet deep and 150 feet wide. A channel 25 feet deep and generally 500 feet wide in Mobile River from the highway bridge to the mouth of Chickasaw Creek, then 25 feet deep and 250 feet wide in Chickasaw Creek to a point about 400 feet below Shell Bayou. Enlarging Mobile Bay Channel to 42 by 600 feet. Enlarging Mobile Bay Channel to 40 by 400 feet. Deepening Mobile River Channel below highway bridge to 40 feet over present widths, including existing turning basin and anchorage areas. Widening river channel opposite Mazagine Point to provide a 40- by 800- by 1,400-foot turning basin. The turning basin was further modified for maintenance by SAD letter of November 27, 1973 under authority contained in ER-I130-2-307 to increase the turning basin's dimensions to 1000' by 1600'. 10-37 H. Doc. 442, 76th Cong.. Ist Sess. H. Doc. 325, 81st Cong., ist Sess. Public Law 89-789, 89th Cong. 2d Sess. H. Doc. 120, 55th Cong., 3d Sess. H. Doc. 2, 60th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 692, 69th Cong., 2d Sess. H. Doc. 112, 81st Cong.,, Ist Sess. S. Doc. 123, 84th Cong., 2d Sess. The Supplemental Appropriations Act, 1985 (P.L. 99-88) Water Resources Development Act of 1986 (P.L. 99-662) Water Resources Development Act of 1988 (P.L. 100-676) Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 69, 74th Cong., Ist Sess. H. Doc. 739, 79th Cong., 2d Sess. H. Doc. 74, 83d Congress, 1st Sess. REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 2000 TABLE 10-B (Continued) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Work Authorized Documents Sep. 3.,19 54 Jul. 26. 1970 (SR) Dec. 15, 1970 (HR) Aug. 15, 1985 Nov. 17, 1986 Nov. 17, 1986 Aug. 30, 1935 Mar. 2, 1945 Jun. 30, 1948 Mar. 23, 1967' Jun. 14, 1972 Mar. 4, 1913 Mar. 4, 1915 May 17, 1950 Sep. 3, 1954 Jul. 3, 1958 Closure of Garrows Bend Channel by construction and operation of an earth-filled causeway across said channel (work to be done by local interests). To provide a channel 40 feet deep and 400 feet wide from the main ship channel in Mobile Bay and extending northwesterly for about 5.3 miles to the shore of Mobile Bay including an anchorage and turning basin near the shoreline, thence a land-cut 40 feet deep, 300 feet wide and about 1.9 miles long to and including a trapezoidal turning basin 40 feet deep and approximately 42 acres, 40 feet deep; a barge channel 12. by 100-feet extending 6500-feet and terminating ina 300-foot by 300-foot terminal basin. Deepen and widen entrance channel over the bar to 57 by 700 feet, a distance of about 7.4 miles, deepen and widen Mobile Bay Channel from mouth of bay to south of Mobile River, 55 by 550 feet, a distance of about 27.0 miles, deepen and widen an additional 4.2 miles of Mobile Bay Channel to 55 by 650 feet, provide 55 foot deep anchorage area and turning basin in vicinity of Little Sand Island, and construct a 1710 acre disposal area adjacent to the Brookley Industrial Complex. Modification of FY 1985 Supplemental Appropriations Act. Dredged material from project shall be disposed of in open water in the Gulf of Mexico in accordance with all provisions of Federal law. PANAMA CITY BEACHES, FL Shoreline protection to provide a 110-foot wide beach with an artificial dune system and stabilization of vegetation. PANAMA CITY HARBOR, FL (See Section 18 of Text) Channels 27 and 29 feet deep. Abandonment of project adopted by act of June 25, 1910. Maintenance of a channel in Watson Bayou 100 feet wide and 10 feet deep from that depth in St. Andrew bay to the highway bridge. Channels 32 and 34 feet deep. A channel 8 by 100 feet in Grand Lagoon from St. Andrew Bay to a point about 2,400 feet east of State Highway 392. Bridge with branches to serve shore facilities which terminate at the bridge. Channels 38, 40, 42 feet deep. PASCAGOULA HARBOR, MS (See Section 19 of Text) Provides for through channel from the Gulf to mile 4 on Dog River 25 by 300 feet through Horn Island Pass, thence 22 by 225 feet across Mississippi Sound and up 150 feet in Pascagoula River above bridge, and up Dog River to mile 4, all subject to financial participation by local interests. Waived requirement for financial participation by local interests. Cutoff channel, 12 by 125 feet, from State Highway 63 bridge to mile 4 on Dog River, via Robertson and Bounds Lakes. Modification to provide for channel dimensions of 35 by 325 feet through Horn Island Pass, thence 30 by 275 feet across Mississippi Sound and up Pascagoula River to the railroad bridge, and a turning basin just below the bridge. Reimbursement of local interests for work done on Dog River cutoff ($44,000). H. Doc. 74, 83d Cong., 2d Sess. (Under provision of Section 201 of the 1965 Flood Control) The Supplemental Appropriations Act. Water Resources Development Act of 1986 (P.L. 99-662) Water Resources Development Act of 1986 (P.L. 99-662) H. Doc. 33, 73d Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 555, 76th Cong., 3d Sess. H. Doc. 559, 80th Cong., 2d Sess. DPR (Sec. 107) H. Doc. 196, 92d Cong., 2d Sess. H. Doc. 682, 62d Cong., River and Harbor Committee Doc. 12, 63d Cong., 2d Sess. H. Doc. 188, 81st Cong., Ist Sess. H. Doc. 98, 96th Cong., 10-38 TABLE 10-B (Continued) Acts Jul. 14, 1960 Jul. 14, 1967 Oct. 23, 1962 Jul. 11. 1983' Nov. 17, 1986 Jun. 13, 1902 Aug. 30, 1935 Aug. 26, 1937 Aug. 27, 1962 Oct. 27, 1965 Jul. 24, 1946 MOBILE, ALABAMA, DISTRICT AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Work Authorized Modification to provide for maintenance of 12- by 125-foot channel to mile 6 on Dog River, and maintenance of 30-by 225-foot side channel from main ship channel in Mississippi Sound to the mouth of Bayou Casotte, thence 30 by 300 feet in Bayou Casotte to a turning basin of the same depth I mile above the mouth. Deepening the Horn Island Pass channel to 38 feet and deepening the main ship channel in Mississippi Sound, the river channel to the railroad bridge, and the turning basin all to 33 feet. Enlarging Horn Island Pass Channel to 40 by 350 feet provision of an impounding area adjacent to and east of channel 40 feet deep, 200 feet wide, and about 1,500 feet long, enlarging main channel in Mississippi Sound and river channel to railroad bridge to 38 by 350 feet, and deepening turning basin in river and Bayou Casotte channels and basin to 38 feet. Modification to provide for channel dimensions 12 by 80 feet extending abut 2,750 feet from deep waters in the Pascagoula River into Krebs Lake to a turning basin, thence, along the south bank of the lake a channel with dimensions of 10 x 60 feet terminating at a second turning basin, a distance of about 2,750 feet. The project was constructed by hydraulic dredging with the disposal placed in an upland diked area. Deepen and widen gulf entrance channel to 44 by 550 feet; widen Horn Island channel to 600 feet, relocating that channel about 500 feet westwardly; deepen Mississippi Sound portion to 42 feet: widen and deepen Bayou Casotte to 42 by 350 feet and construct turning basin. Disposal of all new work material in Gulf of Mexico. PENSACOLA HARBOR, FL (See Section 20 of Text) A channel 30 feet deep at mean low water and 500 feet wide from the Gulf of Mexico to the dock line at the east end of the city of Pensacola, and also provided that $150,000 may be used in constructing or purchasing a seagoing suction dredge. Modified the existing project for the present inner channels and the deepening of the entrance channel to 32 feet. Improvements of Bayou Chico. Maintenance of the entrance channel from the Gulf of Mexico to lower Pensacola Bay, a distance of about 5 miles to dimensions of 35 feet feet deep and 500 feet wide; maintenance of a channel along thesouth side of the aircraft carrier mooring basin, a distance of about 2.5 miles, to dimensions of 33 feet deep and 300 feet wide; a bay channel 33 feet deep, 300 feet wide, and about 2.1 miles long; parallel approach channels to opposite ends of the inner-harbor channel, about 1.3 and 1.4 miles in length, each 33 feet deep, 300 feet wide, and flared at the junctions with the inner-harbor channel; and deepening the existing 500-foot wide inner-harbor channel to a depth of 33 feet and lengthening it to 3,950 feet. PERDIDO PASS CHANNEL, AL (See Section 21 of Text) A 12- by 150-foot channel stabilized by twin rubblemount jetties, from the Gulf of Mexico into Perdido Pass, thence 9 by 100 feet into Perdido Bay with a spur channel of the same dimensions into Terry Cove. TENNESSEE-TOMBIGBEE WATERWAY, AL AND MS (See Section 22 of Text) A waterway connecting Tennessee and Tombigbee Rivers via East Fork of Tombigbee River, Mackeys and Yellow Creeks. Plan of improvement consists of three sections: river section, 9- by 300-foot channel for 149 miles between Demopolis and Amory, Ms; canal section, 12 by 300 feet for C 10-39 rmmmmwwmmmlmmmmw Documents H. Doc. 98. 86th Cong.. Ist Sess. Chief of Engineers Report dated Nov. 3, 1960. H. Doc. 560. 87th Cong.. 2d Sess. DPR (Sec. 107) Water Resources Develop ment Act of 1986 (P.L. 99-662) H. Doc. 253, 72d Cong., 1st Sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 96, 74th Cong., 2d Sess. H. Doc. 528, 87th Cong., 2d Sess. H. Doc. 94, 88th Cong., 2d Sess. H. Doc. 486, 79th Cong., 2d Sess. REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 2000 TABLE 10-B (Continued) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Work Authorized Documents Nov. 17, 1986 Sep. 5, 1997 Sep. 9. 1998 Sep. 11. 1995 Jan. 15, 1998 Sep. 15, 1999 Jun. 13, 2000 Sep. 24, 1999 Oct. 23, 1962 Nov. 17, 1986 Aug. 18, 1941 46 miles from Amory to Bay Springs; divide section, 12 by 300 feet (except in the 27 mile-long divide cut in which bottom width be 280 feet) for 39 miles from Bay Springs through dividing ridge to Tennessee. Total lift of 341 feet to be accomplished by 10 locks. Total length of project is 234 miles. TENNESSEE-TOMBIGBEE WILDLIFE MITIGATION (See Section 22A of Text) Acquire from willing sellers in a timely manner at fair market value 88,000 acres of land for mitigation of wildlife losses resulting from construction and operation of the project for the Tenpessee-Tombigbee Waterway. BLACK WARRIOR RIVER NORTHPORT LEVEE, AL (See Section 31 of Text) Provide flood protection for the city of Northport, Alabama from over bank flows from the Black Warrior River. CEDAR POINT SEAWALL, BAY ST. LOUIS, MS (See Section 32 of Text) Construction of a 1,500 foot concrete/sheetpile wall in front of existing concrete seawall. CHOCTAWHATCHEE/PEA RIVERS, AL (See Section 33 of Text) Install fourteen (14) combination rain and stream gages within Choctawhatchee and Pea River Basins. CHOCTAWHATCHEE AND PEA RIVERS ELBA AND GENEVA LEVEES, AL (See Section 33A of Text) Replacing or repairing culverts flap gates, installing sluice gates on inside of levee and clearing underbrush. GULF OF MEXICO, HWY 193, MOBILE CO., AL (See Section 34 of Text) Provide a 5,875 vinyl sheetpile/riprap seawall along Highway 193 to prevent erosion and destruction of highway due to wave action from Gulf of Mexico. GULF SEAWALL, WAVELAND, MS (See Section 35 of Text) Provide a 3,000 foot long sheetsteel concrete bulkhead to protect South Beach Boulevard from erosion, due to wind driven wave action from Mississippi Sound. TEXAS FLAT ROAD, KILN, MS (See Section 36 of Text) Construct a 150-foot revetment, consisting of vinyl sheetpile and riprap, along southeastern slope of the Jourdan River to protect roadway and atrium. OKATIBBEE LAKE, MS (See Section 37 of Text) Provides for a dam and reservoir for flood control, water supply, water quality control, and recreation. THREEMILE CREEK, MOBILE, AL (See Section 38 of Text) Channel widening and deepening from about 2,000 feet downstream of Stone Street to a point about 6,300 feet upstream of Interstate 65 or a total distance of 5.6 miles. Development of recreational facilities. TOMBIGBEE RIVER (EAST FORK), MS AND AL (See Section 39 of Text) Provides for alleviation of floods from the Tombigbee River by clearing, snagging, and excavation of 13 cut-off channels, and other related channel improvements. 10-40 Water Resource Development Act of 1986 (P.L. 99-662) DPR (Sec. 205) DPR (Sec. 14) DPR (Sec. 205) DPR (Sec. 205) DPR (Sec. 14) DPR (Sec. 14) DPR (Sec. 14) H. Doc. 549, 87th Cong., 2d Sess. Water Resources Development Act of 1986 (P.L. 99-662) Special Report on Record in Oct. (P.L. 222) 77th Cong., 1st Sess. MOBILE, ALABAMA, DISTRICT TABLE 10-B (Continued) Acts AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Work Authorized Jul. 23, 1958 Jul. 8, 1980 Oct. 13, 19882 Nov. 17, 1986 Nov. 28, 1990 Mar. 2, 1945 Jun. 28, 1954 May 25, 1982 Nov. 17, 1986 Aug. 18, 1941 Dec. 22, 1944 Mar. 2, 1945 Jul. 24, 1946 Dec. 22, 1944 Jan. 27, 19811' TOMBIGBEE RIVER TRIBUTARIES, MS AND AL (See Section 40 of Text) Provides for improvement of 22 tributaries of Tombigbee River. Extends project limits on Twenty Mile Creek and eliminates local cooperation for this remedial work. UPPER GORDON CREEK, HATTIESBURG, MS (See Section 41 of Text) Real Estate acquisition of nine (9) residences: habitat mitigation. and channel enlargement. VILLAGE CREEK, JEFFERSON COUNTY, BIRMINGHAM, AL (See Section 42 of Text) Basically nonstructural and includes evacuating 642 structures in six separate neighborhoods from floodplain; enlarge 2 miles of channel and relocate necessary facilities; Install flood warning devices. Authorized the Secretary to acquire private vacant lands within the definite project boundaries established in the Real Estate Design Memorandum as a nonstructural element of the project. MULTIPLE PURPOSE PROJECTS INCLUDING POWER ALABAMA-COOSA RIVERS, AL AND GA (See Section I of Text) Provides for full development of Alabama-Coosa Rivers and tributaries for navigation, flood control, power, recreation, and other purposes. Authorized construction of Carters Lake, GA, Claiborne Lock and Dam, AL, Jones Bluff Lock and Dam, AL, and Millers Ferry Lock and Dam, AL. Suspended comprehensive plan to permit non-Federal interests to develop Coosa River by constructing series of dams. Designated change of name from Jones Bluff to Robert F. Henry Lock and Dam. Modification to the plan for the Coosa River segment of the waterway between Montgomery and Gadsden, AL to carry out planning, engineering, and design in accordance with the Montgomery to Gadsden, Coosa River Channel, AL Design Memorandum No. 1, General Design, dated May 1982. ALLATOONA LAKE, COOSA RIVER BASIN, GA (See Section 46 of Text) Provides for dam and reservoir for flood control, regulation of stream flow for navigation, development of hydroelectric power and recreation. APALACHICOLA, CHATTAHOOCHEE AND FLINT RIVERS, AL, GA AND FL (See Section 3 of Text) Development ofApalachicola, Chattahoochee, and Flint Rivers for navigation, flood control, hydropower, and recreation. Modified general plan for full development of Apalachicola, Chattahoochee, and Flint River System and authorized construction of Lake Sidney Lanier multipurpose reservoir. Authorized recreation facilities. Modified the existing project to provide for 9- foot deep by 100-foot wide side channel into the Apalachicola River Industrial Park, Blountstown, Fl. 10-41 Documents H. Doc. 167. 84th Cong., ist Sess. Supplemental Appropriations and Recession Act DPR (Sec. 205) 1980 (P.L. 96-304) Water Resources Development Act of 1986 (P.L. 99-662) Water Resources Development Act of 1990 (P.L. 101-640) H. Doc. 414, 77th Cong., Ist Sess. Public Law 436, 83rd Cong. S.2034 97th Cong., 2d Sess. Water Resources Develoment Act of 1986 (P.L. 99-662) Public Law 228, 77th Cong., Ist Sess. H. Doc. 674, 76 Cong., 3d Sess. H. Doc. 342, 76th Cong., Ist Sess. H. Doc. 300, 80th Cong., ist Sess. DPR (Sec. 107) REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 2000 TABLE 10-B (Continued) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Work Authorized Documents Nov. 17. 1986 Jul. 24, 1944 Jul. 24, 1946 Dec. 22. 1944 Dec. 22, 1944 May 19. 1953 Oct. 23, 1963 APALACHICOLA, CHATTAHOOCHEE, AND FLINT Modified Rivers and Harbors Act of 1945 to restore and maintain access to bendways and interconnecting waterways in the course of routinue maintenance dredging, and to acquire lands for and to construct, operate. and maintain water-related public use and access facilities. LAKE SIDNEY LANIER, GA (See Section 47 of Text) Provision of recreation facilities. GEORGE W. ANDREWS LOCK AND DAM, AL AND GA (See Section 3A of Text) Construction of high dam at Walter F. George site and low dam at George W. Andrews site. Provided recreation facilities. JIM WOODRUFF LOCK AND DAM, GA AND FL (See Section 49 of Text) Provided for recreation facilities. WALTER F. GEORGE LOCK AND DAM, AL AND GA (See Section 52 of Text) Authorized construction of high dam at Walter F. George site and low dam at Columbia site. WEST POINT LAKE, CHATTAHOOCHEE RIVER BASIN, GA AND AL (See Section 53 of Text) Authorized construction for flood control, power, recreation, fish and wildlife development, and streamflow regulation for downstream navigation. I. Authorized by Chiefof Engineers under Section 107 of 1960 River and Harbor Act, as amended. 2. Authorized by Chief of Engineers under Section 205 of Flood Control Act of 1948, as amended. 3. Authorized by Chief of Engineers under Section 208 of Flood Control Act of 1954, as amended. 4. Authorized by Chief of Engineers under Section 14 of Flood Control Act of 1946, as amended. 10-42 Water Resources Development Act of 1986 (P.L. 99-662) H. Doc. 300, 80th Cong., 1st sess. H. Comm. on Public Works H. Doc. 570, 87th Cong., 2d Sess. - -- moo MOBILE, ALABAMA, DISTRICT TABLE 10-C OTHER AUTHORIZED NAVIGATION PROJECTS For Last Cost to September 30, 2000 Full Report See Annual Operation Report For Construction Maintenance Blackwater River, FL 1981 $41,650 $330,433 Bluff Creek. MS' 1963 1,000 6,883 Cadet Bayou, MS 1984 87,921 1,461,915 Cahaba River, AL2 1894 45,000 Choctawhatchee River, FL and AL , 1973 171,885 291,694 Escambia-Conecuh Rivers, AL and FL 1981 208,499 1,585,376 Holmes Creek, FL 1931 8,562 36,800 LaGrange Bayou, FL 1972 289,496 209,089 Leaf and Chickasawhay River, MS2 1919 23,090 42,676 Noxubee River, MS' 1902 47,528 14,472 Ochlockonee (Ochlockney) River, GA and FL' 2 1900 5,000 - Old Town Creek' 2 1887 3,000 Oostanaula and Coosawattee River, GA' 2 1907 32,656 Panacea Harbor, FL 1979 122,383 106,446 Pascagoula River, MS 1956 15,000 179,535 Pass Christian Harbor, MS 1976 59,313 823,385 Port St. Joe Harbor, FL 1984 1,960,862 2,983,463 Removing Water Hyacinths 1984 - 1,100.471 St. Marks River, FL 1965 1,710,809 87,379 Tallapoosa River, AL2 1893 43,972 Tombigbee River at Columbus Port. MS 1988 500,500 Upper Chipola River, FL from Marianna to its' mouth' 2 1941 36,781 63,193 Wolf and Jordan Rivers, MS 1979 29,195 481,515 1. Abandonment recommended in H. Doc. 467, 69th Cong. 2. Uncompleted portion of project deauthorized by H. Doc. 96-157, Ist Session. TABLE 10-D OTHER AUTHORIZED BEACH EROSION CONTROL PROJECT For Last Cost to September 30, 2000 Full Report See Annual Operation Report For Construction Maintenance Harrison County, MS, shore protection' 1953 $1,133,000 Panama City Beaches, FL Underway 7,867,082 1. Completed. 2. Operation and maintenance is the responsibility of local interests. 10-43 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 2000 OTHER AUTHORIZED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS Alabama River a Montgomery. AL' Anruchee Creek. GA Bayvew Court. Bay St Louis. MS Beaver Creek. Monteuma. GA Big Brown Creek. PrmntisCso . MS Bioxi River at Lorraine Road Hamrison County, MS Black Creek. GadsdaeAn L Black Warior River. U S Hwy 11 Bridge. FostersA, L Boggy Bayou. Vlpapraso. FL Boligee Canal Boligee, AL Burkett Creek.Am ory. MS Chattahoochee River. Eufaula AL Chickasaw Bogue Creek. U S Highway 43 Bridge, Linden. AL Clanton. AL Coinvike. AL County Line Road Bridge, Itawamba Co. MS County Road SS. Etowah Co, AL Cribb Mill Creek. Tuscalooa, AL Dauphin island Shorelie, AL East End Duphin Island. AL Eslava Creek. Mobile, AL Fort ToulouseW, e urpka. AL GadudenW ater Treamune Plant, AL Goodfood Creek. Chickasaw Co. MS Gordons Cretk. Hastiesburg. MS Gulf Breeze, Sanv Ross Co. FL HancockC ounty Seawall Hancock Co. MS Highway 39 BridgeG. aesville AL Hintonville Road Bridge. Perry Co. MS Houlka Creek. Chickasaw & Clay Counties MS Houston School Rd. Bridge, Itawamba Co. MS HurricaneC reek. Prentiss Co. MS Interstate 59 Bridges FostersA. L Kings Creek, Tupelo, MS Lake DouglasD. ecatur County. GA Leaf and Bowie Rivers. Hatiesburg MS Leaf River. Couy Road Bridge, Mahned. MS LinkleC ove Creek. Glencoe. AL Magby Creek. Columbus. MS Martin Creek. Prentiss County, MS Mill Creek. Delton GA Mill Creek. Sumrall. MS Mound StateP arkM. oundville, AL Murder and Burnt Corn Creeks Brewton, AL Murder Creek. Brewton, AL Murder Creek. EastB rewton. AL Noubee River Reef Bridge ShuqualakM. S Old Hwy 82 Bridge. Cokmnbus, MS Osborne Creek. Highway 362 BridgeP, rentissC ounty, MS Portersvile Bay East. Mobile Co, AL Prattvile. Auau Creek. AL Proctor Creek. Atlanta. GA Pumpkinvee Creek. Emerson, GA Raccoon Creek. Baconton. GA Rome. Coosa River. GA Sait Lous Bay. Bay St. Louis, MS Sewetine Proection. Valley. AL Siver Creek. Rome, GA Sope Creek Marietta. GA SowasleeC reek. Menridian MS Sun Creek. Okibeha County, MS Tallabinela Creek, Chickasaw County, MS Tallahala Creek. Pascagoula River, MS Tallahalla Creek. Laurel, MS Tombigbee River Bridge 06. Monroe Co.. MS Town Creek. Amarcus. GA Trim Cane Creek. Okbbeha County. MS Trussville, AL Twenty Mile Creek, Airport Rod Bridge. Frnkstown, MS West Poinst Chaahoochee River, GA Whortons Bend Road, Etowah Co , AL WolfCreek. Highway 362 Bridge, Prentiss County, MS Wof Creek. U S Highway 45 BnridgeP, renmiCsosu nty, MS �~_~_~ ~~~,~- ~~_ 1 t . . .= 1l, ,G- , -- I. Engineernng, design, supervision, and administration (no constructton work has been done. Includes $17,000 for pre.authonzation studies.) 2. Operation and maintenance is the responsibility of local interests. 10-44 TABLE 10-E Now- For Last Full Report See Aanual Report For 1965 1966 1998 1958 1987 1985 1953 1986 1994 1987 1984 1988 1985 1964 1940 1992 1996 1994 1996 1996 1997 1994 1996 1988 1985 1991 1998 1990 1991 1982 1988 1992 1987 1998 1970 1990 1986 1991 1991 1988 1992 1994 1994 1980 1994 1986 1988 1987 1985 1996 1946 1994 1985 1994 1955 1998 1989 1992 1990 1998 1984 1988 1988 1996 1996 1965 1984 1965 1986 1955 1991 1985 1986 1966 Constructioi $144,194 II5.547 247,400 149.815 137.500 132,174 125,389 181,500 147,200 178,600 1,366.454 206,600 121,718 274,024 71.119 116,800 242,348 1,848,327 352,479 318,580 4,732,721 368.000 360,000 91,500 802,026 147,432 307,000 71,000 268,691 238,219 59,300 52,803 155,200 499,930 164,998 1,585,000 231.618 144,047 156,508 78.500 474.065 157.340 789.000 190,974 1.215,000 903.474 119.500 143,936 250,000 490,750 649,280 870,000 835029 385.300 384,550 237,400 180,937 604.719 1.538.555 1,218,036 55.569 81.000 3,945.757 641,058 331.323 340,409 145,519 141.334 21 5.860 599,637 448,956 114.753 154,641 110 714 Ceot to September 30, 2000 Operation n Mainteeaoce' Ad- ~m.-c A .1 - - i 1 3-Womo VYln . l w licks r aH a!I Vl le_ UA TABLE 10-G Project Bayou Galere, MS' Buttahatchee Creek, MS: (Auth. P.L. 96-304) Coosa River Channel, Gadsden, AL to Rome, GA (Auth. 1945 Act) GIWW; Apalachicola Bay to St. Marks River, FL Lazer Creek Lake, GA Little Browns Creek, AL: (Auth. P.L. 96-304) Lower Auchumpkee Creek, GA Noxubece River, MS2 (Auth. P.L. 96-304) Pensacola Harbor Modification, FL Sipsey River, Al) (Auth. P.L. 96-304) Tombigbee River, AL & MS2 (Auth. 1941 Act) Westfork, MS2 (Auth. P.L. 96-304) MOBILE, ALABAMA, DISTRICT DEAUTHORIZED PROJECTS ... .. scar of Last Type Navigation Flood Control Navigation Navigation Hydroelectric power Flood Control Hydroelectric power Flood Control Navigation Flood Control Flood Control Flood Control vmwlmmwm I. H. Doc. 96-157 deauthorized uncompleted portions of certain projects as shown in Table 10-C. 2. Deauthorized tributaries of Tombigbee River improvements. TABLE 10-H NAVIGATION WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION Fiscal year Study Authority 2000 Costs Bayou Casotte 107 19,737 Old Pass Lagoon, Dcstin, FL 107 31,591 Section 107 Coordination Account 107 3,391 Biloxi Channel, MS 107 2,363 Total 57,082 10-45 Date ___ Year of Last Full Report 1946 1989 1955 1986 1986 1989 1986 1989 1986 1989 n/a 1989 Deauthorization Document H. Doc. 192. 94th Cong., 1st Sess., as amended. Public Law 99-662 99th Congress Public Law 99-662 99th Congress Public Law 99-662, 99th Congress Public Law 99-662, 99th Congress Public Law 99-662 99th Congress Public Law 99-662, 99th Congress Public Law 99-662 99th Congress Public Law 99-662 99th Congress Public Law 99-662 99th Congress Public Law 99-662 99th Congress Public Law 99-662 99th Congress Date Deauthorized Aug. 5, 1977 Jul. 9, 1995 Aug. 18, 1996 Nov. 17, 1986 Nov. 17, 1986 Jul. 9, 1995 Nov. 17, 1986 Jan. 1, 1990 Nov. 17, 1986 Jan. 1, 1990 Jan. 1, 1990 Jan. 1, 1990 .. REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 2000 TABLE 10-J FLOOD CONTROL WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION Study Autauga Creek, Prattville, AL Big Willis Creek, Ft. Payne, AL Bray Creek. Houston. MS Coosa River, Etowah Co., AL Dry Creek, Prattville, AL Elba Levee Major Rehab. AL Flint River, Albany, GA Greens Creek, Petal, MS Kinchafoone Creek, GA Laurel, MS Magbee Creek, Columbus, MS Matubbee Creek, Okalona, MS Minnesota Bend, Coosa River, AL Mixons Creek, Lamar County, MS Moores Creek, Columbus, MS Section 205 Coordination Account Shades Creek Bridge, Homewood, AL Section 14 Coordination Account Total Authority 205 205 205 205 205 205 205 205 205 205 205 205 205 205 205 205 14 14 Fiscal year 2000 Costs 30,685 4,270 76,496 3.270 32,015 221,320 36,078 14,012 4,562 2,749 11,402 3,682 3,376 80,181 34,407 12,594 607 9,272 $580,978 10-46 - -- WWWNWP - - -- mono MOBILE, ALABAMA, DISTRICT TABLE 10-K Proiect RECONNAISSANCE AND CONDITION SURVEYS Cost During Fiscal Year Shoals -Airborne Lidar Bathymetry Channel Condition Surveys on Florida projects Channel Condition Surveys on Alabama & Mississippi projects Project Condition Surveys. General Total TABLE 10-L ALABAMA-COOSA RIVERS, AL AND GA DEVELOPMENT PROPOSED UNDER EXISTING PROJECT (See Section 1 of Text) Proposed Structures Claiborne Lock and Dam Millers Ferry Lock and Dam Robert F. Henry Lock and Dam Miles above mouth of river Nearest town Distance (miles) Greatest lock length available for full width (feet) Width of lock chamber (feet) Maximum lift (feet) Elevation of normal pool surface (mean sea level) Depth over sills at low water (feet) Character of foundation Kind of spillway Height of dam (feet) Type of construction Total reservoir capacity (acre-feet) Power development (kw) Percent complete Cost to date:' 72.5' Claiborne, AL. 7 600 84 30 35 133.0' Camden, AL 10 600 84 48 80 13 Rock Gated and Fixed Crest 95.5 Concrete 96,360 100 $27,997,450 Upper 15 Lower 13 Rock Gated 99.5 Concrete 331,800 75,000 100 $63,125,300 245.4' Benton. AL 3 600 84 47 125 Upper 15 Lower 12 Rock Gated 94 Concrete 234,200 68,000 100 $83,360,800 26.82 Carters, GA 2 1072 Rock Gated 451 Rock-fill Earth Core 472,800 500,000 100 $111,140,340 47.84 Cartersville, GA 4 840 Rock Gated 190 Concrete 670,050 74,000 100 $35,709,085 I. Above mouth of Alabama River (river miles). 2. Above mouth of Coosawattee River (river miles). 3. Reregulation dam (Carters) 25.3 (river miles). 4. Above mouth of Etowah River (river miles). 5. Includes cost of added recreation facilities as shown in Table 10A. 10-47 $2,565,000 118,588 145,564 26,957 $2,856,109 Carters Lake Dam Allatoona Dam t - - -. U-.- - ----- - .. __ -- .. -- -- rr - ~--- - QMW REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 2000 TABLE 10-M APALACHICOLA, CHATTAHOOCHEE, AND FLINT RIVERS, AL, GA, AND FL, LOCKS AND DAMS AND MULTIPLE-PURPOSE DEVELOPMENT INCLUDED IN EXISTING PROJECT (See Section 3 of Text) Existing Projects Jim George W. Walter F. Buford Dam Woodruff Andrews George Lake Lock Lock Lock West Point Sidney and Dam and Dam and Dam Lake Lanier Miles above mouth Nearest town Distance (miles) Greatest lock length and available for full width (feet) Width of chamber (feet) Maximum lift (feet) Elevation of normal pool surface (msl) Depth over sills at low water (feet) Character of foundation Kind of spillway Height of dam (feet) Type of construction Total reservoir capacity (acre-feet) Power-development (kilowatts) Percent complete 100 Year opened to navigation Cost to date:3 107.6' Chattahoochee, FL I 4 450 82 33 77 14 Limestone Fixed-gated 67 Concrete and Earth 367,300 30,000 100 1954 $56,097,984' 46.52 Columbia, AL 450 82 25 102 13 Limestone Fixed-gated 72 Concrete 18,180 100 1962 $13,038,427 75.02 Ft. Gaines. GA 2 450 82 88 190(Summer) 185(Winter) 13 Limestone Gated 114 Concrete and Earth 934.400 130.000 100 1963 $101,370,1454 201.42 West Point, GA 2.8 635(Summer) 625(Winter) Rock Gated 95 Concrete and Earth 604,500 73,375 100 $131,565,760 1. Above mouth of Apalachicola River (river miles). 2. Above mouth of Chattahoochee River (river miles). 3. Includes cost of added recreational facilities as shown in Table 10-A. 4. Includes $333,198 cost of land for wildlife refuge and $ 10,932,884 for major rehabilitation. 5. Includes $2,480,143 for major rehabilitation. 10-48 348.32 Buford, GA 5 1071(Summer) 1070(Winter) Rock Fixed 192 Earth 2,554,000 86,000 100 $53,777,828 MOBILE, ALABAMA, DISTRICT TABLE 10-N BLACK WARRIOR AND TOMBIGBEE RIVERS, AL (See Section 8 of Text) Coffeeville Lock and Dam Demopolis Lock and Dam Armistead Selden Lock and Dam William Bacon Oliver Lock & Dam (Replacement) Miles above Mobile2 Nearest town (Alabama) Distance (miles) Lock: Grestest length available for full width (feet) Width of chamber (feet) Maximum lift (feet) Depth over sills at low water (feet) Character of foundation Kind of spillway Type of construction Lock Dam Year completed Year opened to navigation Actual cost of lock and dam' 116.7 Coffeeville 3 (within city) 600 110 34 13.0 Rock 213.2 Demopolis 6 600 110 40 13.0 Rock Fixed-Gated Fixed Concrete Concrete 1965 1960 $21,597,264 Concrete Concrete 1962 1954 $19,774,583 261.1 Eutaw 15 600 110 22 13.2 Sand. clay Gated Concrete Earth-Concrete 1962 1957 $13.295,553 I. Single lift lock. 2. Navigation mileage from foot of Government Street, Mobile, Ala. 3. Excludes cost of adding recreation facilities. 4. Scheduled. 10-49 Holt Lock and Dam John Hollis Bankhead Lock and Dam' 337.7 Tuscaloosa (within city) 600 110 28 18.0 Hard shale Fixed Concrete Concrete 1934 1991 $123,822,919 347.0 Tuscaloosa 6 600 110 64 13.0 Shale, sandstone Gated Concrete Concrete 1969 1966 $28,100,000 365.5 Tuscaloosa 30 600 110 68 14.0 Sandstone Gated Concrete Concrete 1985 1975 $52,292,880 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 2000 TABLE 10-0 TENNESSEE-TOMBIGBEE WATERWAY, ALABAMA AND MISSISSIPPI (See Section 21 of Text) Existing Projects Gainesville Aliceville Columbus Aberdeen Lock A Lock B , Lock C Lock D Lock E B Lock Lock Lock Lock and and and and and L and Dam and Dam and Dam and Dam Spillway Spillway Spillway Spillway Spillway a Miles above mouth' 266 307 335 358 371 376 39 398 407 41 Nearest town Gainesville, AL Aliceville, AL Columbus, MS Aberdeen, MS Amory, MS Smithville, MS Fulton, MS Fulton, MS Belmont, MS Greatest lock length 600 600 600 600 600 600 600 600 600 6( available for full width (feet) Width of Chamber (feet) 110 I10 110 I10 110 110 I10 110 110 II Maximum lift (feet) 36 27 27 27 30 25 25 30 30 84 Elevation of normal 109 136 163 190 220 245 270 300 330 (S pool surface (msl) (V Depth over sills at 15 15 15 15 15 18 18 18 18 18 low water (feet) Character of foundation Mooreville Eutaw Form. Eutaw Form. Eutaw Form. Eutaw Form. Eutaw Form. Gordo Form. Eutaw Form. Gordo Form. Sa / Chalk Sand & Clay Sand & Clay Sand Lam. Sand Sand & Clay Clay Sand Clay an Kind of spillway Fixed & Fixed & Gated GGaatteedd Gated Gated Gated Gated N/ Gated Gated Height of dam (feet) 56 57 57 57 46 48 53 52 44.5 10 Type of construction Concrete Concrete Concrete Concrete Concrete Concrete Concrete Concrete Concrete C & Earth & Earth & Earth & Earth & Earth & Earth & Earth & Earth & Total reservoir capacity 45,290 655 59,483 31,564 4,400 19,000 13,300 24,900 6,900 (S (acre-feet) ( Percent complete 100 110000 100 100 100 100 100 100 10 Year opened to 1978 1979 1981 1984 1985 1985 1985 1985 1985 19 navigation Estimated Cost $103,214,000 151,255,000 182,650,000 128,262,000 102,685,000 96,905,000 71,375,000 98,205,000 88,173,000 14 Cost to Date $100,010,600 143,190,800 174,620,500 112,620,200 92,190,500 93,106,700 62,197,000 89,610,800 76.917.700 13 1. Miles above Mobile, Alabama (Mile 0.00 is at Bankhead Tunnel on U.S. Highway 90). ay Springs ock rd Dam 12 upelo, MS 0 0 ummer) 414 inter) 409 indstone d Shale A )3 )ncrete Earth umnmer)180,000 (inter) 143,000 0 85 7,000,000 0,398,000 10-50 MOBILE, ALABAMA, DISTRICT TABLE 10-P COMPLETED FLOOD INSURANCE STUDIES AND FLOOD HAZARD INFORMATION REPORTS FOR FY 1990 THRU FY 2000' Date Federal Requesting Agency Completed Cost Flood Insurance Studies Jefferson County, AL Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) Sep 91 397,000 Calhoun County, AL Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) Apr 91 200,000 Fayette County, GA Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) Jan 93 264,000 Tupelo, MS Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) Jun 94 157,965 Mobile, AL Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) Nov 94 254,531 Tuscaloosa, AL Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) Jan 97 182,000 Dougherty Co., GA Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) Feb 97 244,000 Meridian, MS Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) Jan 96 119,000 Special Flood Hazard Information Turkey Creek, AL Jefferson County AL Sep 91 7,000 Leaf River, MS Taylorsville, MS Sep 91 25,000 Oostanaula River, GA City of Rome, GA Jan 92 10,000 Coosa River, GA City of Rome, GA Jul 92 10,000 Big Wills Creek, AL Fort Payne, AL Aug 93 41,800 Dry Creek, AL Oneonta, AL Dec 93 25,000 Big Wills Creek, AL Valley Head, AL Nov 93 34,800 Coosa River, AL Wilsonville, AL May 95 35,000 Choctawhatchee River, FL Holmes County, FL Aug 95 3,000 Thompson Creek, MS Richton, MS Aug 96 44,000 Black Creek, MS Forrest Co., MS Aug 97 35,000 Leaf River, MS McLain, MS Sep 97 19,000 Tanyard Creek, AL Jasper, AL Oct 96 32,000 Cane Creek & Tribs, AL Oakman, AL May 97 45,000 Magby Creek, MS Lowndes Co., MS Apr 96 5,700 Coosa River Wetumpka, AL Sep 98 24,000 Chickasawhay Shabuta, MS Sep 98 62,000 Walnut Creek Chilton Co., AL Nov 98 4,000 Big Dry Creek Floyd Co., GA May 99 62,000 Noxabee River Macon, MS Sep 99 67,000 Spring Creek Lafayette, GA Aug 99 7,000 Galbrith Mill Creek Montgomery, AL Sep 99 14,000 Okeelala Creek Baldwyn, MS Oct 99 53,000 Coosa River Riverside, AL Oct 99 5,000 Black Warrior River City of Northport June 00 50,000 I. For list of reports completed by Mobile District for FY 1965 thru FY 1974, see FY 1974 Annual Report, page 10-50; reports completed in FY 1975 see FY 1975 Annual Report, page 10-44; and for reports completed in FY 1976 and FY 1977, see FY 1977 Annual Report, page 10-46. See page 10-48 FY 1978 Annual Report for FY 1978 reports, and see page 10-43 FY 1984 Annual Report for FY 1978 through FY 1984 reports. 10-51 NEW ORLEANS, LA, DISTRICT* District comprises a portion of Louisiana, embraced in drainage basins tributary to Mississippi River and Gulf of Mexico, except Mississippi River above mile 325.5 above Head of Passes (AHP), drainage area of Ouachita- Black River Basin, and small eastern and western portions of Louisiana tributary to Pearl River and Sabine River and Lake. The New Orleans District territory encompasses 30,000 square miles. It includes sections of the Gulf Intracoastal Waterway from Lake Borgne Light 29 at the mouth of IMPROVEMENTS Navigation Pearl River to Sabine River, and the Passes of the Mississippi River. It exercises jurisdiction over flood control work on Mississippi River from mile 325.5 AHP to Gulf of Mexico; Atchafalaya River; and in Atchafalaya Basin; and maintenance of project navigation channel of Mississippi River below mile 325.5 AHP, under supervision of President, Mississippi River Commission (MRC), and Division Engineer, Mississippi Valley Division. Page 1. Inner Harbor Navigation Canal Lock, LA .............. .................... 11-2 2. Mississippi River-Gulf Outlet, LA ................... 11-2 3. Mississippi River Ship Channel, Gulf to Baton Rouge, LA ..................................... 11-3 4. Port Fourchon, LA.........................................11-3 5. Navigation work under Special authorization .... .......................................... 11-4 Flood Control 6. Amite River and Tribs, LA, East Baton Rouge Watershed ........................... 11-4 7. Comite River, LA (Diversion)..........................11-5 8. Grand Isle and vicinity, LA..............................11-5 9. Lake Pontchartrain and vicinity, LA, (hurricane protection) ....................................... 11-6 10. Lake Pontchartrain, LA, Stormwater Discharge Project ............................................. 11-7 11. Larose to Golden Meadow, LA (hurricane protection) ...................................... 1-7 12. New Orleans to Venice, LA (hurricane protection) ....................................... 11-7 13. Southeast Louisiana Urban Drainage Project .................................... 11-8 14. West Bank and Vicinity, New Orleans, LA, Hurricane Protection ........................................ 11-9 15. Inspection of completed flood control projects ............................................................ 11-9 16. Flood control work under special authorization .................................... ... 11-9 17. Protection of Navigation................................ 11-10 18. Catastrophic Disaster Preparedness Program ..................................... 11-10 19. Coastal Wetlands Planning, Protection, and Restoration Act ....................................... 11-10 20. General Regulatory Program ........................ 11-11 Tables Table 1-A Cost and Financial Statement ............................... 11-13 Table 11-B Authorizing Legislation .......... 11-15 Table 11-C Other Authorized Navigation Projects ................................... 11-20 Table 1-D Other Authorized Flood Control Projects ......................... 11-22 Table 11-E Deauthorized Projects ............. 11-22 Table 11-F Flood Control Work Under Special Authorization................. 11-23 Table 1 1-G Environmental Work Under Special Authorization ................. 11-24 Table 11-H Active General Investigations ............ 11-25 11-1 Page Flood Control (cont.) NEW ORLEANS, LA, DISTRICT 1. INNER HARBOR NAVIGATION CANAL LOCK, LA Location. The project is located within the city of New Orleans, Louisiana. It is a deep and shallow draft canal extending northward from the Mississippi River to Lake Pontchartrain. Existing project. The existing Inner Harbor Navigation Canal Lock, built in 1920 by the Port of New Orleans, has dimensions of 31.5 feet deep, 75 feet wide, and 640 feet long (usable length). It passes barge traffic between the Mississippi River and the Gulf Intracoastal Waterway and is a vital link in the nation's Inland Waterway System. Delays to the navigation traffic average about 11 hours, with 24-36 hour delays common. The average yearly tonnage through the lock is 24 million tons, 2/3 of which is coal, petroleum products, and crude petroleum. Other major commodities include metallic ores, industrial chemicals and non-metallic minerals. Two major vehicular roadway bridges (Claibome and St. Claude Avenues) and one railroad/roadway bridge (Florida Avenue) cross the canal in the vicinity of the existing lock. The Corps of Engineers bought the lock from the Port of New Orleans in 1985. Local cooperation. The cost sharing for the replacement lock is specified in the Water Resources Development Act of 1986. The costs of the new lock were apportioned between general cargo navigation and inland navigation. Costs assigned to inland navigation represent the NED Plan and are shared 50 percent from the Inland Waterway Trust Fund and 50 percent from regular Corps of Engineer's appropriations. Those costs assigned to general cargo navigation, will be cost shared &5% Federal and 25% non-Federal, with the Port of New Orleans being that non-Federal sponsor. The Recommended Plan is 36 feet deep by 110 feet wide by 1200 feet long (usable length) and is estimated to cost $603,000,000. Terminal facilities. Two container ship berths and one other ship wharf are located on the canal in the vicinity of the existing lock. Operations and results during the fiscal year. The final Evaluation Report for the Replacement Lock, including a Community Impact Mitigation Plan, was approved by HQUSACE in Feb. 1998. Detailed engineering and design for the replacement lock was initiated. A contract for a test pile program was awarded in FY 99. Also an initial job training program will be started in FY 00 as part of the Community Impact Mitigation Plan. The Community Impact Mitigation Plan was specifically authorized to be a feature of this project in the Water Resources Development Act of 1996. Condition as of Sep 30. Initiation of construction was authorized in the FY 99 Appropriations Act. Demolition of existing facilities on both banks of the canal between Claiborne Ave. and Florida Ave. and work on a levee segment on the west bank of the canal south of St. Claude Ave. will begin in FY 01. 2. MISSISSIPPI RIVER-GULF OUTLET, LA Location. In State of Louisiana and the territorial waters of the United States and extends from existing Inner Harbor Navigation Canal at a point 7,500 feet north of existing IHNC lock and about 11,000 feet from Mississippi River, to a turning basin south of Michoud, LA, and then as a land and water cut from turning basin south of Michoud, LA, southeasterly to and along south shore of Lake Borgne and through marshes to and through Chandeleur Sound to 38-foot contour in Gulf of Mexico. (Refer to NOAA Coast Charts Nos. 11340, 11360, 11363, 11369, 11371, and 11373. Also see MRC 1989 (57th edition) folio of maps, Mississippi River-Cairo, IL, to Gulf of Mexico, LA.) Existing project. Provides for a seaway canal, 36 by 500 feet, extending 76 miles as a land and water cut from Michoud southeasterly to and along south shore of Lake Borgne, and across Chandeleur Sound to Chandeleur Island and increasing gradually to 38 by 600 feet in Gulf of Mexico, with protective jetties at entrance, a permanent retention dike through Chandeleur Sound, and a wing dike along islands as required. It also provides for an inner tidewater harbor consisting of 1,000- by 2,000-foot turning basin 36 feet deep at landward end of seaway canal, and a connecting channel 36 by 500 feet wide extending easterly along Gulf Intracoastal Waterway from turning basin, including construction of a suitable highway bridge with approaches to carry Louisiana State Highway 47 (formerly 61) over channel. Plan further provides for future construction of a channel and lock in the vicinity of the existing lock to furnish an additional connection between tidewater harbor and Mississippi River. (See "Inner Harbor Navigation Canal Lock, LA" for more details). Reevaluation studies to determine the economic feasibility of continuing to maintain the 36-foot depth in the channel were initiated in FY 99, all at Federal expense. Maintenance dredging costs have increased in the last few days that prompted this study. 11-2 NEW ORLEANS, LA, DISTRICT Local cooperation. Requirements of local cooperation are fully described on page 11-4 of FY 1986 Annual Report. Terminal facilities. A public facility on the water- Way is the Public Bulk Terminal of New Orleans constructed by Board of Commissioners, Port of New Orleans, on left descending bank at Mile 63. Two container ship berths are in operation at the Industrial Canal end of the seaway. Operations and results during fiscal year. Four dredging contracts for removal of 6,150,168 cubic yards of material from the channel at a cost of $9,675,861 were completed in FY 00. One contract to maintain the north bank foreshore dike at a cost of $828,100 and one contract to construct a north bank foreshore dike at a cost of $1,688,750 were completed in FY 00. Engineering and economic studies for the reevaluation report continued in FY 00. Condition as of Sep. 30. Construction was initiated March 1958. The channel unit is 90 percent complete and the shiplock unit is 0 percent complete. The total project is 75 percent complete. The channel Was opened to navigation Jul. 25, 1963, and completed Jan. 20, 1968. Paris Road Bridge was opened to traffic Jul. 21, and completed Nov. 14, 1967. The foreshore protection, south bank, Chalmette Area, Station 367+00 to Station 1007+00 is complete. 3. MISSISSIPPI RIVER SHIP CHANNEL, GULF TO BATON ROUGE, LA Location. The project is located in the southeastern portion of Louisiana below Baton Rouge, and Consists of the Mississippi River and its major outlet to the Gulf of Mexico, Southwest Pass. Existing project. Provides more efficient deepdraft navigation access to the New Orleans and Baton Rouge reaches of the Mississippi River via Southwest Pass by enlarging the existing channel to a project depth of 55 feet and enlarging the adjacent channel along the left descending bank in New Orleans Harbor to a 40-foot depth, a turning basin at Baton Rouge, and training works in the passes to reduce maintenance. Estimated cost of existing project (Oct. 1, 1999) is $179,800,000 Federal and $446,000,000 non-Federal. In addition, Coast Guard is to provide navigation aids at an estimated cost of $1,200,000. Local cooperation. Requirements are described in full on pages 11-2 and 11-3 of the FY 92 Annual Report. A third supplement to the LCA addressing the Permanent Saltwater Intrusion Mitigation Plan was executed on May 28, 1993. A Project Cooperation Agreement (PCA) between the Government and the State of Louisiana was executed on Sep. 3, 1993 which provides for the dredging of a 45-foot channel from Mile 181 AHP to Baton Rouge. Terminal facilities. See Mississippi River, Baton Rouge to the Gulf of Mexico, LA. Operations and results during fiscal year. Construction is underway on the permanent mitigation plan. The permanent mitigation plan consists of the Government constructing an underwater sill, when needed, at Mile 64 AHP to prevent the intrusion of saltwater into water supplies of the metropolitan New Orleans area. The plan also provides for upgrading the Plaquemines Parish water distribution system to provide fresh water to water treatment plants impacted by increased saltwater intrusion caused by the deeper channel. The first six contracts for the improvement of Plaquemines Parish water distribution system have been completed and one is underway. A supplemental LCA for this work was executed on May 28, 1993. The underwater sill was constructed during FY 99 due to extremely low flows in the river which allowed salt water to threaten up river water supplies. The sill was successful in preventing impacts to these facilities. One contract to maintain the pile dikes at a cost of $6,932,000 was completed in FY 00. Construction of soft dikes at Medora Crossing was completed at a cost of $3,398,000 as part of our effort to lower maintenance dredging cost in FY 00. We have initiated work on the General Design Memorandum for the remaining authorized features of the project. This includes the deepening of the Mississippi River to 55 feet from the Gulf of Mexico to Baton Rouge. Condition as of Sep. 30. The 45-foot channel is completed from the Gulf to Baton Rouge. Construction of the permanent mitigation plan is underway. Work on the General Design Memorandum for the remaining authorized features is underway. 4. PORT FOURCHON, LA Location. Port Fourchon is located near the mouth of Bayou Lafourche in southern Louisiana. The port includes 3,600 acres and is located approximately three miles from the Gulf of Mexico. An authorized Federal 12 by 125-foot channel, which was completed in 11-3 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 2000 September 1960, is located along the same alignment as the Port Fourchon project. This channel was enlarged to 20 by 300 feet from the Gulf to the port by the Greater Lafourche Port Commission in 1968. In 1980, the Port Commission deepened the entrance channel to 30 feet and enlarged Pass Fourchon, a channel intersecting Bayou Lafourche at channel mile 2, to 20 by 300 feet. Existing project. The project provides for a channel 24 by 300 feet from the upstream end of the existing jetties to channel mile 3.4. A 26 by 300-foot channel will be constructed from the 26-foot contour in the Gulf of Mexico to the upstream end of the jetties. The channel will be dredged hydraulically. Material from the initial dredging of the interior reach and from the first maintenance will be placed in a pipeline canal, an oil well canal, and an open water impoundment area. Subsequent maintenance dredging material from this reach will be placed in the impoundment only. For both the initial dredging and future maintenance dredging from the jetty reach, material will be placed on the shoreline east and west of the jetties. All work is programmed. The estimated constructioned cost of the project is $4,930,000. (Oct 99) Local Cooperation. The local sponsor is the Greater Lafourche Port Commission. A Project Cooperation Agreement was executed on Aug. 21, 2000, and Facilities were relocated. Operations and results during fiscal year. Preconstruction, Engineering and Design was completed. Condition as of Sep. 30. Construction is scheduled to be completed in FY 01. 5. NAVIGATION WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION Navigation activities pursuant to Sec. 107, Public Law 86-645, as amended (preauthorization). Preauthorization studies costs for FY 00 were East Fork Calcasieu Pass, LA $97, Taylor Point Cut for $1,010; Houma Navigation Canal for $28,121. Preconstruction Engineering and design work costs for the Bayou Dularge, LA, project were $100 and Section 107 Coordination, $7,034. Flood Control 6. AMITE RIVER AND TRIBUTARIES, LOUISIANA, EAST ROUGE PARISH WATERSHED Location. In East Baton Rouge Parish, LA, consisting of the following five watersheds in the metropolitan Baton Rouge area: Jones Creek, Ward Creek, Bayou Fountain, Beaver Bayou, and Blackwater Bayou. Existing project. The project will provide protection to residents of the metropolitan Baton Rouge area by reducing stages in the five waterways through clearing and snagging, earthen channel improvement and concrete lining of the waterways. The authorized project consists of modifying approximately sixty-six (66) total miles of channel. This involves approximately twenty-five (25) miles of minimal channel clearing and snagging, twenty-four (24) miles of earthen channel enlargement, and seventeen (17) miles of channel concrete lining. Included in the proposed construction are sixty (60) miles of stream bank aesthetic tree planting. Fish and wildlife mitigation feature consist of the reforestation of 397 acres of cleared land to compensate for an estimated 280 acres of bottomland hardwoods that would be lost to project construction. Recreation features include an eleven (11) mile bicycle path. The authorized channel modifications for Beaver Bayou, Ward Creek, and Bayou Fountain are designed to have a ten percent change of being out of bank in any one year. Blackwater Bayou and Jones Creek channel modification are designed to have a four percent and two percent chance, respectively, of being out of bank in any one year. The proposed project would reduce the areal extent of the Federal Emergency Management regulatory flood plain throughout the area. The current approved cost of the project is $112,900,000, including $73,400,000 Federal cost and $39,500,000 non-Federal cost (1995 price level). Local Cooperation. The cost sharing provisions contained in the Water Resources Development Act of 1999 require that local interests shall provide cost sharing in accordance with the Chief of Engineers report dated December 23, 1996. The project requires that the local sponsor provide all land, easements, rights-of-way, relocations, and disposal areas 11-4 NEW ORLEANS, LA, DISTRICT (LERRD's) needed for project construction. In lieu of a portion of the cash contribution, the sponsor will perform work-in-kind, including design, construction and management of the proposed channel modifications for the Bayou Fountain Watershed, and perform all necessary clearing and snagging for channel modification on Beaver Bayou, Blackwater Bayou, Weiner Creek and Dawson Creek. Cost sharing for the flood damage reduction features is in accord with the cost sharing specified by the Water Resources Development Act of 1986 (WRDA 1986), as amended by Section 202(a) and 202(c) of the Water Resources Development Act of 1996 (WRDA). Recreation cost sharing is in accordance with Section 103(a) of WRDA 86. Condition as of Sep. 30. A Design Memorandum for the Jones Creek and tributaries portion of the project is underway in FY 01. Plans and specification s will be initiated in FY 01. 7. COMITE RIVER (DIVERSION), LA Location. In East Baton Rouge Parish, LA, between the Comite River and the Profit Island Chute of the Mississippi River, north of the town of Baker, LA, and south of the town of Zachary, LA. Existing project. The project will provide protection for residents of the Comite River Basin by reducing stages in the river below the diversion point for events up to the 100-year flood event,and containing within banks events up to the 10-year flood event. The authorized project consists of construction of an eight-mile diversion channel from the Comite River to an outfall into Lilly Bayou, and then a four-mile diversion along Lilly and Cooper Bayous to the Profit Island Chute of the Mississippi River. The project also includes a diversion structure in the new channel near the diversion point, a stage control structure and an outfall structure near and at the outfall into Lilly Bayou, and four control structures at the intersections of Whites, Cypress and Baton Rouge Bayous, the fourth near McHugh Road. Disposal areas will be constructed along both banks of the new channel to retain the flood Waters from the Comite River along both side of the new channel, and clearing and snagging of White, Cypress and Baton Rouge Bayous north of the diver- Sion channel will also be done. Mitigation for the Project includes the planting of trees on cleared land near the diversion point and on portions of the disposal area, the protection and management of existing forested lands near the diversion point. Upgrading two gauging stations and installing six new gauging stations to assist in flood prediction is also included in the project. The current approved cost of the project is $153,500,000, including $106,000,000 Federal cost and $47,000,000 non-Federal cost. The Water Resources Development Act of 1999 authorized the Secretary to include the costs of highway relocations to be cost shared as project construction features. Local Cooperation. The cost sharing provisions contained in the Water Resources Development Act of 1986 require that local interests shall: (a) Provide to the Federal Government all lands, easements, rightsof- way, and dredged material disposal areas, and perform the necessary relocations required for construction, operation, and maintenance of the project (Current estimate is $39,393,000); and (b) Provide to the Federal Government a cash contribution equal to 5 percent of the total cost of the project, excluding cultural resources (Current estimate is $7,607,000). The total cost of items (a) and (b) mentioned above is limited to 50 percent of the total cost of the project. Upon completion of the Feasibility Study, the Louisiana Department of Transportation and Development signed a letter of intent to sponsor the project. Operations and results during the fiscal year. In FY 00 Preconstruction Engineering and Design (PED) efforts continued the plans and specifications for Lilly Bayou Control Structure and negotiation of the Project Cooperation agreement with the non-Federal sponsores. Condition as of Sep. 30. The Water Resources Development Act of 1996 reauthorized the project. The Appropriations Act of 2000 provided $10,000,000 for construction of the project. Work on the initial set of plans and specifications is proceeding, as well as the negotiations for a Project Cooperation Agreement. 8. GRAND ISLE AND VICINITY, LA Location. In south Jefferson Parish, LA, along the Gulf of Mexico, about 50 miles south of New Orleans and 45 miles northwest of Southwest Pass (Mississippi River). Existing project. The project provides protection from waves driven by hurricanes that have a frequency of recurrence of up to once in every 50 years. The plan consists of a berm and vegetated dune extending the length of Grand Isle's gulf shore and a jetty to stabilize the western end of the island at Caminada Pass. The dune has a 10-foot-wide crown at an elevation of 11.5 feet NGVD, 1 on 5 side slopes, and protective vegetation. The sandfill berm slopes from an elevation of 8.5 feet NGVD at the toe of the dune 180 feet gulfward to an elevation of 3 feet NGVD and, from this point, assumes its natural slope to the offshore bottom. The jetty provided by the plan has a top width of 6 feet at an elevation of 4 feet mean sea level, 1 on 2 side 11-5 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 2000 momm slopes, and extends approximately 3,600 feet along the western end of the island at Caminada Pass. Estimated cost of project (October 1991) is $20,933,000 Federal and $12,567,000 non-Federal, including $7,157,484 contributed funds. The repair and restoration of Grand Isle were accomplished by two separate contracts. The jetty extensions and sand bar removal contract (partial fix), was completed in early 1988. The dune repair and structural reinforcement contract was physically completed Sep. 4, 1991. An O&M Manual has been approved. The project has been turned over to the State of Louisiana for operation and maintenance. The 1992 Dire Emergency Supplemental Appropriations Act provided funds to repair damage to the wave berm and dune caused by Hurricane Andrew and to add offshore breakwaters to the project as an integral part of the repair. The original plan was to construct 27 breakwater segments; however, only 23 breakwater segments were constructed due to limited federal funds. 19 additional breakwater segments were built in the summer of 1999 by the local sponsor. Local cooperation. Requirements are described in full on page 11-4 of the FY 92 Annual Report. An additional $4,750,000 was deposited in escrow to complete restoration of the dune which was completed on Sep. 4, 1991. NORTH SHORE PROJECT The Water Resources Development Act of 1996 authorized construction of $17 million of additional improvements to the region subject to approval of a report justifying the improvements. The District received $250,000 to initiate the study. The study is considering improvements such as raising roads, building breakwaters, and building a levee through the marshes, along the north side of the island. A preliminary economic analysis shows the Benefit-Cost Ration=0.4. The Water Resources Development Act of 1999 authorized the Secretary to consider environmental benefits that the project provides to the main land coast of Louisiana. No funds were appropriated. The Energy and Water Development Appropriations Bill of 2000 provided $500,000 to complete the economic analysis and investigate the environment benefits of the project. 9. LAKE PONTCHARTRAIN AND VICINITY, LA (HURRICANE PROTECTION) Location. In southeastern Louisiana, vicinity of New Orleans, in St. Charles, Jefferson, Orleans, St. Bernard, and St. Tammany Parishes, comprising lower land and water area between the Mississippi River alluvial ridge and the Pleistocene escarpment to north and west. The dominant topographic feature is Lake Pontchartrain, a shallow tidal basin, about 640 square miles in area and averaging 12 feet deep, connecting with lesser Lake Maurepas to the west and through Lake Borgne and Mississippi Sound to the Gulf to the east. The lake drains about 4,700 square miles of tributary area. (Refer to Geological Survey quadrangles Yscloskey and Malheureaux Point, Drum Bay, Door Point, Lake Eugenie, Oak Mound Bayou, Mitchell Keys, Lake Eloi, and Morgan Harbor; Engineer quadrangles Slidell, Covington, Ponchatoula, Springfield, Denham Springs, Donaldsonville, Mt. Airy, Bonnet Carre', Spanish Fort, Chef Menteur, Rigolets, St. Bernard, New Orleans, and Hahnville; and Coast and Geodetic Survey Charts Nos. 1115 and 1116. Existing project. Provides protection to the greater New Orleans area and other communities bordering Lake Pontchartrain from the effects of hurricane-generated floods. The project is comprised of two major features: The Chalmette Area Plan and the High Level Plan. The Chalmette Area Plan consists of a levee and floodwall system around the Chalmette area and along the Mississippi River-Gulf Outlet, with connections to the Mississippi River levees. The High Level Plan provides for heightening and strengthening the existing hurricane protection levee systems in Orleans Parish and the east bank of Jefferson Parish, repairing and rehabilitating the Mandeville Seawall in St. Tammany Parish; building a new mainline hurricane levee on the east bank of the St. Charles Parish just north of U.S. Highway 61 (Airline Highway); raising and strengthening the existing levee which extends along the Jefferson-St. Charles Parish boundary between Lake Pontchartrain and Airline Highway; and deferring construction of the proposed Seabrook lock until its feasibility as a feature of the Mississippi River-Gulf Outlet navigation project can be determined. Areas which will be enclosed by the levee and floodwall construction will be provided protection against tidal surge resulting from the Standard Project Hurricane (SPH). The estimated project cost for work (October 2000) is $527,000,000 Federal and $215,000,000 non-Federal. 11-6 NEW ORLEANS, LA, DISTRICT Local cooperation. Requirements are described in full on page 11-5 of the FY 92 Annual Report. Operations and results during fiscal year. Preparation of design memorandums and plans and specifications continued by hired labor, Architect-Engineer Contractors, and the local sponsors. A change from the original,Barrier Plan to the current high level plan was approved in February 1985 by the Office, Chief of Engineers. A draft mitigation report with corresponding EIS was prepared and distributed for public review on Mar. 16, 1988, and subsequently approved. The Louisiana Department of Natural Resources agreed to fund the Local Sponsor's share of mitigation and a mitigation dike was constructed in FY 97. Condition as of Sep. 30. Construction started May 1967 and is 88 percent complete. In FY 01, we will initiate award of 5 construction contracts, continue six ongoing construction contracts, and complete six construction contracts. In FY 02, we Will initiate award of four construction contracts, and complete five construction contracts. 10. LAKE PONTCHARTRAIN STORMWATER DISCHARGE PROJECT Location. The project is located on the east bank of the Mississippi River in Jefferson Parish, near New Orleans, Louisiana. Project Description. The project encompasses the design, construction, construction management, and monitoring of improvements to demonstrate a process that will reduce the impacts of stormwater discharges from Jefferson Parish on the water quality of Lake Pontchartrain. Features include: a 20,000 gpm Stormwater pump station, sewer force main from the Stormwater pump station to the existing Parish Wastewater treatment plant, and modifications to the treatment plant. Local Cooperation. The project requires that the local sponsor provide all lands, easements, rights-of-way, relocations, and disposal areas (LERRD's) needed for project construction. The total of the local share must be a minimum of twenty-five Percent of the project total, but not exceed fifty percent. Design and construction of modifications or additions to the Sponsor's facilities will be conducted by the facility owner under technical oversight by the Corps of Engineers. Section 307(c) of the Water Resources Development Act of 1992 provides for reimbursement to the Local Sponsor for work compatible with project requirements. Condition as of Sep. 30. Physical construction of the project is complete. 11. LAROSE TO GOLDEN MEADOW, LA (HURRICANE PROTECTION) Location. In coastal section of Louisiana, along Bayou Lafourche, and includes lands on both banks of the bayou from Larose to 2 miles south of Golden Meadow. (Refer to Geological Survey quadrangles Cutoff, Lake Felicity, Bay Dosgris, Golden Meadow Farms, Bay Tambour, Mink Bayou, Caminada Pass, Leeville, Belle Pass, Pelican Pass, and Calumet Island; Engineer quadrangles New Orleans, Hahnville, Point a la Hache, Barataria, and Fort Livingston; and Coast and Geodetic Survey Charts Nos. 1115 and 1116.) Existing project. Provides a loop levee about 40 miles long along both banks of Bayou Lafourche from Larose to South Golden Meadow; enlargement of 3 miles of existing levee at Golden Meadow; floodgates for navigation and hurricane protection in Bayou Lafourche at upper and lower bayou crossings; about 8 miles of low interior levees to regulate intercepted drainage. Estimated cost for new work (October 2000) is $81,000,000 Federal and $35,000,000 non-Federal. Local cooperation. Requirements are described in full on page 11-6 of the FY 92 Annual Report. Operations and results during fiscal year. One 3rd Lift contract was completed in FY 00. Condition as of Sep. 30. In FY 00, one 3rd lift contract was completed and one more was awarded. In FY 01, a 2nd lift contract for the Point Au Chien Mitigation area will be awarded. construction commenced in February 1972 and is 90 percent complete. 12. NEW ORLEANS TO VENICE, LA, HURRICANE PROTECTION Location. Includes land subject to inundation by hurricane tides extending along both banks of the Mississippi River below New Orleans from vicinity of Phoenix to Venice, LA. Existing project. Provides for improvements along Mississippi River below New Orleans, LA, for prevention of hurricane tidal flood damages by increasing heights of existing back levees and modifying existing drainage facilities where necessary 11-7 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 2000 in three separate reaches: Reach A, on the west bank from St. Jude to Tropical Bend, 18 miles, 4,340 acres protected; Reach B, on the west bank from Tropical Bend to Venice, 21 miles, 4,900 acres protected; and Reach C, on the east bank from Phoenix to Bohemia 16 miles, 5,470 acres protected, and raising the river levee on the west bank (MR&T levee) from City Price to Venice, to a grade high enough to prevent overtopping by tidal surges from the east, generally called the West Bank River Plan. Reach B was later divided into two units, Reach B-I from Tropical Bend to Fort Jackson and Reach B-2 from Fort Jackson to Venice, LA, as a result of a request made by the local agency. Estimated cost of new work (October 2000) is $173,000,000 Federal and $74,000,000 non-Federal. Local cooperation. Provide all lands, easements, and rights-of-way including borrow areas and spoil disposal areas necessary for the construction of the project, at costs presently estimated at $9,342,000; accomplish all necessary alterations and relocations to roads, pipelines, cables, wharves, and other facilities required by the construction of the project at costs presently estimated at $6,213,000; bear 30 percent of the first cost, a sum presently estimated at $74,000,000, and cash contribution or equivalent work presently estimated at $58,445,000 to be paid either in a lump sum prior to initiation of construction or in installments prior to start of pertinent work items. The local sponsor has requested that an area extending from the upstream limits of Reach A at City Price to St. Jude, Louisiana be incorporated into the project. This work involves upgrading 3.3 miles of existing non-Federal levees to project standards. The local sponsor has elected to pay all of the costs of this reach of levee. While the sponsor will not receive credit for these costs, the increased protected area is eligible for Federally subsidized flood insurance. Savings to the project achieved by a portion of levee no longer being required at the upstream end of Reach A, is creditable to the local sponsor. A Post Authorization Change report was prepared for this reach and was approved by the Lower Mississippi Valley Division on Mar. 6, 1992. Supplemental assurances for the City Price to St. Jude reach were accepted on Feb. 18, 1993. Assuring Agency: Plaquemines Parish Government. Assurances for all reaches of the project have been furnished. Requirements are described in full on page 11-7 of the FY 92 Annual Report. Operations and results during fiscal year. Construction during FY 00 was on one 2nd enlargement contract. Two construction contracts are scheduled for award in FY 01. Condition as of Sep. 30. Construction began on the project in September 1968 and the total project is approximately 79 percent complete. 13. SOUTHEAST LOUISIANA URBAN DRAINAGE PROJECT (FLOOD CONTROL) Location. The authorized project is located in Orleans, Jefferson and St. Tammany Parishes. Features in Orleans Parish (city of New Orleans) are located on the east bank of the Mississippi River. Work in Jefferson Parish is located on the east and west banks of the Mississippi River in the vicinity of New Orleans, LA. St. Tammany Parish features are located in the southern portion of the parish, near Lake Pontchartrain, in and around the communities of Slidell, Mandeville, Madisonville, Abita Springs, and Lacomb, LA. Project Features. The work in Orleans Parish consists of enlargement of a major pumping station and work on two other stations; and improvements to about seven drainage canals and underground drainage lines. Jefferson Parish features include improvements to five pumping stations and almost thirty drainage canals. Work in St. Tammany includes: channel improvements, retention ponds, levees, and structure raising. Local Cooperation. The project requires that the local sponsor(s) provide all lands, easements, rights-ofway, relocations, and disposal areas (LERRDs) needed for project construction, as well as a minimum five percent cash contribution. The total (value) of the locals share must be a minimum of twenty-five percent of the project total, but not exceed fifty percent of the project total. Jefferson Parish and the Sewerage and Water Board of New Orleans executed the Project Costsharing Agreements (PCAs) in January 1997. Operations and results during fiscal year. Local interests in Jefferson and Orleans parishes continued (and in some instances, completed) some of the design and construction of features authorized in the project, for which they will get credit. Architect-Engineer contractors, working for both the Corps and the parishes, are doing most of the design work. Federal construction began in March 1997. 11-8 NEW ORLEANS, LA, DISTRICT Eight additional investigations are underway, four in Jefferson Parish and four in Orleans Parish, to determine whether there are more Federally justified plans for improving drainage. Five of the studies are expected to conclude in FY 01 and the remaining three in FY 02. These studies are required to justify additional improvements to Orleans and Jefferson primary drainage systems. Condition as of Sep. 30. Thirty-three Federal contracts were awarded through FY 00 with ten scheduled for FY 01. The project is about 40% complete. 14. WEST BANK AND VICINITY, NEW ORLEANS, LA, HURRICANE PROTECTION Location. The project is located in Jefferson, Orleans and Plaquemines parishes on the West Bank of the Mississippi River in the vicinity of New Orleans, Louisiana. The project area generally extends from the Jefferson-St. Charles Parish line to the community of Oakville in Plaquemines Parish and is bounded by the Mississippi River on the north and east and Lakes Cataouatche and Salvador and the GIWW on the south and west. The originial project was from Westwego to Harvey Canal but has been expanded to include the area East of Harvey Canal and also the Lake Cataouatche area. These two areas were authorized by WRDA 96. Existing project. The total project consists of about 57 miles of new and enlarged earthen levee, 9 miles of floodwall, a navigable floodgate in the Harvey Canal below Lapalco Boulevard, a discharge channel and 1,000cfs capacity increase at the Cousins Pump Station. The protection is designed to protect against tidal floodwaters resulting from the Standard Project Hurricane (SPH). The SPH has a frequency of recurrence of one in 500 years. The elevation of the SPH protection varies from 9 feet NGVD to 12 feet NGVD. The project plan includes mitigation which consists of the construction of a timber pile and tire breakwater on the west bank of Lake Cataoutache adjacent to the Salvador Wildlife Management Area and the acquisition of approximately 1,300 acres of forested wetlands which will be managed to improve habitat quality. The estimated project cost (October 2000) is $303,000,000. ($200,000,000 Federal and $108,000,000 non-Federal). Local Cooperation. The project requires that the local sponsor provide all lands, easements, rights-ofway, relocations, and disposal areas (LERRDs) needed for project construction. The total (value) of the sponsors share must be a minimum thirty-five percent of the total project costs, in cash or creditable work. Funds provided by non-Federal interests for interim hurricane protection on the Westwego to Harvey Canal area may be considered beneficial expenditures and may be credited as part of the non- Federal contribution of the project pursuant to the WRDA of 1986. The Louisiana Department of Transportation and Development and West Jefferson Levee District executed amendment number 1 of the local cooperation agreement in April 1999. Conditions as of September 30. Project construction began in February 1991 and the total project is approximately 22% complete. The project is currently scheduled for completion in 2014. 15. INSPECTION OF COMPLETED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS Various hurricane protection projects, as well as small flood control projects, were inspected during FY 2000. Also, periodic inspection and continuing evaluation of completed civil works structures was conducted in accordance with ER 1110-2-100, at various times during the year on an as needed basis. Fiscal year costs for the period were $352,080. Total costs to Sep. 30, 2000 were $5,952,212. 16. FLOOD CONTROL WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION Emergency flood control activities-repair, flood fighting, and rescue work. (Public Law 99, 84th Cong., and antecedent legislation.) Disaster preparedness, fiscal year costs for the period were $340,111. There were no emergency or rehabilitation cost for FCCE in FY 00. See Table 11-F. Three construction contracts were awarded during FY 00 in the Westwego to Harvey Canal area. The first construction contract in Lake Cataouatche area was also awarded in FY 00. The first construction contract in 11-9 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 2000 the East of Harvey Canal area is scheduled for award in FY 01. 17. PROTECTION OF NAVIGATION During FY 00, operation and maintenance costs were $31,128 on Project Condition Surveys and $4,074,388 for Waterborne Commerce Statistics. 18. CATASTROPHIC DISASTER REPAREDNESS ROGRAM During FY 00, operation and maintenance costs were $25,052 on Local Preparedness; $117,616 on National Preparedness; $5,184 on National Emergency Facilities; and $377 Disaster Training and Exercise. Total costs for FY 00 were $148,292. 19. COASTAL WETLANDS PLANNING, PROTECTION AND RESTORATION Location. The coastal parishes of Louisiana. Authority. Activities were authorized by the Coastal Wetlands Planning, Protection and Restoration Act (CWPPRA) (Title III of Public Law 101-646, dated Nov. 29, 1990), which established the Louisiana Coastal Wetlands Conservation and Restoration Task Force. The Task Force consists of the Secretary of the Army (chairman); the Administrator of the Environmental Protection Agency; the Governor of the State of Louisiana; the Secretary of the Interior; the Secretary of Agriculture; and the Secretary of Commerce. Local Cooperation. The conditions of local cooperation are established by this act. Condition of Sep. 30. The first Priority List (PPL) was approved by the Task Force on Oct. 31, 1991. Fourteen projects were named on the list. Funds in the amount of $36.6 million ($28.1 million Federal, $8.5 million State) were made available for construction of these projects. The Task Force has given final approval for construction for 13 of the 14 projects. Of the 14 projects, construction has been completed on 12: West Hackberry Vegetative Plantings Demo, March 94; Bayou Labranche Wetlands Restoration, April 94; Cameron Prairie Refuge Shoreline Protection, August 94; Sabine Wildlife Refuge Erosion Protection, March 95; Vermilion River Cutoff Bank Protection, February 96; Lake Salvador Shoreline Protection at Jean Lafitte, March 96; Bayou Sauvage #1, May 96; Timbalier Vegetative Plantings Demo, July 96; Falgout Canal Vegetative Plantings Demo, December 96; and Cameron-Creole Watershed Hydrologic Restoration, January 97; Isles Dernieres (Phase 0), October 98; and GIWW Clovelly Wetland Restorations, October 00. One project is under construction, Barataria Bay Waterway Marsh Creation. Additionally, one of the deauthorized projects, Dewitt/Rollover Vegetative Plantings Demo was completed in August 94. The 2nd PPL was approved by the Task Force on Oct. 19, 1992. Fifteen projects were named on the list. Additional funds in the amount of $38.5 million ($28.3 million Federal, $10.1 million State) were made available for construction of these projects. Engineering and design on several of the projects has been completed, and the Task Force has given final approval for construction for 13 of the 15 projects. Of the 15 projects, construction has been completed on 11: Vermilion Bay/Boston Canal, November 95; Mud Lake, June 96; Clear Marais Bank Protection, March 97; Point Au Fer, May 97; Bayou Sauvage #2, May 97; Atchafalaya Sediment Delivery, Mar 98; West Belle Pass Headland Restoration, July 98; Freshwater Bayou, Aug 98; Big Island Mining, Oct 98; and Isles Dernieres (Phase 1), October 98; and Hwy 384, January 2000. Two projects, Fritchie Marsh and Jonathan Davis, are under construction. The 3rd PPL was approved by the Task Force on Oct. 1, 1993. Twelve projects were named. Additional funds in the amount of $37.6 million ($29.9 million Federal, $7.7 million State) were made available for construction of these projects. Engineering and design of several of the projects has been completed, and the Task Force has given final approval for construction for 11 of the 12 remaining projects. Of the 12 remaining projects, construction has been completed on eight projects; Lake Salvador Shore Protection, Jun 98; Channel Armor Gap Crevasse, Nov 97; Cameron Creole Maintenance, Jul 98; Whiskey Island, Aug 98; and Cote Blanche, Dec 98; Lake Chapeau, May 99, MR-GO Back Dike, Jan 99; and Brady Canal, May 00. Three projects are under construction: Red Mud Demo, East Timbalier Island Restoration #1, and Sabine Refuge Structure -- Hog Island. Additionally, one of the deauthorized projects, South West Shore White Lake Demo, was completed in July 1996. The 4th PPL was approved by the Task Force on Dec. 16, 1994. Six projects were named on the list. Additional funds in the amount of $33.6 million (30.0 million Federal, $3.6 million State) were made available for construction of these projects. Engineering and design on several of the projects has been completed, and the Task Force has given final approval for construction for 4 of the 6 remaining projects. Construction has been completed on three of the 4th pPL projects, Perry Ridge Bank Protection, Feb 99. Plowed 11-10 NEW ORLEANS, LA, DISTRICT Terraces Demo, August 00; and Barataria Bay Waterway Bank Protection West, November 00. One project is under construction: East Timbalier Island Restoration #2. The 5th PPL was approved by the Task Force on Feb. 28, 1996. Nine projects were named on the list. Additional funds in the amount of $38.3 million ($33.4 million. Federal, $4.9 million State) were made available for construction of these projects. Engineering and design on several of the projects has been completed, and the Task Force has given final approval for construction for 4 of the 9 projects. Four projects have been completed, Racoon Island Breakwaters Demo, July 97, and Freshwater Bayou Bank Stabilization, June 98, and Little Vermilion Bay Sediment Trapping, Aug 99; and Sweet Lake/Willow Lake Phase 1, Jan 00. The 6th PPL was approved by the Task Force on April 24, 1997. Eleven projects were named on the list. Additional funds in the amount of $44.9 million (39.1 million Federal, $5.8 million State) were made available for construction of these projects and to fund 5th PPL phased projects. Engineering and design on several of the projects has been completed and four projects are under construction: Nutria Harvest for Wetland Restoration Demo, Delta-Wide Crevasses, and Oaks/Avery Canal, and Barataria Bay Waterway Bank Protection East. The 7th PPL was approved by the Task Force on Jan. 16, 1998. Four projects were approved on the list. Additional Federal funds in the amount of $45.7 million ($42.5 million Federal, $3.2 million State) were made available for construction of these projects. Engineering and design on several of the projects has been completed. Construction has been completed o n one Project, Thin Mat Float and Marsh Enhancement Demo, May 00. Another project, Barataria Basin Landbridge, is currently under construction. The 8th PPL was approved on Jan. 20, 1999. Six Projects were approved on the list. Additional funds in the amount of $44.5 million ($41.9 million federal, $2.6-million state) were made available for construction of these projects. Engineering and Design on several Projects has begun. The 9th PPL was approved on Jan. 1, 2000. Nineteen projects were approved on the list. However, starting with PPL 9, the Task Force implemented cash flow management policy in which only the Phase 1 design of the projects was approved by the Task Force. After Phase 1 design is completed, the Phase2 construction of the projects will need separate approval by the Task Force. Additionally, funds for the postconstruction monitoring and O&M will be approved as needed so as not to encumber funds upfront for the full 20 year life of the project. Additional funds in the amount of $50.5 million ($47.9 million Federal; $2.6 million State) were made available for construction of the projects. Three projects have been approved to proceed to Phase 2 construction. The 10th PPL was approved on Jan. 10, 2001. Twelve projects were approved for Phase I design on the LIST. Additional funds in the amount of $50.4 million (48.0 million Federal; $2.4 million State) were made available for construction of the projects. 20. GENERAL REGULATORY PROGRAM Permit Evaluation Enforcement Environmental Inspection Statement Appeals Total General Regulatory Program $3,487,331 800,586 10,888 55,179 $303,979 In response to Section 303(b) of the CWPPRA, the Louisiana Coastal Wetlands Restoration Plan report was published in November 1993. Following public review of the final report, a Record of Decision was prepared, signed by the Task Force chairman, and submitted to HQUSACE for transmittal to the ASA(CW). The report proposed $1.3 billion worth of projects that could prevent 65 percent of the coastal wetland losses over the next 20 years. The State of Louisiana expressed its intention (by letter of Jan. 5, 1993) to develop a Conservation Plan in accordance with provisions of the CWPPRA. Once approved (by the Administrator of the EPA, the Director of the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, and the Secretary of the Army), the State's share in project construction will be reduced from 25 percent to 15 percent. The State submitted the plan to the approving agencies in May 1997. Approval was received on Nov. 21, 1997. Section 532 of the Water Resources Development Act (WRDA) of 1996 amends the CWPPRA to provide for a further reduction in the State' share of CWPPRA projects. Upon approval of the Conservation Plan, the State' share of projects in 1996 and 1997 will be 10 percent. In a Sep. 3, 1996, speech in the House of Representatives, the Honorable Bud Shuster of Pennsylvania said that the intent of the legislation was to reduce the State's share of projects approved on the 5th and 6th Priority Project Lists. The amendment further provides that the Secretary of the Army must 11-11 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 2000 determine that a reduction in the non-Federal share is warranted. The Task Force approved a planning budget of $3,460,491 for program management and preparation of the 9th List. The Task Force is scheduled to complete the selection of the 9th Priority Project List in Jan. 2000. Recognizing that restoration of the state's coastal wetlands requires projects of a more complex nature and a larger scope that can be analyzed in the process of developing annual priority lists, the Task Force has authorized the initiation of two feasibility studies. Projects with costs of more than $40 million cannot be accommodated by the present funding stream of $35 million per year and would need authorization through a Water Resources Development Act or similar act for implementation. The Mississippi River Sedient, Nutrient, and Freshwater Redistribution study, which is being managed by the Corps of Engineers, is intended to develop a plan for optimizing the resources of the Mississippi River, giving consideration to the river's many uses (e.g., navigation and water supply, in addition to creation and nourishment of wetlands). The study is scheduled for completion in Feb. 2000. The Louisiana Barrier Shoreline study which is being managed by the Louisiana Department of Natural Resources, is intended to determine the feasibility of restoring the state's barrier islands and other shorelines to protect coastal wetlands and related resources. The first phase of this study was complete. In June 1997, the Task Force initiated a coast-wide grassroots planning effort termed the Coast 2050 initiative to develop a technically sound strategic plan to sustain coastal resources and provide an integrated multiple use approach to ecosystem management. The Coast 2050 plan differs from the 1993 restoration plan in that regional strategies, rather than basin strategies, will be developed and prioritized. Coast 2050 was completed in December 1998 and supports the Louisiana Coastal Area authority, Louisiana Ecosystem Restoration reconnaissance report, which was approved by HQUSACE in May 1999. Nine basin feasibility studies are planned for execution under the 1967 Louisiana Coastal Area authority. The Energy and Water Development Act of FY 2000 allocated approximately $1.5 million to initiate the Barataria Basin feasibility study schedule for completion in June 2002. Follow on basin feasibility studies will be initiated about every 18 months to 3 years thereafter. The total estimated cost of the nine feasibility studies is $30 million, which is to be cost shared on a 50-50 percent basis with the State of Louisiana. 11-12 NEW ORLEANS, LA, DISTRICT TABLE 11-A COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Total Funds Section to Sep. 30, in Text Project Funding FY 97 FY 98 FY 99 FY 00 2000 1. Inner Harbor Navigation Canal Lock 2. Mississippi River-Gulf Outlet, LA (Regular Funds) 3. Mississippi River Ship Channel-Gulf to Baton Rouge (Contrib. Funds) 4. Port Fourchon, LA (Contrib. Funds) 7. Comite River, LA (Diversion) 8. Grand Isle and Vicinity, LA 9. Lake Pontchartrain and Vicinity, LA (Hurricane Protection) (Regular Funds) (Contrib. Funds) New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost 0 3,534,000 7,261,000 10,795,000 0 3,107,909 6,017,859 9,125,768 1,370,000 2,323,000 200,000 300,000 107,750,200 1,371,613 1,922,193 446,971 372,294 107,559,275 21,173,000 16,028,000 40,417,000 15,970,000 292,358,476 20,342,160 15,570,763 41,742,157 15,993,423 164,475,590 1,485,000 2,185,000 1,424,837 2,245,266 630,000 1,286,000 25,766,000 519,422 1,577,854 25,697,104 0 -21,900 0 -7,000 225,000 105,000 24,000 373,000 56,835 83,210 126,337 30,665 1,341,000 0 4,750,000 4,750,000 746,000 315,665 1,341,000 0 296,000 367,000 930,000 930,000 8,077,000 279,840 313,000 780,000 898,640 7,895,640 247,000 186,072 10,000 79,747 56,059 60,000 19,127,500 43,249 23,809 19,078,496 10,000 8,616 17,025,000 22,920,000 16,000,000 26,204,000 395,626,000 18,367,390 12,695,193 24,443,102 27,402,978 410,172,080 2,073,018 1,056,430 -- 1,000,000 4,600,000 21,685,000 1,292,290 0 9,274,120 21,562,120 11-13 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 2000 TABLE 11-A COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT (Continued) See Total Funds Section to Sep. 30, in Text Project Funding FY 97 FY 98 FY 99 FY 00 2000 10. Lake Pontchartrain Stormwater Discharge 11. Larose to Golden Meadow, LA (Hurricane Protection) (Contrib. Funds) 12. New Orleans to Venice, LA New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost New Work (Fed) Approp. (Hurricane Protection) Cost (Regular Funds) (Contrib. Funds) New Work Contrib. Cost 13. Southeast Louisiana, Louisiana 2,650,000 9,000,000 4,500,000 -9,000 19,087,000 3,286,913 10,462,748 4,184,658 357,811 19,057,130 489,000 938,000 1,088,000 2,015,000 73,834,000 398,829 827,614 1,071,952 2,030,154 73,623,550 273,000 -10,513 0 330,054 310,000 0 4,838,000 4,528,000 3,926,000 1,469,000 697,000 2,150,000 145,228,000 3,910,154 1,498,276 701,055 2,077,000 145,146,289 2,920,000 1,508,200 600,000 100,000 19,702,397 1,632,249 1,813,000 1,754,507 100,000 19,701,268 14,070,000 36,910,000 75,000,000 47,263,000 175,243,000 7,613,261 41,841,635 53,229,795 69,197,930 173,576,011 (Contrib. Funds) 14. Westbank and Vicinity, New Orleans, LA (Hurricane Protection) 14. Westbank East of Harvey Canal, LA 14. East of Harvey Canal 19. Coastal Wetlands Planning, Protection and Restoration (Contrib. Funds) New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Approp. Cost 0 6,618,000 1,632,249 0 0 0 720,000 5,661,572 7,338,000 5,661,572 5,809,000 9,805,000 15,614,000 5,231,688 6,301,839 11,533,527 6,999,000 4,123,000 6,534,898 4,143,471 1,419,000 320,000 836,297 813,707 0 0 34,856,000 575,294 23,080 34,799,751 0 85,818 0 2,622 1,739,000 1,738,444 44,134,000 47,540,715 46,864,079 52,907,300 365,972,362 7,894,204 16,022,782 46,204,412 18,150,316 135,650,427 5,701,366 3,186,896 2,593,248 3,864,325 50,614,724 7,894,100 1,676,564 935,300 1,734,222 15,217,112 11-14 NEW ORLEANS, LA, DISTRICT TABLE 11-B AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Work Authorized Water Resources Development Act, 1986 Mar. 2, 1945 Oct. 23, 1962 Mar. 29, 1956 Oct. 22, 1976 Water Resources Development Act, 1986 Water Resources Development Act, 1996 LAKE CHlARLES, LA The project for deepening of the project for navigation, Lake Charles, Louisiana, to a depth of 45 feet, at a total cost of $1,070,000. MISSISSIPPI RIVER, BATON ROUGE TO GULF OF MEXICO, LA Combines projects of Mississippi River, Baton Rouge to New Orleans, Mississippi River, South Pass, and Southwest Pass, adding thereto project for Mississippi River from New Orleans to Head of Passes, to provide a single project, "Mississippi River, Baton Rouge to the Gulf of Mexico," with channel dimensions as follows: Baton Rouge to New Orleans, 35 by 500 feet; port limits of New Orleans, 35 by 1,500 feet; New Orleans to Head of Passes, 40 by 1,000 feet; Southwest Pass, 40 by 800 feet; Southwest Pass Bar Channel, 40 by 600 feet; South Pass, 30 by 450 feet; South Pass Bar Channel, 30 by 600 feet. Deepen existing channel from 35 to 40 feet by 500 feet wide from one-tenth mile below Louisiana Highway Commission bridge at Baton Rouge to upper limits of Port of New Orleans, and also 40 by 500 feet within presently authorized 35- by 1,500-foot channel in port limits of New Orleans. MISSISSIPPI RIVER-GULF OUTLET, LA (See Sec. 1 of Text) Construct a seaway canal 36 feet deep and 500 feet wide from Michoud to 38-foot contour in gulf and an inner tidewater harbor consisting of a 1,000- by 2,000-foot turning basin 36 feet deep and a connecting channel 36 feet deep and 500 feet wide to Inner Harbor Navigation Canal and provides, when economically justified, for construction of a lock to Mississippi River in the vicinity of Meraux, LA. Amends above Act making the construction of bridge relocations a Federal responsibility when required by the the construction of the Mississippi River-Gulf Outlet channel. The Mississippi River-Gulf Outlet feature is modified to provide that the replacement and expansion of the existing industrial canal lock and connecting channels or the construction of an additional lock and connecting channels shall be in the area of the existing lock or at the Violet site. Amends above Act of 1986 to include a Community Impact Mitigation Plan as an authorized feature of the project to replace the Inner Harbor Navigation Canal Lock. Public Law 104-303 Oct. 12, 1996 11-15 Documents Public Law 99-662, Nov. 17, 1986 H. Doc. 215, 76th Cong., 1st sess. S. Doc. 36, 87th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 245, 82d Cong., 1st sess. Sec. 186, Water Resources Development Act of 1976 (PL 94-587) 2d sess. Public Law 99-662, Nov. 17, 1986 .- r REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 2000 TABLE 11-B AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION (Continued) Acts Work Authorized Documents Approp. Act of 1985, dated Jul. 2, 1986 (PL 99-88) Nov. 17, 1986 (PL 99-662) Water Resources Development Act, 1996 Aug. 30, 1985 Oct. 23, 1962 Water Resources Development Act, 1986 Water Resources Development Act, 1999 August 17, 1999 MISSISSIPPI RIVER SHIP CHANNEL, GULF TO BATON ROUGE, LA (See Sec. 3 of Text) Will provide more efficient deep-draft navigation access to the New Orleans and Baton Rouge reaches of the Mississippi River via Southwest Pass by enlarging the existing channel to a project depth of 55 feet and enlarging the adjacent channel along the left descending bank in New Orleans Harbor to a 40-foot depth, a turning basin at Baton Rouge, and training works in the passes to reduce maintenance. Formalizes the cost sharing provisions of the project, permits the State of Louisiana to enact user fees to defray their portion of the project costs, and implements harbor maintenance fees to help pay for the Federal cost of the project. It also provides an option to the local sponsor to defer their initial payment for one year following initiation of construction. In terms of channel depths up to 45 feet, the cost sharing requirements are 75 percent Federal and 25 percent non-Federal for construction and 100 percent Federal for maintenance. For channels deeper than 45 feet, the cost sharing requirements are 50 percent Federal and 50 percent non-Federal for both construction and maintenance. PORT FOURCIION, LA Provides a Federal navigation channel with a project depth of 24 feet MLLW in Bayou Lafourche, Belle Pass, and the Gulf of Mexico to improve navigation access to Port Fourchon at a total cost of $4,440,000, with an estimated Federal cost of $2,300,000 and an estimated non-Federal cost of $2,140,000. WATERWAY FROM INTRACOASTAL WATERWAY TO BAYOU DULAC, LA (Bayous Grand Caillou and LeCarpe, LA) Channel 5 by 40 feet from Intracoastal Waterway at Houma through Bayou LeCarpe, Bayou Pelton, and Bayou Grand Caillou to Bayou Dulac, about 16.3 miles. Channel 10 by 45 feet in Bayou LeCarpe from Gulf Intracoastal Waterway to Houma navigation canal. BAYOU RIGOLETTE, LA A project to construct six additional floodgates at Bayou Rigolette, LA, adjacent to the existing drainage structure, at a total cost of $2,300,000. Amite River and Tributaries, Louisiana, East Baton Rouge Parish Watershed. The project for flood damage reduction and recreation, Amite River and tributaries, Louisiana, East Baton Rouge Parish Watershed: Report of the Chief of Engineers Dated December 23, 1996, a total cost of $112,900,000, with an estimated Federal cost of $73,400,000 and an estimated non-Federal of $39,500,000. H. Doc. 2577, 99th Cong., 1st sess. Water Resources Development Act of 1986, 99th Cong., 2d sess. Public Law 104-303, 104th Congress (See Section 101) Oct. 12, 1996 H. Doc. 206, 72d Cong., 1st sess. Public Law 99-662, Nov. 17, 1986 Public Law 106-53 August 17, 1999 11-16 NEW ORLEANS, LA, DISTRICT TABLE 11-B (Continued) Acts AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Work Authorized COMITE RIVER, LA (Diversion) (See Sec. 6 of Text) Construct an eight-mile diversion channel from the Comite River to an outfall into Lilly Bayou, and then a four-mile diversion along Lilly and Cooper Bayous to the Profit Island Chute of the Mississippi River. Also included a diversion structure in the new channel near the diversion point, a stage control structure and an outfall structure near and at the outfall into Lilly Bayou, and three control structures at the intersections of Whites, Cypress and Baton Rouge Bayous. Public Law 102-580 Section 101 (11) Oct. 31, 1992 Water Resources Development Act, 1996 Energy and Water Development Appropriations Act, FY 1999 Adopted by Committee Resolutions Sep. 23, 1976, and Oct. 1, 19762 Oct. 27, 1965 Section 107, Rivers and Harbors Act of 1960, as amended Water Resources Development Act, 1986 Nov. 17, 1988 Provided funding authority in the amount of $930,000 to initiate construction. GRAND ISLE AND VICINITY, LA (See Sec. 7 of Text) To provide hurricane protection by placement of a berm and vegetated dune extending the length of Grand Isle's gulf shore and a jetty to stabilize the western end of the island at Caminada Pass. LAKE PONTCIIARTRAIN AND VICINITY, LA (HURRICANE PROTECTION) (See Sec. 8 of Text) Control of hurricane tides by construction of two independent units, the Lake Pontchartrain Barrier plan and the Chalmette Area plan. NORTH PASS - PASS MANCHAC, LA The Corps of Engineers may construct small river and harbor improvement projects not specifically authorized by Congress when they will result in substantial benefits to navigation. LAKE PONTCIIARTRAIN, NORTI SHORE, LA The project for navigation, Lake Pontchartrain North Shore, LA: Report of the Chief of Engineers, dated February 14, 1979, at a total cost of $1,310,000, with an estimated first Federal cost of $655,000 and an estimated first non-Federal cost of $655,000. Public Law 104-305 Section 301(b)(5) Oct. 12, 1996 Public Law 105-245 Oct. 7, 1998 H. Doc. 639, 94th Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 231, 89th Cong., 1st sess. Public Law 86-645 Jul. 14, 1960 Public Law 99-662, Nov. 17, 1986, 99th Cong., 2d sess. LAKE PONTCIIARTRAIN STORMWATER DISCHARGE, LA (See Section 9 of Text) Provides for design and construction of project to to address water quality problems associated with stormwater discharges. Public Law 102-580 11-17 Water Resources Development Act, 1992 Documents Water Resources Development Act, 1992 r REPORT OF TIlE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 2000 TABLE 11-B AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION (Continued) Acts Work Authorized Documents Oct. 27, 1965 Oct. 27, 1965 Section 14, Flood Control Act of 1946 Oct. 23, 1962 Energy and Water Development Appropriations Act, FY 1996 Water Resources Development Act, 1996 Water Resources Development Act, 1999 LAROSE TO GOLDEN MEADOW, LA (HURRICANE PROTECTION) (See Sec. 10 of Text) A loop levee about 40 miles long along both banks of Bayou Lafourche from Golden Meadow to Larose; enlargement of 3 miles of existing levee at Golden Meadow; floodgates for navigation and hurricane protection in Bayou Lafourche at upper and lower bayou crossings; about 8 miles of low interior levees to regulate intercepted drainage; and seven multibarreled culverts controlled by flapgates. MORGAN CITY AND VICINITY, LA, HURRICANE PROTECTION Construction of new levees along Lake Palourde and Bayou Ramos, levee to tie-in with Bayou Boeuf lock levee and three gravity drainage structures in Morgan City unit and enlargement of bank levee, construction of new levee, and construction of one floodgate and five gravity drainage structures in Franklin and vicinity unit. The Franklin Area reparable element is currently under review for deauthorization in accordance with WRDA 1990. MERMENATU RIVER - GRAND CHENIER, LA (See Sec. 11 of Text) Construction of emergency bank-protection works to prevent flood damage to highways, bridge approaches and public works. NEW ORLEANS TO VENICE, LA, HURRICANE PROTECTION (See Sec. 12 of Text) Improvements along Mississippi River below New Orleans, LA, for prevention of hurricane tidal flood damages by increasing heights of existing back levees and modifying existing drainage facilities where necessary in five separate reaches. SOUTIIEAST LOUISIANA, LA (See Section 13 of text) Provides for drainage canal and pump station improvements in Orleans and Jefferson Parishes, and drainage improvements, flood protection and structure raising in St. Tammany Parish. H. Doc. 184, 89th Cong., 1st sess.' H. Doc. 167, 89th Cong., 1st sess. Public Law 526, 79th Cong, 2d sess. Jul. 24, 1946 H. Doc. 550, 87th Cong., 2d sess. Public Law 104-46 (Sec 108) Public Law 104-303 (Sec 533) WEST BANK AND VICINITY, OF NEW ORLEANS, LA HtURRICANE PROTECTION Combination of Projects - Section 328(b) of WRDA 99 states: The Secretary shall carry out work authorized as part of the Westwego to Harvey Canal project, the East of Harvey Canal project, and the Lake Cataouatche modifications as a single project, to be known as the "West Bank and Vicinity, New Orleans, Louisiana, Hurricane Protection", with a combined total cost of $280,300,000. Public Law 106-53, Aug. 17, 1999 11-18 NEW ORLEANS, LA, DISTRICT TABLE 11-B (Continued) Acts AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Work Authorized Water Resources Development' Act, 1986 Water Resources Development Act, 1996 Water Resources Development Act, 1996 Coastal Wetlands Planning, Protection and Restoration Act Westwego to Harvey Canal - Section 401(b) of WRDA 86 states: Structural and nonstructural measures to prevent flood damage to those areas identified in the Feb. 1984 draft Environmental Impact Statement for the West Bank IHurricane Protection Levee, Jefferson Parish, LA at a total cost of $61,500,000, with an estimated first Federal cost of $40,000,000 and as estimated first non-Federal Cost of $21,500,000. Funds provided by non-Federal interest for interim hurricane protection may be considered beneficial expenditures and may be credited as part of the non-Federal contribution of the project pursuant to Section 104 of this Act. East of Harvey Canal.- Section 101(a)(17) of WRDA96 states: The project for hurricane damage reduction, West Bank of the Mississippi River in the vicinity of New Orleans (East of Harvey Canal), Louisiana: Report of the Chief of Engineers, dated May 1, 1995, at a total cost of $126,000,000, with an estimated Federal cost of 82,200,000 and an estimated non-Federal cost of $43,800,000. Lake Cataouatche - Section 101(b)(11) of WRDA 96 states: The project for hurricane damage prevention and flood control, West Bank Hurricane Protection (Lake Cataouatche Area), Jefferson Parish, Louisiana, at a total cost of $14,375,000 with an estimated Federal cost of $9,344,000 and an estimated non-Federal cost of $5,031,000. COASTAL WETLANDS PLANNING, PROTECTION AND RESTORATION ACT (See Section 19 of Text) Directed the Secretary of the Army to convene the Louisiana Coastal Wetlands Conservation and Restoration Task Force to initiate a process to identify and prepare a list of coastal wetlands restoration projects in Louisiana to provide for the the long-term conservation of such wetlands and dependent fish and wildlife populations in order of priority in creating, restoring, protecting, and enhancing coastal wetlands, taking into account the quality of such coastal wetlands, with due allowance for small-scale projects necessary to demonstrate the use of new techniques or materials for coastal wetlands restoration. Public Law 99-662, Nov 17, 1986 Public Law 104-303 Public Law 104-303 Public Law 101-64 Nov. 24, 1990 Section 301-306 1. Contains latest published map. 2. Permanent Appropriation Repeal Act. 11-19 Documents --- --- REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 2000 TABLE 11-C OTHER AUTHORIZED NAVIGATION PROJECTS Cost To September 30, 2000 For Last Mo. and Yr. Full Report Operation Completed See Annual and Deauthorized Project Status Report For Construction Maintenance or Reclassified Alteration of Berwick Bay Bridge' -- Amite River and Bayou Manchac, LA Complete Aquatic Plant Control Program, LA Complete Atchafalaya River Bayous Chene Boeuf, and Black, LA Complete Atchafalaya River, Morgan City to Gulf of Mexico, LA Complete Barataria Bay Waterway, LA Complete Bayou Bonfouca, LA Complete Bayou Dorcheat, Loggy Bayou and Lake Bisteneau, LA2'3" -- Bayou Dupre, LA Complete Bayou Lacombe, LA Complete Bayou Lafourche and Lafourche Jump Waterway, LA Bayou La Lautre, St. Malo, and Yscolskey, LA Complete Bayou Plaquemine Brule, LA Complete Bayou Queue de Tortue, LA Complete Bayou Segnette Waterway, LA -- Bayou Teche, LA Bayou Teche & Vermilion River, LA Complete Bayou Terrebonne, LA3'7 Complete Bayou Vermilion, LA3 Complete Big Pigeon and Little Pigeon Bayous, LA Complete Calcasieu River and Pass, LA Complete Calcasieu River at Coon Island, LA8 Complete Calcasieu River at Devil's Elbow, LA Complete Cascasieu River Salt Water Barrier, LA9 Complete Cane River, LA2'J -- Chefuncte River and Bogue Falia, LA Complete Cypress Bayou and Waterway between Jefferson, TX, and Shreveport, LA' � Complete Freshwater Bayou, LA Complete Grand Bayou Pass, LA Complete Gulf Intracoastal Waterway between Apalachee Bay, FL, & Mexican Border Complete Houma Navigation Canal, LA Inland Waterway from Franklin to Mermentau River, LAL'"" Complete Intracoastal Waterway from the Mississippi River to Bayou Teche, LA'2 --" Lake Charles Deep Water Channel, LA'3 -- Leland Bowman Lock, LA Complete Little Caillou Bayou, LA Complete Mermentau River, Bayou Nezpique, and Bay Des Cannes, LA Complete Mermentau River, LA Complete Mississippi River Baton Rouge to Gulf of Mexico, LA -- 1967 1978 1984 1984 1981 1984 1974 1887 1968 1967 1984 1970 1950 1970 1958 1984 1983 1961 1947 1936 1984 1976 1981 1973 1910 1967 1971 1984 1950 1985 1984 1960 1956 1950 1987 1973 1977 1985 1991 $ -- 28,234 17,098,851 30,356,691 501,963 1,572,685 30,997 5,000 38,915 4,716 1,624,424 96,916 33,410 33,355 238,828 754,330 2,891,822 120,089 34,900 27,830,835 1,015,81410 5,856,200 4,197,262 2,500 58,342 202,817 7,116,224 7,676 $ -- 69,087 152,118,678 37,167,654 32,021,690 320,758 104,187 119,191 2,229,706 223,616 36,780 28,315 754,451 12,883,918 2,766,663 251,691 200,169 37,169 199,235,019 2,000 584,440 452,611 38,561,125 14,480'o 63,284,470 572,380,909 -- 36,883,070 249,052 32,200,010 77,761 5,197,975" 4,672,579 552,780 11,699 241,896 751,485 114,519 44,095,196 84,568,12816 1,103,406,473 7,22 11-20 1928 1914 Nov. 1963 1931 1939 1938 May 1956 1915 Mar. 1923 Mar. 1957 1916 1896 2 Oct. 1968 Apr. 1974 Sep. 1978 Jan. 1968 1959 Dec. 1914 Aug. 1968 1939 Mar. 1985 1929 Jul. 1952 NEW ORLEANS, LA, DISTRICT TABLE 11-C OTHER AUTHORIZED NAVIGATION PROJECTS (Continued) Cost To September 30, 2000 For Last Mo. and Yr. Full Report Operation Completed See Annual and Deauthorized Project Status Report For Construction Maintenance or Reclassified Mississippi River-Gulf Outlet, -.21 1996 88,535,00020 2292,182,343 Jan. 196821 Michoud Canal, LA Complete 1976 2,499,555 1,271,252 Nov. 1974 Mississippi River Outlets, Venice, LA Complete 1986 10,014,012 36,995,627 Complete Navigation work under special authorization (Calcasieu Pass channel in Old River Bend at Cameron, LA)' s -- 1957 -- 139,755 -- North Pass-Pass Manchac, LA Complete 1996 533,492 -- May 1995 Pass Manchac, LA Complete 1950 79,845 124,681 1912 Petite Anse, Tigre, and Carlin Bayous, LA Complete 1981 -- 1,453,172 Nov. 1980 Removal of Aquatic Growth, LA 1984 -- 47,066,871 Sulphur River, AR and TX 2 '5 -- 1919 45,989 -- -- Tangipahoa River, LA -- 1985 -- 2,881,416 -- Tickfaw, Natalbany, Ponchatoula, and Blood Rivers, LA3 Complete 1973 8,115 94,164 1921 Waterway from White Lake to Pecan Island, LA" -- 1948 10,904 742 -- Waterway from Empire, LA, to Gulf of Mexico Complete 1981 1,068,142 1,672,251 Jun. 1950 Waterway from Intracoastal Waterway to Bayou Dulac, LA Complete 1990 641,608 1,908,280 Aug. 1964 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. I1. 12. 13. 14. 1S. 16. 17. 18. 19. 20. 21. 22. Transferred to Department of Transportation. Authorized under Truman-Hobbs Act. Completed. Date will be furnished when available. Includes previous project costs. No commerce reported. Abandonment recommended in H. Doc. 467, 69th Cong., Ist sess. Completed except that portion above mile 10.3 providing for widening from 40 feet to 60 feet, which is inactive. By Public Law 88-404, that portion of Bayou Terrebonne between point where Barrow Street crosses said stream and a line determined by prolonging and extending eastern right-of-way line of New Orleans Boulevard southerly to south bank of said stream was declared nonnavigable. Includes $66,000 contributed funds. Operation and maintenance of the structure reported under project "Calcasieu River and Pass, LA." Excludes $50,000 contributed funds. Not completed; incorporated in navigation project "Mermentau River, LA." Not completed; superseded for most of it length by present 12- by 125-foot Gulf Intracoastal Waterway, which coincides with or parallels it. Maintenance project; no future work schedules. Includes $57,555 ($29,974 of which was from Public Works funds) for new work on previous project. Includes $114,519 for maintenance of previous project. Work is under continuing authority. Includes $1,729,989 for previous project. Does not include allotment of $40,000 (9613123). Does not include expenditures of $63,370 (9613123). Includes $169,055 for previous projects and $3,379,676 from permanent indefinite appropriation. Includes $8,811,000 Non-Federal Costs. Channel completed except for IHNC Lock replacement and foreshore protection. Does not include expenditures of $7,267,452 for Dredge Wheeler Ready Reserve. 11-21 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 2000 TABLE 11-D OTHER AUTHORIZED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS Cost to Sep. 2000 For Last Full Report Operation See Annual and Mo. and Yr. Project Report For: Construction Maintenance Completed Amite River and Tributaries, LA 1964 3,034,255' -- Feb. 1964 Bayou Choupique, LA2 1954 129,930 -- Mar. 1954 Bayou Rapides, LA2 1952 95,179 -- Dec. 1951 Harvey Canal, Bayou Barataria Levee, LA 1979 1,018,005 -- Morgan City and Vicinity, LA 1992 1,975,628 -- -- 1. In addition, the following was expended from contributed funds: Amite River and tributaries ........................................ $ 430 Harvey Canal, Bayou Barataria Levee, LA ................... 425,209 2. Authorized by Chief of Engineers (Sec. 205, .1948 Flood Control Act, as amended) TABLE 11-E DEAUTHORIZED PROJECTS For Last Full Date Federal Contributed Report See Annual and Funds Funds Project Report for Authority Expended Expended Baton Rouge Harbor 1946 Nov. 2, 1979 -- -- Segment Between Section 12, Mi 2.5 and 5.0 Public Law 93-251 (WRDA 74) Bayou Grosse Tete, 1969 May 6, 1981 -- -- LA DAEN-CWP-A Letter Subj: Completed Action on 5th Deauthorization Rpt, dated Jun. 17, 1981 Lake Borgne and 1942 Nov 1979 -- -- Chef Menteur Bulkheads and Jetties Vinton Waterway, LA 1950 Nov. 2, 1979 Section 12, Public Law 93-251 (WRDA of 1974) 11-22 NEW ORLEANS, LA, DISTRICT TABLE 11-F FLOOD CONTROL WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION Flood control activities pursuant to Section 205, P.L. 858 80th Congress, as amended (preauthorization) FISCAL YEAR COST Project Federal Non-Federal Total Bayou Tete L'Ours, LA Crown Point Basin, LA Goose Bayou Basin, LA Jean Lafitte, LA (Fisher School Basin) Pochitolawa Creek, LA Lockport to La Rose, LA Lower Lafitte Basin, LA Pailet Basin, LA Rosethorne Basin in Lafitte, LA Section 205 Coordination Oakville to La Reussite, LA Henderson Bayou Ascension Parish, LA Stephensville, St. Martin Parish, LA Braithwhite Park, LA Donaldson Canal, LA Total Section 205 11,850 65,041 71,566 737,346 4,547 45,424 59,867 84,884 26,273 16,380 78,911 39,614 54,303 80,307 8,476 $1,384,809 18,537 65,041 32,690 104,256 737,346 4,547 45,424 59,867 36,794 121,678 14,442 40,715 16,380 78,911 39,614 54,303 15,564 95,891 8,476 $99,490 $1,484,299 Emergency StreamBank & Shoreline Protection (Section 14 of 1946 Flood Control Act, P.L. 526) (Section 27 of the 1974 Water Resources Development Act) FISCAL YEAR COST Project Federal Non-Federal Total Fagan Drive Bridge, Arnolds Creek, LA 38,826 38,826 Scotlandville Bluff, LA 54,982 54,982 Section 14 Coordination 11,005 11,005 Stage Highway 1185, Site 1 -1,843 6,248 4,405 State Highway 3066 Below Indian Village 507,043 344,213 851,256 Highway 1185, Site #2, Avoyelles Parish 11,610 11,610 Highway 77, Bayou Plaquemine, LA 19,470 19,470 Total Section 14 $307,658 $350,461 $991,554 Clearing and Snagging For Flood Control (Section 208, 1954 Flood Control, as amended) Project Federal Bayou Manchac, Ascension Parish, LA Section 208 Coordination Total Section 208 FISCAL YEAR COST Non-Federal 66,352 5,996 $72,348 Total 66,352 5,996 $72,348 11-23 _ __ REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 2000 TABLE 11-G ENVIRONMENTAL WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION Wetland/Other Aquatic Habitat Creation (Section 204, Public Law 102-560) FISCAL YEAR COST Project Federal Non-Federal Total Barataria Bay Waterway, MI 31 to 24.5, LA 753 -753 0 Sabine National Wildlife Refuge, LA 1999 47,613 -1,728 45,885 COSMAD, Sediment Trap for Marsh Creation, LA 105,970 105,970 Mississippi River - Gulf-Outlet, MI -2 to 3 Berm, LA -82 -27 -109 Section 204 Coordination Account 7,995 7,995 Houma Navigation Canal, Barrier Island Restoration 20,471 20,471 Total Section 204 $2,528,958 $-2,508 $180,212 Aquatic Ecosystem Restoration (Section 206, Public Law 102-560) FISCAL YEAR COST Project Federal Non-Federal Total Coordination Account Funds 10,010 10,010 Preliminary Restoration Plans 59917 59,917 Comite River @ Hoopa Rd, LA 158,867 158,867 Southern Shores Lake Borgne, LA 59,987 59.987 Total Section 206 $288,781 $288,781 Project modifications to improve environment (Section 1135, Public Law 99-662) FISCAL YEAR COST Project Federal Non-Federal Total Coordination Account Funds (062092) 8,759 8,759 Initial Appraisals (062093) 5,169 5,169 Gulf Intercoastal Waterway, Plaquemines Lock, LA (096063) 299,701 299,701 New River Restoration (164063) 166,694 166,694 GIWW Weeks Bay Iveria PH, LA (164131) 28,490 28,490 GIWW Miles 220 to 222.5 W of Harvey Lock, LA (134132) 87,923 87,923 Bayou Sauvage Nat Wildlife Refuge, LA (164241) 78,316 78,316 Total Section 1135 78,316 675,052 11-24 NEW ORLEANS, LA, DISTRICT TABLE 11-H ACTIVE GENERAL INVESTIGATIONS (96x3121) FISCAL YEAR COST Item and CWIS Number Federal Non-Federal Total SURVEYS (Category 100) Navigation(110) Intracoastal Waterway Locks, LA-81289 Morganza to Gulf of Mexico-012875 Calcasieu Lock, LA-014314 Subtotal Flood Damage Prevention Studies(120) Black Bayou, Diversion, LA-13236 Calcasieu River Basin, LA-014378 Jefferson Parish, LA-13236 Lafayette Parish, LA-13251 Orleans Parish, LA-13237 West Shore, Lake Pontchartrain-10455 St. Bernard Parish, LA-099397 Subtotal Special Studies(140) Amite River and Tribs-014358 Louisiana Coastal Area Ecosystem-013573 Morganza, LA to the Gulf of Mexico-012875 Subtotal Miscellaneous Activities(170) Gulf of Mexico Program-17251 Interagency Water Resources Development-14713 National Estuary Program-53903 North American Waterfowl Management-53904 Special Investigations-17250 Subtotal 548,118 101.244 845,840 548,118 845,810 101.244 $ 649,362 845,840 1,495,202 306 306 85,925 85,925 167,669 148,370 316,039 261,332 227,324 488,656 328,583 323,583 247,011 247,011 74,361 74,361 $1,160,187 375,695 1,535,882 94,420 94,420 1,423,244 153,663 1,576,907 30,051 30,051 $1,517,664 183,714 1,701,378 152,108 152,108 37,777 37,777 565 565 4,841 4,841 29,553 29,553 $ 224,844 224,844 11-25 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 2000 TABLE 11-H ACTIVE GENERAL INVESTIGATIONS (Continued) (96x3121) FISCAL YEAR COST Item and CWIS Number Federal Non-Federal Total Planning Assistance to States(180) Amite Basin Flood Hazard Mitigation-022050 5,099 11,555 16,654 Ascension Parish Hydrologic & Hydraulic Modeling-022040 19,716 335 20,051 Ascension Wr Data Management-022045 0 24,186 24,186 Calcasieu Parish Data Management-(022043) 150 1,824 1,974 Chitimacha Indian Tribe Emergency Response Phase 2-071505 25,305 5,191 30,496 Chitimacha River Corridor Master-71506 2,664 0 2,664 Chitmacha Indian Tribe River Corridor-071503 3,575 396 3,971 Chitmacha Tribe H&H-071501 0 1,597 1,597 Chitmacha Raintree Planning-071507 79,500 58,004 137,504 Chitmacha Reservation Civil Plan-071508 146,109 90,426 236,535 City of Hammond Data Management-22038 0 3,565 3,565 City of Port Allen-22060 25,000 0 25,000 Comprehensive Performance Evaluations-022036 80,948 36,109 117,057 Donaldson Riverfront Development-22053 24,269 25,000 49,269 DOTD State Water Plan-022044 0 13,403 13,403 DOTD Water Resource Prioritization Study-022044 50,000 1,627 51,627 E. Baton Rouge Parish Data Management-022032 50 7,653 7,703 E. Baton Rouge Parish GIS Mapping-022028 1,730 4,612 6,342 EBR Value Engineering-02051 28,619 29,572 58,191 Evangeline Parish Environment-022042 160 7,721 7,881 Harahan H&H-22055 30,100 803 30,903 Iberia Eco-Tourism Plan-22059 25,000 134 25,134 Lafayette Flood Preparedness-22031 13,686 0 13,686 LA State Penitentary-22031 12,866 13,710 26,576 Morgan City Amac-22056 25,000 1,728 26,728 Planning Assistance to States-022038 40 0 40 Plaquemines Parish Data Management-22039 126 4,826 4,952 St. Charles East Bank Recreation-022049 44,562 77,441 122,003 St. Charles West Bank Recreation-22048 16,815 55,894 72,709 St. Charles Parish Water Resources Data Management-022035 0 27,088 27,088 St. James Water Resources Data M-022047 880 4,998 5,878 St. Martin Eco-Tourism Plan-22058 25,000 859 25,859 St. Tammany Wr Data Management-022046 0 74,564 74,564 Tunica Master Planning-72501 377 0 377 W. Baton Rouge Riverfront Development-22034 50 1,502 1,552 W. Baton Rouge Water Front Planning-22054 17,500 15,443. 32,943 Subtotal 704,908 601,778 1,306,662 TOTAL (Category 100) $4,256,965 . 2.007.027 4.617.06 11-26 NEW ORLEANS, LA, DISTRICT TABLE 11-H ACTIVE GENERAL INVESTIGATIONS (Continued) (96x3121) FISCAL YEAR COST Item and CWIS Number Federal Non-Federal Total COLLECTION AND STUDY OF BASIC DATA (Category 200) Flood Plain Management-82030 Quick Responses-82045 Technical Services-82040 Special Studies, Tunica-Biloxi, LA-083167 Special Studies- Town of Livingston-083171 Special Studies-Armaudville-81377 Special Studies-Digitized Records-83186 Southwest Louisiana Hurricane Evacuation Study-83152 Southwest Louisiana Hurricane Evacuation Re-Study-83152 Bi-State Hurricane Transportation Analysis-83179 NFPC-82025 Special Studies, Haysville, KS-83012 Subtotal TOTAL (Category 200) PROJECTS NOT AUTIIORIZED FOR CONSTRUCTION (Category 400) Navigation Projects (421) Port Fourchon, LA-010009 Subtotal Flood Control Projects (450) East Baton Rouge Parish, LA-012909 Subtotal TOTAL (Category 400) PRECONSTRUCTION ENGINEERING AND DESIGN (Category 600) Flood Control Projects (650) Port Fourchon, LA-010009 Comite River, LA-077059 East Baton Rouge Parish, LA-012909 Subtotal TOTAL (Category 600) GRAND TOTAL GENERAL INVESTIGATIONS 42,314 6,624 136,023 2,083 40,663 12,826 4,580 46,014 2,972 5,647 7,371 305 42,314 6,624 136,023 2,083 40,663 12,826 4,580 46,014 2,972 5,647 7,371 305 388,550 388,550 $ 266,268 266,268 4,969 4,969 $ 4,969 4,969 11,453 11,453 $ 11,453 11,453 $ 16,422 16.422 73,477 73,477 7,614 7,614 307,506 307,506 $ 388,597 388,597 $ 388,597 388.597 $4.928,744 2.007.027 5.546.154 11-27 VICKSBURG, MS, DISTRICT* This district comprises western and central Mississippi, southern Arkansas, northern Louisiana, and a very small portion of southwestern Tennessee, embraced in drainage basins of eastern tributaries of Mississippi River south of Horn Lake Creek to and including Buffalo River; Pearl River Basin in Mississippi; independent tributaries of the Gulf of Mexico south of the Buffalo River Basin to the Mississippi-Louisiana state line; western tributaries of Mississippi River between White and Atchafalaya Rivers including Arkansas River Basin below a point 3 miles upstream from Pine Bluff and Arkansas River below mile 36.1 near Pendleton, AR; Ouachita and Black Rivers in Arkansas and Louisiana; and Red River in Louisiana and Arkansas to the Texas-Arkansas state line. The Vicksburg District territory encompasses 68,000 square miles. IMPROVEMENTS Page Flood Control (cont.) 1. Ouachita and Black Rivers below Camden, AR ..................................................... 2-2 2. Red River emergency bank protection .......... 12-2 3. Red River Waterway-Mississippi River to Shreveport, LA ............................ 12-3 4. Navigation work under special authorization ................................................... 12-3 Flood Control 5. Aloha Rigolette, LA......................................12-3 6. McKinney Bayou, AR......................................12-4 7. Ouachita River Levees, LA .............................. 12-4 8. Ouachita River and tributaries AR and LA ................................................... . 2-5 9. Pearl River Basin, MS and LA ................. 12-5 10. Pearl River, Slidell, St. Tammany Parish, LA ........................................................ 12-6 11. Red River below Denison Dam (Vicksburg Dist.) .............................................. 12-7 12. Red River below Denison Dam, levees and bank stabilization (Vicksburg D istrict) ............................................................ 12-7 13. West Agurs, LA, Levee..................................12-7 14. Inspection of completed Flood Control Projects............................................................12-8 15. Flood control work under special authorization...................... 12-8 16. Ecosystem Restoration Work Under Special Authorization ...................................... 12-8 17. Catastrophic Disaster Preparedness Program...................................................... 12-8 18. General Regulatory Program ........................... 12-8 Tables Table 12-A Cost and Financial Statement......... 12-9 Table 12-B Authorizing Legislation................ 12-11 Table 12-C Ouachita and Black Rivers, AR and LA (9-Foot Project), Locks and Dams ........................... 12-15 Table 12-D Other Authorized Navigation Project ..... ................................ 12-16 Table 12-E Ouachita River and Tributaries-Existing Project ......... 12-18 Table 12-F Red River Below Denison Dam (Vicksburg District) New Projects ............................. 12-19 Table 12-G Red River Below Denison Dam (Vicksburg District) Incorporated Projects................. 12-20 Table 12-H Other Authorized Flood Control Projects........................ 12-21 Table 12-I Deauthorized Projects ........... . 12-23 Table 12-J Active General Investigations ...... 12-24 12-1 Navigation Page REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 2000 Navigation 1. OUACHITA AND BLACK RIVERS BELOW CAMDEN, AR Location. Ouachita River rises in Polk County, AR, and flows southeasterly and southerly about 600 miles. Below its confluence with the Tensas and Little Rivers at Jonesville, LA, it is called Black River, which enters Red River 35.5 miles from the Mississippi River. Previous projects. See page 683 of Annual Report for 1962 for details. Existing project. See page 684 of Annual Report for 1962 for details of the old 6.5-foot navigation project. Modified project and project for Red River below Fulton, AR, provide for a channel 9 feet deep and 100 feet wide in Red River between Old River and mouth of Black River, and in Black and Ouachita Rivers from mouth of Black River to Camden, AR. Authorized features for the modified project include four new locks and dams, in-river construction dredging to achieve a 9-foot navigation channel depth, and channel realignment. All 4 locks and dams are complete and in operation and initial channel dredging is complete providing 9-foot navigation depth. Remaining work consists of realignment of 25 restricted bendway sites between river miles 195 at Sterlington, LA, and river mile 335 at Camden, AR, on the Ouachita River. With these improvements in place the river system will be navigable by a four-barge tow (two abreast) to Crossett, AR, river mile 237, and a two-barge tow (abreast) to Camden, AR. Mitigation features include the 65,000-acre Felsenthal National Wildlife Refuge in Arkansas, the 18,000-acre D'Arbonne National Wildlife Refuge in Louisiana, a series of recreation facilities along the waterway, and improvements to Catahoula Lake to preserve it for migratory waterfowl. Estimated total cost for the nine-foot navigation project is $281,009,000 which includes $263,000,000 Federal costs and $18,009,000 non-Federal costs. Local cooperation. Local interests are required to furnish the construction rights-of-way for the realignment work. Seven of the 25 sites are within the Felsenthal National Wildlife Refuge and are already owned by the Federal Government. However, there have been no indications that the land for the remaining 18 sites will be forthcoming because of strong opposition to the realignment work by local environmental groups. The six remaining recreation facilities are unscheduled at this time due to the lack of required cost sharing agreements. Terminal facilities. Public loading docks are at Columbia, LA, and Camden and Crossett, AR. Privately owned docks and loading and unloading facilities are at Columbia, Monroe, and Sterlington, LA, and El Dorado, Calion, and Camden, AR. Two grain-handling facilities and a petroleum-loading facility are in the vicinity of Jonesville, LA, a grain-handling facility is in the vicinity of Acme, LA, and a petroleum-loading facility is in the vicinity of Smackover, AR. Operations and results during fiscal year. In FY 00, maintenance dredging was performed from Camden, AR, to the mouth of the Black River by the contract Dredge Jolly Roger. 1,001,380 cubic yards of material were moved from the navigation channel. Condition as of Sep. 30. The project is 92 percent complete and provides limited navigation as far north as Camden, AR. All four locks and dams associated with the project are complete and in operation. Design and construction of the remaining features is on hold pending a consensus between the states of Arkansas and Louisiana concerning the type of development desired or the additional studies needed to reach a decision. 2. RED RIVER EMERGENCY BANK PROTECTION Location. In northwest Louisiana, southwest Arkansas, and northeast Texas, along the Red and Old Rivers between the Mississippi River and the head of the levee system above Index, AR. Existing project. Provides for realigning the banks by means of cutoffs and training works and for stabilizing banks by means of revetments, dikes, and other methods as emergency conditions may require in advance of developing the design for the entire Red River Waterway project. Estimated cost for this work (October 1997) is $112,862,000 Federal and $2,182,000 non-Federal, including a cash contribution of $7,000. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. For details see pages 11-19 to 11-20, Annual Report FY 80. Operations and results during fiscal year. Construction was completed on Black Lake Revetment in ARK and LA. Condition as of Sep. 30. Construction was initiated in October 1972 and is 99 percent complete. 12-2 VICKSBURG, MS, DISTRICT 3. RED RIVER WATERWAYPROJECT J. Bennett Johnston Waterway Location. From east central to northwest Louisiana along the Red and Old Rivers between the Mississippi River and Shreveport, LA. Existing project. Provides a navigation route from the Mississippi River at the junction with Old River via Old and Red River to Shreveport, LA, developing a channel approximately 236 miles long, 9 feet deep, and 200 feet wide. The development includes five locks and dams, realignment and contraction of the river as necessary to develop an efficient channel, and bank stabilization as necessary to hold the newly developed channel in position. Facilities to provide and acquisition of wildlife mitigation lands opportunities for recreation and for fish and wildlife development and acquisition of Wildlife mitigation lands are an integral part of the project. Estimated cost for new work is $1,896,133,000 Federal and $88,833,000 non-Federal. The Federal cost includes $442,000 for aids to navigation by U.S. Coast Guard. Local cooperation. For details see page 11-21, Annual Report FY 80. The Red River Waterway Commission, governing body of the Red River Waterway District, executed an act of assurance for all project features in Louisiana on Feb. 26, 1969, supported by resolution dated Jan. 30, 1969. The assurances were accepted for and on behalf of the United States on Apr. 15, 1969. The Commission furnished amended assurances covering the provisions of Public Law 91-646 and Public Law 91-611 on May 23, 1973, for the portion of the project Within Louisiana. These were accepted for and on behalf of the United States on Nov. 14, 1973. A Local Cooperation Agreement between the Department of the Army and the Red River Waterway Commission for the acquisition of mitigation lands in the vicinity of Loggy Bayou Wildlife Management Area was executed on Jun. 16, 1993, and a project cooperation agreement between the same agencies for the acquisition of mitigation lands in the vicinity of Bayou Bodcau was executed on July 17, 1996. Terminal facilities. Local interests are to provide adequate terminal facilities along the waterway. The Corps entered into an agreement with the City of Alexandria, LA, whereby material excavated from the Philip Bayou Realignment could be used as fill for port construction at mile 109. Construction of the realignment and port fill are complete. Construction of the Caddo-Bossier and Natchitoches Parish ports are complete. Operations and results during fiscal year. The following contracts were completed in FY 99: Eagle Bend Capout, PH. I; Socot Capout PH III; and Campti Capout and Hadden-Ft. Derussy Repairs. Several channel training works were initiated and completed in FY 00 to refine the reliability and safety in the navigation channel. Engineering and design for additional channel work was continued. Ile Au Vaches Dikes and Ben Routh reinforcement work was initiated. In addition, acquisition of mitigation lands in the Bayou Bodcau area was initiated. Maintenance dredging was performed along the waterway by the Contract Dredge Butcher, during Fiscal Year 2000. 1,623,328 cubic yards of material were removed from the navigation channel. Condition as of Sep. 30. Construction was initiated in July 1973, and project is 88 percent complete. Feasibility phase studies were authorized by WRDA 96 to determine the feasibility of extending navigation on the Red River from the vicinity of Shreveport, LA, to the vicinity of Index, AR, or to any justifiable interim point were initiated in Mar 99. Feasibility studies are scheduled for completion in Sep 02. The Arkansas Red River Commission is the non-Federal sponsor. 4. NAVIGATION WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION Navigation activities pursuant to Sec. 107, Public Law 87-645, as amended. In FY 00, $4,980 was expended on Section 107 Coordination Account; $3,826 on Yazoo Diversion Canal, MS; $10,555 on Yellow Bend Port, AR; $1,193 on Ouachita River, Smackover, AR, $44,824 on Vidalia Port, Vidalia, LA. Flood Control 5. ALOIIA-RIGOLETTE AREA, LA Location. The project is located in north-central Louisiana between the towns of Winnfield and Pineville on the left descending bank of the Red River. 12-3 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 2000 Authorized Project. The recommended plan consists of a three-barrel floodgate structure installed at the mouth of Bayou Darrow to reopen it to the Red River, 8.2 miles of clearing and snagging on Bayou Darrow from its mouth upstream to Bayou Rigolette, construction of a closure and low-flow structure on Bayou Rigolette just below its junction with Bayou Darrow, and realignment of Sam's Bayou and appropriate mitigation features. Local Cooperation. The City of Colfax, LA, has agreed to cost share this project. The Project Cooperation Agreement was signed on Sept. 19, 1994. Operations And Results During Fiscal Year. Construction is underway on the Bayou Darrow Structure and Low Flow Structure Item 2. Right-ofway acquisition for Item 3 is underway. Condition as of Sep. 30. Construction underway on Items 1 and 2. Construction of Item 4 is complete. 6. MCKINNEY BAYOU, AR Location. The project area is located in southwestern Arkansas in the vicinity of Texarkana, AR and TX. The McKinney Bayou area is a crescent-shaped watershed located adjacent to the Red River containing approximately 340 square miles. Existing project. The authorized project consists of flow diversion to the Red River at the state line between Arkansas and Texas, flow diversion into the Red River at Buzzard Bluff, improvement of McKinney Bayou channel, and land acquisition for mitigation. The State Line Diversion, Buzzard Bluff Diversion, and channel improvement features have subsequently been reclassified to the inactive category due to a lack of local support or lack of economic justification. Alternative plans developed to reduce flooding consisted of various channel improvements on the lower 27.6 miles of McKinney Bayou. A clearing and snagging alternative with project first costs of $3.2 million and a plan combining clearing and snagging with channel improvement with project first costs of $4.9 million were found economically feasible. Shortly after initiation of reconnaissance studies, Headquarters, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, in an effort to streamline the study process, approved proceeding directly from the reconnaissance phase to preconstruction engineering and design (PED), subject to reconnaissance study finding being substantially in accordance with the authorized McKinney Bayou project and with previous U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, New Orleans Disrict, study findings. Under this arrangement, the cost-shared feasibility phase would be eliminated. Study findings substantiated this decision. As a result, it was recommended that the study effort progress into PED. The reconnaissance report was approved by the U.S. Army Corps, Mississippi Valley Division, on May 12, 1997. The plan recommended for implementation would be developed during PED. The local cost-sharing sponsors, the Miller County Improvement and Drainage District and the McKinney Bayou Drainage District have indicated by letters dated Sep. 24, and Sep. 30, 1997, respectively, that they do not have the financial resources to undertake project construction. Therefore, they do not wish to continue into the next project development phase, PED. The project is being held in abeyance pending further developments regarding the local sponsor's ability to cost-share. If this cost-sharing issue cannot be resolved, all activities associated with the project will be terminated and it will be classified as inactive. Condition as of Sep. 30. A new start reconnaissance study was initiated in January 1996. This restudy of the authorized project to address the feasibility of channel improvements on McKinney Bayou to reduce flooding of agricultural and other properties was completed in March 1997. Project is approved to proceed directly into preconstruction engineering and design pending execution of a PED cost sharing agreement. 7. OUACHITA RIVER LEVEES, LA Location. East bank of Ouachita River between Bastrop, LA, and Sandy Bayou. Loop levees on the west bank at West Monroe, Columbia, and Bawcomville. Existing project. There are 105.8 miles of levee on the east bank and 11.6 miles of levee in the three loops on the west bank. A Summary Report authorized gravel surfacing 117.4 miles of levee, and enlarging 36.6 miles of levee. Estimated Federal cost is $29,500,000. Estimated non-Federal cost is $5,404,000. Local cooperation. Requirements and assurances of local cooperation are fully described on page 12-6 of FY 80 Annual Report. A supplemental agreement for the Bawcomville segment was executed in FY 90. The 1991 Water and Energy Appropriations Act gave the Federal government responsibility for the repair and/or replacement of the deteriorated drainage structures. The Assurances Agreement for Local Cooperation was supplemented to reflect this change in responsibility. The supplemental agreement covered 12-4 VICKSBURG, MS, DISTRICT Work performed in Fiscal Years 1992, 1993, 1994, 1995, 1996, and 1997. Condition as of Sep. 30. Item 1 of the Monroe to Sandy Bayou Levee enlargement project was completed Jul. 7, 1978. Additional work was deferred pending results of a comprehensive study of the entire Ouachita River Levee System. A summary report indicating that it is economically feasible to raise portions of the existing levee to authorized grade and that complete rehabilitation of the levee system was necessary was approved by LMVD on Oct. 1, 1986. The study results were disseminated to the project sponsor and interested parties in October 1986. The Project was reclassified as an active project on May 7, 1987. The final summary report was sent to the Office of the Chief of Engineers in July 1988 and design was initiated on the Bawcomville segment of the Ouachita River levees. A construction contract for the Bawcomville levee enlargement is complete. All deteriorated culverts have been replaced and/or rehabilitated. Item 1 of the Bastrop to Monroe Levee enlargement was advertised and awarded in FY 99. Construction of the levee enlargement is underway and is scheduled to be completed in late FY 00. 8. OUACHITA RIVER AND TRIBUTARIES, AR AND LA Location. Improvements comprising comprehen- Sive projects are on main stem Ouachita River, AR and LA, on its tributaries, Caddo and Little Missouri Rivers, and in Pine Bluff, AR. Description of Ouachita River Basin is presented in greater detail on page 690 of Annual Report for 1962. Existing project. The authorized general plan for flood control and other purposes in the Ouachita River Basin includes the projects listed in Table 12-E. The 1966 Flood Control Act modified the Bayou Bartholomew and Tributaries, AR and LA, project to include 10 water-retention lakes in the western tributaries of Bayou Bartholomew in Arkansas and 6 local levee units along the main stem of the bayou in Louisiana. Local cooperation. Fully complied with for completed features of comprehensive project. (See indi- Vidual statements for further details.) Operations and results during fiscal year. Operations for Blakely Mt. Dam-Lake Ouachita, DeGray Lake, Narrows Dam-Lake Greeson, Bayou Bartholomew and Tributaries, and Ouachita River Levees are shown in individual reports in 1985. Condition as of Sep. 30. Pertinent data on those features which are complete or not started are in Table 12-E. Conditions of Blakely Mt. Dam-Lake Ouachita, DeGray Lake, and Narrows Dam-Lake Greeson are given in the individual reports in 1985 report. Reconnaissance studies of flooding problems in Ouachita Parish, LA, were initiated in January 1994. Study efforts are concentrating on the developing urban area around Monroe, LA. The reconnaissance report, completed in January 1995, recommended a feasibility study be conducted on flood reduction for the River Styx Bayou area under authority of Section 205 of the Flood Control Act of 1948, as amended. The study addressed alternative sized pumping stations. The final Detailed Project Report was completed in November 1995. Plans and specifications for the project are complete. The construction contract was awarded on Sep 30 98. This contract is scheduled for completion in FY 00. 9. PEARL RIVER BASIN, MS AND LA Location. The basin comprises most of the South-central portion of Mississippi and a small part of southeast Louisiana. The Pearl River begins in Neshoba County, MS, and flows southwesterly 113 miles to the vicinity of Jackson, MS, then southeasterly 233 miles to the vicinity of Bogalusa, LA. At that point, the Pearl River splits into the East and West Pearl Rivers, and flows southerly 44 and 48 miles, respectively, before entering the Rigolets and Lake Borgne. Existing projects. The Jackson-East Jackson Flood Control Project provides for improvements of the Pearl River at Jackson, MS. This project includes two levee systems totaling 13.2 miles in length, with two pumping stations, four gated outlets, and 18.9 miles of channel rectification including three cutoffs with a total length of 2.2 miles in the Pearl River. This project was authorized by the Flood Control Act of Jul. 14, 1960. Construction began in July 1964 and work was completed in FY 68. Total Federal cost of the project was $7,190,200. The FY 83 Jobs Bill authorized extension of the Jackson-East Jackson West Bank levee system along the Fortification Street I-55 exit. This extension was initiated and completed in FY 84. Public Law 98-63, dated Jul. 29, 1983, authorized the vicinity of Jackson project. This authority provided for additional measures to prevent recurring flood damages along the Pearl River at Jackson and included 12-5 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 2000 3.3 miles of floodway clearing and enlarging the opening at the Highway 25 Bridge. This work has been completed. Mitigation lands for the clearing were purchased by the local sponsor in May 1985 and the Corps has reimbursed the local sponsor to cover the cost of these lands. Total Federal cost of this project is $1,800,000. Authorized projects. Public Law 99-88, dated Aug. 15, 1985, authorized planning, design, engineering, and construction of a levee system in Slidell, LA, to protect 3,265 residential and commercial structures from floods in the West Pearl. Public Law 99-662, dated Nov. 17, 1986, authorized construction of Shoccoe Dam and various flood control measures for Carthage-Leake County, MS. Local cooperation. Requirements are described in full on page 12-6 of the FY 92 report. Condition as of Sep. 30. An overall basin study is essentially complete, except for alternative studies to Shoccoe Dry Dam as discussed below. Flood control feasibility studies for Jackson, MS, recommending Shoccoe Dam, and for Slidell, LA, recommending a 15-mile levee system, have been completed. Detailed engineering and design studies have been terminated due to the lack of a local sponsor. As a result of upstream opposition, Shoccoe Dam is not implementable. In response to a request by the local sponsor, the Pearl River Basin Development District, reconnaissance studies to evaluate alternatives to Shoccoe for flood damage reduction in the Jackson Metropolitan Area have been completed and a potentially feasible levee plan identified. A Feasibility Cost Sharing Agreement was signed with the Local Sponsor on Sep. 25, 1991. The feasibility studies focused on a comprehensive levee system and other flood control measures across the basin to reduce damages associated with flooding from the Pearl River. The Feasibility Study was terminated in July 1998 due to the lack of a cost sharing sponsor. Studies of various flood control measures for Carthage-Leake County, Columbia and Picayune, MS; Bogalusa, LA, and the Bogue Chitto Subbasin have been completed. None were found economically feasible. We are currently coordinating with the NRCS to identify other feasible projects in the basin. Navigation studies have been conducted on the East and West Pearl Rivers. Results of these studies indicate that maintenance necessary to reopen the existing West Pearl River navigation project is economically justified. The final EIS was filed with EPA in March 1994. Studies indicate that the West Pearl River Navigation Project is economically justified, engineeringly feasible, and in the overall public interest. Maintenance dredging was to resume in the spring of 1995; however, the Corps was enjoined from dredging until a trial could be held in Federal court. At present, litigation has been stated and the court has retained jurisdiction until the Corps is prepared to initiate dredging and notified the court. This notification could take place when the record of decision is signed and the Corps is ready in all other aspects to initiate dredging. The NEPA process is not complete; therefore, dredging of the West Pearl River will not occur in 2000. Studies also indicate that the East Pearl River does not have sufficient existing flows to support a 7- to 9-foot-deep navigation channel. The navigation study for Port Bienville, MS, has been terminated due to withdrawal of the Hancock County Port and Harbor Commission as local sponsor. Reconnaissance studies of flow distribution between the West Pearl River and the East Pearl River (boundary between the States of Louisiana and Mississippi) in the Lower Basin have been completed. Investigations of low flow conditions in the Walkiah Bluff area were initiated in FY 95 under authority of Section 307(d) of WRDA 90. A detailed project report was completed in May 1997 which recommended a 50-50 low-flow distribution (50 percent down Wilson Slough and 50 percent down the Pearl River). Construction of this project was completed in Dec 99. Reconnaissance studies of flood damage prevention and erosion control along Caney Creek in Jackson, MS, have been completed. These studies indicated that flood damages attributable to headwater flooding from Caney Creek are relatively insignificant and will not economically justify a water resource improvement plan under current conditions. Studies also found that most of the more serious streambank erosion problems along the creek have been corrected through actions undertaken by other public entities and agencies. 10. PEARL RIVER, SLIDELL, ST. TAMMANY PARISH, LA Location. The project is located in the southeastern portion of the State of Louisiana and consists of the area bounded by the West Pearl River on the east, Interstate 10 on the west, and Lake Pontchartrain on the south. Authorized project. The project is broken into two segments of levees. The segment north of I-10 will consist of 4.0 miles of levee, a pumping station, a floodgate structure, and minor drainage structures. This levee will protect the Slidell area north of I-10 from flooding associated with a 200-year hydrological event on the Pearl River. The segment south of 1-10 will consist of 9.0 miles of levees, three pumping stations, floodgates, and minor drainage structures. This levee will protect the Slidell area south of I-10 from flooding 12-6 VICKSBURG, MS, DISTRICT associated with a 200-year hydrological event on the Pearl River and provides the same level of protection against hurricane surges. These two levee segments total 13 miles of levee and would protect some 3,029 homes. Estimated Federal cost is $28,437,000. Estimated non-Federal cost is $9,479,000. Local cooperation. The project sponsor, St. TammanyLevee Board, and the Assistant Secretary of the Army (Civil Works), in an agreement consistent with the Fiscal Year 1985 Supplemental Appropriation Act Public Law 99-88) and Senate Report 1567, signed the Local Cooperation Agreement Jun. 30, 1986. The 1997 Louisiana Regular Legislative Session abolished the St. Tammany Levee District. Operations and results during fiscal year. This project has been terminated due to the abolishment of the project sponsor. Condition as of Sep. 30. Completed resolution of comments on the General Design Memorandum for north levee only. Preparation of plans and specifications has been terminated. No construction has taken place. 11. RED RIVER BELOW DENISON DAM (VICKSBURG DISTRICT) Location. On Red River and its tributaries below Denison Dam, in Oklahoma, Arkansas, Texas, and Louisiana. (Refer to Geological Survey State maps and folio "Maps of Red River" - 1958 edition.) Existing project. Flood Control Act of 1946 approved general plan for flood control on Red River below Denison Dam, TX and OK, which provides for construction of six flood control reservoirs in combination with existing or authorized Federal and non-Federal levee improvements, modified as required, and channel stabilization at locations where levee setbacks are impossible or uneconomical. This act further authorized incorporation of several separate existing projects for flood damage prevention along Red River below Denison, above jurisdiction of the MRC, into this project. By Public Law 780, 83rd Cong., 2nd sess., as amended by Public Law 218, 84th Cong., Ist sess., and Public Law 645, 86th Cong., Ist sess., plan of improvement was amended to include additional projects as indicated in following lists of reservoirs and local protection works considered in general flood control plan for the Red River below Denison Dam, and existing flood control projects incorporated into project in Vicksburg District. (See Table 12-F for new projects and Table 12-G for incorporated projects.) Local cooperation. See individual reports herein. 12. RED RIVER BELOW DENISON DAM, LEVEES AND BANK STABILIZATION (VICKSBURG DISTRICT) Location. Along the main stem of the Red River from the head of the levee system immediately above Index, AR, through the southwest corner of Arkansas to the vicinity of Boyce, LA, on the right bank, and Pineville, LA. on the left bank. Existing project. Raising and strengthening existing and authorized Red River levees to provide protection against flooding and bank protection works at locations where levee setbacks are impossible or uneconomical. The plan consists of raising and strengthening existing and authorized Red River levees to provide against a flood approximately 20 percent greater than the flood of 1945, the flood of record, as modified by authorized reservoirs. Bank protection works are to be constructed at locations where levee setbacks are impossible or uneconomical. Estimated cost for new work (October 1998) is $83,609,000 Federal and $5,391,000 non-Federal. Local cooperation. Requirements of local cooperation are fully described on page 12-10 of FY 1984 Annual Report. Operations and results during fiscal year. Hired labor forces continued investigations, surveys, and preparation of plans and specifications. Condition as of Sep. 30. Construction was initiated in February 1948 and the levee and bank stabilization are complete with the exception of levee rehabilitation within the state of Arkansas. Construction was completed on the rehabilitation of levee Item 4 in Arkansas. 13. WEST AGURS, LA, LEVEE Location. The West Agurs, LA, Levee is located in Caddo Parish in northwestern Louisiana, immediately adjacent to the northern corporate limits of Shreveport. Existing Project. The West Agurs levee was constructed by local interests in 1961 and incorporated into the Federal project Red River Below Denison Dam Project in 1983. The levee extends from U.S. Highway 71 at the north end of the area to the Texas and Pacific Railroad at the lower end, a distance of approximately 3 miles. In addition to the levee, appurtenant interior 12-7 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 2000 drainage works include a borrow pit channel at an approximate bottom elevation of 150.0 feet NGVD, a 55 CFS pumping station, and one 10- by 10-foot floodgate. The entire system was designed to protect the 700-acre West Agur area from Twelve Mile Bayou headwater and Red River backwater flooding. Total Federal cost is $0. Local Cooperation. The Caddo Levee District completed levee improvements consisting of a temporary ponding area required for the levees to be incorporated into the Federal project in 1983. The West Agur levee was incorporated into the Federal system in 1983. Operation and maintenance of the levee is the responsibility of the Caddo Levee District. Condition as of Sep 30. Studies of flooding problems in the West Agur area conducted under the authority of Section 205 of the 1948 Flood Control Act as amended were completed in March 99. The report completed in December 1998 recommends an additional 55 cfs pump to provide flood protection to commercial and industrial properties located within the leveed area. Plans and specifications for the pumping station are currently being prepared. Project construction is scheduled for FY 01. 14. INSPECTION OF COMPLETED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS Inspection of completed work was accomplished at a cost of $254,000 for the fiscal year. Total cost as of Sep. 30, 2000, is $5,432,441. 15. FLOOD CONTROL WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION Emergency flood control activities-repair, flood fighting, and rescue work. (Public Law 99, 84th Cong., and antecedent legislation.) FY 99 costs for the period were $430,707 for disaster preparedness. Snagging and clearing of navigable streams and tributaries in the interest of flood control (Sec. 208 of 1954 Flood Control Act, Public Law 780, 83rd Cong.) No activity during the period. Emergency bank protection (Sec. 14 of 1956 Flood Control Act, Public Law 780, 83rd Cong.) Total FY costs for emergency bank protection work was $58,191. This included work on Cane Creek, MS, $11,022; Bayou Pierre, $8,460; Little Black Creek, $20,505; Coordination Account Funds $9,945, and Section 14 Coordination Account, $18,204. Flood control activities pursuant to Sec. 205, Public Law 858, 80th Cong., as amended (preauthorization). Ouachita Parish River Styx, LA, $1,852,903, Twelve Mile Bayou $53,547 Camden, AR $70,619; Red Chute Bayou, LA, $55,900; Kings Point, MS, $55,355 Coordination Account Funds $16,473; $656,780 non-Federal on Ouachita Parish Police. 16. ECOSYSTEM RESTORATION WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION Project modifications for improvement of environment pursuant to Sec. 1135, Public Law 99-662, as amended (preauthorization). During the FY, $14,868 was expended on initial appraisals; $18,489 on Coordination Account Funds; $28,506 on Lake Whittington Weir, MS, $389,792 on Catahoula, Lake, LA; $12,480 on Little Tallahatchie River above Sardis Lake, MS; $129,760 on Sulphur River, AR; and $18,994 on Frasier Whitehorse Oxbow, LA; Lake Lee, MS & AR, $3,521; Bayou Macon, $71,223; Bayou Desiard, Monroe, LA, $69,113; Lake George Restoration, Yazoo County, $517. Total cost for Section 1135 was $757,258. Aquatic Restoration pursuant to Section 206, P.L. 104-303. During FY 00, $10,045 was expended on Coordination Account Funds and $9,856 on Preliminary Restoration Plans. 17. CATASTROPHIC DISASTER PREPAREDNESS PROGRAM During FY 00, $24,728 was expended on Local Preparation; $111,152 on National Preparedness, and $1,711 on National Emergency Facilities; and $2,348 on Readiness Training. Total costs for FY 00 was $109,399. 18. GENERAL REGULATORY PROGRAM During FY 00, $1,993,128 was expended on Permit Evaluation, and $314,842 on Enforcement. A total of $2,307,970 was expended in FY 00. 12-8 VICKSBURG, MS, DISTRICT TABLE 12-A COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Total Funds Section to Sep. 30, in Text Project Funding FY 97 FY 98 FY 99 FY 00 2000 Ouachita and Black Rivers below Camden, AR (6.5-foot navigation project) 1". Ouachita and Black Rivers below Camden, AR (9-foot navigation project) 2. Red River Emergency Bank Protection (Contrib. Funds) 3. Red River Waterway Mississippi River to Shreveport, LA (Contrib. Funds) 5. Aloha- Rigolette, LA 6. Contrib. Funds (Contrib. Funds) New Work Approp.$ Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost New Work Approp Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost -- $ 5,248,619' -- 5,248,619' 150,000 111,076 3,573 0 230,759,2512 42,650 230,156,4572 8,698,000 6,919,000 7,403,000 8,637,285 155,377,388 8,646,907 6,646,737 7,683,567 8,638,451 155,142,419 6,000,000 8,451,252 -- 493,000 7,355,000 72,856,000 2,222,056 677,778 7,830,942 72,671,860 6,825 6,825 8,904,000 15,487,000 10,739,000 17,494,000 1,334,564,200 4,921,367 11,354,810 17,188,358 18,418,154 1,333,531,340 9,167,000 12,033,000 9,309,400 13,820,867 103,736,058 9,051,268 12,049,231 9,374,662 13,808,395 102,639,800 -150,893 0 4,916,659 4,879,967 1,814,000 1,418,000 744,000 748,000 7,244,800 1,518,306 1,195,331 1,108,937 823,559 7,161,900 138,000 250,000 156,900 397,923 788,000 982,099 32,553 12-9 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 2000 TABLE 12-A COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT (Continued) See Total Funds Section to Sep. 30, in Text Project Funding FY 97 FY 98 FY 99 FY 00 2000 7. Ouachita River New Work Levees, LA 9. Pearl River Vicinity of Jackson, MS Pearl River Walkiah Bluff (Contrib. Funds) 10. Pearl River, Slidell, St. Tammany Parish, LA 11. Red River below Denison Dam Levees and Bank Stabilization (Vicksburg District) Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost 95,000 2,563,294 293,276 1,306,715 0 300,000 24,763,758 462,763 1,370,435 24,098,932 2,000,000 1,560,000 1,000,000 1,906,884 1,561,608 1,963,685 156,000 141,000 124,400 152,834 136,000 128,840 -- 977,500 220,000 -- 680,951 636,852 -- 939,000 681,346 1,362,608 0 1,466,232 2,080,000 2,079,999 6,560,000 6,474,543 2,760,900 2,667,808 2,050,054 2,020,788 3,586,000 3,682,404 0 76,400,000 809,399 76,072,101 4,500,000 4,000,000 4,000,000 1,962,000 14,462,000 631,071 766,414 5,404,158 4,260,032 11,061,675 New Work -- 741,000 939,200 - QR 5_65 1 191 A94 2,280,200 S27Q9 009 12-10 Natchez Bluff New Work Approp. Cost (Contrib. Funds) Approp. Cost - !- ,J ,l l, 7r L I, -,/ v , 1. Includes $674,068 for new work on previous projects. 2. Includes $3,312,000 PL 98-8 Jobs Bill. Excludes $47,854,000 previously allocated to New Orleans District. 3. Excludes New Orleans District allocation and cost. VICKSBURG, MS, DISTRICT TABLE 12-B AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Work Authorized Documents May 17, 1950 Jul. 14, 1960 Dec. 31, 1970 CANAL 43, AR Channel enlargement CANEY CREEK, MS Authorizes construction of such bank stabilization measures for Caney Creek in the vicinity of Jackson, MS, between McDowell Road and Raymond Road as the Secretary determines necessary for flood damage prevention and erosion control along approximately 3,000 feet of the creek. OUACHITA AND BLACK RIVERS BELOW CAMDEN, AR (See Section 1 of Text) Modification of existing project to provide for 9-foot channel and deepening canal to Felsenthal, AR. Modification of 9-foot project to provide four new locks and dams and channel improvements. Migratory waterfowl refuges on Bayou D'Arbonne in connection with the pool of the Columbia Lock and Dam and in the pool of the Felsenthal Lock and Dam.. RED RIVER EMERGENCY BANK PROTECTION (See Section 2 of Text). Realining the banks by dredging cut-offs and training works and stabilizing banks by means of revetments and dikes. RED RIVER WATERWAY-MISSISSIPPI RIVER TO SIREVEPORT, LA (See Section 3 of Text) Develop a 9 by 200 feet, approximately 236 miles long from Mississippi River at junction of Old River via Old River and Red River to Shreveport, LA, consisting of realinement, bank stabilization, and construction five locks and dams. ALOHA-RIGOLETTE AREA, LA (See Section 5 of Text) Original author incorporated into RRBW Protection FCA 1946 project modified to provide Bayou Darrow outlet. BAYOU BODCAU AND TRIBUTARIES, AR AND LA Extend Cypress Bayou-Red Chute Bayou levee, construct stream closure landside drainage channel and three culverts on Red Chute Bayou and clearing and snagging channel; extend Flat River-Loggy Bayou levee, close Flat River near junction with Cutoff Bayou, and construct control structures on Flat River near junction with Red Chute Bayou; and enlarge Flat River channel to 20 to 35 feet, a distance of 11.6 miles. Sec. 205 of the Flood Control Act of 1948, as amended Authorized by Chief of Engineers, October 31, 1988. Public Law 99-662, 99th Cong., 2d sess. 12-11 S. Doc. 117, 81st Cong., 1st sess. S. Doc. 112, 86th Cong., 2d sess. Report of the Chief of Engineers dated Nov. 25, 1970, and H. Doc. 92-109, 92d Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 304, 90th Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 304, 90th Cong., 2d sess. Public Law 101- 101 Cong., 2nd sess. H. Doc. 203, 89th Cong., Ist sess. Aug. 13, 1968 Aug. 13, 1968 Aug. 18, 1941 Oct. 27, 1965 Jun. 30, 1948 Nov. 17,1986 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 2000 TABLE 12-B AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION (Continued) Acts Work Authorized Documents Water Resources Development Act of 1996 Jun. 30, 1948 as amended NATCHEZ BLUFFS, MS Authorizes bluff stabilization in accordance with the Natchez Bluff study at a total cost of $17,200,000, estimated federal cost of $12,900,000 and non federal cost of $4,300,000. CHAUVIN BAYOU, LA Construction of a 250-cfs pumping plant located adjacent to Chauvin Bayou at the Ouachita River levee and a water control structure in Canal L-11. Public Law 104-303 Sec. 205 of the Flood Control Act of 1948, as amended. Authorized by the Chief of Engineers Feb. 6, 1990. LEAD BAYOU, MS Channel enlargement. Sec. 205 of the Flood Control Act of 1948, as amended. Authorized by Chief of Engineers Jun. 10, 1980. MCKINNEY BAYOU, AR AND TX (See Section 6 of text) Authorizes a comprehensive study and recommendations for development and efficient utilization of water and related resources for the McKinney Bayou area, a tributary of Red Water. MONROE AND WEST MONROE, LA, AND OUACHIITA PARISH, LA Authorizes such structural and nonstructural measures as the Secretary deems feasible to prevent flood damage to the cities of Monroe and West Monroe, LA, and Ouachita Parish, LA. OUACHITA RIVER AND TRIBUTARIES, AR AND LA (See Section 8 of Text) Authorized DeGray Lake; Murfreesboro Lake; extension of floodwall at Monroe to partially close the existing gap; local protection at Bawcomville, LA (subsequently constructed under Sec. 6, Act of May 15, 1928, with local interests contributing one third of cost); Bayou Bartholomew channel improvement, including Deep Bayou and Overflow Creek; Pine Bluff local protection; local protection at Calion, AR; and incorporation, into the Ouachita River and Tributaries project, of all existing projects and portions thereof in the basin above the lower end of the levees on the east bank of the Ouachita River. In addition, the Chief of Engineers authorized on Nov. 14, 1966, additional work on the levees. Public Law 98-63 98th Cong., Ist sess. Public Law 99-662, 99th Cong., 2d sess. S. Doc. 117, 81st Cong., Ist sess. 12-12 Jun. 30, 1948, as amended Jul. 29, 1983 Nov. 17, 1986 May 17, 1950 VICKSBURG, MS, DISTRICT TABLE 12-B AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION (Continued) Acts Work Authorized Documents Jul. 14, 1960 Jun. 13, 1983 Jul. 29, 1983 Aug. 15, 1985 Nov. 17, 1986 Nov. 17, 1986 Jun. 30, 1948, as amended Nov. 17, 1986 Nov. 28, 1990 Water Resources Development Act of 1996 PEARL RIVER, MS AND LA (See Section 9 of Text) Construction of levee system and channel rectification, Pearl River, vicinity of Jackson, MS Accomplish the clearing and channel improvements at Hwy 25 bridge on the Pearl River in the vicinity of Jackson, MS. Design and construct protection to prevent flooding along the Pearl River in the vicinity of Jackson, MS Planning, design, engineering, and construction of a levee system for Slidell, LA, pending binding cost-sharing arrangements acceptable to the Secretary of the Army or under terms and conditions provided in subsequent legislation when enacted into law. Authorizes the Pearl River Basin, including Shoccoe, MS, for the construction of the Shoccoe Dam plus upstream flood control measures at east-central Leake County, south part of Carthage, MS, Highway 35 vicinity, upstream reservoirs on the Pearl River and upstream channels on the Pearl River and elsewhere in Leake County. PEARL RIVER, SLIDELL, ST. TAMMANY PARISH, LA (See Section 10 of Text) Authorizes flood control improvements for Pearl River Basin, St. Tammany, LA, subject to a favorable Chiefs report and approval by the Secretary of the Army for Civil Works. PORTER BAYOU, MS Selective snagging and clearing of Porter Bayou, MS, from mile 12.5 to mile 32.3 RED RIVER WATERWAY, LA (See Section 11 of Text) Water Resources Development of 1986 authorized for construction the project for mitigation of wildlife losses, Red River Waterway, LA, which may include all or such portion of any land adjacent to the Loggy Bayou Wildlife Management Area. Water Resources Development Act of 1990 modified the mitigation project to authorize the Secretary to acquire an additional 12,000 acres adjacent to or close to the Bayou Bodcau Wildlife Management Area. WRDA 96 modified the mitigation project to authorize the Secretary to acquire lands adjacent to Loggy Bayou Wildlife Management Area in Caddo and Red River Parishes and increasing the authorized cost to $10,500,000. H. Doc. 441, 86th Cong., 1st sess. S. Doc. 153, 98th Cong., Ist sess. Public Law 98-63, 98th Cong., Ist sess. Public Law 99-88, 99th Cong., 2d sess. Public Law 99-662, 99th Cong., 2d sess. Public Law 99-662 99th Cong., 2d sess. Sec. 205 of the Flood Control Act of 1948, as amended. Authorized by Chief of Engineers, Feb. 18, 1982. Public Law 99-662, 99th Cong., 2d sess. Public Law 101-640, 101st Cong., 2d sess. Section 301, Public Law 104-303 12-13 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 2000 TABLE 12-B AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION (Continued) Acts Work Authorized Documents Water Resources Development Act of 1996 Jul. 24, 1946 Aug. 13, 1968 Aug. 13, 1968 WRDA 96 modified the project to include dredging of the entrance to the Oxbow Lakes designated for preservation in project documentation and stated that the cost sharing for this dredging should be the same as the general navigation features. RED RIVER BELOW DENISON DAM LEVEES AND BANK STABILIZATION (VICKSBURG DIST.) (See Section 12 of Text) Levee and bank stabilization. Deauthorization of Morringsport Dam and Reservoir on Cypress Creek; realining and stabilizing the banks of the Red River; and recreational facilities from the Mississippi River to Denison Dam, OK and TX. RED RIVER WATERWAY-SHREVEPORT, LA, TO INDEX, AR Provides for realinement of the channels of the Red River from Shreveport, LA, to Index, AR. Section 301, Public Law 104-303 H. Doc. 602, 79th Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 304, 90th Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 304, 90th Cong., 2d sess. 12-14 TABLE 12-C OUACHITA AND BLACK RIVERS, AR AND LA (9-FOOT PROJECT), LOCKS AND DAMS (See Section 1 of Text) Min. Depth Greatest on Available Lower Miles Length Max. Elev. Miter Above Width for Full Lift Normal Still at Miles Mouth of Width at Pool Normal Per- Total from of Lock of Lock Low Surface Pool Character cent Estimated Nearest Black Chamber Chamber Water (feet Level or Kind of Type of Com- Project Location Town River (feet) (feet) (feet) msl) (feet) Foundation Dam Construction plete Cost Jonesville, LA 10 25 84 600 30 34 14 Piling Moving Tainter gated dam; 1002 $ 43,585,000 bascule gated navigation pass; steel mitering lock gates Columbia, LA 5 117 84 600 18 52 13 do do Tainter gated dam; 952 46,235,000 fixedcrest navigation pass; steel mitering lock gates Felsenthal, AR 1 227 84 600 18 70' 13 Earth = do Tainter gated dam; 882 102,161,000 hinged crest gated navigation pass; steel mitering lock gates. Calion, AR 7 283 84 600 12 77 13 do do Tainter gated dam; 882 71,019,000 (H. K. hinged crest gated Thatcher) navigation pass; steel mitering lock gates. Estimated Federal Cost $263,000,000 Estimated Non-Federal Cost 18009,000 Total Estimated Cost 281,009,000 1. Fish and wildlife impoundment level. Navigation pool elevation 65. 2. The percent complete reflects all work within the pool. 12-15 N) to! C C POW d~ REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 2000 TABLE 12-D OTHER AUTHORIZED NAVIGATION PROJECTS Cost to Sep. 2000 For Last Full Report Operation See Annual and Mo. and Yr. Project Status Report For: Construction Maintenance Completed Bayou Bartholomew, LA and AR, 2'3',4 -- 1931 $ 45,874 $ 42,857 Bayous D'Arbonne and Corney, LA 1'2'4 -- 1941 19,000 37,804 Big Black River, MS1 4'5 1895 15,000 -- Big Sunflower River, MS '4'6'7 - 1942 560,027 459,328 Boeuf River, LA,3,4 ,7,8,9 -- 1949 30,000 103,737 Claiborne County Port, MS -- 1985 2,000,000 720,841 Dec. 1983 Cypress Bayou and Waterway between Jefferson, TX, and Shreveport, LA'S Complete 1971 202,817 452,611 Dec. 1914 Homochitto River, MS4 -- 1910 15,482 8,518 1 Lake Providence Harbor, LA -- 1985 208,537 6,474,815 Nov. 1963 Little Missouri River, AR', 4 '5 -- 1873 19,992 -- Little River, LAl' 4,'s,' -- 1890 1,500 -- Little Tallahatchie River, MS.7 -- 1913 19,000 -- Madison Parish Port, LA -- 1985 656,000 1,191,198 Dec. 1980 Mouth of Yazoo River, MS 7 "1 -- 1953 1,179,211 1,143,583 1 Ouachita and Black Rivers, AR and LA, Felsenthal Canal -- 193712 -- 4,387,192 1 Overton-Red River Waterway, LA -- 1985 - .. Pearl River, MS -- 1985 8,562,908 3,751,556 1956 Red River below Fulton, AR '6', 17, 8s -- 1978 1,963,806 2,147,890 Red River Waterway LA, AR, OK, and TX1, 7'8 -- 1969 -- Red River Waterway, Shreveport, LA to Daingerfield, TX' -- 1976 150,800 -- Removings snags and wrecks from Mississippi River below mouth of Missouri River and from Old and Atchafalaya Rivers" -- 1948 -- 272,500 Rosedale Harbor, MS -- 1985 2,000,000 6,956,158 Sep. 1978 Saline River, AR I3'4'5 -- 1931 26,900 12,792 Tallahatchie and Coldwater Rivers, MS I'4's -- 1939 43,481 173,066 Tensas River and Bayou Macon, LA"" 3 -- 1949 38,367 85,352 Yalobusha River, MS" 4' 5'4 -- 1937 7,000 15,936 12-16 VICKSBURG, MS, DISTRICT TABLE 12-D OTHER AUTHORIZED NAVIGATION PROJECTS (Continued) Cost to Sep. 2000 For Last Full Report Operation See Annual and Mo. and Yr. Project Status Report For: Construction Maintenance Completed Yazoo River, MS -- 1987 9,341,826 1,209,895 Yellow Bend Port, AR Complete 1991 3,793,069 1,114,994 Aug. 1991 1. Status and Date unavailable. 2. Abandonment recommended in H. Doc. 1962, 64th Cong., 2d sess., and H. Doc. 467, 69th Cong., Ist sess. 3. Channels adequate for existing commerce. 4. Inactive project. No commerce. 5. Abandonment recommended in H. Doc. 467, 69th Cong., 1st sess. 6. Project curtailment recommended by elimination of work between Pentecost and mouth of Hushpuckena River. (Abandonment of entire project erroneously recommended in H. Doc. 467, 69th Cong., 1st sess.) 7. See report of Mississippi River Commission for operations in connection with Yazoo Basin. 8. Report of New Orleans District, pp. 919-920 for Fiscal Year 1949. 9. Project curtailment recommended by elimination of work above Girard, LA. (Abandonment of entire project recommended erroneously in H. Doc. 467, 69th Cong., Ist sess.) 10. Due to decline of traffic, local interests not sufficiently interested to provide rights-of-way and dumping privileges. 11. No additional funds available under this project. Work is being carried on under appropriation flood control, Mississippi River and tributaries. 12. Year authorized. 13. Inactive. Channel adequate for commerce. 14. See report of Mississippi River Commission for operations in connection with Yazoo Basin flood control project including channel clearing and rectification and Grenada Lake on Yalobusha River. 15. Excludes $50,000 contributed funds. 16. Includes $1,553,878 for previous projects. 17. Incorporated in the project "Red River Waterway-Mississippi River Shreveport, LA" Sept. 30, 1976. 18. Emergency bank protection on this project is reported separately as "Red River Emergency Bank Protection." Two reaches, "Red River Waterway-Mississippi River to Shreveport, LA" and "Red River Waterway-Shreveport, LA, Daingerfield, TX," are also reported separately. 19. Includes $674,068 for new work on previous projects. 12-17 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 2000 TABLE 12-E OUACHITA RIVER AND TRIBUTARIES: EXISTING PROJECT (See Section 10 of Text) For Last Estimated Full Report Federal See Annual New Work Project Report for: Cost Blakely Mt. Dam-Lake Ouachita, AR 1985 $ 44,100,000 DeGray Lake, AR 1985 72,034,0002 Narrows Dam-Lake Greeson, AR 1985 20,900,000 Calion, AR 1960 970,9963 Columbia, LA 1941 204,7403 Existing levees and extensions thereto from Bastrop, LA, to mouth of Boeuf River and at West Monroe, LA 1961 3,025,1813 Little Missouri River below Murfreesboro, AR 1957 354,8023 Ozan Creek, AR 1957 57,7423 Terre Noire Creek, AR 1948 123,7003 Pine Bluff, AR, local protection 1954 172,5823 Monroe, LA, floodwall extension (Plan B) 1984 2,561,0003 Ouachita River Levees (additional work) (1) 9,400,000 Total $153,904,7434 1. See individual reports herein. 2. Includes $5,800,000 for water supply to be reimbursed by local interests. 3. Actual cost of completed project. 4. Excludes the authorized Murfreesboro Lake, AR, project, which is inactive. The latest estimated cost (1954) was $4,190,000. 12-18 VICKSBURG, MS, DISTRICT TABLE 12-F RED RIVER BELOW DENISON DAM (VICKSBURG DISTRICT): NEW PROJECTS (See Sec. 13 of Text) Drainage Flood Area Conservation Control Estimated (square Storage (acre- Federal Project Stream miles) (acre-feet) feet) Cost Bayou Bodcau and tributaries, AR2 and LA -- 1,158 -- -- $25,100,0003 Bayou Nicholas-Coushatta, LA .. -- -- -- 70,7174 Bayou Pierre in vicinity of Shreveport, LA5 ...... 243,336 3 Caddo Lake, LA' Caddo Lake -- -- -- 3,586,000 Campti-Clarence Area in Natchitoches Parish, LA Red River -- -- -- 1,950,0003 Garland City, AR'.6 -- -- -- -- 1,450,0003 Maniece Bayou, AR -- -- -- 970,0323 McKinney Bayou, AR7' -- -- -- 5,610,0003 Posten Bayou, AR and LA2'6'9 ..-- -- -- -- 560,000 Red River below Denison Dam levees and bank stabilization, TX, AR, and LA' 3 -- -- -- -- 66,775,0003 Total 99,191,885 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. Details presented in individual report herein. Construction on this project not started. In addition, non-Federal funds are: Bayou Bodcau and tributaries, AR and LA ............................................................................................................. $5,300,000 Bayou Pierre in vicinity of Shreveport, LA (cash contribution)............................................................................ 89,047 Caddo Lake, LA ............ .......... ................................................................................................................................... 28,000 Campti-Clarence Area in Natchitoches Parish, LA.................................................................... ......................... 480,000 East Point ....................................................................................... ............................ ..... .................................. 67,000 Garland City, AR .................................................................................................................................... 6,000 Maniece Bayou, AR (cash contribution) ................................................................................................................. 18,000 McKinney Bayou, AR (cash contribution)................................................................................................................ 508,000 Red River below Denison Dam, levees and bank stabilization, TX, AR, and LA............................. 1,560,000 For last full report, see Annual Report for 1964. For last full report, see Annual Report for 1951. Inactive. Includes $4,330,200, Code 711, and $399,739 accelerated Public Work funds. Joint-use pool (sediment). Deauthorized by resolution Dec. 17, 1970, which also authorized new project "Posten Bayou, AR," under provision of Sec. 201 of Flood Control Act of 1965. 12-19 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 2000 TABLE 12-G RED RIVER BELOW DENISON DAM (VICKSBURG DISTRICT): INCORPORATED PROJECTS (See Sec. 13 of Text) For Last Flood Estimated Full Report Control Federal See Annual Project Type of Work Act Cost Report For: Aloha-Rigolette Area, Grant and Rapides Parishes, LA Levee and appurtenances 1941 $ 1,653,2371 1956 Bayou Bodcau Reservoir, LA' Flood-control reservoir 1938 5,120,7401 4 Bayou Bodcau, Red Chute, and Loggy Bayou, LA Channel improvement 1941 319,2001 1948 Bayou Pierre, LA Channel enlargement 1936 255,529' 4 Black Bayou Lake, LA5'6 Flood-control reservoir 1936 714,000 1945 Colfax, Grant Parish, LA Cutoff 1938 70,3481'7 1938 Grant Parish, below Colfax, LA Levees 1938 38,8091 1941 Hempstead County levee district No.1, AR Levee enlargement 1938 88,0061 1941 Natchitoches Parish, LA Levee and appurtenances 1936 1,529,9271.8 1956 Pineville, Red River, LA Levee and appurtenances 1941 232,4261 1953 Red River in vicinity of Shreveport, LA Bank protection 1944 3,908,000' 1953 Red River Parish, LA Levee enlargement 1936 149,435' 1939 Saline Point, LA Cutoff 1936 124,111' 1945 Wallace Lake, LA Flood-control reservoir 1936 1,219,3711.3 4 West Agurs, LA Levee and appurtenauces 1976 0 Total $15,467,134 1. Actual cost. 2. Project transferred to Vicksburg District, August 1982. 3. Includes amounts indicated for recreational facilities under Code 711, Bayou Bodcau Reservoir, LA, $1,027,000; Wallace Lake, LA, $17,164. 4. Included in this report. 5. Work not started. 6. Inactive. 7. Completed under provisions of Sec. 7 of Flood Control Act of 1928, as amended by Sec. 9 of Flood Control Act of 1936, and included in 1939 Annual Report of President, Mississippi River Commission, p. 2214. 8. In addition, $25,000 was expended from contributed funds. 12-20 VICKSBURG, MS, DISTRICT TABLE 12-H OTHER AUTHORIZED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS Cost to Sep. 2000 For Last Full Report Operation See Annual and Mo. and Yr. Project Report For: Construction Maintenance Completed Aloha-Rigolette Area, Grant and Rapides Parishes, LA' 1956 $ 1,896,826 $ -- Apr. 1955 Bayou Bodcau and Tributaries AR and LA 1995 1,037,952 1,600,919 Bayou Bodcau, Red Chute, and Loggy Bayou, LA' 1948 319,200 353,298 Jan. 1948 Bayou Bodcau Reservoir, LA 1985 -- 6,098,704 Apr. 1961 Bayou Pierre, LA 1985 -- 343,524 FY 1939 Bayou Pierre in vicinity of Shreveport, LA' 2 1951 243,3362 -- Jun. 1939 Big Black River, MS3 1956 910,185 670,750 Big Choctaw Bayou, LA3'4 1966 248,823 -- Black Bayou Reservoir, LA', 5'6 1945 -- Blakely Mt. Dam - Lake Ouachita, Ouachita River, AR 1985 34,023,108 106,868,274 Oct. 1955 Caddo Lake Dam, LA 1986 -- 2,270,533 Campti-Clarence Area in Natchitoches Parish, LA 1978 1,655,700 -- Jul. 1978 Canal 43, AR 1997 898,061 -- Aug. 1990 Chauvin Bayou, LA 1995 4,245,863 Colfax, Grant Parish, LA' 7 1938 70,348 -- -- DeGray Lake Caddo River, AR 1985 72,033,992 75,969,517 Dec. 1971 East Point, LA 1969 286,069 3,051,536 Aug. 1968 Garland City, AR 1976 1,335,841 -- Jul. 1974 Grant Parish below Colfax, LA''3 1941 38,809 -- Hlempstead County Levee District No. 1, AR' 3 1941 88,006 -- Homochitto River, MS' 1956 205,000 144,650 Maniece Bayou, AR' 2 1970 970,9322 -- Aug. 1969 Monroe Floodwall, LA 1984 2,560,000 -- Murfreesboro Dam and Lake4 1951 - Narrows Dam-Lake Greeson, Little Missouri River, AR 1985 16,516,689 75,286,937 May 1950 Natchez Port Area, MS3,4 1969 538,000 -- 12-21 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 2000 TABLE 12-H OTHER AUTHORIZED FLOOD (Continued) CONTROL PROJECTS Cost to Sep. 2000 For Last Full Report Operation See Annual and Mo. and Yr. Project Report For: Construction Maintenance Completed Natchitoches Parish, LA'2 1956 1,529,478 -- Aug. 1955 Pearl River, Jackson-East Jackson, MS 1986 2,790,127 - 1987 Pineville, Red River, LA3'4 1953 232,426 -- Dec. 1951 Lead Bayou, MS 1991 1,961,089 -- Nov. 1988 Porter Bayou 1995 1,049,278 -- Sep. 1993 Posten Bayou, AR8 1973 -- -- -- Poverty Point, LA 1986 250,000 -- Oct. 1985 Red River Parish, LA1'3 1939 149,435 -- 3 Red River in vicinity of Shreveport, LA' 1953 3,908,000 -- Mar. 1953 Red River Waterway, 1994 855,497 - -- Shreveport, LA to Index, LA9 Saline Point, LA '3, 1945 124,111 - -- Twelvemile Bayou, LA4 1966 335,433 - May 1965 Wallace Lake, LA 1985 -- 2,373,918 Dec. 1946 1. Authorized under project "Red River Below Denison Dam." 2. In addition, the following was expended from contributed funds: Am ite R iver and tributaries ...........................................................$. ...4.3.0........................................................................ Bayou Pierre in vicinity of Shreveport, LA................................................................................................................ 89,047 Choctaw Bayou and Tributaries, LA............................................. ......1.70.,.7 99 Harvey Canal, Bayou Barataria Levee, LA..................................................4.2.5.,2.0.9.......................................................... M aniece B ayou, A R ..................................................................3.9,.2.93.............................................................................. N atchitoches Parish, LA ..............................................................2.5.0.,0.0.0........................................................................... 3. Completion Date Unavailable. 4. Authorized by Chief of Engineers under authority of Sec. 205, Flood Control Act of 1948, as amended. 5. Construction not initiated. 6. Inactive. 7. Completed under provisions of Sec. 7 Flood Control Act of 1928, as amended by Sec. 9, Flood Control Act 1936, and included in 1939 Annual Report of President, Mississippi River Commission, p. 2214. 8. Posten Bayou Project, authorized by Senate and House Resolutions, Dec. 17 and 15, 1970, deleted the plan authorized by the Flood Control Act dated Aug. 3, 1955. 9. Excludes New Orleans District allocation and cost. 12-22 VICKSBURG, MS, DISTRICT TABLE 12-I DEAUTHORIZED PROJECTS For Last Full Report Date Federal Contrib See Annual And Funds Funds Project Report For Authority Extended Exp Bayou Bartholomew and Tributaries, AR and LA 1990 May 17, 1950 974,000 -- S. Doc. 117, 81st Cong., Ist sess. Buffalo River, MS' 1940 Nov 1986 -- -- McKinney Bayou, Finn 19632 Aug 1977 -- - Bayou Segment, AR 1. Deauthorized by Sec. 1002, Water Resources Development Act of 1986. 2. Date Authorized. 12-23 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 2000 TABLE 12-J ACTIVE GENERAL INVESTIGATIONS (96X3121) FY 00 COSTS Item and CWIS Number Federal Non-Federal Total SURVEYS (Category 100) Navigation Studies (110) Red River Navigation Study, S.W. Ark., 010436 Subtotal Flood Damage Prevention (120) Jackson Metro - 012742 Subtotal Miscellaneous Activities (170) Interagency Water Resources (173) -14713 Special Investigations (171) -17250 North American Water - 053904 Subtotal COORDINATION WITH OTHER AGENCIES AND NON FEDERAL INTERAGENCIES (180) COOP With Other Water Agencies - 053907 Hobolchitto Creek - 28004 PAS - MS-Ross Barnett Operation Model - 28002 PAS Archusa Creek Water Park - 28003 PAS - Nego Funds Subtotal TOTAL (Category 100) COLLECTION AND STUDY OF BASIC DATA (Category 200) Flood Plain Management Services (250) Flood Plain Management Services - 82030 Quick Response - 82045 Special Studies - Monticello, MS Technical Services - 82040 Subtotal Hydrologic Studies (260) Hydrologic Studies (260) -53820 Subtotal TOTAL (Category 200) GRAND TOTAL GENERAL INVESTIGATIONS 987,976 722,383 1,710,359 987,976 722,383 1,710,359 25,000 25,000 50,00o 25,000 25,000 50,000 32,989 32,989 20,000 20,000 3,979 3,97 56,968 56,968 5,450 0 5,450 457 307 764 7,380 0 7,380 60,586 55,311 115,897 3,410 0 3,4 77,283 55,618 132,901 1,147.227 803001 1.950228 30,197 30,197 5,004 5,004 22,524 22,524 65,189 65.189 122,914 122,914 7,968 7,968 7,968 7,968 130.882 130.82 $1.278 109 803.001 2081.Q 12-24 MEMPHIS, TN, DISTRICT* This district comprises a portion of southeastern Missouri and southern Illinois, western portions of Kentucky and Tennessee, a small portion of northern Mississippi, and the northeastern portion of Arkansas; includes area embraced in drainage basins of eastern tributaries of the Mississippi River south of Ohio River Basin to Nonconnah and Horn Lake Creeks, inclusive, and those of western tributaries south of Little River diversion channel and Commerce, MO, including St. Francis River Basin and White River and tributaries below Peach Orchard Bluff, AR, on the right bank and below Augusta, AR, on the left bank; also includes left bank Mississippi River levee from vicinity of Memphis south to about mile 620, and right bank levees from Cape Girardeau, MO, to about mile 605. IMPROVEMENTS Navigation Page General Investigations 1. New Madrid County Harbor, MO ................. 13-1 Flood Control 2. Cooper Creek, Cherry Valley, AR ................... 13-1 3. Simmon Field Control Structure, AR...............13-2 Miscellaneous 4. Inspection of Completed Works.......................13-2 5. Work Under Special Authorities ...................... 13-2 6. Emergency Response Activities.......................13-3 7. General Regulatory Program..........................13-3 8. White River to Newport, AR ...................... 13-3 9. Coordination with Other Agencies .................. 13-3 10. Collection and Study of Basic Data ................. 13-3 Tables Table 13-A Cost & Financial Statement .............. 13-4 Table 13-B Authorizing Legislation...................... 13-4 Table 13-C Other Authorized Navigation Project. 13-5 Table 13-D Other Authorized Flood Control Projects .......................... ................ 13-6 Table 13-E Deauthorized Projects........................ 13-7 Table 13-F Active General Investigations ............ 13-8 Navigation 1. NEW MADRID COUNTY HARBOR, MO Location. The project is located in New Madrid County, MO, at Mississippi River mile 885.0. Existing project. The existing harbor channel is 150 feet wide and 1,500 feet long. The harbor enlargemnent project has widened the channel from a bottom Width of 150 feet to 225 feet. The project was approved for construction on June 29, 2000, under the authority of Section 107 of the River and Harbor Act of 1960. The construction cost for the project is $824,267 and of that $164,853 is non-Federal. Local cooperation. The New Madrid County Port Authority is the local sponsor of the project. The Sponsor is required to provide the lands, easements, right-of-way, and relocations required for project construction and cash contribution sufficient to bring the non-Federal share to 10% of general navigation facility costs during construction and 10% over a 30 year period. Condition as of Sep. 30. Construction is complete. 2. COOPER CREEK, CHERRY VALLEY, AR Location. Cooper Creek is located in Cross County, Arkansas,. about 70 miles northeast of Memphis, Tennessee. Existing project. A Detailed Project Report documenting the results of a study to stabilize the south bank of Cooper Creek was approved by the Mississippi River Commission (MRC) in November 1999. The project addresses channel bank erosion problems that exist along the south bank of Cooper Creek where there is a three-cell, 11 acre, wastewater stabilization pond treatment system that serves the town of Cherry Valley. The project was approved for construction on 13-1 Page C- _ REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 2000 October 30, 1999, under the authority of Section 14 of the Flood Control Act of 1946, as amended. The construction cost for the project is $186,000 and of that $65,000 is non-Federal. Local cooperation. Cross County is the local sponsor of the project. A Project Cooperation Agreement (PCA) was executed in December 1999. Rights-of-way were provided and relocations completed in January 2000. Condition as of Sep. 30. Project construction began in February 2000 and is complete 3. SIMMON FIELD CONTROL STRUCTURE, AR Location. Simmon Control Structure is located at the southeast corner of the Big Lake State Wildlife Management area in Mississippi County Arkansas approximately 15 miles southwest of Blytheville, Arkansas. Existing project. The project consists of replacing an existing outlet control structure that is nonfunctional. The control structure assures water level management from elevation 230 feet to 236 feet NGVD. The project was approved for construction on August 28, 1998, under the authority of Section 1135(b) of WRDA 1986 as amended. The construction cost for the project is $1,082,475 and of that $273,475 is non- Federal. Local cooperation. A local cooperation agreement was executed with the local Sponsor, The Arkansas Game and Fish Commission, on May 28, 1998. The sponsor is required to provide the lands, easements, right-of-way, and relocations required for project construction and cash contribution sufficient to bring the non-Federal share to 25 percent of the total project cost. Condition as of Sep. 30. Construction is complete. Construction adjustments are in progress for temporary/permanent pipes that is scheduled to be completed December 2000. Miscellaneous 4. INSPECTION OF COMPLETED WORKS Completed projects were inspected at a cost of $191,063 during this period. Total cost as of Sep. 30, 2000, was $3,301,359. This included in-depth inspection of projects. 5. WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORITIES Navigation activities pursuant to Sec. 107, Public Law 87-645, as amended. During this period, $3,441 was expended on Pemiscot County Harbor; $47,067 Federal and $17,618 non-Federal was expended on Blytheville Harbor, AR; $44,664 Federal and $24,007 non-Federal on Northwest Tennessee Regional Harbor, TN; and $10,939 was expended on Des Arc, AR. Flood control activities Public Law 858, 80th (preauthorization). pursuant to Sec. 205, Cong., as amended During this period $14,915 was expended on Section 205 Coordination Account; $5,888 was expended on Main Ditch #8, Pemiscot County, MO; $51,921 was expended on Baxter Bottom, Tipton County, TN; $60,916 was expended on Rossville, TN, $50,423 was expended on Huntington, TN, $13,227 was expended on Crockett Creek, Finley, TN, $47,492 was expended on Gates, TN, $49,424 was expended on Halls, TN Emergency bank stabilization activities pursuant to Sec. 14, Public Law 526, 79th Cong., as amended. During this period, $11,635 was expended on Sectionl4 Coordination Account, $3,365 was expended on Town Creek, Somerville, TN, $144,571 on Cooper Creek, Cherry Valley Sewage Lagoon. Snagging and clearing of navigable streams and tributaries in the interest of flood control (Sec. 208 of 1954 Flood Control Act, Public Law 780, 83rd Congress). During this period $5,867 was expended on Hatchie River Alcorn/Tippah Counties; $10,036 was expended on Cross County Ditch, II-1, AR; $9,566 was expended on Cross County Ditch, 11-2, AR; $38,915 was expended on Big Slough Ditch Craighead County, AR; $38,518 was expended on Ditch 2 Craighead County, AR; $4,330 was expended on Farrenburg Ditch New Madrid County, MO; $37,540 was expended on Sugar Creek Piggott, AR. Project Modifications for improvement of environment pursuant to Sec. 1135, Public LaW 99-662, as amended (preauthorization). 13-2 MEMPHIS, TN, DISTRICT During this period $19,431 was expended on Section 1135 Coordination Account; $8,306 on Initial Appraisals; $23,529 was expended on Tunica Cutoff Weir, AR; $88,448 was expended on Simmons Field Control Structure, Mississippi County, AR. Aquatic Ecosystem Restoration, Public Law 104-303, Sec. 206 During this period, $7,581 was expended on Aquatic Ecosystem Restoration Coordination Account Funds; $9,033 was expended on Preliminary Restoration Plans; $68,010 was expended on North Fork Obion River, Henry County, TN. 6. EMERGENCY RESPONSE ACTIVITIES Emergency flood control activities, Public Law 99, 84th Cong. During this period, Federal cost was $387,709 for disaster preparedness. Catastrophic Disaster Preparedness Program Local Preparedness $ National Preparedness National Emergency Facilities Readiness Training & Exercise Task Force Total $ 7. GENERAL REGULATORY PROGRAM Permit Evaluations Enforcement Appeals Total 35,228 113,403 150 General Investigations 8. WHITE RIVER TO NEWPORT, AR. Pre-Construction Engineering and Design Location. The project is located in Arkansas on the White River, starting at Newport, AR (mile 254) to the Arkansas Post Canal (mile 10) Existing project. Project was authorized by WRDA of 1986, subsequently deauthorized by WRDA of 1988, and reauthorized by WRDA of 1996. The existing authority is for 4.5 ft deep by 100 ft wide from Augusta (River Mile 198) to Newport ( Mile 254); and 8 ft deep by 125 ft wide from the Arkansas Post Canal (Mile 10) to river mile 198 at stages equivalent to or exceeding 12 ft on the Clarendon gage, with a 5 ft minimum depth at lower stages. Condition as of Sep. 30. Funds are being used to continue the general reevaluation of the authorized White River to Newport, AR project. During this period $394,595 was expended 9. COORDINATION WITH OTHER AGENCIES During this period $4,959 was expended. 0 10. COLLECTION AND STUDY OF 148,781 BASIC DATA During this period $91,051 was expended. $ 962,925 240,985 1,519 $1,205,429 13-3 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF TIlE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 2000 TABLE 13-A COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT Total See Funds to Section Sep. 30, in Text Project Funding FY 97 FY 98 FY 99 FY 00 2000 1. New Madrid County Harbor New Work Approp. ' -- -- -- 730,100 730,100 Cost -- -- -- 684,777 684,777 2. Cooper Creek, Cherry New Work Valley, AR Approp. - -- -- 116,006 116,006 Cost - - -- 144,571 144,571 3. Simmons Field Control New Work Structure, AR Approp. .10,000 210,000 496,000 93,000 809,000 Cost 0 210,786 501,844 88,448 801,078 8. White River to New Work Newport, AR Approp. - 537,000 801,000 421,000 1,759,000 Cost -- 424,265 891,916 394,595 1,710,776 TABLE 13-B AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Work Authorized Documents Section 107, River and Harbor New Madrid County Harbor Public Law 86-645, Act of 1960 Phase II of the harbor expansion project is a Jul. 14, 1960 Section 107 project and consists of widening the remainder of the harbor, approximately 850 feet, to the desired 225 ft bottom. Section 14 of the Flood Cooper Creek, Cherry Valley, AR Public Law 526, 79th Control Act of 1946, as amended (See Section 2 of Text) Congress Construction of emergency bank-protection work 2nd session, to prevent flood damage to a three-cell, 11 acre, Jul. 24, 1946 wastewater stabilization pond treatment system that serves the town of Cherry Valley. WRDA as amended 1986, Simmons Field Control Structure Public Law 99-662, 99'th Sec 1135(b) The outlet control structure replaces an existing Congress non-functional outlet control structure and is 2nd session, constructed upstream of a structure built by the Arkansas Game and Fish Commission in the Jul. 14, 1960 1970's. The proposed control structure assures water level management from elevation 230 feet to 236 feet NGVD. 13-4 MEMPHIS, TN, DISTRICT TABLE 13-C OTHER AUTHORIZED NAVIGATION PROJECTS Cost to Sep. 2000 For Last Full Report See Operation Annual and Mo. and Yr. Project Report For: Construction Maintenance Completed Caruthersville habor, MO 1984 $768,992 $4,875,669 Dec. 1980 Helena Harbor, AR 1984 90,847 7,967,317 Sep. 1963 Elvis Stahr Harbor, KY 1984 149,827 8,995,566 Jan. 1963 New Madrid Harbor, MO6 1984 196,373 2,549,781 Oct. 1970 Obion River, TN '3 1911 28,716 -- Osceola Harbor, AR 1984 269,115 11,753,409 Nov. 1974 Removing snags and wrecks from Mississippi River 1948 -- 318,833 below mouth of the Missouri River and Old and Atchafalaya River 4,5 White River, AR (below Newport) 1984 169,994 44,898,734 Wolf River Harbor, TN 1984 586,50 15,253,309 1959 New Madrid County Harbor, MO 2000 824,267 -- Sep. 2000 1. No commerce. 2. Existing project is for maintenance only. 3. Recommended for abandonment in H. Doc. 467, 6 9th Cong., I' session. 4. Completion date not available. 5. No funds available under this project. Work being carried on under "Appropriation, Flood Control, Mississippi River and Tributaries." 6. WRDA 92 (Section 102) modified authorization by directing the Secretary to assume responsibility for maintenance of New Madrid County harbor constructed by non-Federal interest. 13-5 r no REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 2000 TABLE 13-D OTHER AUTHORIZED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS Cost to Sep. 2000 For Last Full Report See Operation Annual and Mo. and Yr. Project Report For: Construction Maintenance Completed Big Creek Canal, Millington, TN 1977 $ 70,363 $ -- - Bradford, TN 1984 95,061 -- Dec. 1983 Cottonwood Slough pumping plant, IL 1 1964 147,000 -- Feb. 1964 Cypress Creek, McNairy City, TN 1998 10,883 -- Dails Creek, Holly Grove, AR 1996 462 -- - Drinkwater Sewer, MO . 1984 1,494,828 -- Jun. 1980 Dyersburg, TN 1 1962 229,649 2 -- Jun. 1962 Dyersburg, TN (SW) 1981 1,820,869 -- Oct. 1976 Fletcher Creek at Memphis, TN 1993 421,898 -- Sept. 1991 Grays Creek Canal Shelby Co., TN 1985 155,280 -- Aug. 1985 Hatchie River, Alcorn Co., MS 1987 85,200 -- Feb. 1986 Humboldt, TN 1989 1,141,407 -- Apr. 1988 Memphis, Wolf River, and Nonconnah Creek, TN 1960 11,141,199 -- May 1959 Loosahatchie Intreceptor Sewer, Shelby 1998 394,000 -- Dec 1997 Millington, TN 1996 830,898 -- Dec. 1995 Mounds and Mound City, Ohio River Basin, IL 3 1955 1,132,704 -- Oct. 19594 Nixon Creek, TN 1 1952 62,821 -- Dec. 1951 Nonconnah Blvd. Nonconnah Creek, TN 1983 249,999 - Nov. 1981 Nonconnah Creek, Interceptor Sewer, Memphis, TN 1987 259,000 -- Dec. 1986 Nonconnah Creek at Perkins Street, Memphis, TN 1993 830,781 -- Feb. 1992 N. Second St., Memphis, TN (Wolf River Bridge) 1983 249,999 -- Sep. 1980 N. Second St. at Wolf River, Memphis, TN 1991 367,012 -- Jan. 1990 Plainview Road Bridge, Chester County, TN 1991 124,954 -- Sep. 1990 Quince Road Bridge, Memphis, TN 1993 156,565 -- Jul. 1991 Raft Creek, AR 1997 245 -- - Sandy Creek Jackson, TN 1985 238,000 -- Dec. 1984 St. Francis River Highway No. 90, AR 1985 161,000 -- Sep. 1985 Tar Creek, Chester County, TN 1997 1,161 -- - Treasure Island, MO 1981 861,528 -- Mar. 1978 Turner Creek, Corinth, MS 1987 100,600 -- Mar. 1987 US Hwy 51, Nonconnah Creek, TN 1984 369,200 -- Mar. 1983 W. Hickman, Area, Hickman, KY 1983 1,674,180 -- Oct. 1976 1. Authorized by Chief of Engineers under small project authority, Sec. 205, Flood Control Act of 1948, as amended. 2. Includes $21,863 contributed funds. 3. Work being completed under Mississippi River and Tributaries project. 4. Exclusive of Cache River Pumping Station. 13-6 MEMPHIS, TN, DISTRICT TABLE 13-E DEAUTHORIZED PROJECTS Cost to Sep. 2000 For Last Full Report Federal Contributed See Annual Date Funds Funds Project Report For: Deauthorized Expended Expended Big Creek and L'Anguille River, White River 1977 May 6, 81 $ -- -- Basin, AR Clarendon to Laconia Circle White River 1937 May 6, 81 -- -- Basin, AR Huntingdon, TN 1983 Sep 80 $2,900,281 -- Long Lake Area, Helena, AR 1983 Jul 83 61,281 -- Memphis Harbor, Memphis, TN -- Nov 29, 95 ---- 13-7 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 2000 TABLE 13-F ACTIVE GENERAL INVESTIGATIONS (96X3121) Federal Cost Totals by Item and CWIS Number FY 00 Categories SURVEYS (Category 100) Miscellaneous Activities (170) Special Investigations (171) -17250 $18,350 Intra Agency Water Resources Development-14713 24,177 North American Waterfowl Mgmt (176) - 53904 6,136 $48,663 Coordination Studies with Other Agencies (180) Coop with Other Water Agencies (181) -53907 $ 4,045 PAS Negotiation Funds 914 $4,959 TOTAL (Category (100) $53,622 COLLECTIONS AND STUDY OF BASIC DATA (Category 200) Flood Plain Management Services (250) Flood Plain Mgmt Services - 082030 $15,175 Technical Services - 082040 59,790 Quick Responses - 082045 4,897 SS Marion, AR.- 083125 30 SS Aubrey, AR - 083126 34 Jonesboro, AR- 083180 11,124 TOTAL (Category 200) $91,050 Preconstruction Engineering and Design (Category 600) White River to Newport, AR - 060740 $3943595 TOTAL (Category 600) $394.595 GRAND TOTAL GENERAL INVESTIGATIONS $539,267 13-8 ST. LOUIS, MO, DISTRICT* This district comprises those portions of southwestern Illinois and eastern Missouri which lie in the drainage basin of Mississippi River and its western tributaries, exclusive of the Missouri River, from the mouth of the Ohio River to mile 300, and of its eastern tributaries to Hamburg Bay at mile 261 on the left bank, exclusive of tributary basin of Illinois Waterway upstream of new La Grange Lock and Dam at mile 80.15 above confluence of the Illinois and Mississippi Rivers. The St. Louis District territory encompasses 27,000 square miles. The District also includes a drainage basin in Missouri tributary to the Little River diversion channel. The Mississippi River between the Missouri River and mile 300 is included in a separate report on the Mississippi River between the Missouri River and Minneapolis, MN. The portion of the Illinois River downstream of new La Grange Lock and Dam is included in the report of the Chicago District on the Illinois Waterway, Illinois and Indiana. IMPROVEMENTS Page Miscellaneous (Cont.) 1. Illinois Waterway, IL (St. Louis Dist.)..........14-2 2. Kaskaskia River, IL................................ 14-2 3. Mississippi River between Missouri and Minneapolis, MN (St. Louis Dist.) (Includes Melvin Price Locks & Dam) ............ 14-2 4. Mississippi River between Ohio and Missouri Rivers, MO and IL ......................... 14-2 5. St. Louis Harbor, MO and IL ........................ 14-3 6. Navigation work under special authorization..................................................... 14-3 Flood Control 7. Alton to Gale Organized Levee Districts, IL & MO ........................................ 14-3 8. Cape Girardeau-Jackson, MO .......................... 14-4 9. East St. Louis and vicinity, IL.........................14-4 10. Meramec River Basin (Valley Park), M O ................................................................... 14-5 11. Nutwood Drainage and Levee D istrict, IL ...................................... .................. 14-5 12. Ste. Genevieve, MO ...................................... 14-5 13. Inspection of completed flood control projects................................................. 14-6 14. Flood control work under special authorization....................... ........ 14-6 Miscellaneous 15. Ecosystem restoration work under special authorization...................... 14-6 16. General Regulatory Functions..........................14-6 17. Catastrophic Disaster Preparedness Program............. ....................................... 14-6 18. Other Programs and Activities ...................... 14-6 Multiple-Purpose Project Including Power 19. Upper Mississippi River Environmental Management Program .................................... 14-7 20. Formerly Utilized Sites Remedial Action Program (FUSRAP) ............................ ........ 14-7 Tables Table 14-A Cost and Financial Statement ................ ............... . 14-9 Table 14-B Authorizing Legislation ............ 14-11 Table 14-C Other Authorized Navigation Projects ........................................ 14-16 Table 14-D Other Authorized Flood Control Projects ..................... 14-17 Table 14-E Deauthorized Projects .................. 14-19 Table 14-F Flood Control Work Under Special Authorization .............................. 4-21 Table 14-G Active General Investigations (96X3 121) ............ 14-22 14-1 Navigation Page REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THIE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 2000 Navigation 1. ILLINOIS WATERWAY, IL (ST. LOUIS DISTRICT) See report on Illinois Waterway, IL and IN, under Rock Island District. 2. KASKASKIA RIVER, IL Location. The river rises in Champaign County, IL, about 5 miles northwest of Urbana, in the eastcentral part of the state. It flows southwesterly about 325 miles and empties into the Mississippi River about 8 miles above Chester, IL, or about 118 miles above the mouth of the Ohio River. (See Cincinnati sheet of maps of United States published by Army Map Service, scale 1:500,00.) Previous project. For details, see Annual Report for 1986. Existing project. Improvement for navigation provides a channel 9 feet deep and 225 feet wide from the mouth to Fayetteville, IL. Improvements included channel enlargement and a dam at mile 0.8 with a single lock 84 feet wide and 600 feet long. Federal cost totaled $147,387,000; non-Federal cost totaled $7,665,000, which included $1,118,160 local contributions. Local cooperation. State of Illinois passed legislation authorizing Illinois Department of Public Works and Buildings to enter into assurances of local cooperation with the United States. These assurances have been furnished and were accepted on behalf of the United States on Sep. 10, 1965; these assurances were supplemented on Aug. 7, 1972, to incorporate the provisions of Public Law 91-646. Operations and result during fiscal year. Hired labor performed operation ($968,953) and maintenance ($1,222,210) of the project. 3. MISSISSIPPI RIVER BETWEEN MISSOURI RIVER AND MINNEAPOLIS, MN (ST. LOUIS DISTRICT) See separate section entitled "Mississippi River between Missouri River and Minneapolis, MN," printed in the Annual Report of the Chief of Engineers. This section includes Lock & Dam 24 Major Rehabilitation, Lock & Dam 25 Major Rehabilitation, and Melvin Price Locks & Dam. 4. MISSISSIPPI RIVER BETWEEN OHIO AND MISSOURI RIVERS, MO AND IL Location. The Mississippi River rises in Lake Itasca, MN, and from that lake flows southerly about 2,340 miles and empties into the Gulf of Mexico. Portion included in this report embraces the 195-mile section known as "Middle Mississippi," between tributary Ohio and Missouri Rivers about 974 to 1,169 miles from the gulf. (See folder by Corps of Engineers of Navigation Charts, Middle and Upper Mississippi River, Cairo, IL, to Minneapolis, MN.) Previous projects. For details see page 1879 of Annual Report for 1915, and page 1014 of Annual Report for 1938. Existing project. The existing project provides for obtaining and maintaining a minimum channel depth of not less than 9 feet, a minimum width of not less than 300 feet at low water, with additional widths in bends from mouth of Ohio River (about 974 miles from gulf) to northern boundary of city of St. Louis, mile 191, thence 200 feet wide, with additional width in bends to mouth of Missouri River, mile 195; to be obtained: (1) by regulating works, for closing secondary channels, contracting river by building neW banks where river width is excessive and protecting new and old banks from erosion where necessary to secure permanency at an estimated total Federal cost (Oct 2000 price level) of $269,273,000; (2) by dredging to maintain project channels; (3) by construction of works authorized for Chain of Rocks reach in 1945 River and Harbor Act, which approved a comprehensive plan for development of the river at Chain of Rocks to provide for construction of a lateral canal at a cost of $59,720,600; and (4) by construction of a fixed-crest rock-fill dam about 900 feet below Chain of Rocks Bridge, authorized by 1958 River and Harbor Act, at a cost of $4,353,000, excluding $7,000 costs to Coast Guard for aids to navigation. A small boat harbor opposite Chester, IL, was deauthorized and excluded from foregoing cost estimate. See H. Doc. 669 (76th Cong., 3rd sess.) for report of Chief of Engineers dated Feb. 27, 1940, containing a general plan for improvement of Mississippi River between Coon Rapids Dam and mouth of Ohio River for purposes of navigation, power development, flood control, and needs of irrigation. Local cooperation. None required. Terminal facilities. Existing facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. 14-2 ST. LOUIS, MO, DISTRICT Operations and results during fiscal year. Regulating Works: contracts continue on stone dike and revetment construction; as well as engineering design, supervision and administration. Construction on existing project began in 1881 and project has been in beneficial use practically from its inception. Projects on Dam 27 and Chain of Rocks are complete. Work on the project is about 76 percent complete. Channel as a whole has been greatly improved by the Work completed to date. Dredging is required at low stages to remove temporary shoals and maintain required channel depths. River is generally above 10-foot stage, St. Louis gage, from latter part of February to the latter part of August, during which time project channel depths generally prevail without dredging. Following the great Mississippi River Flood of 1993, it became apparent that the Chain of Rocks, East Canal Levee was not performing as intended. Sand boils were developing along a sizeable reach at flood elevations considerably below design height. Emergency repairs were completed in FY 97. Deficiency corrections (additional berms, relief wells, and a pump station) are estimated at $24,756,000 (Oct 2000 price level). These corrections were initiated in FY 99 and continued in FY 00. Maintenance. Work consists of approximately 2,000 feet of dike repair and 5,000 feet of revetment repair yearly. U.S. plant and hired labor plus contract dredging perform channel dredging removing 5,000,000 to 10,000,000 cubic yards of material (average year) from main channel. Condition and operation studies, recreation planning, engineering and design, and operation and maintenance of Lock and Dam 27 continued. . ST. LOUIS HARBOR, MO AND IL Location. The project area includes both sides of the Mississippi River from miles 138.8 to 208.8 above the Ohio River (generally, the limits of the Port of Metropolitan St. Louis). Existing project. The project was authorized by the Water Resources Development Act of 1986. The authorized project includes improvements in two areas: the North Riverfront area in Missouri (which is served by the St. Louis Municipal Docks) and the Tri-City Port area along the east bank of the Chain of Rocks Canal in Illinois. The principal project at the St. Louis Municipal Docks is an L-dike sediment control structure in the river to provide reliable water access to the dock when the river is low. The principal project at the Tri-City Port area is a 210 ft. wide harbor along 6,900 ft. of the Chain of Rocks Canal. The North Riverfront project and half the Tri-City harbor (3.450 ft.) would be constructed in Phase 1, and the second half of the Tri-City harbor in Phase 2 approximately 10 years later. Estimated cost of the project (1999) is $15,524,000 Federal and $30,624,000 Non-Federal. A March 1986 Reevaluation Report described model tests which showed that the L-dike sediment control structure recommended for the St. Louis Municipal Docks would not be effective but that appropriate configuration of a new outer wall for the docks, referred to as the Prototype River Access Improvement Structure (PRAIS), would divert currents so as to control scour and sedimentation and maintain sufficient water depths for the needs of the harbor. Local cooperation. The District coordinated with the two local sponsors and found that (1) the city of St. Louis Port Authority supports the PRAIS project and (2) the Tri-City Regional Port Authority wants the Corps to consider the possibility of reducing the length of their Phase I harbor to 1,800 ft. and shifting its location so that it is a northern extension of the existing Tri-City harbor (the authorized project length of 6,900 ft. would be maintained by increasing the length of the Phase 2 harbor to 5,100 ft.). Operations and results during the fiscal year. Headquarters reviewed the District's 1992 letter report and directed that new economic studies and other work be accomplished and documented in a General Reevaluation Report (GRR) with a Project Study Plan (PSP). Preparation of the GRR began in FY 97. In FY 99, Tri-City Regional Port District requested an evaluation of a new harbor location just below the mouth of the Chain of Rocks Canal. Evaluation of this site began in FY 99 and continued in FY 00. 6. NAVIGATION WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION No activity in FY 00. 7. ALTON TO GALE ORGANIZED LEVEE DISTRICTS, IL & MO Location. The levee system is located adjacent to the Mississippi River between Alton and Gale, Illinois. Existing Project. The project is authorized by the Flood Control Acts of 1936, 1938 and 1946. Construction of the Alton to Gale levee system was completed in 1977. Some reaches of this levee system have, for many years, been experiencing a significant number of slides associated with design deficiencies increasing the probability of levee failure during flood events. 14-3 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 2000 The recommended plan will correct these slides by a lime stabilization procedure. Estimated cost (1997) is $109,018,000 Federal and $4,374,000 non-Federal. Resumption of project initiated. New slides were discovered during the 1997 spring levee inspections. The contract to repair the Blue Waters Levee in the Metro East Drainage and Levee District was completed Oct. 1997. Local cooperation. The cost sharing applicable for the Alton to Gale Levee Slide repairs is in accordance with policies established for the Water Resources Development Act of 1986, PL 99-662. The local sponsor is required to operate and maintain all works after completion. Supplemental assurances have been executed for the portion of the remedial work that is 100% federally funded. Operations and results during fiscal year. No activity in FY 00. 8. CAPE GIRARDEAU-JACKSON, MO Location. Missouri, along the right bank of the Mississippi River between River Miles 50 and 55 above the Ohio River. Existing Project. The project includes a 157 acre dry detention reservoir; approximately one mile of channel improvements on Cape La Croix Creek and two miles of channel improvements on Walker Branch, eight bridge replacements; recreational/environmental features and non structural features which are not going to be implemented at this time. The project is authorized by the Water Resources Development Act of 1986 (PL 99-662). The estimated Federal project cost (2000) is $36,806,000. Non-Federal cost is $13,787,000. Local Cooperation. The city of Cape Girardeau, MO, local sponsor, is strongly supportive of the project. The Local Cooperation Agreement (LCA) was executed on May 25, 1990 with a modification to the LCA executed on Oct. 27, 1992. Requirements of local cooperation are fully described in the FY 1991 Annual Report. Operations and results during fiscal year. Construction of the detention reservoir began in June 2000. 9. EAST ST. LOUIS AND VICINITY, IL Location. Project is in St. Clair and Madison Counties, IL, on the left bank of the Mississippi River between river miles 175 and 195 above the Ohio River. Project includes all bottom lands between bluffs on the east and Mississippi River and Chain of Rocks Canal on the west, and extends from Cahokia diversion channel on the north to Prairie du Pont Creek on the south. (See Corps of Engineers Navigation Charts, Middle and Upper Mississippi River, Cairo, IL, to Minneapolis, MN.) Existing project. The 1936 Flood Control Act authorized raising and enlarging existing levee systems by construction or reconstruction of 19.8 miles of levee, including 3.1 miles of floodwall, together with necessary appurtenant works consisting of gravity drainage structures, highway and railroad closure structures, alterations and reconstruction of existing pumping plants, alterations to railroad bridges and approaches at levee crossings, service roads on levee crown, and seepage control measures. Work under this authorization provides the area protection against a flood flow of 1,300,000 cfs which was originally considered a 200-year frequency flood; however, with the completion of retention reservoirs upstream this protection is currently considered a 500-year level of protection. The completed 10 miles of levee along Chain of Rocks Canal and Lock 27 provide flood protection on the landward side integral with and to the same degree as the East St. Louis levee. Final cost of work under this authorization is $22,550,100. The Flood Control Act of 1965 modified existing project to provide for channel improvements, diversion ditches, flood plain detention areas, a reservoir on Little Canteen Creek, and a pumping plant to considerably reduce damages resulting from interior flooding. This act also authorized reconstruction of a channel stabilization dam in Cahokia Creek diversion channel to provide protection to adjacent levees and bridges from scour and eventual loss. Post authorization studies in the early 1980's justified a project that was constructed for the Blue Waters Ditch area, which included channel improvements and a pumping station with a final project cost of $11,530,000 and $2,950,000 non- Federal. However, flood plain detention areas, the reservoir on Little Canteen Creek and other related flood control measures in the Cahokia-Harding Ditch Area are not economically feasible. Severe flooding, which has resulted in National Disaster Declarations each year from 1993 to 1996, resulted in a new Congressional appropriation in FY 1998 to restart a cost-shared general reevaluation of the interior area. Congress added funds each year since FY 1998 to continue this effort. The project has been reformulated as an ecosystem restoration project that provides flood damage reduction. A report, which appears positive at this time, is due out in the summer of 2001. Project costs are currently under development. Further studies of the 14-4 ST. LOUIS, MO, DISTRICT need for a channel stabilization dam in Cahokia Creek diversion channel have been deferred due to lack of Support from the local sponsor of the project. The 1988 Energy and Water Development Appropriations Act authorized repair and rehabilitation of pump stations and appurtenant works, channels and bridge structures. The estimated total cost of this work (1999) is $37,861,000 Federal and $15,759,000 Non-Federal. Local cooperation. For work under the Energy and Water Development Appropriations Act of 1988, PL 100-202, local interests have entered into three Local Cooperation Agreements (LCA) which cover all of the work in the Flood Protection Rehabilitation project. Construction work under the first two LCAs complete, and construction work under the third LCA is underway. Operations and results during fiscal year. Construction was completed for repairs to the North St. Louis Pump Station. Ditch rehabilitation work continued, and design of relief well rehabilitation completed. 10. MERAMEC RIVER BASIN (VALLEY PARK), MISSOURI Location. The project is located in St. Louis County, Missouri, adjacent to the left bank of the Meramec River between miles 20.7 and 22.1 above the confluence with the Mississippi River. Existing project. The project was authorized for construction by Section 2(h), Public Law 97-128, Dec. 29, 1981, and the Water Resources Development Act of 1986 and 1999. It will afford partial flood protection to the area. The project provides for construction of 3.2 miles of earthen levee with six gravity drains, three closure structures, interior ponding areas and 33 relief wells required for under-seepage control. Recreational features include standard play equipment, multi-user courts, play field areas, picnic tables, comfort stations, parking areas and hiking/biking trails. Estimated total project cost (2000) $38,843,000; $29,056,000 Federal, and $9,787,000 non-Federal. Local cooperation. The city of Valley Park, Missouri is the local sponsor. A Local Cooperation Agreement was executed on August 12, 1992. Operations and results during fiscal year. The first two construction contracts are complete. Construction was initiated on Levee Item IIIB and Railroad Closure Structure Item IVA. Construction continued on Levee Item IIIA, and design continued on the remainder of the project. 11. NUTWOOD DRAINAGE AND LEVEE DISTRICT, IL Location. The levee district is in Green and Jersey Counties, IL, on the left bank of the Illinois River between miles 15.2 and 23.7 above the Mississippi River. (See Quincy, IL-MO, sheet of maps of the United States, published by Army Map Service, scale 1:250,000.) Existing Project. Project was authorized by the 1962 Flood Control Act (H. Doc. 472, 87th Cong., 2d sess.). Project provides for raising and enlarging 11.4 miles of levee, construction of 1.0 miles of new levee, altering a pumping station and construction of seepage control measures. This project would provide protection to 10,360 acres of land, 9,365 of which are highly productive agricultural lands. A General Design Memorandum (GDM), completed in 1986, indicated that the plan was not economically justified at the interest rate used at the time. The project was declared inactive on Jun. 3, 1987. As a result of the Great Flood of 1993 and the inundation of Illinois State Highway 16/100 within the project area, the 1995 Energy and Water Development Appropriations Bill included funding to perform a flood damage reduction study. Local Cooperation. Requirements of local cooperation are described on page 14-11 of FY 1980 Annual Report except that cost sharing policies established by the Water Resources Development Act of 1986, PL-99-662, will also apply. The Nutwood Drainage and Levee District is the local sponsor. The cost sharing agreement for preconstruction engineering and design (PED) was executed in July 1997. Operations and results during fiscal year. PED continued in FY 00. The present total Federal project cost (2000) is $12,207,000; non-Federal cost is $4,069,000. 12. STE. GENEVIEVE, MO Location. The City of Ste. Genevieve is located in Ste. Genevieve County at the edge of the Mississippi River floodplain about 54 miles south of St. Louis, MO. Existing project. The project was authorized by the Water Resources Development Act of 1986 (PL 99-662). The authorizing language states "Congress finds that, in view of the historic preservation benefits resulting from the project," the overall project consists of four parts. Part I is a major levee and associated features that will protect the town from the Urban Design Flood on the Mississippi River. 14-5 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 2000 Parts 2 and 3.are channel improvements on tributary streams that flow through the town, North and South Gabouri Creek, respectively. Part 4 is recreation features on flood control lands. The Corps of Engineers and the project sponsor are concentrating on designing and constructing Part 1, and Parts 2, and 3 and 4 have been placed in a deferred category. Estimated total project cost (2000) is $47,946,000; $34,710,000 Federal, and $13,236,000 is non-Federal. Local cooperation. The project sporisor is the Ste. Genevieve Joint Levee Commission. The City of Ste. Genevieve, Ste. Genevieve County Levee District Number 2, and Ste. Genevieve County Levee District Number 3 hold membership on the Commission. Operations and results during fiscal year. Part 1 of the project, the urban design levee, was completed to the point where some protection is provided from Mississippi River flooding. The middle closure structure was completed, the pump station was essentially completed, and significant progress was made on the levee. 13. INSPECTION OF COMPLETED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS Inspection of completed work was accomplished at a cost of $437,433 for the Fiscal Year 2000. Total cost as of end of fiscal year is $11,385,193. 14. FLOOD CONTROL WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION Flood control activities pursuant to Sec. 205, Public Law 858, 80th Cong., as amended (preauthorization). See Table 14-F. Emergency bank stabilization activities puruant to Sec. 14, Public Law 526, 79th Cong., as amended. See Table 14-F. Emergency flood control activities - repair flood fighting, and rescue work (Public Law 99, 84th Cong., and antecedent legislation). Federal costs for the fiscal year were $306,384 for Disaster Preparedness, $0 for Emergency Operations, and $24,307 for Rehabilitation. Miscellaneous 15. ECOSYSTEM RESTORATION WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION Project Modifications for improvement of environment pursuant to Sec. 1135, Public Law 99-662, as amended (preauthorization). During FY 00, the following funds were expended: $5,077 Coordination Account; $9,178 Initial Appraisals; $2,543 Carlyle Lake Wildlife Management; $12,120 Rend City Wetlands Restoration; $12,202 Pool 25 Water Control; $483 Confluence Greenway; and $105,448 Spunky Bottoms. Aquatic Ecosystem Restoration Public Law 104-303, Sec. 206. In FY 00, funds were expended as follows: $4,802 Coordination Account; $263 Preliminary Restoration Plans; $42,213 Ted Shanks Area Reforestation, $8,848 Lemay Wetland Restoration; and $171,626 Horseshoe Lake Restoration. Multiple-Purpose Project Including Power 16. GENERAL REGULATORY FUNCTIONS Permit Evaluations Enforcement Studies Environmental Inspection Statement Appeals Total Regulatory 17. CATASTROPHIC DISASTER PREPAREDNESS PROGRAM Local Preparedness National Preparedness Readiness Training Total $1,104,746 178,849 0 7,212 3,825 $1,293,825 97,114 21,504 0 $118,618 18. OTHER PROGRAMS AND ACTIVITIES In FY 00, $1,500,785 was expended on Native American Grave Protection for operation and maintenance. 14-6 ST. LOUIS, MO, DISTRICT 19. UPPER MISSISSIPPI RIVER ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT PROGRAM Location. The portion of the Upper Mississippi River within the boundaries of the St. Louis District extends from the mouth of the Ohio River (river mile 0) to river mile 300, downstream of Lock and Dam 22. Existing project. The project is composed of five elements: Habitat Rehabilitation and Enhancement Projects, Long-term Resource Monitoring, Recreation Projects, Studies of Recreation Impacts and Navigation Traffic Monitoring. (The St. Louis District's involvement has been limited to Habitat Rehabilitation and Enhancement Projects and Long Term Resource Monitoring.) The overall program, involving five states and three engineer districts, is administered by the Mississippi Valley Division. In the St. Louis District, three habitat rehabilitation projects have been constructed. These are Clarksville Management Area, Missouri, Dresser Island, Missouri, and Pharrs Island, Missouri. All projects are being operated and maintained by the state of Missouri. Through FY 2000, funds allocated to the St. Louis District have amounted to $28,026,000 for design and construction of Habitat Rehabilitation and Enhancement Projects (HREP), $1,359,400 for Long Term Resource Monitoring (LTRM), $1,883,500 for Program Management; and $925,100 for Habitat Needs Assessment. The authorization limit for the overall program projected over a 10-year period is $191,415,000. During FY 00, expenditures of $3,589,241 included the following: Baseline Monitoring Batchtown Biological Response Monitoring Calhoun Point Cuivre Island Dike Alterations Dresser Island Fort Chartres Habitat Needs Assessment Jafferson Barracks Pools 25/26 Program Management Project Evaluation LTRM Schenimann Chute Swan Lake $ 43,045 1,468,220 6,991 260,908 9,082 28,696 34,666 59,527 449,024 82,511 66,473 197,246 26,573 22,650 833,629 Local cooperation. The terms of local cooperation, as established by Public Law 99-662, will vary according to the nature of the project, land ownership and pre-existing management responsibilities. The local sponsor for Habitat Rehabilitation and Enhancement projects is usually the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service in coordination with the state of Missouri or the state of Illinois. A PCA agreement with the state of Missouri was completed in FY 97 for the Cuivre Island project. Operations and results during the fiscal year. During FY 2000, Habitat Needs Assessment continued. Plans and specifications for Batchtown Phase II and Calhoun Phase I were initiated, and construction continued at Swan Lake. The Project Resstoration Plan was completed on Schenimann Chute. Habitat and biological response monitoring activities continued at the Missouri projects of Dresser Island, Clarksville Refuge, and Pharrs Island. 20. FORMERLY UTILIZED SITES REMEDIAL ACTION PROGRAM (FUSRAP) On October 13, 1997, Congress transferred the management of the Formerly Utilized Sites Remedial Action Program (FUSRAP) to the Corps of Engineers, via the Energy and Water Development Appropriations Act, 1998. The St. Louis District was chosen to remediate low-level radioactive contamination, which resulted from activities conducted by the Manhattan Engineer/Atomic Energy Commission, at the five St. Louis area sites. These sites include Madison, Illinois, and Latty Avenue, St. Louis Airport (SLAPS), St. Louis Airport and Vicinity Properties (SLAPS VPs), and St. Louis Downtown (SLDS), Missouri. A sixth site, the Iowa Army Ammunition Plant (IAAP), was assigned to St. Louis late in FY 00. Cleanup will follow the provisions of the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act. Major accomplishments in FY 00 include the removal of 82,000 cubic yards of material from the Illinois and Missouri sites (40 from Madison; 5,964 from SLDS; 50,073 from SLAPS; 6,922 from SLAPS VP; and 19,710 from Latty Avenue). The removal activities at Madison signify completion of remediation at this site in FY 00, ahead of schedule. In Iowa, the Department of Energy declared the IAAP eligible for inclusion in FUSRAP. Upon assignment to the St. Louis District late in FY 00, the preliminary assessment was initiated. The Corps of Engineers continued remediation efforts at SLDS under the approved Record of Decision. The remediation and restoration of the Mallinckrodt Plant 2 was completed and work on 14-7 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 2000 Plant 1 initiated. Remedial design for Plants 6 East and % East Half was also completed. The Corps made significant progress on the cleanup of the North County area. Continuing its site stabilization efforts at SLAPS, contaminated material was removed from the SLAPS East End and the radium pits. Three of the four Hazel wood Interim Storage Sites (HISS, Latty Avenue) piles were successfully removed in FY 00. The final remedy for the North County Sites, which include SLAPS, HISS, and the SLAPS VPs, will be accomplished according to the remedy selected from the feasibility study/proposed plan. The study/plan will be presented to the public in FY 01. 14-8 ST. LOUIS, MO, DISTRICT TABLE 14-A COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Total Funds Section to Sep. 30, in Text Project Funding FY 97 FY 98 FY 99 FY 00 2000 4. Mississippi River Between Ohio and Missouri Rivers (Includes Chain of Rocks original project and deficiency corrections 7. Alton to Gale Organized Levee Districts, IL & MO (Contrib. Funds) 8. Cape Girardeau Jackson, MO (Contrib. Funds) 9. East St. Louis and Vicinity, IL (Contrib. Funds) 9. Meramec R. Basin, Valley Park, MO (Contrib. Funds) New Work Approp. Cost 3,617,000 2,768,000 2,908,000 5,323,000 $259,373,600' 3,954,760 2,661,040 2,955,533 5,176,900 259,069,395' Approp. 17,858,442 11,479,900 15,042,800 15,012,000 419,300,1212 Cost 17,112,937 12,376,769 14,929,842 15,194,684 419,260,5302 New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost 133,000 48,572 60,250 10,000 5,000 9,609 0 1,185 8,859,000 8,858,752 143,750 100,296 13,000 98,259 23,219 446,000 2,790,000 1,175,000 1,479,000 30,352,000 514,368 2,783,256 1,068,051 1,580,879 30,320,303 423,700 99,980 151,540 110,439 21,128 322,755 297,619 124,001 2,305,759 2,314,202 2,162,000 1,904,000 602,000 2,415,000 46,206,3263 2,086,086 1,914,246 712,631 2,387,095 46,077,2394 350,000 150,000 183,210 415,635 0 406,835 86,966 359,108 7,964,435 7,872,654 459,000 1,004,000 5,212,000 2,574,000 16,661,000 513,357 917,231 4,834,388 2,908,181 16,494,636 30,000 108,400 -1,868 108,206 0 266,558 55,614 272,097 1,107,058 1,107,058 14-9 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 2000 TABLE 14-A COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT (Continued) See Total Funds Section to Sep. 30, in Text Project Funding FY 97 FY 98 FY 99 FY 00 2000 12. Ste. Genevieve, MO (Contrib. Funds) 20. FUSRAP (Total) Madison Latty Avenue St. Louis Airport St. Louis Airport & Vic. Properties St. Louis Downtown New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost 311,493 1,314,638 434,392 124,999,000 124,999,000 6,000 6,000 28,737,000 28,737,000 30,717,000 30,717,000 26,509,000 26,509,000 39,030,000 39,030,000 Iowa Army New Work Ammunition Plant Approp. Cost Oakridge Transition New Work Approp. -- Cost -- 1. Excludes previous project cost of $1,416,620. 2. In addition $1,139,000 was expended for rehabilitation. 3. Includes $8,072,326 for work authorized by Flood Control Act of 1c 4. Includes $7,921,939 for work authorized by Flood Control Act of 15 2 1 965. 965. 14-10 -- 5,765,000 11,780,000 1,369,216 5,093,835 14,613,858 1,413,000 1,168,525 2,330,000 1,220,072 1,346,101 2,964,764 25,494,000 43,550,000 53,750,000 22,481,215 41,802,804 57,476,272 144,000 300,000 1,754,000 141,046 268,127 1,700,625 3,730,000 4,845,000 7,050,000 3,488,582 2,775425 9,158,737 15,396,000 22,252,000 27,727,000 13,319,210 23,190,751 28,629,141 2,037,000 1,086,000 3,397,000 1,720,014 978,827 3,686,467 3,987,000 15,067,000 13,782,000 3,621,690 14,588,792 14,294,626 40,000 0 200,000 0 0 190,673 882 6,476 21,545,000 21,402,091 6,321,163 6,078,865 247,793,000 246,759,291 2,204,000 2,115,798 44,362,000 44,159,744 96,092,000 95,856,103 33,029,000 32,894,307 71,866,000 71,535,308 40,000 0 200,000 198,031 ST. LOUIS, MO, DISTRICT TABLE 14-B Acts AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Work Authorized Oct. 23, 1962 Oct. 12, 1996 Dec. 11, 2000 Jun. 3, 1896 Jun. 13, 1902 Mar. 2, 1907' Mar. 3, 1905' Jun. 25, 1910 S. Doc. 44, 87th Cong., 1st sess. Public Law 104-303 Public Law 106-541, Section 311 Annual Report, 1881, p. 1536. KASKASKIA RIVER, IL (See Section 2 of Text) Construct canal, lock, and dam to provide a 9-foot navigation channel from mouth to Fayetteville, IL. Modified to add fish and wildlife and habitat restoration as project purpose. Modified to include recreation as a project purpose. MISSISSIPPI RIVER BETWEEN 01110 AND MISSOURI RIVERS (See Section 4 of Text) Project for regulating works in 1881. (To obtain a minimum depth of 8 feet.) Dredging introduced as part of the project. These acts practically abrogated that part of project for middle Mississippi which proposed regulating works. Regulating works restored to project and appropriations begun with a view to completion of improvement between Ohio and Missouri Rivers within 12 years at an estimated cost of $21 million, exclusive of amounts previously expended. For 9 feet deep and 300 feet wide from Ohio River to northern Rivers and Harbors boundary of city of St. Louis. Project between northern boundary of St. Louis and Grafton (mouth of Illinois River) modified to provide a channel 9 feet deep and generally 200 feet wide with additional width around bends. Modified to provide construction of a lateral canal with lock at Chain of Rocks. Modified to provide construction of a small-boat harbor opposite Chester, IL. Modified to provide construction of a fixed crest rockfill dam 900 feet below Chain of Rocks Bridge. MELVIN PRICE LOCKS & DAM (FORMERLY LOCK AND DAM NO. 26 (REPLACEMENT)) Construct new dam and a 1,200-foot lock approximately 2 miles downstream of the existing structure. Change name from "Lock and Dam No. 26" to "Melvin Price Lock and Dam" upon termination of service in U.S. Congress. Construct a second lock, 600 feet long at the Lock and Dam No. 26. (Replacement) Project. Public Law 95-502, 95th Cong. Public Law 97-118, 97th Cong. Public Law 99-88 and Public Law 99-662, 99th Cong. 14-11 Documents Committee Doc. 9, 69th Cong., 2d sess. Rivers and Hlarbors Committee Doc. 12, 70th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 231, 76th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 230, 83d Cong., 1st sess. Jan. 21, 1927 Jul. 3, 1930 Mar. 2, 1945 Sep. 3, 19542 Jul. 3, 1958' Oct. 21, 1978 Dec. 29, 1981 Aug. 15, 1985 and Nov. 17, 1986 ~ -- REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 2000 TABLE 14-B AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION (Continued) Acts Work Authorized Documents Nov. 28, 1990 Oct. 31, 1992 Oct. 12, 1996 1960 River and Harbor Act as amended. Section 107 Nov. 26, 1986 Oct. 12, 1996 Jun. 22, 1936 Jun. 28, 1938 1946 Nov. 17, 1986 Oct. 12, 1996 Nov. 28, 1990 Modified to provide construction of cost-shared recreation facilities within the state of Illinois Modified to allow cost-shared recreation with other non-Federal interests and authorized a 24,000 square foot visitor center. Amended project for recreation to include other contiguous nonproject lands, including those referred to as the Alton Commons. SOUTHEAST MISSOURI PORT, MO Construct harbor channel with adjacent landfill. ST. LOUIS HARBOR, MO & IL (See Section 5 of Text) As outlined in the Report of the Chief of Engineers, dated Apr. 30, 1984, the Water Resources Development Act of 1986 authorizes navigation improvements. The Secretary shall complete a limited reevaluation of the authorized St. Louis Harbor Project in the vicinity of the Chain of Rocks Canal, Illinois, consistent with the authorized purposes of that project, to include evacuation of waters collecting on the land side of the Chain of Rocks Canal East Levee ALTON TO GALE ORGANIZED LEVEE DISTRICTS, IL & MO (See Section 7 of Text) Authorized construction of levees to protect area from flooding from the Mississippi River. CAPE GIRARDEAU, JACKSON METROPOLITAN AREA, MO (See Section 8 of Text) As outlined in the Report of the Chief of Engineers dated Dec. 8, 1984, the Water Resources Development Act of 1986 authorizes flood control and related recreational improvements in the Cape La Croix Creek Watershed. As outlined in the Report of the Chief of Engineers, dated July 18, 1994, the Water Resources and Development Act of 1996 authorizes construction, including nonstructural measures, at a total cost of $45,414,000 ($33,030,000 Federal; $12,384,000 non-Federal) COLDWATER CREEK, MO As outlined in the report of the Chief of Engineers dated Aug 9, 1988, the Water Resources Development Act of 1990 authorizes flood control. Public Law 101-640, 101st Cong. Public Law 102-580, 102nd Cong. Public Law 104-303 Public Law 99-662 99th Cong., 2d sess. Public Law 104-303 Special report on record in OCE Flood Control Committee Doc. 1, 75th Cong., 1st sess. Public Law 99-662, 99th Cong., 2d sess. Public Law 104-303, 104th Congress Public Law 101-640 101st Cong. 14-12 ST. LOUIS, MO, DISTRICT TABLE 14-B (Continued) Acts AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Work Authorized Jun. 22, 1936 Oct. 27, 1965 Oct. 22, 1976 Dec. 22, 1987 Oct. 23, 1962 Oct. 23, 1962 Oct. 23, 1962 Oct. 23, 1962 Nov. 17, 1986 Jul. 14, 1984 Jun. 28, 1938 Nov. 7, 1966 EAST ST. LOUIS AND VICINITY, IL (See Section 9 of Text) Raise and enlarge existing levee. Construct pumping plant and other modifications to reduce interior flooding. Construct Blue Waters Ditch as independent section. Repair and rehabilitate pump stations and appurtenant works, channels, and bridges. ELDRED AND SPANKEY DRAINAGE AND LEVEE DISTRICT, IL Raise and enlarge existing levee and other modifications. HARTWELL DRAINAGE AND LEVEE DISTRICT, IL Raise and enlarge existing levee and other modifications. IHILLVIEW DRAINAGE AND LEVEE DISTRICT, IL Raise and enlarge existing levee and other modifications. KASKASKIA ISLAND DRAINAGE AND LEVEE DISTRICT, IL Raise and enlarge existing levee. MALINE CREEK, MO As outlined in the Report of the Chief of Engineers dated Nov. 2, 1982, the Water Resources Development Act of 1986 authorizes flood control, recreation, and environmental improvements. MAUVAISE TERRE DRAINAGE AND LEVEE DISTRICT, IL Raise and enlarge existing levee and other modifications. MERAMEC RIVER BASIN, MO (See Section 10 of Text) Construct reservoirs and local protection project. Construct Pine Ford, Irondale, and 1-38 dams and 19 Angler-use sites. H. Doc. 525, 89th Cong., 2d sess. 14-13 Documents Special report on record in OCE. H. Doc 329, 88th Cong., 2d sess. Public Law 94-587, 94th Cong. Public Law 100-202, 100th Cong. H. Doc. 472, 87th Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 472, 87th Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 472, 87th Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 519, 87th Cong., 2d sess. Public Law 99-662, 99th Cong., 2d sess. Energy and Water Development Approp. Act of 1985, 98th Cong., 2nd sess. Flood Control Committee, Doc. 1, 75th Cong., 1st sess. -- REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 2000 TABLE 14-B AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION (Continued) Acts Work Authorized Documents Dec. 29, 1981 Aug. 17, 1999 Oct. 23, 1962 Oct. 23, 1962 Oct. 23, 1962 Oct. 23, 1962 Nov. 28, 1990 Undertake structural and nonstructural flood control measures. Modified to authorize construction at a maximum Federal expenditure of $35,000,000 MCGEE CREEK DRAINAGE AND LEVEE DISTRICT, IL Reconstruct existing levee and construct pumping plant to reduce flooding. MEREDOSIA LAKE AND WILLOW CREEK DRAINAGE AND LEVEE DISTRICT, IL Raise and enlarge existing levee and other modifications. NUTWOOD DRAINAGE AND LEVEE DISTRICT, IL (See Section 11 of Text) Raise and enlarge existing levee and other modifications. REND LAKE, BIG MUDDY RIVER, IL Construct dam at Benton, IL, and subimpoundment dams on upper arms of reservoir. RIVER DES PERES, MO As outlined in the report of the Chief Engineers dated May 23, 1989, the Water Resources Development Act of 1990 authorizes flood control. STE. GENEVIEVE, MO (See Section 12 of Text) As outlined in the Report of the Board of Engineers for Rivers and Harbors dated Apr. 16, 1985, the Water Resources Development Act of 1986 authorizes construction of a levee and a pumping plant to protect the city from Mississippi River and Gabouri Creek floods. WOOD RIVER DRAINAGE AND LEVEE DISTRICT, IL Construct reservoirs and local protection projects. CLARENCE CANNON DAM AND RESERVOIR, SALT RIVER, MO Modified act of Jun. 28, 1938 by deleting the reservoir therefrom and reauthorizing it as a separate multiplepurpose project. 14-14 Public Law 97-128, 97th Cong. Amended Section 1128, Public Law 99-662, 99th Cong. Public Law 106-53, 106th Cong., Ist sess. H. Doc. 472, 87th Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 472, 87th Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 472, 87th Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc 541, 87th Cong., 2d sess. Public Law 101-640 101st Cong. Public Law 99-662, 99th Cong., 2d sess. Flood Control Committee Doc. 1, 75th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 507, 87th Cong., 2d sess. Nov. 17, 1986 Jun. 28, 1938 Oct. 23, 1962 ST. LOUIS, MO, DISTRICT TABLE 14-B AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION (Continued) Acts Work Authorized Documents Oct. 27, 1965 Oct. 13, 1997 Changes name of project from Joanna Dam to present designation. Formerly Utilized Sites Remedial Action Program (FUSRAP) (See Sec. 20 of text.) Carry out remediation at five St. Louis Area sites - Madison, Illinois, Latty Avenue, St. Louis Airport, St. Louis Airport and Vicinity Properties, and St. Louis Downtown, MO. Public Law 89-298, 89th Cong. Energy and Water Development Approp. Act of 1998 1. Also joint resolution, Jun. 29, 1906. 2. Inactive. 3. All work completed. 14-15 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 2000 TABLE 14-C OTHER AUTHORIZED NAVIGATION PROJECTS Cost to Sep. 2000 For Last Full Report Operation See Annual and Mo. and Yr. Project Report For: Construction Maintenance Completed Cuivre River, MO' .,1883 $ 12,000 $ -- -- Kaskaskia River, IL2 1989 147,387,000 29,756,014 1988 Moccasin Springs, MO 1969 76,436' -- -- Southeast Missouri Port, MO 1993 3,466,522 2,178,937 Apr. 89 Wabash Railroad Bridges, Illinois River, Meredosia, and Valley City, IL 1961 2,653,194 1961 -- 1. Inactive. River declared nonnavigable by act of Mar. 23, 1900. 2. Excludes $10,461 expended on previous project. 3. Excludes $56,605 contributed funds. 14-16 ST. LOUIS, MO, DISTRICT TABLE 14-D OTHER AUTHORIZED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS Cost to Sep. 2000 For Last Full Report Operation See Annual and Mo. and Yr. Project Report For: Construction Maintenance Completed Clarence Cannon Dam and Reservoir, Salt River, MO 1996 313,180,128 86,001,558 -- Cache River Diversion, IL 1953 2,837,114 1953 Cape Girardeau, MO, No. 2 1965 5,157,805 -- 1964 Carlyle Lake, IL 1981 42,819,400 96,496,655 Oct. 1976 Chouteau, Nameoki, and Venice Drainage and Levee District, IL 1955 185,700 -- 1955 Columbia Drainage and Levee District No. 3, IL 1981 2,818,000 -- Aug. 1981 Degognia and Fountain Bluff Levee and Drainage District, IL 1959 5,889,500 -- 1959 Dively Drainage & Levee District, IL 1976 1,720,000 1976 Emergency bank protection for certain highway and railroad facilities at Price Landing, MO (see Flood Control Act of 1944)' 1950 55,415 -- Oct. 1949 Emergency repairs to levees on Mississippi, Illinois, and Kaskaskia Rivers and flood fighting and rescue work (Sec. 5, Flood Control Act of 1941, as amended)' 1953 -- 1951 Emergency protection for certain highway and railroad facilities at Chester, IL, bridge (Sec. 12, Flood Control Act of 1944) 1952 50,000 -- Jan. 1952 Emergency protection for Illinois approach, Chain of Rocks Bridge (Sec. 12, Flood Control Act of 1944) 1946 25,000 -- Aug. 1945 Fort Chartres and Ivy Landing Drainage District No. 5, IL 1970 1,154,800 -- 1958 Grand Tower Drainage and Levee District, IL 1959 4,677,900 -- 1959 Ilarrisonville Levee and Drainage District, IL 1981 6,829,069 -- Mar. 1981 Kaskaskia Island Drainage and Levee District, IL 1959 297,460 -- 1949 Lake Shelbyville, IL 1981 44,000,000 101,211,812 Sep. 1978 Mauvaise Terre Drainage and Levee District, IL 1989 589,000 -- 1988 McGee Creek Drainage and Levee District, IL 1989 25,043,300 -- 1989 Meredosia Lake and Willow Creek Drainage and Levee District, IL 1944 249,738 -- 1944 Miller Pond Drainage District, IL 1955 164,183 -- 1955 14-17 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 2000 TABLE 14.D OTHER AUTHORIZED FLOOD (Continued) CONTROL PROJECTS Cost to Sep. 2000 For Last Full Report Operation See Annual and Mo. and Yr. Project Report For: Construction Maintenance Completed Mississippi River Agricultural Area 8, MO 1987 2,137,000 - .. Mississippi River at St. Louis, MO 1980 79,265,166 -- Jan. 1980 Mississippi River, Alton to Gale, IL, underseepage measures - 85,422 -- Oct. 1962 North Alexander Drainage and Levee District, IL 1957 939,569 -- 1957 Nutwood Drainage and Levee District, IL 1989 670,000 1984 Perry County Drainage and Levee2 District Nos. 1, 2, and 3, MO 1987 7,968,700 -- 1986 Pine Ford Lake, MO 1996 3,644,000 -- - Prairie du Pont Levee and Sanitary District, IL3 1970 6,005,127 -- 1970 Prairie du Rocher and vicinity, IL 1959 3,882,600 -- 1959 Preston Drainage and Levee District, IL 1959 1,866,910 -- 1959 Rend Lake, Big Muddy River, IL4'5 1989 43,700,900 75,549,413 1988 Strington, Ft. Chartres, and Ivy Landing, IL 1957 2,123,700 -- Aug. 1956 Urban areas at Alton, IL 1960 192,000 -- - Village of New Athens, IL 1981 1,983,000 -- Sep. 1981 Valley City Drainage & Levee District, IL6 1967 91,952 -- 1967 Wood River Drainage and Levee District, IL7 1989 17,163,821 -- 1988 Work complete, now performed under Public Law 99. Excludes $6,800,700 for previous project. Includes $5,235,927 for previous project. Excludes $550,000 Area Development Administration Funds allotted to the State of Illinois for increased construction costs of Interstate Highway 57 to meet project requirements, and excludes $449,093 Area Redevelopment Administration Funds allotted to the Corps. Includes $6,103,711 credit to State of Illinois for work in kind. Authorized by Chief of Engineers (Sec. 205, 1948 Flood Control Act, as amended). Funds are for work authorized by Flood Control Act of 1938. 14-18 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. ST. LOUIS, MO, DISTRICT TABLE 14-E DEAUTHORIZED PROJECTS For Last Full Report Date Federal Contrib See Annual And Funds Funds Project Report For Authority Expended Exp Angler-use sites, Meramec Basin, MO 1967 WRDA 1986 -- -- Oct 86 Big Swan D&L District Illinois River, IL . WRDA 1986 -- -- Oct 86 Cape Girardeau, MO Reaches Nos 1, 3, and 4 1959 Oct 78 $ 22,000 -- Clear Creek Drainage and Levee District, IL 1964 PL 100-676 4,984,500 -- Jan 90 East Cape Girardeau and Clear Creek D&L PL 100-676 District, IL 1963 Jan 90 1,920,600 -- Eldred, IL 1962 Nov 79 -- -- Fort Chartres & Ivy Landing D&L District No. 5 and Stringtown Drainage and Levee District No. 4, IL 1971 WRDA 1986 -- -- Oct 86 Grafton Small Boat Harbor, IL 1962' Nov 77 -- -- 1-38 Lake, MO PL 100-676 1 Jan 1990 -- -- Indian Creek Area Illinois River, IL -- Nov 81 -- -- Irondale Lake, MO PL 100-676 1 Jan 1990 Keach Drainage and Levee District, IL -- WRDA 1986 -- -- Oct 86 Levee Districts between Carlyle and New Athens, IL, Nos. 2, 5, 6 and 7 1979 Nov 79 -- -- Levee Districts between Carlyle and New Athens, IL Nos. 3, 4, 8, 10 and 13 1979 Nov 79 -- -- Levee Districts between Cowden and Vandalia, IL 1978 Oct 78 496,000 -- Meramec Park Lake, MO Dec 81 37,682,514 -- Mississippi River Agricultural Area No. 10, MO 1967 Nov 79 -- -- Mississippi River Agricultural Area No. 12, MO 1967 WRDA 1986 -- -- Oct 86 Mississippi River at Alton, IL Small Boat Harbor 1958' Nov 77 -- -- Preston Drainage and Levee District, IL 1959 PL 100-676 1,866,910 -- 1 Jan 1990 Richland Creek, IL 1969 PL 100-676 401,000 -- 10 Aug 89 Riverland Levee District, MO 1936 Aug 77 -- -- Scott County D&L District Illinois River, IL -- WRDA 1986 -- -- Oct 86 Small Boat Harbor opposite Chester, IL 19541 Nov 77 -- -- Small Boat Harbor opposite hamburg, IL 1950 Nov 77 -- -- Ste. Genevieve County Drainage and Levee District No. 1, MO 1936 Nov77 -- -- Year authorized. 14-19 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 2000 TABLE 14-E DEAUTHORIZED PROJECTS (Continued) For Last Full Report Date Federal Contrib See Annual And Funds Funds Project Report For Authority Expended Exp St. Louis County Drainage and Levee District No. 1, MO 1936 Nov 77 -- - Union Lake, MO 1979 PL 100-676 4,931,154 -" Jan 90 Wiedmer Chemical Drainage and Levee District, MO 1936 Nov 77 -- - 14-20 ST. LOUIS, MO, DISTRICT TABLE 14-F FLOOD CONTROL WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION Project FISCAL YEAR COST Federal Cost Non-Federal Total Flood Control (Section 205, P. L. 858, preauthorization) Bois Brule L&D District, MO $ 11,583 69,810 81,393 Grafton, IL 12,618 12,618 Festus and Crystal City, MO 338,976 338,976 Modoc Levee & Drainage District, Prairie, IL 123,501 0 123,501 Section 205 Coordination Account 9,099 9,099 St. Peters, MO 1,195,701 90,000 1,285,701 Wellston Branch, MO 31,507 31,507 West Frankfurt, IL 6,689 6,689 $1,729,674 $159,810 $1,889,484 Emergency StreamBank & Shoreline Protection (Section 14 of 1946 Flood Control Act, P.L. 526) Caulks Creek, Metro St. Louis Sewer, MO $ 10,610 10,610 Fayette County, Highway 23 18,250 18,250 Missouri Bottoms Levee, MO 2,930 2,930 Section 14 Coordination Account 8,450 8,450 St. Louis Water Lines, MO 37,566 57,764 95,330 O'Fallon Sewage Lagoons, MO 17,904 17,904 Shotwell Creek, MO 16,012 16,012 South Senior High School 597 597 Wildwood, MO Site 1 83.211 23,672 106,883 Total Section 14 $195,530 $81,436 $276,966 14-21 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 2000 TABLE 14-G ACTIVE GENERAL INVESTIGATIONS (96x3121) Project FISCAL YEAR COST Federal Cost Non-Federal Total SURVEYS (Category 100) Flood Damage Prevention Studies(120) Alexander and Pulaski Counties, IL-12217 Chesterfield, MO-10457 Festus and Crystal City, MO-10458 Lower River des Peres, MO-10460 Wood River Levee, IL-10524 Subtotal Review of Authorized Projects (160) St. Louis Flood Protection, MO-17360 Wood River D&LD, IL-20180 Subtotal Miscellaneous Activities(170) Interagency Water Resources Development-14713 Review of FERC Licenses-53857 Special Investigations-17250 Waterfowl Management Plan-53904 Subtotal Coordination Studies with Other Agencies(180) PAS - St. Louis Sewer Stormwater-29013 Coordination with Other Water Resources Agencies PAS - Kaskaskia Riverbank Erosion PAS - St. Louis County PAS - Grafton, IL PAS - Negotiation Funds Subtotal TOTAL (Category 100) COLLECTION AND STUDY OF BASIN DATA (Category 200) Flood Plain Management Services (250) Automated Information System Support (294)GCase-53916 Flood Plain Management Services (250)-82030, 82040, 82045, 83019, 83153, 83154, 83175, 83191 Hydrology Studies (260)-10463 TOTAL (Category 200) 136,966 259,798 37,249 40,544 174 124,907 228,359 7,485 22,696 261,873 488,157 44,734 63,240 174 $474,731 $383,447 $858,178 11,359 11,359 47 47 11,406 11,406 241,310 241,310 0 0 23,753 23,753 3,825 3,825 268,888 268,888 109,972 68,041 178,013 33,157 33,157 3,862 4,828 8,690 7,911 9,000 16,911 3,000 2,941 5,941 5,000 0 500q 162,902 84,810 247,712 $917,927 468,257 1,386,184 7,267 7,267 159,044 159,044 14,416 14,416 $180,727 180,727 14-22 ST. LOUIS, MO, DISTRICT TABLE 14-G (Continued) Project ACTIVE GENERAL INVESTIGATIONS (96x3121) FISCAL YEAR COST Federal Cost Non-Federal Total ADVANCE ENGINEERING AND DESIGN (Category 600) Nutwood D&LD, IL-00623 St. Louis Harbor, MO & IL-10184 Wood River D&LD, IL-20180 River de Peres, MO-12638 Wood River Levee, IL-10524 St. Louis Flood Protection, MO-17360 TOTAL (Category 600) GRAND TOTAL GENERAL INVESTIGATIONS $ 429 285,771 39,524 26,924 161,355 285,125 799,128 $1,897,782 16,302 87,683 103,985 $572,242 14-23 16,731 285,771 39,524 26,924 161,355 372.808 903,113 $2,470,024 --- - --- -- [ . .. . . .... . . .. I ROCK ISLAND, IL, DISTRICT* This district comprises most of the northern half of Illinois, portions of southern Wisconsin, southern and southwestern Minnesota, eastern and central Iowa, and northeastern Missouri, embraced in drainage basin of Mississippi River and its eastern and western tributaries between mile 300 (above mouth of Ohio River) and 614, and of its eastern tributaries only, between Hamburg Bay, at mile 261 and 300. This district also includes the Illinois Waterway above mile 80 with its tributaries and drainage basins. The section of the Mississippi River between river miles 300 and 614 is included in the report on Mississippi River between Missouri River and Minneapolis, MN. IMPROVEMENTS Page Navigation 1. Illinois and Mississippi Canal, IL................ 15-2 2. Illinois Waterway, IL and IN ........................... 15-2 3. Mississippi River between Missouri River and Minneapolis, MN ....................... 15-3 4. Upper Mississippi River - Illinois Navigation Study............................................... 15-3 5. Upper Mississippi River System Environmental Management Program (UMRS-EMP), IL, IA, MN, MO, WI.....................................15-4 6. Other Authorized Navigation Projects ............. 15-4 Flood Control 7. Coralville Lake, IA................. ..................... 15-4 8. Des Moines Recreational River and Greenbelt, IA .................................... 1.5.-.5............. 9. Loves Park, IL...............................1................... 5-5 10. Red Rock Dam and Lake Red Rock, IA .......... 15-5 11. Saylorville Lake, IA ...................................... 15-6 12. West Des Moines, IA ................................ 15-6 13. Muscatine Island, IA ........................................ 5-7 14. Inspection of Completed Flood Control Projects............................... 15-7 15. Other Authorized Flood Control Projects ........ 15-7 16. Flood Control Work Under Special Authorization ............................................ 15-7 Miscellaneous 17. General Regulatory Functions.......................15-7 18. Catastrophic Disaster Preparedness Program......................................15-7 19. Ecosystem Restoration Work under Special Authorization ................................... 15-7 General Investigations 20. Surveys............................................................. 15-8 21. Collection and Study of Basic Data ................. 15-8 22. Preconstruction Engineering and Design.........15-8 23. Flood Control and Coastal Emergencies..........15-8 Tables Table 15-A Cost & Financial Statement............ 15-9 Table 15-B Authorizing Legislation............. 15-11 Table 15-C Other Authorized Navigation Projects ................. 1........................5-15 Table 15-D Not Applicable Table 15-E Other Authorized Flood Control Projects..... ......... ..... 15-16 Table 15-F Not Applicable Table 15-G Deauthorized Projects ............ 1....5-18 Table 15-H Inspection of Completed Flood Control Projects.........................15-19 Table 15-I Flood Control Work Under Special Authorization ................... 5-21 Table 15-J Illinois Waterway: Existing Locks and Dams ...... 1.5..-..2..2.............. Table 15-K Illinois Waterway: Lock and Dam Construction, Foundations, Cost .............................................. 15-23 Table 15-L Illinois Waterway: Additional Features Entering into Cost..........15-24 Table 15-M Illinois Waterway: Existing Project .......................................... 15-25 Table 15-N Illinois Waterway: Total Cost of Existing Project ............ ........... 15-25 Table 15-0 Active General Investigations ............................. 1.5.- 26 15-1 Navigation Page REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 2000 Navigation 1. ILLINOIS AND MISSISSIPPI CANAL, IL Location. This canal extends for 75 miles from the Illinois River near LaSalle, IL, to the Mississippi River at Rock Island, IL. A feeder canal, 29 miles in length, extends from the summit level of the canal to the Rock River at Rock Falls, IL. Existing project. See pages 1306-1308 of Annual Report for 1962 for details regarding project. The canal was constructed in the period 1892-1918. The canal has not been operated for navigation since June 1951 in accordance with Corps policy to discontinue operation of waterways affording little or no benefit to navigation. The River and Harbor Act of 1958 authorized the appropriation of $2,000,000 for the purpose of placing the canal in proper condition for public recreational use and to convey and transfer the canal to the State of Illinois as part of the State park system. The repair and modification program was initated in 1961, and a number of canal features have been repaired or modified. In connection with this program, fee title of 1,062 acres and recreational flowage easements over 309 acres of land in Rock River at Rock Falls, formerly under navigation flowage easement, have been acquired. The State of Illinois accepted title to the canal as of August 1, 1970. The River and Harbor Act of 1970 authorized the additional appropriation of $6,528,000 to be expended for the repair, modification, and maintenance of bridges, title transfer, modification or rehabilitation of hydraulic structures, fencing, clearing auxiliary ditches, and for the repair and modification of other canal property appurtenances. The repair and modification work was underway until a suit was filed by three Illinois counties and their Commissioners of Highway against the Federal Government and the State in 1974 over maintenance of highway bridges crossing the canal. After the lawsuit was filed, further rehabilitation work by the Federal Government on the canal was suspended. On November 4, 1981, the Corps of Engineers deposited $3,722,572 with the Clerk of the U.S. District Court in Chicago in full satisfaction of the Court's judgment. These funds were used by the counties to complete rehabilitation work as directed in the court order. Rehabilitation work by the Federal Government in coordination with the state was resumed in 1984 with the remaining authorization expended in 1987. The Water Resources Development Act of 1986 authorized an additional appropriation of $8,472,000 to accomplish the work described in the 1970 River and Harbor Act. The State of Illinois filed an additional lawsuit against the United States on July 6, 1987 in the U.S. Claims Court in the amount of $8,472,572. In a preliminary decision on September 22, 1988, the court dismissed the claim for $3,722,572. A settlement agreement between the State of Illinois and the United States was signed on November 14, 1991. The agreement provided that Illinois release all claims against the United States as stipulated in the claims court and that the United States provide $4,750,000 to Illinois as reimbursement for previous repair work performed upon the canal bridges by Illinois. On Decemer 16, 1991, the U.S. Claims Court entered a judgment for $4,750,000 in favor of the State of Illinois. This judgment was paid in FY92. Once funds are received, principal work features to restore the canal to acceptable conditions consist of the repair or reconstruction of retaining walls, embankments, portions of the lock and dam structures, culverts, drainage ditches, and other related work features which the United States has maintained or has been obligated to maintain under previous agreements. These features are consistent with a Master Management Plan prepared by the Illinois Department of Conservation. NEPA documentation to assess remaining work items must be completed prior to initiation of construction. Local cooperation. A revised Supplemental Agreement with all work items remaining was executed between the state of Illinois and the Federal Government in April 1996. Operations during fiscal year. Engineering and Construction work was performed for a total cost of $1,162,782. 2. ILLINOIS WATERWAY, IL AND IN Location. Illinois River (entirely within State of Illinois), formed by confluence of Kankakee and Des Plaines River, flows southwesterly and enters Mississippi at Grafton, IL, about 38 miles above St. Louis. Illinois Waterway comprises Illinois River from its mouth to confluence of Kankakee and Des Plaines Rivers (273 miles), Des Plaines River to Lockport (18.1 miles) and Chicago Sanitary and Ship Canal and South Branch of Chicago River to Lake Street, Chicago (34.5 miles). Also from a point 15-2 ROCK ISLAND, IL, DISTRICT 12.4 miles above Lockport, II, waterway comprises Calumet-Sag Channel and Little Calumet and Calumet Rivers to turning basin 5, near entrance to Lake Calumet (23.8 miles); and Grand Calumet River from junction to 141st Street, deep (lake) draft navigation (9 miles) and to Clark Street, Gary, IN (4.2 miles). Previous projects. For details, see page 1945 of Annual Report for 1915 and page 1172 of Annual Report for 1932. Existing project. See Table 23-K and page 1255 of Annual Report for 1963. Cost of new work was $124,041,436 and includes $445,000 for Recreation Facilities under Code 711. Calumet-Sag Modification, Part III, placed in the deferred-for-restudy category in March 1972, cost of $33,000,000 (July 1971) Federal and $20,700,000 (July 1971) non Federal; is excluded from present cost estimate. Land acquired for the project consisted 865.937 acres in fee and 1,286.734 acres in flowage easement. See Table 23-B for authorizing legislation. (See Table 15-J through 15-N on existing locks and dams; lock and dam construction, foundations, cost; additional features entering into cost of project; existing project and total cost of existing project.) Local cooperation. Complied with for completed modifications and Part I of Calumet-Sag Modification. All pools above Alton Pool: Maintenance: Channel dredging by contract cutterhead pipeline dredge was performed in Peoria and LaGrange Pools, at various locations with a total of 109,481 cubic yards of material being removed. Mechanical dredging was performed at Dresden, Marseilles and Brandon Pools with a total of 49,311 cubic yards being removed. The total cost of dredging was $2,261,200. Continued construction includes Starved Rock Headgate repairs, Lower Guidewall Keviel Rail at Peoria Lock and Dam, and Paint Barge Mounted Ringer Crane (Hercules). New Construction includes replace Boiler House Roof at Marseilles Lock and Dam. Maintenance for the navigation function continued at a cost of $11,506,600 (includes dredging costs). Maintenance of Recreation Features continued at a cost of $42,800. Total maintenance costs for Operation and Maintenance were $11,549,400 and $55,000 for Maintenance and Operations appropriation. New credits to the project were $395,100, primarily as a result of collections from towboat companies for damages to lock and dam structures. Operation and Care: Operations for navigation continued at a cost of $11,248,500. Operations for Flood Damage Reduction Functions continued at a cost of $159,400. Environmental Stewardship- Management of Natural Resources continued at a cost of $45,000. Operations for the Recreation Function continued at a cost of $267,600. Total operation costs were $11,720,500. Total Operation and Maintenance costs were $23,269,900, and Maintenance and Operations costs were $55,000. Rehabilitation: Major Rehabilitation was physically completed on the Illinois Waterway, Four Locks. FY 00 expenditures were $2,197,000. Alton Pool Operation: Costs for the year were $166,470 for lock operation; $36,270 for management of natural resources; $90,152 for water control management; $2,562 for environmental compliance management; and $48,096 for studies and surveys. Total operation costs were $343,550. Alton Pool Maintenance: Costs for the year were $1,757,012 for dredging; $10,000 for boundary monumentation; and $8,382; for water management equipment. Total maintenance costs were $1,775,394. Total operation and maintenance costs for all pools above Alton Pool were $23,269,900. Rehabilitation costs were $2,197,000. Alton Pool operation and maintenance costs were $2,118,944. Total costs incurred were $27,585,844. 3. MISSISSIPPI RIVER BETWEEN MISSOURI RIVER AND MINNEAPOLIS, MN For report on this improvement, see chapter on "Mississippi River between Missouri River and Minneapolis, MN." 4. UPPER MISSISSIPPI - ILLINOIS NAVIGATION STUDY Location. The study includes both the Upper Mississippi River and the Illinois Waterway. The study area covers over 850 miles of navigable waterways and 29 locks and dams of the Upper Mississippi River from the headwaters at St. Anthony Falls near Minneapolis- St. Paul, Minnesota; downstreamto the mouth of the Ohio River at Cairo; and the Illinois Waterway (eight locks and dams) from Lake Michigan in Chicago, 15-3 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1999 Illinois, southwest to where the waterway joins with the Mississippi River at Grafton, Illinois, 348 miles long. The Upper Mississippi River system meanders through the states of Minnesota, Wisconsin, Iowa, Illinois, and Missiouri, and over 40 counties. The Illinois Waterway is located entirely within the State of Illinois. Existing project. The project consists of conducting a feasibility study to address the need for navigation improvement on the river system. Undertaken by four Corps Districts (St. Paul, Rock Island, St. Louis, and New Orleans). The review of this completed project is authorized by Section 216, Flood Control Act of 1970, PL 91-611. Local cooperation. None required. Operations during fiscal year.' The Feasibility Phase was continued during FY 00 at a cost of $4,845,341. 5. UPPER MISSISSIPPI RIVER SYSTEM ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT PROGRAM (USMRS-EMP), IL IA, MN, MO, WI Location. The project is authorized for those river reaches having commercial navigation channels on the Upper Mississippi River, Illinois River, Minnesota River, St. Croix River, and Kaskaskia River in the states of Illinois, Iowa, Minnesota, Missouri, and Wisconsin. Existing project. The purpose of the UMRS-EMP as stated in the authorizing legislation is to ensure the coordinated development and enhancement of the Upper Mississippi River system, recognizing its several purposes. The program includes habitat rehabilitation and enhancement projects to counteract the effects of backwater sedimentation. Long Term Resource Monitoring will provide the means for more informed management of the UMRS. Also authorized was a study of the economic impacts of completed recreation, completed navigation traffic monitoring, and recreation projects (currently unfunded). The program was initiated in 1986 utilizing funds provided by PL 99-88, FY 1985 Supplemental Appropriation Act.' PL 99-662, Water Resources Development Act of 1986, further defined the program and provided for a 10 year implementation period and was extended to 15 years by PL 101-640, Water Resources Development Act of 1990. The Water Resources Development Act of 1999, P.L. 106-53, amends the previous authority by deleting recreation as a project purpose; increasing annual appropriation limits available to the program; authorizing an independent technical advisory committee; requiring submission of a report to Congress on a 6 year cycle that evaluates programs, accomplishments, assesses systemic habitat needs, and identifies any needed changes to the Program authorization. Local Cooperation: Local cooperation agreements are obtained for habitat projects for such projects not located on lands managed as a national wildlife refuge, within the meaning of Section 906(e) of the 1986 WRDA. WRDA 1999 establishes a cost sharing percentage of 35 percent for such projects. Operations During Fiscal Year. Expenditures during the year totaled $17,799,000. The majority of funds was expended on two primary program elements: habitat projects and long term resource monitoring. This fiscal year general design continued on 14 projects; construction was initiated on three projects; continued on 13 projects; and completed on six projects. Construction has essentially been completed on a total of 35 projects since the program was initiated. Data collection, analysis of data and production of technical and special reports was continued by contract with the Upper Midwest Environmental Sciences Center in Lake Onalaska, WI. The first report to Congress detailing the programs activities since the programs inception was completed and was submitted to Congress. A Habitat Needs Assessment continues and is scheduled for submission to Congress in Sep. 2000. This assessment will address the ecosystem needs along the Environmental Management Programs' reaches of the Upper Mississippi River. 6. OTHER AUTHORIZED NAVIGATION PROJECTS See Table 15-C. Flood Control 7. CORALVILLE LAKE, IA Location. Coralville Lake is formed by the Coralville Dam on the Iowa River, several miles upstream from Iowa City, Johnson County, IA, about 83 miles above the confluence of the Iowa River with the Mississippi River. Existing project. See page 28-4, Annual Report for 1981, for project details. Construction began in July 1949 and the project has been in operation since February 1958. About 25,035.706 acres in fee of land were acquired and 3,675.734 acres in flowage easements. The project was modified to provide for construction of a highway bridge crossing the lake at 15-4 ROCK ISLAND, IL, DISTRICT the Mehaffey site, which was begun in June 1964 and completed in October 1966. See Table 15-B for authorizing legislation. Operations during fiscal year. No new work was performed during FY 00. Operation and Maintenance: Routine maintenance activities continued at a cost of $2,924,660. 8. DES MOINES RECREATIONAL RIVER RIVER AND GREENBELT, IA Location. The greenbelt area is located along both banks of the Des Moines River in central IA and extends from a point at which relocated U.S. Highway 92 crosses the Des Moines River near Harvey, upstream approximately 169 river miles to U.S. Highway 20, and includes portions of Fort Dodge, IA. It also includes the Corps' operated Lake Red Rock and Saylorville Lake projects. Existing project. The project will include, but not be limited to: (1) the construction, operation, and maintenance of recreational facilities and streambank Stabilization structures; (2) maintenance of all structures constructed before the date of authorization of this project (other than any such structure operated and maintained by any person under a permit or agreement With the Secretary); (3) such tree plantings, trails, Vegetation, and wildlife protection and development for recreational purposes; and (4) the prohibition or limitation by the Secretary of the killing, wounding, or capturing at any time of any wild bird or animal in such areas as may be directed by the Secretary. In carrying out the project the Secretary may acquire by purchase, donation, exchange, or otherwise, land and interests therein, as the Secretary determines are necessary to complete the project. The authorization requires that an Advisory Committee be established for consultation with the Department of the Army consisting of 47 members; three Corps of Engineers appointees, one person from the city of Des Moines, and one from each other incorporated municipality within the greenbelt, two from each of the nine counties in the greenbelt, and five from the State of Iowa. See Table 15-B for authorizing legislation. Local Cooperation. Letters of assurance have been received for 15 seperable elements. Local Cooperation Agreements have been executed for five Separable elements. Operations during fiscal year. Coordination was nlaintained with the Advisory Committee in accordance with Public Law 99-88. Due to lack of funding, work remained deferred on eleven projects: Red Rock Trails Segment IVA; Botanical Center Park; Johnston Trail and Canoe Access; Raccoon River Trail; Raccoon River Regional Park; Polk City - Big Creek Trail; Webster City - Briggs Wood Trail; Dayton - Stratford Trail; Knoxville; Riverview Park; and Saylorville Barrier Dam Trail. Twelve projects in total have been completed to date. Costs incurred in FY 00 were $209,327. 9. LOVES PARK, IL Location. The Loves Park project is located in Winnebago County, IL on the northeast boundary of the city of Rockford, IL. Loves Park is 17 miles south of the Illinois-Wisconsin state line. Existing project. The project provides 100-year level of protection against flooding along Loves Park Creek. Protection measures consist of 17,900 feet of channel improvements, a 16,300 GPM pump plant, and ponding. The estimated project cost is $30,400,000 including $9,400,000 non-federal costs. See Table 15-B for authorizing legislation. Local cooperation: The local cooperation agreement was executed on March 26, 1991. Operations during fiscal year. Work continued to develop Plans and Specifications for Stage IB. The city continued to work on the acquisition of rights-ofway for Stage IB. Construction was initiated on Stage IA. Total costs incurred during FY 00 were $1,353,000. 10. RED ROCK DAM AND LAKE RED ROCK, IA Location. The site of this project is on the Des Moines River, chiefly in Marion County, but extending into Jasper, Warren, and Polk Counties. The dam is 142.9 miles above the mouth of the Des Moines River, which empties into the Mississippi River at mile 361.4 above the mouth of the Ohio River. The city of Des Moines lies northwesterly from the site, about 60 miles upstream. Existing project. See page 28-6, Annual Report for 1981 for description of the project. Construction began in May 1960, and the dam was placed in beneficial use for storage of flood water in January 1969. Land acquired for the project consisted of 50,207.860 acres in fee and 26,351.995 acres in flowage easement. Landowner complaints, that lake operation have flooded their lands more frequently than what 15-5 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THIE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1999 they were told to expect when flowage easements were initially acquired, led Congress to modify the project authorization. Language in PL 99-190 authorizes acquisition from willing sellers fee simple title in real property, which is subject to periodic flooding in connection with the operation of the project. Potentially there are approximately 1,000 tracts consisting of about 30,000 acres. Estimated Federal cost is $43,500,000. See Table 15-B for authorizing legislation. Local Cooperation. None required. Operations during fiscal year. Additional Land Acquisition efforts were deferred due to lack of funding. Cost of Land acquisition coordination activities were $29,406. Operation and Maintenance activities were continued at a cost of $5,572,952. 11. SAYLORVILLE LAKE, IA Location. The project site is chiefly in Polk County, IA, but portions extend into Dallas and Boone Counties. The dam is about 213.7 miles above the mouth of the Des Moines River and about 5 miles upstream from the city of Des Moines, IA. Existing project. The dam is an earth embankment 6,750 feet long at crest with a height of 120 feet. Outlet works are a single circular concrete conduit, 22 feet in diameter, located at the toe of the west bluff. Control structure is at upstream end of conduit and uses three gates. A stilling basin is provided to dissipate energy of discharge from outlet conduit. Spillway is in the west bluff, weir 430 feet long. Water flowing over the spillway weir discharges into a paved chute and thence into an excavated earth channel to the Des Moines River. Top of spillway is about 31 feet below top of earth embankment section, and flow over weir is uncontrolled when water in reservoir reaches its crest. Watershed area above dam site is 5,823 square miles. With pool at spillway crest elevation, lake area is 16,700 acres and contains about 676,000 acre-feet of water at that height (602,000 for flood control and 74,000 for a conservation pool to maintain minimum flows at downstream points). Lake supplements capacity of downstream Lake Red Rock at river mile 142.9. The two lakes provide a high degree of flood protection to the lower Des Moines River Valley. Reach along the Mississippi River downstream from the mouth of the Des Moines River are also benefitted. A project modification plan to minimize the adverse environmental effects at Ledges State Park, located upstream from the dam, was authorized in 1976. The project modification included relocation of affected park facilities, acquisition of additional park land, and the development of a floodway corridor, with recreational facilities, from the dam downstream to Sixth Avenue in Des Moines. Improvements to Highway 415, the main access road to existing facilities on the east side of the reservoir, were added to the project by Congress in 1984. Segments A and B of Highway 415 have been completed. Segment C of Highway 415 was completed in 1994. Construction began in June 1965, and the dam was placed in operation for the storage of flood water in April 1977. Remedial work in Big Creek Valley, consisting of diversion dam and channel and a barrier dam, for the protection of the town of Polk City was completed in December 1974. The land acquisition program involved 25,524.597 acres in fee and 1,498.444 acres in flowage easements. The estimated project cost is $116,470,000 including $2,820,000 in non-Federal costs from the State of Iowa and the City of Des Moines, for recreational development. See Table 15-B for authorizing legislation. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Operations during fiscal year. New work: Project right-of-way has been transferred to the Iowa Department of Transportation, the project sponsor. Planning, Engineering, and Design efforts for the 86th street improvements project were turned over to Polk County. Costs incurred were $16,627. Operation and maintenance activities were continued at a cost of $4,098,213. The project is about 97 percent completed, excluding deferred work. 12. WEST DES MOINES, IA Location. The city is located in Polk County in central Iowa. Existing project. The project provides flood protection from the Raccoon River and Walnut Creek. The project consists of four stages: Stage I, 3,100 feet of levees and floodwalls along Walnut Creek north of Ashworth Road; Stage II, 9,000 feet of levees along the Raccoon River from Jordan Creek to 63rd Street, with pump station; Stage IIIA, 4,500 feet of levees along the lower end of Walnut Creek; and Stage IIIB, 5,800 feet of levees and flood walls tieing Stages I and IIIA along Walnut Creek with pump station and tieing Stages II with IIIA along the Raccoon River. The project provides 100-year protection and will prevent 4.387 million dollars in average annual damages. See Table 15-B for authorizing legislation. 15-6 ROCK ISLAND, IL, DISTRICT Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Operations during fiscal year. New Work: Construction of the project is complete and closeout is underway. Total costs incurred during FY 00 were -$77,518 (credit). 13. MUSCATINE ISLAND, IA Location. Muscatine Island lies on the west bank of the Mississippi River in Muscatine and Louisa Counties, Iowa, adjacent and in the city of Muscatine, IA. The flood protection area of 30,800 acres is protected by 15.6 miles of existing sand and clay levees. The protected area consists of residential, commercial, industrial and agricultural areas and also includes U.S. Highway 61 and the Muscatine Municipal Airport. Existing Project. The existing levee will be raised to increase the level of protection from less than a 100-year flood and associated closure and utility improvements. The 200-year protection level is achieved by improving and raising approximately 6.6 miles of the existing levee system. Also included in the project is construction of an upstream railroad closure structure, improving drainage facilities, concrete I-wall sections and relocating existing utilities. See Table 15-B for authorizing legislation. Local Cooperation. The city of Muscatine and Muscatine Island Levee District are co-sponsors for the project. The Project Cooperation Agreement (PCA) Was executed on 21 September 1995. Operations during fiscal year. The project was Completed in June 2000 and project closeout is underway. Total costs incurred during FY 00 were $1,136,890. 14. INSPECTION OF COMPLETED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS Federal flood control regulations (part 208 of title 33, Code of Federal Regulations) provide that the structures and facilities constructed by the United States for local flood protection shall be continuously naintained in such a manner and operated at such times and for such periods as may be necessary to obtain the mnaximum benefits. Costs during the period for inspections of projects turned over to local interests to ascertain compliance with Federal requirements were $241,472. (See Table 15-H for list of completed flood Control projects inspected.) 15. OTHER AUTHORIZED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS See Table 15-E. 16. FLOOD CONTROL WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION See Table 15-I. Miscellaneous 17. GENERAL REGULATORY FUNCTIONS Permit Evaluations Enforcement Appeals Total 18. CATASTROPHIC DISASTER PREPAREDNESS PROGRAM Continuity of Operations National Preparedness Emergency Operations Center Support Readiness Trngt Exercise Total $1,534,853 334,061 1,909 $1,870,823 123 44,404 19,091 154 63,722 19. ECOSYSTEM RESTORATION WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION Project Modifications for improvement environment pursuant to Sec. 1135, Public Law 662, as amended (preauthorization). of 99- During FY 00, $13,828 was expended on Coordination Account Funds; $20,934 on Initial Appraisals; $3,954 on Mississippi River Mast Tree Planting; $7,265 on Oquawka Refuge Habitat; and $88,891 on Mill Creek/Milan Bottoms Habitat Restoration. Aquatic Ecosystem Restoration Pursuant to Sec. 206, P. L. 104-303. In FY 00 $14,960 was expended on Section 206 Coordination Account; $51,887 on Preliminary Restoration Plans; and $328,313 on Whitebreast Watershed Ecosystem Restoration; $237,327 on Token Creek Habitat Restoration; $96,671 on Koshkonong 15-7 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1999 Creek Dane County; $156,956 on Lake Belle View Aquatic Ecosystem* Restoration. For a total of $886,114. General Investigations 20. SURVEYS There was one flood prevention study in progress during FY 00 at a cost of $20,311. There was one Review of Completed Projects at a cost of $4,845,341. There were four special studies at a cost of $1,579,422. Miscellaneous expenses including Special Investigations, FERC, Interagency Water Resource Development at a cost of $30,942. Coordination Studies with Other Agencies, and Planning Assistance to States efforts totaled $219,833. Total cost of surveys was $6,876,849. See Table 15-0. 21. COLLECTION AND STUDY OF BASIC DATA Flood Plain Management Services cost were $214,059 for FY 00. Hydrologic Studies were continued during FY 00 at a cost of $16,254. Total cost for collection and study of basic data in FY 00 was $230,313. 22. PRECONSTRUCTION ENGINEERING AND DESIGN There was one PED in progress during FY 00 at a cost of $3,007,145 for the Upper Mississippi - Illinois Navigation Study. 23. FLOOD CONTROL AND COASTAL EMERGENCIES (FC & CE) 96x3125 Disaster Preparedness Program Emergency Operations Rehabilitation Hazard Mitigation Total 378,663 109,429 1,006,640 1,443 $1,496,175 15-8 ROCK ISLAND, IL, DISTRICT TABLE 15-A COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Section Total Cost in Text Project Funding FY 97 FY 98 FY 99 FY 00 to Sep. 00 1. Illinois and Mississippi Canal IL 2. Illinois Waterway IL and IN 4. Upper Mississippi -Illinois Navigation Study 5. Upper Mississippi River System Environmental Management Program, IL, IA, MN, MO, WI 7. Coralville Lake, IA 8. Des Moines Recreational River and Greenbelt, IA 9. Loves Park, IL New Work Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. 19, Cost 18, Rehab: Approp. Cost Inland Waterway Trust Fund: Approp. Cost 1 New Work: Approp. 9, Cost 8, New Work: Approp. 17, Cost 18, Contributed Funds: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. 3, Cost 3, New Work: -- 7,605,143 -- 7,605,143 950,000 458,000 693,069 722,770 24,034,248 24,032,575 -- 126,707,751 -- 126,706,419 ,045,000 20,609,000 ,278,706 19,945,545 21,459,000 22,761,846 23,043,684 22,874,728 435,000 60,000 1,422,500 620,098 92,884 1,476,522 435,000 60,000 1,422,500 ,048,220 144,130 1,476,284 0 2,197 468,575,083 442,832,903 162,629,439 162,302,832 0 15,375,819 0 14,454,622 ,321,000 6,283,000 5,581,000 6,376,000 ,298,606 6,475,247 6,905,257 4,845,341 ,906,000 18,729,000 18,900,000 11,596,000 ,796,000 17,312,000 18,488,000 11,799,516 14,000 35,173 26,738 5,862 353,000 3,017,800 3,177,000 2,917,0 385,267 3,227,926 3,305,942 2,924,6 Approp. -- Cost 2,192,805 Contributed Funds: Approp. -- Cost 24,348 New Work: Approp. 1,254,000 Cost 1,424,638 Contributed Funds: Approp. 250,000 Cost 463,558 301,192 -- 125,0 43,199 209,3 290,000 223,000 1,329,000 254,769 301,000 1,309,510 50,000 85,657 23,006 0 43,495 57,300,600 30,547,509 340,526,000 191,106,516 0 1,444,000 0 1,388,631 -- 30,179,488 -- 30,173,702 00 61,949,074 60 59,878,872 00 13,771,000 27 13,344,613 0 1,457,849 0 1,444,555 11,717,176 11,655,746 2,359,000 2,345,876 15-9 25,000 1,154,000 39,509 1,162,782 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 2000 TABLE 15-A COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT (Continued) See Section Total Cost in Text Project Funding FY 97 FY 98 FY 99 FY 00 to Sep. 00 10. Red Rock Dam and Lake Red Rock, IA 11. Saylorville Lake IA 12. West Des Moines, IA 13. Muscatine Island, IA New Work: Approp. 0 Cost ,69,372 Maint: Approp. 5,618,186 Cost 5,242,535 Contributed Funds: Approp. (979) Cost -- New Work: Approp. 100,000 Cost 35,596 Maint: Approp. 6,436,000 Cost 5,942,532 Contributed Funds: Approp. -- Cost -- New Work: Approp. 1,648,000 Cost 1,520,161 Contributed Funds: Approp. 342,000 Cost 473,161 New Work: Approp. 473,000 Cost 491,445 Contributed Funds: Approp. 215,000 Cost 222,503 30,000 53,269 3,628,000 4,053,859 (80,000) 16,627 4,338,000 4,861,335 139,955 91,890 75,000 178,360 6,738 1,518,000 1,396,499 88,162 40,000 0 29,407 44,846 5,202,000 5,499,673 5,306,960 5,566,218 116 4,328 4,212,000 3,961,509 4,325,243 4,089,569 29,787 217,368 -- (100,000) 90,479 (83,568) 53,645 1,893,000 1,868,266 345,000 262,222 6,050 819,000 939,428 0 197,462 15-10 13,716,000 11,096,176 74,785,346 72,475,230 19,850 18,422 128,067,887 127,872,466 74,243,750 71,681,030 3,564,428 3,247,835 12,179,000 12,200,555 2,021,000 1,732,673 5,213,000 5,173,013 748,162 748,098 ROCK ISLAND, IL, DISTRICT TABLE 15-B AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION See Date Section Authorizing in Text Act Project and Work Authorized Documents 2. January 21, 1927 July 3, 1930 June 26, 1934' August 30, 1935 August 30, 19353 June 14, 1937 June 20, 1938 October 23, 1943 March 2, 1945 ILLINOIS WATERWAY, IL AND IN Channel 9 feet deep and 200 feet wide from mouth of Illinois River to Utica, 231 miles, modification of 2 U.S. locks and dams, removal of 2 State dams. (Act authorized appropriation of not to exceed $3,500,000 for carrying on work.) Channel 9 feet deep from Utica, IL, to heads of present Federal projects on Chicago and Calumet Rivers 94.6 miles to Lake Street, and 96.3 miles to turning basin 5, respectively, to be secured by means of completed dams, locks, lateral canals, and dredging begun by State of Illinois in general accordance with present plans of State for that work. Act adopting project authorized appropriation of not to exceed $7,500,000 for carrying on work. Operation and care of locks and dams provided for with funds from War Department appropriation for rivers and harbors. Construct modern locks and dams at LaGrange and Peoria and a channel 9 feet deep and 300 feet wide below Lockport, exact location and details of design of all structures to be left to discretion of Chief of Engineers, and for time being, that no change be made in water authorized for navigation of Illinois River by act of July 3, 1930. Also provides for 3 passing places along Sag Channel and authorized channel in Calumet-Sag route to turning basin 5, and dredging at entrance of Lake Calumet. Realign portion of Calumet River and abandonment of bypassed section of Calumet River. Modifies local cooperation requirements in 1935 act. Pay damages to levee and drainage districts due to seepage and other factors, not to exceed $503,500. Enlarge Calumet-Sag Channel to 160 feet wide and a usable depth of 9 feet. Dredge a barge channel 160 feet wide with a usable depth of 9 feet in Grand Calumet and Little Calumet River Branch of Indiana Ilabor Canal to deep (lake) draft through 141st St., East Chicago, IN. Construct in Little Calumet River a lock of suitable dimensions for large navigation. Rebuild or otherwise alter at Federal expense all obstructive railroad bridges across Calumet-Sag Channel, Little Calumet River, Calumet River, Grand Calumet River, and Indiana Harbor Canal, so as to provide suitable clearance, except that no Federal funds shall be expended for removal or alteration of Illinois Central RR bridge at mile 11.20 of Little Calumet River. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 69th Cong., 1st sess., and S. Doc. 130, 69th Cong., 1st sess. S. Doc. 126, 71st Cong., 2nd sess. H. Doc. 184, 73rd Cong., 2nd sess.2 H. Doc. 180, 73rd Cong., 2nd sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 19, 75th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 711, 77th Cong., 2nd sess. H. Doc. 145, 76th Cong., 1st sess. 15-11 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 2000 TABLE 15-B AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION (Continued) See Date Section Authorizing in Text Act Project and Work Authorized Documents July 24, 1946 July 24, 1946 July 17, 1953 July 3, 1958 August 18, 1968 Substitute following work for that authorized by act of March 2, 1945; replace emergency dam in Chicago Sanitary and Ship Canal; enlargement of that canal thence to Sag Junction and of Calumet-Sag Channel to afford channels 225 feet wide and usable depth of 9 feet; construct along general route depth of 9 feet to 225 feet wide between Little Calumet River and junction with Indiana Harbor Canal and 160 feet wide thence to Clark St., Gary, IN, with a turning basin at Clark St., enlarge Indiana Harbor Canal to 225 feet wide and usable depth of 9 feet between Grand Calumet River and vicinity of 141st St., inclusive; remove Blue Island lock and construct a lock and control works in Calumet River near its head, and similar structures in proposed Grand Calumet Channel west of Indiana Harbor Canal; alter or eliminate railroad bridges across three channels lakeward of Chicago Sanitary and Ship Canal, or construct new railroad bridges to provide suitable clearance. A small-boat harbor in vicinity of Peoria, IL, by construction of a basin 510 by 250 feet, dredged to 7 feet deep. $48,933 to reimburse Nutwood Drainage and Levee District for additional pumping operation; supplementing $58,750 authorized in October 1943 act. Federal participation in alteration of highway bridges, Calumet-Sag Modification, Part I, which constitute unreasonable obstructions to navigation, in accordance with Public Law 647, 76th Cong., as amended. Federal participation in alteration of highway bridges, Calumet-Sag Modification, Part II, which constitute unreasonable obstructions to navigation, in accordance with the Public Law 647, 76th Cong., as amended. Illinois River at Peoria, IL modification of navition project to include an adjacent downstream water area. 15-12 H. Doc. 677, 79th Cong., 2nd sess. H. Doc. 698, 79th Cong., 2nd sess. H. Doc. 144, 81st Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 45, 85th Cong., Ist sess. 4 Specified in Act. Also H. Doc. 45, 85th Cong., Ist sess. Sec. 857, H.R.6, Water Resources Development Act of 1986. November 17, 1986 ROCK ISLAND, IL, DISTRICT TABLE 15-B AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION (Continued) See Date Section Authorizing in Text Act Project and Work Authorized Documents 5. August 15, 1985 (P.L. 99-88) Novemer 17, 1986 7. June 28, 1938 July 14, 1960 8. August 15, 1985 (P.L. 99-88) November 17, 1986 9. November 17, 1986 10. June 28, 1938 December 19, 1985 11. July 3, 1958 October 22, 1976 12. November 17, 1986 UPPER MISSISSIPPI RIVER SYSTEM ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT PROGRAM, IL, IA, MN, MO, WI Provide for a 10-year environmental program to include habitat rehabilitation and enhancement; longterm resource monitoring with computerized inventory and analysis; recreational development; assessment of economic benefits from recreational activities; and navigation system traffic monitoring. Approves 1982 Upper Mississippi River Master Plan, authorizes interstate agreements between Upper Mississippi River states, directs Secretary to imple- GREAT II recommendations for disposal of dredged material and facilitate the productive use of dredge material, directs and interagency agreement with the Department of Interior for its participation in the plan, authorizes second lock at Lock and Dam No. 6. CORALVILLE LAKE, IA Reservoir for flood control and recreation. Highway bridge across Coralville Lake at or near the Mehaffey site. DES MOINES RECREATIONAL RIVER AND GREENBELT, IA Recreational development; environmental enhancement; and related streambank stabilization. Defines area of work. LOVES PARK, IL Improved channel, pumping plant and pond storage. RED ROCK DAM AND LAKE RED ROCK, IA Reservoir for flood control and recreation. Land Acquisition SAYLORVILLE LAKE, IA Reservoir for flood control and recreation. Modification to minimize adverse project impact on Ledges State Park. WEST DES MOINES, IA Construct levees and floodwall. H. Doc. 2577, 99th Cong., 1st sess. Sec. 1103, H.R.6, Water Resources Development Act of 1986. Flood Control Committee Doc. 1, 75th Cong., 1st sess. None H. Doc. 2577, 99th Cong., 1st sess. Sec. 604, H1.R.6, Water Resources Development Act of 1986. Sec. 401, H.R.6, Water Resources Development Act of 1986. Flood Control Committee Doc. 1, 75th Cong., 1st sess. PL 99-190 S. Doc. 9, 85th Cong., Ist sess. H. Doc. 487, 94th Cong., 2nd sess. Sec. 401, H.R.6, Water Resources Development Act of 1986 15-13 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 2000 TABLE 15-B AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION (Continued) See Date Section Authorizing in Text Act Project and Work Authorized Documents MUSCATINE ISLAND LEVEE DISTRICT AND MUSCATINE-LOUISA COUNTY DRAINAGE DISTRICT, NO. 13, IA 13. November 17, 1986 Raise existing levees Sec. 401, H.R.6, Water Resources Development Act of 1986. 1. Permanent Appropriations Repeal Act. 2. Contains latest published map of Illinois and Des Plaines Rivers. 3. Included, in part, in Public Works Administrative Program October 31, 1934, and February 28, 1935. 4. Contains latest published maps of Calumet - Sy portion. 15-14 ROCK ISLAND, IL, DISTRICT TABLE 15-C OTHER AUTHORIZED NAVIGATION PROJECTS (See Section 6 of Text) Cost To September 30, 2000 For Last Full Report Operation See Annual and Project Status Report For Construction Maintenance Hannibal SBH, MO Completed 1958 $ 108,7004 $201,685 Squaw Chute at Quincy, IL Completed 1967 70,979' 9,345 Muscooten Bay, Illinois River, IL Completed 1985 265,4993 171,000 Quincy, IL, Harbor Acces Channel Completed 1970 35,4772 37,700 Muscatine Harbor, IA Completed 1964 353,000 356,061 1. Excludes $25,851 contributed funds. 2. Excludes $35,350 contributed funds. 15-15 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 2000 TABLE 15-E OTHER AUTHORIZED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS (See Section 15 of Text) Cost To September 30, 2000 For Last Full Report Operation Contributed See Annual and Funds Project Report For Construction Maintenance Expended Completed Projects Banner Special Drainage and Levee Districts, IL 1943 $ 247,822 -- Bear Creek Dam (City of Hannibal, MO) 1962 1,679,056 --.. Bettendorf, IA 1987 14,930,085 -- $ 228,073 Big Lake Drainage and Levee District, IL 1943 144,910 -- -- Canton, MO' 1964 1,496,555 -- -- Clinton, IA 1991 26,237,690 -- 839,615 Coal Creek Drainage and Levee District, IL 1954 1,923,145 -- Crane Creek Drainage and Levee District, IL 1941 68,898 -- -- Des Moines and Mississippi Levee District No. 1, MO 1969 1,492,016 -- -- Des Moines, IA 1972 4,993,224 -- 23,323 Drury Drainage District, IL 1964 1,144,875 -- -- Dubuque, IA 1974 10,861,170 -- 145,415 East Liverpool Drainage and Levee District, IL 1941 207,826 -- -- East Moline, IL 1984 9,692,097 -- -- East Peoria Drainage and Levee District, IL 1946 279,963 -- -- Elkport, IA 1951 34,200 -- -- Evansdale, IA 1983 4,409,088 -- -- Fabius River Drainage District, MO 1941 60,500 -- -- Fabius River Drainage District, MO 1963 1,621,841 -- -- Farm Creek, IL 1997 9,859,020 5,219,635 -- Farmers Levee and Drainage District, IL 1942 155,562 -- - Fulton, IL 1984 18,017,200 -- -- Galena, IL 1952 844,100 -- 118,000 Green Bay Levee and Drainage District No. 2, IA 1949 299,000 -- -- Green Bay Levee and Drainage District No. 2, IA 1967 1,727,711 -- -- Gregory Drainage District, MO 1940 77,100 -- -- Gregory Drainage District, MO 1972 1,538,963 -- 20,626 Hannibal, MO 1993 6,060,221 -- 600,000 Henderson County Drainage District No. 1, IL 1968 1,453,217 -- -- Henderson County Drainage District No. 2, IL 1968 1,043,902 -- -- Henderson County Drainage District No. 3, IL 1949 42,700 -- -- Hennepin Drainage and Levee District, IL 1940 109,593 -- -- Hunt Drainage District and Lima Lake Drainage District, IL 1972 4,772,498 -- -- Indian Grave Drainage District, IL 1972 3,551,961 -- -- Iowa River-Flint Creek Levee District No. 16, IA 1972 6,044,693 -- -- Kishwaukee River at DeKalb, IL' 1957 123,300 -- -- Lacey Langellier, West Mantanzas and Kerton Valley Drainage and Levee District, IL 1954 1,290,000 -- -- Liverpool Drainage and Levee District, IL 1943 117,731 -- -- Lost Creek Drainage and Levee District, IL 1938 152,000 -- -- Marengo, IA' 1981 2,447,001 -- -- Marion County Drainage District, MO 1967 873,748 -- -- Marshalltown, IA 1978 8,437,511 -- 252,136 Mason and Menard Drainage District, IL 1940 93,808 -- -- Meredosia Levee and Drainage District, IL' 1977 1,995,322 -- 269,739 Milan, IL 1988 13,437,663 -- 213,554 15-16 ROCK ISLAND, IL, DISTRICT TABLE 15-E OTHER AUTHORIZED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS (Continued) (See Section 15 of Text) Cost To September 30, 2000 For Last Full Report Operation Contributed See Annual and Funds Project Report For Construction Maintenance Expended Muscatine, Mad Creek, IA' 1983 1,129,800 -- -- Muscatine Island Levee District and Muscatine- Louisa County Drainage District No. 13, IA 1970 3,293,276 -- 220,000 Near Springfield on Sangamon River, IL 1941 -- -- -- Oakford Special Drainage District, IL 1940 38,417 -- -- Okabena Creek at Worthington, MN' 1957 72,432 -- -- Ottumwa, IA 1977 233,145 -- -- Pekin and La Marsh Drainage and Levee District, IL 1955 158,383 -- - Penny Slough, Rock River, IL 1940 85,800 -- -- Rock Island, IL 1979 7,582,373 -- -- Rockford, IL 1989 10,032,496 -- 514,188 Rocky Ford Drainage and Levee District, IL 1941 108,797 -- -- Sabula, IA 1958 411,915 -- -- Sangamon River (Mouth), IL 1980 1,048,990 272,848 15,122 Seahorn Drainage and Levee District, IL 1945 32,281 -- -- Sid Simpson Project, IL 1968 5,789,800 -- -- Sny Basin, IL 1972 14,003,560 -- -- Sny Island Levee Drainage District, IL 1942 61,400 -- -- Sny Island Levee Drainage District, IL 1968 4,956,749 -- -- South Beardstown and Valley Drainage and Levee District, IL 1942 220,729 -- -- South Beardstown Drainage and Levee District, IL 1942 171,839 -- South Quincy Drainage and Levee District, IL 1940 61,200 -- -- South Quincy Drainage and Levee District, IL 1968 1,231,243 -- -- South Quincy Drainage and Levee District, IL 1991 7,066,437 -- 2,355,479 South River Drainage District, MO 1941 55,300 -- - South River Drainage District, MO 1966 1,106,056 -- -- Spring Lake Drainage and Levee District, IL 1941 185,980 -- Subdistrict No. I of Drainage Union No. 1 and Bay Island Drainage and Levee District No. 1, IL 1967 3,306,695 -- - Union Township Drainage District, MO 1947 116,576 -- -- Van Meter, IA' 1965 113,842 -- -- Waterloo, IA 1987 48,620,099 -- 83,300 Waterloo Bridges, IA 1991 1,125,000 -- 1,108,787 Authorized Projects Not Constructed Ames Dam and Reservoir, Skunk River, IA 1987 � 1,400,800 -- - Davenport, IA 1987 -- --.. Moline, IL2 1987 -- -- .. Peoria, IL 1973 534,580 -- -- Rock River Agricultural Levees, IL 1984 858,000 -- -- 1. Authorized by Chief of Engineers (Sec. 205, 1948 Flood Control Act). 2. FY 89 funds of $5,639 were expended to close out project. 15-17 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 2000 TABLE 15-G DEAUTHORIZED PROJECTS For Last Full Report Federal Contributed See Annual Date Funds Funds Project Report For Deauthorized Expended Expended Cal.-Sag Channel, Part II Illinois Waterway, IL and IN 1986 1986 - Campbells Island Mississippi River, IL 1969 1979 $76,664 Carroll County Levee and Drainage District, IL 1938 1977 Central City Lake, Wapsipinicon River, IA 1970 1977 55,664 -- Farmers Drainage and Levee District (Sangamon River), IL 1942 1986 Green Island Levee and Drainage District, IA 1938 1977 Henderson River, IL 1964 1977 102,310 -- Illinois Waterway, IL and IN Duplicate Locks 1982 1981 Illinois Waterway Navigation Project (Pekin, IL) 1986 1986 Janesville and Indian Ford Dams, WI 1938 1977 -- Keithsburg Drainage District, IL 1938 1977 -- -- Pecatonica River at Darlington, WI -- 1977 Rochester Lake, Cedar River, IA -- 1977 -- -- South Beloit, IL 1979 1986 270,000 -- William L. Springer Lake Decatur, IL 1979 1986 -- -- Illinois Waterway, Marseilles Canal, IL 1989 1990 -- Peoria Levees, IL -- 1990 -- 15-18 ROCK ISLAND, IL, DISTRICT TABLE 15-H INSPECTION OF COMPLETED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS (See Section 14 of Text) Date Project Inspected Alpine Dam and Page Park Dam, Rockford, IL Banner Special Drainage and Levee District, IL Bear Creek Reservoir, Hannibal, MO Bay Island Drainage and Levee District, IL Bettendorf, IA Big Lake Drainage and Levee District, IL Burlington, IA Canton, MO Clinton, IA Coal Creek Drainage and Levee District, IL Crane Creek Drainage and Levee District, IL DeKalb, IL Des Moines, IA Des Moines and Mississippi Levee District No. 1, MO Des Moines County DD7, IA Des Moines County DD8, IA Drury Drainage District, IL Dubuque, IA East Liverpool Drainage and Levee District, IL East Moline, IL East Peoria Drainage and Levee District, IL East Peoria Sanitary District, IL Elkport, IA Evansdale, IA Fabius River Drainage District, MO Farmers Drainage and Levee District, IL Fulton, IL Galena, IL Green Bay Levee and Drainage District No. 2, IA Gregory Drainage District, MO Hannibal, MO Henderson County Drainage District No. 1, IL Henderson County Drainage District No. 2, IL Hennepin Drainage and Levee District, IL Ilerget Drainage and Levee District, IL Hunt Drainage District & Lima Lake Drainage District, IL Indian Grave Drainage District, IL Iowa River-Flint Creek Levee District No. 16, IA Kerton Valley Drainage and Levee District, IL Lacey Drainage and Levee District, IL Langellier Drainage and Levee District, IL Levings Lake Dam, IL Lima DD, IL Liverpool Drainage and Levee District, IL Lost Creek Drainage and Levee District, IL Mad Creek, Muscatine, IA Marengo, IA Marion County Drainage District, MO Marshalltown, IA Mason and Menard Drainage District, IL November 1999 December 1999 November 1999 November 1999 November 1999 November 1999 November 1999 November 1999 November 1999 December 1999 November 1999 November 1999 December 1999 November 1999 January 2000 January 2000 November 1999 November 1999 November 1999 November 1999 November 1999 January 2000 November 1999 November 1999 November 1999 November 1999 November 1999 December 1999 November 1999 November 1999 November 1999 November 1999 November 1999 January 2000 November 1999 November 1999 November 1999 January 2000 November 1999 November 1999 November 1999 December 1999 November 1999 November 1999 December 1999 November 1999 November 1999 November 1999 November 1999 October 1999 15-19 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 2000 TABLE 15-H INSPECTION OF COMPLETED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS (Continued) (See Section 14 of Text) Date Project Inspected Meredosia Levee and Drainage District, IL November 1999 Milan, IL November 1999 Muscatine Island, L&DD, & Louisa DD No. 13, IA November 1999 Oakford Special Drainage and Levee District, IL December 1999 Page Park Dam, IL November 1999 Pekin-LaMarsh Drainage and Levee District, IL November 1999 Penny Slough Drainage and Levee District, IL November 1999 Rock Island, IL November 1999 Rock Island Arsenal, IL November 1999 Sabula, IA November 1999 Sanitary District of Beardstown, IL October 1999 Savanna Ordinance Depot, IL November 1999 Seahorn Drainage and Levee District, IL November 1999 Sny Island Levee Drainage District, IL November 1999 South Beardstown Drainage and Levee District, IL December 1999 South Quincy Drainage and Levee District, IL November 1999 South River Drainage District, MO November 1999 Spring Lake Drainage and Levee District, IL November 1999 Subdistrict No. 1 of Drainage District Union No. 1 and Bay Island Levee and Drainage District No. 1, IL November 1999 Tama, IA November 1999 The Sny Basin, IL November 1999 Valley Drainage and Levee District, IL December 1999 Van Meter, IA November 1999 Volga, IA November 1999 Waterloo, IA November 1999 West Matanzas Drainage and Levee District, IL November 1999 Worthington, MN November 1999 15-20 ROCK ISLAND IL, DISTRICT TABLE 15-I FLOOD CONTROL WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION FISCAL YEAR COSTS Project Federal Cost Non-Federal Total Flood Control (Section 205, P. L. 858) Cedar River, Cedar River City, IA Cedar River, Plainfield, IA East Peoria, IL Liverpool, IL Mad Creek, Muscatine Ottawa, IL Raccoon River, Des Moines, IA Section 205 Coordination Westfork, Des Moines, Jackson, MN Volga River, Fayette, IA $ 860,685 7,382 323,647 20,681 123,044 163,448 222,448 19,657 14,318 28,810 $1,784,120 Snagging and Clearing (Section 208, 1954 Flood Control Act, P.L. 780) Devils Creek, Lee Co, IA Section 208 Coordination Account Emergency Bank Protection (Section 14 of 1946 Flood Control Act, P.L. 526) Jackson County Middle Fabius River Lewis County Road 582, MO Section 14 Coordination Account West Fork, Des Moines River, MN Highway 52, Bellevue, IA Des Moines River Township Road 65, MN State Route A, Scotland Co, MO Emergency Flood Control Activities (P.L. 99) Disaster Preparedness Program Emergency Operations Rehabilitation $27,021 14.792 $286,043 $1,146,728 7,382 277 323,924 65,975 86,656 69,258 192,302 57,524 220,972 11,000 233,448 19,657 14,318 28,810 $490,079 $2,274,199 27,021 14.792 $41,813 $41,813 $ $ 6,762 $ 6,762 36,194 10,311 46,505 24,524 24,524 -6,762 -6,762 18,927 18,927 16,783 16,783 31,654 31,654 $121,320 $17,073 $138,393 $ 178,663 $ 178,663 109,429 109,429 1,006,640 1,006,640 $1,294,732 $1,294,732 15-21 .... _ REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 2000 TABLE 15-J ILLINOIS WATERWAY: EXISTING LOCKS AND DAMS (See Section 2 of Text) Depth on Dimensions Miter Sills Available Lift at at Low Water Miles Width of Length for Low Above Chamber Full Width Water' Lower Upper Lock Mouth Miles to Nearest Tpwn (feet) (feet) (feet) (feet) (feet) LaGrange Lock 80.2 7.8 below Beardstown, IL 110 600 10.0 13.0 15.5 Peoria Lock 157.7 4.1 below Peoria, IL 110 600 11.0 12.0 15.5 Starved Rock Lock 231.0 Utica, IL 110 600 18.5 14.0 16.8 Marseilles Lock 244.6 Marseilles, IL 110 600 24.45 14.0 18.6 Dresden Island Lock 271.5 8 above Morris, IL 110 600 21.75 12.25 16.85 Brandon Road Lock 286.0 Joliet, IL 110 600 34.0 13.8 17.85 Lockport Lock 291.1 Lockport, IL 110 600 30.5-39.52 15.0 11.0-20.22 T.J. O'Brien Lock 326.5 Chicago, IL 110 1,000 -- 14.0 14.0 1. Lifts and depth on miter sills are those obtained with flat pools. 2. Variation in lift and depth on upper miter sill at Lockport is due to fluctuation of water surface in the sanitary district canal. 15-22 ROCK ISLAND, IL, DISTRICT TABLE 15-K ILLINOIS WATERWAY, IL AND IN LOCK AND DAM CONSTRUCTION, FOUNDATIONS, COST (See Section 2 of Text) Estimated Lock Dam Federal Cost Under Type of Character of Type of Character of Year Existing Name Construction " Foundation Kind Construction Foundation .Complete Project Illinois River, mouth to Utica; channel improvement by dredging in Illinois River below Starved Rock modification of two U.S. locks and dams, and removal of two State dams. LaGrange Peoria $2,733,499' Concrete Concrete Starved Rock Concrete Marseilles Dresden Island Brandon Road Lockport Concrete Concrete Concrete Concrete T.J. O'Brien Concrete and sheet Piles in sand Movable (wicket with Aframe- crest) Piles in sand Movable (wicket type) Rock Rock Rock Rock Rock Movable (tainter gates) Movable (tainter gates) Movable (tainter gates) Movable (tainter gates) Movable (Bear trap) (Bear trap) Concrete and timber Concrete and timber Concrete and structural steel Concrete and structural steel Concrete and structural steel Concrete and structural steel Concrete and structural steel Piles in clay Fixed Concrete and sheet piling piling Piles in sand 1939 $ 2,744,592' Piles in sand 1939 Rock Rock Rock Rock Rock 1933 1933 1933 1933 1933 Piles in clay 1960 3,381,030' 885,3151 1,853,725' 2,503,376' 2,031,683' 133,608' 6,954,700' 15-23 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 2000 TABLE 15-K (Continued) ILLINOIS WATERWAY, IL AND IN 'LOCK AND DAM CONSTRUCTION, FOUNDATIONS, COST (See Section 2 of Text) Estimated Lock Dam Federal Cost Under Type of Character of Type of Character of Year Existing Name Construction Foundation Kind Construction Foundation Complete Project Lock and dam -- -- -- - -- 1,250,304 equipment Total locks -- -- -- -- -- $ 24,471,832 and dams 1. Actual cost. TABLE 15-L ILLINOIS WATERWAY, IL AND IN ADDITIONAL FEATURES ENTERING INTO COST (See Section 2 of Text) Dredging: Little Calumet and Calumet Rivers $ 2,135,358' Calumet-Sag, 3 passing places 813,318' Starved Rock to Lockport 6,007,335 Starved Rock to Grafton 2,917,607 Calumet-Sag Channel 19,238,200 Peoria small boat harbor 24,937' Protection piers at all locks 77,613' Calumet-Sag modification engineering and design 5,141,474 Calumet-Sag modification, supervision and administration 5,466,804 Rebuild highway bridges 19,327,850 Rebuild railway bridges: Calumet-Sag Channel 20,828,435' Little Calumet and Calumet Rivers 18,362,041' Recreation Facilities, Code 711 445,000 Removal of Blue Island lock 288,600' Grand Calumet River controlling works2 St. Louis District 1,081,600' Total additional features $100,442,142 Total existing project $124,913,974 1. Actual cost. 2. Placed in inactive status November 19, 1974. 15-24 ROCK ISLAND, IL, DISTRICT TABLE 15-M EXISTING PROJECT See Section in Text Project Item Length (feet) Width (feet) Depth (feet) 2. Illinois Waterway, Nine locks and six dams IL and IN Grafton to Lockport, IL 291.1 miles 300 9 Lockport to controlling works 2.0 miles 200-300 9 Controlling works to junction with 10.0 miles 225 9 Calumet-Sag Channel Calumet-Sag Channel to lock in Blue 16.0 miles 225 9 Island Calumet and Little Calumet Channel, 7.7 miles 300 9 from Blue Island to turning basin 5 Grand Calumet River Channel from 9.0 miles 9 -- junction with Little Calumet River to and in Indiana Harbor Canal to 141st, East Chicago, IN Also, Grand Calumet River Channel 4.2 miles 160 9 from junction of Indiana Harbor Canal and Grand Calumet River to Clark St. in Gary, IN, with a turning basin at Clark St. A channel in Chicago Sanitary and 22.1 miles 175-300 9 Ship Canal and South Branch Chicago River from Sag-Junction to Lake St. in Chicago, IL TABLE 15-N ILLINOIS WATERWAY, IL AND IN TOTAL COST OF EXISTING PROJECT TO SEPTEMBER 30, 2000 (See Section 2 of Text) New Work Maintenance Rehabilitation Total Regular Funds $120,886,748 $461,128,282 $155,468,726 $737,483,756 Public Works Funds 3,960,735 -- -- 3,960,735 Emergency Relief Funds 1,858,936 -- -- 1,858,936 Total $126,706,419 $461,128,282 $155,468,726 $1,301,435,340' 1. Includes $1,735,890 expended between 1927 and 1936 on the operation and care of the works of improvement under the provisions of the permanent indefinite appropriation for such purposes. 15-25 REPORT OF TIlE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 2000 TABLE 15-0 ACTIVE GENERAL INVESTIGATIONS (96x3121) FISCAL YEAR COSTS Item and CWIS Number Federal Cost Non-Federal Total SURVEYS (Category 100) Flood Damage Prevention (120) DesMoines & Racoon River, IA - 013490 Subtotal Special Studies (140) Peoria Riverfront Development, IL - 013410 Upper Miss. River FLD Profile Study - 013414 Illinois River Ecosystem Restoration - 014293 Rock River, IL & WI Subtotal Review of Authorized Projects (160) Mississippi River Navigation Study - 010315 Subtotal Miscellaneous Activities (170) Special Investigations - 017250 Review of FERC Licenses - 053857 Interagency Water Resources Dev. - 014713 Subtotal Coordination Studies with other Agencies (180) Cooperation w/other Water Agencies - 053907 PAS - IA - Black Haw Co. Hydraulic Analysis - 019008 PAS - Negotiation Funds - 014800 PAS-WI-Fox Lake Restoration - 055011 PAS-IA-Coralville - 019010 PAS-MN-Jackson - 127020 PAS-WI-TRI-State Port Development - 055015 Subtotal TOTAL (Category 100) 201.311 $201,311 233,510 1,223,749 51,347 70,818 201,311 $201,311 33,476 266,986 1,223,747 51,347 70,818 $1,579,422 $ 33,476 $1,612,898 4,845,341 4,845,341 $4,845,341 $4,845,341 15,373 353 15,216 15,373 353 15.216 $30,942 $30,942 13,618 13,618 95,546 107,766 203,312 1,811 1,881 276 276 522 81,882 14,448 96,330 7,353 3,994 11,347 19,275 49,209 68,484 $219,833 $175,693 $395,526 $6,876,849 $209,168 $7,086,018 15-26 ROCK ISLAND, IL, DISTRICT TABLE 15-0 ACTIVE GENERAL INVESTIGATIONS (Continued) (96x3121) FISCAL YEAR COSTS Item and CWIS Number Federal Cost Non-Federal Total COLLECTION AND STUDY OF BASIC DATA (Category 200) Floodplain Management Services (250) Flood Plain Mgmt Services - 082030 Technical Services - 082040 Quick Responses - 082045 SS Hannibal, MO - 083187 Subtotal IHydrologic Studies (260) General Hydrologic Studies - 053820 Subtotal TOTAL (Category 200) PRECONSTRUCTION ENGINEERING AND DESIGN (Category 400) Navigation Projects (420) Mississippi River Navigation Study - 010315 Subtotal TOTAL (Category (400) 106,617 97,583 9,648 211 106,617 97,583 9,648 211 $214,059 $214,059 16,254 16,254 $16,254 $16,254 $230,313 $230,313 3,007,145 3,007,145 $3,007,145 $3,007,145 $3,007,145 $3,007,145 GRAND TOTAL GENERAL INVESTIGATIONS (NON REIMBURSABLE) $10,114,307 $209,168 $10,323,475 15-27 ST. PAUL, MN, DISTRICT* District comprises western Wisconsin, major portion of Minnesota, northern and eastern North Dakota, and small portions of northeastern South Dakota and northern and northeastern Iowa embracing drainage basins of Mississippi River and tributaries from its source to mile 614 above mouth of Ohio River; Red River of the North and tributaries; those streams north of Missouri River Basin in North Dakota; and U.S. waters of Lake of the Woods and its tributaries. That section of Mississippi River above mile 614 is included in report on Mississippi River between Missouri River and Minneapolis, Minnesota. IMPROVEMENTS Page Flood Control (cont.) 1. Mississippi River between Missouri River and Minneapolis, MN ..................................... 16-2 2. Reservoirs at Headwaters of Mississippi River, MN ................................ 6-2 3. Upper Mississippi River System Environmental Management Program (UMRS-EMP) ............................................. 16-2 Flood Control 4. Aitkin County, CSAH 10, MN..................... 16-3 5. Bassett Creek, M N ......................................... 16-4 6. Chaska, MN ....................... 16-4 7. Crookston, MN ............................................... 6-4 8. Grafton, Park River, ND ............... 1..................6-5 9. Grand Forks, ND - East Grand Forks, MN.....16-5 10. Homme Lake and Dam, ND ..................... 1.6.-.6.... 11. Houston, MN ............................................... 6-6 12. LaFarge Lake and Channel Improvement, WI..................................1..........6-7 13. Lake Ashtabula and Baldhill Dam, Sheyenne River, ND ...................................... 16-7 14. LeSueur River, CSAH 28, Blue Earth County, MN ........................... 11.6..-.8..... 15. M arshall, M N ............................................ ... 16-8 16. Pool 8 Pilot Drawdown, WI ............................ 16-9 17. Portage, W I ................................................ 16-10 18. Red River of the North, Fargo Public Facilities, ND ............................................. 16-10 19. Rochester, M N ........................................... 16-11 20. Sheyenne River, ND ..................................... 16-11 21. Souris River Basin, ND..............................1...6-12 22. St. Croix River, Stillwater, MN ................. 16-12 23. St. Paul, M N.................................................. 16-13 24. Inspection of Completed Flood Control Projects ............................ 16-13 25. Other Work Under Special Authority ........... 16-13 26. Flood Control and Coastal Emergencies (FC & CE) .............................. 16-13 27. National Emergency Preparedness Program (NEPP)..................... 16-13 28. Regulatory Functions Program..................... 16-13 General Investigations 29. Surveys...................... ............................ 16-14 30. Collection and Study of Basic Data............. 16-14 31. Advance Engineering and Design .............. 16-14 Tables Table 16-A Cost and Financial Statement...... 16-15 Table 16-B Authorizing Legislation............. 16-19 Table 16-C Other Authorized Navigation Projects .................................... 16-22 Table 16-D Not Applicable Table 16-E Other Authorized Flood Control Projects........................... 16-23 Table 16-F Not Applicable Table 16-G Deauthorized Projects .............. 16-27 Table 16-H Reservoirs at Headwaters of Mississippi River......................... 16-28 Table 16-I Red River of the North Drainage Basin: Active Units in Comprehensive Basin Plan.................................... 16-29 Table 16-J Inspection of Completed Flood Control Projects ........... 16-30 Table 16-K Flood Control Work Under Special Authorization .................. 16-32 Table 16-L Project Modifications for Improvement of Environment ..... 16-33 Table 16-M Aquatic Ecosystem Restoration... 16-33 Table 16-N General Investigations ................. 16-34 16-1 Navigation Page REPORT OF TIlE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 2000 Navigation 1. MISSISSIPPI RIVER BETWEEN MISSOURI RIVER AND MINNEAPOLIS, MN For report on this improvement see chapter on Mississippi River between Missouri River and Minneapolis, Minnesota. 2. RESERVOIRS AT HEADWATERS OF ,, MISSISSIPPI RIVER, MN Location. Reservoirs are on the Mississippi River and several of its tributaries in Itasca, Beltrami, Hubbard, Aitkin, Cass and Crow Wing Counties, MN. (See Table 16-H on reservoirs.) Previous projects. For details see page 1888 of Annual Report for 1915, and page 1098 of Annual Report for 1938. Existing project. Provides for reconstruction from timber to concrete at Winnibigoshish, Leech Lake, Pokegama, Sandy Lake and Pine River Dams, and construction of a concrete dam at Gull Lake. Pokegama was built on bedrock and the others on pile foundations. A portion of Leech Lake Dam from piers 26 to 39 was replaced with an earth fill. Constructed three dikes at Winnibigoshish, four at Pokegama, two at Sandy Lake, and 16 at Pine River. Sandy Lake Dam includes a lock 160 feet long, 30 feet wide, with a maximum lift of 9.5 feet and a depth of 2.5 feet on lower sill at low water which was converted to use as a spillway. (See Table 16-B for authorizing legislation.) The Pine River Dam main embankment consists of a timber diaphragm core and earth fill. The Pine River Dam control structure is made of reinforced concrete with a wooden sheet pile cutoff and is supported on a timber substructure. The recommended plan for improvements to the Pine River Dam for dam safety assurance includes: rehabilitation of the existing structure to include 13 new gates, concrete replacement and a sheetpile and concrete wall along the current main dam embankment, and improvements to the perimeter dikes. Estimated cost (1999) to the United States for new Dam Safety Assurance work at the Pine River Dam is $10,200,000. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. None. Operation and results during fiscal year. Reservoirs were operated as required, recreation facilities and equipment maintained, and surveys, repairs, reports and data collection cost $3,227,423. Dam Safety: Engineering and design and the start of construction for dam safety modifications at Pine River Dam cost $2,780,954. Condition at end of fiscal year. Existing project was completed in 1937. Flowage rights were acquired on all lands affected by construction, maintenance, and operation of reservoirs. A total of 1,672.26 acres in fee are owned by the United States. The United States has easements, flowage rights, and other rights of use on another 296,334.44 acres. Structures are in fair condition. Recreation facilities for public use are being constructed intermittently at all reservoir areas. (See Table 16-H for capacities and costs by reservoir.) Pine River Dam has been classified as a high hazard dam under the National Dam Safety Program due to inadequate spillway capacity which could lead to dam failure during a flood event. Construction of dam safety modifications is currently underway. 3. UPPER MISSISSIPPI RIVER SYSTEM ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT PROGRAM (UMRS-EMP) Location. The program is authorized for the commercially navigable portions of the Upper Mississippi River System. In the St. Paul District, this includes the Mississippi, Minnesota, Black, and St. Croix Rivers in the states of Minnesota, Wisconsin and Iowa. Existing project. The purpose of the UMRS-EMP as stated in the authorizing legislation is to ensure the coordinated development and enhancement of the Upper Mississippi River System, recognizing its several purposes. It is intended to protect and/or enhance the river resources and guide future river management. The primary emphasis of the program is on habitat rehabilitation and enhancement projects. Long term resource monitoring will provide the means for more informed management of the UMRS. Also authorized, was a study of the economic impacts of recreation (completed), navigation traffic monitoring (continuing under other authority), and recreation projects (unfunded). The program was initiated by WRDA in 1986 and the 1999 WRDA extends the EMP on a continuing basis. The execution of the program is being closely coordinated with the Upper Mississippi River Basin Association, the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, the U.S. Geological Survey, and the three affected states in the St. Paul District. See Rock Island District Tables 15-A and 15-B for total program costs and authorizing legislation. In the St. Paul District, twenty-one habitat projects have been completed. These are the Guttenberg Waterfowl Ponds (IA), Island 42 (MN), Lake Onalaska 16-2 ST. PAUL, MN, DISTRICT (WI), Blackhawk Park (WI), Pool 8 Islands Phases I and II (WI), Indian Slough (WI), Finger Lakes (MN), Lansing Big Lake (IA), Cold Springs (WI), Pool 9 Island (WI), Spring Lake Peninsula (WI), Bussey Lake (IA), Peterson Lake (MN), Polander Lake Stage I (MN), East Channel (WI/MN) Rice Lake (MN), Small Scale Drawdown (WI) Trempealeau (WI), Bank Stabilization (IA, WI, MN), and Long Lake (WI). The projects are, being operated and maintained by the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, except for Blackhawk Park which is maintained by the Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources (DNR). Through FY 2000, funds expended by the St. Paul District have amounted to $34,018,000 for planning, design, construction and monitoring of habitat rehabilitation and enhancement projects; $894,000 for long term resource monitoring; $768,000 for economic impacts of recreation study; and $2,082,000 for program management. The annual authorized funding level for the overall program is about $34 million. Local cooperation. Local cooperation agreements are obtained for habitat projects of features not located on lands managed as a national wildlife refuge, as specified in Section 906(e) of the 1986 WRDA. Operations and results during fiscal year. In the St. Paul District, costs during the year totaled $2,531,858 Federal. The majority of funds were expended on the planning, design, construction and monitoring of habitat projects. Design was continued on seven projects. Construction was completed on two projects. Flood Control 4. AITKIN COUNTY, CSAH 10, MINNESOTA Location. Along the west bank of the Mississippi River adjacent to County State Aid Highway 10 (CSAH 10), Aitkin County, about 155 miles north of Minneapolis-St. Paul, Minnesota. Existing Project. The emergency streambank protection project on the Mississippi River involves approximately 550 feet of riverbank. The project consists of rockfill toe protection and associated earthwork to protect CSAH 10. The project was approved by the Mississippi Valley Division for construction on May 10, 1999, under the authority contained in Section 14 of the 1946 Flood Control Act, as amended. Local Cooperation. A project Cooperation Agreement was executed between the Federal Government and Aitkin County on July 9, 1999. The agreement requires the county to provide, during the period of construction, a cash contribution of at least 5 percent of total project costs and any additional funds needed to make its total contribution, including the value of all required local responsibilities, equal to 35 percent of the total project costs; provided without cost to the United States all lands, easements, and rights-of-way, including suitable borrow and dredged material disposal areas necessary for construction, operation and maintenance of the project; perform all relocations and alterations of building utilities (other than those portions which pass under or through the project structures), highways, railroads, bridges (other than railroad bridges and approaches thereto), sewers and related and special facilities determined by the Government to be necessary for construction of the project; pay all costs in excess of the Federal statutory limitation of $500,000; hold and save the United States free from all damages arising from construction, operation and maintenance of the completed project, except for damages due to the fault or negligence of the Government or its contractors; comply with the provisions of the Uniform Relocation Assistance and Real Property Acquisition Policies Act of 1970, Public Law 91-646, approved 2 January 1971, in acquiring lands, easements, and rights-of-way for construction and subsequent operation and maintenance of the project, and inform all affected persons of applicable benefits, policies, and procedures in connection with said Act; operate, maintain, replace, and rehabilitate the project upon completion in accordance with regulations or directions prescribed by the Government; give the Government a right to enter, at reasonable times and in a reasonable manner, upon land which it owns or controls for access to the project for the purpose of inspection and if necessary, for the purpose of completing, operating, maintaining, repairing, rehabilitating, or replacing the project; and comply with all applicable Federal and State laws and regulations, including Section 601 of Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 (Public Law 88-352) and Department of Defense Directive 5500.11 issued pursuant thereto and published in Part 300 of Title 32, Code of Federal Regulations, as well as Army Regulation 600-7, entitled "Nondiscrimination on the Basis of Handicap in Programs and Activities Assisted or Conducted by the Department of Army." Operations and results during fiscal year. New Work: A construction contract was awarded on August 13, 1999 and construction was initiated. Total FY 00 Federal costs were $47,658 and non-Federal, $0. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction of the emergency streambank protection project is underway. 16-3 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 2000 5. BASSETT CREEK, MN Location. In Hennepin County and Minneapolis, Minnesota, on Bassett Creek, a tributary of the Mississippi River. (For general location, see Geological Survey map of Minnesota.) Existing project. The project consists of nonstructural and structural flood control measures. Nonstructural measures include continuation of existing floodplain regulations, flood insurance and forecasting, and flood warning. Principal structural measures consist of six small control structures in the upper watershed to temporarily impound flood waters and a new tunnel (part of which was constructed on a cooperative basis with the Minnesota Department of Transportation) in a highly urbanized area of Minneapolis to replace the existing tunnel outletting Bassett Creek to the Mississippi River. Also included in the project are a limited reach of channel widening, bridge removals, culvert replacements, a weir structure, a flood storage area, and a railroad bridge replacement. Project was authorized by the 1976 Water Resources Development Act. Local cooperation. See Annual Report for 1977 for requirements. Under current cost sharing policies, when the costs of lands, easements, rights-of-way, relocations and disposal areas (LERRD) are less than 20 percent of total project costs, local interests are required to furnish the standard local cooperation requirements plus a cash contribution, the total of the two to amount to a minimum of 25 percent of the total project costs. On June 27, 1986, the City of Minneapolis entered into a local cooperation agreement with the Department of the Army. Operations and results during fiscal year. Project financial closeout work continues. New Work: Construction on the final stage of work was completed in FY 98. Total Federal costs were $3,070 and non- Federal, $0. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction has been completed on all components. The project financial closeout work is currently underway. 6. CHASKA, MN Location. In Carver County in south-central Minnesota on the Minnesota River. (For general location, see Geological Survey map of Minnesota.) Existing project. The plan of improvement consists of a levee and interior drainage works along the Minnesota River, flood diversion channels on Chaska Creek and East Creek, and appropriate floodplain regulation measures. Principal project features include: approximately 1.1 miles of upgraded levee, 1.5 miles of new levee, and one pumping station on the Minnesota River; 1.1 miles of diversion channel on Chaska Creek; and 1.0 mile of diversion channel on East Creek. Approximately 2.9 miles of paved recreation trails on top of the levee and around Courthouse Lake are also included in the proposed plan. Estimated Federal cost for new work is $30,397,000 and $12,558,000 is to be contributed by local interests. Project was authorized by the 1976 Water Resources Development Act. (H. Doc. 644, 94th Congress, 2d sess., contains latest published map.) Local cooperation. See Annual Report for 1977 for requirements. A local cooperation agreement was executed on Sep. 12, 1988. The agreement included cost sharing provisions in accordance with the 1986 Water Resources Development Act. Operations and results. during fiscal year. Stage 3 construction is substantially complete. Stage 3A construction (final stage) is complete. Total Federal costs were $75,886 and non-Federal, $570. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction is complete. A project dedication was held on July 28, 1998. 7. CROOKSTON, MN Location. In Polk County in northwest Minnesota, approximately 25 miles east of Grand Forks, North Dakota. It is located on the Red Lake River 52 miles upstream from its confluence with the Red River of the North at East Grand Forks. Existing Project. This flood reduction project was specially authorized by Congress via the Water Resources Development Act of 1999 and appropriations for the new start construction was provided in 2001 budget appropriations. The cost-shared feasibility report and environmental assessment that justified the Federal project was completed in 1997and recommended a local flood protection project consisting of 2 downstream high-flow cutoff channels, and levees built to the 100-year level of protection for Thorndale, Woods and Downtown/Riverside neighborhoods. The recommended plan has a fully funded baseline cost estimate of $9.5 million, and a benefit to cost ratio of 1.6. However, based on plans and specification efforts now done, the actual costs are now projected to increase to approximately $10.5 million. Preconstruction engineering and design efforts began in 1998 and the plans 16-4 ST. PAUL, MN, DISTRICT and specification for Stage I of the project construction were completed in October 2000 and Stage 2 plans and specifications for the project will be completed in June 2001. The first stage of construction for the project will begin in the summer of 2001. Construction is expected to take 2 years to complete. Local Cooperation. Negotiation of a Project Cooperation Agreement will be completed in the spring of FY 2001. The non-Federal Sponsor will comply with the local cost sharing requirements of Water Resources Development Act of 1986, as amended. Operations and results during fiscal year. New Work: Engineering associated with pre-engineering and design was accomplished at a cost of $50,578 Federal and $228,184 non-Federal. Condition at end of fiscal year. The stage I plans and specs were completed and progress on the stage 2 plans and specs were also made. Preliminary negotiations on the Project Cooperation Agreement were undertaken. 8. GRAFTON, PARK RIVER, ND Location. In Walsh County in northeastern North Dakota along the Park River where State Highway 81 and the Park River intersect about 340 miles northwest of Minneapolis-St. Paul, Minnesota. Existing Project. The recommended plan will provide flood protection for the city of Grafton; it consists of a 3.75-mile-long bypass channel that would extend upstream and to the west of Grafton along the South Branch Park River. The tieback levee will direct the flood flows to the inlet of the bypass channel. A diversion structure will be constructed at the point where the levee crosses the Park River. River flows that exceed 2,000 cubic feet per second (cfs) will be diverted through the proposed bypass channel. During periods when the river flow is less than 2,000 cfs, the entire flow will go into the natural channel of the Park River through Grafton. The project is estimated to cost $30,000,000 with an estimated Federal cost of $19,500,000 and an estimated non-Federal cost of $10,500,000. Grafton park was authorized for construction by WRDA 1986, deauthorized in 1991, and subsequently reauthorized by Section 364 of WRDA 1999. Local Cooperation. The city of Grafton is the local sponsor. In accordance with the cost sharing and financing concepts reflected in the Water Resources Development Act of 1986, as amended, local interests will be required to provide lands, easements, rights-ofway, and borrow and excavated or dredged material or disposal areas; modify or relocate utilities, roads, bridges (except railroad bridges), and other facilities, where necessary in the construction of the project; pay five percent of the costs allocated to flood control; contribute an additional amount in cash as necessary to bring the non-Federal shares of costs allocated to flood control to a minimum 35 percent; and bear all costs of operation, maintenance, and replacement of the flood control facilities. Operations and results during fiscal year. New Work: Engineering associated with pre-engineering and design was accomplished at a cost of $72,759. Condition at end of fiscal year. Funds are being used to prepare and complete a General Reevaluation Report. The completion schedule for preconstruction engineering and design is December 2001. 9. GRAND FORKS, NORTH DAKOTA AND EAST GRAND FORKS, MINNESOTA Location. Grand Forks, North Dakota is located in Grand Forks County in eastern North Dakota about 70 miles south of the Canadian border. East Grand Forks, Minnesota is located at the outlet of the Red Lake River to the Red River of the North, immediately across the river from Grand Forks. (For General Location see Geological Survey map of either North Dakota or Minnesota.) Existing project. Project was authorized by P.L. 105-277, Omnibus Appropriation Bill FY 99. Estimated cost (1998) of the entire flood damage reduction project is $322,068,000, total cost to the United States is estimated at $161,733,000 and total cost to the non- Federal sponsors (cities of Grand Forks and East Grand Forks) is estimated at $160,335,000. The flood damage reduction project consists of a flood barrier around both communities providing protection against a flood equivalent to the peak discharge that occurred during the devastating flood of 1997 (136,900 cubic feet per second). A secondary purpose of recreation is also included in the authorized project. Local cooperation. Project Cooperation Agreement was signed with both communities in January 2000. The non-Federal sponsors will comply with the local cost share requirements of Water Resources Development Act of 1986, as amended. Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: Engineering associated with pre-engineering and design was accomplished at a cost of $223,759. Total Federal construction costs for FY 00 was $6,281,598. 16-5 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 2000 Condition at end of fiscal year. The General Reevaluation Report and Environmental Impact Statement formulating and identifying the selected flood damage reduction plan for these communities was completed in November 1998. The Chief of Engineers Report was signed on Dec. 29, 1998, and the Record of Decision was signed on Feb. 17, 1999. Cultural and historical survey work was performed to quantify extent of project impacts and define requires mitigation. Design memorandum addressing the flood barrier alignment and interior flood control designs were completed. Project Cooperation Agreement was signed. Construction was initiated on Bank Stabilization and bridge removal. Plans and specifications for the first levee reaches were initiated. 10. HOMME LAKE AND DAM, ND Location. Dam is on South Branch of Park River about 4 miles upstream from Park River, ND, and 62.1 miles above mouth of Park River. South, Middle, and North Branches, headwater streams of Park River, rise in Cavalier County in northeastern North Dakota and flow easterly to an almost common confluence near Grafton, ND, forming main stream which flows easterly 35 miles to join Red River of the North about 35 miles south of the international boundary. (For general location, see Geological Survey map of North Dakota.) Existing project. See Annual Report for 1962. Project was authorized as Park River Reservoir by 1944 Flood Control Act (S. Doc. 194, 78th Cong., 2d sess.), and redesignated Homme Reservoir and Dam by Public Law 435, 80th Congress, 2d session. Project restoration of wetland habitat conditions is taking place under the authority contained in Section 1135 of the 1986 Water Resources Development Act, as amended. Latest published maps is in project document. A reconnaissance report was completed in 1994 under the Dam Safety Assurance Program. The report recommended adding a new spillway to increase the dam's discharge capacity to the Probable Maximum flood level. Estimated cost (2000) to the United States for new Dam Safety Assurance work is $12,400,000 and $85,000 is to be contributed by local interests. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Total costs for all requirements of local cooperation under terms of project authorization, including required non- Federal contributions, were $62,800. In addition, local interests contributed $16,220 for construction ofa water supply outlet through dam and incurred other costs of $19,600. The North Dakota Game and Fish Department has agreed to serve as the non-Federal sponsor for the environmental improvement to the project. According to current Dam Safety cost sharing guidance, the local sponsors are required to fund 15 percent of the dam safety improvement costs in the same proportion as the original construction was cost shared. The local sponsors would therefore pay for 4.5 percent of 15 percent or 0.68 percent of the dam safety costs. The North Dakota Office of the State Engineer has supported the proposed modifications identified in the Reconnaissance Report. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Structure was operated, maintained, inspected and evaluations were performed at a cost of $188,546. Dam Safety: Engineering and design cost $1,600,633, all Federal. Condition at end of fiscal year. Project completed in June 1956 except for additional recreational facilities which have been done intermittently since that time. Construction began in April 1948 and major structures completed in May 1951. Structures are in good condition. Government has acquired 395 acres of land in fee and easements over 7.8 acres of land for project. An additional 6.3 acres of land have been donated for recreational development and 3.75 acres have been acquired due to bank erosion bordering the project. Construction of a habitat improvement project (under Section 1135 authority) was completed and the project was turned over to the local sponsor, the North Dakota Fish and Game Department. Homme Dam has been classified as a high hazard dam under the National Dam Safety Program due to inadequate spillway capacity which could lead to dam failure during a flood event. Engineering and design of dam safety modifications has been completed and construction of a new concrete spillway is underway. 11. HOUSTON, MN Location. The project is located in the city of Houston, in Houston County, in southeastern Minnesota. The city of Houston is adjacent to the Root River, which is a tributary to the Mississippi River. The city is bounded by floodplain agricultural land to the west and east, and by steep bluffs to the south and by the Root River to the north. Existing project. The flood control project is designed to provide protection to the city of Houston against the 100-year flood on the Root River. There are currently two levee systems in the vicinity of Houston; neither of which provides adequate protection against the 100-year flood. Proposed measures to provide 100-year flood protection to the city of Houston include: A levee system, two full-height road raises; 16-6 ST. PAUL, MN, DISTRICT and a sandbag closure. To ease the constriction at the Hwy 76 bridge, an existing portion of the MnDOT levee will be removed, and a high-flow channel will be constructed on the north bank of the Root River. The project also includes construction of two ponding areas to supplement existing interior ponding, three interior gravity outlets, one exterior gravity outlet and a ditch constructed between the levee and the Root River to carry gravity flow from outlet A-1. The project was approved for construction under Section 401 of the 1986 Water Resources Development Act (PL 99-662), as amended; and is also authorized under Section 205 of the Flood Control Act of 1948, as amended; and Section 4 of the Water Resources Development Act of 1988, as amended. Local cooperation. See Annual Report for 1995 for requirements. A Local Cooperation Agreement was executed between the Federal Government and the city of Houston on Feb. 15, 1995. Operations and results during fiscal year. New Work: Completed work includes the construction of a high-flow channel in the Root River; substantial completion of the levee upstream of the Hwy 76 bridge, including the US Hwy 16 and CSAH 13 road raises; partial completion of ponding area A-1, and substantial completion of the interior drainage outlet ditch to the Root River. Federal costs were $3,459 and non-Federal $16,373. Condition at end of fiscal year. Stage 2A (ponding area) construction is complete. Stage 1 (channel work) construction is complete. Stage 2B (levees) construction is complete. 12. LA FARGE LAKE AND CHANNEL IMPROVEMENT, WI Location. On the Kickapoo River which rises in Monroe County in southwestern Wisconsin and flows south and southwest through Vernon, Richland, and Crawford Counties emptying into Wisconsin River about 16 miles above junction of latter stream with Mississippi River. (For general location see Geological Survey map of Wisconsin.) Existing project. See Annual Report for 1996 for flood control dam and impoundment project authorized by 1962 Flood Control Act. The Water Resources Development Act of 1996 (WRDA 96) authorized a modification to the original project to include transfer of approximately 8,569 acres of project lands to the State of Wisconsin and the Secretary of the Interior to be held in trust for the Ho-Chunk Nation. The Ho-Chunk Nation is to receive up to 1,200 acres of lands that are of cultural and religious significance. The modification also includes deauthorizing the construction of the reservoir and dam, while completing other features of the original project. Estimated Federal cost for work authorized by WRDA 96 is $17,000,000. Local cooperation. None required for construction of La Farge Lake. See Annual Report for 1967 for requirements for local protection works. A Project Cooperation Agreement is not required for the land transfer. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Project was operated and maintained at a cost of $60,474. New Work: Work associated with WRDA 96 project was accomplished at a cost of $262,937. Condition at end of fiscal year. See Annual Report for-1996 for status of work authorized by 1962 Flood Control Act. The project was specifically deauthorized by Section 361(b)(7) of Public Law 104- 303, October 12, 1996, with the exception of named relocation and restoration features that remain authorized. 13. LAKE ASHTABULA AND BALDHILL DAM, SHEYENNE RIVER, ND Location. Baldhill Dam is on the Sheyenne River, 16 miles upstream from Valley City, ND, and about 271 miles above mouth. Sheyenne River rises in central North Dakota and flows 500 miles generally southeast to enter Red River of the North about 10 miles north of Fargo, ND. (For general location see Geological Survey map of North Dakota.) Existing project. See Annual Report for 1962. Project was authorized by Flood Control Act of 1944 (S. Doc. 193, 78th Cong., 2d sess., contains latest published map). Estimated cost (1998) to the United States for Major Rehabilitation is $8,200,000. Estimated cost (2000) to the United States for new Dam Safety Assurance work is $14,700,000 and $260,000 is to be contributed by local interests. The reservoir above Baldhill Dam was designated as Lake Ashtabula by Public Law 772, 81st Congress, 2d session. Local cooperation. See Annual Report for 1962. Complied with. Operations and results during fiscal year. Major Rehabilitation: Engineering and design on Stage 4 replacement of permanent operation equipment was completed and construction was initiated. Total Federal 16-7 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 2000 costs were $1,380,068. Dam Safety: Stage 2 construction contract was closed out. Total Federal costs were $50,106 and non-Federal costs, $0. Maintenance: Project was operated, maintained, inspected, investigated, monitored and evaluations were performed at a cost of $1,166,045. Condition at end of fiscal year. Project completed in March 1956 except construction of recreational facilities which is being accomplished intermittently. United States owns 7,816.5 acres of land in fee and easements on 666.2 acres. Construction initiated in July 1947 and major features completed in November 1950. Dam was placed in permanent operation in spring of 1951. Structures are in good condition. Baldhill Dam was classified as a large, high hazard dam under the National Program for the inspection of dams. A risk assessment report prepared in June 1986 indicated a serious spillway discharge capacity deficiency. Construction of dam safety and major rehabilitation modifications was completed in 2000. 14. LE SUER RIVER, CSAH 28, BLUE EARTH COUNTY, MN Location. Along the right bank of the Le Sueur River, Blue Earth County, abut 90 miles southwest of Minneapolis-St. Paul, Minnesota. Existing project. The emergency streambank protection project on the Le Sueur River involves approximately 570 feet of riverbank at two locations of 440 feet and 130 feet. The project consists of rockfill toe protection and associated earthwork to protect County State Aid Highway (CSAH) 28. The project was approved by the Mississippi River Division for construction on Sept. 7, 1999, under the authority contained in Section 14 of the 1946 Flood Control Act, as amended. Local cooperation. A Project Cooperation Agreement was executed between the Federal Government and Blue Earth County on Sep. 13, 1999. The agreement requires the county to provide, during the period of construction, a cash contribution of at least 5 percent of total project costs and any additional funds needed to make its total contribution, including the value of all required local responsibilities, equal to 25 percent of the total project costs; provide without cost to the United States all lands, easements, and rights-of-way, including suitable borrow and dredged material disposal areas necessary for construction, operation and maintenance of the project; perform all relocations and alterations of building utilities (other that those portions which pass under or through the project structures), highways, railroads, bridges (other than railroad bridges and approaches thereto), sewers and related and special facilities determined by the Government to be necessary for construction of the project; pay all costs in excess of the Federal statutory limitation of $500,000; hold and save the United States free from all damages arising from construction, operation and maintenance of the completed project, except for damages due to the fault or negligence of the Government or its contractors; comply with the provisions of the Uniform Relocation Assistance and Real Property Acquisition Policies Act of 1970, Public Law 91-646, approved 2 January 1971, in acquiring lands, easements, and rights-of-way for construction and subsequent operation and maintenance of the project, and inform all affected persons of applicable benefits, policies, and procedures in connection with said Act; operate, maintain, replace, and rehabilitate the project upon completion in accordance with regulations or directions prescribed by the Government; give the Government a right to enter, at reasonable times and in a reasonable manner, upon land which it own or controls for access to the project for the purpose of completing, operating, maintaining, repairing, rehabilitating, or replace the project; and comply with all applicable Federal and State laws and regulations, including Section 601 of Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 (Public Law 88-352) and Department of Defense Directive 5500.11 issued pursuant thereto and published in Part 300 of Title 32, Code of Federal Regulations, as well as Army Regulation 600-7, entitled "Nondiscrimination on the Basis of Handicap in Programs and Activities Assisted or Conducted by the Department of the Army." Operations and results during fiscal year. New Work: A construction contract was awarded on Sep. 17, 1999 and construction was initiated. Total FY 00 Federal Costs were $43,916 and non-Federal $93,506. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction of the emergency streambank protection project is underway. 15. MARSHALL, MN Location. In Lyon County in southwestern Minnesota along the Redwood River about 68 miles above its confluence with the Minnesota River at the city of Marshall, Minnesota. (For general location see Geological Survey map for Minnesota.) Existing project. See page 1059 of Annual Report for 1964 for completed channel improvement project authorized by 1960 Flood Control Act. Federal costs 16-8 ST. PAUL, MN, DISTRICT amounted to $1,802,866. The existing flood control project was completed in 1963. In response to a need for additional flood control, a feasibility study was completed in 1979. The project recommended in the feasibility report was authorized by the Water Resources Development Act of 1986, Public Law 99- 662, Section 401(a) and reauthorized by the Water Resources Development Act of 1988, Public Law 100- 676. Improvements include 4.7 miles of additional levees, 3.8 miles of bank protection, 0.3 mile of new high-flow diversion channel, an interbasin overflow structure, modifications to the existing diversion and drop structures, and a recreation plan. The project would provide protection against a flood having an occurrence interval of about once in 115 years. Estimated Federal cost (1999) for new work is $8,010,000 and $2,890,000 is to be contributed by local interests. Local cooperation. Fully complied with for completed work. Project was transferred to local interests on Dec. 23, 1963. For new work, see Annual Report for 1985 for requirements. A local cooperation agreement was executed on Sep. 9, 1996. The agreement included cost sharing provisions in accordance with the 1986 Water Resources Development Act. Operations and results during fiscal year. New Work: Stage 2 (final stage) construction was substantially completed. Federal costs were $3,135,144, Non-Federal $865,000. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction of completed work was initiated August 1962 and completed December 1963. The first stage of construction for new work is complete. The final stage of construction is substantially completed. 16. POOL 8 PILOT DRAWDOWN, WI Location. The project is located in pool 8 of the Mississippi River, approximately 165 miles below the head of navigation. Pool 8, formed by Lock and Dam 8 at Genoa, Wisconsin, is bordered by La Crosse and Vernon Counties, Wisconsin, and by Winona and Houston Counties, Minnesota. The City of La Crosse, Wisconsin is located adjacent to pool 8. Existing Project. The 9-foot Navigation Channel Project on the Mississippi River extends from the head of navigation in Minneapolis, Minnesota, to the mouth of the Ohio River at Cairo, Illinois. The Navigation project was authorized by the River and Harbor Act of 1930. The locks and dams on the Mississippi River were constructed in the 1930's. The primary purpose of these facilities was to permanently increase water depths for the purpose of navigation. This modified the natural hydrologic regime of the river, eliminating the low water levels and exposure of sediments associated with low river discharges. Over time, this is believed to be a significant factor in the observed long-term decline of emergent aquatic vegetation in the navigation pools. A drawdown of navigation pool 8 is proposed for the summer of 2001 as a pilot project to determine the effectiveness of lowering water levels for regeneration of persistent emergent aquatic vegetation and to evaluate the effects of drawdown on other public uses. The 1135 project will consist of limited dredging to mitigate for the effects the drawdown may have on recreational and commercial boat passage. The project was approved by the Mississippi River Division for construction on June 13, 2000, under the authority contained in Section 1135 of t 1986 Water Resources Development Act, as amended. Local Cooperation. A project Cooperation Agreement was executed between the Federal Government and the Minnesota-Wisconsin Boundary Area Commission on October 11, 2000. The agreement requires the Commission to pr, during the period of construction, a cash contribution of at least 5 percent of the total project costs and any additional funds needed to make its total contribution, including the value of all required local responsibilities, equal to 25 percent of the total project costs; provided without cost to the United States all lands, easements, and rights-of-way, including suitable borrow and dredged material disposal areas necessary for construction, operation and maintenance of the project; perform all relocations and alterations of building utilities (other than those portions which pass under or through the project structures), highways, railroads, bridges (other than railroad bridges and approaches thereto), sewers and related and special facilities determined by the Government to be necessary for construction of the project,- pay all costs in excess of the Federal statutory limitation of $500,000; hold and save the United States five from all damages arising from construction operation and maintenance of the completed project except for damages due to the fault or negligence of the Government or its contractors; comply with the provisions of the Uniform Relocation Assistance and Real Property Acquisition Policies Act of 1970, Public Law 91-646, approved January 2, 1971, in acquiring lands, easements, and rights-of-way for construction and subsequent operation and_maintenance of the project, and inform all affected persons of applicable benefits, policies, and procedures in connection with said Act; operate, maintain, replace, and rehabilitate the project upon completion in accordance with regulations or 16-9 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 2000 directions prescribed by the Government; give the Government a right to enter, at reasonable times and in a reasonable manner, upon land which it owns or controls for access to the project for the purpose of inspection and if necessary, for the purpose of completing, operating, maintaining, repairing, rehabilitating, or replacing the project; and comply with all applicable Federal and State laws and regulations, including Section 601 of Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 (Public Law 88-3 52) and Department of defense Directive 5500.11 issued pursuant thereto and published in Part 300 of Title 32, Code of Federal Regulations, as well as Army Regulation 600-7, entitled "Nondiscrimination on the basis of Handicap in Programs and Activities Assisted or Conducted by the Department of the Army." Operation and results during the fiscal year. The plans and specifications were completed and a project cooperation agreement was executed. Total FY 00 Federal costs were $10,612 and non-Federal $0. Condition at end of fiscal year. Procedures to award a construction contract are underway. 17. PORTAGE, WI Location. In Columbia County in central Wisconsin along the Wisconsin River about 35 miles north of Madison, Wisconsin. (For general location see Geological Survey map for Wisconsin.) Existing project. The project includes 1.2 miles of existing levee improvement; 1.6 miles of new levee; one highway and one railroad closure; cultural mitigation; and recreation features along the left bank of the Wisconsin river at Portage. The project would protect against a flood having an occurrence interval of about once in 100 years. Estimated Federal cost (2000) for new work is $9,336,000 and $3,214,000 is to be contributed by local interests. Project was authorized by the Water Resources Development Act of 1986 (Public Law 99-662). Local cooperation. See Annual Report for 1989 for requirements. A Project Cooperation Agreement between the city of Portage and the Federal Government was executed in October 1996. The agreement included cost sharing provisions in accordance with the 1986 Water Resources Development Act. Operations and results during fiscal year. New Work: A construction contract which was awarded in July 1997 is conplete. Federal costs were $-23,996, non-Federal $379,049. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction is complete except for a new railroad bridge that will be constructed by the Canadian Pacific Railway. 18. RED RIVER OF THE NORTH, FARGO PUBLIC FACILITIES, ND Location. Three separate and distinct erosion sites are located on the left bank of the Red River of the North in Fargo, Cass County, North Dakota. Fargo is located on the eastern border of North Dakota approximately 240 miles northwest of St. Paul, Minnesota. Reach A is north of 37th Avenue North near 37th Street North. Reach B is north of Kandi Lane and east of North Broadway. Reach C is east of Elm Street between 14th Avenue North and 15th Avenue North. Existing Project. The emergency streambank protection project on the Red River of the North involves approximately 4,100 feet of riverbank at three locations. The project consists of rockfill toe protection and associated earthwork to protect a flood-control levee, an interior drainage pump station, three roadways (Kandi Lane, North Broadway, and Elm Street) and the Fargo wastewater treatment plant. The project was approved by the Mississippi River Division for construction on 19 June 2000 under the authority contained in Section 14 of the 1946 Flood Control Act, as amended. Local Cooperation. A project Cooperation Agreement was executed between the Federal Government and the City of Fargo on 10 August 2000. The agreement requires the City to provide, during the period of construction, a cash contribution of at least 5 percent of the total project costs and any additional funds needed to make its total contribution, including the value of all required local responsibilities, equal to 35 percent of the total project costs; provided without cost to the United States all lands, easements, and rights-of-way, including suitable borrow and dredged material disposal areas necessary for construction, operation and maintenance of the project; perform all relocations and alterations of building utilities (other than those portions which pass under or through the project structures), highways, railroads, bridges (other than railroad bridges and approaches thereto), sewers and related and special facilities determined by the Government to be necessary for construction of the project,- pay all costs in excess of the Federal statutory limitation of $500,000; hold and save the United States five from all damages arising from construction operation and maintenance of the completed project except for damages due to the fault or negligence of the Government or its contractors; comply with the 16-10 ST. PAUL, MN, DISTRICT provisions of the Uniform Relocation Assistance and Real Property Acquisition Policies Act of 1970, Public Law 91-646, approved January 2, 1971, in acquiring lands, easements, and rights-of-way for construction and subsequent operation and_maintenance of the project, and inform all affected persons of applicable benefits, policies, and procedures in connection with said Act; operate, maintain, replace, and rehabilitate the project upon completion in accordance with regulations or directions prescribed by the 'Government; give the Government a right to enter, at reasonable times and in a reasonable manner, upon land which it owns or controls for access to the project for the purpose of inspection and if necessary, for the purpose of completing, operating, maintaining, repairing, rehabilitating, or replacing the project; and comply with all applicable Federal and State laws and regulations, including Section 601 of Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 (Public Law 88-3 52) and Department of defense Directive 5500.11 issued pursuant thereto and published in Part 300 of Title 32, Code of Federal Regulations, as well as Army Regulation 600-7, entitled "Nondiscrimination on the basis of Handicap in Programs and Activities Assisted or Conducted by the Department of the Army." Operation and results during the fiscal year. The plans and specifications were completed. A construction contract was awarded on September 26, 2000,and construction initiated. Total FY 00 Federal costs were $106,738_and non-Federal $0. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction of the emergency streambank protection project is underway. 19. ROCHESTER, MN Location. In Olmsted County in southeastern Minnesota on the South Fork of the Zumbro River. (For general location, see Geological Survey map of Minnesota.) Existing project. Provides for stream channel modifications and levees functioning in combination with a system of seven headwaters reservoirs. Principal features, in addition to the reservoirs, include 5.7 miles of riprapped or gabion-lined channels, 0.7 mile of architecturally- treated concrete channels, 0.5 mile of dredged channel, three drop structures, 1.3 miles of levee, and 6.5 miles of hiking and biking trails and nonstructural features. Project was authorized by the Water Resources Development Act of 1986 and reauthorized by the Water Resources Development Act of 1992 (H. Doc. 156, 93rd Cong., 1st sess., contains latest published map.) Local cooperation. See Annual Report for 1974 for requirements. A local cooperation agreement was signed Aug. 27, 1987 by the city of Rochester. Operations and results during fiscal year. New Work: Work continued on project closeout activities. Total Federal costs were $-913,400 and non-Federal costs were $973,703. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction is complete. Project has been transferred to the local sponsor. 20. SHEYENNE RIVER, ND Location. The Sheyenne River Basin is included in 16 counties in the southeastern portion of North Dakota and drains an area of 7,140 square miles into the Red River of the North near Fargo, North Dakota. The principal area of flood damages in the basin is located at the lower end within Cass County and the city of West Fargo. (For general location, see Geological Survey map of North Dakota.) Existing project. The project as authorized by the 1986 Water Resources Development Act consists of three major components for Federal implementation: 1) 11.9 miles of levee and a 6.7 mile flood diversion channel at West Fargo; 2) 7.5 miles of flood diversion channel from Horace to West Fargo; and 3) a five-foot raise of the Baldhill Dam flood control pool. The Water Resources Development Act of 1986 stipulated that the project shall also include a dam and reservoir of approximately 35,000 acre-feet of storage for the purpose of flood protection on the Maple River. There are several items of local cooperation required to implement the plan, and several components identified for non-Federal implementation which would supplement the recommended plan. Estimated cost (2000) to the United States for new work is $31,130,000 and $12,470,000 is to be contributed by local interests. Local cooperation. See Annual Report for 1988 for requirements. Project consists of three separable components each requiring a local cooperation agreement. The Southeast Cass Water Resource District is the local sponsor for the West Fargo Unit and the Horace to West Fargo Unit. The local cooperation agreement for the West Fargo Unit was executed on July 25, 1988, and for the Horace to West Fargo unit on Mar. 6, 1990. The local cooperation agreement for the Baldhill Dam flood control pool raise unit was executed on May 31, 2000. The Maple River Reservoir Unit was deleted from the project. 16-11 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF TIlE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 2000 Operations and results during fiscal year. New Work: Engineering and design continued and the initial construction contract was awarded on Baldhill Dam flood control pool raise component. Flood damage repair continued on the West Fargo and Horace components. Total Federal costs were $1,573,889 and non-Federal costs $362,670. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction of both the West Fargo and Horace to West Fargo Units are essentially complete. Both of these units, were operated during the spring and summer floods of 1993 and the spring floods in 1994, 1995, 1996, and 1997 and performed very well although some erosion damage was sustained on both projects. For the Baldhill Dam flood control pool raise unit, preparation of real estate maps was initiated; the contract for Stage 1, Gate Modifications, was awarded; and preparation of plans and specifications for Stage 2, Cabin Modifications and Riprap Protection, were initiated. The Maple River Reservoir unit has been deleted from the project due to lack of economic justification. 21. SOURIS RIVER BASIN, ND Location. On the Souris River in Ward, Renville, McHenry, and Bottineau Counties in northwestern North Dakota. The existing Lake Darling Dam is located about 20 miles northwest of Minot, North Dakota. The project also includes features at the communities of Sawyer and Velva and at various locations along the 358-mile U.S. portion of the Souris River. (For general location see Geolgical Survey map of North Dakota.) Existing project. The plan of improvement authorized by the Water Resources Development Act of 1986 is the one-time purchase of 377,800 acre-feet of flood storage in Rafferty and Alameda Dams in Saskatchewan, Canada and the operation of these dams with the existing Boundary Dam and Lake Darling Dam: to provide 100-year flood protection at Minot, North Dakota. The Act also authorizes those flood control measures upstream and downstream of the dam which are necessary for effective operation of the project. The 4-foot raise of the Lake Darling design pool (authorized by Section III of the Energy and Water Development Appropriations Act, 1982, PL 97-88) and the construction of Burlington Dam (authorized by PL 91-611) was deauthorized March 10, 1995, with the completion of the structures in Canada. An International Agreement between Canada and the United States was signed in October 1989. The work under the current plan authorized by PL 99-662, consists of two reservoirs in Saskatchewan, Canada (known as the Rafferty and Alameda projects); a modified outflow structure at Lake Darling Dam; a flood warning system for Minot; levee and channel improvements at Sawyer and six subdivisions from Burlington to Minot; levee and diversion channel at Renville County Park; flood proofing of about 90 rural homes in the basin and the purchase of flowage easements; modifications to dams 87 and 96 in the Upper Souris National Wildlife Refuge; and modifications to dams 320, 326, 332, 341, and 357 in the J. Clark Salyer National Wildlife Refuge. Estimated Federal cost for new work is $109,260,000 and $8,180,000 is to be contributed by local interests. Local cooperation. See Annual Report for 1983 for requirements. Representatives of the water resource districts from Ward, Renville, McHenry, and Bottineau Counties area agreed to become members of a Souris River Joint Board for flood control, which would serve as local sponsor for the project. A local cooperation agreement for construction at Velva was signed in November 1984. A local cooperation agreement for the remainder of the project as authorized by the Water Resources Development Act of 1986 was signed in October 1989. Operations and results during fiscal year. New Work: Construction was completed on the final stage of work at Renville County Park. Total costs, all Federal, were $107,945. Maintenance: Total cost was $301,189. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction of the channel and levee improvement work at Velva, Sawyer, Renville County Park and Burlington to Minot Stages 1, 2, and 3 is complete. Construction at Rafferty Dam and Alameda Dam is complete. Construction on rural improvements Stage 1 and Stage 2, road raises and acquisitions, is complete. Construction on improvements to Fish and Wildlife Service refuge dams is complete. Lake Darling Dam construction is complete. The project dedication ceremony was held on May 27, 1998. 22. ST. CROIX RIVER, STILLWATER, MN Location. In Washington County in eastern Minnesota along the St. Croix River about 18 miles northeast of St. Paul, Minnesota. (For general location, see Geological Survey map of Minnesota). Existing project. The proposed plan provides for repair of the existing 1000-foot retaining wall system, construction of a 1000-foot extension to the wall and expansion of the wall system to include a new secondary landward flood wall to aid in flood protection 16-12 ST. PAUL, MN, DISTRICT for the downtown area. Estimated Federal cost for new work is $8,700,000 and $2,900,000 is to be contributed by local interests. Project was authorized by the Water Resources Development Act of 1992 (Public Law 102- 580) as amended by the Water Resources Development Act of 1996 (Public Law 104-303). Local cooperation. See Annual Report for 1996 for requirements. A Project Cooperation Agreement was executed between the Federal Government and the city of Stillwater, Minnesota on Apr. 22, 1996 which covered Stage I of the project. An amendment to the Project Cooperation Agreement to encompass Stage II was executed on September 29, 1998. Operations and results during fiscal year. New Work: Stage IIs (surcharging at Mulberry Point) was completed. Engineering and design of Stage II was completed. Total costs were $1,496,791 Federal, and $129,307 non-Federal. Condition at end of fiscal year. The Stage IIs (surcharging at Mulberry Point) was completed Jun 1999. Preparation of plans and specifications of the extension of the retaining wall to the north, Stage II is complete. A construction contract for Stage II was awarded Jun. 30, 1999. The Stage III economic feasibility study was completed and no Federal interest was identified. It has been recommended that the study be terminated.. 23. ST. PAUL, MN Location. In Ramsey County at St. Paul, Minnesota, on the Mississippi River. (For general location see Geological Survey map of Minnesota.) Previous project. For details see page 27-20 of Annual Report for 1974. Existing project. Since completion of the St. Paul and South St. Paul flood control project in 1964, the protected area has experienced two floods greater than the previous flood of record. The plan of protection provides for a nominal 4-foot barrier raise along the existing project alignment. Project was authorized by the Water Resources Development Act of 1986 (Public Law 99-662) and reauthorized by the Water Resources Development Act of 1990 (Public Law 101-640). Local cooperation. See Annual Report for 1988 for requirements. The local cooperation agreement was executed on Aug. 22, 1991. Operations and results during fiscal year. New Work: Completion of the Operation and Maintenance manuals and other project close out activities. Total Federal costs were $16,070. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction of the project is complete. 24. INSPECTION OF COMPLETED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS Flood control projects turned over to local interests were inspected to determine that project channels are kept clean and unobstructed, dikes and revetments are in good condition, and structures are in good repair and operable. Deficiencies, if any, were minor unless noted. (See Table 16-J on inspection of completed flood control projects.) Cost for the period was $124,148. Sep. 30, 2000 is $2,222,431. Total cost to Miscellaneous 25. OTHER WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORITY In the Sign Standards Programs (as described in Chap. 6, ER 1130-2-500) there were costs of $108,982. 26. FLOOD CONTROL AND COASTAL EMERGENCIES (FC & CE) Disaster Preparedness Emergency Operations Rehabilitation and Inspection Program Advanced Measures Total FC & CE $ 349,853 96,195 37,845 3,436.440 $3,920,333 27. NATIONAL EMERGENCY PREPAREDNESS PROGRAM (NEPP) National Mobilization Emergency Operations Center Support Total NEPP 36,169 $56,731 28. REGULATORY FUNCTIONS PROGRAM Permit Evaluation Enforcement Environmental Impact Statements Administrative Appeals Total Regulatory $3,716,141 245,237 209,128 14,952 $4,185,458 16-13 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 2000 General Investigations 29. SURVEYS Fiscal year cost was $618,455 which included one special studies, miscellaneous activities, and coordination with both Federal and non-Federal agencies. Table 16-N provides a specific list and respective fiscal year expenditures. 30. COLLECTION AND STUDY OF BASIC DATA Fiscal year cost was $368,028 which included the items concerning international water studies, flood plain Management services and hydrologic studies. Table 16-N provides a specific list and respective fiscal year expenditures. 31. ADVANCE ENGINEERING AND DESIGN Fiscal year cost was $574,848 which included four local protection projects. Table 16-N provides a specific list and respective fiscal year expenditures. 16-14 ST. PAUL, MN, DISTRICT TABLE 16-A COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Total Cost Section- to Sep. 30, in Text Project Funding FY 97 FY 98 FY 99 FY00 2000 2. Reservoirs at Headquarters of Mississippi River, MN 4. Aitkin County, CSAH 10, MN (Contributed Funds) 5. Bassett Creek, MN (Contributed Funds) 6. . Chaska, MN (Contributed Funds) 7. Crookston, MN (Contributed Funds) 8. Grafton, Park River, ND New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost Maj. Rehab: Approp. Cost Dam Safety: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Contrib. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Contrib. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Contrib. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Contrib. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost -- -- -- -- 4,398,628 -- -- -- -- 4,398,628' 2,635,416 3,011,447 3,139,000 3,186,335 58,779,358 2,658,766 2,971,844 3,192,401 3,227,423 58,702,7432 S-- -- -- 425,000 - -- -- - 425,000 833,000 540,000 1,603,000 2,709,000 6,325,000 754,546 612,495 1,477,300 2,780,954 6,263,542 -- 15,000 199,000 -- 10,039 148,059 -- 84,500 -- 0 80,000 64,795 50,000 44,400 10,426 -125,000 30,063 3,066,000 475,000 2,916,251 470,146 185,000 208,116 15,000 187,997 0 2,237 20,000 31,000 35,000 185,712 10,000 27,152 169,000 326,000 350,000 40,563 258,902 5184652 0 214,000 47,659 205,757 84,500 0 0 29,419,000 29,418,8913 2,196,191 2,190,737 90,000 31,264,000 75,885 31,236,6254 0 4,305,000 570 4,301,457 25,000 870,000 50,578 868,5084 -- 298,000 298,000 -- 228,184 228,184 -- 100,000 -- 72,759 100,000 72,7594 9. Grand Forks, ND - New Work: East Grand Forks, MN Approp. Cost 500,000 3,747,000 2,195,000 7,028,000 13,470,000 211,192 4,926,288 2,038,518 6,544,182 12,720,180 16-15 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 2000 TABLE 16-A COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT (Continued) See Total Cost Section to Sep. 30, in Text Project Funding FY 97 FY 98 FY 99 FY00 2000 9. (Cont.) (Contributed Funds) 10. Homme Lake and Dam, ND (Contributed Funds) 1135 authority 11. Houston, MN (Contributed Funds) 12. La Farge Lake and Channel Imp., WI 13. Lake Ashtabula and Baldhill Dam, Sheyenne River, ND (Contributed Funds) New Work: Contrib. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost Dam Safety Approp. Cost Dam Safety Contrib. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Contrib. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost New Work: Contrib. Cost Rehab: Approp. Cost Dam Safety Approp. Cost -- 600,000 -- 0 177,000 176,325 371,000 259,984 118,000 126,000 121,234 125,971 600,000 0 1,419,097 1,419,0975 190,000 4,398,056 188,546 4,395,344 40,000 571,000 1,696,000 3,478,000 115,573 601,292 1,600,633 3,376,945 -- 30,000 -- 0 2,229,600 153,200 1,323,627 1,099,180 11,735 86,000 420,000 100,800 88,946 343,341 210,071 30,000 0 0 5,018,968 3,459 5,018,9456 15,720 777,070 16,373 767,555 94,000 670,000 2,516,000 2,516,000 24,438,000 91,637 241,024 955,951 262,937 20,193,549 122,000 122,095 96,000 95,493 48,000 49,278 61,000 971,457 60,474 970,720 ---- 3,325,638 -- -- 3,325,638 936,000 1,110,000 1,028,000 1,170,000 26,988,531 928,263 1,122,258 1,039,495 1,166,045 26,979,561 -- -- -- 208,000 -- -- -- 208,000 331,000 643,000 1,520,000 1,404,000 8,259,000 334,098 524,708 1,627,623 1,380,068 8,206,013 2,837,000 270,000 264,000 2,798,322 291,562 232,025 0 14,465,000 50,106 14,454,486 16-16 ST. PAUL, MN, DISTRICT TABLE 16-A COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT (Continued) See Total Cost Section to Sep. 30, in Text Project Funding FY 97 FY 98 FY 99 FY00 2000 13. (Cont.) (Contributed Funds) 14. Le Sueur River, CSAH 28, Blue Earth County, MN (Contributed Funds) 15. Marshall, MN (Contributed Funds) 16. Pool 8 Pilot Drawdown, WI 17. Portage, WI (Contributed Funds) 18. Red River of the North, Fargo Public 19. Rochester, MN (Contributed Funds) 20. Sheyenne River, ND (Contributed Funds) Horace to W. Fargo New Work: Contrib. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Contrib. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Contrib. Cost New Work: Contrib. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Contrib. Cost New Work: Approp: Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Contrib. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Contrib. Cost 18,000 22,000 30,000 5,000 20,000 20,000 -- 4,800 247,800 -- 242,000 32,000 168,000 45,395 179,560 -- 114,000 -- 2,752 379,000 470,000 1,035,577 408,816 510,000 175,000 300,000 243,000 44,900 274,900 43,916 273,871 0 93,507 114,000 96,259 2,445,000 3,176,000 8,295,000 2,495,982 3,135,144 8,238,7667 70,000 186,216 840,000 1,595,000 865,000 1,594,216 -- 127,500 127,500 -- 10,612 10,612 889,000 3,909,000 2,095,000 896,555 3,867,502 2,128,673 400,000 350,000 101,690 585,386 770,000 64,393 -- 66,000 135,000 -- 62,268 114,494 40,000 40,266 . 0 48,610: 0 8,986,000 -23,995 8,943,818 0 1,520,000 379,049 1,127,518 178,300 106,738 379,300 283,500 20,000 182,000 -891,000 67,538,549 34,034 195,687 -913,401 67,511,5988 4,913 -- 4,913 493,000 720,000 2,133,000 483,941 666,630 1,267,444 799,444 7,628,650 973,703 7,619,790 839,000 26,344,000 1,573,889 26,148,1239 -- 424,318 424,318 16-17 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 2000 TABLE 16-A COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT (Continued) See Total Cost Section to Sep. 30, in Text Project Funding FY 97 FY 98 FY 99 FY00 2000 20. (Cont.) (Contributed Funds) New Work: W. Fargo Contrib. -- 10,000 136,000 347,000 1,543,000 Cost -- 15,000 166,000 362,670 1,540,860 21. Souris River New Work: Basin, ND Approp. 1,953,000 650,000 50,000 116,000 102,311,000 Cost 1,692,829 772,630 193,572 107,945 102,281,97710 Maint. Approp. 337,000 280,000 268,000 309,000 1,652,000 Cost 329,379 251,636 303,774 301,188 1,641,902 (Contributed Funds) New Work: Contrib. -- -- -- 0 5,698,858 Cost -- -- -- 19,700 5,698,813 22. St. Croix River New Work: Stillwater, MN Approp. 473,000 779,000 860,000 1,071,000 5,583,000 Cost 853,188 54,673 1,169,570 1,496,792 5,507,088 (Contributed Funds) New Work: Horace to W. Fargo Contrib. 500,000 -- 50,000 -- 750,000 Cost 358,025 177,646 85,021 129,308 750,000 23. St. Paul, MN New Work: Approp. 210,000 10,000 -- 25,000 13,254,000 Cost 208,096 8,368 2,297 16,070 13,267,889" (Contributed Funds) New Work: Contrib. - - -- 4,024,000 Cost - -- -- -- 3,986,877 1. Includes $681,805 for new work for previous project. 2. Includes $100,857 for maintenance for previous projects. 3. Excludes $1,034,561 in other contributed funds that have been expended for betterments. 4. Excludes $744,114 in other contributed funds have been expended for betterments. 5. Excludes $56,220 contributed funds. Includes $23,000 expended during FY91-FY95 under Section 1135, Public Law 99-662 authority. 6. Excludes $249,964 for relocations accomplished under a government contract but which are a non-Federal responsibility. 7. Excludes $1,802,866 for previous project. Includes $372,000 CP&E funds obligated prior to I Oct 85 which remains excluded from the project cost estimate. 8. $787,042 in other contributed funds have been expended for betterments and $4,198,445 for relocations accomplished under a government contract but which are a non-Federal responsibility. 9. Excludes $1,150,000 sunk costs for deauthorized Kindred Lake unit (see Table 16-G). Excludes $475,000 for costs associated with inactive Maple River unit. 10. Excludes $4,919,000 sunk costs for deferred Lake Darling Dam unit (see Table 16-E). 11. Excludes $383,048 in other contributed funds that have been expended for betterments. 16-18 ST. PAUL, MN, DISTRICT TABLE 16-B AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION See Date of Sec. Authorizing in Text Act Project and Work Authorized Documents RESERVOIRS AT IIEADWATERS OF MISSISSIPPI RIVER, MN Reconstruct 4 of the 5 original dams and surveys to determine extent of lands overflowed by reservoirs. Reconstruct Sandy Lake Dam and construct Gull Lake Reservoir. Construct an equalizing canal between Winnibigoshish and Leech Lake Reservoirs (no work was done and this part of the project abandoned in Act of Mar. 4, 1915). Abandonment of ditches connecting Long Lake, Round Lake, and Gull Lake. Operation and maintenance provided for with funds from War Department appropriations for rivers and harbors. H. Doc. 363, 61st Cong., 2nd sess. H. Doc. 413, 64th Cong., 1 sess.' 4. July 24, 1946 May 10, 1999 5. October 22, 1976 6. October 22, 1976 November 17, 1986 7. August 17, 1999 8. November 17, 1986 AITKIN COUNTY, CSAH 10, MN BASSETT CREEK, MN CIIASKA, MN Cost Sharing provisions CROOKSTON, MN GRAFTON, PARK RIVER, ND Sec 14 1946 Flood Control Act, as amended 1976 WRDA Public Law 94-587 FY 1985 Supplemental Appropriations Act -- Public Law 99-98 1976 WRDA-- Public Law 94-587 1986 WRDA-- Public Law 99-662 1999 WRDA - Public Law 106-53 1986 WRDA - Public Law 99-662 November 18, 1991 Deauthorization August 17, 1999 9. October 21, 1998 10. December 22, 1944 November 17, 1986 GRAND FORKS, ND AND EAST GRAND FORKS, MN HOMME LAKE AND DAM, ND Authorized as Park River Reservoir Redesignated lomme Reservoir and Dam Cong. 2d sess.) Project restoration of wetland habitat conditions 1999 WRDA - Public Law 106-53 (Reauthorization) Public law 105-277, OMNIBUS Appropriation Bill, FY 99 1944 Flood Control Act (S. Doc. 194, 78 th Cong., 2d sess.) Public Law 435 (80th Sec 1135 1986 WRDA-- Public Law 99-662 16-19 March 3, 1899 March 2, 1907 June 25, 1910 July 27, 1916 June 26, 19342 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 2000 TABLE 16-B AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION (Continued) See Date of Sec. Authorizing in Text Act Project and Work Authorized Documents 11. November 17, 1986 HOUSTON, MN June 30, 1948 November 17, 1988 12. October 23, 1962 October 12, 1996 13. December 22, 1944 14. July 24, 1946 September 7, 1999 15. November 17, 1986 LA FARGE LAKE AND CHANNEL IMPROVEMENT, WI Flood control dam and impoundment project Modification to original project to include transfer of approximately 8,569 acres of project lands to the State of Wisconsin and the Secretary of the Interior to be held in trust for the Ho-Chunk Nation. Modification also includes deauthorizing the construction of the reservoir and dam, while completing other features of the original project. LAKE ASHTABULA'AND BALDHILL DAM LESUEUR RIVER, CSAH 28, BLUE EARTH COUNTY, MN MARSHALL, MN November 17, 1988 16. November 17, 1986 June 13, 2000 17. November 17, 1986 POOL 8 PILOT DRAWDOWN, WI Sec 401 1986 WRDA-- Public Law 99-662, as amended Sec 205 1948 Flood Control Act, as amended Sec 4 WRDA 1988, as amended 1962 Flood Control Act WRDA 1996 Flood Control Act 1944 Sec 14 1946 Flood Control Act, as amended WRDA 1986- Public Law 99-662, Sec 401 (a) WRDA 1988- Public Law 100-676 Sec 1135 1986 WRDA Public Law 99-662 PORTAGE, WI WRDA 1986-Public Law 99-662 18. July 24, 1946 June 19, 2000 19. November 17, 1986 RED RIVER OF TIIE NORTH, FARGO PUBLIC FACILITIES, ND ROCIIESTER, MN October 31, 1992 20. November 17, 1986 SHEYENNE RIVER, ND Project shall include a dam and reservoir of approximately 35,000 acre-feet of storage for the purpose of flood protection Maple River. Sec 14 1946 Flood Control Act, as amended WRDA 1986- Public Law 99-662 WRDA 1992- Sec 102, Public Law 102-580 WRDA 1986- Public Law 99-662 16-20 ST. PAUL, MN, DISTRICT TABLE 16-B AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION (Continued) See Date of Sec. Authorizing in Text Act Project and Work Authorized Documents 21. November 17, 1986 SOURIS RIVER BASIN, ND WRDA 1986-Public Consists of two reservoirs in Saskatchewan, Canada Law 99-662 (known as Rafferty and Alameda projects); a flood warning system for Minot; Levee and channel improvements at Sawyer and six subdivisions from Burlington to Minot; levee and diversion channel at Renville County Park; flood proofing in the basin and Purchase of flowage easements; modifications to dams 87 and 96 in the Upper Souris National Wildlife Refuge; and modificantions to Dams 320, 326, 332, 341 and 357 in the J. Clark Salyer National Wildlife Refuge. 22. October 12, 1996 ST. CROIX RIVER, STILLWATER, MN WRDA 1996 (Public Law 104-303) Sec 363, WRDA 1992 23. November 17, 1986 ST. PAUL, MN WRDA 1986- Public Law 99-662 WRDA 1990- Public Law 101-640 1. Contains latest published map. 2. Permanent Appropriations Repeal Act. 16-21 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 2000 TABLE 16-C OTHER AUTHORIZED NAVIGATION PROJECTS Cost To September 30, 2000 For Last Full Report Operation See Annual and Project Status Report for Construction Maintenance Baudette Harbor, MN Completed 1961 $36,415 57,768 Black River, WI ,, 1 1950 67,585 -- Lake Traverse, MN and SD 3,4 1921 92 -- Minnesota River, MN Completed 1996 2,057,7228 396,098 Mississippi and Leech Rivers, MN Completed3 1929 277,615 40,251 Mississippi River between Brainerd 5 1925 47,794 3,891 and Grand Rapids, MN Pine Creek, Angle Inlet, MN Completed 1978 38,700 102,196 Red Lake and Red Lake River, MN Completed3 1923 9,070 -- Red River of the North, MN and ND ,6 1921 293,344 76,209 St. Croix River, MN and WI Completed 1991 150,410 1,185,011 Warroad Harbor and River, MN Completed 1996 86,105 2,159,833 Wisconsin River, WI 2,3 1888 -- Zippel Bay Harbor, MN Inactive 1928 27,941 11,139 Zippel Bay, Lake of the Woods County, MN Completed 1996 515,000 63,941 1. Existing channel adequate for commerce (see Table 16-G for deauthorized portion of project.) 2. Originally included in project 'Fox and Wisconsin River, WI'. Abandonment of improvement of Wisconsin River by channel contraction works recommended in 1886 and 1887 (H. Doc. 65, 49th Cong., 2nd sess.) Expenditures included under 'Fox and Wisconsin Rivers, WI'. No breakdown available. 3. No commerce reported. 4. Abandonment recommended in 1915 (H. Doc. 439, 64th Cong., 1st sess.) and June 24, 1926 (H. Doc. 467, 69th Cong., 1st sess.) 5. Abandonment recommended June 24, 1926 (H. Doc. 467, 69th Cong., 1st sess.) 6. Abandonment recommended in 1915 (H. Doc. 1666, 63d Cong., 3d sess.) 7. Abandonment recommended June 24, 1926 (H. Doc., 69th Cong., 1st sess.) 8. Includes $117,542 for new work for previous project. 16-22 ST. PAUL, MN, DISTRICT TABLE 16-E OTHER AUTHORIZED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS Cost To September 30, 2000 For Last Full Report Operation See Annual and Project Status Report for Construction Maintenance Big Fork River, MN2 Big Stone Lake and Whetstone River, MN and SD Black Bear & Miller Lakes, Crow Wing City, MN3 Black River at North Bend, WI2 Bonnes Coulee, Velva, ND2 Cannon River at Faribault, MN2 Cochrane Drainage Ditch, WI Devils Lake, ND3 Dry Run, IA Eau Galle River, WI Elk River, MN Emerson Manitoba-Noyes, MN3 Enderlin, Maple River, ND3 Gilmore Creek, Winona, MN3 Grafton Pumping Station, ND 2 Grand Mound, State Historic Site, MN2 Guttenberg, IA Hanover, Hennepin County, MN2 Irving Township, Jackson County, WI2 Irving Township at Nicols Road, Jackson County, WI2 Kickapoo River, Gays Mills, WI 2 Lac qui Parle Lakes, MN Lake Andrusia, Mississippi River, MN2 Lake Darling Dam, ND Lake Pulaski, Wright County, MN 3 Lake Traverse and Bois de Sioux River, SD and MN Lost River, MN Lower Branch Rush River, ND3 Mahnomen, Wild Rice River, MN2 Mankato and North Mankato, MN Mankato Township, MN9 Melrose, WI2 Middle River at Argyle, MN3 Minnesota River, Belgrade Township, MN 2 Minnesota River at Henderson, MN3 Minnesota River at LeSueur,MN2 Minneota, MN3 Minot, ND Mississippi River near Aitkin, MN Pembina River, ND Pettibone Park, La Crosse, WI2 Plum Creek, New Haven Township, MN4 Prairie du Chien, WI $ 294,6006 12,174,600' 471,000 $5,553,611 Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Deferred Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Active5 Completed Completed Completed 1998 1996 1988 1985 1991 1992 1966 1996 1970 1992 1990 1997 1990 1992 1974 1988 1984 1986 1987 1996 1989 1987 1991 1996 1967 1974 -- 1997 1998 1998 1993 1995 1997 1986 1963 1983 1957 1983 1989 1991 13,506,015 13,125,202 11,554,927 -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 11,554,927 74,500 58,500 62,5857 37,182 2,732,000 1,790,7598 9,039,250 259,7009 343,000t1 4,000,000" 2,351,55312 92,86513 242,00014 2,361,915 259,500 189,600 158,500 33,000 964,87352 61,32615 4,919,00016 1,353,47817 1,339,727 517,51918 1,000,00019 85,400 97,013,03720 215,20021 219,60022 2,360,000 261,00023 1,969,80024 250,00025 161,545 21,479,50026 1,675,835 -- 62,76227 31,100 3,529,000 16-23 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 2000 TABLE 16-E OTHER AUTHORIZED FLOOD (Continued) CONTROL PROJECTS Cost To September 30, 2000 For Last Full Report Operation See Annual and Project Status Report for Construction Maintenance Red Lake River at Gentilly, MN , Completed 1991 311,00028 -- Red Lake River at Huot, MN2 Completed 1984 64,500 -- Red Lake River at Red Lake Falls, MN2 Completed 1984 131,000 -- Red Lake River, MN including Completed 1996 3,120,07929 3,148,481 Clearwater River, MN Red Lake River, Polk County, Crookston, MN2 Completed 1997 166,40030 -- Red Lake River, State Hwy 32, MN2 Completed 1993 151,66531 -- Red River of the North Completed 1990 1,534,000 -- at Argusville, ND3 Red River of the North Completed 1990 85,66532 at Breckenridge, MN2 Red River of the North Completed -- 27,500 -- at Breckenridge, MN2 Red River of the North Drainage Basin, MN SD, & ND Completed 1997 8,322,11233 11,545,052 Red River of the North at Fargo, ND-Moorhead, MN4 Completed 1992 226,50034 Red River of the North at Halstad, MN3 Completed 1986 2,012,000 -- Red River of the North at Oslo, MN3 Completed 1984 1,960,200 -- Red River of the North at Pembina, ND3 Completed 1979 2,000,000 -- Redwood River below Marshall, MN3 Completed 1960 202,400 -- Root River at Hokah, MN2 Completed 1992 239,62735 -- Roseau River, MN Completed 1996 2,341,00036 -- Rushford, MN Completed 1980 3,192,333 -- Sanders Creek, Boscobel, WI3 Completed 1998 1,441,50037 -- Shepard Road, Mississippi River, Completed 1985 250,00038 St. Paul, MN2 Sheyenne River, Valley City, ND2 Completed 1988 111,000 -- Snake River, Alvarado, MN3 Completed 1997 1,761,000" -- Sogn, MN Completed 1996 47,40040 Souris River, Velva, ND2 Completed 1988 137,500 -- State Road and Ebner Coulees, WI Completed 1996 21,435,0004' Sterling Center, MN2 Completed 1997 160,90042 St. Hilaire, MN Completed 1996 141,10043 -- St. Paul and South St. Paul, MN Completed 1974 8,476,01244 -- Twin Valley Lake, MN Inactive 1988 2, 115,700 -- Upper Iowa River, IA Completed 1964 888,445 -- Velva, ND' Completed 1970 334,628 -- Vermillion River, Hastings, MN3 Completed 1980 999,900 -- Veteran's Memorial Levee, Completed 1985 182,000 -- Mississippi River, Hastings, MN2 Wabasha County, County Hwy 11, MN2 Completed 1995 273,00045 - Wabasha, Mississippi River, MN2 Completed 1993 113,70046 Warner Road, Mississippi River, Completed 1987 250,000 -- St. Paul, MN2 Warner Road, Sibley Street, Completed 1992 500,00047 Mississippi River, St. Paul MN Wild Rice River, Hendrum/Lee, MN3 Completed 1997 383,3004" 16-24 ST. PAUL, MN, DISTRICT TABLE 16-E OTHER AUTHORIZED FLOOD (Continued) CONTROL PROJECTS Cost To September 30, 2000 For Last Full Report Operation See Annual and Project Status Report for Construction Maintenance Wild Rice River, Mahnomen County, MN2 Completed 1986 58,500 -- Wild Rice River, Mahnomen, MN4 Completed -- 86,568 -- Wild Rice River, South Branch and Completed 1989 5,620,700 -- Felton Ditch, MN Winona, MN Completed 1989 32,741,13149 Zumbro River at Genoa, MN2 Completed 1992 34,50050 -- Zumbro River, MN Completed 1975 1,284,100 -- Zumbro River at Jarrett and Millville, MN2 Completed 1990 141,44051 -- 1. Excludes $152,492 contributed funds. In addition, $487,491 in other contributed funds have been expended for work under Government contract paid for by the Ottertail Power Company. 2. Project authorized by Chief of Engineers under small project authority, Section 14, Flood Control Act of 1946, as amended. 3. Project authorized by Chief of Engineers under small project authority, Section 205, Flood Control Act of 1948, as amended. 4. Project authorized by Chief of Engineers under small project authority, Section 208, Flood Control Act of 1954, as amended. 5. Preconstruction planning has not started. Phase I completed under General Investigations. 6. Excludes $56,453 contributed funds. 7. Excludes $18,362 contributed funds. 8. Excludes $42,766 contributed funds. 9. In addition $87,878 was expended from Public Law 99 funds in the spring of 1969 for emergency protection and incorporation into the permanent project. 10. Excludes $201,544 contributed funds. 11. Excludes $150,191 contributed funds. 12. Excludes $12,749 contributed funds. 13. Excludes $27,583 contributed funds. 14. Excludes $77,290 contributed funds. 15. Excludes $20,441 contributed funds. 16. Advance engineering and design costs only. Project deferred with authorization of Souris River Basin Project (see Section 25 and Table 16-A for costs for active project. 17. Excludes $74,225 contributed funds. 18. Excludes $46,034 for the Ruffy Brook unit for which authorization expired in April 1966 (see Table 16-G). Excludes $246,911 contributed funds. 19. Excludes $35,000 contributed funds. 20. Excludes $79,749 contributed funds. 21. Excludes $91,218 contributed funds. 22. Excludes $59,855 contributed funds. 23. Excludes $68,421 contributed funds. 24. Excludes $307,239 contributed funds. 25. Excludes $130,300 contributed funds. 26. Excludes $4,167 contributed funds. 27. Excludes $20,920 contributed funds. 28. Excludes $92,402 contributed funds. 29. Excludes $30,020 contributed funds. 30. Excludes $33,000 contributed funds. 31. Excludes $35,430 contributed funds. 32. Excludes $26,055 contributed funds. 16-25 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 2000 TABLE 16-E OTHER AUTHORIZED FLOOD (Continued) CONTROL PROJECTS 33. Includes cost of the Wahpeton-Breckenridge unit $11,239, which is classed as "deferred" and the units on which authorization has expired: Maple River, $1,241; Moorehead, $27,700; which Sheyenne, $37,956. In addition, $203,874 special deposit funds and $146,160 in other contributed funds have been expended for work under government contract paid for by local interests. Includes $184,352 expended on Orewll Lake between FY91 - FY96 under Section 1135, Public Law 99-662 authority. Excludes $64,775 contributed funds under Section 1135, PL 99-662 authority. 34. Excludes $61,895 contributed funds. 35. Excludes $67,014 contributed funds. 36. Excludes $65,902 contributed funds. 37. Excludes $175,357 contributed funds. 38. Excludes $62,620 contributed funds. 39. Excludes $100,000 contributed funds. 40. Excludes $5,253 contributed funds. 41. Excludes $225,000 sunk costs for inactive Ebner Coulee unit (see Table 16-E) and $4,206,836 contributed funds. 42. Excludes $39,815 contributed funds. 43. Excludes $31,064 contributed funds. 44. Excludes $545,637 contributed funds for new work and $38,000 expended by South St. Paul for work in lieu of required cash contribution. Excludes an additional $206,629 expended for work done at request of local interests. 45. Excludes $73,619 contributed funds. 46. Excludes $37,631 contributed funds. 47. Excludes $184,709 contributed funds. 48. Excludes $97,800 contributed funds. 49. Excludes $589,316 contributed funds. In addition, $717,809 in other contributed funds have been expended for work under Government contract paid for by local interests. 50. Excludes $11,066 contributed funds. 51. Excludes $38,173 contributed funds. 52. Excludes $20,000 contributed funds. 16-26 ST. PAUL, MN, DISTRICT TABLE 16-G DEAUTHORIZED PROJECTS For Last Full Report Federal Contributed See Annual Date Funds Funds Project Report for Deauthorized Expended Expended Black River, WI' 1950 Aug. 5, 1977 -- -- Black River Lake, WI 1950 Aug. 5, 1977 -- -- Burlington Dam, Souris River, ND 1983 Mar. 10, 1995 $5,568,6002 Grafton, ND3 1983 Nov. 18, 1991 -- -- Hudson Harbor, WI4 1986 Nov. 17, 1986-- Kindred Lake, ND5 1987 Nov. 17, 1986 1,150,000 -- La Crosse, WI6 1983 Nov. 17, 1986 --- Lake Darling Dam, ND 1987 Sep. 13, 1994 4,919,0001 -- Maple River, ND8 1981 Oct. 6, 1961 1,241 -- Moorhead, MN8 1981 Oct. 30, 1961 27,700 -- Pembina River Lake, ND 1950 Jan. 1, 1990 50,000 -- Ruffy Brook, MN 1967 Apr. 1966 46,034 -- Sheyenne River, ND8 1981 Dec. 31, 1970 37,956 -- State Road and Ebner Coulees 1981 Jul. 9, 1995 225,000 -- (Ebner Coulee Unit) Tongue River Lake, ND 1950 Jan. 1, 1990 23,695 -- Warroad River and Bulldog Creek, MN 1974 Nov. 17, 1986 182,000 -- Warroad Harbor and River, MN9 1981 Aug. 5, 1977 --- 1. Portion of project for removal of obstructions at various points outside the dredged area to clear channel to full project width (see Table 16-C for costs for completed portion of the project). 2. Advance engineering and design costs only. The Senate Report 97-256 states that the Corps is to take no further action to construct Burlington Dam until directed to do so by Congress. 3. Grafton, ND, was reauthorized by Section 364 of WRDA in 1999. 4. Part of the St. Croix River, Minnesota and Wisconsin project. 5. Previously part of Sheyenne River, ND project (see Section 23 and Table 16-A for costs for active project). 6. Authorized for further study by a House Committee on Public Works Resolution dated March 15, 1988. 7. Advance engineering and design costs only. (See Section 25 and Table 16-A for costs for active project). 8. Part of Red River of the North Drainage Basin (see Section 20 in text and Table 16-I for costs for active units of project). 9. Portion of dredging of entrance channel and turning basin to complete project width and depth (see Table 16-C for costs for completed portion of project). 16-27 TABLE 16-H RESERVOIRS AT HEADWATERS OF MISSISSIPPI RIVER See Section 2 of Text) Watershed Area (Square miles) Capacity Previous Projects Existine Projects at Minimum Above Watershed Maximum Stages Outlet St. Paul (Square Original Stage Total Reservoir (feet)1 River (miles) miles) Lake Reservoir (acre-feet) Completed Cost Completed Cost Cost Winnibigoshish 6 Mississippi 408 1442 117 179.4 967,930 1884 $214,000 1900 $173,470 $387,470 Leech Lake 0 Leech 410 1163 173 205.9 743,320 1884 171,805 1902 84,830 256,185 Pokegama 6 Mississippi 344 6602 24 35.0 120,750 1884 85,000 1904 126,030 211,030 Sandy Lake 7 Sandy 267 421 8 16.6 72,500 1895 114,000 1909 117,020 231,020 Pine River 9 Pine 199 562 18 23.7 177,520 1886 97,000 1907 133,320 230,320 Gulf Lake 5 Gull 168 287 20 20.5 70,820 -- -- 1913 86,826 86,826 Surveys and flowage rights - - - - 160,939 160,939 Recreational facilities -- -- - - 2,834,838 2,834,838 Total new work -- -- 681,805 -- 3,716,823 4,398,628 Total operating and care - -- 100,857 - 54,407,266 54,508,123 Permanent indefinite - -- -- - 967,197 967,197 appropriation for operation and care, Feb. 1, 1895 to end of fiscal year 1936 Rehabilitation - -- - - 425,000 425,000 Total 2,152,840 - $782,662 -- $57,810,481 $60,298,948 1. Lower operating limits by regulations approved February 4, 1936, as modified December 29, 1944. 2. Exclusive of area controlled by Winnibigoshish and Leech Lake Dams. 16-28 00 N) O 0Oil O Oz OWN COl O 0 0 0 "x2J c3 ST. PAUL, MN, DISTRICT TABLE 16-I RED RIVER OF THE NORTH DRAINAGE BASIN: ACTIVE UNITS IN COMPREHENSIVE BASIN PLAN Cost to Total Sep. 30, Estimated State Type 2000 Federal Cost Orwell River (Otter Tail River) Minnesota Reservoir $1,916,753 $1,916,700' Wild Rice and Marsh Rivers Minnesota Channel improvement 405,056 405,100 Rush River North Dakota Channel improvement 287,686 287,700 Sand Hill River Minnesota Channel improvement 548,778 548,800 Mustinka River Minnesota Channel improvement 440,788 440,800 Otter Tail River Minnesota Channel improvement 174,768 174,800 Red River at Grand Forks North Dakota Levees and flooodwall 948,895 948,900 Red River at East Grand Forks Minnesota Levees, floodwall, 1,698,2002 1,698,2003 pumping plants Red River at Fargo North Dakota Channel improvement 1,639,924 1,639,9004 Total Cost to Date $8,060,8485 Total Estimate Cost $8,060,9006 1. Includes $181,713 for lands and $25,045 for recreation facilities. 2. Excludes cost for current planning, engineering and design work. See Table 16-M for current year costs associated with this work. 3. The East Grand Forks unit was reclassified from active to inactive on August 19, 1988; the project was reactivated in June 1997. The cost of this unit was last revised in 1987. A new flood control plan for a combined Grand Forks-East Grand Forks project was authorized in 1999. 4. Includes $67,900 for lands. 5. Costs of $11,239 for the Wahpeton-Breckenridge deferred unit not included. Authorization of the Sheyenne River, Moorhead, and Maple River units has expired. Cost of these units also not included total $66,897. 6. The Wahpeton-Breckenridge unit of the project is classed as 'deferred' and is excluded from the estimate. The cost of this unit, last revised in 1955, was estimated to be $666,000. The Flood Control Act approved December 31, 1970 (H. Doc. 330-91-2) provided for deletion of the Sheyenne River unit, and authorization of the Maple River and Moorhead units expired at the end of the 5-year period within which local interests were required to furnish assurances of local cooperation. Authorization of these units, not included, expired on the dates indicated in Table 16-G. In FY 89, the Wahpeton- Breckenridge unit was included as part of the General Investigation program under Restudy of Deferred projects. 16-29 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 2000 TABLE 16-J INSPECTION OF COMPLETED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS (See Section 20 of Text) Project Date Inspected Big Fork River, MN Bigstone Lake & Whetstone River, MN and SD Black Bear & Miller Lake, Crow Wing Co Black River - Irving Township - Jackson County, WI Black River at North Bend, WI Cannon River at Faribault, MN Chaska, MN Devils Lake, ND Dry Run, Decorah, IA Elk River, MN Emerson, Manitoba - Noyes, MN Enderlin, Maple River, ND Gilmore Creek, Winona, MN Grafton, ND Grand Mound State Historic Site, MN Guttenberg, IA Hanover, Hennepin County, MN Hennepin County, CSAH 116, MN Kickapoo River, Gays Mills, WI Lake Andrusia, Mississippi River, MN Lake Pulaski, Wright Co., MN Mankato Township, MN Melrose, WI Middle River at Argyle, MN Minneota, MN Minnesota River at Henderson, NM Minnesota River at LeSueur, MN Minnesota River, Belgrade Township, MN Minot, ND Mississippi River near Aitkin, MN Pettibone Park, LaCrosse, WI Plum Creek, New Haven Township, MN Prairie du Chein, WI Red Lake River at Gentilly, MN Red Lake River at Huot, MN Red Lake River at Red Lake, Falls, MN Red Lake River, Polk County, Crookston, MN Red Lake River, State Highway 32, MN Red River of the North at Argusville, ND Red River of the North at Breckenridge, MN Red River of the North at Fargo, ND - Moorhead, MN Red River of the North at Halstad, NM Red River of the North at Oslo, NM Red River of the North at Pembina, ND Redwood River below Marshall, MN Root River at Hokah, MN Roseau River, MN August 2000 September 2000 August 2000 August 2000 August 2000 August 2000 August 2000 October 2000 August 2000 August 2000 August 2000 August 2000 August 2000 August 2000 August 2000 August 2000 August 2000 August 2000 August 2000 August 2000 August 2000 August 2000 August 2000 August 2000 September 2000 August 2000 August 2000 August 2000 October 2000 August 2000 August 2000 August 2000 August 2000 August 2000 August 2000 August 2000 August 2000 August 2000 August 2000 August 2000 August 2000 August 2000 August 2000 August 2000 September 2000 August 2000 August 2000 16-30 ST. PAUL, MN, DISTRICT TABLE 16-J INSPECTION OF COMPLETED (Continued) FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS (See Section 20 of Text) Project Date Inspected Rushford, MN Sanders Creek, Boscobel, WI o Sheyenne River, Valley City, ND Snake River at Alvarado, MN Souris River Basin, ND Souris River - Burlington to Minot Souris River - Renville, County Park Souris River - Rural Improvements Souris River - Sawyer Souris River, Velva, ND St. Hillaire, MN Sterling Center, Maple River, MN Trempealeau River - Arcadia Upper Iowa River, IA Vermillion River, Hastings, MN Veterans Memorial Levee, Mississippi River, Hastings, MN Wild Rice River, Mahnomen County, NM Winona, MN Zumbro River, MN Zumbro River at Genoa, MN Zumbro River at Jarrett and Millville, MN Zumbro River at Wabasha County - Hammond August 2000 August 2000 August 2000 August 2000 October 1999 October 1999 October 1999 October 1999 October 1999 October 1999 August 2000 August 2000 August 2000 August 2000 August 2000 August 2000 August 2000 September 2000 August 2000 August 2000 August 2000 August 2000 16-31 REPORT OF TIlE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 2000 TABLE 16-K FLOOD CONTROL WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION Flood control activities pursuant to Section 205, Public Law 858, 80th Congress, as amended (preauthorization) Study/Project and Location Fiscal Year Costs Bois de Sioux River, Richland County, ND...................................................................$ 555 Chippewa River at M ontevideo, M N ....................................................................................................................... 201,454 C ity of H ouston..................................................................................................................................................................3,459 Cottonwood River, Springfield, MN...............................................................................................175 Fargo, Ridgewood Addition, ND ................................................................................................................ 17,454 Granite Falls, M N ........................ ....................................................................... .................................... ............ 82,298 Lac Qui Parle River, Dawson, MN ........................................................ 85,068 M innew aukan, N D .......................................................................................................................................................... 3,328 Ottertail River, Breckenridge, M N ..... .................................................................................................................. 274,400 Pembina River, Neche, ND..................................................................... ........................ ............ 7,595 Red River of the North, Oakport, MN.........................................................212,448 Section 205 Coordination.......................................................................................................................................................... 26,664 Wahpeton, ND .................................................... 214,160 Wild Rice, and Marsh Rivers, Ada, MN .................................................................................................................... 152,734 W ild Rice, M arsh Rivers, M N .................................................................................................................................... 1,009 Zumbro River, Pine Island, M N................................................ ......................................... 9 Emergency bank protection (Section 14 of the 1946 Flood Control Act, Public Law 526, 79th Congress) Study/Project and Location Fiscal Year Costs Aitkin County State Aid, Hwy 10, MN..................................................$ 47,658 Fargo Public Facilities, N D ................................................................................................................................ ..... 106,738 Lake St. Croix Beach Public Facilities, M N ................................................................................................................... 7,125 LeSueur River CSAH 28, Blue Earth County, MN.....................................................43,916 M innesota H ighway 169, M ankato, M N .......................................................................................................................... 3,850 Minnesota River, Shakopee, MN ..................................................................................................................................... 47,177 Red Lake River, Fisher, Polk County, M N ...................................................................................................................... 27,036 Red River of the North, Drayton, ND .................................................................................... ................................... 41,808 Section 14 Coordination.................................... ............................................................................................................... 14,993 State Hwy 7 Bridge, Pomme de Terre River, MN............................................................... ....................................... 12,655 16-32 ST. PAUL, MN, DISTRICT TABLE 16-L PROJECT MODIFICATIONS FOR IMPROVEMENT OF ENVIRONMENT Modifications of projects for the purpose of improving the quality of the environment in the public interest (Section 1135, Public Law 99-662, 99th Congress, as amended) Study/Project and Location Fiscal Year Costs Coordination account funds ....................................................... ..... ... ... .... .... .............. ............. $15,083 Initial appraisals, general ..... .......................................... 13,650 Pool 8, Pilot Drawdown, WI ...... .. ................................................... ......................... 10,612 TABLE 16-M AQUATIC ECOSYSTEM RESTORATION Restorations of Aquatic Ecosystems pursuant to Section 206, Public Law 104-303 Study/Project and Location Fiscal Year Costs Baraboo River Aquatic Restoration ...................................... ........ $13,058 C oordination account funds........... ........................................................................................................................... ..... 15,127 Lake Neshonoc, LaCrosse County, W I ..................................................................................... ............................... 25,268 ay Creek, Roseau County, M N ........................................................................................ 92,348 Paint Creek, Allamakee County, IA..... .............................................................. 20,053 Prelim inary restoration plans ................................... ................................................................................................ 19,185 Red River of the North Fishways, ND & M N .................................................................................................................. 60,265 16-33 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 2000 TABLE 16-N GENERAL INVESTIGATIONS (See Sections 27, 28, and 29 of Text) Study/Project and Location Fiscal Year Costs Special Studies Devils Lake, ND.............................................. ......... ..................... .....$ 81,0193 Upper M ississippi River from Lake Itasca, MN .........................................1.1.0.,6.5.5................................................ Miscellaneous Activities ,, Special Investigations ........................................................................................ .......... ......... ...9.6.,7 26 FERC Licensing Activities ............................................................................................... 7,704 Inter Agency Water Resources Development................. ........................ ................... 52,809 North American Waterfowl Management Plan ..................................................2. ,.48.2.................................. Coordination with Other Agencies Cooperation with Other Water Resource Agencies....................................... ....9.,.46.6........................ Planning Assistance to States': M innesota..............................................................17.3.,0.7.4..................................................................... W isconsin .......................... ...................................................................................................... . 84,520 TOTAL SURVEYS ........................ ................................................................................................ ... $618,455 ..- COLLECTION AND STUDY OF BASIC DATA International Water Studies ................................................. .... .......... ..... $. 19,8332 International Joint Commission, Red River of the North.................................................................. 166,790 Flood Plain Management Services Unit. ................................................60.,.4.46....................................................... Technical Services, General ............................................................................ .............5.9,.7.98...... Quick Responses .......................................................... ......... ..5.,1.4.7........................................................... Special Studies ............................................................................................ 25,628 Hydrologic Studies ................... ...................................................30.,.38.6..................................................................... TOTAL COLLECTION AND STUDY OF BASIC DATA ...................................... . .................... $368,028 ADVANCE ENGINEERING AND DESIGN Crookston, M N .................................................................$. 5.0.,5.7.8................................................................. Devils Lake Outlet, ND ............................................................................ 188,926 East Grand Forks, MN......................................................... 262,585 Grafton, Park River, ND............................................................................................. 72,759 TOTAL ADVANCE ENGINEERING AND DESIGN .........................................$.57.4.,8.4.8.......................................... 1. Excludes $236,999 contributed funds. 2. Excludes $49,593 for International Water Studies under O & M Appropriation. 3. Excludes $150,000 contributed funds. 16-34 MISSISSIPPI RIVER BETWEEN THE MISSOURI RIVER AND MINNEAPOLIS, MN Section of river covered in this report is divided into three reaches, under supervision and direction of District Engineers at St. Louis, Rock Island, and St. Paul. Section in St. Louis District extends 105 miles from Mouth of Missouri River to Upper Mississippi River mile 300 above Ohio River; Rock Island District extends about 314 miles from mile 300 to 614; and St. Paul District extends about 244 miles from mile 614 to Soo Line Railroad bridge, Minneapolis (mile 857.6). Location. Mississippi River rises in northern Minnesota, flows about 2,360 miles southerly and empties into Gulf of Mexico. Portion included in this report extends about 663 miles from mouth of Missouri River to Soo Line Railroad bridge, Minneapolis. The latest map and profile showing this section of river are in House Document 669, 76th Congress, 3d session. A map showing Lake Pepin is in House Document 511, 79th Congress, 2d session. A map of section Minneapolis to Dubuque is in House Document 515, 79th Congress, 2d session. A map showing location of drainage districts (Bellevue, Iowa, to Missouri River) is in River and Harbors Committee Document 34, 75th Congress, 1st session. Previous projects. See page 1199 of Annual Report for 1963. Existing project. Provides a channel of 9-foot depth and adequate width between mouth of Missouri River (1,179 miles from the gulf) and Soo Line Railroad at Minneapolis, by construction of a system of locks and dams, supplemented by dredging. Project also provides for further improvements at St. Paul to provide a 2.7 mile basin extending downstream from Robert Street Bridge, and at Minneapolis to provide adequate terminal facilities, and for other harbor improvements and miscellaneous work. Pertinent data on locks and dams, harbor improvements, additional features entering into cost of project, and authorizing legisation are given in Tables 17-C, 17-D, 17-E, and 17-G. All dams are concrete. Three dams (Upper St. Anthony Falls, 1 and 19) are fixed, remainder are movable. See House Document 669, 76th Congress, 3d session, for a report of Chief of Engineers dated February 27, 1940, containing a general plan for improvement of Mississippi River between Coon Rapids Dam and mouth of Ohio River for purposes of navigation, power development, flood control, and irrigation needs. Local cooperation. Small-boat harbors authorized in the River and Harbor Act of 1962 are subject to conditions that local interests make a cash contribution toward cost of construction (except in case of Quincy Harbor which involves maintenance only of an existing harbor); furnish lands and rights-of-way for construction and future maintenance; hold the United States free from damages; provide and maintain mooring facilities and utilities; reserve accommodations for transient small boats; accomplish all necessary relocations and alterations; and establish public bodies empowered to regulate use, growth and development of the harbors. Rectification of seepage damages to privately owned lands in the Sny Island Levee Drainage District, IL, was contingent upon the conditions that local interests acquire all lands, easements, and rights-ofway necessary for construction and maintenance of the project; comply with applicable provisions of the Uniform Relocation Assistance and Real Property Acquisition Policies Act of 1970; accept, operate, and maintain the project upon its completion; and hold and save the United States free from damages arising from the construction and operation of the completed project; provided further that the local public entity shall be reimbursed by the Government in the amounts actually expended by it in the acquisition of real estate and for payments required under Public Law 91-646 if said amounts have been previously submitted to and approved by the Government. Local cooperation requirements have been complied with for improvement of commercial harbor at Dubuque, IA; for improvement of Beaver Slough at Clinton, IA, for navigation; and for general navigation facilities at small-boat harbors at Rock Island, IL; Hannibal, MO; Fort Madison, IA; Davenport (Lindsay Park), IA; Muscatine, IA (including freight terminal approach channel); Andalusia, IL; Warsaw, IL; Moline, IL; Clinton, IA; and Savanna, IL. 17-1 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF TIIE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 2000 Licenses. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission collects from non-Federal licensees annually to recompensate the United States for use of government dams for generation of hydroelectric power. Amounts collected are returned to U.S. Treasury. (See Table 17-F for license fees collected for the fiscal year.) St. Paul District. New Work: None. Maintenance: During fiscal year 2000, the Government pipeline dredge WILLIAM A. THOMPSON removed 668,805 cubic yards of material at ten sites. Government derrick barge HAUSER/WADE removed 1,700 cubic yards of material at two sites. Government pipeline dredge DUBUQUE removed 18,957 cubic yards of material at three sites. Mechanical dredging contractors removed 341,926 cubic yards of material at 27 sites. Major maintenance projects included Lock 1, dewatering, the second stage of bluff protection at Lock 1, central control building and electrical controls at Lock 5A, and crane carrier installation on Lower Saint Anthony Falls dam. Projects commenced in FY 00 that are underway include the central control building and electrical controls at Lock 7, sandblasting and painting of the bridge at Dam 9, placement site excavation in Pool 2, and installation of the crane carriers at multiple sites. The crane carrier supply contract is substantially complete. Operating and Care: Locks and Dams were operated as required and necessary repairs were made to those and appurtenant structures. Other studies, reports, and miscellaneous engineering work were also accomplished. Rehabilitation: Major rehabilitation projects at Locks and Dams 3 and 5A through 9 continued. The central control building and electrical controls at Lock 5A, was completed in FY 00. The central control building and electrical controls at Lock 7 is underway. The crane carrier supply contract is substantially complete. The related navigation safety and embankments problems at Lock and Dam 3 were examined in separate reports in 1995 with recommended structural fixes for these problems. The proposed projects were approved by Corps Headquarters, but have not been implemented for a number reasons including the presence of a diverse mussel bed with state-listed endangered species in the tailwater area. Construction of the first stage of the embankment project was completed in the summer of 1999. The St. Paul District has decided to re-evaluate these related problems in an effort to find more optimal solutions. A Notice of Intent to Prepare of Environmental Impact Statement for the Lock and Dam3 navigation safety and embankments re-evaluation is being published in the Federal Register. Meetings have been held this year with interested agencies and organizations to initiate the re-evaluation. Costs to St. Paul were $45,902,385 for operation and maintenance and $5,786,732 for rehabilitation; for a total cost of $51,689,117. Rock Island District. New Work: None. Maintenance: Channel dredging by Government Cutterhead Pipeline Dredge WILLIAM A. THOMPSON was performed at various locations in Pools 16, 18, 19, 21, 22, and 24, with a total of 230,937 cubic yards of material being removed. Dredging by Government Dredge America (St. Louis District) was performed in Pool 21, with a total of 18,230 cubic yards being removed. The total cost of dredging was $1,649,000. Continuing construction includes, Sandblast, paint and repairs to Lock and Dam 14, LeClaire Base redevelopment, utility corridor stage I (DOCKWALL REPAIR????), Lock 19 paving and utilities, Lock and Dam 22 miter gate machinery repairs, Roof Repairs at Lock and Dam 18, and Concrete repairs at Lock and Dam 11 and Lock and Dam 12. Construction initiated includes: Service Bridge Painting at Lock and Dam 13, Roller Gate Chains at Lock and Dams 16, 18, and 20, Lock and Dam 18 Overflow Structure concrete. Maintenance for the Navigation Function continued at a cost of $22,136,900 (includes dredging costs). Environmental Stewardship continued at a cost of $2,700. Maintenance of Recreation Features continued at a cost of $1,234,500. Total maintenance costs for Operation and Maintenance were $23,374,100. Net credits to the project were $318,900, primarily as a result of collection from towboat companies for damages for lock and dam structures. Operation and care: Operations for Navigation continued at a cost of $15,856,300. Operations for Flood Damage Reduction Functions cost $245,300. Environmental Stewardship continued at a cost of $493,100. Operations for the Recreation Function continued at a cost of $1,771,100. Total operation costs were $18,365,800. Total operations and maintenance costs were $41,739,900. Rehabilitation: Rehabilitation was continued at Locks and Dams 12 and 14 for a total cost of $2,220,585, and $2,480,457, respectively. Maintenance operations of dams and improvements at a total cost of $54,960. Total rehabilitation and maintenance costs were $4,756,002. 17-2 MISSISSIPPI RIVER BETWEEN THE MISSOURI RIVER AND MINNEAPOLIS, MN Costs to the Rock Island District were $41,420,911 for operations and maintenance and $4,756,002 for major rehabilitation for a total cost of $46,176,913. St. Louis District. New Work: Costs incurred for Melvin Price Locks and Dam, formerly Lock and Dam 26 Replacement, were $5,166 for real estate acquisition; $182,268 for the dam; $43,517 for the locks; $227,000 for roads; $21,700 for cultural resource monument, $651,070 for buildings, grounds and utilities; $10,607 for permanent operating equipment; $323,222 for engineering; $125,858 for supervision and administration. Cost for Melvin Price totaled $1,590,408. Costs incurred for the second lock totaled $52,948, all for engineering. Total cost of new work was $1,643,356. Rehabilitation: Major rehabilitation continued in FY 2000 at Lock and Dam 25. Construction costs included $1,401 for real estate; $1,094,500 for the dam; $76,995 for the lock; $226,798 for engineering; and $170,454 for supervision and administration. Costs for Lock and Dam 25 totaled $1,570,148. Major rehabilitation also continued at Lock and Dam 24 at a cost of $1,645 for real estate; $220,582 for the dam; $980,543 for the lock; $2,187,911 for engineering; and $142,205 for supervision and administration. Costs for Lock and Dam 24 totaled $3,532,886. Total rehabilitation cost $5,103,034. Operating and care: The locks and dams were operated as required and necessary repairs were made thereto. Other work accomplished was management of natural resources, operations of recreation areas, condition and operating studies, water control management, and other studies and reports for a total cost of $6,261,737. Maintenance: $13,041,162. Total maintenance cost Costs to the St. Louis District were $1,643,356 for new work on the Melvin Price Locks and Dam and Second Lock; $5,103,034 for major rehabilitation; $19,302,899 for operation and maintenance for a total cost of $26,049,289. Total Federal costs of existing project to the end of fiscal year for the three Districts were $1,628,307 for new work; $106,626,195 regular funds for operation and maintenance; and $10,685,545 regular funds for rehabilitation. Total costs for FY 00 were $118,940,047. Condition of the channel at end of fiscal year: The controlling depths of nine feet at low water and minimum widths suitable for long-haul common carrier service were maintained in all pools. St. Paul District. Work completed: Locks and Dams at St. Anthony Falls and 1 to 10, inclusive, except for relatively minor appurtenant work; major improvements of channels and harbors at St. Paul and Minneapolis; small boat harbors and commercial harbors at Lake City, Red Wing, and Winona, MN; and Prairie du Chien, WI; small-boat harbors at St. Paul, Hastings, Red Wing, Wabasha, Lake City and Winona, MN; Lansing, IA; and Bay City, Alma, Pepin, and Prairie du Chien, WI; a remedial drainage ditch at Cochrane, WI; miscellaneous channel dredging and realignment; channel markers; pool clearing; and construction of various facilities for recreation use. Seepage damages totaling $90,027 were paid to 210 claimants. Status of land and flowage acquisition: Approximately 51,546.46 acres of land in fee, including 47,305 acres used by the Department of the Interior in accordance with a cooperative agreement and general plans, and easements of 15,612.55 acres of land are owned or controlled in Pools 1 to 10, inclusive, at end of fiscal year. In addition, fee title to 12.46 acres and perpetual easements on 2.98 acres of land for St. Anthony Falls and perpetual easements over 244.39 acres of land for harbors have been obtained and Department of the Army holds special rights over 62,954.74 acres owned by the Department of the Interior in pool Nos. 3 to 10, inclusive. Dredge sites acquired in FY 99 added 19.91 acres in fee and 27 acres in permanent easement to Pool 2. Work remaining to complete portion of project in St. Paul District: FY 01 projected acquisitions include approximately 30 acres fee and 15 acres permanent easement for Pools 3, 7, and 10. Condition of channel at end of fiscal year: The controlling depths of 9 feet at low water and minimum depths for long-haul common carrier service were maintained in all pools. Rock Island District. Work completed: Major construction items including all locks and dams, are completed and in operation. The following related work has also been completed: construction of smallboat harbors at Rock Island, IL; Moline, IL; Andalusia, IL; Warsaw, IL; Fort Madison, IA; Davenport (LindsayPark), IA; Muscatine, IA; Clinton, IA; and Hannibal, MO; improvement of Beaver Slough at Clinton, IA, for navigation; improvement of commercial harbor at Dubuque, IA; rehabilitation of 17-3 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 2000 old auxiliary lock at Lock and Dam 14; permanent closure of old Lock 19 and drydock; rock and conglomerate excavation in Pools 15 and 16; rectification of seepage damage in the Sny Island Levee Drainage District, IL; recreational facilities; and construction of visitor center at Lock and Dam 15. Status of land and flowage acquisition: Acquisition of land in Pools 11 to 22, inclusive consisting of 93,658.174 acres in fee and 1,286.734 acres in flowage easement, has been completed. Condition of the channel at end of fiscal year: The controlling depths of nine feet at low water and minimum widths suitable for long-haul common carrier service were maintained in all pools. Work remaining to complete portion of project in Rock Island District: None. St. Louis District. Work completed: Major construction. items, including all locks and dams, are completed and in operation, with the exception of the remaining work at Melvin Price. Status of land and flowage acquisition: Acquisitions of land in Pools 24, 25, and 26, involving 4,448 acres of land in fee and flowage easements over 6,600 acres, is complete. A total of 4,201 acres has been acquired for the Melvin Price Locks and Dam project. Condition of channel at end of fiscal year: The controlling depth of nine feet at low water and generally suitable widths for long-haul common carrier services were maintained in all pools and between Melvin Price Locks and Dam and Missouri River. Work remaining to complete portion of project in St. Louis District: Work remaining at the Melvin Price Locks and Dam project includes the esplanade landscaping and implementation of remaining required fish and wildlife mitigation measures. 17-4 MISSISSIPPI RIVER BETWEEN TIlE MISSOURI RIVER AND MINNEAPOLIS, MN TABLE 17-A COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT Total Cost to Project Funding FY 97 FY 98 FY 99 FY 00 Sep 2000 Mississippi River New Work' between Missouri Approp.2 $ 3,462,000 $ 3,244,000 $ 3,149,000 $ 1,776,000 $1,297,683,629 River and Cost3 3,163,733 3,636,021 3,313,547 1,643,356 1,256,515,321 Minneapolis, Maint. 4 Minnesota Approp. 98,145,656 94,949,282 95,438,365 106,677,912 1,879,569,077 (Federal Funds) Cost 95,938,787 59,803,497 95,539,206 106,626,195 1,827,798,394 Rehab. Approp. 6,637,000 15,321,104 11,368,734 10,694,096 234,672,555 Cost 9,244,165 22,054,036 11,319,497 10,685,545 240,960,210 (Contributed Funds) New Work: Approp. 0 0 0 0 16,283,039 Cost 0 0 0 0 6,868,921 Inland Waterway Rehab. Trust Fund Appro. 4,855,443 11,624,491 8,385,387 5,206,507 55,647,463 Cost 4,571,919 11,752,351 8,418,746 4,960,223 50,298,672 1. Includes $15,476,259 for new work on previous projects. 2. Includes Melvin Price Locks and Dam funds $941,580,900. 3. Includes Melvin Price Locks and Dam funds $941,332,217. 4. Includes $1,949,301 for maintenance on previous project. TABLE 17-B TOTAL COSTS OF EXISTING PROJECT TO SEPTEMBER 30, 2000 Regular Public Work Emergency District Cost Funds Funds Relief Funds Total St. Paul New Work' $ 60,184,2462 24,210,071 $9,071,214 $ 93,465,533 Maintenance3 802,314,276 -- -- 802,314,276 Rehabilitation 93,579,444 ---- 93,579,444 Total 956,077,966 24,210,071 9,071,214 989,359,251 Rock Island New Work4 71,307,9455 17,403,322 11,338,865 100,050,132 Maintenance6 192,792,205 -- -- 192,792,205 Rehabilitation 112,271,714 -- -- 112,271,714 Total 376,371,864 17,403,322 11,338,865 405,114,051 St. Louis New Work8 970,437,0347 10,282,566 2,440,266 983,159,873 Maintenance 339,438,688 -- -- 339,438,688 Rehabilitation 41,800,832 -- -- 41,800,832 Total $1,351,676,554 10,282,566 2,440,266 $1,364,399,393 1. Excludes $2,041,140 contributed funds. Includes $7,673 expended in pool No. 11. 2. Includes $159,359 transferred from Rock Island District covering pro rata share of cost of derrick boat Hercules. 3. Includes $762,196 expended between 1930 and 1936 on operating and care of works of improvement under provisions of permanent indefinite appropriation for such purposes. Excludes $797,670 contributed funds. 4. Excludes $58,999 contributed funds. 5. $687,709 was transferred to St. Louis District in fiscal year 1958. Excludes $201,167 transferred to St. Paul and St. Louis Districts covering their pro rata share of cost of derrick boat Hercules. 6. Cost subsequent to FY 1953 included with operating and care. Includes the sum of $395,442, expended between 1930 and 1934 on the operating and care of the works of improvement under the provisions of the permanent indefinite appropriation for such purposes. 7. Includes $47,800 transferred from Rock Island District covering pro rata cost of derrick boat Hercules and $687,709 transferred from Rock Island District. 8. Includes $939,688,861 for Melvin Price Locks and Darn. 17-5 TABLE 17-C LOCKS AND DAMS Lock Dimensions Greatest Depth on Character of Foundation Percent Width Length Upper Miter Sill Complete Miles of Available Normal Locks, Year Estimated Cost of Above Cham- for Full Pool Dams, and Opened Each Lock and Ohio Miles from ber Width Lift Eleva- Upper Lower Work in to Navi- Dam Including Lock and Dam River Nearest Town (feet) (feet) (feet) tions (feet) . (feet) Lock Dam Pool gation Work in Pool St. Anthony 853.9 Falls, upper Lock St. Anthony 853.3 Falls, lower Lock and dam Lock and dam 1 847.6 Lock and dam 2 815.2 Lock and dam 3 796.9 Lock and dam 4 752.8 Lock and dam 5 738.1 Lock and dam SA 728.5 Lock and dam 6 714.3 Lock and dam 7 702.5 Lock and dam 8 679.2 Lock and dam 9 647.9 Lock and dam 10 615.1 Lock and dam 11 583.0 Lock and dam 12 556.7 In city of Minneapolis, MN In city of Minneapolis, MN Minneapolis- St. Paul, MN 1.3 above Hastings, MN 6.1 above Red Wing, MN Alma, WI Minneiska, MN 3 above Winona, MN Trempealeau, WI Dresbach, MN Genoa, WI 3.3 below Lynxville, WI Guttenberg, IA 3.7 above Dubuque, IA Bellevue, IA 56 400 49.2 56 400 26.94 56 400 35.94 56 400 35.9 110 500 12.2 1108 6008 12.2 110 600 8.0 110 600 7.0 110 600 9.0 110 600 5.5 110 600 6.5 110 600 8.0 110 600 11.0 110 600 9.0 110 600 8.0 110 600 11.0 110 600 9.0 799.2 15.7 13.7 Some lime- Limestone. 1002 stone, mainly sandstone. No piles. 750.0 13.7 10.3 Sandstone. No Sandstone. 100 piles 725.1 13.54 10.1 Rock and piles Piles in gravel. 100 - 12.5' 7.6 in gravel. - 16.0 15.1 Piles in sand, Piles in sand, 100 687.2 22.2 . 13.0 silt and clay. silt and clay. 100 675.0 17.0 14.0 Piles in sand, Piles in sand. 100 silt and clay. 667.0 17.0 13.0 Piles in sand Piles in sand 100 and gravel. and gravel. 660.0 18.0 12.0 Piles in sand Piles in sand. 100 and gravel. 651.0 18.0 12.5 Piles in sand. Piles in sand. 100 645.5 17.0 12.5 Piles in sand, Piles in sand 100 gravel and and clay. silt. 639.0 18.0 12.0 Piles in sand Piles in sand. 100 and gravel. 631.0 22.0 14.0 Piles in sand, Piles in sand 100 gravel and and gravel. broken rock. 620.0 16.0 13.0 Piles in sand. Piles in sand. 100 611.0 15.0 12.0 Piles in sand. Piles in sand. 100 603.0 18.5 12.5 Piles in sand, Piles in sand. 99 gravel and silt. 592.0 17.0 13.0 Piles in sand Piles in sand 99 and gravel. and gravel. -- $ 18,203,0003 1959 1917 1930 1948 1938 1935 1935 1936 1936 1937 1937 1938 1936 1937 1938 12,382,000 s 2,358,0006 6,492,0009 5,596,000 4,865,000 5,081,000 4,549,000 4,874,000 5,574,000 6,061,000 6,539,000 4,750,000 7,428,000 5,580,000 J 0 0 0 0 0 t2 O ?1 m ,O ci: 0 06 0C 0 TABLE 17-C LOCKS AND DAMS (Continued) Lock Dimensions Greatest Depth on Character of Foundation Percent Width Length Upper Miter Sill Complete Miles of Available Normal Locks, Year Estimated Cost of Above Cham-- for Full Pool Dams, and Opened Each Lock and Ohio Miles from her Width Lift Eleva- Upper Lower Work in to Navi- Dam Including Lock and Dam River Nearest Town (feet) (feet) (feet) tion' (feet) (feet) Lock Dam Pool gation Work in Pool Lock and dam 13 522.5 Lock and dam 14 493.3 Le Claire Lock 493.1 (Canal) Lock and dam 15 482.9 Lock and dam 16 457.2 Lock and dam 17 437.1 Lock and dam 18 410.5 Lock and dam 19 364.2 Lock and dam 20 343.2 Lock and dam 21 324.9 Lock and dam 22 301.2 Lock and dam 24 273.4 Lock and dam 25 241.4 Lock and dam 26 202.9 (Henry T. Rainey Dam) 5 4.3 above Clinton, IA 3.7 below Le Claire, IA 3.9 below Le Claire, IA Foot of Arsenal Island, Rock Island, IL 1.8 above Muscatine, IA 4.2 above New Boston, IL 6.5 above Burlington, IA Keokuk, IA 0.9 above Canton, MO 2.1 below Quincy, IL 1.5 below Saverton, MO Clarksville, MO Cap Au Gris, MO Alton, IL 110 600 11.0 583.0 19.0 13.0 Piles in sand, clay and gravel. 110 600 11.0 527.0 20.5 13.5 Rock. 80 320 11.0 - 17.6 10.9 Rock. 110 600 16.0 561.0 24.0"11 11.0 Rock. 110 360 16.0 - 17.0"11 11.0 110 110 110 110 110 110 110 110 110 110 110 110 600 9.0 600 8.0 600 9.8 358 38.2 1,200 600 10.0 600 10.5 600 10.2 600 15.0 600 15.0 600 24.0 360 24.0 545.0 536.0 528.0 518.2 480.0 470.0 459.5 449.0 434.0 419.0 17.0 16.0 16.5 4.5 5.0 15.0 16.5 18.0 19.0 19.0 19.0 16.0 12.0 Piles in sand and gravel. 13.0 Piles in sand and gravel. 13.7 Piles in sand. 9.2 Rock. 13.0 12.0 Rock. 12.0 Piles in sand and gravel. 13.8 Rock. 12.0 Rock and piles. 12.0 Piles in sand and gravel. 10.0 Piles in sand. 10.0 Piles in sand and gravel. Rock. Rock. Rock. Piles in sand and gravel. Piles in sand. Piles in sand. Rock. Rock and piles in sand and gravel. Piles in sand and gravel. Rock. Piles in sand. Piles in sand and gravel. Piles and sand. 100 1938 92 100 100 98 99 90 100 99 97 95 99 9914 9914 100 1939 1922 1934 1937 1939 1937 1913 1957 1936 1938 1938 1940 1939 1938 Ci) 0" z 7,502,000 6,284,000 1o 14,201,000 9,788,000 5,843,000 10,308,000 14,813,00012 6,281,000 8,065,000 5,275,000 10,337,000 13,694,000 12,824,000 .Ja TABLE 17-C LOCKS AND DAMS (Continued) Lock Dimensions Greatest Depth on Character of Foundation Percent Width Length Upper Miter Sill Complete Miles of Available Normal Locks, Year Estimated Cost of Above Cham- for Full Pool Dams, and Opened Each Lock and Ohio Miles from ber Width Lift Eleva- Upper Lower Work in to Navi- Dam Including Lock and Dam River Nearest Town (feet) (feet) (feet) tion' (feet) (feet) Lock Dam Pool gation Work in Pool Melvin Price 200.8 Alton, IL 110 1,200 24.0 419.0 23.0 18.0 Piles to bedrock. Piles to 97 1990 748,090,000 Locks and Dam bedrock. Melvin Price 200.8 Alton, IL 110 600 24.0 419.0 42.0 18.0 Piles to bedrock. Piles to 93 1994 226,000,000 Locks and Dam bedrock. (2nd Lock) Total, Locks and dams $1,196,556,000 I. Elevation of Pools 1 to 22 and at St Anthony Falls are mean sea level 1912 adjustment: Pools 24, 26 are mean sea level 1929 adjustment. 2. Includes existing dam, owned by Northern States Power Co. 3. Includes dredging above upper lock. (Federal cost only.) 4. Based on pool elevation 723.1 in Pool 1 which is crest of dam. Pool is normally maintained at elevation 725.1 by flashboards. 5. Includes lower approach dredging and dredging between upper and lower rock. (Federal cost only.) 6. In addition $1,948,000 expended from previous projects and $1,349,600 from O & M appropriation for first of twin locks. Excludes lock and dam rehabilitation program. 7. Old upper guard sill. 8. Landward lock. 9. In addition, $1,965,300 expended from previous projects. 10. Existing Le Claire Canal lock is used as auxiliary to lock 14; previous project cost $540,000. 11. Depth over upper poiree sill. Depth over upper miter sill is 27 feet, at lock 15. 12. $640,868 for first lock was reported by Mississippi River Power Company, transferred to Government free in lieu of improvements destroyed. (Annual Report, 1928, pp. 1118-1119.) Present estimate includes $13,132,600 for main lock and appurtenant work. 13. Includes cash contribution of $4,900,000. 14. Complete except for guidewall extensions. 15. Lock and Dam 26 has been replaced by the Melvin Price Locks and Dam at which full pool was raised 1 February 1990. Lock and Dam 26 has been removed. 00 O 3 O C 0 0 0 -] 0 0 LEI 0 z 0 0 TABLE 17-D HARBOR IMPROVEMENTS Project Approximate size (feet) Miles above depth Percent Estimated Name Ohio River Location Type (feet) Width Length Complete Cost St. Paul Harbor, MN Hastings Harbor, MN Red Wing Harbor, MN Red Wing Harbor, MN Bay City Harbor, WI Lake City Harbor, MN Pepin Harbor, WI Wabasha Harbor, MN Alma Harbor, WI Winona Harbors, MN Lansing Harbor, IA / Prairie du Chien Harbor, WI Dubuque Harbor, IA Savanna Harbor, IL Clinton Harbor, IA Moline Harbor, IL Davenport Harbor, IA (Lindsay Park) Rock Island Harbor, IL Andalusia Harbor, IL Muscatine Harbor, IA Fort Madison Harbor, IA 836.5-839.2 839.7 813.2 791.4 791.1 785.9 773.0 767.1 760.0 751.3 726.0 726.2 663.3- 635.5 635.0 579.4 537.3 519.0 488.0 484.2 479.8 473.0 455.5 455.6 383.7 In city of St. Paul, MN Channel improvement, Small-boat harbor and channel enlargement. Lower end of city of Hastings, MN In city of Red Wing, MN In city of Red Wing, MN Upper end of Bay City, WI In city of Lake City, MN In city of Pepin, WI Upper end of city of Wabasha, MN Upper end of Alma, WI In city of Winona, MN Latsch Island Crooked Slough Upper end of city of Lansing, IA Upper end of city of Prairie du Chien, WI In Marais de St. Friol East Channel below Hwy bridges. At Dubuque, IA At Savanna, IL At Clinton, IA At Moline, IL At Lindsay Park At Rock Island, IL Andalusia Slough At Muscatine, IA At Fort Madison, IA Commercial Small-boat Small-boat Commercial Small-boat Small-boat Small-boat Commercial3 Small-boat3 Small-boat Small-boat Small-boat Small-boat Commercial Small-boat Small-boat Commercial Commercial Small-boat Small-boat Small-boat Small-boat Entrance channel small-boat harbor Small-boat Small-boat Freight terminal approach channel Small-boat 95 5 955 5995 5 55 95 5 9 12 5555 400-1,000 300 200 300 450 50-100 400 500 500 50 175-400 300 200 200 170 400 340 280 400 230 200 2.7(mile) 400 500 1,200 800 5,990 600 1,000 850 600 800 500 1,000 6,000 500 800 1,000 frontage 1,500 910 1,400 660 1,150 1,100 435 950 1,890 900 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 0 78 100 100 100 100 100 100 $ 217,100 230,200 74,300 146,800' 8,700 39,4002 i.r C 0z 0 C 93,500 1,077,0004 205,5005 41,700 56,300 89,800 84,700 95,300 85,500 93,100 55,200 310,000 101,912 110,328 262,100 31,000 21,000 353,000 184,200 100 40 150 200 250 -- TABLE 17-D HARBOR IMPROVEMENTS (Continued) Project Approximate size (feet) Miles above depth Percent Estimated Name Ohio River Location Type (feet) Width Length Complete Cost Warsaw Harbor, IL 359.1 At Warsaw, IL Small-boat 5 100 600 100 73,000 Quincy Harbor, IL 327.3 In Quincy Bay, IL Small-boat 5 200-300 9,000 0 6 Hannibal Harbor, MO 308.8 At Hannibal, MO Small-boat 5 180-260 600 100 129,000 Total $4,269,640 1. In addition, local interests contributed $3,455. 2. In addition, local interests contributed $9,533. 3. Commercial harbor converted to small-boat harbor under authority of Section 107 of 1960 River and Harbor Act, as amended. Primary use is small-boat, although some commercial activity exists. 4. In addition, local interests contributed $812,599. 5. In addition, local interests contributed $32,344. 6. Maintenance only, estimated at $5,000 annually. J O O oil 01 C' 3 O �3 -] z C, ON O Xx CM 0r Xr MISSISSIPPI RIVER BETWEEN THE MISSOURI RIVER AND MINNEAPOLIS, MN TABLE 17-E ADDITIONAL FEATURES ENTERING INTO COST OF PROJECT Facilities for public use, convenience and safety $ 3,348,200 Rectification of damages caused by seepage and backwater 7,049,700' Regulating works between Melvin Price Locks and Dam and Missouri River 545,000 Improvement of Beaver Slough at Clinton, Iowa, for navigation 193,600 Miscellaneous 1,312,9002 Total additional features 12,449,4003 Total existing project (new work) $1,176,675,543 1. Includes a lump-sum payment of $2,146,800 (O&M appropriation) paid to the Sny Island Levee Drainage District, IL, for rectification of seepage damages. Also includes $140,000 Construction General funds for project studies, evaluation, and report preparation. 2. Includes $686,500 for repairs to Stone Arch Bridge, Minneapolis, MN. (FY 1969) 3. Excludes $227,000 (1965) for inactive remedial measures at Sandy Slough, MO. TABLE 17-F LICENSE FEES COLLECTED THROUGH FISCAL YEAR 2000 Annual Dam Licensee Charge St. Anthony Falls Lower Northern States Power $ 3,300 Lock and Dam Co. (No. 2056) Lock and Dam No. 1 Ford Motor Co. 95,440 Lock and Dam No. 2 City of Hastings, MN. 24,487 17-11 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 2000 TABLE 17-G AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Work Authorized Documents Sep. 22, 1922 July 3, 1930 as amended by P.R. No. 10, Feb. 24, 1932 June 26, 1934 Aug. 30, 1935 Aug. 26, 1937 Aug. 30, 1935 Aug. 26, 1937 Dec. 22, 1944 Mar. 2, 1945 Mar. 2, 1945 Mar. 2, 1945 Mar. 2, 1945 None Mar. 2, 1945 Mar. 2, 1945 Mar. 2, 1945 July 24, 1946 July 24, 1946 July 24, 1946 July 24, 1946 July 24, 1946 June 30, 1948 May 17, 1950 May 17, 1950 May 17, 1950 May 17, 1950 MISSISSIPPI RIVER BETWEEN MISSOURI RIVER AND MINNEAPOLIS, MN Dredging channels to landing places. Project adopted from Illinois River to Minneapolis; Chief of Engineers granted discretionary authority to make such modification in plan as may,be deemed advisable. 4 Operation of snag boats and operation and care of locks and dams to be provided for with funds from Department of the Army appropriations for rivers and harbors. Missouri River established as lower limit of project. Extension of 9-foot channel above St. Anthony Falls, MN, including adequate terminal facilities for Minneapolis, MN St. Paul, MN harbor. Determine damages to drainage and levee districts caused by seepage and backwater, and cost of making rectification thereof. Public park and recreational facilities. Red Wing, MN harbor. Remedial works to correct damages caused by seepage and backwater at Cochrane, WI Such changes or additions to payments, remedial works, or land acquisitions authorized by River and Harbor Act of Aug. 26, 1937 (River and Harbor Committee Doc. 34, 75th Cong., 1st sess.), as Chief of Engineers deems advisable. St. Paul, MN channel enlargements, small boat harbor, and roadway. Vertical bridge clearance at Minneapolis to 26 feet above estimated stage for discharge of 40,000 c.f.s Winona, MN basin. Future modification of lock and dam No. 2 for power development. Provides for cash contribution by local interests in lieu of alteration of privately owned bridges and utilities for St. Anthony Falls project. Lake City, MN harbor. Wabasha, MN harbor. Payment of damages caused by backwater and seepage, Pools 3 to 11. Hastings, MN harbor. Lansing, IA harbor. Fort Madison, IA harbor. Payment of damages caused by pool No. 14 at Clinton, IA. Davenport, IA harbor. Muscatine, IA harbor. Alma, WI harbor. None H. Doc. 290, 71st Cong., 2d sess. None H. Doc. 137, 72nd Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 137, 72nd Cong. 1st sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 44, 74th Cong., 1st sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 34, 75th Cong., 1st sess. None H. Doc. 103, 76th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 137, 76th Cong., 1st sess. None H. Doc. 547, 76th Cong., 3rd sess. S. Doc. 54, 77th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 263, 77th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 432, 77th Cong., Ist sess. H. Doc. 449, 78th Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 511, 79th Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 514, 79th Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 515, 79th Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 559, 79th Cong., 2d sess. S. Doc. 192, 79th Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 661, 80th Cong., 2d sess. S. Doc. 197, 80th Cong., 2d sess. Il. Doc. 642, 80th Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 733, 80th Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 66, 81st Cong., Ist sess. 17-12 MISSISSIPPI RIVER BETWEEN THE MISSOURI RIVER AND MINNEAPOLIS, MN TABLE 17-G AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION (Continued) Acts Work Authorized Documents May 17, 1950 May 17, 1950 May 17, 1950 May 17, 1950 Sep. 3, 1954 Sep. 3, 1954 July 3, 1958 July 3, 1958 July 3, 1958 July 3, 1958 Mar. 3, 1959 July 14, 1960 Oct. 23, 1962 Oct. 23, 1962 Oct. 23, 1962 Nov. 7, 1966 Oct. 21, 1978 Dec. 29, 1981 Nov. 17, 1986 Nov. 28, 1990 Oct. 31, 1992 Oct. 12, 1996 Hannibal, MO harbor. Prairie du Chien, WI harbors. Opposite Hamburg, IL harbor. Permits such change in location of Winona, MN small boat basin authorized by River and Harbor Act of Mar. 2, 1945 (H. Doc. 263, 77th Cong., Ist sess.), as Chief of Engineers deems advisable. Construction of Crooked Slough Harbor at Winona, MN, in lieu of previously authorized commercial harbor. Payment of damages caused by pool No. 24 at Louisiana, MO. Permits modification of vertical bridge clearances and authorizes completion of St. Anthony Falls project. Small boat and commercial harbors at Alton, IL.2 Payment of lump sum amounts for damages to drainage and levee districts caused by operation of navigation pools. Improvement and maintenance of Beaver Slough at Clinton, IA. Reconstruction of structures as may be necessary to provide adequate facilities for existing navigation. Construction of Industrial Harbor at Red Wing, MN. Construction of small-boat harbors at Savanna2, Moline, Andalusia, New Boston5, Warsaw, Quincy, and Grafton, IL; Bellevue', Clinton, Davenport, and Keokuk3, IA; St. Paul (Harriet Island), MN'; and Bay City, Pepin, and Cassville', Wl. Payment of damages caused by Pool 24 at Clarksville, MO. Remedial works at Sandy Slough, MO. Repair of Stone Arch Bridge at Minneapolis, MN. Replacement of Lock and Dam 26 Change name of Lock and Dam 26 to Melvin Price Locks and Dam effective on the date of Melvin Price's death. (Apr. 22, 1988 - date of death) Authorized a second lock at Locks and Dam 26, Alton, Illinois and Missouri Modified PL 95-502 to authorize recreational development at Melvin Price Locks and Dam, requiring no separable project lands and cost sharing. Authorized the construction of a 24,000 square foot regional visitor center at Melvin Price Locks and Dam. Amended PL 101-640 to allow the use of project lands and other contiguous non-project lands. 1. Deauthorized FY 75. 2. Inactive. 3. Deauthorized FY 87 (WRDA of 1986). 4. Guidewalls at Locks 3, 4, 5, 5A, 7, 8, 9, and 10 deauthorized FY 87 (WRDA of 1986). 5. Deauthorized FY 90 (WRDA of 1986). 6. Guidewall extensions at Locks 16, 18, and 21; construction of mooring facilities at Locks and Dams 11, 12, 14, 15, 16, 17, and 18; upper approach improvement at Lock 19 and Lock and Dam 20; and rock and/or conglomerate excavation in Pools 14, 18, and 21 deauthorized FY 90 (WRDA of 1986). 17-13 H. Doc. 67, 81st Cong., Ist sess. H. Doc. 71, 81st Cong., Ist sess. H. Doc. 254, 81st Cong., Ist sess. None H. Doc. 347, 83rd Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 251, 82nd Cong., Ist sess. H. Doc. 33, 85th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 136, 84th Cong., Ist sess. H. Doc. 135, 84th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 345, 84th Cong., 2d sess. None H. Doc. 32, 86th Cong., Ist sess. H. Doc. 513, 87th Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 552, 87th Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 419, 87th Cong., 2d sess. None Public Law 95-502 Public Law 97-118 Public Law 99-662 Public Law 101-640 Public Law 102-580 Public Law 104-303 PITTSBURGH, PA DISTRICT* This District comprises part of eastern Ohio, western Pennsylvania, southwestern New York, northern West Virginia, and northwestern Maryland embraced in drainage basin of Ohio River and Tributaries above mile 127 (below Pittsburgh), immediately upstream from New Martinsville, W. Va. IMPROVEMENTS Navigation - Locks and Dams .... . . . . . Page 1. Allegheny River, PA.... . . . . . . . . . . . . 18-2 2. Construction of locks and dams,Ohio River... . 18-2 3. Monongahela River, PA and WV.... . . . . . . 18-2 4. Open-channel work, Ohio River... . . . . . . . 18-3 5. Tygart Lake, WV.................. 18-3 6. Other authorized navigation projects...... 18-4 Flood Control - Local Protection 7. Elkins, WV...................... 18-4 8. Johnstown, PA... . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 18-4 9. Punxsutawney, Ohio River Basin, PA...... . 18-5 10. Saw Mill Run, Pittsburgh, PA ....... . 18-5 11. South Central, PA Environment Improvement Program ..................... 18-5 12. West Virginia and Pennsylvania Flood Control 18-6 Flood Control - Reservoirs 13. Berlin Lake, Ohio River Basin, OH... . . . . 18-7 14. Conemaugh River Lake,Ohio River Basin, PA. 18-7 15. Crooked Creek Lake, Ohio River Basin, PA.. . 18-8 16. East Branch, Clarion River Lake, Ohio River Basin, PA.. . . . . . . . . . . . . . 18-8 17. Kinzua Dam and Allegheny Reservoir, Ohio River Basin, PA and NY... . . . . . . . 18-8 18. Lower Girard Dam, OH. . . . . . . . . 18-9 19 Loyalhanna Lake, Ohio River Basin, PA.... . 18-9 20. Mahoning Creek Lake, Ohio River Basin, PA .............. 18-9 21. Michael J. Kirwan Dam and Reservoir, Ohio River Basin, OH.............. .. 18-9 22. Mosquito Creek Lake, Ohio River Basin, OH 18-10 23. Ohio River Basin (Pittsburgh District) . . . . 18-10 24. Shenango River Lake, Ohio River Basin, PA and OH ... . . . .. .............. 18-10 25. Stonewall Jackson Lake, Ohio River Basin, WV.... 18-11 26. Tionesta Lake, Ohio River Basin, PA. ..... .18-12 27. Union City Dam, Ohio River Basin, PA. . . . 18-12 28. Woodcock Creek Lake, Ohio River Basin, PA. 18-12 29. Youghiogheny River Lake, Ohio River Basin, PA and MD. ................... ... 18-13 30. Inspection of completed flood control projects. 18-13 31. Other authorized flood control projects . ... 18-13 32. Flood control work under special authorization.. .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . 18-13 General Investigations 33. Surveys...................... 18-14 34. Collection and study of basic data... ..... .18-14 35. Preconstruction, Engineering and Design... . 18-14 36. Research and development... ....... . 18-14 37. Project Modifications for Improvement of Environment. ................ 18-14 38. Aquatic Ecosystem Restoration ........ .18-14 Tables Table 18-A Cost & Financial Statement. .... 18-15 Table 18-B Authorizing Legislation......... 18-19 Table 18-C Other Authorized Navigation Projects . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 18-26 Table 18-D Not Applicable. Table 18-E Other Authorized Flood Control Projects.. ...... . . .... . . 18-26 Table 18-F Not Applicable. Table 18-G Deauthorized Projects. ......... 18-28 Table 18-H Allegheny River Statistics. ..... 18-29 Table 18-I Monongahela River Statistics.. ... 18-30 Table 18-J Monongahela River Total Costs .... 18-32 Table 18-K Ohio River Basin Reservoirs. ..... .18-32 Table 18-L Inspection of Completed Flood Control Projects.. ........... 18-33 Table 18-M Flood Control Work Under Special Special Authorization........... 18-34 18-1 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS FOR CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR 2000 Navigation - Locks and Dams 1. ALLEGHENY RIVER, PA Location. The Allegheny River is 321 miles long. It rises in northern Pennsylvania, flows northwestward into New York, thence generally southwestward to Pittsburgh, PA, where it joins with Monongahela River to form the Ohio. (See Geological Survey Charts for western Pennsylvania and southwestern New York.) Existing project. The project consists of eight locks and dams to afford slack-water navigation for a length of 72 miles from Pittsburgh, PA to above East Brady, PA. Controlling depth through canalized portion is 9 feet at normal pool level. Channel width varies from a minimum of 200 feet to full width of river at mouth. Existing project is complete, the last lock, No. 9, was placed in service in 1938. All locks and dams are in fair condition. Navigation channel has been widened at certain points and, in general, maintained to project depth, thus affording adequate depth for passage of commercial tows. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. City of Pittsburgh constructed a modern wharf for river freight. There are numerous privately maintained terminals and docks, consisting of tipples, various types of hoists, chutes, and pipelines for use in loading and unloading coal, stone, sand, gravel, petroleum products, steel products, and other commodities. Transshipment of freight between river and railroads is handled at privately owned river-to-rail terminals. Existing private terminals are adequate for shipments and receipt in Pittsburgh District of type of commerce now in existence. Operations & Maintenance, General. During FY 00 a major maintenance and repair contract was awarded and a major supply contract was awarded; Electrical and Mechanical Rehabilitation and Concrete Repairs at Lock 5 at a cost of $3,983,632, and Supply Lock Operating Equipment at a base cost of $919,980. Contracts will be accomplished in FY 01. 2. CONSTRUCTION OF LOCKS AND DAMS, OHIO RIVER See this heading under Ohio River portion. 3. MONONGAHELA RIVER, PA AND WV Location. Formed by junction of Tygart and West Fork Rivers about 1 mile south of Fairmont, WV, and flows northerly for 128.7 miles to its junction with Allegheny River, forming Ohio River at Pittsburgh, PA (See Geological Survey Charts for southwestern Pennsylvania and northern West Virginia.) Previous project. For details see Annual Report for 1963, page 1070. Existing project. Provides for improvement of river by 9 locks and dams to afford slack-water navigation for its entire length from Pittsburgh to above Fairmont, WV. Original locks and dams 7, 8 and 9 were replaced by new locks and dams 7 and 8 in 1925. Increased traffic necessitated enlargement and improvement of locks and dams 1 to 6 between Pittsburgh and Rices Landing, PA, by building two parallel chambers and fixed concrete dams during 1905 and 1932. Locks and dam 1 were eliminated in 1938 by raising Emsworth Dam, Ohio River. Reconstruction of lock 2 was completed in 1953 to provide two modern navigation chambers. The existing locks and dam 2 were originally completed in 1907; major modifications were made in 1923 and 1924, and in 1926 the upper guard and guide walls were extended. Construction of Maxwell locks and dam and the reconstruction of dam 4 have allowed for removal of obsolete locks and dams 5 and 6. Small and antiquated original locks and dams 10 to 15, inclusive, have been replaced by three modern structures. Morgantown lock and dam, initial step in replacement program, was completed in 1950 replacing locks and dams 10 and 11. Hildebrand lock and dam, next upstream, was completed in 1959 replacing locks and dams 12 and 13. Raising crest of dam 8 was also completed in 1959 as part of upper river improvement and eliminates restricted depth in upper reach of pool. Opekiska lock and dam was completed in 1967 replacing locks and dams 14 and 15. Completion of this link in upper river replacement program provides for entire river length of minimum channel depth of 9 feet, varying in width from a minimum of 250 feet to practically full width at mouth. Locks and dam 3 showed advanced stages of deterioration and, because of its strategic location and its importance to industry throughout the Greater Pittsburgh area and the nation, emergency remedial work had to be done in 1977. Major rehabilitation of locks and dam 3 was completed on Oct. 27, 1980. The Water Resources Development Act of 1986 authorized the replacement of Lock and Dam 7 with Grays Landing Lock and Dam and the construction of a new lock landward of the existing lock at Lock and Dam 8 (renamed Point Marion Lock and Dam). In accordance with the provisions of this act, 50% of the total cost of construction for the Grays Landing and Point Marion projects was derived from the Inland Waterways Trust Fund. Construction of a new lock at Point Marion was competed and put into service in December 1993. Construction of a new lock at Grays Landing was completed and put into service in May 1993. Construction of the dam at Grays Landing was completed in December 1995. Local cooperation. None required. Terminal facilities. City of Pittsburgh constructed a modern wharf for freight. Boat landings are maintained by some municipalities along the river. A large number of tipples at mines and various types of hoists at manufacturing plants and sand and gravel supply companies are maintained for private use in loading and unloading coal, coke, billets, steel products, sand, gravel, and other commodities. These terminals and docks are not available for general commerce. A number of docks and pipelines are also privately maintained for petroleum and acid products. Marine ways are maintained by some of the larger industries. These are also several terminals for rail-toriver and river-to-rail transfer. Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations during fiscal year. New Work: Construction of the new Grays Landing dam was completed 18-2 PITTSBURGH, PA., DISTRICT in December 1995 at an approximate cost of $25,000,000. Construction of the lock was completed in May, 1993 at a contract cost of approximately $80,000,000. Removal of the old fixed crest dam and river lock wall at Lock and Dam 7 was completed in FY 96 at a cost of $2,800,000. Work continues on cultural resources and the acquisition of real estate for the remainder of the project. The present project consists of 84 acres of fee land and 403.3 acres of easement. The estimated total cost of the project, which is scheduled to be complete in September 2000, is $181,000,000. Construction of the new lock for the Point Marion Project was completed in December, 1993 at a cost of $78,800,000. Land acquired for the project consists of 58 acres of fee land and 77.4 acres of easement. The estimated total cost of the Point Marion project is $111,700,000. Approximately $300,000 of closeout work remains to be completed and two outstanding contractor claims must be resolved. The Water Resources Development Act of 1992 authorized the District to proceed with navigation improvements on the Lower Monongahela River. The project included replacement of the fixed crest dam at Locks and Dam 2 with a gated dam, raising the existing Pool 2 by 5 feet; elimination of Locks and Dam 3, lowering the existing Pool 3 by 3.2 feet; and the construction of twin 84' x 720' locks at Locks and Dam 4. The changes in pool elevations will adversely affect numerous municipally-owned facilities, which the Corps will adjust at project cost. The total estimated fully funded cost of the project is $705 M, consisting of $352.5 M from Construction, General Appropriations from the US Treasury and $352.5 M from the Inland Waterways Trust Fund. Preconstruction, Engineering and Design activities were initiated in January 1992 and were concluded in September 1994. The FY 1995 Energy and Water Development Appropriation Act provided $8 M for the project, of which $4.1 M was in the Construction, General Appropriation, which allowed construction to begin, consisting of modifications to the Locks 2 auxiliary chamber floodway bulkhead; this work is complete. In February 1996, a $606 K contract was awarded for the procurement of 750 tons of PS31 sheet pile for the renovation and extension of the Locks 2 Upper Guardwall. In April 1996, a $3.4 M contract was awarded for this upper guardwall work; it was completed in November 1997. The FY 1998 Appropriations Act contained $12.7 M for the project, which allowed for the award of the construction contract for new abutments for the new gated Braddock Dam. This $13 M contract to Brayman Construction began in March 1998. The FY 1999 Appropriation of $26.5 M allowed for the timely completion of the abutments construction and for the award of the second and main contract for the in-the-wet construction of the new Braddock Dam. On 22 December 1998, the District issued a Request for Proposal for the construction of the new Braddock Dam. On 1 July 1999, the District awarded a $107 M contract to the Joint Venture of J.A. Jones Construction Company and Traylor Bros., Inc. to construct the new Braddock Dam. The Notice to Proceed was issued on 30 July 1999, and construction is currently proceeding on the base of the dam, which is being constructed in two large segments at a remote 30-acre fabrication site at Leetsdale Industrial Park along the Ohio River. In May 2000, a contract for dredging Pool 3 between River Miles 40-41 was awarded to GASA, Inc. for $6.4 M. This phase of dredging is scheduled to be completed in March 2001. In June 2000, the District awarded a $5.2 M contract to Alan Stone Co., Inc. to construct submerged upstream training dikes for the new Charleroi Locks. Completion of this work is scheduled for March 2001. As with FY 2000, the FY 2001 Appropriation will continue to fund the Braddock Dam construction, the dredging of Pool 3, the design and construction phases of the federally funded relocations effort, and the design of the new Charleroi Locks. The overall Lower Mon project is scheduled for completion in FY 2008. Operations and Maintenance, General. Major work accomplished by Government hired labor was the Renovation of the Land Wall Emptying Valve at Lock 4 ($536,105); the renovation of the River Wall Filling Valve at Maxwell ($685,635); the replacement of the River Wall Filling Valve and River Wall Emptying Valve at Lock 2 ($486,463); the rehab of the Maxwell Tainter Valve at PEWARS ($111,828). Work accomplished by contracts included an Indefinite Delivery Contract to Fabricate Tainter Valve for Opekiska ($168,000); an Indefinite Delivery Contract to Fabricate Butterfly Valves for the Mon River (177,495); a contract award for Stream Bank Protection at Point Marion ($1,760,624); and contract award to Install Auxiliary Crane at Morgantown & Hildebrand ($617,464). 4. OPEN-CHANNEL WORK, OHIO RIVER See this heading under Ohio River portion. 5. TYGART LAKE, WV Location. Tygart Lake is located on the Tygart River in Taylor and Barbour Counties, northcentral WV. The lake is approximately 26 road miles due east of Clarksburg, WV and 30 road miles south of Morgantown. The dam is situated 22.7 river miles above the mouth of the Tygart River at Fairmont, or 2.25 miles upstream from Grafton, WV, and about 78 miles south of Pittsburgh, PA. (See Geological Survey Charts for Fairmont, Thornton, and Belington, WV.) Existing project. A reservoir for low water regulation and flood control. Dam is concrete gravity type with an uncontrolled center spillway flanked by abutment sections joining valley sides. Project was authorized by Public Works Administration January 11, 1934, and adopted by 1935 River and Harbor Act. For further project description see Annual Report for 1962. Authorized project is complete. Reservoir is in operation for low water control in Monongahela River and for purpose of flood protection in Monongahela and Ohio Valleys. Construction of dam was started in 1935 and placed in operation in 1938. Present project lands consist of 2,662.9 acres in fee, flowage easements over 1,216.9 acres and 1,731.9 acres of other easements. Local cooperation. The State of West Virginia has assumed responsibility for the development and operation of hunting and fishing areas as well as the Tygart 18-3 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS FOR CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR 2000 Lake State Park. Controlled releases for downstream navigation and recreation are also coordinated with others to the extent feasible. No local cooperation is required at completed project; however, future recreational developments are subject to certain conditions of non-Federal cost-sharing under Federal Water Project Recreation Act of 1965. A cost-sharing agreement was executed with the West Virginia Department of Recreation in May 1981. Licenses. The Federal Energy Regulatory Commission granted a license to the City of Grafton for construction of a non-Federal hydropower facility at this project (FERC license 7307). Details of the design and other issues are still being finalized. The deadline for the start of project construction expired on April 15, 1995; however, the developer has requested an extension. Operations during fiscal year. Operations and Maintenance, General: Reservoir was operated for benefit of flood control and low water regulation, as required, and project structures were operated and maintained in a serviceable condition throughout the year. Estimated flood control benefits achieved by this reservoir for FY 00 were $44,222,000; total benefits through September 30, 2000, revised to reflect damages prevented in downstream districts as well as Pittsburgh District, were $1,070,911,000. Activities under reservoir management program comprising sanitation measures, conservation, land management, and operation and maintenance of public-use facilities continued. This work was limited in scope as the State of West Virginia has jurisdiction over most of the recreation in the reservoir area. Tygart Dam was selected as a Dam Safety Assurance Project in March 1996. The Evaluation Report was initiated in March 1994 to address spillway capacity and structural stability in relation to the probable maximum flood event. Findings of the report concluded that under present conditions, the probable maximum flood would overtop the dam and cause failure. The report recommends protecting the dam from failure to include downstream erosion protection and stilling basin modifications. The Design Memorandum was completed in September 1998 and Plans and Specifications were completed in July 1999. The construction contract was advertised in August 1999 and awarded to Joseph B. Fay Co. on 28 September 1999 for $5,628,929. The Notice to Proceed was issued in October 1999 and $1.8 M (32%) of the scheduled work was completed and paid to the contractor during FY 00. The remainder of the work is to be completed in FY 01. The project features include construction of a new road to provide access to the left bank abatement of the dam, new concrete channels consisting of a concrete wall (end sill) and concrete slope paving on the downstream side of the dam, new concrete lagging retaining walls on the left and right banks of the dam, modification of the existing parapet wall, and minor repairs to the roadway decking. An $182,201 A/E contract for the E&D of a replacement bulkhead hoist and slide gate rehab was awarded in FY 00. 6. OTHER AUTHORIZED NAVIGATION PROJECTS See Table 18-C on other authorized navigation projects. Flood Control - Local Protection 7. ELKINS, WV Location. On Tygart River in north-central Randolph County, WV, about 155 miles south of Pittsburgh, PA. It is at downstream end of a long, broad reach of upper Tygart Valley, about 75 miles above mouth of river. (See Geological Survey Chart for Elkins, WV). Existing project. Provides flood protection by diverting flood discharges from upstream arm of loop of natural river channel into an artificial cutoff channel, thereby bypassing City of Elkins. Improvement is designed to accommodate discharges equivalent to maximum flood of reasonable expectancy. Project construction was started in May 1946 and completed in May 1949. Completed works, except that portion of.channel maintained by Federal Government, has been operated and maintained by City of Elkins since March 31, 1949. Present project lands consist of 32.04 acres in fee and 526.01 acres in easements. Project was authorized by 1938 Flood Control Act. For further project description see Annual Report for 1962, page 1222. Federal cost of completed project was $1,772,627; estimated non-Federal cost for lands, easements, and rights-of-way was $40,000. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Operations during fiscal year. Operation and maintenance, general: Routine investigations and inspections were made. Project was last inspected in October 1997. Flood damages prevented through FY 99 were estimated to be $19,669,000. 8. JOHNSTOWN, PA Location. Project is located in southwestern Cambria County, PA, about 58 miles east of Pittsburgh, PA. It is in a deep and comparatively narrow valley at junction of Stoney Creek and Little Conemaugh River, which unite to form Conemaugh River. (See Geological Survey Chart for Johnstown, PA.) Existing project. Provides for increased channel capacity by enlarging and realigning channels and protecting banks with concrete pavement. Improvement designed to accommodate discharges equivalent to those of March 1936 flood, maximum natural flow of record, minimum of overbank flow and to practically eliminate damages therefrom. Project construction began in August 1938 and was completed in November 1943. Footer protection for Unit 4 was completed in November 1949. Present project lands consist of easements over 199 acres. Project was authorized by Flood Control Acts of 1936 and 1937. For further project description see Annual Report for 1962, page 1215. Local cooperation. The rules of local cooperation for the rehabilitation of the existing project are governed by the FY 91 Energy and Water Resources Appropriations Act. Pursuant to this Act, the City of Johnstown will have a limited role in securing the needed rights of access to non-federal structures included in the line of protection and will hold and save the United States from damages due to construction or operation and maintenance of the work on the non-federal structures, except for damages 18-4 PITTSBURGH, PA., DISTRICT due to the fault or negligence of the United States or its contractors. Operations during fiscal year. Operations and maintenance, general: The FY 1991 Energy and Water Resources Development Appropriations Act authorized and directed the Corps to undertake a major rehabilitation of the existing project. The Project Design Memorandum was approved in June 1995. The major rehabilitation work is to be accomplished under the Construction, General appropriation at an estimate cost of $32.5 million. Contract plans and specifications were initiated in July 1995. Four of six construction contracts were awarded through September 1999. The fifth of six construction contracts could be awarded in July 2001, but is dependant on the Operations & Maintenance funds availability. The project is scheduled to be physically complete in April 2003. The Construction, General work consists of the repair of 54 exisiting wall sections, slope paving and replacement of balustrade (safety) wall. Also included in the major rehabilitation is all the necessary Operation and Maintenance funded. work. The O&M work estimated to cost $8.3 M consists of concrete spall repairs, slope paving joint repairs, sediment removal and miscellaneous repairs. Through FY 00 $22.5 M CG and $4.3 M O&M has been expended. Flood damages prevented by the project through September 30, 2000 were estimated to be $802,916,000. 9. PUNXSUTAWNEY, PA Location. Borough of Punxsutawney is on Mahoning Creek in Jefferson County, PA, about 85 miles northeast of Pittsburgh, PA. It is on a comparatively wide, alluvial flood plain about 52 miles above mouth of stream and 30 miles above Mahoning Creek flood control dam. (See Geological Survey Charts for Punxsutawney and Smicksburg, PA.) Existing project. Provides flood protection by channel enlargement, dikes, and walls. Improvement is designed to accommodate discharges 20% greater than that of maximum flood of record. Construction was accomplished by construction of four units. Construction started in May 1946 and was completed in June 1950. Present project lands consist of perpetual easements over 72.6 acres. Completed works, except that portion of channel maintained by the Federal Government have been operated and maintained by Borough of Punxsutawney since July 31, 1950. Project was authorized by 1938 Flood Control Act. For further project description see Annual Report for 1962, page 1209. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Operations during fiscal year. Operations and maintenance, general. Operation Activities continued and routine investigations and inspections were made. Survey cross sections were taken at Unit 1 in preparation of sediment removal. Total flood damages prevented through FY 00 were estimated to be $72,002,000. 10. SAW MILL RUN, PITTSBURGH, PA Location: The project is located within the City of Pittsburgh, Allegheny County, at Ohio River Mile 0.7 and traverses upstream from the mouth of Saw Mill Run approximately 4,700 L.F. Existing Project: The proposed project was authorized in WRDA of 1986 in accordance with the Chief of Engineers report dated 30 January 1978. The WRDA 1996 increased the project estimate to $12,780,000, the current project estimate in 1994 dollars. In FY 97 this project was included in the FY 97 appropriations as a new construction start. Local Cooperation: The City of Pittsburgh is the local sponsor for this project and is responsible for real estate acquisition and relocation design and construction. The project will be cost shared 75% Federal and 25% non-federal in accordance with the requirements of WRDA 86. Operations during fiscal year: In October 1997, a Project Cooperation Agreement was executed with the City of Pittsburgh. In June 1998, the District executed a Memorandum of Agreement (MOA) for the purpose of allowing the District to acquire the real estate and complete relocation work on behalf of the city. With the MOA executed and the funds for this effort transferred to the District in July 1998, real estate acquisition was initiated, and is currently scheduled to be completed in May 2000. In FY 99, the District continued with the preparation of Plans and Specifications for the project. Plans and Specifications are scheduled to be completed in May 2000. The construction contract is currently scheduled for advertisement in May 2000. 11. SOUTH CENTRAL, PA ENVIRONMENT IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM Location. Projects under this program in the Pittsburgh District are located in the South Central PA counties ofAllegheny, Armstrong, Cambria, Fayette, Indiana, Somerset and Westmoreland. Existing Projects. Section 313 authorizes the Secretary of the Army to establish a pilot program to provide design and construction assistance to non-Federal interests in south central Pennsylvania. The following projects were authorized under Section 313 of the Water Resources Development Act of 1992. The Forest Hills Municipal Authority (FHMA) project consists of the fast track planning, design and construction of a wastewater treatment plant, pump substations, interceptor lines and collection systems. The treatment system provides service to four boroughs and five townships. The total project cost is estimated at $40,300,000 ($13,150,000 Federal cost, $27,150,000 non-Federal cost). The Burrell Township Sanitary Authority project consists of the installation of gravity sanitary sewers and pump stations. The total project cost is estimated at $4,700,000 ($1,750,000 Federal cost, $2,950,000 non-Federal cost). The Blacklick Valley Municipal Authority project consists of the installation of potable water transmission and distribution lines. The total project cost is estimated at $2,750,000 ($1,450,000 Federal cost, $1,300,000 non-Federal cost). The Redstone Township Sewer Authority project consists of the design of a wastewater treatment plant and conveyance system. The total project cost is estimated at $626,000 ($500,000 Federal cost, $126,000 non-Federal cost). The Westmoreland County Industrial Development Corporation project consists of 18-5 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS FOR CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR 2000 waterline and sanitary sewer extensions. The total project cost is estimated at $700,000 ($450,000 Federal cost, $250,000 non-Federal cost). The Indiana County Municipal Services Authority (ICMSA) will be the sponsor for the White Township project which consists of construction of a wastewater treatment plant, interceptor sewer, sanitary sewer extension and upgrade of an existing pump station. The total project cost is estimated at $5,720,000 ($1,000,000 Federal cost, $4,720,000 non-Federal cost). The East Huntingdon Township project consists of construction of a new 250,000 GPD sewage treatment plant, interceptor and collector sewers. The total project cost is estimated at $5,900,000 ($4,200,000 Federal, cost, $1,700,000 non-Federal cost). The Somerset County Economic Development Council project consists of upgrading the infrastructure and utilities backbone of the Somerset Industrial Park Facility. The total project cost is estimated at $550,000 ($380,000 Federal cost, $170,000 non-Federal cost). The Redevelopment Authority of the County of Westmoreland project consists of providing an additional 50,000 GPD sewage treatment plant, extending sewer and waterlines and providing a water booster pump station. The total project cost is estimated at $650,000 ($375,000 Federal cost, $275,000 non-Federal cost). The Municipal Authority of Portage will be the sponsor for the Cassandra Borough project which consists of replacement of the Ben's Creek interconnect line and the replacement of the Borough of Cassandra's water system. The total project cost is estimated at $1,400,000 ($1,000,000 Federal cost, $400,000 non-Federal cost). The Municipal Authority of the Borough of Cresson project consists of eliminating the raw sewage by-pass at the main pump station and upgrade and expand the existing treatment plant. The total project cost is estimated at $7,100,000 ($4,500,000 Federal cost, $2,600,000 non-Federal cost). The Ligonier Borough Council project consists of replacement of the vitrified clay pipe collection system. The total project cost is estimated at $800,000 ($720,000 Federal cost, $80,000 non-Federal cost). The Cambria Somerset Authority project consists of the rehabilitation of deteriorating sections of the pipeline which feeds commercial industries in and around the city of Johnstown, Pa. The total project cost is estimated at $334,380 ($250,785 Federal cost, $83,595 non-Federal cost). The Armstrong County project consists of the separation of the combined sewer outflow in the town of New Bethlehem. The total project cost is estimated at $960,000 ($463,000 Federal cost, $497,000 non-Federal cost). The Ohiopyle Borough project consists of rehabilitating and expanding the existing treatment plant to meet higher demands. The total project cost is estimated at $600,000 ($200,000 Federal cost, $400,000 non-Federal cost). The Georges Creek Municipal Authority project consists of the construction of a sewage treatment plant and collection system. The total project cost is estimated at $4,000,000 ($2,000,000 Federal costs and $2,000,000 non-Federal costs). The Kittanning-Plumcreek Water Authority project involves the design of 62,000 linear feet of waterline along route 422 from near Kittanning to the small village of Whitesburg, with several spurs along certain populated township roads which branch off route 422. Also required is a booster pumping station and a �250,000 gallon water storage tank. The total project cost is $280,000 ($210,000 Federal costs and $70,000 non-Federal costs). The Indiana County Municipal Services Authority has identified Armagh, Heilwood and Marion Center as areas in need of sanitary collection systems. The total estimated project costs are $6,500,000 ($1,500,000 Federal costs and $5,000,000 non-Federal costs). The Energy and Water Development Appropriations Act of 1999 specifically cited projects in Penn Hills, Shaler Township and Scott Township at a Federal cost of $500,000 for the design of much needed improvements in these areas. Additional projects identified for FY01 funding include New Bethlehem Phase 2, Whitesburg construction, Blacklick sewers, Quemahoning phase 2, National Pike Water Authority design, Fayette Business Park, Twin Lakes and Dunbar design only. Local Cooperation. Legislation requires the project to be cost shared at no more than 75% Federal funds and a minimum of 25% non-Federal funds. Project Cooperation Agreements are executed between the Corps of Engineers and the Non-Federal Sponsors. Sanitary Authority is required prior to design and construction efforts. Operation and maintenance of the project will be at 100% non-Federal cost. Operations during fiscal year. Construction PCA's were executed for Armagh, Heilwood and Marion Center, Cassandra, Cresson, Ligonier, New Bethlehem, Ohiopyle, Smithfield and Westmoreland Business and Research Park projects on 18 September 2000, 18 September 2000, 21 September 2000, 24 July 2000, 24 July 2000, 24 July 2000, 27 September 2000 and 24 July 2000 respectively. Design PCA's were executed for Armagh, Heilwood and Marion Center, Cresson, New Bethlehem, Ohiopyle, Penn Hills, Quemahoning Phase 1, Scott, Shaler, Smithfield and Whitesburg projects on 10 November 1999, 9 March 2000, 9 February 2000, 20 March 2000, 26 September 2000, 9 August 2000, 20 March 2000, 4 April 2000 and 5 September 2000 respectively. Designs for the efforts are all underway and between 25% and 100% complete. PCA's will be submitted for the following projects in FY01: Patton design and construction, Whitesburg construction, New Bethlehem design and construction, Blacklick design and construction, Quemahoning Phase 2 design and construction, National Pike design, Fayette Business Park design and construction, Twin Lakes design and construction, and Dunbar design. 12. WEST VIRGINIA AND PENNSYLVANIA FLOOD CONTROL Location. Project under this program in the Pittsburgh District are located in the Tygart River Basin in West Virginia and the lower Allegheny River in Pennsylvania. The priority (named in the legislation) communities located in West Virginia are Phillipi and Belington. The priority communities in Pennsylvania are New Bethlehem, Clymer, Benson, Hooversville, Meyersdale, Connellsville and Dubois. Section 581 of the Water Resources Development Act of 1996 authorizes the Secretary of the Army to design and construct flood control measures for these priority communities at a level of pro- 18-6 PITTSBURGH, PA., DISTRICT tection sufficient to prevent future losses from flooding equivalent to that which occurred in January 1996, but at least no less than a 100 year level of protection. Project development will consist of developing a least cost plan including structural and/or non-structural elements, to provide the authorized level of protection without guard to a benefit/cost ratio. Local Cooperation. The reconnaisance phase is 100% Federally funded. The Detailed Project Report, Plans and Specifications and Construction phases are cost shared at 75% Federal funds and 25% Non-Federal funds. A Design Agreement is required to design efforts and a Project Cooperation Agreement (PCA) is required prior to the project construction. In September 1998, Director of Civil Works, HQUSACE, approved the District's request for a waiver of the up front cost sharing for the design portion of the West Virginia projects. The basis for the approval of the waiver was that the priority communities in West Virginia qualified for a reduced cost share (5%) based on the ability to pay provisions on Section 103(m) of the Water Resources Development Act of 1986. Operation during fiscal year. In Pennsylvania, the General Management Plans for the seven communities were completed in January 1999. Project Study Plans (PSP) for the seven communities was completed in July 2000. Design Agreements are being prepared and current plans call for the execution of these agreements pending the local sponsors' ability to obtain the Non-Federal cost share. Design Agreements will be submitted for the Meyersdale and Hooversville projects in FY01. In West Virginia, the PSPs for the two communities were completed in September of 1998 and approved in November 1998. Since no Design Agreement is required for these communities, work on the DPRs started in December 1998. The DPRs for the two communities remain under development. Least cost plans and Locally Preferred Plans for both communities have been developed. The DPRs are currently scheduled for completion in FY02. A decision to implement a Flood Warning System for the two communities as the first phase of the projects was made in September 1999. An interim DPR for the Flood Warning System was submitted in November 2000. Implementation of the Flood Warning System will follow execution of the Project Cooperation Agreement and is currently scheduled for completion in FY02. Flood Control - Reservoirs 13. BERLIN LAKE, OH Location. Dam is on Mahoning River about 73 miles above its confluence with Shenango River. It is about 10 miles above existing Milton Reservoir Dam and 35 miles upstream from Warren, Ohio. Reservoir is in Portage, Mahoning and Stark Counties, OH. (See Geological Survey charts for Warren, Ravenna, and Alliance, OH.) Existing project. A reservoir for flood control and water supply. Dam consists of a partially controlled, concrete gravity, center spillway flanked by rolled-earthfill abutment sections joining valley sides. Authorized project is complete and in operation for flood control and low Water regulation purposes in industrialized Mahoning Valley below. Construction of dam was started in January 1942 and completed in June 1943. Present project lands consists of 6,885.3 acres in fee and 1,098.7 acres in easements. For further project description, see Annual Report for 1962, page 1233. Local cooperation. None required at completed project; however, future recreational developments are subject to certain conditions of non-Federal cost-sharing under Federal Water Project Recreation Act of 1965. Operations during fiscal year. Operations and maintenance, general: Reservoir was operated as required and necessary repairs were made to structures and appurtenances. A contract for Construction of New Bridge Service in the amount of $2,985,994 was started in FY 98 and was completed in FY 00. $200,000 of an IDIQ construction services contract was utilized to pave roadways in the Mill Creek Recreation Area. The National Recreation Reservation Service (NRRS) was initiated at the Mill Creek Recreation Area during the FY 99 recreation season and went on-line in FY 00. Estimated flood control benefits achieved in FY 00 were $12,747,000; total benefits through September 2000, revised to reflect damages prevented in downstream districts as well as Pittsburgh District, were $493,482,000. Activities under reservoir management program comprising sanitation measures, conservation, land management, and operation and maintenance of public-use facilities continued. 14. CONEMAUGH RIVER LAKE, PA Location. Dam is on Conemaugh River in Indiana and Westmoreland Counties, PA, 7.5 miles above junction of Conemaugh River and Loyalhanna Creek, which form the head of the Kiskiminetas River. It is about 2 miles northeast of Tunnelton, PA, and about 42 miles east of Pittsburgh, PA. Reservoir is in Westmoreland and Indiana Counties, PA. (See Geological Survey Charts for Latrobe, New Florence, and Elders Ridge, PA.) Existing Project. A flood control reservoir dam of concrete gravity type with a gate-controlled center spillway flanked by abutment sections joining valley sides and an earth embankment ending in right abutment. Authorized project is complete. Reservoir system is designed for protection of Pittsburgh and reduction of flood heights in upper Ohio Valley, generally. Present project lands consist of 7608.7 acres in fee and 522.8 acres in easements. Project authorized by Flood Control Acts of 1936 and 1938. For further project description see Annual Report for 1962, page 1217. Local cooperation. None required by law. Licenses. A non-Federal hydropower project utilizing Conemaugh Lake was constructed downstream of the dam under FERC Licenses 3207. The 15-megawatt project began commercial operation on February 6, 1989. It is owned by National Renewable Resources, Inc. Operations during fiscal year. Operation and maintenance, general: Reservoir was operated for benefit of flood control as required, and necessary repairs were made to structures and appurtenances. The multi-year rehabilitation of the dam electrical system by in-house personnel is 75% completed. Estimated flood control benefits achieved by this reservoir for FY 00 were 18-7 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS FOR CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR 2000 $5,291,000; total flood control benefits through September 2000, revised to reflect damages prevented in downstream districts as well as Pittsburgh District, were $1,523,412,000. Activities under reservoir management program comprising sanitation measures, conservation, land management and operation and maintenance of public use facilities were continued. A real estate license and a cooperating association agreement with the Conemaugh Valley Conservancy for construction of a 3.5 mile hiking /biking trail were sign in FY 00. 15. CROOKED CREEK LAKE, PA Location. Dam is on Crooked Creek 6.7 miles above junction of creek with Allegheny River near Ford City, PA, and about 32 miles northeast of Pittsburgh, PA. (See Geological Survey Charts for Freeport and Elders Ridge, PA.) Existing project. A flood control reservoir dam of earth-fill type with separate uncontrolled saddle spillway and tunnel outlet works. Authorized project is complete. Reservoir is in operation as a unit of a coordinated reservoir system designed for protection of Pittsburgh and reduction of flood heights in upper Ohio Valley, generally. Construction of dam was started in March 1938 and completed in October 1940. Present project lands consist of 2,561.7 acres in fee and 100.22 acres in easements. Project was authorized by Flood Control Acts of 1936 and 1938. For further project description see Annual Report for 1962, page 1213. Local cooperation. None required by law. Operations during fiscal year. Operations and maintenance, general: Reservoir was operated for benefit of flood control, as required, and necessary repairs were made to structures and appurtenances. Estimated flood control benefits achieved by this reservoir for FY 00 were $10,000; total benefits achieved through September 2000, revised to reflect damages prevented in downstream districts as well as Pittsburgh District, were estimated at $286,320,000. Activities under reservoir management program comprising sanitation measures, conservation, land management, and operation and maintenance of public-use facilities continued. 16. EAST BRANCH, CLARION RIVER LAKE, PA Location. Dam is in Elk County, PA on East Branch of Clarion River above Middle Fork, 7.3 miles above junction of East and West branches of Clarion River at Johnsonburg, PA, and about 105 miles northeast of Pittsburgh, PA. Reservoir is in Elk County, PA. (See Geological Survey Chart for Mount Jewett, PA.) Existing project. A reservoir for flood control and low-water regulation. Dam is rolled-earthfill type with gate-controlled concrete tunnel under right abutment and a paved uncontrolled spillway on left abutment slope. Authorized project is complete. Reservoir is in operation for low-water regulation purposes in Clarion River Valley below and for flood control as a unit ofa coordinated reservoir system for protection of Pittsburgh and upper Ohio Valley, generally. Construction of dam was started in June 1947 and completed in July 1952. Present project lands consist of 287.2 acres in fee and 1,296.7 acres in easements. Project was selected for construction under general authorization for Ohio River Basin in Flood Control Acts of 1938 and 1944. For further project description see Annual Report for 1962, page 1206. Local Cooperation. None required by law. Operations during fiscal year. Operations and maintenance, general: Reservoir was operated for flood control and low-water regulation, as required; and necessary repairs were made to structures and appurtenances. IDIQ Construction Service Contracts for $128,730 were utilized to pave gravel roads in the campground and to resurface parking lots adjacent to the main access road. Volunteers continued to apply limestone sand to tributary streams in an effort to neutralize acid mine drainage into the lake. In 2000 under a Cost Share Agreement between the District, US Forest Service, Willamette Industries, and utilizing labor from the Federal Bureau of Prisons, the District began a modernization program in the campground. Camp sites were redesigned and enlarged and 50 amp electrical hookups were installed. This work will continue in FY 01. Estimated flood control benefits achieved in FY 00 were $6,000; total benefits through September 30, 2000, revised to include damages prevented in downstream districts as well as Pittsburgh District were $73,789,000. Some reservoir management activity was performed throughout the year comprising sanitation measures, conservation, land management and operation of public-use facilities. 17. KINZUA DAM AND ALLEGHENY RESERVOIR, PA AND NY Location. Dam site is on Allegheny River 9 miles above Warren, PA, and 198 miles above mouth of river at Pittsburgh, PA. Reservoir is in Warren and McKean Counties, PA., and Cattaraugus County, NY. (See Geological Survey Charts for Warren and Kinzua, PA-NY, and Randolph and Salamanca, NY.) Existing project. Reservoir provides flood control, low water regulation, and recreation. Dam consists of a combination concrete gravity structure and rolled earth embankment with gate-controlled spillway and discharge conduits controlled by slide-gates in gravity section. Construction of project, initiated in February 1960, is complete. Construction of dam was started in September 1960 and completed in December 1965. Development of recreation area at Onoville under a cost-sharing agreement with Cattaragus County was completed in June 1978. Present project lands consist of 2,646 acres in fee and easements over 22,420.0 acres. For further details see Annual Report for 1962, page 1202. Project was authorized by Flood Control Acts of 1936, 1938 and 1941. Local cooperation. None required by law. Licenses. The Federal Power Commission granted a license to Pennsylvania Electric Company and Cleveland Electric Illuminating Company on December 28, 1965, for thejoint construction, operation and maintenance of a 325-megawatt pumped-storage installation (FPC Project No. 2280). The project is complete. Operations during fiscal year. Operations andmaintenance, general: Reservoir was operated forbenefit of flood control and low water regulation, as re- 18-8 PITTSBURGH, PA., DISTRICT quired, and necessary repairs were made to structures andappurtenances. Estimated flood control benefits achievedby this reservoir through September 30, 2000, revised to include damages prevented in downstream districts aswell as Pittsburgh District, were $948,145,000. Activities under reservoir management program comprising sanitation measures, conservation, land management, and operation and maintenance of public-use facilities continued. 18. LOWER GIRARD DAM, OH Location. Lower Girard Lake(formerly called Liberty Lake)is located in the northeast section of Ohio in Trumbull County in the City of Girard which lies just northwest of the City of Youngstown, Ohio. Lower Girard Lake Dam is located on Squaw Creek approximately 5,000 feet downstream of Girard Lake and approximately 2 miles upstream from Squaw Creek's confluence with the Mahoning River. Existing Project. Lower Girard Lake together with Girard Lake, located immediately upstream, is a system of water supply reservoirs that was constructed in 1917 and operated by the Ohio Water Service Company to provide process water to local steel mills and industry. The Lower and Upper Girard Dams were purchased by the City of Girard from the Consumer Ohio Water Company in 1995. The dam is an Ambersen type buttress dam. It has been determined that the dam requires rehabilitation to meet modern dam safety standards. Local Cooperation. The City of Girard, Ohio is the non-Federal sponsor for this project. The City owns the dam and the lake impounded by it. A Design Agreement was executed in July 1998 with cost-sharing for the design portion set at 75% Federal and 25% by the City. Operations during the fiscal year. In WRDA 1998 Congressman Traficant added $2.5 M for the Corps to investigate the safety of, and rehabilitate the Lower Girard Dam. The "Special Report and Environmental Assessment" recommended a rehabilitation plan to bring the dam up to present safety standards. Total cost for design and rehabilitation is estimated at $9.6 M. In FY 2000 Plans and Specifications were initiated and are approximately 60% complete. 19. LOYALHANNA LAKE, PA Location. Dam is on Loyalhanna Creek, 4.5 miles above junction of creek with Conemaugh River at Saltsburg, PA, and about 29 miles east of Pittsburgh, PA. Reservoir is in Westmoreland County PA. (See Geological Survey Chart for Latrobe, PA). Existing project. A flood control reservoir dam of concrete gravity type with a gate-controlled center spillway flanked by abutment sections joining valley sides, and an earth embankment section ending in left abutment. Authorized project is complete. Reservoir is in operation as a unit of a coordinated reservoir system designed for protection of Pittsburgh and reduction of flood heights in upper Ohio Valley, generally. Construction of dam was started in October 1939 and completed in June 1942. Present project lands consist of 3,330.8 acres in fee and easements over 86.7 acres. Project was authorized by Flood Control Acts of 1936 and 1938. For further project description see Annual Report for 1962, page 1219. Local cooperation. None required by law. Operations during fiscal year. Operations and maintenance, general: Reservoir was operated for benefit of flood control, as required, and necessary repairs were made to structures and appurtenances. Estimated flood control benefits achieved by this reservoir for FY 00 were $8,000; total benefits through September 2000, revised to reflect damages prevented in downstream districts as well as Pittsburgh District, were $320,186,000. Activities under reservoir management program comprising sanitation measures, conservation, land management and operation and maintenance of public-use facilities continued. 20. MAHONING CREEK LAKE, PA Location. Dam is on Mahoning Creek in Armstrong County, PA, 22.9 miles above junction of creek with Allegheny River. It is about 6.50 miles southeast of New Bethlehem, PA, and about 51 miles northeast of Pittsburgh, PA. Reservoir is in Armstrong, Indiana, and Jefferson Counties, PA. (See Geological Survey Charts for Rural Valley.and Smicksburg, PA). Existing project. A flood control reservoir dam of concrete gravity type with a gate-controlled center spillway flanked by abutment sections joining valley sides. Authorized project is complete. Reservoir is in operation as a unit of a coordinated reservoir system designed for protection of Pittsburgh and reduction of flood heights in upper Ohio Valley, generally. Construction of dam started in February 1939 and was completed in June 1941. Present project lands consist of 2,519.36 acres in fee and easements over 83.5 acres. Project was authorized by Flood Control Acts of 1936 and 1938. For further project description see Annual Report for 1962, page 1210. Operations during fiscal year. Operations and maintenance, general: Reservoir was operated for benefit of flood control, as required, and necessary repairs were made to structures and appurtenances. Roads and parking areas at the Dam Site area were re-surfaced in FY 00 for $60,247 under a construction services IDIQ contract. Estimated flood damages prevented by this project for FY 00 were $13,000; total benefits through September 30, 2000, revised to reflect damages pre- vented in downstream districts as well as Pittsburgh District, were $429,088,000. Activities under reservoir management program comprising sanitation measures, conservation, land management and operation and maintenance for public-use facilities continued. 21. MICHAEL J. KIRWAN DAM AND RESERVOIR, OH Location. Dam site is on West Branch of Mahoning River which joins Mahoning River at Newton Falls, OH. It is 11 miles above mouth of branch and about 15 miles upstream from Warren, OH. Reservoir is in Portage County, OH. (See Geological Survey Charts for Ravenna, Garrettsville, Chagrin Falls, and Kent, OH.) 18-9 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS FOR CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR 2000 Existing project. Reservoir provides flood control, low-water regulation and recreation. Dam consists of a rolled-earth embankment structure with gate-controlled outlet works and an uncontrolled side-hill spillway through left abutment. Authorized project is completed and in operation for flood control and low water regulation purposes. Present project lands consist of 6,298.9 acres fee and easements over 27.9 acres. For further description see Annual Report for 1962, page 1231 (West Branch Reservoir, Mahoning River, Ohio). Project was authorized by 1958 Flood Control Act (H. Doc. 191, 85th Cong. 1st sess.), with local contribution requirements modified by Flood Control Act of 1960. Federal costs of completed project is $17,370,000. Local interests contributed $3,230,000 during period of construction bringing initial project cost to $20,600,000. The State of Ohio has a lease from the Secretary of the Army for development and operation of recreation facilities in the reservoir area. Local cooperation. Local interests must contribute $5,200,000 for water pollution abatement and for municipal and industrial water supply purposes, of which $3,230,000 was paid in cash during construction. Unpaid balance at time project is placed in operation, $1,970,000, will be paid in cash at that time or on an annual basis. Of the unpaid balance of contributed funds due and payable, payment in full of Trumbull County's share in the amount of $663,040 has been received. Mahoning County elected to pay their share ($1,306,960) in 50 annual installments of $50,323.32, including interest. Operations during fiscal year. Operations and Maintenance, general: Reservoir was operated for benefit of flood control and low-flow augmentation, as required, and necessary repairs were made to structures and appurtenances. Estimated flood control benefits achieved by this project for this FY were $5,492,000. Total benefits for this reservoir through September 30, 2000 were $174,647,000. Activities under reservoir management program comprising sanitation measures, conservation, land management, and operation and maintenance of public-use facilities continued. This work was limited in scope as state of Ohio has jurisdiction over most of the recreation in reservoir area. 22. MOSQUITO CREEK LAKE, OH Location. Dam is on Mosquito Creek, 12.6 miles above junction of creek with Mahoning River at Niles, OH, and about 18 miles northwest of Youngstown, OH. (See Geological Survey Charts for Bristolville and Kinsman, OH, and Pennsylvania.) Existing project. A reservoir for flood control, lowwater regulation and water supply storage. Dam is rolled-earthfill type with outlet facilities through dam, and an uncontrolled natural wasteway to discharge overflow from reservoir. Authorized project is complete and in operation for flood control and low-water regulation purposes in industrialized Mahoning and Beaver Valleys below. Construction of dam was started in July 1943 and was ready for beneficial use in January 1944. Present project lands consist of 11,180.4 acres in fees and easements over 276.0 acres. State of Ohio has a license from Secretary of the Army for development and operation of recreation facilities in reservoir area. Project was selected for construction under general authorization for Ohio River Basin in 1938 Flood Control Act. For further project description see Annual Report for 1962, page 1228. Local cooperation. None required at completed project; however, future recreational developments are subject to certain conditions of non-Federal cost-sharing under Federal Water Project Recreation Act of 1965. Operations during fiscal year. Operation and maintenance, general: Reservoir was operated for benefit of flood control and low-flow regulation as required, and necessary repairs were made to structures and appurtenances. Estimated flood control benefits achieved by this project for this fiscal year were $1,982,000. Total flood control benefits for this reservoir through September 30, 2000 were $120,604,000. Activities under reservoir management program comprising sanitation measures, conservation, land management and operation and maintenance of certain public-use facilities continued. This work was limited in scope as State of Ohio has jurisdiction over most of the recreation in reservoir area. 23. OHIO RIVER BASIN (PITTSBURGH DISTRICT) Location. A series of dikes, floodwalls, channel improvements, and reservoirs/lakes in Ohio River Basin within Pittsburgh District. Existing project. Individual projects considered in comprehensive plan within Pittsburgh District. (See Tables 18-B, 18-E and 18-K on Acts authorizing existing projects, local protection projects and reservoirs.) Operations during fiscal year. New work: None by the United States except as stated in individual projects. Completed local protection projects operated and maintained by local interests, including those projects for which individual reports have been included. 24 SHENANGO RIVER LAKE, PA AND OH Location. Dam is on Shenango River about 0.8 mile above Sharpsville, PA, and about 33 miles above junction of river with Mahoning River, which unite near New Castle, PA, to form Beaver River. Reservoir is in Mercer County, PA and Trumbull County, Ohio. (See Geological Survey Chart for Kinsman, Ohio, and Shenango, PA.) Existing project. A reservoir for flood control, lowflow augmentation and recreation. Dam consists ofa concrete gravity structure with gate-controlled outlet works and an uncontrolled center spillway section. Authorized project is complete. Reservoir is in operation for lowwater regulation purposes in Shenango River valley below and for flood control as a unit of a coordinated reservoir system for protection of Shenango River valley and the Beaver and upper Ohio River Valley, generally. Construction of dam was started in March 1963 and completed in May 1965. Present project lands consists of 14,485.94 acres in fee and easements over 198 acres. Approximately 65.94 acres in abandoned railroad right-ofway were acquired for project use. Future work consists of completion of project lands of any additional recreation 18-10 PITTSBURGH, PA., DISTRICT facilities as required to serve the public needs. For further project description, see Annual Report for 1962, page 1230. Project was authorized by 1938 Flood Control Act. Local cooperation. None required by law. Operations during fiscal year. Operations and maintenance, general: Reservoir was operated for benefit of flood control and low-flow augmentation, as required, and necessary repairs were made to structures and appurtenances. A construction service IDIQ contract was utilized to resurface facility roads within the Shenango Recreation Area for $152,000. The National Recreation Service (NRRS) was initiated at the Shenango Recreation Area during the FY 99 recreation season and went online in FY 00. Estimated flood control benefits achieved through September 30, 2000 revised to reflect damages prevented in downstream districts as well as Pittsburgh District, were $99,824,000. Activities under reservoir management program comprising sanitation measures, conservation, land management and operation and maintenance continued. 25. STONEWALL JACKSON LAKE, WV Location. In Lewis County, North Central West Virginia, on the West Fork River, which joins the Tygart River at Fairmont, West Virginia to form the Monongahela River. Damsite is located at Brownsville, West Virginia, about 4 miles south of Weston and 72 miles above mouth of West Fork River at Fairmont, WV. (See Geological Survey Charts for Weston and Crawford, WV.) Existing project. Provides for construction of a reservoir for flood control, water supply, water quality control, area redevelopment and recreation. Dam is concrete gravity type, 95 feet high and 620 feet long. Outlet works consist of five multi-level sluices, spillway is uncontrolled. Storage capacity is 74,650 acre-feet controlling an area of 102 square miles.A station hydropower plant completed in 1995 supplies power to the dam and administration building, with excess power being sold to an electric utility company. Project was authorized by 1966 Flood Control Act. Estimated initial Federal cost for new work (1991) is $231,000,000 (includes an estimated $24,900,000 reimbursement by non-Federal interests.) Present project lands consist of 20,451 acres in fee and easements over 398 acres. Local cooperation. Local interests are required to make arrangements for repayment, under the provisions of the Water Supply Act of 1958, as amended, of that part of the construction cost and annual operation, maintenance and replacement costs allocated to municipal and industrial water supply, an amount presently estimated at $4,350,000 for construction; and $15,000 annually for operations, maintenance and replacements. Also, in accordance with Federal Water Project Recreation Act, local interests are required to administer project land and Water areas for recreation and fish and wildlife enhancement, pay, contribute in kind or repay (which may be through user fees) with interest, one-half of the separable first costs of the reservoir project allocated to recreation and fish and wildlife enhancement, an amount presently estimated at $24,810,000, bear all costs of operation, maintenance and replacement of recreation and fish and wildlife land and facilities, the amount involved being currently estimated on an average annual basis to be $457,000, exercise to the full extent of their legal capability, control against removal of streamflow made available for water quality control; and contribute to the control of pollution of streams subject to low-flow augmentation by adequate treatment or other methods of controlling wastes at their source. The requirements of Section 221 were amended in 1971 to exempt assurances for future demands for water supply pursuant to the Water Supply Act of 1958 from the contractual requirements of the Act. Accordingly, the city of Weston, West Virginia, has provided assurances that it will enter into a water supply contract with the Department of the Army within a period of time which will permit paying out the costs allocated to the water supply storage within the life of the project. A recreation cost-sharing contract, in accordance with the requirements of the Federal Water Project Recreation Act, P.L. 89-72, was executed by the State of West Virginia on March 27, 1977. Local cooperation assurances for recreation cost-sharing were executed by the Governor and Attorney General of West Virginia on May 29, 1973. In this connection, Section 8 of P.L. 92-222 deleted the requirement that the State of West Virginia "hold and save the United States free from damages resulting from water rights claims due to construction and operation of the project." Legislation relieving Stonewall Jackson Lake, WV, project of the requirements of Section 221, P.L. 96-611 was contained in Water Resources Development Act of 1974 signed by the President on March 7, 1974. Operations during fiscal year. New Work: The Corps worked with the State of WV to revise the Master Plan to incorporate higher revenue producing recreation facilities, including a lodge, golf course, cabins and camping. The revised Master Plan was approved by the Corps in 1992. The FY 1992 Energy and Water Development Appropriations Act allows the State cost-sharing credits for all of these facilities except the golf course. In March 1994, the State and the Assistant Secretary of the Army for Civil Works ASA (CW) executed an amendment to the 1977 Stonewall Jackson Lake Recreation Cost-Sharing Contract to reflect these credits. The State of West Virginia is to build the approved remaining recreation facilities within ten years of the executed amendment, or March 2004, in accordance with the timeframes and conditions set forth in the amended contract. The WV State Supreme Court has ruled to allow the sale of $6 million in revenue bonds for the construction. In 1996, the State issued a solicitation for interest and qualifications to create a public/private joint venture for the purpose of developing recreational facilities at Stonewall Jackson Lake Park. In October 1997, the State selected a private firm to design and build the remaining recreational facilities. Section 508 of the FY 1998 Energy and Water Appropriations Act provides for cost sharing credits for this public/private development against the current $21.5 million owed to the government by the State of WV. The contracted improvements are expected to be operational in the Spring of 2002. 18-11 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS FOR CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR 2000 Activities under reservoir management program comprising sanitation measures, conservation, land management, and operation and maintenance of public-use facilities continued. This work was limited in scope as State of West Virginia has jurisdiction over most of the recreation in reservoir area. Estimated flood control benefits achieved for this project for FY 2000 were $7,236,000; total flood control benefits through 30 September 2000, revised to include downstream districts, were $95,714,000. 26. TIONESTA LAKE, PA Location. Dam is on Tionesta Creek, 1.25 miles,above junction of creek with Allegheny River at Tionesta, PA, and about 78 miles northeast of Pittsburgh, PA. Reservoir is entirely in Forest County, PA. (See Geological Survey Charts for Tionesta, Tidioute and Sheffield, PA.) Existing project. A flood control reservoir dam of earthfill type with separate uncontrolled saddle spillway and tunnel outlet works. Authorized project is complete. Reservoir is in operation as a unit of a coordinated reservoir system designed for protection of Pittsburgh and reduction of flood heights in upper Ohio Valley, generally. Construction of dam was started in May 1938 and completed in January 1941. Present project lands consists of 2,794.77 acres in fee and easement over 13.1 acres. Approximately 2.53 acres of fee were disposed at the project. Future work consists of provision on project lands of additional recreational facilities as required to serve public needs. Project was authorized by Flood Control Acts of 1936 and 1938. For further project description see Annual Report for 1962, page 1203. Local cooperation. None required by law. Operations during fiscal year. Operation and maintenance general: Reservoir was operated for benefit of flood control and low-flow augmentation, as required, and necessary repairs were made to structures and appurtenances. The National Recreation Reservation Service (NRRS) was initiated at the Tionesta Recreation Area campground during the FY 99 recreation season and went on-line in FY 00. Estimated flood control benefits achieved by this project through September 30, 2000, revised to include downstream districts, were $419,517,000. Activities under reservoir management program comprising sanitation measures, conservation, land management and operation and maintenance of public-use facilities continued. 27. UNION CITY DAM, PA Location. In Erie County, northwestern Pennsylvania, on French Creek, a tributary of Allegheny River. Damsite is 24 miles upstream from Cambridge Springs, PA, and 41 miles upstream from Meadville, PA. (See Geological Survey Chart for Union City, PA - NY.) Existing project. A flood control reservoir dam of earth embankment non-gated type with uncontrolled side-channel spillway. Outlet works consist of a lower outlet located in valley floor constructed of reinforced concrete conduit 8 feet by 4.5 feet and an upper outlet consisting of an uncontrolled slot 9.5 feet wide through the north end of the ogee weir in the spillway. Dam is 1,420 feet long at top rising 88 feet above streambed and provides gross capacity of 47,640 acre-feet from a drainage area of 222 square miles. Project authorization was modified to provide for a conservation pool and addition of recreation facilities. On November 5, 1974, a referendum proposal was defeated by the constituents of Erie County in regard to the cost-sharing for construction of recreation facilities. In view of the foregoing, all action toward implementation of the authorized project modification was discontinued. Reservoir is operated as one of a two-reservoir system for reduction of flood stages in French Creek Basin between damsite and mouth, Allegheny River from Franklin, PA, to Pittsburgh, PA, inclusive, and upper Ohio River Valley. Initial highway relocations were completed in October 1968 and remaining highway relocations were completed in May 1972. Construction of the dam was started in July 1968 and completed in September 1971. Present project lands consist of 161.4 acres in fee and easements over 2,410.29 acres. Existing project was authorized by 1962 Flood Control Act. Local cooperation. Local interests are required to inform affected interests in French Creek Basin at least annually, that the system of reservoirs of which Union City Dam is a part, will not provide protection against maximum floods. On November 10, 1964 the Department of Forests and Waters of the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania furnished formal assurances of local cooperation in respect to notifying local interests at least annually that the system of reservoirs will not provide protection against maximum floods. A referendum on the ballot during the November 1974 election regarding the approval to cost-share the maintenance of a summer pool was defeated by the local voters. Operations during fiscal year. Operation and maintenance, general: Maintenance of the structure and appurtenances was performed as required. This dam acted as an uncontrolled detention type dam during the fiscal year. Estimated flood control benefits achieved for this project for FY 00 were $614,000. Total flood control benefits for this reservoir through September 30, 2000, revised to include downstream districts, were $46,660,000. 28. WOODCOCK CREEK LAKE, PA Location. In Crawford County, northwestern Pennsylvania, on Woodcock Creek, a tributary of French Creek. Damsite is about 4.1 miles above mouth of Woodcock Creek and about 5 miles northeast of Meadville, PA. (See Geological Survey Chart for Meadville, PA.) Existing project. A flood-control reservoir dam of rolled-earth embankment type, gate-controlled outlet works with a 6 foot-wide by 7.75 foot-high conduit and uncontrolled saddle spillway on the left abutment. Dam is 4,650 feet long at top rising 90 feet above streambed and provides for gross capacity of 20,000 acre-feet from a drainage area of46 square miles. Reservoir is operated as one of a two-reservoir system for reduction of flood stages in French Creek Basin between damsite and mouth. Allegheny River from Franklin, PA, to Pittsburgh, PA, inclusive, and upper Ohio River Valley. Authorized project is complete. Construction of dam was started in July 1970 and completed in July 1973. Land acquired for project 18-12 PITTSBURGH, PA., DISTRICT consists of 1,731.5 acres in fee and easements over .56 acres. Project was authorized for flood control and recreation by 1962 Flood Control Act. Storage for water quality control was added to the project during the preconstruction planning stage. Local cooperation. Local interests must inform affected interests in French Creek Basin at least annually, in a manner satisfactory to District Engineer, that a system of reservoirs of which Woodcock Creek is a part, will not provide protection against maximum floods. Pennsylvania Department of Forests and Waters assumed responsibility of local cooperation for project. Operations during fiscal year. Operation and maintenance, general: Maintenance of the structure and appurtenances was performed as required. Estimated flood control benefits achieved by this project for FY 00 were $134,000. Total flood control benefits achieved by this reservoir through September 30, 2000, revised to include downstream districts, were $26,625,000. Activities under reservoir management program comprising sanitation measures, conservation, land management and operation and maintenance of public use facilities continued. 29. YOUGHIOGHENY RIVER LAKE, PA AND MD Location. Dam is on Youghiogheny River about 74.2 miles above its junction with Monongahela River at McKeesport, PA. It is 1.2 miles upstream from Confluence, PA, and about 57 miles southeast of Pittsburgh, PA. Reservoir is in Fayette and Somerset Counties, PA, and Garrett County, MD. (See Geological Survey Charts for Confluence, PA, Accident, MD, West Virginia and Pennsylvania.) Existing project. Reservoir for flood control, lowflow augmentation, and pollution abatement purposes. Dam is rolled-earthfill type with separate uncontrolled side channel spillway and tunnel outlet works. Authorized project is complete. For flood control, reservoir is operated as a unit of a coordinated reservoir system designed for protection of Pittsburgh and reduction of flood heights in upper Ohio Valley, generally. Construction of dam was started in June 1940 and completed in May 1944. Present project lands consist of 3,914.9 acres In fee and easements over 0.62 acre. Project was selected for construction under general authorization for Ohio River Basin in 1938 Flood Control Act. For further project description see Annual Report for 1962, page 1223. Local cooperation. None required. Licenses. A non-Federal hydropower project utilizing releases from Youghiogheny River Lake was constructed in accordance with FERC License 3623. D/R Hydro Company is the authorized representative of the Licensee, Youghiogheny Hydroelectric Authority, and is responsible for operation of the plant. It has a 10- mIegawatt capacity. The plant began commercial operation on December 7, 1989. Operations during fiscal year. Operations and maintenance general: Reservoir was operated for benefit of flood control and low flow augmentation, as required, and necessary repairs were made to structures and appurtenances. A $1,000,000 contract for the rehabilitation of the Spillway launching area was initiated in FY 00. In-house labor constructed 12 high-impact campsites at the Outflow Recreation Area. An IDIQ construction services contract was utilized to repair $38,000 worth of bituminous treatment in the Mill Run area. The Outflow and Tub Run campgrounds went online with the National Recreation Reservation Service (NRRS) for the FY 00 recreation season. Estimated flood control benefits achieved by this reservoir for FY 00 were $37,113,000. Total flood control benefits achieved by this project through September 30, 2000 revised to include damages prevented in downstream districts, were $444,436,000. Activities under reservoir management program comprising sanitation measures, conservation, land management and operation and maintenance of public use facilities continued. 30. INSPECTION OF COMPLETED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS Flood Control Act of June 22, 1936, and subsequent acts require local interests to furnish assurances that they will maintain and operate certain local protection projects after completion in accordance with regulations prescribed by Secretary of the Army. District Engineers are responsible for administration of these regulations within boundaries of their respective districts. Inspections were made of completed units transferred to local interests for maintenance and operation and local interests were advised, as necessary, of measures required to maintain these projects in accordance with standards prescribed by regulations. (See Table 18-L for dates of inspections.) Costs for this fiscal year, $100,052. Total cost to September 30, 2000 was $2,174,050. 31. OTHER AUTHORIZED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS See Table 18-E on other authorized flood control projects. 32. FLOOD CONTROL WORKS UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION For flood control activities pursuant to Section 205, Public Law 858, 80th Congress, as amended (preauthorization) See Table 18-M. For emergency bank protection (Sec. 14 of 1946 Flood Control Act, Public Law 526, 79th Cong.) See Table 18-M. Flood control and coastal emergencies (Public Law 99, 84th Cong., and antecedent legislation.) Disaster Preparedness Emergency Operations Rehabilitation Total Cost for Fiscal Year $ 286,007 23,176 55,881 $365,064 18-13 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS FOR CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR 2000 General Investigations 33. SURVEYS Navigation Studies $2,269,731 Flood Damage Prevention Studies 130,801 Special Studies 26,701 Special Investigations 167,132 FERC Licensing Activities 14,492 Interagency Water Resources Development 36,141 Coordination Studies with Other Agencies 34,015 Review of Authorized Projects 105,896 Total Cost for Fiscal Year $2,784,909 34. COLLECTION AND STUDY OF BASIC DATA Costs this fiscal year were $141,755 for flood plain management services. 35. PRECONSTRUCTION ENGINEERING AND DESIGN Beaver River, PA $72 Conemaugh, Nanty Glo. 141,481 Mon River, WV (4 sites) 3 Total Cost for Fiscal Year $141,556 36. RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT None. 37. PROJECT MODIFICATIONS FOR IMPROVEMENT OF ENVIRONMENT Coordination Acct Funds $7,469 Initial Appraisals, General 5,623 Total Cost for Fiscal Year $13,092 38. AQUATIC ECOSYSTEM RESTORATION Coordination Acct Funds $12,027 Preliminary Restoration Plans 35,980 Nine Mile Run. Allegheny Co, PA 756,565 North Fork Yellow Ck, OH 70,006 Total Cost for Fiscal Year $874,578 18-14 PITTSBURGH, PA., DISTRICT TABLE 18-A COS' See Section In Text Project Navigation - Locks and Dams 1. Allegheny River PA 2. Monongahela River, PA and WV 3. T~I art Lake, Flood Control - Local Protection 4. Chartiers Creek, PA 5. Elkins, WV 6. Johnstown, PA 7. Punxsutawney, Ohio River Basin, PA 8. Saw Mill Run, PA 9. South Central, PA Environment Improvement Program 10. Turtle Creek, PA 11. WV & PA, Flood Control, WV & PA T AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT Total Cost to Sept. 30, Funding FY97 FY98 FY99 FY00 2000 New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Major Rehab. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Major Rehab. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Major Rehab. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost 7,239,820 6,921,132 16,525,000 13,881,611 12,680,000 13,086,392 775,000 946,251 953,090 837,734 6,448,000 6,536,467 13,202,000 16,327,949 14,044,000 14,273,266 614,000 550,474 1,315,000 1,072,824 10,466,000 7,819,163 21,342,000 23,299,052 12,674,000 13,091,848 572,000 652,235 2,011,700 2,370,143 ---- 18,157,860' ---- 18,157,860' 11,052,000 183,486,7432 13,984,568 183,470,593 2 45,465,000 517,954,8353 45,018,588 506,481,417 4 13,447,000 326,107,8575 13,429,900 326,086,1546 ---- 15,857,000 ---- 15,857,000 2,070,000 23,570,932 7 2,056,653 23,501,919 7 1,690,000 24,128,2418 1,698,084 24,124,4488 89,000 88,999 ---- 30,818,15341 --- 30,818,15341 11,000 1,579 7,000 183,589 1,857,000 1,770,774 1,000 8,582 212,000 208,015 5,982,000 5,425,479 14,000 13,000 75,019 6,801 500,000 20,000 69,322 293,645 3,500,000 10,000,000 1,183,075 1,399,029 265,000 (54,553) 472,866 (18,392) ---- 2,100,000 232,832 1,000 3,707 812,000 797,523 4,873,000 5,267,814 3,000 4,029 41,000 194,109 13,000,000 13,554,280 1,772,627 1,772,627 16,000 388,192 16,254 387,960 ---- 8,865,3889 8,865,3889 1,008,000 8,952,190 1,036,127 8,961,908 8,832,000 27,506,0003 8,940,917 27,338,91744 3,586,10710 .- 3,586,107 10 12,000 1,680,59711 16,864 1,679,65611 243,000 804,000 197,563 754,639 0 37,035,00042 8,641,623 26,251,79242 ---- 26,680,799 38 ---- 26,680,799 500,000 1,454,000 4,054,000 38 921,033 1,346,120 2,499,98538 18-15 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 2000 TABLE 18-A See Section In Text Project Flood Control - Reservoirs 12. Berlin Lake Ohio River Basin, OH 13. Conemaugh River Lake, Ohio River Basin, PA 14. Crooked Creek Lake, Ohio River Basin, PA 15. East Branch, Clarion River Lake, Ohio River Basin, PA 16. Kinzua Dam and Allegheny Reservoir, Ohio River Basin, PA and NY 17. Lower Girard Dam, OH 18. Loyalhanna Lake, Ohio River Basin, PA 19. Mahoning Creek Lake, Ohio River Basin, PA 20. Michael J. Kirwan Dam and Reservoir, Ohio River Basin, OH 21. Mosquito Creek Lake, Ohio River Basin, OH 22. Ohio River Basin Pittsburgh, PA District Consolidated COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT (Continued) Total Cost to Sept. 30, Funding FY 97 FY98 FY99 FY00 2000 New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. " Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Major Rehab. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Minor Rehab. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost ----- - - 8,739,987 12 ---- - - 8,739,98712 2,539,790 3,372,000 3,560,400 4,422,000 45,159,105 13 1,936,936 4,053,379 3,652,353 4,387,787 45,114,25313 ---- ---- ---- ---- 46,012,411 14 --- ---- ---- ---- 46,012,411 14 3,522,910 2,924,592 1,454,300 1,325,143 1,081,740 1,225,242 1,267,860 1,240,737 1,195,260 1,618,063 1,929,100 1,146,859 1,633,000 1,034,000 1,005,000 25,051,88639 2,136,743 1,167,223 1,009,019 25,051,178 39 ---- ---- ---- 4,482,93315 - ---- ---- 4,482,93315 1,542,759 1,535,000 1,586,000 34,549,61916 1,605,591 1,617,586 1,575,244 34,534,58016 ---- ---- ---- 9,539,58617 ---- -.--- 9,539,58617 898,000 969,500 1,043,000 20,484,22418 922,310 998,733 1,029,793 20,469,07018 1,334,954 1,336,783 ---- 309,000 ---- 80,552 1,263,000 1,312,786 ---- 109,305,07619 ---- 109,305,07619 1,337,000 32,905,75739 1,324,820 32,887,040 39 ---- 2,921,000 2,921,000 160,000 400,000 869,000 38 334,313 328,677 743,54238 -.--.---.--- 5,727,53120 ---- 5,727,531 1,099,000 1,037,000 1,247,000 25,316,55321 1,102,203 1,078,120 1,245,382 25,314,338 2 1 2,802,000 956,500 3,413,337 1,228,343 ---- ---- ----r ---- --- 7,144,97322 ---- 7,144,973 23 971,000 22,267,56240 954,989 22,250,76240 ---- 47,033 --- 47,033 ------- ---- ---- 17,376,097 24 ----.-------- 17,376,097 24 770,280 887,000 907,300 753,000 17,944,81425 732,529 869,061 979,667 751,564 17,943,324 25 ---- 848,330 884,890 --- ---- ---- 4,253,02926 -...------ 4,253,029 26 1,031,000 1,127,000 1,143,000 19,767,90145 1,003,425 1,228,824 1,135,988 19,759,98645 ---- ---- ---- 985,19727 ...-..--.-.- 985,19727 18.16 PITTSBURGH, PA., DISTRICT TABLE 18-A COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT (Continued) See Total Cost to Section Sept. 30, In Text Project Funding FY 97 FY98 FY99 FY00 2000 23. Shenango River New Work Lake, Ohio River Approp. ---- ------------ 40,217.20128 Basin, PA Cost ---- ---- ---- ---- 40,217,20128 Maint. Approp. 2,329,210 2,078,000 2,278,000 2,270,000 46,670,55729 Cost 2,523,289 1,987,107 2,420,917 2,271,569 46,659,44629 24. Stonewall Jackson New Work Lake, Ohio Approp. ---- 61,307 70,000 (70,000) 211,374,741 River Basin, WV Cost 69,348 94,530 1,249 25,548 211,366,420 Maint. Approp. 994,230 921,000 844,100 881,000 11,072,143 Cost 870,392 1,048,722 874,885 883,275 11,068,374 25. Tionesta Lake, New Work 30 Ohio River Approp.----------- 7,792,37831 Basin, PA Cost --.- -.-- ---- ---- 7,792,37831 Maint. Approp. 1,392,470 1,615,000 1,585,300 1,506,000 30,367,79832 Cost 1,402,835 1,530,343 1,704,350 1,495,070 30,350,33732 26. Union City New Work Dam, Ohio Approp. --- ----- 14,559,800 River Basin, PA Cost -..- ---- ---- ---- 14,559,800 Maint. Approp. 222,030 272,000 247,000 198,000 6,787,698 Cost 219,336 277,942 258,029 195,607 6,784,902 27. Woodcock Creek New Work Lake, Ohio Approp. ---- 20,545,065 3 River Basin, PA Cost---------- ---- 20,545,065s Maint. Approp. 978,810 842,000 782,500 729,000 16,186,46735 Cost 1,062,680 841,392 813,542 727,211 16,183,44735 29. Youghiogheny New Work River Lake Approp. ---- ----......---- 12,521,16736 Ohio River Cost ---- .-.. 12,521,167 Basin, PA and Maint. MD Approp. 1,699,770 2,043,937 1,918,700 3,173,000 42,832,870 37 Cost 1,840,191 1,813,962 2,190,876 3,127,000 42,757,354 37 1. Includes $2,453,737 from emergency relief funds and $1,250,049 from public works funds. 2. Includes $64,365 public works acceleration, executive funds (1963) and $191,400 provided from the Productive Employment Appropriations Act (PL 98-8) 1983 funds. Also includes $995,000 appropriated and expended for major maintenance at L/D's 2, 3 and 4.Also includes $44,810 appropriated to and $41,631 expended in FY 00 on M&O of Dams. 3. Includes amounts appropriated to date for; Point Marion, L&D 8, PA - $56,226,400 for CG, $56,817,000 for IWTF, $3,322,057 for raising crest of dam in 1958-9, $2,086,438 for original reconstruction years 1923-26 and $618,758 for AE&D (Total $119,070,653). Grays Landing, L&D 7, PA - $85,552,700 for CG, $85,803,500 for IWTF, and $803,000 AE&D (Total $172,159,200). L&D 2, 3 & 4 - $47,397,700 for CG and $60,120,000 for IWTF (Total $107,517,700). 4. Includes amounts expended to date on; Point Marion, L&D 8, PA - $56,215,160 for CG, $56,452,243 for IWTF, $3,322,057 for raising crest of dam in 1958-9, $2,086,438 for original construction years 1923-26 and $618,758 for AE&D (Total $118,694,656). Grays Landing, L&D 7, PA - $85,512,319 for CG, $85,663,801 for 1WTF, and $803,000 AE&D (Total $171.979,120). L&D 2, 3 & 4 - $46,619,083 for CG, $58,784,009 for IW'F (Total $105,403,092). 5. Includes $22,549 public works acceleration, executive funds (1963), $742 for maintenance for previous project and $582,000 provided from the Productive Employment Appropriations Act (PL 98-8) 1983 funds. 6. Includes $22,549 public works acceleration, executive funds (1963), $742 for maintenance for previous project and $464,508 provided from the Productive Employment Appropriations Act (PL 98-8) 1983 funds. 7. Includes $1,999,995 emergency relief funds, $10,000,000 public work funds, $234,000 Code 711 funds and $412,088 Code 713 funds, $462,000 appropriated to and $218,374 expended on the Dam Safety Assurance Program - CG; excludes $409,622 contributed by local interest. 8. Includes $89,000 provided from the Productive Employment Appropriations, Act (PL 98-8) 1983 funds. Also includes $425,000 appropriated to and $424,493 expended on the Dam Safety Assurance Program O&M.Also includes $12,424 appropriated to and $11,669 expended in FY 00 on M&O of Dams. 9. Includes $33,423 from emergency relief funds. 10. Excludes $180,485 for new work expended from contributed funds. 11. Includes $283,988 provided from the Productive Employment Appropriations Act (PL 98-8) 1983 funds. 12. Includes $1,542,500 Code 711 funds, $809,700 Code 712 funds and $99,111 Code 713 funds; excludes $100,000 contributed by local interest. 13. Includes $40,000 provided from the Productive Employment Appropriations Act (PL 98-8) 1983 funds. Also includes $711,086 appropriated to and $711,032 expended to date on M&O of Dams. 18-17 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 2000 TABLE 18-A COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT (Continued) 14. Includes $5,351 from emergency relief funds and $328,000 Code 711 funds. 15. Includes $63,788 from emergency relief funds. Also includes $278,044 Code 711 funds. 16. Includes $45,000 provided from the Productive Employment Appropriations Act (PL 98-8) 1983 funds. Also includes $699,564 appropriated to and $699,531 expended to date on M&O of Dams. 17. Includes $156,812 Code 711 funds. 18. Includes $322,000 provided from the Protective Employment Appropriations Act (PL 98-8) 1983 funds.Also includes $12,674 appropriated to and $12,319 expended to date on M&O of Dams. 19. Includes $2,791 from emergency relief funds, $14,622 Code 711 funds and $568,265 Code 713 funds; excludes $389,370 contributed by local interest. 20. Includes $7,339 from emergency relief funds and $274,669 Code 711 funds. 21. Includes $256,000 provided from the Protective Employment Appropriations Act (PL 98-8) 1983 funds. Also includes $104,866 appropriated to and $104,816 expended to date on M&O of Dams. 22. Includes $25,671 emergency relief funds, $162,381 Code 711 funds and $561,247 Code 713 funds; excludes $500,086 contributed by local interests. 23. Includes $25,671 emergency relief funds, $162,381 Code 711 funds and $561,247 Code 713 funds; excludes $456,611 contributed by local interests. 24. Includes $74,900 Code 711 funds; excludes $4,585,627.29 for new work contributed by local interest. 25. Includes $315,500 provided from the Protective Employment Appropriations Act (PL 98-8) 1983 funds. Also includes $3,714 appropriated to and $3,658 expended to date on M&O of Dams. 26. Includes $122,729 Code 711 funds and $94,900 Code 713 funds. 27. Includes $8,914 from emergency relief funds. 28. Includes $1,730,100 Code 711 funds and $1,618,300 Code 713 funds. 29. Includes $152,000 provided from the Protective Employment Appropriations Act (PL 98-8) 1983 funds. Also includes $11,896 appropriated to and $11,259 expended to date on M&O of Dams. 30. Includes $2,303,076 Code 711 funds ($256,760 provided from the Productive Employment Appropriations Act PL 98-8, 1983 funds), $275,900 Code 712 funds, and $24,201 emergency relief funds. 31. Includes $2,303,077 Code 711 funds, ($256,531 provided from the Productive Employment Appropriations Act PL 98-8, 1983 funds), $275,900 Code 712 funds, and $24,201 emergency relief funds. 32. Includes $203,000 provided from the Protective Employment Appropriations Act (PL 98-8) 1983 funds. Also includes $9,362 appropriated to and $9,276 expended to date on M&O of Dams. 33. Includes $1,671,366 Code 711 funds. 34. Includes $1,671,366 Code 711 funds. 35. Includes $85,000 provided from the Productive Employment Appropriations Act (PL 98-8) 1983 funds).Also includes $230 appropriated to and expended in FY 00 on M&O of Dams. 36. Includes $2,846,263 Code 711 funds ($293,000 provided from the Productive Employment Appropriations Act. (PL 98-8) 1983 funds). 37. Includes $591,000 provided from the Protective Em-ployment Appropriations Act (PL 98-8) 1983 funds. Also includes $22,240 appropriated to and $22,236 expended to date on M&O of Dams. 38. Includes $1,840,000 (non-Federal) original construction cost and an additional $4,205,000 (non-Federal) contributed and $4,159,759 (non-Federal) expended to date. 39. Includes $701,504 appropriated to and $701,470 expended to dated on M&O of Dams. 40. Includes $104,684 appropriated to and $104,133 expended to date on M&O of Dams. 41. Includes $4,225,188 (non-Federal funds) contributed and expended to date. 42. Includes $285,000 (non-Federal) contributed funds and $282,914 (non-Federal) expended to date. 43. Includes $4,894,000 appropriated to date for Rehab. Operations and Maintenance and $2,925,000 appropriated to date for Rehab. Construction, General. 44. Includes $4,880,202 expended to date for Rehab. Operations and Maintenance and $2,824,695 expended to date for Rehab. Construction, General. 45. Includes $7,656 appropriated to and $7,321 expended to date on M&O of Dams. 18-18 I I PITTSBURGH, PA., DISTRICT TABLE 18-B AUTHORIZATION LEGISLATION See Date Section Authorizing in Text Act Project and Work Authorized Documents 1. Aug 5, 1886 June 3, 1896 July 25, 1912 July 3, 1930 Aug 30, 19351 Aug 30, 19351 June 26, 19342 3. Mar 3, 1899 June 13, 1902 Mar 3, 1905 Mar 3, 1905 Mar 2, 1907 Mar 4, 1913 Sep 22, 1922 July 3, 1930 Jan 31, 19313 June 26, 19342 ALLEGHENY RIVER, PA. (See Section 1 of Text) For lock and dam 1. (Fixed dam contemplated. Sep 29, 1891 Secretary of War authorized change to a moveable dam.) For locks and dams 2 and 3. For locks and dams 4 to 8 inclusive. For a depth of 9 feet in the lower 61 miles. Replace lock and dam 1 by a dredged channel, 9 feet deep and 200 feet wide up to lock 2, and construct new locks and dams 2 and 3, to replace existing locks and dams 2 and 3. Construct lock and dam 9, raising crest of dam 8, and dredging a navigable channel to head of pool 8. Operation and care of locks and dams provided for with funds from War Department appropriation for rivers and harbors. MONONGAHELA RIVER, PA AND WV Enlarge and improve lock and dam 6; additional works at lock 3; new repair steamer and new dredge boat with equipment; all at an estimated cost of $185,556. Rebuild lock and dam 2 at estimated cost of $655,961. (Estimate increased in 1910 to $698,961.) Acquisition of land and additional improvements at 5 and 6 at a cost of $7,850. Rebuild lock and dam 3 at estimated cost of $589,196. Reconstruct lock and dam 5 at estimated cost of $756,042. Reconstruct lock and dam 6 at estimated cost of $356,400. (Estimate increased in 1916 to $418,860.) Additional improvements at estimated cost as follows: Guide walls and guard walls, 1 to 6, $1,255,130; Lengthen land chamber of lock 3 to 720 feet, $787,722; New chamber (360 feet long), lock 4, $699,786; Lock and dam 7, $1,161,241; Lock and dam 8, $1,165,758; Lock and dam 7 (second chamber), $419,126; Lock and dam 8 (second chamber), $504,465; Reconstruction dam 4, $397,211; Marine ways, repair plant, office and warehouse, $250,000, for a total of $6,640,439. Construct new locks and dam 2.5 miles below existing structure, at estimated cost of $2,175,000 in lieu of work authorized at old lock and dam 4. Chief of Engineers authorized to locate new locks and dam 4 above existing structure and on such site as they may deem most desirable. Operation and care of locks and dams provided for with funds from War Department appropriations for rivers and harbors. Annual Report 1886, p. 1545, Annual Report 1891, p. 2366 H. Doc. 204, 54th Cong., 1st Sess., and Annual Report 1896, p. 2212 H. Doc. 540, 62d Cong., 2d Sess. H. Doc. 356, 71st Cong., 2d Sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee, Doc. 16, 72d Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 721, 71st Cong., 3d Sess., and Rivers and Harbors Committee, Doc. 27,73d Cong., 2d Sess. Annual Report 1897, p. 2423 Annual Report 1909, p. 1756 Annual Report 1904, p. 460 H. Doc. 209, 58th Cong., 2d Sess. H. Doc. 209, 58th Cong., 2d Sess. H. Doc. 1217, 62d Cong., 3d Sess. H. Doc. 288, 67th Cong., 2d Sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee, Doc. 22, 70th Cong., 2d Sess. 18-19 ___ REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 2000 TABLE 18-B AUTHORIZATION LEGISLATION (Continued) See Date Section Authorizing in Text Act May 17, 1950 Nov 17, 1986 Oct 31, 1992 5. 7. 8. 9. Jan 11, 1934 Aug 30, 1935 Jun 28, 1938 Jun 28, 1938 Jun 28, 1938 Project and Work Authorized Modification of existing project as follows: Provide 2 new locks and dams similar to Morgantown lock and dam to replace existing locks and dams 12 to 15 inclusive. Provide a movable crest on existing dam 8 to raise existing pool-full elevation 4 feet. Provide a navigation channel of 300-foot minimum bottom width and a 9-foot project depth above lock and dam 8. Provide an extension of navigable channel of upper Monongahela River, into lower Tygart River for 2.1 miles at a maximum bottom width of 200 feet and a 9-foot project depth. Construct new lock and dam 7 (Grays Landing Lock and Dam) as follows: The Grays Landing Lock and Dam will be located 3.0 miles downriver from existing Lock and Dam 7. It will consist of a single lock chamber, 84 feet wide by 720 feet long, with a fixed crest dam 576 feet in length. The existing Maxwell Pool at elevation 763.0 will be shortened three miles and the existing Pool 7 at elevation 778.0 will be extended downriver to the new dam. There will be no change in pool elevation above existing Dam 7. Upon completion of the new replacement lock and dam, existing Lock and Dam 7 will be removed. Total authorized cost is $181,000,000. Replace existing 56'x360' lock chamber at Point Marion Lock and Dam (Lock and Dam 8) with new 84'x720' chamber. Existing movable crest dam to remain; no change in pool elevations. Total authorized cost is $53,600,000. Navigation improvements as follows: The project replaces the fixed crest dam at Locks and Dam 2 with a gated dam; raises the existing pool 2 by 5', constructs twin 84'x720' locks at Locks and Dam 4, and eliminates Locks and Dam 3; lowering the existing pool 3 by 3.2 feet. Authorized cost is $705,000,000. Cost of construction is to be paid equally from the general fund of the Treasury and the Inland Waterways Trust Fund. TYGART RIVER LAKE, WV Construction of a dam and reservoir for low water regulation and flood control ELKINS, WV For construction of local flood protection projects. JOHNSTOWN, PA For construction of local flood protection projects. PUNXSUTAWNEY, OHIO RIVER BASIN, PA For construction of local flood protection projects. Documents S. Doc. 100, 81st Cong., 1st Sess. 3. Supplemental Appropriations Act of 1985 for Engineering and Design and Land Acquisition and Water Resources Development Act of 1986; Public Law 99-662 Sec. 301(a). Supplemental Appropriations Act of 1985 for Engineering and Design and Land Acquisition and Water Resources Development Act of 1986; Public Law 99-662 Sec. 301(a). Water Resources Development Act of 1992; PL 102-580 Sec 101 H. Doc. 1792, 64th Cong. 2nd Sess. H. Doc. 106, 76th Cong. 1st Sess. H. Doc. 306, 74th Cong. 1st Sess. FCC Doc. No. 1, 75th Cong. 1st Sess. H. Doc. 306, 74th Cong. 1st Sess. FCC Doc. No. 1, 75th Cong. 1st Sess. H. Doc. 306, 74th Cong. 1st Sess. FCC Doc. No. 1, 75th Cong. 1st Sess. 18-20 L I ___LI_1_ ___ __~_ ____ _ L ---- PITTSBURGH, PA., DISTRICT TABLE 18-B AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION (Continued) See Date Section Authorizing in Text Act Project and Work Authorized Documents 10. Nov 17, 1986 Oct 12, 1996 11. Oct 31, 1992 12. Oct 12, 1996 13. Jun 28, 1938 Dec 22, 1944 as amended Jun 22, 1936 amended by Jun 28, 1938 Dec 22, 1944 as amended Jun 22, 1936 amended by Jun 28, 1938 Dec 22, 1944 as amended Jun 28, 1938 Dec 22, 1944 as amended Jun 22, 1936 amended by Jun 28, 1938 modified by Aug 18, 1941 SAW MILL RUN Construction of local flood protection projects. SOUTH CENTRAL PA ENVIRONMENTAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM Construction of local flood protection projects. WEST VIRGINIA AND PENNSYLVANIA FLOOD CONTROL Construction of local flood protection projects. BERLIN LAKE, OHIO RIVER BASIN, OH Construction of a dam and reservoir for flood control and low water regulation. Construction, operation & maintenance of recreation facilities. CONEMAUGH RIVER LAKE, OHIO RIVER BASIN, PA Construction of a dam and reservoir for flood control. Construction, operation & maintenance of recreation facilities. CROOKED CREEK LAKE, OHIO RIVER BASIN, PA Construction of a dam and reservoir for flood control. Construction, operation & maintenance of recreation facilities. EAST BRANCH CLARION RIVER LAKE, OHIO RIVER BASIN, PA Construction of a dam and reservoir for flood control and low water regulation. Construction, operation & maintenance of recreation facilities. KINZUA DAM AND ALLEGHENY RESERVOIR, OHIO RIVER BASIN, PA AND NY Construction of a dam and reservoir for flood control and low water regulation and recreation. Construction of a dam and reservoir for flood control, pollution abatement, low water regulation and recreation. Water Resources Development Act of 1986 Water Resources Development Act Of 1996 PL 99-622 Water Resources Development Act of 1992 PL 102-580 Sec 313 Water Resources Development Act of 1996 PL 104-303 Sec 581 H. Doc. 306, 74th Cong. 1st Sess. FCC Doc. No. 1, 75th Cong. 1st Sess. Sec. 4, Flood Control Act of 1944 H. Doc. 306, 74th Cong. 1st Sess. FCC Doc. No. 1, 75th Cong. 1st Sess. Sec. 4, Flood Control Act of 1944 H. Doc. 306, 74th Cong. 1st Sess. FCC Doc. No. 1, 75th Cong. 1st Sess. Sec. 4, Flood Control Act of 1944 H. Doc. 306, 74th Cong. 1st Sess. FCC Doc. No. 1, 75th Cong. 1st Sess. Sec. 4, Flood Control Act of 1944 H. Doc. 306, 74th Cong. 1st Sess FCC Doc. No. 1, 75th Cong. 1st Sess. H. Doc. 300, 76th Cong. 1st Sess. 18-21 14. 15. 16. 17. REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 2000 TABLE 18-B AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION (Continued) Date Authorizing Act ActvParnojde c WorkAuthorize Documents 19. Dec 22, 1944 as amended Jun 22, 1936 amended by Jun 28, 1938 Dec 22, 1944 as amended Jun 22, 1936 amended by Jun 28, 1938 Dec 22, 1944 as amended Jul 3, 1958 Jul 14, 1960 Jun 28, 1938 Dec 22, 1944 as amended Aug 28, 1937 Jun 28, 1938 Aug 18, 1941 Dec 22, 1944 Jul 24, 1946 May 17, 1950 Dec 30, 1963 Jun 18, 1965 May 12, 1967 Aug 13, 1968 Construction, operation & maintenance of recreation facilities. LOYALHANNA LAKE, OHIO RIVER BASIN, PA Construction of a dam and reservoir for flood control. Construction, operation & maintenance of recreation facilities. MAHONING CREEK LAKE, OHIO RIVER BASIN, PA Construction of a dam and reservoir for flood control. Construction, operation & maintenance of recreation facilities. MICHAEL J. KIRWAN DAM AND RESERVOIR, OH Construction of a dam and reservoir for flood control, water supply, low water regulation and recreation. To define cost-sharing arrangement for municipal & industrial water supply & water for pollution abatement purposes. MOSQUITO CREEK LAKE, OHIO RIVER BASIN, OH Construction of a dam and reservoir for flood control, low water regulation and water supply storage. Construction, operation & maintenance of recreation facilities. OHIO RIVER BASIN - Pittsburgh District Construct levees, floodwalls, and drainage structures for protection of cities and towns in Ohio River Basin. Projects to be selected by Chief of Engineers with approval of Secretary of War at a cost not to exceed $24,877,000 for construction. Approved general comprehensive plan for flood control and other purposes in Ohio River Basin as may be advisable in discretion of Secretary of War and Chief of Engineers, and for initiation and partial accomplishment of plan, authorized $75 million for reservoirs and $50,300,000 for local flood protection works. Additional $45 million for prosecution of comprehensive plan for Ohio River Basin. Additional $70 million for further prosecution of comprehensive plan for Ohio River Basin, including additional projects in tributary basins. Additional $125 million for further prosecution of comprehensive plan including additional projects in tributary basins. Additional $100 million for prosecution of comprehensive plan for Ohio River Basin. Additional $150 million for further prosecution of comprehensive plan for flood control and other purposes in Ohio River Basin. Additional $89 million for further prosecution of comprehensive plan for Ohio River Basin. Additional $38 million for further prosecution of comprehensive plan for Ohio River Basin. Additional $35 million for further prosecution of comprehensive plan for Ohio River Basin. 18-22 See Section in Text Sec. 4, Flood Control Act of 1944 H. Doc. 306, 74th Cong. 1st Sess. FCC Doc. No. 1, 75th Cong. 1st Sess. Sec. 4, Flood Control Act of 1944 H. Doc. 306, 74th Cong. 1st Sess. FCC Doc. No. 1, 75th Cong. 1st Sess. Sec. 4, Flood Control Act of 1944 H. Doc. 191, 85th Cong. 1st Sess. Pub. Law 86-645 H. Doc. 306, 74th Cong. 1st Sess. FCC Doc. No. 1, 75th Cong. 1st Sess. Sec. 4, Flood Control Act of 1944 Flood Control Committee, Doc. 1, 75th Cong., 1st Sess. Flood Control Committee, Doc. 1, 75th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 300, 76th Cong. 1st Sess. H. Doc. 762, 77th Cong. 2d Sess. H. Doc. 506, 78th Cong. 1st Sess. S. Doc. 20, 81st Cong. 1st Sess. Public Law 88-253, 88th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 6755, 89th Cong., 90th Cong. 1st Sess. Public Law 90-17. 90th Cong., 1st Sess. Public Law 90-483, 90th Cong., 2d Sess. 20. 21. 22. 23. ___ _1_ _ _ ____ __ __ __ _ I Project and Work Authorized PITTSBURGH, PA., DISTRICT TABLE 18-B AUTHOf See Date Section Authorizing in Text Act IZING LEGISLATION (Continued) Project and Work Authorized Jun 19, 1970 Mar 7, 1974 Oct 22, 1976 24. Jun 28, 1938 Dec 22, 1944 as amended Nov 7, 1966 Jun 22, 1936 amended by Jun 28, 1938 Dec 22, 1944 as amended Oct 23, 1962 Oct 23, 1962 Jun 28, 1938 Dec 22, 1944 as amended Additional $69 million for further prosecution of comprehensive plan for Ohio River Basin. Additional $120 million for further prosecution of comprehensive plan for Ohio River Basin. Authorized phase I design memorandum stage of advanced engineering and design of the project for abatement of acid mine drainage in the Clarion River Basin, Pa. SHENANGO RIVER LAKE, OHIO RIVER BASIN, PA AND OH Construction of a dam and reservoir for flood control, low water regulation and recreation. Construction, operation & maintenance of recreation facilities. STONEWALL JACKSON LAKE, WV Construction of a dam and reservoir for flood control, water supply, water quality control, area redevelopment and recreation. TIONESTA LAKE, OHIO RIVER BASIN, PA Construction of a dam and reservoir for flood control and low water regulation. Construction, operation & maintenance of recreation facilities. UNION CITY DAM, PA Construction of a dam and reservoir for flood control. WOODCOCK CREEK LAKE, PA Construction of a dam and reservoir for flood control, recreation and storage for water quality control. YOUGHIOGHENY RIVER LAKE, OIIIO RIVER BASIN, PA AND MD Construction of a dam and reservoir for flood control, low-flow augmentation, and pollution abatement, purposes. Construction, operation & maintenance of recreation facilities. H. Doc. 15166, 91st Cong., 2d Sess. H. Doc. 10203, 93rd Cong. River Basin Monetary Authorization Act of 1974 Water Resources Development Act of 1976; Public Law 94-587, Sec. 101(a) H. Doc. 306, 74th Cong. 1st Sess. FCC Doc. No. 1, 75th Cong. 1st Sess. Sec. 4, Flood Control Act of 1944 S. Doc. 109, 89th Cong. 2nd Sess. H. Doc. 306, 74th Cong. 1st Sess. FCC Doc. No. 1, 75th Cong. 1st Sess. Sec. 4, Flood Control Act of 1944 S. Doc. 95, 87th Cong. 2nd Sess. S. Doc. 95, 87th Cong. 2nd Sess. H. Doc. 306, 74th Cong. 1st Sess. FCC Doc. No. 1, 75th Cong. 1st Sess. Sec. 4, Flood Control Act of 1944 Included in the Emergency Relief program April 8, 1935. Permanent Appropriations Repeal Act. Public Res. 117, 71st. Cong., 3d Sess. 18-23 Documents 25. 26. 27. 28. 29. 1. 2. 3. REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 2000 TABLE 18-B See Date Section Authorizing in Text Act AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION (Continued) Project and Work Authorized 22. 21. Jul 3, 1958 Jul 14, 1960 Jun 28, 1938 Dec 22, 1944 as amended Aug 28, 1937 Jun 28, 1938 Aug 18, 1941 Dec 22, 1944 Jul 24, 1946 May 17, 1950 Dec 30, 1963 Jun 18, 1965 May 12, 1967 Aug 13, 1968 Jun 19, 1970 Mar 7, 1974 Oct 22, 1976 18-24 MICHAEL J. KIRWAN DAM AND RESERVOIR, OH Construction of a dam and reservoir for flood control, water supply, low water regulation and recreation. To define cost-sharing arrangement for municipal & industrial water supply & water for pollution abatement purposes. MOSQUITO CREEK LAKE, OHIO RIVER BASIN, OH Construction of a damn and reservoir for flood control, low water regulation and water supply storage. Construction, operation & maintenance of recreation facilities. OHIO RIVER BASIN - Pittsburgh District Construct levees, floodwalls, and drainage structures for protection of cities and towns in Ohio River Basin. Projects to be selected by Chief of Engineers with approval of Secretary of War at a cost not to exceed $24,877,000 for construction. Approved general comprehensive plan for flood control and other purposes in Ohio River Basin as may be advisable in discretion of Secretary of War and Chief of Engineers, and for initiation and partial accomplishment of plan, authorized $75 million for reservoirs and $50,300,000 for local flood protection works. Additional $45 million for prosecution of comprehensive plan for Ohio River Basin. Additional $70 million for further prosecution of comprehensive plan for Ohio River Basin, including additional projects in tributary basins. Additional $125 million for further prosecution of comprehensive plan including additional projects in tributary basins. Additional $100 million for prosecution of comprehensive plan for Ohio River Basin. Additional $150 million for further prosecution of comprehensive plan for flood control and other purposes in Ohio River Basin. Additional $89 million for further prosecution of comprehensive plan for Ohio River Basin. Additional $38 million for further prosecution of comprehensive plan for Ohio River Basin. Additional $35 million for further prosecution of comprehensive plan for Ohio River Basin. Additional $69 million for further prosecution of comprehensive plan for Ohio River Basin. Additional $120 million for further prosecution of comprehensive plan for Ohio River Basin. Authorized phase I design memorandum stage of advanced engineering and design of the project for abatement of acid mine drainage in the Clarion River Basin, Pa. Documents H. Doc. 191, 85th Cong. 1st Sess. Pub. Law 86-645 H. Doc. 306, 74th Cong. 1st Sess. FCC Doc. No. 1, 75th Cong. 1st Sess. Sec. 4, Flood Control Act of 1944 Flood Control Committee, Doc. 1, 75th Cong., 1st Sess. Flood Control Committee, Doc. 1, 75th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 300, 76th Cong. 1st Sess. H. Doc. 762, 77th Cong. 2d Sess. H. Doc. 506, 78th Cong. 1st Sess. S. Doc. 20, 81st Cong. 1st Sess. Public Law 88-253, 88th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 6755, 89th Cong., 90th Cong. 1st Sess. Public Law 90-17. 90th Cong., 1st Sess. Public Law 90-483, 90th Cong., 2d Sess. H. Doc. 15166, 91st Cong., 2d Sess. H. Doc. 10203, 93rd Cong. River Basin Monetary Authorization Act of 1974. Water Resources Development Act of 1976; Public Law 94-587, Sec. 101(a). 23. PITTSBURGH, PA., DISTRICT TABLE 18-B AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION (Continued) See Date Section Authorizing in Text Act Project and Work Authorized Documents Jun 28, 1938 Dec 22, 1944 as amended Nov 7, 1966 Jun 22, 1936 amended by Jun 28, 1938 Dec 22, 1944 as amended Oct 23, 1962 Oct 23, 1962 Jun 28, 1938 Dec 22, 1944 as amended 24. SHENANGO RIVER LAKE, OHIO RIVER BASIN, PA AND OH Construction of a dam and reservoir for flood control, low water regulation and recreation. Construction, operation & maintenance of recreation facilities. STONEWALL JACKSON LAKE, WV Construction of a dam and reservoir for flood control, water supply, water quality control, area redevelopment and recreation. TIONESTA LAKE, OHIO RIVER BASIN, PA Construction of a dam and reservoir for flood control and low water regulation. Construction, operation & maintenance of recreation facilities. UNION CITY DAM, PA Construction of a dam and reservoir for flood control. WOODCOCK CREEK LAKE, PA Construction of a dam and reservoir for flood control, recreation and storage for water quality control. YOUGHIOGHENY RIVER LAKE, OHIO RIVER BASIN, PA AND MD Construction of a dam and reservoir for flood control, low-flow augmentation, and pollution abatement, purposes. Construction, operation & maintenance of recreation facilities. Included in the Emergency Relief program April 8, 1935. Permanent Appropriations Repeal Act. Public Res. 117, 71st. Cong., 3d Sess. H. Doc. 306, 74th Cong. 1st Sess. FCC Doc. No. 1, 75th Cong. 1st Sess. Sec. 4, Flood Control Act of 1944 S. Doc. 109, 89th Cong. 2nd Sess. H. Doc. 306, 74th Cong. 1st Sess. FCC Doc. No. 1, 75th Cong. 1st Sess. Sec. 4, Flood Control Act of 1944 S. Doc. 95, 87th Cong. 2nd Sess. S. Doc. 95, 87th Cong. 2nd Sess. H. Doc. 306, 74th Cong. 1st Sess. FCC Doc. No. 1, 75th Cong. 1st Sess. Sec. 4, Flood Control Act of 1944 25. 26. 27. 28. 29. 1. 2. 3. 18-25 _ __I I_ ___ _L __ __ ______Il____l_ I_ _I~LI____ ___ _____C __~_I_ _______ __ __ __ PITTSBURGH, PA., DISTRICT TABLE 18-C OTHER AUTHORIZED NAVIGATION PROJECTS (ep SPtion 6 of Text) For Last Cost to September 30, 2000 Full Report See Annual Operations and Project Status Report For Construction Maintenance Allegheny River, PA, opg-channel work Completed 1934 197,000 133,940 Buckhannon River, WV Completed 1893 5,500 - Cheat River, WV 12 Completed 1895 12,997 - Pittsburgh Harbor, PA Completed 1922 110,663 81,613 1. Abandonment recommended in H. Doc. 467, 69th Cong., 1st Sess. 2. No Commerce reported. TABLE 18-E OTHER AUTHORIZED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS (All Projects Not Specifically Identified in Text) For Last Cost to September 30, 2000 Full Report See Annual Construction Non-Federal Operation and Project and Status Report For (Federal Cost) Cost Maintenance Flood Protection Specifically Authorized Projects Completed: Bradford, PA 1962 7,601,763 1,895,000 - Brookville, PA 1963 964,976 289,000 - Buckhannon, WV 1972 1,568,661 75,000 - Butler, PA 1970 1,556,181 534,000 - DuBois, PA 1979 4,464,607 910,000 - Johnsonburg, PA 1958 674,664 130,000 - Kittanning, PA, Part I 1949 130,317 2,000 - Latrobe, PA 1951 207,659 44,400 - Latrobe, PA 1970 2,556,652 698,000 - Olean, NY 1954 . 3,217,531 597,000 - Portage, PA 1965 150,386 14,900 - Portville, NY 1954 2,070,484 353,000 - Reynoldsville, PA 1959 385,494 26,000 - Ridgeway, PA (Elk Creek) 1964 628,888 72,000 - Salamanca, NY 1972 2,880,535 465,000 - Turtle Creek, PA 1998 22,500,079 4,180,720 - Washington, PA 1964 789,093 323,000 - Wellsville, OH, Section I 1956 483,910 113,000 - Wellsville, OH, Section II 1956 157,633 - - Youngstown, OH 1976 3,621,134 152,200 - Deferred: Benwood, WV 1954 81,028 - - Chartiers Creek, PA 1998 26,592,965 4,225,188 - Authorized by Chief of Engineers Completed: Amsterdam, OH 1964 183,072 22,500 - Big Run, PA 1965 364,208 35,900 - Burgettstown, PA - 83,129 - - Friendsville, MD - 41,529 2,200 - Girty's Run, Millvale, PA 1986 2,655,934 701,722 18-26 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 2000 TABLE 18-E OTHER AUTHORIZED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS (Continued) For Last Cost to September 30, 2000 Full Report See Annual Construction Non-Federal Operation and Project and Status Report For (Federal Cost) Cost Maintenance Granville, PA - 75,908 3,000 - Leetonia, OH - 89,299 17,200 Oil City, PA - 43,595 - - Oil City Ice Control Structures 1987 3,927,792 25,000 Root Creek, Bolivar, NY 1986 1,591,436 - - Slovan, PA - 57,811 - Sykesville, PA 184,246 9,000 - Tarentum, PA 1964 136,591 24,600 Tenmile Creek at Marianna, PA 1981 1,554,428 -- West Little Pine Creek, Etna, PA - 2,021,852 86,200 - Wilmore, PA - 96,853 1,300 - Active: Ridgeway & Vicinity (on Clarion River)2 1979 132,464 - - Inactive: Black Fork at Hendricks, WV 1972 6,800 - - Oakdale, PA - 14,127 - - Rouseville, PA 1,642 - - Wallace, WV1 11,035 - - Weston Mills, Olean, NY - 50,100 - - Weston Mills, Portville, NY - 52,100 - - Reservoirs Other: Rowlesburg Lake, WV 1977 2,873,799 - 1. Lacks local support. 2. No longer economically justified. 18-27 PITTSBURGH, PA., DISTRICT TABLE 18-G DEAUTHORIZED PROJECTS For Last Full Report Federal Contributed See Annual Date Funds Funds Project Report For Deauthorized Expended Expended Adena, OH (Short Creek) Allegany, NY Unit I (Allegheny River)' Allegany, NY Unit II (Five Mile Creek Area)' Bellaire, OH Brackenridge, Tarentum and Natrona, PA1 Brilliant, OH Brockway, PA (Allegheny River Basin) Clarington, OH Coraopolis, PA Dillonvale, OH (Short Creek) Eagle Creek Reservoir, OH Empire-Stratton, OH Follansbee, WV Freeport, PA (Allegheny River) Industry, PA Kittanning, PA, part II (Allegheny River) Lake Chautauqua and Chadakoin River, NY2 Lake Erie-Ohio Canal, OH and PA - 1935 Act Leetsdale, PA 1 Martins Ferry, OH 1 McKees Rocks, PA Mingo Junction, QH Moundsville, WV 1 Muddy Creek Daq, PA1 Neville Island, PA New Cumberland, WV New Kensington and Parnassus, PA1 Pittsburgh, PA (Golden Triangle) Pittsburgh, PA (North Side) Pittsburgh, PA (The (trip) Powhaten Pint, OH Proctor, WV Redbank Creep Lake, PA Rochester, PA St. Marys, PA (Allegheny River Basin) Smith Ferry, PA Uniontown, Warwood, WPV Wellsburg, WV West Bridgewgter, PA Wheeling, WV1 Wheeling, WV (North Wheeling)1 Wheeling, )VV (Wheeling Island)1 Wilcox, PA� Woodlands, WV1 Youghiogheny River, PA and MD (Canalization)1 4 1975 1965 1972 1941 1977 1956 1954 1971 7- Aug 5, 1977 Nov 17, 1986 Nov 17, 1986 May 6, 1981 Nov 17, 1986 Aug 5, 1977 Aug 5, 1977 Aug 5, 1977 Aug 5, 1977 Aug 5, 1977 Jan 1, 1990 Nov 17, 1986 Aug 5, 1977 Aug 5, 1977 Aug 5, 1977 Nov 6, 1977 Mar 2, 1970 May 6, 1981 Nov 17, 1986 Nov 17, 1986 Oct 3, 1978 Aug 5, 1977 Nov 17, 1986 Nov 17, 1986 Nov 17, 1986 Aug 5, 1977 Nov 17,1986 Oct 3, 1978 Oct 3, 1978 Oct 3, 1978 Nov 17 ,1986 Nov 17, 1986 Aug 5, 1977 Nov 17, 1986 Aug 5, 1977 Aug 5, 1977 Jan 1, 1990 Nov 17 ,1986 Aug 5, 1977 Aug 5, 1977 Nov 17, 1986 Nov 17, 1986 Nov 17, 1986 Mar 5, 1955 Nov 17, 1986 Nov 17, 1986 1. Deauthorized under Water Resources Development Act of 1986 (PL99-662). 2. Local Interests failed to meet requirements of cooperation, authority for project expired Mar. 2, 1970. 3. Local interests failed to meet requirements of cooperation, authority for project expired Mar. 5, 1955. 4. Includes $47,195 construction costs expended under previous project and $1,700 O&M costs expended under previous project. 18-28 13,452 4,100 64,851 76,487 194 16,884 100,000 33,031 190,722 1,342,000 25,164 402,459 156,377 13,529 6,387 189,067 21,700 16,761 232,863 --- -- -- --- -- --- -- ------- - - ..... ._. ._... ._.,. .. _.. ... . ._. _.. _.... .. _.. ,_.. ._.. .. . TABLE 18-H ALLEGHENY RIVER, PA.: LOCKS AND DAMS (See Section 1 of Text) Dimensions Upper Avail- Normal Depth on Character Width able Lift at Pool Miter Sills at of Type of Year of Length Normal Elevation Normal Pool Foundation Construction Per Opened Miles Cham- to Full Pool (feet, Level' cent to Above ber Width Level mean sea Lower Upper Kind Com- Naviga- No Mouth Nearest Town (Feet) (Feet) (Feet) level) (Feet) (Feet) Lock Dam of Dam Lock Dam plete tion Actual Cost 2 6.7 Aspinwall, PA 56 360 11.0 721.0 12.0 10.9 Rock Rock Fixed Concrete Concrete 100 19342 $1,763,485 3 14.5 Cheswick, PA 56 360 13.8 734.8 10.8 11.8 Rock Pile-Rock Fixed Concrete Concrete 100 19342 1,875,665 4 24.2 Natrona, PA 56 360 10.6 745.4 10.0 8.5 Rock Rock Fixed Concrete Concrete 100 1927 1,707,690 5 30.4 Freeport, PA 56 360 11.6 757.0 10.5 10.3 Piling Crib-Pile Fixed Concrete Concrete 100 1927 1,940,537 6 36.3 Clinton, PA 56 360 12.4 769.4 10.6 10.8 Rock Crib-Pile Fixed Concrete Concrete 100 1928 1,523,959 7 45.7 Kittanning, PA 56 360 13.0 782.4 9.8 10.9 Piling Steel Sheet Fixed Concrete Concrete 100 1930 1,460,008 Piling 8 52.6 Templeton, PA 56 360 17.8 800.2 10.4 13.8 Rock Rock Fixed Concrete Concrete 100 1931 2,848,920 9 62.2 Rimer, PA 56 360 22.0 822.2 10.5 11.3 Rock Rock Fixed Concrete Concrete 100 1938 2,510,373 Total $ 15,630,637 Abandoned lock and daml 591,187 Abandoned lock and dam 2 544,929 Abandoned lock and dam 3 310,103 Demolishing old dam 1 26,001 Dredging channel 1,055,003 Total $ 18,157,860 1. All depths as shown are on guard sills and are controlling depth. 2. Dates shown represent replacement structures. 00 N to 9 0C C d o tTI t= 00 z 0 r) 0 , 0 t3 0 o t3 c OC (/3 o .q r TABLE 18-I MONONGAHELA RIVER, PA. AND W.V.: LOCKS AND DAMS (See Section 3 of Text) Dimensions Upper Depth on Avail- Normal Miter Sills at Character Width able Lift at Pool Normal Pool of Type of Year of Length Normal Elevation Level' Foundation Construction Per Opened Miles Cham- to Full Pool (feet, cent to Above ber Width Level mean sea Lower Upper Kind Com- Naviga- No Mouth Nearest Town (Feet) (Feet) (Feet) level) (Feet) (Feet) Lock Dam of Dam Lock Dam plete tion Actual Cost 2 11.2 Braddock, PA 3 23.8 Elizabeth, PA 4 41.5 Charleroi, PA 56 110 563 563 - 61.2 Maxwell locks 843 and dam, Maxwell, PA - 82.2 Grays Landing 84 lock and dam, Grays Landing, PA - 90.8 Point Marion 84 lock and dam, Point Marion, PA - 102.0 Morgantown lock 84 and dam, Morgantown, WV 108.0 Hildebrand lock 84 and dam, 6 miles above Morgantown, WV - 115.4 Opekiska lock 842 and dam, 13.4 miles above Morgantown, WV 360 720 360 720 360 720 720 8.7 718.7 16.0 15.95 Rock Crib Pile 8.2 726.9 11.6 11.9 Rock Crib Pile 16.6 743.5 10.7 20.0 Piles Piles 19.5 763.0 15.0 20.5 Rock Rock 720 15.0 778.0 18.0 26.0 Rock Rock 720 19.0 797.0 16.2 16.2 Rock Rock 600 17.0 814.0 14.5 17.8 Rock Rock 600 21.0 835.0 15.0 14.0 Rock Rock 600 22.0 857.0 14.0 17.75 Rock Rock Fixed Concrete Fixed Concrete Gated Concrete Gated Concrete Fixed Concrete Gated Concrete Gated Concrete Gated Concrete Gated Concrete Concrete 100 19532 $71,053,425 57 Concrete 100 19532 35,059,867 5 Concrete 100 19322 37,165,182 56 Concrete 100 19642 30,110,889 s Concrete 83 1994 174,874,407 9 Concrete 10 19932. 118,620,523 45 Concrete 100 19502 Concrete 100 19592 Concrete 100 19642 8,778,000 s 12,506,829 s 25,179,622 s 7d] Marine ways, etc Abandoned lock and dam 1 Abandoned lock and dam 4 Abandoned lock and dam 5 Abandoned lock and dam 6 Abandoned lock and dam 7 Abandoned lock and dam 8 Abandoned lock and dam 9 Abandoned lock and dam 10 Abandoned lock and dam 11 Abandoned lock and dam 12 Abandoned lock and dam 13 Abandoned lock and dam 14 Abandoned lock and dam 15 Dredging channel Total 250,000 s 1,019,907 s 780,816 s 1,074,812 s 770,449 s 2,853,580 'o 245,900 s 191,000 s 210,445 s 227,668 s 200,550 190,691 s 210,127 s 175,829 5 $522,338,417 00 0 IV 1 2 TABLE 18-I MONONGAHELA RIVER, PA. AND W.VA.: LOCKS AND DAMS (see Section 3 of Text) 1. All depths as shown are on guard sills and are controlling depth. 2.. Dates shown for locks and dams number 2 to 8 inclusive, represent reconstruction. 3. 2 Chambers. 4. Includes $3,322,057 for raising crest of dam, (1958-9), $2,086,438 for original reconstruction (1923-1926), $618,758 AE&D costs for replacement of lock, and $112,509,066 for replacement of lock ($56,119,588 CG funds; $56,389,478 from the Inland Waterways Trust Fund). 5. Actual cost: may include estimated costs which have been footnoted as necessary. 6. Includes $2,173,767 for original reconstruction (1931-2), and $15,080,304 for reconstruction of dam (1963-1967). 7. Includes $16,967,114 for reconstruction of locks. 8. Includes $15,857,000 for major rehabilitation. 9. Includes AE&D costs for proposed lock ($803,000) and $87,102,966 expended from the Inland Waterways Trust Fund. 10.Includes $213,776 original project and $2,639,804 for reconstruction (1925). O 0 r! 0 PTI rn 0 0 00 O t3 0 01 o 0< ;> o Z 3 r o3 r oo V-. PITTSBURGH, PA., DISTRICT TABLE 18-J MONONGAHELA RIVER, PA AND WV: TOTAL COSTS OF EXISTING PROJECT TO END OF FISCAL YEAR (See Section 3 of Text) Operation and Maintenance, Funds New Work General Total Regular $522,338,41713 $325,610,9822 $847,949,39912 3 Maintenance and operation 452,623 452,623 Public Works acceleration, executive (1963) - 22,549 22,549 Total $522,338,417' $326,086,1542 $848,424,57112 3 1. Includes $5,420,541 for new work for previous proj- 3. Includes $15,857,000 for major rehabilitation of L/D 3; ects. $166,026,462 for replacement of L/D 7 ($83,271,383 provided 2. Includes $20,446,587 expended between July 7, 1897 by Inland Waterways Trust Fund); and $109,552,616 for reand June 30,1937, on operation and care of works of improve- placement of the lock at Point Marion Lock and Dam ment under provisions of permanent appropriation for such ($54,845,083 provided by Inland Waterways Trust Fund). purposes and excludes $742 for maintenance of previous projects. TABLE 18-K OHIO RIVER BASIN (PITTSBURGH DISTRICT): RESERVOIRS (See Section 23 of Text) Total Tributary Basin and Reservoir Stream Cost Allegheny: Conemaugh River, PA Conemaugh River $46,012,411 Crooked Creek, PA Crooked Creek 4,482,933 East Branch Clarion River, PA Clarion River 9,539,586 Kinzua Dam and Allegheny Reservoir, PA and NYAllegheny River 112,226,0761 Loyalhanna, PA Loyalhanna Creek 5,727,531 Mahoning Creek, PA Mahoning Creek 7,144,973 Tionesta, PA Tionesta Creek 7,792,378 Union City, PA French Creek 14,559,800 Woodcock Creek, PA Woodcock Creek 20,545,065 Beaver: Berlin, OH Mahoning River 8,739,987 Michael J. Kirwan, OH Mahoning River 17,376,097 Mosquito Creek, OH Mosquito Creek 4,253,029 Shenango River, PA and OH Shenango River 40,217,201 Monongahela: Stonewall Jackson Lake, WV West Fork River $211,366,420 2 Youghiogheny River, PA and MD Youghiogheny River 12,521,167 1. Includes $2,921,000 for dam rehabilitation. 2. Actual cost. Latest cost estimate (1991) is $231,000,000. 18-32 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 2000 TABLE 18-L INSPECTION OF COMPLETED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS (See Section 30 of Text) PrniPe.t Amsterdam, OH Big Run, PA Bolivar, NY Bradford, PA Brookville, PA Buckhannon, WV Burgettstown-Slovan, PA Butler, PA Chartiers Creek, PA Cannonsburg-Houston Reach James G. Fulton Reach Colliers, WV DuBois, PA Eldred, PA Etna, PA Friendsville, MD Granville, PA Johnsonburg, PA Kittaning, PA Latrobe, PA Leetonia, OH Dates of Inspection Apr 1998 Oct 1999 May 1999 Apr 1999 Oct 1999 Jun 1999 Apr 1999 Apr 1998 Mar 1999 Nov 1998 Sep 1994 Oct 1998 Apr 1987 Mar 1998 Apr 1999 Apr 1999 May 1999 Apr 1997 Sep 1998 May 1998 Project Marianna, PA Millvale, PA Oil City Ice Control Structure, Allegheny River, PA Oil City LPP-(Dike), PA Olean, NY Portage, PA Portville, NY Reynoldsville, PA Ridgway, PA Salamanca, NY Stonewood-Nutter Fort, WV Sykesville, PA Tarentum, PA Turtle Creek, PA Washington, PA Wellsville, OH Weston, WV Wilmore, PA Youngstown, OH 18-33 Dates of Inspection Jun 1999 Mar 1998 May 1999 May 1999 Jun 1999 Oct 1999 Jun 1999 Apr 1998 May 1999 Jun 1999 Jun 1992 Oct 1998 Sep 1997 Apr 1999 Apr 1999 Sep 1998 Oct 1996 Oct 1998 May 1998 A. av I v ~ PITTSBURGH, PA., DISTRICT TABLE 18-M FLOOD CONTROL WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION (See Section 32 of Text) Flood Control Activities pursuant to Section 205, Public Law 858, 80th Congress, as amended (preauthorization) Project/Study Identification Buckhannon River, Upshur County, WV Cambridge Springs, PA Coordination Account (Sec 205) Girty's Run, Millvale, PA Tawney Run, Creek, PA W.Br. Tunungwant Creek, Bradford, PA Total Cost for Current Fiscal Year: Fiscal Year Costs 31,557 4,283 27,242 17,205 1,875 .. 8Ji98 $139,529 Emergency Streambank Protection - Section 14 of the 1846 Flood Control Act, Public Law 526, 79th Congress Project/Study Identification Access Road, Tygart Lake Allegheny River, First St., Ford City, PA Bear Creek, Walnut St., PA Friendsville, MD Buffalo Creek, Freeport, PA' Center Treatment Plant, Elkhorn Run, PA Cheat River, Sadler St., Springhill Twp. Chester, Ohio River, WV Conneaut Lake, PA Coordination Account (Sec 14) Diel South Road (Hwy 139 A) Mahoning Riv Kiskiminetas River, STP, Avonmore, PA Little Plum Creek, Allegheny Co., PA Moon Treatment Plant, Elkhorn Run, PA Mononaghela River Water Street, Point Marion, PA Nickleplate Rd, French Creek, Fairfield Sewage Treatment Plant, Point Marion, PA Ten Mile Creek, Washingtion County, PA Fiscal Year Costs 18,708 52,525 20,202 7,325 29,799 20,188 (829) 116,848 31,804 7,363 25,097 22,728 29,161 10,041 28,534 2,020 28.2f Total Cost for Current Fiscal Year: $972,317 18-34 OHIO RIVER For actual construction of locks and dams, and operation and care of completed structures, river is divided into three sections under immediate supervision and direction of District Engineers at Pittsburgh, Huntington, and Louisville. Pittsburgh section extends 127 miles from head of river at Pittsburgh, PA, to a point immediately upstream from New Martinsville, WV, and includes Emsworth, Dashields, Montgomery, New Cumberland, Pike Island, and Hannibal Locks and Dams. Huntington section extends 311 miles from mile 127 to 438 immediately upstream from Foster, KY, and includes Willow Island, Belleville, Racine, Robert C. Byrd, Greenup, and Captain Anthony Meldahl Locks and Dams. Louisville section extends 543 miles from mile 438 to mouth of river, and includes Markland and McAlpine Locks and Dams (with Louisville and Portland Canal), Cannelton, Newburgh, John T. Myers, and Smithland Locks and Dams, and Locks and Dams 52 and 53. Improvements Navigation 1. Construction of locks and dams on Ohio River.................. .................... 19-1 2. Open channel work, Ohio River...............19-4 Tables Table 19-A Table 19-B Table 19-C Table 19-D Table 19-E Cost and Financial Statement...... 19-5 Authorizing Legislation ............. 19-6 Not Applicable Not Applicable Not Applicable Navigation 1. CONSTRUCTION OF LOCKS AND DAMS ON OHIO RIVER Location. Ohio River is formed by junction of Allegheny and Monongahela Rivers at Pittsburgh, PA, and flows generally southwesterly for 981 miles to join Mississippi River near Cairo, IL. For description of river see page 1227, 1932 Annual Report. Previous Projects. For details see page 1907 of Annual Report for 1915. Existing project. Provides for improvement of entire river by construction of locks and dams to provide channel depth of 9 feet and for widening Louisville and Portland Canal at Louisville, KY. Project provides for a lock with usable dimensions of 110 by 600 feet at each of the dams and, in addition, an auxiliary lock 56 by 360 feet is available at Emsworth, Dashields, Montgomery, and McAlpine Locks and Dams with an auxiliary lock at Robert C. Table. 19-F Not Applicable Table 19-G Not Applicable Table 19-H Construction of Locks and Dams On Ohio River, Total Cost of Existing Project ................... 19-7 Table 19-I Federal Energy Regulatory Commission Licenses of Locks and Dams, Ohio River.............19-7 Table 19-J Ohio River Locks and Dams Statistics............................ 19-8 Byrd being 110 by 1,200 feet. Dashields and McAlpine are fixed dams, while Emsworth, Montgomery, and Robert C. Byrd are fixed dams with movable crests. Remaining dams are movable type, with navigable pass varying in width from 600 to 1,248 feet. In addition to navigable pass, movabletype dams are also provided with one or more regulating weirs. At McAlpine Locks and Dam, a canal (Louisville and Portland) extends along left bank for 2 miles, with locks at lower end. Modifications to existing project under purview of Section 6, March 3, 1909 Act, provide for fixed dams with movable crests with two locks (110 by 1,200 feet and 110 by 600 feet) at New Cumberland, Pike Island, Hannibal, Willow Island, Belleville, Racine, Greenup, Captain Anthony Meldahl, Markland, Cannelton, Newburgh, and John T. Myers; two locks 110 by 1,200 feet at Smithland; I10- by 1,200-foot temporary locks in addition to the existing locks at Locks and Dams 52 and 53, and reconstruction to provide a 110- by 1,200-foot lock in addition to existing locks and a fixed dam with two sections of 19-1 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 2000 movable crest at McAlpine Locks and Dam; widening Louisville and Portland Canal to 500 feet. Auxiliary lock 56 by 360 feet at McAlpine Locks and Dam has been inoperative since failure of downstream lock gates in December 1972. Rehabilitation of existing Locks and Dams 52 and 53 was started in September 1979 under the purview of Section 6, March 1909 Act. Mound City was also considered authorized under purview of 1909 Act, and preconstruction planning was performed in the period 1965 to 1972. The ruling of the U.S. District Court, District of Columbia, on September 6, 1974,. with reference to Lock and Dam 26, Mississippi River, would also apply to this project. Consequently, it is no longer considered authorized. Operation and care of locks and dams were included in project July 1, 1935, under provisions of Permanent Appropriations Repeal Act of June 26, 1934. Estimated Federal cost of new work, is $3,228,107,648; non-Federal cost is $465,914. Foregoing estimate does not include expenditures on previous projects. Various items previously included in this project are considered inactive or unnecessary and are excluded from foregoing cost estimate. See page 693, Annual Report, 1968, for items and estimated cost. Under authority of 1910 River and Harbor Act, Louisville and Portland Canal was widened to 200 feet; Locks and Dams 40 and 42 eliminated; Locks and Dams 1 and 2 replaced by Emsworth Locks and Dam; Lock and Dam 3 replaced by Dashields Locks and Dam; and Locks and Dams 4, 5, and 6 replaced by Montgomery Locks and Dam. Locks and Dams 24, 25, and 26 were replaced by Robert C. Byrd Locks and Dam authorized by August 30, 1935, Act, and constructed under project for improving lower Kanawha River. Locks and Dams 7, 8, and 9 were replaced by New Cumberland Locks and Dam; Locks and Dams 10 and 11 were replaced by Pike Island Locks and Dam; Locks and Dams 12, 13, and 14 were replaced by Hannibal Locks and Dam; Locks and Dams 15, 16, and 17 were replaced by Willow Island Locks and Dam; Locks and Dams 18, 19, and 20 were replaced by Belleville Locks and Dam; Locks and Dams 21, 22, and 23 were replaced by Racine Locks and Dam; Locks and Dams 27, 28, 29, and 30 were replaced by Greenup Locks and Dam; Locks and Dams 31, 32, 33, and 34 were replaced by Captain Anthony Meldahl Locks and Dam; Locks and Dams 35, 36, 37, 38, and 39 were replaced by Markland Locks and Dam; the Louisville and Portland Canal at McAlpine Locks and Dam was widened to 500 feet. Locks and Dams 43, 44, and 45 were replaced by Cannelton Locks and Dam; Locks and Dams 46 and 47 were replaced by Newburgh Locks and Dam; Locks and Dams 48 and 49 were replaced by John T. Myers Locks and Dam, and Locks and Dams 50 and 51 were replaced by Smithland Locks and Dam, as modifications to existing project under purview of Section 6, March 3, 1909 Act, reducing total number of structures to 20. The Water Resources Development Act of 1974 combined the Newburgh Bank Protection Works project with the Newburgh Locks and Dam project. A December 1981 Act established the Falls of the Ohio National Wildlife Conservation Area near McAlpine Locks and Dam to protect and preserve existing fossilized coral and a diversity of wildlife. A November 17, 1988 Act authorized a replacement structure for Locks & Dams 52 & 53 at Olmsted, IL. A November 28, 1990 Act authorized an interpretive center at the Falls of the Ohio National Wildlife Conservation Area near McAlpine Locks & Dam and a replacement of the existing 110 foot x 600 foot lock at McAlpine Locks & Dam, IN & KY. Table 19-J contains data relative to various features of locks and dams included in existing project. For list of principal towns and cities along Ohio River with their mileage below Pittsburgh, PA, see page 1060, 1962 Annual Report. See Table 19-I for licenses. Navigation system of 20 locks and dams is in operation and 9-foot navigation throughout length of river is generally available at all times. At certain unstable bars project depth is maintained by dredging, supplemented by contraction works. (See "Open Channel Work, Ohio River.") Table 19-J shows cost and year completion of locks and dams now in operation. Existing project does not provide adequate facilities for present day navigation due to obsolescence of structures. Since repair and modernization of these facilities would be extremely costly, replacement and reconstruction is being accomplished as rapidly as funds are made available for the purpose. Construction of lock and dam replacement program was initiated in Fiscal Year 1955. New Cumberland, Pike Island, Hannibal, Willow Island, Belleville, Racine, Greenup, Captain Anthony Meldahl, Markland, McAlpine, Cannelton, Newburgh, John T. Myers, and Smithland replacement locks and dams are in operation, replacing 39 old low-lift locks and dams. For total cost of existing project, see Table 19-H. Terminal facilities. Modern public terminals, with warehouses, equipped with operating machinery for transferring materials, have been constructed by private interests at some of the larger cities and towns. A list of terminals on Ohio River is revised annually and can be obtained from Division Engineer, U.S. Army Engineer Division, Ohio River, Cincinnati, Ohio. Operations during fiscal year. New work by contract and hired labor: 19- 2 OHIO RIVER Willow Island Locks and Dam: Construction was initiated in January 1967. All work is complete. Belleville Locks and Dam: Construction was initiated in May 1962. All work is complete. Racine Locks and Dam: Construction initiated in June 1964 is complete. Robert C. Byrd Locks and Dam: The existing project, constructed under project for improving lower Kanawha River, was placed in operation in August 1937. The dimensions of the existing locks chambers and poor approach conditions, particularly to downstream traffic, have created a higher than normal accident rate to the structure with corresponding hazards and delays to traffic. The Water Resources Development Act of 1976 authorized Phase I studies for 1,200-foot locks in a bypass canal. These studies are complete. Initial Construction, General funds for the continuation of Engineering activities were received in September 1985. Real estate acquisition is complete. The contract for the Locks was awarded in- October 1987 and is complete. The contract for the Dam Rehabilitation was awarded in June 1993 and is 99 percent complete. The total estimated cost of the project is $369.5 million, which is 50 percent federal cost and 50 percent Inland Waterways .Trust Fund cost. Greenup Locks and Dam: Construction was initiated in October 1954. All work is complete. Captain Anthony Meldahl Locks and Dam: Construction work complete. Falls of the Ohio National Wildlife Conversation Area Was authorized by 97-137 on December 29,1981 and modified by Public Law 101-640 on November 28, 1990 to design and construct an interpretive center. The Conservation Area will protect 1,000 acres, which consists of birdlife and other wildlife. Planning consisted of efforts to define facilities to be cost shared with local interests. All Real Estate tracts have been acquired and one tract remains in a condemnation trial. A construction contract to construct the cost-shared recreation facilities was awarded on 30 September 1993, and completed in February 1995. McAlpine Locks and Dam: Project is complete except for alteration of lift section of railroad bridge that spans the upper end of the Louisville and Portland Canal which work is presently deferred. A replacement of the existing 110 foot x 600 foot lock with a new 100 foot x 1,200 foot lock was authorized by WRDA of 1990 in Public Law 101-640. Construction has been initiated. A contract to construct a cofferdam and demolish the 360 foot and 600 foot locks was awarded in May 2000 and is 5 percent complete. $36,200,000 has been expended for the lock replacement and ancillary efforts. Olmsted Locks & Dam: A replacement structure for Locks and Dams 52 & 53 was authorized by the WRDA of 1988 in Public Law 100-676 on 17 November 1988. Planning Engineering and Design continued. A contract to construct the lock was awarded 6 December 1995 and has advanced to 90 percent completion. A contract to construct the approach wall was awarded 26 August 1999 for $98,980,610 and advanced to 16 percent completion. The contractor for the 700 HP tender and flat deck completed fabrication and delivered them. A contract was awarded for the wash down barge on 27 Jan 00 for $1,418,230. In FY 00, $87,162, 511 was expended on the Olmsted project. New Cumberland Locks and Dam: Efforts during FY 00 included dewater & repair of land wall filling valve ($577,000); and an indefinite delivery contract to fabricate floating mooring bits (2nd Delivery Order $463,000). Pike Island Locks and Dam: Efforts during FY 00 included dewatering and repair of river lock chamber ($2,705,000); and indefinite Delivery Contract to fabricate tainter valve (3rd Delivery Order $281,000). Emsworth Locks and Dam: Efforts during FY 00 included repair of land lock chamber ($253,000); emergency repairs to lift gates on front channel dam ($167,000); contract for track beam replacement on main and back channel dams ($692,776); installation of security fence and gates ($109,000); repair of auxiliary crane power conductor system ($83,000); and award of contract for replacement of vertical lift gate #7 and hoist equipment ($2,697,000). Dashields Locks and Dam: Efforts during FY 00 included renovation of river wall emptying valve ($440,000). Montgomery Locks and Dams: Efforts during FY 00 included renovation of land wall filling valve ($385,000); award of contract to fabricate miter gates for river lock chamber ($350,000); and award of contract for replacement of hand rail on the service bridge ($486,000). Operation and maintenance, general. Locks and dams operated as required and necessary repairs and improvements made thereto and to operator's quarters, grounds and esplanades. Costs were $18,317,777 for Huntington District, $33,527,121 for Louisville District and $19,969,596 for Pittsburgh District. 19-3 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 2000 2. OPEN CHANNEL WORK, OHIO RIVER Location. Under jurisdiction of district engineer in whose district work is located. Portion of river included in project extends 974.7 miles from head of river at Pittsburgh, PA, to mouth of Cache River (Mound City, IL). Open channel improvement from mouth of Cache River to mouth of Ohio River is under jurisdiction of Mississippi River Commission. Existing Projects. Before completion of canalization project, no project depth had been fixed by Congress under project for open channel work; but, in order to properly aid packet and barge navigation, it was necessary to secure a low-water channel with a minimum depth of 4 to 6 feet, and a width, depending upon difficulty of running channel, of 400-600 feet; also, to permit movement of large coal tows, which movement occurred at stages of water exceeding 10 feet, it was necessary to remove points of projecting bars which formed at various locations along river. Accomplishment of this purpose involved concentration of current by closing back channels at islands with low dams, contraction and straightening wide open channels by low dikes, dredging bars and shoals, and removal of snags and wrecks. Incidental to direct improvement of Ohio River is construction and maintenance of ice piers as required for protection of river craft. Stage of extreme high water on Ohio River varies from 46 feet at Pittsburgh, PA, to 80 feet at Cincinnati, OH, with 57.2 feet at Louisville, KY (head of falls, 53.8 feet at Evansville, IN, and 59.5 feet at Cairo, IL (mouth of river). Estimated cost of new work is $16.16 million, exclusive of following items which are considered inactive: Ice piers authorized by 1927 River and Harbor Act; reforestation of sloughs of Kentucky Peninsula near Evansville, IN, authorized by 1930 River and Harbor Act; dredging to widen channel at certain points; and placing revetment at various points. Estimated cost of these items is $6,565,000. Operation of snag boats on Ohio River below Pennsylvania State line was included in project July 1, 1935, under provisions of Permanent Appropriations Repeal Act of June 26, 1934. See Table 19-B for authorizing legislation. New work under this project is substantially complete, since it is not anticipated that work on inactive portion of project will be accomplished. In addition to dredging, local stabilization of channel has been effected at various points by construction of dikes and revetment. Work, which remains, consists of dredging to widen channels at certain points to project depth. Local cooperation. River and Harbor Act of January 21, 1927, authorizing construction of ice piers for general open channel work, imposes condition that before work is begun on any pier, local interests convey to the United States free of cost such riparian rights as may be deemed necessary in connection with the improvements at locality (H. Doc. 187, 67th Congr., 2nd Sess.). Existing ice piers are adequate for present purposes and local cooperation is not needed since no additional construction is under consideration. River and Harbor Act of July 3, 1930, provides for reforestation of sloughs of Kentucky Peninsula and bank protection and that no expense shall be incurred by the United States for acquiring lands required for purpose of this improvement (H. Doc. 409, 69th Congr., 1st Sess.). However, since no serious overbank erosion has occurred since bank revetment in 1933-34, reforestation is not considered justifiable at this time and no local cooperation is required. Operations during fiscal year. Operation and maintenance, general: Dredging was done where required to provide an adequate and dependable channel of project depth at minimum pool conditions. Dikes and revetments were maintained and routine work of maintaining navigation aids, removing snags, making channel studies, hydrographic surveys and mapping was performed as required. Channel soundings, hydrographic surveys, steam gaging operations, channel inspections and aids to navigation, and miscellaneous inspections and reports cost $1,945,111. In FY 00 dredging by hired labor on the Ohio River totaled 8,000 cubic yards at $30,000. Dredging by contract: Huntington District 560,880 cubic yards at $2,030,210. Louisville District 867,441 cubic yards at $2,410,190. 19- 4 OHIO RIVER Table 19-A Cost and Financial Statement See Total Cost Section To in Text Project Funding FY 97 FY 98 FY 99 FY 00 Sep 30, 2000 (footnotes) 1 Construction of New Work Locks and Dams Approp. $82,267,653 $90,840,000 $73,057,000 $103,603,000 $2,242,207,761 13s 10 1721 on Ohio River Cost 82,495,874 90,492,313 73,941,293 104,909,063 2,241,748,089' 3 6 12 16 18 22 23 Maint Approp. 56,903,026 49,786,050 54,060,851 71,813,499 1,239,084,0482 4 19 Cost 58,600,008 49,562,113 55,864,485 71,541,494 1,238,500,8092 13 14 19 20 Rehab. Approp. 0 0 0 0 82,972,138 Rehab. (O&M) 0 0 0 0 82,972,138 Approp. 0 0 0 0 33,914,252 Cost 0 0 0 0 33,914,252 2 Open Channel New Work Approp. 0 0 0 0 15,962,260 8 Cost 0 0 0 0 15,962,260' Maint Approp. 5,636,283 6,250,100 6,571,448 6,861,375 182,508,494 7 9 Cost 5,549,421 5,737,473 7,261,154 6,837,404 182,470,582 7 9 Rehab Approp. 0 0 0 0 944,649 Cost 0 0 0 0 944,649 I Includes $17,003,761 for previous 6-foot canalization project. 2 Includes $36,943,217 expended from 1885 to 1937 on operation and care of work of improvement under provisions of permanent indefinite appropriations for such purposes. 3 Includes $215,812 public works acceleration, executive 1963. 4 Includes $38,766 public works acceleration, executive 1963. 5 Excludes $251,769 contributed funds for new work. 6 Excludes $250,102 contributed funds for new work. 7 Excludes $1,621,349 expended in operation of snag boats under provisions of permanent indefinite appropriation for such purposes, and $267 transferred to project without reimbursement. 8 Includes $1,040,236 Public Works funds. 9 Includes $1,000 for removal of obstructions in Licking River under authority of Section 3, R&H Act of 1930. 10 Includes $100,000 placed in Fiscal Year 1971 Budget Reserve 11 Excludes $3,899 transferred from project without reimbursement. 12 Surplus property valued at $3,553 transferred to project without reimbursement. 13 Excludes $2,140 transferred to project without reimbursement. 14 Excludes surplus property valued at $73,832 transferred to project without reimbursement. 15 Includes $87,724,158 prior construction cost. 16 Excludes surplus property valued at $297,385 transferred to project without reimbursement. 17 Includes $549,392 Code 710 Funds, $572,162 Code 711 Funds, $532,677 Code 712 Funds, and $1,759,812 Code 713 funds. 18 Includes $549,392 Code 710 Funds, $342,162 Code 711 Funds, $532,677 Code 712 Funds, and $1,989,812 Code 713 Funds Includes $2,158,073 Funds provided from The Productive Employment Appropriations Act of 1983 (PL 98-8). 20 Includes $920,945 cost for operations and care of previous projects. 21 Includes $430,589,500Inland Waterways Trust Funds. 22 Includes $430,362,187 Inland Waterways Trust Funds. 23 Excludes $9,525,437 settlement from the U.S. Treasury Dept Judgment Fund 19-5 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 2000 Authorizine Legislation Project and Work Authorized Documents Open Channel Work, Ohio River March 3, 1827 January 21, 1927 July 3, 1930 July 3, 1958 Project adopted by this act originally covered entire length of Ohio River from its mouth near Cairo to Pittsburgh, a distance of 981 miles. It provided for removal of all obstructions, which tend to endanger steamboat navigation. Construct ice piers as a part of allotted from appropriations for general open channel work. Reforestation of sloughs on Kentucky Peninsula near Evansville, IN, and a 200-foot strip along bank and For bank protection, at an estimated cost of $200,000. Act of March 3, 1827, modified to include maintenance of existing Licking River Channel within lower 3-mile limit of river slack water, at an estimated increase of $1,000 in cost of average annual maintenance. H. Doc. 187, 67th Cong., 2nd Sess. H. Doc. 409, 69th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 434, 84th Cong., 2nd Sess. Locks and Dams, Ohio River December 29, 1981 November 17, 1988 November 28, 1990 November 28, 1990 October 31, 1992 Act of December 29, 1981, established the 1,000-acre Falls of the Ohio National Wildlife Conservation Area, at a cost not to exceed $300,000. Act of November 17, 1988 authorized a replacement structure for Locks and Dams 52 and 53 at Olmsted, Illinois. Act of November 28, 1990, modified PL 97-137 by authorizing an interpretive center at Falls of the Ohio National Wildlife Conservation Area, at an estimated total cost of $3,200,000. Act of November 28, 1990 authorized a modernization of the existing 110 foot x 600 foot lock at McAlpine Locks and Dam, Indiana and Kentucky at a total cost of $219,600,000 with one-half appropriated from the Treasury and one-half from the Inland Waterways Trust Fund. Act of October 31, 1992 renamed the Gallipolis Locks and Dam to the Robert C. Byrd Locks and Dam. H.R. 2241, PL97-137, Title II, 95 Stat. 1710 PL 100-676, 100th Cong., 2nd Sess. PL 101-640, 101st Cong., 2nd Sess. PL 101-640, 101st Cong., 2nd Sess. PL 102-580, 102nd Cong., 2nd Sess. 19-6 Table 19-1B See Section in Text Date of Authorizing Act 2. '" '"_ J 01110 RIVER Table 19-H Construction of Locks and Dams on Ohio River Total Cost of Existing Project to September 30, 2000 (See Section 1 of Text) Operations and Maintenance Funds New Work General Rehabilitation Total Regular $2,149,350,914 $1,197,539,092 $116,886,390 $3,463,776,396 Public Works 3,258,368 0 0 3,258,368 Emergency Relief 1,198,837 19,000 0 1,217,837 Maintenance & Operation 0 3,039,789 0 3,039,789 Public Works Acceleration 215,812 38,766 0 354,578 Executive 1963 0 0 0 0 Total $2,154,023,931 $1,200,636,647 "2 $116,886,390 $ 3,471,546,968 1Excludes $36,943,217 expended from 1885 to 1937 under permanent indefinite appropriation. 2 Excludes $920,945 cost for operation and care of previous projects. 3 Excludes $87,724,158 prior construction cost. 4Includes $33,914,252 cost for O & M Rehabilitation. Note: All other cost variations are listed in the Footnotes of Table 19-A. Table 19-I Federal Energy Regulatory Commission Licenses At Locks and Dams, Ohio River Markland Dam McAlpine Dam Racine Dam Greenup Dam Hannibal Dam F.E.R.C License 2,211 289:1,000 2,570 2,614 3,206 License Public Service Co. Louisville Gas Ohio Power Co. City of Vanceburg, City of New of Indiana and Electric Co. Kentucky Martinsville, WV Annual Charge $ 45,950 $ 95,000 $ 64,232 $ 261,103 0 Collections to end of Fiscal Year 2000 $1,560,366.64 $9,385,353.94 $2,036,150 $4,412,574 $197,589.03 19-7 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 2000 Table 19-J Ohio River Locks and Dams (See Section 1 of Text) Lock Miles Distance from Width of Greatest Length Upper Depth on Miter Sills Character of Actual Cost And Below Nearest Town Chamber Available for Lift Normal Upper Lower Foundation Year to Date o Dam Pittsburgh (feet) Full Width (feet) Pool (feet) (feet) Lock Dam Percent Opened to Each Loc (feet) Elevation Complete Navigation and Dar (feet, mean sea level) 1 - Replaced -. . - .. $ 870ld 6.2 Emsworth Locks and Dam, Emsworth, PA 2 - Replaced 3 - Replaced 13.3 Dashields Locks and Dam 1.6 miles below Sewickley, PA 4 - Replaced 5 - Replaced 6 - Replaced 31.7 Montgomery Locks and Dam, 1.4 miles above Industry, PA 7 - Replaced 8 - Replaced 54.4 New Cumberland Locks and Dam, Stratton, OH 9 - Replaced - Replaced - Replaced 84.3 Pike Island Locks and Dam, 2 miles upstream from Warwood, WV - Replaced - Replaced - Replaced 126.4 Hannibal Locks and Dam, 1.6 miles upstream from New Martinsville, WV - Replaced 18.0 10.0 710.0 692.0 110 56 110 56 110 56 110 110 110 110 110 110 20.5 664.5 17.0 1 4 12.9 3 Rock 13.41 16.01 17.53 Rock Rock and Piles Rock 14.63 Rock Rock and and : Piles Piles 7.01 14.83 Rock Rock f k n 100 1921 43,347,635 2 14 976,767 1,144,588 100 1929 37,447,328 15 - - 1,071,472 - - 1,080,132 - - 1,123.442 100 1936 37,754,307 16 1,075,000 -- 1,167,456 100 1959 39,099,688 1,177,100 1,138,000 1,162,165 21.0 21.0 644.0 623.0 17.01 38.0 18.01 Rock 17.0 Rock Rock Rock 100 1968 56,623,946 - - 1,166,104 1.222,389 - - 1,133,371 99 1972 87,902,000 1,180,478 17.5 682.0 600 360 600 360 600 360 1,200 600 1,200 600 1,200 600 10 11 12 13 14 15 19-8 15.5 1 5 12.9 3 OHIO RIVER Table 19-J Ohio River Locks and Dams (continued) (See Section 1 of Text) Lock Miles Distance from Width of Greatest Length Upper Depth on Miter Sills Character of Actual Cost And Below Nearest Town Chamber Available for Lift Normal Upper Lower Foundation Year to Date c Dam Pittsburgh (feet) Full Width (feet) Pool (feet) (feet) Lock Dam Percent Opened to Each Loc (feet) Elevation Complete Navigation and Dal (feet, mean sea level) 16 - Replaced - - - - - - - - - - 1,275,532 161.7 Willow Island Locks and Dam, 2.7 miles above Waverly, WV 17 - Replaced 18 - Replaced 19 - Replaced 20 - Replaced 103.9 Belleville Locks and Dam, 0.3 mile below Reedsville, OH 21 - Replaced 22 - Replaced 23 - Replaced 237.5 Racine Locks and Dam, 1.5 miles below Letart Falls, OH 24 - Replaced 25 - Replaced 26 - Replaced 279.2 Robert C. Byrd Locks and Dam, 0.7 mile below 6 Hogsett, WV Robert C. Byrd Modernization 27 Rehab Dam and New Lock 27 - Replaced 28 - Replaced 29 - Replaced 30 - Replaced 341.0 Greenup Locks and Dam, 4.9 miles below Greenup, KY 31 - Replaced Replaced Replaced 32 33 110 110 110 110 110 110 1,200 600 1,200 600 1,200 600 20.0 22.0 22.0 602.0 582.0 560.0 35.0 37.0 15.0 Rock and Piles 15.03 Rock and Piles 18.0 15.0 Rock and Piles Rock Rock Rock 100 1972 78,173,881 - - 1,362,591 - - 927,091 - - 1,213.848 - - 936,696 100 1968 62,591,255 - - 1,484,562 - - 1,218,798 - - 1,851,488 100 1971 64,922,680 - - 1,187,542 - - 1.925.205 - - 1,307,241 110 1,200 110 110 110 110 1,200 600 1,200 600 3,452,066 23.0 30.0 538.0 515.0 18.0 18.01 15.0 Rock 13.0 Rock Rock Rock 100 1992 358,824,375 17 - - 1,063,133 - - 1,088,802 - - 1,579,618 100 1959 57.464.191 - 1,359,231 - 2,951,216 - 1,937,166 19-9 f k m REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 2000 Table 19-J Ohio River Locks and Dams (continued) (See Section 1 of Text) Lock Miles Distance from Width of Greatest Length Upper Depth on Miter Sills Character of Actual Cost And Below Nearest Town Chamber Available for Lift Normal Upper Lower Foundation Year to Date o Dam Pittsburgh (feet) Full Width (feet) Pool (feet) (feet) Lock Dam Percent Opened to Each Loc (feet) Elevation Complete Navigation and Dat (feet, mean sea level) 34 - Replaced . - - - - - - -3,437,057 436.2 Captain Anthony Meldahl Locks and Dam, 2.2 miles above Foster, KY - Replaced - Replaced - Replaced 38 - Replaced 531.5 Markland Locks and Dam, 1 mile above Markland, IN 39 Replaced 40 - Eliminated 41 - - Falls of the Ohio, I mile above McAlpine 604.0 McAlpine Locks and Dam (Reconstruction of Locks and Dam 41) 42 - Eliminated 43 - Replaced 44 - Replaced 45 - Replaced 720.7 Cannelton Locks and Dam, 3 miles above Cannelton, IN 46 - Replaced 776.1 Newburgh Locks and Dam, 16 miles above Evansville, IN 47 - Replaced 110 110 30.0 35.0 485.0 455.0 15.0 Rock 50.0 15.0 Rock Rock Piles f k ill 100 1962 74,188,216 -- 1,894,942 - - 3,704,535 - - 1,297,924 -- 2,857,040 100 1963 63,019,403 - - 2,222,448 - - - - 7,658,134 7 N/A N/A 0 N/A 2,364,774 1,200 600 1,200 600 N/A 1,200 600 360 1,200 600 1,200 600 49.0 420.0 383.0 12.0 19.0 19.0 11.0 Rock 11.0 38.0 13.0 Rock Rock Rock 100 1961 81,930,621 7,8,19 - - 2,592,242 - - 2,819,930 - - 3,202,890 100 1972 99,032,866 10 110 110 N/A 110 110 56 110 110 110 110 16.0 358.0 32.0 16.0 Rock Pile 99 1975 104,496,840 - - 4,415,526 - - 3,062,710 19-10 37.0 25.0 35 36 37 3,129,028 48 Replaced OHIO RIVER Table 19-J Ohio River Locks and Dams (continued) (See Section 1 of Text) Lock Miles Distance from Width of Greatest Length Upper Depth on Miter Sills Character of Actual Cos! And Below Nearest Town Chamber Available for Lift Normal Upper Lower Foundation Year to Date Dam Pittsburgh (feet) Full Width (feet) Pool (feet) (feet) Lock Dam Percent Opened to Each Lo (feet) Elevation Complete Navigation and Da (feet, mean sea level) 49 - Replaced - - - - - - - - - -3,325,964 846.0 John T. Myers 110 1,200 Locks and Dam, 110 600 22.0 342.0 34.0 12.0 Rock Rock 99 1975 100,326,373 3.5 miles below Uniontown, KY 50 - Replaced - - - - - - - - - - 3,571,762 51 - Replaced - - - - - - - - - - 4,370,566 918.5 Smithland Locks 110 1,200 and Dam, 2 110 1,200 22.0 324.0 34.0 12.0 Rock Rock 99 1980 273,725,471 miles above Smithland, KY 52 938.9 1.4 miles below 110 600 12.0 302.0 15.4 11.0 Pile Pile 100 1928 13,337,747 1 Brookport, IL 938.9 1.4 miles below 110 1,200 12.0 302.0 15.4 11.0 Pile Pile 100 1969 10,197,516 Brookport, IL (New lock) 964.4 Olmsted Locks & 110 1,200 21.0 300.0 18.0 18.0 Pile Pile 44 2008 456,179,166 1 Dam at Olmsted, IL 53 962.6 10.8 miles 110 600 13.4 290.0 15.4 9.69 Pile Pile 100 1929 10,004,240 1 above Mound City, IL 962.6 10.8 miles 110 1,200 13.4 290.0 15.4 9.6 Pile -100 1982 38,570,920 above Mound City, IL (New lock) 974.2 Mound City - - - - - -1,539,470 1 Lock and Dam, 1 mile below Mound City, IL TOTAL $2,351,621,07420 t of )ck m 1 8 2 3 19-11 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 2000 Table 19-J Ohio River Locks and Dams (Continued) Footnotes I Depths are on emergency dam foundation and recontrolling depths. 2 Change from fixed dam to lift-gate dam completed in 1938. 3 Depths are on poiree dam foundation and are controlling depths. 4 Land chamber. 5 River chamber. 6 Roller-gate dam. Cost not included in total. Constructed under project for improving lower Kanawha River. 7 Lock and Dam 41 completed with 110- by 600-foot lock in 1921. Completed with new dam and raised canal and lock wall in 1928. Auxiliary 56- by 360-foot lock constructed in 1929-30. Reconstruction and modernization began 1956, renamed McAlpine Locks and Dam in 1960. Operation of auxiliary lock suspended in 1971. 8 Existing structures are complete except for deferred alteration of railroad bridge. Construction of the new 110 foot x 1,200 foot lock has not yet begun. 9 Dam below not yet constructed. Depth on lower miter sill at lower water. 10 Excludes $2,219,975 payment for settlement of damage to dam caused by barge accident in April 1978. 11 Major rehabilitation ($8,876,000) initiated in FY 79 is complete. 12 Major rehabilitation ($4,593,572) initiated in FY 79 is complete. 13 For preconstruction planning 1965 to 1972. No longer considered authorized. (See Section 1 of Text) 14 Includes $37,485,870 for major rehabilitation completed in FY 84 15 Includes $33,914,252 for major rehabilitation completed in FY 90 (O&M funds). 16 Includes $33,016,696 for major rehabilitation completed in FY 89. 17 Includes $184,180,385 Inland Waterways Trust Funds. 18 Includes $228,076,809 Inland Waterways Trust Funds. 19 Includes $18,104,993 Inland Waterways Trust Funds. 20 Exclusive of $7,013,405 details below. Additional Features Entering into Cost of Project Louisville and Portland Canal and Indiana chute $5,359,203 (under previous project). Examinations, survey contingencies, plants, and miscellaneous 966,232 Waterfront Development at Huntington, WV (Greenup Pool) 19,170 Recreation facilities, pool area, Gallipolis Locks and Dam. 668,800 Total 7,013,405 Grand Total $2,358,634,479 19-12 BUFFALO, NY DISTRICT* The District comprises northern OH, northwestern PA and western and northern NY, embracing U.S. waters of lake Erie exclusive of a small portion of the western end, Lake Ontario, and St. Lawrence River, with their tributary drainage basins from boundaries between the states of OH and MI to international boundary line east of Frontier, NY. IMPROVEMENTS NAVIGATION Page 1. Ashtabula Harbor, OH 20-2 2. Barcelona Harbor, NY 20-2 3. Black Rock Channel and Tonawanda Harbor, NY 20-2 4. Buffalo Harbor, NY 20-3 5. Buffalo Hbr Environmental Dredging 20-3 6. Cattaraugus Creek Harbor, OH 20-4 7. Cleveland Harbor, OH 20-4 8. Conneaut Harbor, OH 20-5 9. Dunkirk Harbor, NY 20-5 10. Erie Harbor, PA 20-6 11. Fairport Harbor, OH 20-6 12. Great Sodus, NY 20-6 13. Huron Harbor, OH 20-7 14. Irondequoit Bay, NY 20-7 15. Lorain Harbor, OH 20-7 16. Oak Orchard, NY 20-8 17. Oswego Harbor, NY 20-8 18. Owasco Outlet, Auburn, NY 20-9 19. Put-In-Bay Harbor, OH 20-9 20. Rochester Harbor, NY 20-9 21. Rocky River, OH 20-9 22. Sandusky Harbor, OH 20-10 23. Sturgeon Point, NY 20-10 24. Toledo Harbor, OH 20-10 25. Touissaint River, OH 20-11 26. Vermilion Harbor, OH 20-11 27. Wilson Harbor, NY 20-11 28. Reconnaissance and Condition Surveys 20-11 NAVIGATION WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION 29. Lake Erie-Cooley Canal- Lucas, OHE 30. New York State Canal System 31. Rochester Harbor, NY (Wave Surge) SHORE PROTECTION 32. Presque Isle Peninsula, Erie, PA FLOOD CONTROL 33. Mt. Morris Lake, NY Genesee River URBAN STORM WATER MGMT 34. Onondaga Storm Water Discharge, NY 20-12 Page 20-13 20-13 MISCELLANEOUS 35. National Emergency Preparedness 36. Regulatory Functions Program 20-13 20-13 TABLES Table 20-A Cost and Financial Statement Table 20-B Authorizing Legislation Table 20-C Other Authorized Navigation Projects Table 20-D Other Authorized Shore Protection (Formerly called "Beach Erosion Control") Projects Table 20-E Other Authorized Flood Control Projects Table 20-G De-authorized Projects Table 20-H Flood Control and Coastal Emergencies (FC&CE) Table 20-I Formerly Used Sites Remedial Action Program (FUSRAP) Table 20-J General Investigations Table 20-K Work Under Special Authorities Table 20-L Inspection of Completed Flood Control Projects 20-11 20-12 20-12 20-1 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES NAVIGATION 1. ASHTABULA HARBOR, OH Location. On the south shore of Lake Erie, at mouth of Ashtabula River, 59 miles easterly from Cleveland, OH. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14836.) Previous Projects. For details see pg. 1963 of Annual Report for 1915, and pg. 1593 of Annual Report for 1938. Existing Project. For description see pgs. 1297-99 of Annual Report for 1966. Federal cost of completed project is $12,240,147. Non-Federal costs of $5,743,000, including contribution of $47,000, were for construction of access roads, docks, storage and handling facilities and dockside dredging. See Table 20-B for authorizing legislation. Local Cooperation. Fully complied with. Local interests contributed $47,000 for work authorized by 1936 and 1970 acts. Terminal Facilities. There are sixteen piers and wharves. Coast Guard owns one facility. Ten facilities are along banks of Ashtabula River and six are on south side of outer harbor. Eleven terminals have railroad connections and six have mechanical handling facilities. Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. (See Port Series No. 42, revised 1972, Corps of Engineers.) Operations and Results during FY. Maintenance: Federal funds for environmental activities cost $12,435; real estate support cost $4,712; project condition surveys cost $40,818; dredging studies cost $4,351, E&D Analysis of the inner west breakwater cost $34,201. The U.S. Derrickboat McCauley repaired 50 l.f. of the west breakwater and cost $105,552. $452,372 was expended on the Ashtabula River Partnership effort. The partnership is comprised of local, private and government agencies to address remediation and removal of contaminated sediments in the Harbor and Ashtabula River system. Effort continues on a Comprehensive Management Plan/Environmental Impact Statement (CMP/EIS) regarding dredging and construction of a new Upland Disposal Facility for toxic and non-toxic sediments. 2. BARCELONA HARBOR, NY Location: On the south shore of Lake Erie about 17 miles southwesterly of Dunkirk, N.Y. and 29 miles northwesterly of Erie, PA (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14823.) Previous Projects. Adopted by July 4, 1936, River and Harbor Act. Only information available is in index to report of Chief of Engineers under title "Portland Harbor, N.Y." Existing Project. For description of existing project, see page 1506 of Annual Report for 1961. Actual costs for new work for completed project were $1,124,286. Local interests incurred Non- Federal costs of $60,000. Of this amount, $7,500 was a cash contribution and remainder was for providing necessary lands and construction of a public wharf. Existing project was authorized by the 1945 River and Harbor Act (H. Doc. 446, 78 "h Cong., 2"d sess.) Local Cooperation. Fully complied with. Local interests contributed $7,500. Terminal Facilities. Facilities consist of private docks for recreational craft and privately owned servicing and storage handling facilities for recreational and other small craft. Operations and results during FY. Maintenance: Federal funds for project condition surveys cost $5,924, supervision and administration cost $2,413, and dredging cost $53,802 to finalize the FY 99 contract. 3. BLACK ROCK CHANNEL TONAWANDA HARBOR, NY AND Location. Improvement is essentially that of upper 13.5 miles of Niagara River from its head at Lake Erie, Buffalo, NY, to and including Tonawanda Harbor, NY. It comprises improvements formerly designated by three titles; Lake Erie entrance to Black Rock Harbor and Erie Basin, NY, Black Rock Harbor and Channel, NY and Tonawanda Harbor and Niagara River, NY. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14832.) Previous Projects. For details, see items "5 and 7, pg. 1970 of Annual Report for 1915, and pg. 1612 of Annual Report for 1938. Existing Project. For description of existing project and Federally owned Black Rock ship lock, see pg. 1548 of Annual Report for 1962. Improvement of guide pier at Black Rock Lock, as authorized by 1935 act was de-authorized by Congress in Aug 1977. Cost for completed portion of new work is $10,457,093. Enlarging of existing 21-foot turning basin and deepening lower 1,500 feet of Tonawanda Inner Harbor from 16 to 21 feet, authorized by the 1954 act, was de-authorized by Congress in May 1981, and is excluded from foregoing cost. Non-Federal costs are estimated at $1,540,000 for costs incurred by NY State for construction of Erie Basin and protecting breakwater, and construction and extension of Bird Island Pier, and by other local interest for relocation of utilities. See Table 20-B for authorizing legislation. 20-2 BUFFALO, NY DISTRICT Local Cooperation. Fully complied with for existing project. Contract for cost-shared recreation development at completed projects (Code 713 program) was executed by the NY State Department of Environmental Conservation, Albany, NY on Apr 16, 1985, and was approved by the Assistant Secretary of the Army and Chief of Engineers on May 3, 1985. Terminal Facilities. Two facilities are along the upstream end of the channel. Below Black Rock Lock and at Tonawanda Harbor there are 13 privately owned terminals. There are two State-owned barge canal terminals at Tonawanda, NY, and several marine service and supply docks for recreational and other small craft. The Corps owns a wharf adjacent to Black Rock Lock that is private. Ten terminals have railroad connections and six mechanical-handling facilities. Facilities considered adequate for existing commerce. (Port Series No. 41, revised 1971, Corps of Engineers.) Operations and Results during FY. Maintenance: The lock did not close for major maintenance during the 2000 fiscal year. All maintenance required during FY 2000 was accomplished with minimal impact on commercial and recreational navigation interests. Required repairs to the upper east guide wall and wharf wall were completed this fiscal year. Total costs of $1,906,871 were distributed as follows: Operation and care of lock and ordinary maintenance and repair cost $494,946. Real estate support cost $5,000; project condition surveys cost $5,385; water control management cost $23,757. Maintenance included $942,966 for the rehabilitation of the upper east wharf wall; $2,971 for the upper east guide wall; $173,743 for the upper west wall engineering and design; $15,271 for safety implementation structural measures; $22,619 for lock signage; $18,720 for stream gauging; $25,300 for gate painting engineering and design. Costs were $20,752 for the gate pin repair and $54,008 for snagging and clearing work performed by the U.S. Derrickboat McCauley; $28,198 for middle gate removal plans and specifications. Regular maintenance performed cost $73,235. 4. BUFFALO IIARBOR, NY Location. At eastern end of Lake Erie, at head of Niagara River, 176 miles easterly from Cleveland, OH. (See NOAA Nautical Charts 14820 and 14833.) Previous Projects. For details see pg. 1967 of Annual Report for 1915 and pg. 1606 of Annual Report for 1938. Existing Project. For description see pg. 1368 of Annual Report for 1963. In addition, on Dec 15, 1980, OCE authorized the removal of bridge abutments of South Michigan Avenue Bridge. New work for completed project cost $18,837,601. Estimated non-Federal costs were $9,188,000 for deepening, widening, and improving Buffalo River and ship canal, constructing piers, retaining walls, and dikes and performing dockside dredging. See Table 20-B for authorizing legislation. Local Cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal Facilities. There are 27 piers, wharves, and docks of which five are on the Outer Harbor, nine are on the Lackawanna, Union, and Buffalo Ship Canals, and thirteen are located along the deep-draft section of the Buffalo River. Gateway Metroport, Division of Gateway Trade Center, Inc., owns and operates, for the former Bethlehem Steel Corp., wharves at Lackawanna for the receipt and shipment of general cargo and bulk commodities. Buildings of the former steel plant are utilized for transit and longterm storage of cargo as required. The Niagara Frontier Transportation Authority owns Terminals A and B in the Outer Harbor used for handling general cargo. Twenty terminals have railroad connections. The city of Buffalo owns a slip on the right bank of Buffalo River just north of Michigan Avenue Bridge for mooring the city fireboat. Coast Guard facilities are at the mouth of Buffalo River along the left bank. (See Port Series No. 41, revised 1991, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers.) Operations and Results during FY. Maintenance: Federal funds for environmental studies cost $5,992; real estate support cost $4,933; project condition surveys cost $61,943; dredging studies cost $6,579; water control management cost $22,195. Dredging cost $269,172 to finalize the FY 99 contract. Work performed using the U.S. Derrickboat McCauley cost $262,123. The work included repairs to 75 1.f. of the South Breakwater, Dike 4, snagging and clearing the Buffalo River, and clearing out the culverts at Bird Island Pier. Coastal mapping cost $21,666. 5. BUFFALO HARBOR ENVIRONMENTAL DREDGING Location: The eastern end of Lake Erie at the head of the Niagara River, 176 miles easterly from Cleveland, OH. Previous Projects: None Existing Project: An outer harbor, about 4-1/2 miles long and 1,600 feet wide, formed by a breakwater system, approximately parallel to the lake shore, 22,718 feet in length, with entrances near north 20-3 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES and south ends and one confined disposal facility. A west breakwater 1,800 feet long located in Lake Erie protecting the north entrance. The inner harbor consists of a south pier at the mouth of the Buffalo River, about 5.8 miles of Federal Channel in the Buffalo River, and a 2-mile channel in the Buffalo Ship Canal. Local Cooperation: Fully complied with. Terminal Facilities: There are 13 wharves and docks located along the deep-draft section of the Buffalo River. Grain storage facilities, a cement transfer operation and a fuel storage/transfer operation are found along the Buffalo River on both banks. The city of Buffalo owns a slip on the right bank of Buffalo River just north of Michigan Avenue Bridge for mooring the city fireboat. Coast Guard facilities are at the mouth of Buffalo River along the left bank. (See Port Series No. 41, revised 1991, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers.) Operations and Results during FY. Maintenance: $26,221 in Federal funds was expended to formulate a decision document addressing application of Section 312 environmental dredging authorities, impacts to navigation, and identifying potential areas for ecosystem restoration. 6. CATTARAUGUS CREEK HARBOR, OHi Location. At mouth of Cattaraugus Creek on south shore of Lake Erie about 12 miles northeasterly from Dunkirk Harbor, NY and 24 miles southwesterly from Buffalo Harbor, NY (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14823.) Existing project. For details of the existing project, see page 32-4 of Annual Report for 1983. Construction was completed in January 1983. Total Federal cost of new work was $4,804,060. Total non-Federal cost for new work was $2,566,529, excluding $20,000 for lands. Existing project was authorized by 1968 R&H Act (H.Doc. 97, 90th Cong., 1"t sess.) Local cooperation. See page 32-5 of Annual Report for 1976 for details of requirements of local cooperation. The cash contribution paid was $2,566,529. The State of New York executed local cooperation agreement in July 1981. Terminal facilities. Facilities consist of private docks for recreational craft and privately owned servicing and storage handling facilities for recreational and other small craft. Operations and Results during FY. Maintenance: Federal funds for coastal mapping cost $18,590. Funds were adjusted downward $81 for real estate support. Project condition surveys cost $10,2i0; environmental activities cost $2,980. 7. CLEVELAND HARBOR, OH Location. On south shore of Lake Erie, at mouth of Cuyahoga River, 176 miles westerly from Buffalo, NY (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14839). Previous Projects. For details see pg. 1962, Annual Report for 1915, and pg. 1585, Annual Report for 1938. Existing Project. For description of existing project, as authorized through the 1966 modification, see pg. 1269 of Annual Report for 1967. Further improvements in the interest of commercial navigation and recreational navigation were authorized in the 1985 Supplemental Appropriations Act (PL 99-88). For details of the commercial navigation portion of the project, see pg. 20-4 of the Annual Report for 1995. For details of the recreational navigation portion of the project, see pg. 20-3 of Annual Report for 1994. The recreational navigation project was also authorized by the Water Resources Development Act of 1986 (PL 99-662) and the FY 88 Energy and Water Appropriations Act (PL 100-202). These acts also authorized additional undefined improvements to Cleveland Harbor. A portion of the project was de-authorized by the Intermodel Surface Transportation Efficiency Act of 1991. Estimated total Federal cost of the existing project is $33,852,100 (Oct 1991) exclusive of undefined, inactive and deferred portions of the project. The amount of $29,315,100 is for completed work and the balance of $4,537,000 is for new work. Estimated non-Federal cost is $13,740,000 (Oct 1991) of which $9,203,000 is actual cost for completed work and the balance of $4,537,000 is required for work authorized by PL 99-88, PL 99-662, and PL 100-202. Remaining work authorized by 1946 River and Harbor Act, consisting of widening and deepening the right bank of Cuyahoga River at the downstream end of Cut 4, is considered inactive and excluded from foregoing cost estimate. Estimated Federal cost (1966) of this portion is $85,600 and non-Federal cost (1966) $5,000,000. Remaining work authorized by 1958 R&H Act, consisting of planning and replacement of bridges number 19 (E.L.R.R.) and 32 (B. & O.R.R.) and widening Cuyahoga and Old River channels, and remaining work authorized by the 1960 R&H Act, consisting of deepening the remainder of the Cuyahoga River from bridge number 1 to and including the Old River to a depth of 27 feet, has been classified as deferred and is also excluded from foregoing estimate. Estimated Federal cost (Oct 1976) of this portion is $18,033,300 and estimated non-Federal cost (Oct 1976) is $21,251,000. The 1989 Energy and Water Development Appropriations Act (PL 101-101) authorized the Corps to begin a 20-4 BUFFALO, NY DISTRICT Reconnaissance study of the Cuyahoga River, to address the concerns of boat traffic congestion and related risks, accidents and safety of the public. Preliminary plans were studied to alleviate the commercial navigation problem and inadequate width and depth, in the Old and Cuyahoga Rivers. The cost of this Reconnaissance study was $250,000. The Reconnaissance Report recommended a feasibility study for one plan which has three structural features and the potential for yielding commercial (priority) outputs. The non-Federal sponsor did not commit to provide its total share of the cost of the feasibility phase of the study. Therefore, the study was reclassified as "inactive". See Table 32-B for authorizing legislation. A confined disposal facility (CDF) (Dike 10B) was constructed adjacent to the Burke Lakefront Airport for containment of dredged material from Cleveland Harbor. The rubble mound structure was designed to hold material unsuitable for open-lake disposal. The sixty-eight (68) acre site should provide sufficient CDF capacity for approximately twenty years. The project was constructed with Federal O&M funds at a cost of $17,500,000 and was completed in 1998. Terminal Facilities. Fifty-one piers, wharves, and docks are situated in the Port of Cleveland. Eleven are located in the east and west basins of the outer harbor; 7 along the banks of the Old River and 17 and 16 along the right and left banks of the Cuyahoga River, respectively. Twenty-two terminals have both railroad connections and mechanical-handling facilities. The Corps owns a wharf at the foot of East 9th Street. The city of Cleveland owns and operates a wharf for mooring the city fireboat. U.S. Coast Guard vessels are moored east of the foot of 9th Street in the east basin. (See Port Series No. 43, revised 1989, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers.) Operations and Results during FY. Maintenance: Federal funds for environmental activities cost $9,850; real estate cost $9,724; project condition surveys cost $60,489; coastal mapping cost $1,008; FY 99 dredging finalization cost $4,989; FY 00 dredging cost $1,760,551 to remove approximately 276,947 cubic yards of shoaled material; dredging studies cost $26,818. Finalizing the CDF Site 10B contract cost $26,478. $2,328,641 was expended to continue construction for the rehabilitation of the southerly portion of the East Pier (Dock 20) and the north end of the West Pier. Repairs consist of a new anchored steel sheetpile bulkhead for the entire 832-foot length of Dock 20 and a concrete cap overlay on the north end of the West Pier. $1,947 was expended for coastal assessment of Dike 14. $129,332 was expended to complete an evaluation report on the existing dike and initiate the repair plans and specifications. $870,954 was expended for completion of plans and specifications and to initiate construction on 2500 I.f. of the East Breakwater contract. $33,280 was spent for engineering and design and supervision and administration of the East Breakwater. $634,335 was expended to repair 45 1.f. of the West Breakwater and Spur Breakwater near Edgewater Marina, 221 l.f. of the East Arrowhead Breakwater, and snagging and clearing using the U.S. Derrickboat Simonsen. Non- Federal cost was $23,649 to finalize the contract to extend 3 combined storm water and sewer overflow utility pipes. 8. CONNEAUT HARBOR, OH Location. On the south shore of Lake Erie, at mouth of Conneaut River, 73 miles easterly from Cleveland, OH. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14824.) Previous Projects. For details see pg. 1964, Annual Report for 1915. Existing Project. For description see pg. 1274 of Annual Report for 1967. Actual costs for new work for completed portion of the project were $7,541,369. For completed work, non-Federal costs were $200,000 for dockside dredging and removal of existing dolphins. The most southerly 300 feet of the 1,670 foot long shore arm, authorized by the R&H Act of 1910, was de-authorized Oct. 96. See Table 20-B for authorizing legislation. Local Cooperation. Fully complied with for completed portion of project. Terminal Facilities. There are seven piers and wharves. Six are privately owned and operated and located in inner harbor. Remaining facility is city owned on the south side of outer harbor. Six terminals have railroad connections and four mechanical - handling facilities. (See Port Series No. 42, revised 1972, Corps of Engineers.) Operations and Results during FY. Maintenance: Federal funds for economic studies cost $4,215; project condition surveys cost $16,218; coastal mapping cost $472; and environmental studies cost $991. Finalizing the FY 99 dredging contract cost $474,974. 20 l.f. of the East Breakwater was repaired using the U.S. Derrickboat McCauley, cost $73,307. 9. DUNKIRK HARBOR, NY Location. On south shore of Lake Erie, 37 miles southwesterly from Buffalo, NY. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14823.) Previous Projects. For details see pg. 1966 of Annual Report for 1915, and pg. 1604 of Annual Report for 1938. 20-5 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES Existing Project. For description of completed portion of existing project see pg. 32-8 of Annual Report for 1976. For description of small boat harbor project as authorized under Section 201 of Flood Control Act of 1965, see pg. 32-8 of Annual Report for 1978. Actual costs for completed work are $3,010,024. Actual non-Federal costs are $1,961,000. See Table 20-B for authorizing legislation. Local Cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal Facilities. Facilities consist of private docks for recreational craft and privately owffed servicing and storage handling facilities for recreational and other small craft. Operations and Results during FY. Maintenance: Federal funds for project condition surveys cost $6,475; coastal mapping cost $40,000; dredging cost $365,350 to remove 24,923 cubic yards of shoaled material. Miscellaneous breakwater repairs cost $815. 10. ERIE HARBOR, PA Location. On southerly side of bay formed by Presque Isle Peninsula, on south shore of Lake Erie, 78 miles westerly from Buffalo, NY. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14835.) Previous Projects. For details see pg. 1965 of Annual Report for 1915 and pg. 1600 of Annual Report for 1938. Existing Projects. For description see pgs. 1363-64 of Annual Report for 1963. The FY 93 Appropriations Act (PL102-377) authorized the planning, design and dredging of an access channel and berthing area. Entire project modification authorized by 1945 River and Harbor Act, providing for deepening channel and basin, both 23 feet deep, to Penn Central Company coal docks at westerly end of harbor, was de-authorized by Congress in Aug 1977. Actual costs for new work for completed portion of project were $2,860,906. Extension of north pier portion, authorized by 1899 Act was deauthorized in Nov 1981. A portion of work authorized by 1960 Act, deepening strips adjacent to north and south piers, was de-authorized in Aug 1982. Non- Federal costs for completed work were $51,000 for providing ore dock and dredging slip adjacent thereto. See Table 20-B for authorizing legislation. Local Cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal Facilities. Sixteen piers and wharves, of which twelve are privately owned and operated. Erie International Marine Terminal No. I owned by Port Commission, city of Erie, is along main waterfront on south side of Presque Isle Bay and Coast Guard facilities are on north side. Two offshore oil docks are on Lake Erie. Eight terminals have railroad' connections and six mechanical-handling facilities. Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. (See port Series No. 42, revised 1972, Corps of Engineers.) Operations and Results during FY. Maintenance: Federal funds for environmental activities cost $996; project condition surveys cost $34,388; dredging studies cost $11,953; coastal mapping cost $62,049; miscellaneous costs were $442. 11. FAIRPORT HARBOR, OH Location. On south shore of Lake Erie at mouth of Grand River, 33 miles easterly from Cleveland, OH. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14837.) Previous Projects. For details see pg. 1963 of Annual Report for 1915, and pg. 1590 of Annual Report for 1938. Existing Project. For description of existing project, see pg. 1526 of Annual Report for 1962. Total Federal cost of $2,591,000 is actual cost for completed portion of project. Total non-Federal cost is $101,000 for bulkheads and dockside dredging for completed portion of project. See Table 20-B for authorizing legislation. Local Cooperation. See pg. 32-11 of 1976 Annual Report regarding assurances of local cooperation for work authorized by R&H Act of 1927. Terminal Facilities. Sixteen piers and wharves, all along banks of Grand River. Coast Guard owns one facility. Nine terminals have railroad connections and ten mechanical-handling facilities. Facilities considered adequate for existing commerce. (See Port Series No. 42, revised 1972, Corps of Engineers.) Operations and Results during FY. Maintenance: Federal funds for real estate support cost $504; project condition surveys cost $24,153; East Pier repair cost $600,068; environmental studies cost $29,916; coastal mapping cost $509. 15 l.f. of the East Breakwater was repaired using the U.S. Derrickboat McCauley cost $18,081. Dredging cost $942,963 to remove approximately 253,215 cubic yards of shoaled material. 12. GREAT SODUS BAY HARBOR, NY Location. On Sodus Bay, which is a nearly landlocked indentation on south shore of Lake Ontario, 29 miles westerly from Oswego, NY. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14814.) 20-6 BUFFALO, NY DISTRICT Previous Project. For details, see pg. 1972 of Annual Report for 1915, and pg. 1526 of Annual Report for 1938. Existing Project. For description, see pg. 1380 of Annual Report for 1963. Improvements authorized by 1962 act, consisting of deepening lake approach channel, entrance channel and inner approach channel were deauthorized by Congress in Aug. 1977. Actual costs of new work for completed portion of project were $249,187.. Costs incurred by local interests are not available. See Table 20-B for authorization legislation. Local Cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal Facilities. Facilities consist of private docks for recreational craft and privately owned servicing and storage handling facilities for recreational and other small craft. Operations and Results During FY. Maintenance: Federal funds for project condition surveys cost $7,500. 200 l.f. of the East Breakwater was repaired using the U.S. Derrickboat McCauley cost $258,457. Real estate costs were adjusted downward $78. 13. HURON HARBOR, OH1 Location. On south shore of Lake Erie at mouth of Huron River, 47 miles westerly from Cleveland, OH. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14843.) Previous Project. For details, see pg. 1961 of Annual Report for 1915, and pg. 1576 of Annual Report for 1938. Existing Project. For description, see pg. 1347 of Annual Report for 1963 and pg. 32-12 of Annual Report for 1978. Cost of completed portion of existing project was $4,834,006. Construction of detached breakwater as authorized by 1962 R&H Act was de-authorized Jan 1, 1990. Non-Federal costs of $163,000 were incurred by local interests in 1963 for dockside dredging of areas between Federal improvement and terminal facilities. See Table 20-B for authorizing legislation. Local Cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal Facilities. Six privately owned wharves and docks, one along left bank of Huron River and remainder along right bank. Four terminals have railroad connections and four mechanical-handling facilities. Facilities are regarded as adequate for existing commerce. (See Port Series No. 42, revised 1972, Corps of Engineers.) Operations and Results during FY. Maintenance: Federal funds for project condition surveys cost $16,515. Finalizing the FY 99 dredging cost $18,372. The FY 00 dredging cost $490,320 to remove approximately 102,383 cubic yards of shoaled material. 40 l.f. of the East Breakwater was repaired by the U.S. Derrickboat Simonsen cost $125,209. Miscellaneous costs were $141. 14. IRONDEQUOIT BAY, NY Location. On south shore of lake Ontario, 4 miles east of Rochester, NY at mouth of Irondequoit Creek, Monroe County, NY (See NOAA Nautical Charts 14804 and 14815). Existing Project. For details of existing project, see pg. 32-7 of Annual Report for FY 87. Total estimated project cost is $15,363,000 (Oct 1994) including $3,582,000 Federal (which includes the COE $3,536,000 and the USCG $46,000) and $11,781,000 non-Federal, including a cash contribution of $2,661,000, lands and damages $290,000 and the cost of a movable highway bridge $8;830,000. Existing project was authorized by 1958 River and Harbor Act (H. Doc. 332, 84th Cong., 2nd sess.). Local Cooperation. The Buffalo District has a Local Cooperation Agreement with New York State, executed April 20, 1983. Terminal Facilities. Facilities consist of private docks for recreational craft and privately owned servicing and storage handling facilities for recreational and other small craft. Operations and Results during FY. Maintenance: Federal funds for project condition surveys cost $18,365; FY 00 dredging cost $334,542 to remove approximately 23,857 cubic yards of shoaled material. The contract will be finalized in FY 01. A credit of $2,349 was for environmental sampling. Coastal mapping cost $120. 15. LORAIN HARBOR, Oil Location. On south shore of Lake Erie at mouth of Black River, 25 miles westerly from Cleveland, OH. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14841.) Previous Projects. For details, see pg. 1961 of Annual Report for 1915, and pg. 1580 of Annual Report for 1938. Existing Project. For description see pgs. 1319-22 of Annual Report for 1966. Federal cost of new work is $20,475,000. Deepening and widening remainder of Black River Channel at Cut 1 and construction of bank stabilization, authorized by 1960 Act and modified by 1965 Act was de-authorized Jan 1, 1990. A portion of work authorized by 1960 act, dredging of 15-to-25 foot wide strips adjacent to the U.S. East and West piers were also de-authorized Jan 1, 1990. Total non-Federal cost is $3,000 contributed by local interests towards construction of west shore arm. See Table 20-B for authorizing legislation. The Water Resources Development Act (WRDA) of 1986 (PL 20-7 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF TIIHE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES 99-662) authorized construction of commercial navigation improvements consisting of two bend cuts on the Black River to widen and straighten the channel between the Norfolk and Western Railroad Bridge and the 21st Street Bridge. These cuts are to be excavated to the existing channel depth of 27 feet. The authorized plan also includes widening the Upper Turning Basin at the existing depth of 21 feet. Estimated costs for this work are $2,290,000 Federal and $1,510,000 non-Federal (Oct 1989). This portion of the project has been classified deferred. On Mar 12, 1986, the Chief of Engineers under authority of Section 107 of the 1960 River and Harbors Act, as amended, authorized construction of a small boat harbor that was completed in Jul 1987. The project consists of a 225-foot detached rubble mound breakwater and an 800-foot long rubble mound breakwater attached to the east breakwater shorearm in the east basin of the outer harbor. Construction costs for this project, including supervision and administration, were $775,025 Federal and $775,025 non-Federal. Local Cooperation. For completed work, local interests contributed $3,000. Work authorized by 1960 Act (and modified by 1965 Act) is deauthorized. All other conditions fully complied with. On Mar 25, 1986, the city- of Lorain, OH signed the Local Cooperation Agreement (LCA), for the Section 107 project. For details see pg. 32-7 of Annual Report for 1986. For details of LCA for deferred project authorized by the 1986 WRDA, see pgs. 32-9 of Annual Report for FY 87. Terminal Facilities. There are 23 piers and wharves, of which three are on the outer harbor and the remainder are along banks of Black River. Two are owned by the city. Eight terminals have railroad connections and 15 mechanical-handling facilities. Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. (See Port Series No. 42, revised 1972, Corps of Engineers.) Operations and Results during FY. Maintenance: Federal funds for environmental studies received a credit of $69; real estate support cost $4,928; project condition surveys cost $39,270; dredging studies cost $1,814; East and West Pier repairs cost $104,745; FY 00 dredging cost $343,541 to remove approximately 62,100 cubic yards of shoaled material; engineering cost for the CDF was $61,791. 200 l.f. of the West Breakwater was repaired using the U.S. Derrickboat Simonsen and cost $652,219. 16. OAK ORCHARD, NY Location. On south shore of Lake Ontario, at mouth of Oak Orchard Creek, 33 miles westerly of Rochester, NY. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14805.) Previous Project. For details see pg. 628 of Annual Report for 1905. Existing Project. For description of completed existing project see pg. 32-14 of 1975 Annual Report. Actual Federal cost for completed project was $1,613,500. Estimated non-Federal cost is $270,000 (Jul 1971) including cash contribution of $170,700 and $54,002 for recreational facilities and remainder for lands and construction of wharf. Existing project was authorized by the 1945 River and Harbor Act (H. Doc. 446, 78th Cong., 2nd sess.) Local Cooperation. Fully complied with. Local interests contributed $224,702. Terminal Facilities. There is no commercial navigation at Oak Orchard Harbor. Terminal facilities consist of private docks for recreational craft. Operations and Results during FY. Maintenance: Federal funds for project condition surveys cost $1,900; FY 00 dredging cost $146,893 to remove approximately 10,000 cubic yards of shoaled material; environmental activities cost $2,980; real estate received a credit of $61; coastal mapping cost $70. 17. OSWEGO IIARBOR, NY Locations. On South shore of Lake Ontario, at mouth of Oswego River, 59 miles easterly from Rochester, NY. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14813.) Previous Projects. For details see pg. 1973 of Annual Report for 1915, and pg. 1630 of Annual Report for 1938. Existing Project. For description see pgs. 1383-84 of Annual Report for 1963. Completed portion of project cost $7,242,039 and non-Federal costs for completed work were $4,440,000 for lands, dockside dredging, construction of terminal wharves, and cargo handling facilities. Deepening a 200-foot wide strip along harbor line east of mouth of Oswego River, remaining feature of work authorized by the 1930 Act, was de-authorized Jan 1, 1990. Deepening to 22 feet a 150-foot wide strip along harbor line in west outer harbor, remaining feature of work authorized by 1940 Act, was de-authorized in May 1981. The portion of the Federal Channel from the southernmost alignment of the Route 68 bridge upstream to the northernmost alignment of Lake Street bridge authorized by the 1910 R&H Act as amended by the 1935 R&H Act, was de-authorized Oct 96. See Table 20-B for authorizing legislation. 20-8 BUFFALO, NY DISTRICT Local Cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal Facilities. There are seven piers and wharves in the harbor and along the river channel. The Port of Oswego owns and operates a general cargo terminal at the mouth of the Oswego River. The Port Authority also operates a grain elevator west of the mouth of the river. The U.S. Coast Guard moors patrol and environmental research vessels west of the mouth of the river. Operations and Results during FY. Maintenance: Federal funds for project condition surveys cost $9,775; real estate support cost $1,977. Finalizing the FY 99 dredging contract cost $49,570 to remove 48,935 cubic yards of shoaled material. 600 1.f. of the West Arrowhead was repaired by the U.S. Derrickboat McCauley cost $830,824. 18. OWASCO OUTLET, AUBURN, NY Location. The project is located on Owasco Outlet, in the Oswego River Basin at Auburn, N.Y., in the towns of Fleming and Owasco, Cayuga County, N.Y. (See U.S. Geological Survey map of Auburn, N.Y. Existing Project. For description see pg. 1538 of Annual Report for 1960. Local Cooperation. Fully complied with. Local interest contributed. Operations and Results during FY. Maintenance: Funds were adjusted downward by $18,869. 19. PUT-IN BAY HARBOR, OH Location. Located on the north side of South Bass Island approximately 5 miles due north of Port Clinton, OH. Approximately 60 miles west of Cleveland, OH and 40 miles east of Toledo, OH. Existing Project. Provides for a channel of varying width, not exceeding 225 feet, and 14 feet deep from that depth in lake to a point 150 feet west of Fox Wharf. Thence 100 feet wide and 8 feet deep along harbor frontage to vicinity of Miller's Wharf, a distance of 1,600 feet, provided that no dredging is done by United States closer than 25 feet to existing structure. Existing project was completed in 1939. Cost of completed project was $51,609. Terminal Facilities. Dock facilities for the recreational boat users on the municipal dock. Island ferry service docks from South Bass Island to Port Clinton, OH. Operations and Results during FY. Maintenance: Federal funds for project condition surveys cost $8,330. The FY 99 dredging contract was finalized at a cost of $138,230; coastal mapping cost $16,000. 20. ROCHESTER HARBOR, NY Location. On south shore of Lake Ontario, at mouth of Genesee River, 59 miles westerly from Oswego, NY. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14815.) Previous Project. For details see pg. 1471 of Annual Report for 1915, and pg. 1623 of Annual Report for 1938. Existing Project. For description see pg. 1556 of Annual Report for 1962. Actual cost for new work for completed project is $2,191,514. Non-Federal costs are estimated at $2,260,000, all for 1960 Act, for lands, relocation of submarine cable crossing, relocations of small docks and boathouses, dockside dredging, structure modifications, and replacement of Baltimore & OH coal loader. See Table 20-B for authorizing legislation. Local Cooperation. Complied with except provision for replacement of coal loading facility as required by River and Harbor Act of Jul 14, 1960. Terminal Facilities. There are 3 docks at Rochester Harbor. The city of Rochester owns an 830-foot long wharf at the entrance to the Genesee River. Three storage buildings at the terminal, formerly used as transit sheds, have approximately 100,000 square feet of storage space. Approximately 3 acres of open storage area is located at the upper end of the facility. The facility has not been used for handling cargo for over 10 years. The U.S. Coast Guard moors search and rescue vessels at the mouth of the Genesee River. Another private facility is located 1.6 miles above the Stutson Street Bridge. Operations and Results during FY. Maintenance: Federal funds for environmental studies cost $4,787; project condition surveys cost $10,225; supervision and administration cost $11,990; real estate funds were adjusted downward by $124. Finalizing the FY 99 dredging contract resulted in a net credit of $3,000. 21. ROCKY RIVER, OHI Location. At mouth of Rocky River which empties into Lake Erie 7 miles westerly from Cleveland, OH. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14826.) Existing Project. For description see pg. 1329 of Annual Report for 1966. Federal cost for completed project was $343.494 and non-Federal cost was a cash contribution of $249,346. See Table 20-B for authorizing legislation. Local Cooperation. Fully complied with. Local interests contributed $249,346 for new work. Terminal Facilities. Facilities consist of private docks for recreational craft and privately owned servicing and storage handling facilities for recreational and other small craft. 20-9 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES Operations and Results during FY. Maintenance: Federal funds for project condition surveys cost $8,290. Funds were adjusted downward by $43,837 to finalize the FY 99 dredging contract. $232,144 was expended to complete plans and specifications and initiate construction on the East Pier. 22. SANDUSKY HARBOR, Oil Location. On south shore of Lake Erie," in southeastern portion of Sandusky Bay, 50 miles westerly from Cleveland, OH. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14845.) Previous Project. For description see pgs. 1511- 12 of Annual Report for 1962. Actual costs for new work for completed project were $6,250,121, excluding $325,000 contributed by local interests. Non-Federal costs for completed project are estimated at $675,000, including $325,000 cash contribution and the remaining $350,000 is for dockside dredging adjacent to deepening channels authorized by 1960 Act. See Table 20-B for authorizing legislation. Local Cooperation. Fully complied with. Local interests contributed $325,000 for new work. Terminal Facilities. Fourteen piers and wharves, three at west end of harbor and remainder along dock channel. One is a base for State-owned fish research and patrol boats. One publicly owned and six privately owned used for mooring fishing boats and recreational craft and for ferry service. Five terminals have railroad connections and five mechanical-handling facilities. Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. (See Port Series No. 42, revised 1972, Corps of Engineers.) Operations and Results during FY. Maintenance: Federal funds for environmental studies cost $22,602; project condition surveys cost $20,078; real estate support cost $2,956; dredging studies cost $3,936; dredging cost $932,378 to remove 184,563 cubic yards of shoaled material. 23. STURGEON POINT, EVANS, NY Location. On south shore of Lake Erie, 17 miles southwest of Buffalo, NY and 22 miles northeast of Dunkirk, NY. )See Geological Survey map of Angola, NY.) Existing Project. For description of existing project, see pg. 20-11 of Annual Report for 1991. Federal project cost is $ 1,460,000. Non-Federal project cost is $1,475,000. In addition, the local sponsor provided associated costs for upland development of $1,000,000. Local cooperation. The Buffalo District has a properly executed Local Cooperation Agreement with the Town of Evans, NY, signed Oct 26, 1987. Operations and results During FY. Maintenance: $21,835 was incurred for sand by-pass reimbursement. 24. TOLEDO HARBOR, OH Location. Comprises lower 7 miles of Maumee River and channel through Maumee Bay to Lake Erie. Maumee River has its source in northern Indiana and empties into Lake Erie. Harbor is at the westerly end of Lake Erie, 99 miles westerly from Cleveland, OH. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14847.) Previous Projects. For details see pg. 1959 of Annual Report for 1915, and pg. 1565 of Annual Report for 1938. Existing Project. For description of existing project see pgs. 32-18 and 32-19 of Annual Report for 1978. Cost of completed existing project was $15,567,147. See table 20-B for authorizing legislation. Local Cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal Facilities. Thirty-five piers, wharves and docks are located in the Port of Toledo. Seven are located on Maumee River; and 28 are equally divided along the right and left banks of the lower 7 miles of the Maumee River. The Toledo-Lucas County Port Authority Facility No. 1 Wharf handles conventional and containerized general cargo as well as an increasing amount of miscellaneous bulk materials. Fifteen of the terminals have railroad connections and mechanical handling facilities. (See Port Series No. 44, revised 1989, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers.) Operations and Results during FY. Maintenance: Federal funds for environmental studies cost $6,163; project condition surveys cost $133,772; real estate support cost $3,140; dredging studies resulted in a credit of $2,101; finalizing the FY 99 dredging contract cost $78,699; FY 00 dredging cost $1,600,815. 124,133 cubic yards of material were removed from the Maumee Bay and 598,273 cubic yards of material were removed from the Maumee River. Costs to continue the Long-Term Management Strategy were $913,812. These costs included the cost of developing and implementing a mutually acceptable and comprehensive sampling and testing plan to conduct EPA-required scientific studies. These studies included toxicity, bioaccumulation biological effects and chemical analyses of sediment and water over 26 miles of lake and river channels. Other work efforts were field application of innovative technologies that restored 1.4 million cubic yards of storage capacity in the 20-10 BUFFALO, NY DISTRICT existing confined disposal facilities, thereby expanding the useful life of these facilities. Miscellaneous other works performed included regular leachate testing and surveys for estimating restored capacity. 25. TOUSSAINT RIVER, OH Location. At weekly end of Lake Erie, 8 miles west of Port Clinton and 22 miles east of Toledo, Ohio (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14847) Existing Project. For description of existing project, pg 20-12 of annual Report for 1991. See table 20-B for authorizing legislation. Project ' is deferred due to discovery of unexploded ordnance in he dredging area. Local cooperation. The Buffalo District has a property executed Local Cooperation Agreement with Carroll Twsp., OH, signed April 3, 1991. Operations and Results during FY. Maintenance: Federal funds for project condition surveys cost $1,600; finalizing the FY 99 dredging contract cost $105,391; coastal mapping cost $36,012. Funds were adjusted downward $572 for environmental sampling. 26. VERMILION HARBOR, OH Location. On south shore of Lake Erie at mouth of Vermilion River, 37 miles westerly from Cleveland, OH. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14826.) Existing Project. For description of existing project see pgs. 32-17 and 32-18 of Annual Report for 1975. Actual Federal cost for the completed existing project was $1,156,118. Estimated non- Federal cost for new work is $754,679 including cash contribution of $740,679 and remainder for relocation of submarine cable and construction of public wharf. See Table 20-B for authorizing legislation. Local Cooperation. Fully complied with. Local interests contributed $740,679. Terminal Facilities. Facilities consist of private docks for recreational craft and privately owned servicing and storage handling facilities for recreational and other small craft. A reconnaissance study to alleviate the ice-jam and free-flow flooding of the river was completed in 1986 at a cost of $180,000. The proposed project was an ice-retention structure. The non-Federal sponsor did not commit to provide its total share of the cost of the feasibility study; the project was therefore reclassified as "inactive". Operations and Results during FY. Maintenance: Federal funds for project condition surveys cost $10,700; dredging cost $417,024 to remove 36,149 cubic yards of shoaled material. Environmental costs were $2,988; coastal mapping cost $100. Real estate costs were adjusted downward by $74. 27. WILSON IIARBOR, NY Location. At mouth of east branch of Twelve- Mile Creek, which enters Lake Ontario 12 miles easterly of mouth of Niagara River, and 67 miles westerly of Rochester Harbor, NY. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14806.) Previous Projects. For details see pg. 2395 of Annual Report for 1889, and pg. 628 of Annual Report for 1905. Existing Project. For description of existing project see pg. 32-18 of Annual Report for 1975. Actual Federal cost for completed existing project was $477,904. Estimated non-Federal costs are $774,000 that includes cost of $16,000 for previously completed work. Remainder of non-Federal costs is for work required for ,1968 R&H Act including cash contribution of $166,988. See Table 20-B for authorizing legislation. Local Cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal Facilities. Facilities consist of private docks for recreational craft and privately owned servicing and storage handling facilities for recreational and other small craft. Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations and Results during FY. Maintenance: Federal funds for project condition surveys cost $6,800; dredging cost $169,037 to remove 5,132 cubic yards of shoaled material. 75 l.f. of the West Breakwall was repaired by the U.S. Derrickboat McCauley cost $15,340. Environmental activities cost $2,967; subsurface investigations cost $57; coastal mapping cost $200. Real estate costs were adjusted downward $24.. 28. RECONNAISSANCE AND CONDITION SURVEYS Condition surveys were performed by the Buffalo District at a cost of $92,124. Remaining cost for reconnaissance and condition survey s are reported in individual project write-ups. Proiect Niagara River Ogdensburg Harbor Port Clinton Port Ontario West Harbor Date of Survey Sep 2000 Sep 2000 Sep 2000 Sep 2000 Oct 1999 20-11 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES NAVIGATION WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION 29. LAKE ERIE - COOLEY CANAL - LUCAS, OH Location: On the south shore of Lake Erie, approximately 12 miles east of Toledo, Ohio and 14 miles west of Port Clinton, Ohio. Existing Project: The project consists of two breakwaters, the west is 1,400 feet long and the east is 250 feet long. Also, included in the project is dredging a navigation channel to a depth of -4 LWD. The Federal cost of the project is $2,197,000 and the non-Federal share is $244,100. Local Cooperation: The Buffalo District has properly executed a Project Cooperation Agreement with Lucas County, Ohio, signed 27 October 1997. Operation and Results during FY. New Work: Federal funds of $34,445 were incurred for construction; $3,823 for supervision and administration; $39,972 for engineering and design; $20,136 for pre-authorization studies; and $412 for real estate activities. Non-Federal funds resulted in a credit of $4,120 for construction; $1,715 for supervision and administration; $14,458 for engineering and design; $80 for pre-authorization studies; and $80 for real estate activities. 30. NEW YORK STATE CANAL SYSTEM Location: The New York State Canal System runs primarily east west through New York State. It consists of 4 components: Erie Canal, Oswego Canal, Cayuga/Seneca Canal, and Champlain Canal. Existing Project: Reimburse the State of New York 50% of non-Federal operation, maintenance and rehabilitation costs as well as make capital improvements. Existing project was authorized by Sec. 1105, WRDA 1986 and Sec. 553, WRDA 1996 and Sec 341, WRDA 1999. Local Cooperation: Fully complied with. Terminal Facilities: Numerous piers, wharves and locks used for recreational craft. Operations and Results during FY. New work $3,359,073 was expended for Reconnaissance Report/Decision Document and to reimburse the State of NY for completed project. 31. ROCHESTER WAVE SURGE, NY Location. On south shore of Lake Ontario at mouth of Genesee River, 59 miles westerly from Oswego, NY. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14815). Existing Project. Project was approved for construction by the Chief of Engineers pursuant to Section 107 of the 1960 River and Harbors Act, as amended, as authorized by the 1990 Water Resources Development Act. The recommended plan of improvement consists of a partial segmented rubble mound lining of the interior walls of the existing piers. Total estimated Federal cost of the project is $3,850,000. Total estimated non-Federal cost is $3,850,000. Local Cooperation. The Local Cooperation Agreement was executed with the local sponsor, the City of Rochester, on Feb 27, 1996. Operations and Results during FY. New Work: Due to balancing of Federal and non-Federal cost, FY 00 Federal costs were $87,508 for real estate activities; a credit of $212,529 for construction contract; a credit of $30,275 for contract supervision and administration; and a credit of $284,427 for inhouse engineering effort. Non-Federal costs were $517,470 for contract supervision and administration; $1,366 for real estate activities; and $517,485 for engineering and design. SHORE PROTECTION 32. PRESQUE ISLE PENINSULA, ERIE, PA Location. At Erie, PA, on south shore of Lake Erie, 78 miles southwest of Buffalo, NY and 102 miles east-northeast of Cleveland, OH. (See NOAA Nautical Charts 14824 and 14835.) Existing Project. For description of completed portion of existing project see pg. 1393 of Annual Report for 1963. For details of project authorized by the 1974 Water Resources Development Act (WRDA), 1976 WRDA and 1986 WRDA, see pg. 32-14 of Annual Report for FY 87. Actual Federal cost for the authorized beach nourishment project modifications through FY 92 is $16,879,000 which includes $5,646,000 for completed work authorized by the 1954 and 1960 R&H Acts and 1974 WRDA Act and $11,233,000 for completed work authorized by the 1976 WRDA Act. Actual non-Federal cost for the authorized project and modifications through FY 92 is $8,798,000 which includes $3,983,000 for completed work authorized by 1954 and 1960 R&H Acts and 1974 WRDA Act and $4,815,000 for completed work authorized by the 1976 WRDA Act. Beach nourishment as authorized by the 1976 WRDA was completed in FY 91. The estimated Federal cost (Oct 1999) for the 55 breakwaters project is $66,335,000. This estimate includes $13,435,000 for the initial construction and $52,900,000 for 50 years of post-construction beach nourishment. The estimated non-Federal cost (Oct 1999) for the 20-12 BUFFALO, NY DISTRICT breakwater project is also $66,335,000. See Table 32-B for authorizing legislation. Local Cooperation. Fully complied with for completed project as authorized by 1954 and 1960 R&H Acts and 1974 WRDA Act. An agreement between the United States of America and the Commonwealth of PA, acting through the Department of Environmental Resources was entered into on Feb 21, 1979 for the annual nourishment which was extended by the 1976 WRDA Act. Operations and Results during FY. New Work: Annual nourishment for a fifty-year period, beginning in FY 93, continued in FY 00 for the eighth year of this fifty-year period. Federal expenditures were $167,506,162 for the nourishment contract, $33,735 for contract supervision and administration and $178,483 for in-house engineering and design. Non-Federal costs were $262,918 for the nourishment contract, $13,247 for contract supervision and administration, and $26,914 for inhouse engineering and design. FLOOD CONTROL 33. MT. MORRIS LAKE, GENESEE RIVER, NY Location. Dam is on Genesee River 66.9 miles above river mouth and about 32 miles southwesterly of Rochester, NY. Reservoir is in Livingston and Wyoming Counties, NY. (See ecological Survey maps of Nunda and Portage, NY). Existing Project. For description of existing project, as authorized by 1944 Flood control Act, see pg. 1575 of Annual Report for 1962. New work for completed project cost $23,365,559. In addition, $5,000 contributed funds were expended for new work. Local Cooperation. None required. Local interests contributed $5,000 for new work. Operations and Results during FY. Maintenance: Federal Funds for the operation of the dam, reservoir and service facilities, real estate support and miscellaneous reports were accomplished by hired labor at a cost of $666,034. Flood emergency plans cost $177,192; water control management cost $361,425 and $35,108 for dam safety. Operation and maintenance costs for the visitor center and recreation facilities were $216,222. Regular maintenance costs were $62,637 and the cost for debris removal was $261,550. Costs for bank stabilization was $760,382. URBAN STORM WATER MANAGEMENT 34. ONONDAGA STORM WATER DISCHARGE, NY Location. Onondaga Lake is located in Central NY State, northwest of the city of Syracuse, within the Oswego River Basin, which is tributary to Lake Ontario. It is also part of the NY State Barge Canal System. (See Geological Survey map of Syracuse, NY.) Existing Project. Existing project is authorized under Section 307 of the Waters Resources Development Act of 1992 (P.L. 102-580) and will demonstrate the effectiveness of using swirl concentrator system technology for combined Sewer Overflow abatement at Hiawatha Boulevard to improve water quality in Onondaga Lake. The project has three separate components: interceptor sewers; a treatment and storage facility; and out fall pipe and force main which will be designed and constructed by others. Federal cost will be $3,406,000. Non-Federal cost is estimated to be $3,786,000. Local Cooperation. The project will be costshared 75% Federal, 25% non-Federal up to the maximum Federal contribution ($4,000,000). Operations and Results during FY. New Work: Federal costs for FY 00 were $8,443 for real estate activities; $421,764 for in-house engineering effort, $296,554 for contract activities; $264,398 for feasibility effort; $112,983 for supervision and administration of the contract; and $2,529 for HTRW Activities. Non-Federal costs were $15,236 for inhouse engineering effort; $110,390 for supervision and administration of the contract; $45,977 for feasibility effort for contract activities; and $1,306,556 for HTRW activities. MISCELLANEOUS 35. NATIONAL EMERGENCY PREPAREDNESS PROGRAM Local Preparedness $20,142 National Emergency Facilities 7,813 Catastrophic Disaster Training and Exercise 6,306 Total NEPP $34,261 36. REGULATORY FUNCTIONS PROGRAM Permit Evaluation Enforcement Total Regulatory $2,314,626 738,855 $3,053,481 20-13 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 99 Table 20-A See Sect. In Total Cost to Text Project Funding FY 97 FY 98 FY 99 FY 00 Sep 30, 2000 NAVIGATION 1. Ashtabula Harbor, OH 2. Barcelona Harbor, NY (Contributed Funds) 3. Black Rock Channel Tonawanda Harbor, NY (Contributed Funds) 4. Buffalo Harbor, NY New Work Approp New Work Cost Maint. Approp Maint Cost Rehab Approp Rehab Cost New Work Approp New Work Cost Maint. Approp Maint Cost New work Contrib New Work Cost New Work Approp New Work Cost Maint. Approp Maint Cost New Work Contrib New Work Cost New Work Approp New Work Cost Maint. Approp Maint Cost Rehab Approp Rehab Cost 390,600 393,325 359,370 348,806 411,713 416,065 465,388 465,388 3,491,845 4,246,500 3,507,832 4,274,097 3,473,867 3,549,008 12,805,339 12,805,339 ' 654,643 18,337,559 654,441 18,330,305 6,077,000 6,077,000 62,226 62,139 1,185,853 1,185,853 2,457,791 2,457,704 174,000 174,000 11,135,120 2 11,135,120 2 1,908,300 65,923,448 3 1,906,871 65,889,242 3 620,000 620,000 1,198,891 1,367,500 1,462,041 1,151,193 1,426,799 1,467,976 23,115,187 4 23,115,187 4 662,363 66,941,338 5 654,623 66,933,093 s 295,457 295,457 5. Buffalo Harbor, NY, Environmental Dredging Maint. Approp Maint Cost 123,000 28,373 (12,374) 80,169 24,375 26,221 ' Includes $565 for previous projs. Excludes $47,000 contributed funds. 2 Includes $58,027 for previous projs. 3 Includes $4,922 emergency relief authority administrative costs transferred for new work to maintenance upon conversion to programming & budgeting system Jul I, 1953 by direction of Office, Chief of Engineers. Also includes appropriations & cost under appropriation titles 96X3123 Operations and Maintenance & 96X5125 Maintenance and Operation of Dams and Other Improvements of Navigable Waters. Includes $4,277,586 for previous projs. Excludes expenditures of $239,305 for work authorized be Sec. 107. 5 Includes $1,883,647 for previous projs. Excludes $446,805 contributed funds. 20-14 135,001 134,763 BUFFALO, NY DISTRICT Table 20-A See Sect. In Total Cost to Text Project Funding FY 97 FY 98 FY 99 FY 00 Sep 30, 2000 6. Cattaraugus Creek, Harbor, Oil (Contributed Funds) 7. Cleveland Harbor, OH (Contributed Funds) 8. Conneaut Harbor, OIH 9. Dunkirk Harbor, NY New Work Approp New Work Cost Maint. Approp Maint Cost New Work Approp New Work Cost New Work Approp New Work Cost Maint. Approp Maint Cost Rehab Approp Rehab Cost New Work Contrib New Work Cost Maint Contrib Maint Cost New Work Approp New Work Cost Maint. Approp Maint Cost Rehab Approp Rehab Cost New Work Approp New Work Cost Maint. Approp Maint Cost Rehab Approp Rehab Cost 19,772 19,772 (9) 28,719 28,719 4,804,060 4,804,060 346,440 346,440 2,566,529 2,566,529 36,550,299 6 36,550,299 6 14,615,585 9,695,600 4,108,972 5,686,707 215,007,9477 14,427,160 9,061,717 4,952,590 5,733,286 214,989,255 7 16,404,903 16,404,903 2,240,000 3,077,000 2,225,484 3,768,714 26,314 47,200 72,904 40,150 176,752 367,900 240,818 364,669 1, 150,000 1,364,012 920,124 927,137 324,332 356,519 23,649 1,083,178 1,083,178 7,744,000 7,659,309 8,346,641 8 8,346,641 8 570,235 15,736,880 9 570,177 15,736,787 9 651,850 651,850 413,202 412,640 3,010,024 10 3,010,024 to 5,453,375 5,452,812 1,950,000 " 1,950,000 " 6 Includes $1,564,154 for previous projs. & appropriation & cost of $16,596 for modification authorized for construction under authority of Sec. 107, 1960 R&H Act. Includes appropriations & cost under appropriation titles 96X3123 Operations and Maintenance & 96X5125 Maintenance and Operations of Dams and Other Improvements of Navigable Waters. Excludes $201,960 contributed funds. Includes $805,272 for previous projs. " Includes $39,784 for previous projs. o Includes $811,250 for previous projs. Excludes $11,000 contributed funds. " Includes $176,520 for previous projs. 20-15 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 99 Table 20-A See Sect. In Total Cost to Text Project Funding FY 97 FY 98 FY 99 FY 00 Sep 30, 2000 10. Erie Harbor, PA 11. Fairport Harbor, NY 12. Great Sodus Bay Harbor, NY 13. Huron Harbor, OH (Contributed Funds) 14. Irondequoit Bay, NY, (Contributed Funds) New Work Approp New Work Cost Maint. Approp Maint Cost Rehab Approp Rehab Cost New Work Approp New Work Cost Maint. Approp Maint Cost New Work Approp New Work Cost Maint. Approp Maint Cost Rehab Approp Rehab Cost New Work Approp New Work Cost Maint. Approp Maint Cost Rehab Approp Rehab Cost New Work Approp New Work Cost New Work Approp New Work Cost Maint. Approp Maint Cost New Work Approp New Work Cost 5,449,736 (689,605) 899,17,3 3,999,053 2,187,663 324,300 2,022,725 526,685 -15,165 5,841 2,000 2,007 789,311 681,900 815,841 650,780 (8,264) 14,923 3,597,873 12 3,597,873 12 110,122 23,748,659 13 109,828 23,747,359 13 1,154 1,154 2,959,611 14 2,959,611 14 767,678 1,619,655 22,942,415 857,370 1,616,193 22,933,577 265,964 265,879 665,734 696,618 3,172,071 3,171,986 5,103,795 '5 5,103,795 '5 655,338 23,490,562 650,557 23,485,480 247,030 247,030 63,079 63,079 23,356 23,104 (17) 341 351,129 350,677 3,535,651 3,535,651 1,007,504 1,007,052 2,718,077 2,718,077 n2 Includes $736,967 for previous projs. '1 Includes $104,900 for previous projs. Excludes $154,500 contributed funds. ' Includes $368,940 for previous projs. 1I'nc ludes $269,789 for previous projs. 20-16 BUFFALO, NY DISTRICT Table 20-A See Sect. In Total Cost to Text Project Funding FY 97 FY 98 FY 99 FY 00 Sep 30, 2000 15. Lorain Harbor, OH0 (Contributed Funds) 16. Oak Orchard, NY 17. Oswego Harbor, NY 18. Owasco Outlet, Auburn, NY 19. Put-In-Bay, O 11 20. Rochester Harbor, NY New Work Approp New Work Cost Maint. Approp Maint Cost New Work Contrib. New Work Cost New Work Approp New Work Cost Maint. Approp Maint Cost New Work Approp New Work Cost Maint. Approp Maint Cost Rehab Approp Rehab Cost New Work Approp New Work Cost Maint. Approp Maint Cost Rehab Approp Rehab Cost New Work Approp New Work Cost Maint. Approp Maint Cost Rehab Approp Rehab Cost New Work Approp New Work Cost Maint. Approp Maint Cost Rehab Approp Rehab Cost 869,026 1,590,930 1,164,182 1,356,728 161,063 135,949 (22,600) 2,491 531,926 57,700 573,323 80,622 22,240,670 16 22,240,670 16 459,130 1,211,476 39,634,755 691,371 1,208,239 39,627,674 (23) 305,428 247,835 265,779 263,848 87,392 87,358 878,023 17,804 1,006,392 863,718 32,435 1,005,943 152,932 151,782 837,377 892,144 (20,790) (18,869) 181,240 162,560 845,551 845,551 1,586,996 1,586,996 733,829 732,679 8,430,016 8,430,016 10,036,751 10,033,387 307,590 307,590 244,989 244,979 268,632 249,918 2,439,308 20 2,439,308 20 23,578 24,987,491 23,878 24,987,273 1 Includes $292,203 for new work for previous projs. Excludes $3,000 contributed funds. Also excludes appropriation and cost of $29,570 under authority of Sec. 197, 1960 R&H Act. 17 Excludes $224,702 contributed funds. 18 Includes $1,187,977 for previous projs 1 Includes $945,684 for previous projs. 2I0ncl udes $247,794 for previous projs. 20-17 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 99 Table 20-A See Sect. In Total Cost to Text Project Funding FY 97 FY 98 FY 99 FY 00 Sep 30, 2000 21. Rocky River, OH 22. Sandusky Harbor, OH (Contributed Funds) 23. Sturgeon Point, NY (Contributed Funds) 24. Toledo Harbor, OH New Work Approp New Work Cost Maint. Approp Maint Cost New Work Approp New Work Cost Maint. Approp Maint Cost Rehab Approp Rehab Cost Maint. Contrib. Maint Cost New Work Approp New Work Cost Maint. Approp Maint Cost New Work Contrib. New Work Cost New Work Approp New Work Cost Maint. Approp Maint Cost 12,188 23,815 12,188 23,815 706,616 834,000 708,753 788,162 564,454 564,426 853,801 900,228 201,954 196,597 343,494 343,494 3,878,022 3,872,637 6,727,270 21 6,727,270 1,009,650 24,499,984 959,348 24,449,490 675,606 675,606 15,445 15,445 (560) 13,000 12,849 17,063 17,063 21,685 21,835 1,718,700 22 1,718,140 22 109,164 109,162 1,299,008 1,299,008 17,191,842 23 17,191,842 23 2,395,459 4,192,300 3,358,834 2,770,943 125,869,429 2,400,139 3,328,312 4,236,765 2,734,301 125,827,609 25. Toussaint River, OH (Contributed Funds) 26. Vermilion Harbor, OH Maint. Approp Maint Cost Maint. Contrib. Maint Cost New Work Approp New Work Cost Maint. Approp Maint Cost Rehab Approp Rehab Cost 403,122 402,646 125,000 77,625 152,423 44,835 159,235 56,864 141,957 142,431 15,000 52,772 (7) 431,875 430,738 21 Includes $477,149 for previous projs. Excludes $325,000 contributed funds. 22 Excludes $5,000 contributed funds. 23 Includes $1,624,695 for previous projs. 24 Excludes $740,679 contributed funds. 20-18 545,651 545,649 140,000 130,397 1,156,118 24 1,156,118 24 3,292,784 3,291,647 139,775 139,775 BUFFALO, NY DISTRICT 'able 20-A See Sect. In Total Cost to Text Project Funding FY 97 FY 98 FY 99 FY 00 Sep 30, 2000 27. Wilson Harbor, NY 29. Lake Erie Cooley Canal, Lucas, OI1 (Contributed Funds) 30. New York State Canal System, NY 31. Rochester Harbor, NY (Wave Surge) (Contributed Funds) New Work Approp New Work Cost Maint. Approp Maint Cost New Work Approp New Work Cost New Work Contrib. New Work Cost New Work Approp New Work Cost New Work Approp New Work Cost New Work Contrib. New Work Cost 223,977 221,701 9,671 11,843 145,100 359,639 157,577 109,833 370,000 2,146 138,187 (124) 1,525,000 1,576,664 100,000 98,499 378,000 3,422,000 3,355,000 44,413 3,750,616 3,359,703 533,572 51,617 3,254,292 (1,000,000) 787,918 44,008 (1,670,571) 235,536 (527,696) (1,100,000) (105,319) (191,103) 525,064 SHORE PROTECTION 32. Presque Isle Peninsula, Erie, PA (Contributed Funds) FLOOD CONTROL 33. Mount Morris Lake, Genesee River, NY New Work Approp New Work Cost Maint. Approp Maint Cost New Work Contrib. New Work Cost New Work Approp New Work Cost Maint. Approp Maint Cost 659,000 500,000 641,682 509,500 685,000 474,000 637,389 517,453 800,000 755,832 800,000 819,876 357,000 34,244,049 379,725 34,203,719 4,978 4,978 520,000 25,209,869 303,080 24,986,987 23,365,559 26 23,365,559 26 2,562,880 2,036,000 2,751,577 2,577,432 34,527,060 2,464,985 2,015,118 2,978,997 2,540,550 34,449,652 25 Includes $57,342 for previous projs. Excludes $166,998 contributed funds. 26 Includes study cost of $117,000 under authority Sec 205, 1948 Flood Control Act. Excludes $17,493 in contributed cost. 20-19 195,068 194,378 (64,000) 78,788 12,212 535,246 25 535,246 25 1,157,160 1, 156,470 2,172,738 2,114,546 527,000 305,834 7,155,000 7,154,732 2,329,429 1,800,769 1,713,189 1,713,189 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 99 Table 20-A See Sect. In Total Cost to Text Project Funding FY 97 FY 98 FY 99 FY 00 Sep 30, 2000 34. Onondaga Storm Water Discharge, NY (Contributed Funds) New Work Approp New Work Cost New Work Contrib. New Work Cost 567,284 586,033 - 3,691,500 - 54,433 264,256 981,480 1,064,543 - (50,000) 1,877,871 1,432,202 20-20 3,670,256 3,609,399 3,641,500 3,464,506 BUFFALO, NY DISTRICT 'rable 20-B See Section AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Work Authorized ASHITABULA HARBOR, OHI Jun 3, 1896 Construction of breakwater. Mar 3, 1905 Jun 25, 1910 Enlarge outer harbor by extending west breakwater and Constructing new east breakwater pier heads on lakeward ends of breakwaters; remove part of old east breakwater. Mar 2, 1919 Extend west breakwater to shore; dredge outer harbor to a depth of 20 feet. Aug 30, 1935 Aug 26, 1937 Remove portion of east breakwater to, extend breakwaters to present dimensions and dredging restrictions in portion of west basin. Dredge channel through outer harbor, channel of approach to Penn Central Co. slip, channel Ashtabula River, to and in turning basin all to present project dimensions; remove portion of old east inner breakwater and Maintenance to 24-foot depth of portion of outer harbor. Mar 2, 1945 Extend river channel to present project limit. Sep 3, 1954 Dredging approach channel and turning basin in east outer harbor to 25-foot depth. Jul 14, 1960 A depth of 29 feet in soft and 30 feet in hard material in entrance channel to just inside outer ends of Breakwaters, thence 28 feet in soft and 29 feet in hard material in a channel to inner breakwater, thence 27 feet in soft and 28 feet in hard materials in a channel extending to Penn Central Co. slip and Extending 2000 feet up Ashtabula River, 22 feet in hard material in turning area; and 28 d. feet in soft and 29 feet in hard material in areas adjacent to 250-foot section of inner breakwater when that section is removed as now authorized. Oct 27, 1965 Dredging approach, channel and turning basin in east outer harbor to 28 feet in soft material and 29 feet in hard material. BLACK ROCK CHANNEL AND TONAWANDA HARBOR, NY Aug 11, 1888 Dredging channel through horseshoe reef at outlet of Lake Erie Jun 3, 1896 and Tonawanda Inner Harbor to 16 feet. Jun 13, 1902 Deepening Tonawanda Creek to 16 feet. Jun 13, 1902 Dredging channel from Buffalo outer harbor to foot of Aug 8 , 1917 Maryland St., Buffalo, to 21 feet. Annual Report, 1895, p. 2132 H. Doc. 654. 61st Cong., 2nd sess. H. Doc. 997, 64th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 43, 73rd Cong., 1st sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 78, 74th Cong., 2nd sess. H. Doc. 321, 77th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 486, 83rd Cong., 2nd sess. H. Doc. 148, 86th Cong., Ist sess. H. Doc. 269, 89th cong., 1st sess.' H. Doc. 143, 56th Cong., Ist sess. and Annual Report, 1900 p.4152. H. Doc. 125, 56th Cong., 2d sess., And Annual Report 1901, p.3343. Contains latest published map. 20-21 Documents -- -- -- Contains latest published map. REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 99 Table 20-B See Section AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Work Authorized Mar 3, 1905 Dredging channel from foot of Maryland St., Buffalo, to natural deep water pool upstream from Tonawanda Harbor to 21 feet; construction of ship lock and bridge; and repair of Bird Island pier towpath wall. Jul 27, 1916 Dredging channel along Tonawanda Island, with turning basin at its downstream end at the foot of the Island, to 21 feet. Mar 2, 1919 Dredging triangular area at junction with Buffalo north Mar 2, 1945- Entrance channel. Sep 22, 1922 Widening channel at foot of Maryland St., Buffalo. Mar 3, 1925 Widening canal south of International Bridge and removal of westerly end of Rattlesnake Island shoal. Jun 26, 19342 Aug 30, 19353 H. Doc. 428, 58th Cong., 2nd sess. H. Doc. 658, 63rd Cong., 2nd sess. H. Doc. 1004, 65th Cong., 2d sess. & H. Doc. 92, 79th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 981, 66th Cong., 2nd sess. H. Doc. 289, 68th Cong., 1st sess. Operation and care of improvements provided for with funds from War Department appropriations for rivers and harbors. Removal of rock shoals in Lake Erie entrance to canal, and in canal south of Ferry Street Bridge, to 22 feet; Enlargement of North Tonawanda turning basin; extension of Bird Island Pier Improvement of guide pier at the lock; and elimination of upper 150 feet of Tonawanda Creek channel from the project.4 Mar 2, 1945 Widening Lake Erie entrance to canal. 1i. Doc. 28, 73rd Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 92, 79th Cong., 1st sess.' Sep 3, 1954 Deepen lower 1,500 feet of Tonawanda inner harbor and enlarge H. Doc. 423, 83rd Cong., 2nd sess.1 turning basin. 5 May 20, 1826 BUFFALO HARBOR, NY Construction of south pier (extended in 1868).6 Jun 23, 1866 Construction of old breakwater. 6 Jun 23, 1874 Extension of old breakwater.6 Jun 3, 1896 Stony Point and south breakwater6 Mar 3, 1899 Mar 3, 1909 Annual Report, 1868, pp. 222 -232. Annual Report, 1868, pp. 232 -236. Annual Report, 1876, pt. 2, pp. 569 And 573. Annual Report, 1895, p. 3153. H. Doc. 72, 55th Cong., 1st sess., and Annual Report, 1897, p. 3245. North breakwater. 6 2 Permanent Appropriations Repeal Act. 3 Authorized May 28, 1935 by Emergency Relief Administration Act of 1935. 4 Improvement of guide pier at Black Rock Lock was de-authorized by Congress in Aug 1977. 5 Classified deferred. 6 Completed under previous projects. 20-22 Documents BUFFALO, NY DISTRICT Table 20-B See Section AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Work Authorized Jun 6, 1900 Deepening entrance channel to inner harbor and removing Jun 18, 1902 rock shoal therein. Specified in acts. Mar 2, 19077 Dredging at entrance to canals at South Buffalo in outer harbor.6 Specified in act. Mar 2, 1907 South entrance breakwater. 6 Jun 25, 1910 Extension of Federal project to Commercial St. and Removal of Watson elevator site. Jul 25, 1912 Deepening areas A, B, D, in outer harbor to 21 feet, C in north entrance to 23 feet. Mar 2, 1919 Deepening areas F and G in outer harbor to 21 feet. Jan 21, 1927 Removal of shoal between entrance channel to Buffalo River and Erie Basin to 21 feet. Jul 3, 1930 Deepening areas H, I, and K in outer harbor 21 feet. Aug 30, 19358 Extension of south entrance and south breakwaters, Deepening outer harbor to present project dimensions, and removal of shoals on approach to south entrance. Aug 30, 1935 Maintenance of channels in Buffalo River and Buffalo ship Mar 2, 19458 canal to 21 feet in cooperation with city of Buffalo. Jul 14, 1960 Deepening North and Buffalo River entrance channels, and deepening and maintaining Buffalo River and Buffalo ship canal to present project dimensions. Oct 23, 1962 Deepening approach to south entrance channels, and Deepen to 30 feet in outer area and 29 feet in inner area of Southerly part of outer harbor. Deepening portion of outer harbor to 27 feet over a width of 500 feet for 2,500 feet northward from 28-foot project area, widening within 1,700 feet to limits within 150 feet of breakwater axis and 75 feet from harbor line and continuing within these limits for 7,000 feet. Elimination of 25-foot wide strip between presently authorized and proposed easterly dredging limits.easterly 50 foot wide undredged strip in existing 23-foot depth project area, extending northerly from 27-foot depth to Buffalo River entrance channel. Previously authorized but uncompleted portions or work authorized by 1935 act, combined within this act as a single improvement. 7 Also Sundry Civil Act of Mar 3, 1905 Authorized in part by Public Works Administration, Sep 6, 1933. H. Doc. 240, 59th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 298, Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 2, 61st Cong., 2nd sess. H. Doc. 550, 62nd Cong., 2n" sess. H. Doc. 1139, 64th Cong. 1st sess. H.Doc. 481, 68th Cong., 2nd sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 1, 71st Cong., Ist sess. H. Doc. 46, 73rd Cong., Ist sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 54, 74th Cong., Ist sess. H. Doc. 352, 78th Cong., Ist sess. H. Doc. 151, 86th Cong., Ist sess. H. Doc. 451, 87th Cong., 2nd sess. 20-23 Documents _ ____-_ _ - __ __ ._ _ -._I_ .___ --__ --- - REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 99 Table 20-B See Section AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Work Authorized Jul 14, 1960 Removal of abandoned abutments of South Michigan As amended Bridge. BUFFALO HARBOR, NY ENVIRONMENTAL DREDGING Nov. 28, 1990 Oct. 12, 1996 Sec. 107, PL 86-645. Authorized Chief of Engineers Dec 15, 1980. The Secretary may remove, as part of operation and P.L. 101-640 Maintenance of a navigation project, contaminated sediments Outside the boundaries of and adjacent to the navigation Channel. The Secretary may remove contaminated sediments from the waters of the United States, in general, for the purpose of environmental enhancement and water quality improvement if such removal is requested by a non-Federal sponsor and the sponsor agrees to pay 50% of the cost of the removal. Amended P.L. 101-640 to include Buffalo Harbor, NY as priority work. P.L. 104-303 CATTARAUGUS HARBOR, NY Aug 13, 1968 (See Section 4 of Text). Construction of arrowhead breakwaters at mouth of Creek entrance channel 200 feet wide at lakeward end, 100 feet wide and 8 feet deep from that depth in lake to point 1,575 feet upstream; channel 100 feet wide, 6 feet deep an additional 3,425 feet upstream; and recreational fishing facilities at mouth. CLEVELAND HARBOR, OH Mar 3, 1875 West breakwater. Aug 5, 1886 Part of east breakwater.6 Aug 11, 1888 Extension of east breakwater. Jun 3, 1896 Reconstruction of piers. 6 Mar 3, 1899 Dredging channel between piers and outer harbor to depth of 19 feet; dredging to depth of 23 feet in any portion of harbor is discretion of Secretary of War. Jun 13, 1902 Arrowhead breakwater and extension of east breakwater. Mar 2, 1907 Jun 25, 1910 Removal of deflecting arm of old east breakwater and Closure of gap between old and new east breakwaters. Jul 27, 1916 Pierhead at easterly end of east breakwater. H. Doc. 97, 90th Cong., 1st sess. Annual Report, 1876, p.558. EH. Ex. Doc. 116, 48th Cong., 2d Sess., and Annual Report, 1886, p. 1865. H. Ex. Doc. 189, 50th Cong., 2 " nd sess., and Annual Report, 1888, p. 2005. H. Doc. 326, 54th Cong., 1st sess., and Annual Report, 1896, p. 2949. H. Doc. 156, 55th Cong., 2nd sess., and Annual Report, 1899, pp. 3075 and 3078. H. Doc 118, 56th Cong, 2nd sess. No printed report. 1H. Doc 891, 63rd Cong., 2nd sess. 20-24 Documents - -- -- 1- - -- --- BUFFALO, NY DISTRICT Table 20-B See Section AUITHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Work Authorized Aug 8, 1917 Aug 29, 1937 Aug 30, 19359 Aug 30, 19358 Mar 2, 194510 Maintenance and improvement of channels in Cuyahoga and Old Rivers to a depth of 21 feet to a point 2,000 feet Upstream from Clark Ave. viaduct and 18-foot turning basin. Deepening outer harbor and channel between piers to Present project dimensions, construction of 400-foot spur Breakwater at gap in shore arm of west breakwater, removal of easterly 150 feet of west breakwater, elimination from project of a 298-foot southerly extension on west pier, and abandonment of inner 932 feet of shore Arm of west breakwater. Maintenance dredging in Cuyahoga and Old Rivers for 1 year as an emergency measure. Maintenance extension of Cuyahoga River channel. Extension, maintenance, and improvement to a depth of 21 feet of Cuyahoga River channel to present project limit.'1 12 Jul 24, 1946 Improvement of Cuyahoga and Old Rivers to a depth of 23 feet and replacement or pier construction of 7 railroad Bridges. 13 Jul 3, 1958 Deepening channel 25 feet through east basin of outer harbor; replacement of Erie-Lackawanna Railroad bridge over Cuyahoga River at mile 4.1 and widening of channel at that point, with elimination of reconstruction of east pier of bridge as previously authorized; and replacement of Baltimore and Ohio Railroad Bridge over Old River near its mouth and Willow Avenue Highway Bridge about 800 feet above mouth and widening channel at four locations along lower, 2,000 feet of river.14 Jul 14, 1960 Depth of 29 feet in lake approach to main entrance; 28 feet in entrance channel to lakeward ends of piers at mouth of Cuyahoga River; 27 feet in river to a point just above its Junction with Old River, and in Old River to upstream limit of present 23-foot project; 28 feet in west basin within Existing project limits as modified to eliminate a triangular Area at west end and to extend limits to a line parallel to And 75 feet from harbor line; and 28 feet in westerly 800 Feet of east basin.'5 Oct 23, 1962 An area in east basin 27 feet deep extending 3,800 feet H. Doc. 707, 63rd Cong., 2d sess., & Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 84, 74th Cong., 2nd sess. H. Doc. 477, 72nd Cong., 2d sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 39, 74th Cong., 1st sess. Specified in act. H. Doc. 95, 79th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 629, 79th Cong., 2nd sess. H. Doc. 107, 85th Cong., ist sess. H. Doc. 152, 86th Cong., 1st sess.' H. Doc. 527, 87th Cong., 2nd sess. 9 Authorized by Public Works Administration, Sep 6, 1933. 1o First Deficiency Appropriations Act approved Apr 1, 1944. 11 Deepening left half of channel extension was eliminated from project by 1962 R&H Act. Authorized by Defense Plant Corp. May 19, 1942. 13 Widening Cuyahoga River downstream at. end of Cut 4 classified inactive. 14 Replacement of bridges 19 and 32, widening Cuyahoga and Old River Channels, classified deferred. 5 Deepening remainder of Cuyahoga River from Bridge 1 to and including Old River, Classified deferred. 20-25 Documents ALWSRf%fa 0 - AL REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 99 Table 20-B AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION See Section Acts Work Authorized Easterly of 28-foot area with project limits 380 feet from East breakwater and on landward side generally by a line 75 feet lakeward of and parallel to harbor line. A dock Channel to Nicholson Cleveland Terminal Co. pier, at Easterly end of east basin, from 25-foot contour to a limit Easterly end of east basin, from 25-foot contour to a limit 75 feet north of pierhead line, 400 feet wide at shoreward end and flared toward the lake. Jul 14, 1960 Deepening upper end of Old River channel from 21 As amended to 27 feet. Oct 22, 1976 Preparation of Phase I design memorandum for Improvements consisting of removal of portions of Entrance breakwater; construction of breakwater; Construction of breakwater extension of east entrance; Deepening approach and entrance channels; construction of diked disposal area; and installation of recreational Fishing facilities on west breakwater. Aug 15, 1985 Deepening and widening east entrance and approach Channels, deepening the east basin channel and Disposing of dredge material in an existing disposal site, as described in the Report to the Board of Engineers for Rivers and Harbors Jan 22, 1985, including bulk heading and other necessary repairs at Pier 34 and approach Channels and necessary protective structures for mooring Basins for transient vessels in the area south of Pier 34 and including such modifications as may be Recommended by the Chief of Engineers at a cost not to Exceed $36,000,000. Nov 17, 1986 Bulk heading and other necessary repairs at Pier 34 and Approach channels and necessary protective structures for mooring basins for transient wells in the area south of Pier 34. Dec 21, 1987 Appropriates and directs the Secretary of the Army to use the sum of $11,000,000 which is to remain available until Expended to carry out the provisions for the harbor Modifications contained in PL 99-662. Sec. 107, PL 86-645. Authorized Chief of Engineers Dec 6, 1966. Sec. 175, PL 94-587 PL 99-88 Sec. 202, PL 99-662. PL 100-202. Doc. 653, 61st Cong., 2nd sess. 20-26 Documents - -- ------- BUFFALO, NY DISTRICT Table 20-B See Section AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Work Authorized CONNEAUT HARBOR, OH Jun 25, 1910 Extension of east breakwater, construction of new west Breakwater, removal of portion of old west breakwater, and Dredging of outer harbor to 19 feet. Aug 8, 191716 Realignment of west breakwater, removal of remainder of old west breakwater, and deepening outer harbor to 20 feet. Removal of Bessemer & Lake Erie R.R. Co. of inner 635 feet of west pier. Aug 30.19358 Removal of portion of west breakwater, extension of breakwaters to present project dimensions, construction of pierheads on outer ends of breakwaters, deepening outer harbor to present project dimensions; removal of portions of river pier, and elimination from project of a 255-foot shoreward extension of west breakwater. Oct 23, 1962 Deepening easterly part of outer harbor to 28 feet in soft material and 29 feet in hard material; deepening remaining triangular area of outer harbor to 22 feet in soft Material and 23 feet in hard material; deepening inner harbor for 2,450 feet upstream of outer end of west pier to 27 feet in soft material and 28 feet in hard material; removal of east pier, extension of east breakwater to shore; and an access channel 8 feet deep in outer harbor to city dock. Previously authorized, but uncompleted portion of work authorized by 1917 and 1935 acts combined with this act for accomplishment as a single improvement. Oct 12,1996 De-authorized the most southerly 300 feet of the 1,670 foot Long shore arm, authorized by the R&H Act of 1910. DUNKIRK HARBOR, NY Mar 2, 1827 Construction of west pier.6,'7 Mar 2, 1867 Breakwater and evacuation of entrance channel to 13 feet. 6 Jun 3, 1896 Deepening of entrance channel and harbor basin to a Depth of suitable for vessels of 16-foot draft. Jun 25, 1910 Removal of rock reef bordering the inner entrance channel. Jun 30, 1948 Deepening outer entrance channel to present project depths; removal of rock shoal on the west side of the entrance channel to a depth of 17 feet, and changed limits of the inner Entrance channel and basin to present project dimensions. Dec 15, 1970 Construction of small-boat harbor. H. Doc. 983, 64th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 48, 73rd Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 415, 87th Cong., 2nd sess. P.L. 104-303 S. Ex. Doc.42, 35th Cong., 1st sess. and Annual Report 1866 pt. IV, p.155 Annual Report, 1871, p. 214 H. Doc. 63, 54th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 720, 61st Cong. 2nd sess. H. Doc. 632, 80th Cong., 2nd sess.' H. Doc. 91-423, 91st Cong., 2nd sess. 16 Permit of Secretary of War, Aug 5, 1927. 17 Modified 1828 and 1852. 20-27 Documents I _ _ __ REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 99 Table 20-B See Section AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Work Authorized (House Public Works Committee) Jun 22, 1971 (Senate Public Works Committee) Sec. 201 of F.C. Act of 1965 ERIE HARBOR, PA May 26, 1824 Breakwaters and piers; dredging entrance channel; and Brushwood protection of beach of Presque Isle peninsula.6 Mar 3, 1899 Deeping channel and harbor basin 18 feet, repair and Extension of piers; and plant growth and emergency Protection of work on peninsula. Jun 15, 1910 Deepening channel and part of harbor to 20 feet. Nov 28, 1920"9 Re-conveyed Presque Isle Peninsula to the State of Pennsylvania for park purposes. Aug 30, 1935 Deepening, widening, and straightening entrance channel, Dredging channel at easterly end of harbor basin, all to resent project dimensions; elimination of north breakwater from project; and limitation of south breakwater to a length of 1,200 feet. Mar 2, 1945 Protection of the peninsula south of the waterworks Settling basin. Sep 3, 1954 Widen 25-foot deep approach channel to ore dock. Jul 14,1960 Depth of 29 feet in the entrance channel to a point opposite the inner end of the north pier, thence 28 feet in soft material and 29 feet in hard material in the remainder of the entrance channel, within the general limits of the 25-foot basin and inner channel opposite the ore dock except as modified to eliminate from the project a triangular area along the easterly side; and a depth of 28 feet over 300-foot westward extension of the 25-foot basin. 20 Oct 23, 1962 Depth of 27 feet in soft material and 28 feet in hard material in approach area to Duquesne Marine Terminal. Previously authorized but uncompleted portion of work authorized by 1935 act is combined with this act as a single improvement. Annual Report, 1915, p. 1965. H.Doc.70, 55th Cong., 1st sess. And Annual Report, 1896, p.3237.'8 Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 26, 61st Cong., 2nd sess. H. Doc. 52, 73rd Cong., 1st sess. Specified in act. H. Doc. 345, 83rd Cong., 2nd sess. H. Doc. 199, 86th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 340, 87th Cong., 2nd sess. 20-28 Documents 10 ;$ Extension of north pier portion of this modification was deauthorized Nov 1981. 19 Public Law 366. 20 Deepening strips adjacent to north and south piers was deauthorized Aug 1982. BUFFALO, NY DISTRICT Tahle 20-B See Section AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Work Authorized 11 FAIRPORT HARBOR, OHi Mar 3, 182521 Construction of piers. Jun 3, 1896 Breakwaters and dredging outer harbor to a depth of 18 feet. Mar 3, 1905 Mar 2, 1919 1,400-foot extension of east breakwater, present project Dimension of east pier, and deepening of to 19 feet. Jan 21, 1927 4,000-foot extension of east breakwater at limit of cost to Jul 3,1930 the United States of $715,000. Aug 30, 193522 Deepening of outer harbor and entrance channel to present dimensions; extending the west breakwater to present project dimensions with pierhead at its outer end; removal of west pier, and construction of bulkhead on west side of river channel. Aug 26, 1937 Dredging of 21- and 24-foot river channels and turning Basin in Grand River to present project dimensions. Jul 24, 1946 Dredging of 8-foot river channel. GREAT SODUS BAY HARBOR, NY Mar 2, 1829 Construction of piers and breakwater. 9 Aug 2, 1882 Extension of piers to 15-foot contour in the lake Mar 3, 1925 Deepening and widening of channel to 180foot depth and 150 -foot width. Jul 3, 1930 Widening channel lakeward of piers to 250 feet. Aug 30, 1935 Dredging channel to present project dimensions. 20-29 Documents Annual Report, 1889, pp. 2147- 2153. H .Doc. 347, 54th Cong., 1st sess. and Annual Reports, 1896, p.2956; 1 903, p. 2084; 1905, p. 2349. H. Doc. 206, 63rd Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 592, 69th Cong., 2nd sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc 13, 70th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 472, 72d Cong., 2d sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 79, 74th Cong., 2nd sess. H. Doc. 706, 79th Cong., 2nd sess.' Annual Report, 1876 pt. II p. 589 Annual Report, 1881, p. 2442. H. Doc. 192, 68 'h Cong., 1" sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 17, 7 0 th Cong., 1 S' sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 23, 72"n Cong., 1' sess. 12 21 Modified 1830, 1881, and 1890. New work completed under previous projects. 22Partly included in Public Works Administration Program, Nov 15, 1933. _ _~_ _ %-F AL M6V REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 99 Table 20-B See Section AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Work Authorized 13 H. Doc. 122, 58th Cong., 2nd sess. H-. Doc. 5, 63rd Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 478, 72nd Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 165, 87th Cong., ist sess.1 H. Doc. 332, 84th Cong., 2nd sess HURON HARBOR, OH Mar 2, 1905 Extension of west pier, construction of east breakwater, Removal of part of old east pier; deepening of channel to 19 feet; and dredging of sheltered area. Mar 2, 1919 Widening river to 200 feet; removal of remainder of old east pier, construction of new spur pier, enlargement of sheltered area; and closure of beach at shore end of west pier. Aug 30, 193522 Extension of west pierhead at its outer end; removal of outer end of east breakwater and construction pierhead on new outer end; widening and deepening channel to present project dimensions; enlargement of turning basin at head of channel; shore protection west of west pier, and elimination from project construction of spur pier and dredging sheltered area outside channel limits. Oct 23, 1962 Depths of 29 feet in approach channel, 28 feet in entrance Channel, 27 feet in river channel, 21 feet in turning basin and abandonment of lakeward end of existing approach channel. IRONDEQUOIT BAY, NY Jul 3, 1958 Construction entrance channel 9 feet deep and 100 feet wide, extending from 9-foot depth in Lake Ontario to junction with inner bay channels, a distance of about 1,300 feet; inner channel, 8 feet deep and 100 feet wide, from entrance channel to deep water in bay, a distance of about 3,035 feet, access channel 8 feet deep, 100 feet wide and 500 feet in length from the inner bay channel to the west; two stone rubble-mound structures 1,350 feet and 750 in length at the natural entrance; and recreational facilities. LORAIN HARBOR, OH Mar 3, 1899 Breakwaters and extension of piers to present dimensions. Mar 2, 1907 Extend 18-foot channel from inner end of piers to Erie Avenue Bridge. Jun 25, 1910 Extend breakwaters and dredge to depth of 19 feet in Outer harbor. Aug 8, 1917 Extend breakwaters to present dimensions. Aug 8, 1917 Deepen outer harbor and river channel of Erie Avenue Bridge to 20 feet. Jul 3, 1930 Extend 20-foot channel to American Shipbuilding Co. drydock. Aug 30, 1935 Widen 2 bends in river and enlarge turning basin opposite National Tube Co. dock.9 Aug 30, 1935 Approach channel to municipal pier. 20-30 Documents H. Doc. 131, 55th Cong., 2d sess., And Annual Report 1898, p. 2718. HI. Doc. 560, 60th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 644, 61st Cong., 2nd sess. 11. Doc. 980, 64th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 985, 64th Cong., 1st sess. 11. Doc. 587, 69th Cong., 2nd sess. H. Doc. 469, 72nd Cong., 2d sess. Senate Committee print, 73d Cong., 2nd sess. 14 15 -- -- - -- --- BUFFALO, NY DISTRICT Table 20-B AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION See Section Acts Work Authorized Deepen outer harbor and river channel to American Shipbuilding Co. Drydock 2 present project dimensions and extension of river channel to upper end of National Tube Co. dock with turning basin opposite that dock. Maintenance dredging in Black River from American Shipbuilding Co. Drydock 2. Upper end of National Tube Co. dock was authorized Apr 7, 1934, by Public Works Administration. Aug 30 1935 Enlarging turning basin opposite National Tube Co. Dock to present project dimensions. Mar 2, 1945 Turning basin in bend of Black River immediately Upstream from Baltimore & Ohio RR coal dock. Jul 14, 1960 Replace Norfolk and Western Railway swing bridge with a Vertical lift bridge; construct two detached arrowhead breakwaters lakeward of existing breakwaters; construct extension of east breakwater, to shore; remove 300 feet of lakeward end of west breakwater; remove outer 1,100 feet east pier; deepen lake approach to 29 feet, 800-foot wide outer harbor channel to 27 feet; widen river channel at bends; and construct a new turning basin 21 feet deep near upstream limit of existing project.23 Jul 14, 1960 Construction of a 225 foot detached rubble mound breakwater and as amended an 800 foot long rubble mound breakwater attached to the east breakwater shore arm I in the east basin of the outer harbor. Nov 17, 1986 33 Two bed cuts on Black River between the Norfolk and Western Railroad Bridge and 21st Street Bridge, excavated to existing channel depth of 27 feet. Widening Upper Turning Basin at existing authorized depth of 21 feet. s MT. MORRIS LAKE, GENESEE RIVER, NY Construction of a concrete gravity dam and reservoir. Construct a visitor center at Mt. Morris Dam to be known as the "William B. Hoyt II Visitor Center." Doc. 51, 74th Cong., 1st sess.Rivers and Harbors Committee Specified in act. H. Doc. 161, 77th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 166, 86th Cong., 1st. sess. Sec. 107, PL 86-645. Authorized Chief of Engineers Mar 12, 1986 H. Doc. 124, 99th Cong., ist sess. I. Doc 615, 78th Cong., 2 nd sess. Sect 103, PL 102-580 NEW YORK STATE BARGE CANAL Nov 17 1986 Authorizes the Secretary to reimburse the State of New York for P.L. 99-662 50% of the cost of operating, maintaining and rehabilitating the New York State Barge Canal. The Federal contribution shall be limited in any fiscal year to $5,000,000, or 50% of the expenditures in that fiscal year, whichever is the lesser.s Oct 12, 1996 The Secretary may make capital improvements to the New York State Canal System for the purposes of rehabilitation, Renovation, preservation, and maintenance of the New York State Canal System and its related facilities. The Federal share of the cost of capital improvements shall be 50%, up to a limit of $8,000,000. P.L. 104-303 20-31 Documents 30 23 Deepening and widening remainder of Black River Channel at Cut 1 has been de-authorized. - - -- REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 99 Table 20-B See- See Section 16 Acts AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Work Authorized OAK ORCHARD, NY Mar 2, 1945 Harbor of refuge. Documents H. Doc. 446, 78th Cong., 2nd sess. Oct 12,1996 De-authorized a part of the Section 107 Small Boat Basin Authorized by R&H Act of 19,40, as amended. P.L. 104-303 17 Oct 12, 1996 De-authorized the portion of the Federal Channel authorized by P.L. 104-303 the R&H Act of 1910 as amended by the R&H Act of 1935, from the southernmost alignment of the Route 68 Bridge upstream to the northernmost alignment of the Lake St. Bridge. 24 Deepening a 200-foot strip along harbor line east of mouth of Oswego River is de-authorized. 25 Deepening to 22 feet a 150-foot wide strip in west outer harbor de-authorized in may 1981. 26 Modification eliminated by River and harbor Act of Oct 26, 1962. 20-32 OSWEGO HARBOR, NY Jul 11, 1870 Construction of outer west breakwater.6 Annual Report, 1870, pp. 54, 220 and 221. Mar 2, 1907 .Repair of outer west breakwater under Plan (A). 14 H. Doc. 55, 58th Cong., 2nd sess. Jul 3, 1930 Construction of arrowhead breakwaters; deepening outer Rivers and Harbors Committee Harbor between arrowhead breakwaters; west outer harbor east of Doc. 24, 71st Cong., 2nd sess. Erie-Lackawanna coal dock, and Oswego River north of Seneca St., to 21 feet; and deepening west outer harbor, west of Erie- Lackawanna coal dock, to 16 feet. 24 Aug 30, 195 Widening channel to harbor line in Oswego River north Rivers and Harbors Committee of Seneca Street. Doc. 7, 74th Cong., 1st sess. Oct 17, 1940- Closing gap in west breakwater; deepening west outer harbor, H. Doc. 96, 76th Cong., 1st sess. west of east line of Erie-Lackawanna coal dock, to project depth.25 Jun 30, 1948 Construction of east outer breakwater; removal of the H. Doc. 722, 80th Cong., 2nd sess. inner end of east arrowhead breakwater; and dredging Channel and basin in east outer harbor.26 Sep 3, 1954 Construction of detached breakwater at harbor entrance and H. Doc. 487, 81st Cong., 2nd sess. removal of shoals in approach to harbor entrance to 25 feet deep. Oct 23, 1962 Depth of 27 feet in lake approach channel; 25 feet deep in outer H. Doc. 471, 87th Cong., 2nd sess. harbor channel 800 feet wide from entrance gap to a Turning basin 25 feet deep about 750 by 1,100 feet, at mouth of Oswego River; depth of 24 feet in earth and 25 feet in hard material in river channel from turning basin to upstream end of Port of Oswego Authority's east side terminal, a distance of about 1,600 feet; relocation of Federal project limits in Oswego River upstream of 2 4-foot channel to Federal project limit at north line of West Seneca St., on lines parallel to 50 feet channel ward of established harbor lines; elimination of maintenance of inner west breakwater and elimination of modification authorized by River and Harbor Act of 1948. BUFFALO, NY DISTRICT Table 20-B See Section 18 Acts AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Work Authorized OWASCO OUTLET, AUBURN, NY Jul 21,1997 Study, design, and prepare plans and specifications for rehabilitation of the seawall at the outlet of Owasco Lake PRESQUE ISLE PENINSULA, ERIE, PA Sep 3, 1954 Construction of groin system, seawall, bulkhead, placement of beach material at waterworks reservation and along remainder of peninsula; removal of portions of existing structures. Jul 14, 1960 Periodic nourishment of shores for a 10-year period. Mar 7, 1974 Periodic nourishment.of shore for a 5-year period. Oct 22, 1976 Preparation of Phase I design memorandum for improvements consisting of construction of five sections of spaced offshore breakwaters and replenishment of beach area with sand fill. Nov 17, 1986 Construct offshore breakwaters and restore beaches. ROCHESTER, HARBOR, NY Mar 2, 1829 Construction of piers.6 Aug 2, 1882 Extension of piers to 15 foot contour in the lake. Concrete Superstructure on piers.6 Jun 25, 1910 Deepening channel to 20 feet. Aug 30, 19353 Dredging of the entrance channel and turning basin, and the elimination of the inner ends of the east and west piers, all to present project dimensions. H Doc.190, 10 5'h Cong., lt sess. IHDoc.. 2 31, 81"s Cong., 1" sess. H. Doc., 397, 86 'h Cong., 2 nd sess. H. Doc. 796, 93 rd Cong., 2 nd sess. Sec. 101, PL 94-587 Sec. 501, PL 99-662. Annual Report, 1874, p. 247 Annual Report, 1881, p. 2437; Annual Report, 1905, p. 2383. H. Doc. 342, 61st Cong., 2nd sess. H.Doc. 484, 72nd Cong., 2nd sess. Mar 2, 1945 Maintenance of existing channel upstream of the Penn Central Co. H. Doc. 139, 76th Cong., 1st sess. Bridge. Jul 14,1960 Depth of 24 feet in the channel from the lake to the west Pier, a depth of 23 feet between the piers and in the lower river to the Penn Central Co. Bridge, including the existing turning basin; a depth of 21 feet from the bridge to the upstream Upstream project limit, with suitable widening at the bends; and, stream turning basin 21 feet deep and 650 feed wide Adjacent to the improved channel, with two mooring dolphins. Nov 28, 1990 A navigation project for the mouth of the Genesee River in Rochester, New York, by development and implementation of wave surge control measures. Project to be carried out under Section 107 of the River and Harbor Act of 1960 (33 U.S.C. 577). H. Doc. 409, 86th Cong., 2nd sess.' P.L. 101-640 20-33 Documents 32 20 _____ REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 99 Table 20-B AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION See Section Acts Work Authorized ROCKY RIVER HARBOR, OH Jun 10, 1872 East pier and dredging of channel. Aug 26, 1937 Extension of east pier and deepening channel to present project dimensions. Oct 27, 1965 Realign and extend channel and construct an Anchorage basin. SANDUSKY HARBOR, OH Mar 3, 1899 Construction of channel protection works. Annual Report 1871, p. 211 H. Doc. 70, 75h Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 352, 88th Cong., 2nd sess. H. Doc. 362, 55th Cong., 2nd sess. and Annual Report 1898, p. 2708. Jun 13, 1902 Widening of Straight and Dock channels and deepening to 19 feet. H. Doc. 120, 56th Cong., 2nd sess. Mar 2, 1919 Extension of east jetty to total length of 6,000 feet, with . pierhead on outer end; deepening of the outer, straight, and easterly portion of Dock channel to 20 feet Jan 21, 1927 Deepening of Dock Channel to 22 feet Aug 30, 1935 Enlargement of turning basin and construction rock dike. Oct 2,1945 Maintenance of Bay Channel to 22 feet; and elimination from project of portion of turning basin and rock dike. Jul 14, 1960 Extending Moseley Channel and deepening that channel and the outer end of Straight channel to 26 feet, from deep water in the lake to the vicinity of Cedar Point dock; widening the bend at the junction of the Moseley and Straight channels to 25 feet from the vicinity of Cedar Point dock to Junction Bay channel; deepening the Bay channel from the junction with the Straight channel to the outer end of the Pennsylvania Coal dock no. 3 to 24 feet, thence from outer end of the coal dock to the turning basin to 24 feet in soft material and 25 in hard, with no Federal dredging within 50 feet of the dock; and enlarging the turning basin, including removal of approximately 300 feet of the rock dike, and deepening to 24 feet in soft material and 25 feet in hard. STURGEON POINT, EVANS, NY 23 Jul 14, 1960 Rehabilitate existing breakwater, construct rubble mound, West breakwater extension, construct rubble mound east breakwater, a shore revetment and dredging 24 TOLEDO hIARBOR, OHi Mar 3, 1899 A channel 400 feet wide and 21 feet deep from 25-foot contour in Maumee Bay to fassett Street Bridge, 200 feet wide and 19 feet deep above that point and a 500-foot turning basin at Upper End. A stone re-vetted earth dike in Maumee Bay Channel. H. Doc. 982, 64th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 584, 69th Cong., 2nd sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 2, 73rd Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 328, 76th Cong., 1st sess. Sec. 107, PL86-645. Authorized by Chief of Engineers Oct 21, 1987 H. Doc. 198, 55th Cong., 2d sess. And Annual Report 1898, p. 2693. 20-34 21 Documents 22 am --- - - -- - -ww w wo w BUFFALO, NY DISTRICT Table 20-B See Section AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Work Authorized Jun 25, 1910 Act 1899 modified to insure a navigable channel to 21 feet from fassett Street Bridge to Lake. Aug 30, 1935 Channel 25 feet deep and 500 feet wide from 25-foot contour to mouth of Maumee River (300 feet wide on each side of center dike in Bay Channel), thence 400 feet wide to fassett Street Bridge, 200 feet wide above that point and a turning basin at Upper end 18 feet deep. May 17, 1950 Widening at bend of mouth of River opposite Chesapeake and .Ohio Railway Dock. Sep 3, 1954 Removal of center dike in Maumee Bay Channel. Jul 3, 1958 Enlarge widening at bend opposite Chesapeake and Ohio dock and turning basin opposite American Shipbuilding Co. dock. Jul 14, 1960 Deepening Bay Channel including widening to 28 feet, Deepen River channels to NY Central Railroad Bridge to 27 feet and construct new turning basin below Anthony Wayne Bridge.27 VERMILION HARBOR, OH1 Jul 4, 1836 Parallel piers and dredging channel to 8 feet deep. Mar 3, 1875 Deepening of channel to 12 feet. Mar 3, 1905 Reconstruction of piers. Jul 3, 1958 New entrance formed by two overlapping arrowhead breakwaters and extension of existing river channel upstream to Liberty St. Bridge. WILSON HARBOR, NY Mar 2, 1945 Entrance channel 80 feet wide and 8 feet deep; and restore east and west piers. Aug 3, 1968 Extend existing channel 300 feet; and construct new channel 3,800 feet long through Tuscarora Bay. Rehabilitate existing breakwater, construct rubble mound west breakwater extension, construct rubble mound east Breakwater, a shore revetment and dredging. H. Doc. 865, 60th Cong., 1st sess. River and Harbors Committee Doc 21, 72nd Cong., Ist sess. H. Doc. 189, 81st Cong., Ist sess. 11. Doc. 620, 81st Cong., 2nd sess. H. Doc. 436, 84th Cong., 2nd sess. H. Doc. 153, 86th Cong., 1st sess.' Annual Report, 1880. Annual Report, 1874, p.219 H. Doc. 252, 58th Cong., 2nd sess. H. Doc. 231, 85th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 679, 76th Cong., 2nd sess. H. Doc. 112, 90th Cong., Ist sess. Sec. 107, PL86-645. Authorized by Chief of Engineers Oct 21, 1987 20-35 Documents 26 27 27 The 27-foot project extended 2,800 feet on turning basin relocated under authority of Chief of Engineers. _ _ REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 99 Table 20.B AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Work Authorized ONONDAGA LAKE, NY 37 Nov 16, 1990 The Assistant Secretary of the Army for Civil Works, The administrator of the Environmental Protection Agency, and the Governor of the State of New York, acting jointly, shall convene a management conference for the restoration and management of Onondaga Lake. The purpose,of the conference shall include the development, in the 2-year period beginning on the date of enactment of this fact, for a Reaffirmation of PL 101-596. Nov 28, 1990 The Secretary is authorized to design and construct projects to address water quality problems associated with storm water discharges from large storm events for... the watershed areas of Oct 31,1992 Onondaga County and Syracuse, New York, from which waters discharge into Onondaga Lake, New York. The design of Projects shall ensure the development of effective Federal and non-Federal actions which will contribute toward compliance with the Federal Water Pollution Control Act. Total project cost shall be shared at 75% Federal and 25% non-Federal. Operation and maintenance cost shall be 100% non-Federal. Documents PL 101-596 PL 101-640 PL 102-580 20-36 See Section - -- BUFFALO, NY DISTRICT TABLE 20-C OTHER AUTHORIZED NAVIGATION PROJECTS For Last Cost to Full Report Sep 30, 2000 See annual Operations & Project Status Report For Construction Maintenance Big (Cunningham) Creek, OH Black River Harbor, NY Buffalo Small Boat Harbor, NY Cape Vincent Harbor, NY Cattaraugus Creek Harbor, NY Geneva-on-the Lake, OH Grasse River Massena, NY Kelleys Island, OH Little River at Cayuga Island, NY Little Sodus Bay Harbor, NY Morristown Harbor, NY Niagara Remedial Works, NY8 Niagara River, NY9 Ogdensburg Harbor, NY Olcott Harbor Port Clinton Harbor, NY Port Ontario Harbor, NY Pultneyville Harbor, NY 14 Sackets Harbor, OH1 Sandusky River, OIi 15 West Harbor, OH Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Active Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed 1994 1962 1999 1990 1891 19746 1969 1999 1949 1966 1964 1987 1999 1997 1995 1934 1982 1894 1999 $ 19,763 2 42,401 602,016 275,082 4,804,060 4 3,145,176 s 9,000 2 129,874 46,804 7 301,934 6,221 6,069,395 559,457 0 1,720,466 1,754,694 71,950 2,369,621 13 68,219 25,010 58,000 2 3,303,898 Only information available is in index to reports of Chief of Engineers. 2 Amount includes maintenance; not separable. 3 Excludes $593,216 contributed funds. 4 Excludes $2,566,529 contributed funds. s Excludes $3,261,375 contributed funds. 6 Annual Report for Detroit District. 7 Includes local interests contribution of $25,742. SCost of operation and Maintenance of this project will be settled directly by concerned power agencies. No further appropriations will be made to this project. 9 Construction of compensating works as authorized by 1930 R&H act was authorized by Congress in Aug 1977. 10 Includes local interest contribution of $27,563. " Includes $271,380 for previous projects. Excludes $57,000 contributed funds. 12 Includes $130,512 for previous projects. 1" Includes $50,000 for previous projects. Excludes $1,299,008. 1 Abandonment recommended in H. Doc. 275, 64" Cong., 1" sess. 20-37 1,769,003 355,923 10,168 6,580 5,590,413 13,218 510,819 290,845 1,429,973 12 694,705 1,072,750 42,613 20,087 28,583 557 1,985,927 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 99 Table 20-D OTHER AUTHORIZED SHORE PROTECTION PROJECTS For Last Cost to Full Report Sep 30, 2000 See Annual Operations & Project Status Report For Construction Maintenance Hamlin Beach State Park, NY Lakeview Park, Lorain, OH Maumee Bay State Park, OH Selkirk Shore State Park, Lake Ontario, NY3 Completed Completed Completed Completed 1976 1987 1995 1963 $1,769,600 1,741,125 2,780,975 2 58,978 $307 ' Federal participation was limited to one-third of first cost when project was authorized by 1954 River and Harbor Act. Federal participation was changed from one-third to 70 percent of remaining work under Public Law 87-874. 2 Does not include $739,700 contributed funds. 3 Does not include $199,845 contributed funds. 20-38 BUFFALO, NY DISTRICT OTHER AUTHORIZED Project Auburn, NY, Owasco Outlet Batavia and Vicinity, Tonawanda Creek, NY Camp Perry, OHf Cayuga Creek, Cheektowaga, NY4 " Cuyahoga River Basin, OH Dansville and Vicinity, Canaserga Creek, NY Fremont, OH, Sandusky River Ithaca, Cayuga Inlet, NY Lackawanna, NY, Smokes Creek Lancaster, Cayuga Creek, NY Marsh Creek, Geneva, NY Montour Falls, Oswego River Basin, NY Onondaga Creek, Nedrow, NY4 Ottawa, OH Owasco Inlet and Outlet, Montiville And Dry Creek, State Ditch and Crane Brook, NY8 Point Place, Toledo, Ol Reno Beach-Howard Farms, OHi Scajaquada Creek, NY Syracuse Oswego River Basin, NY Warsaw, NY Oatka Creek 4 Wellsville, NY, Genesee River . .. Table 20-E Status Completed Completed Completed Completed Active Active Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Deferred Inactive Deferred Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed 281,559 9,885,733 9 5,483,192 '0 4,944,852 3,349,248 558,317 " 3,145,303 12 ' Excludes cost of $188,732 under Public Law 88-99, Flood Control and Coastal Emergencies Appropriation, incurred for project rehabilitation as a result of damages due to stonn Agnes, Jun 1972. 2 Annual Report for Detroit District. 3 Includes local interest contribution of $125,000. Project authorized by Chief of Engineers. Includes local interest contribution of $6,944. Excludes cost of $383,786 under Public Law 84-99. Flood Control and Coastal Emergencies Appropriation, for emergency restoration of levees damaged during 1973. 6 Includes local interest contribution of $99,999. Excludes cost of $104,005 under Public Law 84-99. Flood Control and Coastal Emergencies Appropriation, incurred for project rehabilitation as a result of damages due to storm Agnes, Jun 1972. Includes local interest contribution of $50,000. 8 In-active portion of work for State Ditch has been done by local interest and work on Crane Brooks has been deferred at the request of local interests. 9 Excludes $1,871,631 in contributed funds. 10 Excludes $475,994 in contributed funds. " Excludes cost of $26, 807 under Public Law 84-99, Flood Control and Coastal Emergencies Appropriation, incurred for project rehabilitation as a result of damages due to storm Agnes, Jun 1972. 1" Includes local interest contribution of $50,000. Excludes cost of $374,042 under Public Law 84-99, Flood Control and Coastal Emergency Appropriation, incurred for project rehabilitation as a result of damages due to storms. 20-39 mFLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS For Last Cost To Full Report Sep 30, 2000 See Annual Operations & Report For Construction Maintenance 1962 $ 371,985 ' 1957 335,385 19672 275,000 3 1984 1,404,500 1985 1,117,000 1985 490,300 1976 8,589,824 s 1978 3,929,300 6 1971 3,542,068 ' 1954 79,730 - 226,429 1954 1,681,785 1964 330,231 1989 374,000 onwummmm 1950 1990 1997 1985 1954 1969 1978 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 99 TABLE 20-G DEAUTHORIZED PROJECTS For Last Full Report Federal Contributed See Annual Date Funds Funds Project Report For Deauthorized Expended Expended Black Rock Channel and Tonawanda Harbor, NY 1935 1962 Aug-77 R&H Act' Black Rock Channel and Tonawanda Harbor, NY 1954 1962 May-81 R&H Act Buffalo Harbor Drift Removal, NY - Dec-92 Buffalo Ship Canal, Buffalo, NY - Dec-92 Caledonia, Genesee River, NY 1950 FC Act 1950 Jan-90 Cape Vincent Harbor, NY 1945 R&H Act 1962 Nov-86 Chittenango Creek and Tributaries, NY 1944 FC Act 1948 Jan-90 12,464 Conneaut Harbor, OH R&H Act, 1910 (southerly 300 1997 Oct-96 - feet of shorearm) Conneaut Harbor, OH 1966 R&H Act, 1990 WRDA 1995 Nov-95 Crane Creek State Park, OH 1962 R&tH Act 19682 Nov-79 - Cuyahoga River Basin 1970 FC Act - Apr-99 - Dansville & Vicinity 1948 FC Act - Apr 98 Dunkirk Harbor, NY WRDA 1986 - Dec-92 - Eastlake, Chagrin River, OH 1965 FC Act 1976 Jan-90 506,344 Edgewater Park, OH 1954 R&H Act - Jan-90 - Elk Creek Harbor, PA 1966 R&H Act 1978 Dec-92 101,500 Erie Harbor, PA 1899 R&H Act 1963 Nov-81 - Erie Harbor, PA 1945 R&H Act 1963 Aug-77 - Erie Harbor, PA 1960 R&H Act 1963 Aug-82 - Fairhaven Beach State Park, NY 1958 R&H Act - Jan-90 - Fairport Harbor, OH 1960 R&H Act 1995 Nov-95 67,000 Fairport Harbor, OH Sec. 201 1965 FC Act 1995 Nov-95 - Fort Niagara State Park, NY Sec. 201 1965 FC Act - Jan-90 - Grandview Bay Harbor, NY 1945 R&H Act 1948 Aug-77 1,524 Great Sodus Bay Harbor, NY 1941 R&H Act . 1963 Aug-77 - Hamlin Beach Harbor, NY 1968 R&H Act 1973 Jan-90 72,052 - Hammondsport, Oswego River Basin, NY 1941 FC 1951 Nov-83 29,000 Act Huron Harbor, NY 1962 R&H Act3 1963 Jan-90 - Ithaca, NY - Cascadilla Creek 1941 FC Act 1950 Aug-77 8,159 Ithaca, NY - Fall Creek 1941 FC Act 1950 Aug-77 12,300 Lorain Harbor, OH - Sec. 107, R&H Act 1960 (Portion 1998 Oct-96 - of small boat basin) Lorain Harbor, OH 1960 R&H Act, modified by 1965 1966 Jan-90 R&H Act4 Maumee River, above Toledo, OH 1872 Act 19712 Nov-77 12,000 SExtension of guide pier only: other improvements completed. 2 Annual Report For Detroit District. 3 Breakwater. 4 Uncompleted portion. 20-40 BUFFALO, NY DISTRICT TABLE 20-G DEAUTHORIZED PROJECTS For Last Full Report Federal Contributed See Annual Date Funds Funds Project Report For Deauthorized Expended Expended Morristown Harbor. NY 1927 R&H Act (Portion north 1949 Oct-96 of northern boundary of Morris St. Extended. Niagara River, Compensating Works, 1930 R&H Act Ogdensburg Harbor, NY 1935 R&H Act Ogdensburg Harbor, NY R&H Acts 1910, 1935 (Portion from southernmost alignment of Rte 68 Bridge upstream to northern alignment of Lake St. Bridge) Oswego Harbor, NY 1930 R&H Act Oswego Harbor, NY 1940 R&H Act5 Port Bay, NY 1950 R&H Act Red Creek, NY 1966 FC Act Sackets Harbor, NY 1945 R&H Act Selkirk Shores State Park, OH 1954 R&H Act3 Sheffield Lake Community Park, Oh 1962 R&H Act Watkins Glenn, NY 1941 FC Act White City Park, OH 1954 R&H Act 1964 1986 1987 1963 1963 1975 1948 1963 1958 Deepening of west outer harbor, other improvements completed. 20-41 Aug-77 Nov-86 Oct-96 Jan-90 May-81 Jan-90 Nov-86 May-81 Jan-90 Aug-77 Aug-77 Jan-90 361,241 19,010 43,182 I REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 99 TABLE 20- H FLOOD CONTROL AND COASTAL EMERGENCIES FEDERAL CONTRIBUTED ACTIVITY COST COST Disaster Preparedness $ 250,864 - Emergency Operations 11,127 - Rehabilitation 15,322 - Advance Measures 463,996 $94,467 The Emergency Operations Center was activated once for flood and hurricane related disasters, without any work for FEMA. TABLE 20-I FORMERLY USED REMEDIAL ACTION PROGRAM (FUSRAP) FUSRAP SITE FY 00 COST Niagara Falls Storage Site Lewiston, NY $ 5,031,322 Ashland 1 Tonawanda, NY 21,838,935 Ashland 2 Tonawanda, NY 261,590 Praxair (Linde Air Projects) Tonawanda, NY 5,875,057 Seaway Industrial Park Tonawanda, NY 824,055 Bliss and Laughlin Steel Buffalo, NY (58,247) Luckey Site Luckey, OH 1,642,329 Painesville Site Painesville, OH 607,059 Fusrap Dayton, OH 65,564 Former Harshaw Chemical Co., Cleveland, OH 30,573 Scioto Laboratory Complex, Mation, OH 25,018 Dayton 1, Dayton, OH 9,730 Old Warehouse, Dayton, OH 9,610 20-42 BUFFALO, NY DISTRICT TABLE 20-J GENERAL INVESTIGATIONS COLLECTION AND STUDY OF BASIC DATA GENERAL OPERATIONS & STUDY INVESTIGATIONS MAINTENANCE NON-FEDERAL International Water Studies $143,450 $758,109 Flood Plain Mgmt Services 74,273 $162 Technical Services 8,766 Quick Responses 4,015 SS - Tonawanda Creek 4,955 SS - Ohio Study 8,229 SS Croghan Dam 54 SS - Niagara Falls 27,886 SS - NYS Barge Canal Failure 17,428 General Hydrologic Studies 4,842 PRE-CONSTRUCTION ENGINEERING AND DESIGN Onondaga Lake NY PL 101-596 130,500 104,681 SURVEYS NAVIGATION STUDIES Cleveland Harbor, OH 1,078 FLOOD DAMAGE PREVENTION STUDIES Ellicott Creek, NY 58,427 Oneida Lake, NY 41,119 SHORELINE PROTECTION STUDIES Hamlin & Lakeside Beach, NY 31,072 SPECIAL STUDIES Onondaga Lake NY PL 101-596 251,923 MISCELLANEOUS ACTIVITIES Special Investigations 33,006 Review of FERC Licenses 3,933 Interagency Water Resource 10,201 Natural Estuary Studies 3,580 N. American Waterfowl Mgmt Plan 1,812 COORDINATION WITl OTIIER GOVERNMENT AGENCIES AND NON-FEDERAL INTERESTS COOP with Other Water Agencies 6,341 Remedial Action Plans 9,194 20-43 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 99 TABLE 20-K WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORITIES Navigation Work pursuant to Sec 107, P.L. 86-645 as amended Study Identification Buffalo Inner Harbor, NY Fairport Harbor, Lake County, OH Middle Bass Island, Put-In-Bay, OH Put-In-Bay Harbor, Put-In-Bay, OH Port Bay Harbor, Huron, NY Rochester Harbor Toussaint River, OH Union Ship Canal - Buffalo, NY Walnut Creek Access Area - Erie Co., PA Section 107 Coordination Account Federal Cost $ 197,384 6,168 10,479 30,754 22,493 9,999 26,874 11,799 14,017 8,713 Non-Federal Cost Navigation Work pursuant to Sec 111, P.L. 86-645 as amended of the 1968 River & Harbor Act, as amended Study Identification Lorain Harbor, Ford City West, OH Section 111 Coordination account " Federal Cost Non-Federal Cost 8,335 4,988 Shore Protection Activities pursuant to Sec. 103 of the 1962 River and Harbor Act, as amended Study Identification Lake Erie, Athol Springs, Hamburg, NY Lake Erie, Painesville, OH Lake Shore Park, Ashtabula Mexico Point State Park, NY Section 103 Coordination Account Sylvan Beach Breakwater, Oneida Lake, NY Federal Cost Non-Federal Cost 38,895 31,422 83 4,649 4,881 22,098 Flood Control Projects Pursuant to Sec. 205 of the 1954 Flood Control Act, as amended Study Identification Buffalo Creek, Erie Co., NY Cattaraugus & Clear Creek - Arcade, NY Cazenovia Creek, NY Chagrin River, Eastlake, OH Cross Lake, NY East Branch Huron River Ellicott Creek - Lancaster, NY Ellicot Creek, Lehn Spring, NY Genesee River - Portageville, NY Irondequoit Creek, Penfield Keuka Lake Outlet Mod Scajaquada Creek - Depew, NY Section 205 Coordination Account Swan Creek, Toledo, OH Thatcher Brook, Gowanda, NY Vermilion River, Vermilion, OH Federal Cost Non-Federal Cost 8,740 8,620 154,245 9,461 6 145 8,841 42,138 14,085 12,650 107,538 10,101 21,669 14,568 (16,014) 13,308 13,068 42,484 (19,656) (8) 20-44 - -- BUFFALO, NY DISTRICT TABLE 20-K WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORITIES Flood Control work pursuant to Sec 14 of the 1946 Flood Control Act, as amended Study Identification Cayuga Creek - Depew, NY Conneaut Creek, 1-90 Bridge Kingsville, OH Cuyahoga River, Bath Road, Akron, OH Hospice of Western Reserve Lake Erie, SR 531 - North Kingsville, OH Lake Erie, SR 531 @ SR 534 - Geneva, OH Lake Ontario, Albion Water Lake Ontario, Sodus Point-Wayne Co., NY Minnick Road, Tonawanda Creek Niagara River,.Tonawanda, NY Section 14 Coordination Account Sewerline, Canadaway Creek - Fredonia, NY Sodus Point Lighthouse Tonawanda Cr- Niagara Co, NY Tonawanda Creek, Queen of Heaven Cemetery Federal Cost 5,525 19,689 43,813 27,517 6,664 23,798 16,454 159,364 12,327 104,854 14,285 69,766 84,384 3,260 597 Non-Federal Cost Project Modification to Improve Environment pursuant to Sec 1135, PL. 99-662 Study Identification Buffalo River Habitat Coordination Account Funds Initial Appraisals Rochester Navigation Channel, NY Federal Cost 5,742 7,888 13,219 136,748 Non-Federal Cost Aquatic Ecosystem Restoration pursuant to Sec 206, P.I. 104-303 Study Identification Preliminary Restoration Plans Sec 206 Coordination Account Funds Federal Cost 7,899 8,487 Non-Federal Cost Snagging and Clearing Pursuant to Sec. 208 of the 1954 Flood Control Act as amended Study Identification Section 208 Coordination Account 4,957 Wetlanld/Other Aquatic Habitat Creation pursuant to Section 204, P.L. 102- 560 Study Identification Section 204 Coordination Account 3,664 20-45 __ REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 99 TABLE 20-L INSPECTION OF COMPLETED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS DATE NAME OF PROJECT INSPECTED Catherine/Shequaga Creek, Montour Falls, NY Jun 2000 Cayuga Creek, Lancaster, NY Jul 2000 Cayuga Creek, Cheektowaga, NY Jul 2000 Cayuga Inlet, Ithaca, NY " May 2000 Conesus Lake Outlet, Livonia, NY Jun 2000 Ellicott Creek, Amherst and Tonawanda, NY Jul 2000 Genesee River, Wellsville, NY Jul 2000 Keuka Lake Outlet, Penn Yan, NY Jun 2000 Lake Erie, Point place, OH Mar 2000 Marsh Creek, Geneva, NY Feb 2000 Oatka Creek, Warsaw, NY Jul 2000 Onondaga Creek, Onondaga Dam, NY May 2000 Onondaga Creek, Syracuse and Nedrow, NY May 2000 Owasco Inlet, Dry and Mill Creeks, Moravia, NY May 2000 Sandusky River, Fremont, OH Oct 2000 Scajaquada Creek, Cheektowaga, NY Jul 2000 Swan Creek, Swan Creek, OH Mar 2000 Smokes Creek, Lackawanna, NY Jul 2000 Tonawanda Creek, Batavia, NY Jun 2000 Inspections of completed flood control works for compliance with Federal requirements were made during the period at a cost of $224,001. This includes updating the hydraulics and hydrology of various local flood control projects. Total cost to Sep. 30, 2000 is $3,623,76 20-46 DETROIT, MI, DISTRICT* The District is composed of the upper and lower peninsulas of Michigan and portions of Indiana, Wisconsin and Minnesota, which border the lakes. It includes U.S. waters of Lakes Superior, Michigan, Huron, St. Clair and western Lake Erie. Unless otherwise indicated, all depths stated in this report are referred to low water datum as follows: Lake Superior, 601.1 feet; Lake Michigan-Huron, 577.5 feet; Lake Erie, 569.2 feet; and Lake St. Clair, 572.3 feet. These elevations are in feet above the mean water level at Rimouski, Quebec -- International Great Lakes Datum,1985 (IGLD 1985). The IGLD 1985 is a datum or reference system used to define water levels within the Great Lakes - St. Lawrence River system. This datum was implemented in January 1992, officially replacing IGLD 1955. At the time IGLD 1955 was established, it was recognized that this datum would have to be periodically revised due to isostatic rebound. Isostatic rebound is the gradual rising or bouncing back of the earth's crust from the weight of the glaciers that covered the Great Lakes region during the last ice age. IMPROVEMENTS Navigation Page 1. Algoma Hlarbor, WI ................................. 21-2 2. Alpena tHarbor, MI ........................................ 21-3 3. Arcadia Harbor, MI ....................................... 21-3 4. Ashland Harbor, WI..................................... 21-4 5. AuSable Harbor, MI ................................... 21-4 6. Bay Port Harbor, MI....................................... 21-4 7. Big Bay Harbor, MI .................. .............. 21-5 8. Big Suamico River, WI................ .............. 21-5 9. Black River (P.H.), MI .................................. 21-5 10. Black River Harbor (U.P.), MI ...................... 21-6 11. Caseville Harbor, MI ............... ............... 21-6 12. Cedar River Harbor, MI.................................... 21-7 13. Charlevoix Harbor, MI ............... ............. 21-7 14. Clinton River, MI...................................... 21-8 15. Cornucopia Harbor, WI ........... ............... 21-9 16. Detroit River, MI ..................................... 21-9 17. Duluth-Superior Harbor, MN and WI.......... 21-10 18. Fox River, WI .................... ........ 21-11 19. Frankfort Harbor, MI ................................... 21-12 20. Grand Haven Harbor, MI ............................... 21-12 21. Grand Traverse Bay Harbor, MI.................. 21-13 22. Green Bay Harbor, WI............................. 21-14 23. Greilickville IHarbor, MI........... .............. 21-15 24. Harbor Beach Harbor, MI ............................ 21-15 25. Hlarrisville Harbor, MI........................... 21-15 26. Holland Harbor, MI.............................. 21-16 27. Inland Route, MI .......................................... 21-16 28. Kenosha Harbor, WI .............................. 21-17 29. Kewaunee Harbor, WI ................................. 21-18 30. Keweenaw Waterway, MI ....................... 21-18 31. La Pointe Harbor, WI ............................ 21-19 32. Lac La Belle Harbor, MI ............................. 21-19 33. Lake St. Clair, MI, Channels ...................... 21-19 34. Leland Harbor, MI ................................. 21-20 35. Lexington Harbor, MI.............................. 21-20 Navigation (Continued) i Page 36. Little Lake Harbor, MI ............................. 21-21 37. Ludington Harbor, MI ................................. 21-21 38. Manistee Harbor, MI ................................... 21-22 39. Manistique Harbor, MI.......................... 21-22 40. Manitowoc Harbor, MI.......................... 21-23 41. Marquette Harbor, MI ..................................... 21-24 42. Menominee Harbor & River, MI & WI....... 21-24 43. Milwaukee Harbor, WI................................ 21-25 44. Monroe Harbor, MI..................................... 21-26 45. Muskegon Harbor, MI .............................. 21-26 46. New Buffalo Harbor, MI .......................... 21-27 47. Oconto Harbor, WI ................................... 21-27 48. Ontonagon Harbor, MI ................................ 21-28 49. Pentwater Harbor, MI ............................... 21-28 50. Petoskey Harbor, MI................................. 21-29 51. Point Lookout Harbor, MI ........................ 21-29 52. Port Sanilac Harbor, MI ..... ......................... 21-29 53. Port Washington Harbor, WI .................... 21-30 54. Port Wing Harbor, WI .............................. 21-30 55. Portage Lake Harbor, MI.......................... 21-31 56. Rouge River, MI .......................................... 21-31 57. Saginaw River, MI .................................... 21-32 58. St. Clair River, MI ....................................... 21-33 59. St. Joseph Harbor, MI ............................... 21-33 60. Saugatuck Harbor and Kalamazoo River, MI ............................ 21-34 61. Saxon Harbor, WI ............. ........... ............. 21-34 62. Sebewaing River, MI ................................... 21-35 63. Sheboygan Harbor, WI .......................... 21-35 64. South Haven Harbor, MI ............................. 21-36 65. Sturgeon Bay and Lake MI Ship Canal, WI......... ......... 21-36 66. Two Rivers Harbor, WI ............................ 21-37 67. White Lake Harbor, MI ...................... 21-37 68. Whitefish Point Harbor, MI......................... 21-38 21- 1 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 2000 Navigation (Continued) Page 69. Reconnaissance and Condition Surveys ...... 21-38 70. Other Authorized Navigation'Projects......... 21-38 71. Navigation Work Under Special Authorization ............................................ 21-38 Shore Protection 72. Authorized Beach Erosion Control Projects 21-39 73. Emergency Shore Protection .................... 21-39 74. Beach Erosion Work Under Special Authorization ............................................. 21-40 75. Mitigation of Shore Damage ....................... 21-40 76. Project Modification for Improving the Quality of the Environment ..................... 21-41 Flood Control 77. Clinton River Spillway, MI ......................... 21-42 78. Fort Wayne Metro Area, IN...................... 21-42 79. Saginaw River, MI ....................................... 21-43 80. Sebewaing River, MI ................................... 21-45 81. Inspection of Completed Flood Control Projects ...................................... 21-45 82. Other Authorized Flood Control Projects.... 21-45 83. Flood Control Under Special Authorization ............................................ 21-45 84. Surveillance of Northern Boundary Waters and International Water Studies............. 21-46 NAVIGATION 1. ALGOMA HARBOR, WI Location. On west shore of Lake Michigan, about 68 miles from Green Bay via Sturgeon Bay Canal and about 115 miles northerly from Milwaukee (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14910). Previous Project. For details see page 1199 of Annual Report for 1958. Existing Project. Provides for (a) a north pier 1,102 feet long; (b) a south breakwater 1,530 feet long; (c) an entrance channel 14 feet deep and 200 feet wide from that depth in Lake Michigan and extending 800 feet landward; (d) a channel 14 feet deep in the Ahnapee River 80 to 175 feet wide for 1,200 feet up to the Second Street Bridge; (e) an outer basin 14 feet deep, 600 feet long and 100 to 500 feet wide. For a Multiple-Purpose Projects Including Power 85. St. Marys River, MI .................................. 21-49 General Investigations 86. Surveys ..................................... 21-51 87. Preconstruction Engineering and Design..... 21-52 88. Collection and Study of Basic Data............. 21-52 Tables Table 21-A Cost & Financial Statement ............ 21-54 Table 21-B Authorizing Legislation .................. 21-73 Table 21-C Other Authorized Navigation Projects ........................................... 21-89 Table 21-D Not Applicable Table 21 -E Other Authorized Flood Control Projects ..................................... 21-91 Table 21-F Multiple Purpose Projects, Including Power, St. Marys River, MI: Existing Project............................ 21-91 Table 21-G Deauthorized Projects.................. 21-92 Table 21-H Features of Existing Project............ 21-95 Table 21-I Fox River, WI: Locks & Dams....... 21-96 Table 21-J Reconnaissance & Condition Surv. 21-97 more detailed description see page 1200 of Annual Report for 1958. Section 52 (c) of the Water Resources Development Act (WRDA) of 1988 deauthorized the outer harbor basin feature of the navigation project. (See Table 21- B for legislation.) Local Cooperation. None required. Terminal Facilities. Consists of several fishing wharves. This harbor has one of the largest charter fishing fleets on the Great Lakes. Operations During Fiscal Year. Maintenance: Condition and structure surveys, environmental studies, and miscellaneous inspections and reports performed by Government forces and contract cost $55,382. Repair of the South Breakwater, Sections C&D, and the North Pier, Sections A-C, was performed using the U.S. Cranebarge MANITOWOC 21- 2 DETROIT, MI, DISTRICT at a cost of $21,501. Supervision and administration cost $2,970. Existing project was completed in 1909. Ahnapee River is navigable for about two miles from the mouth at a depth of four feet. Total cost of the existing project to end of FY was $1,990,329 of which $292,010 was for new work and $1,698,319 for maintenance. 2. ALPENA HARBOR, MI Location. At mouth of Thunder Bay River which empties into Thunder Bay, Lake Huron. Harbor is 100 miles southeast of Cheboygan Harbor, MI. River has its source in Montmorency and Alpena Counties, MI. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14864.) Previous Project. For details see page 1957 of Annual Report for 1915 and page 1548 of Annual Report for 1938. Existing Project. Provides for a bay channel 200 feet wide and 25 feet deep from deep water in Thunder Bay to a point 300 feet lakeward of the Alpena Light; thence an entrance channel 24 feet deep, narrowing to a width of 100 feet at a point 700 feet upstream from the light; a river channel 100 feet wide, 23 feet deep to Second Avenue Bridge; thence 18.5 feet deep and 75 feet wide for 1,600 feet to upper limit of Federal project; a turning basin at upstream end of project, basin at river mouth 19 feet deep, trapezoidal in shape, with a maximum width of 700 feet including the channel width and a maximum length of 900 feet along the channel line, including removal of existing rubble breakwater; and a breakwater about 550 feet long paralleling lakeward side of new turning basin. Work authorized by the 1965 River and Harbor Act, which consists of the proposed turning basin and breakwater reconfiguration, was deauthorized by the Water Resources Development Act (WRDA) OF 1986; Public Law (PL) 99-662, November 17, 1986, 99th Congress, Title X. Local Cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal Facilities. Several commercial docks along Thunder Bay River used primarily for receipt of coal and petroleum products. Also a municipal marina basin about 0.25 mile southwest of river mouth. Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations During Fiscal Year. Maintenance: Condition surveys and miscellaneous inspections and reports performed by Government forces cost $17,015. Engineering and design for repair of the Rubblemound Breakwater was completed at a cost of $25,922. A contract for this work was awarded this FY in the amount of $770,144. At the end of the FY the contract was 84% complete at a cost of $649,000. Engineering and design during construction cost $2,600. Real estate and supervision and administration cost $66,517. Existing project was completed in 1939. The modification of existing project at Alpena Harbor, as authorized by the 1965 River and Harbor Act, was reclassified into an inactive status May 22, 1969 based on an unfavorable benefit-cost ratio. In 1975 the modification was recommended and reviewed for deauthorization, which was withdrawn by Congressional Resolution the same year. Subsequently, the work authorized by the 1965 Act was deauthorized by the WRDA of 1986. Project features range from good to excellent. Total cost of the existing project to end of FY was $2,298,075, of which $337,394 was for new work and $1,960,681 for maintenance. 3. ARCADIA HARBOR, MI Location. On east shore of Lake Michigan, 193 miles northeasterly from Chicago, IL, and 15 miles northerly from Manistee, MI. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14907). Existing Project. Provided for maintenance dredging of the existing harbor built by private interests, for a period of five years. The five years covered by this project were the calendar years 1905 to 1909, inclusive. Funds were also appropriated and maintenance was performed in calendar years 1911, 1912, 1913 and 1915, inclusive. There is at present no approved project for the improvement of this harbor. (See Table 21-B for authorizing legislation.) Local Cooperation. None required. Terminal Facilities. Dock facilities are considered adequate for existing recreational traffic. 21- 3 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 2000 Operations During Fiscal Year. Maintenance: Condition surveys and miscellaneous inspections and reports performed by Government forces cost $19,778. Safety maintenance performed by hired labor cost $3,234. A contract was awarded and completed this FY for maintenance dredging, removing 4,201 cubic yards of shoal material at a cost of $41,804. Engineering, design, surveys, and supervision and administration cost $16,016. Existing project was completed in 1909. Varying depths of 5-12 feet exist in the channel at present. Maintenance of the harbor is based on providing a 9-foot depth. Piers and revetments are in good condition. Total cost of the existing project to end of FY was $5,299,092. 4. ASHLAND HARBOR, WI Location. At head of Chequamegon Bay, on south shore of Lake Superior, about 65 miles east of Duluth, MN. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14974.) Existing Project. A west channel 20 and 21 feet deep and an east basin 25 and 27 feet deep, both all protected by an 8,000-foot breakwater. For additional details see page 1008 of Annual Report for 1965. (See Table 21-B for authorizing legislation.) Local Cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal Facilities. City of Ashland owns 4,150 feet of waterfront for future public needs. Wharves for handling coal, ore, limestone, logs and pulpwood are served by railroads. Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. Handling of ore and logs has been discontinued for the present. Operations During Fiscal Year. Maintenance: Condition surveys and miscellaneous inspections and reports performed by Government forces cost $5,591. Repairs to the Breakwater were performed using the U. S. Derrickbarge SCHWARTZ at a cost of $120,133. Real estate and supervision and administration cost $9,953. Work authorized prior to 1960 Act was completed in 1950. Work authorized by 1960 Act was completed in November 1962. Navigation structures are in fair condition. Total cost of the existing project to end of FY was $6,083,514, of which $1,695,645 was for new work and $4,387,869 was for maintenance. 5. AuSABLE HARBOR AT AuSABLE RIVER (OSCODA), MI Location. The AuSable River and village of Oscoda, MI are on the west shore of Lake Huron, 8 miles north of AuSable Point, northeast limit of Saginaw Bay. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14863.) Previous Project. For details see pages 336 and 2453 of Annual Report for 1892. Existing Project. Riprapping outer 200 feet of north pier at mouth of AuSable River, dredging an entrance channel 12 feet deep and dredging between piers and upstream to State highway bridge 10 feet deep. (See Table 21-B for authorizing legislation.) Operations During Fiscal Year. Maintenance: Condition surveys performed by Government forces cost $993. Engineering and design for maintenance dredging contract to be awarded next FY cost $7,588. Existing project was completed in 1962. Piers and revetments are in fair condition, it is anticipated repairs will be required in the next several years. Total cost of the existing project to end of FY was $3,109,101, of which $209,776 was for new work (includes $16,400 contributed funds) and $2,899,325 for maintenance. 6. BAY PORT HARBOR, MI Location. On Wild Fowl Bay on east shore of Saginaw Bay about 10 miles south of Caseville, MI. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14863.) Existing Project. Provides for a channel 6 feet deep and 50 feet wide extending 5,750 feet from 6-foot contour in Saginaw Bay to intersection of private service channels to be dredged by local interests. (See Table 21-B for authorizing legislation.) Local Cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal Facilities. Several small wharves used primarily by commercial fisherman. Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. 21- 4 DETROIT, MI, DISTRICT Operations During Fiscal Year. Maintenance: Condition surveys and miscellaneous inspections and reports performed by government forces cost $6,233. Engineering and design for future maintenance dredging was initiated at a cost of $2,940. Existing project was completed in 1967. Total cost of the existing project to end of FY was $695,139, of which $93,597 was for new work and $601,542 for maintenance (which includes $137,399 contributed funds). 7. BIG BAY HARBOR, MI Location. On south shore of Lake Superior 33 miles northwesterly from Marquette, MI, and 38 miles easterly from Portage entry to Keweenaw Waterway. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14964.) Existing Project. Provides for two converging piers extending from shore, an entrance channel between piers and rectangular harbor basin. Project depths are 12 feet in entrance channel and 10 feet in harbor basin. For details see page 1009 of Annual Report for 1965 and page 1261 of Annual Report for 1962. (See Table 21-B for authorizing legislation.) Local Cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal Facilities. A State-owned launching ramp and dock for small craft. Operations During Fiscal Year. Maintenance: Condition surveys, environmental studies, and miscellaneous inspections and reports performed by Government forces and contract cost $54,457. A contract for maintenance dredging was awarded and completed this FY, removing 13,936 cubic yards of shoal material at a cost of $82,455. Engineerinng, design, surveys, and supervision and administration cost $48,637. Project was completed in June 1961 except for protection at inner end of east breakwater, completed in November 1961. Project features are in fair to good condition. Total cost of the existing project to end of FY was $2,103,049, of which $396,943 was for new work and $1,706,106 for maintenance. The new work cost does not include $56,500 contributed funds. 8. BIG SUAMICO RIVER, WI Location. A small stream which flows easterly into Green Bay, an arm of Lake Michigan. Mouth of the river is about 8 miles north of Green Bay Harbor, and about 44 miles southwesterly from Menominee Harbor, MI and WI. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14910.) Existing Project. An entrance channel 8 feet deep which extends from that depth in Green Bay to 1,800 feet above the river mouth, with widths of 100 feet in bay and 60 feet in river; total length of channel is about 3,700 feet. (See Table 21-B for authorizing legislation.) Local Cooperation. None required. Terminal facilities. Small private wharves along lower 1.5 miles of river, used by local fishing interests. Ample space is available for additional fishing wharves when required. Facilities considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations During Fiscal Year. Maintenance: Condition surveys, environmental studies, and miscellaneous inspections and reports performed by Government forces and contract cost $39,330. Real estate and engineering and design for future maintenance dredging was initiated at a cost of $87,853. Existing project was completed in 1938. Dredging channel was started in September 1938 and completed in November 1938. Total cost of the existing project to end of FY was $1,371,433, of which $20,243 was for new work and $1,351,190 for maintenance. 9. BLACK RIVER (PORT HURON), MI Location. This river has its source in the northern part of Sanilac County, MI, is about 60 miles long, and flows in a southeasterly direction into the St. Clair River. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14852.) Previous Project. For details see page 1441 of Annual Report for 1916, and page 1554 of Annual Report for 1938. Existing Project. Provides for a channel 20 feet deep from deep water in St. Clair River to the Grand Tnrumk Western Railroad Bridge, 160 feet wide at the 21- 5 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 2000 mouth, decreasing to 100 feet, about 800 feet from the mouth, thence 100 feet wide for 2,600 feet, decreasing to 75 feet for a distance of 4,800 feet; widening two bends to 100 feet, one at the foot of 12th Street, and the other below the Grand Trunk Western Railroad Bridge; for a settling basin 75 feet wide and 20 feet deep, beginning at the Grand Trunk Western Railroad Bridge in Port Huron and extending upstream a distance of about 2,300 feet; and then for a distance of 2.6 miles as a 100-foot wide river channel, 8 feet deep to the 1-94 bridge where it decreases to 6 feet deep and continues to the vicinity of the Black River Drainage Canal with suitable widening where required at bends in the channel. The project modification authorized by the Act of August 30, 1935, is considered to be inactive and is excluded from the foregoing cost for new work. The cost of this modification was last revised in 1954 and was estimated to be $194,000 exclusive of $194,000 to be contributed by local interests. (See Table 21-B for authorizing legislation.) Local Cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal Facilities. There are docks on both sides of Black River near its mouth, and between these docks and the upper limit of improvement there are 5 other docks varying in length from 100 to 500 feet. All docks are privately owned and are restricted to the use of the owners. The facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. Public recreational boating facilities constructed by the State and local agencies are available, as are privately owned and operated marinas. Operations During Fiscal Year. Maintenance: Condition surveys, environmental studies, and miscellaneous inspections and reports performed by Government forces and contract cost $47,479. All work, except that authorized by Act of August 30, 1935, and the latest modification, has been completed. Total cost of the existing project to end of FY was $2,368,135, of which $830,165 was for new work (includes $349,921 contributed funds) and $1,537,970 for maintenance. 10. BLACK RIVER IHARBOR (UPPER PENINSULA), MI Location. At mouth of Black River on south shore of Lake Superior 39 miles westerly from Ontonagon, MI, and 47 miles easterly from Ashland, WI. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14965.) Existing Project. Two converging breakwaters, an entrance channel between breakwaters, an inner channel, and an irregular harbor basin. For additional details see page 1092 of Annual Report for 1966. Project depths are 12 feet in the approach channel and 8 feet in the river channel and basin. (See Table 21-B for authorizing legislation.) Local Cooperation. Fully complied with. Local interests furnished easements on 0.85 acre of land. Terminal Facilities. Wharves constructed on both sides of river. Wharf on east bank has frontage of 400 feet, on west bank, a frontage of 750 feet. Operations During Fiscal Year. Maintenance: Engineering and design for maintenance dredging contract to be awarded next FY was initiated at a cost of $5,562. Project was completed in June 1958. Navigation structures range from fair to good condition. Total cost of the existing project to end of FY was $1,398,319, of which $383,350 was for new work and $1,014,969 was for maintenance. The new work cost does not include $30,000 contributed funds. 11. CASEVILLE HARBOR, MI Location. At mouth of Pigeon River on south shore of Saginaw Bay about 17 miles southwest of Port Austin, MI. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14860.) Existing project. A small craft harbor of refuge consisting of a breakwater protected channel extending from the 10-foot contour in Saginaw Bay into Pigeon River. Project depths are 10 and 8 feet. For additional details see page 1320 of Annual Report for 1963. Widening river channel from 50 to 60 feet for about 1,000 feet, with widening to 80 feet in upper 300-foot reach, is considered inactive. Estimated (1963) cost of this portion of project is $30,000 (See Table 21-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. Complete public boating facilities constructed by State and local agencies are 21- 6 DETROIT, MI, DISTRICT available in addition to privately owned and operated marinas. Operations During Fiscal Year. Maintenance: Condition surveys and miscellaneous inspections and reports performed by Government forces at a cost of $8,073. A contract for maintenance dredging was awarded and completed this FY, removing 18,174 cubic yards of shoal material at a cost of $212,156. Engineering, design, surveys, and supervision and administration cost $62,601. The existing project was completed in 1964 except for the inactive portion of the project. Project features are in fair to good condition. Total cost of the existing project to end of FY was $2,601,450, of which $587,314 was for new work (including $293,657 contributed funds) and $2,014,136 for maintenance. 12. CEDAR RIVER HARBOR, MI Location. At mouth of Cedar River on west shore of Green Bay, an arm of Northern Lake Michigan, about 68 miles north of City of Green Bay. Nearest harbors are Menominee, MI, 27 miles southwest and at Escanaba, MI, 20 miles northeast. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14909.) Existing Project. Two parallel entrance piers, a west pier 230 feet long and a rubblemound east pier 875 feet long with a sport fishing walkway; an entrance channel 100 feet wide and 10 feet deep from that depth in Green Bay to mouth of Cedar River about 900 feet long; and inner channel in Cedar River 1,400 feet long, 80 feet wide, and 8 feet deep upstream to about 150 below State Route 35 bridge; and a turning basin 150 feet wide near upstream end of inner bridge channel. (See Table 21-B for authorizing legislation.) Local Cooperation. No local sponsor has been identified. The State of Michigan is awaiting completion of the limited Re-evaluation Report. Terminal Facilities. There are no permanent docking, mooring or handling facilities. Operations DI)uring Fiscal Year. Maintenance: The FY98 contract for repair of the East Pier was completed this FY at a cost of $86,589. An adjustment of $1 was made in engineering and design during construction cost for this work. Engineering and design for repair of the West Pier continued at a cost of $124,373. An adjustment of -$3,885 was made in contract costs for maintenance dredging completed last FY. Liquidated damages in the amount of -$2,630 was assessed the maintenance dredging contract. Engineering, design, surveys, and supervision and administration cost $18,277. Project features are in poor to excellent condition. Total cost to end of FY was $3,206,490 of which $408,000 was for new work and $2,798,490 for maintenance. 13. CItARLEVOIX HARBOR, MI Location. On east shore of Lake Michigan, 276 miles northeasterly from Chicago, IL, and 75 miles northerly from Frankfort, MI. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14942.) Existing Project. A channel 24 feet deep in Lake Michigan and a river channel 23 feet deep in the lower and upper channels connecting Lake Michigan with Lake Charlevoix via Round Lake. The channels are protected where needed by piers and revetments. For additional details see page 1476 of Annual Report for 1962. (See Table 21-B for authorizing legislation.) Section 25 of the WRDA of 1988 provides authorization pertaining to the South Pier to Charlevoix Harbor. It states, "The Secretary shall take such action as may be necessary to restore recreational uses established prior to May 1, 1988, or provide comparable recreation uses at the South Pier to Charlevoix Harbor project, Charlevoix, Michigan in order to mitigate any adverse impact on recreational uses resulting from reconstruction of the South Pier..." Local Cooperation. None required except the latest project modification is subject to the following: Provide without cost to the United States, all lands, easements, and rights-of-ways required for construction and subsequent maintenance of the modified project upon the request of the Chief of Engineers, including suitable areas determined by the Chief of Engineers to be required in the general public interest for initial and subsequent disposal of excavated materials and any necessary retaining dikes, bulkheads, and embankments, therefor, or the cost of such retaining works; hold and save the United States free from damages due to the constructing and maintenance of the modified project, except for damages due to the fault or negligence of the United 21- 7 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF TIIE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 2000 States or its contractors; provide and maintain without cost to the United States depths in berthing areas and local access channels serving the terminal commensurate with the depths provided in the related project areas; accomplish, without cost to the United States, such alterations of submarine utility crossing as are required by the modified project; establish regulations prohibiting discharge of pollutants into the waters of the harbor by users thereof which regulations shall be in accordance with applicable laws or regulations of Federal, State and local authorities responsible for pollution prevention and control; if acquiring lands, easements and rights-ofways for construction of the project, local interests will comply with the applicable provisions of the Uniform Relocation Assistance and Real Property Acquisition Policies Act of 1971; PL 91-646, approved January 2, 1971; contribute all costs in excess of $1,000,000 should the total cost of construction of the general navigation facilities exceed that amount, in accordance with provisions of Section 107 of the 1960 River and Harbor Act, as amended. The total first cost of construction (1975) is estimated at $625,000. Terminal Facilities. Several small landing places in Round Lake at Charlevoix for handling fish and miscellaneous commodities, a wharf for petroleum products at west end of Lake Charlevoix, and coal wharves at Advance and Boyne City. Charlevoix, Boyne City, and East Jordan provide public docks for small craft. Facilities considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations During Fiscal Year. Maintenance: Condition surveys and miscellaneous reports performed by Government forces cost $43,064. Safety maintenance performed by hired labor cost $1,348. Repairs to the North Pier, Sections A-1, A-2 & B, were performed using the U.S. Cranebarge MANITOWOC at a cost of $39,299. Supervision and administration cost $3,938. Existing project was completed in 1939 except for the latest modification. Navigation structures are in fair condition with miscellaneous repairs scheduled in future years. Total cost of the existing project to end of FY was $11,901,088, of which $180,623 was for new work, $10,591,069 for maintenance (Bank Stabilization $46,352), and $1,129,396 for rehabilitation. 14. CLINTON RIVER, MI Location. Has its sources in Oakland County, MI, flows easterly about 60 miles and empties into Anchor Bay in northwestern part of Lake St. Clair. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14850.) Previous Project. For details see page 1958 of Annual Report for 1915, and page 1556 of Annual Report for 1938. Existing Project. An entrance channel in Anchor Bay 8 feet deep, 300 feet wide at 8-foot depth contour in the bay, gradually decreasing to 50 feet wide at about 1,000 feet upstream from mouth of Clinton River, a length of about 4,600 feet; a channel 8 feet deep and 50 feet wide in the river about 38,700 feet long from entrance channel upstream to Mt. Clemens at Cass Avenue; closing old channel and making a cutoff at Shoemakers Bend; closing Catfish Channel; construction of revetments as needed in the river; and a harbor basin, 5 feet deep and 11 acres in area at entrance along bay channel, protected by breakwaters on north and south sides. (See Table 21-B for authorizing legislation.) Local Cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal Facilities. River is used exclusively by recreational craft. There are numerous public and private wharves along the river below the city. They are considered adequate. Operations During Fiscal Year. Maintenance: Condition surveys and miscellaneous inspections and reports performed by Government forces cost $17,915. Maintenance of confined disposal facility cost $4,205. A contract was awarded this FY for maintenance dredging in the amount of $866,400. Dredging will begin next FY. However, the contractor was paid $26,000 to cover his cost of bonds. Engineering, design surveys, and supervision and administration cost $58,971. Existing project was completed in 1966. Total cost of the existing project to end of FY was $8,107,968, of which $549,798 was for new work (includes $289,752 contributed funds), $3,761,990 for maintenance and $3,796,180 for diked disposal. 21- 8 DETROIT, MI, DISTRICT 15. CORNUCOPIA HARBOR, WI Location. At mouth of Siskiwit River on south shore of Lake Superior, 49 miles east from Duluth, MN. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14973.) Existing Project. Provides for an entrance channel between piers; an irregular-shaped turning basin; two inner channels, and reconstruction and Federal maintenance of deflection dike and entrance piers constructed by local interests. Project depths are 10 feet between piers and 8 feet in turning basin and inner channels. For additional details see page 1010 of Annual Report for 1965. (See Table 21-B for authorizing legislation.) Local Cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal Facilities. About 1,000 linear feet of privately owned docking space is available. Operations During Fiscal Year. Maintenance: Condition surveys and miscellaneous inspections and reports performed by Government forces cost $2,423. Engineering and design for maintenance dredging contract to be awarded next FY cost $12,316. Work authorized by earlier Act was completed in 1939. Work authorized in 1954 was completed in 1963. Navigation structures are in fair condition; repairs will be scheduled in future years. Total cost of the existing project to end of FY was $1,680,911, of which $462,653 was for new work and $1,218,258 for maintenance. 16. DETROIT RIVER, MI Location. One of the Great Lakes connecting channels, 31 miles long, flows south from Lake St. Clair to Lake Erie. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14848.) Previous Project. For details see page 1958 of Annual Report for 1915, and page 1541 of Annual Report for 1938. Existing Project. Improving Detroit River main channels to provide 25.5-foot draft navigation; improving certain auxiliary and side channels; and constnruction of various water level and crosscurrent control stnructures. Details are in accompanying Table 21-H. Project depths are referred to local low water datum planes which correspond to low water datums for Lakes St. Clair and Erie, 572.3 and 569.2 feet above mean water level at Rimouski, Quebec, IGLD 1985. (See Table 21-B for authorizing legislation.) Local Cooperation. Fully complied with. No local cooperation is required for modifications authorized by Acts of July 1946 and March 1956. The uncompleted portion of the project authorized by the 1946 and the 1956 R & H Acts, construction of the Compensating Works, with the uncompleted portion of the Trenton Channel modification approved Aug. 13, 1968, were deauthorized Dec. 31, 1989, in accordance with Section 1001 of the WRDA of 1986 (PL 99-662). Terminal Facilities. Numerous commercial installations used for handling coal, iron ore, limestone, steel products, petroleum products, and other items such as overseas general cargo. Detail on actual port and harbor facilities is in Port Series No. 45 (revised 1984) prepared and published by the Water Resources Support Center. Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations During Fiscal Year. Maintenance: Condition surveys, environmental studies, confined disposal facility monitoring, support of water control center, and miscellaneous inspections and reports performed by Government forces and contract cost $684,407. Location and removal of obstructions was performed using the U.S. Cranebarge VELER and the U.S. Survey Vessel PAJ at a cost of $1,558,621. Maintenance of disposal area performed by hired labor and contract cost $60,617. A contract for maintenance dredging East Outer Lower Livingstone was awarded and completed this FY, removing 147,110 cubic yards of shoal material at a cost of $770,038. Engineering, design, surveys, real estate, and supervision and administration cost $308,278. Latest modification of connecting channels project in the Detroit River is complete except for compensating works. Pertinent data concerning channels covered by project at end of FY are set forth in Table 21-H. Total cost of the existing project to end of FY was $246,990,678, of which $76,877,357 was for new work ($75,346,669 regular funds and $1,530,688 Public Works Funds), $127,642,736 (includes $361,235 Section 150 contributed funds) for maintenance and $42,470,585 for diked disposal. 21- 9 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF TIlE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 2000 17. DULUTH-SUPERIOR HARBOR, MN AND WI Location. At extreme western end of Lake Superior. Cities of Duluth, MN, and Superior, WI, are on north and south sides, respectively. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14975.) Previous Projects. See page 1246 of Annual Report for 1962. Existing Project. Provides for rebuilding canal piers at Duluth entry, replacement or construction of piers and breakwater at Superior entry and dredging approaches and channels within harbor, St. Louis Bay, and St. Louis River. Channels vary in depth from 32 to 28 feet in entrances, are 27 feet deep in iron-ore route channels, and are from 20 to 23 feet deep in inner channels. (See Table 21-B for authorizing legislation.) For details of authorized channel dimensions and dimensions of structures, see pages 1246 and 1247 of Annual Report for 1962 and page 1011 of Annual Report for 1965. Portion of project for deepening Twenty-first Avenue West channel was deauthorized Dec. 31, 1989, in accordance with Section 1001 of the WRDA of 1986 (PL 99-662). The WRDA of 1986 authorized modifications to the project to deepen the western portions of North and South Channels, the entire Upper Channel and the Minnesota Channel to 27 feet LWD; widen the Cross Channel to provide a minimum turning basin of 1,500 feet; widen the bend at the Arrowhead Bascule Bridge to 600 feet; and construct an upland confined disposal facility. The current recommended plan involves only the mechanical dredging of the Cross Channel Turning Basin with disposal at the Erie Pier CDF. The remainder of the project is now unscheduled. Local Cooperation. Fully complied with for completed portion of project. Local cooperation items for the newly authorized project in the WRDA of 1986 (PL 99-662), are as described in House Document 150, 86th Congress, 1st Session and also includes, as a result of PL 99-662, construction cost sharing. Terminal Facilities. There are 113 docks or terminals including some 54 major ones; all but one privately owned. Facilities for handling iron ore, coal, limestone, petroleum, steel and scrap iron, cement, general cargo, and grain are believed adequate for most existing commerce. Operations During Fiscal Year. Maintenance: Operation and maintenance of the museum performed by Government forces and contract cost $374,100. Operation and maintenance of service facilities and park pier performed by hired labor cost $198,457. Condition surveys, environmental studies, confined disposal facility monitoring, support of water control center, and miscellaneous inspections and reports performed by Government forces and contract cost $280,930. Development of dredged material management plans continued at a cost of $23,428. Duluth and Superior Entry Breakwater repairs were performed using the U.S. Derrickbarge SCHWARTZ at a cost of $92,572. Maintenance of the disposal area performed by hired labor cost $24,548. The FY98 repair contract for South Pier, Sections Rl-R4 (Phase I) was completed this FY at a cost of $372,334. An adjustment of $1 was made in cost for engineering and design during construction. Engineering and design for repair of the Superior Entry, South Pier (Phase II) was initiated at a cost of $119,276. A contract for maintenance dredging was awarded in the amount of $879,641. The contract was 58% complete at the end of this FY, removing approximately 60,000 cubic yards of shoal material at a cost of $508,064. Engineering, design, surveys, real estate, and supervision and administration cost $299,923. Real estate disposal activities for Wisconsin & Left Hand Points cost $36,907. CORRECTION: The FY99 Annual Report erroneously states that a contract for maintenance dredging was awarded. The $83,806 expended last FY was for emergency strike removal, performed by modification to the FY98 structure repair contract. A contract for maintenance dredging was not awarded for this work. Work authorized prior to 1960 Act was completed in June 1956. Under the 1960 Act, work on the outer harbor, included in House Document 150, was completed in June 1965. Work in the inner harbor, included in House Document 196, started in May 1963, was completed in November 1968 except for 21st Avenue West channel portion which was deauthorized December 31, 1989. Of the work authorized in WRDA 1986, only the Cross Channel dredging has been completed (September 1994). All other authorized improvements are unscheduled. The United States owns 34.90 acres of land in fee in Minnesota and Wisconsin of which 2.15 acres are used for a vessel yard. Navigation structures are in 21- 10 DETROIT, MI, DISTRICT poor to good condition; repairs are scheduled in the near future. Total cost of the existing project to end of FY was $108,501,857, of which $17,226,343 was for new work (includes $331,685 contributed funds), $78,163,855 for maintenance, $1,556,249 for diked disposal and $11,555,410 for rehabilitation. 18. FOX RIVER, WI Location. Rises in Columbia County, WI, and flows about 176 miles northerly into Green Bay. Wolf River, physically a main river but by designation a tributary of Fox River, rises in central part of Fort County, WI and flows southerly. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14916 for Lake Winnebago and lower Fox River.) Previous Projects. See page 1368 of Annual Report for 1962. Existing Project. Deepening and widening channel of Fox River from DePere 7 miles above mouth to confluence of Wolf River, a total length of 59 miles, to 6 feet, with 9.6 feet in rock cut below DePere lock and 7 feet in other rock cuts on lower river below Menasha lock; construction and reconstruction of 19 locks and 9 dams; a concrete retaining wall at Kaukauna; construction and maintenance of harbors having depths of 6 feet on Lake Winnebago; widening Neenah Channel to 100 feet, with a 6-foot depth for about 1 mile; and dredging, snagging, and otherwise improving Wolf River 47 miles from its mouth to New London, depth to be 4 feet. Cost of completed portion of project is $513, 424 for the lower river exclusive of previous projects. The uncompleted portion of the project authorized by the River and Harbor Act of 1925, was deauthorized Dec. 31, 1989, in accordance with Section 1001 of the WRDA of 1986 (PL 99-662). Section 332 of the WRDA of 1992 authorized the transfer of the navigation system to the State of WI subject to agreement; however, water regulation and dam operation will be continued by the Federal government. (See Table 21-B for authorizing legislation.) Local Cooperation. None required. Terminal Facilities. Wharf and landing facilities are, in general, adequate for existing needs. (See Table 21-I on locks and dams, Fox River, WI.) Operations During Fiscal Year. Maintenance: Condition surveys, environmental activities, safety training, miscellaneous inspections and reports, and plans for flood emergencies were performed at a cost of $345,590. Water control studies, monitoring and regulation of water levels were performed at a cost of $331,699. Real Estate activities cost $40,862. The operation and maintenance of nine (9) dams and ten (10) overflow weirs and caretaker status maintenance of seventeen (17) locks and two (2) guard locks totaled $511,754. Federal canal banks at various locations were repaired at a cost of $126,910. Supervision and administration costs were $115,530. Work for Phase I site assessment to support the transfer of the locks to the state of Wisconsin was completed at a cost of $175,129. Lock repairs at DePere, Little Kaukauna and Menasha, and valves and seals repairs at DePere and Menasha performed by contracts cost $139,256. Engineering and design for this work cost $17,106. Supervision and administration of the contracts cost $42,906. Engineering and design for repair of the right abutment at Upper Appleton Dam continued at a cost of $63,873. Engineering and design for repair of the access road and retaining wall at Upper Appleton Dam continued at a cost of $44,088. Engineering and design for repair of the Little Kaukauna Dam retaining wall continued at a cost of $67,018. Engineering and design was initiated for concrete (crack) repairs at dams in the amount of $64,811. A contract was awarded this FY to renovate the gate hoist and electrical mechanism at the remaining seven (7) dams in the amount of $2,116,939. No work was performed this FY. However, the contractor was paid $26,000 to cover his cost of bonds. Engineering and design for this work cost $46,215. Supervision and administration of the contract cost $21,705. Existing project is complete except for the inactive portion. Nineteen original locks and nine original dams were rebuilt. (See Table 21-I for year of completion of each). Structures and dredging in pools have increased original depths generally about 2 feet. Work remaining to complete project consists of dredging in upper portion of Wolf River, and rock removal and deepening of Neenah Channel on lower Fox River, which are no longer considered necessary. The dams tainter gates are receiving new hoist mechanisms. Existing dams repairs are underway or programmed in the near future; but many of the locks are in extremely poor condition. Only the most critical lock repairs are being made to maintain the pool for industry and hydropower users. Total cost of 21- 11 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 2000 the existing project to end of FY was $67,950,391, of which $3,753,334 was for new work and $64,197,057 for operation and maintenance. Between July 5, 1884 and June 30, 1935, funds in the amount of $3,706,187 were expended on operation and care of works of improvement under provisions of permanent indefinite appropriation for such purposes. 19. FRANKFORT HARBOR, MI Location. On east shore of Lake Michigan, 204 miles northeasterly from Chicago, IL, and 28 miles northerly from Manistee, MI. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14907.) Existing Project. Provides for constructing an exterior basin in Lake Michigan formed by two breakwaters, 450 feet apart at the outer ends, diverging at an angle of about 90 degrees, the main arm and shore connection on north breakwater are 972 and 1,000 feet long, respectively, and the main arm and shore connection of south breakwater 1,188 and 1,400 feet long, respectively; for removing 801 feet of north pier and 1,172 feet of south pier; dredging basin 20 feet deep and 800 feet wide at entrance, decreasing toward new pier heads to 600 feet wide, dredging approach and entrance channel through outer basin to a depth of 24 feet from deep water in Lake Michigan to a point 500 feet landward of opening between breakwaters, over the entire width outside the breakwaters; thence to maximum width of 500 feet inside the breakwaters and to 23 feet deep through inner portion of outer basin to outer end of north pier, over widths decreasing from 500 to 160 feet; and thence to 22 feet deep between the piers to the inner basin in Lake Betsie; dredging an 18-foot deep interior basin in Lake Betsie from within 50 feet of existing structures on the west and extending eastward about 1,550 feet to easterly boundary and from within 50 feet of existing structures on the north and extending southward 800 feet to the southerly boundary; dredging a recreational craft anchorage area 10 feet deep and 300 feet wide, extending 600 feet eastward of the east limit of the interior basin, with its north side in line with the north limit of the basin. Breakwaters and shore connections are built of concrete caissons and piling capped with concrete. Inner piers and revetments are built of stonefilled timber cribs and piling, all capped with concrete, except for 476 feet of south revetment which consists of steel sheet piling. (See Table 21-B for authorizing legislation.) Local Cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal Facilities. Two car ferry slips on south shore and several docks along north shore of Lake Betsie. The City and State provide a recreational docking facility on north side of Lake Betsie which is open to all on equal terms. There is also a marine railway capable of handling small craft. Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations During Fiscal Year. Maintenance: Condition surveys and miscellaneous inspections and reports performed by Government forces cost $39,840. Safety maintenance performed by hired labor cost $7,582. Repairs to the South Revetment, Sections O&P, were performed using the U.S. Cranebarge MANITOWOC at a cost of $105,861. Supervision and administration cost $13,366. Existing project was completed in 1939, with exception of the latest modification that was completed in 1969. For additional details on completion of existing project see page 1474 of Annual Report for 1962. Navigation structures are in fair condition. Total cost of the existing project to end of FY was $13,777,707, of which $1,955,159 (includes $31,709 contributed funds) was for new work, $10,343,272 for maintenance, $1,204,500 for diked disposal and $274,776 for rehabilitation. 20. GRAND HAVEN HARBOR AND GRAND RIVER, MI Location. Harbor is on east shore of Lake Michigan, 108 miles northeasterly from Chicago, IL, and 23 miles northerly from Holland, MI. River rises in Jackson County, MI, and flows 260 miles westerly into Lake Michigan. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14933, and Geological Survey Grand Rapids quadrangle.) Previous Project. For details see page 1949 of Annual Report for 1915, and page 1481 of Annual Report for 1938. Existing Project. An entrance channel protected by parallel piers and revetments at mouth of Grand River, a deep draft channel in river extending to Spring Lake, a turning basin, and a shallow draft channel in river extending 14.5 miles upstream to Bass River. Project depths are 23 feet in entrance channel, 21 feet in river to turning basin, 18 feet in turning basin and 21- 12 DETROIT, MI, DISTRICT channel to Spring Lake, and 8 feet in upper Grand River channel. For additional details see page 1461 of Annual Report for 1962. Dredging on northerly side of inner channel is considered inactive. Estimated cost of this portion (1954) is $38,600. The WRDA of 1986 authorized modifications to deepen the harbor entrance and river channels to 29 and 27 feet, respectively; and provides for a new and larger turning basin. Estimated cost (Oct 90) is $20,400,000, which includes $11,754,000 Federal and $8,646,000 non-Federal. (See Table 21-B for authorizing legislation.) Local Cooperation. Fully complied with for completed portions of project. Local cooperation items for the newly authorized project in the WRDA of 1986 (PL 99-662), are as described in House Document 661, 76th Congress, 3d Session, and also includes, as a result of PL 99-662, construction cost sharing requirements as follows: a. Contribute in cash 25 percent of the total cost of construction of general navigation facilities, exclusive of aids to navigation, a contribution presently estimated at $4,246,000. The estimated cash contribution of $4,246,000 to be paid in lump sum, prior to initiation of construction, or in annual installments during the construction period at a rate proportionate to the proposed or scheduled expenditure of Federal funds as required by the Chief of Engineers, or under another arrangement satisfactory to the Secretary of the Army, the final apportionment of cost to be made after actual costs have been determined; and b. Repay, with interest, over a period of up to 30 years following project completion, 10 percent of the total cost of construction of general navigation facilities, an amount presently estimated at $2,040,000. The Secretary of the Army may count against all or part of the 10 percent repayment, the amount of the local contribution of lands, easements, rights-of-ways, dredged/demolition material disposal sites and relocations. In no case are these costs to count against the cash payment during construction, and in no case would the amount waived exceed 10 percent of project cost. Terminal Facilities. Several wharves exist for handling coal, limestone, sand and gravel, petroleum products, fish, and miscellaneous commodities. There is also a car ferry slip which is inactive. The State and local agencies provide recreational boating facilities which are open to all on equal terms. Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations During Fiscal Year. Maintenance: Condition and structure surveys, confined disposal facility monitoring, environmental studies, and miscellaneous inspections and reports performed by Government forces and contract cost $209,379. Development of dredged material management plans were completed at a cost of $28,961. Safety maintenance performed by hired labor cost $18,557. Engineering and design for repair of the North Pier, Section B, continued at a cost of $58,418. An adjustment of -$16,647 was made in contract cost for FY98 maintenance dredging of the inner harbor. Option year 1 of the FY99 contract for maintenance dredging of the outer harbor was awarded and completed this FY, removing 28,927 cubic yards of shoal material at a cost of $122,793. This contract was also for Section 111 beach nourishment. Engineering, design, surveys, supervision and administration cost $17,210. Monitoring in connection with Section 111 of P.L. 90-483 was performed at a cost of $48,887. Beach nourishment in conjunction with above maintenance dredging outer harbor contract cost $35,092. Supervision and administration under Section 111 cost $1,694. Existing project was substantially completed in 1949. For additional details on completion of existing project see page 1463 of Annual Report for 1982. Structures are in a general state of deteriorating condition and are scheduled for repairs. Total cost of the existing project to end of FY was $38,765,303, of which $1,458,469 was for new work, $35,712,821 for maintenance (includes $15,585 contributed funds), $780,400 diked disposal and $813,613 for rehabilitation. 20. GRAND TRAVERSE BAY HARBOR MI Location. At mouth of Traverse River on eastern shore of Keweenaw Peninsula about 20 miles northeasterly from Portage entry to Keweenaw Waterway. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14964.) Existing project. Provides two parallel piers, an entrance channel between piers and a harbor basin. Project depths are 12 feet between piers and 10 feet in basin. Project area extended 200 feet upstream in 1966. For additional details see page 1015 of Annual Report for 1965. (See Table 21-B for authorizing legislation.) 21- 13 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 2000 Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Local interests furnished easements on 5.1 acres of land. Terminal facilities. Several privately owned fishing wharves. Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations During Fiscal Year. Maintenance: Condition surveys and miscellaneous inspections and reports performed by Government forces cost $7,444. Breakwater repairs performed using the U.S. Derrickbarge SCHWARTZ cost $212,801. Real estate and supervision and administration cost $11,870. Existing project was completed in 1950 except for extension of north pier completed in 1964. Steel cells and piers are in good condition. Total cost of existing project to end of FY was $2,738,227, of which $329,565 was for new work and $2,408,662 for maintenance. 22. GREEN BAY HARBOR, WI Location. At mouth of Fox River, at head of Green Bay, about 180 miles from Milwaukee, WI, via Sturgeon Bay Canal, and about 49 miles southwest of Menominee Harbor, MI and WI. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14918.) Previous Projects. See page 1366 of Annual Report for 1962. Existing Project. See Chicago District 1979 Annual Report, Table 30-C, page 30-30. For more detailed description of project see page 1216 of Annual Report for 1963. Cost of completed portion of project is $9,335,000 Federal, and non-Federal cost is $490,000 including $100,000 contributed funds. Local interests requested that the inactive portion of the 1962 River and Harbor Act, consisting of dredging the reach from 150 feet downstream of the Chicago & Northwestern Railway Bridge to 1,700 feet upstream of this bridge, be reactivated and the authorization modified to include deepening the adjacent turning basin and modifying the Chicago & Northwestern Railway Bridge to provide increased horizontal clearance. Estimated cost of this portion (1990) is $6,130,000; $4,030,000 Federal and $2,100,000 non-Federal which includes $1,970,000 local contribution. Section 601c of the WRDA of 1986 authorized deepening the Fox River Channel, Green Bay, WI, to 27 feet. (See Table 21-B for authorizing legislation.) Local Cooperation. Fully complied with for existing project. Terminal Facilities. There are 16 wharves for handling coal, petroleum products, cement, limestone, general overseas cargo and miscellaneous commodities. Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations During Fiscal Year. Maintenance: Condition and structure surveys, environmental studies, confined disposal facility monitoring, and miscellaneous inspections and reports performed by Government forces and contract cost $391,441. Development of dredged material management plans continued at a cost of $32,893. Maintenance of the disposal area cost $2,984. A contract was awarded this FY for maintenance dredging the outer harbor in the amount of $1,493,333. The contract was 54% complete at the end of the FY, removing approximately 69,500 cubic yards of shoal material at a cost of $810,000. Engineering, design, real estate, surveys, supervision and administration cost $124,226. Existing project is complete. The 1962 modification was started in November 1966 and completed in September 1973, except for dredging the reach from 150 feet downstream of the Chicago & Northwestern Railway Bridge to 1,700 feet upstream of this bridge. Dredging of the turning basin above C & N.W. Railway Bridge was commenced in August 1938. The turning basin was enlarged under authority of Section 5 of the Rivers and Harbors Act of March 4, 1915, in order to provide sufficient area for the large ships that use it. The work was performed as part of a maintenance dredging contract in September and October 1973. East revetment at Grassy Island was entirely removed in July 1935. Dredging Fox River and entrance channel to Tail Point Light was completed in September 1967. Total cost of the existing project to end of FY was $61,447,513 ($60,506,713 regular funds and $940,800 Public Works Funds), $9,946,395 for new work, $43,596,807 for maintenance and $7,904,311 for diked disposal. The new work cost does not include $100,000 contributed funds. 21- 14 DETROIT, MI, DISTRICT 23. GREILICKVILLE IIARBOR, MI (Formerly Traverse City Harbor, MI) Location. On Lake Michigan at the south end of the West Arm of Grand Traverse Bay, about 45 miles southwesterly from Charlevoix and 29 miles northeasterly from Frankfort. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14913.) Existing Project. Provides for dredging a basin 600 feet wide and about 850 feet long with a depth of 14 feet in outer 350 feet of the area and a 10-foot depth in remainder, protected by a steel sheet pile breakwater about 1,300 feet long with a 300-foot long rubblemound extension along a line bearing south 60 degrees west from outer end of steel structure and a detached rubblemound breakwater 420 feet long along south side of the basin. (See Table 21-B for authorizing legislation.) Local Cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal Facilities. An existing public wharf (built in connection with the 1948 authorization), a boat launching ramp, and a small privately operated yacht harbor located beyond the limits of the existing project. The existing public wharf deteriorated from lack of maintenance and must be rebuilt. Operations During Fiscal Year. Maintenance: Condition surveys and miscellaneous inspections and reports performed by Government forces and contract cost $23,784. Safety repairs performed by hired labor cost $1800. Existing project was completed in August 1951. The last modification was completed during FY 1967. Controlling depths are 14 feet in the outer basin and 10 feet in the inner basin. Navigation structures are in good condition. Total cost of the existing project to end of FY was $710,747, of which $369,557 was for new work and $341,190 for maintenance. The new work does not include $127,000 contributed funds. 24. IIARBOR BEACII IIARBOR, MI Location. On west shore of Lake Huron about 60 miles north of Port Huron, MI. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14862.) Existing Project. IHIarbor of refuge protected by three breakwaters; a main entrance 23 feet deep; and an anchorage area 21 feet deep. For additional details see page 1485 of Annual Report for 1962. (See Table 21-B for authorizing legislation.) Local Cooperation. None required. Terminal Facilities. Coal and limestone are received at a private wharf. In addition, there is a public recreational craft pier, a Coast Guard pier, and several small installations engaged in docking and servicing light-draft commercial and recreational vessels. These facilities satisfy current commerce and traffic requirements. Operations During Fiscal Year. Maintenance: Miscellaneous inspections and reports performed by Government forces cost $827. Existing project was completed in 1928. For additional details on completion of existing project see page 1485 of Annual Report for 1962. Navigation structures are in good condition. Total cost of the existing project to end of FY was $17,001,822, of which $1,200,598 was for new work, $15,363,620 for maintenance, $243,100 for diked disposal and $194,504 for rehabilitation. 25. IIARRISVILLE HARBOR, MI Location. On the west shore of Lake Huron, 20 miles north of Oscoda and 30 miles south of Alpena. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14864.) Existing Project. A harbor of refuge protected by breakwater structures, and dredging an entrance channel 12 feet deep and a harbor basin 10 feet deep. (See Table 21-B for authorizing legislation.) Local Cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal Facilities. Dockage facilities built by State and local agencies for recreational craft; considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations During Fiscal Year. Maintenance: Condition surveys performed by Government forces cost $15,357. A contract was awarded and completed this FY for maintenance dredging, removing 14,550 cubic yards of shoal material at a cost of $133,000. Engineering, design, surveys, and supervision and administration cost $41,219. 21- 15 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 2000 Navigation structures range from fair to good condition. Total cost of the existing project to end of FY was $4,245,145, of which $2,639,392 was for new work (includes $287,454 contributed funds) and $1,605,753 for maintenance. 26. HOLLAND HARBOR, MI Location. On east shore of Lake Michigan 95 miles northeasterly from Chicago, IL, and 23 miles southerly from Grand Haven, MI. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14932.) Previous Project. For details see page 1948 of Annual Report for 1915, and page 1478 of Annual Report for 1938. Existing Project. An outer breakwater protected approach channel in Lake Michigan, an entrance channel to Lake Macatawa protected by piers and revetments, a channel through Lake Macatawa into Black River, and a turning basin. Project depths are 23 feet in outer portion of approach channel decreasing to 21 feet at outer end of inner piers, 21 feet to upper end of project, and 18 feet in turning basin. For additional details see page 1458 of Annual Report for 1962. The uncompleted portion of the project, widening bend of entrance channel into Lake Macatawa, was deauthorized Dec, 31, 1989, in accordance with Section 1001 of the WRDA of 1986 (PL 99-662). (See Table 21-B for authorizing legislation.) Local Cooperation. Fully complied with for completed portions of project. Terminal Facilities. Wharves are at inner end of Lake Macatawa and used for handling coal, building materials, petroleum products, and miscellaneous commodities. Two shipbuilding yards are on south shore of the lake. Holland provides a public wharf for small craft. Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations During Fiscal Year. Maintenance: Condition and structure surveys, environmental studies, confined disposal facility monitoring, and miscellaneous inspections and reports performed by Government forces and contract cost $146,526. Safety maintenance and minor confined disposal facility repairs performed by hired labor cost $28,490. Option year I of the FY99 contract for maintenance dredging the outer harbor was awarded and completed this FY, removing 18,311 cubic yards of shoal material at a cost of $57,925. This contract was also for beach nourishment. A contract was awarded this FY in the amount of $656,000 for emergency dredging of the inner harbor. The contract was 74% complete at the end of the FY, removing approximately 99,786 cubic yards of contaminated material at a cost of $488,718. Engineering, design, real estate, surveys, and supervision and administration cost $58,708. Monitoring in connection with Section 111 of P.L. 90-483 was performed at a cost of $49,616. Beach nourishment in conjunction with the above maintenance dredging outer harbor contract cost $17,664. Supervision and administration under Section 111 cost $576. Existing project, with exception of widening bend in revetted entrance channel authorized by Act of September 3, 1954, was completed in 1957. For additional details on completion of existing project, see page 1460 of Annual Report for 1962. Navigation structures are in fair condition with repairs anticipated within the next 5 years. Total cost of the existing project to end of FY was $31,983,526, of which $1,392,827 was for new work ($1,180,502 regular funds, $176,620 for previous project and $35,705 contributed funds), $28,424,947 for maintenance, $1,663,300 for diked disposal and $502,452 for rehabilitation. 27. THE INLAND ROUTE, MI Location. A series of interconnected lakes and streams stretching across northern tip of Lower Peninsula of Michigan, and extends from Conway near Lake Michigan to Cheboygan on Lake Huron; a distance of 35 miles. Crooked and Indian Rivers are connecting channels in the waterway. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14886.) Existing Project. Provides for a channel 30 feet wide and 5 feet deep, with necessary widening at bends, through Crooked and Indian Rivers, and Crooked, Burt, and Mullett Lakes, and from Conway (west end of Crooked Lake) to navigation lock at Cheboygan; in Pickerel Channel from Pickerel Lake to Crooked Lake. It also provides for suitable jetties at head of Indian River. The addition of a lock and dam was approved by the Chief of Engineers on Sep. 21- 16 DETROIT, MI, DISTRICT 2, 1964, to correct a design deficiency. (See Table 21-13 for authorizing legislation.) Local Cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal Facilities. None exist for commercial cargo-handling along the Crooked and Indian Rivers. Numerous small privately owned timber piers and wharves, some equipped with covered boat wells for serving and storing recreational craft, have been constructed. Landings maintained by hotel and resort operators are open to the public for transfer of passengers. Public docks are at Conway and Oden on Crooked Lake; the village of Indian River, Topinabee, and Mullett Lake Village on Mullett Lake; and at Cheboygan. About 30 highways dead end at water's edge, permitting public access for various marine activities. Dock facilities are considered adequate for existing traffic. Operations During Fiscal Year. Maintenance: The navigation lock was operated and maintained by the State of Michigan at no cost to the Government. In FY 00, the lock was operated from 9:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m. April 29-30, May 6, 7, 13, 14, 20, 21, September 18-30, October 1, 7, 8, 14, 15. The lock was operated 8:00 a.m. to 9:00 p.m. May 27-31, June 1-30, and 8:00 a.m. to 8:00 p.m. September 5-17. The lock was operated from 8:00 a.m. to 10:00 p.m. July 1 - September 4. The lock closed for the season on October 15. Condition surveys, environmental studies, and miscellaneous inspections and reports performed by Government forces cost $33,214. An adjustment of 4,098 cubic yards and $154,624 was made in contract cost for FY99 maintenance dredging of the Indian and Crooked Rivers completed last FY. Supervision and administration for closeout of the contract cost $32,909. The existing project was completed in 1958. The lock and dam was completed in FY 1968. For additional details see page 1382 of Annual Report for 1960. Total cost of the existing project to end of FY was $4,886,304, of which $918,222 was for new work (includes $148,000 contributed funds), $3,563,782 for maintenance, and $404,300 for diked disposal. 28. KENOSHA IIARBOR, WI Location. On west shore of Lake Michigan about 35 miles south of Milwaukee and about 54 miles north of Chicago. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14904.) Previous Project. See page 1390 of Annual Report for 1962. Existing Project. For detailed description see page 1237, Annual Report for 1963. Estimated (1986) Federal cost is $455,000 exclusive of amounts expended on previous projects, and $195,000 non- Federal which includes $155,000 local contribution. (See Table 21-B for authorization legislation.) The uncompleted portion of the project authorized by the 1962 River and Harbor Act, dredging of 25- foot wide strips adjacent to the north and south piers, was deauthorized Dec. 31, 1989, in accordance with Section 1001 of the WRDA of 1986 (PL 99-662). Local Cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal Facilities. Three wharves used for miscellaneous foreign overseas commodities and autos, and also several fish wharves. While these facilities are considered generally adequate for existing commerce, more efficient use of existing terminals and utilization of available frontage for development of additional terminals should be made. Operations During Fiscal Year. Maintenance: Condition and structure surveys, and miscellaneous inspections and reports performed by Government forces cost $18,259. Preparation of plans and specifications for repair of the North Detached Breakwater was initiated at a cost of $137,294. An adjustment of $27,602 was made in contract cost for FY99 maintenance dredging completed last FY. Supervision and administration for closeout of the contract cost $13,697. Existing project is complete except for dredging 25-foot strips adjacent to the north and south piers which was deauthorized December 31, 1989. The north and south piers were completed in 1900 and the breakwater in 1909. Navigation structures range from fair to good condition, Detached North Breakwater needs repair. Total cost of the existing project to end of FY was $14,146,289 ($14,118,631 were regular funds and $27,658 Emergency Relief Funds), of which $988,969 was for new work, $7,508,445 for maintenance, $4,378,600 for diked disposal and $1,270,275 for rehabilitation. The new work cost does not include $3,000 contributed funds. 21- 17 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF TIIE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 2000 29. KEWAUNEE HARBOR, WI Location. On west shore of Lake Michigan, about 105 miles north of Milwaukee, WI, and about 78 miles from Green Bay, via Sturgeon Bay Canal. Harbor is at mouth of Kewaunee River. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14908.) Previous Projects. See page 1375 of Annual Report for 1962. Existing Project. See Chicago District 1979 Annual Report, Table 30-C, page 30-31. Costs of completed project are $603,021 Federal, and $9,000 non-Federal, exclusive of amount expended on previous projects. Uncompleted portion (estimated $200,000, July 1965) of 1935 River and Harbor Act is considered inactive, and excluded from present cost estimate. The portion authorized by the 1960 River and Harbor Act was deauthorized in 1977. (See Table 21-B for authorizing legislation.) Local Cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal Facilities. Two car-ferry slips, a petroleum tank farm, a Corps of Engineers project office, and several fish wharves. Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations During Fiscal Year. Maintenance: Condition and structure surveys, and miscellaneous inspections and reports performed by Government forces cost $54,601. The FY99 contract for maintenance dredging was completed this FY removing 60,320 cubic yards of shoal material at a cost of $608,993. Surveys and supervision and administration of the contract cost $54,411. Active portion of existing project is complete. The north pier was completed in 1897 and the remaining portion is in generally good condition. Rehabilitation of the south pier was completed in June 1967. Construction of north breakwater and shore connection, except for a gap of 150 feet about 830 feet from shoreward end, and removal of outer 706.5 linear feet of north pier was commenced in September 1935 and completed in June 1937. Removed 500 linear feet of north pier in April/May 1963 and widened and deepened the adjacent channel in 1965. Outer end of the north pier was struck and severely damaged by car ferry vessel in October 1973 and a 24-foot section at outlet end was subsequently removed, thus reducing the structure to a length of 626 feet. Dredging entrance channel in interior basin to the existing project depth was commenced in April and completed in October 1938. Kewaunee River is navigable to about 6.5 miles above mouth for craft drawing not more than 4 feet. Navigation structures range from fair to good condition. Total cost of the existing project to end of FY was $12,829,799, of which $758,333 was for new work ($338,333 regular and $420,000 Emergency Relief Funds) $8,492,705 for maintenance, $2,961,461 for diked disposal and $617,300 for rehabilitation. 30. KEWEENAW WATERWAY, MI Location. In Lake Superior across Keweenaw Peninsula in upper peninsula of Michigan. The west entrance is 169 miles east of Duluth, MN. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14972.) Existing Project. A navigable channel, minimum width 300 feet, 25 miles long, partially natural and partially artificial, across Keweenaw Peninsula via Portage Lake. For details see page 1121 of Annual Report for 1963. (See Table 21-B for authorizing legislation.) The uncompleted portion of the project for navigation at Keweenaw Waterway, Houghton County, MI, authorized by the River and Harbor Act of Aug. 30, 1935, PL 409, 73rd Congress, which consists of extending the lower entrance breakwater by 2,000 feet, including the necessary alteration or replacement of structures due to channel deepening, was deauthorized by the WRDA of 1986; PL 99-662, Nov. 17, 1986, 99th Congress, Title X. Local Cooperation. None required. Terminal Facilities. Six coal docks, a petroleum dock, and several general merchandise and miscellaneous wharves, all privately owned. Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. Also present is a government constructed recreational area with facilities to include a picnic area and small boat landing range. Operations During Fiscal Year. Maintenance: Condition and structure surveys, environmental activities, and miscellaneous inspections and reports performed by Government forces cost $31,778. Upper 21- 18 DETROIT, MI, DISTRICT Entry Breakwater repairs were performed using the U.S. Derrickbarge SCHWARTZ at a cost of $180,471. Supervision and administration cost $7,979. Active portion of the project is complete. Lower entry piers are in fair condition. It is anticipated repairs will be required within the next ten years. Upper entry breakwaters are in good condition, but require annual stone maintenance due to severity of the wave climate. Total cost of the existing project to end of FY was $35,250,819, of which $5,974,141 was for new work, $27,753,178 for maintenance and $1,523,500 for diked disposal. 31. LA POINTE HARBOR, WI Location. At westerly end of Madeline Island in the Aspostle Island group off the south shore of Lake Superior. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14973). Existing Project. Provides for reconstruction of 73.5 feet of the existing breakwater, extending the breakwater 126.24 feet with 5 new steel sheet pile cells, harbor dredging and related work. The harbor is 10 feet in the entrance and 8 feet deep in the basin. Project was authorized by Section 107 of the 1960 River and Harbor Act (PL 645, 86th Congress), as amended. Local Cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal Facilities. A 400-foot L-shaped dock was constructed and rehabilitated by local interests, not as a part of the Federal project. Operations During Fiscal Year. Maintenance: Condition surveys and miscellaneous inspections and reports performed by Government forces cost $615. The existing project was completed in 1967. Total cost of the existing project to end of FY was $321,295, of which $139,874 was for new work and $181,421 for maintenance. 32. LAC LA BELLE HARBOR, MI Location. On the south shore of Lake Superior on the eastern shore of Keweenaw Peninsula, 41 miles northeasterly from Portage entry to Keweenaw Waterway. Lack La Belle, Bete Grise Bay, and Mendota Ship Canal combine to form the harbor. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14964.) Existing Project. Provides for construction of two parallel piers at the entrance having lengths of 584 and 682 feet for north and south piers, respectively; for an entrance channel between the piers 50 feet wide and 12 feet deep, about 820 feet long with a flared approach; and for an inner canal 50 feet wide and 10 feet deep, about 730 feet long. For additional details see page 1039, Annual Report for 1964. (See Table 21-B for authorizing legislation.) Local Cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal Facilities. Several small, privately owned wharves are available in the harbor for use of small craft engaged in fishing and recreational activities. A State owned dock for small craft is located at the northwest corner of Lac La Belle Bay. Operations During Fiscal Year. Maintenance: Condition surveys and miscellaneous inspections and reports performed by Government forces cost $6,729. Breakwater repairs were performed using the U.S. Derrickbarge SCHWARTZ at a cost of $19,384. Real estate and supervision and administration cost $15,331. The existing project was completed in 1960. Controlling depths are about 11 feet in the approach channel and 10 feet in the inner channel. Navigation structures range from fair to good condition. Total cost of the existing project to end of FY was $1,058,053, of which $269,270 was for new work and $788,783 for maintenance. The new work does not include $38,190 contributed funds. 33. LAKE ST. CLAIR, MI, CHANNELS IN Location. Lake St. Clair, a section of Great Lakes connecting channels, is an expansive shallow basin having a vessel track length of about 15 miles from mouth of St. Clair River to head of Detroit River. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14850.) Previous Project. For details see page 2882, Annual Report for 1896; pages 1957-58, Annual Report for 1915; and page 1539, Annual Report for 1938. 21- 19 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 2000 Existing Project. An improved channel through Lake St. Clair 800 feet wide, 27.5 feet deep, and about 14.5 miles long; extending from mouth of Southeast Bend cutoff channel at lower end of St. Clair River to head of Detroit River Channel. (See Table 21-B for authorizing legislation.) Local Cooperation. None required. Terminal Facilities. None. Operations During Fiscal Year. Maintenance: Condition surveys, environmental studies, support of the water control center, and miscellaneous inspections and reports performed by Government forces cost $52,770. Location and removal of obstructions were performed using the U.S. Cranebarge VELER. Maintenance of the confined disposal facility by hired labor and contract cost $17,977. An adjustment of -$746 was made in engineering and design costs for future maintenance dredging. Total cost of the existing project to end of FY was $21,763,797, of which $7,675,357 was for new work ($6,666,762 regular funds and $1,008,595 Public Works Funds), $8,968,640 for maintenance, and $5,119,800 for diked disposal. 34. LELAND HARBOR, MI Location. A light-draft harbor on eastern shore of Lake Michigan at mouth of Carp River, about 40 miles north of Frankfort, MI, and 40 miles southwest of Charlevoix, MI. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14912.) Existing Project. Provides for a harbor of refuge consisting of a breakwater about 1,200 feet long, a protected anchorage and maneuver area about 3 acres in extent and 10 feet deep, a 12-foot deep flared approach channel decreasing in width to 90 feet, an existing south pier 440 feet long, a 35-foot long cellular extension to south pier, an entrance channel 6 feet deep and 40 feet wide extending to mouth of Carp River, and for elimination of existing north pier. (See Table 21-B for authorizing legislation.) Local Cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal Facilities. Privately owned wharves on each side of river below the dam which is 400 feet above the river mouth. These wharves serve the local fishing interests and recreational craft. Public facilities are operated by the State and local agencies. All available dockage space is utilized. Operations During Fiscal Year. Maintenance: Condition and structure surveys, environmental studies, and miscellaneous inspections and reports performed by Government forces cost $17,225. Safety maintenance performed by hired labor cost $5,000. A contract was awarded and completed this FY for maintenance dredging, removing 17,220 cubic yards of shoal material at a cost of $85,270. Engineering, design, surveys, and supervision and administration cost $31,660. The existing project was completed in 1932 except for the 1962 authorization, which was completed in 1967. Navigation structures are in good condition. Total cost of the existing project to end of FY was $4,812,640, of which $1,027,089 was for new work (includes $354,139 contributed funds), $3,714,873 for maintenance and $70,678 for rehabilitation. 34. LEXINGTON HARBOR, MI Location. On southwest shore of Lake Huron, 20 miles north of Port Huron, MI. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14862.) Existing Project. Provides for two offshore breakwaters opening to the southeast and totaling about 2,400 feet long with provisions for recreational fishing on the main breakwater; an anchorage and maneuver area of about 5 acres, 8 feet deep; and a flared approach channel 10 feet deep, decreasing to 160 feet in width through the breakwaters. Project also provides for recreational fishing facilities. Estimated (1979) Federal cost of new work is $1,647,306 excluding $1,088,888 to be contributed by local interests. (See Table 21-B for authorizing legislation.) Local Cooperation. Assurances of local cooperation were furnished by the Michigan Department of Natural Resources to the Secretary of the Army. The cash contribution was $1,088,888. Terminal Facilities. An existing public fishing pier of open pile construction is not adequate for existing and prospective commerce. Complete boating 21- 20 DETROIT, MI, DISTRICT facilities are planned by State and local agencies in connection with the harbor construction. Operations During Fiscal Year. Maintenance: Condition surveys and miscellaneous inspections and reports performed by Government forces cost $14,755. A contract was awarded and completed this FY for maintenance dredging, removing 23,612 cubic yards of shoal material at a cost of $165,472. Engineering, design, surveys, and supervision and administration cost $48,175. Monitoring in connection with Section 111 of P.L. 90-483 was performed by government forces at a cost of $54,473. The existing project was completed during FY 1977. Navigation structures are in fair condition. Total cost of the existing project to end of FY was $6,267,320, of which $3,107,192 (includes $1,088,888 contributed funds) was for new work and $3,160,128 for maintenance. 36. LITTLE LAKE IIARBOR, MI Location. On south shore of Lake Superior 21 miles west of Whitefish Point and 30 miles east of Grand Marais, MI. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14962.) Existing Project. Provides for a small-craft harbor of refuge by dredging an entrance channel 12 feet deep from Lake Superior into Little Lake, suitably protected by breakwaters and revetments. (See Table 21-B for authorizing legislation.) Local Cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal Facilities. Only terminal facility at project consists of a public dock built by the State of Michigan for light-draft craft. Operations During Fiscal Year. Maintenance: Condition surveys, and miscellaneous inspections and reports performed by Government forces and contract cost $11,273. Final Option of FY98 contract for maintenance dredging was not exercised this FY. Supervision and administration to closeout the contract cost $4,937. Engineering and design for maintenance dredging contract to be awarded next FY cost $55,683. This project is considered complete; however, because of shifting sand, the harbor entrance shoals rapidly with the result that filll project depth is not usually available. Navigation structures are in fair condition. West Breakwater has deteriorated with stone migrating into navigation channel. Total cost of the existing project to end of FY was $5,290,491, of which $600,478 was for new work (includes $57,670 contributed funds) and $4,690,013 for maintenance. 37. LUDINGTON HARBOR, MI Location. On east shore of Lake Michigan, 156 miles northeasterly from Chicago, IL, and 67 miles northerly from Grand Haven, MI. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14937.) Previous Project. For details see page 1951 of Annual Report for 1915, page 1491 of Annual Report for 1938, and page 1307 of Annual Report for 1963. Existing Project. Provides for an exterior basin in Lake Michigan protected by north and south breakwaters, north breakwater is 1,800 feet long and south breakwater 1,700 feet long, 550 feet apart at outer ends, diverging at an angle of 90 degrees, with shore connections, 1,103 and 2,004 feet long, respectively; for dredging exterior basin to 18 feet deep with a maximum width of 1,500 feet; for a channel with a depth of 29 feet from deep water in Lake Michigan decreasing to 27 feet at the west end of the north pier, over a maximum width of 600 feet; thence a channel with a depth of 27 feet, over a minimum width of 230 feet with necessary widening at Pere Marquette Lake; and for inner piers and revetments, 1,649 feet long on north and sufficiently long on the south for turn at Pere Marquette Lake. The estimated (1977) Federal cost for new work is $8,250,000. Estimated total cost for local interests is $147,000. (See Table 21-B for authorizing legislation.) Local Cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal Facilities. In addition to main terminal of Chesapeake & Ohio Railway Company consisting of three car ferry slips, a wharf, and warehouses, there are several wharves which handle coal, limestone, and miscellaneous commodities. Facilities adequate for existing commerce. Operations During Fiscal Year. Maintenance: Condition surveys, and miscellaneous inspections and reports performed by Government forces and contract cost $143,936. Safety maintenance performed by 21- 21 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF TIIE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 2000 hired labor cost $4,545. FY99 contract for repair of the North Breakwater, Section B, was completed this FY in the amount of $926,376. An adjustment of - $100 was made in engineering and design costs. Supervision and administration cost $51,095. Monitoring in connection with Section III of P.L. 90- 483 was performed at a cost of $5,090. Existing project was completed in 1918. For additional details on completion of existing project see page 1469 of Annual Report for 1962. Structures are in good condition except for the south breakwater head that needs repair. Total cost of the existing project to end of FY was $30,491,907, of which $8,532,202 was for new work, $21,601,792 for maintenance, and $357,913 for rehabilitation. The maintenance cost does not include $136,286 contributed funds. 38. MANISTEE HARBOR, MI Location. On east shore of Lake Michigan, 179 miles northeasterly from Chicago, IL, and 26 miles northerly from Ludington, MI. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14938.) Previous Project. For details see page 1952 of Annual Report for 1915, and page 1493 of Annual Report for 1938. Existing Project. An entrance channel in Lake Michigan protected by a breakwater, piers, and revetment; a channel in Manistee River to Manistee Lake; and Federal participation in cost of replacing Maple Street Bridge. Project depths are 25 feet in entrance channel and 23 feet in river channel. For additional details see page 1470 of Annual Report for 1962. (See Table 21-B for authorizing legislation.) Local Cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal Facilities. Installations are on both sides of river and on Manistee Lake. Commerce handled includes coal, sand, salt, and general cargo. In addition, there is a Government wharf and a State and City owned recreational craft pier which is open to the public. These facilities satisfy current commerce requirements. Operations During Fiscal Year. Maintenance: Condition surveys and miscellaneous inspections and reports performed by Government forces cost $22,398. An adjustment of -$251 was made in safety maintenance costs performed by hired labor last FY. Existing project was completed in August 1967. For additional details on completion of existing project see page 1470 of Annual Report for 1962. Navigation structures range from generally fair to good condition. Total cost for existing project to end of FY was $16,099,785, of which $2,696,522 was for new work, $12,029,099 for maintenance, and $1,374,164 for rehabilitation. 39. MANISTIQUE HARBOR, MI Location. On the north shore of Lake Michigan, 135 miles northeasterly from Green Bay Harbor, WI, and 220 miles northerly from Milwaukee, WI. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14908.) Previous Projects. For details see page 1933 of Annual Report for 1915, and page 1422 of Annual Report for 1938. Existing Project. A breakwater protected entrance channel in Lake Michigan, a channel in Manistique River, and a pier at river mouth. Project depths are 19 feet in outer portion of entrance channel, 18 feet in inner portion of entrance channel, and 18 feet in river channel. For additional details see page 1452 of Annual Report for 1962. (See Table 21-B for authorizing legislation.) Local Cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal Facilities. A car ferry slip, two coal and building material wharves, two fishing wharves, and numerous lumberyard slips. Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations During Fiscal Year. Maintenance: Condition surveys and miscellaneous inspections and reports performed by Government forces cost $22,989. The contract awarded last FY for repair of the East and West Breakwater, Sections F, E, C & D, was 58% complete at the end of FY at a cost of $1,858,001. Engineering and design during construction cost $12,511. Supervision and administration of the contract cost $149,190. Navigation structures are in generally poor condition and are under major repair. Total cost of the existing project to end of FY was $6,388,652, of which 21- 22 DETROIT, MI, DISTRICT $1,299,355 was for new work, $4,772,964 for maintenance and $316,333 for rehabilitation. 40. MANITOWOC HARBOR, WI Location. On west shore of Lake Michigan about 79 miles north of Milwaukee, WI, and about 106 miles from Green Bay Canal. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14922.) Previous Projects. See page 1379 of Annual Report for 1962. Existing Project. The total estimated (Oct. 1981) project cost is $3,080,000; the Federal cost is $1,085,000 and non-Federal cost is $1,995,000, which is a cash contribution. See Chicago District Annual Report for 1979, Table 30-C. For detailed description see page 1228 of Annual Report for 1963. Estimated costs (1970) of new work for 1968 modification are $81,000 Federal and $30,000 non-Federal which includes a cash contribution of $18,000. Work on the 1968 modification was postponed until 1982. The portion authorized by the 1962 River and Harbor Act was deauthorized Dec. 31, 1989, in accordance with Section 1001 of the WRDA of 1986 (PL 99-662). (See Table 21-B for authorizing legislation.) Construction of a small boat harbor within the existing harbor was authorized by the Chief of Engineers, June 26, 1979, and 720-foot channel extension affirmed in July 1982, under authority of Section 107, 1960 River and Harbor Act, as amended. Local Cooperation. Fully complied with for completed modifications. For 1968 modification local interests must make an annual cash contribution equivalent to 50% of the annual costs associated with construction and maintenance of the channel extension until such time that a second user utilizes the channel extension. Such a contribution is presently estimated at $9,206; additional assurances require that the sponsor provide without cost to the United States all lands, easements, and rights-of-way required for construction and subsequent maintenance, including suitable areas determined by the Chief of Engineers to be required in the general public interest for initial and subsequent disposal of dredged materials, and the necessary retaining dikes, bulkheads and embankments therefor or the costs of such retaining works; hold and save the United States free from damages due to the construction works and subsequent use, operation, and maintenance of the project, not including damages due to the fault or negligence of the United States or its contractors; provide and maintain without cost to the United States adequate berthing areas at the docks adjacent to the improvement; accomplish at no cost to the United States all relocations and alterations of utilities necessary for the project; assume full responsibility for all project first costs in excess of the Federal cost limitation of $2,000,000; and comply with the Uniform Relocation Assistance and Real Property Acquisition Policies Act of 1970. Terminal Facilities. Three car-ferry slips, a grain elevator, one shipbuilding yard, and three other wharves used for handling coal, building materials, cement, and miscellaneous commodities. While these facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce, it is believed the city should provide a suitable wharf with warehouse and railway connection open to the general public. Operations During fiscal year. Maintenance: Condition and structure surveys, environmental studies, and miscellaneous inspections and reports performed by Government forces and contract cost $100,889. Minor safety repairs performed by hired labor cost $7,216. A contract for emergency maintenance dredging was awarded and completed this FY, removing 12,817 cubic yards of shoal material at a cost of $109,553. Real estate, engineering, design, surveys, and supervision and administration cost $31,809. Of the funds expended, the City of Manitowoc contributed $18,875. Existing project is complete except for the 1962 and 1968 modifications. The 1962 modification was deauthorized December 31, 1990. Work on the 1968 modification was essentially completed in FY 83. The Federal modification, adopted July 15, 1985, included the expansion of the new entrance channel to the Section 107 project and extension of the rubblemound breakwater. Dredging a channel through the outer basin to existing project depth and removal of a portion of old north stub pier at the river entrance were completed in December 1937. Dredging river channel was completed in July 1942. South Revetment, Section E, is in fair condition and is programmed for repair. Total cost of the existing project to end of FY was $16,303,639, of which $3,960,044 was for new work (includes $1,911,130 contributed funds), $9,261,839 for maintenance 21- 23 REPORT OF TIlE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 2000 (includes $66,735 contributed funds), and $3,081,756 for diked disposal. 41. MARQUETTE HARBOR, MI Location. In Marquette Bay on south shore of Lake Superior, 160 miles west of Sault Ste. Marie, MI, and 265 miles east from Duluth, MN. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14970.) Existing Project. Provides for a breakwater, and a harbor basin 26.5 feet deep, giving a protected area of 350 acres. Project was modified in 1960 to provide a 27-foot depth in harbor area. (See Table 21-B for authorizing legislation.) Local Cooperation. None required for earlier authorizations. Fully complied with for the 1960 Act. Terminal Facilities. One ore dock, unused at present; two coal docks; one petroleum dock; and three other unused docks. There are also several small fish wharves without railroad connections. Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations During Fiscal Year. Maintenance: Condition surveys, and miscellaneous inspections and reports performed by Government forces cost $5,351. Minor safety repairs performed by hired labor cost $303. Breakwater repairs using the U.S. Derrickbarge SCHWARTZ cost $171,200. Supervision and administration cost $9,989. Navigation structures are in fair condition. Total cost of the existing project to end of FY was $5,113,538, of which $1,282,893 was for new work, $3,364,888 for maintenance and $465,757 for rehabilitation. 42. MENOMINEE HARBOR AND RIVER, MI AND WI Location. On Lake Michigan at the mouth of Menominee River on the western shore of Green Bay, 16 miles northwest of the mouth of Sturgeon Bay, and 49 miles northeast of Green Bay Harbor, about 155 miles from Milwaukee via Sturgeon Bay Canal. The river forms the boundary between the commercial harbors at Marinette, WI, and Menominee, MI. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14917.) Previous Projects. See page 1361 of Annual Report for 1962. Existing Project. See Chicago District Annual Report for 1979, Table 30-C, page 30-26. For detailed description see page 1214, Annual Report for 1963. The portion authorized by 1960 River and Harbor Act is inactive and estimated (1964) at $442,000 Federal, and $105,000 non-Federal. Costs of completed new work, exclusive of inactive work and amount expended on previous projects, are $221,053 Federal and $40,762 non-Federal, which includes a cash contribution of $36,762. (See Table 21-B for authorizing legislation.) Local Cooperation. Fully complied with for completed work. Terminal Facilities. There are 9 wharves for handling coal, limestone, pulp and miscellaneous commodities. City of Marinette, WI, provided a public wharf. Facilities are considered fairly adequate for existing commerce, except that there is need for a public wharf owned by city of Menominee, with warehouse and railway connection. Operations During Fiscal Year. Maintenance: Condition surveys and miscellaneous inspections and reports performed by Government forces cost $13,373. Minor safety repairs performed by hired labor cost $4,202. A contract for emergency maintenance dredging was awarded and completed this FY, removing 17,178 cubic yards of shoal material at a cost of $138,365. Engineering, design, surveys, and supervision and administration cost $24,077. The project in effect prior to the modification of March 2, 1945, was completed in 1938. No additional work was necessary under the modification of March 2, 1945, to provide a depth of 12 feet in the extension of the channel to the vicinity of the Marinette Yacht Club, as project depth or more was available. The entrance piers were completed in 1884, were rehabilitated (1954-1964) and are in excellent condition. Dredging of the channel below the Marinette municipal wharf, together with enlarging the turning basin to existing project depth, was commenced in May 1938. Modification of the project authorized by the 1960 River and Harbor Act is inactive. Construction for the 1967 modifications was started August 17, 1968, and completed in October 1968. Navigation structures are in good condition. 21- 24 DETROIT, MI, DISTRICT Total cost of the existing project to end of FY was $5,800,734, of which $570,238 was for new work (includes $36,762 contributed funds), $3,284,984 for maintenance, $593,660 for diked disposal and $1,351,852 for rehabilitation. 43. MILWAUKEE HARBOR, WI Location. On west shore of Lake Michigan about 85 miles north of Chicago, IL, and about 83 miles west of Grand Haven, MI. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14924.) Previous Projects. See page 1385 of Annual Report for 1962. Existing Project. See Chicago District Annual Report for 1979, Table 30-C, page 30-26. For detailed description see page 1232 of Annual Report for 1963. Completed new work costs are $6,934,804 Federal and $478,000 non-Federal, exclusive of amount expended on previous projects. The uncompleted portion authorized by the 1935 River and Harbor Act was deauthorized Dec. 31, 1989, in accordance with Section 1001 of the WRDA of 1986 (PL 99-662). Uncompleted portion of 1945 River and Harbor Act was deauthorized in 1977. (See Table 21-B for authorizing legislation.) Local Cooperation. Complied with for Acts of March 2, 1945, October 23, 1962, and July 14, 1960, except deauthorized portion of 1945 Act. Act of Aug. 30, 1935, provided that original dredging of outer harbor area be done by city of Milwaukee and city of Milwaukee be reimbursed at actual cost but not to exceed 10 cents per cubic yard, place measurement, for original dredging done subsequent to authorization of work by Congress. Agreement covering dredging was executed by Secretary of War, Feb. 23, 1934, after this work was originally authorized as part of public works program. City was reimbursed for 10 percent of dredging. Terminal Facilities. There are 4 car-ferry slips, and 57 other wharves, private and municipal, used for handling coal, grain, building materials, cement, petroleum products, and miscellaneous commodities. As facilities in inner harbor were inadequate for existing commerce, Milwaukee Harbor Commission has constructed nine docks in the outer harbor for handling general cargo. Operations During Fiscal Year. Maintenance: Condition and structure surveys, environmental studies, confined disposal facility monitoring, and miscellaneous inspections and reports performed by Government forces and contract cost $260,123. Development of dredged material management plans continued at a cost of $91,764. Repairs to the North Extension Breakwater, Sections D, C-1, C, and North Breakwater, Section B-4, were performed using the U.S. Cranebarge MANITOWOC at a cost of $164,799. The contract awarded last FY for maintenance dredging was completed this FY, removing 58,259 cubic yards of shoal material in the amount of $581,991. Real estate, engineering, design, surveys, and supervision and administration cost $143,343. Existing project is complete except for inactive portions. The 1962 modification was completed in July 1967. North breakwater and shore connection, 9,954 feet long, was completed in August 1925. North pier was completed in 1905 and construction of south pier was completed in November 1910. Construction of south breakwater and shore connection was completed in October 1929. Before modification of August 30, 1935, City of Milwaukee also dredged most of the area in the outer harbor south of inner entrance piers and lakeward of pierhead line to more than 21 feet below datum without cost to the United States. City of Milwaukee also dredged a portion of the area of the outer harbor north of inner entrance piers to provide an approach channel to the passenger and auto pier opposite East Claybourn Street. Work on the 1945 modification was completed in August 1957, except for the uncompleted portion which consists of dredging the Milwaukee River from Buffalo Street to upper limit of the project at Humboldt Avenue. The uncompleted portion of the project authorized by the 1945 Rivers and Harbors Act was deauthorized in 1977. Navigation structures range from fair to good condition. Total cost of the existing project to end of FY was $75,040,387, of which $8,231,024 was for new work, $47,712,878 for maintenance (includes $322,471 contributed funds), $6,380,925 for diked disposal and $12,715,560 for rehabilitation. 21- 25 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 2000 44. MONROE HARBOR, MI Location. On lower reach of River Raisin, which empties into Lake Erie and is 36 miles south of Detroit, MI. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14830.) Existing Project. Provides for a channel in Lake Erie and River Raisin to city of Monroe, for a turning basin, and for riprapping protecting dikes at river mouth. Project depths are 21 feet to turning basin, 18 feet in turning basin, and 9 feet to upstream end of project. For additional details see page 1490 of Annual Report for 1962. Project feature for riprapping protecting dikes is considered inactive. Estimated cost of this feature (1954) is $90,000. (See Table 21-B for authorizing legislation.) The WRDA of 1986 authorized modifications to deepen the River Raisin portion of the existing 200- foot navigation channel from 21 to 27 feet between existing turning basin and the river's mouth; deepen the lake channel from 21 to 28 feet, and widen the channel from 200 to 500 feet, for a distance of approximately 47,000 feet from the river's mouth to the Maumee Bay Entrance Channel; dredge a new turning basin 24 feet deep, with a diameter of at least 1,600 feet, at the river's mouth; and construct a 190 acre confined disposal area in Plum Creek Bay behind which would enable the creation of a 700 acre marsh. Estimated total cost (Oct. 88) is $150,200,000; $59,000,000 Federal and $91,200,000 non-Federal, which includes a cash contribution of $19,650,000. Local Cooperation. Fully complied with for completed portion of project. Local cooperation items for the newly authorized project in the WRDA of 1986 (PL 99-662), are as described in the Rivers and Harbors Committee Document 22, 71st Congress, 1st Session; R & H Comm. Doc. 12, 72d Congress, 1st Session, and 45, 75th Congress, 1st Session, and also includes, as a result of PL 99-662, construction cost sharing as follows: a. Contribute in cash 25 percent of the total cost of construction of general navigation facilities, exclusive of aids to navigation, a contribution presently estimated at $19,650,000. The estimated cash contribution of $19,650,000 to be paid in lump sum prior to initiation of construction, or in annual installments during the construction period at a rate proportionate to the proposed or scheduled expenditure of Federal funds as required by the Chief of Engineers, or under another arrangement satisfactory to the Secretary of the Army, the final apportionment of cost to be made after actual costs have been determined; b. Repay, with interest, over a period of up to 30 years following project completion, 10 percent of the total cost of construction of general navigation facilities, an amount presently estimated at $7,860,000. The Secretary of the Army may count against all or part of the 10 percent repayment, the amount of the local contribution for lands, easements, rights-of-way, dredged/demolition material disposal sites and relocations. In no case are these costs to count against the cash payment during construction, and in no case would the amount waived exceed 10 percent of project cost; and c. The confined dike area construction is a non- Federal responsibility and is estimated to cost $70,156,000. Terminal Facilities. Several privately owned docks and a municipal terminal. Port of Monroe Authority built a steel and concrete wharf on southeast side of turning basin for commercial use. Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations During Fiscal Year. Maintenance: Condition surveys, environmental studies, and miscellaneous inspections and reports performed by Government forces and contract cost $113,998. Maintenance of the confined disposal facility performed by hired labor cost $8,841. An adjustment of $48,001 was made in contract cost for maintenance dredging completed last. Supervision and administration to closeout the contract cost $8,758. Total cost of the existing project to end of FY was $61,417,163, of which $987,340 was for new work (includes $300,000 contributed by the Port Commission of Monroe), $21,740,241 for maintenance (includes $166,667 contributed funds: $125,000 by Consolidated Paper Company and $41,667 by River Raisin Company) and $38,689,582 for diked disposal (includes $83,182 contributed funds). 45. MUSKEGON IIARBOR, MI Location. On east shore of Lake Michigan, 114 miles northeasterly from Chicago, IL, and 80 miles 21- 26 DETROIT, MI, DISTRICT easterly from Milwaukee, WI. (See NOAA Nautical chart 19434.) Previous Project. For details see page 1950 of Annual Report for 1915; page 1399, Annual Report for 1924; and page 1484, Annual Report for 1938. Existing Project. A breakwater protected outer basin in Lake Michigan and an entrance channel from Lake Michigan to Muskegon Lake protected by piers and revetments. Project depths vary from 29 feet in the lakeward portion of the outer basin to 27 feet in the channel between the inner piers to Muskegon Lake. For additional details see page 1303 of Annual Report for 1963. (See Table 21-B for authorizing legislation.) Local Cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal Facilities. Several privately owned wharves primarily for commercial use. Details on actual port and harbor facilities are in Port Series, No. 48 (revised 1981) prepared and published by the Water Resources Support Center. Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations During Fiscal Year. Maintenance: Condition and structure surveys, environmental studies, and miscellaneous inspections and reports performed by Governmeht forces cost $111,200. Safety repairs performed by hired labor cost $7,548. Repairs to the North Breakwater, Section A-I, North Revetment, Sections, KI & K2, were performed using the U.S. Cranebarge MANITOWOC at a cost of $76,592. Supervision and administration cost $11,785. Under Section 111 of P.L. 90-483, an adjustment of $75 was made in supervision and administration costs for closeout of FY98 beach nourishment (trucking) contract. Existing project, including latest project modification, was completed in 1965. For additional details on completion of existing project see page 1465 of Annual Report for 1962. Navigation structures are in good condition. Total cost of the existing project to end of FY was $30,986,381, of which $3,017,110 was for new work, $14,144,971 for maintenance, and $13,824,300 for rehabilitation. 46. NEW BUFFALO IIARBOR, MI Location. At mouth of Galien River on southeast shore of Lake Michigan in Berrien County, about 45 miles easterly from Chicago, IL. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14905.) Existing Project. Provides for an entrance channel 10 feet deep by 80 feet wide and 850 feet long, to mouth of Galien River; new north and south breakwaters 1,305 and 740 feet long, respectively, and deepening inner channel to Galien River to 8 feet and 80 feet wide and 1,250 feet long. (See Table 21-B for authorizing legislation.) Local Cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal Facilities. One village owned boat ramp and three privately operated marinas, and a private boat club facility. Operations During Fiscal Year. Maintenance: Condition surveys, environmental studies, and miscellaneous inspections and reports performed by Government forces cost $29,474. Safety repairs performed by hired labor cost $2,173. Engineering and design for maintenance dredging contract to be awarded next FY cost $1,328. Existing project is complete. The North and South Breakwaters are in fair condition. It is anticipated repairs will be required within the next five years. Total cost of the existing project to end of FY was $7,911,188, of which $2,472,183 was for new work (includes $1,186,467 contributed funds), $5,257,505 for maintenance, and $181,500 for diked disposal. 47. OCONTO HARBOR, WI Location. On the west shore of Green Bay, about 31 miles northeasterly from Green Bay Harbor, WI and about 25 miles southwesterly from Menominee Harbor, MI and WI, at mouth of Oconto River. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14910.) Previous Project. For details see page I187 of Annual Report for 1958. Existing Project. See Chicago District Annual Report 1979, Table 30-C, page 30-27. For detailed description see page 1187, Annual Report for 1958. (See Table 31-B for authorizing legislation.) Local Cooperation. Fully complied with. 21- 27 REPORT OF TIlE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 2000 Terminal Facilities. Two municipally owned wharves of 400 and 100 foot frontage, respectively, for miscellaneous freight, open to general public use. Facilities considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations During Fiscal Year. Maintenance: Condition surveys, and miscellaneous inspections and reports performed by Government forces cost $10,302. A limited dredged material management plan study was initiated at a cost of $81,721. Navigation structures are in good condition. Total cost of the existing project to end of FY was $2,486,673, of which $130,754 was for new work and $2,355,919 for maintenance. 48. ONTONAGON HARBOR, MI Location. About 140 miles east of Duluth, MN, on south shore of Lake Superior, at mouth of Ontonagon River; provides the only refuge for small craft between the Keweenaw Waterway upper entrance and Black River Harbor. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14965.) Previous Project. For details see page 1931 of Annual Report for 1915, and page 1406 of Annual Report for 1938. Existing Project. Provides for approach channel 16 feet deep, a channel between piers with 17- and 15- foot depths, an inner basin 12 feet deep, and maintenance of channels, basin, and entrance piers. Completed project cost $19,619. See page 1100 of Annual Report for 1966 for details. A modification authorized by 1962 River and Harbor Act provides for increasing depths of channels, construction of an inner basin and a sedimentation basin. (See Table 21-B for authorized legislation.) The turning basin feature of the project for navigation at Ontonagon Harbor, Ontonagon County, MI, authorized by the River and Harbor Act of 1962, was deauthorized by the WRDA of 1986; PL 99-662 (Section 1002) Nov. 17, 1986, 99th Congress, Title X. The channel modification project authorized by the 1962 River and Harbor Act was deauthorized Dec. 31, 1989, in accordance with Section 1001 of the WRDA of 1986 (PL 99-662). Terminal Facilities. There are no publicly owned wharves. There are three coal wharves, an oil receiving facility, and a few small fish wharves. Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations During Fiscal Year. Maintenance: Condition and structure surveys, environmental studies, and miscellaneous inspections and reports performed by Government forces and contract cost $72,021. An adjustment of $1 was made in contract cost for repair of the East Breakwater, Section B, completed last FY. Engineering and design for repair of the East and West Piers failed tie rods, continued at a cost of $75,888. A multi-year contract was awarded this FY for maintenance dredging. The base year contract was awarded and completed this FY, removing 13,265 cubic yards of shoal material at a cost of $197,091. Engineering, design, surveys, and supervision and administration cost $69,194. All work authorized under previous Acts was completed in 1938. Navigation structures range from fair to good condition. Several areas along the piers have had tie rod failures which requires repairs within the next two years. Total cost of the existing project to end of FY was $24,202,530, of which $953,903 was for new work, $23,227,627 for maintenance and $21,000 for diked disposal. 49. PENTWATER HARBOR, MI Location. On east shore of Lake Michigan, 146 miles northeasterly from Chicago, IL, and 14 miles southerly from Ludington, MI. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14907.) Existing Project. Provides for widening old entrance channel to 150 feet between parallel piers and revetments, channel to extend from Lake Michigan to Pentwater Lake, with a depth of 16 feet. Piers and revetments are built of stone filled timber cribs and piling and capped with concrete. The 200- foot extension to south pier portion of project is considered inactive. Estimated cost (1954) of this portion is $65,100. (See Table 21-B for authorizing legislation.) Local Cooperation. None required. Local Cooperation. None required. 21- 28 DETROIT, MI, DISTRICT Terminal Facilities. Several small privately owned wharves on west end of Pentwater Lake. The City and Michigan Waterways Commission jointly constructed a dock on northwest side of Pentwater Lake for public use. Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations During Fiscal Year. Maintenance: Condition and structure surveys, environmental studies, and miscellaneous inspections and reports performed by Government forces and contract cost $51,548. The contract awarded last FY for repair of the North Pier and Revetment, Sections A-D, F, F1, (Phase II) was approximately 99% complete at the end of the FY at a cost of $3,273,001. Engineering and design during construction cost $28,792. Acquisition of real estate easement cost $234,421. A contract for maintenance dredging was awarded and completed this FY, removing 13,939 cubic yards of shoal material at a cost of $73,787. Engineering, design, surveys, and supervision and administration cost $156,370. Existing project was completed in 1959 except for a 2 00-foot extension to the south pier, which is not considered necessary under present conditions. For additional details see page 1468 of Annual Report for 1962. Navigation structures are in excellent condition. Total cost of the existing project to end of FY was $14,477,398, of which $179,899 was for new work, and $14,297,499 for maintenance. 50. PETOSKEY HARBOR, MI Location. This harbor is on the east shore of Lake Michigan about 50 miles south of the Straits of Mackinac. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14913.) Previous Project. For details see page 1954 of Annual Report for 1915, page 1547 of Annual Report for 1931, and page 2024 of Annual Report for 1949. Existing Project. Provides for a breakwater extending from shore 1,345 feet long of stone-filled timber crib, concrete capped, and rubblestone construction which protects the municipal pier. (See Table 21-B for authorizing legislation.) Local Cooperation. None required. Terminal Facilities. There is a municipal pier which is about 635 feet long plus several recreational craft piers. These installations satisfy current commerce and traffic requirements. Operations During Fiscal Year. Maintenance: An adjustment of $19 was made in FY99 costs for repair of the Extension Breakwater, Sections A-C, and filling of ports on concrete caps using the U.S. Cranebarge MANITOWOC. The existing project was complete in 1938. Breakwater is in fair overall condition. Total cost of the existing project to the end of FY was $1,086,427 of which $123,839 was for new work and $962,588 for maintenance. 51. POINT LOOKOUT HARBOR (AU GRES RIVER), MI Location. At Au Gres River on westerly shore of Lake Huron at entrance to Saginaw Bay, about 17 miles northeast of mouth of Saginaw River. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14863.) Existing Project. Provides for construction of a small boat harbor having a 12-foot deep, 100-foot wide, 2,800-foot long outer entrance channel; a 5,600- foot long, 100-foot wide inner entrance channel having a 10-foot depth; an 8,270-foot long, 6-foot deep river channel ending just downstream from U.S. 23 highway bridge and having a width of 60 feet; a 4,000-foot long north breakwater and a 3,800-foot long south breakwater. (See Table 21-B for authorizing legislation.) Local Cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal Facilities. Small boat marina facilities are under construction by the State of Michigan. Operations During Fiscal Year. Maintenance: Condition surveys and miscellaneous inspections and reports performed by Government forces cost $6,934. Engineering and design for maintenance dredging contract to be awarded next FY cost $94,817. Existing project was completed in 1974. Navigation structures are in good condition. Total cost of the existing project to end of FY was $6,821,927 of which $2,642,584 was for new work, $4,057,743 for maintenance (includes $9,257 contributed funds) and $121,600 for diked disposal. 21- 29 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 2000 52. PORT SANILAC HARBOR, MI Location. On southwest shore of Lake Huron, 30 miles north of Port Huron, MI. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14862.) Existing Project. Provides for a harbor of refuge protected by breakwater structures extending to 12- foot depth contour in lake; for dredging a harbor basin 10 feet deep; for dredging an entrance channel,1l2 feet deep; a 70-foot extension of the south breakwater; a 300-foot arm added to the north breakwater; and riprap placed at the lakeward side of the breakwater addition. (See Table 21-B for authorizing legislation.) Local Cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal Facilities. There is one privately owned dock used principally as a fishing terminal by owner and a municipally owned pier for recreational craft. Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations During Fiscal Year. Maintenance: Condition surveys and miscellaneous inspections and reports performed by Government forces cost $3,182. Safety repairs performed by hired labor cost $2,215. Engineering and design for maintenance dredging contract to be awarded next FY cost $36,361. Under Section 111 of P.L. 90-483, an adjustment of $79 was made in engineering and design cost for future beach nourishment (trucking) contract. The project was completed in 1951 except for latest modification that was completed in FY 76. The breakwaters are in good condition, with miscellaneous repairs programmed in the next 5 years. Total cost of the existing project to end of FY was $5,424,519, of which $1,733,071 was for new work (includes $487,108 contributed funds), $3,682,290 for maintenance (includes $115,000 contributed funds) and $9,158 for diked disposal. 53. PORT WASHINGTON IARBOR,WI Location. On the west shore of Lake Michigan, about 53 miles south of Manitowoc and about 29 miles north of Milwaukee, WI. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14904.) Previous Project. For details, see page 1938 of Annual Report for 1915, page 1459 of Annual Report for 1938, and page 30-14 of Chicago District Annual Report for 1975. Existing Project. See Chicago District Annual Report for 1979, Table 30-C, page 30-27. Construction of a small boat harbor within the existing harbor was authorized by the Chief of Engineers, June 12, 1975, under authority of Section 107, 1960 River and Harbor Act, as amended. Local Cooperation. Fully complied with. .Terminal Facilities. There is one coal wharf, a petroleum tank farm and several fishing wharves. City provided a wharf which is open to public use. Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations During Fiscal Year. Maintenance: Condition and structure surveys, environmental studies, and miscellaneous inspections and reports performed by Government forces and contract cost $12,513. Engineering and design for future maintenance dredging cost $31,830. The existing project was completed in 1936. The 1958 modification was deauthorized in 1977. Navigation structures range from fair to good condition. Total cost of the existing project to end of FY was $7,655,867, of which $4,206,204 was for new work (includes $1,624,000 contributed funds), $3,439,042 for maintenance and $10,621 for diked disposal. 54. PORT WING HARBOR, WI Location. On south shore of Lake Superior, 34 miles easterly from Duluth, MN. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14966.) Existing Project. Provides for two parallel piers at entrance, 835 and 1,017 feet long, respectively, 200 feet apart; an entrance channel between piers 150 feet wide with 15-foot depth; an irregular-shaped turning basin 15 feet deep at inner end of piers from which two inner channels with 8-foot depth extend. One of these is 60 feet wide extending southerly for 340 feet and one 70 feet wide extending easterly 1,170 feet. Portion of dredging entrance channel to complete project width and depth is considered unnecessary to 21- 30 DETROIT, MI, DISTRICT meet present navigation requirements. (See Table 21- B for authorizing legislation.) Local Cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal Facilities. There are four privately owned fishing wharves which are considered adequate for existing conditions. Operations During Fiscal Year. Maintenance: Condition surveys, environmental studies, and miscellaneous inspections and reports performed by Government forces cost $1,893. Safety repairs performed by hired labor cost $794. Engineering and design for future maintenance dredging was initiated at a cost of $82. Existing project is complete, except channel between piers, and has been dredged to only a 100-foot width. Widening the channel an additional 50 feet was considered unnecessary to meet present navigation requirements. That work was classified inactive and deauthorized on August 5, 1977, under Section 12 of Public Law 93-251. Land owned by the United States totals 7.80 acres. Navigation structures are in fair condition. Total cost of the existing project to end of FY was $1,505,996, of which $63,393 was for new work and $1,442,603 for maintenance. 55. PORTAGE LAKE HARBOR, MI Location. On east shore of Lake Michigan about 186 miles northeasterly from Chicago, IL, and about 37 miles northerly from Ludington, MI. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14939.) Existing Project. Provides for a harbor of refuge with an entrance channel from Lake Michigan to Portage Lake protected by piers and revetments. Project depth is 18 feet. For additional details see page 1297 of Annual Report for 1958. (See Table 21- B for authorizing legislation.) Local Cooperation. None required. Terminal Facilities. There are landing places and marinas at inner end of Portage Lake. Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations I)During Fiscal Year. Maintenance: Condition and structure surveys, and miscellaneous inspections and reports performed by Government forces cost $24,841. Safety repairs performed by hired labor cost $1,792. Engineering and design for repair of the North and South Piers, Sections A&B (Phase I) continued at a cost of $108,771. Real estate inleasing activities cost $9,514. Existing project was substantially completed in 1912. For additional details on completion of existing project see page 1298 of Annual Report for 1958. Navigation structures are in generally poor condition and major repairs will be underway in the near future. Total cost of the existing project to end of FY was $3,309,666 of which $256,129 was for new work and $3,053,537 for maintenance. 56. ROUGE RIVER, MI Location. Rises in Oakland and Washtenaw Counties, MI, 30 miles long, flows southeasterly through Wayne County, and joins Detroit River at westerly limit of city of Detroit. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14854.) Previous Project. For details see page 1530 of Annual Report for 1932, and page 1558 of Annual Report for 1938. Existing Project. Provides for: (a) Main channel from Detroit River through Short Cut Canal extending to upstream limit of the project, a distance of 3.5 miles. Project depths are 25 and 21 feet in navigation channel, 21 feet in turning basin, and 13 feet in upper reach of project. (b) Old Channel from Detroit River extending to junction of Old Channel with Short Cut Canal. Project depths are 25, 18, 17, and 21 feet. For additional details see page 1324 of Annual Report for 1963. In 1973, work authorized by the 1962 River and Harbor Act was reclassified from the active to inactive category. Estimated cost (1972) of this work is $880,000. Except for dredging 25-foot channel 1,150 feet upstream from mouth of Old Channel, work authorized in Act of Aug. 30, 1935, is considered inactive. Estimated cost (1958) of inactive portion is $255,000. Work authorized by Act of July 3, 1958, is considered inactive. Estimated cost (1960) of this work is $210,000. (See Table 21-B for authorizing legislation.) Local Cooperation. Act of Oct. 23, 1962, requires local interests to provide lands and rights-of-way for construction upon request of the Chief of Engineers; hold the United States free from damages; provide 21- 31 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 2000 terminal facilities to accommodate prospective commerce considered in report of District Engineer; dredge and maintain areas between the Federal improvement and terminal facilities to depths commensurate with improved Federal channel; make alterations in docks, bulkheads and other structures, and take such other measures as may be necessary to assure stability of banks adjacent to channel; and provide bridge protection. The assurances of local cooperation for the River and Harbor Act of 1962 were furnished by the Michigan State Waterways Commission and accepted on Jan. 7, 1965. Fulfillment of all items of local cooperation has not been accomplished. Terminal Facilities. Numerous large commercial docks for handling various type cargo. Details on actual port and harbor facilities are contained in the Port Series No. 45 (revised 1984) prepared and published by the Water Resources Support Center. Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations During Fiscal Year. Maintenance: Condition surveys, environmental studies, and miscellaneous inspections and reports performed by Government forces cost $46,809. An adjustment of $55,107 was made in contract cost and 9,102 cubic yards for maintenance dredging completed last FY. Supervision and administration to closeout the contract cost $21,844. Work authorized before 1962 modification is complete or deauthorized. For additional details on completion of existing project see Annual Report for 1962. Total cost of the existing project to end of FY was $38,835,465, of which $675,251 was for new work ($29,563 was expended from Emergency Relief Act Funds), $23,252,896 for maintenance and $14,907,318 for diked disposal. 57. SAGINAW RIVER, MI Location. Formed by union of Tittabawassee and Shiawassee Rivers, 22 miles long, and flows northerly into extreme inner end of Saginaw Bay, Lake Huron. Cities of Saginaw and Bay City are on the river. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14867.) Previous Project. For details, see page 1957 of Annual Report for 1915; and page 1550 of Annual Report for 1938. Existing Project. Provides for an entrance channel 27 feet deep and 350 feet wide from 27-foot contour in Saginaw Bay to river mouth; thence a channel 26 feet deep and 200 feet wide to New York Central Railroad Bridge at Bay City; thence 22 feet deep and 200 feet wide to C&O Railroad Bridge in Saginaw; thence 16.5 feet deep and 200 feet wide to upstream limit at Green Point. Project also provides for five turning basins; one 25 feet deep at Essexville, 600 feet wide with a maximum length of 1,850 feet; one 22 feet deep on east side of channel about 1 mile upstream from Cass Avenue in Bay City, 650 feet wide and 1,000 feet long; one 20 feet deep at Carrollton, 100 to 300 feet wide and 900 feet long; one 20 feet deep downstream from C&O Bridge in Saginaw, 650 feet wide and 1,000 feet long; and one 15 feet deep between Bristol Street Bridge and New York Central Railroad Bridge in Saginaw. (See Table 21-B for authorizing legislation.) Local Cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal Facilities. Numerous large commercial docks for handling a great variety of cargo. Details on actual port and harbor facilities are in Port Series No. 45 (revised 1984) prepared and published by the Water Resources Support Center. Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations During Fiscal Year. Maintenance: Condition surveys, environmental studies, confined disposal facility monitoring, support of water control center and miscellaneous inspections and reports performed by Government forces and contract cost $438,083. Development of dredged material management plans study completed in FY98 was for the Lower Saginaw River. A dredged material management plans study for the Upper Saginaw River was initiated this FY at a cost of $18,149. Confined disposal facility maintenance performed by hired labor cost $102,950. An adjustment of -$17,120 was made in contract cost for FY98 maintenance dredging contract completed last FY. The FY99 dredging contract was completed this FY, removing 45,137 cubic yards of shoal material at a cost of $91,240. A contract for maintenance dredging of the Bay and River was awarded this FY in the amount of $1,114,800. The contract was 22% complete at the end of FY, removing approximately 18,306 cubic yards of shoal material at a cost of $250,000. Engineering, design, surveys, and supervision and administration cost $139,080. 21- 32 DETROIT, MI, DISTRICT Existing project is complete except for small part of the work authorized by the Act of October 23, 1962. Section D (Sixth Street Turning Basin) of the 1962 Act is complete except for the channel portion, which is pending modification. Total cost of the existing project to end of FY was $95,706,758, of which $14,930,727 was for new work (includes $13,600 for contributed funds), $59,824,143 for maintenance, and $20,951,888 for diked disposal. 58. ST. CLAIR RIVER, MI Location. A 40 mile long section of Great Lakes connecting channels which flows southerly from Lake Huron and discharges into Lake St. Clair. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14852.) Existing Project. Provides for channels through St. Clair River, which, at low water datum, are suitable for vessels drawing 25.5 feet. Project also provides for improvement of North Channel outlet, 100 feet wide and 10 feet deep, for recreational craft. Project depths are referred to low water datums for Lakes Huron and St. Clair; 577.5 and 572.3 feet above mean water level at Rimouski, Quebec, IGLD 1985. (See Tables 21-B and 21-II for authorizing legislation and features of existing project.) Act of July 24, 1946, provides for widening and deepening of southeast bend and improvement of outlet of north channel at an estimated cost (1986) of $870,000; $435,000 Federal and $435,000 non-Federal. On June 16, 1969, the Director of Civil Works approved substitution of the middle channel of the St. Clair River for the authorized north channel. Subsequently, however, the work authorized by the River and Harbor Act of July 24, 1946, was deauthorized by the WRDA of 1986; PL 99-662, Nov. 17, 1986, 99th Congress, Title X. Local Cooperation. None required. Terminal Facilities. This improvement serves through commerce, between the upper and lower Great Lakes, and has not materially influenced terminal facilities along its route. A number of privately owned piers and wharves are at Port Huron, Marysville, St. Clair, and Marine City, MI, which handle coal, limestone, petroleum products, woodpulp, salt and general cargo. These installations satisfy present commerce requirements. Operations During Fiscal Year. Maintenance: Condition surveys, environmental studies, support of water control center, and miscellaneous inspections and reports performed by Government forces and contract cost $97,120. Location and removal of obstructions was performed using the U.S. Cranebarge VELER and Survey Vessel PAJ at a cost of $552,811. A contract for maintenance dredging was awarded this FY in the amount of $2,680,989. Dredging will begin next FY. However, the contractor was paid $26,000 to cover his cost of bonds. Engineering, design, surveys, real estate, and supervision and administration cost $121,292. Existing project is complete. Total cost of the existing project to end of FY was $47,442,157, of which $19,213,246 was for new work and $28,228,911 for maintenance. 59. ST. JOSEPH HARBOR, MI Location. On east shore of Lake Michigan, 60 miles easterly from Chicago, IL, and 24 miles southerly from South Haven, MI. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14930.) Previous Project. For details see page 1945 of Annual Report for 1915, and page 1470 of Annual Report for 1938. Existing Project. Provides for protecting mouth of St. Joseph River by two piers, 250 to 325 feet apart at their inner and outer ends, respectively, having lengths of 2,758 feet on north side and 2,603 feet on south side; for a channel 21 feet deep from Lake Michigan to mouth of Benton Harbor Canal, a length of about 6,900 feet with widths of 265 feet at outer end of piers, 190 feet at inner end of piers and revetments, thence generally 215 feet to lower end of turning basin, increasing to 250 feet above the turning basin to mouth of Paw Paw River, thence generally 110 feet in Paw Paw River to mouth of Benton Harbor Canal; for dredging channel in Benton Harbor Canal up to west line of Riverview Drive extended northerly, to 18 feet deep and 80 feet wide; and a turning basin 18 feet deep on north side of channel above mouth of Morrison Channel and a turning basin 18 feet deep near mouth of Paw Paw River. Public Law 88-88 declared a portion of Benton Harbor Canal a non-navigable stream. (See Table 21-B for authorizing legislation.) 21- 33 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF TIHE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 2000 Local Cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal Facilities. Several commercial wharves for handling coal, building materials, petroleum products, and miscellaneous commodities. A package freight terminal and a public docking facility is also available. Facilities considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations During Fiscal Year. Maintenance: Condition and structure surveys, environmental studies, confined disposal facility monitoring, and miscellaneous inspections and reports performed by Government forces cost $113,422. Environmental activities for a disposal area and polluted dredged material continued at a cost of $25,806. Safety maintenance performed by hired labor cost $3,104. Repairs to the North Pier, Sections A-1, A-2, A & B, using the U.S. Cranebarge MANITOWOC cost $78,314. A contract for maintenance dredging the outer channel was awarded and completed this FY, removing.39,472 cubic yards of shoal material at a cost of $187,631. This contract was also for beach nourishment. Engineering, design, real estate, surveys, and supervision and administration cost $84,346. Monitoring in connection with Section 111 of P.L. 90-483 cost $53,938. Beach nourishment in conjunction with the above maintenance dredging of the outer channel contract cost $64,618. Supervision and administration under Section 111 cost $6,102. Existing project was completed in 1956. For additional details on completion of existing project see page 1454 of Annual Report for 1962. Navigation structures are in generally good condition. Total cost of the existing project to end of FY was $32,575,651, of which $1,804,485 was for new work, $29,170,874 for maintenance, $638,076 for diked disposal and $962,216 for rehabilitation. 60. SAUGATUCK HARBOR AND KALAMAZOO RIVER, MI Location. Harbor is on east shore of Lake Michigan, 90 miles northeasterly from Chicago, IL, and 22 miles northerly from South Haven, MI. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14906.) Previous Project. For details see page 1947 of Annual Report for 1915, and page 1475 of Annual Report for 1938. Existing Project. Entrance channel protected by parallel piers at mouth of Kalamazoo River and a river channel to village of Saugatuck, MI. Project depths: 16 feet in entrance channel, 14 feet in river channel. Additional details on page 1456 of 1962 Annual Report. (See Table 21-B for authorizing legislation.) Local Cooperation. None required. Terminal Facilities. At city of Saugatuck, MI, there are several landing places for recreational craft and one for small commercial vessels. At village of Douglas, MI, there is a landing pier. Facilities are considered adequate for present traffic. Operations During Fiscal Year. Maintenance: Condition and structure surveys, environmental studies and miscellaneous inspections and reports performed by Government forces and contract cost $36,307. The contract awarded last FY for repair of the North and South Pier, Sections A-C (Phase I) was completed this FY at a cost of $1,437,919. Engineering and design during construction cost $1,798. Engineering and design for repair of the North and South Pier, Sections C-F, (Phase II), was initiated at a cost of $4,151. An emergency dredging contract was awarded and completed this FY, removing 21,101 cubic yards of shoal material at a cost of $140,330. Engineering, design, surveys, and supervision and administration cost $105,498. Existing project was completed in 1903. Navigation structures are in generally poor condition and are under major repair. Total cost of the existing project to end of FY was $9,886,689, of which $364,527 was for new work and $9,522,162 for maintenance. 61. SAXON HARBOR, WI Location. On the south shore of Lake Superior in Wisconsin at the mouth of Oronto Creek, 27 miles southeast of the harbor at Bayfield, WI, and 21 miles westerly of the harbor at Black river, MI; 99 miles east of Duluth-Superior Harbor and 60 miles west of Ontonagon Harbor, MI. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14965.) Previous Project. For details see page 1254 of Annual Report for 1962. Existing Project. Provides for east and west breakwaters, an outer channel 10 feet deep, an inner basin and side channel 8 feet deep, and diversion of 21- 34 DETROIT, MI, DISTRICT Oronto Creek to Parkers Creek by three short reaches of channel excavation and a levee. For detailed dimensions of features see page 1025 of Annual Report for 1965. (See Table 21-B for authorizing legislation.) Local Cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal Facilities. One wharf 300 feet long on the east side of present harbor basin constructed by local interests. Operations During Fiscal Year. Maintenance: Condition surveys and inspections and reports performed by Government forces cost $4,291. Minor safety repairs performed by hired labor cost $178. Engineering and design for maintenance dredging contract to be awarded next FY cost $61,087. The project was completed in March 1968. A reconnaissance report was completed in August 1971 concerning erosion of the shoreline west of the harbor. Navigation structures are in good condition. Total cost of the existing project to end of FY was $1,749,205, of which $711,777 was for new work and $1,037,428 for maintenance. The new work cost does not include $50,193 contributed funds. 62. SEBEWAING RIVER, MI Location. At mouth of Sebewaing River on south shore of Saginaw Bay about 10 miles south of Bay Port, MI. (NOAA Nautical Chart 14863.) Previous Project. For details see page 1007 of Annual Report for 1912. Existing Project. Provides for an entrance channel 8 feet deep, 100 feet wide, and about 15,000 feet long in Saginaw Bay. (See Table 21-B for authorizing legislation.) Terminal Facilities. A number of small wharves used by fishing vessels and other light-draft craft are along the river. Facilities are considered adequate for existing conmlerce. Operations During Fiscal Year. Maintenance: Environmental studies performed by Government forces and contract cost $19,030. The limited dredged material management plans study continued at a cost of $47,228. Existing project was completed in 1903. Total cost of the existing project to end of FY was $4,284,769, of which $35,573 was for new work and $4,249,196 for maintenance. 63. SHEBOYGAN HARBOR, WI Location. On west shore of Lake Michigan about 26 miles south of Manitowoc and about 55 miles north of Milwaukee, WI. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14922.) Previous Project. See page 1381 of Annual Report for 1962. Existing Project. See Chicago District Annual Report for 1979, Table 30-C, page 30-27. For detailed description see page 1230 of Annual Report for 1963. New work for project as completed cost $648,271, exclusive of amounts expended on previous projects. (See Table 21-B for authorizing legislation.) Local Cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal Facilities. Three wharves for handling coal, petroleum products and miscellaneous commodities. City provided a public wharf. Facilities considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations During Fiscal Year. Maintenance: Condition and structure surveys, and miscellaneous inspections and reports performed by Government forces cost $34,328. Repairs to the North Breakwater, Sections E&F and South Pier, Section N, were performed using the U.S. Cranebarge MANITOWOC at a cost of $68,977. Real estate and supervision and administration cost $19,849. Existing project was completed in 1904. Construction of north breakwater was commenced in October 1913 and completed in October 1915. Dredging entrance channel to existing project depth was commenced in June and completed in July 1938. Work on 1954 modification was completed in December 1956. Inner 260 feet of south pier was replaced with a revetment by private interests under permit granted July 16, 1931, by the Secretary of War. Piers, therefore, are maintained only for a length of about 2,490 feet. Sheboygan River is navigable about 2.4 miles above its mouth for craft drawing not more 21- 35 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 2000 than 2 feet. Navigation structures range from fair to good condition. It is anticipated repairs will be required in the next 5 to 7 years. Total cost of the existing project to end of FY was $11,120,387, of which $1,136,088 was for new work, $8,467,479 for maintenance, $907,792 for diked disposal and $609,028 for rehabilitation. 64. SOUTH HAVEN HARBOR, MI, Location. On east shore of Lake Michigan, 77 miles northeasterly from Chicago, IL, and 24 miles northerly from St. Joseph, MI. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14906.) Previous Project. For details see page 1947 of Annual Report for 1915, and page 1473 of Annual Report for 1938. Existing Project. An entrance channel protected by parallel piers and revetments at mouth of Black River, a river channel and a turning basin. Project depths are 21 feet in entrance channel and 19 feet in river channel and turning basin. For additional details see page 1455 of Annual Report for 1962. The turning basin feature was subsequently deauthorized by Section 116 of the WRDA of 1992 (PL 102-580). (See Table 21-B for authorizing legislation.) Local Cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal Facilities. Several wharves for handling coal, building materials, wood-pulp, fish, and miscellaneous commodities; two have warehouses. Facilities satisfy current commerce requirements. Operations During Fiscal Year. Maintenance: Condition surveys, and miscellaneous .inspections and reports performed by Government forces cost $18,512. Safety maintenance performed by hired labor cost $6,736. Repairs of the North Revetment, Section G, were performed using the U.S. Cranebarge MANITOWOC at a cost of $134,758. Engineering and design for repair of the North Pier, Sections A-C (Concrete Caps), continued at a cost of $130,113. An emergency dredging contract was awarded and completed this FY, removing 7,014 cubic yards of shoal material at a cost of $48,077. This contract was issued as a modification under the FY99 dredging contract for St. Joseph Harbor. Real estate and supervision and administration cost $11,418. An adjustment of -$87 was made in costs for monitoring in connection with Section 111I of P.L. 90-483. Existing project was completed in 1960. Project now being maintained to 14-foot and 12-foot depths, respectively (in lieu of the 21 feet and 19 feet authorized), which is adequate for current usage. For additional details on completion of existing project see page 1456 of Annual Report for 1962. Navigation structures are in fair condition and are scheduled for repair. Total cost of the existing project to end of FY was $11,222,179, of which $984,426 was for new work, $8,563,296 for maintenance, $42,381 for diked disposal and $1,632,076 for rehabilitation. 65. STURGEON BAY AND LAKE MICHIGAN SHIP CANAL, WI Location. On west shore of Lake Michigan about 52 miles northeast of Green Bay and about 128 miles north of Milwaukee, WI. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14919.) Previous Project. See page 1373 of Annual Report for 1962. Existing Project. See Chicago District Annual Report for 1979, Table 31-C, page 30-27. For detailed description, see page 1223, Annual Report for 1963. (See Table 21-B for authorizing legislation.) Local Cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal Facilities. As the canal and connecting channel is a through waterway, only terminal facilities are in city of Sturgeon Bay, 4 miles from west end of revetted portion of canal. These facilities consist of two wharves for handling coal, petroleum products and miscellaneous commodities, and four shipbuilding yards. City of Sturgeon Bay provided a public wharf about 5 miles northwesterly from city of Sturgeon Bay. Two major shipyards are located in Sturgeon Bay where repair facilities are available including dry docks, marine railways and hoists. Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations During Fiscal Year. Maintenance: Condition surveys, environmental studies, miscellaneous inspections and reports performed by Government forces and contract cost $86,540. Repairs to the Breakwater were performed using the U.S. Derrickbarge SCHWARTZ at a cost of $141,758. 21- 36 DETROIT, MI, DISTRICT Engineering and design for repair of South Revetment, Section N, continued at a cost of $106,543. Supervision and administration cost $17,139. Navigation structures are in fair condition, the South Revetment, Section N, is in poor condition and is programmed for major repair. Total cost of the existing project to end of FY was $13,200,733, of which $1,059,722 was for new work, $10,944,993 for maintenance, $311,119 for diked disposal and $884,899 for rehabilitation. In addition, between April 25, 1893, and June 30, 1917, $235,940 was expended for operating and care of works of improvements under provision of permanent indefinite appropriations for such purposes. 66. TWO RIVERS HARBOR, WI Location. On west shore of Lake Michigan about 82 miles north of Milwaukee and about 101 miles from Green Bay, WI, via Sturgeon Bay Canal. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14903.) Previous Project. See page 1377, Annual Report for 1962. Existing Project. See Chicago District Annual Report for 1979, Table 30-C, page 30-28. For detailed description see page 1226 of Annual Report for 1963. Completed project cost $147,463, exclusive of the amount expended on previous projects. The 1935 River and Harbor Act portion of project is essentially complete, except for dredging a 10-foot width along each side of the entrance channel between the piers. The uncompleted portion of. the project authorized by the 1935 R & H Act was deauthorized Dec. 31, 1989, in accordance with Section 1001 of the WRDA of 1986 (PL 99-662). (See Table 21-B for authorizing legislation.) Local Cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal Facilities. A coal wharf and several fishing wharves. City provided a wharf for receipt of petroleum products and public use. Facilities considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations During Fiscal Year. Maintenance: Condition surveys and miscellaneous inspections and reports performed by Government forces cost $25,019. Repairs to the North Pier, Sections B-D, were performed using the U.S. Cranebarge MANITOWOC at a cost of $46,084. Engineering and design for repair of the South Entrance Pier was initiated at a cost of $142,847. A contract for maintenance dredging was awarded this FY in the amount of $322,500. Dredging will begin next FY. Engineering, design, surveys, and supervision and administration cost $36,702. Existing project is complete except for portion deauthorized in December 1989. Present width of channel is considered adequate for present and reasonably prospective commerce. North Pier was completed in 1908. North Revetment, completed in 1917, was rebuilt in May to August 1962. Dredging entrance channel and inner basin to existing project depth was commenced in March and substantially completed in May 1937. Navigation structures range from fair to good condition. Repairs are programmed in the near future. Total cost of the existing project to end of FY was $9,661,286, of which $360,320 was for new work, $8,055,437 for maintenance, $1,187,472 for diked disposal and $58,057 for minor rehabilitation. 67. WHITE LAKE HARBOR, MI Location. On the east shore of Lake Michigan 120 miles northeasterly from Chicago, IL, and 45 miles southerly from Ludington, MI. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14935.) Existing Project. Parallel piers, revetments, and a channel 16 feet deep, 200 feet wide, 1,950 feet long, extending from Lake Michigan to White Lake. For additional details see page 1465 of Annual Report for 1962. (See Table 21-B for authorizing legislation.) Local Cooperation. None required. Terminal Facilities. A privately owned chemical shipping dock on the north side of the lake about 3 miles from the inner end of revetted entrance channel. Across the lake, at village of Whitehall, there are several installations serving light draft vessels. These terminals satisfy present recreational and commercial traffic requirements. Operations During Fiscal Year. Condition surveys and miscellaneous inspections and reports performed by Government forces cost $19,178. Funds in the 21- 37 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF TIlE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 2000 amount of $59,919 were expended this FY for real estate activities in support of acquisition of permanent easements." An adjustment of -$160 was made in supervision and administration cost for closeout of FY98 structure repair contract completed last FY. Existing project was completed in 1908. Stone was placed on the north and south revetments in FY 1972. Navigation structures are in excellent condition. Project now being maintained to 14-foot depth authorized, which is adequate for current usage. Total cost of the existing project to end of FY was $12,550,365, of which $457,562 was for new work and $12,092,803 for maintenance. 68. WHITEFISH POINT HARBOR, MI Location: On south shore of Lake Superior 40 miles northwesterly from Sault Ste. Marie, MI, and 53 miles easterly from Grand Marais, MI. (See NOAA Nautical Chart No. 14962.) Existing project. Provides for a harbor of refuge protected by two breakwater structures and for dredging a harbor basin and entrance channel, 12 feet deep. The addition of a 270-foot wave absorbing breakwater inside the harbor was approved by the Chief of Engineers on August 17, 1967, to correct a design deficiency. (See Table 21-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. There is one privately owned fishing wharf and a small boat pier and launching ramp built by the State of Michigan. Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations During Fiscal Year. Maintenance: Condition surveys, miscellaneous inspections and reports performed by Government forces cost $12,559. A contract for maintenance dredging was awarded and completed this FY, removing 16,336 cubic yards of clean material at a cost of $95,680. Engineering, design, surveys and supervision and administration cost $29,133. Existing project was completed in 1960. The interior breakwater and repairs to the shore connection were accomplished by contract during FY 1969. Remaining structures are in generally good condition. Total cost for existing project to end of FY was $1,356,688, of which $771,639 was for new work and $585,049 for maintenance. 69. RECONNAISSANCE AND CONDITION SURVEYS See Table 21-J. 70. OTHER AUTHORIZED NAVIGATION PROJECTS See Table 21-C. 71. NAVIGATION WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION Navigation activities pursuant to Section 107. Public Law 86-645 (pre-authorization.) Navigation activities pursuant to Section 107 of the River and Harbor Act of 1960, as amended. Douglas County, WI - By letter dated 10 September 1999, Douglas County, Wisconsin requested that the Corps of Engineers conduct a study pursuant to constructing a harbor of refuge in Douglas County. Funds in the amount of $24,116 were expended in FY00 to initiate the feasibility study. Duluth (McQuade Road) Ilarbor, MN - The Water Resources Development Act of 1996 authorized the Corps of Engineers to undertake investigations to determine the feasibility of a navigation project at Duluth, MN. Funds were provided by Congressional Add in FY98 and FY99 to conduct a feasibility study for a harbor of refuge at Duluth (McQuade Road) Harbor. By letter dated January 8, 1998, the State of Minnesota made a formal request under Section 107 of the River and Harbor Act of 1960, as amended. Work on the feasibility study was initiated in FY98, including review of design and coordination work already completed by the State of Minnesota. A FONSI was signed in February 2000, and work initiated on plans and specifications. Funds in the amount of $103,569 were expended in FY00. Grand Marais, MN - Funds in the amount of $6,961 were expended in FY00 to initiate a 21- 38 DETROIT, MI, DISTRICT preliminary assessment. The project is on hold until receipt of a formal request from the State of Minnesota under Section 107 of the River and Harbor Act of 1960, as amended. Olde Stone Creek Park, Door County, WI - Olde Stone Quarry Park is a 9 acre park along Green Bay in Door County, Wisconsin. The site is about 4.5 miles north of the town of Sturgeon Bay, Michigan. During storms, moderate to high winds travel across Green Bay and create heavy wave action along the west shore of Door County. The shoreline has extensive exposure to Green Bay and Sturgeon Bay. The heavy wave action creates a safety hazard for small boats. The shoreline along Olde Stone Quarry Park is naturally deep and the proposed harbor of refuge would provide an additional safe harbor for small boats. The U.S. Coast Guard has indicated that a new harbor in this area could cut their yearly Search and Rescue missions in half. Funds in the amount of $34,067 were expended in FY00 to initiate a feasibility study. Taconite Ilarbor, MN - The Water Resources Development Act of 1996 authorized the Corps of Engineers to undertake investigations to determine the feasibility of a navigation project at Taconite Harbor, MN. Funds were provided by Congressional Add in FY98 to construct the harbor of refuge at Taconite harbors. By letter dated January 8, 1998, the State of Minnesota made a formal request under Section 107 of the River and Harbor Act of 1960, as amended. Work on the project design was initiated in FY98 and plans and specifications were completed on June 22, 1999. The State of Minnesota prepared the design analysis, plans and specifications and the Environmental Assessment. A Project Cooperation Agreement was executed on July 27, 1999, and the construction contract was advertised on August 27, 1999. Construction started on December 3, 1999. Funds in the amount of $2,877,988 were expended in FY00. Total project cost is estimated to be $3,852,000, of which the Federal share would be $1,500,000. Two tHarbors, MN - The Water Resources Development Act of 1996 authorized the Corps of Engineers to undertake investigations to determine the feasibility of a navigation project at Two Harbors, MN. Funds were provided by Congressional Add in FY98 to construct the harbor of refuge at Two Harbors. By letter dated January 8, 1998, the State of Minnesota made a formal request under Section 107 of the River Harbor Act of 1960, as amended. Work on the project design was initiated in FY98. Work conducted in FY00 included geotechnical investigations and surveys of the project area. Funds in the amount of $59,318 were expended in FY00. BEACH EROSION CONTROL 72. AUTHORIZED BEACH EROSION CONTROL PROJECTS River and Harbor Act of 1962, as amended, Beach Erosion Control. None. 73. EMERGENCY SHORE PROTECTION Authority for emergency streambank and shoreline protection of public works and non-profit services (Section 14 Flood Control Act of 1946, as amended). Belle Isle Park, City of Detroit, MI - By letter dated November 25, 1998, the City of Detroit, formally requested the Corps of Engineers' assistance in providing approximately 1,100 feet of emergency streambank protection along the Detroit River, to protect a City of Detroit's island park (Belle Isle) from further damage. Planning and design analysis (PDA) continued this FY. Funds in the amount of $60,905 were expended in FY00. Berrien County, Lake Charter Township, MI - By letter dated March 4, 1997, Lake Charter Township requested the Corps of Engineers to plan and design for approximately 240 feet of shoreline erosion problem threatening a water pumping station located in Charter Township of Lake Charter, Berrien County, MI. On-site construction was completed in September 1999. The project is currently being transferred to the sponsor. Funds in the amount of $3,937 were expended in FY00. City of Escanaba, Delta County, MI - By letter dated November 3, 1997, the City of Escanaba requested the Corps of Engineers to plan and design 21- 39 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 2000 for approximately 1,400 feet of a shoreline erosion problem threatening the City of Escanaba's water treatment plant, in Delta County, MI. Project was complete this FY. Funds in the amount of $750,440 were expended in FY00 of which $297,516 was contributed by the City of Escanaba. Combined Sewer Outfall No. 6, City of South Bend, IN - By letter dated April 6, 1999, the City of South Bend requested the Corps of Engineers' assistance for a study of stream bank erosion problem threatening CSO #6. The site is located on the south bank of the St. Joseph River between Leland Avenue and Riverside drive. The riverbank is steep and is severely eroded. The plans specifications phase continued this FY at a cost of $38,860. Kinnickinnic River, Milwaukee County, WI - By letter dated May 6, 1999, the Milwaukee Metropolitan Sewerage District (MMSD) requested the Corps of Engineers' assistance in protecting a county road and county sewer outfalls from further deterioration along the Kinnickinnic River. Planning and design analysis (PDA) continued this FY in the amount of $101,322. Leeper Park Island Wall, City of South Bend, IN - By letter dated April 6, 1999, the City of South Bend requested the Corps of Engineers' assistance for a study of stream bank erosion problem threatening the two drinking water wells located on Leeper Park Island. Several sections of the deteriorated masonry stone wall have completely failed. The plans and specifications phase continued this FY at a cost of $44,059. North Shore Drive, City of South Bend, IN - By letter dated April 6, 1999, the City of South Bend requested the Corps of Engineers' assistance for a study of stream bank erosion problem threatening a portion of North Shore Drive. The riverbank is steep and is severely eroded adjacent to the North Shore Drive between Parkovash Avenue and Lafayette Boulevard. The plans and specifications phase continued this FY at a cost of $72,200. Oconto River, McDonald Street, Oconto, WI - By letter dated November 20, 1997, the city of Oconto requested the Corps of Engineers to plan and design for approximately 640 feet of a streambank erosion problem threatening McDonald Street in the city of Oconto, WI. Construction was completed in July 1999. Project to be transferred to the sponsor for operation and maintenance, Funds in the amount of $16,226 were expended in FY00. Riverside Drive, City of South Bend, IN - By letter dated April 6, 1999, the City of South Bend requested the Corps of Engineers' assistance for a study of stream bank erosion problem threatening a portion of Riverside Drive. The riverbank is steep and is severely eroded adjacent to the Riverside Drive. The project was terminated this FY. Funds in the amount of $108 were expended in FY00. Rouge River, City of Southfield, MI - By letter dated August 29, 2000, the City of Southfield formally requested the Corps of Engineers' assistance in providing approximately 200 feet of emergency streambank protection at a slope failure along the Rouge River, to protect a 30" sanitary sewer line from damage. Water Resource Institute Lake Michigan, MI - By letter dated December 17, 1999, Grand Valley State University requested the Corps of Engineers' assistance with a bank erosion problem which is endangering its facilities. The effected property is a peninsula extending into Muskegon and is the site of the Annis Water Resources Institute of the University. The Preliminary Design Report was completed in September 00. Funds in the amount of $23,747 were expended in FY00. 74. BEACH EROSION WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION Beach erosion activities pursuant to Section 103 of the 1962 River and Ilarbor Act. None. 75. MITIGATION OF SHORE DAMAGES Mitigation of Shore Damages pursuant to Section 111 of the River and Ilarbor Act of 1968. Minnesota Point, Duluth Ship Canal, MN - Accelerated shoreline erosion along Minnesota Point is occurring, as a result of the interruption of along shore littoral transport processes by the Federally maintained navigation structures at Duluth Entry and Superior Entry. A study was initiated in FY97 in response to a request from the City of Duluth. The study addresses structural and non-structural measures 21- 40 DETROIT, MI, DISTRICT to reduce erosion-type damage by shoreline stabilization. The feasibility report continued investigating potential alternatives to resolving the shoreline erosion problem. Funds in the amount of $10,343 were expended in FY00 to complete the final feasibility report. The project was terminated. Saugatuck Harbor, MI - The Township of Saugatuck requested the Corps of Engineers to assess the impact of the Federally maintained navigation structures at the mouth of the Kalamazoo River. The Township is concerned those structures are interrupting the natural along shore littoral transport processes and accelerating the rate of erosion south of the Federal Structures. A previous study was initiated but terminated in 1992 due to the lack of a willing local sponsor. Funds in the amount of $18,926 was expended in FY00 to investigate the issue, to develop a preliminary cost estimate, and to draft a study Fact Sheet and Feasibility Cost Share Agreement. 76. PROJECT MODIFICATION FOR IMPROVING THE QUALITY OF TIlE ENVIRONMENT Project modification activities pursuant to Section 1135(b) of the Water Resources Development Act of 1986, as amended. Paw Paw River, MI - Funds in the amount of $7,576 were expended in FY00 to continue a feasibility study of Paw Paw River, Michigan. The feasibility study addresses potential solutions to control sea lamprey in the Paw Paw River by use of either fixed-crest or variable crested dam alternatives. Ecosystem Restoration - Section 204 beneficial use of dredged material in connection with dredging. Projects in connection with dredging use of dredged material activities pursuant to Section 204 of Water Resources Development Act of 1992, as amended. Cat Island Chain, Brown County, WI - Funds in the amount of $11,011 were expended in FY00 to continue feasibility phase activities for designing restoration techniques to restore the Cat Island entrance to Green Bay Hlarbor, with its easterly boundary about 150 feet west of the deep-draft navigation channel extending into Green Bay. These techniques are being closely coordinated with State and local entities. Historically, the Cat Island Chain had an average width of about 500 feet and extended northwest for approximately 1-1/2 miles. It has dissipated over the years, such that, it only has an area with a diameter of 400 feet above normal water levels. 21'1 Avenue, West Channel, Duluth, MN - The project is located within St. Louis Bay, Duluth- Superior Harbor, at the extreme western end of the Lake Superior. The 21"s Ave, West Channel, study involves the creation of wetlands by construction of a wave barrier to enclose the inlet area and place dredged material below Low Water Datum to create multiple habitat (wildlife refuge and fish habitat). Funds in the amount of $96,401 were expended in FY00 to continue the Feasibility Phase. Various construction alternatives are being evaluated. Aquatic Ecosystem Restoration - Projects for aquatic ecosystem restoration and protection projects, for the purpose of improving the environment pursuant to Section 206 of the Water Resources Development Act of 1996. Belle Isle Piers, Detroit, MI - Project involves investigation of alternatives to create and improve aquatic habitat in the Detroit River, in the vicinity of Belle Isle Piers (U.S. Coast Guard and the North Inselruhe piers) in the City of Detroit, Wayne County, Michigan. Such alternatives include dredging deepwater areas in order to enhance spawning/nursery fishery habitat. Funds in the amount of $109,414 were expended in FY00 to initiate the feasibility phase. Koontz Lake, IN - Koontz Lake is a 346-acre public freshwater lake located in Marshal and Stark Counties, IN. The project consists of a one time removal of approximately 190,000 cubic yards of sediments that are re-suspended by boats and thus adversely impacting the aquatic habitat. Funds in the amount of $146,747 were expended in FY00 to continue the feasibility study. Oak Creek, WI - The Oak Creek Watershed, located within Milwaukee County, drains approximately 27 square miles and flow approximately 26 miles from its headwaters in Cudahy, Franklin, and Greenfield, and Milwaukee to Lake Michigan. The project proposes the removal of three (3) concrete and steel sheet pile drop structures which are impediments to movement of fish upstream. The structures were constructed to 21- 41 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF TIHE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 2000 improve drainage or conveyance or provide grade control/velocity reduction. Upon removal the remaining creek bed would be restored to a more natural condition by a combination of filling or excavation to establish a stable uniform cross-section and slope. Funds in the amount of $102,214 were expended in FY00 to initiate the Planning and Design Analysis Phase. Preliminary Restoration Plans - Funds,, in the amount of $74,732 were expended in FY00 in the preparation of Preliminary Restoration Plans for the initial appraisal of the following projects: Menomonee River, Wisconsin; Black Lagoon, Trenton, Michigan; Hennepin Marsh, Grosse Ile, Michigan; Gibraltar Canals, Detroit River, Gibraltar, Michigan; Grand River, Jackson, Michigan; Huron River, Brownstown Township, Michigan; Quanicassee Wildlife Area, Bay County, Michigan; Shiawassee River State Game Area, Saginaw County, Michigan; Lake St. Clair, Metro Beach, Michigan; Paw Paw River, Berrien County, Michigan; and Princeton Dam, Green Lake County, Wisconsin. FLOOD CONTROL 77. CLINTON RIVER SPILLWAY, MI Location. Clinton River Basin including its tributaries drains an area of 760 square miles in southeastern Michigan and empties into Lake St. Clair. Existing Project. The project consists of a two-mile long spillway channel connecting the Clinton River with Lake St. Clair and a weir at the upstream end of the project, about 9 miles upstream of the river's mouth, in Mount Clemens, MI. (See Table 21-B for authorizing legislation.) Local Cooperation. Clinton River Spillway Inter- County Drainage Board operates and maintains the project. Operations During Fiscal Year. Funds in the amount of $47,528 were expended in FY00 to complete the design for the removal of sediments upstream of the spillway weir, solicit and award a construction contract, and initiate construction. Total cost to end of FY was $3,326,091. 78. FORT WAYNE METRO AREA, IN Location. Fort Wayne, which is located in northeastern Indiana in Allen County, is in the Maumee River drainage basin. In all, the Maumee basin covers an area of 6,586 square miles. Of this area, 4,856 square miles are in northwest Ohio, 1,260 are in northeast Indiana and 470 are in southeast Michigan. This basin is one of the largest and most important tributaries in the Great Lakes-St. Lawrence River system. There are four main tributary streams to the Maumee River: the Auglaize, Tiffin, St. Joseph and St. Marys Rivers. The St. Joseph and Tiffin Rivers originate in the hills of southern Michigan and flow southerly to the Maumee. The St. Marys and Auglaize originate in Ohio and flow northward. In the City of Fort Wayne, the St. Joseph and St. Marys Rivers join to form the headwaters of the Maumee River. From this point, the Maumee flows northeasterly and empties into Lake Erie at Toledo, Ohio. The central business district is located on the south side of the Maumee and the St. Marys Rivers. The St. Joseph River bisects primarily residential areas on the north side of the central business district. While some portions of the central business district are prone to flooding in the immediate vicinity of the St. Marys River, the majority of the business district is sufficiently elevated to avoid flood damages. The residential areas, however, are generally low lying and are prone to frequent flooding. Existing Project. The Fort Wayne and Vicinity, Indiana, Flood Control Study was authorized by resolution of the Committee on Public Works, House of Representatives on October 12, 1972. The authorization requested that the Corps determine the advisability of providing improvements for flood control and allied purposes at and in the vicinity of Fort Wayne, Indiana. The study authorization resulted in completion of a Final Feasibility Report entitled "Fort Wayne and Vicinity, Indiana Flood Control Study," dated September 1987, and revised in April 1988, which identified and evaluated a number of different alternatives to flood control in the Fort Wayne area. The Final Feasibility Report also contained the "Final Environmental Impact Statement" for this project. Preparation of the General Design Memorandum began in August 1989 and was approved in December 1993. Construction was authorized in Section 101 of the Water Resources Development Act of 1990 (Title 1 Public Law 101- 640). This project was a Congressionally added new 21- 42 DETROIT, MI, DISTRICT construction start in FY 1994. The Project Cooperative Agreement (PCA) was executed in August 1994 and construction was initiated in September 1995. The project will provide a 100-year level of flood protection to a large part of the central area of the City of Fort Wayne, Indiana which has experienced numerous flooding events in the past. The project is located along the north side of the St. Marys River, the east and west banks of the St. Joseph River, and the north bank of the Maumee River. Junk Ditch and Spy Run Creek which are tributary to the St. Marys River will also have protection installed or improved along their north and east banks respectively. The project area has been broken into four (4) segments which provide flood protection to various areas within the project limits. The West Segment is located along the St. Marys River and the Junk Ditch Tributary. The Central Segment is located along the Spy Run Tributary to the St. Marys River, a short section of the St. Marys River itself (at the confluence with the St. Joseph River), and along the west bank of the St. Joseph River. The East-North Segment is located along the east bank of the St. Joseph River and the East-South Segment is located along the north bank of the Maumee River. The total project length is approximately 54,000 feet. The project consists of several types of flood protection improvements. The most common type of flood Protection improvements proposed are earth levees. The levees proposed are to have turf or rock protected slopes depending on the available space for their construction. Levees account for approximately 63 percent of the total project length. Concrete floodwalls are proposed in those areas where insufficient space exists to construct levees due to site constraints. Concrete flood walls account for 20 percent of the project length. An additional eight percent of the project length consists of a combination of a 2 Reduced levee and concrete L-Wall. The remaining length is composed of various types of road closures (stoplogs, clay dikes and high curbs), and 3,000 feet in several areas which do not require improvements due to adequate existing surface grades. The fully funded total project cost estimate is $48,793,000. The Federal cost is $36,239,000 and the non-Federal cost is $12,554,000. Local Cooperation. The non-Federal sponsors for the project are the City of Fort Wayne and Allen County. A Project Cooperation Agreement (PCA) Was executed with the Mayor of Fort Wayne and the Allen County Board of Commissionlers on 22 August 1994. Under the terms of the PCA, the non-federal sponsors shall contribute a minimum of 25 percent, but not to exceed 50 percent, of the total project costs attributed to flood control purposes. This shall consist of all required lands, easements, rights-of-way and relocations for the project; and a cash contribution equal to a minimum of five percent of the total project flood control cost. The Assistant Secretary of the Army (CW) has approved a credit in the amount of $1,123,500 under Section 104 of the Water Resources Development Act of 1986. This will be applied to the non-Federal share of the project flood control cost. In addition to the above, the non-federal sponsor shall provide 50 percent of the total project recreation costs, 100 percent of all betterment costs, and shall operate and maintain all works after completion. Cash contributions totaling $7,725,000 have been provided through the end of FY 00. Real estate requirements for the East-South Segment were completed on July 27, 1995, East-North Segment on July 19, 1996, Central Segment on November 11, 1997 and the West Segment on April 8, 1999. Operations During Fiscal Year. Expenditures of $5,269,640 were made to complete construction for the East-North and Central Segmenst; and to continue construction. Of the funds expended, $1,072,714 was contributed by the City of Fort Wayne and Allen County. Total cost to end of FY was $42,601,198. 79. SAGINAW RIVER, MI Location. Saginaw River Basin including its tributaries, Tittabawassee, Shiawassee, Flint and Cass Rivers, drains an area of 6,260 square miles in the east central part of Michigan and empties into Saginaw Bay, an arm of Lake Huron. Bay City, near mouth of river, and Saginaw, 22 miles upstream from mouth, are on Federally improved deep-draft Saginaw River navigation channel (See Saginaw and Flint Geological quadrangles and NOAA Nautical Chart 14867). Existing Project. Provides for improvements in Saginaw River Basin for flood control and other purposes: (a) at Sanilac Flats, MI, Middle Branch and South Branch, Cass River, to provide for major drainage improvements by channel improvements on Middle and South Branches, including a short reach of East Branch. This feature of the project for flood control, Saginaw River, MI, authorized by the Flood Control Act of 1958, was deauthorized by the WRDA of 1986; 21- 43 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 2000 PL 99-662 - Nov. 17, 1986, 99th Congress, Title X; (b) at Vassar on Cass River, to provide for flood protection of areas on north and south sides of river by channel improvement, levee construction floodwalls, modifications of Moore Drain, and related work at an estimated U.S. cost (Oct. 1984) of $8,620,000 and non-Federal cost of $579,000 for construction; (c) at Frankenmuth on Cass River, to provide for flood protection of areas on north side of river by channel improvement, levee construction, and related work, at an estimated U.S. cost (July 1974) of $410,900 for construction; (d) at Flint on Flint River, to provide for flood protection of areas on both sides of main stem of Flint River and its tributaries, Swartz and Thread Creeks by channel improvement, bridge alterations, floodwall and levee construction, and related work, at an estimated U.S. cost (Oct. 1984) of $18,251,600 and non-Federal cost of $2,580,000 for construction; provided local interests contribute in cash 1 percent of first cost of project, exclusive of cost of rights-of-ways; (e) at Corunna on Shiawassee River, to provide for flood protection by channel improvement, levee construction, and related work. This feature of the project for flood control, Saginaw River, MI, authorized by the Flood Control Act of 1958, was deauthorized by the WRDA of 1986; PL 99-662 - Nov. 17, 1986, 99th Congress, Title X; (f) at Owosso on Shiawassee River, to provide for flood protection by channel improvement. This feature of the project for flood control, Saginaw River, MI, authorized by the Flood Control Act of 1958, was deauthorized by the WRDA of 1986, PL 99-662 - Nov. 17, 1986, 99th Congress, Title X; (g) at Midland on Tittabawassee River, to provide for flood protection through non-structural (permanent evacuation) measures at an estimated U.S. cost (Apr. 1982) of $5,125,000 and non-Federal cost of $1,611,500 for implementation; however, project was reclassified to the "inactive" category on Dec.15, 1982; (h) at Shiawassee Flats along lower reaches of the four principal tributaries of Saginaw River, to provide for flood protection, including fish and wildlife areas; by channel improvement, levees, lateral reservoirs with control structures and related work at an estimated U.S. cost (Oct. 1984) of $23,417,500 Federal and non-Federal cost of $2,705,000 which includes a cash contribution of $1,237,000; provided local interests contribute in cash 5 percent of cost of rights-of-way for flood control and other work required as local cooperation, and furnish one-half of land required for fish and wildlife areas; provided that the Federal allocation for conservation does not exceed amount obtained by taking 28 percent of project cost for Shiawassee Flats unit and subtracting therefrom one-half cost of lands for conservation; and provided further that before starting work for flood control to Shiawassee Flats, Chief of Engineers and Director, Fish and Wildlife Service, prepare a plan mutually acceptable to Secretary of the Army and Secretary of the Interior for operation of fish and wildlife areas to required degree of controlled storage of flood waters while preserving the maximum fish and wildlife benefits. Total estimated cost for new work, for active portion (1984) is $50,700,000 Federal and $1,421,000 to be contributed by local interests. Total estimated cost (1984) to local interests is $5,870,000. Local Cooperation. Responsible local interests must make cash contributions as called for above; furnish lands, and rights-of-way, including removal of buildings, for construction; hold the United States free from damage; maintain and operate all works after completion; establish and enforce regulations designed to prevent encroachments in improved channels; and bear expense of constructing highway relocations and highway bridges, alter bridge approaches and existing highway bridge approaches and existing highway bridges (except underpinning and bridge raising), and alter utilities. Required assurances for Flint River at Flint were furnished by city of Flint and accepted by the United States on Nov. 23, 1962. Estimated required cash contribution for Flint ($56,000) was furnished Feb. 20, 1963. An additional $117,000 was furnished by the City to cover increased construction costs. Required assurances for Cass River at Frankenmuth were accepted on Sep. 8, 1964. All necessary lands, easements, and rights-of-way have been provided. The Midland City Council adopted a resolution on Jun. 7, 1982, declaring its intent not to sponsor the Flood Control project on the Tittabawassee River at Midland. The Vassar City Council, in a letter dated Jan. 26, 1982, indicated a willingness and capability to provide the assurances of local cooperation for the Vassar Flood Control Project. Saginaw County, in a resolution dated Aug. 11, 1982, indicated a willingness and capability to provide the assurances of local cooperation for the Shiawassee Flats Flood Control Project. Operations During Fiscal Year. Maintenance: Work began on the construction contract awarded last FY to replace the inflatable dam at a cost of$620,674. Supervision and administration of the contract cost $38,700. Construction is expected to be complete in FY 2001. The operation and maintenance 21- 44 DETROIT, MI, DISTRICT responsibility will then be transferred to the City of Flint. The Water Resources Development Act of 1996 (Public Law 104-303), Section 329, Saginaw River, Michigan @ modified Section 203 of the Flood Control Act of 1958 (PL 85-500) to include as part of the Project the design and construction of an inflatable dam. The Energy and Water Development Act of 1998 (Public Law 105-62) provided $875,000 under the Operation & Maintenance, General appropriation for the preservation, operation, maintenance, and care of the Project, to replace the inflatable dam. Total cost of the existing project to the end of FY00 was $31,245,581, of which $24,928,359 was for new work (includes $173,000 contributed funds) and $6,317,222 for maintenance. 80. SEBEWAING RIVER, MI Location. Sebewaing River drains an area of 105 square miles in Huron and Tuscola Counties on the westerly side of Thumb area of Lower Peninsula of Michigan and discharges into Saginaw Bay, an arm of Lake Huron, 20 miles northeast from mouth of Saginaw River. Village of Sebewaing is near mouth of River. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14863.) Existing Project. Enlarging present channel of Sebewaing River through village of Sebewaing, MI, to a capacity of 7,500 cubic feet per second from junction of Columbia and State drains to a point 4,500 feet lakeward from railroad bridge near mouth; altering railroad bridge and three highway bridges to permit free passage of ice; and removal of present dike on south side of channel lakeward from railroad bridge. Project is designed to provide protection for village of Sebewaing from floods with a frequency of Once in 15 years and with a magnitude greater than the maximum flood of record. (See Table 21-B for authorizing legislation.) Local Cooperation. Complied with except for furnishing easements and rights-of-way for removal of remaining portion of dike on south side of channel lakeward from railroad bridge. Operations During Fiscal Year. Maintenance: Miscellaneous inspections and reports performed by Government forces cost $4,507. Total costs to the end of FY were $821,099 of which $365,642 was for new work and $455,457 for maintenance. 81. INSPECTION OF COMPLETED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS NAME OF PROJECT DATE OF INSPECTION Fort W ayne, IN ......................................... May2000 Red Run, Clinton River, MI.......................... Jun 2000 Flint River, M I ............................................. Sep 2000 Frankenmuth, MI ...................................... Sep 2000 Paw Paw Lake & River, MI .......................... Oct 1999 Operations During Fiscal Year. Maintenance: Miscellaneous inspections and reports performed by Government forces cost $197,917. Total cost to the end of FY was $3,345,839. 82. OTHER AUTHORIZED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS See Table 21-E. 83. FLOOD CONTROL WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION Emergency Flood Control Activities, Flood Fighting (Public Law 84-99 and PL 93-288 and Antecedent Legislation). Project and Location FY Cost for Sep. 30, 2000 Disaster Preparedness................................ $194,243 Emergency Operations ..............................-... $6,000 Rehabilitation ........ ................................... $18,149 Advance Measures ................................. $3,617,638 Flood control activities pursuant to Section 205 of the 1948 Flood Control Act, as amended. Cass River, Spaulding Township, MI - By letter dated December 21, 1998, the Township of Spaulding formally requested the Corps of Engineers' assistance under Section 205 to implement a flood relief solution for the purpose of providing flood protection to the 21- 45 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF TIlE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 2000 community of Spaulding Township, Saginaw County, MI. Funds in the amount of $12,971 were expended in FY00 to continue the feasibility phase. Detroit Beach, Lake Erie, Frenchtown Township, MI - By letter dated October 27, 1999, the Township of Frenchtown formally requested the Corps of Engineers' assistance under Section 205 to implement a solution for the purpose of improving flood protection to the community of Frenchtown Township, Monroe County, MI. Funds in the amount of $12,012 were expended in FY00 to initiate the feasibility phase. Menominee River, Milwaukee County, WI - By letter dated April 30, 1999, the Milwaukee Metropolitan Sewerage District (MMSD) requested the Corps of Engineers' assistance under the Section 205 authority to investigate non-structural alternatives for the purpose of reducing flooding in the Menominee River. The feasibility phase continued this FY at a cost of $8,239. Root River, Milwaukee County, WI - By letter dated April 30, 1999, the Milwaukee Metropolitan Sewerage District (MMSD) requested the Corps of Engineers' assistance under the Section 205 authority to investigate non-structural alternatives for the purpose of reducing flooding in the Root River. The feasibility phase continued this FY at a cost of $31,389. Oak Creek, Milwaukee County, WI - By letter dated April 30, 1999, the Milwaukee Metropolitan Sewerage District (MMSD) requested the Corps of Engineers' assistance under the Section 205 authority to investigate non-structural alternatives for the purpose of reducing flooding in the Oak Creek Watershed. Funds in the amount of $32,678 were expended in FY00 to continue the feasibility phase. Underwood Creek, Village of Elm Grove, WI - By letter dated April 4, 2000, the Village of Elm Grove requested the Corps of Engineers' assistance under the Section 205 authority to investigate structural and non-structural alternatives for the purpose of reducing flood damages in the Village. Funds in the amount of $12,059 were expended in FY00 to initiate the feasibility phase. Flood control activities pursuant to Section 208 of the 1954 Flood Control Act. Snagging and clearing activities pursuant to Section 208 of the Flood Control Act of 1954, as amended. None. Aquatic plant control activities pursuant to Section 302 of the River and Harbor Act of 1965 (PL89- 298). None. 84. SURVEILLANCE OF NORTHERN BOUNDARY WATERS AND INTERNATIONAL WATER STUDIES Field Operations. As a continuing and ongoing mission, the Detroit District conducts hydraulic flow measurements throughout the Great Lakes Connecting Channels and St. Lawrence River system. This capability is unique among the Corps Districts (and other federal agencies) on the Great Lakes. During FY2000, the Detroit District conducted current velocity and discharge measurements on the St. Mary's, St. Clair, Detroit and Niagara Rivers. During FY2000 the District continued gathering hydraulic data using the ADCP (Acoustic Doppler Current Profiler) instrumentation at several sections on the upper and lower Detroit River, the St. Clair River and the Niagara River. These hydraulic data sets are currently being used to develop twodimensional flow models of the river systems, and to help refine the flow retardation estimates for weed conditions through the growing season. Niagara River discharge measurements in the upper river are being used to update and verify flow equations for Lake Erie outflow. Conventional discharge measurements were also made on the Niagara River, in the American Falls Channel. These will be used to verify and update the rating curve for the flow over the American Falls. As an ongoing mission, during the winter months the District monitors the extent of ice in the St. Mary's, St. Clair, and Detroit Rivers. Water levels are monitored continuously at key gages in these rivers to detect possible ice jams and potential flooding. This information can be used to provide advance warning to area residents and to trigger emergency actions by the Corps and other governmental agencies, including the National Weather Service and the Coast Guard. Currently, data are obtained through phone line interrogation of these gages or from a satellite downlink station using portable laptop personal computers. These systems provide water level 21- 46 DETROIT, MI, DISTRICT information to the District office within minutes of data collection. International Activities. The Detroit District has successfully supported the International Joint Commission (IJC) for many years. This has included numerous engineering and scientific assignments supporting the Commission's boards of control, working committees, and study boards. The following activities were conducted by the Detroit District, specifically for the IJC Boards and Committees: a. Semi-Annual Meetings. Members of the Detroit District staff attended the semi-annual meetings of the three Great Lakes Boards of Control. They also attended the spring and fall appearances of the Boards before the IJC, in Washington, D.C. in April 2000, and the fall appearances, in Ottawa, Ontario in September 2000. b. International Lake Superior Board of Control. The Detroit District Engineer is the United States Regulation Representative of this Board. In support of the U.S. section of the Board, the District provided monthly Lake Superior outflow recommendations based upon a review of the hydrologic factors, which influence the future regulation of Lake Superior. These recommendations were based upon the use of probability forecasts of water supplies routed through the lakes using the approved operating plan, Plan 1977-A. Plan 1977-A has been in operational use since June 1990. The District's program to evaluate the hydraulic rating of the Compensating Works in the St. Mary's River continued in FY2000. During FY2000 flow measurements were conducted in the power canals at Sault Ste. Marie, MI and Ontario as part of an ongoing program to verify the ratings of the power plants. The 5 -year periodic inspection of the Compensating Works was conducted in May 2000. The Board is required by the IJC to hold at least one public meeting each year to inform them of the Board's activities to gain feedback regarding their Work. As such, the District participated in the Board's FY2000 annual meeting held in Marquette, Michigan in June 2000. The District also disseminates extensive Board information to the public and the media via news releases and by maintaining the Board's web page. c. International Niagara Board of Control, International Niagara Working Committee, and International Niagara Committee. The District provides direct technical support and consulting engineering services to this Board and its Committees. The Chief of the Great Lakes Hydraulics and Hydrology Office is a member of the Niagara Working Committee. Under the auspices of the Committee, the Detroit District, with Canada, computes, coordinates, and publishes the monthly flows in the Niagara River. During FY2000, the Detroit District and the Water Survey of Canada conducted a series of discharge measurements in the upper Niagara River at the International Railway Bridge Section as part of a continuing effort for verification of Lake Erie outflow equations. Information to date indicates that the existing equations are not adequate to represent the present hydraulic regime in the upper river. Based upon the measurement data collected since 1974, the Buffalo gage rating equation has been re-derived and is being reviewed before being accepted. Future measurements to verify this revised equation are scheduled for FY2003. Measurements may be scheduled earlier if water levels on Lake Erie rise into a range where measurement data is sparse. In FY2000 discharge measurements were also made at the American Falls Channel Section of the Niagara River. These are part of the continuing effort to verify the rating for the flow over the American Falls. Data collected to date indicates that the present may be slightly under estimating the flow. The next measurements at this section are scheduled for FY2005, in accordance with the five-year schedule. Due to the dynamic nature of the Niagara River at the Falls, the District is also involved with periodic verification of the rating curve for the Ashland Avenue gage. The Ashland Avenue relationship measures the total flow over the American and Canadian Falls to ensure that the Board operates within the terms of the Niagara Treaty. Discharge measurements for the Ashland Avenue rating curve are scheduled every three years. Measurements were made in FY1998, and the next series is scheduled for FY200 . d. Lake Michigan Potential Damages Study (LMPDS). In response to one of the recommendations from the IJC's 1993 Levels Reference Study, in FY2000 the Detroit District continued a potential damage study of the Lake Michigan shoreline. The ultimate goal of this study is to create a modeling procedure and 21- 47 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 2000 engineering/management tool for estimating economic effects of lake level changes and related social, environmental, and cultural impacts. The LMPDS modeling approaches are expected to be the framework for. economic assessments for each of the other Great Lakes. The LMPDS is also intended to be a forum for concerted information system development between international, federal, state, county, township, and municipal governance about the resource base that is commonly shared. In order to focus modeling and other FY2000 activities and to ensure the methods developed are appropriate for application to the whole lake, detailed analysis continued on five prototype counties. These include Ottawa and Allegan counties in Michigan, and Ozaukee, Sheboygan, and Manitowoc counties in Wisconsin. They were selected because they contain a number of the LMPDS site-specific study areas being examined. They also have wealth of data and information available from other initiatives being carried out by state agencies and academic institutions. The study is continuing into FY2001, with emphasis on refining economic impact estimates for the five prototype counties and mapping terrain and cultural details in another sixteen shoreline counties to expand economic assessments in future fiscal years. Coordinating Committee on Great Lakes Basic Hydraulic and Hydrologic Data. In FY2000, the Chief of the Great Lakes Hydraulics and Hydrology Office was the U.S. Secretary to this Committee. Other Office personnel also held membership on the three subcommittees: the Vertical Control-Water Levels, Hydraulics, and Hydrology. The District continued its support of Committee operations pertaining to the coordination of basic hydraulic and hydrologic data with Canada. District efforts have also continued to closely coordinate the formats of the U.S. and Canadian water level bulletins in order to avoid confusion and to better inform the public. In addition, the District continued working with NOAA's Great Lakes Environmental Research Lab (GLERL) with regard to improving the computational procedures currently employed in the Great Lakes 6-month water level forecast. The District is also discussed improvements to its biweekly Connecting Channel Depths forecast. The desired product would be a web-based weekly forecast demonstrating the least, greatest, and mean channel depths at various points on the St. Mary's, St. Clair, and Detroit Rivers, as well as the St. Lawrence River system. Water Management Data System. In FY2000, the Detroit District continued to provide an extensive variety of water management products, for the entire Great Lakes system, based on the water level gage network, on its Internet home page. Weather information and meteorological data are also received and processed within the District and available on its web page. The District has 29 active data collection platforms (DCPs) and plans to upgrade and possibly expand the network, based upon an on-going review of its water level gaging program. In FY2001, the Detroit District will be implementing the Corps of Engineers Water Management Software (CEWMS) suite with its initial prototype development being placed on modernizing the Lake Winnebago watershed outflow management. Great Lakes Information Management. In FY2001, the District continues the development of a Geographic Information System (GIS) for the U.S. portion of the Great Lakes. The GIS contains multiple information layers on the physiographic, economic, sociologic, environmental, and hydrologic characteristics of the Great Lakes region. The GIS is designed to create a corporate database to support various District operations and studies. The District has completed a comprehensive GIS containing U.S. shoreline land uses, under the IJC Levels Reference Study. The data coverages include but are not limited to digital elevation models for bathemetric and topographic mapping, digital orthophotography, coastal zone planimetric mapping and landuse updates. Great Lakes Hydrology. Water supply forecasts are used routinely by the Great Lakes Hydraulics and Hydrology Office in forecasting water levels and regulating the outflows from Lakes Superior and Ontario. Studies to improve the existing Great Lakes water level forecasting system, including investigations into the factors affecting the Great Lakes water balance relationship (i.e., runoff, overwater precipitation, evaporation, ice retardation, etc.) and use of real-time hydrologic data were continued by the staff of the Office. Great Lakes Water Levels. The Great Lakes Hydraulics and Hydrology Office continued to make routine short-term (15 days to one month) and long-term (six months) Great Lakes still water level forecasts. These forecasts are distributed in the formn 21- 48 DETROIT, MI, DISTRICT of weekly, bimonthly and monthly news releases and bulletins. The Monthly Bulletin of Lake Levels for the Great Lakes, containing a six-month projection of Great Lakes water levels, has a circulation of about 10,000 copies per month. Included with the monthly bulletin on a quarterly basis is an informational enclosure entitled Great Lakes Update, which consists of various topics of interest pertaining to the Great Lakes, such as frequently asked questions, information on water regulation plans, and incidental information on Great Lakes hydraulics and hydrology. With water levels on the Great Lakes being below average during FY2000 and continuing to recede, Office personnel provided extensive technical information and expertise regarding water level forecasts, recorded lake levels, and the potential impacts of these water levels to many interested parties, such as members of Congress, state and local officials, news media, navigation and power interests, concerned property owners, and recreational boaters. Upon request, water level information was supplied to the public in the form of the District's web page, telephonic and written responses to inquiries, presentations to various interest groups, and interviews with the news media. Daily reports on present water levels, precipitation and significant events on the Great Lakes basin, are currently available on the District's Internet home page. Forecasted and historical water level data are also available on the web. In concert with the Great Lakes Commission, the Detroit District in FY2000 completed Living with the Lakes, a 40-page booklet, which offers infonrmation and advice on Great Lakes water levels and shoreline protection. Through the end of FY2000, nearly 45,000 copies of this publication have been distributed to the public and collaborating agencies. The Office also furnished the public with a publication about dredging and recreational boating on the Great Lakes. Great Lakes boaters and shoreline property owners have seen dramatic lake level fluctuations in recent years. The Living with the Lakes booklet answers questions regarding the causes of these fluctuations, how the levels are forecasted, where the outflows are controlled within the system, and how shoreline property can be protected. The total costs for FY2000 under the Surveillance of Northern Boundary Waters was $2,799,294, and under the International Water Studies, $303,542. MULTIPLE-PURPOSE PROJECTS INCLUDING POWER 85. ST. MARYS RIVER, MI Location. A Great Lakes connecting channel about 63 miles long, flows southeasterly between State of Michigan and Providence of Ontario, Canada, from eastern end of Lake Superior into northern end of Lake Huron. (See NOAA Nautical Charts 14882, 14883, and 14884.) At Sault Ste. Marie, MI, about 14 miles downstream from Lake Superior, there are four parallel locks and a hydroelectric powerplant. Previous Project. For details see page 1955, Annual Report for 1915; and page 1529, Annual Report for 1938. Existing Project. Channels permitting 25.5-foot draft navigation in St. Marys River and Lake Superior and Lake Huron approaches thereto; constructing and operating four locks and two canals; constructing an electric plant of 14,000 kilowatt capacity (45,000 kilowatt ultimate capacity) constructing anchorage areas in river above and below locks; and constructing various other works in conjunction with project. Subsequently, in 1932, the Unit 10 powerhouse was installed raising the capacity to 18,400 kilowatts (45,000 ultimate capacity). Original State Locks were operated and maintained under permanent indefinite appropriation from Jun. 9, 1881, to Nov. 2, 1886, after which they were destroyed by excavation for the Poe Lock in 1896. Weitzel Lock, destroyed in 1942 by excavation for the MacArthur Lock, was operated and maintained under the same appropriation from Sep. 1, 1881, to Jun. 30, 1935. Poe Lock was operated and maintained under the same appropriation from Aug. 3, 1896, Davis Lock from Oct. 21, 1914, and Sabin Lock from Sep. 18, 1919, to end of FY 1935. The 1,200- foot by 110-foot new Poe Lock was authorized in 1962 and put into operation in 1968. Details of existing project are set forth in Table 21-F. Project depths are referred to low water datum corresponding to sloping surface of river as follows: Above locks: When water surface of Lake Superior is at elevation 601.1 feet and at upstream side of locks is 600.6 feet above mean water level at Rimouski, 21- 49 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF TIIE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 2000 Quebec, IGLD 1985. Below locks: When water surface at downstream side of locks is at elevation 578.4 feet and Lake Huron is 577.5 feet above mean water level at Rimouski, Quebec, IGLD 1985. Estimated (1974) cost for new work is $163,087,000. (See Table 21-B for authorizing legislation.) The WRDA of 1986 authorized construction of a second lock 1,294 feet in length, 115 feet in width, and 32 feet in depth, adjacent to the existing lock. The replacement lock is to be located in the North Canal of the St. Marys Falls Canal at Sault Ste. Marie, MI, on the site of the existing Davis and Sabin Locks. Material removed during construction of the replacement lock will be placed on the Northwest Pier to serve as a windbreak for downbound vessels approaching the lock. Estimated cost (Oct. 90) is $174,200,000 Federal and $93,800,000 non-Federal. Local Cooperation. Fully complied with for completed portion of project. Local cooperation items for the newly authorized project in the WRDA of 1986 (PL 99-662), are as follows: (a) Provide without cost to the United States all lands, easements, and rights-of-way necessary for implementation and later maintenance of the proposed project, and for aids to navigation upon the request of the Chief of Engineers, including suitable areas determined by the Chief of Engineers to be required in the general public interest for initial and later disposal of dredged/demolition material and including necessary retaining dikes, bulkheads, and embankments therefor, or the costs of such retaining works; (b) Hold and save the United States free from damages due to the implementation and maintenance of the project, not including damages due to the fault or negligence of the United States or its contractors; (c) Accomplish without cost to the United States such alterations and relocations of pipelines, powerlines, cables, sewer, water supply, drainage, and other utilities, structures, and improvements made necessary by the project. (Any such costs of the items on Federal property at the locks, would be part of the total construction cost and not separable local sponsor cost.); (d) Contribute in cash 25 percent of the total cost of construction of general navigation facilities, exclusive of aids to navigation, a contribution presently estimated at $67,000,000. The estimated cash contribution of $67,000,000 to be paid in lump sum prior to initiation of construction, or in annual installments during the construction period at a rate proportionate to the proposed or scheduled expenditure of Federal funds as required by the Chief of Engineers, or under another arrangement satisfactory to the Secretary of the Army, the final apportionment of cost to be made after actual costs have been determined; (e) Repay, with interest, over a period of up to 30 years following project completion, 10 percent of the total cost of construction of general navigation facilities, an amount presently estimated at $26,800,000. The Secretary of the Army may count against all or part of the 10 percent repayment, the amount of the local contribution for lands, easements, rights-of-way, dredged/demolition material disposal sites and relocations. In no case are these costs to count against the cash payment during construction, and in no case would the amount waived exceed 10 percent of project cost; and (f) Any construction needed to prevent/mitigate for erosion or shoaling attributed to the lock would be cost shared in the same proportion as the project. Terminal Facilities. This improvement serves through commerce between Lake Superior and lower lakes and has not materially influenced terminal facilities at localities along its route. Three piers at Sault Ste. Marie receive coal and petroleum products. Limestone is shipped from a pier at Drummond Island. Vessel refueling stations are at Lime Island and village of DeTour; they receive coal and petroleum products. Present terminals satisfy current traffic requirements. Operations During Fiscal Year. Operations, maintenance, and care of locks: Two canals and three locks were operated (the fourth lock, Sabin, was in caretaker status) as required. Necessary repairs and improvements were made thereto and to appurtenant structures and equipment. Canals were open to navigation 297 days during the period 1 October 1999 through 30 September 2000. A total of 8,999 vessels, aggregating 86,172,602 short tons of freight and 111,450 passengers passed through the MacArthur and Poe Locks. (The Davis Lock was not used in FY00.) Total cost for operation, maintenance, and care of the locks during the FY was $12,839,814. Total cost includes completion of the FY98 repair contract for the Poe Lock monolith joint and stoplog recess at a cost of $2,807,182 with $18,522 for 21- 50 DETROIT, MI, DISTRICT engineering and design during construction and $173,004 for supervision and administration of the contract. And $1,566,201 in contract cost to continue MacArthur Lock (Phase II) repairs with $7,677 to complete plans and specifications, $58,584 for engineering and design during construction, and $106,576 for supervision and administration of the contract. Powerhouse and equipment: A total of 164,289,693 kilowatt-hours of power was generated this FY. Income from the sale of power, sent to the U.S. Treasury, amounted to $1,924,001. Total cost of operation and maintenance for two hydroelectric powerhouses during the FY was $1,082,078. Total cost includes an adjustment of -$3,482 made in cost for assistance from the Hydroelectric Design Center for continued benchmark testing of the generators and turbines, a powerhouse rehabilitation report, preparation of plans and specifications for 3A runner. An adjustment of -$19 made in contract cost for repair of Unit 10 shaft & guide bearings completed last FY. Rehabilitation of governor, excitation, fire suppression system, and installation contracts continued at a cost of $168,120 with $29,538 for engineering and design during construction, and $99,868 for supervision and administration of the contracts. Engineering and design was initiated to sandblast and paint the head and tailgates at a cost of $72,435; replace the main power plant roof at a cost of $46,960; and replace boathouse and warehouse roofs at a cost of $28,075. Other operation and care items: Buildings and grounds were operated and maintained, condition surveys, operations studies, environmental activities, real estate, and miscellaneous inspections and reports cost $2,116,120, which includes a custodial, snow removal and grounds upkeep contract for $418,433 and a service contract for security measures for $506,733. Channels and canals: St. Marys River channels and canal approach depths were surveyed by sweeping. Removal of shoals in the St. Marys River channels and canal approaches performed by hired labor using the U.S. Derrickbarge NICOLET and the U.S. Cranebarge HARVEY cost $2,113,791. Funds in the amount of $1,293 were expended for replacement of canal feeders. Shoal removal contract acquisition cost $24,058. Other miscellaneous items: An adjustment of-$280 Was made in contract cost for the underground storage tank repairs. An adjustment of $3,325 was made in contract cost for rehabilitation of the Administration and Davis buildings roof completed last FY. The contract for the rest of the buildings continued at a cost of $1,311,613. Engineering and design during construction cost $8,657. Supervision and administration of these contracts cost $145,942. The contract awarded last FY for repair of armor old disposal sites was 24% complete at a cost of $214,001. Engineering and design during construction cost $6,624. Supervision and administration of the contract cost $22,131. An adjustment of $2 was made in contract cost for installation of barriers completed last FY. The security camera/detection system contract awarded last FY was completed this FY in the amount of $87,001. Supervision and administration of the contract cost $7,967. Engineering and design for major repair of the Rock Cut, East Guide Wall, was completed at a cost of $44,122. A contract for this work was awarded and completed this FY in the amount of $431,359. Engineering and design during construction cost $12,710. Supervision and administration of the contract cost $22,237. Engineering and design for park landscaping continued at a cost of $1,650. Engineering and design for installation of fire alarms and enunciators was initiated at a cost of $59,558; and repairs of the West Center Piers at a cost of $104,109. Recreational facilities: Information center, visitors center, comfort stations, park fountain, and observation and overlook platforms were operated and maintained at a cost of $197,509 which includes a custodial contract for the Information Center. Visitors entering the Soo Locks Visitors Center numbered 457,285. Visitors to the observation platforms overlooking the locks numbered 444,808. Total visitors to the Soo Locks park numbered 604,939. A grand total of 716,389 people (includes tour boat visitors of 111,450) visited the Soo Locks. Total project costs in FY 00 amounted to $20,857,391. Project in effect prior to modification of March 21, 1956, is complete and work authorized by 1956 modification to provide a safe draft of 25.5 feet for both upbound and downbound traffic is also complete. Public Works Acceleration Funds used for maintenance were $118,000. Total cost of the existing project to end of FY was $552,308,212, of which $160,657,071 was for new work and 21- 51 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF TIlE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 2000 $391,651,141 for maintenance (includes $340,400 contributed funds). GENERAL INVESTIGATIONS 86. SURVEYS FY00 funds in the amount of $25,199 were expended to continue the Section 216 restudy of Federal interest for Fox River, WI. FY00 funds in the amount of $2 and $98,237 were expended on Paw Paw River, MI and St. Joseph River & Spy Run Creek, IN for reconnaissance studies; and $114,738, $41,255, $59,453, $85,785, and 89,952 were expended on Detroit River, MI; Fox River, WI; Kalamazoo, MI; Muskegon Lake, MI; and White Lake, MI, respectively for watershed/ecosystem reconnaissance studies. Coordination Studies with other Agencies include: Special Investigations, $39,983 which includes engineering and technical assistance given to local citizens because of fluctuating lake levels of the Great Lakes; FERC, $2,984; and Interagency Water Resources Development, $10,318; North American Water Fowl Management Planning, $1,166; National Estuary Studies, $3,067; and Cooperation with other Water Resource agencies, $3,007. Great Lakes Remedial Action, $185,956; and Section 22, Planning Assistance to States and Tribes: Federal amount shown, studies cost shared equally with partner include: Sylvan Lake, IN - $32,610; Dearborn Heights, MI - $2,382; Allegan County, MI - $47,500; Michigan State Park Orthos - $29,228; Flint Dam, MI - $14,991; Kalamazoo Co., MI - $30,413; Michigan CUPPAD GIS - $18,121; Keweenaw Stamp Sand, MI - $1,985; Big Muskego Lake, WI - $3,041; Erosion Study Superior, WI - $1,142; Calumet Co., WI GIS - $84,750; Potowatomi Tribe GIS Study - $2,652; Bad River Tribe, WI Sea Lamprey Study - $24,754; Bay Mills Tribe, WI Cultural Study - $14,890; Grand Portage Tribe - $22,515, Milwaukee County, WI Breakwater - $216, Menominee Tribe, WI - $203, Elks Rapids Breakwater, MI - $181, State Flood Plain Mapping, MI - $610, and Planning Assistance to States, IN - $3,925. 87. PRECONSTRUCTION ENGINEERING AND DESIGN Great Lakes Connecting Channels and Harbors, Replacement Lock Funds in the amount of $284,400 were expended in FY00 on preconstruction engineering and design work activities. The project, as authorized in the WRDA of 1986 and the WRDA of 1990, calls for constructing a second lock able to accommodate the largest vessels engaged in Great Lakes commerce. The authorized dimensions are 1,294 feet in length, 115 feet in width, and 32 feet in depth. The authorized cost (1985) is $227,428,000. The new lock would replace two existing locks that are only 80 feet in width and 23 feet in depth. The project had not been funded earlier due to lack of a local sponsor. The WRDA of 1996 eased the costsharing requirements for a non-Federal sponsor. Given the delay in initiating preconstruction engineering and design, the initial work effort is preparing. a limited re-evaluation report (LRR) to assure that the project remains economically justified. The draft LRR was completed in December 1999. Comments were provided in March 2000, and a revised LRR submitted in October 2000. Upper St. Marys River, MI and Canada In FY 2000, funds in the amount of $133,478 were expended to complete an environmental assessment and plans and specifications. The project is authorized in Section 372 of the Water Resources Development Act of 1999 (Public Law 106-53) and provides an additional foot of overdraft between Point Louise Turn and the Locks, Sault Sainte Marie, Michigan and Canada, consistent with the channels upstream of Point Louise Turn. The modifications will be carried out as operation and maintenance to improve navigation safety. This modification was analyzed for reasonableness and safety; and a model study was completed that confirmed that the proposed channel widths are safe for two-way traffic. 88. COLLECTION AND STUDY OF BASIC DATA Flood Plain Management Services. FY00 Expenditures under the Flood Plain Management 21- 52 DETROIT, MI, DISTRICT Services Program: FPMS Unit - $81,725, Technical Committee - $5,257, Quick Responses - $4,982; HEC-RAS Workshop in Indiana - $18,754, HECRAS Workshop in Wisconsin - $18,549, HECWEAP Workshop, MI - $-5,251; HEC-HMS Workshop IN DNR - $712; HEC-RAS Workshop MIDEQ $939; HEC-HMS Workshop WIDNR- $2,401; Special Study Flood Plain, St. Louis County, MN - $19,439; Special Study Flood Plain Rabbit River, MI - $8,664 Flood Insurance Studies. FY00 ongoing Flood Insurance Studies coordination costs for other Services - $43,396, National Flood Proofing studies at Macomb, Wayne and Kent Counties, Michigan were $75,730, $66,175 and $141,898, respectively. Costs in FY00 in support of the Federal Emergency Management Agency's Community Assistance Program for Survey of Temporary Benchmarks, MI, amounted to $34,500. In FY00, Hydrologic Studies cost $3,030, and International Water Studies, $45,007. 21- 53 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 2000 See Section Total to In Project Funding FY 97 FY 98 FY 99 FY00 Sep 30, 2000 Text 1. Algoma Harbor, New Work WI 2. Alpena Harbor, MI 3. Arcadia Harbor, MI 4. Ashland Harbor, WI 5. AuSable Harbor, MI Approp. Cost Maintenance Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maintenance Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maintenance Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maintenance Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Contributed New Work Funds Contrib. Cost Maintenance Approp. Cost 6. Bay Port Harbor, MI New Work Approp. Cost Maintenance Approp. Cost 0 0 13,742 1133,,774422 2,174 2,174 27,946 27,946 1,307 1,307 79,853 79,853 00 52,238 75,900 761,019 52,238 75,865 761,054 0 0 144,000 244,900 93,400 139,272 251,196 93,377 39,000 (8,213) 29,890 1,269 0 0 0 0 44,012 41,437 0 0 18,662 18,662 00 00 6,884 9,459 00 4,421 4,421 80,802 80,832 62,300 135,371 62,045 135,677 00 0 0 9,989 9,989 00 6,232 6,232 0 0 0 0 8,581 8,581 0 0 9,173 9,173 21- 54 292,010' 292,010' 1,698,319 1,698,319 337,3942 337,3942 1,960,681 1,960,681 5,299,131 5,299,092 1,695,645 1,695,645 4,387,869 4,387,869 193,3763 193,3763 16,400 16,400 2,899,325 2,899,325 93,597 93,597 464,1434 464,1434 DETROIT, MI, DISTRICT TABLE 21-A (Continued) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Section Total to In Project Funding FY 97 FY 98 FY 99 FY00 Sep 30, 2000 Text 6. Bay Port Maintenance Harbor, MI (Continued) 7. Big Bay Harbor MI Contrib. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maintenance Approp. Cost 00 0 0 20,054 20,054 8. Big Suamico New Work River, MI Approp. Cost 9. Black River, MI (P.1.) Contributed Funds 10. Black River Harbor, MI (U.P.) Maintenance Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost Maintenance Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maintenance Approp. Cost 15,738 15,738 0 0 0 0 29,284 29,947 8,878 8,878 3,769 3,769 0 0 6,276 6,276 0 0 0 0 4,765 5,012 0 0 1,357 1,627 15,053 185,474 14,978 185,549 0 0 5,913 127,246 5,913 127,183 00 0 0 7,349 7,349 0 0 2,206 2,206 137,399 137,399 396,9435 396,9435 1,706,106 1,706,106 20,243 20,243 1,351,253 1,351,190 0 480,244 0 480,2446 0 480,2446 0 349,921 0 349,921 47,797 1,538,2887 47,479 1,537,9707 0 383,3508 0 383,350$ 5,632 1,015,039 5,562 1,014,969 11. Caseville New Work Harbor, MI Approp. Cost Contributed New Work Funds Contrib. Cost 12. Cedar River Harbor, MI Maintenance Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost 1,531 1,531 0 733 897 897 0 0 00 00 15,102 282,758 15,030 282,830 0 0 21- 55 293,657 293,657 293,657 293,657 2,014,136 2,014,136 408,000 408,000 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF TIIE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 2000 TABLE 21-A (Continued) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Section Total to In Project Funding FY 97 FY 98 FY 99 FY00 Sep 30, 2000 Text 12. Cedar River Maintenance Harbor, MI (Continued) 13. Charlevoix Harbor, MI 14. Clinton River, MI Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maintenance Approp. Cost Major ( or Minor) Rehabilitation Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Contributed New Work Funds Contrib. Cost 15. Cornucopia Harbor, WI 16. Detroit River, MI Contributed Funds 17. Duluth-Superior Harbor MN & WI Maintenance Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maintenance Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maintenance Approp. Cost Maintenance Contrib. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost 124,000 108,163 123,000 684,000 1,798,000 637,000 122,573 374,769 2,078,423 222,725 0 0 244,000 372,700 151,100 87,730 243,814 375,119 151,195 87,649 00 00 00 10,089 26,384 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 11,329 106,496 11,234 106,591 0 0 112,006 (8,266) 23,332 102,828 1,559 23,304 0' 0 14,823 14,739 0 0 3,242,000 2,798,490 180,623 180,623 10,591,168 10,591,069 1,129,396 1,129,396 260,0469 260,0469 289,75210 289,75210 7,558,170 7,558,170 462,653 462,653 1,218,370 1,218,258 76,877,357" 76,877,357" 3,907,000 2,527,500 2,436,600 3,408,297 169,778,88212 3,869,796 2,588,228 2,437,212 3,381,961 169,752,08612 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 361,235 361,235 16,894,658" 16,894,658"3 331,685 331,685 21- 56 DETROIT, MI, DISTRICT TABLE 21-A (Continued) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Section Total to In Project Funding FY 97 FY 98 FY 99 FY00 Sep 30, 2000 Text 17. Duluth-Superior Maintenance Harbor MN & WI (Continued) 18. Fox River, WI Approp. Cost Major (or Minor) Rehabilitation Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maintenance Approp. Cost 3,499,000 4,157,000 2,857,780 2,333,867 79,729,339' 4 3,523,702 4,158,386 2,905,406 2,330,540 79,720,104'4 00 11,555,410 11,555,410 3,753,33415 3,753,33415 2,384,000 2,740,802 3,112,700 2,554,855 64,278,08316'17 2,197,791 2,968,374 3,191,248 2,196,546 64,197,05716.17 19. Frankfort harbor, MI Contributed Funds Maintenance Approp. Cost Major (or Minor) Rehabilitation Approp. Cost 20. Grand Haven New Work Harbor, MI Approp. Cost Section I11 New Work Approp. Cost Maintenance Approp. Cost 44,122 240,724 49,300 166,738 11,547,92218 43,343 241,542 49,846 166,649 11,547,77218 00 0 0 0 0 274,776 274,776 1,283,46919 1,283,46919 175,000 175,000 1,305,000 1,230,200 879,700 441,336 33,708,54620 1,310,152 1,225,812 888,608 438,671 33,705,21020 Contributed Maintenance Funds Contrib. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1,923,450 1,923,450 31,709 31,709 00 15,585 15,585 21- 57 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 2000 TABLE 21-A (Continued) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Section Total to In Project Funding FY 97 FY 98 FY 99 FY00 Sep 30, 2000 Text 20. Grand Haven, Maintenance 105,000 56,000 102,900 104,008 60,795 104,491 21. Grand Traverse Bay Harbor, MI Major (or Minor) Rehabilitation Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Section 111 New Work Approp. Cost 22. Green Bay Harbor, WI Maintenance Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost 1,187 1,187 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 14,708 134,500 232,052 14,708 134,437 232,115 Maintenance Approp. Cost 23. Greilickville New Work Harbor, MI Approp. Cost 24. Harbor Beach Harbor, MI Maintenance Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maintenance Approp. Cost 1,928,663 2,182,900 2,970,100 1,344,900 51,505,00123 1,935,240 2,183,373 2,954,028 1,361,584 51,501,11823 0 0 5,261 5,261 0 0 8,120 8,040 00 97,090 519,800 83,776 528,224 9,540 9,596 00 9,012 14,836 25,560 25,584 00 369,55724 369,55724 341,190 341,190 1,200,598 1,200,598 763 15,606,72025 827 15,606,72025 21- 58 Harbor, MI (Continued) Section 111 Approp. Cost 85,665 85,673 2,772,426 2,772,426 813,613 813,613 266,037 266,037 63,528 63,528 2,408,662 2,408,662 9,946,39521,22 9,946,39521,22 DETROIT, MI, DISTRICT TABLE 21-A (Continued) UC'O S AIND rINANCIAL TATIEMEINT See Section Total to In Project Funding FY 97 FY 98 FY 99 FY00 Sep 30, 2000 Text 24. Harbor Beach Major (or Harbor, MI (Continued) Minor) Rehabilitation Approp. Cost 194,504 194,504 25. HIarrisville Harbor, MI New Work Approp. Cost 0 1,849,938 0 1,849,938 Contributed New Work Funds Contrib. Cost Section 111 New Work Approp Cost Maintenance Approp. Cost Section 111 Maintenance Approp. Cost 26. Holland Harbor, New Work MI Approp. Cost Contributed New Work Funds Contrib. Cost Section II New Work Approp Cost 56,001 (15,992) 35,749 4,515 5,730 191,312 5,730 189,576 00 0 0 0 0 Section Ill Maintenance Approp. Cost Maintenance Approp. Cost 1,567,000 302,100 316,900 781,506 27,753,91027 1,570,839 302,941 319,462 780,367 27,752,59727 74,000 71,800 59,000 67,900 62,029 70,651 Major (or Minor) Rehabilitation Approp. Cost 27. Inland Route, New Work MI Approp. Cost 21- 59 287,454 287,454 502,000 502,000 1,519,567 1,517,753 88,000 88,000 736,12226 736,12226 35,705 35,705 621,000 621,000 67,835 67,856 00 00 2,335,650 2,335,650 502,452 502,452 770,222 770,222 AP-4 /1 CI rIM T' I Yl T f ? T /^11' f ['t, f /'rte7 w Ar Ier L rrrI REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF TIlE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 2000 TABLE 21-A (Continued) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Section Total to In Project Funding FY 97 FY 98 FY 99 FY00 Sep 30, 2000 Text 27. Inland Route, New Work MI (Continued) Contributed Funds 28. Kenosha Harbor, WI 29. Kewaunee Harbor, WI 30. Keweenaw Waterway, MI 31. La Pointe Harbor, WI Contrib. Cost Maintenance Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maintenance Approp. Cost Major (or Minor) Rehabilitation Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maintenance Approp. Cost Major (or Minor) Rehabilitation Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maintenance Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maintenance Approp. Cost 27,000 14,634 0 0 10,400 539,700 220,566 23,918 539,602 220,747 148,000 148,000 3,968,08228 3,968,08228 988,96929,30 988,96929.30 193,000 54,922 436,915 196,809 11,887,0453' 186,927 61,576 437,939 196,852 11,887,04531 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1,270,275 1,270,275 758,33332 758,33332 200,000 219,800 279,800 717,935 11,454,16633 205,791 220,784 281,617 718,005 11,454,16633 617,300 617,300 5,974,141 5,974,141 0 0 282,000 477,014 440,500 220,235 29,285,46434 285,777 483,633 443,832 220,228 29,276,67834 0 0 16,383 16,383 00 585 585 0 0 11,952 11,901 00 564 615 139,874 139,874 181,421 181,421 21- 60 DETROIT, MI, DISTRICT TABLE 21-A (Continued) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Section Total to In Project Funding FY 97 FY 98 FY 99 FY00 Sep 30, 2000 Text 32. Lac LaBelle New Work Harbor, MI 33. Lake St. Clair, MI, Channels 34. Leland Harbor, MI Contributed Funds 35. Lexington Harbor, MI Contributed Funds Approp. Cost Maintenance Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maintenance Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost Maintenance Approp. Cost Major (or Minor) Rehabilitation Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost Section 111 New Work Approp. Cost Maintenance Approp. Cost 15,000 14,680 102,000 77,272 20,535 21,425 0 0 4,468 41,444 4,468 41,444 0 0 269,2703s 269,2703s 788,783 788,783 7,675,35736 7,675,35736 25,200 117,400 88,344 14,097,61537 51,571 114,177 82,476 14,088,44037 672,950 672,950 354,139 354,139 146,126 231,800 118,300 139,152 119,883 257,184 121,344 139,155 00 0 0 0 0 44,000 33,100 00 0 0 0 0 0 0 (23,121) 27,639 227,508 213 27,634 228,402 3,714,873 3,714,873 70,678 70,678 1,646,304 1,646,304 1,088,888 1,088,888 372,000 372,000 1,065,667 1,064,679 21- 61 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 2000 TABLE 21-A (Continued) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Section Total to In Project Funding FY 97 FY 98 FY 99 FY00 Sep 30, 2000 Text 35. Lexington Maintenance Harbor, MI (Continued) Section 111 36. Little Lake Harbor, MI Contributed Funds 37. Ludington Harbor, MI Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost Maintenance Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost 40,000 37,624 0 0 00 135,000 129,245 11,000 44,000 19,051 45,363 54,462 54,473 0 0 0 0 53,300 131,300 71,241 60,422 130,918 71,893- Section 111 New Work Approp. Cost Maintenance Approp. Cost Section 111 Maintenance Approp. Cost 38. Manistee Harbor, MI Major (or Minor) Rehabilitation Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maintenance Approp. Cost Major (or Minor) Rehabilitation Approp. Cost 620,000 620,000 210,000 699,200 1,706,900 1,138,569 20,832,41639 139,849 756,673 1,722,891 1,125,852 20,819,60939 10,000 30,000 9,927 29,920 24,900 19,906 0 5,090 0 0 0 0 782,239 782,183 357,913 357,913 2,696,52240 2,696,52240 73,961 458,262 259,100 22,085 12,029,09941 66,394 471,806 259,050 22,147 12,029,09941' 0 0 1,374,164 1,374,164 21- 62 2,095,449 2,095,449 542,808 542,808 57,670 57,670 4,690,013 4,690,013 7,912,20238 7,912,20238 DETROIT, MI, DISTRICT TABLE 21-A (Continued) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Section Total to In Project Funding FY 97 FY 98 FY 99 FY00 Sep 30, 2000 Text 39. Manistique Harbor, MI 40. Manitowoc Harbor, WI New Work Approp. Cost Maintenance Approp. Cost Major (or Minor) Rehabilitation Approp. Cost 186,000 51,600 235,975 2,042,571 123,739 113,446 236,105 2,042,691 New Work Approp. Cost Contributed New Work Funds Contrib. Cost Maintenance Approp. Cost Contributed Maintenance Funds Contrib. Cost 00 00 1,299,35542 1,299,35542 4,773,129 4,772,964 316,333 316,333 2,048,91443 2,048,91443 1,911,130 1,911,130 129,000 208,100 185,900 249,439 12,276,86044 161,987 210,525 187,779 249,467 12,276,86044 7,399 0 9,206 0 9,206 (7,163) 0 18,875 66,743 66,735 41. Marquette Harbor, MI New Work Approp. Cost Maintenance Approp. Cost Major (or Minor) Rehabilitation Approp. Cost 3,441 238,411 3,441 238,140 0 0 36,400 186,829 36,157 186,843 42. Menominee Harbor & River MI & WI 1,282,89345 1,282,89345 3,365,38846 3,364,88846 465,757 465,757 New Work Approp. Cost 533,47647 533,47647 21- 63 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 2000 TABLE 21-A (Continued) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Section Total to In Project Funding FY 97 FY 98 FY 99 FY00 Sep 30, 2000 Text New Work Contrib. Cost 0 0 36,762 36,762 42. Menominee Maintenance Harbor & River, Approp. MI&WI Cost (Continued) Major (or Minor) Rehabilitation Approp. Cost 43. Milwaukee Harbor, WI Contributed Funds New Work Approp. Cost Maintenance Approp. Cost Maintenance Contrib. Cost 153,000 147,871 38,000 144,820 180,181 44,764 144,748 180,017 0 0 0 0 3,003,000 1,319,500 2,977,783 1,354,333 0 0 3,878,88048 3,878,64448 1,351,852 1,351,852 8,231,02449 8,231,02449 783,800 1,212,969 53,771,5065� 767,988 1,242,020 53,771,33250 322,471 322,471 Major (or Minor) Rehabilitation Approp. Cost 44. Monroe Harbor, New Work MI Approp. Cost Contributed New Work Funds Contrib. Cost Maintenance Approp. Cost Contributed Maintenance Funds Contrib. Cost 45. Muskegon Harbor, MI New Work Approp. Cost 672,000 195,200 673,383 196,078 1,008,700 179,610 60,180,061"l 1,008,680 179,598 60,179,974"' 00 0 0 249,849 S2 249,849 S2 0 2,912,110" 0 2,912,110" 21- 64 00 0 0 0 0 12,715,560 12,715,560 687,340 687,340 300,000 300,000 DETROIT, MI, DISTRICT TABLE 21-A (Continued) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Section Total to In Project Funding FY 97 FY 98 FY 99 FY00 Sep 30, 2000 Text 45. Muskegon Harbor, MI (Continued) New Work Approp. Cost Maintenance Approp. Cost 105,000 105,000 93,000 303,200 494,700 88,875 304,572 501,924 207,437 10,879,77714 207,125 10,879,37154 Section 111 Maintenance Approp. Cost 0 41 160,000 (1,100) 157,407 2,993 Major (or Minor) Rehabilitation Approp. Cost 46. New Buffalo New Work Harbor, MI Approp. Cost Contributed Funds New Work Contrib. Cost Maintenance Approp. Cost 38,000 36,084 8,655 172,000 19,240 172,016 0 13,824,300 0 13,824,300 00 0 0 32,955 32,975 47. Oconto Harbor, New Work WI Approp. Cost 48. Ontonagon Harbor, MI 49. Pentwater Harbor, MI 50. Petoskey Maintenance Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maintenance Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maintenance Approp. Cost New Work 59,059 (1,168) 50,529 7,878 0 0 1,064 94,330 1,064 92,023 0 0 1,475,000 599,000 829,200 1,487,371 609,765 829,049 0 .0 2,835,000 1,523,900 862,600 2,810,345 1,556,995 862,811 443,905 23,279,99159 414,195 23,248,62759 00 3,817,734 3,817,919 21- 65 0 75 3,265,600 3,265,600 1,285,716 1,285,716 1,186,467 1,186,467 5,439,005 ss 5,439,00555 130,75456 130,75456 2,358,22657 2,355,91957 953,90358 953,90358 179,899 179,899 14,297,501 14,297,499 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THIE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 2000 TABLE 21-A (Continued) See Section Total to In Project Funding FY 97 FY 98 FY 99 FY00 Sep 30, 2000 Text Harbor, MI Approp. 0 0 0 0 123,839 50. Petoskey Harbor, MI (Continued) 51. Point Lookout, MI Cost Maintenance Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maintenance Approp. Cost 50,000 106,075 236,825 41,646 114,073 237,162 0 0 87,000 74,551 Contributed Maintenance Funds Contrib. Cost 52. Port Sanilac New Work Harbor, MI Approp. Cost Contributed Funds Section 111 Contributed Funds Section 111 53. Port Washington Harbor, WI Contributed Funds New Work Contrib. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maintenance Approp. Cost Maintenance Contrib. Cost Maintenance Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost 0 (5,459) 00 6,000 10,621 0 0 (1,224) 11,871 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 (4,688) 1,857 0 19 0 0 927 101,752 927 101,751 123,839 962,588 962,588 2,642,584 2,642,584 4,1 70,0 8 760 4,170,08660 9,257 - 9,257 909,963 909,963 487,108 487,108 336,000 336,000 11,500 41,756 .2,384,99861 11,579 41,759 2,384,99861 00 39,200 45,241 00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 79 0 0 115,000 115,000 1,191,450 1,191,450 2,582,20462 2,582,20462 1,624,000 1,624,000 21- 66 COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT DETROIT, MI, DISTRICT TABLE 21-A (Continued) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Section Total to In Project Funding FY 97 FY 98 FY 99 FY00 Sep 30, 2000 Text 54. Port Wing Harbor, WI Maintenance Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maintenance Approp. Cost 55. Portage Lake New Work Harbor, MI Approp. Cost Maintenance Approp. Cost 33,265 164,500 135,200 30,469 165,735 135,696 24,898 258,932 (8,781) 24,898 252,852 (2,778) 43,256 3,449,66363 44,343 3,449,66363 00 2,693 2,769 0 0 406,829 84,300 33,837 144,862 402,505 90,648 33,848 144,918 63,393 63,393 1,442,603 1,442,603 256,129 256,129 3,053,747 3,053,537 56. Rouge River, New Work MI Approp. Cost Maintenance Approp. Cost 57. Saginaw River, New Work MI Approp. (Federal Funds) Cost Contributed New Work Funds Contrib. Cost Maintenance Approp. Cost 58. St. Clair River, New Work MI Approp. Cost 59. St. Joseph IH arbor, MI Maintenance Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost 0 0 352,000 457,900 549,300 123,755 357,367 458,313 549,376 123,760 0 0 00 00 1,902,000 1,020,400 2,077,350 1,022,466 1,843,746 1,112,917 2,091,979 1,022,382 0 0 0 675,25164 0 675,251 " 38,160,21465 38,160,21465 14,917,12766 14,917,12766 13,600 13,600 80,777,46867 80,776,03167 19,213,246 19,213,246 28,231,46168 28,228,91168 976,48569 976,48569 0 0 442,000 826,800 789,100 798,453 453,256 812,947 823,195 797,223 21- 67 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF TIlE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 2000 TABLE 21-A (Continued) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Section Total to In Project Funding FY 97 FY 98 FY 99 FY00 Sep 30, 2000 Text Section I1 1 New Work 59. St. Joseph Harbor, MI (Continued) Section Ill 60. Saugatuck Harbor & Kalamazoo River, MI 61. Saxon Harbor, MI Section 111 62. Sebewaing River, MI 63. Sheboygan Harbor, WI Approp. Cost Maintenance Approp. Cost Maintenance Approp. Cost Major (or Minor) Rehabilitation Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maintenance Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maintenance Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maintenance Approp. Cost 1,009,000 1,036,485 596,400 900,200 489,518 21,419,93170 596,456 902,707 492,623 21,417,98670 448,000 296,000 175,000 124,563 447,407 301,120 180,610 124,658 0 0 0 0 272,000 260,414 0 0 0 0 19,110 3,738 88,700 3,330,470 1,725,815 9,522,16272 108,508 3,333,922 1,726,003 9,522,16272 0 0 0 0 97,872 113,335 0 0 0 0 10,322 10,322 0 0 0 0 265,987 65,556 0 0 20,000 (8,717) 186,600 66,405 14,804 1,483 186,645 66,258 New Work Approp. Cost 507,50773 507,50773 204,270 204,270 1,237,859 1,037,428 35,573 35,573 4,249,38374 4,249,19674 1,136,088"7 1,136,08875 21- 68 828,000 828,000 8,391,014 8,390,964 962,216 962,216 364,5277' 364,5277' DETROIT, MI, DISTRICT TABLE 21-A (Continued) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Section Total to In Project Funding FY 97 FY 98 FY 99 FY00 Sep 30, 2000 Text 63. Sheboygan Harbor, WI (Continued) Maintenance Approp. Cost Major (or Minor) Rehabilitation Approp. Cost 64. South Haven New Work Harbor, MI Approp. Cost Section 11ll1 Section 111 65. Sturgeon Bay, W1, & Lake Michigan Ship Canal, WI 66. Two Rivers Harbor, WI New Work Approp. Cost Maintenance Approp. Cost Maintenance Approp. Cost Major (or Minor) Rehabilitation Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maintenance Approp. Cost Major (or Minor) Rehabilitation Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maintenance Approp. Cost 106,000 193,300 69,200 123,101 105,775 194,224 70,945 123,154 0 0 0 0 0 0 99,003 85,430 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 80,227 140,702 354,226 53,693 170,347 349,614 190,000 129,300 0 189,999 131,091 (87) 0 0 305,000 302,690 9,375,27176 9,375,27176 609,028 609,028 452,42677 452,42677 532,000 532,000 6,684,69778 6,669,62378 1,936,233 1,936,054 0 1,632,076 0 1,632,076 0 0 0 1,059,72279 0 0 0 1,059,72279 75,900 247,800 341,941 11,256,21280 79,140 238,157 351,980 11,256,11280 884,899 884,899 0 360,32081 0 360,3208' 294,000 305,405 59,360 63,946 (16) 274,338 1,478 250,652 9,268,90982 9,242,90982 21- 69 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 2000 TABLE 21-A (Continued) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Section Total to In Project Funding FY 97 FY 98 FY 99 FY00 Sep 30, 2000 Text 66. Two Rivers Harbor, WI (Continued) 67. White Lake Harbor, MI Section 11 68. Whitefish Point Harbor, MI 77. Clinton River Spillway, MI 78. Fort Wayne Metro Area, IN Major (or Minor) Rehabilitation Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maintenance Approp. Cost Maintenance Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maintenance Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Contributed New Work Funds Contrib. Cost 0 0 0 0 0 0 1,929,037 5,266,000 697,300 1,933,426 5,277,383 699,199 0 0 16,013 16,013 150,000 600,581 78,894 78,937 (3,500) 0 0 0 1,487 1,487 0 13,816 7,833 137,285 7,747 137,372 0 3,147 59,000 47,528 6,474,000 10,615,000 4,730,000 4,087,000 6,352,932 10,655,342 4,686,386 4,196,925 1,150,000 2,800,000 1,200,000 1,524,000 1,252,707 2,502,554 1,737,370 1,072,714 21- 70 58,057 58,057 207,862 207,862 249,700 249,700 10,922,788 10,922,784 1,170,115 1,170,019 771,639 771,639 585,049 585,049 3,345,008 3,326,091 35,391,000 35,332,804 7,725,000 7,268,394 DETROIT, MI, DISTRICT TABLE 21-A (Continued) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Section Total to In Project Funding FY 97 FY 98 FY 99 FY00 Sep 30, 2000 Text 79. Saginaw River New Work 1958 Act Flint, MI 79. Saginaw River 1958 Act Flint, MI (Continued) Contributed Funds 80. Sebewaing River, MI 84. Surveillance of Northern Boundary Waters 85. St. Marys River, MI Contributed Funds Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost Maintenance Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maintenance Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maintenance Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maintenance Approp. Cost Maintenance Contrib. Cost 0 126,842 875,000 75,174 0 0 94,726 659,374 0 0 10,000 (14,300) 3,582 0 3,800 4,331 4,501 4,507 24,755,359 24,755,359 173,000 173,000 6,375,000 6,317,222 365,642 365,642 455,456 455,457 00 3,030,316 2,965,000 2,969,100 3,018,614 71,087,36483 3,067,335 2,844,210 3,088,137 3,102,836 71,033,20483 0 0 160,657,07184 160,657,07184 16,075,300 16,535,691 21,983,900 20,811,820 391,351,73285,86 15,638,123 16,704,004 22,252,293 20,857,071 391,310,74185.86 0 (319) 0 0 0 320 340,400 340,400 21- 71 REPORT OF TIHE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 2000 TABLE 21-A (Continued) 'Includes $92,774 for previous projects. 2Includes $18,889 for previous projects. 3Includes $114,786 for previous projects. 4lncludes $792 for diked disposal. 5Excludes $56,500 for contributed funds. 6Includes $85,849 for previous projects. 7lncludes $12,008 for previous projects. 8Excludes $30,000 for contributed funds. 91ncludes $25,500 for previous projects. '0 lncludes $3,796,180 for previous projects. ''Includes $2,097,254 for previous projects. 12lncludes $42,470,585 for diked disposal. '3lncludes $1,547,195 for previous projects. 4"Includes $1,556,249 for diked disposal. "Includes $3,239,910 for previous projects. '6Includes $89,309 for previous projects. '7 Includes $42,084 expended for M&O of Dams. (Excludes $10 expended in FY99). "Includes $1,204,500 for diked disposal. 9Includes $311,329 for previous projects. 20Includes $13,437 for previous project and $780,400 for diked disposal. 21lncludes $506,437 for previous projects. 22 Excludes $100,000 contributed funds. 23Includes $8,918 for previous projects and $7,642,642 for diked disposal. 24 Excludes $127,000 contributed funds. 251ncludes $243,100 for diked disposal. 26Includes $176,620 for previous projects. 27Includes $127,598 for previous projects and $1,663,300 for diked disposal. 2 RIncludes $404,300 for diked disposal. 291ncludes $453,839 for previous projects. 30Excludes $3,000 contributed funds. 3 1Includes $21,818 for previous projects and $4,378,600 for diked disposal. 32Includes $149,312 for previous projects. 33"ncludes $88,364 for previous projects and $2,961,461 for diked disposal. 34Includes $402,242 for previous projects and $1,523,500 for diked disposal. "Excludes $38,190 contributed funds. 361ncludes $656,000 for previous projects. 37 ncludes $235,346 for previous projects and $5,119,800 for diked disposal. "Ilncludes $491,416 for previous projects. 39Excludes $136,286 contributed funds. 40lncludes $354,999 for previous projects. 41lncludes $150,910 for previous projects. 42 lncludes $3,955 for previous projects. 43Includes $400,126 for previous projects. 44Includes $54,288 for previous projects and $3,081,756 for diked disposal. COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT 4 5lncludes $312,423 for previous projects. 46Includes $36,194 for previous projects. 47lncludes $312,423 for previous projects. 48Includes $36,194 for previous projects and $593,660 for diked disposal. 491ncludes $1,293,220 for previous projects. S"Includes $459,305 for previous projects and $6,380,925 for diked disposal. 51Includes $38,606,400 for diked disposal. "Includes $83,182 contributed funds - diked disposal. "Includes $613,408 for previous projects. 54Includes $446,183 for previous projects. s"Includes $181,500 for diked disposal. 5"Includes $84,569 for previous projects. "Includes $8,181 for previous projects. "Includes $284,802 for previous projects. "Includes $113,326 for previous projects and $21,000 for diked disposal. 60lncludes $121,600 for diked disposal. 6 tlncludes $9,158 for diked disposal. 62lncludes $188,495 for previous projects. 63 lncludes $15,123 for previous projects and $10,621 for diked disposal. "Includes $50,084 for previous projects. 65Includes $56,608 for previous projects and $14,907,318 for diked disposal. 661ncludes $962,556 for previous projects. 67 lncludes $20,951,888 for diked disposal ($1,671,660 public works fund and $49,419 emergency relief funds) 6"Includes $420,000 expended for M&O of Dams. 69Includes $503,113 for previous projects. 70Includes $638,076 for diked disposal. 71Includes $90,232 for previous projects. nlncludes $117,554 for previous projects. 73Excludes $50,193 contributed funds. 74Includes $15,000 for previous projects. "Includes $487,817 for previous projects. 76Includes $87,131 for previous projects and $907,792 for diked disposal. 77Includes $187,233 for previous projects. 78lncludes $131,299 for previous projects and $42,381 for diked disposal. "I9cludes $323,419 for previous projects. slIncludes $219,730 for previous projects and $311,119 for diked disposal. "lIncludes $212,857 for previous projects. 82 ncludes $33,113 for previous projects and 83 $1,187,472 for diked disposal. lncludes $3,973,897 for previous projects. 84Includes $2,904,807 for previous projects. "Ilncludes $13,100 for diked disposal. 86Includes $699,947 expended for M&O of Dams. 21- 72 TABLE 21-B (Continued) DETROIT, MI, DISTRICT AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION See Date of Authorizing Project and Work Sec. Act Authorized Documents 2. 3. 4. 1.Mar. 3, 1871 Mar. 3, 1871 Nov. 17, 1988 Sep. 19, 1890 Mar. 2, 1919 Sep. 22, 1922 Aug. 30, 1935 Oct. 27, 1965 Nov. 17, 1986 Mar. 3, 1905 Aug. 5, 1886 Aug. 11, 1888 21- Mar. 3, 1899 Jun. 6, 1990 Aug. 8, 1917 Jul. 3, 1930 Aug. 30, 1935 Mar. 2, 1945 Jul. 14, 1960 5. Mar. 2, 1945 May 20, 1965 Mar. 2, 1945 ALGOMA IIARBOR, WI Outer basin enclosed by a north pier, 1,102 feet long and a south breakwater 1,530 feet long, a 2, 100 foot entrance channel and outer basin. Deauthorization of the outer harbor basin feature of the navigation project. ALPENA HARBOR, MI Channel depth of 16 ' feet. Rubblemound breakwater for protecting channel on south side and widening entrance channel. . 21 and 18 foot channel depths and turning basin. Present project dimensions. New turning basin. Removal of old breakwater and construction of new breakwater. Deauthorization of the feature authorized by the 1965 River and Harbor Act. ARCADIA HARBOR, MI Maintenance of existing 12-foot channel. River and Harbor Act. H. Doc. 1098, 100 Cong. 2d Sess., Sec. 52(c) of the WRDA of 1988. Annual Report, 1889, p. 2288. H. Doc. 830, 65th Cong., 2d Sess., and Rivers & Harbors Comm. Doc. 1, 67th Cong., Ist Sess. Rivers and Harbors Comm. Doc. 42, 72d Cong., Ist. Sess. H. Doc. 151, 88th Cong., Ist. Sess.' H. R. 6 (formerly S. 1567), 99 th Cong., 2d Sess. (WRDA of 1986). H. Doc. 194, 58th Cong., 2d Sess. ASHLAND HARBOR, MI Breakwater 7,900 feet long and dredging to remove a H. Ex. Doc. 89, 48th Cong., 2d shoal. Sess. Annual Reports, 1886, p. 1674; and Appropriation of $60,000 for'Continuing improvements 1887, p. 1966. on enlarged project' (On completion of Poe Lock in H. Ex. Doc. 89, 48th Cong., 2d 1896, with available depth of 20 feet, dredging at Sess. Ashland Harbor was carried to a similar depth.) Annual Reports, 1886, p. 1674; and Detached breakwater extending 4,700 feet out from 1887, p. 1966. shore at a point 2,600 feet east of main breakwater (prolonged) and parallel thereto. Project modified by omitting detached breakwater and defining depth and extend of channel to be dredged. Widening part of present channel for entrance channel H. Doc. 1698, 64th Cong., 2d Sess. and for basin in eastern part of harbor. Deepening east basin to 25 feet and west channel, as far S. Doc. 133, 71st Cong., 2d Sess as 8th Ave. West, extended to 21 feet. Widening west channel to 750 feet at its westerly end Rivers and Harbors Committee Deepening portions of east basin and west channel to 27 Doc. 46, 82d Cong., 1st Sess. and 21 feet, respectively. H. Doc. 337, 77th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 165, 86th Cong., 1st Sess.' AU SABLE HARBOR AT AU SABLE RIVER (OSCODA), MI Dredging channels 12 and 10 feet deep and riprapping H. Doc. 446, 78th Cong., 2d Sess.' North Pier. BAY PORT HARBOR, MI Channel 6 feet deep and 50 feet wide. BIG BAY HIARBOR, MI Provides for converging piers extending from shore, an Section 107, 1960 Rivers and Harbor Act. 1HD. oc. 446, 78th Cong., 2d Sess.' 21- 73 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 2000 TABLE 21-B (Continued) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION See Date of Authorizing Project and Work Sec. Act Authorized Documents entrance channel between piers and a rectangular harbor basin. Project depths are 12 feet in entrance channel and 10 feet in harbor basin. 8. 9. Aug. 26, 1937 Sep. 19, 1890 Jul. 13, 1892 Sep. 22, 1922 Jul. 3, 1930 Aug. 30, 1935 Apr. 23, 1970 21- 74 BIG SUAMICO RIVER, WI Channel from Green Bay to 1,800 feet above the river mouth. BLACK RIVER, MI (PORT HURON) Channel from mouth of Grand Trunk R.R. Bridge. Channel from Grand Trunk R.R. Bridge to Washington Ave. Consolidation of projects for Black River at Port Huron and Mouth of Black River. Settling Basin. Deepening channel and settling basin to 20 feet, and widening to 100 feet 2 bends; I at the foot of 12h St., the other below the Grand Trunk R.R. Bridge. Extension of existing channel. BLACK RIVER HARBOR, MI (UPPER PENINSULA) Two converging breakwaters, an entrance channel between breakwaters, an inner channel, and an irregular harbor basin. Project depths 12 feet in approach channel and 8 feet in the river channel and basin. CASEVILLE HARBOR, MI Channel 10 to 8 feet deep protected by Breakwater. CEDAR RIVER HARBOR, MI Dredge an entrance channel (datum at 580.69 feet above mean tide at New York) and construct two parallel piers extending lakeward from mouth of Cedar River. Modification of project to provide for two parallel entrance piers including a new rubblemound east pier with a sport fishing walkway; an entrance channel from Green Bay to mouth of Cedar River, and a turning basin CIIARLEVOIX HARBOR, MI Channel from Lake Michigan to Round Lake protected where needed by piers and revetments. Channel from Round Lake to Lake Charlevoix. Project depth increased to 15 feet. Project depth increased to 18 feet. Restore recreational uses or provide comparable recreational uses at the South Pier. Project depth increased to 24 and 23 feet, and construction of revetment upstream of Highway Bridge. CLINTON RIVER, MI Channel in River and Lake St. Clair, Pile Dike, Closing channels and making Cutoff, and revetments as needed. H. Doc. 498, 7 4 'h Cong., 2d Sess.' Annual Report, 1889, p. 2291. No Printed Report. H. Doc. 436, 64 'h Cong., I1st. Sess. H. Doc. 162, 71" Cong., 2d Sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 54, 72d Cong., 2d Sess. Section 107, 1960 Rivers and Harbors Act. Hi. Doc. 446, 78 'h Cong., 2d Sess.' H. Doc. 64, 87th Cong., Ist Sess.' S. Ex. Doc. 12, 47th Cong., 1't Sess. H. Doc. 248, 89th Cong., Ist Sess. S. Ex. Doc. 16, 44th Cong., Ist Oess. and Annual Report 1876, p. 523. No Prior Survey of Estimates. No Prior Survey of Estimates. S. Doc. 163, 75th Cong., 3rd Sess.' H. Doc. 1098, 100th Cong., 2d Sess. Sec. 25 of the WRDA of 1988. Section 107, 1960 Rivers and Harbors Act. S. Doc. 199, 46th Cong., 2d Sess. Annual Report, 1880, p. 2062, and 1. Doc. 210, 44th Cong., 2d Sess., 10. Mar. 2, 1945 11. 12. 13. 14. Oct. 23, 1962 Aug. 2, 1882 Oct. 28, 1965 Aug. 14, 1876 Aug. 2, 1882 Jun 13, 1902 Jun. 20, 1938 Nov. 17, 1988 Mar. 29, 1977 Aug. 5, 1886 TABLE 21-B (Continued) DETROIT, MI, DISTRICT AUTIIORIZING LEGISLATION See Date of Authorizing Project and Work Sec. Act Authorized Documents and Ann-ual Kep-ort ip.nn 15. Jul. 19, 1963 Aug. 26, 1937 Sep. 3, 1954 16. Jun. 13, 1902 Mar. 3, 1905 Jun. 25, 1910 Mar. 4, 1913 Mar. 2, 1907 Jun. 25, 1910 Mar. 2, 1919 Jul. 3, 1930 Aug. 30, 1935 Aug. 26, 1937 Mar. 2, 1945 Jul. 24, 1946 22 May 17, 1950 4 Mar. 21, 1956 22 Jul. 14, 1960 Widening entrance channel and constructing protected harbor basin CORNUCOPIA HARBOR, WI SEntrance channel 50 feet wide and 10 feet deep between existing piers from bay to a turning basin 200 feet long, 8 feet deep, with maximum width of 180 feet, with 150- and 300-foot inner channels each 50 feet wide and 8 feet deep. Reconstruction and Federal maintenance of ease and west entrance piers, a 25-foot extension of west pier and a 300-foot extension of existing westerly inner channel at a depth of 8 feet and a width of 50 feet. DETROIT RIVER, MI Amherstburg Channel and removal of Grosse lie Shoal. Fighting Island Channel. Livingstone Channel. Channel Depths of 26 and 25 feet. Channel to Wyandotte 21 feet deep and 300 feet wide through Middle Ground opposite Head of Fighting Island. Trenton Channel and Turning Basin (West of Grosse Ile). American Channel North of Belle Isle between Windmill Point and Fairway Slip, Detroit. Deepen Westerly 300 feet of Amherstburg Channel and Ballards Reef Channel below Livingstone Channel to 27 feet to provide depths adequate for 24-foot draft navigation when governing Lakes are at Datum, with necessary widening at approaches and bends and construction of necessary compensating works, Detroit River. Extend Turning Basin in Trenton Channel 600 feet. Dredge through East Draw of lower Grosse lIe Bridge and extend 300-foot width of Channel North of lower Grosse Ile Bridge. Channel Depth of 28.5 feet throughout downbound and Two-Way Channels, except in upper (27.7-foot depth) and lower (29-foot depth), Livingstone Channel, and in upbound Channel; 27-foot depth in Ballards Reef Channel below junction with Livingstone Channel, 27.5-foot depth in westerly 300-foot width of Limekiln Crossing and Amherstburg Reaches, and 28.5-foot depth in westerly 300-foot width of Hackett Beach, with necessary compensation works. Also 28.5-foot depth in Lake Erie from Detroit River to Pelee Passage Shoal, inclusive. Trenton Channel: Deepen to 25 feet, where necessary, Wyandotte Reach from Detroit River to Upper Grosse and Annual Report, 1886, p. 219. Section 107, 1960 Rivers and Harbors Act. S. Committee, 75th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 434, 83rd Cong., 2d Sess.' H. Doc. 712, 56th Cong., Ist. Sess. and 40, 58th Cong., 3rd Sess. H. Doc. 17, 62d Cong., Ist Sess. H. Doc. 266, 59th Cong., 1st Sess.; 676, 61st Cong., 2d Sess.; and 322, 65th Cong., Ist Sess. H. Doc. 253, 70th Cong., 1st. Sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 1, 72d Cong., 1st Sess.' H. Doc. 205, 75th Cong., Ist Sess. H. Doc. 734, 79th Cong., 2d Sess. H. Doc. 335, 80th Cong., 1st Sess. S. Doc. 30, 81st Cong., 1st Sess.' S. Doc. 71, 84th Cong., Ist Sess.' H. Doc. 319, 86th Cong., 2d Sess.' 21- 75 REPORT OF TIIE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 2000 TABLE 21-B (Continued) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION See Date of Authorizing Project and Work Sec. Act Authorized Documents Aug. 13, 1968 22 17. Jun. 3, 1896 Jun. 13, 1902 Mar. 2, 1907 May 28, 1908 s Jul. 27, 1916 Mar. 2, 1919 Jan. 21, 1927 Jul. 30, 1930 3 Aug. 30, 1930 Jul. 16, 1952 4.6 Jul. 14, 1960 7.22 Oct. 4, 1961 Nov. 17, 1986 18. Aug. 5, 1886 Sep. 19, 1890 Jun. 3, 1896 Jun. 3, 1896 Jun. 13, 1902 Mar. 2, 1907 Mar. 3, 1925 8.22 Jun. 26, 1934 9 Ile Bridge, about 5.5 miles, deepen to 28 feet and widen to 300 feet below Upper Grosse Ile Bridge to and including a Turning Basin 28 feet deep and 15 feet across in area outside project limits. Trenton Channel: Deepen to 28 feet and widen to 300 feet from Upper Turning Basin at Trenton to Gibraltar, about 20,500 feet from downstream: Construct a Turning Basin at Gibraltar at a depth of 28 feet, width of 830 feet, and length of 1,500 feet: Build compensating works to maintain water levels. DULUTH-SUPERIOR HARBOR, MN AND WI Dredging. Rebuilding piers at Superior Entry. Enlarge plan for Superior Entry and additional dredging near draw span of Burlington Northern railway bridge. Dredging additional area of basin inside Duluth entrance to 22-foot depth. Enlarging Superior Harbor Basin. Removal of shoal point at southerly end of East Gate Basin. Howards Bay Channel, 20 feet deep. Deepening and widening channels and basins. Deepen Superior Front Channel and a portion of East Gate Basin to 25 feet. Present project dimensions of channels and basin. Abandons northerly portion of 21st Avenue West Channel. Deepen portions of the North and South Channels, the entire Upper Channel and Minnesota Channel to 27 feet; widen the Cross Channel turning basin to 1,500 feet; widen the bend at the Arrowhead Bascule Bridge to 600 feet, and construct an upland CDF. FOX RIVER, WI Improvement of Fox River. Dredging Fond du Lac Harbor on Lake Winnebago. Improvement of Wolf River. Improvement of Stockbridge, of Calumet and Miller Bay, and of Brothertown Harbor, on Lake Winnebago. Increased depth in rock cuts on lower river, widen Neenah Channel, and a concrete retaining wall at Kaukauna. Operation and care of locks and dams provided for with funds from War Department appropriations for rivers and harbors. H. Doc. 338, 90th Cong., 2d Sess.' H.Ex. Doc. 59, 53d Cong., 3rd Sess. and Annual Report, 1895, p. 2538. H. Doc. 82, 59th Cong., 2d Sess. H. Doc. 221, 60th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 651, 64th Cong., Ist Sess. H. Doc. 1018, 64th Cong., Ist Sess. H. Doc. 145, 69th Cong., 1st Sess., and Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 32, 71st Cong., 2d Sess. H. Doc. 482, 72d Cong., 2d Sess. H. Doc. 374, 82d Cong., 2d Sess. H. Doc. 150, 86th Cong., 1st Sess.; H. Doc. 196, 86th Cong., Ist Sess. H. Doc. 204, 99th Cong., 2d Sess. Sec. 202a of WRDA of 1986. Annual Report, 1885, pp 2041-2045 (plan of a board approach Dec. 10, 1884, as modified by Corps of Engineers, May 14, 1886). H. Ex. Doc. 24, 51st Cong., Ist Sess Annual Report, 1890, p. 2390. No prior survey or estimates. No prior survey or estimates. No prior survey or estimates. H. Doc. 294, 68th Cong., Ist Sess.' 21- 76 TABLE 21-B (Continued) DETROIT, MI, DISTRICT AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION See Date of Authorizing Project and Work Sec. Act Authorized Documents Jul. 3, 1958 'o Sec. 108, Federal project structure, appurtenances, and S. Bill 3910, 85th Cong., 2d Sess. Oct. 31, 1992 19. Jun. 23, 1866 " Mar. 3, 1925 Aug. 26, 1937 Oct. 27, 1965 Jun. 23, 1866 Jun. 14, 1880 Sep. 19, 1890 Jul. 13, 1892 Jul. 3, 1930 Aug. 26, 1937 Mar. 2, 1945 Nov. 17, 1986 21. Mar. 2, 1945 22. Jun. 23, 1866 Jul. 13, 1892 Jun. 26, 1910 Aug. 8, 1917 Mar. 3, 1925 Aug. 30, 1935 2 Aug. 26, 1937 real property of Upper Fox River, WI, be disposed of to State of Wisconsin. Sec. 332 authorized transfer of navigation system to Wisconsin subject to agreement, Federal government to continue water regulation/dam operation. FRANKFORT HARBOR, MI A New Outlet 12 feet deep protected by Piers and Revetments. Exterior Breakwaters, removal of portions of Piers, Project Dimensions of Outer Basin. Dredge the area in Lake Betsie. Deepen approach and entrance channels. Extend Inner Basin and Dredge recreational anchorage area. GRAND HAVEN HARBOR, MI Piers and Revetments. Piers and Revetments. Piers and Revetments. Piers and Revetments. Present Project dimensions of Harbor channel to Grand Trunk Car Ferry Slip and River Channel. Eliminating all of that portion of Grand River above Bass River, Consolidation of Projects for Harbor and River. Channel to Spring Lake. Present Project Dimensions of Harbor Channel from Car Ferry Slip to Grand Trunk Railway Bridge and Turning Basin. Deepen the harbor entrance channel and harbor river channel to 29 and 27 feet, respectively; provide a new and larger turning basin, trapezoidal in shape, 1,200 feet long at the channel, 300 feet long at the shore, 800 feet at a right angle to the channel, and 18 feet deep. GRAND TRAVERSE BAY HARBOR, MI Two parallel piers, an entrance channel between piers and a harbor basin. Project depths are 12 feet between piers and 10 feet in basin. Project area extended 200 feet upstream in 1966. GREEN BAY HARBOR, WI Outer Channel and revetment at Grassy Island.' 2 Inner channel." Turning basin at DePere. Maintenance of turning basin at DePere. Increasing depth of inner channel and turning basin to 18 feet. Deepen outer channel to 22 feet with widening and straightening inside of Tail Point Bend, widen channel in Fox River through city of Green Bay to 22 feet. Turning basin above Chicago & North Western R.R. Public Law 102-580 (WRDA of 1992). H. Doc. 482, 5th Cong., 2d Sess. H. Doc. 208, 68th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 511, 74th Cong., 2d Sess., S. Doc 16, 89th Cong., 1st Sess.' S. Ex. Doc 42, 35th Cong. Ist. Sess. S. Ex. Doc 42, 35th Cong, 1st. Sess. S. Ex. Doc 42, 35th Cong, 1st. Sess. S. Ex. Doc 42, 35th Cong, 1st. Sess. S. Doc. 88, 71st Cong., 2d Sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doe. 1, 75th Cong., 3rd Sess.' H. Doc. 661, 76th Cong., 3rd Sess.' H. Doc. 227, 98th Cong., 2d Sess. Sec. 202a of WRDA of 1986. H. Doc. 446, 78th Cong., 2nd Sess. Annual Report, 1867, p. 70. Unpublished report approved Aug. 3, 1892. H. Doc. 222, 61st Cong., 2d Sess. H. Doc. 1017, 64th Cong., Ist Sess. H. Doc. 294, 68th Cong., 1st Sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 40, 72d Cong., 2d Sess. 21- 77 20. REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 2000 TABLE 21-B (Continued) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION See Date of Authorizing Project and Work Sec. Act Authorized Documents Mar. 2, 1945 Oct. 23, 1962 Nov. 17, 1986 1948 June 26, 1964 Mar. 3, 1871 Jan. 21, 1927 Jul. 16, 1984 Mar. 2, 1945 Aug. 30, 1852 Mar. 2, 1867 Mar. 3, 1899 Mar. 3, 1905 Jul. 3, 1930 Aug. 30, 1935 Sep. 3, 1954 22 Sep. 3, 1954 Sep. 2, 1964 Bridge. Turning basin at mouth of East River. Deepen and widen 9 miles of entrance channel to 26 by 500 feet; 3.6 miles of entrance channel to 24 by 300 feet; and 3.2 miles of existing Fox River to 24 feet deep. Deepen the Fox River channel at Green Bay, WI, to 27 feet. GREILICKVILLE HARBOR, MI Basin 600-foot wide, 850-foot long with a depth of 14 feet in outer 350 feet of the area and a 10-foot depth in remainder. Breakwater 1,300 feet long. Attached Rubblemound Breakwater and Breakwater extension. HARBOR BEACH, LAKE HURON, MI Adopted Site and made provision for harbor. Closing North Entrance and dredging Main Entrance and Anchorage Area. Removal of portion of Breakwater in interest of sanitation. Deepen the waterway within the Marina facility. HARRISVILLE HARBOR, MI Harbor of Refuge, Breakwaters; 12-foot depth entrance channel 10-foot depth in harbor basin. Extend north end of south breakwater 100 feet; extend southeast end of north breakwater 145 feet; install two navigation light structures. HOLLAND IIARBOR, MI Artificial channel between Lakes Macatawa and Michigan. 12 Piers and Revetments.' 2 Extending Inner Piers. Converging Breakwater. Channel to Holland and Turning Basin at Holland. Present Project Dimensions of Channels at Turning Basin. Widen Bend in Revetted Entrance Channel into Lake Macatawa, Dredge Channel in Black River, and Widen and Extend Turning Basin. THIlE INLAND ROUTE, MI Channel 30 feet wide and 5 feet deep through Lakes and Rivers with suitable jetties. Lock and Dam. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 73, 74th Cong., 2d Sess. H. Doc. 95, 76th Cong., Ist Sess. H. Doc. 470, 87th Cong., 2d Sess.' H.R. 6 (formerly S. 1567), 99th Cong., 2d Sess. (WRDA of 1986, Sec. 601c). River and Harbor Act. H. Doc. 546, 80th Cong., 2d Sess. River and Harbor Act. Annual Report, 1873, p. 282; H. Doc. 1700, 64th Cong., 2d Sess. H.R. 5653, 98th Cong., 2d Sess.; P.L. 98-360 (98 Stat. 405) Sec. 105. 11. Doc. 446, 78th Cong., 2d Sess. Sec. 107, 1960 River and Harbor Act. S. Ex. Doc. 42, 35th Cong, Ist Sess. Annual Report, 1866, p. 106. H. Doc. 272, 51st Cong., 2d Sess.; and Annual Report 1887, p. 2950. Annual Report, 1905, p. 2176; H. Doc. 588, 69th Cong., 2d Sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 48, 74th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 282, 83rd Cong., 2d Sess. It. Doe. 142, 82d Cong., 1st Sess.' Chief of Engineers. KENOSIIA HARBOR, WI 21- 78 23. 24. 25. 26. 27. 28. TABLE 21-B (Continued) DETROIT, MI, DISTRICT AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION See Date of Authorizing Project and Work Sec. Act Authorized Documents H. D.oc. 32.5th. o.. d.s.; Mar. 3, 1899 Parallel piers and 600 feet of breakwater." Mar. 2, 1907 Aug. 30, 1935 2 May 17, 1950 Oct. 23, 1962 22 29. Mar. 3, 1881 Jun. 25, 1910 Aug. 30, 1935 2,14 Jul. 14, 1960 30. Sep. 19, 1890 Jun. 25, 1910 Mar. 2, 1919 Aug. 30, 1935 '5 Nov. 17, 1986 31. 32. Extending Breakwater 200 feet. Present project dimensions of entrance channel and basin. Channel northwesterly from basin. Deepen lake approach channel to 27 feet and 800 feet wide; deepen approach channel to 26 feet, entrance channel and inner basin to 25 feet. KEWAUNEE HARBOR, WI Entrance piers. Turning basin. North breakwater, remove old north pier, widen and deepen entrance channel and turning basin to 20 feet and remove outer south shoal. Enlarge existing turning basin, extend existing project into north basin, and increase depth of north basin to 20 feet at a maximum width of 500 feet and eliminate removal of outer shoal. KEWEENAW WATERWAY, MI Acquision of waterway; for a 16-foot channel of 70-foot bottom width, renew canal revetments, reconstruct and extend piers at upper entrance to 30-foot depth of water, and at proper time for increase of channel depth to 20 feet with bottom width of not less than 120 feet (increase in width and depth of channel approved May 15, 1898). Anchorage basin just within lower entrance about onehalf mile long, 800 feet wide; a mooring pier on its westerly side 2,000 feet in length, and for purchase of necessary land. Princess Point Cutoff Channel. General deepening, widening and straightening of channels and basins to provide 25-foot depth with additional overdepth at entrances, extend lower entrance breakwater, and necessary alteration or replacement of structures due to deepening channels. Deauthorization of the uncompleted portion of the project authorized by the 1935 Rivers and Harbors Act. LA POINTE HARBOR, WI Provides for reconstruction of 73.5 feet of the existing breakwater, extending the breakwater 126.24 feet with 5 new steel sheet pile cells, harbor dredging and related work. The harbor is 10 feet deep in the entrance and 8 feet deep in the basin. H. Doc. 328, 54th Cong., 2d Sess.; Annual Report, 1897, p. 2772; H. Doc. 164, 55th Cong., 3rd Sess.; Annual Report, 1899, p. 1817. H. Doc. 62, 59th Cong., 2d Sess. and Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 3, 5th Cong., 2d Sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 19, 74th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 750, 80th Cong., 2d Sess. H. Doc. 496, 87th Cong., 2d Sess.' Annual Report, 1881, p. 2082. H. Doc. 324, 60th Cong., 1st Sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 43, 72d Cong., 1st Sess.' S. Doc. 19, 86th Cong., 1st Sess.' H. Ex. Doc. 105, 49th Cong., 2d Sess.; and Annual Report, 1887, p. 1977. H. Doc. 325, 60th Cong., Ist Sess. H. Doc. 835, 63rd Cong., 2d Sess. H. Doc. 55, 73rd Cong., 1st Sess.' H.R. 6 (formerly S. 1567), 99th Cong., 2d Sess. (WRDA of 1986). Section 107 of the 1960 Rivers and Harbors Act; P.L. 645, 86th Cong., as amended. LAC LA BELLE HARBOR, MI 21- 79 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF TIIE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 2000 TABLE 21-B (Continued) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION See Date of Authorizing Project and Work Sec. Act Authorized Documents Mar. 2, 1945 Two parallel piers at the entrance, 584 and 682 feet; an entrance channel between the piers 50 feet wide and 12 feet deep, 820 feet long with a flared approach and inner canal 50 feet wide, 10 feet deep, and 730 feet long. Aug. 5, 1886 Jul. 13, 1892 Jun. 13, 1902 Mar. 2, 1919 Jul. 3, 1930 Aug. 30, 1933 3 Mar. 21, 1956 Aug. 30, 1935 Oct. 23, 1962 Oct. 27, 1965 Mar. 2, 1945 Mar. 2, 1867 Mar. 3, 1899 Mar. 2, 1907 Dec. 31, 1970 Mar. 2, 1867 Sep. 19, 1890 Jul. 25, 1912 Jul. 3, 1920 Mar. 2, 1945 33. LAKE ST. CLAIR, MI, CHANNELS Two Dikes. Deepening Canal and dredging Channel at Grosse Pointe. Second Canal for downbound vessels. 21-foot depth in Grosse Pointe Channel for about 5.25 miles. 25-foot depth through Canals and Channel through Lake St. Clair. Removal of Center Dike and widening Channel to 700 feet. Deepening Channel to 27.5 feet and abandonment of Channel above mouth of Southeast bend cutoff Channel. LELAND HARBOR, MI Entrance Channel protected by Piers. Outer Breakwater, Anchorage Area, Approach Channel and removal of North Pier. LEXINGTON HARBOR, MI Approach Channel and Maneuver Area Protected by Breakwaters.' LITTLE LAKE HARBOR, MI 12-foot deep Channel from Lake Superior into Little Lake Breakwaters and Revetments. LUDINGTON HARBOR, MI Entrance Piers. Pier Extension, Reconstruction and repairs to existing structures and present project dimensions of Channel. Breakwaters, Shore Connections, and Removal of outer ends of the two inner piers. Deepen Channels and widen opening between breakwaters. MANISTEE HARBOR, MI Entrance Piers. Extending Channel 8,000 feet to connect with Manistee Lake, and further Pier extension. Depth of 20 feet in Outer Harbor 570 feet wide to Outer end of South Pier 18 feet deep in river, South Breakwater with shore connection, and extend North Pier if required. 23-foot depths in entrance channel and 21-foot depths in River Channel. Remove old South Revetment, Construct new South Pier and Revetment, and widen river entrance Channel. 21- 80 H. Doc. 446, 78'h Cong., 2d Sess. Annual Report, 1961, p. 1039. Annual Report, 1885, p. 2150. H. Doc. 297, 51st Cong., 2d Sess. H. Doc. 234, 56th Cong., 2d Sess. H. Doc. 188, 65th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 253, 70th Cong., 1st Sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 3, 72d Cong., 1st Sess. S. Doc. 71, 84th Cong., 1st Sess.' Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 23, 74th Cong., Ist Sess. H. Doc. 413, 87th Cong., 2d Sess. H. Doc. 301, 88th Cong., 2d Sess.' H. Doc. 446, 78th Cong., 2d Sess.' Annual Report, 1867, p. 114.'6 H. Doc. 273, 54th Cong., 2d Sess.; and Annual Report, 1897, p. 2951. H. Doc. 62, 59th Cong., Ist Sess.; and Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 3, 59th Cong., 2d Sess.'6 H. Doc. 342, 91st Cong., 2d Sess.' Annual Report, 1867, p. 115. Annual Report, 1891, P. 2678. H. Doc. 599, 62d Cong., 2d Sess. S. Doc. 131, 71st Cong., 2d Sess. H. Doc. 380, 77th Cong., Ist Sess. 34. 35. 36. 37. 38. TABLE 21-B (Continued) DETROIT, MI, DISTRICT AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION See Date of Authorizing Project and Work Sec. Act Authorized Documents Jul. 14, 1960 Present project dimensions of Channel through Outer H. Doc. 358, 86th Cong., 2d Sess. Basin and River, and Federal participation in cost of replacing Maple Street Bridge. 39. 40. Mar. 3, 1905 Mar. 2, 1907 Mar. 2, 1907 Aug. 30, 1935 ' Aug. 26, 1937 Oct. 23, 1962 29 Dec. 31, 1968 (Sec. 107 of 1960 R & H) Jun. 26, 1979 41. 42. Mar. 2, 1867 Aug. I1, 1888 Jun. 25, 1910 Aug. 30, 1935 Jul. 11, 1960 Mar. 3, 1871 Jun. 13, 1902 Mar. 4, 1913 Jul. 3, 1930 Aug. 30, 1935 MANISTIQUE HARBOR, MI Breakwaters and Outer IHarbor. Present location of West Breakwater and Pier at River Mouth. MANITOWOC HARBOR, WI Breakwaters. ' Present project dimensions of channel through outer basin, removal of old north stub pier, and approach channel to a proposed city terminal south of shore end of south breakwater. Channel in river. Deepen Lake approach to 25 feet by 800 feet wide, deepen outer harbor to 25 feet, river channel to 23 feet to 8th Street, and Upper River Channel to 22 feet to Soo Line R.R. Dredge River Channel to 12 feet from Soo Line R.R. 720 feet upstream. Construct 765-foot long stone Breakwater, and rubblemound bulkhead; construct 360-foot long entrance Breakwater; dredge 16,500 cubic yards for entrance channel. MARQUETTE IIARBOR, MI Breakwaters, 2,000 feet long. Extending the breakwater 1,000 feet. Additional 1,500-foot extension to breakwater and removing a shoal in northerly part of harbor. Deepening harbor to 25 feet. Deepening harbor to 27 feet. MENOMINEE HARBOR AND RIVER, MI AND WI Entrance piers. Consolidation of project for harbor and river, and a channel 18 feet deep. Partial restoration of work above bridge which had been eliminated by Act of May 3, 1905. 20-foot depth in channel and 18-foot depth in turning basin. 21-foot depth in channel and turning basin and enlarge H. Doc. 429, 58th Cong., 2d Sess. Annual Report, 1908, p. 648, and Unpublished Report of Mar. 13, 1908; Approved by Secretary of War, Apr. 3, 1908. H. Doc. 62, 59th Cong., 1st Sess., as modified by Rivers and Harbors Comm. Doc. 3, 59th Cong., 2d Sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 39, 73rd Cong., 2d Sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 80, 74th Cong., 2d Sess. H. Doc. 479, 87th Cong., 2d Sess. Jun. 1967 Detailed Project Report Apr. 1982 Supplement.' Sec. 107, 1960 Rivers and Harbors Act. H. Ex. Doc. 56, 39th Cong., 2d Sess., pts. I and 2; and Annual Report, 1866, pp. 8 and 77. Annual Report, 1889, pp. 272 and 2021. H. Doc. 573, 61st Cong., 2d Sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 20, 72d Cong., Ist Sess. H. Doc. 154, 86th Cong., I1st Sess.' Annual Report, 1867, p. 132. H. Doc. 419, 56th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 171, 70th Cong., Ist Sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee 21- 81 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 2000 TABLE 21-B (Continued) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION See Date of Authorizing Project and Work Sec. Act Authorized Documents turning basin. 43. 44. 45. 46. Mar. 2, 1945 Jul. 14, 1960 Jun. 27, 1967 (Sec. 107) Aug. 30, 1852 Mar. 3, 1883 Mar. 2, 1907 Sep. 22, 1922 Aug. 30, 1935 22 Mar. 2, 1945 18 Jul. 14, 1960 Oct. 23, 1962 Feb. 24, 1835 19 Jul. 3, 1930 Jul. 14, 1932 21 Nov. 17, 1986 Jun. 13, 1902 Mar. 3, 1925 Aug. 30, 1935 Oct. 23, 1962 Oct. 23, 1962 Extend channel 12 feet deep to vicinity of Marinette Yacht Club. Deepen existing approach channel to 26 feet, entrance and river channels to 24 feet and enlarge turning basin. Deepen 1,100 feet of river channel generally north of Marinette Corp. facilities to 19 feet. MILWAUKEE HARBOR, WI North Pier.'1 Inner 7,600 feet of breakwater."2 South pier. Extending north breakwater 1,000 feet. Extend north breakwater; a south breakwater; present project dimensions of inner entrance channel. Dredging a portion of outer harbor to 21-foot depth. Dredging river channels to 21-foot depth. Deepen South Menominee and Burnham Canals to 21 feet. Deepen an approach channel to 30 feet by 800 feet wide and 300 feet wide through breakwater; deepen entrance channel 28 feet through piers, outer harbor to 28 feet south of entrance channel, and a channel to 27 feet in Milwaukee River to Buffalo Street, and in Kinnickinnic River to Chicago & North Western R.R. bridges. MONROE HARBOR, MI 9-foot channel, protecting Revetments and Piers. 21-foot channel, dikes and turning basin.20 Modified Conditions of Local Cooperation imposed by Act of Jul. 3, 1930. Deepen portion of existing navigation channel to 27 feet; deepen lake channel to 28 feet; widen the channel from 200 to 500 feet; dredge a new turning basin 24 feet deep, 1,600 feet wide at river's mouth; and construct a 190 acre CDF in Plum Creek Bay to enable creation of a 700 acre marsh behind the CDF. MUSKEGON HARBOR, MI Piers and Revetments. Breakwaters. Repairing Revetments around Car Ferry Slip. Channel deepening and present project dimensions of channel. Piers and Revetments. NEW BUFFALO IIARBOR, MI Entrance channel 10 feet deep by 80 to 180 feet wide and 850 feet long to mouth of Galien River, new north and south breakwaters 1,305 and 740 feet, respectively, Doc. 28, 73rd Cong., 2d Sess. H. Doc. 228, 76th Cong., Ist Sess. H. Doc. 113, 86th Cong., 1st Sess. Detailed Project Report, Dec. 1966.' S. Doc. 175, 25th Cong., 2d Sess. Annual Report, 1881, p. 2122. Annual Report, 1906, p. 1752 (No prior survey or estimate affecting breakwater extensions). H. Doc. 804, 66th Cong., 2d Sess. H. Doc. 289, 72d Cong., 1st Sess. S. Doc. 29, 76th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 285, 86th Cong., 2d Sess. H. Doc. 134, 87th Cong., 1st Sess.' Annual Report, 1872, p. 237. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 22, 71st Cong., Ist Sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 12, 72d Cong., 1st Sess.; 45, 75th Cong., Ist Sess.' H. R. 6 (formerly S. 1567), 99th Cong., 2d Sess. (WRDA of 1986). H. Doc. 104, 56th Cong., 2d Sess. H. Doc. 494, 67th Cong., 4th Sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 64, 75th Cong., 1st Sess.' H. Doc. 474, 87th Cong., 2d Sess.' I. Doc. 474, 87th Cong., 2d Sess. 21- 82 TABLE 21-B (Continued) DETROIT, MI, DISTRICT AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION See Date of Authorizing Project and Work Sec. Act Authorized Documents deepening inner channel to Galien River to 8 feet and 80 feet wide and 1,250 feet long. Aug. 2, 1882 Jun. 25, 1910 Jun. 25, 1910 Aug. 26, 1937 Oct. 23, 1962 29 Nov. 17, 1986 Jan. 3, 1996 Mar. 2, 1867 Mar. 3, 1873 Jul. 5, 1881 Jul. 13, 1892 Mar. 25, 1907 Aug. 18, 1894 Jun. 13, 1902 Mar. 2, 1945 Mar. 2, 1945 Jul. I1, 1870 Aug. 14, 1876 Aug. 30, 1935 27 Jul. 3, 1958 28 Jan. 3, 1996 47. OCONTO HARBOR, WI Piers, except for inner 300 feet of south pier and 250 feet north pier built by city.2 Present project dimensions of channel and turning basin. ONTONAGON IIARBOR, MI Channel 17 feet deep and 150 feet wide through bar and 15 feet deep and 100 feet wide between piers, and pier maintenance. Modified project widths and provide inner basin. Enlarging and deepening the existing harbor basin. Deauthorization of the turning basin feature of the project authorized by the 1962 Rivers and Harbors Act. Reauthorization of the turning basin feature which was deauthorized (Sec. 1002) in WRDA 86. PENTWATER HIARBOR, MI Piers and revetments, dredging. Piers and revetments, dredging. Piers and revetments, dredging. Piers and revetments, dredging. Present project depth of channel. PETOSKEY HARBOR, MI Breakwaters according to larger of two projects. Removal of north breakwater and extension of west breakwater if cost did not exceed $170,000. POINT LOOKOUT HARBOR (AU GRES RIVER), MI Breakwater, Anchorage Area, Channel Dredging. PORT SANILAC HARBOR, MI Entrance Channel 12 feet deep, Anchorage Basin, Breakwater. PORT WASIIINGTON HARBOR, WI North pier and south basin.'" North basin. North breakwater, removal of 650 feet of north pier, outer turning basin, present project dimensions of channel and basin and extension of south breakwater. Extending and raising of north breakwater and placing rubble along sides; removing 456 feet of south breakwater and dredging in outer basin. Deauthorization of portion of the navigation project. 21- 83 Annual Report, 1881, p. 2066. H. Doc. 538, 61"S Cong., 2d Sess., Plan C.' H. Doc. 602, 61st Cong., 2d Sess. S. Committee print, 74th Cong., 2d Sess. H. Doc. 287, 87th Cong., 2d Sess. H. R. 6 (formerly S. 1567), 99th Cong., 2d Sess. (WRDA of 1986). Sec. 363 (e) of WRDA 1996 H. Ex. Doc. 70, 39th Cong, 2d Sess. H. Ex. Doc. 70, 39th Cong, 2d Sess. H. Ex. Doc. 70, 39th Cong, 2d Sess. H. Ex. Doc. 70, 39th Cong, 2d Sess. H. Doc. 181, 39th Cong., 2d Sess.' Annual Report 1890, p. 2673 Annual Report 1895, p. 2819 Annual Report 1896, p. 2722 1HD. oc. 446, 78 'h Cong., 2d Sess. HI. Doc. 446, 78th Cong., 2d Sess. 1H. Ex. Doc. 28, 41st Cong., 2d Sess. and Annual Report, 1879, p. 119. Annual Report, 1876, pt. 2, p. 379. H. Doc. 168, 72d Cong., 1st Sess. and Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 41, 74th Cong., Ist Sess. H. Doc. 446, 83rd Cong., 2d Sess.' Sec. 501(17) of WRDA of 1996. 48. 49. 50. 51. 52. 53. REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 2000 TABLE 21-B (Continued) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION See Date of Authorizing Project and Work Sec. Act Authorized Documents 54. PORT WING HARBOR, WI 55. 56. Jun. 13, 1902 Jun. 30, 1948 Aug. 5, 1977 Mar. 3, 1879 Aug. 8, 1917 Aug.30, 19352.242s Jul. 3, 1958 2 Oct. 23, 1962 2 57. 58. Jun. 25, 1910 ul. 3, 1930 Aug. 26, 1937 Jun. 20, 1938 Sep. 3, 1954 Oct. 23, 1962 Oct. 27, 1965 Jul. 13, 1892 Jul. 8, 1930 Mar. 2, 1945 Jul. 24, 1946 22 Mar. 21, 1956 22 Construction of parallel piers and dredging. Dredging inner channels and abandonment of certain revetments and channels. Deauthorization of 50 feet of entrance channel widening. PORTAGE LAKE HARBOR, MI Entrance channel 18 feet deep protected by piers and revetments. ROUGE RIVER, MI 21-foot channel via the Shortcut Canal 25-foot channel at mouth of Old Channel, 1,425 feet long and adjacent to latter; 21-foot channel extending from junction of Old Channel and Shortcut Canal into Old Channel to Detroit, Toledo & Ironton R.R. Bridge. Old Channel; 100 feet wide from Peerless Cement Corp. To Junction with Shortcut Canal widened to 150 feet at 2 bends. 25-foot channel over modified limits from Detroit River to Jefferson Avenue (via Shortcut Canal). SAGINAW RIVER, MI Channel 200 feet wide, with depth of 18.5 feet in Bay and 16.5 feet in River. Project Depth of 18.5 feet extended up River to Saginaw. Turning Basin. Present project channel dimensions from Bay to Sixth Street Bridge in Saginaw. New Channel in Bay, 350 feet wide and 24 feet deep from 24-foot contour to River Mouth, Project Depth of 24 feet in River Channel up to Detroit & Mackinac Railway Bridge, Project Depth of 22 feet in River Channel up to Sixth Street Bridge, Turning Basins at Essexville and Carrollton, and elimination of present Channel in Bay. Deepen Bay Channel, Deepen River Channel to Detroit & Mackinac Bridge, Extend 22-foot project above Sixth Street Bridge, Deepen Essexville Turning Basin, and Construct 2 new Turning Basins.3 Deepen River Channel to 25 feet, from Detroit & Mackinac Bridge to New York Central Railroad Bridge. ST. CLAIR RIVER, MI 20-foot Channel in the River. Deepen Channel to 25 and 26 feet, and Compensating Works. Widening Channel at Southeast Bend to 700 feet. Widen and deepen Southeast Bend and improve Outlet of North Channel, St. Clair River. Deepen and further improve Channels in St. Clair River H. Doc. 114, 56th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 668, 80th Cong., 2d Sess. Annual Report 1879, p. 1634 30 H. Doc. 1063, 64th Cong, 2d Sess.23 1HD. oc. 125, 85th Cong., 1st. Sess. H. Doc. 509, 87th Cong., 2d Sess.' H. Doc. 740, 61st Cong., 2d Sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 30, 71st Cong., 2d Sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 21, 75th Cong., Ist Sess. H. Doc. 576, 75th Cong., 3rd Sess. H. Doc. 500, 83rd Cong., 2d Sess. H. Doc. 554, 87th Cong., 2d Sess. H. Doc. 240, 89th Cong., Ist Sess.' H. Doc. 207, 51st Cong., 2d Sess. H. Doc. 253, 70th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 309, 77th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 335, 80th Cong., Ist Sess. S. Doc. 71, 84th Cong., Ist Sess. 21- 84 TABLE 21-B (Continued) DETROIT, MI, DISTRICT AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION See Date of Authorizing Project and Work Sec. Act Authorized Documents Nov. 17, 1986 Mar. 3, 1875 Jun. 14, 1880 Mar. 3, 1899 Aug. 30, 1935 Jun. 2, 1937 Mar. 2, 1945 Jul. 3, 1958 Jun. 3, 1896 Mar. 2, 1907 Jun. 25, 1910 Jul. 3, 1958 Jun. 3, 1896 Mar. 2, 1907 Jan. 21, 1927 Aug. 30, 1935 Sep. 3, 1954 59. between limits of 27.1 to 30 teet to provide sate navigation by vessels with drafts of 25.5 feet. A cutoff Channel in Canada at Southeast Bend and abandon old Southeast Bend Channels. Deauthorization of the work authorized by the Rivers and Harbors Act of Jul. 24, 1946. ST. JOSEPH IIARBOR, MI Interior Revetments. 26 Benton Harbor Canal. 26 Present project dimensions of piers and a turning basin. Present project dimensions of the channel and turning basin near mouth of Paw Paw River. Abandon easterly 1,000 feet of canal above west line of 9th Street. Turning basin above mouth of Morrison Channel and eliminate turning basin near mouth of Paw Paw River. Maintenance of turning basin near mouth of Paw Paw River. SAUGATUCK HARBOR AND KALAMAZOO RIVER, MI Entrance Channel, Piers and Revetments. Deepening entrance to 16 feet. Deepening Channel in River to 14 feet. SAXON HARBOR, WI Provides for east and west breakwaters, an outer channel 10 feet deep, an inner basin and side channel 8 feet deep, and a diversion of Oronto Creek to Parkers Creek by 3 short reaches of channel excavation and a levee. SEBEWAING RIVER, MI Entrance Channel 8 feet deep, 100 feet wide and 15,000 feet long in Saginaw Bay. SIIEBOYGAN HARBOR, WI North breakwater. Preserving south pier as part of project, providing turning basin, and elimination of proposed south breakwaters. Present project dimensions of channel. Widen and deepen outer harbor entrance channel to 450 feet, widen and deepen river channel from present H. Doc. 912, 54th Cong., Ist Sess.; Annual Report, 1896, Vol. 2, Pt. 5, p. 2739. Annual Report, 1907, p. 6416. H. Doc. 635, 61st Cong., 2d Sess. River and Harbors Act, H. Doc. 169, 85 'h Cong., Ist Sess.,' Annual Report for 1965, p. 1025. H. Doc 71, 54th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 62, 59th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 475, 68th Cong., 2d Sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 47, 74th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 554, 82d Cong., 2d Sess.' 21- 85 H. R. 6 (formerly S. 1567), 99th Cong., 2d Sess. (WRDA of 1986). H. Ex. Doc. 160, 43rd Cong., 2d Sess., and Annual Report, 1875, pt. 1, p. 162. Annual Report, 1880, pp. 2030, 2031, 2049, and 2055. H. Doc. 307, 55th Cong., 2d Sess., and Annual Report, 1898, p. 2496. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 52, 74th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 129, 76th Cong., Ist Sess. S. Doc. 95, 84th Cong., 2d Sess.' 60. 61. 62. 63. REPORT OF THIE SECRETARY OF TIIE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 2000 TABLE 21-B (Continued) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION See Date of Authorizing Project and Work Sec. Act Authorized Documents project limit to north side of Jefferson Avenue. Aug. 11, 1888 Mar. 3, 1905 Aug. 30, 1935 Oct. 31, 1992 Mar. 3, 1873 Jul. 13, 1892 Jun. 13, 1902 Aug. 30, 1935 Mar. 2, 1945 Mar. 3, 1871 Mar. 2, 1907 Aug. 30, 1935 22 Jul. 3, 1958 Mar. 2, 1867 Mar. 3, 1873 Jul. 5, 1884 Jul. 13, 1892 Mar. 2, 1907 Mar. 2, 1945 Aug. 17, 1967 Jul. 24, 1946 Nov. 5, 1990 Oct. 30, 1990 64. SOUTH HAVEN HARBOR, MI Channel from Inner End of Piers to Highway Bridge.'2 Present dimensions of Piers and for a Turning Basin. Present project dimensions of Channel and Turning Basin. Turning Basin deauthorized. STURGEON BAY AND LAKE MICIIGAN SHIP CANAL, WI Breakwaters. 12 Acquision of the canal. Canal revetments and consolidation of canal and harbor works. Present project dimensions of channels and elimination of turning basin immediately west of revetted canal. Turning basin between city and Bushman wharves. TWO RIVERS HARBOR, WI South pier, 750 feet of north pier, and about 44 feet of north revetment.' 2 Remainder of north pier and stilling basin. Deepening entrance channel and inner basin to 18 feet. Extend existing project in West Twin River to 18 feet deep and in East Twin River to 10 feet deep to 22nd Street Bridge. WIIITE LAKE HARBOR, MI New Channel, with Piers and Revetments. New Channel, with Piers and Revetments. New Channel, with Piers and Revetments. New Channel, with Piers and Revetments. Present project depth of Channel. WIIITEFISH POINT HARBOR, MI Breakwaters. Entrance Channel, Anchorage Basin. Breakwater Inside Harbor. CLINTON RIVER SPILLWAY, MI Construction of a cutoff canal with control weirs. Completed project review due to significantly changed physical conditions. FORT WAYNE METRO AREA, IN Provides 100-year level of flood protection to part of 21- 86 No Prior Survey or Estimate. H. Doc. 119, 58th Cong., 2d Sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 9, 73rd Cong., 1st Sess.' and Unpublished review Report of Chief of Engineers, dated Dec. 21, 1934. Public Law 102-580 (Section 116 of WRDA of 1992). H. Ex. Doc. 34, 42d Cong, 2d Sess.; Annual Report, 1872, p. 171. H. Ex. Doc. 106, 49th Cong., 2d Sess. H. Doc. 117, 56th Cong., 2d Sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 9, 74th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 421, 78th Cong., 2d Sess. Annual Report, 1871, p. 123 (as modified by Chief of Engineers, Feb. 27, 1897). H. Doc. 730, 59th Cong., 1st Sess., Modification of Plan A. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 25, 73rd Cong., 2d Sess. H. Doc. 362, 84th Cong., 2d Sess.' Unpublished Survey Report of 1868 Unpublished Survey Report of 1868 Unpublished Survey Report of 1868 No Prior Survey or Estimate." H. Doc. 446, 78th Cong. 2d Sess. Chief of Engineers. H. Doc. 694, 79th Cong., 2d Sess.' Section 216 Reconnaissance Report, September 1991. Public Law 101-640 (Section 101 of 65. 66. 67. 68. 77. 78. TABLE 21-B (Continued) DETROIT, MI, DISTRICT AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION See Date of Authorizing Project and Work Sec. Act Authorized Documents Central area of city of Fort Wayne, IN. WRDA of 1990) 79. Jul. 3, 1958 Aug. 17, 1991 Oct. 8, 1992 Jan. 3, 1996 80. Aug. 18, 1941 Jul. 11, 1870 Aug. 5, 1886 Jul. 13, 1892 Jun. 13, 1902 Jun. 13, 1902 Mar. 2, 1905 Mar. 3, 1907 Mar. 3, 1909 Jul. 25, 1912 Mar. 4, 1915 Sep. 22, 1922 Jan. 21, 1927 Jul. 3, 1930 Jun. 26, 1934 9 Aug. 30, 1935 Mar. 7, 1942 Jun. 15, 1943 Mar. 2, 1945 SAGINAW RIVER, MI, FLOOD CONTROL Flood control improvements to Saginaw River and its tributaries including Tittabawassee, Shiawassee, Flint, and Cass Rivers. One-time O&M repairs at Flint Unit to restore project to original dimensions. Provides funding for continuing O&M repairs at Flint Unit. Project is modified to include as part of the project the design and construction of an inflatable dam. SEBEWAING RIVER, MI Enlarging present Channel of Sebewaing River, altering Railroad and Highway Bridges, removal of Dike. ST. MARYS RIVER, MI Weitzel Lock (Replaced in 1943 by MacArthur Lock), widen and deepen existing State Channel.26 Poe Lock.' Dredging through shoals above falls and shoals below falls between lower end of Canal and upper entrance Channel into Lake Nicolet (formerly Hay Lake). Enlarging the Old Channel. Lake Nicolet and Neebish Channels work in that section of River below Locks. Davis Lock Second Canal, and Emergency Dam. Lease of Waterpower at Falls, Lease entered into with Michigan Northern Power Company provided for construction of remedial and compensating works. Fourth Lock (Renamed 'Sabin' Lock in 1943). Deepen Tailrace of Power Plant. Widen upper approach to Canals through Vidal Shoals, extend anchorage and maneuver area below locks. Remove Round Island, middle ground extension of Northwest Canal Pier, and widen Channels Middle Neebish Route. Deepen Channels throughout downbound Route. Operation and Care of Canal and Locks provided from War Department Appropriations for Rivers and Harbors. Widen Brush Point Turn and Channel from Brush Point to Point Louise. Construct new (MacArthur) Lock on site of former Weitzel Lock, deepen approach Channels to 27 feet, and reconstruct approach Piers. Name 'MacArthur' Lock and changed name of'Fourth' Lock to'Sabin' Lock. Remove Bridge Island and construct new Hydroelectric H. Doc. 346, 84th Cong., 2d Sess.' Energy and Water Development Appropriation Act of 1992, (P.L. 102-104). Energy and Water Resources Appropriation Act of 1993, H.R. 5373, (P.L. 102-377). Sec. 329 of WRDA 1996. H. Doc. 286, 76th Cong. 1st Sess.' Report by Maj. O.M. Poe, Corps of Engineers, not published. H. Ex. Doc. 72, 49th Cong. 2d Sess. H. Ex. Doe. 207, 51st Cong., 2d Sess., and Annual Report, 1891, p. 2810. H. Doc. 138, 56th Cong., 2d Sess., and 215, 58th Cong., 3rd Sess. H. Doc. 128, 56th Cong., 2d Sess. H. Doec. 215, 56th Cong., 3rd Sess. H. Doc. 333, 59th Cong., 2d Sess. (Plan 3). H. Doe. 65, 62d Cong., 1st Sess. District Engineer Report, Oct. 29, 1920. H. Doc. 270, 69th Cong., Ist Sess. H. Doc. 253, 70th Cong., 1st Sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 53, 74th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 218, 77th Cong., Ist Sess. H. Doc. 679, 78th Cong., 2d Sess., 21- 87 85. REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 2000 TABLE 21-B (Continued) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION See Date of Authorizing Project and Work Sec. Act Authorized Documents Power Plant. And 339, 77th Cong., Ist Sess. Jul. 24, 1946 Mar. 21, 1956 Jul. 9, 1956 Nov. 17, 1986 Replace Poe Lock at St. Marys Falls Canal with a new structure 800 feet long, 100 feet wide and 32 feet deep with necessary construction of Nose and Center Piers, and widen and deepen Channel across Point Iroquois Shoals and in Lake Nicolet to provide wider anchorage and maneuver areas in St. Marys River. Deepen to provide a Project Safe Draft of 25.5 feet over full width to downbound and 2-way Channels (including anchorage areas) and over Westerly 300-foot width of upbound Middle Neebish Channel, when levels of Lakes Superior and Huron are at their respective LWD's. Repeal Authorization of Bridge as a part of Project, authorize alteration with cost to be apportioned by Sec. 6, Truman Hobbs Act, Jun. 21, 1940. Construct a second large lock 1,294 feet in length, 115 feet in width, and 32 feet in depth, adjacent to the existing lock. The replacement lock is to be located in the North Canal of the St. Marys Falls Canal at Sault Ste. Marie, MI, on the site of the existing Davis and Sabin Locks. 'Contains latest published map. 2lncluding Emergency Relief Administration Work authorized May 28, 1935. 'Included in Public Works Administration Program September 6, 1933. 'This modification deauthorized August 5, 1977, under Section 12, Public Law 93-251. SAdministrative Act, Section 4. 6Public Law 568, 82d Congress. 'Public Law 388, 87th Congress. sThis portion inactive.. 9Permanent Appropriations Repeal Act. '"Transfer completed June 1962. "Amended 1868, 1879, 1892. 2Completed under previous project. "Included in Public Works Administration Program January 3, 1934. '4Inactive portion; removal of 200 linear feet of north pier, widening inner 200 feet of channel through outer basin, and closing gap in north shore connection of breakwater. "Latest published map is in Annual Report, 1914, p. 2974. "'Latest published map in Annual Report, 1914, p. 2914. "Superseded by Act of October 23, 1962. "Uncompleted portion was deauthorized in 1977 (dredging Milwaukee River from Buffalo Street Bridge to North H. Doc. 335, 80th Cong., Ist Sess. S. Doc. 71, 84th Cong., 1st Sess.' None. H. R. 6 (formerly S. 1567), 99th Cong., 2d Sess. (WRDA of 1986). Humboldt Avenue Bridge). '9Modified by Act of June 10, 1872. 20Riprapping of protecting dikes portion of project is inactive. 21War Department Appropriations Act. 22Uncompleted portion deauthorized December 31, 1989, under Section 1001, P.L. 99-662. "Contains latest published maps. See also map with Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 19, 72d Cong., Ist Sess. 24Except for dredging 25-foot channel to 1,150 feet upstream of mouth of old channel, work authorized in this Act is considered inactive. "This modification deauthorized August 5, 1977, under Section 12, Public Law 93-25 1. 26Completed under previous projects. Public Law 130, 75th Cong., Ist Sess. "Work recommended in H. Doc. 588, 64th Cong., Ist Sess. 28Deauthorized in 1977. "This modification deauthorized December 31, 1989, under Section 1001, P.L. 99-662. S"Latest published map is in H. Doc. 588, 64th Cong., 1st Sess. '"Latest published map is in H. Doc. 2053, 64th Cong., 2d Sess. 21- 88 DETROIT, MI, DISTRICT TABLE 21-C OTHER AUTHORIZED NAVIGATION PROJECTS Cost to Sep. 30, 2000 For Last Full Report Operation See Annual & Project Status Report for Construction Maintenance Alternative Technology Project, Duluth Active ---- 0 609,199 Bayfield Harbor, WI Completed 1979 183,855 165,949 Bell River, MI Completed 1980 24,301 133,308 Beaver Bay, MN Active 1982 293,000 2,818 Black River (lcona Co), MI Inactive 1907 0 878 Bolles Harbor, MI Completed 1996 472,916 3,647,940 Channels in Straits of Mackinac, MI Completed 1991 2,832,629 263,180 Cheboygan Harbor, MI Completed 1998 504,236 1,043,297 Chippewa Harbor, Isle Royale, MI Completed 1959 125,629 17,829 Cross Village, MI Active 1983 364,000 0 DeTour Harbor, MI Completed 1989 2,559,346 165,605 Eagle Harbor, MI Completed 1996 205,164 ' 134,903 Grand Marias Harbor, MI Completed 1998 1,055,871 2,643,031 Grand Marais Harbor, MN Completed 1996 450,972 2,389,569 Grays Reef Passage, MI Completed 1970 190,521 852,757 Htammond Bay Harbor, MI Completed 1998 1,092,366 1,068,148 Knife River Harbor, MN Completed 1999 528,945 315,561 Les Cheneaux Island Channels, MI Completed 1980 399,478 368,060 Little Bay De Noc, Gladstone Harbor, MI Completed 1966 332,832 105,634 Lutsen Harbor, MN Active 1982 357,000 0 Mackinac Island Harbor, MI Completed 1989 334,089 1,816,628 Mackinaw City Harbor, MI Completed 1986 136,286 2 120,121 Northport Harbor, WI Inactive ---- 0 0 Pensaukee Harbor, WI Completed 1996 34,035 * 679,767 Pine River, MI Completed 1980 13,649 97,942 Port Austin Harbor, MI Completed 1998 3,363,334 2,082,777 3 21- 89 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF TIlE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 2000 Presque Isle Harbor, MI Completed 1998 1,252,192 1,936,642 4 Silver Bay Harbor, MN Completed 1999 2,600,000 0 St. James, Beaver Island, MI Completed 1957 49,1715 573,305 St. Joseph River, MI Completed 1975 54,555 19,185 Tawas Bay Harbor, MI Completed 1996 2,110,745 98,108 Two Harbors Harbor, MN Completed 1998 4,170,710 6 5,252,461 Washington Island, WI Completed 1950 62,838 107,336 'Excludes $27,800 for previous projects. 2Excludes $210,500 Contributed Funds. 3Includes $159,000 for Diked Disposal. 4 lIncludes $16,500 for Diked Disposal. 5Excludes $7,500 Contributed Funds. 6Includes $48,404 Nat'l Recovery Act. 21- 90 DETROIT, MI, DISTRICT TABLE 21-E OTHER AUTHORIZED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS Cost to Sep. 30, 2000 For Last Full Report See Annual Operation & Project Status Report for Construction Maintenance Kawkawlin River, MI 1.2 Completed 1999 1,000,000 470,500 Kalamazoo River (Battle Creek) MI .4 Deferred 1975 4,471,235 ---- Paw Paw Lake. MI Completed 1989 3,589.000 ---- Upper River Rouee.MI ' Inactive 1968 7.935 River Rouge, MI Completed 1981 31,960,332 ---- Excludes $204,559 Contributed Funds. 4Uncompleted portion deauthorized Dec. 31, 1989, in accordance with Section 1001 of the 2Excludes 228,748 Contributed Funds. W.R.D.A. of 1986 (PL 99-662). 3lncludes $108,335 Contributed Funds. sPlanning indefinitely suspended due to lack of local cooperation. TABLE 21-F MULTIPLE PURPOSE PROJECTS, INCLUDING POWER ST. MARYS RIVER, MI: EXISTING PROJECT (SEE SECTION 85 OF TEXT) Lock Davis Sabin MacArthur New Poe Miles Above Mouth 47 47 47 47 Clear Width of Chamber Feet 80 80 80 110 Leneth Between Gate Quoins Feet 1.350 1.350 800 1.200 Lifts Feet 21.7 21.7 21.7 21.7 Depth Over Upper Breast Walls' Feet 24.3 24.3 31 32 Depth Over Lower Breast Walls' Feet 23.1 23.1 31 32 Foundation Rock Rock Rock Rock Type of Construction Concrete Concrete Concrete Concrete Estimated Cost $6.200.0002 $3.275.000' $12.909.440 $39.000.000 Actual Cost $2.200.0005 $1.750.0006 $12.718.80647 $34.813.066 Completed (Open to Commerce) Oct. 21. 1914 Sep. 18. 1919 Jul. 1,. 1943 Jun. 26. 1969 Emergency Dam for South Canal North Canal Miles Above Mouth 47 47 Estimated Cost 9 $300.000 Type Steel Stoplogs Steel Stoplogs Recessed Recessed Into Lock Masonry Into Lock Masonry Cost Completed 9 $169.224 Year Completed 1943 1922 (Modified 1963) 'At low water datum 600.6 above and 578.4 below. 2Includes cost of North Canal. 'Includes cost of canal excavations to provide necessary approaches to lock, canal walls, piers, and emergency dam, $662,919. 4Excludes cost of deepening and enlarging South Canal, $1,653,378. 'Excludes cost of North Canal, $2,572,611. 6Excludes cost of canal excavation to provide necessary approaches to lock, canal walls, piers, and emergency dam, $662,919. 7Excluding cost of lower guard gates which were never installed. 8Including engineering office and inspection. 'Not separate from cost of locks. Note;. Limiting draft to locks is determined by depth over breast walls. 21-91 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 2000 TABLE 21-G Project Beaver Bay, MN (Mar. 2, 1945 R&H Act) Berrien County, MI (St.Joseph Shore) beach erosion control (1958 Flood Control Act) Black River Harbor, Alcona County, MI (Authorized Dec.17, 1979, under Section 201 of the 1965 Flood Control Act) Black River Harbor, MI (Aug. 30, 1935 R&H Act) Detroit River, Trenton Chnl., MI (May 17, 1950 R&H Act) Detroit River, Trenton Chnl., MI (Uncompleted portion) (Aug. 13, 1968 R&H Act) Duluth-Superior Inner Harbor, MN and WI (Jul. 14, 1960 R&H Act) Forestville Harbor, MI (1968 R&H Act) Grand Haven Harbor, MI (Mar. 2, 1945 R&H Act) Grand River at Grandville, MI (Oct. 27, 1965 Flood Control Act) Great Lakes Connecting Channels, MI' (Uncompleted portion) (R&H Acts of 1946 and 1956) Green Bay Harbor, Brown County, WI (1962 Modification) Harbors of Washington Island, WI (R&H Act of 1937) Holland Harbor Entrance Channel, MI (Uncompleted portion) (Sep. 3, 1954 R&H Act) Kalamazoo River, Battle Creek, MI (Uncompleted portion) (1954 Flood Control Act) Kalamazoo River, Kalamazoo, MI (Jul. 3, 1958 Flood Control Act) DEAUTHORIZED PROJECTS For Last Full Report See Annual Report For 1982 1963 1971 1976 1976 1976 1990 1969 1976 1966 1990 1999 1950 1962 1975 1975 21-92 Federal Funds Expended 295,818 Contributed Funds Expended 0 Date Deauthorized Jul 1995 Nov 1986 Dec 1989 Nov 1977 Aug 1977 Dec 1989 Dec 1989 Nov 1986 Nov 1977 Nov 1977 Dec 1989 April 1999 Dec 1989 Dec 1989 Dec 1989 Dec 1989 93,993,349 4,030,000 1,970,000 62,838 6,656,668 416,822 108,332 ="mom -- 159,300,000 14,562,100 DETROIT, MI, DISTRICT TABLE 21-G (Continued) DEAUTHORIZED PROJECTS For Last Full Report Federal Contributed See Annual Date Funds Funds Project Report For Deauthorized Expended Expended Kenosha Harbor, WI 1990 Dec 1989 552,000 43,000 (Uncompleted portion) (Oct. 23, 1962 R&HI Act) Kewaunee River, WI 1976 Aug 1977 0 0 (1960 R&H Act) Lansing (Grand River), MI 1971 Jun 1981 7,000 0 (Jul. 3, 1958 Flood Control Act) Lower Fox River, WI 1990 Dec 1989 3,753,334 0 (Uncompleted portion) (Mar. 3, 1925 R&H Act) Lutsen Harbor, MN 1990 Jul 1995 357,000 0 (Mar. 2, 1945 R&H Act) Manitowoc Harbor, WI 1990 Dec 1989 0 0 (Oct. 23, 1962 R&H Act) Milwaukee Outer Harbor, WI 1990 Dec 1989 6,937,804 478,000 (Uncompleted portion) (R&iH Act of 1935) Northport Harbor, WI .. Dec 1989 132,000 0 (Authorized in 1972 under Section 201 of the 1965 Flood Control Act) Ontonagon Harbor, MI 1990 Dec 1989 27,482 0 (R&Hl Act of 1962) Pentwater Harbor, MI 1976 Nov 1977 0 0 (Jul. 13, 1892 R&II Act) Racine Harbor, WI 1963 May 1986 9,441,554 0 (Mar. 2, 1907; Aug. 26, 1937; and Mar. 2, 1945 R&H Acts, and Section 107 of the 1960 R&H Act) 1983 Nov 1986 3,823,000 0 Red Run Drain, Lower Clinton River, MI (1970 Flood Control Act) 1926 Aug 1977 5,892 0 Rogers City Harbor, MI (Jun. 25, 1910 R&HI Act) 1976 Aug 1977 22,000 0 Rouge River, MI (Oct 23, 1962 R&H Act) 1976 Aug 1977 12,000 0 Rouge River, MI (Jul. 3, 1958 R&H Act) Rouge River, Mi 1976 Aug1977 0 0 (Aug. 30, 1935 R&H Act) 1983 May 1997 5,125,000 1,611,500 Saginaw River, MI (Midland on Tittabawassee River) 19076 Aug 1977 0 St. Clair River Compensating Works, MI 1976 Aug 1977 Jul. 3, 1930 R&ll Act) 21-93 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 2000 TABLE 21-G (Continued) DEAUTHORIZED PROJECTS For Last Full Report Federal Contributed See Annual Date Funds Funds Project Report For Deauthorized Expended Expended South Milwaukee Harbor, WI (1836 Flood Control Act) St. Marys River (MacArthur Lock Guard Gates), MI (Mar. 7, 1942 R&H Act) Two Rivers Harbor, WI (Uncompleted portion) (Aug. 30, 1935 R&H Act) 'Includes Detroit and St. Clair Rivers. 1906 1977 1990 Aug 1977 Oct 1978 Dec 1989 147,463 21-94 DETROIT, MI, DISTRICT TABLE 21-H FEATURES OF EXISTING PROJECT Length Miles Upbound Project Name of Channel of from or Down- Project Project Datum Year Channel River bound Width Depth Planes Com- (Feet) Mouth Vessels (Feet) (Feet) IGLD 1985 plete (Feet) DETROIT RIVER, MI (SEE SECTION 16 OF TEXT) Channel north of Belle Isle' Channel at head of Detroit River Misc. shoals and obstructions Belle Isle to Fighting Island Channel Fighting Island Channel Ballards Reef Channel north of junction with Livingstone Channel Livingstone Channel Upper Livingstone Channel Lower: CS 260+00 to 368+87 CS 368+87 to 492+00 East Outer Channel Misc. shoals and obstructions, Detroit River to Pelee Passage Pelee Passage Shoal Amherstberg Channel: Upper Section, Ballards Reef Channel Middle Section Lower Section, Hackett Range West Outer Channel Trenton Channel: Wyandotte Reach Trenton Channel (Upper) Trenton Reach (Lower) Grosse Ile Shoal 2 38,800 44,500 30 32 25 24,800 17 12,200 12 26,000 10 10,887 5 12,313 --- 42,000 --- Both 200 Both 800 Both --- Both 800 Both 600 Down 450 Down Both Both Both Both 6,500 12,000 24,000 21,000 31,500 5,100 600 600 10 17 14 Up Up Up Down Local Local Local Local 450-800 800-1,200 1,200 600 600 600 800 300 300 250-300 ..-- 21.0 28.5 28.5 28.5 28.5 27.7 29.0 29.0 28.5 28.5-29.5' 29.5 27.5 21-27.54 21-28.55 22.0 27.0 28.0 28.0 20.0 571.9 572.1-571.5 571.5-570.9 570.4 570.4 1964 1964 1964 1962 1964 570.4-569.2 1964 569.2 569.2 569.2 569.2 569.2 570.4-570.1 570.1-569.5 569.5-569.2 569.2 570.3-570.2 570.2-569.4 570.4 1961 1961 1964 1964 1960 1960 1960 1929 19646 1964 1941 1904 ST. CLAIR RIVER, MI (SEE SECTION 58 OF TEXT) Channel at foot of Lake Huron Channel north of Blue Water Bridge Port Huron to Stag Island: Widening at Upper and Lower Ends of Stag Island St. Clair to Russell Island Russell Island to Southeast Bend Southeast Bend: CS 324+00 to 250+00 Cutoff Channel North Channel Outlet 26,500 44 4,100 39 38,000 37,600 77,000 20,600 7,400 30,300 8,000 38 31 24 11 5 Both 800 Both 800 Both Both Both Both Both Both Small Craft 1,000- 1,400 900-1,000 1,000 700-1,000 700 700 100 30.0 30.0 27.4 27.3 27.3 27.2 27.1 27.1 10.0 577.5-577.1 1961 577.1-576.5 1962 577.1-575.3 575.3-574.3 574.3-572.6 572.6-572.3 572.3-572.2 572.2 572.2 1961 1962 1962 1962 1962 1962 'This is a side channel. 2Extends from deep water near Windmill Point to a point opposite Fairview Slip, about 3,000 feet. Project depth 29.5 feet over Rock Shoals and 28.5 feet over other than Rock Shoals. 4Project depth 21 feet in easterly 300-foot width of channel and 27.5 feet in westerly 300-foot width. SProject depth 21 feet in easterly 300-foot width of channel and 28.5 feet in westerly 300-foot width. 6Project complete except for work authorized by Rivers and Harbors Act of 1950. 21-95 c REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 2000 TABLE 21-I FOX RIVER, WI: LOCKS AND DAMS (SEE SECTION 18 OF TEXT) Depth at Normal Pool Miles Avail- Lower from Dis- Clear able Breast Miter Year Green Nearest tance Width Length Lift Wall' Sill Character of Kind of Type of Com- Actu Name of Lock and Dam Bay Town (miles) (feet) (feet) (feet) (feet) (feet) Foundation Dam Construction plete DePere lock2 7.1 DePere - 36.0 146.0 8.9 10.3 12.0 Rock - Concrete 1936 $2 DePere dam' 7.2 DePere - - - - .- - Rock Fixed' "4 Concrete 1929 20 Little Kaukauna lock2 13.0 DePere 6 36.0 146.0 7.2 8.0 9.5 Clay - Concrete 1938 36 Little Kaukauna dam2 13.1 DePere 6 - - - - - Clay & Gravel Fixed3' 4 Piers and concrete 1926 17 Rapide Croche lock2 19.2 Wrightstow 2 36.0 146.0 8.3 8.8 9.3 Rock -- Concrete 1934 22 Rapide Croche dam2 19.3 Wrightstow 2 - - - - - Rock Fixed' "4 Concrete 1930 11 Kaukauna fifth lock'2 22.8 Kaukauna - 35.6 144.0 9.1 6.7 9.3 Rock - Composite 1898 1 Kaukauna fourth lock2 23.1 Kaukauna - 36.6 144.1 10.2 6.9 6.0 Rock - Stone masonry 1879 3 Kaukauna third lock2 23.3 Kaukauna - 30.6 144.0 10.2 6.9 6.3 Rock -- Stone masonry 1879 3 Kaukauna second lock2 23.4 Kaukauna - 35.0 144.0 9.6 6.0 6.0 Rock --- Stone masonry 1903 2 Kaukauna first lock2 23.6 Kaukauna - 35.1 144.4 11.0 6.9 6.0 Rock - Stone masonry 1883 3 Kaukauna dam' 24.0 Kaukauna - - - - - - Rock Fixed3'" Concrete 1931 12 Kaukauna guard lock 24.0 Kaukauna - 40.0 - - 9.4 - Rock - Stone masonry 1891 1 Little Chute combined lock: Lower 24.4 Little Chute 1 35.4 146.5 10.9 6.0 8.6 Rock - Stone masonry 1879 1 Upper 25.4 Little Chute 1 36.3 144.1 10.6 7.6 6.0 Hardpan - Stone masonry 1879 Little Chute second lock' 26.4 Little Chute - 35.0 144.2 13.8 8.0 6.1 Rock - Stone masonry 1881 4 Luttle Chute first (guard) lock' 26.5 Little Chute -- 35.4 - - 6.6 -- Rock - Stone masonry 1904 Little Chute dam2 26.6 Little Chute - - - - - - Rock Fixed34 Concrete 1932 8 Cedars lock' 27.3 Little Chute 1 35.0 144.0 9.8 6.8 7.3 Rock - Stone masonry 1888 3 Cedars dam' 27.4 Little Chute 1 - - - - - Rock Fixed3'4 Concrete 1933 8 Appleton fourth lock' 30.7 Appelton 1 35.0 144.0 7.6 8.1 7.9 Rock - Stone masonry 1907 4 Appleton lower dam2 30.9 Appleton I - - - - - Rock Fixed3' Concrete 1934 7 Appleton third lock2 31.3 Appleton - 35.0 144.0 8.7 6.0 8.6 Rock - Stone masonry 1900 3 Appleton second lock2 31.6 Appleton - 35.1 144.6 9.6 6.9 6.0 Clay - Stone masonry 1901 2 Appelton first lock2 31.9 Appleton -- 35.0 144.7 10.0 6.6 6.0 Rock - Stone masonry 1884 3 Appleton upper dam 32.2 Appleton - - - - - - Rock Fixed3 Concrete 1940 1 Menasha lock' 37.0 Menasha - 35.4 144.0 8.5 7.2 8.0 Clay -- Composite 1899 1 Menasha dam2 37.8 Menasha -- -- - -- - - Hardpan Fixed' Concrete 1937 8 'Depth shown is on breast wall, which is controlling depth for upper pool. 2Original structure built prior to assumption of control by United States on Sep. 18, 1872. 'Provided with sluices. 'Flash boards used. sPartially rebuilt. al Cost 29.308 )9,536 52.427 79.398 !8.738 8.975 3.3105 7.536 9.948 4.313 8.704 23.763 2.630 )2.304 ,- 18.555 7.8175 2.554 34.972 4.973 0.893 73.903 2.238 2.940 36.004 51.558 19,3265 4,686 21-96 TABLE 21-J Name of Prnipet DETROIT, MI, DISTRICT RECONNAISSANCE & CONDITION SURVEYS Date Survey Conducted CHEBOYGAN HARBOR, MI EAGLE HARBOR, MI GRAND MARAIS HARBOR, MI GRAND MARAIS HARBOR, MN GRAND TRAVERSE BAY, MI GRAYS REEF PASSAGE, MI KNIFE RIVER HARBOR, MN PORT AUSTIN HARBOR, MI PRESQUE ISLE HARBOR, MI TAWAS BAY HARBOR, MI AUGUST 2000 JUNE 2000 JUNE 2000 SEPTEMBER 2000 JUNE 2000 JUNE 2000 MAY 2000 AUGUST 2000 MAY 2000 SEPTEMBER 2000 21-97 HIII va a ,vj CHICAGO, ILLINOIS, DISTRICT* CHICAGO, ILLINOIS, DISTRICT The district comprises Cook, McHenry, Lake, Kane, DuPage, and Will Counties in Illinois, and Lake and Porter Counties in Indiana, and a portion of La Porte County along Lake Michigan in Indiana. IMPROVEMENTS Navigation 1. Burns Waterway Harbor, IN 2. Burns Waterway SBH, IN 3. Burns Waterway Harbor (Major Rehab), IN 4. Calumet Harbor and River, IL and IN 5. Chicago Harbor, IL 6. Chicago River, IL 7. Indiana Harbor, IN 8. Indiana Harbor CDF 9. Lake Michigan Diversion 10. Michigan City Harbor, IN 11. Waukegan Harbor, IL 12. Reconnaissance and Condition Surveys 13. National Emergency Preparedness Alterations of Bridges 14. Other Authorized Bridge Alterations Beach Erosion Control 15. Casino Beach, IL 16. Chicago Shoreline, IL 17. Illinois Beach State Park, IL 18. Indiana Dunes National Lakeshore Bank Protection, Beverly Shores, IN 19. Indiana Shoreline Erosion, IN 20. Other Authorized Beach Erosion Control Projects 21. Beach Erosion Control Under Special Authorization Flood Control 22. Chicago River, IL (North Branch) 23. Des Plaines River 24. Lake George, Hobart, IN 25. Little Calumet River, IN 26. Little Calumet River Basin, Cady Marsh Ditch, IN 27. McCook and Thornton Reservoirs, IL 28. North Branch, Chicago River, IL 29. O'Hare Reservoir, IL 30. Other Authorized Flood Control Projects 31. Flood Control Work Under Special Authorization General Investigations 32. Surveys 33. Collection and Study of Basic Data Page 22-3 22-3 22-4 22-4 22-5 22-5 22-6 22-6 22-7 22-8 22-8 22-9 22-9 22-9 22-9 22-9 22-10 22-11 22-11 22-11 22-11 22-11 22-12 22-12 22-13 22-13 22-14 22-14 22-15 22-16 22-1 22-16 Page 22-16 22-16 wmmmmm REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 2000 TABLES Table Title Number Pages Cost and Financial Statement Authorization Legislation Existing Projects Other Authorized Bridge Alterations Other Authorized Beach Erosion Projects Other Authorized Flood Control Projects Deauthorized Projects 22-A 22-B 22-C 22-D 22-E 22-F 22-G 22-17 thru-20 22-21 thru 25 22-26 thru 27 22-28 22-28 22-28 22-29 22-2 CHICAGO, ILLINOIS, DISTRICT Navigation 1. BUIRNS WATERWAY HARBOR, IN Location. Northwestern Indiana on the southern shore of Lake Michigan in Porter County, 28 miles southeast of Chicago Harbor. (See NOAA Nautical Chart Numbers 14905 and 14926.) Previous Projects. None. Existing Project. Provides for (a) a rubblemound north breakwater 4,630 feet long and a rubblemound breakwater west arm 1,200 feet long, for a total breakwater length of 5,830 feet; (b) an approach channel 30 feet deep and 400 feet wide; (c) an outer harbor 28 feet deep; (d) an east harbor arm 27 feet deep and 620 feet wide; and (e) a west harbor arm 27 feet deep and 620 feet wide. The project was authorized by the River and Harbor Act of October 27, 1965 (Public Law 89-298; House Document Number 160, 88th Congress, 1st Session). The authorizing act also provided the Secretary of the Army with the authority to reimburse the State of Indiana for expenditure of funds used to construct such portions of the project as approved by the Chief of Engineers and constructed under the supervision of the Chief of Engineers (See tables 22-B,C). Local Cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal Facilities. Eleven berths are available at the facilities owned and administered by the Indiana Port Commission. One berth, committed to grain, is located on the outer harbor. Four berths on the East Harbor Arm are dedicated to handling dry and liquid bulk commodities. The East Harbor Arm also includes a small-boat harbor designed to accommodate working tugs for vessel assistance and barge movement. On the West Arm there are six berths. Although one berth is available for dry bulk cargoes, these berths are primarily used for the shipment and receipt of general cargo. Additionally, the Indiana Port Commission, through a lease, administers the west side of the West Harbor Arm for barge fleeting. The remaining available harbor berthing on the east side of the East Harbor Arm is privately owned. Operations and Results During Period. Maintenance: Sediment surveys and studies were performed at a cost of $105,000 by other Corps of Engineers and $5,644 by hired labor. Breakwater maintenance costs were $75,173 for hired labor and other in-house costs, $286,046 by other Corps of Engineers, and $200,000 by contract. Supervision and administration cost was $7,040. Engineering and design costs were $68,477 by AE contract, $3,263 by other Corps and $113,609 for hired labor and other in-house. Channel maintenance costs were $9,684 by other Corps of Engineers and $7,972 by AE contract. Project operation and real estate costs were $61,673 and $4,376, respectively. Condition at End of Fiscal Year. The existing project is complete. Total costs to September 30, 2000 were $27,187,137 of which $13,599,900 was for new work ($13,584,000 federal and $15,900 nonfederal) and $13,587,237 ($13,478,875 federal and $108,362 non-federal) for was maintenance. 2. BURNS WATERWAY SBH, IN Location. Northwestern Indiana on the southeast shore of Lake Michigan in Porter County, at the mouth of the Burns Waterway, approximately 27 miles southeast of Chicago Harbor. (See NOAA Nautical Chart Numbers 14905 and 14926.) Previous Projects. None Existing Project. Provides for (a) a rubblemound west breakwater 1,043 feet long; (b) a rubblemound north breakwater 678 feet long; and (c) channel improvements of 5,200 linear feet with 145,000 cubic yards of dredged material used for beach nourishment (See table 22-C). Local Cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal Facilities. There are several marinas located along Burns Waterway and Burns Ditch. The principal marina, which is owned and operated jointly by the City of Portage and the Little Calumet River Basin Commission, was built in 1996 to comply with the local cooperation agreement. The commodities handled at this harbor are fresh fish caught as a result of charter boat fishing. Operations and Results During Period. Maintenance: Engineering and design for dredging was performed at a cost of $116,527 by AE contract and $50,101 by hired labor. Channel maintenance costs were $1,350,080 by contract, $472,918 by hired labor, and $33,423 for supervision and administration. Breakwater maintenance was performed at costs of $20,332 for engineering and design, $14,794 by hired labor and $196,000 by other 22-3 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 2000 Corps of engineers. Project management costs were $3,604. Condition at End of Fiscal Year. Total costs of the existing project to September 30, 2000 were $6,998,441 of which $3,770,558 was for new work ($2,000,000 federal and $1,770,558 non-federal), and $3,227,883 for maintenance (federal). 3. BURNS WATERWAY HARBOR (MAJOR REHAB), IN Location. The project is located in northwestern Indiana on the southern shore of Lake Michigan in Porter County. Existing Project. The rehabilitation project consists of constructing a segmented reef breakwater system, 75 feet lakeward of the northern section of the existing rubblemound breakwater. The project provides for seven reef segments, one 1,575 feet long and six 375 feet long with 25 feet spacing between segments Local Cooperation. None required. Operations and Results During the Period. New Work: Following construction completion in 1998, project closeout was completed in 1999. Condition at the End of Fiscal Year. The construction contract was financially completed. The total cost of the existing project to September 30, 2000 was $13,384,161. 4. CALUMET HARBOR AND RIVER, IL and IN Location. Northeastern Illinois, on the southwest shore of Lake Michigan in Cook County, 15 miles south of Chicago Harbor, within the corporate limits of the City of Chicago, except for breakwaters, and approach channel and an anchorage area which are in Indiana. (See NOAA Nautical Chart Numbers 14926 and 14929.) Previous Projects. For details see page 1400 of Annual Report for 1962. Existing Project. Provides for (a) a stone-filled timber crib breakwater 6,714 feet long; (b) a stonefilled double-row steel sheet pile detached breakwater 5,007 feet long; (c) an approach channel 29 feet deep and 3,200 feet wide; (d) an outer harbor anchorage area 28 feet deep and 3,000 feet wide; (e) an entrance channel 27 feet deep and 230 to 290 feet wide; (f) a channel in the Calumet River 27 feet deep and at least 200 feet wide to the north side of 130th Street; (g) three turning basins designated as numbers, 1, 3, and 5; and (h) a channel extending into Lake Calumet at a width of about 1,000 feet. The project was authorized by the River and Harbor Acts of March 3, 1899, June 13, 1902, August 30, 1935, July 14, 1960, October 23, 1962, and October 27, 1965 (See tables 22-B,C). Local Cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal Facilities. Thirty six docks, wharves, and terminals are available. The Illinois International Port District owns four wharves, two grain elevators, one dock, and one terminal. The United States Government owns one stone dock. The most important cargoes handled are general cargo, grain, iron ore and concentrates, coal, and cement. Operations and Results During Period. Maintenance: Sediment surveys and studies were performed by hired labor at a cost of $42,643 and by other Corps of Engineers for $116,749. CDF maintenance costs were $37,928 for hired labor and $150,771 for engineering and design. Costs for routine operation and monitoring of the CDF were $90,362 for hired labor and $5,380 by other federal agency. Costs for breakwater maintenance were $4,579 for hired labor and $532,320 by contract. Dredging costs were $233,935 for in-house E&D, $173,256 by AE contract, $3,916 by other Corps, $52,091 by hired labor and $1,660,000 by contract. Supervision and administration costs were $15,915. Facilities maintenance costs were $113,989. Project management and real estate costs were $84,586 and $3,859, respectively. Condition at End of Fiscal Year. The existing project is 100 percent complete. Total costs of the existing project to September 30, 2000, were $67,068,365 of which $22,578,567 was for new work ($19,541,964 federal funds and $3,036,603 public works funds), $39,061,797 for maintenance ($38,225,130 federal and $836,667 non-federal funds) and $5,428,001 federal funds for rehabilitation. 22-4 CHICAGO, ILLINOIS, DISTRICT 5. CHICAGO HARBOR, IL Location. Northeastern Illinois on the southwest shore of Lake Michigan in Cook County, within the corporate limits of the City of Chicago. (See NOAA Nautical Chart Numbers 14926, 14927, and 14928.) Previous Projects. See page 1396 of Annual Report for 1962. Existing Project. Provides for (a) a stone-filled timber crib shore and extension breakwater 2,250 feet long; (b) a stone-filled timber crib exterior breakwater 5,421 feet long; (c) a rubblemound and stone-filled concrete caisson southerly extension to the exterior breakwater 4,944 feet long, exclusive of a 582-foot entrance gap enclosing an outer basin of about 970 acres; (d) a stone-filled timber crib north pier 960 feet long; (e) a stone-filled timber crib north inner breakwater 4,034 feet long with a 304-foot shore return and a 754-foot gap; (f) a stone-filled timber crib south inner breakwater 2,544 feet long, enclosing an inner basin of approximately 224 acres; (g) a lake approach channel 29 feet deep and 800 feet wide; (h) a channel and maneuver area inside the exterior breakwater and southerly extension breakwater 28 feet deep with a maximum width of 1,300 feet; (i) an entrance channel 21 feet deep and (j) the Chicago Harbor Lock. The Chicago Lock was constructed in 1938 by the Metropolitan Water Reclamation District of Greater Chicago. The deepdraft lock is 600 feet long, 80 feet wide, and 23 feet deep over the sill and is of steel cellular design. The project was authorized by the River and Harbor Acts of July 11, 1870, June 14, 1880, March 3, 1899, July 25, 1912, March 2, 1919 and October 23, 1962 (See table 22-B). Operation and maintenance responsibilities in the interest of navigation were transferred to the Federal Government pursuant to Public Law 98-63 approved July 30, 1983; Section 107 of the Public 97-88; and the Memorandum of Agreement between the Department of Army and the Metropolitan Water Reclamation District of Greater Chicago. Local Cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal Facilities. There are five docks with 18 berths for passenger excursion boats and 10 berths for visiting large vessels. The most important cargoes handled through the lock are petroleum products, in addition to sugar and non-metallic minerals. Operations and Results During Period. Maintenance: Project condition surveys were performed by other Corps for $138,801. The lock was operated by contract at a cost of $673,844. Other costs associated with the lock operation were $10,396 by other Corps and $248,219 for hired labor and other in-house services. Facilities maintenance cost was $33,245 by hired labor and other in-house resources. Lock maintenance costs were $112,780 for hired labor and in-house resources, $49,999 by other federal agency and $100,262 by other Corps of Engineers. Work on lock property improvements was conduct at costs of $93,377 for engineering and design, and $16,562 for hired labor. Breakwater maintenance costs were $18,254 for hired labor, $312,137 by other Corps of Engineers and $388,013 by contract. Work on the lock major rehabilitation report was performed at $103,851 by hired labor and $57,123 by other Corps of Engineers. Project management and real estate costs were $118,107 and $6,312, respectively. Condition at End of Fiscal Year. The existing project is complete. Total costs to September 30, 2000 were $53,326,130 of which $4,788,827 was for new work, $47,050,703 was for maintenance, $1,326,600 for rehabilitation and $160,000 Harbor and Dams funds. 6. CHICAGO RIVER, IL Location. Northeastern Illinois, in Cook County within the corporate limits of the City of Chicago. (See NOAA Nautical Chart Numbers 14926, 14927 and 14928.) Previous Projects. See page 1394 of Annual Report for 1962. Existing Project. Provides for (a) a channel 21 feet deep in the main river from its mouth at Rush Street to the junction of the North and South Branches (0.7 miles); (b) a channel 21 feet deep in the North Branch from the junction to North Avenue (2.22 miles); (c) a channel 21 feet deep on the North Branch Canal (1.04 miles); (d) a 21-foot deep North Branch Turning Basin just south of North Avenue; and (e) a channel 9 feet deep in the North Branch from North Avenue to Addison Street (authorized but not constructed). The project was authorized by the River and Harbor Acts of March 3, 1899, June 13, 1902, March 2, 1907, and July 24, 1946 (See tables 22-5 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 2000 22-B, C). The portion of the project authorized by the River and Harbor Act of 1946 is presently being restudied to confirm economic feasibility. Local Cooperation. Fully complied with for completed modifications. The River and Harbor Act of July 24, 1946, which provided for the improvement of the channel, is subject to the condition that local interests furnish assurances that they will hold the United States government free from damages which may result from construction ,0 and maintenance of the improvement. Requirement has not been complied with. Terminal Facilities. Six docks are available. The most important cargoes handled are sand, gravel and crushed rock, non-metallic minerals and scrap iron. Operations and Results During Period. Maintenance: Water control activities were performed by hired labor at a cost of $162,998, by other Corps of Engineers at a cost $10,000 and by other federal agency at a cost of $145,640. Program management and real estate costs were $20,121 and 9,725 respectively. Condition at End of Fiscal Year. The project is complete except for dredging the channel between North Avenue and Addison Street as authorized by the 1946 River Harbor Act. Channel maintenance for the reach from Clark Street to head of navigation has been deferred pending location and approval of suitable dredged material disposal site. Head of navigation for deep-draft vessels is North Avenue, 5.97 miles from the Michigan Avenue bridge. Total costs of the existing project to September 30, 2000 were $17,923,307 of which $1,500,565 was for new work and $16,422,742 was for maintenance. 7. INDIANA HARBOR, IN Location. Northwestern Indiana, on the southwest shore of Lake Michigan in Lake County, 19 miles southeast of Chicago Harbor. (See NOAA Nautical Chart Numbers 14926 and 14929.) Previous Projects. For details see page 1943 of Annual Report for 1915, and page 1520 of Annual Report for 1938. Existing Project. Provides for (a) a northerly rubblemound breakwater 1,120 feet long; (b) an easterly concrete capped caisson breakwater 201 feet long with a rubblemound extension 2,324 feet long; (c) a lake approach channel 29 feet deep and 800 feet wide; (d) an anchorage and maneuver basin 28 feet deep; (e) a main canal entrance channel 27 feet deep and 280 feet wide; (f) a main canal 22 feet deep; (g) a turning basin 22 feet deep; (h) the Forks Turning Basin 22 feet deep; (i) the Lake George Branch 22 feet deep; and (j) the Calumet River Branch 22 feet deep. The project was authorized by the River and Harbor Acts of March 4, 1913, March 2, 1919, March 20, 1922, July 3, 1930, August 30, 1935, August 28, 1937, and July 14, 1960 (See tables 22-B, C). Local Cooperation. Substantially complied with. See FY 1986 Annual Report for full requirements. Terminal Facilities. Fifteen docks and wharves are available. Six docks handle iron ore and limestone. Six docks are for handling petroleum products and three docks for handling gypsum, scrap metal and steel, and bulk products. However, not all docks are presently being used for the shipment or receipt of waterborne commodities. Operations and Results During Period. Maintenance: A demonstration of dredging disposal, waste water treatment and sediment management was conducted at costs of $253,976 by AE contract, $91,836 by other Corps of Engineers and $17,952 for hired labor and other in-house costs. Project operation and real estate costs were $58,248 and $2,588, respectively. Condition at End of Fiscal year. The existing project is complete. Total costs of the existing project to September 30, 2000 were $19,371,007 of which $4,909,648 ($4,897,148 federal and $12,500 nonfederal contributed funds) was for new work and $14,461,359 (federal) for maintenance. Channel maintenance has been deferred pending construction of suitable Confined Disposal Facility. 8. INDIANA AND CANAL CONFINED DISPOSAL FACILITY (CDF), IN Location: The navigation project is located on the southwestern shore of Lake Michigan within the City of East Chicago, Lake County, Indiana, 4-1/2 miles east of the Indiana-Illinois state line and 17 miles from downtown Chicago, Illinois. A CDF will be constructed at the Energy Cooperative Incorporate (ECI) site in East Chicago, Illinois. 22-6 CHICAGO, ILLINOIS, DISTRICT Existing Project. IHC is an authorized Federal navigation project with an entrance channel and outer harbor protected by breakwaters, and an inner harbor which includes the Indiana Harbor Canal and its two branches, the Lake George Branch, which extends west for a distance of 6,800 feet, and the Calumet River Branch which extends to the south for about 2 miles where it joins the Grand Calumet River. The harbor has not been dredged since 1972, when the United States Environmental Protection Agency determined that disposal in Lake Michigan was no longer acceptable due to the polluted character of the harbor sediments. A 4.8 million cubic yards capacity CDF will be constructed on the 164 acres of land adjacent to the Lake George Branch of the IHC, formerly occupied by an oil refinery owned by the Atlantic Richfield Company and subsequently acquired by ECI. The ECI property currently has open Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) status due to the contaminated soil and grounwater that exists on the site. Use of this site for the CDF is contingent upon the construction of specific RCRA closure and corrective action features which will be integral aspects of the CDF construction. The elements of the CDF include construction of an impervious cutoff wall built around the 11,000 linear feet perimeter of the site to approximately 30-35 feet depths, tied into the clay layer below; groundwater monitoring and extraction wells and pumps to maintain an inward gradient and prevent any contaminated groundwater from leaving the site; an air monitoring system; an on-site water treatment facility to treat groundwater pumpage, water from dried dredged materials and precipitation falling on the site; dikes built in two 15 feet stages, with an impervious clay layer on the interior of the dikes; a rehandling area; and a cap constructed using 3 feet of clay, 6 inches of sand, 2 feet of clean fill and 6 inches top soil with grass cover. This cap configuration, used for both the CDF and the buffer areas, will satisfy the RCRA closure requirement for the ECI site. Local Cooperation. The local sponsor is the East Chicago Waterway Management District (ECWMD). The local sponsor is required to provide all lands, easements and rights-of-way; provide all required relocations; and hold and save the United States government free from any damages due to construction or operation of the project. In addition, the ECWMD is required to pay a cash contribution to bring the total non-federal share to twenty-five percent of the costs allocated to general navigation facilities during construction and pay 50 percent of the costs of incremental maintenance. The local sponsor is also required to reimburse an additional 10 percent of the costs of the general navigation facilities allocated to commercial navigation within a period of 30 years following completion of construction, as partially reduced by a credit allowed for the value of lands, easements, rights of way, relocations, and dredged or excavated material disposal provided for commercial navigation. In addition, the ECWMD is required to pay 100 percent of the costs allocated to general navigation facilities during construction for the local service facilities (non-federal berthing areas) and 100 percent of costs of incremental maintenance for the local service facilities. The Project Cooperation Agreement for the project was executed 7 August 2000. Operations and Results During the Period. New Work: Total engineering and design costs were $1,455,637 including $1,224,030 for hired labor, $56,329 by AE contract, and $168,588 performed by other Corps of Engineers. The real estate costs were $6,690. Condition at the End of Fiscal Year. Work on the Design Document Report was completed and the plans and specifications for the first construction contracts (cut-off wall) were continued. The total cost of the existing project to September 30, 2000 was $2,023,466. 9. LAKE MICHIGAN DIVERSION Location. Northeastern Illinois on the southwest shore of Lake Michigan in Cook County, within the corporate limits of the City of Chicago. (See NOAA Nautical Chart Numbers 14926, 14927, and 14928.) Previous Projects. See page 22-3 of Annual Report for 1988. Operations and Results During Period. Operations: Water accounting studies and preparation of reports were performed at costs of $262,739 by hired labor, $420,694 by other federal agency, and $117,590 by AE contract. Condition at End of Fiscal Year. Total cost of the existing project to September 30, 2000 was $5,661,900. 22-7 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 2000 10. MICHIGAN CITY HARBOR, IN Location. Northwestern Indiana, on the southeast shore of Lake Michigan in La Porte County, 38 miles southeast of Chicago Harbor. (See NOAA Nautical Chart Numbers 14905 and 14926.) Previous Projects. See page 1407 of Annual Report for 1992. Existing Project. Provides for (a) a stone-filled,, timber crib detached breakwater 1,304 feet long; (b) a pile and steel sheeting west pier 835 feet long; (c) a stone-filled timber crib, pile and steel sheeting east pier 2,276 feet long; (d) a stone-filled timber crib east breakwater 1,000 feet long; (e) an entrance channel 18 feet deep and 425 feet wide; (f) a turning basin No. 1, 18 feet deep; (g) a channel in Trail Creek 18 feet deep; (h) an outer basin 12 feet deep in the northerly portion and 8 feet deep in the southerly portion; and (i) a channel in Trail Creek 6 feet deep and 50 feet wide from turning basin No. 2 to the E Street bridge. The project was authorized by the River and Harbor Acts of March 3, 1899, March 3, 1905, January 21, 1927, August 30, 1935, and Section 107 of July 14, 1960, River and Harbor Acts, September 30, 1966 (See tables 22-B, C). Local Cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal Facilities. There are several marinas in the lower mile of Trail Creek. The commodity handled at this harbor is fresh fish. Operations and Results During Period. Maintenance: Sediment surveys and studies were conducted by other federal agency for $85,038 and by hired labor at $4,104. Channel maintenance was performed at costs of $836,221 by contract and $141,202 by hired labor. Engineering and design costs were $153,406 by AE contract and $90,368 by hired labor. Supervision and administration cost was $33,861. Confined Disposal Facility maintenance costs were $626. Breakwater maintenance costs were $61,830 by AE contract, $60,000 by other Corps of Engineers and $40,699 by hired labor. Project operation and real estate costs were $35,140 and $7,002, respectively. Condition at End of Fiscal Year. Total costs of existing project to September 30, 2000 were $16,847,200, of which $1,574,158 was for new work ($1,543,646 federal and $30,512 non-federal funds), $13,654,372 for maintenance ($13,599,372 federal and $55,000 non-federal) and $1,618,670 for rehabilitation (federal funds). 11. WAUKEGAN HARBOR, IL Location. Northeastern Illinois on the west shore of Lake Michigan in Lake County, 38 miles north of Chicago Harbor. (See NOAA Nautical Chart Numbers 14904 and'14905.) Previous Projects. See page 1392 of Annual Report for 1962. Existing Project. Provides for (a) a northerly stone-filled timber crib breakwater 588 feet long; (b) a stone-filled reinforced concrete caisson shore connection 270 feet long; (c) a stone-filled doublerow steel sheeting shore connection 640 feet long; (d) a single-row steel sheeting shore connection 398 feet long; (e) a stone-filled timber crib north pier 998 feet long; (f) a single-row steel sheet piling north pier 444 feet long; (g) a steel piling revetment 632 feet long; (h) a stone-filled timber crib pier 1,399 feet long; (i) a stone-filled double-row pile and sheeting south pier 1,712 feet long; (j) an entrance channel 22 feet deep and 390 feet wide; (k) a channel between the piers 18 feet deep and 200 feet wide; (1) an inner basin 18 feet deep; and (m) an anchorage area in the southwest corner of the inner basin 8 feet deep. An authorized, but as yet unconstructed project modification provides for (a) an entrance channel 27 feet deep, (b) a channel between the piers 23 feet deep and (c) an inner basin and channel extension 23 feet deep. The project was authorized by the River and Harbor Acts of June 3, 1902, July 13, 1930, and March 2, 1945, and on December 17,1970 by delegated authority under Section 201 of the Rivers and Harbor Act of October 27, 1965. (See tables 22-B, C). The portion of the project authorized by the 1970 modification is being restudied to confirm economic feasibility. Local Cooperation. Fully complied with for completed portions. The Dec. 17, 1970 modification, which provides for modifications to the channel, is subject to the conditions that local interests furnish assurances that they will hold the United States government free from damages from construction and maintenance of the improvement and that certain lands, easements and rights-of-way be provided. Terminal Facilities. Four docks are available. The commodities handled at this harbor are gypsum and building cement. 22-8 CHICAGO, ILLINOIS, DISTRICT Operations and Results During Period. Maintenance: Sediment surveys were performed at cost of $4,616. Plans and specifications for dredging the outer harbor were performed by hired labor at a cost of $119,470. Dredging was performed at a contract cost of $513,267, supervision and administration costs were $35,779 and other dredging costs were $17,702. Environmental studies for CDF construction costs were $22,613 by hired labor. Project operation and real estate costs were $58,060 and $1,055, respectively. Condition at End of Fiscal Year. The existing project is complete except for the 1970 modification, which is being restudied. Maintenance of the channel between the pier to the head of navigation has been deferred pending location, approval and probable construction of a suitable dredged.material disposal site. Total costs of existing project to September 30, 2000 were $17,689,919 of which $823,026 was for new work and $16,866,893 was for maintenance. 12. RECONNAISSANCE AND CONDITION SURVEYS Condition surveys were performed at a cost of $85,893. 13. NATIONAL EMERGENCY PREPAREDNESS Fiscal Year 1999 costs for management and mobilization planning were $62,044. Alteration of Bridges 14. OTHER AUTHORIZED BRIDGE ALTERATIONS See table 22-D. Beach Erosion Control 15. CASINO BEACH, IL Location. Casino Beach is located along the Lake Michigan shoreline at Jackson Park in Chicago, Illinois. Existing Project. The Casino Beach project was authorized by Section 501 (a) of the 1986 Water Resources Development Act. The project consists of rehabilitating 1,800 feet of the Casino jetty by encasing the existing timber pile and stone structure in steel sheet piling and a concrete cap. Local Cooperation. The local project sponsor is the Chicago Park District. The local sponsor is required to provide all lands, easements and rightsof- way; complete all necessary relocations; hold and save the United States free from damages due to construction or operation of the project; operate and maintain the completed project; and make cash contribution toward the cost of construction. Operations and Results During Period. No new work. Condition at End of Fiscal Year. Construction is complete. The total cost of the existing project to September 30, 2000 was $2,465,517 federal and $2,499,451 non-federal. 16. CHICAGO SHORELINE, IL Location. The project area includes 9.2 miles of revetment reconstruction within 24 miles of publicly owned shoreline along Lake Michigan in Chicago, Illinois. Existing Project. The Chicago Shoreline project is not authorized. The Federally supportable plan consists of constructing rubblemound revetments along 16,750 and 25,400 feet of the shoreline in the Lincoln Park and Burnham Park areas, respectively. Other project features include: revetments near the Adler Planetarium and at Meigs Field; a breakwater to protect the South Filtration Plant near 78th Street; and nourishment of a short reach of shoreline near Fullerton Avenue and 31st Street. The estimated fully funded project cost for this plan (1999) is $293,240,000. The local sponsor prefers to substitute steel sheet pile step stone revetments (the locally preferred plan, or LPP) for the rubblemound revetments in the Lincoln and Burnham Park areas. They have agreed to pay the increased cost above the federally supportable plan. The LPP is the authorized plan. Local Cooperation. This project has three separate Project Cooperation Agreements (PCA's). The first PCA, for the Reach 5 breakwater reconstruction, was executed on 28 April 1997. The second PCA, for Section 215 work, was executed on 7 August 1998, and covers construction of three portions of the project: 1,000 feet of revetment at Belmont Harbor in Reach 2, an 800 foot stretch of 22-9 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 2000 shoreline at 31s' Street beach in Reach 4 (both of these are being constructed by the non-federal sponsor), and revetment reconstruction from 31"' to 3 3 rd streets in Reach 4 (Corps work). The project Cooperation Agreement for the balance of the project work was executed on 17 May 1999, implementing section 206 of WRDA 92 which allows the nonfederal sponsor to perform a significant portion of the work. Design and construction of the project is well underway. Project construction is estimated to be completed in the year 2005. The local sponsor is required to provide all lands, easements, and rights-of-way; complete all necessary relocations; hold and save the United States free from damages due to construction or operation of the project; operate and maintain the completed project; perform work for credit towards their cash contribution; and make cash contribution toward the cost of any outstanding balance. Operations and Results During Period. The Corps performed betterment work for the non-Federal sponsors at 31"s to 33 rd Street, and at the 31"s Street Beach sites. The Corps continued with revetment construction in Reach 2, at Irving to Belmont; and in Reach 4, at 1-55 to 30th, and 33 rd to 37"* Street. The non-Federal sponsors continued with construction in Raech 4, at 51" to 54 th Street. A total of$19,849,110 was expended for construction and $1,089,303 was expended for construction management. Engineering and design costs of $3,079,950 were expended on Reaches 2 and 4, which included $1,134,398 for A-E contracts. Total expenditures was $28,918,363 ($24,018,363 federal and $4,900,000 non-federal inkind services) in FY2000. Condition at End of Fiscal Year. Completed project construction consists of the Reach 5 Breakwater (sponsor); Reach 3, Solidarity Drive Revetment (sponsor); Reach 2, Belmont Harbor Peninsula Revetment (sponsor); Reach 4, 31"' Street Beach Stablilization (sponsor; and Reach 4, 31S" to 33 r'd Street (Corps). Continuing construction was at Reach 2, Irving to Belmont (Corps); Reach 4, 1-55 to 3 0 'h Street (Corps); Reach 4, 33 'd to 37'" Street (Corps); and Reach 4, 51" to 54" Street (sponsor). Engineering and design was continued in Reaches 2 and 4 by the Corps and the non-Federal sponsor. The total cost of the existing project to September 30, 2000, was $48,208,292 federal funds and $4,900,000 in non-federal in-kind services. 17. ILLINOIS BEACH STATE PARK, IL Location. Northeastern Illinois on the west shore of Lake Michigan along the 9-mile reach of shoreline immediately south of the Illinois-Wisconsin State line. (See NOAA Nautical Chart Numbers 14901 and 14904.) Previous Projects. None. Existing Project. Provides for annual beach nourishment and construction of a sediment trap at the south end of the State Park. The project would entail placement of coarse-graded sediment at six stockpile sites at the rate of 124,000 cubic yards in the first year, 104,000 cubic yards in the second year, and 60,000 cubic yards in the third year. Thereafter, 60,000 cubic yards would be placed at the northernmost stockpile annually. The sediment trap would consist of a rubble-mound groin, with a total length of 600 feet from the base of the dunes (400 feet lakeward from the shoreline), with a crest height of about +8 feet above Low Water Datum (LWD). The project was conditionally authorized in Section 501 (b) of the 1986 Water Resources Development Act subject to a report by the Corps of Engineers and approval by the Secretary of the Army. A Feasibility Review Conference was held in April 1991. As a result, the District Engineer was directed to terminate work on this project and to submit a letter report to the Congress summarizing the feasibility study and the results of the Washington level review. Work on the feasibility report was resumed in FY 1994 as directed by the Assistant Secretary of the Army for Civil Works in response to a letter from Congressman John Porter, 10th Congressional District of Illinois. Local Cooperation. The local project sponsor would be required to provide all lands, easements and rights-of-way; accomplish all required relocations; hold and save the United State free from damages; and provide a cash contribution. Operations and Results During Period. No work effort was accomplished on this project due to lack of funding. Condition at End of Fiscal Year. Total cost of the existing project to September 30, 2000 was $11,908. 22-10 CHICAGO, ILLINOIS, DISTRICT 18. INDIANA DUNES NATIONAL LAKESHORE BANK PROTECTION, BEVERLY SHORES, IN Location. Northwestern Indiana, on the southeast shore of Lake Michigan in Porter County, about 35 miles southeast of Chicago Harbor. (See NOAA Nautical Chart Numbers 14095 and 14926.) Existing Project. Provides for placement of 13,000 feet of stone revetment and periodic repair of riprap to maintain the full length of Lake Front Drive in Beverly Shores, Indiana. The current project was authorized by Public Laws 97-88 and 98-63. Local Cooperation. Fully complied with. Project lands are held by the National Park Service. Operations and Results During Period. Revetment maintenance was completed at costs of $1,487 for supervision and administration and $4,315 by hired labor. Condition at End of Fiscal Year. Total costs of existing project to September 30, 2000 were $2,956,000 of which $660,000 was for new work and $2,296,000 was for maintenance. 19. INDIANA SHORELINE EROSION, IN Location. On the south end of Lake Michigan along a two-mile reach of shore west of Michigan City Harbor, Indiana. (See NOAA Nautical Chart Numbers 14095 and 14926.) Existing Project. The project consists of beach nourishment along approximately two miles of beach between Michigan City Harbor and Beverly Shores, Indiana, requiring an initial placement of 264,500 cubic yards of sand. Periodic replenishment of about 264,500 cubic yards of sand at five year intervals would be required throughout the life of the project. The project was authorized for construction by Section 501 of the Water Resources Development Act of 1986. Estimated federal cost (1997) for new work is $184,000,000, including future beach nourishment. Local Cooperation. None required. Operations and Results During Period. Monitoring of initial sand placement and impacts to fish was performed, and preparation of plans and specifications for the next round of sand placement was initiated. There was no real estate related cost. Total construction cost was $43,578 (federal). Design cost was $171,942 (federal) of which $11,938 for A/E contract and $160,004 for design labor cost. Supervisory and administration cost was $5,818. Condition at End of Fiscal Year. Initial construction was completed. Monitoring of project and preparation of plans and specifications for additional and placement was initiated. The total cost of the existing project to September 30, 2000 is $7,856,478 (federal). 20. OTHER AUTHORIZED BEACH EROSION CONTROL PROJECTS See table 22-E. 21. BEACH EROSION CONTROL UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION Beach erosion control activities pursuant to Section 103 of the Rivers and Harbors Act of 1962, as amended. None. Flood Control 22. CHICAGO RIVER, IL (NORTH BRANCH) Location. Northern Illinois, in Cook and Lake Counties. Existing Project. Provides for clearing the channel of the North Branch of the Chicago River of fallen trees, roots, and other debris and objects which contribute to the flooding, unsightliness, and pollution of the river. The project extends from Wolf Point in Chicago, Illinois, to its source just south of Rockland Road east of Libertyville, Illinois. The project was authorized by the River and Harbor Act of December 31, 1970 (Section 116) and amended by the River and Harbor Act of March 7, 1974 and the Water Resources Development Act of 1986. Local Cooperation. The 1970 Act provided that local interests furnish without cost to the United States all lands, easements, rights-of-way, and disposal areas necessary for construction of the project; hold and save the United States free from damages due to construction; maintain and operate all works after completion without cost to the United States; and agree to bear all costs in excess of $200,000 for completing construction. The 1974 Act provided that the United States will maintain the 22-11 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 2000 channel free of trees, roots, debris and objects at a cost not to exceed $150,000 per year with nonfederal interests paying 25 percent of the cost of maintenance. The 1986 Water Resources Development Act changed the cost sharing to require that non-federal interests pay 50 percent of the cost of maintenance plus the cost of disposal. The requirements are fully complied with. Operations and Results During Period. Maintenance: Engineering and design for debris ,, removal cost was $29,338 (federal) and $3,985 (nonfederal) and other project management costs were $12,223 (federal) and $17,379 (non-federal). Condition at End of Fiscal Year. Total cost of existing project to September 30, 2000 was $4,445,097 of which $231,884 was for new work ($191,884 federal funds and $40,000 contributed funds), and $4,276,128 was for maintenance ($2,653,343 federal funds and $1,622,795 nonfederal contributed funds). 23. DES PLAINES RIVER, ILLINOIS Location. The Upper Des Plaines River is located in the northeastern Illinois counties of Lake and Cook. Its 67 miles flow through 33 communities, most of which are part of the Chicago metropolitan area. Existing Project. The Des Plaines flood control project was authorized by Section 101(b) (10) of the 1999 Water Resources Development Act. The optimized project provides a maximum 0.12 foot reduction in stage for the 100-year flood, and the levee features meet the FEMA criteria for 100-year protection. The project consists of six features to construct (three in Lake County and three in Cook County), environmental mitigation, and a flood warning plan. The project adds 1,975 acre-feet of storage by constructing 4 features: a lateral storage area in Van Patton Woods (412 acre-feet); enlarging the existing North Fork Mill Creek Dam by elevating the crest of spillway (500 acre-feet); and excavating the existing reservoirs at Buffalo Creek (476 acrefeet) and at Big Bend Lake (587 acre-feet). The remaining 2 project features are levees with appurtenant interior drainage features. Levee 37 raises portions of Des Plaines River Road and Milwaukee Avenue between Palatine Road and Euclid Avenue from 0.5 to 5 feet over a total length of 8,500 feet. Levee 50 is a combination levee/flood wall in the City of Des Plaines between Dempster Road and the Chicago and Northwestern railroad. The length of this levee would be about 2,600 feet and the length of the floodwall would be 2,115 feet. Local Cooperation. The nonfederal sponsor is the Illinois Department of Natural Resources (IDNR). IDNR is required to provide all lands, easements and rights-of-way; complete all required utility relocations; hold and save the United States free from damages due to construction or operation of the project; provide the required interior drainage improvements; operate and maintain the completed project; and make a cash contribution toward the cost of construction. Operations and Results During the Period. New Work: Preconstruction engineering and design stage. Federal design engineering cost was $334,617 (of which $102,910 was A/E cost and $231,707 was design labor cost). Non-Federal design cost was $84,409 ($21,121 was A/E cost and $63,288 design labor cost). Condition at End of Fiscal Year. Preconstruction engineering design is in progress. Total cost of existing project to September 30, 2000 was $465,845 ($381,436 federal and $84,409 nonfederal). 24. LAKE GEORGE, HOBART, IN Location. Lake George in Hobart, Indiana and Deep River watershed upstream of the lake through Lake Station, Indiana. Existing Project. The project consists of the removal of silt, aquatic growth and other material and the construction of silt traps or other devices to prevent and abate the deposition of sediment. Project was authorized by Section 602 of the Water Resources Development Act (WRDA) of 1986. Local Cooperation. Section 602(b), Water Resources Development Act of 1986 applies. By letter dated March 9, 1987 the City of Hobart, Indiana indicated that it was a potential local project sponsor and applied for credit for previous work applicable to the project under the provisions of Section 104 (d) of the 1986 WRDA. By letter dated March 19, 1999, the City of Hobart, Indiana withdrew it's interest in the project. Operations and Results During Period. No Work was performed in FY 2000. Project was terminated. 22-12 CHICAGO, ILLINOIS, DISTRICT Condition at End of Fiscal Year. Preconstruction engineering and design was terminated. Total cost of the existing project to September 30, 2000 is $1,311,977. 25. LITTLE CALUMET RIVER, IN Location. The Little Calumet River project is located in northwest Indiana between the Illinois- Indiana State line and the Conrail Railroad in east Gary, Indiana. Existing Project. The project consists of replacing 9.5 miles of existing spoil bank levees with 12.2 miles of new levees, floodwalls, closure and appurtenant structures between the Illinois-Indiana State line and Cline Avenue; construction of 9.7 miles of set-back levees in Gary; a diversion structure at Hart Ditch; permanent evacuation of 29 structures in the Black Oak area of Gary; flood proofing 38 residential structures in Gary; modifying 7 miles of channel and 3 accompanying bridge culvert modifications; modifying one highway bridge; construction of 16.8 miles of hiking trails and accompanying recreation support facilities; and preservation of 788 acres of wetlands with wildlife mitigation measures. Estimated federal cost in FY 2000 for new work is $184,000,000; $134,500,000 federal and $49,590,000 is to be contributed by local interests. The project was authorized by Section 401 of the Water Resources Development Act of 1986. The construction contract for Stages II-3A, III and V-1 levee segment and the Stage I-4 demolition contract were completed in FY 1995. Local Cooperation. The local sponsor is the Little Calumet River Basin Development Commission. The local cooperation agreement was signed on August 16, 1990. The local sponsor is required to provide all lands, easements and rights-of-ways; provide all required relocations; and hold and save the United States from any damages due to construction or operation of the project. In addition, the local sponsor is required to pay a five percent cash contribution for structural flood control measures, fifty percent for recreation features and twenty-five percent for fish and wildlife enhancements. A memorandum of agreement with the local sponsor to design non-federal improvements was signed on May 20, 1992. Operations and Results During Period. Completed construction on East Reach Remediation, and Stage IV-2B. Continued work on Stage IV-1 North. Initiated construction on Burr Street Betterment Phase I, Stage IV-1 South and Pump Station lB. Total cost for Real Estate $3,339,782 of which $319,108 was federal (A/E $15,837; labor $303,271) $3,020,764 is non-federal (Land $2,096,881; relocation $922,011; and labor $1,872). Total construction placement cost was $7,841,658 of which $6,878,336 was federal and $963,322 was nonfederal. Total design cost was $3,023,988. Federal cost was $2,807,859 ($2,211,950 was design labor, $595,909 A/E contract); non-federal design labor was $216,129 ($168,317 design labor and $47,812 A/E contract). Total cost for supervision and administration was $326,941 federal cost. At the end of FY 2000, total federal cost was $10,332,244 and non-federal cost was $1,181,323 of which $477,000 was for betterment. Land and relocation cost was $3,018,892 for. Total project cost was $14,532,459. Condition at End of Fiscal Year. Construction is in progress. Total cost of existing project to September 30, 2000 was $77,473,708. Federal costs total $70,869,497; required non-federal costs were $5,748,752; and non-federal improvement costs $1,524,759. 26. LITTLE CALUMET RIVER BASIN, CADY MARSH DITCH, IN Location. Cady Marsh is located in Lake County, Indiana. The Ditch is a tributary of the Little Calumet River system in northwest Indiana and flows through the Towns of Griffith and Highland, Indiana. Existing Project. The Cady Marsh Ditch flood control project was authorized by Section 401 (a) of the 1986 Water Resources Development Act. The project provides for diverting flood flows from Cady Marsh Ditch to the Little Calumet River through a diversion system under Arbogast Avenue in Griffith. Specifically, the project consists of improving 1,290 feet of Cady Marsh Ditch between Colfax and Arbogast Avenues in Griffith, constructing approximately 5,000 feet of large conduct pipes under Arbogast Avenue, excavating an open channel approximately 2,850 feet long from the north end of Arbogast Avenue to the Little Calumet River, and constructing interior drainage improvements. 22-13 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 2000 Local Cooperation. The local project sponsor is the Town of Griffith, IN. The local sponsor is required to provide all lands, easements and rightsof- way; complete all required utility relocations; hold and save the United States free from damages due to construction or operation of the project; provide the required interior drainage improvements; operate and maintain the completed project; and make a cash contribution toward the cost of construction. Operations and Results During the Period. New Work: Pre-construction engineering and design was continued at a cost of $129,065 in FY2000 ($128,814 was for design labor and $250 was for A/E contract). There was no non-federal expenses. Condition at End of Fiscal Year. Preconstruction engineering and design is in progress. The total cost of the existing project to September 30, 2000 was $1,337,774 (federal cost). 27. McCOOK AND THORNTON RESERVOIRS, IL Location. The McCook Reservoir will be located near the communities of McCook, Justin and Bedford Park, Illinois at the existing Metropolitan Water Reclamation Solids Management Area. The Thornton Reservoir will be located in the community of Thornton, Illinois at the existing Thornton Quarry. Existing Project. The project consists of converting two quarries into flood storage reservoirs. The McCook Reservoir will have a storage volume of 21,400 acre-feet (7 billion gallons); the Thornton Reservoir will have a volume of 14,600 acre-feet (4.8 billion gallons). The reservoirs will store floodwater from tunnels constructed or under construction by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency and the Metropolitan Water Reclamation District of Greater Chicago as part of the Tunnel and Reservoir Project (TARP). Estimated project cost (1999) is $668,000,000, including a federal cost for new work of $501,000,000, and $167,000,000 to be contributed by non-federal interests. The project was authorized by Section 3 of the Water Resources Development Act of 1988. Local Cooperation. The Metropolitan Water Reclamation District of Greater Chicago will be the local sponsor and provide the required local cooperation. The local sponsor is required to provide all lands, easements and rights-of-way; provide all required relocations; and hold and save the United States government free from any damages due to construction or operation of the project. In addition, local sponsors are required to pay a cash contribution to bring the total non-federal share of the flood control improvements to twenty-five percent of the total project cost. Operations and Results During Period. New Work: Engineering and Design was continued. Total cost for FY 2000 was $5,809,780 ($4,457,250 for Federal and $1,352,530 for Non-Federal). Real estate cost was $5,810 (federal). There was no land or relocation cost. Engineering and design was continued at a total cost of $5,332,894. Out of $4,450,168 federal costs, $2,690,839 was design labor costs and $1,759,329 was for A/E contracts. Out of $882,726 non-federal costs, $559,921 was for design labor and $322,804 was for A/E contracts. Total construction cost was $382,147 (non-federal). Total supervisory and administration costs was $88,929 of which $1,272 was federal and $87,657 was non-federal. Condition at End of Fiscal Year. Engineering and design are continuing. Construction of the overburden cut-off wall, the first construction contract, is in progress. Total costs of the existing project to September 30, 2000 were $30,410,181 of which $29,057,651 was federal and $1,352,530 was non-federal. 28. NORTH BRANCH, CHICAGO RIVER, IL Location. The North Branch Chicago River Basin is located north of the City of Chicago in suburban Cook and Lake Counties. Existing Project. The project was authorized by the Water Resources Development Act of 1986 and consists of constructing two excavated floodwater storage reservoirs on the West Fork and one excavated reservoir on the Middle Fork. Section 401 of the 1986 Act also included authorization to reimburse non-federal interests 50 percent of the costs of planning and construction for three existing reservoirs on the West Fork, known as Techny Reservoirs, and the existing Mid Fork Reservoir on the Middle Fork. In July 1990, the federal government reimbursed the non-federal interests $4,467,298 for the Techny and Mid Fork Reservoirs. The total federal cost was $4,537,435 for these reservoirs. Reservoir 27 in the Village of Bannockburn, is located on the West Fork, 12.7 miles 22-14 CHICAGO, ILLINOIS, DISTRICT above its confluence with the North Branch Chicago River. It has a floodwater storage capacity of 525 acre-feet. The reservoir construction was completed in June 1990. Reservoir 29A is located 9.6 miles above the mouth of the West Fork and 3.1 miles south of Reservoir 27. The floodwater storage capacity is 575 acre-feet. Two project features, channel relocation and construction of two bridges, are a non-federal responsibility. Reservoir 29A was substantially completed in September 1994. Reservoir 15 is located near the City of Green Oaks on the Middle Fork, 22.1 miles above its confluence with the North Branch Chicago River. The floodwater storage capacity is 500 acre-feet. The reservoir is approximately 42 feet deep except in the sedimentation pool area which is about 15 feet deeper. Construction of Reservoir 15 was completed in May 1992. The local sponsor has contributed $550,100 for the non-federal improvements for Reservoir 29A. Local Cooperation. The local sponsor is required to provide all lands, easements and rights-of-way; provide all required relocations; and hold and save the United States government free from any damages due to construction or operation of the project. In addition, local sponsors are required to pay a cash contribution to bring the total non-federal share of the flood control improvements to twenty-five percent of the total project cost. Operations and Results During Period. Completed erosion repair at reservoir no. 15 and 29A and trash rack installation at reservoir 29A. Total design services cost was $35,438 ($73,938 federal, which includes $7,946 A/E services and $65,992 design services and -$38,500 non-federal). Total S&A cost was $90,881 ($90,548 federal and $333 non-federal). Total construction placement cost was $1,018,121 (federal). Condition at End of Fiscal Year. The existing project is 100% complete. Total costs of the existing project to 30 September 2000 are $24,371,672 of which $22,112,587 is federal and $2,259,085 is nonfederal. This excludes the $4,493,298 non-federal cost for the Techny and Mid Fork Reservoirs. A total $549,022 in non-federal funds has been expended on bridge and channel betterments at Reservoir 29A. A total of $6,320,134 in non-federal funds has been expended on investigations in connection with the clean-up of soils contaminated with lead shot pellets at Reservoirs 29A. Non-federal betterment funds in the amount of $38,500 were expended for work on an impact assessment. A total of $11,166 was spent at Reservoir 27 for the Illinois Tollway project. 29. O'HARE RESERVOIR, IL Location. The reservoir is located in an unincorporated portion of Elk Grove Township in Northwestern Cook County, Illinois about 1 mile northwest of Chicago O'Hare International Airport. Existing Project. The project consists of a 1,050 acre-foot capacity reservoir, excavated to a depth of 80 feet. The reservoir has been constructed at the terminus of the existing system of 6.6 miles of deep tunnels, constructed under the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency and the Metropolitan Water Reclamation District of Greater Chicago Tunnel and Reservoir Project (TARP). The project was authorized by Section 401 of the Water Resources Development Act of 1986. Local Cooperation. The local sponsor is the Metropolitan Water Reclamation District of Greater Chicago. The local cooperation agreement for the first construction contract, creek relocation, was signed on July 31, 1990. The local sponsor is required to provide all lands, easements and rightsof- way; provide all required relocations; and hold and save the United States government free from any damages due to construction or operation of the project. In addition, the local sponsor is required to pay a cash contribution of five percent of the total project costs. The local cooperation agreement for the remainder of the project, reservoir excavation and lining, was signed July 29, 1991. Operations and Results During Period. The reservoir construction was substantially completed in 1998. However some construction continued with contract modification. There was no real estate or AE contract expenditures in FY2000. Contract modification costs were $-172,368 ($-325,636 federal, $153,268 non-federal) and nonfederal betterment cost was $20,524. Design labor cost was $1,577 and construction management cost was $9,397 (federal). Condition at End of Fiscal Year. Construction and modification was completed. Total cost of the existing project to September 30,2000 was $38,207,388 ($30,968,478 Federal and $4,613,430 non-federal, and non-federal improvement costs $2,625,481). 22-15 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 2000 30. OTHER AUTHORIZED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS See table 22-F. 31. FLOOD CONTROL WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION Emergency flood control activities, repair, flood fighting and rescue work (Public Law 99, 84th Congressional antecedent legislation). Fiscal Year Costs Program to September 30, 2000 Disaster Preparedness Disaster Assistance (FEMA) $ 188,023 8,329 Flood control activities pursuant to Section 205 of Flood Control Act of 1965, as amended: Fiscal year 2000 costs were $523,792 federal and $295,024 non-federal for flood control activities. A total of $23,000 was spent on the Section 205 coordination account. Squaw Creek, Lake County, IL DPR was continued at a cost of $19,085 federal. Fox River, McHenry Co., IL construction phase was initiated at the cost of $162,140 federal and $17,913. Libertyville Estates, IL construction phase was continued at the cost of $28,824 federal and $9,768 nonfederal. McCook Levee, IL DPR was continued at the cost of $570 federal. Tinley Creek, IL DPR was continued at the cost of $3,509 federal. Kankakee River and Newton Co., (Sumava) DPR was continued at the cost of $46,171 federal and $52,792 non-federal. City of Oak Forest (Natalie Creek) DPR was continued at the cost of $63,015 federal. Stony Creek, IL DPR was continued at the cost of $39,668 federal and $113,383 non-federal. Hickory Creek, Tinley Park DPR was continued at the cost of $3,059 federal. Deer Creek DPR was continued at $77,137 federal and $28,488 nonfederal. Calumet Park DPR was initiated at $4,680. Chicago Heights/Thorn Creek was initiated at $11,457. Flossmoor/Butterfield Creek DPR was initiated at $17,441. Section 14, Emergency Streambank and Shoreline Protection: Fiscal Year 2000 costs were $83,197 federal. A total of $10,001 was spent on Section 14 coordination account. Lake Michigan Beach Drive, Dune Acres PDA was continued at $30,451; Highland Park PDA was initiated at $42,745. Section 1135, Project modification to improve Environment: Fiscal Year 2000 costs were $29,001. A total of $13,977 were spent on Section 1135 Coordination Account. Indiana Ridge Marsh ERR was initiated at $15,024. Section 206, Aquatic Ecosystem Restoration: Fiscal Year 2000 costs were $115,331 federal and $3,272 non-federal. A total of $30,000 were spent on Section 206 Coordination Account. A total of $26,788 were spent on Preliminary Restoration Plan. Cuneo Press, Chicago River Plans and specifications was initiated at $19,246. Weed Street, Chicago River was initiated at $19,328. Northside PREP/Von Steuben Chicago plans and specifications was initiated at $19,969 Federal and $3,272 nonfederal. General Investigations 32. SURVEYS Fiscal Year 2000 costs were $1,176,598 federal and $595,521 non-federal. Itemized as follows: Federal Non-federal Flood Damage Prevention Studies Shoreline Protection Special Studies Review Authorize Projects Miscellaneous Activities Coordination Studies $ 360,943 204,509 167,482 71,530 68,800 303,334 $ 194,219 0 0 166,115 0 235,187 33. COLLECTION AND STUDY OF BASIC DATA Fiscal Year 2000 costs were $58,000 federal and $0 non-federal itemized as follows: Federal Flood Plain Management $ 53,000 Services Hydrologic Studies 5,000 Non-federal $ 0 0 22-16 CHICAGO, ILLINOIS, DISTRICT TABLE 22-A COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Total Cost Section To in Text Project Funding FY 97 FY 98 FY 99 FY 00 Sept. 30, 2000 1. Burns Waterway New Work: Harbor, IN Approp. 0 0 0 0 13,584,000 (Federal Funds) Cost 0 0 0 0 13,584,000 Maint: Approp. 1,020,000 385,000 1,157,000 947,000 13,479,104 Cost 1,009,088 403,364 1,183,840 947,957 13,478,875 (Contributed New Work: Funds) Contrib. 0 0 0 0 15,900 Cost 0 0 0 0 15,900 Maint: Contrib. (17,538) 0 0 0 108,362 Cost 0 0 0 0 108,362 2. Burns Waterway New.Work: Small Boat Harbor, IN Approp. 0 0 0 0 2,000,000 (Federal Funds) Cost 0 0 0 0 2,000,000 Maint: Approp. 5,000 0 95,000 1,858,000 3,229,935 Cost 2,134 7,176 93,169 1,857,779 3,227,883 (Contributed New Work: Funds) Contrib. 0 0 0 0 1,770,558 Cost 0 0 0 0 1,770,558 3. Burns Waterway New Work: Harbor (Major Rehab), IN Approp. 3,675,000 3,557,000 (112,800) 0 13,384,200 (Federal Funds) Cost 3,500,638 3,948,927 7,425 0 13,384,161 (Contributed New Work: Funds) Contrib. 0 0 0 0 0 Cost 0 0 0 0 0 4. Calumet Harbor and New Work: River, IL and IN Approp. 0 0 0 0 22,578,567 1/ (Federal Funds) Cost 0 0 0 0 22,578,567 1/ Maint: Approp. 672,000 912,000 1,333,100 3,326,500 38,234,399 2/ Cost 674,340 867,649 1,386,142 3,322,279 38,225,130 2/ Rehab: Approp. 0 0 0 0 5,428,001 3/ Cost 0 0 0 0 5,428,001 3/ (Contributed Maint: Funds) Contrib. 0 0 0 0 836,667 Funds) Cost 0 0 0 0 836,667 5. Chicago Harbor, IL New Work: (Federal Funds) Approp. O 0 0 0 4,788,827 4/ Cost 0 0 0 0 4,788,827 4/ Maint: Approp. 5,409,000 4,562,000 4,176,000 2,601,400 47,114,946 Cost 5,376,330 4,512,080 4,450,229 2,548,572 47,050,703 Rehab: 0 0 0 0 1,326,600 Cost 0 0 0 0 1,326,600 22-17 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 2000 TABLE 22-A COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Total Cost Section To in Text Project (Harbor and Dam Funds) 6. Chicago River, IL (Federal Funds) 7. Indiana Harbor, IN (Federal Funds) (Contributed Funds) 8. Indiana Harbor, Confined Disposal Facility, IN (Federal Funds) 9. Lake Michigan Diversion, IL (Federal Funds) 10. Michigan City Harbor, IN (Federal Funds) (Contributed Funds) 11. Waukegan Harbor, IL (Federal Funds) (Contributed Funds) 15. Casino Beach, IL (Federal Funds) Funding Maint: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost New Work: Contrib. Cost New Work: Contrib. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost Rehab: Approp. Cost New Work: Contrib. Cost Maint: Contrib. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Contrib. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost FY 97 FY 98 FY99 FY 00 Sept. 30, 2000 0 7,536 0 0 284,000 302,328 0 0 0 0 0 0 160,000 160,000 1,500,565 5/ 1,500,565 5/ 306,000 271,000 350,500 16,429,894 6/ 298,532 285,428 348,484 16,422,742 6/ 0 0 4,897,148 7/ 4,897,148 7/ 642,000 770,000 526,000 259,500 14,461,488 8/ 610,516 762,311 480,518 424,600 14,461,359 8/ 0 0 0 0 12,500 12,500 600,000 1,560,000 2,160,000 567,829 1,455,637 2,023,466 488,000 782,000 990,000 802,000 5,663,000 500,397 700,799 1,076,336 801,023 5,661,900 0 0 1,543,646 9/ 1,543,646 9/ 61,000 126,000 155,000 1,543,500 13,600,554 45,948 136,729 157,363 1,549,497 13,599,372 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 350,000 676,773 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 (233,914) 209,080 69 152,000 (12,000) 579,125 (144,728) (140,000) 0 1,618,670 1,618,670 30,512 30,512 55,000 55,000 823,026 10/ 823,026 10/ 333,395 2,499,481 333,395 2,499,451 2,525,000 2,465,517 22-18 CHICAGO, ILLINOIS, DISTRICT TABLE 22-A COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Total Cost Section To in Text Project Funding FY 97 FY 98 FY 99 FY 00 Sept. 30, 2000 (Contributed Funds) 16. Chicago Shoreline, IL (Federal Funds) 17. Illinois Beach State Park, IL (Federal Funds) 18. Indiana Dunes National Lakeshore, Beverly Shores, IN (Federal Funds) 19. Indiana Shoreline Erosion, IN (Federal Funds) 22. Chicago River North Branch, IL (Federal Funds) (Contributed Funds) 23. DesPlaines River, IL (Federal Funds) (Contributed Funds) 24. Lake George, Hobart, IN (Federal Funds) 25. Little Calumet River, IN (Federal Funds) (Contributed Funds Required) (Non-Federal Improvements) New Work: Contrib. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost New Work: Contrib. Cost Maint: Contrib. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Contrib. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Contrib. Cost New Work: Contrib. Cost 350,000 676,773 0 (233,914) 209,080 69 333,395 2,499,481 333,395 2,499,451 8,000,000 7,392,000 14,382,800 16,539,000 3,600,693 7,285,287 11,350,949 24,018,363 O0 0 0 0 2,200,000 1,846,052 0 O0 5,000 3,550 O0 0 O0 4,315 0 O0 0 O 00 1,700,000 435,235 3,000,000 3,179,721 00 0 4,060 0 0 00 0 1,258,963 700,000 1,827,816 0 0 (1,292) 0 0 0 48,266,800 48,208,292 11,908 11,908 660,000 660,000 0 2,296,000 5,802 2,296,000 33,000 7,864,800 12/ 221,338 7,856,478 12/ 0 0 191,884 191,884 0 41,000 2,653,350 453 41,561 2,653,343 40,000 40,000 48,000 1,785,441 21,364 1,622,795 140,000 (91,032) 346,000 0 46,819 334,617 87,129 84,409 100,000 3,500,000 98,460 254,703 9,639,000 8,378,000 9,656,693 8,336,116 800,000 962,600 799,848 1,028,481 57,500 402,000 54,224 424,831 0 (3,484,000) 62,412 0 5,657,000 8,061,000 3,269,332 10,332,244 394,968 381,436 87,129 84,409 1,320,000 1,311,977 71,235,300 13/ 70,869,497 13/ 700,000 400,000 5,905,600 464,413 704,323 5,748,752 39,000 550,000 1,616,500 20,723 477,000 1,524,759 22-19 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 2000 TABLE 22-A COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Total Cost Section To in Text Project Funding FY 97 FY 98 FY 99 FY 00 Sept. 30, 2000 26. Little Calumet River, New Work: Cady Marsh Ditch, IN (Federal Funds) 27. McCook and Thornton Reservoirs, IL (Federal Funds) (Contributed Funds) 28. North Branch Chicago River, IL (Federal Funds) (Contributed Funds Required) (Non-Federal Improvements) (Non-Federal Lead Shot Clean-up) (Non-Federal Impact Assessment) (Non-Federal Res. 27 IL Tollway) 29. O'Hare Reservoir, IL (Federal Funds) (Contributed Funds Required) (Non-Federal Improvements) Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Contrib. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Contrib. Cost New Work: Contrib. Cost New Work: Contrib. Cost New Work: Contrib. Cost New Work: Contrib. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Contrib. Cost New Work: Contrib. Cost 1 Includes $855,973 for previous projects. 2 Excludes contributed funds in settlement pursuant to, decree (No. 54-C-1608) regarding removal of flue dust and includes $45,230 for previous projects. 3 Includes $689,001 in settlement pursuant to decree regarding removal of flue dust. 4 Includes $446,005 for previous projects. 5 Includes $955,886 for previous projects 6 Includes $109,463 for previous projects. 7 Includes $60,668 for previous projects. 8 Includes $2,509 for previous projects. 9 Includes $287,389 for previous projects. 200,000 122,000 17,815 64,346 0 2,018,847 0 0 0 3,084,398 0 106,550 0 1,342,000 129,065 1,337,774 2,908,000 3,859,000 29,141,000 3,762,786 4,457,250 29,057,651 0 0 6,000,000 1,352,530 6,000,000 1,352,530 300,000 518,000 135,000 1,100,000 22,305,500 14/ 108,255 346,271 274,064 1,182,608 22,112,587 14/ 0 28 0 0 0 8,119 0 28,566 20,000 9,718 0 0 00 0 48,090 0 0 0 (8,834) 1,448 0 4,615,000 3,447,000 4,073,508 3,987,380 870,000 553,708 0 354,577 (37,422) (38,167) (1,078) 0 0 0 00 0 0 930,000 (380,000) 970,892 (314,661) 0 115,260 580,000 750,000 280,000 512,189 1,400,233 677,663 2,259,832 2,259,085 549,022 549,022 6,335,170 6,320,134 38,500 38,500 11,166 11,166 30,997,000 30,968,478 70,000 5,131,200 153,268 4,613,430 0 2,810,000 20,524 2,625,481 10 Includes $218,233 for previous projects. 11 Includes $15,711 for previous projects. 12 Includes $107,000 of CP&E funds obligated prior to 1 Oct 1985 which are excluded from total project costs IAW EC 1105-2-159 dated 25 Sep 1985. 13 Includes $670,529 of CP&E funds obligated prior to 1 Oct 1985 which are excluded from total project costs IAW EC 1105-2-159 dated 25 Sep 1985. 14 Includes $489,310 of CP&E funds obligated prior to 1 Oct 1985 which are excluded from total project costs IAW EC 1105-2-159 dated 25 Sep 1985. 22:20 - CHICAGO, ILLINOIS, DISTRICT TABLE 22-B AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Work Authorized Documents Oct. 27, 1965 Jul. 14, 1960 Sec. 107 Mar. 3, 1899 Jun. 13, 1902 Mar. 3, 1905 Jun. 25, 1910 Sep. 22, 1922 Aug. 30, 1935"2 Aug. 30, 1935 Mar. 2, 19453 Jul. 14, 196013 Oct. 23, 196213 Oct 27, 1965" BURNS WATERWAY HARBOR, IN (See Section 1 and 3 of Text) Provides for breakwater and channel to present dimensions and Public Law, 89-298, depths, a north breakwater, west bulkhead, approach channel and H. Doc. 160. 88 th Cong., outer harbor, east and west harbor arms. 1" Sess. BURNS WATERWAY SBH, IN (See Section 2 of Text) Provides for a 700-foot north breakwater, a 950-foot west breakwater Detailed Project Report an entrance channel 11-feet deep, a harbor-of-refuge area 10 feet detailed February 1983. deep and a channel in Burns Waterway 6 feet deep. CALUMET HARBOR AND RIVER, IL AND IN (See Section 4 of Text) Outer harbor protected by breakwaters. Annual Report, 1896, pp. 2584 et Seq. and H. Doc. 277, 54 th Cong., 1St Sess. Five turning basins. H. Doc. 172, 54 th Cong., 2nd Sess. Provided for shape and dimensions of turning basins. H. Doc. 346, 60th Cong., 1"' Sess. Consolidated the two projects for Calumet Harbor and Calumet River. Detached breakwater, dredging outer harbor to existing project depth H. Doc. 494, 72nd Cong., and dimensions; deepen river entrance channel and river to existing 2 "d Sess. project depths; widen and straighten river channel; five turning basins to same depth as adjacent channel. Dredging area A and B in south end of Lake Calumet and an entrance H. Doc. 180, 7 3 rd Cong., channel 300 feet wide and 21 feet deep. 2 "d Sess. An approach channel to harbor 3,200 feet wide and 28 feet deep H. Doc. 233, 76th Cong., through shoals outside breakwater and closing existing gap between 1"SS ess. breakwaters. Depth of 29 feet in lake approach to 28 feet in outer harbor, and 27 H. Doc. 149, 86th Cong., feet in river entrance up to E.J. & E. Ry. Bridge. 1St Sess.8 Deepen, widen and straighten channel in Calumet River from E.J. and H. Doc. 87'" Cong., E. Ry. Bridge, to and including turning basins 1, 3 and 5 to 27 feet; 2nd Sess.s enlarge turning basins 3 and 5; channel into Lake Calumet to 27 feet deep for 3,000 feet and a width of 1,000 feet; and eliminate turning basins 2 and 4 from project. Modification of Act of Oct 23, 1962. Protection for Elgin, Joliet and H.R. 973, 89 'h Cong., Eastern Railway Bridge over the Calumet River, to permit dredging to 1"s Sess. full width of the south draw to depth of 27 feet, and temporary protection for center pier and south abutment of the New York, Chicago and St. Louis Railroad Bridge (Nickel Plate) to permit dredging of full width of south bridge draw to depth of 27 feet prior to its replacement. 22-21 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 2000 TABLE 22-B AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Work Authorized Documents Jul. 11, 1870 Jun. 14, 1880 Mar. 3, 1899 Jul. 25, 1912 Mar. 2, 1919 CHICAGO HARBOR, IL (See Section 5 of Text) Inner breakwaters and inner basin. H. Ex. Doc. 114, 41S' Cong. 2 "d Sess. and Annual Report 1870, pp. 1562-1567 Annual Report 1870, pp. 1562-1567 Exterior breakwater. Present project depth in basin and entrance to Chicago River. Shore-arm and southerly extension of exterior breakwater Modification of area to be dredged in inner basin. Mar 3, 1931 Shore-arm extension of exterior breakwater transferred to Lincoln Park Commissioners. Mar. 2, 1945 Resumption of jurisdiction over shore-arm extension breakwater and over certain navigable waters in Lake Michigan which lie in northwestern part of outer harbor. Oct. 23, 1962 Deepen a lake approach channel to 29 by 800 feet wide for 6,600 feet; deepen channel and maneuver area inside harbor entrance to 28 by 1,300 feet wide. Dec. 4, 1981 Provides for lock operations and maintenance responsibilities in the Jul. 30, 1983 interests of navigation. Annual Report 1897, pp. 2790-2791 H.Doc 710, Cong, 2d Sess H.Doc 1303, 64"h Cong, 1$S'e ss. Public Law 797, 71St Cong Public Law 14, 79 h Cong. H.Doc. 485, 87th Cong., 2"d Sess.4 Sec. 107 of P.L. 97-88 P.L. 98-63 Mar. 3, 1899 Jun. 13, 1902 Mar. 2, 1907 Mar. 2, 1919 Jul. 24, 1946 Jun 25, 1910 Mar. 4, 1913 Mar 2, 1919 CHICAGO RIVER, IL (See Section 6 of Text) For project depth of 21 feet in lieu of that fixed by act of Jun 3, 1896. Turning basins Interpreted by Chief of Engineers, April 11, 1908, as adopting new work of the then existing project for 21-foot depth. Eliminated all work except maintenance of main river. Dredging channel 9 feet deep to within 30 feet of existing bulkheads and river banks from North Ave. to Belmont Ave., thence 9 feet deep and 50 feet wide to Addison St. INDIANA HARBOR, IN (See Section 7 and 8 of Text) Maintenance of outer harbor. Maintenance of inner harbor channel when deeded free of cost to and accepted by the United States. Breakwaters. Lighthouse crib, present length and alignment easterly and northerly breakwaters. Specified in act. Specified in act. H. Doc. 95, 56 h Cong. 1"' Sess. (Annual Report, 1900, p. 3863 and Annual Report 1909, p. 709) H. Doc. 1294, 64th Cong. 1" Sess. H. Doc 767, 78" Cong., 2nd Sess.6 7 H. Doc. 1113, 60" Cong., 2nd Sess. HI.D oc. 690, 6 2 "d Cong., 2"d Sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 6, 65 th Cong., 2 "d Sess. 22-22 CHICAGO, ILLINOIS, DISTRICT TABLE 22-B AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Work Authorized Documents Mar. 20, 1922 Mar. 3, 1925 Mar. 2, 1929 July 3, 193010 Jul. 30, 1932 Aug. 30, 1935" Aug. 28, 1937 Jul. 14, 1960 Oct. 27, 196512 Nov. 17, 1986 Mar, 3, 1889 Reduce channel length to be maintained in extension to Lake George Authorized Secretary of War to modify project so far as relates to length and alignment of breakwaters and to sell Youngstown Steel and Tube Co. about 1,180 linear feet of shoreward end of existing north breakwater. Accept 2.3 acres of land for construction of the Forks Turning Basin. Existing project channel width and depth in Lake George Branch and turning basin at the Forks Authorized Secretary of War to sell to Inland Steel Co., about 1,903 linear feet of southerly end of existing east breakwater. Extended easterly breakwater, dredge entrance channel and outer harbor, deepen channel between bulkhead fills, widen main stem of canal and portion of Calumet River Branch to 141'S St. Modified conditions of local cooperation required before enlargement of Indiana Harbor Canal is undertaken by United States. Increase authorized depths of 29 feet in outer harbor entrance channel, 28 feet in outer harbor and 27 feet in canal entrance channel to first E. J. and E. Ry. Bridge. Deepen main canal from landward end of canal entrance channel to a point lakeward of Dickey Place Bridge over a modified channel width of 190 feet, except through bridge openings. LAKE MICHIGAN DIVERSION (See Section 9 of Text) Responsible for monitoring of Lake Michigan Diversion. MICHIGAN CITY HARBOR, IN (See Section 10 of Text) East breakwater and old east pier enclosing the outer basin. Extension of east pier. Extend east pier and construct detached breakwater. Mar 3, 1905 Lower turning basin. Rebuild west pier as at present location. Present project dimensions of entrance channel. Jun. 21, 1927 Existing project depth in channel, and in lower and middle turning basins, eliminated improvement of Trail Creek above middle turning basin and uncompleted portion of detached breakwater, abandonment of old east breakwater and old east pier enclosing outer basin. Public Law 176, 6 7 th Cong Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 21, 71S" Cong., 2 nd Sess. Public Law 219, 7 2 "d Cong. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 29, 7 2 nd Cong., 1S" Sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 13, 7 5th Cong., 1"S Sess. H. Doc. 195, 86th Cong. 1St Sess. H. Doc. 227, 89th Cong. 1St Sess. Section 1142, WRDA of 1986 Recommendations of a Board of Engineers, Annual Report 1870, p. 123. Reports of Boards of Engineers, Annual Rpt 1851, pp. 2187-2189; Annual Report 1882, p. 2264-2266. Annual Report 1897, pp. 2903-2904. Joint Resolution of Cong. approved May 13,1908. Public Law 23. H. Doc. 279, 69th Cong., 1' Sess. 22-23 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 2000 TABLE 22-B AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Work Authorized Documents Aug. 30, 1935 Jul. 14, 1960 Sec. 107 Restore and repair westerly 1,000 feet of east breakwater, dredging outer basin and enlarging entrance to basin through east pier. Dredge river channel 50 feet wide and 6 feet deep from upper turning basin to E. Street Bridge. River and Harbors Committee Doc 34, 74' Cong., 1SS" ess. Detailed Project Report dated June 1965. WAUKEGAN HARBOR, IL " (See Section 11 of Text) Jun. 14, 1880 Parallel piers and basins. Annual Rpt 1880, p. 142 Aug. 3, 1882 Modified location of harbor entrance. Annual Report 1882, pp. 277, 2162. Jun. 13, 1902 Detached breakwater, extend piers, increase width of harbor at inner H. Doc. 343, 56" Cong., end of north pier and dredge channel and basin to depth of 20 feet. 1's Sess. Jul. 3, 1930 Extension of breakwater to shore, dredging near outer end of north Rivers and Harbors piers and enlarging inner basin. Committee Doc 27, 71" Cong., 2 "nd Sess. Mar. 2, 1945 Dredge an entrance channel to existing project dimensions from outer H. Doc. 116, 77 'h Cong., end of north pier to project depth in lake and dredge an anchorage area 1" Sess. in southwest corner of inner basin to existing project depth. Abandonment of dredging triangular area in southwest corner of inner basin to 18 feet deep. Dec. 17, 1970 Provides for deepening the existing entrance channel in the outer H. Doc. 368, 90'h Cong., Sec. 201 harbor to 25 feet and extending to the depth in Lake Michigan, at 2"d Sess. Oct. 27, 1965 widths varying from 380 feet to 500 feet; deepening the channel between piers to a depth of 23 feet at a width of 180 feet and deepening the inner basin to 23 feet and extending its limits approximately 275 feet northward. CASINO BEACH, IL (See Section 15 of Text) Provides for encasing approximately 1,800 feet of the existing Casino Beach jetty in steel sheet piling and a concrete cap and replacing beach fill. ILLINOIS BEACH STATE PARK, IL (See Section 17 of Text) Provides for 46 offshore breakwaters approximately 150 feet long, initial beach nourishment of 100,000 cubic yards and periodic nourishment of 100,000 cubic yards at 5-year intervals. Feasibility Report dated Feb. 1983. Feasibility Report dated June 1982. INDIANA DUNES NATIONAL LAKESHIORE, BEVERLY SHORES, IN (See Section 18 of Text) Dec. 4, 1981 Provides for emergency shore protection repairs to stone revetment initially constructed in 1973. Jul. 30, 1983 Public Law 97-88 Provides for operations and maintenance of shore protection measures. Public Law 98-63 22-24 Nov. 17, 1986 Nov. 17, 1986 CIICAGO, ILLINOIS, DISTRICT TABLE 22-B AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Nov. 17, 1986 Aug. 17, 1999 Nov. 17, 1986 Nov 17, 1986 Nov. 17, 1986 Nov. 17, 1988 Nov. 17, 1986 Dec. 31, 1970 Nov. 17, 1986 Work Authorized INDIANA SHORELINE EROSION, IN (See Section 19 of Text) Beach nourishment of 2-mile reach of shore west of Michigan City Harbor, Indiana DES PLAINES RIVER, IL (See Section 23 of Text) Provides for construction of levees, storage areas, environmental Mitigation and flood warning plan. LAKE GEORGE, HOBART, IN (See Section 24 of Text) Removal of silt, aquatic growth and construction of silt traps. LITTLE CALUMET RIVER, IN (See Section 25 of Text) Provides for levee construction, a diversion control structure at the mouth of Hart Ditch. Permanent evacuation of a portion of the Black Oak area of Gary and non-structural flood proofing measures in Gary. LITTLE CALUMET RIVER BASIN, CADY MARSH DITCH, IN (See Section 26 of Text) Widening and deepening 1,250 feet of Cady Marsh Ditch, installing 4,880 feet of pipe and excavating 2,850 feet of open channel. McCOOK AND THORNTON RESERVOIRS, IL (See Section 27 of Text) Provides for construction of two floodwater storage reservoirs in the quarries of the same name. NORTH BRANCH CHICAGO RIVER, IL (See Sections 22 and 28 of Text) Construction of three reservoirs and reimbursement to locals for 50% of the costs of Techny and Mid-Fork Reservoirs Clearing fallen trees, roots and other debris and objects which contribute to flooding. O'HARE RESERVOIR, IL (See Section 29 of Text) Provides for a 1,050 acre-foot excavated reservoir. Documents Sec. 501, WRDA 1986 Sec. 101, WRDA 1999 Sec. 602, WRDA 1986. Sec. 401, WRDA 1986 Feasibility Report dated April 1984 Sec. 3, WRDA 1988 H. Doc. 100-72, 10 0 'h Cong., 1"' Sess., Sec. 401, WRDA 1986. River and Harbor Act (Sec. 116) Sec. 401, WRDA 1986 1. Included in Public Works Administrative Program Sep. 6, 1943 and Dec. 16, 1933. 2. Uncompleted portion was deauthorized in 1977 (dredging in front of U.S. Steel Corp.) 3. Uncompleted portion was deauthorized in 1977 (breakwater closure). 4. Contains latest map of harbor. Uncompleted portion is inactive. 5. Contains latest map of river. 6. Latest published map is in Annual Report for 1914, opposite p. 2928. 7. Contains latest published map of North Branch above North Ave. 8. Contains latest published map. 9. Completed under previous project. 10. Uncompleted portion was deauthorized in 1977 (widen and deepen Lake George Branch). 11. Include in Public Works Administration Program Sep. 6, 1933 and Jul. 25, 1934. Uncompleted portion was deauthorized in 1977 (widen and deepen main canal and Calumet River Branch). 12. Project deauthorized in 1977. 13. Project deauthorized in 1989. 22-25 m REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 2000 TABLE 22-C EXISTING NAVIGATION PROJECTS See Section Length Width Depth In Text Project Item (feet) (feet) (feet) 1. Burns Waterway North Breakwater 4,630 Harbor, IN 2. Burns Waterway SBH, IN 4. Calumet Harbor and River, IL and IN 5. Chicago Harbor, IL 6. Chicago River, IL West Breakwater Approach Channel Outer Harbor East Harbor Arm West Harbor Arm North Breakwater West Breakwater Approach Channel Burns Waterway Northerly Crib Breakwater Southerly Steel Breakwater North Pier Chicago Confined Disposal Facility Approach Channel Outer Harbor River Entrance Elgin, Joliet & Eastern Railway Bridge to turning basin No. 3 Turning Basin No. 3 to Turning Basin No.5 Approach into Lake Calumet Extension in Lake Calumet Turning Basins 1, 3 and 5 Shore Arm Extension Exterior Breakwater Exterior Breakwater Southerly Extension North Inner Breakwater South Inner Breakwater North Pier Approach Channel Channel and maneuver Lock Inner Basin Entrance Channel Main Branch of Chicago River North Branch of Chicago River North Branch Canal North Branch Turning Basin 22-26 1,200 2,200 3,700 2,100 3,800 678 1,043 1,200 5,593 6,714 5,007 2,450 2,979 9,700 10,500 3,000 21,000 8,000 4,000 3,000 2,250 5,421 4,944 4,034 2,544 960 6,600 2,200 600 1,270 7,300 3,800 11,100 5,500 400 Varies 620 620 200 100 3,200 3,000 290 200 and variable Variable 400 1,000 800 1,300 80 740 190-470 190-390 91-390 56-210 30 28 27 27 11 9 29 28 27 27 earth 28 rock 27 27 27 27 29 28 23 21 21 21 21 21 21 CHICAGO, ILLINOIS, DISTRICT TABLE 22-C EXISTING NAVIGATION PROJECTS See Section Length Width Depth In Text Project Item (feet) (feet) (feet) 7. Indiana Harbor, IN Northerly Breakwater 1,120 Easterly Breakwater 2,525 Approach Channel 7,200 800 29 Outer Harbor 7,200 Varies 28 Entrance Channel 3,600 65-280 27 Main Channel 7,400 61-210 22 Turning Basin 22 Lake George Branch 3,700 64-160 22 Calumet River Branch 2,500 160-260 22 9. Michigan City Harbor Detached Breakwater 1,304 22 IN West Pier 835 East Pier 2,276 East Breakwater 1,000 Entrance Channel 1,900 150-425 18 Main Channel 2,400 120-150 18 Outer Basin 900 900 8-12 Trail Creek 3,000 50-100 8 Trail Creek 2,300 50 6 10. Waukegan Harbor, IL North Breakwater and Shore Connection 1,896 North Pier into North Revetment 2,074 South Pier 3,111 Entrance Channel 3,250 390 22 Channel to Inner Basin 1,700 200 18 Inner Basin 1,650 375-500 18 Anchorage Area _ 8 Area of about 6 acres. 22-27 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 2000 TABLE 22-D OTHER AUTHORIZED BRIDGE ALTERATION Cost to September 30, 2000 For Last Full Report See Annual Operation and Project Report For Construction Maintenance Calumet River Bridges' 1967 $1,625,068 'Transferred to Department of Transportation in accordance with Section 6(g) of the Act of October 16,1966. P.L. 89-670 TABLE 22-E OTHER AUTHORIZED BEACH EROSION PROJECTS Cost to September 30, 2000 For Last Full Report See Annual Operation and Project Report For Construction Maintenance Mt. Baldy, Indiana Dunes National Lakeshore, IN 1984 $1,500,000 Hollywood-Ardmore Beach, Chicago, IL 1982 237,271 Evanston, IL 1979 766,052 Lake Michigan-Lake Bluff, IL 1976 244,889 Lake Michigan-Lake Forest, IL' 1975 65,611 Illinois Shore of Lake Michigan, Kenilworth, IL2 1975 5,200 'Authorized by River and Harbor Act of 1954. 2Uncompleted portion deauthorized in 1977. TABLE 22-F OTHER AUTHORIZED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS Cost to September 30, 2000 For Last Full Report See Annual Operation and Project Report For Construction Maintenance Lake Michigan, Edgewater/Rogers Park Communities, Chicago, IL 1989 $2,062,347 Little Calumet River, IL 1984 583,000 Kankakee River Ice Management 1993 44,791 22-28 CIIICAGO, ILLINOIS, DISTRICT TABLE 22-G DEAUTHORIZED PROJECTS For Last Full Report Federal Contributed See Annual Date Funds Funds Report For Deauthorized Expended Expended Illinois Shore of Lake Michigan, Winnetka, IL 1975 1977 Illinois Shore of Lake Michigan, Chicago, IL 1975 1977 Kankakee River, IL and IN Levee between Shelby Bridge and Baum's Bridge in IN 1938 Nov 17, 1986 Little Calumet River, IL and IN Little Calumet River and Tributaries, IL and IN 1968 Nov 17, 1986 53,136 Calumet Harbor and River, IL and IN Widening and straightening the Calumet River in the vicinity of 106th Street and closing the gap between breakwaters, and dredging minor shoals in the outer harbor. 1990 Jan 1, 1990 Wilmington Ice Control Demonstration .... Nov 18, 1991 22-29 NASHVILIE, TN, DISTRICT* This district comprises portions of southern Kentucky, embraces drainage basins of Tennessee and Cumberland southwestern Virginia, western North Carolina, northern Rivers and their tributaries. Georgia and Alabama, northeastern Mississippi and practically all of Tennessee except western portion, and IMPROVEMENTS Navigation Page 1. Cumberland River, TN and KY....... ....... 23-2 2. Kentucky Lock.......................................................23-3 3. Tennessee River, TN, AL and KY.................... .23-3 4. Tennessee-Tombigbee Waterway, AL and M S .............................................. ......... 23-4 5. Navigation Work Under Special Authorization ........ .. ............. ........... 23-4 Alteration of Bridges 6. Authorized Alteration of Bridges.... .... ....... ****.. 23-4 Flood Control 7. Big South Fork National River and Recreation Area, KY and TN .....................*23-5 8. Black Fox, Murfree & Oaklands Springs, TN......23-5 9. Hamilton County, TN...................... .............. 23-5 10. Martins Fork Lake, KY .................. ....... "....".... 23-6 11. Middlesboro, Cumberland River Basin, KY.........23-6 12. Tug and Levisa Forks of the Big Sandy River and Cumberland River, W VA, V A and K Y ............................................................ 23-6 13. Ohio River Basin (Nashville Dist.) .................. 23-6 14. Inspection of completed flood control projects ....................................................... 23-7 15. Flood control work under special authorization .......... ......... '........................"" Multiple-Purpose Projects, Including Power 16. Center Hill Lake, Ohio River Basin, TN................23-7 17. Dale Hollow Lake, Ohio River B...a..s..i.n...,.................... 23-7 TN and KY........................ 18. J. Percy Priest Dam and Reservo..i.r, Ohio 23-8 River Basin, TN .................................................... 19. Laurel River Lake, Ohio River Basin, KY..... 23-8 20. Wolf Creek Darn - Lake Cumberland, Ohio River BKYa ..s...i..n....,.. ........................... 23-8 River Basin, KY .......... General Investigations 23-9 21. Surveys........ . ................ .23-9 22. Collection and study of basic data..... ..... 23-9 23. Preconstruction Engineering and Design .... 23-9 Tables Page Table 23-A Cost & Financial Statement ............ 23-10 Table 23-B Table 23-C Authorizing Legislation ................... 23-12 Other Authorized Navigation Projects............................. ..... 23-14 Table 23-D Not Applicable ................................. Table 23-E Other Authorized Flood Control Projects................................................ 23-14 Table 23-F Other Authorized Multiple-Purpose Projects, Including Power..................23-15 Table 23-G Deauthorized Projects .......................... 23-15 Table 23-H Cumberland River, TN & KY, Principal Features...................... ....23-16 Table 23-I Tennessee River Lock Dimensions.......23-17 Table 23-J Tennessee River Total Cost of Existing Project.. ............................ 23-18 Table 23-K Ohio River Basin (Nashville District) Local Protection .......... ... 23-18 Table 23-L Reservoirs ................................ 23-18 Table 23-M Inspection of Completed Flood Control Projects ................................ 23-19 Table 23-N Flood Control Work Under Special Authorization....................................23-19 23-1 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES, FY 2000 Navigation 1. CUMBERLAND RIVER, TN AND KY Location. Formed by junction of Poor and Clover Forks in Harlan County, KY, about 694.2 miles above its mouth, and flows west to Burnside, KY, from whence it makes a loop southwestward into Tennessee, passes Nashville, and returns northwestward to Kentucky, emptying into Ohio River near Smithland, KY (See Geological Survey base maps of Tennessee and Kentucky.) Previous projects. For details see pages 1898 and 1901 of Annual Report for 1915, and page 1208 of Annual' Report for 1938, and pages 1069 and 1070 of Annual Report for 1962. Existing project. Below Nashville: Improvement of Cumberland River between mouth and Nashville was authorized for 9-foot navigation; increased project depth to be obtained by construction of three moderate height dams with lockage facilities, designated as Kuttawa (Eureka), Dover, and Cheatham, to replace existing locks A to F inclusive below Nashville and lock 1 above Nashville. (See table 23-B for authorizing legislation.) Subsequent authorities provide for construction of hydroelectric power-generating facilities at Cheatham Dam, rivermile 148.7, and modification of project for navigation on Cumberland River, TN and KY, to provide, in lieu of previously authorized works at Kuttawa, mile 32.2, and Dover, mile 100.1, for construction of a multiple-purpose improvement consisting of a dam, lock, and powerplant near mile 30.6 on lower Cumberland River and a canal for navigation and other purposes connecting this reservoir with reservoir formed by Kentucky Dam on the Tennessee River. The project is known as Barkley Dam and Lake Barkley. Provision of interconnecting canal, involving excavation of a channel through narrow watershed divide about 2.5 miles upstream from damsite, permits alternative routes available for navigation between either Cumberland or Tennessee Rivers and Ohio River, and affords integrated operation of Barkley and Kentucky Reservoirs through diversion of flows in interests of flood control and power production. Cost of modified project for 9-foot navigation and multiplepurpose development is $178,181,406 Federal funds and $102,966 non-Federal funds for recreation facilities under the completed projects program. (See table 23-H for listing of principal features.) Under flood conditions as regulated by upstream reservoirs, extreme fluctuation in stage of river below Nashville, TN, varies at different localities from about 16 to 55 feet above minimum pool levels. Ordinary fluctuations vary with power flows from as much as the allowable 3-foot drawdown below normal pool elevation 385 at Cheatham Lock and Dam to a range of about 7 feet at Nashville. Seasonal variation in normal headwater levels at Lake Barkley is 5 feet, which in combination with power flows produces fluctuations up to 10 feet below Cheatham Lock and Dam. Above Nashville: See pages 1693 thru 1696 of Annual Report for 1950 for information including statistical data on locks and dams 1 to 17 and 21. Completion information is shown on pages 1454 of the report for 1951. See Table 23- B for Authorizing Legislation. Construction of Old Hickory, Carthage, and Celina Dams above Nashville was also authorized for navigation and power. The dam and reservoir authorized for construction on Cumberland River near Carthage, TN, has been redesignated as Cordell Hull Dam and Reservoir. Cost of Old Hickory and Cordell Hull projects, including locks, is $132,140,904. (See table 23-H at end of chapter for listing of principal features.) Celina Dam was deauthorized in 1995. Under flood conditions as presently regulated, including effect of surcharge operation of Old Hickory project, extreme fluctuations of stage in this section of river vary from a range of 35 feet at Nashville (mile 191) to a maximum of 46 feet immediately below Old Hickory Dam (mile 216.2), and from an 8-foot variation in headwater at dam to 36 feet in vicinity of Carthage, TN, (mile 313.5), present head of navigation; with variations up to 35 feet at Celina, TN (mile 380.8) and 29 feet in tail water at Wolf Creek Dam (mile 460.9). Maximum fluctuations under ordinary conditions from power flows vary from about 7 feet at Nashville to 14 and 3 feet, respectively, in tailwater and headwater of Old Hickory Dam, and at other key points as follows: 13 feet at Carthage; 18 feet at Celina; and 19 feet at Wolf Creek Dam. Further details on project authorization for river sections below and above Nashville as shown on Table 23-B. Local cooperation. Under modified project for 9-foot navigation and multiple-purpose development, recreation features of reservoir components are subject to certain conditions of non-Federal cost-sharing under Federal Water Project Recreation Act of 1965. Terminal facilities. There are 42 terminals on the Cumberland River (5 Municipally owned and open for public use; 5 government owned facilities and 32 privately owned facilities). A total of 18 terminals have railroad connections. Principal commodities handled are petroleum products, stone, sands, gravel, coal, coke, iron, steel, chemicals and grain. Facilities considered adequate for existing commerce. For further information see page 695 of Annual Report for 1969. Operations during fiscal year. New work: None. Maintenance: Operations and Maintenance improvements included replacement of the power plant roof at Cordell Hull Power Plant. The comfort station at Cheatham Dam and a showerhouse at Barkley Canal were replaced. Handicapped accessibility improvements were provided at several areas on Old Hickory Lake. Work continued on the inspection and repair of all lock dewatering structures and the major rehab study of Barkley Power Plant. Old Hickory was dewatered for repairs. Cracked upper guardwalls at Cordell Hull and Old Hickory Locks were stabilized by installing post tensioned tendons. Approximately 22,000 cubic yards of material was removed from one site by hired labor channel maintenance dredging on the Cumberland River. An estimated 24.3 million tons of commodities were locked through the Cumberland River Locks. Commercial lockages were approximately 5,800 and 6,200 recreational craft were also locked through. 23-2 NASHVILLE, TN, DISTRICT Total sales energy generated at Barkley Dam (525,385,000kw-hr) was made available through Southeastern Power Association to the Tennessee Valley Authority, Southern Illinois Power Cooperative, Big Rivers Rural Electric Cooperative Corporation, and Indiana Statewide Rural Electric Cooperative, Inc., Hosier Energy Division. Total sales energy generated at Cheatham Dam (152,163,000kw-hr), Cordell Hull (230,680,000 kw-hr), and Old Hickory (326,440,000 kw-hr) was made available for distribution. Activities under reservoir management program comprising malaria control, shoreline sanitation, land management and disposal, and maintenance of public-use facilities continued. 2. KENTUCKY LOCK ADDITION, KY Location. Kentucky Lock and Dam is located in western Kentucky at Mile 22.4 of the Tennessee River between Livingston and Marshall Counties. Existing Project. Kentucky L&D.was completed in 1945 by the Tennessee Valley Authority (TVA). TVA continues to operate the dam and powerhouse while operation of the 110' x 600' navigation lock is the reponsibility of the Nashville District. Products from 20 states pass through the system of Kentucky and Barkley Locks, the lower-most locks on the Tennessee and Cumberland Rivers, respectively. Over 80% of the commercial tows hauling these products pass through KY Lock instead of Barkley Lock because of difficult and costly navigation on the Cumberland River below Barkley. Since most of the tows are greater than 600' in length, they must perform a time-consuming double lockage to transit through the existing 600' long KY Lock. This results in average delays between three to five hours per tow under existing traffic levels. Since the traffic levels are expected to grow in the near future, these delays will also increase. The last traffic forecast developed in 1995 estimated that 43M tons of products would be transported through the Kentucky- Barkley system in the year 2000. Actual tonnage for the system in 1997 was 43.5M tons and has leveled out and decreased slightly over the few years since. It costs a tow about $400/hour to wait in line at the lock. Construction of a new 1200' lock would eliminate the delay time in the near term and drastically shorten it for forecasted traffic levels past the year 2020. Project Description. The 1992 Kentucky Lock Feasiblity report recommended a new 110' x 1200' lock adjacent and landward of the existing 110' x 600' lock. The project was authorized for construction in WRDA 96. Average annual benefits attirubted to a new lock are $55.1M. Most of these benefits are associated with improving the performance of the lock by reducing traffic delays and disruptive lock outages for maintenance and major rehabilitation work. Based on an estimated construction cost of $440M (Oct. '99), the new lock has a Benefit/Cost ratio of 2.5. Other project features in addition to the new lock itself are three major relocation efforts: 1) four large TVA transmission towers, 2) about 2 miles of the Paducah and Louisville Railway, including a major river bridge, and 3) about 2 miles of US Highway 62, also including a new major river bridge. Operations during fiscal year. FY 2000 funding of $19.3M was used to advance the design of the project and to continue construction of the relocation of the transmission towers and initiate construction of the west bank approaches for the two Tennessee River bridges. Significant activities include: 1) completion of proposed condition testing of the General Model at the Waterways Experiment Station; 2) awarding a $5.9M contract for the construction of the west bank embankment for the U.S. Hwy 62 and P & L Railway relocations, 3) completion of design efforts on 110' wide floating caisson, 4) continued design of the lock including advancements in the upstream and downstream approach walls, upstream and downstream cofferdams, miter gates, culvert valves, east bank permanent embankment, site development, and electrical/ mechanical features; 5) major advancement of the P&L Railroad relocation Design Memorandum, 6) substantial completion of the Highway Relocation DM, 7) continued geotechnical land exploration for the RR and Highway relocations and lock, 8) substantial completion of analyses for the Supplemental Environmental Impact Statement, 9) completion of the Highway Relocation Environmental Assessment and 10) completion of foundations for all eight transmission towers and initiation of steel erection for two towers. 3. TENNESSEE RIVER, TN, AL AND KY Location. Formed by junction of French Broad and Holston Rivers in eastern Tennessee, 4.4 miles above Gay Street Bridge at Knoxville, flows southwest into northern Alabama, thence in a generally westerly course across north Alabama, to northeast boundary of Mississippi, thence nearly due north across Tennessee and Kentucky, entering Ohio River at Paducah, 652.1 miles from junction of French Broad and Holston Rivers. (See Geological survey base map of Tennessee River Basin.) Previous projects. For details see pages 1902-1906, Annual Report for 1915; pages 1190-1194, 1196-1216, and 1220-1222, Annual Report for 1929; and page 1216, Annual Report for 1938. Existing project. Originally provided for permanent improvement of river for a navigable depth of 9 feet at low water from mouth about 650 miles to Knoxville, TN. Only work performed by the Corps was construction of lock at General Joe Wheeler Dam and miscellaneous appurtenant improvements at a new work cost of $2,244,236. Tennessee Valley Authority program provided for obtaining authorized 9-foot project by construction of high dams and locks and utilization of certain locks and dams previously constructed under jurisdiction of the Corps. (See Table 23-B for Authorizing Legislation.) Subsequent construction by the TVA of Melton Hill Dam extends navigable channel of Tennessee River system up the Clinch River about 38 miles above damsite (mile 23.1) to vicinity of Clinton, TN. (See table 23-I on Tennessee River.) In accordance with general navigation laws placing control and supervision over navigable waters under direction of Secretary of the Army, the Corps of Engineers operates and maintains all locks, and maintains navigation channels 23-3 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES, FY 2000 and safety harbors by performing all necessary maintenance dredging and snagging operations. For information concerning other functions of the Corps under division of responsibilities for Tennessee River since adoption of Tennessee Valley Authority Act of 1933, see page 1084 of Annual Report for 1962. Local cooperation. Authorization requires no local cooperation in construction of alternate system of low dams. It does, however, provide that if high dams are built before the United States builds projected locks and low dams which are to be replaced, the United States shall contribute to cost of substituted structures an amount" equal to estimated cost of works of navigation for which substitution is made. Terminal facilities. There are 150 terminals on the Tennessee River (13 municipally owned, 15 government owned facilities and 122 privately owned facilities). A total of 79 terminals have railroad connections. Principal commodities handled are petroleum products, stone, sand, gravel, coal, coke, grain, chemicals, iron, and steel. Facilities considered adequate for existing commerce. A list of terminals is revised annually and can be obtained from Division Engineer, Ohio River Division, Corps of Engineers, Cincinnati, Ohio. For further information see page 698 of Annual Report for 1969. Operations during fiscal year. Channel work by government plant and hired labor consisted of dredging and snagging at various locations, and maintenance of mooring facilities and safety harbors. Cost of channel maintenance was $9,272. Maintenance: All locks were operated and lock appurtenances and standby plant maintained as required. Major maintenance included dewatering and repairs to Wilson Main and Auxiliary, Wheeler Auxiliary, and Watts Bar Locks. Operations building roofs were replaced at Nickajack and Watts Bar Locks. Dewatering needles were fabricated for Wilson Auxiliary Lock. Water level indicating systems wree repaired at various locks. Monitoring devices for stress and operational movement were installed at Kentucky and Pickwick Main Locks. Valves, operating machinery, floating mooring bitts, check posts, and wall armor were repaired or installed at various locks. Work continued on inspection and repair of all dewatering closures. Approximately 13,000 cubic yards of material was removed from one site by hired labor channel maintenance dredging on the Tennessee River. Two mooring dolphins were constructed at mile 66.3. An estimated 52 million tons of commodities were locked through the Tennessee River Locks. Commerical lockages were approximately 24,000 and 23,000 recreational craft were also locked through. The long-term program to maintain Chickamauga Lock was continued. Work included installation and evaluation of additional instrumentation. Additional concrete cores were tested for shear stress properties. Finite element model was developed for prediction of stress concentration and deflections of the lock. Additional post-tensioned anchors were installed in the concrete monoliths and additional post-tensioned anchors for lock walls were designed. Risk and reliability analysis was continued. 4. TENNESSEE-TOMBIGBEE WATERWAY, AL AND MS Location. West Central Alabama and Northeastern Mississippi; in Marengo, Sumter, Greene and Pickens Counties, Alabama, and Noxubee, Lowndes, Clay, Monroe, Itawamba, Prentiss and Tishomingo Counties, Mississippi. Existing project. Provides for a waterway 234 miles in length, connecting the Tombigbee and Tennessee Rivers by way of the East Fork of Tombigbee River, Mackeys and Yellow Creeks, affording a channel not less than 9 feet deep and 280 feet in bottom width, with 10 locks each having clear chamber dimensions of 110 x 600 feet. Construction for the divide section, including Bay Springs lock and dam, is assigned to the Nashville District; whereas, the prosecution of work on the river and canal sections is under the jurisdiction of the Mobile District. Only activities of the Nashville District are reported herein. Local cooperation. Authorization requires local interests to construct, maintain and operate all highway bridges, construct and maintain all highway relocations or alterations, make and maintain alterations as required to sewer, water supply and drainage facilities, assume cost of operation and maintenance of utility crossings, provide and maintain as required suitable and adequate river and canal terminals in accordance with plans approved by the Secretary of the Army and the Chief of Engineers. Operations during fiscal year. The Mobile District is responsible for operation and maintenance of the entire Tennessee-Tombigbee Waterway. The project is 100% complete. 5. NAVIGATION WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION Navigation activities pursuant to Sec. 107, Public Law 86-645, as amended (preauthorization). During the period a total of $55,652 were expended for Section 107 projects, $30,466 for Barton Riverfront Park, Muscle Shoals, Al, $15,475 for Clarksville Riverport, TN and $9,711 in the coordination account. Alteration of Bridges 6. AUTHORIZED ALTERATION OF BRIDGES Work on Woodland Street bridge, under Truman-Hobbs Act, was initiated in 1965 and completed in 1966. Costs were $987,632. For details see page 922 of Annual Report for 1967. 23-4 NASHVILLE, TN, DISTRICT Flood Control 7. BIG SOUTH FORK NATIONAL RIVER AND RECREATIONAL AREA, KY AND TN Location. The project is located in Northeastern Tennessee and Southeastern Kentucky along the Big South Fork River and its tributaries in Pickett, Scott, Fentress, and Morgan Counties, Tennessee, and McCreary County, Kentucky. Existing project. A National Recreation Area was established in accordance with the concept included in the interagency report prepared pursuant to section 208 of Flood Control Act of 1968. Total acreage was not to exceed 125,000 acres. The act specifically established the National Area for the purpose of preserving and interpreting the scenic, biological, archeological and historical resources of the river gorge area and developing the natural recreational potential of the area. The project was authorized by the Water Resource Development Act of 1974, 1976 and Water Resources Development Act of 1986. (See table 232B for authorizing legislation). The authorized cost (ceiling) for the project was $156,122,000. $112,588,920 was appropriated to The Corp of Engineers for design and construction of park facilities. The first construction contract was awarded in June 1981. 72% of the authorized project is complete. By Memorandum of Agreement dated 1 October 1990 jurisdiction of the area was transferred to The Department of Interior. Local cooperation. None required. Operation during fiscal year. The Memorandum of Agreement between the Department of Army and the Department of Interior, transferring jurisdiction of the Big South Fork National River and Recreation Area, itemized activities to be completed by the Army. In accordance with this agreement, miscellaneous minor construction items were completed. 8. BLACK FOX, MURFREE, AND OAKLAND SPRINGS, TN Location. Black Fox, Murfree, and Oaklands Springs, wetlands lie in Murfreesboro, Tennessee Existing project. Project features at all three sites include trails, boardwalks, observation platforms, parking, removing exotic invasive vegetation, and planting native species. At Oaklands the planting of all tree species native to Tennessee and heritage gardens will enhance the existing antebellum mansion. Ecosystem restoration features include the creation of additional wetlands and in-stream structures. Murfree Springs plans include demolishing several existing buildings to provide space for an environmental education center and creating additional wetland habitat. A master plan for an environmental education center and improvements at each site was completed in FY95. FY96 appropriations of $148,000 were used to initiate PIED. FY97 funds were used to begin a decision docu- 'nent for the entire project and site plans for Oaklands and Black Fox. FY98 funds totaled $2.7 million. A portion Was used to substantially complete the draft decision aocument and continue plans and specifications for the environmental education center (which the government is designing, but not constructing). FY99 work included responding to higher-level review comments, revision of the decision document and refinement of the project design. Local cooperation. The project authorization by WRDA 1996 and the City of Murfreesboro, TN is the local sponsor. Cost sharing is 75% Federal and 25% non- Federal. Real estate costs over 25% will be borne by the Federal Government. Operations during fiscal year. FY2000 work included obtaining ASA project approval, executing PCA, completing first set of construction documents, and certifying real estate for the first construction contract. 9. HAMILTON COUNTY STREAMBANK STABILIZATION, TN Location. The project is on the Tennessee River, in central Chattanooga, TN from river mile 464 to 468. The bank stabilization consists of stone protection at 5 sites along this reach of the river. Existing project: High floodwaters have caused slope failures and erosion along both previously protected and unprotected areas of the riverbank. Endangered facilities include a large interceptor sewer line (which serves a major portion of North Chattanooga), riverwalk trails, observation decks, fishing piers, drain pipes, ramps, power poles, roads, bridge abutments and parks/recreation facilities. Planned streambank protection is stone armament using graded limestone (referred to as "riprap"). Local cooperation: WRDA of 1996 authorized $7.5M (Federal) for Streambank Stabilization. Hamilton County is the project's sponsor; the City of Chattanooga is also sponsoring the project through a separate agreement with Hamilton County. Chattanooga and Hamilton County provided funding to initiate a feasibility study in FY97 ($150K) under our Work for Others Program. This information was utilized in the development of the decision document called a Detail Project Report (DPR). The Corps received $1.4M in FY98 and $1.4M in FY99 to prepare a Detailed Project Report (DPR) and Environmental Assessment (EA), execute a Project Cooperation Agreement (PCA), and initiate construction. The Final DPR was approved in Feb 99. It described each site (cost, real estate requirements, and environmental and cultural impacts), included the benefitcost ratios, and made recommendations of funding priority. The recommended plan includes five cost-effective sites. The district continued into design on Site 1 (Coolidge Park) and Site 2 (Heritage Landing) under a separate Design Agreement (local funding provided - $87K) prior to executing a Project Cooperation Agreement (PCA) for consturction in May 99. Congress appropriated $1.5M in FY 00. Operations during fiscal year: Funds received during FY00 were used to complete construction on sites 1 and 2 with the exception of a small section of unprotected bank between the completed Coolidge Park and Heritage Land, which will be completed in FY 01. 23-5 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES, FY 2000 10. MARTINS FORK LAKE, KY Location. Dam located at mile 15.6 on Martins Fork of Clover Fork, Cumberland River, about 10 miles southeast of city of Harlan, with reservoir extending about 6 miles upstream within Harlan County, southeastern Kentucky. Existing project. Multiple-purpose improvement combining flood control with water quality control and recreation development adopted by 1965 Flood Control Act (H. Doc. 244, 89th Cong.), in general accordance with recommendations. Dam is concrete type, 504 feet long and rising 97 feet above streambed. Outlet works provide for,, release of water from reservoir at varying levels. Drainage area above damsite is 55.7 square miles. At full pool level, spillway crest at elevation 1341 above mean sea level, reservoir will cover 578 acres and contain 21,120 acre-feet of storage capacity. Provision is made for 17,450 acre-feet of reservoir capacity between elevations 1341 and 1300 for control of floods in winter and spring season, and 14,360 acre-feet (El. 1341-1310) during summer and fall, in conjunction with which storage of 3,090 acre-feet would be available on a seasonal basis to meet streamflow requirements for water quality control and fish life below the dam. A minimum permanent pool of 3,670 acre-feet, 274 acres in extent, is available during the potential flood seasons; and during late spring and summer when flood storage can be reduced, the lake is operated generally at a higher level (El. 1310) to maintain a larger surface area of 340 acres for recreation and provide the required seasonal storage for releases of water during critical low-flow periods. Project prevents a major portion of average annual flood losses at Harlan and results in significant stage reductions with related benefits along rural reaches and to other urban areas downstream. Actual cost of project including $95,000 code 710 funds is $20,479,911. First construction contract awarded in December 1972. Project completed for beneficial use in September 1978. Local cooperation. Federal Water Project Recreation Act of 1965 (P.L. 89-72) applies in regard to non-Federal participation in recreation development, in addition to which local interests are to provide certain safeguards to ensure functioning of reservoir as intended. In May 1981 a final recreation cost-sharing contract with Harlan County was approved and certain recreation facilities have been jointly developed by the Corps and the County. These facilities, consisting of a swimming beach and a picnic area are now operated and maintained by Harlan County. Recreation investment to date (Corps and Local) is about $100,000. Operations during fiscal year. New work: None. Maintenance: A new equipment shed was purchased. 11. MIDDLESBORO, CUMBERLAND RIVER BASIN, KY Location. At Middlesboro, Ky., on Yellow Creek, a tributary entering Cumberland River about 660 miles above its mouth. Existing project. A system of canals and levees around one side of town, arranged so as to divert most headwaters of Yellow Creek away form present channel through heart of city. Protection is thus afforded in large measure to life and property within business district and a large part of residential section. For project details, see page 1088 of Annual Report for 1962. Local cooperation. None required. Operations during fiscal year. New work: None. Maintenance: Only routine maintenance. 12. TUG AND LEVISA FORKS OF THE BIG SANDY RIVER AND UPPER CUMBERLAND, WV, VA AND KY Location. The project is located in the State of West Virginia and the Commonwealths of Kentucky and Virginia. The Cumberland portion consists of the Upper Cumberland River Basin, above Cumberland Falls, KY. The basin is approximately 100 miles in length, averaging 30 miles in width at the lower portion and 10 miles in width upstream at Harlan KY. The Big Sandy Basin is within the Huntington District and the Cumberland within the Nashville District. Existing project. Provides for flood control measures for communities in the Tug and Levisa Forks and Upper Cumberland River Basins. The Cumberland portion has been assigned to the Nashville District. Only activities of the Nashville District are reported herein. Estimated Federal cost of new work under jurisdiction of the Nashville District is $410,835,000. The project was authorized by the Energy and Water Development Appropriation Act of 1981, Section 202 of PL 96-367. Local cooperation. Flood protection cost for Williamsbrug, Middlesborough and Clover Fork, KY are Sshared with their sponsors in accordance with provisions defined by WRDA, 1986. The sponsor has responsibility to operate and maintain such works upon completion of construction. Operations during fiscal year. Major contracts for flood protection at Harlan project were completed this year. Channelization to reduce flooding at Middlesborough continued and is near completion. Nonstructural evacuations and floodproofings continued at Harlan and Middlesborough and were initiated at communitites along thje Clover Fork of the Cumberland River. 13. OHIO RIVER BASIN (NASHVILLE DISTRICT) Location. A series of levees, floodwalls, channel improvements, and reservoirs in Ohio River Basin within Nashville District. Existing project. The general comprehensive plans approved for flood control and other purposes in Ohio River Basin is set forth in legislation listed in Table 23-B. Individual projects, local protection projects and lakes, considered in comprehensive plan within Nashville District are listed in Table 23-K. 23-6 NASHVILLE, TN, DISTRICT 14. INSPECTION OF COMPLETED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS Flood Control Act of June 22, 1936, and subsequent acts, requires local interests furnish assurances they will maintain and operate certain local protection projects after completion in accordance with regulations prescribed by Secretary of the Army. District Engineers are responsible for administration of these regulations within their respective districts. Maintenance inspections were made during fiscal year of completed protective works in localities transferred to local interests for maintenance and operation. Local interests were advised, as necessary, of measures required to maintain projects in accordance with standards prescribed by regulations. Fiscal year cost was $24,480. Total cost to September 30, 2000 was $532,558. For project inspection data see table 23-M. 15. FLOOD CONTROL WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION Flood control and coastal emergencies (Public Law 99, 84th Cong., and antecedent legislation). Actual Federal cost for the fiscal year was $253,190 for disaster preparedness. Multiple-Purpose Projects, Including Power 16. CENTER HILL LAKE, OHIO RIVER BASIN, TN Location. Dam is on Caney Fork River, 26.6 miles above its confluence with Cumberland River (mile 309.2) at Carthage, TN. It is in DeKalb County, TN., about 55 miles east of Nashville, and 14 miles southeast of Carthage, TN. Reservoir extends about 64 miles up main stream and about 10 miles up Falling Water River and lies within DeKalb, Putnam, White, and Warren Counties, TN. Existing project. A combination earth and concrete gravity-type dam, hydroelectric powerplant, and reservoir for primary purposes of flood control and power production, with a permanent pool for public use and conservation purposes. In addition to main dam structure, provi- Sion was made for a rolled-earth dike to close a saddle in reservoir rim near damsite. For further details, see page 1099 of 1962 Annual Report. Actual cost of project including $8,940,642 code 710 funds is $53,412,022. Local cooperation. None required on completed project. Recreation development subject to certain conditions of non-Federal cost-sharing under Federal Water Project Recreation Act of 1965. Operations during fiscal year. New work: None. Maintenance: Dam was operated and structure and its appurtenance maintained as required. Operation of powerplant was continuous except for normal interruptions and necessary shutdowns for inspection and maintenance purposes. Total sales energy generated (213,258,000 kwhr) was made available through the Southeastern Power Association to Tennessee Valley Authority for distribution. Activities under reservoir management involved land management, public relations, and maintenance of public use facilities. Operations and Maintenance work included continued investigation of leakage through the rim of the dam. A major rehab study of the power plant was continued. Spillway gate no. 8 was repaired. Dam Safety: $103,974 was expended in FY 00 to complete acquisition of Spillway flowage easements downstream of the fuse plug. The project stabilizes the main dam and increases spillway capacity by addition of an erodible fuse plug embankment just upstream of the primary structure. This allows normal operation of the project up to a 75 percent probable maximum flood (PMF) and erosion of the fuse plug above this level to prevent failure as a result of catastrophic flooding. 17. DALE HOLLOW LAKE, OHIO RIVER BASIN, TN AND KY Location. Dam is on Obey River, 7.3 miles above its confluence with Cumberland River (mile 380.9) at Celina, TN. It is in Clay County, TN, and about 80 miles northeast of Nashville, TN 28 miles north of Cookeville, TN, and 3 miles east of Celina, TN. Reservoir extends about 51 miles up main stream, 10 miles up East Fork, and 6 miles up West Fork of Obey River, and lies within Cumberland and Clinton Counties, KY, and Clay, Pickett, Overton, and Fentress Counties, TN. Existing project. A concrete gravity-type dam, hydroelectric powerplant, and reservoir for primary purposes of flood control and power production with a permanent pool for public use an conservation purposes. See page 1096 of 1962 Annual Report for project details. Cost of project including $2,195,600 code 710 funds and $150,000 non-Federal funds recreation facilities under the completed projects program is $28,317,746. Local cooperation. None required on completed project; future recreation development subject to certain conditions of non-Federal cost-sharing under Federal Water Project Recreation Act of 1965. Operations during fiscal year. New work: None. Maintenance: Dam was operated and structures and appurtenances maintained as required. Operation of powerplant was continuous except for normal interruptions and necessary shutdowns for inspection and maintenance purposes. Total sales energy generated (65,213,000 kw-hr) was made available through the Southeastern Power Association to Tennessee Valley Authority for distribution. Activities under reservoir management program involved public relations, and management and maintenance of public-use facilities. The showerhouse at Lillydale Recreation Area and the project communication tower were replaced. 23-7 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES, FY 2000 18. J. PERCY PRIEST DAM AND RESERVOIR, OHIO, RIVER BASIN, TN Location. Damsite is on Stones River, 6.8 miles above its confluence with Cumberland River (mile 205.9); in Davidson County, TN.; and about 7 miles east of Nashville, TN. Reservoir extends southeasterly from dam about 32 miles along main stream, 10 miles up East Fork, 6.5 miles up West Fork, and for shorter distances up other tributaries of Stones River; and lies within Davidson, Rutherford, and Wilson Counties, TN. Existing project. A combination earth and concrete gravity-type dam, hydroelectric powerplant, and reservoir for primary purposes of flood control, power production and recreation. For further details see page 703 of 1969 Annual Report. Cost of project including $3,260,400 under code 710 funds and $46,000 non-Federal funds for recreation facilities under the completed projects program is $56,914,039. Local cooperation. Recreation development subject to certain conditions of non-Federal cost-sharing under Federal Water Project Recreation Act of 1965. Operations during fiscal year. New work: None. Maintenance: Dam was operated and structures and appurtenances maintained as required. Total sales energy generated (47,268,000 kw-hr) was made available through Southeastern Power Association to Tennessee Valley Authority for distribution. Activities under reservoir management program involved public relations, fish and wildlife management, and maintenance of public-use facilities. Improvements for handicapped accessibility were provided at Cook and Seven Points Recreation Areas. 19. LAUREL RIVER LAKE, OHIO RIVER BASIN, KY Location. Damsite is at mile 2.3 on Laurel River, a tributary of Cumberland River, in southcentral Kentucky. The two streams meet about 9 miles below Cumberland Falls, a prominent physiographic feature at head of Lake Cumberland which is formed by Wolf Creek Dam. Reservoir extends 19.2 miles upstream to site of Corbin, KY water-supply dam and lies within Laurel and Whitley Counties. Existing project. Project approved in general accordance with recommendations of House Document 413, 86th Congress, by 1960 Flood Control Act, as amended by Public Law 88-253, was designed for purposes of flood control, power, and recreation as an integral unit of a coordinated plan for development of water resources of Cumberland River Basin. With the view of net gain in power potential on a system basis, the plan of improvement incorporated appropriate flood control storage in the proposed project and corresponding adjustment in operations of Wolf Creek Dam - Lake Cumberland for flood control and power, which in effect constituted a transfer of reservoir capacity without entailing a change in flood control benefits. Further detailed study giving full consideration to power capabilities and marketing arrangements indicated the advantage of maintaining present storage allocation at Wolf Creek and use of all available storage capacity of Laurel River Lake for power. The power plant is complete. Recreation was completed in FY 1986. Total cost is $56,741,232. Local cooperation. None required. Operations during fiscal year. New work: None. Maintenance: Dam was operated and structures and appurtenances maintained as required. Total sales energy generated (21,001,000 kw-hr) was made available through Southeastern Power Association for distribution. The power plant microwave system was replaced. A picnic shelter was constructed at the damsite. 20. WOLF CREEK DAM - LAKE CUMBERLAND, OHIO RIVER BASIN, KY Location. Wolf Creek Dam is on Cumberland River at mile 460.0 (above mouth) in Russell County, KY, about 10 miles southwest of Jamestown and 12 miles north of Albany, KY. Lake Cumberland extends 101 miles up main stream, 48 miles up South Fork of Cumberland River, in Russell, Clinton, Wayne, Pulaski, McCreary, Laurel, and Whitley Counties, KY. Existing project. A combination earth and concrete gravity-type dam, hydroelectric powerplant, and reservoir for primary purposes of flood control and power production, with a permanent pool for public-use and conservation purposes. See page 1094 of 1962 Annual Report for project details. Cost of project is $188,267,195. This cost includes $3,259,372 code 710 funds, $880,000 non-Federal funds for recreation facilities under the completed program, and $104,999,237 for major rehabilitation. WRDA 96 authorized an Uprate Project of the hydroelectric powerplant. Local cooperation. None required on completed project; future recreation development subject to certain conditions of non-Federal cost-sharing under Federal Water Project Recreation Act of 1965. Operations during fiscal year. New work: Activity involving the integrity of the structure began in 1968 when a leak or seepage developed in the embankment. The major rehab embankment contract was physically completed in September 1982. Maintenance: Dam was operated and structures and appurtenances maintained as required. Operation of powerplant was continuous except for normal interruptions and necessary shutdowns for inspection and maintenance purposes. Total sales energy generated (441,498,000 kw-hr) was made available through Southeastern Power Association to Tennessee Valley Authority for distribution. Activities under reservoir management program involved land management activities, public relations, and maintenance of public-use facilities. A fire protection system was installed at Mill Springs Mill. 23-8 NASHVILLE, TN, DISTRICT General Investigations 21. SURVEYS Costs for this period were $670,733 for which $223,510 was for Navigation Studies, $23,999 for Flood Damage Prevention Studies, $6 for Shoreline Protection Studies, $283,815 for Special Studies, $94,189 for Miscellaneous Activities and $45,214 for Coordination With Other Agencies and Non-Federal Interests. 22. COLLECTION AND STUDY OF BASIC DATA Costs for this period were $114,775, for which $104,766 was for Floodplain Management Services and $10,009 for General Hydrologic studies. 23. PRECONSTRUCTION ENGINEERING AND DESIGN Costs for this period were $17,875 for which $1,235 was for Watershed/Ecosystem Projects (Black Fox/Oakland Springs), $7,222 for Navigation Projects (Kentucky Lock) and $9,418 for Flood Control Projects (Metro Center Levee). 23-9 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES, FY 2000 TABIIE 23-A COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Section Total to in Text Project Funding FY 97 FY 98 FY99 FY00 Sep 30, 2000 1. Cumberland River TN and KY 2. Kentucky Lock TN and KY 3. Tennessee River, TN, AL, and KY 4. Tenn.-Tombigbee Waterway, AL and MS 7. Big South Fork National River and Rec. Area, KY and TN 8. Black Fox/Oaklands Springs, TN 9. Hamilton County, TN 10. Martins Fork Lake, KY 11. Middlesboro, Cumberland River Basin, KY 12. Tug & Levisa Forks of the Big Sandy & Cumberland River, WV, VA and KY 16. Center Hill Lake, Ohio River Basin, TN 17. Dale Hollow Lake Ohio River Basin, TN and KY 18. J. Percy Priest Dam and Reservoir, Ohio River Basin, TN 19. Laurel River Lake, Ohio River Basin, KY New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Rehab. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint Approp. Cost 320,252,2401,2,3 - - - - 320,252,2401,2,3 23,354,000 21,372,000 21,603,000 24,297,555 490,101,4814 23,798,538 21,241,148 22,307,391 24,277,115 490,008,2645 2,726,000 3,957,000 12,483,000 19,250,000 44,916,000 2,784,980 ,, 3,856,189 12,017,077 18,725,705 43,808,287 - - - - 16,251,428 6 - - - - 16,251,428 6 13,053,000 13,023,000 16,693,000 16,592,069 310,682,117 7 12,996,888 13,187,838 16,622,146 16,888,421 310,586,299 8 - - - - 400,000 - - - - 400,000 0 0 0 0 749,013,050 0 0 0 0 749,013,050 0 0 0 0 112,588,920 9 81,775 -41,469 20,186 47,169 112,572,867 10 287,000 1,426,000 465,000 1,677,000 4,003,000 249,765 716,410 365,228 538,451 1,941,773 - 909,000 1,679,481 1,503,250 4,091,73111 - 110,274 562,470 2,803,955 3,476,69812 - - - 20,479,911 -- - - 20,479,911 785,000 562,000 652,000 773,500 12,233,840 767,093 581,314 680,231 773,854 12,233,063 -- - - 817,830 13 S- - - 817,830 13 38,000 48,000 50,000 61,500 2,466,666 42,402 35,430 62,696 60,362 2,465,529 25,523,000 27,986,000 18,491,299 10,736,710 345,472,535 14 23,048,466 20,452,349 26,398,835 16,035,961 342,498,040 15 - - - 53,412,02216 - - - 53,412,02217 4,770,000 4,163,000 5,309,000 4,974,200 104,225,07618 4,851,338 4,005,131 5,532,725 4,918,695 104,129,19319 - - - 28,317,74620 - - - 28,317,74621 4,206,000 3,669,000 4,117,000 4,436,000 91,594,027 22 4,180,726 3,734,697 4,154,911 4,436,057 91,587,990 23 56,914,03924 .5..6 ,914,03925 4,160,000 3,300.000 3,650,000 3,403,000 71,400,651 26 3,805,105 3,771,642 3,674,280 3,415,921 71,400,647 27 ... 56,741,232 ... 56,741,232 1,283,000 1,166,000 1,251,000 1,793,000 23,818,943 28 1,574,973 1,167,224 1,279,616 1,788,169 23,793,770 9 23-10 NASHVILLE, TN, DISTRICT TABLE 23-A COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT (Continued) See Section Total to in Text Project Funding FY 97 FY 98 FY 99 FY00 Sep 30, 2000 20. Wolf Creek Dam and New Work Lake Cumberland, Approp. - - 83,267,95829 Ohio River Basin, KY Cost 83,267,95829 Maint. Approp. 7,676,000 8,974,346 6,652,104 5,861,287 132,699,47030 Cost 7,374,806 7,831,643 7,917,894 5,903,414 132,445,59331 Rehab. Approp 104,999,23732 Cost 104,999,23732 1. Includes $9,707,354 for abandoned and/or replaced works under the old Cumberland River system. (Amount includes $826,253 for new work and $3,266,706 for maintenance on previous project.) 2. Includes $61,733 public works acceleration funds, and $102,966 contributed by the State of Kentucky and $6,750 contributed by metropolitan Nashville, TN. 3. Includes $298,000 funds provided from the Productive Employment Appropriation Act (PL 98-8) of 1983. 4. Includes $955,889 for special recreation use fees, and $2,628,257 for maintenance and operation of dams and other improvements of navigable waters, and $1,892,000 funds provided from the Productive Employment Appropriation Act (PL 98-8) of 1983. 5. Includes $955,889 for special recreation use fees, and $2,628,257 for maintenance and operation of dams and other improvements of navigable waters, and $1,892,000 funds provided from the Productive Employment Appropriation Act (PL 98-8) of 1983. 6. Includes $14,007,193 for new work and excludes $4,005,175 for maintenance on previous projects. 7. Includes $495,763 for maintenance and operation of dams and other improvements of navigable waters, and $764,000 funds provided from the Productive Employment Appropriation Act (PL 98-8) of 1983. 8. Includes $495,763 for maintenance and operation of darns and other improvements of navigable waters, and $764,000 funds provided from the Productive Employment Appropriation Act (PL 98-8) of 1983. 9. Includes $300,000 funds provided from the Productive Employment Appropriation Act (PL 98-8) of 1983. 10. Includes $300,000 funds provided from the Productive Employment Appropriation Act (PL 98-8) of 1983. 11. Includes $884,731 contributed by Hamilton County, TN 12. Includes $338,613 contributed by Hamilton County, TN 13. Includes $33,876 Emergency Relief Funds. 14. Includes $21,484,026 contributed by the State of Kentucky. 15. Includes $20,809,573 contributed by the State of Kentucky. 16. Includes $35,896 public works acceleration funds, and $148,000 funds provided from the Productive Employment Appropriation Act (PL 98-8) of 1983. 17. Includes $35,896 public works acceleration funds, and $148,000 funds provided from the Productive Employment Appropriation Act (PL 98-8) of 1983. 18. Includes $292,280 funds for special recreation use fees, and $1,083,678 for maintenance and operation of dams and other improvements of navigable waters, and $91,000 funds provided from the Productive Employment Appropriation Act (PL 98-8) of 1983. 19. Includes $292,280 funds for special recreation use fees, and $1,083,678 for maintenance and operation of dams and other improvements of navigable waters, and $91,000 funds provided from the Productive Employment Appropriation Act (PL 98-8) of 1983. 20. Includes $51,789 public works funds and $150,000 contributed by the State of Tennessee, and $341,000 funds provided from the Productive Employment Appropriation Act (PL 98-8) of 1983. 21. Includes $51,789 public works funds and $150,000 contributed by the State of Tennessee, and $341,000 funds provided from the Productive Employment Appropriation Act (PL 98-8) of 1983. 22. Includes $339,480 funds for special recreation use fees, and $1,083,678 for maintenance and operation of dams and other improvements of navigable waters, and $482,000 funds provided from the Productive Employment Appropriation Act (PL 98-8) of 1983. 23. Includes $1,083,678 funds for special recreation use fees, and $884,178 for maintenance and operation of dams and other improvements of navigable waters, and $482,000 funds provided from the Productive Employment Appropriation Act (PL 98-8) of 1983. 24. Includes $46,000 contributed by the Metropolitan Govemment, Nashville, TN. 25. Includes $46,000 contributed by the Metropolitan Government, Nashville, TN. 26. Includes $260,680 for special recreation use fees, and $1,226,978 for maintenance and operations of dams and other improvements of navigable waters, and $40,000 funds provided from the Productive Employment Appropriation Act (PL 98-8) of 1983. 27. Includes $260,680 for special recreation use fees, and $1,226,978 for maintenance and operations of dams and other improvements of navigable waters, and $40,000 funds provided from the Productive Employment Appropriation Act (PL 98-8) of 1983. 28. Includes $66,678 for maintenance and operations of dams and other improvements of navigable waters. 29. Includes $96,920 public works acceleration funds, and $880,000 contributed by the State of Kentucky. 30. Includes $82,048 public works acceleration funds, and $198,578 for maintenance and operation of dams and other improvements of navigable waters, and $278,780 funds for special recreation use fees, and $293,000 fund provided from the Productive Employment Appropriation Act (PL 98-8) of 1983. 31. Includes $82,048 public works acceleration funds, and $198,578 for maintenance and operation of dams and other improvements of navigable waters, and $278,780 funds for special recreation use fees, and $293,000 funds provided from the Productive Employment Appropriation Act (PL 98-8) of 1983. 32. Includes $203,757 for claim paid on initial construction of switchyard. 23-11 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES, FY 2000 TABLE 23-B AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION See Date of Section Authorized Project and Work Authorized Documents in Text Act 1. Annual Report, 1890, p. 2151 H. Docs. 758, 60th Cong., 1st sess.; and 1481, 60th Cong., 2d sess. 1 H. Doc. 38, 73d Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 761, 79th Cong., 2d sess. Jul 13, 1892 Jun 25, 1910 Aug 30, 1935 Jul 24, 1946 Jun 19, 1952' Sep. 3, 1954 Jul 14, 1960 Oct 12, 1996 Aug. 5, 1886 Mar 2, 1907 Mar 2, 1919 Jun 5, 1920 Jul 3, 1930 Jun 26, 19342 Jul 24, 1946 Oct 1, 1980 Oct 17, 1996 Oct 12, 1996 Jul 3, 1930 May 18, 1933 Oct 12, 1996 CUMBERIAND RIVER BELOW NASHVILLE Provision made for lock A Provision made for locks B to F, and for dredging below lock F. Repairing dams A to F, inclusive, and surmounting same with movable crests Provision of 9-foot channel by the construction of 3 moderate height dams below Nashville, via, Kuttawa (Eureka), Dover, and Cheatham. Provision for hydroelectric power production as a function of Cheatham Dam. Construction of Barkley (Lower Cumberland) dam and reservoir project for navigation, flood control, hydroelectric power, and related purposes in lieu of Kuttawa and Dover navigation-only structures. Authorized change in alignment of Illinois Central Railroad. Authorized construction of Kentucky Lock for navigation only. CUMBERLAND RIVER ABOVE NASHVILLE Provision made for locks and dams; the Secretary of War to determine the final plan of improvement. Dimensions of the locks fixed in accordance with reports of Mar. 30, 1887, and Nov. 25, 1890. Adoption of the report of the Board of Engineers, dated Feb. 26, 1906, limiting the lock and dam construction to locks and dams 1 to 7, and 21. Provision made for locks and dams 8 to 17. Authorizes work to proceed in Tennessee without waiting for action of local interests in Kentucky. Raising dam 1, 3 feet. Operation and care of locks and dams provided for with funds from War Department appropriations for rivers and harbors. Construction of Old Hickory, Cordell Hull (Carthage), and Celina Dams above Nashville for navigation and the development of power resources. Design and construct flood control measures for communities in the Upper Cumberland River basins. Authorized ecosystem restoration at three wetlands and historic sites in Murfresboro, TN. Authorized hydropower update at Wolf Creek Dam TENNESSEE RIVER Authorized navigable depth of 9 feet from mouth about 650 miles to Knoxville, Tennessee to be obtained by construction of low dams. Authorized TVA to construct such dams in the Tennessee River as will provide a 9 foot channel. Authorized flood damage reduction by nonstructure methods in Hamilton County, TN. 1H. Doc. 328, 71st Cong., 2d sess. WRDA 96 23-12 S. Doc 81, 83d Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 56, 86th Cong., 2d sess. WRDA 96 Annual Report 1884, p. 1663 Annual Report 1888, p. 1622, and Annual Report 1892, p. 1933. H. Doc. 699, 59th Cong., 1st sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 10, 63d Cong., 2d sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 26, 70th Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 761, 79th Cong., 2d sess. Sec. 202, PL 96-367 WRDA 96 1. WRDA 96 3. - --- NASHVILLE, TN, DISTRICT TABLE 23-B AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION (continued) See Section Date of in Text Authorized Act Project and Work Authorized Documents O, 1) 1 99 A ,tho nr a stdlV for a bank stabilzation project on WRDA 96 AMU l l '-3" yJ' .. .... .. ...- the Tennessee River in Hamilton County, TN. Authorized assistance to non-Federal interests for enviromental activities in Jackson County, AL. 011IO RIVER BASIN, NASIIVILLE DISTRICT Aug 28, 1937 Construct levees, floodwalls, and drainage structures for protection of cities and towns in Ohio River Basin. Project to be selected by Chief of Engineers with approval of Secretary of War at a cost not to exceed $24,877,000 for construction. Jun 28, 1938 Approved general comprehensive plan for flood control and other purposes in Ohio River Basin as may be advisable at discretion of Secretary of War and Chief of Engineers and for initiation and partial accomplishment of plan, authorized $75million for reservoirs and $50,300,000 for local flood protection works. Aug 18, 1941 Additional $45 million for prosecution of comprehensive plan for Ohio River Basin. Dec 22, 1944 Additional $70 million for further prosecution of comprehensive plan for Ohio River Basin. Jul 24, 1946 Additional $125 million for further prosecution of comprehensive plan. May 17, 1950 Additional $100 million for prosecution of comprehensive plan for Ohio River Basin. Dec 30, 1963 Jun 18, 1965 Aug 13, 1968 Jun 19, 1970 Mar 7, 1974 Mar 7, 1974 Jul 24, 1946 Additional $150 million for further prosecution of comprehensive plan for flood control and other purposes in Ohio River Basin. Additional $89 million for further prosecution of comprehensive plan for Ohio River Basin. Additional $35 million for further prosecution of comprehensive plan for Ohio River Basin. Additional $69 million for further prosecution of comprehensive plan for Ohio River Basin. Authorized Big South Fork National River and Recreation Area, KY and TN. Total area not to exceed 125,000 acres. Additional $120 million for further prosecution of comprehensive plan for Ohio River Basin. TENNESSEE-TOMBIGBEE WATERWAY Construction of waterway to connect above rivers and provide a 9 foot channel and minimum bottom width of 170 feet in river and canal sections and 150 feet in the divide cut, with locks 110 by 600 feet clear inside dimensions. Subsequent studies determined most practical plan consists of channel with bottom width of 300 feet (280 feet in divide cut), fewer locks with higher lifts resulted in reducing number of lifts from 18 to 10 and reduced length from 260 to 253 miles. 1. Contains latest publislhed maps. Included in Public Works 2. Permanent Administration program Sept. 6, 1933. 16. Appropriation Repeal Act. 23-13 OctL 12, 1996 Oct 12, 1996 I WRDA 96 Flooxi Control Committee Doc. 1, 75th Cong., 1st sess. Flood Control Committee Doc. 761, 75th Cong., 3d sess. H. Doc. 762, 77th Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 506, 78th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 6755, 89th Cong., 1st sess. S. 3710, 90th Cong., 2d sess. H. R. 15166 91st Cong., 2d sess. H. R. 10203 93rd Cong. Water Resources Develop. Act of 1974 Amended by PL 94-587, 94th Cong. H. R. 10203 93rd Cong. River ABcats ionf M19o7n4e.tary Authorization H. Doc. 486, 79th Cong. 2d sess. Page 1343, Part I, FY 1968 House Hearings REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES, FY 2000 TABLE 23-C Rseeport Report see Project Caney Fork River, TN Clinch River, TN and VA Duck River, TN Elk River, AL and TN French Broad and Little Pigeon Rivers, TN Holston River, TN Little Tennessee River, TN Obey River, TN Red River, TN South Fork of Cumberland River, KY OTHER AUTHORIZED NAVIGATION PROJECTS (All Projects not Specifically Identified in Text) For last Full Operatio Status Annual Report Constru abandoned 1895 $ 27,E abandoned 1923 53,E abandoned 1887 13,( abandoned 1904 4,( abandoned abandoned abandoned abandoned abandoned abandoned 1931 1911 1888 1887 1884 1892 Cost to Sept, 2000 n and ction Maintenance 828 949 $ 7,873 000 - 00 - 249,605 5,714 5,510 11,500 5,000 11,967 33,554 TABLE 23-E OTHER AUTHORIZED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS (All Projects not Specifically Identified in Text) For last Full Cost to Sept, 2000 Report see Operation and Project Status Annual Report Construction Maintenance Barbourville, KY completed 1963 $2,088,147 Coal Creek and Tributaries (Lake City), TN completed 1962 460,134 Corbin (Lynn Camp Creek), KY completed 1969 567,703 Middlesboro (Yellow Creek), KY completed 1949 26,309 Paint Rock River, AL completed 1967 544,173 Pineville, KY completed 1963 1,679,126 1. Includes $9,950 contributed funds. 23-14 NASHVILLE, TN, DISTRICT Project Status Barkley Dam and Lake beneficial use Barkley, KY and TN Celina Dam, KY inactive Cheatham Lock and Dam, TN beneficial use Cordell Hull Lock and Dam, TN beneficial use Old Hickory Lock and Dam. TN beneficial use OTHER AUTHORIZED MULTIPLE-PURPOSE PROJECTS (Including Power) For last Full Co Report see AnuaR eor ^ostu $160,049,90 St to Sept~ 2000 )st to Sept, 2000 Operation and tion Maintenance )2 1 $159,303,525 2 222,575 31,682,762 115,356,909 2 79,874,492 81,348,2802 52,266,412 133,999,580 2 1. Includes $13,551,258 cost for Cross Creek. 2. Details given under "Cumberland River, TN and KY " See Table 23-H TABLE 23-G DEAUTHORZED PROJECTS For last Full Federal Contributed Renort see Funds Funds Project Annual Report Date and Authority Three Islands Reservoir, 1970 Authorized: FC Act 1938, PL 761, Ohio River Basin, TN 75 Cong., 3rd sess.; FC Act 1946, PL 525, 79th Cong., 2d sess. Deauthorized: 5 Aug 1977. Middlesboro, Yellow Creek Authorized: FC Act, Dec 22, Bell County, KY 1944, PL 534, 78th Congress. Deauthorized: 17 Oct 1986. Water Resources Development Act of 1986, PL 99-662, 99th Cong., 2d sess. Cumberland River above Authorized: River & Harbor Act, Nashville, TN Aug 5, 1886. Deauthorized: 17 Oct 1986. Water Resources Development Act of 1986, PL 99-662, 99th Cong., 2d sess. liwassee River, Polk and 1923 Authorized: River & Harbor Act ee River, Polk and Aug 14, 1876. Bradley Counties, TN ug Deauthorized: 17 Oct 1986. Water Resources Development Act of 1986, PL 99-662, 99th Cong., 2d sess. Authorized: FC Act, Jan 28, 1938, Rossview Lake, Tennessee L 76175th Congress. and Kentucky PL 76175th Congress. Deauthorized: 17 Oct 1986. Water Resources Development Act of 1986, PL 99-662, 99th Cong., 2d sess. Authorized: Rivers and harbors Celina Lake, Kentucky Act of 1946. PL 79-522. and Tennessee Deauthorized: July 9, 1995, Section 1001 (B) (2) of PL 99-662. Expended Expended $111,855 123,065 6,779 23-15 TABLE 23-F --- '- - r - Annual Repowrt Construel REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES, FY 2000 TABLE 23-H CUMBERLAND RIVER, TN AND KY: PRINCIPAL FEATURES (See Section 1 of Text) Dam and Reservoir Barkley Cheatham Old Hickory Cordell Hull Nearest town Miles above mouth of river Lock dimensions (feet) 1 Lift at normal pool levels (feet) Depths on guard-sills at minimum pool levels (feet) Character of foundation Dam: Type Height Length, exclusive of lock section (feet) Spillway: Gross length (feet) Net length opening (feet) Crest gates: Type Number Size (feet) Operating levels at dam (feet, mean sea level): Maximum regulated Normal operation: Full pool Minimum pool Minimum pool in advance of floods Reservoir area (acres) Reservoir capacity (acre-feet): Flood control Power drawdown Dead storage Total Canel: Length (mile) Bottom width (feet) Depth a minimum pool level (feet) Power development: Number of units Generator rating (kilowatts) Total installation (kilowatts) Percent of project completion Year opened to navigation Cost9 Kuttawa, KY 11 miles. 30.6 110 by 800 57 11, upper; 13, lower Rock Concrete gravity and earthfill 157 9,959 804 660 Tainter 12 55 by 60 375 359 354 346 93,430 1,213,0003,4 259,000 610,000 2,082,00 1.75 400 11 4 32,500 130,000 8 1964 $160,049,902 10 1. Clear width and length available for full width. 2. Exclusive of lock section. 3. Surcharge. 4. Normal operation (elev. 375-359) during nonflood season; flood control allowance to be increased to 1,472,000 acre-feet (elev. 375-354) during season of major floodflows. 5. Surcharge storage 6. During flood season (elev. 508-501); minimum 51,800 acrefeet (elev. 508-504) with normal operation during non-flood season. 7. Daily pondage allowance; run-of-river project. 8. Completed for full beneficial use. 9. Includes recreation facility costs. 10. Includes $13,551,258 cost for Cross Creek. 23-16 Ashland City, TN, 9 miles 148.7 110 by 800 26 14, upper; 17, lower Rock Concrete gravity 75 800 480 420 Tainter 7 60 by 27 Old Hickory TN, 3 miles 216.2 84 by 400 60 14, upper; 13, lower Rock Concrete gravity and earthfill 98 3,6052 325 270 Tainter 6 45 by 41 Carthage, TN 5 miles 313.5 84 by 400 59 14, upper; 13, lower Rock Concrete gravity and earthfill 93 1,1382 291 225 Tainter 5 45 by 41 385 382 4503 7,450 19,8007 84,200 104,000 442 27,450 125,0005 63,000 357,000 545,000 5083 508 501 499 13,920 85,6005,6 20,500 204,800 310,900 3 12,000 36,000 1952 $31,682,762 4 25,000 100,000 8 1952 $52,266,412 3 33,333 100,000 8 1973 - $79,874,492 TENNESSEE RIVER (SEE SECTION 3 OF TEXT) Miles Above Mouth Miles from Nearest Town Kentucky 22.4 0.5 above Gilbertsville, KY Pickwick Landing: Auxiliary lock 206.7 4.4 above Hamburg, TN Main lock 206.7 4.4 above Hamburg, TN Wilson: Auxiliary lock Main lock General Joe Wheeler: Auxiliary lock Main lock Guntersville: N Auxiliary lock '; Main lock 259.4 2.9 above Florence, AL 259.4 2.9 above Florence, AL 274.9 18.4 above Florence, AL 274.9 18.4 above Florence, AL 349.0 9.1 below Guntersville, AL 349.0 9.1 below Guntersville, AL Nickajack: Auxiliary lock 424.7 39.4 below Chattanooga, TN Main lock 424.7 39.4 below Chattanooga, TN Chickamauga 471.0 6.9 above Chattanooga, TN Watts Bar 529.9 6.8 above Breedenton, TN Fort Loudon Melton Hill (Clinch R.) 602.3 1.3 above Lenoir City, TN 23.1 22.1 above Kingston, TN Lock Dimension Length Minimum Depth Width Avail- Ilft on Guard Sills of able for Year Chain- Full Nor- Maxi- Opened Cost of ber Width mal mum Lower Upper Character of Navi- Kind Type of Each Lock (feet) (feet) (feet) (feet) (feet) (feet) Foundation gation of Dam Construction and Dam 110 600 56 73.3 12.7 11.0 Limestone 1942 Fixed Concrete and 2 earthfill 110 600 55 63.0 12.8 10.0 Limestone 110 1000 55 63.0 12.8 10.0 Limestone 60 292 94 100.0 11.04 11.2 Limestone 300 110 600 94 100.0 13.0 13.0 Limestone 60 400 48 51.5 13.2 14.7 Limestone 110 600 48 51.5 13.0 13.0 Limestone 60 360 39 45.0 11.8 13.0 Limestone 110 600 39 45.0 12.7 13.0 Limestone 110 600 39 41.0 13.0 13.0 Limestone 110 800 39 41.0 13.0 13.0 Limestone 60 360 49 53.0 13.0 10.0 Limestone 60 360 58 70.0 11.8 12.0 Shale 60 360 72 80.0 11.8 12.0 Limestone 75 400 54 60.0 13.0 13.0 Limestone 1937 Fixed Concrete and earthfill 1984 Fixed Concrete and earthfill 1927 Fixed 1959 Concrete and $46,973,5405 earthfill 7 1934 Fixed Concrete and 1,796,2956 earthfill 1963 Fixed Concrete and 7 earthfill 1937 Fixed 1965 Fixed Concrete and earthfill 1967 Fixed Concrete Fixed Concrete 1939 Fixed 1941 Fixed Concrete and earthfill 1943 Fixed Concrete and earthfill 1963 Fixed Concrete 3&7 7 7 7 3&7 3 3 2 :ong., 1st sess.). TABLE 23-I Project1 1. H. Doc. 328, 71 Cong., 2d sess, contains table, pp. 98 and 99,g iving pertinent information concerning low dams contemplated under 5. Constructed by the Corps under authority of sec. 124, National Defense Act of June 3, 1916, (H. Doc. 1262, 64th C 1930 project. Annual Report for 1938, pp. 1218 and 1219, contains similar information pertaining to low dams in addition to existing locks Actual cost of lock and dam. and dans, including those constructed or under construction by Tennessee Valley Authority. 6. Actual cost of lock only as constructed by the Corps; dams constructed by Tennessee Valey Authority. 2. Lock and dam constructed by Tennessee Valley Authority. 7. Constructed by Tennessee Valley Authority. 3. Lock and dam constructed by Tennessee Valley Authority. Design for lock prepared with Corps forces and funds. 4. Tailwater in canal; flight of 2 locks. REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES, FY 2000 TABLE 23-J TENNESSEE RIVER, TN, AL, AND KY TOTAL COST OF EXISTING PROJECTS TO SEP 30, 2000 (See Section 3 of Text) Channel Operation & Funds New Work Maintenance Maintenance Total Regular $2,244,2361,2 $15,087,875 $295,486,754 $312,818,865 Maintenance - - 11,665 11,665 Increase of compen- 5- - 5 sation, rivers and harbors, 1919 (certified claims) Total $2,244,2361,2 $15,087,880 $295,498,419 $312,830,535 1. In addition, surplus property valued at $54,336 was trans- tion and care of works of improvement under provisions of approferred from the project without reimbursement. Excludes priation for such purposes. $4,005,175 expended between 1890 and June 30, 1935, on opera- 2. Excludes $14,007,192 previous construction cost. TABLE 23-K OHIO RIVER BASIN (NASHVILLE DISTRICT) LOCAL PROTECTION PROJECTS Type of Estimated Cost Location Protection Federal Non-Federal Total Cumberland, KY Channel Improvement 520,000 240,000 760,000 1 TABLE 23-L RESERVOIRS Total Federal Tributary Basin and Reservoir Steam Cost Center Hill Lake Caney Fork 53,412,0221 Dale Hollow Lake, TN and KY Obey River 28,167,7461 J. Percy Priest Dam & Reservoir, TN Stones River 56,868,039 1,2 Laurel River Lake, KY Laurel River 56,741,232 3 Martins Fork Lake, KY Martins Fork 20,479,911 1. Details of this project are in individual report. 2. Formerly Stewarts Ferry Reservoir. 3. See "Other authorized multiple-purpose projects." 23-18 NASHVILLE, TN, DISTRICT TABLE 23-M INSPECTION OF COMPLETED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS (See Section 14 of Text) Project Date of Inspection Barbourville, KY Oct 13,1999 Corbin, KY Oct 14, 1999 Lake City, TN Oct 21, 1999 Middlesboro, KY (Yellow Creek) Oct 15, 1999 Middlesboro, KY (Diversion Canal) Oct 15, 1999 Pineville, KY Oct 12, 1999 Spring City, TN Oct 20, 1999 Sunbright, TN (Whiteoak Creek) Oct 21, 1999 TABLE 23-N FLOOD CONTROL WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION Flood Control activities pursuant to Section 205 P.L. 858, 80th Congress, as amended Project FY 00 Cost Section 205 Coordination Account $ 26,188 Clark Spring Branch, Decatur, AL 222,643 Dallas Branch, Huntsville, AL -11,057 Sinking Creek,Murfreesboro, TN 421,046 Muscle Shoals, AL 3,357 Huntsville Spring Branch, AL 10,776 Emily Ave / Tim. St., TN 3,524 Richland Creek, Morgantown, TN 7,695 Doe River, Carter Co, TN 43,938 Lick Creek, Clinch Riv, Russell Co, VA 238 Beason Creek, Adamsville, TN 31,396 Little River, Hopkinsville, KY 44,610 Oak Grove, Christian Co., KY 34,821 French Broad River, Madison Co., NC 45,172 Bakersville, NC 156,956 Buena Vista Pipeline, Muscle Shoals, AL 93,043 Shoal Creek, Lawrenceburg, TN 85,629 Town Creek Basin, Lenoir City, TN 59,348 Big and Little Mocassin Creeks, VA 20,225 Elk River, Fayetteville, TN 81,969 Beaver Creek & Tribs, Bristol, VA 21,615 Valley Fork Creek Paris Henry Co., TN 11,834 Big Nance Creek Lawrence Co., AL 23,163 Cane Creek Camden, TN 24,439 Mountain City, TN 98,499 Beaver Creek & Tribs, Bristol, TN 13,456 Erwin. TN $1,574,940 Emergency Bank Protection (Section 14 of the 1946 Flood Control Act, P.L. 526, 79th Congress) FY 00 Cost Project $18,586 Section 14 Coordination Account 16 Cumberland River, Ted Rhodes Golf Course, TN 481,567 Tennessee River, Mile 645-647.3 94,493 Ross Landing, Chattanooga, TN 448,182 Shelby Bottoms Greenway & Park, TN 1,006 Tennessee Riverpark-Frye Fish 244,781 Beaver Creek, Bristol, TN 181,334 Mousetail landing State Park, TN 3,699 French Broad River Water Treatment Plant, NC 6.952 Pistol Creek, Maryville Public Fac, TN 69,568 N. Chickamauga Creek, Dayton Pike Bridge 26,854 Duck River Sewer Main, Columbia, TN 5,410 Bryson City, (Lackey Iill Pump Station), NC 12,123 Cumberland River, John Merritt BLVD, Nash, TN 38,838 Dry Creek WTP, Cumberland River, Davidson Co., TN 43,106 Blannahassett Island, French Broad River 6.740 Maansker Creek Coolettsville TN $1,683,257 23-19 LOUISVILLE, KY DISTRICT* LOUISVILLE, KY DISTRICT This district encompasses southwestern Ohio, all of Central Kentucky and portions of western and eastern Kentucky, the southern 3/4 of Indiana, and southeastern Illinois, all included in the drainage basin of the Ohio River and its tributaries (exclusive of Tennessee and Cumberland Rivers) from mile 438 (below Pittsburgh) immediately upstream from Foster, KY., to the mouth of the Ohio. All cost and financial statements for projects are listed at the end of this chapter. All other tables are referenced in text and also appear at the end of this chapter. IMPROVEMENTS Navigation - Channels and Harbors Page 1. Open Channel Work, Licking River, KY ............... 24-2 Navigation - Locks and Dams 2. Construction of Locks and Dams, Ohio River.................................................................. . 24-2 3. Green and Barren Rivers, KY ........................... 24-2 4. Kentucky River, KY........ ........................ 24-2 5. Open Channel Work, Ohio River ..... ............... 24-3 6. Other Authorized Navigation Projects.................... 24-3 7. Navigation Work Under Special Authorization ............................ ..................... 24-3 Flood Control - Local Protection 8. Duck Creek, OH............................................ 24-3 9. Holes Creek, OH................................* 24-3 10. Mill Creek, OH .......................... .......... ........ 24-4 11. Ohio River Flood Protection ........................ 24-4 12. Pond Creek, KY ..... .................. ........... 24-4 13. Salyersville, KY .... .................. .... 24-5 14. Southwestern Jefferson County, KY ..................... 24-5 15. Southern & Eastern, KY ............... ... *........*.. *2*4 -5... 16. Wabash River, New Harmony, IN ................... 24-6 17. White River, Indianapolis Central W aterfront, IN.......................................... 24-6 18. White River, Indianapolis, IN (North) .................... 24-6 Flood Control - Reservoirs 19. 20. 21. 22. 23. 24. 25. 26. 27. 28. 29. 30. 31. 32. 33. Barren River Lake, KY.......................................... 24-6 Brookville Lake, KY ......... .......*. ...... ......... 24-7 Buckhorn Lake, KY ......... .............. 24-7 Caesar Creek Lake, OH......................................... 24-7 Cagles M ill Lake, IN ................ ....................... 24- Carr Creek Lake, KY....... ...............*..*... ......... 24-8 Cave Run Lake, KY ............................. .... 2....... Cecil M. Harden Lake, IN ........ *..*..*.. ... 24-9 Clarence J. Brown Dam & Reservoir, OH.............. 24-9 Green River Lake, KY.......24-10.................249 J. Edward Roush Lake, IN ........................ 24-10 M ississinewa Lake, IN............ ................. 24-11 M onroe Lake, IN............................. .24-11 Nolin Lake, KY............................................ 24-1 Ohio River Basin (Louisville District) ................ 24-11 34. Patoka Lake, IN ............................................... 24-11 35. Rough River Lake and Channel Improvement, KY ............................................ 24-12 36. Salamonie Lake, IN .......................................... 24-12 37. Taylorsville Lake, KY...................................... 24-13 38 Wabash River Basin................................... 24-13 39. West Fork of Mill Creek Lake, OH...................... 24-13 40. William H. Harsha Lake, OH............................... 24-14 41. Inspection of Completed Flood Control Projects...................................... 24-14 42. Other Authorized Flood Control Projects ............. 24-14 43. Flood Control Works Under Special Authorization ...................................................... 24-14 General Investigations 44. Surveys ..................................... 24-15 45. Preconstruction Engineering and Design.............. 24-15 46. Coordination with other Agencies.................. 24-15 47. Collection and Study of Basic Data...................... 24-15 Tables Table 24-A Cost and Financial Statement.............. 24-16 Table 24-B Authorizing Legislation ..................... 24-22 Table 24-C Other Authorized Navigation Projects .................. ...... 24-26 Table 24-D Not applicable Table 24-E Other Authorized Flood Control Projects .............................. .......... 24-27 Table 24-F Not applicable Table 24-G Deauthorized Projects...................... 24-29 Table 24-H Principal Features of Green and Barren Rivers and Kentucky River Navigation Systems .................. 24-31 Table 24-I Ohio River Basin - Total Cost of Basin Plan ...................................... 24-32 Table 24-J Wabash River Basin - Total Cost of Basin Plan.............................. 24-36 Table 24-K Inspection of Completed Flood Control Projects......................... 24-37 Table 24-L Flood Control Work Under Special Authorization ..................................... 24-39 Table 24-M General Investigations ....................... 24-41 24-1 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF TIIE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 2000 Navigation - Channels and Harbors 1. OPEN CHANNEL WORK, LICKING RIVER, KY Location. The Licking River originates in southeastern Kentucky and flows generally northwesterly to its confluence with the Ohio River at Covington, KY, mile 470.2 below Pittsburgh, PA. The Licking River Basin includes the drainage area of the Licking River, and all other left bank tributaries of the Ohio River from Markland Locks and Dam (Ohio River Mile 531.5) upstream to Meldahl Locks and Dam (Ohio River Mile 436.2). Existing project. There are no locks and dams on the Licking River. However, a navigable depth of 9 feet is maintained up to mile 7.0 on the Licking River. Local cooperation. None. Terminal facilities. Facilities for bulk commodities, oil products, and coal are considered adequate for existing traffic. Operations during fiscal year. New Work: None. Maintenance: Dredging was done where required to provide an adequate and dependable channel. Navigation - Locks and Dams 2. CONSTRUCTION OF LOCKS AND DAMS, OHIO RIVER For report on this improvement, see the heading under Ohio River. 3. GREEN AND BARREN RIVERS, KY Location. Green River rises in Casey County, KY, flows northwesterly 370 miles, and empties into the Ohio River about 8 miles above Evansville, IN. Barren River rises in Monroe County, KY, flows northwesterly 130 miles, and empties into Green River 1/2 mile above Lock 4 and 149.5 miles above the mouth of Green River. Existing project. Six locks and dams on Green River and one on Barren River were constructed in pools of dams to provide a navigable depth of 9 feet and width of 200 feet from the Ohio River to mile 103 Green River, 3.2 miles upstream from Paradise, KY and a navigable depth of 5.5 feet from mile 103 Green River to Mammoth Cave, KY, mile 197.8 Green River, and from mouth of Barren River mile 149.5 Green River to Bowling Green, KY, mile 30.1, Barren River. Of these facilities, only Green River L&D 1 and 2 are still operational. Green River L&D 3, 4, 5, 6 and Barren River L&D 1 are maintained by the Corps in a caretaker status. Fluctuations in stage vary considerably at different locks. At Lock 3, Green River, ordinary high stages are from 12 to 15 feet above pool level, and at Lock 1, Barren River, from 7 to 10 feet above pool. Maximum stages of record are 34 feet above normal pool stage at Lock 3, Green River, and 29 feet at Lock 1, Barren River, obtained during floods of 1937 and 1913, respectively. (See Table 24-B for authorizing legislation and Table 24- H for principal features of the locks and dams.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. Coal handling facilities located on the Green River between miles 81.5 and 108.1 near South Carrollton, Rockport, Paradise and Rochester, Kentucky, are considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations during fiscal year. New Work: None. Maintenance: Consisted of operation and maintenance of Locks and Dams 1 and 2 and Green River. Maintenance of fencing at the properties of Green River L&D 3, 4, 5, and 6 and Barren River L&D 1. A mooring facility at Green River L&D 3 is also maintained. Condition at end of fiscal year. Locks and Dams I and 2, Green River, are in good condition. Dam 3 on the Green and Dam 1 on the Barren are in fair condition and the locks at those locations are in poor condition. Lock 4, Green River, is in poor condition. Dam 4, Green River, failed May 24, 1965, when 120 feet washed out. Breach later widened, and repairs have been permanently deferred. Pool of Dam 1, Barren River, is maintained for local small boat use, but navigation through lock is suspended because of loss of lower pool. Operation activity was discontinued at Lock 4 Green River and Lock and Dam 1 Barren River in January 1974 and at Lock 3, Green River in September 1981. The residences and associated buildings and certain real estate at Lock 4 Green River and Lock and Dam 1 Barren River were disposed of in January 1975. Operation of Locks 5 and 6, Green River, was discontinued August 1951, as they were no longer used by river traffic. Controlling project depth in lower 103 miles of Green River is 9 feet; controlling depth from mile 103 to Bowling Green, KY, is 5.5 feet. Channel of Green River above Lock 3 is no longer maintained. 4. KENTUCKY RIVER, KY Location. Formed by confluence of its North and Middle Forks about 4 miles east of Beattyville in east central Kentucky, (South Fork joins the main stream at that location), flows northwesterly and empties into Ohio River at Carrollton, KY, mile 545.8 below Pittsburgh, PA. Existing project. Provides for 14 locks and fixed dams to give, in connection with improvement of Ohio River, slack water navigation of 6 feet minimum depth from Ohio River to places on the three forks that are short distances above Beattyville, KY. Length of 6-foot-depth project on main stem of Kentucky River is 258.6 miles to confluence of Middle and North Forks. Cost of completed new work is $4,176,749. River frequently rises to 35 feet or higher. Extreme height at Lock 1 due to flood backwater firom Ohio River is 60.3 feet, while extreme floods reach height of 47.6 feet at Lock 4, and 35.5 feet at Lock 14. At some intermediate locks extreme height of floods exceeds 40 feet. All flood heights refer to upper pool gages. Existing project was adopted by 1879 River and Harbor Act (H. Ex. Doc. 47, 45" Cong., 3d Sess., and Annual Report, 1879, p. 1398). Operation and care of locks and dams were included in project July 1, 1935, under provision of Permnnanent Appropriatiolns Repeal Act of June 26, 1934. (See Table 24-H.1 for principal features of the locks and dams.) 24-2 LOUISVILLE, KY DISTRICT On December 19, 1976, the lock operation schedules for commercial traffic and recreational craft on the Kentucky River System were reduced from continuous 24-hour year-round operation to two-shift year-round operation of Locks 1 through 4, intermittent daily operation of Locks 5 through 10, and intermittent operation five days weekly of Locks 11 through 14. Since that time the hours for operation of Locks 5 through 14 have been reduced in several increments. On October 1, 1981, Locks 5 through 14 were closed to traffic and placed in caretaker status. Locks 5, 6, 8, 9, and 10 were in operation for 15 weekends during fiscal year 1982 and closed at the end of this period. Locks 5 through 14 were leased to the Commonwealth of Kentucky on May 21, 1985. The Commonwealth of Kentucky operated these locks on weekends during the summer boating seasons through the Fiscal Year. The lease expired on October 15, 1989, and Locks 5 through 14 were closed to traffic and placed in caretaker status. The Commonwealth of Kentucky continued operation again under a lease agreement signed in 1990 with several extensions that allow the Commonwealth to operate the Locks until 2019. The Corps continues to operate Locks 1 through 4 on a two-shift, year-round operation. In Fiscal Year 1993 the Corps began repairs to dams 5 through 14 in preparation for transfer to the Commonwealth. During fiscal year 2000 the Corps began repairs to the middle sections of dams 13 and 14. Physical completion is scheduled for fiscal year 2001. In December 1996 the Assistant Secretary of the Army (CW) signed the quitclaim transfer deed for Lock and Dam 10 for direct transfer from the Corps to the Commonwealth. The Corps continues efforts to transfer Locks and Dam 5-9 and 11-14 to the Commonwealth. Licenses. Federal Regulatory Commission License No. 539, to Kentucky Utilities Co., at Dam 7, Kentucky River, Annual charge, $4,400; total collections through September 30, 2000, $341,605. Terminal facilities. Facilities for bulk commodities are considered adequate for existinlg traffic. Operations during fiscal year. New Work: None. Maintenance: Consisted of operation and maintenance of Locks and Dams 1 through 4 and removal of shoals, snags, and slides as required to maintain an adequate channel for existing traffic between mouth of river and Dam 5 at mile 82.2 Kentucky River. Maintenance on Dam 4 stabilization was completed in FY 00. Condition at end of fiscal year. Existing project was completed in 1917. Work accomplished was rehabilitation of thie five old State locks and dams and construction of new Locks and Dams 6 to 14 inclusive. Repairs have been made to deteriorated locks and danls as required to keep locks in operation and maintain pool levels above dams except in extreme dry weather, when Some pools fall below normal levels, details in Amual Reports for 1963, 1964, and 1965. Channel work was performed as required to provide for existing river traffic. Controlling navigable depth in length of river covered by existing project was 6 feet at end of fiscal year. 5. OPEN CHANNEL WORK, OHIO RIVER For report on this improvement, see this heading under Ohio River. 6. OTHER AUTHORIZED NAVIGATION PROJECTS See Table 24-C. 7. NAVIGATION WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION None. Flood Control - Local Protection 8. DUCK CREEK, OH Location. The project area is located in the City of Cincinnati and the Village of Fairfax in Hamilton County, Ohio. The project encompasses 3.2 miles of the stream and begins approximately 2 miles upstream of the confluence of Duck Creek with the Little Miami River. Existing project. The project consists of approximately 7,100 feet of concrete flood wall, 3,300 feet of earth levee, 8,500 feet of riprapped stream bank, 1,200 feet of channel relocation, 1,100 feet of culvert, demolition of an abandoned highway bridge, widening of a railroad bridge, a pump station, and automatic road closure, and an emergency access road. Estimated cost of new work (2000) is $36,323,000 of which $32,123,000 is Federal and $4,200,000 is non-Federal. The project was originally authorized by the Water Resources Development Act of 1996 and reauthorized by the Water Resources Development Act of 2000. Local cooperation. The non-Federal sponsors are the City of Cincinnati and the Village of Fairfax. The Project Cooperation Agreement (PCA) was executed in December 1997. Operations during fiscal year. Work this year included real estate acquisition, completion of plans and specification on two phases, and completion of one construction contract. Condition at end of fiscal year. The project is about 20 percent complete overall with design approximately 80 percent complete. 9. HOLES CREEK, OHi Location. Project area is located on Holes Creek in West Carrollton, Montgomery County, Ohio. West Carrollton is situated in the southwestern portion of Ohio and is a suburb of Dayton. Holes Creek drains 28.2 square miles and empties into the Great Miami River at river mile 72.6. Existing project. Project consists of approximately 4,300 feet of channel widening (80-foot bottom width) with associated bank protection. The existing box culvert type Conrail bridge will be replaced with a 70-foot clear span structure. Project will provide protection to 428 structures in West Carrollton and Moraine. Estimated total cost of new work is $7,945,000 Federal and $1,300,000 non-Federal. 24-3 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 2000 Local cooperation. The non-Federal cost-sharing partner is the Miami Conservancy District (MCD). MCD formed the Holes Creek/Owl Creek Conservancy Subdistrict to act as formal sponsor for this project. The Subdistrict entered into the Project Cooperation Agreement with the Government in September 1996. Funds were provided to the Subdistrict by Montgomery County, the City of West Carrollton, the City of Moriane, and Miami Township. Operations during fiscal year. Work this fiscal year included completion of the second and final construction contract. Conditions at end of fiscal year. Project is 100 percent complete overall. 10. MILL CREEK, OH Location. Project is located along the 18-mile length of Mill Creek and three-fourths mile length of East Forke. Existing project. 17.5 miles of channel improvement, 2 miles of levees, three pumping plants, modification of 29 bridges, and the addition of two pumping units at the present Mill Creek Barrier Dam, located near the Ohio River, are included in the project. Acquisition and development with appropriate landscaping of 620 acres along the creek will be provided for high-density urban oriented recreational use. Local cooperation. Section 3; Flood Control Act of 1936 as amended, applies. An assurance agreement covering local cooperation requirements for the project consistent with Section 221 of the 1970 Flood Control Act and the Uniform Relocation Assistance and Real Property Acquisition Policies Act of 1970 was executed by the Millcreek Valley Conservancy District February 6, 1975, and for the Secretary of the Army March 28, 1975. A recreation cost-sharing contract was executed by the Conservancy District February 25, 1975, and approved by the Secretary of the Army May 28, 1975. A Contributed Funds Agreement for the General Reevaluation Report was executed in August 1998. An Operations and Maintenance Agreement for the completed portions of the project was also executed in August 1998. Operations during fiscal year. New Work: The U.S. Army Corps of Engineers has initiated a General Reevaluation Report that would provide a new course of action for completing the project. Additional studies have been identified and the Corps is reanalyzing the time and funding needed to complete the General Reevaluation Report. In addition, an agreement was executed wherein the Corps can complete repairs to previously constructed sections of the project and turn them over to the local sponsor for assumption of full maintenance on those portions of the total project. All further design and construction activities are unprogrammed. Maintenance: During the 2000 flood season no benefits were realized. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction of channel and levee-Sections 2,3,4A, and 7A, Phase 1, are complete. Project is about 52 percent complete overall. The General Reevaluation Report is approximately 30% complete. 24-4 11. OHIO RIVER FLOOD PROTECTION (INDIANA SHORELINE), IN Location. The six existing local flood protection projects are located along the Indiana shore from Ohio River mile 492 in Lawenceburg downstream to mile 792 in Evansville. They are in the communities of Evansville, Tell City, Cannelton, New Albany, Jeffersonville- Clarksville, and Lawrenceburg. Existing project. Each of the six local flood projects was constructed by the Corps and have been locally operated and maintained. All six projects were constructed to protect against the 1937 flood plus three feet of freeboard. Rehabilitation measures are necessary at each of the six sites in order to maintain their integrity and to insure that they continue to provide the benefits for which they were designed. Rehabilitation would consist of sliplining (or where necessary replacement) of all pipes and culverts which are part of the flood protection facilities, replacing aging pump station equipment, restoring expansion joints and closures, and repairing, as needed, floodwalls and other structures. Estimated cost of new work (2000) is $7,283,000 of which $5,462,000 is Federal and $1,821,000 is non-Federal. Local cooperation. The following Project Cooperation Agreements (PCA) have been executed with the communities: Lawrenceburg PCA - September 1998, Evansville - November 1998, Tell City PCA - June 1998, Cannelton PCA - September 1999, New Albany - November 1999 and Jeffersonville-Clarksville - November 1999. Operations during the fiscal year. Work this year includes execution of the PCAs at each community and completion of the plans and specifications. Construction is complete at Lawrenceburg and Evansville and construction contracts were awarded at Cannelton and Tell City. Conditions at the end of fiscal year. Project is about 30 percent overall with design 100 percent complete. 12. POND CREEK, LOUISVILLE, KY Location. The project is located in the central and eastern portions of the 126 square mile Pond Creek watershed in southern Jefferson County, Kentucky. Existing project. The project consists of constructing a 1500 acre-feet detention basin storage facility along Northern Ditch. An existing abandoned rock quarry adjacent to Fishpool Creek will be converted to a detention basin. Approximately 2.4 miles of the Pond Creek channel will be enlarged as well as 1.5 miles of Northern Ditch. A multi-purpose maintenance road/recreation trail will be constructed along the length of the Pond Creek channel improvement. In addition, three inactive settling basins owned by the local sponsor will be converted into an environmnental restoration site. Estimated cost of new work (2000) is $19,300,000 of which $13,538,000 is Federal and $5,762,000 is non- Federal. The project was authorized by the Water Resources Development Act of 1996. LOUISVILLE, KY DISTRICT Local cooperation. The non-Federal cost-sharing partner is the Louisville and Jefferson County Metropolitan Sewer District (MSD). MSD has included all funds necessary for their cost share of the project in their capital budget plan. The Project Cooperation Agreement (PCA) was executed in March 1998. Operations during fiscal year. Work this year includes finalizing the plans and specifications for the Melco Basin construction contract and completing construction work on the quarry detention basin and environmental restoration site. Conditions at end of fiscal year. The project is about 70 percent complete. Design is 85 percent complete. The first two phases of the construction project have been completed. The Melco Basin design was completed, advertised for construction, and awarded in April 2000. Construction is progressing on schedule with completion in November 2001. Design of the final phase, Channel Improvements, will be deferred to the first quarter of FY01 due to limited funds. 13. SALYERSVILLE, KY Location. Project is located along the banks of the Licking River from approximately mile 266 and 271 in Magoffin County, Kentucky along the Mountain Parkway about 75 miles southeast of Lexington, Kentucky. Existing Project. The most cost-effective and feasible plan to provide the authorized level of protection (1978 flood protection) is called the "Cut-Thru Plan" and includes two channel cut-thrus, a barrier dam at the upstream cut-thru, and an 0.8 mile reach of channel improvement connecting the two cut-thrus. Estimated total cost of new work is $8,541,000 of which $7,730,000 is Federal and $811,000 is non-Federal. Local cooperation. The local sponsor qualifies for an "ability to pay" reduction pursuant to Section 103(m) of the 1986 Water Resource Development Act. Based on current costs and economics, the local sponsor share would be 9.5 percent of the total project cost. The Project Cooperation Agreement (PCA) was executed in August 1995. The construction contract was awarded in September 1996 and completed in July 1998. Operations during the fiscal year. Construction was completed in FY 99. A preliminary study was conducted in FY 00 to determine appropriate additional work for the project. Conditions at the end of fiscal year. Project is complete. However discussions are underway to determinle what additional work might be performed with remaining project funds. 14. SOUTIHIWESTERN JEFFERSON COUNTY, KY Location. In Jefferson County, KY, on left bank of Ohio River from mile 616 to 628.6. Existing project. Construction of 68,500 feet of levee, 1,550 feet of concrete wall, four pumping plants, and other necessary appurtenances. Project provides protection for 24,100 acres against Ohio River floods 24-5 equal to 1937 flood of record with 3-foot freeboard. Cost of new work is $70,049,492, of which $60,207,439 is Federal, and $9,842,053 is non-Federal. Project was authorized under Flood Control Act of August 1968. Recreation as a project purpose has been deferred. Local cooperation. Section 3 Flood Control Act of 1936 as amended applies. In addition, local interests agree to administer project land and water areas for recreation and fish and wildlife enhancement; and to pay, contribute in kind or repay (which may be through user fees) with interest, one-half of the separable first cost of the project allocated to recreation and fish and wildlife enhancement; and bear all costs of operation, maintenance and replacement of lands and facilities for recreation and fish and wildlife enhancement. Jefferson County Fiscal Court expressed intent to fulfill requirements by resolution dated April 4, 1967. Formal assurances of local cooperation for the flood protection portion of the project was executed by resolution of Jefferson County Fiscal Court, adopted September 17, 1971, and assurances for the recreation portion of the project was executed by similar resolution, adopted September 14, 1971. Authorization-of-entry for levee and floodwall sections 1,2,3,4,4A,5 and Pond Creek Pump Plant have been furnished. Project was transferred to local interest on September 8, 1989. Operations during fiscal year. New Work: Expenses to collect a judgement from a contractor who installed pumps and motors at the Pond Creek Pumping Station continued. Project is 100 percent complete except for the collection of the judgement from the pump contractor. During the 2000 flood season, no benefits were realized. 15. SOUTHERN AND EASTERN KENTUCKY Location: The project location comprises a 27 county region in southern eastern Kentucky, which includes portions of the Louisville , Huntington, and Nashville Districts. The program is for the design and construction assistance of environmental infrastructure projects in that region. Existing Project. Two projects are complete, one is currently in construction, and two are currently being designed A sewer line extension project near the community of Means in Menifee County, KY was completed in July, 2000 for a total cost of approximately $300,000. A water line extension project along Bill Hall Branch in Floyd County, KY was completed in March, 2000 for a total cost of approximately $377,000. A sewer line extension project in Corbin, KY in Laurel County is currently being constructed for an approximateprice of $97,000. Plans and specifications are underway for a wastewater treatment plant and sewer line extensions in Magoffin County, KY. Plans and specifications are underway for a wastewater treatment plant upgrade and sewer line extension in McKee, KY in Jackson County. Work is authorized under Section 531 of the Water Resources Development Act of 1996 (P.L. 104-303). Local Cooperation. Project Cooperation Agreements (PCA) were executed for each of the above mentioned projects. PCA negotiations are under way with Breathitt REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 2000 County for the design and construction of an innovative wastewater collection/treatment system for homes along Caney Creek. Operations during fiscal year. Work this year included completion of PCAs with Laurel, Magoffin, and Jackson Counties, construction of the sewer line extension project in Corbin, KY, and work on plans and specifications for the projects in Magoffin and Jackson County. Condition at end of fiscal year. Two projects are complete. One project is currently in construction while two separate projects are being designed. We have scheduled to complete a PCA with Breathitt County, KY in early FY 01. Louisville District has been assigned 4 projects for FY 01. 16. WABASH RIVER, NEW HARMONY, IN Location. The project is located in Posey County in Southwestern Indiana along the left bank of the Wabash River. The town is about 120 miles southwest of Louisville, Kentucky, and seven miles south of 1-64. Existing Project. The project consists of providing erosion control along the left bank of the Wabash River at New Harmony, Indiana. This will be accomplished by placing stone beginning at a point 950 meters (3117 feet) upstream of the State Highway 66 bridge and continuing upstream for a distance of 1470 meters (4823). To comply with environmental commitments, wildlife supporting hardwood seedlings will be planted along the project right -of-way. Estimated cost of the new work is $2,828,000 of which $2,121,000 is Federal and $707,000 is non-Federal. The project was authorized by the Water Resources Development Act of 1996. Local Cooperation. The non-Federal cost sharing partners are the Town of New Harmony, Indiana and the Department of Natural Resources (IDNR). Both costsharing partners included all funding necessary for their cost share of the project in their FY 99 and FY 00 budgets. A Project Cooperative Agreement (PCA) was executed in January 2000. The sponsor has initiated real estate acquisition and negotiation with the construction contractor has been initiated. Operations during the fiscal year. Work this year included execution of the PCA and acquisition of required real estate by the local sponsors. Conditions at the end of fiscal year. The project is about 25 percent complete. Design of the project is complete and construction has been authorized and funding provided. 17. WHITE RIVER, INDIANAPOLIS CENTRAL WATERFRONT, IN Location. Project is located along the White River in the City of Indianapolis, IN. Existing project. Project consists infrastructure improvements such as public of access parking, walkways, pedestrian bridges, landscaping, lighting, and water features. The project also includes continuous public access along both sides of the White River waterfront through the construction of walkways, bike paths, landscaped promenades, and the rebuilding and reconfiguring of the existing concrete slopewalls. Estimated cost of new work is $112,700,000 of which $52,475,000 is Federal and $60,225,000 is non-Federal. Local cooperation. The non-Federal sponsors are the White River State Park (State of Indiana) and the City of Indianapolis. All lands for the project have been acquired by the sponsors. By the end of 1998 approximately $31,000,000 of construction funded by the sponsors was completed. The Project Cooperation Agreement (PCA) was executed in December 1997. An amendment to the PCA was executed in June 1999 to add the Upper Canal feature to the Project. Operation during fiscal year. Work this year includes award of one construction contract, completion of three construction contracts, and continuation of the remainder of plans and specifications. Condition at end of fiscal year. Project is about 70 percent complete overall with design approximately 90 percent complete and construction about 70 percent complete. Flood Control - Reservoirs 18. WHITE RIVER INDIANAPOLIS (NORTH), IN Location. The project is located in metropolitan Indianapolis, Indiana, along the northern reaches of the White River within Marion County. Existing project. The project is located along 3 miles of the White river in the City of Indianapolis, IN. and consists of a combination of levees and floodwalls, rehabilitation of an existing pump station, two mitigation sites, and a flood warning system. Estimated cost of the project is $16,995,000 of which $12,746,000 if Federal and $4,249,000 is non-Federal. Location Cooperation. The non-Federal cost-sharing partner is the City of Indianapolis, Department of Capital Asset Management. The Sponsor has included all funding necessary for their cost share of the project in their FY 01, 02, and 03 budgets. Operations during the fiscal year. Phase I design was completed and the draft PCA was forwarded to the Sponsor. Conditions at the end of fiscal year. The project is 15% complete. Phase I design is complete, construction is authorized and funding provided. 19. BARREN RIVER LAKE, KY Location. Dam is on Barren River, 79.5 miles above its confluence with Green River and 10 miles northeast of 24-6 LOUISVILLE, KY DISTRICT Scottsville, KY. At flood control pool reservoir extends upstream about 40 miles in Barren and Allen Counties, KY. (See U.S. Geological Survey map of Lucas, KY.) Existing project. A reservoir for flood control and allied purposes. Dam is rolled earth and rockfill, 146 feet high and 3,970 feet long, with gate-controlled outlet works and uncontrolled open-cut spillway. Total storage capacity is 815,200 acre-feet (768,000 for flood control and 46,600 for water supply storage). For further details, see page 1125 of Annual Report for 1962. Cost of the completed project is $27,479,717 including $2,335,055 Federal funds and $108,418 non-Federal funds for construction of recreation facilities under the completed projects program. Project was authorized by Flood Control Act of 1938. Local cooperation. None required by authorizing act. Under provision of Water Supply Act of 1958, contract with City of Glasgow for water supply storage was approved by Secretary of Army on October 4, 1965. Terms require City to pay $23,433, which is project cost allocated to water storage plus capitalized prepayment of proportionate share of operation, maintenance, and major replacement costs. A contract, with the Commonwealth of Kentucky for development of additional campsites, shoreline protection and breakwater extension at Barren River Lake State Park under the cost-sharing category of the completed projects program was approved by the Secretary of the Army November 4, 1977. Operations during fiscal year. New work: None. Maintenance: Routine maintenance was performed. During the 2000 flood season estimated damages of $162,000 were prevented. Visitor expenditures were $40,143,726. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction started in March 1960 and all major construction and relocation items were completed in October 1964. Project was placed in operation in March 1964. Land acquisition is complete. 20. BROOKVILLE LAKE, IN Location. Dam site is on East Fork of Whitewater River, 2.4 miles above confluence with West Fork, and about 1-1/2 miles north of Brookville, Indiana. The reservoir lies in Franklin and Union Counties, Indiana. (See U.S. Geological Survey map of Brookville, IN.) Existing project. A reservoir for flood control and allied purposes. Dan is eartlfill, 182 feet high and 3,004 feet long, with gate-controlled outlet works, and uncontrolled open spillway. Total storage capacity is 359,600 acre-feet (214,700 for flood control, 89,300 for Water supply, and 35,500 for conservation). A minimum Pool of 20,100 acre-feet is maintained. Cost of completed new work is $45,402,565 of which $37,905,073 is Federal cost and $7,497,492 is non-Federal contribution for water Supply storage. Project was authorized by 1938 Flood Control Act. Local cooperation. None required by authorizing act. Contract with State of Indiana for water supply storage 24-7 under provisions of Water Supply Act of 1958 was approved by Secretary of Army, August 5, 1965. Under terms of contract, State paid initial costs allocated to water supply feature of project plus capitalized prepayment of proportionate share of operation and maintenance costs. Operation during fiscal year. New work: None. Maintenance: During 2000 flood season no damages were prevented. Routine maintenance was performed. Visitor expenditures were $18,906,513. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction was started in November 1965 and project was placed in operation January 1974. Construction and land acquisition are complete. 21. BUCKHORN LAKE, KY Location. Dam is on Middle Fork of Kentucky River, 43.4 miles above mouth, and 0.5 mile upstream from Buckhorn, Perry County, KY. Reservoir extends upstream about 34 miles and lies in Leslie and Perry Counties, Kentucky. (See U.S. Geological Survey map of Buckhorn, KY.) Existing project. A reservoir for flood control and allied purposes. Dam is earth and rockfill type, with gate controlled outlet works. Total storage capacity is 168,000 acre-feet, of which 157,600 are for flood control. For further details, see page 1120 of Annual Report for 1962. Cost of completed new work is $11,766,206 including $386,707 for construction of recreation facilities under the completed projects program. Existing project was authorized by general authorization for Ohio River Basin in 1938 Flood Control Act. Local cooperation. Department of Parks of the Commonwealth of Kentucky has undertaken management of certain lands and recreational facilities in accordance with license granted by Secretary of the Army on June 29, 1962. Operations during fiscal year. New work: None. Maintenance: Routine maintenance was performed. Operation for flood control during 2000 flood season prevented damages of $83,000. Visitor expenditures were $8,522,624. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction started in September 1956 and project was placed in operation in August 1960. All construction and land acquisition is complete. 22. CAESAR CREEK LAKE, OH Location. Dam site is on Caesar Creek, about 3.0 miles above its confluence with Little Miami River, in Warren County, OH, about 3.5 miles southeast of Waynesville, OH, and 10.5 miles northeast of Lebanon, OH. Reservoir lies in Warren, Clinton, and Green Counties, OH. (See U.S. Geological Survey map of Oregonia, OH.) Existing project. Provides for construction of a reservoir for flood control and allied purposes. It includes an earth and rockfill dam, four saddle dams, outlet works and an uncontrolled saddle spillway. Total storage REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 2000 capacity of reservoir is 242,200 acre-feet, of which 148,500 acre-feet are reserved for flood control storage. Cost of new work is $62,881,010 Federal and $5,037,000 non-Federal reimbursement for water supply storage. Existing project was authorized by general authorization for Ohio River Basin in 1983 Flood Control Act. Local cooperation. None required. However, the State of Ohio requested inclusion in the project of storage for future municipal and industrial water supply uses. Contract with State of Ohio for water supply storage under provisions of Water Supply Act of 1958, as amended, was approved by Secretary of the Army, May, 20, 1970. Under terms of contract, State will reimburse the Federal Government for costs allocated to water supply storage over a period not to exceed 50 years after use of this storage is initiated plus estimated annual amount for cost of operation, maintenance and major capital replacements required for the water supply facilities. Operations during fiscal year. New work: None. Maintenance: Routine maintenance was performed. Flood damages estimated at $4,156,000 were prevented during the 2000 flood season. Visitor expenditures were $33,286,542. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction was started in January 1968 and the project was placed in operation January 1978. Land acquisition is complete. All relocation and construction features are complete. 23. CAGLES MILL LAKE, IN Location. Dam is on Mill Creek, 2.8 miles above its confluence with Eel River, in Putnam County, IN, and about 25 miles east of Terre Haute, IN. Reservoir extends upstream about 11 miles and is in Putnam and Owen Counties, IN. (See U.S. Geological Survey map of Poland, IN.) Existing project. A reservoir for flood control and allied purposes. Dam is earth and rockfill embankment. Total storage capacity is 228,100 acre-feet, of which 201,000 acre-feet are for flood control. For details, see Annual Report for 1962, page 1136. Cost of new work is $4,369,997, which includes $4,256,903 Federal funds, and $113,094 contributed funds for construction of recreation facilities under the completed projects program. Existing project was selected for construction under general authorization for Ohio River Basin in 1938 Flood Control Act. Local cooperation. None required. State of Indiana has undertaken development and management of recreation facilities for use of the public in reservoir area in accordance with license granted by Secretary of the Army on January 17, 1952. A contract with the Indiana Department of Natural Resources for expanding the boat ramp and parking area at Site 3, Lieber State Park, under the cost sharing category of the completed projects program was signed by the State of Indiana on August 26, 1981 and approved by the Deputy Chief of Engineers on March 26, 1982. Operations during fiscal year. New Work: None. Maintenance: Routine maintenance was performed. Operation for flood control during the 2000 flood season prevented damages of $2,016,000. Visitor expenditures were $15,158,842. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction started in July 1948 and completed in June 1953. Recreation facilities constructed under the cost-sharing category of the completed projects program are complete. 24. CARR CREEK LAKE, KY Location. Dam site is 8.8 miles above mouth of Carr Fork, a tributary of North Fork of Kentucky River, 16 miles upstream from Hazard, KY. The reservoir lies entirely within Knott County. (See U.S. Geological Survey maps of Carrie and Vicco, KY.) Existing project. Provides for construction of a reservoir for flood control and allied purposes. Dam is rock and earth fill with impervious core, 720 feet long and 130 feet high, with uncontrolled open cut spillway through left abutment. Outlet works has two control gates and 8-foot diameter conduit to stilling basin. Total storage capacity is 47,700 acre-feet (31,600 for flood control and 4,300 for water quality control). A higher level seasonal pool for recreation is provided. Cost of completed work is $50,854,826 including $76,724 for recreation facilities under the completed projects program. Project was authorized by the 1962 Flood Control Act. Local cooperation. None required for reservoir project. Division of Flood Control and Water Usage of Commonwealth of Kentucky gave assurance that encroachments on downstream channel capacity will be prevented. Under the terms of a new lease, the State of Kentucky assumed operation of the Irishman Creek Beach and Campground in 1996. This establishes a State Park at the lake and also provides the impetus for additional resort development. Project name was changed from Carr Fork Lake, KY to Carr Creek Lake, KY effective 16 February 1997 by Public law 104-303, 12 October 1996. Operations during fiscal year. New work: None. Maintenance: Routine maintenance was performed. Operation for flood control during the 2000 flood season prevented damages of $518,000. Visitor expenditures were $15,654,751. Condition at end of fiscal year. Project was placed in operation January 1976. Construction started in January 1966 is complete. 25. CAVE RUN LAKE, KY Location. Dam site is on Licking River, about 4 miles upstream from U.S. Highway 60 near Farmers, KY, and 7 miles southwest of Morehead, KY. Reservoir will be in Rowan, Bath, Morgan, and Menifee Counties, KY. (See U.S. Geological Survey maps of Salt Lick and Morehead, KY.) Existing project. Plan provides for construction of a reservoir for flood control and allied purposes. Damrn is rolled earthfill, with gate controlled outlet works and 24-8 LOUISVILLE, KY DISTRICT uncontrolled open spillway. Total storage capacity is 614,700 acre-feet (438,500 for flood control and 28,300 for water quality control). Cost of new work is $81,159,541 of which $6,900,000 is U.S. Forest Service cost. Project was authorized by Flood Control Acts of June 22, 1936 and June 28, 1938. Local cooperation. None required. Operations during fiscal year. New work: None. Maintenance: Routine maintenance was performed. Operation for flood control during the 2000 flood season prevented damages of $1,865,000. Visitor expenditures were $12,373,594. Condition at end of fiscal year. Project has been in operation since February 1974. Construction was started in June 1965 and is complete. Land acquisition is complete. All relocation and construction features are complete. 26. CECIL M. HARDEN LAKE, IN Location. Dam is on Raccoon Creek, 32.4 miles above its confluence with Wabash River, and 25 miles northeast of Terre Haute, IN. At flood control pool, reservoir extends upstream about 15 miles in Parke and Putnam Counties, Indiana. (See U.S. Geological Survey Map of Mansfield, IN.) Existing project. A rolled earth dam and reservoir, for flood control and allied purposes. Total storage capacity is 132,800 acre-feet of which 116,600 acre-feet area for flood control. For details, see Annual Report for 1962, page 1132. Cost of completed new work is $6,987,807 made up of $6,260,134 for the initial project and $373,678 Federal cost and $353,995 non-Federal contribution in kind for recreation facilities under the completed projects program. Project was selected for construction under general authorization for Ohio River Basin in 1938 Flood Control Act. Project name was changed from Mansfield Lake to Cecil M. Harden Lake by Public Law 93-521, December 14, 1974. Local cooperation. State of Indiana has undertaken management of lands and recreational facilities in accordance with license granted by Secretary of the Army on April 19, 1961. A contract with the Indiana Department of Natural Resources, approved by the Secretary of the Army in May 1974, provided for that agency to design and construct certain additional recreation facilities at Cecil M. Harden, Huntington, Mississinewa, Monroe and Salamonie Lakes under the cost sharing category of the completed projects program. Operation during fiscal year. New work: None. Maintenance: Routine maintenance was performed. Flood damages of $29,000 were prevented during the 2000 flood season. Visitor expenditures were $34,891,393. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction started in October 1956 and all major itenls of work were completed December 1961. Land acquisition is complete. Project has been hi operatiol since August 1960. Cost slared recreation facilities constructed by tlhe State of 24-9 Indiana under the completed projects program are completed. 27. CLARENCE J. BROWN DAM & RESERVOIR, OH Location. Dam site is just east of Springfield, Clark County, OH, at mile 7.3 of Buck Creek, a tributary of Mad River. (See U. S. Geological Survey maps of New Moorefield and Springfield, OH.) Existing project. A reservoir for flood control and allied purposes. It includes an earthfill dam, 6,620 feet long and 72 feet high, with gated outlet works and open cut spillway with concrete chute through right abutment. Total storage capacity of reservoir is 63,700 acre-feet (32,900 for flood control and 20,800 for water quality control). Federal cost of completed project is $22,083,660. Project was authorized by 1962 Flood Control Act. Project name was changed from Buck Creek Dam and Reservoir to Clarence J. Brown Dam and Reservoir by Public Law 90-46, July 4, 1967. Local cooperation. Assurances from City of Springfield, Springfield Conservancy District, and Clark County, Ohio, covering protection against detrimental channel encroachment below dam to mouth of Buck Creek, were accepted March 5, 1964. Operations during fiscal year. New work: None. Maintenance: Routine maintenance was performed. Flood damages of $238,000 were prevented during the 2000 flood season. Visitor expenditures were $20,736,838. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction started in September 1966. Land acquisition and all major project features were completed in November 1973. The project was placed in operation in January 1974. 28. GREEN RIVER LAKE, KY Location. Dam site is 305.7 miles above mouth of Green River in Taylor County, KY, about 8 miles south of Campbellsville. Reservoir lies in Taylor and Adair Counties. (See U.S. Geological Survey map of Cane Valley, KY.) Existing project. A reservoir for flood control and allied purposes. Dam is earth and rockfill, 141 feet high and 2,350 feet long. Outlet works is slide gate-controlled and spillway open and uncontrolled. Total storage capacity is 723,200 acre-feet (560,600 for flood control and 64,500 for low-flow augmentation). Cost of completed new work is $33,462,330, consisting of $33,105,184 initial project funds, $40,001 for water supply, and $317,145 Federal funds for construction of recreation facilities under the completed projects program. Existing project was authorized under general authorization for Ohio River Basin in 1938 Flood Control Act. Local cooperation. None required by authorizing act. Taylor County, by lease approved by Secretary of Army February 15, 1968, undertook operation and maintenance of Smith Ridge public access area. In May 1980, the lease was amended to turn back responsibility for REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 2000 maintenance and operation of the site to the Corps. Under provision of Water Supply Act of 1958, contract with City of Campbellsville for water supply storage was approved by Secretary of Army April 23, 1969. Terms require city to repay, with interest and annual charges for operation, maintenance and major replacement, the investment cost of $85,765 allocated to its water supply storage space. The Department of Parks of the Commonwealth of Kentucky, by lease approved by Secretary of Army, October 4, 1971, has undertaken the management of the Lone Valley public access area. Operations during fiscal year. New work: None.' Maintenance: Routine maintenance was performed. Operation for flood control prevented damages estimated at $585,000 during 2000 flood season. Visitor expenditures were $30,963,863. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction began in August 1965 and all major construction and relocation items were completed in 1972. Project has been in operation since February 1969. Project including all land acquisition complete in 1973. Construction of sanitary dump station for boats at Dam Site in conformance with EPA and State standards and rehabilitation of sewage treatment facilities, washhouses and restrooms at Smith Ridge site is complete. 29. J. EDWARD ROUSII LAKE, IN Location. Dam site is on Wabash River, about 2 miles from Huntington, IN, and 411.4 miles above mouth. Reservoir is in Huntington and Wells Counties, IN. (See U.S. Geological Survey maps of Majenica and Mt. Etna, IN.) Existing project. A reservoir for flood control and allied purposes. Dam consists of a rolled earth embankment 4,700 feet long and 89 feet high, a concrete spillway and outlet section 155 feet long, and a concrete gravity section 310 feet long. Spillway is controlled by three gates, and outlet works by six sluices. Project also provides local flood protection for Markle, IN. Total storage capacity of reservoir is 153,100 acre-feet, of which 149,000 acre-feet is reserved for flood control storage. Cost for new work is $19,621,777 made up of $19,428,355 Federal cost for the initial project and $193,422 non-Federal contributed funds for low flow augmentation storage, and $155,354 non-Federal contribution in kind for recreation facilities under the completed projects program. Project was authorized by Flood Control Act of 1958. Project name was changed from Huntington Lake, IN to J. Edward Roush Lake, IN effective 16 February 1997 by Public law 104-303, 12 October 1996. Local cooperation. Local interests must contribute in cash an amount equal to one percent of project first cost. State of Indiana has met this obligation. Contract with the Indiana Department of Natural Resources, approved by the Secretary of the Army May 17, 1974, provided for that agency to design and construct certain additional recreational facilities at Cecil M. Harden, Huntington, Mississinewa, Monroe and Salamonie Lakes under the cost shared category of the completed projects program. Operations during fiscal year. New work: None. Maintenance: Routine maintenance was performed. Operation for flood control prevented damages estimated at $704,000 during 2000 flood control season. Visitor expenditures were $9,361,069. Condition at end of fiscal year. Land acquisition and all major construction complete. Project was placed in operation January 9, 1969. Cost shared recreation facilities constructed by the State of Indiana under the completed projects program are complete. 30. MISSISSINEWA LAKE, IN Location. Dam site is 7.1 miles above mouth of Mississinewa River, which flows into Wabash River about 2 miles upstream from Peru, IN. At flood control pool level, reservoir extends upstream about 28 miles, in Wabash, Grant, and Miami Counties, IN. (See U.S. Geological Survey map of Peoria, IN.) Existing project. Provides for construction of a reservoir for flood control and allied purposes. It includes an earthfill dam 137 feet high and 8,100 feet long, gatecontrolled outlet works, and an uncontrolled open spillway through right abutment. Total storage capacity of reservoir is 368,400 acre-feet, of which 345,100 acrefeet are reserved for flood control storage. Cost for completed new work is $24,379,800 made up of $23,791,816 Federal cost for the initial project, $239,200 non-Federal contributed funds for low flow augmentation storage. $174,392 Federal cost and $174,392 non-Federal contribution in kind for recreation facilities under the completed projects program. Project was authorized by the Flood Control Act of 1958. Local cooperation. Local interests must contribute in cash an amount equal to 1 percent of project first cost. State of Indiana assumed this obligation. A contract with the Indiana Department of Natural Resources, approved by the Secretary of the Army in May 1974, provided for that agency to design and construct certain additional recreation facilities at Cecil M. Harden, Huntington, Mississinewa, Monroe and Salanionie Lakes under the cost sharing category of the completed projects program. Operations during fiscal year. New work: None. Maintenance: Routine maintenance was performed. Continued, unexplained, settlement along 300 feet of the crest of the dam is occurring at an approximate rate of 0.5 inch per year. An on-site meeting with Headquarters and Division representatives was held to assess the probleml and receive guidance. Headquarters has recommended a three phased, comprehensive investigation and evaluation to begin in FY 1999 to determine the cause of the subsidence and the remedial measures required to correct it. Initial investigations and evaluation began in FY 1999. The Louisville District prepared a Damn Major Rehabilitation Evaluation to recommend modifications that would ensure the structural integrity and operational adequacy of the project. This report was submitted in February FY 2000. The project is on the HQUSACE High Priority List. Operation for flood control prevented 24-10 LOUISVILLE, KY DISTRICT damages of $138,000 during 2000 flood season. Visitor expenditures were $20,520,872 Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction and land acquisition is complete. Project was placed in operation in May 1968. Cost shared recreation facilities constructed by the State of Indiana under the completed projects program are complete. 31. MONROE LAKE, IN Location. Dam is on Salt Creek, a tributary of White River, 25.9 miles above mouth, and 2 miles east of Harrodsburg, Monroe County, IN. At flood control pool level, reservoir will extend upstream 44 miles in Monroe, Brown, and Jackson Counties. (See U.S. Geological Survey map of Clear Creek, IN.) Existing project. A reservoir for flood control and allied purposes. Dam is earth core and rock shell, with gate-controlled outlet works and uncontrolled open spillway. Total storage capacity is 441,000 acre-feet (258,800 for flood control and 159,900 for low flow augmentation.) Cost of completed new work is $16,570,774 consisting of $7,032,484 Federal funds, $7,797,604 non-Federal contributed funds for low-flow regulation storage and $870,343 Federal cost and $870,343 non-Federal contribution in kind for recreation facilities under the completed projects program. Project was authorized by 1958 Flood Control Act, modifying comprehensive plan for Ohio River Basin. Local cooperation. Section 3, 1944 Flood Control Act applies. Local interests must contribute 54.1 percent of project cost, this being the proportion allocated to lowflow regulation feature, plus a capitalized amount representing that part of average annual maintenance and operation cost allocated to low-flow regulation. State of Indiana assumed this cost-sharing obligation. A contract with the Indiana Department of Natural Resources, approved by the Secretary of the Army in May 1974, provided for that agency to design and construct certain additional recreation facilities at Cecil M. Harden, Huntington, Mississinewa, Monroe and Salamonie Lakes under the cost sharing category of the completed projects program. Operations during fiscal year. New work. None. Maintenance: Routine maintenance was performed. Operation for flood control prevented damages of $2,132,000 during 2000 flood season. Visitor expenditures were $37,116,898. Condition at end of fiscal year. Project is complete and was placed in operation in February 1965. Cost shared recreation facilities constructed by the State of Indiana under the completed projects program are complete. 32. NOLIN LAKE, KY Location. Dam is on Nolin River 7.8 miles above its confluence with Green River, about 70 air miles Southwest of Louisville, KY. Reservoir extends upstream about 57 miles and is in Edmonson, Grayson, Hart, and Hardin Counties, KY. (See U.S. Geological Survey maps ofNolin Reservoir and Dickeys Mill, KY.) 24-11 Existing project. A reservoir for flood control and allied purposes. Dam is rockfill-earth core type with gate-controlled outlet works, and uncontrolled open spillway. Total storage capacity is 609,400 acre-feet, of which 545,600 acre-feet is for flood control. For further details of project, see Annual Report for 1962, page 1124. Cost of new work is $17,193,278 including $2,594,274 for construction of recreation facilities. Project was selected for construction under general authorization for Ohio River Basin in 1938 Flood Control Act. Local cooperation. None required for authorized project. State of Kentucky contributed $18,195 for increased width of dam for public road. Kentucky has assumed responsibility of the Brier Creek site to establish a State Park in 1996. Improvements are planned by Kentucky. Operations during fiscal year. New work: None. Maintenance: Routine maintenance was performed. During the 2000 flood season damages of $164,000 were prevented. Visitor expenditures were $51,530,109. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction started in January 1959. Project was completed and placed in operation in March 1963. 33. O1110 RIVER BASIN (Louisville District) Location. Works covered by this project are a series of levees, floodwalls, channel improvements, and reservoirs in Ohio River Basin within Louisville District. Existing project. Individual projects considered in comprehensive plan within the Louisville District. (See Table 24-B for authorizing legislation and Table 24-I for cost and listing of projects in the basin plan.) Operations during fiscal year. No costs were incurred except for these projects for which individual reports are given. 34. PATOKA LAKE, IN Location. Dam site is in Dubois County, IN, 118.3 miles above mouth of Patoka River, and 50 miles westnorthwest of New Albany, IN. Reservoir extends into Dubois, Orange, and Crawford Counties. (See Geological Survey map of Cuzco, IN.) Existing project. Reservoir for flood control and allied purposes. Dam is earth and rock fill, 1,550 feet long and 85 feet high, with gate-controlled outlet works and uncontrolled open spillway. Total storage capacity is 301,600 acre-feet (121,000 for flood control and 167,500 for water supply and water quality control). Cost of new work is $73,969,316 of which $53,786,861 is Federal cost for other construction, and $20,182,445 is non-Federal contribution for water supply storage and recreation facilities. Project was authorized by 1965 Flood Control Act, and emergency measures and snagging and clearing the Patoka River downstream of Patoka Lake to ensure effective operation of the project for flood control was directed by 1981 Appropriation Act for Energy and Water Development. Local cooperation. Local interests are required to REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 2000 reimburse the Federal Government for costs allocated to water supply storage is initiated, presently estimated at 29.316 percent of the joint-use facilities cost, exclusive of interests, plus $287,000 for the cost of operating and maintaining water supply storage for a period of 50 years, plus $42,000 for the cost of major capital replacements required for water supply storage space for a period of 50 years. Local interests are also required to pay, contribute in kind, or repay (which may be through user fees) with interest, one-half of the separable first cost of the project allocated to recreation. Present laws of the State of Indiana require that agency to make cash contributions , during construction of the project. Local interests must also agree to prevent encroachments on channel of Patoka River from dam to mouth, and to pay allocated initial and annual maintenance and operation costs for water supply storage. Formal assurances of local cooperation, executed by the Indiana Natural Resources Commission, were accepted August 27, 1970. Contracts with State of Indiana for water supply and recreation were approved by the Secretary of the Army November 2, 1970. Operations during fiscal year. New work: None. Maintenance: Sinkholes in the spillway area that are connected to porous limestone layers continue to be an operational concern. A study was completed and recommended a $7.2 million major rehabilitation of the dam. As the design developed, it was determined that the seepage repair could be achieved by using a new method of grout injection utilizing a computer monitoring system and grout mixes for varying underground conditions. A contract was awarded in July and construction is progressing. Operation for flood control during the 2000 flood season prevented damage estimated at $3,698,000. Visitor expenditures were $24,254,660. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction was started in July 1972. Engineering studies are complete. Real Estate relocation work is complete. All major features are complete. Permanent impoundment was started in February 1978 and the project was placed in operation about August 1980. 35. ROUGH RIVER LAKE AND CHANNEL IMPROVEMENT, KY Location. Dam is on Rough River, 89.3 miles above its confluence with Green River, 160.3 miles above Ohio River, and about 60 miles southwest of Louisville, KY. Reservoir extends upstream about 30 miles and is in Breckinridge, Hardin, and Grayson Counties, KY. Channel improvement work is on Rough River, Barnett Creek, and West Fork of Barnett Creek. (See U.S. Geological Survey maps of McDaniels and Falls of Rough, KY.) Existing project. Reservoir is for flood control and allied purposes. Dam is rolled earthfill type, with gatecontrolled outlet works. Storage capacity is 334,380 acrefeet, of which 314,210 acre-feet is for flood control. Project also includes channel clearing of lower Rough River, and channel improvement on Barnett Creek, a tributary of Rough River. For further details, see page 1126 of Annual Report for 1962. Cost of completed new work is $10,643,001 including $890,008 Federal funds and $22,612 non-Federal funds for construction of recreation facilities under the completed projects program. Existing project was selected for construction under general authorization for Ohio River Basin in 1938 Flood Control Act. Modification of previously approved plan to include channel improvement items was authorized by the 1944 Flood Control Act. Local cooperation. None required for construction of reservoir unit. Provisions of Section 3, Flood Control Act of 1936, are applicable to channel improvements. Assurances were obtained from Ohio County for channel improvement. Department of Parks, Commonwealth of Kentucky, has undertaken management of certain lands and recreation facilities in accordance with license granted by Secretary of the Army on August 18, 1961. A contract with the Commonwealth of Kentucky to improve and pave road at the Below Dam Area - State Park under the cost sharing category of the completed projects program was approved by the Secretary of the Army November 4, 1977. Operations during fiscal year. New work: None. Maintenance: Routine maintenance was performed. Operation for flood control during the 2000 flood season prevented damages estimated at $4,236,000. Visitor expenditures were $58,430,562. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction started in November 1955 and reservoir was placed in operation in June 1959. Land acquisition and all major items of construction and relocation are complete. 36. SALAMONIE LAKE, IN Location. Dam site is 3.1 miles above mouth of Salamonie River, which enters Wabash River about 6 miles upstream from Wabash, IN. Reservoir extends upstream about 27 miles at flood control pool and lies in Wabash and Huntington Counties, IN. (See U.S. Geological Survey maps of Lagro and Majenica, IN.) Existing project. Provides for construction of a reservoir for flood control and allied purposes. It includes an earthfill dam with a maximum height of 133 feet and length of 6,100 feet, gate-controlled outlet works with a 16-foot-diameter conduit and an uncontrolled open spillway through right abutment. Total storage capacity of reservoir is 263,600 acre-feet, of which 250,500 acrefeet is for flood control storage. Cost for new work is $17,039,321 made up of$16,244,356 Federal cost for the initial project and $163,867 non-Federal contributed funds for low-flow augmentation storage and $315,549 Federal cost and $315,549 non-Federal contribution in kind for recreation facilities under the completed projects program. Project was authorized by Flood Control Act of 1958. Local cooperation. Local interests must contribute in cash an amount equal to one percent of project first cost. State of Indiana assumed this obligation. A contract with the Indiana Department of Natural Resources, approved by the Secretary of the Army in May 1974, provided for that agency to design and construct certain additional 24-12 LOUISVILLE, KY DISTRICT recreation facilities at Cecil M. Harden, Huntington, Mississinewa, Monroe, and Salamonie Lakes under the cost sharing category of the completed projects program. Operations during fiscal year. New work: None. Maintenance: Routine maintenance was performed. During the 2000 flood season, operation for flood control prevented damages of $661,000. Visitor expenditures were $20,623,563. Condition at end of fiscal year. Land acquisition and all major construction and relocation contracts are complete. Reservoir was placed in operation in spring 1967. Cost shared recreation facilities constructed by the State of Indiana under the completed projects program are complete. 37. TAYLORSVILLE LAKE, KY Location. Dam site is in Spencer County, KY, 60.0 miles above the confluence of Salt River and Ohio River, 4 river miles above Taylorsville and 36.9 river miles above Shepherdsville, KY. (See U.S. Geological Survey map of Taylorsville, KY.) Existing project. A reservoir for flood control and allied purposes. Dam is an earth and rock fill structure, 164 feet high and 1,280 feet long. Outlet works are slide gate controlled and spillway is uncontrolled open cut. Total storage capacity is 291,670 acre-feet (211,230 for flood control, winter months), and 52,245 for water quality and fish and wildlife. Cost of completed new work is $87,004,456, including $82,991,363 federal funds and $4,013,093 non-federal funds. Project was authorized by 1966 Flood Control Act. Local cooperation. Local interests must agree to administer project land and water areas for recreation; pay, contribute in kind, or repay (which may be through user fees) with interest one-half of the separable first costs of the project allocated to recreation; bear all costs of operation, maintenance, and replacement of recreation lands and facilities under P.L. 89-72. Local interests must also agree to prevent encroachments on flow-carrying capacities of stream channels below the reservoir to the extent needed to provide reasonably effective reservoir Operation. Commonwealth of Kentucky has indicated intent to fulfill requirements for recreation cost sharing and has assumed responsibility for channel encroachmnents and pollution control. The Conunonwealth furnished assurance agreemenlts covering prevention of encroaclunent on capacity of stream channels in April and May 1973 and executed the recreation cost sharing contract in April 1973. On April 2, 1980, thle U.S. District Court for the Western District of Kentucky ruled that the 1973 recreation cost sharinlg contract between the Commonwealtll and the United States that provided for repayment after completion was invalid under the Kentucky Constitution which prohibits one General Assembly from obligating future appropriations that would be binding on a subsequent legislature. In response to the Court's ruling, me Conunonwealtli and the United States entered into a new Contract providing for cash contributions. Contract was 24-13 approved by the Secretary of the Army June 11, 1980. The contract was found to be valid and enforceable by the Court July 14, 1980. Operations during fiscal year. New work: A contract to remove debris from Taylorsville Lake was completed. Maintenance: Routine maintenance was performed. During the 2000 flood season operation for flood control prevented damages of $1,285,000. Visitor expenditures were $24,031,844. Condition at end of fiscal year. Engineering and design studies are complete. Land acquisition is 100 percent complete. Construction was started in June 1974. All major construction items are complete. The dam gates were closed in January 1983 for permanent impoundment. Dedication ceremony was May 28, 1983. Two sections of county road were washed out by heavy rainfall. Both sections were originally upgraded for project operation prior to washout. The repairs were completed by the Corps in 1996-97 at a cost of $700,000. 38. WABASH RIVER BASIN Location. Works covered by this project are located in the Wabash River Basin, a drainage area of 33,100 square miles, covering parts of Indiana, Illinois, and Ohio. Existing project. One local protection project and five reservoir projects were authorized for this basin plan. (See Table 24-B for authorizing legislation and Table 24- J for project list and total cost of basin plan.) 39. WEST FORK OF MILL CREEK LAKE, OH Location. Dam is on West Fork of Mill Creek 6.5 miles above its junction with Mill Creek and 2 miles northeast of Mount Health, OH, and 10 miles north of downtown Cincinnati. Reservoir extends upstream about 3 miles and is in Hamilton County, OH. (See U. S. Geological Survey map of Glendale, OH.) Existing project. An earth embankment dam and a reservoir for flood control and allied purposes. Total storage capacity of reservoir is 11,300 acre-feet, of which 9,850 acre-feet is for flood control. For further details, see page 1119 of Annual Report for 1962. Cost of completed new work is $4,722,463 made up of $3,092,941 Federal cost for the initial project, $520,800 non-Federal cost for sewer relocation and dam, $50,000 non-Federal contributed funds in fulfillment of project authorization and $529,361 Federal cost and $529,361 non-Federal contribution in kind for recreation facilities under the completed projects program. Existing project selected for construction under additional authorization for Ohio River Basin in 1946 Flood Control Act. Local cooperation. Local interests were to release necessary land under their control and give assurance that fuilture channel encroachment below dam site would be prevented. For enlargement of reservoir to include a conservation pool, local interests would contribute onehalf additional cost of such pool, including one-half cost of relocation of sanitary sewer, and agree to hold the United States free from damages resulting from its provision. Board of County Commissioners of Hamilton REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 2000 County, Ohio, adopted a resolution October 8, 1947, signifying willingness to fulfill requirements including provision of conservation pool. Assurances were executed on same date. A contract with the United States for relocation of sanitary sewer outside reservoir area in order to include conservation pool in project was accepted by Hamilton County, in which the United States paid onehalf cost of such relocation work. Hamilton County Commissioners furnished $50,000, required as a local contribution toward additional cost of providing conservation pool. Hamilton County Park District has undertaken development and management of recreation,, facilities in reservoir area for use of the public in accordance with the license granted by Secretary of the Army on October 31, 1951. Contract for cost shared recreation development under the completed works program was executed by the Board of Park Commissioners, Hamilton County Park District, Ohio, in September 1975 and approved by the Chief of Engineers in December 1975. Operations during fiscal year. New work: Operation for flood control during 2000 flood prevented damages. estimated at $19,960,000. expenditures were $24,031,844. None. season Visitor Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction started in March 1949 and reservoir was placed in operation in December 1952. Project is complete. Cost shared recreation development under the completed projects program is complete. 40. WILLIAM H. HARSHA LAKE, OH Location. Dam site is on East Fork of Little Miami River between Batavia and Williamsburg, OH, about 6.0 miles above Batavia and 32.6 miles above mouth of the Little Miami River. Entire project lies in Clermont County, OH. (See U.S. Geological Survey map of Batavia, OH.) Existing project. A reservoir for flood control and allied purposes. It includes an earthfill dam, outlet works, an uncontrolled saddle spillway, and a dike to close a saddle north of spillway. Total storage capacity of reservoir is 294,800 acre-feet, of which 210,600 acre-feet is reserved for flood control storage. Cost of complete new work is $52,023,157 and a estimated $3,485,840 non-Federal reimbursement for water supply storage. Existing project was authorized by general authorization for Ohio River Basin in 1938 Flood Control Act. Project name was changed from East Fork Lake to William H. Harsha Lake effective January 4, 1981, by Public. Law 96-383, October 6, 1980. Local cooperation. None required. However, the State of Ohio requested inclusion in the project of storage for future municipal and industrial water supply uses. Contract with State of Ohio for water supply storage under provisions of Water Supply Act of 1958, as amended, was approved by Secretary of the Army, May 20, 1970. Under terms of contract, State will reimburse the Federal Government for costs allocated to water supply storage over a period not to exceed 50 years after use of this storage is initiated plus estimated annual amount for cost of operation, maintenance, and major capital replacements required for the water supply facilities. Operations during fiscal year. New work: None. Maintenance: A new water intake structure was completed in 1995 to support a regional public water supply system. Operation for flood control during 2000 flood season prevented damages estimated at $3,937,000. Visitor expenditures were $29,034,893. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction was started in May 1970. Project is complete and reservoir was placed in operation in February 1978. 41. INSPECTION OF COMPLETED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS Flood Control Act of June 22, 1936, and subsequent acts require local interests to maintain and operate local protection projects in accordance with regulations prescribed by Secretary of the Army. Inspections were made to determine extent of compliance and to advise interests as necessary to measures required to correct deficiencies. (See Table 24-K for the latest dates of inspection performed on the local protection projects, channel improvements, and bank revetments). Fiscal year costs were $232,415.45. Total costs to September 30, 2000, were $5,396,288. 42. OTHER AUTHORIZED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS See Table 24-E. 43. FLOOD CONTROL WORKS UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION Environmental restoration activities pursuant to Section 1135, 1986 Water Resources Act, as Amended. Costs for fiscal year were $25,234 for two planning and design analyses; $16,259 for two feasibility reports; $15,013 for one project under construction; $3,070 for one terminated study; $5,137 for one preliminary restoration plan; and $15,228 for coordination activities. Reflects federal cost only, for full costs see table 24-L. Flood control activities pursuant to Section 205, 1948 Flood Control Act, Public Law 858, 80th Congress, as amended. Cost for fiscal year were $480,588 for sixteen feasibility reports; $369,383 for plans and specifications on four projects; $1,488,903 for five projects under construction; $8,570 for one project completing construction; $168 for two terminated studies; and $24,795 for coordination activities. Reflects federal cost only, for full costs see table 24-L. Emergency bank protection (Section 14, 1946 Flood Control Act, Public Law 526, 79th Congress). Costs for fiscal year were $247,501 for seven planning and design analyses; $1,235 for one project under construction; and $15,832 for coordination activities. Reflects federal cost only, for full cost see table 24-L. Aquatic Ecosystems Restoration (Section 206). Cost for fiscal year was $31,126 for three feasibility reports; $3,439 for one preliminary restoration plan; and $13,955 for coordination activities. 24-14 LOUISVILLE, KY DISTRICT Clearing and Snagging (Section 208). Cost for fiscal year was $21,031 for one planning and design analysis and $3,000 for coordination activities. Emergency flood control; activities pursuant to Public Law 99, 84th Congress, and antecedent legislation. The Louisville District participated in the following emergency management activities. Exercise Iceex in January 2000. This 1st Army Exercise was intended to test and train the 3 d Training Support Brigade stationed at Ft. Benjamin Harrison near Indianapolis, Indiana. Louisville District was invited to take the lead in representing the Corps of Engineers in this 3-day winter exercise. The District Emergency Operations manager served as the ESF #3 Team Leader and worked with FEMA Region V in developing useful exercise play. Licking River basin flood occurred in February 2000. A major rainfall in the Licking River. The Kentucky Division of Emergency Management Emergency Operations Center requested assistance from thdie Corps in providing sandbags and technical expertise. The District's emergency Operations Center opened at 2200 hours Friday night, 11 February and remained open until 1700 hours on Saturday 12 February. The Emergency Operations manager traveled to Falmouth, Kentucky to provide technical assistance in their flood fight operations. The District EOC was staffed by the Emergency Manager, the Emergency Plans Manager and a civil engineer. Cerro Grande Fires. On 12 May 2000 the President declared Los Alamos, New Mexico, a Federal disaster area as a result of the wildfires raging through ie area. Over 48,000 acres and 400 residences were burned. FEMA activated the ESF #3 element as part of the Federal Response Plan, and advised the Corps to prepare for ice, water, power, debris removal and temporary housing missions. Eventually, the only mission received by the Corps of Engineers was a temporary housing mission for the residents of thdie 400 dwellings lost as a result of the fire. The Corps executed this mission in record time. From the time the "go ahead" was given until the first resident moved in was 24 days. The Corps team took an open field and transformed it into a fully functional community complete with water, sewers, electricity, telephones and cable TV. This was viewed as a national record. The Louisville District Emergency Operations Manager served as the Teanl Leader for this effort (May 12 through the end of June 2000). Great Lakes and Ohio River Division and FEMA Region V "2000 Flood Exercise". The Louisville District Emergency Management Branch personnel assisted the LRD Division and the Chief of Engineers Emergency Management staffs in coordinating, preparing and encouraging participation for this major regional flood exercise seminar (attended by over 90 participants) used a large-scale flood scenario to drive discussions about intergovernmental as well as interstate decisions, issues, and perspectives as a means of developing mutual understanding and rapport. LRD CPX - Fall 2000. The LRD Commander requested an "emergency-response exercise" be prepared for all LRD District Commanders. Louisville assisted in the preparation of the scenario and presentations for the exercise, and participated in this daylong executive level exercise in the Division Office. Costs for fiscal year were: $813,157 for Disaster Preparedness; $13,486 federal funds and $208,886 in reimbursable funds for emergency operations; and $9,508 for inspection of non-federal flood works. General Investigations 44. SURVEYS Fiscal year costs was $2,862,376 for one navigation study; $712,621 for thirteen flood damage prevention studies; $106,837 for three special studies; $176,897 for one review of authorized projects; and $123,293 for three miscellaneous activities. Reflects Federal cost only, for full cost see Table 24- M. 45. PRECONSTRUCTION ENGINEERING AND DESIGN Fiscal year costs were $551,515 for two Navigation projects; $105,620 for three flood control projects. Reflects Federal cost only, for full cost see Table 24- M. 46. COORDINATION WITH OTHER AGENCIES Fiscal year total cost was $19,862 for one coordination with other agencies projects and $52,094 for two planning assistance to states projects. Reflects federal cost only, for full costs see Table 24- M. 47. COLLECTION AND STUDY OF BASIC DATA Fiscal year total cost was $116,790 for eight flood plain management projects; and $3,328 for one hydrologic study. 24-15 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 2000 TABLE 24-A COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT CONTINUED See Section Total to in Text Project Funding 1997 1998 1999 2000 Sep 30, 2000 Navigation - Channels and Harbors Open Channel Work, New Work Licking River Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Navigation - Locks and Dams 3 Green and Barren New Work Rivers, KY Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost 4 Kentucky River, KY New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Minor Rehab. Approp. Cost $ $, 35,974 36,018 16,500 16,423 (1369) (1,292) 187,816 187,816 13,808,222 1 13,808,222 1 1,737,411 1,922,000 1,929,836 1,681,014 49,011,311 2,3 1,735,685 1,920,778 1,953,241 168,016 47,498,283 4,176,749 4,176,749 2,612,233 2,452,000 2,743,908 2,953,554 82,271,986 4'., 3,230,687 2,451,441 2,810,773 2,952,266 82,265,933 "46 556,956 556,956 Flood Control, Local Protection 8 Duck Creek New Work Approp. Cost 9 Holes Creek, OH 10 Mill Creek, OH 11 Ohio River Flood Protection (Indiana Shoreline), IN 12 Pond Creek, KY New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost. 466,000 868,000 882,000 1,825,000 4,041,000 "5 259,476 428,979 1,398,032 1,720,169 3,806,656 "6 179,245 2,396,439 1,404,691 2,935,915 7,106,790 s" 216,331 627,953 2,873,681 2,584,891 6,428,749 '2 566,000 1,955,000 (444,800) 2,237,734 101,094,6766 663,830 604,847 937,195 1,968,526 100,803,903, 1,000,000 1,300,000 1,718,633 544,370 4,573,003 ' 151,651 272,167 1,088,735 1,354,457 2,877,010 ' 1,500,000 143,000 117,184 1,667,000 3,427,184 " 189,635 243,753 1,018,888 1,694,191 3,146,46754 24-16 LOUISVILLE, KY DISTRICT TABLE 24-A COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT CONTINUED See Section Total to in Text Project Funding 1997 1998 1999 2000 Sep 30, 2000 13 Salyersville, KY 14 Southwestern Jefferson County, KY 15 Southern & Eastern, KY Approp 16 Wabash River New Harmony, IN 17 White River, Indpls Central Waterfront, IN New Work Approp Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work 0880,00 Cost New Work Approp Cost New Work Approp. Cost 4,242,000 2,155,500 0 0 9,180,019 10 4,687,385 1,374,736 73,116 137,610 8,343,480 11 24,000 46,468 20,137 7,164 0 409 65,000 564,000 1,509,000 59 0 92,448 139,659 (6500) 60,218,720 9 3,612 60,211,0519 642,397 874,504 60 470,000 1,860,000 (823,209) 1,506,791 8 4,058 12,738 61,229 78,025 7,000,000 5,000,000 4,000,000 7,849,000 25,849,000 298,960 4,520,218 8,696,191 10,630,509 24,321,195 18 White River, Indpls (North), IN Flood Control - Reservoirs 19 Barren River Lake, KY 20 Brookville Lake, IN 21 Buckhorn Lake, KY New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp Cost Maint. Approp. Cost 00 0 0 155,000 0 128,835 155,000 128,835 27,479,717 12 27,479,717 12 1,734,020 1,766,658 2,058,008 2,197,732 6,264,0391314. .1 s 1,751,562 1,774,487 2,119,336 2,201,002 36,263,925131415 0 45,402,565 16 0 45,402,565 16 685,239 782,000 747,289 811,685 12,692,93747 689,164 788,799 752,636 811,022 12,691,87147 00 1, 072,107 1,106,692 0 0 0 11,766,20617 0 0 0 11,766,20617 1,211,100 1,131,876 1,584,708 22,930,714 18 1,265,461 1,154,188 1,585,222 22,930,614 18 24-17 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 2000 TABLE 24-A COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT CONTINUED See Section Total to in Text Project Funding 1997 1998 1999 2000 Sep 30, 2000 22 Caesar Creek Lake, OH New Work Approp. 0 0 0 0 62,881,010 Cost 0 0 0 0 62,881,010 Maint. Approp. 1,338,199 1,305,608 1,384,505 1,380,026 18,064,346 * Cost 1,322,433 1,376,329 1,386,968 1,380,586 18,064,326 4 23 Cagles Mill Lake, IN New Work Approp 0 0 0 0 4,369,997 19 Cost 0 0 0 0 4,369,997 20 Maint. Approp. 661,977 717,079 699,208 666,441 12,336,372 Cost 670,768 723,230 706,443 667,216 12,336,371 24 Carr Creek Lake, KY New Work Approp. 0 0 0 0 $50,854,826 21 Cost 0 0 0 0 $50,854,826 21 Maint. Approp. 1,316,804 1,400,000 1,294,586 1,608,858 22,441,033 22 Cost 1,308,457 1,417,835 1,309,872 1,610,528 22,439,665 n 25 Cave Run Lake, KY New Work Approp. 0 0 0 0 81,159,541 3 Cost 0 0 0 0 81,159,541 23 Maint. Approp. 843,428 760,945 834,703 984,129 14,228,426 49 Cost 1,047,916 772,972 836,165 984,815 14,228,426 49 26 Cecil M. Hardin Lake, New Work IN Approp. 0 0 0 0 6,987,807 U Cost 0 0 0 0 6,987,807 U Maint. Approp. 795,221 847,000 768,422 757,175 15,459,458 Cost 765,159 896,053 770,844 756,606 15,456,127 27 Clarence J. Brown New Work Dam & Reservoir, Approp 0 0 0 0 22,083,660 61 OH Cost 0 0 0 0 22,083,660 61 Maint. Approp. 801,407 809,114 711,164 839,262 12,372,292 Cost 777,946 825,859 719,755 845,135 12,372,292 24-18 LOUISVILLE, KY DISTRICT TABLE 24-A COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT CONTINUED See Section Total to in Text Project Funding 1997 1998 1999 2000 Sep 30, 2000 28 Green River Lake, KY 29 J. Edward Roush Lake, IN 30 Mississinewa Lake, IN 31 Monroe Lake, IN 32 Nolin Lake, KY 33 Ohio River Basin Louisville District New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost 0 0 33,462,330 25 33,462,33025 1,551,285 1,791,200 2,422,788 2,171,248 31,847,915 26 1,625,123 1,793,459 2,433,917 2,148,069 31,824,192 26 (481) 0 19,621,77727 19,621,777 28 700,482 1,018,000 935,301 852,598 13,847,669 687,442 1,023,067 946,275 850,706 13,843,539 0 24,379,80029 0 24,379,80029 723,000 764,000 1,000,694 1,750,914 14,542,951 736,129 782,897 1,011,851 1,747,364 14,538,541 00 747,636 763,458 00 1,848,000 1,947,062 16,570,774 30 16,570,774 30 736,879 733,499 689,483 14,663,815 ' 740,676 738,728 13,974,256 14,663,734 31 17,193,278 3 17,193,278 33 1,598,000 1,544,009 2,379,432 39,500,415 - 1,611,785 1,564,594 2,383,913 39,500,36934 1,526,142 1,526,142 24-19 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 2000 TABLE 24-A CONTINUED COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Section Total to in Text Project Funding 1997 1998 1999 2000 Sep 30, 2000 34 Patoka Lake, IN 35 Rough River Lake & Channel Improvement, KY 36 Salamonie Lake, IN 37 Taylorsville Lake, KY 39 West Fork of Mill Creek Lake, OH 40 William H. Harsha Lake, OH New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost 0 0 266,500 73,969,316 35 238,642 73,555,534 36 "791,240 1,096,526 681,825 657,069 10,691,138 792,304 1,128,601 670,891 672,789 10,691,137 0 0 0 0 10,643,001 " 0 0 0 0 10,643,001 n 1,714,947 1,873,863 1,970,346 2,393,004 37,748,577 38 1,690,318 1,873,863 2,025,303 2,329,678 37,680,186 38 (6,830) 0 0 17,039,321 39 0 17,039,321 4o 659,483 617,988 607,612 730,832 12,179,635 646,972 635,393 621,365 730,918 12,179,008 (104,159) (13,979) 37,949 877 87,004,456 41 87,004,456 42 921,905 914,000 1,101,169 1,066,621 13,939,369 1,283,284 940,942 1,110,400 1,047,179 13,915,789 0 4,722,463 3 0 4,722,463 '3 445,935 397,882 407,592 363,362 9,096,174 456,745 410,380 411,208 363,362 9,096,174 0 0 52,023,157 44 52,023,157 " 887,510 1,001,145 813,601 814,294 12,864,187 so 906,896 1,035,774 829,988 814,342 12,864,185 50o 1 Includes $85,000 public works funds. 2 Includes $2,000 emergency relief funds, $204,444 "maintenance and operation of dams and improvements of navigable waters" and $3,842,667 expended from 1888 to 30 June 1936, for operation and care from permanent indefinite appropriation. Includes $725,715 from Productive Employment Appropriation Act (PL 98-8) of 1983. ' Includes $316,871 under "maintenance and operation of dams and other improvements of navigable waters", and $6,405,372 expended between July 5, 1885 and June 30, 1937 on operation and care from permanent indefinite appropriation. Includes $149,700 from Productive Employment 24-20 Appropriation Act (PL 98-8) of 1983. 6 Includes $52,734 in contributed funds. ' Includes $2,266 in contributed funds. $ Includes $276,791 in contributed funds. 9 Does not include contributed funds. 10 Includes $550,019 contributed funds. ,1 Includes $541,992 contributed funds. '2 Includes $2,224,948 Code 711 funds, $110,107 Code 713 Federal funds and $108,418 Code 713 non-Federal funds. 13 Includes $100,000 Supplemental funds. 14 Includes $326,900 Special Recreation Use Fees. 's Includes $668,025 "maintenance & operation of dams and other improvements of navigable water". - --- - --- LOUISVILLE, KY DISTRICT 16 Includes $7,497,492 contributed funds and $100,706 Code 711 funds. '~ Includes $61,451 public work acceleration executive 1963 funds, $143,088 Code 711 funds, and $243,619 Code 712 funds. 18 Includes $52,240 Special Recreation Use Fees. 19 Includes $35,814 Code 711 funds, $113,321 Code 713 funds, and $113,094 contributed funds. 20 Includes $35,814 Code 711 funds, $113,321 Code 713 funds, and $113,094 contributed funds. 21 Includes $76,724 Code 711 funds. 22 Includes $51,854 Special Recreation Use Fees. 23 Includes $6,900,000 of U.S. Forest Service Funds. 24 Includes $19,683 Code 711 funds, $353,995 Code 713 funds, & $353,995 non-Federal contributions in kind for recreation facilities. 25 Includes $133,413 Code 711 fiunds, $183,732 Code 713 funds, and $40,001 contributed funds. 26 Includes $114,280 Special Recreation Use Fees and $664,025 under "maintenance and operation of dams and other improvements of navigable water". 27 Includes $155,354 Code 713 funds and $193,422 contributed funds. 28 Includes $155,354 Code 713 funds and $193,422 contributed funds. 29 Includes $215,000 Code 711 funds, $174,392 Code 713 funds, $239,200 contributed funds and $174,392 non- Federal contribution in kind for recreational facilities. 30 Includes $1,185 Code 711 funds, $869,158 Code 713 funds, $7,797,604 contributed funds and $870,343 non- Federal contribution in kind for recreational facilities. 31 Includes $54,460 from Productive Employment Appropriation Act (PL 98-8) of 1983. 32 Includes $21,897 public works acceleration executive 1963 funds and $2,594,274 Code 711 funds. 33 Includes $21,897 public works acceleration executive 1963 funds and $2,594,274 Code 711 funds. 3' Includes $204,920 Special Recreation Use Fees and $52,000 Supplement Funds, $527,225 "maintenance and operation of dams and other improvements of navigable water". *3 Includes $20,568,369 contributed funds. 36 Includes $20,182,445 contributed funds. " Includes $196,306 public works acceleration executive 1963 funds and $867,396 Code 711 funds, $22,612 Code 713 funds, and $22,612 contributed funds. 38 Includes $236,640 Special Recreation Use Fees and $668,025 under "maintenance and operation of dams and other improvements of navigable water". 9 Includes $315,549 Code 713 funds, $163,867 contributed funds, and $315,549 non-Federal contribution in kind for recreation facilities. 4o Includes $315,549 Code 713 funds, $163,867 contributed funds, and $315,549 non-Federal contribution in kind for recreation facilities. 41 Includes $4,013,093 contributed funds. 4 Includes $4,013,093 contributed funds. 3 Includes $529,361 Code 713 funds, $50,000 contributed 4' Includes $57,000 contributed funds. 46 Includes $45,194 contributed funds. 47 Includes $2,210 "maintenance and operation of dams and other improvements of navigable water." 48 Includes $2,738 "maintenance and operation of dams and other improvements of navigable water." 49 Includes $4,063 "maintenance and operation of dams and other improvements of navigable water." so Includes $4,367 "maintenance and operation of dams and other improvements of navigable water." 51In cludes $1,163,915 contributed funds. 52 Includes $1,026,940 contributed funds. 53 Includes $700,000 contributed funds. 54 Includes $450,320 contributed funds. s Includes $768,000 contributed funds. 36 Includes $581,965 contributed funds. 57 Includes $882,470 contributed funds. 38 Includes $576,194 contributed funds. s59 Includes $880,000 Code 511 funds and $629,000 Code 772 funds. 60 Includes $741,000 Code 511 funds and $133,468 Code 772 funds. 61 Includes $573 "maintenance and operation of dams and other improvements of navigable water". funds, $529,361 non-Federal contribution in kind for recreation facilities, and $520,000 non-Federal cost for sewer relocation and dam. " Includes $58,571 for preconstruction planning, engineering and design completed before FY 1953. 24-21 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 2000 AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Work Authorized Documents GREEN AND BARREN RIVERS, KY (See Section 3 of Text) Aug 11, 1888 Purchase of original improvement Mar 3, 1893 I Jul 13, 1892 Jul 13, 1902 Mar 3, 1905 2 Mar 3, 1909 Jul 3, 1930 2 Construction of Lock 2, Green River Construction of Lock 5, Green River Construction of Lock 6, Green River Appropriated $5,000 for continuing improvements of Green River above mouth of Big Barren River, with provision "That the Secretary of War may, in his discretion, expend such portiqn of said amount as may be necessary for removal of snags in Nolin River." Construct new Lock 1 and new Lock and Dam 2, Green River Construct new locks at Dam 5, Green River and Dam 1, Barren River, modification of Dam 5, Green River, widens bends in Bear Creek, KY Jun 26, 1934 3 Operation and care of locks and dams with War Department Appropriations for rivers and harbors Aug 30, 1935 2 Improvement ofNolin River Sep 3, 1954 Channel enlargement of lower 103 miles of Green River revocation of authorities for improvement of Bear Creek and Nolin River OHIO RIVER BASIN (Louisville Dist.) (See Section 27 of Text) Aug 28, 1937 Construct levee, floodwalls, and drainage structures for protection of cities and towns in Ohio River Basin, projects to be selected by Chief of Engineers with approval of Secretary of War, at a cost not to exceed $24,877,000 for construction Jun 28, 1938 Approved general comprehensive plan for flood control and other purposes in Ohio River Basin as may be advisable in discretion of Secretary of War and Chief of Engineers, and for initiation and partial accomplishment of plan, authorized $75 million for reservoirs and $50.3 million for local protection works, individual projects to be selected and approved by Chief of Engineers, subject to provision that authorization shall include diversion of Cache River above Cairo, Illinois, and protection of area north of Cairo drainage district by levees at an estimated cost of $2 million Aug 18, 1941 Additional $45 million for further prosecution of comprehensive plan for Ohio River Basin Dec 22, 1944 Additional $70 million for further prosecution of comprehensive plan for Ohio River Basin, including plan of improvement for flood control and other purposes in Kentucky River Basin Flood protection works at Taylorsville, KY at an estimated cost of $129,350 Channel improvement of lower Rough River and Barnett Creek at an estimated cost of $360,000 Jul 24, 1946 Additional $125 million for further prosecution of comprehensive plan, including plan of improvement for flood control in Wabash River Basin, Illinois, and Indiana, at an estimated cost of $9,629,000 Also, West Fork of Mill Creek at an estimated cost of $1,527,000. May 17, 1950 Additional $100 million for prosecution of comprehensive plan for Ohio River Basin, including necessary bank stabilization measures at New Harmony Bridge, Indiana, at an estimated cost of $500,000. Jul 3, 1958 Flood control Act of 1958 modified comprehensive plan to provide for Monroe Reservoir on Salt Creek, White River Basin, Indiana, at an estimated cost to the United States of $4,350,000; cost to local interests, $5,141,000. H. Doc 111, 49th Cong., 2d Sess., Ann. Rept. 1887, p.1903 Annual Report, 1891, p. 2439 Annual Report, 1891, p. 2478 S. Doc. 82, 83d Cong., 2d Sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 2, 71st Cong., 1st Sess., and H. Doc. 685, 69th Cong., 2d Sess. l.D. 480, 72d Cong., 2d Sess. S.D. 82, 83d Congress, 2d Sess. Flood Control Committee Document 1, 75th Congress, 1st Session Flood Control Committee Document 1, 75th Congress, Ist Session Ht. Doc. 5 0 4 , 7 8 ' Congress, 2d Session S.D. 105, 78th Cong., 1st Sess. H.D. 535, 78th Congress 2d Session H.D. 197, 80th Congress 1st Session H.D. 198, 80th Cong., 1st Session H.D. 192, 85th Congress, Ist Session 24-22 TABLE 24-B LOUISVILLE, KY DISTRICT AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Oct 23, 1962 Flood Control Act of 1962 deleted Jessamine Creek Reservoir on Kentucky River, Kentucky, from comprehensive plan for Ohio River Basin Dec 30, 1963 Additional $150 million for further prosecution of comprehensive plan for Ohio River Basin Jun 18, 1965 Additional $89 million for further prosecution of comprehensive plan for Ohio River Basin May 12, 1967 . Additional $38 million for further prosecution of comprehensive plan for Ohio River Basin Aug 13, 1968 Additional $35 million for further prosecution of comprehensive plan for Ohio River Basin Jun 19, 1970 Additional $69 million for further prosecution of comprehensive plan for Ohio River Basin Mar 7, 1974 Additional $120 million for further prosecution of comprehensive plan for Ohio River Basin Fifty-four local protection projects and one reservoir project in comprehensive plan for Ohio River Basin were deauthorized August 5, 1977, under Section 12, Water Resources Development Act of 1974 Two additional local protection projects in comprehensive plan for Ohio River Basin were deauthorized November 6, 1977, under Section 12, Water Resources Development Act of 1974 Nov 13, 1995 Directed use of $1,000,000 of funds appropriated in PL 104-46 for construction of the Ohio River Flood Protection, Indiana Project. H.D. 423, 87th Congress, 2d Session Pub. Law 88-253, 88th Cong., 1st Session Public Law 89-42, 89th Cong., 1st Session Public Law 90-17, 90th Cong., 1st Session Public Law 90-483, 90th Cong., 2nd Session Public Law 91-282, 91st Cong., 2nd Session Public Law 93-251, 93rd Congress, 2nd Session Public Law 104-46, 104th Congress, 2nd Session WABASH RIVER BASIN (See Section 32 of Text) Aug 13, 1968 Construction of five multipurpose reservoirs and one local protection project in Wabash River Basin, IL & IN, with provision that construction of Big Walnut Lake, IN, project must be approved by the President. Authorization of $50 million for initiation of partial accomplishment of project Dec 29, 1981 Two multiple purpose reservoirs in Wabash River were deauthorized. May 1, 1997 Two Additional reservoir projects were deauthorized MIAMI RIVER BASIN, PLEASANT RUN, VICINITY FAIRFIELD, OH Nov 17, 1986 Three dry bed reservoirs and a channel improvement were authorized in Section 401 of the Water Resource Development Act of 1986. HAZARD, KENTUCKY Nov 17, 1988 Approximately 6 miles of channel improvement were authorized in Section 3 of the Water Resources Development Act of 1988. Nov 28, 1990 Flood control measures to prevent a January 1957 flood reoccurrence in the vicinity of Hazard, Kentucky at a total cost of $30,000,000 was authorized for design and construction in Section 108 of the Water Resource Development Act of 1990. S.D. 96, 90th Congress, 2nd Session Public Law 97-128, 97th Congress, 2nd Session Public Law 99-662, 99th Congress, 2nd Session Public Law 100-676 100th Congress, 2nd Session Public Law 99-662, 99th Congress, 2nd Session Public Law 100-676, 100th Congress, 2nd Session Public Law 101-640, 101st 2nd Session 24-23 TABLE 24-B CONTINUED A of ,, DnrnimPntc IAULN v(!UKJ UtI1UrILu 1i7t.lr A sthn ,rral REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 2000 TABLE 24-B CONTINUED Acts AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Work Authorized Documents HOLES CREEK, OHIO Nov 17, 1986 The project for flood control, Miami River, Little Miami River, Interim Report No2, West Carrollton - Holes Creek, Ohio: Report of the Chief of Engineers dated December 23, 1981, at a total cost of $8,910,000, with an estimated first Federal Cost of $6,230,000 and an estimated first non-Federal cost of $2,680,000. Aug 17, 1999 Holds the total amount projected as the non-federal share as of September 30, 1996 in the Project Cooperation Agreement executed on that date; and 100% of the amount of any increases in the cost of the locally preferred plan over the cost estimated in the Project Cooperation Agreement. SALYERSVILLE, KENTUCKY Nov 17, 1986 Flood control measures to prevent a December 1978 flood reoccurrence in the vicinity of Salyersville, Kentucky at a total project cost of $7,000,000 was authorized for design and construction in section 401(e)(l) of the Water Resource Development Act of 1986. With respect to the project, Congress has determined that the benefits exceed the cost of such flood control measures. Nov 5, 1990 Provided $400,000 to construct the Salyersville, Kentucky cut-through as authorized by PL 99-662 401(e)(1) in accordance with the Special Project Report for Salyersville, Kentucky, concurred in by the Ohio River Division Engineer on or about July 26, 1989. 7, 1991 Provided $600,000 to continue construction of the Salyersville, Kentucky cut-through as authorized by PL 99-662 section 401(e)(1) in accordance with the Special Project Report for Salyersville, Kentucky, concurred in by the Ohio River Division Engineer on or about July 26, 1989. 2, 1996 Additional $3,000,000 to continue construction of the Salyersville, Kentucky cut-through. Nov 28, 1990 Sep 25, 1996 Sep 25, 1996 Sep 25, 1996 FRANKFORT, SOUTH FRANKFORT, KENTUCKY Flood protection in accordance with Plan R-1 of the Louisville District Commander's Re-evaluation Report, dated June 1990 and a executed LCA no later than October 1991 was authorized in Section 102 of the Water Resources Development Act of 1990. POND CREEK, JEFFERSON COUNTY, KENTUCKY Provide $10,993,000 to construct the Pond Creek, Jefferson County, Kentucky project for flood control in accordance with the Report of the Chief of Engineers dated June 28, 1994. The major components of the Recommended Plan include detention basin storage and channel enlargement, in addition to wetland restoration and recreation. DUCK CREEK, CINCINNATI, OHIO Provide $11,960,000 to construct the Duck Creek, Cincinnati, Ohio flood damage reduction project in accordance with the Chief of Engineers Report dated June 24, 1994. The project consists of floodwalls/ levees and channel relocation. NEW HARMONY, INDIANA Provide $2,100,000 for streambank erosion protection along the Wabash River at the town of New Harmony, Indiana. Public Law 99-662, 99th Congress, 2nd Session Public Law 106-53 106th Congress, 1st Session Public Law 99-662, 99th Congress, 2nd Session Public Law 101-514, 101st Congress, 2nd Session Public Law 102-104, 102nd Congress, 1st Session H.D. 3816, 104th Congress, 2nd Session Public Law 101-640, 101st Congress, 2nd Session Public Law 104-303, 104th Congress, 2nd Session Public Law 104-303, 104th Congress, 2nd Session Public Law 104-303, 104th Congress, 2nd Session 24-24 Aug 1 Sep 1, TABLE 24-B CONTINUED ActsWork Authorized LOUISVILLE, KY DISTRICT AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Documents WHITE RIVER, INDIANAPOLIS CENTRAL WATERFRONT, INDIANA Provide $7,000,000 for construction of recreation facilities and rehabilitation of existing flood protection features in downtown Indianapolis along the White River. Authorized to undertake the riverfront alterations described in the Central Indianapolis Waterfront Concept Plan, dtd Feb 1994 for the Canal Development(Upper Canal feature) and the Beveridge Paper feature, at a total cost not to exceed $25,000,000 ofwhich$12,500,00 is the estimated Federal cost and $12,500,000 is the estimated non-federal cost. BEARGRASS CREEK, KENTUCKY The project for flood control, Beargrass Creek, Kentucky: Report of the Chief of Engineers dtd May 12, 1998 at a total cost of $11,171,300 with an estimated Federal cost of $7,261,500 and an estimated non-federal cost of $3,909,800. H.D. 3816, 104th Congress, 2nd Session Public Law 106-53 106th Congress, 1st Session Public Law 106-53, 106th Congress, 1st Session Deficiency act. Authorization for Nolin River and Bear Creek revoked by Act of Sep. 3, 1954 Permanent Appropriations Repeal Act. 24-25 Sep 12, 1996 Aug 17, 1999 Aug 17, 1999 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 2000 TABLE 24-C OTHER AUTHORIZED NAVIGATION PROJECTS (See Section 6) Name of Project Status Licking River Rough River, KY Tradewater River, KY White River, IN Completed Completed Completed Completed For Last Full Report See Annual Renort 1901 1951 1858 1909 Cost to Sep 30, 1998 Construction $ 13,045 105,500 18,568 119,312 Operation and Maintenance $ 139,108 101,196 33,331 0 24-26 __ _ ---- . .. va r vaav "a + - v a "- w aarvaa LOUISVILLE, KY DISTRICT TABLE 24-E OTHER AUTHORIZED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS For Last Cost to Sep 30, 2000 Full Report See Annual Operation and Project and Status1 Report Construction Maintenance Local Protection: Completed: Boone County, KY (Ohio River, Rabbit Hash) Brevoort Levee, IN (Wabash River) Brookport, IL Cannelton, IN Canoe Creek, Henderson, KY2 Chaplin River, Perryville, KY2 Cincinnati, OH Covington, KY Dayton, KY Delphi, IN (Wabash River) England Pond Levee, IL (Wabash River) English, IN (Little Blue River)2 Evansville, IN Frankfort, KY (North Frankfort) (Kentucky River) 3 8 Frankfort, South Frankfort, KY Gill Township Levee, IN (Wabash River) Golconda, IL Grassy Creek, Jackson County, IN (Muscatatuck River)2 Harrisburg, IL Hawesville, KY Indianapolis, IN (Fall Creek Section) (White River) Indian Creek, Corydon, IN 2 Jackson, KY (Kentucky River) Jeffersonville-Clarksville, IN Lawrenceburg, IN Lebanon Junction, KY (Salt River)2 Levee Unit No. 5, Wabash River, IN Levee Unit No. 8, White River, IN Louisville, KY4 Lyford Levee Unit, IN (Wabash River) Mason J. Niblack Levee, IN (Wabash River)5 Mill Creek, Jefferson County, KY2 Mount Carmel, IL (Wabash River) Muncie, IN (White River) Neon-Fleming, KY (Kentucky River) New Albany, IN New Harmony Bridge, IL & IN (Wabash River) Newburgh, IN (Ohio River) 6 Newport, KY Paducah, KY Panther Creek, KY (Green River) 2 Portland, IN (Salamonie River) 2 Reevesville, IL (Cache River) Rochester & McCleary's Bluff Levee, IL (Wabash River) Rosiclaire, IL Saline River & Tributaries, IL Shawneetown, IL7 Sturgis, KY Taylorsville, KY (Salt River) Tell City, IN Terre Haute (Conover Levee), IN (Wabash River) Town Creek, Hlarrodsburg, KY Triplett Creek, Morehead, KY (Licking River)2 1977 1954 1958 1959 1957 1965 1987 1953 1972 1965 1997 1979 1998 1948 1960 1953 1959 1955 1953 1964 1957 1959 & 1996 1953 1967 1987 1952 1975 1944 1987 1973 1972 1956 1963 1957 1959 1974 1959 1959 1970 1962 1954 1972 1954 1981 1972 1952 1956 1965 1967 1972 $ 392,443 1,240,299 597,493 2,068,391 1,206,852 832,700 10,150,935 7,862,937 13,177,345 144,563 734,498 372,353 43,906,502 2,960,970 11,164,720 561,200 565,333 70,304 870,015 969,318 1,788,840 300,143 130,952 4,836,361 2,473,414 130,417 7,517,464 700,534 26,721,438 267,391 4,337,617 292,710 1,980,675 887,835 86,532 5,375,471 297,624 52,061 7,512,987 4,761,551 254,031 237,657 600,300 1,079,236 622,544 7,826,219 91,000 1,826,778 378,050 932,229 14,913 56,505 893,094 24-27 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 2000 TABLE 24-E OTHER AUTHORIZED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS CONTINUED For Last Cost to Sep 30, 2000 Full Report See Annual Operation and Project and Status' Report Construction Maintenance Uniontown, KY 1956 1,070,926 Vincennes, IN (Wabash River) 7 1964 3,308,941 - West Terre Haute, IN (Wabash River) 1977 1,095,704 Whitewater River, Hagerstown, IN 2 � 641,398 Active: Greenfield Bayou, IN (Wabash River) - 157,935 Indianapolis, IN (Warfleigh Section) (White River) 1976 153,410 Louisville, KY 9 - 415,000 Miami River Basin, Pleasant Run, Vicinity Fairfield, OH 9 514,964 (Great Miami River) West Fork Mill Creek, OH (Winton Road) 9 - 477,649 Fairfield, OH Inactive: Blue River, Salem, IN - 15,000 Cache River, Upper Basin, Ill - 44,000 Columbus, IN 283,000 Gallatin County, IL Stmbk - - Hazard, KY Island Levee, IN (Wabash River) 355,963 Kentucky River National Recreation Area Licking River, KY Mount Vernon, IN - 30,000 Southwest Ohio Urban Waterfront Development - - Vincennes, IL (Wabash River) 1964 Wabash River, York Township, Clark County, IL West Fork Drakes Creek, TN & KY 58,000 West Point, KY - 4,490 Whitewater River & Tributaries, IN & OH - 112,000 Reservoirs: Active: Camp Ground Lake, KY (Salt River) 1983 235,615 Taylorsville, Lake, Floyd's Fork - - Inactive: Big Pine Lake, IN (Wabash River) 1977 1,270,590 Big Walnut Lake, IN (Wabash River) 1980 1,009,188 Booneville Lake, KY (Kentucky River) 1976 1,038,595 Eagle Creek Lake, KY 1975 702,471 Lafayette Lake, IN (Wabash River) 1977 1,200,920 Mining City Lake, KY (Green River) - 350,474 Red River Lake, KY (Kentucky River) 1976 1,794,308 'All projects are on Ohio River unless otherwise noted. 'Authorized by the Chief of Engineers under Section 205, 1984 Flood Control Act, as amended. 'Cost includes $161,098 cash contribution consisting of $105,118 from the City of Frankfort, KY and $55,980 from the Commonwealth of Kentucky. 'Cost includes $1,716,301 cash contributions from the City of Louisville, KY. 'Cost shown are for levee and pump plants. 'The Water Resources Development Act of 1974 modified the Newburgh Locks & Dam project to include the bank protection works at Newburgh Locks & Dam project to include the bank protection works at Newburgh, IN. 7Partially completed to form a useful unit. Remaining portions of project inactive. 'Partially completed to form a useful unit. Remaining portions of project are active and inactive. 'Advance Engineering and Design funded with General Investigations Appropriation. 24-28 LOUISVILLE, KY DISTRICT TABLE 24-G DEAUTHORIZED PROJECTS For Last Full Report Federal Contributed See Annual Date Funds Funds n,,..... nr panhnri d Fienriel F rnnrip Project Flood Control - Local Protection: Adams Levee, IN (Wabash River) Alton, IN Anderson, IN (White River) Aurora, IN Bellevue, KY Bonpas Creek, IL (Wabash River) Bromley, KY California (Cincinnati), OH Carrollton, KY Caseyville, KY Cave-in-Rock, IL Cincinnati, OH (Unit 2) Cincinnati, OH (Unit 4) Cleves, OH Clinton, IN Cloverport, KY Concordia, KY Deer Creek, Prairie Levee, IN Derby, IN Elizabethtown, IL Evansville, Howell II Falmouth Lake Fletcher & Sunshine Gardens Levee, IN Frankfort, KY (Benson Creek) (Kentucky River) Grandview, IN Honey Creek Levee, IN Leavenworth, IN Levee Unit 1, Eel River, IN Levee Unit 2, Eel River, IN Levee Unit 2, East Fork White River, IN Levee Unit 3, East Fork White River, IN Levee Unit 1, IL (Wabash River) Levee Unit 1, Little Wabash River, IL Levee Unit 2, Little Wabash River, IL Levee Unit 2, Wabash River, IL Levee Units 3 and 4, Wabash River, IL Levee Unit 6, Wabash River, IL Levee Unit 17, Wabash River Basin, IN Levee Unit 1, White River, IN Levee Unit 7, White River, IN Levee Unit 9, White River, IN Levee Unit 10, White River, IN Lewisport, KY Louisville, KY (Partial) Louisville Lake Ludlow, KY Madison, IN Mauckport, IN Marion, IN (Wabash River) McGinnis Levee, IN Metropolis, IL 1940 1979 1938 1973 1938 1979 1950 1978 1977 1986 1977 1977 1981 1977 1977 1977 1986 1977 1977 1977 1977 1977 1986 1986 1977 1977 1977 1992 1998 1977 1992 1977 1977 1977 1977 1977 1977 1977 1986 1977 1977 1977 1977 1977 1977 1977 1977 1977 1977 1990 1986 1998 1977 1977 1977 1986 1977 1986 5,724 35,420 19,023 16,465 9,713 6,343 6,848 944,386 3,361 8,497 275 60,000 216 9,922 2,355,395 14,503 209,975 71,049 10,575 24-29 Keporr rr L(IaItilur lAvu rJJ cllucu L lr llucu REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 2000 TABLE 24-G CONTINUED For Last Full Report Federal Contributed See Annual Date Funds Funds Project Report For Deauthorized Expended Expended Flood Control - Local Protection (Cont'd.) Milton, KY Moscow, OH New Amsterdam, IN New Harmony, IN New Richmond, OH Newport-Wilder, KY Orleans, IN Owensboro, KY Patriot, IN Prestonville, KY Raccoon Creek Levee, IN Rising Sun, IN Rockport, IN Rome, IN Russell and Allison, IL Shawneetown, IL Shoals, IN (East Fork White River) Shufflebarger Levee, IN Smithland, KY Sugar Creek Levee, IN Terre Haute, IN Tolu, KY Tri Pond Levee, IL Troy, IN Utica, IN Vevay, IN Vincennes, IN (Partial) Westport, KY Wilders, KY Flood Control - Reservoirs Big Blue Lake, IN Clifty Creek Lake, IN Downeyville Lake, IN (Wabash River) Helm Lake, IL Lincoln Lake, IL Metomora Lake, IN DEAUTHORIZED PROJECTS 1972 1938 1950 1961 1972 1964 1980 1979 1976 1979 1977 1977 1977 1977 1977 1990 1977 1990 1977 1977 1977 1977 1977 1977 1992 1986 1977 1977 1992 1977 1977 1986 1977 1977 1978 1977 1986 1977 1990 1981 1981 1992 1981 1981 1977 7,104 13,158 52,088 25,367 64,487 28,061 65,510 1,079,867 1,016,358 41,616 1,331,844 24-30 ____ TABLE 24-H LOUISVILLE, KY DISTRICT NAVIGATION LOCKS AND DAMS PRINCIPAL FEATURES - GREEN & BARREN RIVERS AND KENTUCKY RIVER NAVIGATION SYSTEMS Lock Dimensions Miles Greatest Length Lock above Available Upper Depth of Year and Mouth of Distance from Width of For Full Normal Pool Miter Sills Character of Percent Opened to Cost of Dam River Nearest Town Chamber Width Lift Elevation Upper Lower Foundation Complete Navigation Lock and (feet) (feet) (feet msl) (feet) (feet) CONSTRUCTION OF LOCKS AND DAMS, OHIO RIVER - For report on this improvement see this heading under Ohio River. GREEN AND BARREN RIVERS, KY (See Section 3 of Text) Green River New 1 9.1 Spottsville, KY 84.0 600.0 11.8 349.1 121 11.3 Shale and Coal 100 1956 2 $5,101,97 New 2 63.1 0.3 miles below Calhoun, KY 84.0 600.0 14.3 363.4 15.0 11.7 Shale 100 1956 " 4,799,27 3 108.5 0.3 miles below Rochester, KY 35.8 137.5 17.0 380.4 7.3 5.6 Rock 100 1836 6 121,37 4 149.0 Woodbury, KY 35.8 138.0 16.4 396.8 7.1 6.5 Rock 100 1839 ' 125,71 5 168.1 0.3 miles below Glenmore, KY 56.0 360.0 15.2 4120' 120 9.3 Piles and Rock 100 1934 9 1,020,86 6 181.7 28 miles above Brownsville, KY 36. 0 145.0 9.2 421.1 8.0 8.8 Gravel 100 1905 9 168,41 Barrra River 1 15.0 " 0.3 miles above Greencastle, KY 56.0 360.0 15.2 4120 12.0 9.3 Gravel 100 1841 u 871,56 TUCKY RIVER, KY (See Section 4 of Text) tucky River 1 4.0 3.8 miles above Carrolton, KY 38.0 145.0 8.2 14 430.0 8.2 4.8 Rock and Clay 100 1839 . 2 31.0 Lockport, KY 38.0 145.0 13.9 443.9 7.6 6.1 Rock 100 1839 i 3 42.0 Gest, KY 38.0 145.0 13.2 457.1 8.6 6.5 Rock 100 1844 1 1,350,31 4 65.0 1.0 mile below Frankfort, KY 38.0 145.0 13.2 470.3 6.4 6.3 Rock 100 1844 5 82.2 28 miles below Tyrone, KY 38.0 145.0 15.0 485.3 10.0 6.4 Rock 100 1844 i" 6 96.2 21.6 miles below High Bridge, KY 520 147.0 14.0 499.3 9.4 6.4 Rock and Piles 100 1894 17 314,8 7 117.0 0.8 mile below High Bridge, KY 52.0 147.0 15.3 514.6 9.1 6.8 Rock 100 1897 i7 290,7 8 139.9 4.7 miles above Camp Nelson, KY 520 146.0 18.7 533.6 10.6 6.0 Rock 100 1900 17 275,4 9 157.5 Valley View, KY 520 148.0 17.3 550.6 10.0 6.6 Rock 100 1907 17 237,6 10 176.4 1.0 mile below Ford, KY 52.0 148.0 17.0 567.6 9.0 6.0 Rock 100 1907 7 221,5 11 201.0 17.2 miles below Irvine, KY 52.0 148.0 18.0 585.6 10.0 6.0 Rock 100 1906 7 296,5 12 220.0 Ravenna, KY 520 148.0 17.0 6026 9.6 6.0 Rock 100 1910 '7 425,6 13 239.9 2.2 miles below Willow, KY 520 148.0 18.0 620.6 9.6 6.0 Rock 100 1915 " 461,4 14 249.0 Heidelberg, KY 52.0 148.0 17.0 63.6 8.6 6.0 Rock 100 1971 17 392,9 1 At normal pool Dam 48, Ohio River, Elev. 337.3, Green River datum (Elev. 338.0 Ohio River datum) 2 New Lock 1 placed in operation May 25, 1956, old Dam 1, completed 1835-40, replaced with new cellular concrete masonry dam constructed 1970-71 with O&M funds at cost of $822,000. 3 Does not include $179,110 cost of old Lock and Dam 1. 4 New Lock and Dam 2, placed in operation June 18, 1956. 5 Does not include $295,696 cost of old Lock and Dam 2. 6 Operation discontinued September 30, 1981. 7 Breaching of dam on May 24, 1965, stopped through traffic to Bowling Green, KY. 8 With moveable A-frame crest 3 feet high. 9 Operation discontinued August 1, 1951. Dam 8 3 1 s 7 8 8 10 5 5 13 85 16 47 88 63 46 00 93 93 76 02 10 Does not include $179,434 cost of old Lock and Dam 5. Transferred to State, December 1996. 11 Distance from mouth of Green River is 164.5 miles. Lock closed to navigation as the result of loss of pool at Green River Lock and Dam 4 on May 24, 1965. 12 Piles in old gravel dam completed in 1934. 13 Includes $729,269 for new large lock completed in 1934. 14At normal pool McAlpine Dam, Ohio River Elev. 421.8 Kentucky River datum (Elev. 420 Ohio River datum). 15Reconstruction completed by United States in 1882. 16Built by State of Kentucky. Cost given is for repairs by United States to Locks and Dams 1 through 5. Original construction costs to State were: L&D 1, $220,300; L&D 2, $151,983: L&D 3 $135,857; L&D 4, $131,607; and L&D 5, $137,436. 17Lock was closed to traffic and placed in caretaker status in September 1982. 24-31 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 2000 TABLE 24-I OHIO RIVER BASIN TOTAL COST OF BASIN PLAN (See Section 33 of Text) LOCAL PROTECTION Estimated Cost Type of Project and Status 1 Construction Federal Non-Federal2 Total Completed: Barnett Creek, KY (Rough River)3 4 Boone County, KY Brookport, IL' 6 Cannelton, IN' 7 Cincinnati, OH ' 8 Covington, KY s 9 Dayton, KY Delphi, IN (Wabash River) 1o0 England Pond Levee, IL (Wabash River) 11 Evansville, IN ' Frankfort, KY, North Frankfort (Kentucky River) ' Frankfort, KY (Kentucky River) South Frankfort Golconda, IL $ 12 Harrisburg, IL 10 Hawesville,KY s 13 Jackson, KY (Kentucky River) ' 8 Jeffersonville-Clarksville, IN 7 Lawrenceburg, IN' Louisville, KY 1 14 Mason J. Niblack Levee, IN (Wabash River) 4 s New Albany, IN "a New Harmony Bridge, IL & IN (Wabash River) Newport, KY ' 7 Paducah, KY S 7 Perryville, KY, Chapin River Reevesville, IL (Cache River) s 1 Rochester and McCleary's Bluff Levee, IL (Wabash River) " Rough River, KY 3 4 Southwest Jefferson County Sturgis, KY (Tradewater River) 11 Taylorsville, KY (Salt River) s 16 Tell City, IN s14 Uniontown, KY Vincennes, IN s 17 (Wabash River)(completed portion) West Terre Haute, IN (Wabash River) Active: Salyersville, KY Inactive: Hazard, KY Channel improvement Bank Protection Wall and levee Wall and levee Wall and barrier dam Wall and levee Wall and levee Levee Levee Wall and levee Wall and levee Wall Wall and levee Wall and levee Levee Cutoff channel Wall and levee Wall and levee Wall and levee Levee and pump plants Wall and levee Bank Protection Wall and levee Wall and levee Channel Improvement Levee Levee Channel improvement Wall and Levee Levee Levee Wall and levee Levee Wall and levee Levee Channel Improvement Channel Improvement 24-32 $ 144,000 392,443 '"597,493 2,068,391 10,150,935 7,862,937 13,117,345 144,563 734,498 43,906,502 2,960,970 8,373,540 565,333 870,015 969,318 130,952 4,226,361 2,473,689 25,005,137 4,337,617 5,375,471 297,624 7,512,987 4,761,551 823,700 600,300 1,079,236 654,000 60,077,183 1,826,778 378,050 932,229 1,070,926 3,308,941 1,095,704 9,348,600 $ 18,000 83,000 8,500 29,105 1,309,146 1,051,102 2,013,000 17,164 107,000 5,500,000 272,100 2,791,180 10,900 20,000 42,593 3,000 590,888 284,725 1,716,301 109,200 740,000 298,506 232,000 11,000 40,000 100,000 5,000 9,917,000 93,000 63,309 32,707 72,153 285,000 150,000 981,400 $ 162,000 475,443 605,993 2,097,496 11,460,081 8,914,039 15,130,345 161,727 841,498 49,406,502 3,233,070 11,164,720 36 576,233 890,015 1,011,911 133,952 4,817,249 2,758,414 26,721,438 4,446,817 6,115,471 297,624 7,811,493 4,993,551 834,700 640,300 1,179,236 659,000 69,994,183 1,919,778 441,359 964,936 1,143,079 3,593,941 1,245,704 10,330,000 TABLE 24-I CONTINUED LOUISVILLE, KY DISTRICT OHIO RIVER BASIN TOTAL COST OF BASIN PLAN (See Section 33 of Text) LOCAL PROTECTION Estimated Cost Type of Project and Status 1 Construction Federal Non-Federalz Total Deauthorized: Adams Levee, IN (Wabash River) 32 Alton, IN 30 Aurora, IN 31 Bellevue, KY 30 Bonpas Creek, IL (Wabash River) s 33 Bromley, KY 30 California (Cincinnati), OH 31 Carrollton, KY 30 Caseyville, KY 1 34 Cave-in-Rock, IL 30 Cincinnati, OH (Unit 2) 30 Cincinnati, OH (Unit 4) 30 Cleves, OH 30 Clinton, IN (Wabash River) 30 Cloverport, KY 34 Concordia, KY S 3 Deer Creek Prairie Levee, IN (Wabash River) 30 Derby, IN 30 Elizabethtown,L, 30 Fletcher and Sunshine Gardens Levee, IN (Wabash River) 30 Frankfort, KY (Kentucky River) Benson Creek ' Grandview, IN 30 Greenfield Bayou Levee, IN (Wabash River) '3 Honey Creek Levee, IN 30 Island Levee, IN (Wabash River) 35 Leavenworth, IN 30 Levee Unit 1, Eel River, IN 30 Levee Unit 1, Little Wabash River, IL 30 Levee Unit 1, White River, IN 30 Levee Unit 17, IN 30 Levee Unit 2, Eel River, IN 30 Levee Unit 2, Little Wabash River, IL 30 Levee Unit 2, White River, IN 30 Levee Unit 6, Wabash River, IL 30 Levee Unit 7, White River, IN 30 Lewisport, KY 5 3' Ludlow, KY 30 Madison, IN 30 Mauckport, IN 30 McGinnis Levee, IN (Wabash River) 30 Metropolis, IL ' 3' Milton, KY 30 Moscow, OH 30 New Amsterdam, IN 30 New Harmony Bridge, IL & IN (Wabash River) n New Harmony, IN (Wabash River) 30 Wilder, KY 3 Levee . Levee Wall and levee Wall and levee Channel Improvement Wall and levee Wall and levee Wall and levee Levee Levee Wall and levee Wall Levee Levee Wall and levee Levee Levee Wall and levee Wall and levee Levee Wall and Levee Levee Levee Levee Levee Wall and levee Levee Levee Levee Levee Levee Levee Levee Levee Levee Wall and levee Wall and levee Levee Levee Levee Wall and levee Wall Levee Levee Bank Protection Levee Wall and levee $ 292,000 255,000 4,300,000 1,570,000 1,080,000 1,250,000 1,750,000 2,220,000 396,000 661,000 16,800,000 14,900,000 1,240,000 77,000' 728,000 590,000 213,000 553,000 559,000 548,000 3,340,000 580,000 4,600,000 653,000 4,630,000 1,470,000 204,000 2,850,000 2,180,000 1,580,000 2,090,000 3,410,000 724,000 1,160,000 1,490,000 610,000 2,540,000 3,820,000 506,000 1,820,000 3,070,000 2,480,000 1,170,000 476,000 664,376 616,000 10,800,000 $ 14,000 40,000 1,190,000 400,000 630,000 925,000 720,000 97,000 35,000 125,000 2,900,000 621,000 67,000 9,000 193,000 55,000 10,000 67,000 153,000 26,000 1,150,000 133,000 1,087,000 32,000 528,000 266,000 40,000 164,000 116,000 118,000 715,000 136,000 73,000 56,000 88,000 243,000 745,000 360,000 105,000 104,000 431,000 41,000 372,000 13,000 99,000 25,000 959,000 $ 306,000 27 295,000 5,490,000 1,970,000 1,710,000 28 2,175,000 2,470,000 2,317,000 431,000 786,000 19,700,000 15,521,000 1,307,000 86,000 921,000 645,000 223,000 24 620,000 712,000 574,000 24 4,490,000 22 713,000 5,687,000 23 685,000 5,158,000 23 1,736,000 244,000 3,014,000 27 2,296,000 27 1,698,000 28 2,805,000 3,546,000 28 797,000 27 1,216,000 1,578,000 27 853,000 24 3,285,000 4,180,000 611,000 1,924,000 3,501,000 2,521,000 1,542,000 489,000 763,376 23 641,000 11,759,000 26 24-33 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 2000 'All projects are on an Ohio River unless otherwise noted. 2 Latest cost estimate revision 1954 unless otherwise noted. 3 Part of Rough River Reservoir and Channel Improvement Project, KY. 4 Details of this project are in individual report. s Also see "Other authorized flood control projects." 6 See Annual Report for 1958 for details. 7 See Annual Report for 1959 for details. See Annual Report for 1957 for details. 9 See Annual Report for 1965 for details. 10 See Annual Report for 1953 for details. 11 See Annual Report for 1972 for details. 12 See Annual Report for 1960 for details. 13 See Annual Report for 1955 for details. 14 See Annual Report for 1962 for details. 1s Substitute project for Belknap, Karnak, and Ullin, IL, complete. See Annual Report for 1954 for details. 16 See Annual Report for 1952 for details. '7 See Annual Report for 1956 for details. s1 Latest cost estimate revision 1988. 19 Latest cost estimate revision 1986. 20 Latest cost estimate revision 1984. 21 Latest cost estimate revision 1983. 22 Latest cost estimate revision 1976. 23 Latest cost estimate revision 1978. 24 Latest cost estimate revision 1960. 25 Latest cost estimate revision 1971. 26 Latest cost estimate revision 1977. 27 Latest cost estimate revision 1961. 28 Latest cost estimate revision 1973. 29 Latest cost estimate revision 1989. 30 Deauthorized Aug 05, 1977 under Section 12, Water Resources Development Act of 1971 (P.L. 93-251). 31 Deauthorized Nov 06, 1977 under Section 12, Water Resources Development Act of 1974 (P.L. 93-251). 32 Deauthorized Oct 03, 1978 under Section 12, Water Resources Development Act of 1974 (P.L. 93-251). 33 Deauthorized May 06, 1981 under Section 12, Water Resources Development Act of 1974 (P.L. 93-251). 34 Deauthorized Nov 17, 1986 under Section 12, Water Resources Development Act of 1974 (P.L. 93-251). 1 Deauthorized Jan 01, 1990 under Section 1001 (b)(1), Water Resources Development Act of 1986 (P.L. 99- 662). 37 Deauthorized Jul 19, 1992. 24-34 LOUISVILLE, KY DISTRICT TABLE 24-I CONTINUED OHIO RIVER BASIN TOTAL COST OF BASIN PLAN (See Section 33 of Text) RESERVOIRS Estimated Cost1 Tributary Basin Reservoirs Status Stream Federal Non-Federal Total Great Miami River: Brookville Lake, IN 2 Metamora Lake, IN Green River: Barren River Lake, KY 2 Green River Lake, KY 2 Mining City Lake, KY Nolin Lake, KY 2 Rough River Kentucky 2 Kentucky River: Booneville Lake, KY Buckhorn Lake, KY 2 Carr Fork Lake, KY 2 Eagle Creek Lake, KY Red River Lake, KY Licking River: Cave Run Lake, KY 2 Falmouth Lake, KY Little Miami River: Caesar Creek Lake, OH 2 William H. Harsha Lake, OH 2 Mill Creek: West Fork of Mill Creek Lake, OH 2 Wabash River: Cagles Mill Lake, IN 2 Cecil M. Harden Lake, IN 2 Monroe Lake, IN 2 Patoka Lake. IN2 Complete East Fork of Whitewater River $ 37,905,073 Deauthorized West Fork of Whitewater River 35,300,000 Complete Complete Inactive Complete Complete Inactive Complete Complete Inactive Inactive Barren River Green River Green River Nolin River Rough River 27,371,299 33,238,597 69,100,000 17,193,278 10,620,389 South Fork of Kentucky River 60,700,000 Middle Fork of Kentucky River 11,766,206 North Fork of Kentucky River Eagle Creek Red River Complete Licking River Deauthorized Licking River Complete Complete Complete Complete Complete Complete Complete 50,854,826 27,800,000 38,551,692 81,162,282 125,000,000 Caesar Creek 62,893,882 East Fork of Little Miami River West Fork of Mill Creek Mill Creek Raccoon Creek Salt Creek Patoka River 52,023,157 3,622,302 4,256,903 6,633,812 7,902,827 53.095.790 $ 7,497,492 3 $ 45,402,565 35,300,000 4 108,418 ' 27,479,717 223,73313 33,462,330 69,100,000 4 17,193,278 22,612 10,643,001 60,700,000 8 11,766,206 50,854,826 - 27,800,000 14 1,794,308 40,346,000 81,162,2827 125,000,000 8 5,037,000 9 67,930,882 3,485,840 9 55,508,997 1,100,161 0 4,722,463 113,094' 353,995 ' 8,667,947" 20,568,369 4,369,997 6,987,807 16,570,774 73,664,159 'Latest cost estimate revision 1989 unless otherwise noted. 2 Details of this project given in individual report. 3Cash contributions for water supply storage. 4 Latest cost estimate revision 1954. For Code 713 recreation development. 6 Latest cost estimate revision 1975. SIncludes $6,900,000 United States Forest Service cost. ' Latest cost estimate revision 1979. 'Reimbursement for water supply storage. to Includes $520,800 for non-Federal cost for sewer relocation and dam, $50,000 for contributed funds in fulfillment of project authorization, and $529,361 for Code 713 recreation development. 11 Includes $7,797,604 cash contribution for storage for lowflow regulation and $870,343 non-Federal contribution in kind for recreational facilities. 12 Includes $14,180,677 cash contribution for water supply storage, and $6,387,692 for initial recreation development. 13 For $183,732 Code 713 recreation development and $40,001 contributed funds. '4 Latest cost estimate 1974 24-35 _-, 7 _ _ - . 7 ., REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 2000 TABLE 24-J WABASH RIVER BASIN TOTAL COST OF BASIN PLAN (FLOOD CONTROL) (See Section 38 of Text) Type of Estimated Cost Construction Project or Stream Status Federal Non-Federal Total LOCAL PROTECTION Marion, IN Wall and Levee Inactive $ 3,900,000 $ 854,000 $ 4,754,000 2 RESERVOIRS Big Blue Lake, IN Big Blue River Deauthorized 87,200,000 53,836,000 * 141,036,000 4 Big Walnut Lake, IN Big Walnut Creek Inactive 81,800,000 45,069,000 3 126,869,000 4 Downeyville Lake, IN Flatrock and Little Flatrock Rivers Inactive 74,200,000 64,448,000 6 138,648,000 Helm Lake, IN Skillet Fork Deauthorized 25,171,000 14,829,000 ~ 40,000,000 8 Louisville Lake, IL Little Wabash River Deauthorized 113,000,000 14,435,000 9 127,435,000 10 Latest cost revision 1984 unless otherwise noted. interests for water supply, $8,749,000 reimbursable for 2 Latest cost estimate revision 1977. initial recreation facilities. 3 Includes $38,190,000 reimbursable by non-Federal 7 Includes $12,696,000 reimbursable by non-Federal interests for water supply and $15,656,000 reimbursable for initial interests for water supply and $2,133,000 reimbursable for initial recreation facilities. recreation facilities. 4 Latest cost estimate revision 1979. 8 Latest cost estimate revision 1975. s Includes $26,663,000 reimbursable by non-Federal 9Includes $8,402,000 reimbursable by non-Federal interests interests for water supply and $18,406,000 reimbursable for initial for water supply and $6,033,000 reimbursable for initial recreation facilities. . recreation facilities. 6Includes $53,084,000 reimbursable by non-Federal 10 Latest cost estimate revision 1982. TABLE 24-K INSPECTION OF COMPLETED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS (See Section 41 of Text) Date of Projects Inspection Local Protection Projects Brevoort Levee, IN Brookport, IL Cache River Levee, IL Cannelton, IN Cincinnati, OH Covington, KY Dayton, KY Delphi, IN England Pond Levee, IL Evansville, IN Frankfort, KY, North Frankfort Gill Township Levee, IN Golconda, IL Harrisburg, IL Hagerstown, IN Hawesville, KY Indianapolis, IN Jeffersonville-Clarksville, IN Lawrenceburg, IN Lebanon Junction, KY Sep 1999 Nov 1999 Aug 1999 Apr 2000 Jun 2000 Jun 2000 Jun 2000 Jul 2000 Sep 1999 Sep 1999 May 2000 Jul 2000 Aug 1999 Aug 1999 Jul 2000 Apr 2000 Jul 2000 May 2000 Aug 1999 May 2000 24-36 LOUISVILLE, KY, DISTRICT TABLE 24-K INSPECTION OF COMPLETED CONTINUED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS (See Section 40 of Text) Date of Projects Inspection Levee Unit No. 5, Wabash River, IN Aug 2000 Levee Unit No. 8, Wabash River, IN Sep 1999 Louisville, KY Jul 2000 Lyford Levee, IN Jul 2000 Mason J. Niblack Levee, IN Jul 2000 Mount Carmel, IL Aug 2000 Muncie, IN Jul 2000 New Albany, IN May 2000 Newport, KY Jun 2000 Paducah, KY Mar 1999 Perryville, KY May 2000 Reevesville, IL Aug 1999 Rochester-McClearys BluffLevee, IL Aug 2000 Rosiclare, IL Aug 1999 Shawneetown, IL Aug 1999 Southwestern Jefferson County, KY Jul 2000 Sturgis, KY May 2000 Taylorsville, KY Jun 1999 Tell City, IN Apr 2000 Terre Haute (Conover Levee), IN Jun 2000 Uniontown, KY May 2000 Vincennes, IN Jul 2000 West Terre Haute, IN Jul 2000 Channel Improvements Canoe Creek, Henderson, KY Aug 1998 Cypress Creek, McLean County, KY Sep 1998 Eel River, Brazil Waterworks, IN Oct 1999 English, IN (Little Blue River) Jun 1994 Grassy Creek, Jackson County, IN Sep 1995 HIarrodsburg, KY (Town Creek) Sep 1998 Indian Creek, Corydon, IN Aug 1998. Jackson, KY (North Fork Kentucky River) Sep 1998 Lancassange Creek, Clark Co, IN Jul 1999 Lick Creek, Hartford City (Blackford County), IN Nov 1999 Mill Creek, Jefferson County, KY Jul 1988 Muscatatuck River, Crothersville, IN Jul 1990 Neon-Fleming, KY (North Fork Kentucky River) Sep 1998 Nicholasville (Town Fork) Vicinity, KY Sep 1995 Panther Creek, Curdsville, KY Sep 1998 Plum Creek, Spencer County, KY Mar 1993 Portland, IN (Salamonie River) Nov 1999 Rough River, Hartford, Ohio County, KY Nov 1999 Salamonie River, Wells County, IN Nov 1999 Saline River and Tributaries, IL Jun 1998 Tripplett Creek, Morehead, KY Sep 1998 Troublesome Creek, Hindman, KY Sep 1998 Wabash River, Adams County, IN Nov 1999 Whitesburg, KY (North Fork Kentucky River) Aug 1998 Bank Revetments Crooked Creek, City Garage, Madison, IN Oct 1999 Crooked Creek, John Paul Park, Madison, IN Oct 1999 East Fork White River, Brownstown, (Jackson County), IN Jun 1993 Eighteen Mile Island, Oldham County, KY Jun 1993 24-37 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 2000 TABLE 24-K INSPECTION OF COMPLETED CONTINUED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS (See Section 40 of Text) Date of Projects Inspection Great Miami River, Ice Jam Flooding, Port Jefferson, OH Nov 1999 Great Miami River, Sidney, OH Aug 1995 Green River, Calhoun, KY (River Mile 63.6) Sep 1995 Green River, Calhoun, KY (River Mile 63.4) Sep 1998 Indian Creek, Burton Lane, Morgan County, IN Oct 1999 Licking River, Butler, KY Aug 1995 Lusk Creek, Golconda, IL Aug 1999 Little Miami River, Indian Hill, OH Nov 1999 Little Miami River, Milford, OH Apr 1995 Nameless Creek, Warren County, IN Jun 1995 Ohio River, Brandenburg, KY Jun 1993 Ohio River, Cloverport, KY Sep 1998 Ohio River, Daviess County, KY Sep 1998 Ohio River, Fort Massac State Park, IL Nov 1999 Ohio River, Hawesville, KY Sep 1998 Ohio River, Lewisport, KY Sep 1998 Ohio River, Madison, IN Oct 1999 Ohio River, Moscow, OH Jan 2000 Ohio River, Mount Vernon, IN May 1995 Ohio River, Newburgh, IN Aug 1998 Ohio River, Ohio Street, Evansville, IN Nov 1999 Ohio River, Otter Creek Park, KY Jun 1993 Ohio River, Owensboro, KY Sep 1998 Ohio River, Owensboro Riverport Authority, KY Feb 1995 Ohio River, Rabbit Hash, Boone County, KY Nov 1999 Ohio River, Rockport/Rockport Landing, IN Aug 1998 Ohio River, Sellersburg, IN Sep 1986 Ohio River, SR 66, Cannelton, IN Dec 1993 Ohio River, Troy, IN May 1995 Ohio River, Upper River Road, Jefferson County, KY Jul 1991 Ohio River, Vanderburg County, IN Aug 1998 Patoka River, Jasper, IN Oct 1993 Patoka River, Winslow, IN Jul 1995 South Fork of Wildcat Creek, County Road 7 East, Tippecanoe County, IN Apr 1995 Stoner Creek, North Middletown, KY Jul 1994 Wabash River, near Merom, IN Jun 1995 Wabash River, New Harmony, IN Aug 1998 Wabash River, Terre Haute STP Outfall Oct 1999 Wabash River, Vigo County, County Road 83 West Oct 1999 Wabash River, Vigo County, Little Road Oct 1999 White River, Morgan County, Blue Bluff Road, IN Oct 1999 White River, Petersburg (Pike County), IN Jul 1995 Whitewater River, Levee Road, near Brookville, IN Apr 1995 Wastewater Treatment Plant, Great Miami River, Ross, OH Apr 1995 24-38 LOUISVILLE, KY DISTRICT TABLE 24-L FLOOD CONTROL WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION (See Section 43 of Text) Fiscal Year Cost Federal Non-Fed Total Environmental Restoration (Section 1135) Caesar Creek Wetland/Prarie6 3,070 - 3,070 Coordination Accounting Fund8 15,228 - 15,228 Falls of Ohio, Wetlands & Fishery' 15,013 461 15,474 Green River Headwater' 4,160 - 4,160 Hovey Lake, IN 2 14,900 - 14,900 Howell Park, Evansville, IN s 6,894 - 6,894 Initial Appraisals 7 5,137 - 5,137 Monroe Lake Wetland & Fish Spawning Areas1 140,909 11,255 152,164 Mt. Etna/Mt. Hope Wetlands Salamonie Lake' 21,074 - 21,074 Wabash River, Greenfield Bayou, IN2 1,359 - 1,359 Flood Control (Section 205) Amberley Creek, Cincinnati, OH 2 125,145 5,429 130,574 Beech Fork, Bardstown, KY 4 115,154 188,378 303,532 Canoe Creek, Henderson, KY2 39,655 - 39,655 City Darn, Brevoort Levee, IN 4 453,106 238,117 691,223 Coordination Account8 24,795 - 24,795 Deshee River, Brevoort Levee, IN 4 47,047 96,886 143,933 Embarrass River, Lawrenceburg, 1L2 25,000 - 25,000 Embarrass River, Villa Grove, IL 2 17,718 - 17,718 Feather Creek, Clinton, IN 3 4,175 - 4,175 Flatrock River, Rushville, IN 4 635,385 336,341 971,726 Licking River Flood Warning System3 224,696 - 224,696 Muddy Creek, Lawrence Co. 6 132 - 132 N. Fork, KY River, Jackson, KY 4 238,211 -179,562 58,649 N. Fork Elkhorn Creek, Georgetown, KY 2 7,473 - 7,473 North Panther Creek, Daviess County, KY2 14,945 - 14,945 Ohio & Cumberland Rivers, Smithland, KY 2 72,066 - 72,066 Ohio River, Lewisport, KY" 31,928 - 31,928 Ohio River, Silver Grove, KY2 28,293 - 28,293 Pigeon Roost Creek6 36 - 36 Pipe Creek, Alexandria, IN' 94,221 - 94,221 Pleasant Creek, Greenwood, IN2 13,386 - 13,386 Red River, Stanton, KY2 26,113 - 26,113 Rolling Fork River, Lebanon Junction, KY 3 46,291 - 46,291 Sugar Creek, Bellbrook, OH ' 8,570 492 9,062 Town Branch, Nicholasville, KY2 31,519 - 31,519 Vaughn's Branch, Lexington, KY2 15,102 - 15,102 White River, Anderson, IN2 3,470 1,068 4,538 Whitewater River, Connersville, IN 2 11,217 - 11,217 Wolf Run & Parkers Mill Trib, Lex. 2 17,558 - 17,558 Emergency Bank Protection (Section 14) Big Vermillion River, Eugene Covered Br. 1 2,260 - 2,260 Coordination Account 15,832 - 15,832 Great Miami River, Cincinnati WTP, Fair ' 1,235 12,348 13,583 Mill Creek, Rd 550W, Park Co. ' 3,654 - 3,654 North Fork, Kentucky River, Vocational School ' 46,254 - 46,254 Ohio River, English Park, Owensboro, KY ' 5,871 - 5,871 Ohio River, National Historic Site ' 33,767 - 33,767 Ohio River, Perry County, IN ' 15,295 - 15,295 Whitewater River, Memorial Road, Fayette ' 140,400 69,117 209,517 24-39 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 2000 TABLE 24-L CONTINUED (See Section 42 of Text) FLOOD CONTROL WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION Fiscal Year Cost Federal Non-Fed Total Snagging & Clearing (Section 208) Rolling Fork River, Nelson & Larue Counties 1 21,031 - 21,031 Section 208 Coordination Account S 3,000 - 3,000 Aquatic Ecosystem Restoration (Section 206) Coordination Account Fund" 13,955 - 13,955 Green River/Tradewater River, KY 2 10,414 - 10,414 Log Creek Church Rd, Pike Co, IN2 20,552 - 20,552 Preliminary Restoration Funds 1 3,439 - 3,439 Wabash River, West Lafayette, IN 2 160 - 160 1 Planning and Design Analysis (PDA). 2 Feasibility Report. Plans and Specification. 4 Construction Funds Received or Construction Underway. Construction Completed. 6 Study Terminated. 1 Preliminary Restoration Plan. 8 Coordination Account 24-40 LOUISVILLE, KY DISTRICT TABLE 24-M GENERAL INVESTIGATIONS (See Sections 44, 45, 46 & 47 of Text) Fiscal Year Cost Projects Federal Non-Fed Total SURVEYS Navigation Studies Ohio River Mainstem, Uniontown, KY, IL, IN $ 2,862,376 - 2,862,376 Flood Damage Prevention Studies Banklick Creek, Kenton Co., KY 96,947 - 96,947 Frankfort, KY 1,854 - 1,854 Licking River Watershed, Butler, KY 2,778 - 2,778 Licking River Watershed, Cynthiana, KY 240,282 49,612 289,894 Licking River Watershed, Falmouth, KY 5,486 - 5,486 Licking River Watershed, North Fork, KY 63 - 63 Licking River Watershed, South Fork, KY 2,448 - 2,448 Metro Lexington 164 - 164 Mississinewa River, Marion, IL 90,558 - 90,558 Muncie, White River, IN 94,569 - 94,569 Ohio River & Trib Recon St. (Metro Louisville S.W.) 168,438 11,062 179,500 Ohio River, Southeastern, IL 1,553 - 1,553 Paducah, KY 7,481 - 7,481 Special Studies Great Miami River, Oxbow Area, OH 10,385 - 10,385 Metropolitan Louisville, Jefferson Co. 96,117 - 96,117 Tippecanoe River, Sedlm, IN 335 - 335 Review of Authorized Projects Green River L&D #6 176,897 - 176,897 Miscellaneous Activities Federal Energy Regulatory Commission 6,540 - 6,540 Intra-Agency Water Resources Development 40,098 - 40,098 Special Investigation, KY 76,655 - 76,655 PRECONSTRUCTION ENGINEERING AND DESIGN Navigation Project - Lock and Dams John T. Myers Locks and Dam 440,856 - 440,856 Ohio River Greenway, In 110,659 - 110,659 Flood Control Projects - Local Protection Metro Indianapolis, Indianapolis North, IN 6,485 - 6,485 Metropolitan Louisville, Beargrass Creek, KY 80,608 2,922 83,530 Wabash River, New Harmony, IN 18,167 7,723 25,890 24-41 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 2000 TABLE 24-M GENERAL INVESTIGATIONS CONTINUED (See Sections 44, 45, 46 & 47 of Text) Fiscal Year Cost Projects Federal Non-Fed Total COORDINATION WITH OTHER AGENCIES Coordination with other Agencies and Non-Federal Interest Coop w/other Water Agencies 19,862 - 19,862 Planning Assistance to States PAS-KY-Jefferson County 49,124 51,999 101,123 PAS Negotiation Funds 2,970 - 2,970 COLLECTION AND STUDY OF BASIC DATA Flood Plain Management Services Flood Plain Management Services 29,814 - 29,814 Harrisburg, IL 10,102 - 10,102 HEC-WEAP Workshop, MI 17,441 - 17,441 Newburgh, IN 6,609 - 6,609 Quick Responses 4,065 - 4,065 SS-Scott County, IN 1,166 - 1,166 SS-Winchester, KY 3,082 - 3,082 Technical Service, General 44,511 - 44,511 Hydrologic Studies Hydrologic Studies 3,328 - 3,328 24-42 HUNTINGTON, WV, DISTRICT* All cost and financial statements for projects are listed at the end of this chapter. All other tables are referenced in the text and also appear at the end of this chapter. The Huntington District includes central and south-eastern Ohio, all of West Virginia except the northern panhandle and northeastern portion, the eastern portion of Kentucky, a portion of midwestern Virginia, a very small portion of northwestern North Carolina, embraced in the drainage basin of the Ohio River and its tributaries from approximate river mile 127 (below Pittsburgh, PA) to approximate river mile 438, immediately upstream from Foster, KY. The drainage area of the Huntington District is approximately 44,914 square miles. Improvements Page 1. Construction of Locks and Dams on Ohio River .................................................... 25-2 2. Kanawha River, WV ................................ 25-2 3. Open Channel Work, Ohio River ...................... 25-3 4. Other Authorized Navigation Projects...............25-3 Flood Control 5. Alum Creek Lake, OH........................................25-3 6. Beech Fork Lake, WV ..................................... 25-3 7. Bluestone Lake, WV ........................................ 25-3 8. Burnsville Lake, WV.......................................25-4 9. Deer Creek Lake, OH ........................................ 25-4 10. Delaware Lake, OH ..................... ....... 25-4 11. Dewey Lake, KY ............................................ 25-5 12. Dillon Lake, OH .............................................. 25-5 13. East Lynn Lake, WV ...................................... 25-6 14. Fishtrap Lake, KY .......................................... 25-6 15. Grayson Lake, KY..........................................25-6 16. John W. Flannagan Dam and Reservoir, VA .......................................... 25-6 17. Levisa and Tug Forks of the Big Sandy and Cumberland Rivers, KY, WV and VA .............. 25-7 18. M assillon, OH ................................................... 25-7 19. Muskingum River Lakes, OH...........................25-8 20. Newark, OH .................. ............ ..................... 25-8 21. North Branch of Kokosing River Lake, OH.......25-8 22. North Fork of Pound River Lake, VA .............. 25-9 23. Ohio River Basin (Huntington District) ............. 25-9 24. Paint Creek Lake, OH.................................25-10 25. Paintsville Lake, KY ................................... 25-10 26. R.D. Bailey Lake, WV .................................. 25-10 27. Roseville, OH ............................................... 25-11 28. Southern West Virginia .................................. 25-11 29. Summersville Lake, WV ................................ 25-11 30. Sutton Lake, W V ........................................ 25-11 31. Tom Jenkins Dam, OH.....................................25-12 32. West Columbus, OH............................... 25-12 33. Yatesville Lake, KY .................................... 25-12 34. Inspection of Completed Flood Control Projects.....................25-13 35. Flood Control Work Under Special Authorization ...................................... 25-13 General Investigations 35. Surveys ...................................... ..... 25-14 Tables Table 25-A Cost & Financial Statement..................25-15 Table 25-B Authorization Legislation ..................... 25-22 Table 25-C Other Authorized Navigation Projects ................................ 25-26 Table 25-D Not Applicable Table 25-E Other Authorized Flood Control Projects............................. ... 25-27 Table 25-F Not Applicable Table 25-G Deauthorized Projects .......................... 25-28 Table 25-H Inspection of Flood Control Projects....25-30 25-1 Navigation Page REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 2000 NAVIGATION 1. CONSTRUCTION OF LOCKS AND DAMS ON THE OHIO RIVER See this heading under Chapter 19 - Ohio River. 2. KANAWHA RIVER, WV Location. The Kanawha River is approximately 97 miles in length and is formed by the junction of the New and Gauley Rivers, a short distance above Kanawha Falls, WV, and flows generally northwesterly to the confluence with the Ohio River at Point Pleasant, WV. Previous projects. For details of previous projects see the Annual Reports for 1875, 1915 and 1938. Existing project. The existing project consists of three navigation structures on the Kanawha River. London Locks and Dam are located approximately 83 miles above the mouth of the Kanawha River and approximately two miles downstream from Montgomery, WV. Marmet Locks and Dam are located approximately 68 miles above the mouth of the Kanawha River at Marmet, WV. Winfield Locks and Dam are located approximately 31 miles above the mouth of the Kanawha River at Winfield, WV. Each structure has twin locks with usable dimensions of 56 feet by 360 feet. Another structure, Robert C. Byrd Locks and Dam, is located on the Ohio River at approximate river mile 279 and approximately nine miles below Gallipolis, OH. This structure has two parallel locks, the main lock is 110 feet by 1,200 feet. The existing project was completed at a cost of $27,853,699. Construction was initiated in 1931 and completed in 1937. This system of locks and dams provides a navigable depth of nine feet from the mouth of the Kanawha River to a point approximately 91 miles upstream. For further cost details see Table 17-B, see also, Appendix C. Public Law 99-88 authorized the initiation of Engineering and Design and Real Estate Acquisition for Winfield Locks and Dam Replacement. Feasibility studies for modernization have been completed. The plan includes construction of an additional lock chamber (800'xl10') adjacent to the existing locks and continued use of the riverward lock chamber and the navigation dam. The contract for Lock Replacement - Phase I was awarded in April 1990 and is complete. The contract for Construction of Additional Lock and Gate Bay, Phase IIA, was awarded in May 1993 and is complete. The contract for lock replacement, Phase IIB, was awarded in January 1994 and is complete. The full funding estimate for new work is $227,500,000, which is 50 percent Federal cost and 50 percent Inland Water Ways Trust Fund cost. Public Law 104-303 authorized construction of a new lock chamber at Marmet Locks and Dam. The plan includes construction of a new lock chamber (800'x110') on the right descending bank landward of the existing locks and the continued use of the current ,,twin 360'x56' chambers and the navigation dam. Feasibility studies for modernization are complete. Pre-construction engineering and design work is complete. Real estate acquisition activities were begun in FY 1998. The full funding estimate for new work is $313,000,000, which is 50% Federal cost and 50% Inland Waterways Trust Fund cost. Major rehabilitation work has been initiated at London Locks and Dam. The plan for rehabilitation includes lengthening the river lock chamber by moving existing upper miter gates, reinstalling them upstream at the emergency dam sill, but within the confines of existing lock walls, and replacing the upper guard wall. In FY 2000, sheet piling was purchased, fabrication of needle dam and sill was initiated and design was continuing for the second phase. The full funding estimate for major rehabilitation is $22,200,000, which is 50% Federal cost and 50% Inland Waterways Trust Fund cost. In addition to the navigation structures on the Kanawha River, the Corps of Engineers participated with the City of Charleston in construction of a riverfront park on the right descending bank near downtown Charleston. The total cost of the project was $8,755,242. The federal share was $4,370,121 and the non-federal share was $4,385,121. The additional $15,000 in the non-federal share was for betterments paid for by the City of Charleston. The project was completed in January 1999. Local cooperation. All requirements for local cooperation have been completed. Terminal facilities. There are 100 terminals along the Kanawha River located from the mouth of the river to 30 miles east of Charleston, WV. These terminals are constructed principally of steel and wood mooring piles and steel pile mooring cells. Eighteen of these terminals have railroad connections. Five terminals are paved wharves and one is owned by the City of Charleston, WV. The remaining terminals are privately owned. The principal commodities handled are coal, chemicals, acids, cement, gasoline and oil, and sand and gravel. For further details see the 1962 Annual Report. 25-2 HUNTINGTON, WV, DISTRICT Operations during the fiscal year. The Locks and Dams were operated as required and necessary repairs and improvements were made to the locks and dams as well as to the appurtenant structures and grounds. Channel inspections were conducted periodically. There was no dredging by hired labor or contract on the Kanawha River in FY 00. 3. OPEN CHANNEL WORK, OHIO RIVER See this heading under Chapter 19 - Ohio River. 4. OTHER AUTHORIZED NAVIGATION PROJECTS See Table 25-C. FLOOD CONTROL 5. ALUM CREEK LAKE, OH Location. The damsite is located in Delaware County, OH, on Alum Creek, a tributary of Big Walnut Creek, approximately 26 miles above the mouth of Alum Creek and 15 miles north of Columbus, OH, and approximately 157 miles above the mouth of the Scioto River. Existing project. The existing project consists of a rolled earthfill dam 93 feet in height and 10,000 feet in length with a gate controlled spillway located in the right abutment. The reservoir provides a total storage of 134,800 acre-feet and controls a drainage area of approximately 123 square miles. See also Appendix A. Construction of the dam and appurtenant works was initiated in August 1970 and completed in July 1974. The 405 tracts of land required for the project have been acquired. The Federal cost of the project was $56,267,422. The Sponsor will reimburse the Government an estimated $27,880,000, exclusive of interest, for cost allocated to water supply. Local cooperation. For details of required local cooperation see the 1981 Annual Report. Operations and Maintenance. The entire project is complete. The project was operated for the benefit of flood control as required, and necessary repairs were made to the structure and appurtenances. During the fiscal year the project prevented flood damages estimated to be $1,202,000. To date, the project has prevented an estimated $76,378,000 in flood damages. 6. BEECH FORK LAKE, WV Location. The damsite is located in Wayne County, WV, on Beech Fork Creek, a tributary of Twelvepole Creek, approximately four miles above the mouth of Beech Fork Creek and 20 miles above the confluence of Twelvepole Creek and the Ohio River. Existing project. The existing project consists of a rolled earth-fill dam 86 feet in height and 1,080 feet in length, an uncontrolled spillway landward of the left abutment of the dam with a control structure at the upstream end. The reservoir provides a total storage of 37,540 acre-feet and controls a drainage area of approximately 78 square miles. Construction of the dam was initiated in December 1972 and completed in February 1977. See also Appendix A. A total of 485 tracts of land were acquired for the project. The total cost of the project was $41,987,500. Local cooperation. None required. Operations and maintenance. The entire project is complete. The project was operated for flood control as required and necessary repairs were made to the structure and appurtenances. During the fiscal year the project prevented flood damages estimated to be $18,000. To date the project has prevented an estimated $17,559,000 in flood damages. 7. BLUESTONE LAKE, WV Location. The damsite is located on the New River in Summers County, WV, approximately three miles above Hinton, WV, and one mile from the confluence of the New and Greenbrier Rivers. The reservoir is located in Summers County, WV, and Giles County, VA. Existing project. The existing project consists of a concrete gravity dam 180 feet in height and 2,048 feet in length. Appurtenant structures consist of a gated spillway 790 feet in length located in the channel section of the dam. The stilling pool is formed by a 23-foot-high weir located 364 feet downstream of 16 gated sluices through the spillway section and discharging into the stilling pool. Penstocks were installed at the time of construction to permit the future installation of hydropower. The 25-3 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY' 2000 reservoir provides for a total storage of 631,000 acrefeet. See also Appendix A. Construction of the dam was initiated in January 1942 and completed in April 1952. A total of 338 tracts of land were acquired for the project. The Federal cost of the project was $29,458,652, which includes expenditures under the recreation at completed projects program. For further details see the 1939 and 1962 Annual Reports. In FY 2000 Dam Safety Assurance activities were initiated at Bluestone Dam. Modifications include increasing the height of the dam 13 feet; installing 309 anchors and thrust blocks; constructing gate closures across State Route 20; modifying penstocks to supplement discharge capacity; and relocating electrical lines. Dam safety assurance activities at Bluestone Dam are about 9% complete. The full funding estimate for this work is $107,300,000 (full Federal expense). Local cooperation. None required. Operations during the fiscal year. Operations and Maintenance. The entire project is complete. The reservoir was operated for flood control as required and necessary repairs were made to the structure and appurtenances. During the fiscal year the project prevented flood damages estimated to be $60,000. To date, the project has prevented an estimated $1,594,026,000 in flood damages. 8. BURNSVILLE LAKE, WV Location. The damsite is located in Braxton County, WV, on the Little Kanawha River, approximately two miles above Burnsville, WV, and 124 miles above the confluence of the Little Kanawha River and the Ohio River. Existing project. The existing project consists of an earth embankment dam 80 feet in height and 1,000 feet in length with a gated spillway in the left abutment. The outlet works is an integral part of the spillway, consisting of five sluice gates and one low flow sluice. The reservoir provides for a total storage of 65,400 acre-feet and controls a drainage area of approximately 165 square miles. Construction of the dam was initiated in June 1973 and completed in February 1976. See also Appendix A. The 357 tracts of land required for the project have been acquired. The Federal cost of the project to date has been $57,166,839. Local cooperation. None required. Operations during the fiscal year. The project is completed. The project was operated for flood control as required and necessary repairs were made to the structure and appurtenances. During the fiscal year the project prevented flood damages estimated to be $15,542,000. To date, the project has prevented an estimated $93,764,000 in flood damage. 9. DEER CREEK LAKE, OH Location. The damsite is located in Pickaway County, approximately seven miles south of Mount Sterling, OH, on Deer Creek, a tributary of the Scioto "River, approximately 21 miles above the mouth of Deer Creek and approximately 106 miles above the mouth of the Scioto River. Existing project. The existing project consists of a rolled earth-filled dam 93 feet in height and 3,880 feet in length, a 741-foot concrete gravity channel section controlled by three tainter gates, an outlet works consisting of five gated sluices through a concrete spillway section discharging into a stilling basin and an earth dike 15 feet by 4,600 feet in a saddle located approximately four miles southwest of the damsite. The reservoir provides a total storage of 102,540 acre-feet and controls a drainage area of approximately 278 square miles. Construction of the dam was completed in May 1968. The 138 tracts of land required for the project have been acquired. For further project details see the 1965 Annual Report. See also Appendix A. The Federal cost of the project is $20,406,545, including expenditures under the recreation at completed projects program. Local cooperation. For details of required local cooperation see the 1981 Annual Report. Operations during the fiscal year. Operations and Maintenance. All construction work is complete. The reservoir was operated for flood control as required and necessary repairs were made to the structure and appurtenances. The project prevented an estimated $1,771,000 in flood damages during the fiscal year. To date, the project has prevented an estimated $32,990,000 in flood damages. 10. DELAWARE LAKE, OH Location. The damsite is located on the Olentangy River, approximately six miles above and north of Delaware, OH, and approximately 32 miles above the confluence of the Olentangy and Scioto Rivers at Columbus, OH. The reservoir is located in Delaware, Marion and Morrow Counties, OH. 25-4 HUNTINGTON, WV, DISTRICT Existing project. The existing project consists of a rolled earth-fill dam with a gate controlled ogee type spillway and five outlet conduits in the channel. The dam is 18,600 feet in length and 92 feet in height. The project provides for storage of 132,800 acre-feet and controls a drainage area of approximately 381 square miles. Construction of the dam was initiated in April 1946 and completed in July 1948. For further details see the 1962 Annual Report. See also Appendix A. Total .real estate requirements of 7,703 acres of fee acquisition and 2,428 acres of flowage easements have been completed. The Federal cost for the project was $7,631,821. Local cooperation. None required. Operations during the fiscal year. Operations and Maintenance. All construction work is complete. The reservoir was operated for the benefit of flood control as required, and necessary repairs were made to the structure and appurtenances. The project prevented an estimated $1,215,000 in flood damages during the fiscal year. To date, the project has prevented an estimated $89,753,000 in flood damages. 11. DEWEY LAKE, KY Location. The damsite is located on Johns Creek, approximately seven miles southeast of Paintsville, KY, and approximately six miles above the confluence of Johns Creek and the Levisa Fork of the Big Sandy River. Existing project. The existing project consists of an earthfill dam 118 feet in height and 913 feet in length, a controlled outlet works discharging through a channel excavated in the left abutment, and a rolled earth-fill dike blocking a low divide to Brandykeg Creek and the Levisa Fork. The reservoir provides a total storage of 93,300 acre-feet and controls a drainage area of approximately 207 square miles. Construction of the dam was initiated in March 1946 and completed in July 1949. For further project detail see the 1965 Annual Report. See also Appendix A. Total real estate requirements for the project were 12,458 acres in fee and 1,170 acres in flowage easements. The Federal cost of the project was $7,845,547, including expenditures for recreation under the completed project program. Dam Safety Assurance activities are underway at Dewey Dam. Modifications include raising Brandykeg Dike approximately 3 feet with compacted earth; adding an auxiliary spillway with a crest elevation of 688.0; and providing vertical walls on the existing spillway to restrict discharge to design capacity. Dam safety assurance activities at Dewey Dam are about 65% complete. The full funding estimate for this work is $13,700,000 (full Federal expense). Local cooperation. None required. Operations during the fiscal year. Operations and Maintenance. All construction activities are complete. The reservoir was operated for the benefit of flood control as required and necessary repairs were made to the structure and appurtenances. During the fiscal year the project prevented flood damages estimated to be $9,000. To date, the project has prevented an estimated $61,808,000 in flood damages. 12. DILLON LAKE, OH Location. The damsite is located on the Licking River, approximately six miles above the confluence of the Licking and Muskingum Rivers at Zanesville, Ohio. Existing project. The existing project consists of a rolled earth-fill dam 118 feet in height and 1,400 feet in length, a controlled outlet works discharging through a 20-foot conduit in the right abutment, and an ungated 280-foot spillway adjacent to the left abutment of the dam, and two rolled earthfill dikes. The reservoir provides for a total storage of 261,110 acre-feet and controls a drainage area of approximately 748 square miles. Construction of the dam was completed in July 1959. For further project details see the 1962 Annual Report. See also Appendix A. Total real estate required for the project consists of 8,232 acres in fee and 5,380 acres of flowage easements. See also Appendix A. Federal cost of the project was $30,218,135. Local cooperation. None required. Operations during the fiscal year. Operations and Maintenance. All construction work is complete. The project was operated as required for flood control, and necessary repairs were made to the structure and appurtenances. During the fiscal year the project prevented flood damages estimated to be $1,643,000. To date, the project has prevented an estimated $287,961,000 in flood damages. 25-5 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 2000 13. EAST LYNN LAKE, WV Location. The damsite is located in Wayne County, WV, approximately six miles southeast of Wayne, WV, 10 miles above the mouth of East Fork and 42 miles above the confluence of Twelvepole Creek and the Ohio River. Existing project. The existing project consists of an earth-fill dam 113 feet in height and 638 feet in length, an uncontrolled spillway near the left abutment of the dam, and a 13-foot reinforced concrete tunnel in the right abutment with a control structure at the upstream end. The reservoir provides for a total storage of 82,500 acre-feet and controls a drainage area of approximately 133 square miles. The required 552 tracts of land have been acquired. See also Appendix A. The Federal cost of the project was $85,872,963. Local cooperation. None required. Operations during the fiscal year. Operations and Maintenance. All construction work is complete. The project was operated for flood control as required and necessary repairs were made to the structure and appurtenances. During the fiscal year the project prevented flood damage estimated to be $55,000. To date, the project has prevented an estimated $63,304,000 in flood damages. 14. FISHTRAP LAKE, KY Location. The damsite is located in Pike County, KY, on the Levisa Fork of the Big Sandy River, approximately 15 miles upstream from Pikeville, KY, approximately three miles above the confluence of Levisa and Russell Forks and 103 miles above the mouth of the Levisa Fork. Existing project. The existing project consists of a rock-fill dam 195 feet in height and 1,100 feet in length, a controlled spillway containing four tainter gates located in the valley wall adjacent to the left abutment of the dam, the outlet works consists of an intake structure with three conduits controlled by slide gates and discharging into a horseshoe shaped tunnel. The reservoir provides for a total storage of 164,360 acre-feet and controls a drainage area of approximately 395 square miles. The dam was completed in February 1969. The 1,301 tracts of land required for the project have been acquired. See also Appendix A. The Federal costs for the project was $54,754,126, which includes expenditures under the recreation at completed projects program. Local cooperation. None required. Operations during the fiscal year. Operations and Maintenance. All construction work is complete. The project was operated for flood control as required, and necessary repairs were made to the structure and appurtenances. During the fiscal year the project prevented flood damages estimated to be $23,000. To date, the project has prevented an estimated $290,814,000 in flood damages. 15. GRAYSON LAKE, KY Location. The damsite is located in Carter County, KY, on the Little Sandy River approximately 49 miles above the confluence with the Ohio River, and 11 miles upstream from Grayson, KY. Existing project. The existing project consists of a random earthfill dam 120 feet in height and 1,460 feet in length, a controlled outlet works discharging though a 14-foot spillway beyond the left abutment. The reservoir provides for a total storage of 119,000 acre-feet and controls a drainage area of approximately 196 square miles. The dam was completed in January 1968. The 484 tracts of land required for the project have been acquired. See also Appendix A. Federal costs for the project was $19,162,741, which includes expenditures for recreation facilities under the completed projects program. Local cooperation. None required. Operations during the fiscal year. Operations and Maintenance. All construction work is complete. The reservoir was operated for flood control as required and necessary repairs were made to the structure and appurtenances. During the fiscal year the project prevented flood damages estimated to be $1,707,000. To date, the project has prevented an estimated $79,036,000 in flood damages. 16. JOHN W. FLANNAGAN DAM AND RESERVOIR, VA Location. The damsite is located in Dickenson County, VA, approximately four miles northwest of Haysi, VA, on the Pound River approximately two miles above the confluence of the Pound River and Russell Fork and approximately 150 miles above the mouth of the Big Sandy River. Existing project. The existing project consists of a rock-fill dam 252 feet in height and 970 feet in 25-6 HUNTINGTON, WV, DISTRICT length, an outlet tunnel located near the left abutment of the dam with a control structure at the upstream end, a spillway controlled by six tainter gates located in a saddle just upstream from the damsite. The reservoir provides for a total storage of 145,700 acrefeet and controls a drainage area of approximately 222 square miles. The project was modified to include water quality control by adding control gates to the previously uncontrolled spillway, which increased the total storage capacity by 39,000 acrefeet. The dam was completed in December 1963. The 382 tracts of land required for the project have been acquired. See also Appendix A. The Federal cost for the project was $20,444,383, which includes expenditures for recreation under the completed projects program. Local cooperation. None required. Operations during the fiscal year. Operations and Maintenance. All construction work is complete. The project was operated for flood control as required and necessary repairs were made to the structure and appurtenances. During the fiscal year the project prevented flood damages estimated to be $9,000. To date, the project has prevented an estimated $155,590,000 in flood damages. 17. LEVISA AND TUG FORKS OF THE BIG SANDY AND CUMBERLAND RIVERS, WV, VA, AND KY Location. The Levisa and Tug Forks form the Big Sandy River at Louisa, KY. The Cumberland portion is the Upper Cumberland River Basin above Cumberland Falls, KY. The basin is approximately 100 miles in length and averages approximately 30 miles in width in the lower portion and approximately 10 miles in width above Harlan, KY. The Big Sandy Basin is within the Huntington District, and the Cumberland Basin is within the Nashville District. This report covers that portion of the project located in the Huntington District. Existing project. The authorization language directs the Corps of Engineers to design and construct, at full Federal expense, such flood control measures as are determined to be necessary and advisable for the communities in the Tug and Levisa Forks and Upper Cumberland River basins. The authorization further states that such flood control measures would be located at or in the vicinity of Pikeville, KY, and Grundy, VA, on the Levisa Fork; Pineville, KY, on the Cumberland River; and Williamson and Matewan on the Tug Fork, in order to afford the named communities and other flood damaged locations and their immediate environs a level of protection against flooding at least sufficient to prevent any future losses from the likelihood of flooding such as occurred in April 1977. The full funding estimate for the project is $1,838,691,000, which includes $105,479,000 non-Federal contributions. Local cooperation. None required. Operations during the fiscal year. Additional engineering studies are now underway to determine what is necessary and advisable to address the flooding problems in both the Levisa Fork Basin and in the Tug Fork tributary stream areas. The contract for construction of the Pump Station at West Williamson, WV, was awarded in April 1983 and is complete. The contract for construction of the floodwall at West Williamson, WV, was awarded in July 1986 and is complete. The contract for the Williamson Area" Snagging and Clearing was awarded in September 1987 and is complete. The contract for the Williamson Housing Development, Valley View Site, was awarded in September 1987 and is complete. The contract for the Floodwall and Pump Stations for the Williamson Central Business District was awarded in June 1988 and is complete. The contract for South Williamson Housing Development, Pond Creek Site, awarded in September 1990 is complete. The contract for Replacement Cafeteria, South Williamson, awarded in June 1991 is complete. The contract for Construction of Local Protection Project, South Williamson, Kentucky, awarded in December 1991 is complete. The contract for Construction of Local Protection Project, Matewan, West Virginia, awarded in August 1992 is complete. The contract for construction of Magnolia High School Ring Wall Levee awarded in March 1996 is complete. The contract for the relocation of the Kermit Town Hall and Fire Station, awarded in July 1999, is complete. The contract for diversion of sewer lines at South Williamson, KY, awarded in August 1999, is 99% complete. 18. MASSILLON, OHi Location. The project is located in Stark County, on the Tuscarawas River, approximately 200 miles above the mouth of the Muskingum River. 25-7 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF TElE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 2000 Existing project. The existing project consists of channel improvement to the Tuscarawas River, combined with the construction of drainage facilities, levees and pump stations. For further details see the 1962 Annual Report. Construction was initiated in July 1940 and completed in October 1951. Local cooperation. None required. See the 1962 Annual Report for details of local contribution of work beyond the scope of the project. To date, the system has prevented an estimated $5,711,000 in flood damages. Operations during the fiscal year. Routine inspections were conducted to determine that the improved channel was maintained in satisfactory condition. 19. MUSKINGUM RIVER LAKES, OH Location. The Muskingum River lies in Southeast Ohio and including tributaries, drains approximately 8,000 square miles. The headwaters rise about 25 miles south of Lake Erie and flow into the Ohio River at Marietta, OH, 172 miles below Pittsburgh, PA. Existing project. The existing project consists of the construction and operations and maintenance of 14 reservoirs and appurtenant works in the Muskingum River Basin. The existing project originally authorized by the Public Works Administration in February 1934. Construction of the system was initiated in January 1935 and completed in November 1938. The system was initially operated and maintained by the Muskingum Watershed Conservancy District of Ohio, the sponsoring agency, from July 1938 to August 1939 when operation and maintenance became the responsibility of the Corps of Engineers in accordance with the provisions of the 1939 Flood Control Act. For further project details, see the 1962 Annual Report. See also Appendix A. The cost of the project was $41,247,815, which includes expenditures for recreation facilities under the completed project program. A significant Major Rehabilitation program was approved in December 1977 in order to assure the integrity of the existing 14 structures under the originally designed maximum pool conditions. Underseepage and abutment seepage problems are being corrected through the installation of downstream blankets, toe drains and/or relief wells and grouting. A related but separate program entitled Dam Safety Assurance has been initiated. Under current hydrologic design standards, deficiencies exist in the spillways at the 14 projects in the system. Corrective measures include widening present spillways, constructing new spillways and installing parapet walls on top of the dams have been completed at 7 projects. Seven remaining projects with deficiencies need corrective measures. New seismic criteria will require all dams to be evaluated for seismic deficiencies. If deficiencies are found, corrective measures will be required. Dam Safety Assurance activities are underway at Beach City Lake. Modifications include upgrading spillway ,adequacy including raising the dam and dike, constructing a parapet wall, raising roadways, and modifying a railroad stoplog closure. Dam safety assurance activities at Beach City Dam are about 75% complete. The full funding estimate for this work is $26,590,000, which includes $8,000,000 from the non-Federal sponsor, the Muskingum Watershed Conservancy District. Local cooperation. All requirements for local cooperation have been met. For further details see the 1942 Annual Report. Operations during the fiscal year. New Work: The Dam Safety Assurance program was initiated during FY 1982. Thus far ten contracts have been awarded and the Dam Safety Assurance program is 50% complete. Operations and Maintenance. The reservoirs were operated for flood control as required, and the necessary repairs were made to the structures and appurtenances. The system prevented an estimated $25,943,000 in flood damages during the fiscal year. To date, the system has prevented an estimated $2,163,022,000 in flood damages. 20. NEWARK, OH Location. The project is located in Licking County at the junction of the North and South Forks of the Licking River, approximately 29 miles above the confluence with the Muskingum River at Zanesville, OH. Existing project. For details of the existing project see the 1981 Annual Report. Construction of the existing project was initiated in July 1940 and completed in November 1941. As a result of the 1968 Flood Control Act the existing project was modified to include improvement of the interior drainage facilities, construction of Log Pond Run diversion channel and modification of the North Fork Channel. Construction of the Log Pond Run diversion channel was awarded in September 1980 25-8 HUNTINGTON, WV, DISTRICT and completed in December 1981. The total cost of the project to date is $11,151,232. Local cooperation. For details of required and completed local cooperation see the 1981 Annual Report. Operations during the fiscal year. New Work: North Fork Channel - As a result of withdrawal of State support for the Utica Lake project (now inactive) and the interdependency of the operation of Utica with the North Fork Channel, the North Fork Channel portion of the project required re-formulation. A reanalysis is complete. Engineering studies continued. The contract for construction of North Fork Channel (Phase I) was awarded in September 1986 and is complete. The contract for construction of the remaining portion of North Fork Channel was awarded in February 1988 is complete. The contract for Remedial Treatment for Erosion was awarded in September 1991 and is complete. Operations and Maintenance: Routine inspections were conducted to determine that the improved channel was maintained in satisfactory condition. To date, the project has prevented an estimated $3,299,000 in flood damages. 21. NORTH BRANCH OF KOKOSING RIVER LAKE, OH Location. The damsite is located in Knox County, OH, on the North Branch of Kokosing River, approximately nine miles above the confluence of the Kokosing and North Branch Rivers, and two miles northwest of Fredericktown, OH. Existing project. The existing project consists of a rolled-earth dam, 70 feet in height and 1,400 feet in length with an uncontrolled spillway adjacent to the right abutment, and an uncontrolled, reinforced concrete outlet work located in the right abutment of the dam. The reservoir provides for a total storage of 14,885 acre-feet and controls a drainage area of approximately 45 square miles. The 56 tracts of land required for the project have been acquired. Construction of the dam was completed in May 1972. See also Appendix A. The Federal cost for the project was $6,665,985, which includes expenditures under the recreation at completed projects program. Operations during the fiscal year. Operations and Maintenance. All construction work is complete. The reservoir was operated for flood control as required and the necessary repairs were made to the structure and appurtenances. 22. NORTH FORK OF POUND RIVER LAKE, VA Location. The damsite is located in Wise County, VA, on the North Fork of Pound River, approximately one mile upstream from the confluence of the North and South Forks which form the Pound River and approximately three miles upstream from Pound, VA. Existing project. The existing project consists of a rockfill dam, 130 feet in height and 600 feet in length, an uncontrolled spillway in a saddle upstream from the dam, and an outlet tunnel in the right abutment with a control structure at the upstream end. The reservoir provides a total storage of 11,300 acrefeet and controls a drainage area of approximately 17 square miles. The 127 tracts of land required for the project have been acquired. Construction of the dam was completed in January 1966. See also Appendix A. The Federal cost for the project was $6,186,901, which includes expenditures for recreation under the completed projects program. Local cooperation. None required. Operations during the fiscal year. Operations and Maintenance. All construction is complete. The project was operated as required for flood control and the necessary repairs were made to the structure and appurtenances. To date, the project has prevented an estimated $5,493,000 in flood damages. 23. OHIO RIVER BASIN (HUNTINGTON DISTRICT) Location. The work covered by this project consists of a series of levees, floodwalls, channel improvements and dams and lakes in the Ohio River Basin within the Huntington District. Existing project. The existing project consists of the individual projects considered in the Ohio River Basin comprehensive plan within the Huntington District. Local cooperation. None required. 25-9 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 2000 Operations during the fiscal year. The completed local protection projects, which are operated and maintained by local interests, except for those local protection projects for which individual reports have been included. The project prevented an estimated $18,753,000 in flood damages during the fiscal year. To date the project has prevented flood damages of an estimated cumulative total of $924,491,000. 24. PAINT CREEK LAKE, OH Location. The damsite is located in Ross County, OH, on Paint Creek, a tributary of the Scioto River, approximately 37 miles above the mouth of Paint Creek and 100 miles above the mouth of the Scioto River and approximately four miles east of New Parkersburg, OH. Existing project. The existing project consists of a rock and random earth fill dam, 118 feet in height and 700 feet in length, a gate controlled spillway located near the right abutment, an outlet tunnel located in the right abutment with a control structure at the upstream end, and a random rockfill dike located at the right abutment of the spillway. The reservoir provides for a total storage of 145,000 acre-feet and controls a drainage area of approximately 576 square miles. Construction of the dam was completed in July 1973. The 257 tracts of land required for the project have been acquired. See also Appendix A. Federal cost for the project was $26,969,962, which includes expenditures under the recreation at completed projects program. Local cooperation. For details of required local cooperation see the 1981 Annual Report. Operations during the fiscal year. Operations and Maintenance. All construction work is complete. The reservoir was operated for flood control as required and the necessary repairs were made to the structure and appurtenances. During the fiscal year the project prevented an estimated $2,092,000 in flood damages. To date, the project has prevented flood damages estimated to be $79,306,000. 25. PAINTSVILLE LAKE, KY Location. The damsite is located in Johnson County, KY, on Paint Creek, a tributary of the Levisa Fork of the Big Sandy River, approximately eight miles above the mouth of Paint Creek, and four miles west ofPaintsville, KY. Existing project. The existing project consists of a rockfill dam 153 feet in height and 1,560 feet in length, an uncontrolled spillway located southwest of the right abutment of the dam, and an outlet tunnel in the right abutment with a control structure at the upstream end. The reservoir provides for a total storage of 76,642 acre-feet and controls a drainage area of approximately 93 square miles. The 635 tracts of land required for the project have been acquired. Construction of the dam was initiated in ,,September 1976 and was completed in September 1980. See also Appendix A. The total cost of the project to date has been $60,194,986. The local sponsor has reimbursed the Government $377,000 for the cost sharing portion of recreation development. Operations during the fiscal year. New Work: Construction of the project is complete. Operations and Maintenance. The reservoir was operated for flood control as required and necessary repairs were made to the structure and appurtenances. During the fiscal year the project prevented flood damages estimated to be $50,000. To date, the project has prevented flood damages estimated to be $7,442,000. 26. R. D. BAILEY LAKE, WV Existing project. The damsite is located in Wyoming County, WV, on the Guyandotte River approximately 108 miles above the confluence with the Ohio River and one mile east of Justice, WV. Existing project. The existing project consists of a rolled rockfill dam with a concrete face, 305 feet in height and 1,330 feet in length, an uncontrolled spillway located in a saddle in the right abutment of the dam, and an outlet tunnel in the left abutment with a control structure located at the upstream end. The reservoir provides for a total storage of 203,700 acre-feet and controls a drainage area of approximately 540 square.miles. Construction of the dam was initiated in November 1973 and completed in December 1979. See also Appendix A. A total of 2,109 tracts of land were acquired for the project. The total cost of the project to date has been $261,251,678. Local cooperation. None required. Operations and Maintenance. The reservoir was operated for flood control as required and necessary repairs were made to the structure and appurtenances. During the fiscal year the project prevented flood damages estimated to be $95,000. 25-10 HUNTINGTON, WV, DISTRICT To date, the project has prevented flood damages estimated to be $121,383,000. 27. ROSEVILLE, OH Location. The project is located in Muskingum and Perry Counties, on Moxahala Creek, approximately six miles from the confluence with Jonathan Creek, a tributary of the Muskingum River. Existing project. The existing project consists of 7,291 feet of channel improvement; 6,400 feet of levee and railroad embankment enlargements; and the necessary appurtenances for interior drainage. Total Federal cost of the project was $910,785. Construction was initiated in August 1959 and completed in October 1960. Local cooperation. All requirements for local cooperation have been completed. See also the 1962 Annual Report. Total costs of local requirements were $62,000. Operations during the fiscal year. Routine inspections of the improved portion of the project were conducted to determine that the project was maintained in satisfactory condition. During the fiscal year the project prevented flood damages estimated to be $15,000. To date, the project has prevented an estimated $1,242,000 in flood damages. 28. SOUTHERN WEST VIRGINIA ENVIRONMENTAL INFRASTRUCTURE Location. The project area consists of sixteen counties in southern West Virginia; Boone, Cabell, Fayette, Greenbrier, Lincoln, Logan, Mercer, Mingo, Monroe, McDowell, Pocahontas, Raleigh, Summers, Wayne, Webster, and Wyoming. The program is for design and construction assistance of environmental infrastructure, largely water supply and wastewater treatment facilities, in that region. Existing project. Five projects are in various stages: Construction of the Gilbert Sewer Collection and Treatment Facility was completed in November 1999. Construction of the Mercer County Water Distribution System was completed in November 1999; however, a modification to the project, called the Jean White Extension is under construction. Design of the Krouts Creek (Huntington) Storm Drainage Project is complete. Construction of the Fayette Plateau Region Water System Phase IV is 52% complete. The McDowell County PSD (Pageton) Water System is in the design phase. Work is authorized under Section 340 of the Water Resources Development Act of 1992 (PL 102-580). Local Cooperation. Project Cooperation Agreements (PCA) were executed with the Town of Gilbert, Mercer County, and Fayette County. PCA negotiations are underway with the city of Huntington and McDowell County. Operations during fiscal year. Work this year included design for Krouts Creek, Fayette County, and McDowell (Pageton). 29. SUMMERSVILLE LAKE, WV Location. The damsite is located at Ruckers Bend in Nicholas County on the Gauley River approximately 35 miles above the confluence of the Gauley and New River at Gauley Bridge, WV. Existing project. The existing project consists of a rockfill dam having a height of 357 feet and a length of 2,280 feet, an outlet tunnel in the right abutment with a control structure located at the upstream end, an uncontrolled spillway located west of the right abutment and two earthfill dikes. The reservoir provides for a total storage of 413,800 acrefeet and controls a drainage area of 803 square miles. See also Appendix A. Construction of the dam was initiated in March 1960 and completed in March 1966. A total of 9,346 acres of land were acquired for the project. The Federal cost of the project was $48,375,884, which includes expenditures under the recreation at completed projects program. Local cooperation. None required. Operations during the fiscal year. All construction work is complete. The project was operated for flood control as required and necessary repairs were made to the structures and appurtenances. During the fiscal year the project prevented flood damages estimated to be $708,000. To date, the project has prevented an estimated $400,041,000 in flood damages. 30. SUTTON LAKE, WV Location. The damsite is located on the Elk River in Braxton County approximately one mile above Sutton, WV, and 101 miles above the mouth of the Elk River. 25-11 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 2000 Existing project. The existing project consists of a concrete gravity dam having a height of 220 feet and a length of 1,178 feet, a gated spillway in the channel section of the dam, comprised of six tainter gates supported by piers, an outlet works comprised of five gate sluices through the spillway section. The reservoir provides for a storage of 265,300 acre-feet and controls a drainage area of 537 square miles. See also Appendix A. Construction of the dam was initiated in 1949 and completed in June 1960. The total cost of the project was $37,029,585. Local cooperation. None required. See the 1981 Annual Report for contributed funds. Operations during the fiscal year. All construction work is complete. The project was operated for flood control as required and necessary repairs were made to the structure and appurtenances. During the fiscal year the project prevented flood damages estimated to be $1,267,000. To date, the project has prevented an estimated $260,913,000 in flood damages. 31. TOM JENKINS RESERVOIR, OH Location. The damsite is located in Athens County, on the East Branch of Sunday Creek, a tributary of the Hocking River, approximately three miles north of Glouster, OH, and 57 miles above the mouth of the Hocking River. Existing project. The existing project consists of a rolled-earth dam, 84 feet in height and 944 feet in length, a controlled works discharging through a tunnel in the left abutment, and an uncontrolled spillway in the ridge running south from the damsite. The reservoir, known as Burr Oak Lake, provides for a total storage of 26,900 acre-feet and controls a drainage area of approximately 33 square miles. See also Appendix A. Construction of the project was initiated in March 1948 and completed in February 1950. A total of 100 acres of land were acquired for the project. The Federal costs of the project were $2,086,503, which includes expenditure for recreation at completed project. Local cooperation. All requirements of local cooperation have been met. See also the 1962 Annual Report. Contributed funds in the amount of $575,000 have been received from the State of Ohio. Operations during the fiscal year. All construction work is complete. The project was operated for flood control as required and necessary repairs were made to the structure and appurtenances. During the fiscal year the project prevented flood damages estimated to be $79,000. To date, the project has prevented an estimated $22,177,000 in flood damages. 32. WEST COLUMBUS, OH Location. The project is located in Columbus, OH, along the Scioto River, adjacent to the downtown area in Franklin County, OH. " Existing project. The project under construction consists of a 5.2-mile system including levee, floodwall and high ground: Fourteen gate closures, interior drainage facilities and construction of two new pump stations and reworking two existing pump stations. The protected area contains about 1,200 acres and is completely urban with a mix of residential, industrial and commercial development. Local cooperation. Local interests are required to provide all lands, easements, and rights-of-way; to verify or relocate buildings; utilities, roads, bridges (except railroad bridges), and other facilities where necessary. Pay a cash contribution of at least 5%, as required by the Water Resources Development Act of 1986, of the costs allocated to flood control, and bear all costs of operation, maintenance, and replacement of flood control facilities. Operations during the fiscal year. Funds to initiate preconstruction engineering and design were appropriated in Fiscal Year 1989 and funds to initiate construction were appropriated in Fiscal Year 1993. The total estimated cost of the project is $127,300,000 of which $35,600,000 is non-Federal. The contract for construction of Dry Run Levee (Phase IA), awarded in September 1993, is complete. The contract for construction of Dry Run Levee (Phase IB), awarded in April 1995, is complete. The contract for construction of Phase IIA, awarded in March 1996, is complete. The contract for construction of Dodge Park Pump Station (Phase IIB), awarded in May 1996, is complete. The contract for construction of Phase IIC, awarded in August 1997, is complete. The contract for construction of Phase lID, awarded in July 1998, is 95% complete. The contract for Phase IIE, awarded in July 1999, is 92% complete. The contract for construction of Phase IIIA North and South is complete. 33. YATESVILLE LAKE, KY Location. The damsite is located in Lawrence County, on Blaine Creek, a tributary of the Big Sandy 25-12 HUNTINGTON, WV, DISTRICT River, approximately five miles west of Louisa, KY, and 18 miles above the mouth of Blaine Creek. Existing project. The existing project consists of an earth and rockfill dam, 104 feet in height and 760 feet in length, an uncontrolled spillway located one-half mile southeast of the right abutment of the dam. The outlet works consists of a 13-foot diameter tunnel through the left dam abutment. The reservoir provides for a total storage of 86,951 acre-feet and controls a drainage area of approximately 208 square miles. The 778 tracts of land required for the project have been acquired. Construction was completed in May 1995. See also Appendix A. The total cost of the project to date has been $99,453,537. Operations during the fiscal year. The reservoir was operated for flood control as required and necessary repairs were made to the structure and appurtenances. During the fiscal year, the project prevented flood damages estimated to be $45,000. To date the project has prevented an estimated $17,569,000 in flood damages. 34. INSPECTION OF COMPLETED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS The Flood Control Act of June 22, 1936, and subsequent acts require local interest to furnish assurances that they will operate and maintain certain local protection projects after completion in accordance with regulations prescribed by the Secretary of the Army. District Engineers are responsible for the administration of these regulations within their respective districts. Maintenance inspections were made during the fiscal year of those completed units transferred to local interests for operation and maintenance. Local interests were advised, as necessary, of measures required to maintain the projects in accordance with the standards prescribed by regulations. Total costs for fiscal year 2000 were $121,071. Total cost to September 30, 2000, were $2,589,183. The flood control works inspected and the dates of inspection are tabulated in Table H. 35. FLOOD CONTROL WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION Emergency bank protection activities pursuant to Section 14 of the 1946 Flood Control Act, Public Law 526, 79th Congress are tabulated as follows: Location FY 2000Cost Ohio River, Sewer Main, Huntington, WV $17,391 Kanawha R, So Charleston Sewer Main, WV 285,327 US Rt 60, Kanawha R, Spring Hill, WV 128 Kanawha R., Kanawha Ave, So Charleston, WV -15,026 Sewer Main, Twelvepole Ck, Wayne Co, WV 792,406 Riverside Dr, Ohio River, Russell, KY 51,112 Athens Co, SR 144, OH 33,827 Greenup, KY 29,246 Ohio R, Gallia Co, SR 7 OH 28,702 Section 14 Coordination Account 39,310 Flood control activities pursuant to Section 205 of the 1948 Flood Control Act, Public Law 852, 80th Congress are tabulated as follows: I .nratinn Dry Fork of Little Fork Willard, KY Greenbrier R, FWS, WV Whitehall, OH, Mason and Turkey Runs Vinton, Gallia Co, OH Augusta, KY Section 205 Coordination Account $ 29,699 1,084 29,989 32,063 4,410 15,115 Flood activities pursuant to Section 208 of the 1954 Flood Control Act, Public Law 780, 83rd Congress are tabulated as follows: Location Dickenson Co, VA FY 2000 Cost $ 24,170 The costs for Project Modification to Improve the Environment (PL 99-662, Sec 1135) during FY 2000 were $46,864. The costs for Aquatic Restoration (PL 104-303, Sec 206) during FY 2000 were $305,067. Work performed under special legislation pursuant to Water Resources Development Act of 1986 (PL-99-5662) as follows: Location Kanawha R. St Albans, WV FY 2000 Cost $ 47 25-13 .uv%.aLI l r 1 4VVV %..,VJ -- -- IvV ,An nfnes L REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 2000 Work performed under special legislation pursuant to Water Resources Development Act of 1996 (PL 104-303) as follows: Location Greenbrier River/Marlinton, WV Southern and Eastern Kentucky Environmental Infrastructure FY 2000 Cost $1,377,762 453,659 GENERAL INVESTIGATIONS 36. SURVEYS Fiscal year 2000 costs were $4,554,683 itemized as follows: Location FY 2000 Cost Flood control and coastal emergency activities pursuant to Public Law 99, 84 h Congress, were conducted as required during FY 2000 at a cost of $277,850. National emergency management activities were accomplished by the district as required. The costs for these activities during FY 2000 were $40,972. Navigation Studies Flood Damage Prevention Studies Special Studies Comprehensive Basin Studies Review of Authorized Projects Miscellaneous Activities Coordination with Other Agencies Collection and Study of Basic Data Preconstruction Engineering and Design Navigation Flood Control 25-14 $2,996,494 322,996 123,393 0 1,294 242,815 44,236 150,531 84,386 588,538 . .. .. HlUNTINGTON, WV, DISTRICT Table 25-A Cost and Financial Statement See Total Cost Section to In Text Project Funding FY 97 FY 98 FY 99 FY 00 Sep. 30, 2000 2 Kanawha River, WV (existing project) 2 Elk River Harbor, WV 2 Charleston Riverfront Park, WV 2 Winfield L&D 2 Marmet L&D 2 London L&D 5 Alum Creek Lake, Oh 6 Beech Fork Lake New Work Approp Cost Maint Approp Cost Rehab Approp Cost Maint Approp Cost New Work Approp Cost New Work Approp Cost New Work Approp Cost New Work Approp Cost New Work Approp Cost Maint Approp Cost New Work Approp Cost Maint Approp Cost 7,580,284 7,101,300 7,726,397 7,451,425 7,008,331 8,282,289 7,184,996 7,141,925 27,853,699 27,853,699 178,889,445 2 178,816,196 2 130,984 130,984 3 432,287 411,320 -20,000 518,203 0 519,855 113,000 "15,000 -22,228 280,867 832 -2,933 32,040,000 11,782,000 8,274,000 31,551,852 12,049,325 8,473,275 0 2,129,000 9,924,000 1,742,629 9,610,205 -1,367 0 0 0 2,880,000 2,946,031 10,909,000 11,577,252 1,326,000 1,118,822 2,421,123 2,420,923 4,370,121 4,370,121 227,302,000 227,009,895 S 22,962,000 6 22,930,086 1,326,000 8 1,118,822 9 56,267,422 56,267,422 864,165 679,000 722,902 674,535 13,244,575 'o 884,012 681,951 741,718 677,513 13,242,438 'o 41,987,500 41,987,500 1,061,333 977,150 1,057,041 1,301,099 17,580,172 1,050,172 1,002,919 1,060,805 1,294,647 17,562,220 25-15 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 2000 Table 25-A (Cont'd) Cost and Financial Statement See Total Cost Section to In Text Project Funding FY 97 FY 98 FY 99 FY 00 Sep. 30, 2000 7 Bluestone Lake New Work 8 Burnsville Lake 9 Deer Creek Lake 10 Delaware Lake 11 Dewey Lake Approp Cost Maint Approp Cost Dam Safety Approp Cost New Work Approp Cost Maint Approp Cost New Work Approp Cost Maint Approp Cost New Work Approp Cost Maint Approp Cost New Work Approp Cost Maint Approp Cost Dam Safety Approp Cost 1,889,601 2,029,450 3,307,248 1,621,800 1,907,565 1,962,929 3,360,118 1,778,295 3,349,000 2,590,849 1,749,019 1,702,535 1,457,489 1,492,133 1,727,904 1,512,084 1,711,993 1,493,198 681,562 688,949 630,818 690,797 664,818 713,089 652,197 687,425 689,237 652,300 657,441 649,172 714,700 667,985 29,458,652 " 29,458,652 " 36,296,915 2 36,275,065 12 3,349,000 2,590,849 57,166,839 57,166,839 25,174,123 "3 25,157,104 '1 20,406,545 '" 20,406,545 14 14,292,108 "' 14,298,306 " 7,631,821 7,631,821 809,872 19,134,808 16 808,930 19,125,108 16 1,434,454 1,229,070 1,431,847 1,373,286 1,386,026 1,293,057 1,457,908 1,352,736 800,000 782,000 1,090,315 1,171,744 727,532 782,016 851,140 1,228,998 7,845,547 7" 7,845,547 17 30,027,880 ' 30,006,756 '" 4,816,059 4,553,505 25-16 HUNTINGTON, WV, DISTRICT Table 25-A (Cont'd) Cost and Financial Statement See Total Cost Section to In Text Project Funding FY 97 FY 98 FY 99 FY 00 Sep. 30, 2000 12 Dillon Lake New Work Approp 30,218,135 19 Cost 30,218,135 19 Maint Approp 866,890 1,038,975 652,667 783,493 13,693,680 20 Cost 953,056 1,085,452 668,500 777,386 13,678,173 20 13 East Lynn Lake 14 Fishtrap Lake 15 Grayson Lake 16 J. W. Flannagan 17 Levisa and Tug Forks 18 Massillon, Ohio New Work Approp Cost Maint Approp Cost New Work Approp Cost Maint Approp Cost New Work Approp Cost Maint Approp Cost New Work Approp Cost Maint Approp Cost 2,102,837 1,400,300 1,394,241 1,665,901 2,075,019 1,477,694 1,404,485 1,653,492 1,515,767 1,552,475 1,262,554 1,647,314 1,467,710 1,587,817 1,399,986 1,651,328 793,867 1,120,800 987,424 1,006,828 769,099 1,139,640 1,017,170 1,002,220 1,381,273 1,076,025 1,186,343 1,333,463 1,274,821 1,171,950 1,214,559 1,339,592 New Work Approp 17,338,232 30,050,555 20,323,000 11,773,000 Cost 22,473,326 20,377,601 20,788,522 18,804,408 New Work Approp Cost Maint Approp Cost -1,056 811 800 777 6,200 6,223 1,351 1,351 85,872,963 85,872,963 28,535,830 21 28,520,832 21 54,754,126 22 54,754,126 22 24,668,870 23 24,735,752 23 19,162,741 24 19,162,741 24 19,863,561 19,858,898 20,444,383 25 20,444,383 25 26,483,536 26 26,477,229 26 400,986,787 27 392,909,210 27 8,139,406 28 8,139,406 28 358,543 358,543 25-17 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 2000 Table 25-A (Cont'd) Cost and Financial Statement See Total Cost Section to In Text Project Funding FY 97 FY 98 FY 99 FY 00 Sep. 30, 2000 19 Muskingum River Dams and Lakes 20 Newark Ohio (Previous Project) (Existing Project) 21 North Branch of Kokosing River 22 North Fork of Pound River Lake 23 Ohio River Basin New Work Approp Cost Maint Approp Cost Maint (Rehab) Approp Cost Rehab Approp Cost Dam Safety Approp Cost New Work Approp Cost Maint Approp Cost New Work Approp Cost New Work Approp Cost Maint Approp Cost New Work Approp Cost Maint Approp Cost New Work Approp Cost 6,179,000 6,182,225 6,348,250 6,356,653 6,557,239 6,291,901 5,830,088 6,198,899 41,247,815 29 41,247,815 29 133,951,468 30 132,908,267 30 982,300 982,300 22,172,945 "1 22,172,945 31 241,000 94,000 814,000 1,776,000 30,360,000 155,548 155,255 55,657 1,960,262 29,760,612 845,916 845,916 758,673 758,673 37,000 10,720 49,537 11,103 219,487 317,000 310,626 491,967 221,997 315,069 323,290 461,533 413,193 308,125 304,209 304,341 394,676 321,317 320,233 304,235 11,151,232 32 11,151,232 32 6,665,985 " 6,665,985 3 4,707,122 4,675,760 6,186,901 " 6,186,901 "3 9,195,214 "3 9,283,913 ~' 355,861 36 355,861 3 25-18 HtUNTINGTON, WV, DISTRICT Table 25-A (Cont'd) Cost and Financial Statement See Total Cost Section to In Text Project Funding FY 97 FY 98 FY 99 FY 00 Sep. 30, 2000 24 Paint Creek Lake 25 Paintsville Lake 26 R. D. Bailey Lake 27 Roseville, Ohio 28 Southern West Virginia Env. Infrastructure 29 Summersville Lake New Work Approp Cost Maint Approp Cost New Work Approp Cost Maint Approp Cost New Work Approp Cost Maint Approp Cost New Work Approp Cost Maint Approp Cost New Work Approp Cost New Work Approp Cost Maint Approp Cost 1,044,601 653,900 571,144 612,843 1,050,060 668,615 611,987 597,171 -1,162 1,094,643 921,175 868,773 935,486 1,024,466 998,998 881,584 932,399 -40,000 -25,555 -108,085 42,530 1,520,494 1,404,470 1,399,225 1,553,551 1,490,472 1,474,197 1,417,407 1,560,074 -927 2,700 2,820 2,315 542 2,667 2,698 2,470 0 378,000 259,000 1,279,000 242,324 293,602 4,129,871 1,343,504 1,469,498 1,786,150 1,693,089 1,564,592 1,444,416 1,784,633 1,725,621 1,565,797 25-19 26,969,962 26,969,962 "7 13,520,372 38 13,500,413 38 60,194,986 60,194,986 14,297,709 14,288,680 261,251,678 39 261,251,678 39 27,855,047 40 27,846,476 4o 910,785 910,785 250,485 250,485 6,916,000 41 6,383,902 ' 48,375,884 42 48,375,884 42 34,870,495 43 34,837,593 43 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 2000 Table 25-A (Cont'd) Cost and Financial Statement See Total Cost Section to In Text Project Funding FY 97 FY 98 FY 99 FY 00 Sep. 30, 2000 30 Sutton Lake New Work Approp Cost Maint 37,029,585 " 37,029,585 " Approp 1,643,421' 1,758,790 1,449,654 1,762,674 39,634,184 41 Cost 1,604,404 ,1,775,213 1,492,809 1,779,211 39,611,796 4 31 Tom Jenkins Dam 32 West Columbus 33 Yatesville Lake New Work Approp Cost Maint Approp Cost 2,086,503 6 2,086,503 46 313,568 248,000 434,775 430,979 274,161 264,812 462,427 430,177 3,807,561 7,799,939 New Work Approp 7,562,000 14,226,280 10,933,000 8,736,961 62,511,241 17 Cost 8,304,497 9,190,907 11,384,643 10,881,536 59,753,973 4 New Work Approp Cost Maint -7,000 22,526 6,000 4,473 Approp 1,255,122 944,360 921,032 940,585 Cost 1,240,913 997,216 934,879 938,308 99,456,500 99,453,537 9,889,549 9,877,615 25-20 HUNTINGTON, WV, DISTRICT lIncludes $4,294,612 for new work for previous projects, $4,498,636 Emergency Relief funds, $9,004,800 Public Works funds and $686,317 Code 713 funds. 2Includes $3,883,513 for maintenance of previous projects and $546,090 Maintenance and Operation funds. 3Public Works Acceleration funds. 41ncludes $1,440,000 Inland Waterways Trust funds. 5Includes $1,451,429 Inland Waterways Trust Fund. 6Includes $5,455,000 Inland Waterways Trust funds. 71ncludes $6,111,841 Inland Waterways Trust funds. 81ncludes $1,193,000 Inland Waterways Trust funds. 91ncludes $1,092,104 Inland Waterways Trust funds. 10 Includes $1,063 Maintenance and Operation funds. 1 Ilncludes $543,960 Emergency Relief funds, $9,698 Public Works Acceleration funds, $211,850 Code 711 funds and $75,000 Code 713 funds. 12 Includes $2,795 Maintenance and Operation funds. 13lncludes $748,281 Maintenance and Operation funds. 14 Excludes $225,090 contributed funds. Includes $590,000 Code 711 funds. 15Includes $130,000 provided by the Productive Employment Act of 1983. 16lncludes $240,000 provided by the Productive Employment Act of 1983. 17Includes $23,087 Public Works Acceleration funds, $1,089,940 Code 711 funds and $231,105 Code 713 funds. 18Includes $82,900 Special Recreation Use Fee Funds and$747,028 Maintenance and Operations Funds. 19 1ncludes $100,000 provided from the Productive Employment Act of 1983. 2 0 Includes $1,924 Maintenance and Operations funds. 2 1Includes $209,918 Special Recreation Use Fee Funds and $747,028 Maintenance and Operations Funds. 2 2 Includes $362,649 Code 711 funds and $10,000 Code 712 funds. 2 3 1ncludes $38,000 Special Recreation Use Fee Funds and $748,714 Maintenance and Operations Funds. 2 41ncludes $406,919 Code 711 funds and $2,317 code 713 funds. 25 Includes 422,983 Code 711 funds 2 6 1ncludes $88,710 special recreation use funds. 2 7 Includes Cost from Ohio River Division of $696,000. 28 Includes $477,813 contributed funds. 2 91ncludes $27,190,000 National Industrial Recovery funds and $528,288 Code 711 funds. 30 Includes $206,815 Maintenance and Operations funds. 31Includes $61,945 public Works Acceleration funds. 32 Excludes $160,082 contributed funds. 33lncludes $45,177 Code 711 funds. 34 Includes $64,233 Code 711 funds. 35lncludes $68,200 special recreation use fees. 36 Includes $10,920 Emergency Relief funds. 37 Includes $14,153 Code 711 funds. 38 1ncludes $31,496 special recreation use fee funds. 39 Includes $5,534 Consolidated Army funds. 40lncludes $60,000 provided from the Productive Employment Act of 1983, and $85,233 Maintenance and Operations Funds. 41Excludes $1,427,732 cumulative contributed funds. 4 2 Includes $300,062 Code 711 funds. 43lncludes $214,112 special recreation use fee funds, $300,000 provided from the Productive Appropriations Act of 1983, and $82,875 Maintenance and Operation Funds. 44 Includes $1,837,337 Code 711 funds and $287,843 Accelerated Public Works funds. Excludes $62,800 contributed funds. 4 5 Includes $267,634 special recreation use fee funds, $215,000 provided from the Productive Employment Appropriations Act of 1983, and $144,562 Maintenance and Operations Funds. 46lncludes $8,064 Code 711 funds and $30,000 Public Works Acceleration funds. excludes $575,000 contributed funds. 4 7Excludes $4,777,601 cumulative contributed funds. 25-21 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 2000 Table 25-B Authorizing Legislation See Date Section Authorizing In Text Act Project and Work Authorized Documents 2. Jun 28, 1938 Jun 28, 1938 Dec 22, 1944 Jun 28, 1938 Dec 22, 1944 Aug 30, 1935 Aug 15, 1985 Oct 12, 1996 Oct 23, 1962 Oct 23, 1962 Jun 28, 1938 Dec 22, 1944 Oct 31, 1992 Jun 28, 1938 Dec 22, 1944 KANAWHA RIVER LOCKS AND DAMS, WV Construction of three locks and dams on the Kanawha River and one on the Ohio River. Engineering and Design and Land Acquisition for Winfield Locks and Dam." Construction of 110' x 800' replacement lock to Replace 56' x 360' twin lock chambers at Marmet Locks and Dam. ALUM CREEK LAKE, OH Construction of Flood Control Reservoir BEECH FORK LAKE, WV Construction of Flood Control Reservoir BLUESTONE LAKE, WV Construction of Flood Control Reservoir Added Recreation; Deleted Power Added Authorization for Drift & Debris BURNSVILLE LAKE, WV Construction of Flood Control Reservoir Added Recreation DEER CREEK LAKE, OH Construction of Flood Control Reservoir DELAWARE LAKE, OH Construction of Flood Control Reservoir Added Recreation DEWEY LAKE, OHi Construction of Flood Control Reservoir Added Recreation 25-22 H. Doc. 31, 73rd Cong., 1st Sess. P. L. 88, 99th Cong., 1st Sess. P.L. 303, 104th Cong., (WRDA '96) H. Doc. 587, 87th Cong 2nd Sess. H. Doc. 587, 87th Cong 2nd Sess. H. Doc 91, 74th Cong 2nd Sess. P. L. 534, 78th Cong, 2nd Sess P.L. 102-580, 102nd Cong (WRDA '92) Flood Control Comm. Doc. 1, 75th Cong., 1st Sess. P.L. 534, 78th Cong., 2nd Sess. Flood Control Comm. Doc 1, 75th Cong., 1st Sess. Flood Control Comm. Doc 1, 75th Cong., Ist Sess. P.L. 534, 78th Cong., 2nd Sess. Flood Control Comm. Doc 1, 75th Cong., Ist Sess. P.L. 534, 78th Cong., 2nd Sess. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. 11. HUNTINGTON, WV, DISTRICT Table 25-B (Cont'd) Authorizing Legislation See Date Section Authorizing In Text Act Project and Work Authorized Documents 12. Jun 28, 1938 Dec 22, 1944 Jun. 28, 1938 Dec. 22, 1944 Jun. 28, 1938 Dec. 22, 1944 Jul. 14, 1960 Jun. 28, 1938 Dec. 22, 1944 Oct. 1, 1980 Jun. 28, 1938 25-23 DILLON LAKE, OH Construction of Flood Control Reservoir Flood Control Comm., Doc 1, 75th Cong., 1st Sess. Added Recreation P.L. 534, 78th Cong., 2nd Sess. EAST LYNN LAKE, WV Construction of Flood Control Reservoir. Flood Control Comm. Doc. 1, 75th Cong., 1st Sess. Added Recreation. P.L. 534, 78th Cong., 2nd Sess. FISHTRAP LAKE, KY Construction of Flood Control Reservoir. Flood Control Comm. Doc. 1, 75th Cong., 1st Sess. Added Recreation. P.L. 534, 78th Cong., 2nd Sess. GRAYSON LAKE, KY Construction of Flood Control Reservoir. H. Doc. 440, 86th Cong., 2nd Sess. JOHN W. FLANNAGAN DAM AND RESERVOIR, VA Construction of Flood Control Reservoir. Flood Control Comm. Doc. 1, 75th Cong., 1st Sess. Added Recreation. P.L. 534, 78th Cong., 2nd Sess. LEVISA AND TUG FORKS OF THE BIG SANDY RIVER, AND CUMBERLAND RIVER, KY, WV Construction of such Flood Control Measures as Sect. 202, P.L. 367, deemed Necessary and Advisable. 96th Cong., 2nd Sess. MASSILLON, OHIO Construction of Channel Improvement Project. Flood Control Comm. Doc. 1, 75th Cong., 1st Sess. 13. 14. 15. 16. 17. 18. REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 2000 Table 25-B (Cont'd) Authorizing Legislation See Date Section Authorizing In Text Act Project and Work Authorized Documents 19. MUSKINGUM RIVER LAKES, OH Construction of 14 Flood Control Reservoirs. Reimbursement to the Muskingum Conservancy District a sum not to exceed actual expenditures for project construction. Operations and Maintenance assigned to the Corps of Engineers. NEWARK, OHIO Construction of Channel Improvement Project. Modification to Existing Project and Additional Channel Improvement and Drainage Facilities. Public Works Admin. Flood Control Comm. Doc. 1, 75th Cong., 1st Sess. P.L. 396, 76th Cong., 1st Sess. Flood Control Comm. Doc. 1, 75th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 337, 90th Cong., 2nd Sess. Feb. 20, 1934 Jun. 28, 1938 Aug. 11, 1939 Jun. 28, 1938 Aug. 13, 1968 Oct. 23, 1962 Jul. 14, 1960 Jun. 28, 1938 Dec. 22, 1944 Oct. 27, 1965 Oct. 23, 1962 Jun. 28, 1938 Oct 31, 1992 25-24 NORTH BRANCH OF KOKOSING RIVER LAKE, OH Construction of Flood Control Reservoir. H. Doc. 220, 87th Cong., 2nd Sess. NORTH FORK OF POUND RIVER LAKE, VA Construction of Flood Control Reservoir. H. Doc. 645, 86th Cong., 2nd Sess. PAINT CREEK LAKE, OH Construction of Flood Control Reservoir. Flood Control Comm. Doc. 1, 75th Cong., 1st Sess. Added Recreation P.L. 534, 78th Cong., 2nd Sess. PAINTSVILLE LAKE, KY Construction of Flood Control Reservoir. H. Doc. 246, 89th Cong., 1st Sess. R. D. BAILEY LAKE, WV Construction of Flood Control Reservoir. H. Doc. 569, 87th Cong., 2nd Sess. ROSEVILLE, OH Construction of Channel Improvement Project. Flood Control Comm. Doc. 1, 75th Cong., Ist Sess. SOUTHERN WEST VIRGINIA ENVIRONMENTAL INFRASTRUCTURE Design and Construction assistance for environmental infrastructure P.L. 102-580 (WRDA '92) 20. 21. 22. 24. 25. 26. 27. 28. HUNTINGTON, WV, DISTRICT Table 25-B See Section In Text 29. 30. 31. 32. 33. 34. Documents 25-25 (Cont'd) Date Authorizing Act Jun. 28, 1938 Dec. 22, 1944 Jun. 28, 1938 Dec. 22, 1944 Dec. 22, 1944 Nov. 17, 1986 Oct. 27, 1965 Jun. 22, 1936 Authorizing Legislation Project and Work Authorized SUMMERSVILLE LAKE, WV Construction of Flood Control Reservoir. Added Recreation SUTTON LAKE, WV Construction of Flood Control Reservoir. Added Recreation TOM JENKINS DAM, OH Construction of Flood Control Reservoir. WEST COLUMBUS, OH Construction of Local Protection Project. YATESVILLE LAKE, KY Construction of Flood Control Reservoir. INSPECTIONS OF COMPLETED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS Inspection of Local Maintenance of Federally Constructed Local Protection Projects. Flood Control Comm. Doc. 1, 75th Cong., Ist Sess. P.L. 534, 78th Cong., 2nd Sess. Flood Control Comm. Doc. 1, 75th Cong., Ist Sess. P.L. 534, 78th Cong., 2nd Sess. H. Doc. 762, 78th Cong., 2nd Sess. P.L. 662, 99th Congr. H. Doc. 246, 89th Cong., 2nd Sess. P.L. 738, 74th Cong., 1st Sess. REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 2000 Table 25-C Other Authorized Navigation Projects For Last Full Report Operation Contributed See Annual and Funds Project Report For Construction Maintenance Expended Big Sandy River, WV and KY including Levisa and Tug Forks2 1952 1,586,236 1,569,811' 131,473 Elk River, WV3 1903 30,259 Gauley River, WV4 1903 14,761 Guyandotte River, WV5 1915 27,500 Little Kanawha River, WV6 1960 470,536 1,023,854 Muskingum River, OH7 1955 301,912 6,171,897 6,041 New River, WV and VA' 1899 109,691 Scioto River at Portsmouth, OH8 1953 10,951 16,593 'In addition, $140,068 expended from funds transferred from Department of Commerce, Under accelerated public works program, for repairs of eroded bank at Lock 3 on Big Sandy River, at Louisa, KY. 2Operations and maintenance suspended June 30, 1952. 'Work closed September 1902. Property transferred to Kanawha River improvements. 4Work closed September 1902. Abandonment recommended in H. Doc 467, 69th Congress. 5Work suspended. 6Operation and maintenance suspended June 30, 1951. 7Collections from licensed non-Federal hydroelectric utilities for use of dams on Muskingum River for fiscal years 1923-1953 were $79,154. 8P.L. 954, August 31, 1954, authorized Secretary of Treasury to pay Portsmouth Sand and Gravel Co. $75,000 in full settlement of claims against government for damages resulting from change in Scioto River Channel. 25-26 HUNTINGTON, WV, DISTRICT Table 25-E Other Authorized Flood Control Projects For Last Full Report Operation Contributed See Annual and Funds Project Report For Construction Maintenance Expended Completed Local Protection Projects Ashland, KY 1954 Athens, OH 1979 Cattletsburg, KY 1963 Ceredo-Kenova, WV 1955 Chillicothe, OH 1986 East Rainelle, WV 1962 Galax, VA 1953 Huntington, WV 1956 Ironton, OH 1952 Maysville, KY 1959 Parkersburg, WV 1955 Pt. Pleasant, WV 1955 Portsmouth-New Boston, OH 1956 Princeton, WV 1962 Russell, KY 1953 Williamson, WV 1964 Inactive Local Protection Projects Augusta, KY --- Coal River, WV 1979 Vanceburg, KY --- Deferred Local Protection Projects Newark, OH (Interior Drainage) 1983 Oceana, WV 1981 Inactive Reservoirs and Lakes Haysi, VA --- Deferred Reservoir and Lakes Kehoe Lake, KY 1981 3,718,839 5,313,700 3,854,361 2,753,551 20,373,314 614,598 480,536 7,172,840 2,604,646 6,493,747 6,652,827 2,919,578 9,806,424 808,750 552,493 1,056,166 11,577 472,229 --- 611,000 2,656 1,272,740 Active Authorized Projects with no current year expenditures. Martin, KY 1983 212,048 25-27 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 2000 Table 25-G Deauthorized Projects All projects listed in this table have been deauthorized in accordance with Section 12 of the Water Resources Development Act of 1974, P.L. 251, 93rd Congress. For Last Full Report Federal Contributed See Annual Funds Funds Projects Report For Date Expended Expended Local Protection Projects Aberdeen, OH --- May 1981 1,334 - Athalia, OH -- Aug 1977 -"- Belpre, OH --- Nov 1977 - - Brooklyn, WV -- Nov 1979 - Buena Vista, OH --- Aug 1977 --. Chambersburg, OH --- Nov 1986 -- Cheshire, OH --- Nov 1977 - - Chilo, OH - Aug 1977 -"- Clifton, WV Aug 1977 11,237 - Coal Grove, OH - Jan 1990 3,389 -- Columbus, OH - Aug 1977 - Dover, KY -- Jan 1990 - Friendly, WV - Aug 1977 --- Fullerton, KY -- Jan 1990 - Gallipolis, OH --- Aug 1977 - "-- Greenup, KY -- Jan 1990 4,962 - Hanging Rock, OH - Aug 1977-- --- Hartford, WV - Aug 1977 -- Henderson, WV -- Aug 1977 -- Higginsport, OH - Oct 1978 - - Hockingport, OH -- Aug 1977 - Letart, WV --- Aug 1977 - Letart Falls, OH --- Aug 1977 - Lower Guyandotte River Basin, WV --- Nov 1986 17,721 - Manchester, OH - May 1981 - Mapleshade, OH -- Oct 1978 - Marietta, OH - Nov 1981 - - Mason, WV --- Aug 1977 - Middleport, OH --- May 1981 9,783 - Miller, OH --- Aug 1977 - Millwood, WV --- Aug 1977 . New Martinsviile, WV - Nov 1979 - New Matamoras, OH --- Aug 1977 - - Newport, OH --- Aug 1977 - Normal, KY - Jan 1990 .- - Pomeroy, OH --- Aug 1977 - Portland, OH --- Aug 1977 - Proctorville, OH --- Nov 1986 - Racine, OH -- Aug 1977 - - Ripley, OH -- Oct 1978 7,523 - Riverview, WV -- Aug 1977 - St. Mary's WV - Aug 1977 .- - Sardis, OH --- Aug 1977 - - Sciotoville, OH -- Aug 1977 - Sistersville, OH - Aug 1977 - - South Point, OH -- Nov 1986 - - South Portsmouth, KY --- Jan 1990 - Syracuse, OH -- Aug 1977 - - Waverly, WV - Aug 1977 - - Williamstown, WV --- Nov 1979 - Zanesville, OH --- May 1981 -- 25-28 HUNTINGTON, WV, DISTRICT Table 25-G (Cont'd) Deauthorizei All projects listed in this table have been deauthorized in Development Act of 1974, P.L. 251, 93rd Congress. d Projects accordance with Section 12 of the Water Resources For Last Full Report Federal Contributed See Annual Funds Funds Local Protection Projects Report For Date Expended Expended Reservoirs and Lakes Big Bend, WV --- Aug 1977 -- Big Darby, OH 1969 Nov 1979 3,349,568 --- Birch, WV -- Nov 1986 -- Frazeysburg, OH - May 1981 5,000 -- Kehoe Lake KY -- July 1992 1,273,000 --- Leading Creek, WV 1974 Jan 1990 272,880 -- Logan, OH --- Oct 1985 --- Millersburg, OH --- May 1981 ----- Mill Creek, OH 1981 Nov 1981 1,602,702 --- Moores Ferry, VA - Nov 1986 22,879 --- Mud River, WV - Nov 1979 .- Panther Creek, WV 1976 Nov 1986 - - Poca, WV -- May 1981--- --- Rocky Fork, OH 1950 Aug 1977 91,321 -- Salt Creek, OH 1975 Nov 1986 1,089,943 -- Utica, OH 1975 Jan 1990 757,550 -- West Fork, WV 1974 Jan 1990 663,192 -- White Oak Creek, OHI -- Nov 1981 .- 25-29 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 2000 Inspection of Flood Control Projects (See Sec 33 of Text) Flood Control Works Inspected Ashland, KY Athens, OH Berwind, WV Bramwell, WV Cairo, WV Canton (Nimishillen), OH Catlettsburg, KY Ceredo-Kenova, WV Chillicothe, OH East Rainelle, WV Fishing Creek, Pine Grove, WV Fourpole Creek, Huntington, WV Galax, VA Grahn, KY Griffithsville-Yawkey, WV Hargus Creek, Circleville, OH Hitchins, KY Huntington, WV Inez, KY Ironton, OH Jacksonburg, Fishing Creek, WV Massillon, OH Matewan, WV Maysville, KY Montcalm, WV Mount Vernon, OH Newark, OH Olive Hill, KY Paint Creek at Chillicothe, OH Paint Creek at Washington Court House, OH Parkersburg, WV Pax, WV Point Pleasant, WV Portsmouth-New Boston, OH Prestonsburg, KY Princeton, WV Richwood and Fenwick, WV Right and Left Forks of Beaver Creek, KY Ripley, WV Roseville, OH Russell, KY Smithfield, WV South Williamson, KY South Williamson (Hospital), KY Spencer, WV Utica, OH West Columbus, OH West Union, Middle Island, WV West Williamson, WV Williamson, WV Dates of Inspection NOT INSPECTED DEC 00 SEP 00 SEP 00 NOT INSPECTED OCT 00 NOV 00 OCT 00 AUG 00 NOT INSPECTED NOT INSPECTED SEP 00 NOT INSPECTED NOT INSPECTED NOT INSPECTED NOV 00 DEC 00 NOV 00 NOT INSPECTED NOT INSPECTED NOT INSPECTED DEC 00 SEP 00 NOT INSPECTED NOT INSPECTED NOT INSPECTED OCT 00 NOT INSPECTED NOV 00 AUG 00 DEC 00 DEC 00 NOT INSPECTED OCT 00 SEP 00 NOT INSPECTED SEP 00 NOT INSPECTED NOT INSPECTED NOT INSPECTED NOT INSPECTED NOT INSPECTED SEP 00 NOT INSPECTED NOT INSPECTED SEP 00 NOT INSPECTED NOT INSPECTED 25-30 Table 25-H _ _